Exposing ObamaGate Un-Maskers

Make no mistake American Great, You're a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show, pumas CIA analysts. I can speak to three hours without a phone call. Try doing that sometime. No, Well, come everybody to the Buck Sexton Show. We had some interesting news breaking late in the evening last night. I'm excited to break it all down for you today. You know, you have the two main stories that are going on in the country right now.

You have still the overwhelming majority of our attention. You know, most hours spent on the TV, radio, etc. It's all focused on COVID nineteen and we've entered now the phase where it's a fight against the wrong response to the disease. As much as it is now a fight against the disease.

So there's that, and then you also have these big bombshells that have fallen as a result largely of the Acting Director of National Intelligence, Richard Grinnell, who is going in there and like he's like the why and Earth of the intelligence community right now. He's just saying, you know what, We're going to just declassify that thing that

Adam Schiff really doesn't want people to know about. We're going to expose what a bunch of liars, the Democrats and all their little student is in the media, running off to CNN and MSNBC to get contracts and push books full of lies where they promote themselves as heroes of the republic, you know, James Comey, among others. We're gonna we're gonna dive into that for a little bit. First today, I've got some stuff for you on the COVID nineteen response, and by that I mean the the

fight for freedom. We are now in a fight for our freedom against a mentality and against a government overreach that is threatening to not just destroy our economy, but to destroy our way of life. And I know that sounds extreme, but think about where we are now. We're two months into this, and they keep lying to us and changing the story, and ultimately it's you no longer have any freedom because you're a threat. You're breathing is a threat to other human beings. You must do what

we say, everything that we say. We'll return to that. Let me start though with, oh my, this list of those who are doing the unmasking and those of you have been listening to me for a while now. One of the one of the advantages that I've had, it was a huge advantage early on in my career and media, is that I spent five years as a CIA officer, and so I had some idea about national security. I knew a lot about a Rock and Afghanistan from working those issues. I wasn't just a CIA guy who learned

about that stuff on the side. Those were the issues. I was on the Iraq desk and then was sent to the was essentially loaned to the Afghanistan desk. So I worked those issues, mostly counter terrorism and counterinsurgency. But I also got quite a dose of the federal bureaucracy, and so I understand what the nature of a bureaucracy is. This is where I get phrases like the giant self looking ice cream cone, which we know is true of the bureaucracy. I also know what will motivate the bureaucrats

to move fast, what their ultimate aims are. That process is the product. That mediocrity is the expectation, and excellence is suspect. These are all things you learn when you're in the federal bureaucracy because it's government. And ultimately, if you're not making decisions in government, you're usually just shuffling

paper around. You know, if it's not very clear what your job is every day, you know, there's some there's some components of government where it's a really straightforward, really straightforward ask, right, what's the what's the purpose of a cop? Why do you have a sheriff in your county? Oh, so someone to enforce the law. So someone with a gun, to make sure the laws are enforced and to protect people and to hold criminals accountable, to arrest them. Okay, right, fireman,

et cetera, et cetera. You go through that. That's what is the purpose of somebody who's you know, an assistant representative or rather an assistant you know, deputy secretary to the trade representative for the blahbity blah. What do you really do all day? I don't know, you kind of just send emails, go to meetings. Anybody really care that you're there or not? Now, I was always I found it remarkable that when I was in the CIA, there

was always the meeting and the onlookers. And this is a concept that I'm sure many you're familiar with just from corporate America as well, but in the government it's particularly clear. And you would know, you know, we go into these pretty large conference from sometimes and you'd have a meeting with you know, dozens and dozens of people

in it, and there would be all these folks. There would be the people that are at the focal point of the table, and then there will be the people who are who know no one has to tell them that they should be sitting at the actual table where the discussion, you know, the long conference from table where

discussions happening. And then you'll have near them the people who are the important seconds, if you will, the aids, the assistance whatever, and then you have like rows of chairs and stuff for people that were supposed to be at the meeting but didn't really do anything. And if they weren't there No one cares and the last there's anybody who have anything to add And if you're in that outer row, the answer is no, I tell you

right now, nobody. Who's nobody who's sitting at that head of the government, you know, the federal bureaucrats table, They don't care what you The little you know GS nine sitting in the back row who are taking notes on something, they don't care what you think. So I understand how government functions in a way that you only can when

you've spent time working in it and been there. And that's why I also know that there's a panic right now because a lot of what you're seeing, and this is true for some elected officials, but it's also true for many, many very powerful, very senior bureaucrats, particularly the intelligence and the intelligence agencies and in the FBI and the upper echelons of federal law enforcement. There their dirty laundry is being exposed when we're seeing stuff that they

didn't think we would get to see. And this is where we have the unmasker situation. Now. I think we've discussed on masking on the show before. It's pretty straightforward. You're not supposed to collect on US persons when you are doing surveillance using intelligence methods. So in order to protect people from this really unconstitutional. But they would say incidental.

Incidental is not the same thing as accidental. Remember that they're they're going they're trying to target, they're trying to catch your conversation. They just are doing it because they want to hear what the foreign person is saying. That's that's what they will tell you. But this is effectively a warrantless surveillance. This is intelligence surveillance as opposed to law enforcement. There's no you know, there's there's really no

court protections. We've talked about FISA for example. And so in unmasking your way rather in masking they decide that the American persons, their names are blocked out. And so you'll be reading a report and we'll say, you know, American person one, or you know US person one or whatever. They'll give it some some designation. Talk to Osama bin Laden, you know, and this is what we said. Now, that's obviously a very clear conversation that you would want to

you would want to collect. But this, this also is the result of a lot of much lower level conversations nobody really cares about. So unmasking is when you're reading this report and you say, okay, I need to know and you have to go to the originator. So whoever collected it, whichever agency, you go to the originator and you say, I need to know who this person is and you have to give some explanation of it, and then you can find out who that person is. Now,

you know, is it something that happens. Yet, absolutely happens, but it's usually something that you would expect to occur from people who are involved in intelligence gathering an analysis, not say, the US Ambassador to the United Nations a few weeks before she's about to lose her job. You wouldn't think that that would be somebody that would be doing this. And now we get to the general Flynn component of all of this. And look, I know there's a lot of a lot of layers here, and I

know that people. You know, after a while, you sort of get you get tired of some of this stuff. You get tired of hearing about these cases and about how all this went. But we're getting the truth now. So this is why it's important. Just this is the last couple of lapse of a very long race, a race that ultimately I can't say that there will be justice, but at least they'll be clarity, there will be truth

at the end of this. I don't think that there will be justice, though, because I don't believe that the wrong doors will be punished. Your only hope for that is Durham, the Durham investigation, and I would not put a lot of stock. I would not put a lot of faith behind that, not because I think Durham is a dishonest guy. I don't think that's the case. I just believe that they won't They'll always be able to hide.

And this is really what we've seen. This is the way the abuse by these Obama Gate conspirators, and it was a conspiracy, the way that they were able to get they will get away with it. It's just to say they believed in good faith things that turned out not to be true, and that the incorrect belief at the time was politically useful to them. That's just incidental,

you know. I just happened to believe this very fraudulent report about Russia collusion because I'm that foolish and that naive can't get mad at me for that, and then I took action based on my own stupid belief that this is what happened, and that it was going after a political enemy. That's a coincidence. That's really their justification. That's really their justification. So the Senate, it was not

D and I Grinnell. D and I Grinnell was involved in the process of giving the DOJ information that it wanted here because of the unmasking stuff around Flynn, because really what we know now what's been proven is that they're what's been proven is that there was a conspiracy to frame I mean, they framed General Flynn. That's what they did. It was a frame job. And so we want to know and the DJ and Attorney General bar want to know more about how this happened and what

the different components were that were involved. So the Senate, Senator Rampaul is making a lot of noise about this. Yesterday released the list, the unmasking list. It was properly declassified, and here's what you have on it. Below is a list of recipients who may have received Lieutenant General Flynn's identity in response to a request process between eighth of November twenty sixteen and the thirty first of January twenty seventeen to unmask an identity that had been generically referred

to in an NSA foreign intelligence report. Each individual was an authorized recipient of the original report, and the unmasking was approved through the NSA standard process, which reviewed which includes a review of the justification for the request. Only certain person are authorized to submit unmasking requests in the NSA system. The principles are identified, we cannot confirm they saw the unmasked information. Now, this would usually be some

pretty boring stuff. There's a lot of you know, if you're working on a specific country account or issue account, and if you're working on a non proliferation office, let's say in the intelligence community or our terrorism office, the intelligence community, and you know there's a US person who's captured in a surveillance report of someone you think as a known terrorist financier. You might want to unmask that guy.

You might want to know what's going on here, and that could also possibly be something that you know you you would well, now you get into how does law enforcement get to use this information? It's not a it's not a it's not a duly predicated law enforcement search. But does this ever? Does Sometimes this information managed to find its way. Sometimes it finds its way to a

Washington Post reporter. That's what we found out when it involves General Flint's yes, of course, these rules and regulations are not perfect, and they are not they're not always respected. But who asked for remember this is specific to General Flynn's identity. Who asked about this right around the time? I mean it was the conversation between Flynn and Kiseljak was on the twenty eighth of December twenty sixteen. My birthday, Oh Buck, it's your birthday. You're gonna yeah, it was

my birthday. And General Flynn, as we know, was framed up by the FBI, and a big part of that was the leak of classify phone intercept information to the Washington Post. And all these are Mama people. They're all upset, you know, they're all sore losers. You gotta remember this. All they all thought that the Hillary administration and all their friends were gonna be running DC and they were going to be in power even if they're even if Obama had to leave, Hillary was going to come in

and all this stuff. It was gonna be great, right, It was gonna be fine, fantastic. Oh no, Trump comes in and he beat her and they couldn't handle it. So that's why in the unmasking request list you have here US Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power, thirtieth of November twenty sixteen, the second of December, seventh of December, fourteenth of December, the twenty third of December, and the

eleventh of January. Unmasking Flynn, unmasking Flyinn. Now, even if this was all completely legitimate, are we supposed to believe that these people didn't realize they're keep reading classify intercepts of conversations involving the incoming National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. They didn't think that this was a little bit dude, that this is just probably put aside. The legality is this ethical? You're reading about your political opponents using the

US intelligence process to do it. This is a backdoor on constitutional protection, That's what this is. Just like FISA. And remember what we saw with FISA. Oh, it's sacred, nobody would abuse FISA. Yeah, FIZ is a joke. Nobody was paying attention. You could put false. You basically read something. If you're an FBI agent. You could read something in a news article and say, yeah, I saw this thing, or have some confidential informant write up some report on

a word doc and just you know, pass that along. Yeah, it's some of my confidential informant told me. The FIS that they got open on Carter Page was appallingly flimsy and false. I remember what they were telling us. Oh, nobody would ever abuse FISA works like a Swiss watch. And now we look at unmasking. Oh one, masking happens all the time. Nothing to see here, nobody deal. If there's nothing to see here, Why are they so upset

at the release of these names? Why? For example, is you know, are the Democrats and people like Shifty Shift so angry? Oh? I have some theories about that, But it's pretty clear, isn't it. As I go through these names, you'll see Obama Gate is real, folks. The Obama administration in its departing weeks, Okay, think about that, they're leaving power. They tried to sabotage the incoming administration, and they use the law enforcement agencies, the press, and the deep state

actors to do so. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Oh, who are the names? I'm sorry? I got so excited to tell you about all the lies and how upset the libs are here about the unmasking? Who are the names on the lists of the people requesting? What just happened? Just happened to be the identity of Lieutenant General Flynn? Who? Oh? Cement the powers? I told you that one. James Clapper, second of December twenty eighth of December, seventh of January. Hmm.

John Brennan, Director of the CIA, fourteenth of December, fifteenth of December. You go down this list, It's pretty scary, folks. You also have who else is on here? You have James Comey, director of the Federal Beer of Investigation, and this is my and there's a whole bunch of other Oh. I am trying to remember and make sure I get all them in here. You have the McDonough the White House Chief of Staff, Obama's chief of staff. He wanted to know, wasn't that interesting? And then you have finally,

and this is probably the best one, Yeah, Dennis Mithella. Yeah. And then you finally have Joseph R. Biden on the twelfth of January, twenty seventeen. Biden can barely remember what planet he's on. But we are to believe that Joe Biden had an urgent need to know to expose the identity of a US person that just happened to be luten In General Flynn. About what ten days before Trump's inauguration? It was really it was that important to know what

General Flynn was talking to? Or was this just about curiosity and the ability to exploit something that we had hoped wouldn't happen. We were acting on the premise that there was a certain level of government in which people would conduct themselves in good faith when it came to things like unmasking that was proven wrong. The authoritarian powermad socialist libs use this to spy on political opponents on their way out the door. Thanks for listening to The

Busson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, at the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. These rumors have been going around for years that the President Obama's administration was abusing this power of unmasked, and this sounds like they were abusing it to go after a political opponent, which I think is a very serious offense and should be investigated. And the fact that president Vice President Biden is directly involved with unmasking a political opponent.

Think about it. You remember we went through this thing called impeachment. They said the president Trump was using the government to go after a political opponent. This is Vice President Biden using the spying powers of the United States to go after a political opponent. He's caught red handed here. Vice President Biden's called red handed eavesdropping on a political

opponent's phone calls. That to me is alarming. Let's also remember that General Flynn, in a sense he is part of the was part of the Trump campaign, right, So this this was occurring, I mean, and this was only the window they looked at. I would want to know, how about the window of the three months before it?

Who else from the Trump campaign? If it's so routine, if it's so normal that there's all these unmasking requests that just happened to be of the incoming National security advisor, Folks, this isn't just you know, some random person who was talking to some strange people overseas. And no, if this is so normal, how many of these conversations were intercepted in the months before involving Flynn. This is what I

really want to know. Where their conversations intercepted with Donald Trump himself was the presidential candidate for the opposition party. I don't know, but they're telling us this is no big deal. This just happens, man, totally just happens. Was Trump intercepted? Was Pennce intercepted? We know that the vice president and the President's chief of staff, which means the

president himself saw it, by the way, that means Obama. Well, we know that they were looking at conversations, that Flynn's having intercepts of conversations and there, and they're now telling us all this happens all the time, totally normal, nothing to see here. We're supposed to believe this is normal. Okay, Well, let's extend that theory out a little bit. How many Trump campaign officials during the campaign we're caught in unmasking by US surveillance? And do we really even have a

Fourth Amendment? Do we really even have any reasonable expectation of privacy? Do we think that there has to be a warrant or not for these kinds of government intrusions. It seems like we keep coming across answers that say no the government. If the government wants to hear your stuff, they can, and they'll make some justification up for it.

Just like right now, as we're seeing with the COVID nineteen pandemic, the government now has just claimed for itself total control over you, and if you disagree, you're putting people's lives at risk if you want to live a normal human life. Right now, there are government officials all across the country, including in the federal Public Health apparatus, who will tell you're putting other people at risk, and therefore you are not allowed to have those freedoms. What's

it going to be like during flu season? You're gonna tell me to stay home? Then too, I can tell me you have to wear a mask. Then too, you're gonna tell me that I have no I mean, I have no basic autonomy and lock me house arrests for what there they look the government has taken all this power in to its hands. The government's also playing with fire here, and there's if this thing gets out of control, it gets out of control fast and it gets ugly, so they need to back off. This stuff is nuts.

That's going on in some of these blue States. But really maybe in a way, you know, let me lemmy, I see, it gets me, gets me fired up. And I don't want to lose the train of thought right now in the unmasking. But I do want you to have that thought exercise with me. If this is so normal, if this is so legitimate, who else were they unmasking

in the Trump campaign? How many? How many Trump convert if if they're going to tell me that it's oh, we would never read Trump's conversations, never read a Trump transcript. Why they've told us that this is fine, that this happens, that there's no problem with it, it's incidental. They didn't know who it was. Oh really, you don't know who's called a senior US official blacked out name speaking to the Russian ambassador. Hey, we're going to be in charge soon.

So when we're in charge, just know that we'll have a good relationship. And just wait a couple of weeks. Buddy. Yeah, they have no idea who that is. This is what there? This was an argument I was seeing yesterday. You morons making this argument out there don't know a damned thing. The text is already in the report. I used to read these reports all day long. It is my job. I was a little cubicle nerd in the Intel community reading these reports all day, all day, all day. We

know who it is. But if you're going to make the claim, and if you're going to leak it, and if you're going to use long when, you better be darned sure, right, you better be very sure that you know exactly who is it. You know, you can't go to the FBI and say, oh, I think there's a violation of the Logan Act here unless you're sure that you know you know the name is. I mean, theoretically you think it's General Flynn, but maybe it's some other incoming.

You know, maybe it's General Flynn's you know, number two, or it's you know, maybe it's you know, it's it's Michael Anton coming into being National Security Council spokesperson, or you know somebody who knows, right Kat McFarlane, the Deputy National Security Advisor, Right, So you got to be sure. But I mean you kind of know, you kind of know, And that's the whole point. Shifty Shift doesn't like any of this. Oh no, another place where their logic all

falls apart. Shifty Shift is upset why if this is so normal, if this is so routine, why is does the exposure this information looks about? Also the fact that Biden two weeks before he's leaving off it just happens to want to know about a general Flynn conversation. And also I would like to know can we do a we should do a similar search. They would have it

a similar search of when Obama took over. Who wants to guess if there was a series of unmasking requests like this involving Obama or one of his you know, top three national security personnelity and a vice president, national security advisor, you know incoming you name it, White House in a White House chief of staff. Who wants to bet that there wasn't this series of unmasked totally normal unmasking requests. These people are liars. They're liars their clowns.

Although it's very unfunny, it's actually really disturbing what they did. And the president knows this, He understands this. This is what he has to say about a Playliff twenty four. Unasking is a mask. It's a massive things. I just got a list. It's who can believe a thing like this? And I watched Biden yesterday on Good Morning America being interviewed by one of your colleagues, George Stephanopolis, and he said he know nothing about anything. He has no idea,

he knows nothing about anything, nothing at all. And then it gets released today that he was a big unmasker. So how do you know nothing if you're one of the unmaskers. It's one of the very big stories. And I suspect you'll have, if it's possible, even bigger stories coming out. I think that may be true. I hope

that's true. We do deserve answers here. Let's also recall that in the last week or so, we've seen the behind closed door transcripts from the House investigation of Russia collusion, which showed us that Clapper and Brennan and all these oh my gosh liars liars on TV. Oh there's oh, there's definitely collusion. They were lying about it. Shift was lying about it because he knew he had heard the witness to say, oh, I don't know really about I don't know. I didn't see any actual evidence. I mean,

come on, we're under Earth now. Shift is a disgrace, but he's a hatchetman for his party. So they don't care. They just they just view Schiff as a as a weapon of disrepute. You know. They view Shift as a guy who cannot be trusted, and that's great because he'll just do their dirty work for them. Try they can trust him, but the country can't trust him. Right. But he's he's he is uh olyaginous, great word for him.

Play twenty one. Well, what's going on is this is the president's effort to distract from the fact that under his watch, we've now lost eighty thousand American lives and our economy is in the worst shape it's been since the Great Depression. This is what this is about. They want to distract attention. I want to create some kind of a counter narrative that Noah was actually Obama committing crimes, not Donald Trump. It was all the Obama administration of figures,

it was an Adam shift. Don't pay attention to Americans dying right now, don't pay attention to Americans unemployed right now. But instead let's focus on this counter narrative that it was Hillary that must have colluded, it was Obama that must have been committing unethical acts instead of Donald Trump. But in the American people see through this. They are focused right now enough that they can see can't take it anymore. Sorry. Just notice how Shift is saying, oh,

Trump is trying to distract you. No, we're learning very important stuff about an investigation that consumed the country for years, and Shift tries to distract everybody by saying, well, look at what's going on in the rest. Okay, yeah, we know, you jerk, what's going on the rest of the country. You don't have to tell us about that. What's his answer here? He's a disgusting liar. He always has been, always will be. The Democratic Party claims that trumps you

have Trump has some issues with facts and figure. Sometimes he exaggerates, he he bs is, I know, I'm I'm a delusional But he doesn't stare the country in the face and just intentionally mislead and lie about stuff that matters. Pelosi does that, Shift does that, Schumer does that. They don't care. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. So what to make of Obama Gate. We are joined by my friend David Reeboy. He is

a Republican strategist and national security analyst. He's down in Florida. Mister Reeboy, good to have you, sir, Great to be here. What do you think about this list yesterday and all the explanations we're hearing for Why I say Joe Biden wanted to know about a flint phone call two weeks before he had to figure where he was going to be resting his head because it wasn't going to be

as vice president anymore. Well, in Joe Biden's case, it's it's more plausible than for the others that he had no idea what he was doing or why he was asking for the name to be unmasked. But I mean, you know, I mean, let's let's let's let's be real.

The first thought that came to my mind when I saw this, this kind of weird, massive collection of folks who are doing the unmasking, most of whom have no real legitimate reason to be asking for this kind of intelligence in the first place, is maybe they all sat down. It's possible that that that that they all sat down and they said, Okay, if we all unmask then the if we ever get caught, the weight of this will not We'll fall on all of us and not just

some of us. That's Uh, that's what I was thinking immediately us as to why so many people were really doing this, And we know too that there was an i'm A directive that allowed the easier transit of this kind of information from one government agency to another. What's also getting lost in this debate is the fact that, I mean, what makes this really criminal is the leak.

The original leak too. I think it was too ignacious at the at the post about about Flynn's call, right, which was completely illegal, and we still haven't had any kind of legal accountability, law enforcement accountability on that as far as I know, there's never been an investigation. We'll see about what Durham is digging up, but this whole thing has taken so much time that I'm just afraid that.

I mean, we know the media is going to try to pass this off as old news, Oh absolutely, And you know, I say, I think last night, at least MSNBC and CNN, I don't believe either of them were really covering the unmat asking. Now I'd have to update that, but as of last night, there was basically no coverage of it. And now we're seeing that the pandemic is going to be the go to for when they don't want to talk about something that's not the pandemic, which

is a whole, a whole conversation. We can get into it with you a little bit. All they have to do is just say, how could you focus on anything else right now? You know, how could anything else be of any importance? That's what Adam Schiff was doing before, which is troubling. I also want to ask you, since we got you're you're down in Florida and you're of

sound mind about these things. Somehow your governor has been the target of and your state, but particularly because it's a Republican governor and it's a swing state that we own, is really important. Oh, Florida is heading for disaster. Florida actually hasn't hit disaster at all. It's done pretty well given what the numbers, the population size and others would suggest. Meanwhile, Governor Cuomo is a hero and New York is a disaster.

I tell it, you know, how do you see that as a Floridian Look, I really like the santas I think he's great throughout all of this. I live in an area that is we've got three counties on the southeastern part of the state, which is which is Miami Dade and Broward and Palm Beach, and these three counties comprised most of the democratic part of the state, and as you would imagine, for that reason, they've been eager to close down, lockdown and slow to want to open

back up. And we see already West Palm is starting to West Palm is open. I believe already they've already got restaurants open, their social distancing. But but Broward and UH and Dade are are not so so within the state. It's interesting people who know. So within the state, the blue areas are more lockdown than the red areas are, at least such as you're seeing right now. That right,

that's that's correct. If I were to jump in the car and drive over to Naples on the west coast right now, I could go to a restaurant and UH and uh and and have dinner. But um, but but I can't, so I I sort of I understand the situation that DeSantis is in with these kind of local blue areas that are determined to shut down, local blue very high population areas that that are are determined to to I guess be the last ones to open back up.

But I think they will. I think I think this area, especially Broward in Miami Dade now are gonna are gonna be open um shortly shortly after, shortly after West Palm and then and then all Florida will be open um. You know, DeSantis has been reamed out in the press.

I mean, you know, the first thing I think was was with the um the big Florida defensive against him was was against opening some of the beaches in Jacksonville, and they predicted, you know, the the media went into absolutely meltdown hysteria mode, and I mean, I guess it was. It was nothing compared to what they did when Georgia opened up, which is they said there's gonna be like mass murder. I mean, George has been open for three weeks now and they've been predicting mass murder every day.

And George's fine. I mean, it's not perfect, but it's doing fine. Atlanta and the mayor of Atlanta to the Atlantic, I think org or some other outlet to say, you know, how how we irresponsible and terrible it is, and yet

and yet they seem to be doing fine. Um. I've always been of the opinion that we're we as as a country, as a as a as a as a as a human race are going to have to just walk through the fire here when it comes to this virus because there's no uh, there's no um uh vaccine around the corner, and at some point you're gonna have to open up. I think it's it's I mean, and there's gonna be risks agree that it's well passed time that we do so. Yeah, and it's not gonna be perfect,

but it's time, it's time we do so well. I'm glad at least Florida there's some pockets of sanity down there. Dave reeboy, everybody political strategist. Check him out on Twitter. Follow him there, David, thanks so much for making the time for us man get some sun. Thanks Buddy thay Care, thank here. Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or

wherever you get your podcasts. When you were Director of National Intelligence, did you see any direct evidence of collusion between General Flynn or any Trump campaign official with the Russians? Oh? No,

I did not. Of course, collusion is not a formally defined term, certainly in a legal sense, but if you if you were read the Intelligence Community assessment, particularly the highly classified version and as well as the young classified version, you won't find the C word anywhere in that report. Does the absence of evidence of collusion indicate to you that no requests for unmasking should have happened? If you had seen no evidence of collusion there, why ask for

names like this in the intelligence reports? Well, there could have been, as I say, other reasons why you would unmask um. Again, when you read the ball read of the report may not tell you what exactly is going on, So what it was collusion or what you're what you're trying to determine? Does this suppose a threat to a national security or you know er your DNI clapper er who er go jan cnn uh or that's right. This is the guy that was at the top of the

intelligence community. And I remember interacting with this guy when I was just a just a young buck and it was the same thing then, or reave the folder there er er and they've elevated him to being some kind of intel wizard. No, the guy's just been around forever. This is not somebody that you want to go to for a student analysis of anything. And notice how even at this stage you'll you'll steal get the same thing.

Even at this stage, you'll have people who will will say, well, there could have been, or maybe we would have found or no, there was nothing. They were all wrong. How are they all so wrong on this? How do we end up talking about Russia collusion that didn't happen For three years? This was the biggest story of the Trump administration until a global pandemic came along. Now, of course they want to pretend like no one should even think about it, no one shold even talk about it, But

that's absurd. Look, I don't want to get too more, too much more into the unmasking situation. I would just say this for right now. If it's no big deal, why do they not want us to know? And now that we know, what are we supposed to do with this knowledge? How are we supposed to act? Given that it's clear there was political targeting of the people around Trump, but notably General Flynn. But who knows what other political targeting was going on with this kind of process too.

I think there should be even more declassification. I think we should see I want to see what these reports were that they were You know, they can, they can redact them as necessary, but we should see what's the content here that they were unmasking. Now, they'll never do this because of the sensitivities, but that would really let us know. Then then you'd really get the answers if you could see, Oh yeah, they really needed to know

who this was. They first of all, they couldn't basically figure it out in second of all, why do you not have Do you not have any expectation of privacy? If you speak to somebody who happens to be a foreigner? Can they just listen in on phone calls and you no longer have any Sorry, the national security impetus, the national security desire overrides whatever constitutional protection you have. Apparently the answers, yes, it's not folks not okay, you can't

trust these status lives. That's the problem. They don't operate in good faith. A lot of our law is set up in a way, and in a sense, I think this is a very it's actually a very important reminder for all of us, and I wanted to take just a pause to say this much about it. The Flint case is the reminder that all of our laws and our system. You know. Look, they require faithful execution and basic decency or else nobody's safe and no right is secure.

Anyone can be investigated or prosecuted if officials make decisions, and those officials are stupid, vicious, and motivated by left wing ideology. Anyone could be subjected to this. And if you think, then here's my brilliant transition. If you think that the judges the courts will save you, you're wrong. There are deep staters wherein rows, just like there are deep staters at the top of the intelligence community, the top of the FBI bureaucracy. Here I bring you the

latest in the judge. Remember this is all now related to Michael Flynn, the Judge Sullivan prosecution, or what they're doing with the prosecution of Michael Flynn, which really now is completely in the hands of this judge, Judge Emmett Sullivan, who had an outburst that he ended up apologizing for him and he lost it in court and started talking about Flynn betraying his country. Some of them never even stopped to think who Flynn was betraying the country on

behalf of Is it Turkey, is it Russia? Is it someone else? Didn't matter, just it was just too enticing a storyline that Flynn was somehow a trader, so that the people that bought into this never stopped to dig into the details. But here you have General Flynn no longer facing the DOJ actively prosecuting him. And this was the big news last week. And I was saying to you, and you know this, I'll say, well, we gotta see with the judge does though I was a little worried

about this. I was concerned about this, you know. It was it. It's not over to the It's not over till the zoftic female vocalist engages in singing. You know.

That's that's where we are. And there's no singing right now because Judge Sullivan has requested an amicist brief from a retired Clinton appointee named John Gleeson, a retired federal judge, to provide the court with the reasoning with the with reasons why the Flynn prosecution should continue effectively, why Flynn should be sentenced and continue to be found guilty even though the DJ has said this case never what the DOJ has said is that this case now never should

have been brought. This never should have happened. Can you imagine how is this any different from say, if there was you know, DNA evidence that exonerates that truly exonerates somebody, not that they make believe it does. Which does there there's there's some DNA stuff that we could talk about another time where Okay, I mean they think that this anyway, I don't know. I haven't seen making a murderer. I want to check that one out for sure. I think

those guys are guilty. But that's just my gud my gut instect. I've seen a few of the episodes, haven't seen all of it. Um, That's what I was thinking. With the DNA stuff, I was like, Oh, it's not always is it. But imagine that there was clear cut and this does happen. There's clear cut evidence of DNA that exonerates somebody. And the judge was just like, nah, now we're still going to hold you in prison. You're

not you're not getting out. And even the prosecute, even the prosecutors that that's really the way along this side, even the prosecutors like, look, we're really sorry this guy was exonerated. We never should have brought this. That that is what has happened here. The Department of Justice has said we're dropping this. This never should have gone down, And the judge is like, yeah, I don't know about that. I think I think I'm going to carry this thing through.

So he brings on this Clinton Judge John Gleeson to file an amicus brief to outline why the charges should not be dropped and also to put forward an argument for how to prosecute Flynn for perjury. Here's the Here's what the judge's order says. The court exercises it's an inherent authority to appoint the Honorable John Gleeson as Amicus curier to present arguments in opposition to the government's motion

to dismiss. It is so ordered that Amicus Curier shall address whether the Court should issue an order to show cause why Flynn should not be held in criminal contempt for perjury. What the heck is this? It's this judge's call, and yes, the judge does have a right to do this. This is also a reminder of my friends. Judges have a Judges are supposed to be referees. They have a ton of authority in that court room. You know that a judge can they don't usually do this. Very few

people generally know this. A judge can set aside a jury verdict. It is within a judge's power. When a jury says guilty, a judge can say, yeah, thanks, Matt, gonna let this person go' gonna set aside that verdict. You're free to leave. Judge can do that. Their power is tremendous. It's also why, you know, it's really the

concentration of state power in that courtroom. Whi's why even if you mouth off to a judge, you know, not a lot of people you can mouth off to who can say, you know what, you're gonna go spend a few days in prison for that one. Judges can do that. They have a lot of authority in that courtroom. And you know, the reality here is that I think they're going to force Trump to pardon Flynn. That's the way that the deep state is going to get back at this guy. He didn't even do anything. I mean, now

it's clear the guy didn't do anything. He didn't lie, he didn't do anything. He's like having conversations people all the time, and you know, misremembered what he said to the ambassador about something, or like misremembered if he talked him about it doesn't even matter if you said, oh, buck, he lied. The FBI agents interviewing him, who had the transcripts, they didn't think he lied at first, So how clear was the lie? But oh no, oh no, they and

Andy McCabe lied twice, FBI director. But they're not going to prosecute him. Why just because because because the bureaucrat establishment likes him, because he's one of these little government stooges who was always first and foremost about the permanent governing class. Wasn't really it wasn't really about what was ethical, what was right. It was about making sure the machine

continues to be in charge. This should be troubling for all of us now as we see across the country how badly the government machine wants to continue to be in charge. They do not want to give this up. They do not want to relinquish any of the power that they have taken into their hands. And we should have seen this coming, warning about it. I've been warning about it for a long time. You can just go back in my Twitter feed if you want to see

I said what six weeks ago. Now we'll go from panic demanding government action to the recognition that the government is inept and stupid, which is where we pretty much are to the government wielding even more power to tell us to shut up and do as we're told once we've realized they're stupid and they've taken too much power

into their hands. That's where we are. And this was the expected trajectory of what would happened in responsible but anyway, with with Judge Sullivan here, they're going to force Trump to pardon Flynn, and then they're going to say this was all political. So this is just all about sullying his reputation at this point and giving the left wing loon Democrats one last chance to frame this issue against Flynn in a way where he looks, you know, looks

like a bad guy. He looks like he did something wrong, even though we know he did nothing wrong. I feel badly even that that Flynn has been dragged through so much at this point must be horrible. Can you imagine your life savings drained fired from your wife. The guy got to be National security Advisor's supposed to be the pinnacle of his career. He's fired before he even starts

the job over this over nothing. I mean, you know, he's got an ego and he you know he's got he's a human being with feelings too, and aspirations and goals. They did this to this guy over what a semant the power on Obama and biding these people. They're all so in love with themselves and they're just disgraceful. They lack decency and think that they're superior. That's what's really troubling. You see this with oh all, all the Obama administration officials.

That's the constant, right, they're vicious, petty little tyrants. Whenever you give them any power, whenever they can have the media, they can sick the media on somebody or attack somebody or destroy them. And never any grace, never any forgiveness, never any sense whatsoever that they're going to rise above and treat people that disagree with them or that see things differently than them with any respect. They don't do that. That was really a defining characteristic of the people in

the Obama White House around him. I mean that was and Obama himself always view the other side with disdain always, So why is it surprising and all that they would have used the powers they had in this way, it's not surprising. If anything, it's just a shame that it took us so long to get this proof. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Maybe it's the opinion of politicians that these protesters are

just violent racists. But the Michigan State Legislature has actually filed a lawsuit against you, claiming that your state of emergency extension to May twenty eighth is unlawful since they did not approve it. Are you acting beyond your authority here? And do you understand why there are so many concerned citizens about government overreach at this point of course? And you know what, I think that that is a robust

debate that we should absolutely have. The fact that the matter is every decision that I've made has been on the right side of the Constitution and always centered by epidemiology, facts and science and to save lives. Do you believe her? I don't. I would love to hear from some more of a team Buck Michigan. Let me know what you think about what's going on in your home state here.

But that's Governor Whitmer who there's a very fundamental point here about a temporary state of emergency versus an open ended state of emergency. Right, and we all understand this, and there's there's some there's some gray area here in the law, but everyone's under everyone also in principle recognizes that. You know, it's one thing. Here's the perfect example. Cops run up to your front door, banging on your front door, say hey, look, we you know, we think there's a

ghastly down the street. We're gonna we need every we need everybody out for a few hours while we check it out. Are you gonna say no, you don't have a warrant? I probably not right. You're gonna say, oh whoa wha, okay, yeah, thank you officer, and you're gonna take your family out. You know, that's a that's a that's a state of emergency situation. Cops runder your door

a different situation. Bang bang bang, I mean with not guns obviously, with their hand on the that was a bad you know, bang bang bang is not what you want to hear from cops. Um knock, knock knock, Thank you. That's knock knock knock was the onomatopeia that I was looking for. Fun word to say, Producer Mark, that's the word of the day to day on a matapia. I used to know how to smell it. Yeah, but uh,

you hear that. You hear that knock of the door, and you go to it and they say, hey, hey, we're really worried about a gas leak in the area. So we're gonna need you to clear out of your house for a month or so, and we'll call you and we'll let you know maybe when you can go back. It might be a few months. We're not sure. But you have to get out now. Okay, you might say, you might say, Buck, you know what, I'm gonna leave

that house for a little bit. But all right, what happens when you call the let's say you go stay at your aunt. Ethel's the famous Buck sex and show an Ethel. I don't have one, but that's the ant we always talk about. And and you call the city, you know, you call the city health department or the police department. What you'd call. He said, Okay, can I go back to my house? No? No, sorry, No, that emergency about the gas league. We're gonna keep We're gonna

keep extending that one. We're gonna push that one a little bit more. And then you do it for more weeks, and then for more weeks. At what point have they exceeded their legal authority? Right? At what point is there no longer a state ability to tell you, you know, sorry, your home is not your home, your stuff is not your stuff, and you have no rights. That's what we're up against. I mean, I know, maybe I got a little too deep into the the analogy here, but that's

where we are. That's what's happening in these different states a state of emergency. And this is also the whole mentality, the whole problem now is that we were told fifteen days just to flatten the curve, slow the spread too, flatten the curve. Right, these are really related concepts. Okay, well, we we went along with this in good faith, and I think that I think that that's still under the circumstances.

Was a decision that that's defensible, right, that we all had to just sort of get ready and understand what's going to We all needed to see what's going on and to prep and get facilities in place and have a national focus on it. But it was a little bit like a storm is coming. Everybody has to clear out of this area. Once the storm hits. You know, we'll come back and we'll rebuild, but never knows that there's a that it's limited in time and scope, limited

in duration and clear limitations. Well, what is this? Can leave your house, can't go see people, gotta where? I don't even give it. We're gonna talk more about the mask thing. There's a protest happening. Look, I I understand why people are doing open carry at some of these Michigan protests, but you know it does for the national level messaging. It results in all that gets focused on by the Lib media. And I'm just talking about what's

more effective messaging, folks. Okay, I'm not saying that I don't understand why people want to enjoy their Second Amendment rights and want to remind the tyrants that they will not be able to just endlessly do whatever they want to people. I get that. I just hope that these protests don't that. You know, the only the best thing for the for the Lib authoritarians. If something ugly happens at one of these protests, that's what the authoritarians want.

Thanks for listening to the bus seton show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts. The iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. Oh, Tim, I just saw this, So you know, we have this whistle blower, they're calling him, a whistle blower named doctor Bright, who is testifying today, and he is telling us we have the world's greatest scientists, let us lead, let us speak without fear of retribution. Oh boy, you know the part of the problem I

have here. And there's a lot of stuff that's going on with with the scientific community. Somehow the people that speak out on behalf of science are all like leftists. Why not all scientists are leftists, but the people that are always listening to the scientists, they're all lives. This was congressional testimony from this guy, doctor Rick Bright, the ousted vaccine chief, that's what they're calling him. And he's

now getting his moment of trash Trump fame. Right, Trump is doing a bad job and all this other stuff. The donal that's already responded to him. I don't know the so called whistleblower Rick Bright, never met him or even heard of him. But to me, he's a disgruntled employee, not liked or respected by people I spoke to, and who with his attitude should no longer be working for our government. Yeah, that sounds about right. Here's what the Here is what the Department of Health and Human Services,

where he used to work. They released a statement. HHS put out a press release on this guy. This guy's being treated as a hero today. Oh he's amazing. Here's what they're saying about him, Rick Bright. This is from the Department of Health and Human Surfaces Publicly, Rick Bright was transferred from his role as BARDA director to lead a bold, new one billion dollars testing program at NAA

NIH critical to saving lives and reopening America. Mister Bright has not yet shown up for work, but continues to collect his two hundred and eighty five thousand dollars salary while using his taxpayer funded medical leave to work with partisan attorneys who are politicizing their response to COVID nineteen. His whistleblower complaint is filled with one sided arguments and misinformation. HHS is reviewing the complaint and strongly disagrees with the

allegations and characterizations made by Rick Bright. HHS is having none of it from this guy. Now. I would like to I would like to just come out right now and say, you know, there's going to be no matter no matter what Trump does. We've all known all along that they're going to blame him for everything, and they're going to be doing this. It doesn't matter if Trump said, I now give up my position as leader of this response. King Fauci will make all of our choices about how

to deal with the virus. King Fauci now has my proxy. They would still they would still find ways to blame him for everything that's going on. And one of the things that came up today during this testimony is that they're saying that there are thousands and thousands of people who have died because of Trump. You know what's you know what? And oh and because he won't listen to the scientist. That's the other thing that I want to say,

because he won't listen to scientists. Play clip ten here, Mark. Yeah. First of all, I want to say, we need more of a national strategy. Where I live Toledo, Ohio's border is half an hour away. We don't have it. The virus doesn't know oops these rules here and these rules there, or a person doesn't. We need to have a more national regional strategy. And I wish you would stop denouncing scientists for giving us facts and work with us to have a plan to take sciences takes these facts into account,

and how do we do things safely? That's what we need do. Science in Fitts keep a line she's Ohio. She's not a uper from Michigan's Ohio. You're science in fits. People that know nothing about forget about no nothing about science. Actually, there are so many who have no intellectual curiosity, no reservoir nor thirst for knowledge, who just love to lecture

everybody about listening to the scientists. Well that's because then the next line is always what we hear here from Elizabeth Warren, for example, who's just saying listen to science. So that's why everyone's dying. Here's Elizabeth Warren doing what knew you would do. Play for The President needs to stop pretending that if he just Endorspan News it will go away. It won't. The time for magical thinking is

over here. President Trump must acknowledge that the federal response has been suspicient and that more people are dying as a result. We are running out of time to save lives, and we need to do now. So thank you, doctor Faucie for all you're doing. You appreciate it, but the urgency of the moment could not be there. You notice there's so much incoherence with all of this running out of time to save lives. We've been told now that we've lost eighty thousand lives already, so and we're doing

the lockdown. We're doing what they we have done, what the science is, what the experts told us to do. For two months, we've lost eighty people, and now when we want to try to do something else, is you want people to die. We don't blame the lockdown people for the eighty thousand debts that have happened from COVID nineteen, although you could start to make a case about in certain areas, was that was that the most effective for your most affective strategy? Did people die because of the

stupidity of the across the board lockdown? You can ask that question. It's a real question worth asking, Meaning instead of focusing on protecting people in nursing homes, acting like everybody's an equal risk from this thing, was that intelligent? Was that the smartest thing to do? Or did people

die because of that decision? In New York It almost looks like people certainly died because of the Governor Cuomo order given that even if they think somebody coming out of a nursing home has COVID nineteen, I'm sorry, coming out of a hospital has COVID nineteen, they should be taken in by the nursing home. Oh and also there's there's a rule that the people that figured out now that nursing homes have no liability for this now, so nursing homes were told take people, but don't worry. You

can't get sued if everybody gets COVID nineteen. And you know, fifty one hundred people die because you took somebody in from a hospital that you knew had COVID nineteen in the highest risk population you could possibly find of older people. So we need to have these discussions right now about how right have the scientists been, how correct have their prognostications been up to this point. And this is where I just have to say, you know they keep telling this,

to listen to them. You have this whole the bay now over masked. LA sent out a note to its residence Los Angeles is not telling everybody you have to wear a mask if you leave your house. Period. That's their guy. If you leave your house wear a mask. This is nuts. If you leave your house wear a mask, the risk of getting this virus or giving this virus

to somebody in open air is almost zero. And if we're going to start change, if we're going to destroy people's freedom because of minute risk, if we're going to eradicate reason, rational thought, sanity in how we approach risk in our day to day lives, we have been transformed, inherently been transformed into a turnkey totalitarian society. There is nothing. This is why the Libs love climate change so much,

because climate change is existential for the world. Everyone's life is at stake, So you better recycle and take that bicycle to work instead of the car, and drive a Prius instead of a car that doesn't look like you know, somebody fell asleep at the design table. You know, that's that's what it is. They can control every aspect of your life. Well now with COVID, now they really can control every aspect of your life, because it's not saving

lives one hundred years from now, it's saving lives right now. Yeah, these people are scary. And I'm gonna ask you this because I've started to see some analyzes popping around about was was the lockdown effective? You know, we we were told lockdown's effective. I've read through histories of the Spanish influence of nineteen eighteen. They did a whole bunch of lockdowns,

did nothing. They were locked Some places lockdown and got decimated, some places didn't lockdown and get decimated, and some places we're fine with a lockdown or without a lockdown. I mean, really, you know, you look at this, I want to say fine. I mean they were hit far less badly. And this is true about countries right now. Japan didn't have a lockdown. Why does Japan have basically no problem with this? They

didn't shut down all their businesses. They were early on this and identifying it and trying to prepare for it in some ways. But they you know, there are so many factors here, climate, average health of the citizens, population density, There are all these things that we know affect the spread of this, the severity of it, age, average age of the population. Why have countries that have been exposed to this. You know, here's a question I haven't seen

anybody able to really answer yet. Why hasn't Africa been hit really badly by this disease? They have cases of it. You want to say, oh, buck, they don't have population density. Really, go hang out in Lagos or a Buja, Nigeria for a while and tell me about population density. They have incredibly dense environments with very poor public health systems. Why haven't now I'm I am posing questions that I don't

have answers to amount an expert. But for people to pretend that the experts who are saying lockdown, lockdown, lockdown know what they're talking about. If they knew, if they weren't just theorizing, if they knew, they would be able to explain this in a way that you would sit there and say, or I would sit there and say, Okay, that makes sense. They can't. They can. There are some countries that have been hit very, very very badly by this. In other countries that seem to be just about okay.

Climate certainly plays a role, not climate change climate, but actual like hot, cold, day to day certainly plays a role in this. Everyone who's been pointing to Australia, Yeah, this they outbreak started during Australia summer, so that makes things a whole lot better for them. Started during our flu season, our winter. One of the reasons we got we got hit so badly, I'd be very curious to see,

you know. I know they have all these stringent measures in place now, but we'll see if if Australia has Hopefully it doesn't, but we'll see if Australia has a more difficult outbreak now that the weather turns in the southern hemisphere. But they can't answer these questions for you. They don't know why it is so bad in some places and not No, Brazil has not been hit that

badly with this. So someone explained to me, if why we must take it on faith that the lockdowns that are destroying the economy and ruining lives are even a good idea, Never put aside necessary that these are even intelligent things to do. Handwashing, I'm down masks in certain circumstances. Sure, it's not that big an imposition mask all the time. No, protect vulnerable populations, yes, try to be in less super

dense environments. Sure, can't go and operate your business. Can't cut hair, why you know, can't sell flowers, can't sell clothing, You can't engage in what you know? Doctors have to shut down their offices if they're not dealing with COVID nineteen patients. Whose idea was this? Again, this is what our public health community comes up with. You know, ask this question too. Notice how we look at this and we're supposed to be able to be present with data,

because these are sciences. We're supposed to be able to say, show me why this was a good idea, and they're just they turned around the yellow you and say, you know, be quiet, peasant you. You don't have the same background that we do on this issue. Oh, the old appeal to authority routine. Huh, I don't think that's going to work all that much longer. And now, of course there's the they want to politicize this, and maybe they want to stay locked down until November if they can, or

at least as close to it as possible. They want to make sure that people are you know, people are fed, and that there's money flowing through this system because it creates a dependency on government that they know they'll be able to exploit for generations to come. And then be on that once Biden comes and look at what happened with Obama. Obama takes over and all he has to do is essentially be president and the cyclical recession. The

Bush administration did the bailouts. The Bush administration saved the banks from failing. Obama just had his be there, and he came in at the worst possible time, and over time it was low, it was a week, it was a poor recovery, but yeah, the the upswing was going to happen. So he was always able to say, well, when I came in, things were terrible, right, which meant, yeah, things are going to get a little bit better than where they are. So when Biden comes in, what they

want is the same effect. We'll say, this guy's a moron, and as policies are terrible, and they say, aren't things getting better now? And we'll say, but hold on, but the economy. You kept the economy shut down for months and months, and that'll just be add that that that that doesn't matter. It's getting better. Look at the numbers now. Biden's improving things. It's not just narrative creation. Narrative creation leads to reality creation. When you're talking about government, media perception,

this is power. This isn't just what people say. This is what people think, and what people think leads to what they do and how they can be controlled. Those are the stakes right now is we're trying to figure out how to reopen this country, and the people that are trying to shut this thing down are playing hardball. I mean, keep it shut down. You're in the freedom hid. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. There's a statute.

There's a nineteen forty seven statute that says Nancy Pelosi would yield all of the powers of the presidency if the president and vice president could not consistent with the law, she can issue whatever executive orders she wanted, fire disfavored political appointees, and in general direct the executive branch as she pleased. She's third in line. It's never going to happen. We'll keep our vice president very healthy and I'll stay healthy. Never going to happen. She would be a disaster. So

it looks Nancy Pelosi is a disaster. Okay, even doing a thing like that with her crazy. But what she wants to do is get involved with a voting. She just got back to Washington. Everyone said, what was so long? She just got back here. So let's just see how it all works out. So I think we're going to have a great election. I'm getting really good pauled numbers. For the most part, they're not being shown. And I saw Joe Biden on television yesterday and if you watch

aminos nothing he knows absolutely nothing. That's pretty much. That's all Trump's line really has to be about Biden. I mean, this guy really isn't know nothing. I mean, he's he is in the ultimate MPT suit. Just a lot of bluster, a lot of you know, the first two lines of the executive summary, that's what this guy gives you all the time. You know, soon, you know, we need to do things and come together and America and the people and the rubbery blown. It's just all silliness. But MSNBC

thinks that Biden's just great. Play sixteen the president is. People sit around saying Joe Biden's in his basement. I'll tell you, I don't recommend you to do this, but if you watch Trump TV, you know their YouTube channel, He's on to have an hour every night on Trump TV right now. It's reaching a lot of people. Go spend some time and watch it. McConnell was on there the other night with Laura Trump. That's where he made

this news where he attacked Obama. If you watch that channel and see what they're the messages are driving about Joe Biden. It's he's in his basement. He's old, he's infirmed, he's sleepy, Joe, he might be senile. It's over and over and over again. They're hammering the stuff. And you think about that message, and then you look at what's happening in the polls. Joe Biden set in his basement, according to Donald Trump, and still beating him on almost

every mentoring that counts in terms of the data. Right now, Now, that does not mean that Donald Trump can't win this election. He can win this election. Okay, we get it right. And this is what I think is fascinating. We all know that the Democrats and Republicans, you could put any candidate forward and it would be a close race. I mean, you could actually put forward a candidate who all we

knew about him. His name is Bob, and he's a guy, and he's running for president as a Democrat, and you get forty nine percent of the country to vote for this random imbascile. So Joe Biden just happens to be the random imbassil here. Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the

iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Collectively, we already spent about in the process of spending about two point eight trillion dollars, we now have a debt the size of our economy. So I have said, and the President has said as well, that we need to take a pause here and take a looking what we've done, see what's working, see what isn't, and also begin to encourage the governors around the country who have the decision

making ability to begin to open up the economy. But they don't want to have to do that because they think that if they can keep their states fed via the federal trough, if they can keep New York and California going at a subdued level, even if you remember, they don't have to keep it locked down all the way to November to affect November even another another month, another six weeks. Is that a price? You don't think

they've already done this to us for two months. You don't think they're willing to drag this out for another six weeks if it means that the chance of Trump winning is traumatically reduced, winning re election, and I know I don't want to sit here and have to have to look at this in those terms. It's absurd, but that's what's going on, so we might as well accept We might as well recognize the truth about what the other side is planning here and try to meet them,

you know, on the battlefield where they're actually fighting. This is political, as I've already said to you, they can't even explain why why they shutdowns work in some countries and not in others, or why because some countries that didn't shut down seem to be fine. And I'm not saying, you know, maybe maybe they do have ants. I just haven't heard them yet, and i'd like to hear them. You know. Barstool president Dave Portnoy has a fantastic rant

on this. I shared it on Twitter. We don't we didn't play here on the show, but you know, because there's a lot of a lot of salty language, mister mister Portnoy uses some of the salty language, a lot of it, but it's a great random He's basically it's like, look, you know, we were told laden the curve and now we've extended into this never never land of we'll just keep doing this until we have a cure of vaccine, and he says, well, we don't even have a cure

for cures for other things that are really bad that are out there, that have been that have been in existence for decades. There's no certainty at all that there will be a vaccine for this in a year or in ten years. So what are we really doing to ourselves?

And then he says, look, if you're telling me this is speaking as mister Portnoy here, but if you're telling me that my business, you know, barstool sports, would he says, he's fine, But he says, if it was going to go away or I have to take my chances with COVID nineteen, I'm taking my chances that that's his. And he says a lot of people I think feel the

same way, and they do. Right, if you're if you're telling me that, I can watch the dissolution of the American economy mass poverty, never mind the poverty around the world. The La Times has a piece It says that there are one hundred million people plus who are risk of starvation, starvation, dying from hunger, a horrible way to go because of the economic catastrophe. That is a self inflicted one. This is a self inflicted economic catastrophe. The virus is one thing. Yeah,

the virus would have hurt economies, no question. But the shutdowns, the shutdowns have crushed economies and forced incalculable economic damage onto all of us. Do you think that they're ever going to admit that this was a bad idea? What do you think we would do to the political class in this country if they had to come out and say to us, you know what, Yeah, that was that was our bad shouldn't have done it. And I've said it to you and you I don't think that there's

a counter argument to this. The extension of the shutdown was the first time that I ever saw Trump because of public pressure, because of pressure from people that hate him and don't have not just his interests, don't have the interests of the country at heart, that he said, Okay, fine, I give well, we'll extend this out. Now there would

have been a fight with the States. I'm not saying it was in his hands to make the shutdowns go away entirely, because it wasn't, but he gave them so much more cover to extend and extend and extend, and Dave Portnoy is just telling everybody this is nuts, and it is nuts, and the people that are pushing this are wrong. And this formulation they have for you will do what we say. You will not open your business, you will not go outside without a protective covering on

your face, go outside at all. That's what they're saying. In Los Angeles and in New York. If you go outside without a mask on, people look at you kind of funny. Trust me, I know I'm here. But you must do these things because it's not about your risk, gets about risk that we're assessing for other people. So we're making the determination for you that you're not allowed to live your life in any freedom whatsoever because you just breathing is a risk to other human beings. That's

what they're telling you. That is ultimately what's going on here, and that's how we get to a point where we have an economic free fall that, as it is calculated today, is at thirty six point five million people without jobs, almost three million more than last week. And it's just the official number. I mean, this is is hard to imagine what this is going to do, and I don't know. I hate to get ahead of where things are right now with how bad things are going to get. But

the virus will the virus we will get through. A society can I'm one hundred percent sure survive a disease that nine percent plus of people who are infected with

it survive. A society can survive that, then that's just in mathematical certainty, right, you know that you can serve can a society into your if it's political class is shown to be a bunch of reckless and stupid authoritarians who sees endless power in their hands at the first opportunity, and who destroy the economy that they inherited from the generations and the people that came before them. They destroy that, and we have an end to the dominance of the

US dollar as the global reserve currency. We have an end to the I mean, it's hard to even wargame what will happen to the economy if they keep doing this, they keep dragging us through this. Look. Ultimately, I think the if it saves just one life, crowd will have to just shut up because people will get tired of this. They'll figure it out. But people are figuring this out too slowly. That's my problem. They're learning the lessons here too slowly, and for Democrats this is I really believe it.

There's another fear, not just of the economy of COVID nineteen that's motivating a lot of this, and it's the fear of them having to psychologically bear the burden of four more years of a Trump administration. I think there are people, and I mean this, there are adults who are in a clinical sense terrified of that. In a clinical sense, it keeps them up at night, and they have physical anxiety symptoms from the idea of Trump being

president for four more years. And so you know, if they can ride it out in their house somewhere, if they've got enough savings in the bank and whatever, they're like, Hey, we only got to do this for another month or two and Donald Trump doesn't get to be president again. That seems like a fair trade. I think there are millions of people who believe that, and that is part of their thought process right now, that is directing their

thought process on this issue. Meanwhile, they're pretending to care about the folks who are economically getting crushed by this because they know who is really being hurt, if not celebrities in fifteen thousand square foot second homes. They're not the ones that are suffering. It's people that have no savings and no job security and lost their jobs and now have nothing and can't go outside and don't have comfortable living situations that they're staying in. You know, But

here's Joe Biden letting you know that. Oh yeah, blue collar Joe really cares about the working class. Play three. Look, the people are getting hurt are Democrats. Hard working people, the people who can't afford to stay home. The people are getting clobbered, the people are making hourly ways. The people who are out there saving our lives, carrying the country on their back and losing lives and the process of doing it, they're the people who are in trouble.

A lot of millionaires aren't in trouble. People making tens of millions of dollars or hundreds of thousands out they're not in trouble. But the people are in trouble are the very people that are our constituency number one Democrat constituencies. Really, I think some of them may change that calculation. We just had these we had these this Republican congressional special election, I'm sorry, this congressional special election, a Republican one didn't

see any media coverage of it. Of course, I think people are gonna you know, this is the hope that I have, is that enough the left wing ideologues, people that are you know, just not my president and hashtag science and all this stuff. They're never going to be able to convince them that, you know, Donald Trump wasn't out there, you know, injecting people with COVID nineteen on purpose. Basically, I mean, they're completely out of their minds. It doesn't matter.

But for those who will be the difference makers in Ohio and Florida, in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania and Michigan, for those folks, I truly hope that they understand who's really pushing for maximum suffering, economic suffering for those who have lost their jobs right now by extending all of this, it is the Democrats. This has become a part as an issue. Now you have the reopened Republicans and the lockdown left that is that is going on across the country.

And the more we learn about this disease, the more we realize they can't protect you from it. It's going to be out there anyway. There's no vaccine in the near term. There may never be a vaccine. Our therapeutics are basically garbage. That's where we are. So what do we do. You're gonna gonna hide in you. You're gonna hide you in your home and your in your bedroom for another three months. People are gonna lose their minds.

So I'm happy that we're seeing this pushback. I'm happy that there's this lockdown rebellion that is growing across the country. And I've been thinking to myself too, what what happens if they start finding or even arresting people who won't wear masks walk around in public? Am I going to be? Am I going to engage in civil disobedience? Maybe? I mean my business doesn't My business is this, It's you. It's talking to all of you, so that that won't

be affected and that's not affected by the lockdown. Obviously. That's why I'm fortunate enough to be able to continue. Although they look revenue across the board for media is way down, even though ratings are up, revenue is way down because media is just a marketing platform. You always have to remember this. Media is a marketing platform for companies that actually make stuff. You know, media as we consume it unless you're talking about direct subscription, which is

also part of it. But anything that's advertiser based, it means that the media products you're watching are really marketing platforms for other products, actual products that you buy. And so when that's all down, because the economy is in such bad shape, it affects the ability of media platforms to make money too. But the unemployment and we have put ourselves into a depression and Democrats want us to crawl out of it as slowly as possible because of

the electoral timing of all this. That's just the truth. And they figure that the federal government will. Oh, I want to make sure that the blue states and blue cities that are going to drag this out as long as they can. You, wherever you are across the country, you're going to be paying for this with your tax dollars. Here's the mayor of New York telling everybody that there better be a huge federal bailout for New York or else. Though there's not going to be a recovery play eight.

We cannot recover without the stimulus period. Right now, what I have lost in this city the human loss. First, the families, the people are suffering first, But then think about what it means for our future that we've already lost seven point four billion dollars already in terms of our city revenue that pays for cops and firefighters and healthcare workers and teachers. That's just after ten weeks. We'll

think where this is going. So if our federal government doesn't step in and fill that gap and help cities and states back on their feet, there won't be a recovery. There won't be a recovery. People will suffer much longer. Why is there even that word stimulus. It is the idea of putting people back on their feet, recreating the energy of our economy, getting people back to work. That's why the concept of stimulus was invented to begin with. And it will only happen if the President says that

it needs to happen. We know the Senate will act if the President says to. But without that stimulus, there is no recovery. It's as simple as that, more federal dollars, more money going in. It's not even really your taxes. It's your children, your children's children and their You know, their ability to provide for themselves and make a living.

That that's what's really an issue here. But their plan is to just keep on you using relying on the federal government money lifeline, that the Treasury money tree is going to just keep getting shook until well as laid the process as they can and the rounds they see, look at how many people died, how bad the economy is. Trump is terrible. Vote Biden. That's the whole plan. We see it. That is the whole plan. You're in the

freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. We all remember the horrible shooting at Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School, and we also remember that there were people on site who had firearms and whose job it was to protect those kids, and they did nothing. I mean some of them just did nothing. Well, one of them who was fired just got his job reinstated thanks to the union.

This is from the Miami Herald. The Broward Sheriff's Office sergeant who was the first supervisor to respond to the Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School shooting and lost his job after it was found he hid behind his car as the first shots rang out, will be reinstated, awarded full back pay, and get back his Seniority Sergeant Brian Miller was one of the four deputies who were terminated because of a neglect of duty in the February fourteenth, twenty

eighteen Parkland shooting, which killed seventeen students and faculty members and injured another seventeen. Miller was paid one hundred and thirty eight thousand, four hundred and ten dollars in twenty seventeen. Man producer Mark I got to become a Broward sergeant. Yeah, I'll hide behind my car for half that yeah, wow. And arbitration ruling union stuff of course found that the Broward Sheriff's office violated Brian's constitutional due process rights and

improperly terminated him. This is just stunning. So here you go the this takes us back into the situation here. Then Sheriff Scott Israel faced backlash from Broward Deputies Association President Jeff Bell, who said at the time that Israel was going after deputies and sergeants by suspending them, but allowed Captain Jan Jordan to resign. Jordan took charge of

the scene. She arrived within seven minutes of the first shots being fired and did not urge deputies to go into the school deputies Edward Easton, Joshua Stanboss, Scott Peterson, and Miller were all fired months after the shootings. The Sheriff's office internal investigation found they all failed in their duties. According to report by the Marjorie Stoneman Douglas Public Safety Commission, which investigated the shootings, Miller was the first supervisor respond.

He arrived as shots were being fired. He hid behind his police cruiser and did not radio in for ten minutes. Pretty amazing, isn't it. Broward police union look unions, public sector unions are a problem, folks, Broward police unions. Making sure that you know you can't be fired for cowardice as a police officer. That's what they're saying, because this

was This was cowardice. It absolutely was. And I've had one or two test the exchanges here when you stay callers in the radio shows, someone's oh, you know, rudo, No, I'm sorry, you've got a gun, your law enforcement officer and their kids being shot up in a school and you're not gonna do anything about it. That's that's if that's not calarie. There's no such thing as calarice. But yeah, here we are, here we are. I'm I'm I mean, this is just unbelievable, unbelievable. And look, it's a it's

a real it's a real dark spot here. It's a real bad moment for law enforcement community. This was really bad. The Pulse nightclub shooting was also really bad. I mean, there's some stuff here, folks. It's look, I know it's easy in a Monday morning quarterback, but if we're not going to expect sheriff's deputies at a school shooting who have guns when they arrive to at least try, I mean, I'm not if you're out gunned or you know you're taking fire and you gotta cover, I get that. You're

not even gonna go and investing here. You're just gonna sit there. You're gonna tell people, you know, citizens, they don't want to carry guns all around of them. Flooria is better than at least New York is. But you're not gonna go in there and do anything. Unbelievable, unbelievable. Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember just some scribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or

wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, team Buck, it's time for roll call, alright, teen, Remember to go to Bucksexton dot com. We post stories there and also you can listen to the podcasts there. Podcast numbers up pretty big last month. We appreciate that. Please continue to spread the word, tell people about the show and what we do here. It's the best way that people learn about this. It's why we keep growing, It's why producer Mark and I

still have jobs. So with that, Facebook dot com, slash buck Sexton if you want to send messages to us, or Teambuck at iHeartMedia dot com. If you wish to email, let's get to it. John Rights, Hey, Buck, I am listening to the segment from Tuesday on the Aubury shooting.

The part that I have a hard time with, and I'm sure many others have as well, is that Aubrey ran up to a truck with obviously armed men in it, then chose to punch the son in the face as he got to the front of the truck and fought with him over the gun as that same gun went off. It could have went off from the physical altercation unless the father and son were verbally threatening Aubrey with physical harm.

I don't see how open carrying a weapon in self defense while questioning someone is a pass for Aubury to assault the father and son. Once Aubrey chose to attack them, I don't see the logical outcome other than the father and son defending themselves on the flip side, if Aubrey, they would have won the altercation and killed the father and son. I don't see how Aubrey would be charged with murder himself. Thoughts, Well, John, this this goes to you know. First of all, you know, the video is

not a perfect I've watched it a few times. It doesn't show, at least from what I could see, exactly what went down there. But you don't. I don't. There's no right to pull over on the high on a road and brandish two shotguns and demand to speak to somebody that that does not exist. This guy was on public property. He was not. He was not on there. Maybe one thing. If someone's you know, on your front lawn,

or if they're you know, that's a different thing. This guy's on a public road, he's jogging, and they are demanding, and they're the big question that I would want to know is are they brandishing? Right? You know? I mean, if you if you want to know what brandishing is someone sits down, they say, hey, you know, you're making a lot of noise last night. You know, I'm your neighbor. You're making a lot of noise last night. I need

you to stop. That's one thing. Someone sits down and says, hey, you're making a lot of noise last night, and they take out, you know, a three to fifty seven and they put it on the table in front of you and they say, you might want to quiet down a little bit, right, I mean, that's and they're pointing the gun of you. That's brandishing. That's not okay. You know, you can't point a weapon at somebody's Hey, I need to talk to you. That's that's not how this goes.

And you know that's what this is where the every little bit of this is going to be deconstructed and looked at very closely. But also why why are they there? Weren't burglaries in the neighborhood that's already been established. There weren't recent burglaries at least looking at an open construction site. Is I mean, I've done it. This is not something that is so strange or weird at all. That's certainly not some terrible crime that anybody would get You wouldn't

think anybody to get in trouble this. They didn't do anything. There's no crime. Really, you could try to say there's trespassing, but I mean, if you want to be annoying about that, there's a lot of trespassing goes on all the time that no one you know, it's a no Usually trespassing is considered a no harm, no foul situation. But yeah, I think that if you instigate, if you on false pretenses, instigate an incident that that involves lethal use of force,

I think you should be held accountable for that. You know, you can't just draw it down on people if you're if you know, it's it's a everyone who knows everyone who's an open carry or who's a firearms owner listening to nose. It's a big responsibility to carry a firearm, to be somebody who's going to exercise their Second Amendment rights. And if you're a concealed carry holder, there's a responsibility

that comes with that. And you don't get to say, oh, you know, I know I was concealed carry and I got a little drunk and I just you know, popped off a couple of rounds in the sky. I mean, yeah, that's how people to go to prison for a long time. And I know you all know that, but there's a responsibility that goes along with it, and you do not I know, these guys had shotguns, but you don't. You don't get to wave shotguns and people's faces when you're

you know, if you're not defending yourself. M m. Look they from what I see, these guys started it and it was unnecessary and it looks very bad and there's a reason. You know, this video shows obviously that this looks really bad. And also the whole thing. The guy's standing in the back of the truck, I mean, that's a threatening Well what is he doing? You know what? Why and why are they bothering this guy in the first they want to talk to them? I'm sorry, it's

not okay. I think they they thought they were putting on their little fake cop hats. It's a very dangerous thing to do, very dangerous thing to do, and a man lost his life in it, and it's a tragedy and it shouldn't have happened. There was no need for this. There was no need for it, and I think people need to be held accountable. If there is new evidence, new information, or a new theory of the case, of course I want to hear that and I'll return to it. But for right now, I think I think this is

proceeding with the charges. I think this is proceeding as it should. I gotta tell you. And if you guys think I'm wrong, please let me know why. Don't just tell me I'm wrong. Let me know why I'm wrong. Let me know what, because I can tell you this. If I'm jogging down the road and someone has a shotgun and they're insisting on talking to me, I think I'm under threat right away. That's that is threatening. This

is a stranger. You're in a public space. You know they don't You don't know who they are, you don't know what their intent is. You clearly don't have a firearm you're jogging. I mean, I mean, maybe you could have a you know, something strapped in somewhere. It's very unlikely. So what's going on here? I would be under I would be nervous about that. I'm never nervous about people carrying firearms or I mean, like I carried firearms. I've

carried some pretty interesting stuff in my day. But I never carried anything like I never would do anything like this. This is absurd anyway. I'm I mean, I I just been stopping somebody when I have a gun and say, hey, I need to talk to you. Jeff Buck. I've been listening to your radio show for a few years now, first on kf AB and Omaha Who Love Love KFA by Omaha. That's one of our first stations where we really showed great traction of the Buck sexon show, you know,

four years ago now. So thank you to everybody in the KFAB family, one for keeping us on the air there and also just for making this a really successful show in Omaha, Braska. I gotta get it to Omaha producer Mark, you ever been out there? I have not. You know that three eleven, the band from the nineties, is from Omaha. Really, yes, that's very interesting. You know, they actually have a pretty fantastic music scene out there from what I understand, you know, like it's like the

Nashville of Nebraska. You know, people think that Nebraska is kind of nothing there, so I guess, oh, hey, hey, oh hey, pretty spar but we love, hey, we love I'm not saying I don't love what I'm saying is people think that it's nothing, but there actually are things there. That's what I'm saying. Yeah, yeah, no, there's dude, Omaha is a cool town. I want to go out there and check it out for sure. So anyway, he writes, Oh, and of course Freedom ninety three seven in Denver. Yeah, yeah,

number one on a time slot. Thank you, Denver. We love you, We love you. I'm a musician, a part time college professor with current situation. Of course, all my teaching has done online and my performances have been canceled. So I picked up another job delivering packages for Amazon. I deliver all over northern Colorado, Greeley, Loveland, Longmont, et cetera, and a lot of rural deliveries in between those smaller cities.

While I'm grateful for the extra work and income, I have to say that it seems that Amazon cares much more about virtue signaling to its customers than they do about the safety of delivery drivers. We're now required to wear masks at all time when working for Amazon, never mind that there's absolutely no benefit for wearing a mask when you're alone and outside. No consideration has been taken for those of us that wear glasses and have to deal with fogged up glasses obviously when driving, that is

a real safety issue. I learned that Amazon is actively encouraging its customers to tattle on delivery drivers that are not wearing masks. I think it's really sad that a portion of our culture has become so fearful and petty. Being a tattletale is something that is being actively encouraged. However, I'm encouraged that majority of the people I see across northern Colorado are not this way. At least some people still value common sense and personal responsibility shields high. Well, Jeff,

thank you so much for that perspective. I mean, it's really useful for us to hear what people are going through in different parts of the country with this. And yeah, wearing a mask in a car by yourself is absurd. You're protecting nobody, and it is dangerous, especially if you well, if you wear glasses. It's dangerous because I try to wear sunglasses with my mask recently because I was social distance walking along somebody one of my parents who wants

to be very cautious about their health. And it's really a producer Mark. Have you had sunglasses on. Yet when you had the mask on, you fogged them up within three breaths. You can't see anything. Oh yeah, And I usually only work sunglasses when I'm driving, so I'm like, I can't even bother to put the mask on while I'm driving. Yeah. No, it's it's not a safe thing at all. So how are we going to deal with that? I ask you? You're in the hut. This is the

Buck Sexton Show podcast. All right, So there's a news story that I did not see and I'm having a hard a hard time believing it. But producer Mark has brought to my attention, Oh my god, it's real. There is a Chicago area woman was mauled to death by her French bulldog. Mark. This is like being eaten by a chihuahua. How could this happen? I mean, apparently it

was a fifty five pound French bulldog, if that helps. Urso, who weighed one hundred and twenty pounds, was found with a very large percent of her body covered in injuries. Urso had two French bulldogs and one Border Collie mix. Cooper said. This is from People magazine. Cooper said both of Urso's French bulldogs were found with blood on them. Oh my god, we know one is an aggressive dog who had bitten someone before. The larger French bulldog Blue is two years old and the ways fifty five pounds.

Oh here we go. There are reports that Blue was rescued from a dog fighting ring. Folks, oh, I mean still folks. Once dogs. I hate to say this. I was near a dog that was a rescue once upstate and these people had built this huge fence, enclosure and stuff for it, and that thing leaped at me because I moved. I just moved my leg, like my knee a little bit in a way that it didn't like, and it went and went right for my throat. I will never forget it. And the dog had been abused.

Dogs that have been abused are yeah, you got to be super I mean they're animals and you have to be super careful around them. It's very hard to on to deprogram that. So that's not First of all, this dog is twice the size of a normal French bull. French bulldogs are like this is like someone getting you know, eat eaten by the by their beloved cats. I mean, this doesn't happen. But if if an animal has been abused and has been bred for fighting, as this dog

apparently was at fifty five pounds. Look, bulldogs, we think of them as just being so cute and everything else, you know, Producer Mark bulldogs. Originally they were larger and heavier and their jaw they were bred to have this dwarf jane, which is what bracky cephalic is. And they would actually do something called they would bull bait, where they would have a bull and they would attack it with bulldogs. They would latch onto it and grab it and try to bring the bull down and kill it,

and the bull would fight. And this is what people, I mean, this is what they would watch. Obviously it's messed up and that's where the bulldog gets its name. But what's up? Not a big fan of bulldogs in general? Whoa, Hey, whoa, I'm Mark. You you sleep on the couch? Is nice? But you know, I meant like a regular bulldogs a friend. Hey, direct all the bulldog owners out there, direct your eye or a Producer Mark. I mean you have to bit that.

Of all dog breeds, they're on the uglier side. They're ugly. They're so ugly. They're cute though exactly don't. I don't even if you have to choose, you to choose a golden retriever. I love bulldogs for the teeth. So just so you all know, I love bulldogs. I don't know what producer mark is it thought all there's opinion on this one, but I'm just saying, like them, I said,

they're just luglier. Do you remember when years ago, I'm like, when people have these animals sometimes and things go bad, and it's really they're they're so surprised and you sit there, you go, is this really that surprising? Though? The woman who had the chimpanzee in Connecticut, who how was a rough story that chimpanzee was one hundred and eighty pounds. I mean, yeah, when you take a wild animal, like if you decided to have a pet cheetah, what do

you expect? Yeah, cheetahs are actually not that big, but still could I mean it was just an example of a while. I don't know, I'm just I'm just saying. I'm just saying. I'm gonna tell you I actually watched the h The Jungle Book with snow Princess recently. Jungle Book based on the Rudyard Kipling stories that the original Disney version of it. You know, it's good. It's not one of the best disneys, but it's it's pretty good

for what it is. But I was always so concause because Blue the Bear looks to me like look looks kind of like a grizzly bear or a black bear, and I was like, well, well, what what was He turns out that actually he is because and this is the tell, the giveaway, he eats ants. He is a m a sloth or sun bear, which they have in India, which also makes sense because a grizzly bear against cher Khan, a tiger grizzly bear, I might come out the winner of that, you know, solo. I mean I actually probably

I don't know. I think I'd probably put my money on a large grizzlies just a large brown bear, A large brown bear against the tiger. I don't know. I'd that'd be. This is like a little of the discussion little kids always have, you know, who would win in a fight. I think grizzly bear probably beats tiger. But sun bear in India they're kind of little, so that's why they're so scared of sheer cons. So it all

makes sense. I'm taking the bear in that fight. By the way, yeah, I think that, I mean the bear. I mean, brown bears are huge. I mean you look Siberian tiger can I think be up upwards of eight or nine hundred pounds. But I mean a big grizzly bear is way bigger than that. And uh yeah, I'm just saying. I'm just saying, all right, let's get back to the actual radio show. What am I doing, Mike Buck? I listened every night here in the twilight Zone of LA.

Thanks for having that doctor on tonight. He's dead on and I wish he was on more media outlets. By the way, how does someone from Queens say water? Water? That's how my ex says it, and it's really annoying, not to mention she denies she pronounces it that way. Bruce and Mark, how do you say w A te r? How do I say it water? How did I used to say it? Like? Water? Yeah? Water, something like that. That's how we say that's a That's how we say

it in this strong island. I'm from Queens. Always remember that when we drive around in the Dodge Neon listening to the Venga Boys outcome and we get the like the neon lights underneath the car. I almost did buy adult neon. That was almost my first car, but it ended up not being there. We go the Strong Island and remember when they used to see it for a while, people used to have like neon lights under the car. You know what I'm talking about, like in the undercarriage.

It was just like a thing people trick out their cars. And I don't understand. Spend the money on your home, how long do you spend in your car? Really? I gotta tell you. One of my brothers is he loves cars and he has he has a gorgeous car, and he cares so much about it. And he's a real car guy and he's done like race car driver training and he loves cars. I view cars as a conveyance. I just wanted to be comfortable and work. I don't

really care. I don't know. I'm just not I'm not a car guy, and I know a lot of people listening probably are. It's just something that I don't I never had. I don't really care. I sent to my wife the other day like if I why would I buy like a Beamer or something like that. I'd just be so worried I'm gonna crash it, or that something would happen to it, somebody would steal it. What am I get to? What that kind of What is the Mark?

What is the Markmobile? Right now? I don't have a car because I moved to Jersey so I could say Manhattan, so I could have Yeah that worked out well, yeah, I I mean things have changed up. But if you, if you and missus Mark we're to get a car tomorrow, what would have been? She drives a Chevy Okay, I guess we kind of share it now, but she mostly drives it. Is it a a sedan suv? What is an suv? Yeah? We both prefer SUVs, but like fine with Chevy Honda, you know, normal cars. I don't need

a BMW or Alexis or something. Dude. My first car was a wood paneled Roadmaster station wagon, dubbed the shaggin Wagon because there was no shagging in that wagon. And uh, it was amazing. It was hard to steer it. You're driving, you know, on the wheel. It was really like I can't really explain it. And you got to drive one of those cars. I think it's become kind of a collector's item now. But it looks like you're in a boat, like a wooden boat on the highway. That's how I

would describe it. Roadmap. I think it was a nineteen ninety three pale blue Buick Roadmaster station Wagon. That was my first car, the shagg and wagon. Yep, those were the days. When you're in college. You're the one person that can move around all the furniture in the back of your car. Everyone loves you, that's true. Alright, alright, team, that's gonna be the show for today. We'll be back tomorrow, same time, end place. God bless you all. We'll talk soon. Hill's High