Democrats Vegas Royal Rumble

matters with actionable intelligence, magnor mistake. You're a great American Again the Buck Sexton Show begins. Remember he's a great guy. No hell'scale for all educational opportunity. Wonderful country. We have the best known socialists in the country. Happens to be a millionaire with three houses. What I miss here, Well, you'll list and I work in Washington Housewash the first problem. Live in Burley to the house school. That's good And like thousands of both Ramontes, I do will have a

sub account and forget me for that. Where is your home? Which tax? Which tax? Haven? New York, New York City? Thank you very much, And I pay all my taxes and I'm happy to do it. Because I get something for it. New York City getting a shout out last night. Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show, everybody, thank you so much for being here. Man. The debate, the debate was spicy. It was a spicy meat the ball. I enjoyed it. I enjoyed it that and I wasn't expecting to. So

you gotta give the Democrats credit. At least they put on a show. And I think the ABC News anchors, I will tell you I find Lester hole to be and I mean this as a high compliment among the very least annoying lib ankers in all of the news business. I mean, I'm not even sure I find him annoying quite honestly at all. So that which is, you know, it's a big compliment. I think I think he did a good job. I mean, Chuck Todd's very annoying. He was there too. But yeah, it was quite a throwdown.

And that we started off with that SoundBite was the single most interesting exchange for me of the night. Now, everyone brings their own biases to this, and when you talk about who you thought had the best night, and look, Bloomberg did not have a good night, didn't have a good night, there's no question, okay, but Bloomberg also would probably stand right next to me and if we could and we asked them the question what do you think

about last night? He said, who cares? In a week, all people will remember is the ad that they're seeing not just on TV, on their smartphone, in their Facebook account, on Twitter, in their email box from people talking about how great bombergs. So does the debate last night really matter? We'll see if there's a big, a big shift in the polls. I don't think it will change all that much for Bloomberg. I mean, there were two people on the stage last night who were really battling it out

for supremacy in terms of attention. Biden was very I'm just gonna yell. I'm just you know, I knew the Obamacare and I did this through and I'm just yelling and I forget where I am. But I know if I keep raising my voice then people might listen. That was Biden, I, just as I've said, a third tier politician with a fourth tier mind. I also think that Bloomberg's best line. Where else have you heard Bernie Sanders

socialist with three houses before? I'm not saying mister Mayor listens to this show frequently, but I'm not saying he doesn't either. I don't know. I don't know, can either confirm nor deny, And I really mean that I have absolutely no idea well that it was quite an exchange. So the big takeaways, you know, the most fun thing to do after these debates, and I didn't do one. I didn't do one because, quite honestly, I watched the

whole debate this morning. I had I had something to do last night, so I watched the whole thing this morning, which was great because I was, you know, sitting there drinking mccoffee, and I didn't want to get any preconceived notions going, so I didn't see what anyone I had said about the debate. And as I watched the whole thing through, I saw that if I were to come up with some live tweets, or if I were to give you the the pithy freedom Hut style, what you

need to know. Sanders got hit hard for being a socialist that's out of step with most of the country, but he still has a political army behind him. Bloomberg. It was exactly what we expected, but he did get in a good shot on on Bernie Sanders, but the stuff with the women and the non disclosure agreements will get into all the specifics. So this didn't look good for him. But again I think I think it doesn't matter.

I think the people that like Bloomberg won't care. Klobaschar comes across as more reasonable and more normal than really all the other Democrats on the stage, at least to me. And that continued last night although she had she mixed it up with may Or Pete on some stuff. Mayor Pete was getting feisty with her. And then you had Elizabeth Warren, and I saw the jokes on Twitter about how you know she brought a tomahawk to a knife fight,

or that she had her war paint on. I mean, people were when the president calls a political candidate pocahonas. I mean, I think the field is wide open for the continuation of those kinds of jokes. I think it's worth noting those are jokes at Elizabeth Warren's expense, not at the expense of Native American people. But it's it's amazing to see how Warren, how predictable it was for her to go after for her to go after people

the way that she did, notably Mike Bloomberg. You see, she had in her head going into this debate that if she was on offense against Bloomberg would elevate her back to being at some degree of perception parody with Sanders, who is the class warfare guy. Sanders is the class warfare guy. Elizabeth Warren tried to be the more policy walk also into the class warfare stuff, but she's she's taken a slightly less aggressive approach, and last night that

all went out of the window. She was going after Sanders, I'm sorry, going after Bloomberg with everything she's got. Klobe shar was going after Sanders on getting rid of healthcare healthcare for one hundred and forty nine million people with his Medicare for All planned Buddha Judge was going after going after Bernie Sanders on thirty trillion dollars of spending, only fifteen trillion of which has been explained. And thankfully

we were spared from having Tom Steyer up there. Like climate changes though you know, I only wear one tie to lower the CO two emissions from making ties. So that was what was going on last night. All right, let's let's dig into a bit of the Shelby. I mean, the big takeaway is that I think that this is now it's a it's a Bernie, It's a Bernie Bloomberg fight for this nomination. I think that's the case. Maybe we'll see after Super Tuesday that Biden all of a

sudden surges. But I think this is a democratic party that has to choose, and they're choosing between They're choosing between polar opposites within the party, which is what's so fascinating. These aren't two people usually. I think you would expect that at a particular political moment, there'd be two people who in a primary, we're really running for the same in the same lane, with mostly the same policy ideas,

and what you have with Biden. I'm sorry with Bloomberg and Bernie getting all these bees, Buddha judge, there's too many bees in this race. It's a good thing Buck isn't in the mix. But then I don't have to

take them all to school in that debate stage. But you have these different candidates, and they are far apart on these issues, so far apart that you have to wonder if Bloomberg, under other circum stances would even really be considered a Democrat or if he's really more of an independent who's trying to run as a Democrat in order to prevent the victory of Donald Trump. So now let's get to it. This is where let's start with this one, because going the person who went after Bloomberg

the hardest, no question, was Elizabeth Warren. Warren was setting setting the ambush from the very beginning. And here is how she started. This was earlier the debate two. Here's how she started out Play five. I'd like to talk about who were running against a billionaire who calls women fat broads and horse faced lesbians. And no I'm not

talking about Donald Trump. I'm talking about Mayor Bloomberg. Democrass are not going to win if we have a nominee who has a history of hiding his tax returns, of harassing women, and of supporting racist policies like redline and stop and frisk. Look, I'll support whoever the Democratic nominee is, but understand this, Democrats take a huge risk if we just substitute one arrogant billionaire for another. Whoa the range

is hot rounds getting fired, it's who it's with. Warren deciding that she was just going to go after Bloomberg and say that he's not really much better than Trump. That's certainly the implication. She more or less came out and said it. Those things that she rattled off that

she believes will prevent the Democratic Party from winning. Let's understand, if you take a longer view, if you look at this from a strategic perspective, redlining, his comments about women and stopping frisk, those are all problems for the Democrat base. I don't think any of those are going to be major issues of concern in the states that if Bloomberg were the winner of the primary, he would be facing off against Trump in right Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Florida,

and whatever else you want to throw in there. I mean, though, those main states that you have to look at as the determining factor in who's going to be the next president United States. I don't know if any of that really matters. You can say that, you know, minority turnout in those states might be a little bit suppressed for Bloomberg, but minority turnout in those states is generally not or it all. It depends on which stay we're talking about

and which minority group. So that's that remains to be seen. I just don't think that any of those issues would stop a Democrat voter from coming out and voting from Mike Bloomberg. I could be wrong. We are seeing now that there's still major concerns among the Democratic establishment that Bernie Sanders is out of the national mainstream. He's not out of the Democratic Party mainstream, clearly, but is he out of the national mainstream? Do independence do undecided voters

turn out for a Bernie Sanders radical socialist agenda. That's that's the pivotal question. That's what has to be answered by these Democrats, and I don't think they're ready for that. Let me go back to Bloomberg for a second. Look. I hate Bloomberg's policies, but I do think that we need to understand who's a bigger threat to the American economy and way of life among the Democrats, and I believe that Bernie Sanders is a much more It's obvious that he's a much more serious threat to many of

the things that are important to us. So if I ever sound like I'm being a little too favorable to Bloomberg, you know, full disclosure. You know that I worked for the MYPD when Bloomberg was the mayor, and that he was relatively well regarded in that role, and he was a Republican then. But I also think that Bloomberg on climate change and on guns and there's a whole host of issues where he is terrible. He's not like a little bit bad. He's not a moderate. He's a leftist

on those issues. So I like to give you that context for everything else. I'm going to say, because I'm kind of gonna be one of these people right now. Everyone's when they're pulling apart this primary, they either are bashing Bloomberg and de facto pumping up Bernie a little bit, or bashing Bernie and pumping up Bloomerg a little bit. I mean, that's even if that's not the intent, that's the side effect. So I'm aware that that may be

what's going on the Indy. Please everyone, I love all of you who listen to this show, and I am humbled and honored, and I mean that from the bottom of my heart. Every day. I don't know how many jobs I could say this, though I have no control over Bloomberg by ads on our podcast, iHeart does not with the company takes political advertisements, and if you take political advertisements, which if you're a major media company you

have to, you can't discriminate against different political parties. So please, I love you all. But I keep getting a producer, markast to feel that we can get these emails like why is Bloomberg by? We can't stop him? There are and I would argue that we should be able to that this. Uh, these campaign finance laws are ridiculous in a lot of ways. But I just wanted to say that there's nothing that we can do right now about

it or with all that. This is where Bloomberg, this is where things got rough for him, and he looked like he was up there on stage and he's just like, ah, do I have to be here? Can I pay someone else to be here instead of me? I'm so bored, I don't want to be here. I'm tired. I'm worth like a hundred bajillion dollars like what? So here is where he got himself into a tough spot up on that stage. Play one Mark and the Mari comes along on His attorney said, I will give you this amount

of money if you promise you'll never say anything. That's how it works. I said, we're not going to get to end these agreements because they were made consensually, and they have every right to expect that they will stay private. If they want to release it, they should be able to release themselves. I will say yes, no, the Mayor. I shouldn't. By the way, I'm somebody who doesn't like the retention of titles things, so I shouldn't we I just go with may Or Pete because his last name

is hard to say like everybody else's. It's not out of some strange newfound respect for for Pete Buddha judge, but Bloomberg. He is not may Or Bloomberg anymore. Bloomberg did not do himself any favors there. But what is he really going to say? I don't know what the

NDAs that were signed. I don't know what the provisions are in them and who's involved, And it might be people that sued Bloomberg's company for what other managers did, and so that then would be he's not in a position to just wave it, but no one wants to.

No one cares about that. All they care about is that Bloomberg has NDA's from his company, where he has apparently a history of not always speaking very well, you know, in front of women and about women, And the Democrats must at some level be aware that all their complaints about how horrible Trump is when it comes to women, that's not going to be as effective a line of attack if, in fact, you have a Bloomberg nominee from the Democratic Party. One thing is interesting Bernie Sanders. You know,

he's been he's been married a few times. His personal life somehow never gets brought up in any of this either. I just I think I think that we've reached the point now where where divorces and messy divorces and those things for political office nobody really cares, uh, you know, kids with with one wife and then kids with another wife or kids without a wife, or whatever it may be. I think that people are increasingly just don't really make

decisions based on that. I think that's what we're seeing. But Bernie Sanders personal life, somehow always have always no one brings it up. They did bring up his medical records last night and his promise that he'd release them, which he has gone back on, but really the the entire m last night for Warren and for Bernie, and probably for a couple of other candidates. You want to

throw them in there too. Was it just stop this Bloomberg momentum, this juggernaut of financial political this financial political onslaught And here is what Warren called for, play too. I hope that Michael Bloomberg decides to live by what he says. He just wants to see the Democrats beat Donald Trump. So that's great, Mike Bloomberg, drop out of the race, keep putting your money in to help Democrats beat Donald Trump, and just take your ego out of this.

Did you expect him to do differently tonight or better than he did? What shocks me is he seems so unprepared for the question about the nondisclosure agreements. I mean, think about what that says about Mike Bloomberg, that all these years he has been sued evidently multiple times for

discrimination against women and for harassing women. The details we don't know, because each time it happens, if he puts a chunk of money on the table and then forces the woman to agree to wear a muzzle for the rest of her life over this issue, well that was the that was the main attack against Bloomberg. Last night, and it didn't look good and Bloomberg had a bad night all in all on the debate stage. But I still hold to I don't think. I don't think anyone's

gonna care. We'll see if I'm writing the polls. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast, all right. So that that was the the big moments. The big moments last night were about the attacks about different candidates on that stage going on offense against each other. I think, by the way, I think that that's fine. I don't understand why people keep saying they should focus on Trump. We all know they hate Trump and think that he's the Antichrist, and they're all

we get that. That doesn't tell us anything. What do they think about each other? And how are they different from each other? And if you're gonna ask for the most powerful job in the world and the nuclear codes, you should be able to take people coming at you on stage and fund of millions and millions of audience. I mean, conservative pundits deal with that all the time.

Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts, Sleepy Joe Biden the other day had sixty eight people. And now they have a new member of the clue, Mini Mic Minim no Boxes. We call him No Boxes. And I hear he's getting pounded tonight. You know, he's in a debate. I hear that pounding. Year. He spent five hundred million dollars so far and I think he has fifteen points. It just came out, Hey,

fake news. How many points does he have right now? Fifteen? Yeah. I love when he calls out the fake news in the back of the room. You know why, because it makes them so mad. Even then they have no sense of humor about it at all. They have no sense of self deprecation. In the corporate liberal news media, they get very touchy about it. So I think that was

pretty fantastic when he does it. But look, you look at the most recent, most recent polling, and you know Sanders is at the top, Biden still is doing well, although not well enough maybe to be the nominee. And Bloomberg has bought himself into this very key spot, this key position. What Warren said that she wants his cash to be used for to help the Democrats. I could see that happening, and that's been my concern all along.

Imagine a Sanders, let's say a Sanders Klobischar ticket, which I think would be a very wise ticket for the Democrats from just their perspective of trying to win and beat Trump. I think Sanders Klobischar would make a lot of sense if Bernie is the nominee, and then with Bloomberg's checkbook behind it, with some kind of a promise, you know, maybe it's behind closed doors between Bernie and Bloomberg that Bernie won't go full Bernie. I don't think

Bernie would make that promise, so I don't know. I think that I think that Bloomberg has stepped into this race more to defeat Bernie Sanders than to defeat Donald Trump. That's that's my belief. Now he can't say that because it would look like, you know, he's a Republican trojan horse going into the Democratic primary. I think it's more important to Mike Bloomberg that Bernie Sanders is not the Democrat nominee than that Donald Trump is not president for

four more years. And I think that's pretty sound analysis from him. I do not find that all that I do not find that to be off at all. Obviously, I share that if that is in fact the way Bloomberg feels, I think that he's correct in that it's a much bigger deal the Democrats can rally after if Trump were to beat let's say, Biden in the in

the next election. But I don't know if the Democrats can come back from a socialist as the as their primary victor going up in a national election that's going to be Unless you think that, then Bernie's movement is picked up by Oh, I don't know, AOC play fifteen producer Mark. I think there's a couple of reasons. One, before people even knew who I was, like five minutes after I won my primary, it was the Apocalypse on Fox News. And I think it's because our political system

is not designed for people like us. They're not designed for working people to succeed, for young people, for women, for people of color. It's not particularly welcoming and historically to have someone like that assent, especially when I was running against someone who was the antithesis of those things, to send so rapidly right, it's it's up ending. But also I think it's because our entire political system revolves frankly around rich men, and rich men are not the

center of my universe. Working families are. So she is going to be the Democrat nominee at some point. I know this is a Now she's thirty. You've got to be thirty five to even under the constitution run for president. But that I don't know. I guess she wouldn't be around for the next cycle. But she'll be at the in the next presidential cycle unless a Democrat. Think of

it this way. If a Democrat wins now in twenty twenty, I think it's going to be you know, AOC would certainly try after that Democrat has had his or her eight year run to run for president. But if Trump wins reelection, which I certainly hope he does, AOC Bernie will be I think even Democrats would accept that in four more years, at age eighty two, Bernie would be too old. Look, I think Bloomberg is too old. I think Biden is too old. I don't understand why anyone

pretends like that's not the case. These people are too old for the job. If Trump was eight nine years older than he is, I mean, like, you know, I think I'm getting up a little too old for the job too. I mean, he's just under the wire of what I think is feasible for age. But also, and I'm biased, of course, but I admit, unlike the other unlike the fake news, I admit that I'm a Trump supporter, and then I appreciate what the president is doing, and I am on board for and advocate for almost all

of his agenda. I mean, I really pretty much all the agenda. I think the Trump has an incredible energy and dynamism, and it's apparent all the time. And he never looks like Bernie looks like at any moment, you know, he's just gonna, like need a nap in a sippy cup. I mean, that's just the sense you get. Biden is like the old guy that I've been trying to get him to take a nap and he's yelling about how he's not tired yet. You know that That's kind of what you get from Joe Biden. These guys are too

old AOC Buddha Judge, this is the future. This is the future of the Democratic Party. I also have to wonder if Buddha Judge is gonna leave Indiana and just decide he's going to run somewhere else because really what he the much safer play him or the much easier play for him down the line would be to go to a safe blue place, safe blue state and become

a congressman and then congressman or run for Senate. I mean, look at Hillary Clinton did right Once you had that level of national recognition, Hillary just showed up in New York and became a center from New York. Wasn't a New Yorker never, but yeah, it's just made it happen. I think you'll see that with Buddha Judge, because he's also gonna you know, you're already seeing the future of the Democratic Party is so even if we defeat Bernie

this time around, unless it is a crushing defeat. That's why I think that Bernie against Trump is probably a better thing for the country because we can see that and have the argument if Bernie loses in the primary to i mean Biden or Bloomberg. You got to think that the supporters that Sanders have, they're just going to think that, and they did get screwed over by the DNC.

That's a real thing. Once again. The media as well, not as supportive of Sanders as they are of other candidates, and so at that point they'll just look for a new figure to rally around for, you know, for Sandersism, you know, for to be a sander Nista. Sanders will become the Lenin, if you will, of the American socialist movement, and they'll be looking for Stalin. I mean, which shit, I would not really stolid you get what I'm saying.

I was just playing out that analogy there. Although I will talk to you later in the show about some some troubling thoughts I have about wokeism and what our future really is as a country. I saw a very interesting piece on that one. Let's get to some of the other important moment, because I'm gonna spend all data down the debate. You didn't if you if you watched it, you've already seen a lot of or you already know some of what I'm gonna be pointing out to you.

And I think there are other things to talk about, including Roger Stone verdict I'm sorry, sentencing. We already have the verdict, obviously, the sentencing of Roger Stone, the verdict on his sentence. You could say, here is what I think was the single you know the single moment that Mayor Pete had where he also went after Sanders and was somewhat memorable, and that he's pointing out, like, guys, this, this person's a socialist. This is the Democratic Party. You

got a socialist running for president who's winning. Right now, play three. We could wake up two weeks from today, the day after Super Tuesday, and the only candidates left standing will be Bernie Sanders and Mike Bloomberg, the two most polarizing figures on this stage, and most Americans don't see where they fit. If they've got to choose between a socialist who thinks that capitalism is the root of all evil and a billionaire who thinks that money ought

to be the root of all power. Let's put forward somebody who actually lives and works in a middle class neighborhood in an industrial Midwestern city. Let's put forward somebody who's actually a Democrat, actually a Democrat. That's a clear swype ed Bernie Sanders, and I think it should be a more effective one. Except the Democratic Party really now is whether they will admit it or not, whether they will accept it or not, the Democratic Party is increasingly

a socialist party. That's where this is now that that's where their policies are directed. They are in the business of bringing socialism to the United States, and that's where I think Bloomberg's strongest points last night were just you guys are crazy, right, you will understand that. I mean, you know, the Sanders Warren Boodha judge on policy, Booda judge seems you know, he's very polished and former McKinsey

consultants and all the rest. He seems like a guy that would be reasonable based on tone, based on policy, is not even the least bit reasonable. And when he does, when he does his Pope Pete routine, I lose my mind. Bloomberg was trying to just yell this. I think he's trying to do the Democrat. He thinks he's doing the Democratic Party a huge favor, if anything, just by stopping Bernie Sanders from being the nominee. I do believe that he if Biden, let's say, we're all kind of counting

Biden now this one. I've been counting him out all along, but I'll just say it is too early, based on numbers and based on polling to say Biden's a no go there's no doubt in my mind that Bloomberg will will put his cash behind a Biden candidacy to help defeed Trump. So you got to remember that means that Biden's effectively going to be running with an unlimited checkbook, and Biden will be able to, you know, the whole all the time, spend fundraising everything else. That it's going

to change the whole game. So we have to take very seriously that Donald Trump is going to have some real competition here. It's going to be closer than maybe we had anticipated, and it was going to and it's always going to be close because of the way the

system currently is in the polarization in our politics. But Bloomberg is trying to warn them, you put a socialist up there, guys, it's not going to be good play for I don't think there's any chance of the senator beating President Trump if you don't start out by saying, I've got to written sixty million people, I'm going to take away the insurance plan that they love. That's just not a ways that you go and start building the coalition that the Sanders camp thinks that they can do.

I don't think there's any chance whatsoever, and if he goes and is the candidate, we will have Donald Trump for another four years. I think he's probably right, But I know some very smart conservatives who would argue till they're blue in the face that Bernie Sanders is the only one who will really be able to defeat Donald Trump. Until you run the experiment, you don't know what the

results are. I fall in the Bloomberg analysis here on that side, I think that he's correct that Bernie Sanders gets crushed because Americans don't really want a socialist to be the president, and Bernie Sanders, unlike much of the Democratic Party, is premised on telling people things when you want them to vote for you, and then not really believing those things or acting on those things the moment that the votes are cast and now they're in power.

Democrats do a lot of head fakes. They do a lot of disingenuous this is who we are outreach when

it's really not who they are. You know, a lot of the ways that they position different candidates, especially in states that are that are purple or where there's a large base of Republican voters, is to allow them to just be close enough to close enough to the mainstream that they can get away with an election time and then all of a sudden they're in lockstep with Nancy Pelosi or in lockstep with Chuck Schumer on all legislative issues. That's very very that's a very common theme among among

the Democrats. Sanders dispenses with that, and he's like, no, I'm a socialist, like really an actual capital s oh c h. Speaking of having so surely speaking of having a difficult time with trivia and spelling and getting things right. Um, I'm just kidding. Bernie Sanders obviously knows how to spell socialist. He is a socialist. He's probably got a tattooed somewhere on his you know, on his arm or something. Senator

klobaschar to Buddha Judge. This was it after Kloba Shar forgot in an interview who the President of Mexico was. Please play twenty one. But you're staking your candidacy on your Washington experience. You're on the committee that oversees border security, You're on the committee that does trade. You're literally in part of the committee that's overseeing these things. And we're not able to speak to literally the first thing about the politics of the country ourselves. Are you trying to

say that I'm dumb? Are you mocking me here? I made an error. People sometimes forget names. I am the one that has number one, has the experience based on passing over one thing. If I could respond, this was a pretty big a colligation. He's basically saying that I don't have the experience to be president of the United States. I have passed over one hundred bills as the lead Democrat since being in the US Senate. I am the one, not you, that has won statewide in congressional district after

congressional district. And I will say, when you tried in Indiana, Pete to run what happened to you? You lost by over twenty points to someone who later lost to my friend Joe Donnelly. So don't tell me about experience. The gloves came off both sides there, the gloves came off. I was surprised Democrat debate made for good viewing. You're in the Freedom Heart. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Help you've heard what his defense was, I'd been nice

to some women. That just doesn't cut it. The mayor has to stand up on his record and what we need to know is exactly what's lurking out there. He has gotten some number of women, dozens who knows, to sign non disclosure agreements both for sexual harassment and for gender discrimination in the workplace. So, mister mayor, are you willing to release all of those women from those non disclosure agreements so we can hear their side of the story.

We have a very few non disclosure agreements. How many? Let me finish? How many is there? None of them accused me of doing anything other than maybe they didn't like a joke I told, And let me just put and let me put. These agreements between two parties that wanted to keep it quiet, and that's up to them. They signed those agreements and we'll live with it. So wait, wait, media is all over this. I know we got to this topic earlier in the hour, but I meant to

play that sound by free and I skiped over. That was where she really that was where she really went for it. Yeah, that was where Tomahawk went swinging. She decided that she was going to go after Bloomberg there, and he didn't sound particularly good at all in the defense. No question's like you know, helped people. They signed the agreements. And but let's also remember Bloomberg runs a huge company, and there's a lot of people that work in that company,

and we know that he's made crude craft chokes. We also know that Bernie Sanders wrote some bizarre stuff about women back in the day. I just don't know how much anyone's really going to care about this. The media cares about it tremendously, and they're viewing this as the huge achilles heel that was exposed during the debate by Bloomberg.

During the debate, When it comes from Bloomberg, I think that everyone will forget this one in a day or two, because that attack really only works on Republicans, you know, with mid Romney and his binders full of women. And I don't think that it as strong as the Democrat media likes to pretend it is, because they're also full of political correctness and wokeness and all the rest of it. I don't think they have a good gauge of what

the damage is from that. But we'll see. We'll see that that was Bloomberg's worst moment, though I wonder if that was when it ever Oh everybody, I was wondering if Minnie Mike was gonna scurry off stage left, so we'll see. Thanks for listening to The bus Essence Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app for wherever you get your podcasts. Roger Stone got forty months in federal prison. Three years, four months all together. All right,

let's let's dive into this one together, my friend. Shall We know that the Libs are going to say this is not justice, and not because they think that Roger Stone is innocent or should get any mercy. They really convinced themselves that, you know, he should go to prison for like seven eight years federal prison. That's a long time to spend in prison. You know, think about your own life, go back in time eight years and think about everything that's transpired between now and then you spend

all that in a sell for eight years. I mean, that's what Blagoyevitch just served. And he is a changed, changed man, that is for sure. He has been through some stuff. Roger Stone going to prison for over three years is in my opinion, which I guess I share with you freely because this is an opinion and analysis

show is really is really a travesty. I mean This is a guy who if it weren't for the frenzy around Russia collusion and the hatred of Trump and all this other crazy stuff, this could have even been deferred prosecution. In my opinion, this could have been deferred prosecutions. When you go and you meet with the prosecutors, they're like, look, we've got you. We know you're guilty, and you're going to sign some stuff, but we're not gonna We're not

gonna go forward with this. But if you do anything else, we retain the right to throw this in at you and the other thing that you do. So it's essentially like a warning. And by the way, I think that deferred prosecution for nonviolent offenders should be much more common than it is for a lot of a lot of

financial crimes and things like this. I think that especially, you know, if you don't have a person who can sit in a courtroom and convince you that either he or she or you know, their counsel, convince you that there's a human being who has really been hurt by something that has been done, or the government can't sit down and tell you, you know, this was really important and this was really bad. This thing that was done to the government putting people in prison. You gotta wonder

why exactly we're doing that. I mean, you got to ask yourself what are we doing here? So that's what I would say. Roger Stone, whom I've interviewed before and I think is a very interesting character, and I feel badly too, because you know, he's he's theatrical, and I think he got a little ahead of his skis on this one and didn't realize quite the viciousness of the people that he was dealing with with these special with the special counsel prosecutors, who were Democrat operatives, that's what

they are. I mean, they came into this not looking for justice but to destroy Trump and everyone around him. And fortunately for Trump, he didn't do anything. And he's also the president, so they couldn't get him on anything that was a true violation, a true crime, and they

couldn't even get him on a real process crime. Thankfully, the President did not testify to them because they would have tried to trip him up on some minor facto it And we know there's no sense of balance, there's no sense of justice between the left and the right anymore on these issues. If you're a Republican and you law, you go to prison. It's terrible, It's super important, and we should all condemn the person. If you're a Democrat and you lie, was it really a lie? Does it

really matter? Did we really need to hear more about this? I think we should just move on, you know, like move on dot org an organization started to get us. You just move on past Bill Clinton lying under oath and being impeached and the whole thing. So you know,

that's they play the move on game. Meanwhile, we have to look at this and say, people keep claiming that Trump is an authoritarian, and yet all I see are person after person who signed up to help Trump with is incredibly effective and an excellent administration, which is what I would say we have seen for now going into the fourth year of this Trump presidency, that people that

went in to do that, they get crushed. They are put through the ringer, bankrupted, put in prison, prosecuted, investigate all these things happen to them. And Democrat after Democrat who either separate Trump Russia collusion stuff, breaks the law Hillary, or in the course of trying to destroy Trump, broke the law, did things that were unethical, did things that should be punished. We're told nope, sorry, there's there's some interpretation of the statute that's not that's not written in

the words of the law. But we libs can find some way to you know, it's it's in there. It's an implied change to the statute because we say so, I mean, that's what they end up doing. This is what they did with Hillary in the emails, Hillary in the email situation. There's no way that you can believe the word reckless has any meaning when it comes to handling classified information and not think the Secretary of State using a private, unsecured email account for classified information storage

and transfer is not reckless. Over one hundred counts or one hundred instances of that you cannot make if reckless is a word. With meeting that was reckless. But James Comey assures us that nobody would have been prosecuted under that. I ask you this, who committed a bigger offense, who put the country at greater risk, who showed a greater willingness to ignore, ignore the gravity of what the government's

interests were. A sitting secretary of State who sets up a private email server allows for the trafficking of some very highly classified information on that email server, is sending that to other people on their emails, and then tries to cover it up, tries to destroy evidence, smashes hard drives, uses, these hard drive wipe programs, all of which all this information you should have been her subpoena. And that's what we found out of Hillary Clinton, that this had all happened.

Do you look at Roger Stone, what exactly is the line to Congress? Which I'm sorry, Why was James Clapper able to say that there was no mass surveillance going on of a of Americans? How I is he able to say that? James Clapper legally could have said when asked Congress, I cannot discuss that in this venue, and he'd be fine. That's you're allowed to do that. That's protecting executive branch equities and classified information in a public forum. But are you allowed to lie to Congress because you

think that you're doing that other thing? Where does that? Where does that stop and start? That's what I would want to know. Clapper's not getting prosecuted line to Congress. That's the charge that they're hitting Roger Stone with and witness tampering, you know, Stone was being an idiot. You know,

it was dumb. It was a dumb thing to First of all, he's an idiot because you never put these things in writing, all right, Not that I'm trying to help you guys with your witness tab break, but you never text someone or DM them anything that could, under any circumstances be used by a lawyer a prosecutor against you. Do it over the phone. Now, that wouldn't have saved Blagoyevich, but at least you got a chance. If you're putting it, if you're typing it out, then then you're going to

be in an interrupt spot. But the two tiered justice system at work once again here what the Rogerstone sentencing is is troubling. And Democrats like this. They're not they

don't feel icky about any of this. They think that, yeah, it's totally fair that Paul Manafort was sentenced to not not only a lengthy prison term, but was put in solitary confinement by this judge, Amy Amy Berman Jackson, the same judge overseeing the Rogerstone trial put Manafort in solitary You see, this is where the swamp is a much more important part of the story than people realize you have in DC some swampy judges, swampy prosecutors, and a

swampy jury pool. Because Washington, d c. Has become a stronghold of the left. It votes ninety five percent Democrat in presidential elections. It's not a place where if you're associated with Trump, you're gonna get a fair trial and anything having to do with the administration. That's where you're going to get this trial. And maybe some of it will be in the Eastern District of Virginia and Alexandria, but you're going to get it in the DC Federal Court.

So this judge already showed that there's an animus against Trump by by putting Rogers, I mean Roger Stone, Paul Menaford, and solitary confinement. That's that's crazy, that's crazy. We should all be able to recognize that as insane. But she did. She did. They also sent remember this, the FBI did a no knock pre five am or pre dawn, I should say, raid on Manaford's house, the same thing if

they ended up doing to Roger Stone. Does anyone think that that would have happened to any of the Democrats that have been involved did anyone show up with long guns to James Comey's house or McCabe's house and say, you know you're under arrest. Nope, there's a pattern here. They say. Trump is the authoritarian, but authoritarians don't allow people in their orbit to get destroyed by the government that the authoritarian is presiding over because the opposition to

that authoritarian doesn't like his people. This is the This is like saying, oh, you know, Trump is the king and he lets all of his courtiers just go get thrown in the deepest, darkest dungeon by the royal prosecutor, because that makes no sense. Right, If you're the king, if you're so powerful and you get whatever you want, you're not going to allow the people who work for you, who are your close advisors, that you care about, that

you like, that you have relationship. Now Stone doesn't really fit in that category, but he's considered a long time Trump advisor. You're not going to let them get destroyed

by the government that you have power over him. The President said that he's the chief law enforcement officer, and there was all this hahaha from stupid journalist because journalists now journalists and are all all just concerned with virtue signaling, wokeness, what their Twitter game is like, and what they look like on MSNBC, and you know, that's that's what it's all about. What other journalists think of them as the

prime motivation for what most of their work is. It's not being learned, it's not being particularly insightful, or it's certainly not being wise. It's a vapid and create a vapid profession. And the worst are the TV journalists. I mean they're they're actually the worst because most of them are just you know, I'm just rating off our prompt ard, I don't know anything. A bunch of idiots. So Roger

Stone's going away. I mean this under the circumstances, I think I probably said on the show, although I don't want to start saying I've made predictions that I didn't make. There are some other radio hosts who do that. I try to keep it real. I think that I said it would be I've definitely said to other people that it would be about three years. Two to three years sounded about right to me for what the sentence would be. That means he's serving. Remember there's no parole, he's serving

the full sentence. He's going to go away unless there's another possibility here. And you all know where I'm going on this one. Who wants to play pardon Roger Stone? That could be next. And I think that I think that a pardon would be I will say, I think a pardon would send the wrong message. You know Stone, what he did was buffoonish and um and I you know this is where this is where being a real human being that cares about other human beings and having

a sense of justice matters. You know, I don't want I don't think Jesse's small Let, for example, despite all of his vanity and stupidity and duplicity and everything else. All right, people are rust you small. Let you go to prison for fifteen years, Jesse small Let should you know, probably have to spend you know, two weeks in county jail and one hundred thousand dollars fine, but admit his

guilt and apologize public. I mean, that's that's getting to what I think justice would be for the whole thing. Oh and of course, pay the whatever the fees were that were run up by the City of Chicago for the hoaks. You should pay that. Maybe spent a week or two in a you know, county lock up. Nothing too scary, and you have to admit that he's guilty. I mean, that's what I think would be. That's a fair punishment, right, I'm not saying that people shouldn't be

punished at all. That's a fair punishment. Roger Stone. If I were in charge of this and I felt like he had to be prosecuted, I would say, Okay, look, we're gonna we're gonna ask for no jail time, but you're gonna have a felony on your record, and you know, don't ever if you do anything else, we're sending you away and we're gonna give you We're gonna give you the upper end of whatever the guidelines are of that offense, because we're gonna take this into account. That seems to

me to be fair. Nine years is crazy for what I mean, that's just I mean, the fact that that was even raised by these prosecutors just goes to show you their Democrat, their Democrat scalphunters and they're trying to take down anybody near Trump. And that was bar. Attorney General Barr was absolutely correct to bring to rein that in bring that back a bit and Okay, so three three plus years. It's harsh. It's you know, it's harsh, but it's about what I would have expected under the circumstances.

He should get a new trial if he wants one, because the jury foreman is an anti Trumper. This brings you back to the swamp situation of DC, where if you're a Trump associate, you can't get a fair trial in the People's Republic of Washington, DC. You can't everyone in DC. And this is one thing about that place. I'll say, you know, I'm here in New York City and I'm on the subway four times a day now, so I'm spending a lot of time, you know, out and about in the city in contact with all kinds

of folks. And the thing I like about in New York is that, yeah, this place is full of Libs, but there's some conservatives hiding here and there. It's full of Libs, but everyone's just in the hustle trying to make money to pay the outrageous rents here and feed themselves in their families, and they're focused more on that. In DC, it's a lot of you know, what are your politics, sir? It's like the first question people will ask you. It's much more focused on it for obvious reasons.

And that also means that people feel very connected to their their political affiliation and if they have the opportunity to be a hero to their peer group by crushing somebody who's even associated with Donald Trump, DC natives love to do that. That makes them very happy, very excited. And that's why the foreman on the Roger Stone jury trial is just an indicative of a broader problem there. And Stone should get a new trial, but does he want one? Is he really going to get a much

better sentence from another judge? Does he want to go through this again? Does he want to go through the expense again? And I don't know, but Judge Jackson here just decided to go forward with us. He doesn't care. He's like, yeah, we're gonna do the sentencing. We're not even going to look into this form in situation. We're just going to go forward. So I think that there's a clear bias and one of the they talk so much on the left about our sacred institutions and our democracy.

It's a reminder for us that all this stuff, this

stuff only works. You know, this government we have only works if we can agree on some very basic thing, is like the plain meaning of language, particularly in statutes, but the plain meaning of language that words do have meaning that we can all understand that it doesn't change just based upon what someone wants it to be, and that respecting the system means respecting it when outcomes happen that you don't like and still saying, Okay, I didn't get what I wanted, but it was within this say,

within the framework of what our government is supposed to do. Libs have abandoned that. They've abandoned it whatever, whatever it is, whether it's the electoral College or Supreme Court judges, or you name it. If they're not getting what they want, they want to change the rules or scrap the whole thing and do something else. That's their approach. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.

Something else that I don't want to leave off the table here, my friends, we were told for the last week or so that the Attorney General of the United States should resolve you must resign, sir. We were told that, we were told that he was in Trump's pocket, that he was destroying the office of the Attorney General with his corruption, and yet this judge, who was no friend of Republicans or Trump. Well, that's clear. This judge gave a sentence that was right in line with the reduced

request from the DOJ. So was Attorney General bar right all along? Yeah? Yeah he was. But what do you think is going to happen now? For all the libs out there, all the people in media, look oh the Attorney general. Look how he intervened and he did all this terrible stuff. So what really happened now that we have the full story is the Attorney General had people who are his employees at the Department of Justice shift around. Remember, the judge can impose whatever sentence she wants, right, the

judge can say it's more, it's less. This judge just happened to give a sentence right in the bullseye of the reduced request from DJ. Is that because is a Trump bought two or was that realistic? And therefore the initial request from the Russia collusion deranged prosecutors that ask for seven to nine years was outrageous. Now we know

the answer. Who looks smarter those of us who supported the reduced sentencing request and said that Bill Barr had done nothing wrong, or the people that are saying, oh, the Republic is in flames because look what they're bailing out another Trump Ally, all that noise you heard from people in the media, you're just partisan morons. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get

your podcasts. I think Internet culture can often be very toxic, and whether we are cognizance of it or not, it nearly always concentrates on women, people of color, were people, and we experience the brunt of it. And I think, you know, I think that to a certain extent, you know, we have to always rejects hate, reject vitriol, and denounce that kind of behavior. Also, you know, we also know the amount of anonymous activity that happens on the Internet,

and that simply is difficult. It is difficult to control when you have like a you know, a a Twitter handle with a bunch of numbers on it, with two followers that are lobbying vitriol at you. We don't know where that comes from, but I know that it doesn't cost on enough paint to try and stop it. Yeah, I think he works very hard. I think we send out so we send out messaging emails and you know what it's I've been subject to a lot of this stuff from all sorts of the all sorts of pockets

from the Internet. I some CBP officers targeted me on Facebook for attacks when I want to visit the border. This is aoc on the Bernie bros. Who have been getting more attention recently because other Democrats are realizing, Wow, Bernie has a lot of psychopath supporters, a lot of them.

Some of this came out when James O'Keefe did his Project Veritas videos and you had people talking about rolling out the guillotine and how you know, we're going to eat the rich, and that was of course dismissed as just the rantings of a few unimportant campaign employees and that really, you know, Bernie is all about love and rejects hate. This is one of the constant Democrat refrains that I find the most troubling because it's so untrue,

and yet they believe it. They really think that they are not hateful, even though they will direct at the present of the United States the following accusations that he is and you know that I'm not exaggerating any of this. This has all been said by prominent voices on the left, not repudiated. People don't shout down other Democrats and other leftist when they say these things. They've called the president a traitor, a white nationalist, a racist, a rapist, demented,

like actually out of his mind? What am I leaving? Oh, of course, corrupt, and all these other things that are lesser. But when you're calling people things like a traitor and a rapist and you have no evidence for either of those things, no evidence to a reasonable person for either of those things at all. I mean, if you believe like sweat Nick about Kavanaugh, well then you'll believe anything. And you're not very bright, and you could believe that,

you know, I had dinner with Elvis last night. But people, unfortunately this country, do believe stuff like that. A lot of Democrats do believe things that are quite viously false and still think they're very bright and very sophisticated. That's a big part of being a Democrat, as you're sophisticated and you're thinking, even though you believe that you know Anderson Cooper and Chris Cuomo and Don Lemon and who's that. Who's that guy? I was gonna say, Phil Donahue, that's

an old talk show. Who's the Irish guy on Forgetting? They know, stop the hammering? That guy on Stop the hammer You know he's the guy from Boston. Anyway, he's on MSNBC. I can't remember his name right now. Chris o'donald, Lawrence O'Donnell. That's gonna say Chris O'Donnell. He was in a very bad Batman movie back in the day. For those of you who have seen some of the bad Batman movies, they're almost worth watching just because they're so terrible.

The ones that were in between the Michael Keaton era and the Christian Bale era, there were some Batman movies that even even they wish they could forget. So they think, I know, I got diverted there for a moment. They think that the left thinks that they don't don't hate people, but they say these things about Trump, and they also say that if you support Trump, you are therefore supporting these things, and so it's fair to say these things

about you too. And I mean, I can tell you that liberals love to whine about the mean things said about them on the Internet, and they claim that it's because they fall into marginalized groups whatever, whichever specific marginalized group. And I can see and tell you, I mean, the things that far left wing people right and say to me on the Internet are are beyond appalling. I mean, it's a combination of disturbing and really sad at the

same time. And I don't even get the worst of it, because I mean, I have I have friends againservative media who they just they're numb to all the death threats at this point. They're not just death threats against them, but death threats against their families and people are completely insane. And I think that there should be much more stringent enforcement of uh, you know, communicating an interstate threat against somebody, and I think that that should be something that's taken

really seriously. Unfortunately it's not usually taken very seriously. But for liberals to claim in the current environment that they reject hate, their entire platform right now is really about believing that everyone who supports Trump is hateful, and they don't see how that is in and of itself a hateful position. They don't care that many people that support Trump just wanted an end to politicians talking to us

all like we're robots. They don't care that. A lot of people who support Trump just think that we should have national sovereignty and a secure border. And the American people, as seen through their legislature that does have laws that say that this is not okay. The American people should have a say in who comes and goes from their country, and the laws are the way that you can enact that. Enforcing those laws, or that you just want to robust economy,

or you want someone to stand up to China and trade. No, they tell their followers. The Democrat narrative is that if you support or Trump, you are in bedwidth effectively a white nationalist, a neo Nazi, and they think that there's not going to be really severe long term consequences from this. They think that they're the ones that reject hate. Here, by the way, is how Bernie Sanders responds. He responded the last night of the debates age about the Bernie Bros.

Who are notorious. I mean, for example, the group on the internet, the Young Turks. Some of the worst people that are in media work for that organization, and they're Bernie Bros. I mean, they're they're Bernie people. Some of the nastiest libs you'll come across on Twitter are are

Bernie people. And I don't think that's an accident. I think it's because Bernie Sanders appeals to envy and the a combination of revolutionary sanctimoniousness and revolutionary nihilism, like tear it all down, because we are the saviors we've been waiting for, and if you get in a way, we'll

crush you, because we're going to bring about utopia. That standard socialist thinking stretching back for now over one hundred and fifty years, they've always thought that anybody who wasn't with the program was an enemy of the class based warfare that they want to engage in, and that so that's not really new or different anyway. Bernie Sanders, though, in confronted with this, I thought this was really interesting.

Just shows you the depth of some of the delusions that Democrats still hold to, some of the depth of the narrative that they still cling to and believe about Russia collusion. Here is what Bernie said about his Bernie Brows being a bunch of psychos that harass people online. Play twelve. Let me say something else about this not being too paranoid. All of us remember two thousand and sixteen, and what we meant, what we remember is efforts by Russians and others to try to interfere in our election

and divide us. I'm not saying that's happening, but it would not shock me. I saw some of those tweets regarding the Culinary Workers Union. I mean, I'm not saying that the Russians. You know, we're pretending to be my supporters, but I'm not saying that this is This is now though, the the end result of the media telling everybody for three years in this country that the Russians stole the election, and you know, the Russian Russian hackers are basically hiding

under your bed at night. You should be terrified about what the Russians are up to all the time. Russians are stealing our democracy, Russians are doing this, Russians are doing that. Just just shocking stuff for a presidential contender to say. But they will continue to say this. They will stick to this script because otherwise they'd have to deal with is the Democratic Party increasingly embracing hateful politics.

I know we're a very polarized, very divisive time. But the people that I know who are Trump supporters, they're strong defenders of Trump, but they want things to continue in this country, or they support things that would be good for all Americans, you know, that would actually be

objectively helpful for the American people. I know a lot of Libs that think that policies that at least half the country dramatically don't agree with should be rammed down our throat by the force of government because it's the right thing for them to do. They say, that feels a little bit different, And I know that this is all about you know, where you sit is where you stand, and there are differences here of perspective. And maybe if I were a leftist, I would think that the right

was trying to do this. I think that that's just not really seeing what has happened where the Democratic Party. Trump has run a presidency that is largely in line with his style. Is different, his tone, his messaging, but his actual implementation as president has been well in line with what you would consider to be traditional GOP norms. There's really very little that he's done that is outside Remember the secure Fence active I think it was two

thousand and six was bipartisan. Both parties in Congress said yeah, we should build a fence, and then they backed off it. Now building a fense makes you, you know what till of the hun Amy Klobischer doesn't know who that is, by the way, you know, now now doing these things that used to be considered bipartisan, it makes you a terrible person. Well why is that? It's because the Democratic Party has shifted so far left? Why is James Carville going on TV? I mean people say it's because he

wants to be relevant. I think Carville is happy, you know, hanging out in New Orleans and doing whatever he's doing down there. But why is he going on TV? And the Democratic Parties lost its mind? And Bernie Sanders, as a socialist should not be presis the United States? Because they have gone they've gone nuts as a party. I mean they've they've gone far, far, too too long in one direction. And so that's now where where I think we need to understand. Countries go through periods where a

political party, you know, we did. I'm not saying we're fighting a civil war now or anything that's gonna happen, but I mean we fought a civil war. You look in history, countries where there are political parties and you think that it's a vibrant democracy, they can go bad, and they can go bad quickly. And some political parties that you wouldn't have thought that you would if you were a betting man, you wouldn't have said, yeah, they're

going to be running the show there. They end up in charge and you know, maybe the country eventually comes back to some degree of normalcy, but they can go through a very dark, dangerous, destructive period as a result of one party losing its way. I think the Democratic Party has lost its way. I don't think that it's safe for America to be entrusted to these people at all. I think that they are very destructive. And I wanted

to share with you there's a letter. I'll get to it in a few moments, but I think that they've reached a point now where then don't even know how to work with the other side on a lot of this stuff. And the younger end of the Democratic Party, when you look at Bernie supporters and other the younger end of the Democratic Party is where the most fervor is. You know, boomers will say what they have to say to be that's why you know, Biden and Kolobuscher and

whoever they'll say. Even though I think Biden is technically he's pre booming, is he? I think he's above the boomer generation age right or whatever? He's not the greatest general? What's between? What's between boomers and the great No, I guess boomers come after the greatest generation, So he must be a boomer. But he's an old boomer. But they'll say what they have to say in order to be

in good standing with the Democratic Party. The younger end of the political spectrum these days is frightening, is frightening, and that's why what you see going on with college campuses and what you see happening in much of the media is I think a harbinger of things to come,

in a very, very troubling one. So I want to talk to you more about what what is the youth support of Bertie Sanders and really the youth direction of the American left telling us about what our future is going to be like in this country because we are we are in a new place now. We have not seen this before, certainly since the nineteen sixties. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the buck Sexton Show podcast.

It's the amount of money that you have can force the DNC to change their rules, but the DMC would not change their rules for Corey Booker, Julean Castro, Kamala Harris. That is a that is an actualization of power. And

we all know how I feel about billionaires. I don't think that in a place where sixty percent of Americans can't even you know, make more than forty thousand dollars a year, that the presence of a billionaire who largely makes their money off of businesses underpaying their workers, like Walmart, like Amazon, like so on, should exact she does. She has an economics degree and learn nothing. Apparently she does

not understand how business works. I left out that There was a pretty good moment last night when Bloomberg got to say, who else on the stage has started their business? Of all the Democrat candidates answers, none of them. They're all just politicians. They're all completely invested in one thing, one thing only, the brand of ME I II MEM. That is where those Democrats come down when you look

at their background, their experience in the private sector. They think private sector is be in office for twenty years and then if somebody ghost write a book about what you did in office for twenty years and go get fancy speeches that somebody else wrote for you at one hundred thousand dollars a pop. I mean, that's technically the private sector, but it doesn't give you any any actual knowledge of how to thrive and operate in the private sector.

And you know, AOC I keep saying, we're going to be talking more about the youth of the Democratic Party or the younger end of it, you know, gen gen Z, gen Y, gen X, and millennial millennials. Obviously I left millennials out. The younger out of the Democratic Party is the more radical end, and we would like to believe that they as they pay more taxes and learn more, as they get older, they'll become at least more moderate,

if not more conservative. I'm not sure given the way that the structure around them is being set up right now. The left wing, the left wing takeover of much of corporate culture that has gone on now and certainly the corporate the left wing takeover of Hollywood and of the

news media. They're churning out people that are going to institutions that you know, I talked people that went to my college, for example, you know when it was all male, which was as recently as the nineteen eighties, and there was still some it was a liberal place. All colleges are a little bit liberal whatever, but there was still some sense of traditional values and norms that would come across. There are more professors that would share those those feelings.

Now these places, colleges, universities, high schools, public schools, they are indoctrination centers for armies of little socialists who mouth platitudes like AOC does. That she has no idea. If a business just becomes rich by underpaying its workers, then all businesses would just underpay all their workers, and you know, nobody would have no workers would stay with them, and they wouldn't make any money. I mean, she has no

understanding of wages and what prices are. That prices are set by the market by individuals making free choices about what they want to do, and that the only information we have to understand where those prices should be, you know, are set by the market. Otherwise it's just people throwing darts at a board with disastrous results. She does not understand that, and what's worse, she doesn't care that She doesn't understand that, and that's why we've gotten to this

point where Bernie Sanders is the Democrat front runner. That should be deeply troubling to all of us an intellectual level as well as a political level. Thanks for listening to The bus Esson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. This came across my radar. I want to share it with you. It's a piece in the American Conservative called Postcard from pre Totalitarian America. That's a you know, kenchy

kenchy headline. I guess it just got published. Yeah, it just published this week. And this is how it goes. Last year, I spoke to a Soviet born scholar who teaches in an American public university. I'm using a quote from our forthcoming from our discussion in my forthcoming book, Live Not by Lies. This morning she sent me this email,

which I reproduce with her permission. I want to read to you from this email because it really does get at what I'm saying to you, which is, even if we defeat Sanders socialism in either the primary or the general election, there's something very wrong with the American left, particularly among the young today, that the virus of socialist authoritarianism has spread in a way that I'm not sure this is going to be a one off. I don't think that Bernie Sanders as a socialist nominee. This isn't

the last time we're going to see this. If anything, Democratic Party the momentum, but for the last twenty years, has been has been consistently pushing in this direction. Certainly Obamaism was far lean. Obama, people forget, was the most left wing senator in the Democratic Party by voting record

when he was elected President the United States. So we already elected the most left wing guy in the Senate by voting record who was a Democrat, and I think at the time, technically Bernie Sanders may have been an independent, but so he was either number one or number two,

all right. He was a very far left guy when he was a Senator, and then he became president United States and did a lot to push forward policies that were really bridging mechanisms between the more free market and capitalist oriented society we have been living in and an

increasingly statist and socialist one. This is the letter that the Rod Dreyer wrote or that he reprinted rather from a Soviet born scholar about what she's seeing among the youth on the left today, youth really in general, because

most of them are leftists. And this gets to also to I think the Bernie Brow mentality, where you have these twenty five and thirty year olds who are big Bernie standers supporters, who are just maniacal about how anybody who stands in Bernie's way, even Democrats, to stand in Bernie's way. They shouldn't be convinced. They should just be destroyed, they should be shoved aside. They're a part of the problem.

Here is what was written here. I know from your blog that the work on your new book is going well, and I'm glad, because boy, it is so needed. I'm observing some disturbing developments on my campus and we are really not one of those Wokester schools for spoiled brats one normally associates with this kind of thing. This academic year, I've had an opportunity to work with some early career academics. These are newly minted PhDs that are in their first

year on the tenure track. What's really scary is that they sincerely believe all the woke dogma. Older people, those in their forties, fifties, or sixties, might parrot the woke mantras because it's what everybody in academia does and you have to survive. But the younger generation actually believes it. All transwomen are women. Black students fail calculus because there are no calculus professors who quote look like them. Whiteness is the most oppressive thing in the world. The US

is the most evil country in history. Anybody who votes Republican is a RACI. Everybody who goes to church is a bigot. But the hijab is deeply liberating. I gently mocked some of this stuff, like we normally do among older academics, and two of the younger academics in the group I supervise actually cried because they believe all this so deeply, and I'd even say fanatically that they couldn't comprehend. Why wasn't taking it seriously? The fanatical glimmer in their

eyes really scared me. Back in the USSR in the nineteen seventies and the nineteen eighties, nobody believed the dogma. People repeated the ideological mantras for cynical reasons to get advanced in their careers or get food packages. Many did it just to protect their kids, but nobody sincerely believed it. That is what ultimately saved us. As soon as the regime weakened a bit, it was doomed because there were

no since your believers anymore. Everybody who did take the dogma seriously belong to the generation of my great grandparents in the US, though the generation of the fanatical believers is only now growing up and coming into its prime. We'll have to wait until their grandkids grow up to see a generation that will be so fed up with the dogma that it will embrace freedom of thought and expression.

But that's a long way away in the future. I'm mentoring a group of young scholars in the humanities to help them do research, and I'm starting to hate this task. Young scholars, almost without exception, think that scholarship is entirely

about repeating woke slogans completely uncritically. Again, this is different from the USSR, where scholars peppered their writing with the slogans, but always took great pride in trying to sneak in some real thinking and real analysis behind the required ideological driven every Soviet scholar starting from the nineteen seventies was a dissonant at heart because everybody knew that the ideology was rotten. All of this is sad and very scary.

I never thought I'd experience anything worse, anything more intellectually stifling than the USSR of its last two decades of existence. But now I do see something worse. The book you are writing is very important. I hope that many people hear your message. So we'll have to have mister dreer On to talk about this book Live not by lies. It sounds very interesting to me. But for somebody who lived for decades in the Soviet Union to come out and note this difference, I think this is something a

lot more people need to hear. That the wokeness that I often make fun of and then you understand to be intellectual rot and that it is just rivel, and that the origins of these ideological points of view are always thinking. Our systems that have already been tried and failed are beliefs that have been shown to be lacking, lacking in terms of nurturing the human spirit, lacking in terms of creating good societies that people want to live in.

This is all rooted in in lies, in untruth, and this is now becoming so commonplace among younger people in particular, that we have to wonder what the future will really look like. Do we think for example, that someone who is twenty five or twenty right now, let's say twenty for kids who are in college age, that really believes some of the things that this professor laid out there,

like trans women or women. If you if you've gone around mouthing that slogan, which is which is absurd, right, It's just it's not trans women or trans women that could be that you can say is true. You can talk about that, fine, but trans women are not just women,

because then what are women? I mean, you get into the definitions here, and you understand that there's an intentional perversion of language that's taking place and a changing of language to go along with it, whereby now plural pronouns are required for individuals and the gender issue by the way, you know, conservatives spend a lot of time talking about this, and I think now the attack on us for it is always why we're picking on this. What is a

very small group percentage wise of the American population. Very small group globally, and there's a sense that because we focus on this that we're picking on trans people. I would never pick on trans people. They're people just like everyone else, and they're deserving of respect and kindness and decency just like everyone else. But the leftist ideology behind the trans movement is something that we have to be

able to talk about and discuss. And the way that they're co opting, we're changing language to suit their political preferences and all of this is really really unsettling, and we should all be very aware of that. We should start to understand that people who think this in their twenties are not going to wake up in their thirties and all of a sudden be reasonable constitutionalists who think that the rule of law has to mean a respect for this system even when you don't like the outcome.

And liberals, because this appeals right, This appeals to people's sense of self righteousness and their emotions. Liberals have created a world in which when the rules are in their favor, the rules are sacrosanct, and when the rules get in their way or don't work out the way they want them to, they are to be abandoned or undermined. Discarded any of the above. And that's why I thought this letter from this former resident of the Soviet Union saying

that this is really troubling. And remember the point here being that people in this Oviet Union in academia. She's

talking about young PhDs, people that are now. They are let's say twenty five, maybe twenty five to thirty in that range, young PhDs who think that the that that academia shouldn't be about the pursuit of truth, including difficult truths, and instead should be about the propagation of ideology, not merely because it's useful in the academy, so that's an opportunistic belief, but the propagation of ideology because they really truly think that this is the way that's not going

to Those people are not going to change, they're not going to grow up. They're not going to start teaching, you know, the great classics of literature and stop referring to it as a province dominated by dead, dead white males, and how that's so not woke. And you know, we need to read more literature from cultures that in some cases don't have a very long history of literature, and not a lot of stuff to read. You know, you really get into this. You say, well, where where is

this going to take us? And I think that it takes us to some pretty frightening places very quickly. That that's why. Also the Bernie Sanders situation really bothers me. It's troubling enough that he's even a front runner right now in this Democrat primary. When you listen to what he's suggesting, what he's saying, you know, Bernie Sanders is going to make sure that if he became president, he's going to make sure that this country is less free,

less prosperous. And with that, let's be honest, let's less happy. But as long as we are equally sharing in a greater degree of misery, that's that's he's fine with that. That outcome is better. He says he's just going to pull down billionaires, but in the process, he's going to be pulling down people who have worked very very hard to try and create more freedom, more options, more security

for themselves in their families. Because ultimately, he doesn't think and this is true of AOC, It's true if Bernie, it's true of Warren. He doesn't think that whatever you've done to get where you are is something that you can claim to have been your own. It's the government that allowed all of that. You didn't build that. This is the line that Obama said, that was a a much greater window into the mind of the contemporary leftist than was that certainly them was intended with that line,

you didn't build that. Well, if you didn't build it, if you don't have ownership of your own time, your own labor, your own decision making, if the state gets to determine all of that, what does that turn into for America as a society. You know, already we've allowed as a country far too much socialism to creep into our system. And the state is a much larger presence in our lives, the big s state, the federal government is a much bigger presence in our lives than it

should be. And we have to deal with that all the time, and we have to try to find ways to push back against it, and it has not been very successful. Recently, Donald Trump comes along, and I think a lot of us feel like this may just be a reprieve from the rampant statism of the left. It may not be a sweeping victory that changes the trajectory of the country. And that's when I look at the young people and what they're saying. At the young people.

I mean, I'm not I'm thirty. God, I'm thirty eight now, Bruce and Mark, I'm almost forty. Man, you realize this. I feel like I feel like we could have been in high school math class together. And I sit here, I look at you, and I'm like, my god, when I was in high school math class, you were actually in diapers. What year were you in high school math class? I mean, let's say I would have been in high school in two. Oh, no, in nineteen nineteen ninety six. Yeah,

it was three. Okay, so maybe you're just you're out of diapers at three. I don't know how that worked kids. But yeah, I'm not a kid guy. Yeah. Yeah, I'm not yet either. Um, but yeah you were. You would have been very very young. Yeah. So you know when I say the youth, though, can you explain to us why your your peers, your gens, you're we know you're millennial. You're like, you're you're barely a millennial because beard millennials. Yeah,

and you're a no beard millennial. Yes, So can you explain why the people of your age are so crazy. Maybe something's in the water, you know. Would you say most of the most of the of your friends are they politically active? Do they care? Or are they just running their lives and like this is all a distraction to them. I have a few here there that will be politically active. I don't really talk politics with my friends.

I don't want to. This is maybe this is a helpful reminder that I feel like when you work in politics and you're constantly looking at the ideology, you know, I want a country where that's actually the standard, where people don't have to think much. We should all think about about ethics and about the good life, and about what we should do with ourselves and our time, and

have the freedom to differ in those pursuits. But I wish that there was much less of a focus on politics as really a form of personal branding, because this is what ends up happening. Everyone just sits around them. And when I was in DC, people to talk politics all the time. I mean, I'm a little different that I have to listen to this every day and yeah, no, I know I'm propagandizing from the right for producer Mark. But before I had this job, I wouldn't go around

talking politics with my friends. I wasn't as informed because I didn't want to be, because I wasn't part of my life. Yeah, if that makes sense. Yeah, No, for for a lot of people, I think that this becomes such a it's become such a part of identity. And that's why you have all these Hollywood actors who aren't religious and I think are looking for purpose, and they latch onto purpose in the guise of climate change, activism and all these leftist causes that ultimately I think are

just are just empty. They fill it with the promise of helping the poor, helping the world, helping the downtrodden, but they really don't do that. They just mouth these these slogans. They just say the things that they believe they're supposed to say. And much of it is I mean, there's a reason people do virtue, virtue signaling. It's because it's a form of self aggrandizement. It's it's look at how great I am. And that's behind a lot of leftism today, a lot of activism on the left today.

So young people believe the crazy stuff from the left today more than even Soviet scholars. When I see young people, young scholars today believing in suppression and censorship as not a thing they have to put up with, but a thing that is good. And juxtaposing that with what was going on in the nineteen seventies and the nineteen eighties and Soviet Union. That's that's sobering, my friends. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Yeah,

the wall is being built. You know, we're up to one hundred and twenty two miles and you think that money. That was not easy. But we got the money and we're building it, and we want a lot of cases in court. We were suthed all the way along the line, and we're up to one hundred and twenty two miles. In a very short time will be over five hundred miles. It's already had a tremendous impact. So the wall is moving along. I hope that the wall keeps moving along.

This is an important promise. I also want to give you something a little bit, a little bit upbeat. After all that talk about the Soviet mentality overtaking young scholars in America in some ways works than the Soviet mentality. I feel like we should have a little bit of happy time. And so that's where I brought out, brought

out the Trumpster. And he's incredible what he's been able to do so far, and the fact that he's still so full of fight and so vigorous in his defense not just of the administration, but now of capitalism and of American patriotism. He can't escape that. The Democrats really come at this with a view of how much America needs to be transformed, because America is deficient in so many ways. Trump is such a powerful voice out there

for now. This country is actually amazing, and people who live here are lucky, and we want to preserve what is best in this country and continue on a path of increased prosperity and freedom and individuals being able to pursue their destiny. Mean, that's what we really want. And

Trump gets that done. And I gotta says, it has been amazing watching him put up with all the nonsense, all the efforts to remove him from office, destroy everybody around him, and you see him at these rallies like he was last night, and you still get the sense that Trump is just loving it. He loves it, he loves the fight. Thanks for listening to the bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,

or wherever you get your podcasts. Team Bugging, it's time for roll call, So Team I want to ask you all a little favor here. Actually, I want to ask you if you could, especially if you're already a podcast listener. It turns out that they are doing a a podcast of my show on wo R, which is the additional fourth hour of radio that I'm now doing every night, And you just go to seven two R dot com slash Buck and you can hear that show. And if we show some Team Buck numbers there, that would be

really helpful. So if you're already, especially if you're already a podcast listener, download that one two That show flies by. It's only one hour, which means in podcast time because there's no we don't have the traditional radio broadcast breaks on the podcast side of it, you can get through that podcast very quickly, and especially we want to know what's going on more in New York City, the New

York City area. So that's where you go seven TENWR dot com, seven one zerowar dot com slash Buck and you can go right to the page. It's a nice photo of me and you can listen on demand there. Um, let's get two DJ, who writes in first on roll Call. I keep hearing Bernie say healthcare is a right. Why is nobody calling him out? The rights are outlined in

our Constitution and our Bill of Rights. If Bernie feels healthcare is a right, and as long as he has been working government, he should know there's a process for creating a new right called an amendment. Why is he not using the known system instead of trying to force what he feels is a right. This tells me he knows it would never go through the process to become a right. Jesse, Kelly and Fox, etc. Are not on this topic of this. Also, why even if he gets elected,

it will still not be illegal right? It takes an amendment. If I'm not mistaken, Well, DJ, he's you know, I see your point. Bernie Sanders is intentionally conflating what he thinks of as a right with what is a right as a function of law. I mean, no one has a When you say you have a right to healthcare, what does that mean? What doesn't just think about that from what does it mean? So? Do you have a right to demand what do you have a right to say that you want a you know, let's say I here,

I'll make this personal. I have a essentially two two severed tendons on my right ankle and what's called a cable various foot, which means you have a super high arch, which, unless you're a ballet answer, is not a good thing. It actually creates real instability. It means you're very susceptible to catastrophic ankle sprains and breaks. And the surgery for it is pretty intense. It's called a calcaneal osteotomy. And if I want to have that surgery, okay, so I

know that's a medically necessary thing. I haven't done it yet. Do I get to so healthcare is a right? All right? Now? Do I get to walk into the most reputable hospital in New York City for this? Some would probably say HHS Hospital or h SS rather Hospital for Special Surgery and demand that their top surgeon give me a date in the next few weeks to do my surgery, and they take whatever money my insurance happens to feel like giving them. Is that? Is that what it means to

have a right? Or do I have a right to wait three years? And have some doctor who went to medical school in French Guiana or something and now is gonna, you know, operate on me in between selling sham wows on the weekend. I mean, is that my right extends to what point if it's not based in free markets and individuals coming together and an insurance system that's actually insurance instead of what we have, which is just a

very complicated cross subsidies. Am I able to just walk in and demand that the best surgeon in New York City operate on my ankle? Why not? I thought it's a right? Oh oh no, no, you see, you know who's going to answer this question for you? A bunch

of bureaucrats. That's what Bernie Sanders. Bernie Sanders wants government bureaucrats who are unaccountable to you, who you won't even be able to get on the phone, who you can't get fired, to come up with policies in Washington, DC, come up with decisions in Washington, d C. About what doctor you can see, how quickly you can see that doctor, what services that doctor will cover. And Bernie Sanders wants you to believe that's going to be a good outcome

for you. Do you really think that that's possible. You really think that that's true? No one who looks the And that's why I made a sort of personal Do I think that I'd be able to go get a great surgeon to take care of my very messed up ankle? Do I think I'd be able to get a great surgeon to do that in a Bernie Sanders world where we have Medicare for all? Absolutely not, because guess what, everybody else who wants to have surgery, you know what

do you call orthopedic surgery? Everyone else in New York City. They can do Google searches too. They know what the reputations are of different facilities, different doctors, and they're all gonna want to see this doctor. And is he gonna get pained enough that he's gonna even want to stay in practice and accept the Bernie Sanders Medicare for All? Or is he going to say no, I'm only seeing patients who pay cash, who run a credit card at my front desk, and then and then I'll perform surgery.

And what if Bernie Sanders administration says that this this you know, super whiz doctor only can take reimbursements for his procedures at a level that won't cover the overhead of his facility, won't cover the insurance that he has to pay for malpractice, etc. Etc. Maybe he just shuts down, or maybe he goes, you know, elsewhere to practice medicine. Right, this is the reality of healthcare. Bernie Sanders is giving you a mythology of healthcare. It's never going to be

what he says it is. You know, he keeps saying Medicare for all. It's not Medicare for all. Medicare has co pays. Medicare doesn't cover everything. Medicare is something that people have paid into. You know, there's a number of things. Remember Medicare for all. You're not paying into this over time, You're just this is now just the general fund. It's more expensive than we already have in. Medicare is already too expensive, and doctors don't want to take it. We

were running this experiment. Bernie Sanders is waging a war on history because we've done the things that he wants to do and it does not turn out well for us. And he just ignores this. He tries to pretend that we don't have the information that we do, that we don't know what's really going on here anyway. Sorry, I know that was a long thing about healthcare, but I just feel like when you when you personalize it, and as I've said to you, I've this is like when

I talk about rent control. I've lived in tiny I've lived in really tiny, rinky dink apartments in New York City. I've had insurance, I've had terrible insurance that I've had no insurance and had to deal with doctors under all those circumstances. So I can draw, I can draw from these these personal experiences to tell you that there's just no way what some of these politicians are telling you

it is true. It's going to be true. And I guess for some people they'd rather live with they'd rather live with the hope from the fantasy than deal with the reality. And that's really what that's at the heart of Sanders is m That's what Bernie Sandernista is all about. Richard Buck, this debate tonight has been like watching blood Sport. Kumid Day, Kumid Day. Prouser Mark, you've seen blood sport, get shut the front door. No way, you haven't seen

blood sport. Do I have to? Well, missus Mark. Let you well, missus Mark, let you come over for like a movie night one night, like I'll have like about brothers over. They love blood Sport too. You gotta watch blood Sport, man. I'll bring it any well order, we'll order Chinese food gluten free and uh and you know we'll sit here and watch. Oh well, you're getting there with gluding preachies. Who is good? I will have sure. I don't want to hear this nonsense from you. Did

you ever watch martial arts? We ever in the martial arts movement? Really, they were a huge thing in the

eighties and even in the nineties a little bit. But then I think people will because here here's my theory about this that people realized because of MMA, that training to actually be a like, you know, having some ninety year old monk who can catch a fly with his fingers or something and has like a long silver beard, that guy's actually not going to beat twenty dudes in a fight like that's not that's not reality at all.

And the people that actually can fight with their hands trained to fight with their hands and are and are in very good shape because also being strong and fast does matter. You don't just like meditate enough and you're a ninja warrior who will defeat everyone. And that was kind of you know, or or do a lot of spin kicks. Spin kicks and someone's gonna write anything. Someone always tols like book I've knocked to go out with a spin kick in the street fight. Okay, well, good

for you. Spin kicks are not a good idea in a self defense. Sounds like an accident if you do it again. If I did, I'd pull a hammy. Who wouldn't. Yeah, I got I gotta stretch before it, and my spincake would be at like Waiste level, So if that all right? Anyway, So he has not seen he's not seen blood Sport. It's Van Dam's best movie. Have you seen any Van Dam movies? No? Probably not. There is one where there's an ice hockey rink. Oh wow, in the background he

actually fights an ice hockey mascot. So maybe that's the one we should start with for you to see. Yeah, I'll get on that. There you go. Producer Mark has homework. Warren has been Van Dam screaming in slow motion as Bloomberg is stunned, sprang cash as he falls down. This whole Nda thing is amazing to watch Trump's ladies who signed NDA spoke anyways, no repercussions. Why is it that the Bloomberg ladies who signed that NDA won't speak. It's

smacks of the Voldemort whistleblower double standard shields high. You know, Richard, I think even if these women, look, I don't believe that. You know, I don't believe the Bloomberg. He's honestly, he's too too cautious and too tactical. And I think we'd all more than that. I think we would know. I think we would know if he had done any really bad stuff to women in his in his company and his employee. You know, he's he's a little crass and

he makes comments because he's a billionaire. He's used to being able to say what he wants. Let's be honest on the right, guys, we're kind of used to that now, right, I mean, crass billionaire who says what he wants. Let's not you know, we're not pearl clutching. It's Democrats who were doing all the pearl clutching over this. We're like, he said some stuff, he's apologized. You know, it's time

to move on. It's not like that these nbas were waved, you'd find out that Bloomberg was running some you know, sex dungeon out of the Bloomberg News offices or something. That's what I'm trying to say. That's just not That's not this guy. So it's not a game changer either way, and I think the media is much more invested in this being a big deal than anybody else. Penny, did we ever actually hear who won an Eyowa? Yes? Penny turned out Mayor Pete Bouddha Judge got the most delegates.

Bernie Sanders got the most in raw vote total in Iowa. Although I believe Sanders and Buddhajudge are both asking for a Reek canvass of a few counties there. So the answer is kinda anyway. Bill Rights. Illegal aliens are not more American than most Americans, but I can argue that many of them are ideologically more American than most lives. At least they see this country as somewhere they want to be and are willing to work for what they get.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not an illegal alien advocate, but given a choice, I would happily trade the farm workers here in the Central Valley of California for Antifa, Bernie Brows and half of Congress. Bill. You know, look, I think most illegal aliens that you're going to come across, you know, vast majority of the percent of them are nice people who are just trying to get a better situation for themselves. And I have human sympathy for them,

There's no question about it. Right they to leave usually crappy dysfunctional countries or crappy dysfunctional economies and come to a much better one. But we also have to protect the economy we have in the country we have, and sovereignty is important. We have laws, and also there is a small, a very small subset of illegal aliens who do commit really terrible crimes here, and we have to factor into this that they shouldn't be here at all

in the first place. So those crimes should not have occurred, they shouldn't have been able to occur. So, Bill, thank you so much for writing in You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast, all our more roll call here. Kristen writes in I also saw Parasite, and unless you like movies that show people just being cruel to others for no reason, other than to make themselves happy. You won't like it. I actually walked out after forty five minutes. I couldn't take it anymore. By

the way, way, I love Training to Bussan too. Maybe I'll have to watch the trailer for Training to Bussan. I have like a little conversation about this. We should do like a bucking Mark Mystery Science Theater thing, you know, when we watch a movie and do the commentary on it, because you know, I'll try to give the movie a little bit of credit. Producer Mark will be salty and an unimpressed. Don't we need like rights for that and stuff we can't? Yeah, it's technically true. Yeah, maybe we're

back the cooking idea. Then, so I think cooking works better because nobody can copyright cooking. Yeah, they can't copyright my steak. They better not. They better not try too, that would be bad news. Training. Have you haven't seen Training to Busan? I'm assuming no. This is that a Brandon movie? Yeah, zombies like eating people's faces. They all have the same storyline. Zombies come up. I think they eat people scary And then you know, give me a

movie with like a plot. Wow. Yeah, Prucer Prucer brand that we gotta get him in here. You can have a little discussion about this a little bit. A little bit there, I think I think he would want to stand up for his horror movie work a little bit. Um Andy's next up, Shields High. The Miracle on Ice was our amateur college kids beating a de facto Soviet professional team. The Olympics jumped the shark after the Cold

War ended by allowing professional athletes to participate. So, yeah, that was what I said yesterday that they were they were we had amateurs playing, so we so we did not have NHL players on that miracle team. Right. It was a couple of years later, maybe the nine. So that was our amateurs and the Soviets were like, we're gonna inject them with steroids and pay for everything, right Yeah, and Soviet the Russians are still very good hockey. Right.

I see all these names of hockey players that are like the best, and I'm like, that guy came straight out of Saint Petersburg. I mean, nobody's gonna be Canada. If you're going pros versus pros, Canada almost always wins. Really yeah, of course it is the best, really better than Canada hockey. No, No, Canada is where hockey was, you know, born A. I guess it is kind of cold up there, kinda yeah, I've heard stories. I've only been to Canada a couple of times. Really, I've been

to Toronto. Lovely people. I really like Canadians a lot, so I feel like I could handle it up there, except for the coal, I'm not. I'm not a super cold by the person. I said to my wife when we went to Toronto's like a clean New York Is it really? Yeah? Yeah, people tell me Vancouver is actually amazing. I've never been. I would like to go. Yeah, I'd like to go. That's the one place in Canada I

really want to check out. I know people go to Montreal for like fun weekends, but I hear that Vancouver is actually I mean, the real estate market there is is completely nuts. People are spending like a million dollars for a you know, tiny little shack by the side of the road. All right, eric ky bucket. It must be a geographical thing, because I've never heard of anyone who hasn't heard of try Tip. No, I've heard of it.

I just don't know what it is. It's not like Amy Klobascher who did not know who the president of Mexico is, Lopez Obrador. I'm low here in SoCal Try tip is probably the most common and loved cut of them all. It's affordable and you can cook it several ways. Smoked tip that is seared in butter on a cast iron skillet at the end is the best. I don't know if you have the restaurant Lucille Smokehouse in New York, but they have good try tip. I've never heard of

that restaurant, but I will take a look. David hey Buck love the show. Listen to discuss how the brain works with depression and food makes sense. When I'm depressed, I go straight to Burger King. While my wife is depressed, she chugs chocolate. Food can make you feel better, even for a little This works. This is worth looking more into. David. Yeah, man, Food is very important for a lot of things, including I think how we feel and our energy and our

immune systems, and I think food really does matter. With that in mind, I'm gonna go make myself some bacon and scrambled eggs as soon as we're done here. Team, Please check out The War Show Podcast seven tenwr dot com slash Buck Download it so you make Buck look good. TUC to you. Tomorrow she'll tie