Democrats Turn For A Special Probe - podcast episode cover

Democrats Turn For A Special Probe

Dec 02, 20201 hr 46 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Season 4, Episode 232.


Allegations of voter fraud start flying at hearings, The Durham probe is now a special counsel, More lockdown hypocrisy in California and James Comey gets a Columbia gig. Plus Author Ryan James Girdusky joins to talk about the situation in Georgia.


Please subscribe to the podcast! And get more exclusive content from Buck at BuckSexton.com.


Subscribe to Buck on YouTube: https://bit.ly/2UNT1Or


Find Buck on:

Twitter @BuckSexton  

Facebook @BuckSexton 

Instagram @BuckSexton 

Email the show: TeamBuck@IHeartMedia.com

Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

You are entering the freedom hunt. Allegations of voter fraud fly at Michigan hearings, the Durham Probe is now a special counsel more lockdown hypocrisy in California, and Coomy gets a Columbia U gig. This is the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with assionable intelligence. Make no mistake America great, Here a great America Again, The buck Sexton Show begins analyst, Remember he's a great guy. No welcome, friends to the

buck Sexton Show. The biggest question in politics right now in America, and therefore, I think you could argue the whole world is who really won this election. I know the media and the Democrats and a whole lot of folks are saying that this is not a real question. It's all over with. We all know that's what they tell us. It's all done, and any allegations of fraud should be dismissed out of hand. But I think you've

also started to notice something, a narrative shift. You've seen things start to move a little bit, because for the last few weeks, what have we been told? There is no fraud, absolutely none, zero. That's interesting because now we're starting to see there are definitely irregularities, and there's certainly

early stage proof that there was voter fraud. So I think that the change in tone that you can expect, and it's already just beginning to happen, is okay, fine, there was fraud, but not enough to change the results of the election. Even the Attorney General Bill Barr and his statement speaking on behalf of the DOJ which he runs, saying that we have not yet found enough fraud to

date to overturn the results of the election. That's not the same thing as saying there was no fraud, which is what the left and the Democrats have been claiming all along. Now. I understand this is hyperpartisan at this point. I understand that there are people who view the fate of the country as enmeshed inextricably in this issue. But I also think it's very important, more than anything else, that we get it right, and we get the truth.

And even if the truth isn't what a lot of us want to hear at this point, even if for many of us it's a disappointment, we need to arrive at that conclusion, and then we need to move on as a country. But we're not there yet. We still have quite a ways to go. And that's in evidence at these various hearings that have been had by state legislatures, including yesterday in Lansing, Michigan, where there were people who were coming forward publicly named individuals. These are not anonymous

Internet rolls. These are not people that are hiding behind some veil of oh, I don't want anyone to know my name. No, they're coming forward and they're saying this is what I saw, and you had hours and hours of this. Now, yes, I understand. In Michigan the separation between Trump and Biden right now is over one hundred thousand votes. So that's a lot. Even if we find a thousand votes here or a thousand votes there, that may not be enough to change the result, but it's

important for all of us. It's critical. It's essential that every vote is counted, that is legal, and that we know that that's what happened, and that we have put our system through this stress test and can come out the other side knowing that. However this shakes out the next election, which is going to be on January fifth, and Georgia, by the way, the next election is at

least secure enough. It's never going to be perfect. Understand that there's no such thing as an election with paper ballots and mail in ballots at all, this with over one hundred and fifty million votes cast, where everyone just

does exactly what they're supposed to do. But it has to be good enough, good enough that we have faith in it, good enough that we don't walk around saying it looks like it was stolen, because right now, based on just a cursory overview of the facts and figures and the indications of what would have been enough to win in previous years, it certainly looks to a lot of folks like the election was stolen. So we're not just going to pretend that's not happening. We have to

look at what's really going on. And when you start to dive into these different cases, you see that there are people who very much believe and are operating in good faith that they saw th things that were improper at a minimum, maybe a mistake, but also very possibly fraudulent. And let's also remember that there is a high degree of culpability. It is the cynicism of Democrats in this election year, in using COVID as an excuse to change in some cases, as we see in Pennsylvania, in likely

unconstitutional fashion, to change the way people vote. And now there are problems and irregularities. Well, of course there are these last minute changes didn't go through the regular process. In fact, some of the changes to the actual process may themselves have been illegal. As I mentioned, Pennsylvania the most important case in point, and I think that it is going to be overturned by the Supreme Court in

Pennsylvania if they take this up. I think that if the whole attention of the country is focused on the Supreme Court on this issue, there's a very good chance at Pennsylvania's results will not be able to be certified as we currently would believe them to be because they changed election law and they were not supposed to do that. But now let's focus in on Michigan. You need to hear at least right the American people need to know what's going on. A lot of major networks, a lot

of conservatives aren't even talking about this right now. They've already gone to the move on position. While I'm not there. I say we fight to the last day. I say we fight to the last man the last minute. So let's cheer out our fellow citizens are concerned fellow Americans who believe that they saw fraud, who believe that things in this election we're not on the up and up. And I will just tell you this, there's a surprising degree of likeness. There's a tremendous similarity in some of

what you're hearing in these different states. Now, maybe that's because of the changes in the process with all the mail in balloting, so that alone caused there to be these irregularities. I mean, I find that hard to believe, but I'm trying to keep an open mind about all of it. But there are certainly similar things being said about last minute ballot dumps, about stops in the ballot counting. Did that really happen? Did they match signatures or do

they just decide to wave it all in? Did Democrats, without even having to be told, who were involved in ballot counting, who were involved in this process, recognize that they just wanted to count every vote because they figured that the more they opened the floodgates, the better chances Biden had to win. Somehow, not winning these house races, somehow not winning these other state legislative battles in country, in states all across the country. But they are so

certain that Biden substantially defeated Trump in these states. I find it hard to believe. Here is a Michigan pull watcher. I'm just giving you this. This hearing went on for a long time yesterday, so I want to give you some of I thought the most poignant moments of it. Here is this Michigan pole watcher talking about people being

rejected from the room who were Republicans. Play one. I am an unaffiliated Michigan voter who was trained by the GOP to be a poll challenger on Wednesday, November fourth, beginning in the late morning until around eight pm, because I was told that they needed help they didn't have they were understaffed. I witnessed the room erupted thunderous applause and derogatory cheering as Republican poll workers were picked off one by one and ejected from the room repeatedly by

police escort throughout the day. By the end of the day, they had picked off so many GOP poll workers that there were probably only a few dozen left to monitor all of the processing stations in the room, which I'm told was between one thirty and one sixty. Why would that happen? Is there any reason this guy would lie about this? If he was just doing it for attention, I think he could come up with a better story. But clearly something concerning here. Republican poll watchers pushed away

so they can't see, and then there's cheering breaking out. Now, remember this is in political terms, enemy territory. Okay, when you're talking about Detroit, when you're talking about Philadelphia, these are eighty twenty Democrat districts. These are eighty twenty cities where the Democrat machine controls everything. You don't have people coming out and saying that this happened in Purple counties outside you know, the suburbs and the exurbs and all this.

You're not having that, at least not the same way it's in these Democrats strongholds in key states that Biden was going to have to win. Now, I ask you, is that is the poll watcher? Is he making it up at a minimum? Isn't it suspicious? Isn't it concerning that this would happen? Okay, you say, well, Buck, that's one person. Well, no, there were others who said exactly the same thing. They were there to observe the count, and they were made to be so far away that

it was impossible for them to observe the count. Here's another Michigan poll challenger yesterday, play three. I was under the impression that as a poll challenger, our primary responsibility is to make sure before a vote is cast that that ballot is either in the registered poll book, the computer book, or in the elect the paper poll book, of which anytime, as a challenger I tried to look at the ballot and then trying to verify it, I would get two or three of the poll workers literally

screaming at me to get back six feet. However, we did not know that that had been overturned the night before, which would have been helpful. But at no time were we able actually to physically see the ballot and then see it in the pole electronic book. The person opening the ballot would probably be sitting where Senator faces, and the electronic screen that we were supposed to be watching

is basically to where the committee clerk is now. I don't know if you guys got binocular vision, but I don't. What's the point of a poll watcher if you can't watch the polls. How many people have to come forward with sworn affidavits and firsthand eyewitness accounts of exactly this going on in major Democrat controlled districts. Now, this could all just be the kind of rough and tumble political melee of the moment. I guess right, I don't, And by the way, don't don't yell at me or send

me emails like how could you believe that? I'm just working through this. I'm looking at all the possibilities. I obviously think something's funky here. I've been saying it's funky for weeks. But it's more than just you and me thinking that something is wrong here. We've got to establish how much wrong, and we've got to be able to prove it, prove it enough in court that a judge is going to say everything else all this. Oh, but I know there was fraud. I know there was fraud. Yeah,

we all know there was fraud. How much fraud? That's the question that matters. This is not some purity test for whether you believe that Democrats are scummy and Trump should have won this thing. Of course we can agree on that one. But what do we know and what can we prove those are the questions of the moment. That's what we have to get real answers to. And some of what was said in Michigan was particularly concerning

and certainly deserves more scrutiny. I spoke to Matt Brader, who's the guy running the voter Integrity Project, and he told me they're just crunching numbers and they're seeing people out of state voting. They're seeing people who are listed as dead voting. I spoke to Sean Parnell, who I mean, I would trust that guy with anything. I would trust Sean Parnell with my life. I'd follow that guy, actually follow him in the battle. Is a good buddy of mine.

And he says that they did the random sampling of nursing homes and look like the signatures and the handwritting on a whole bunch of ballots was all the same. Now, I know Sean's not making that up. There are a lot of people here that are coming forward with things that are suspicious at a minimum, and the media is just suppressing it, just suppressing it. They don't care. They got the result they think they want and that's it.

Now they're moving forward to Georgia and they're going to try to take Georgia two in whatever way they can. You and I both know it. Now. Here's another allegation from a Michigan hearing witness about military ballots. This was among the most stunning play four. One of the military ballots was not One of the military ballots was our registered voter, and the ballots suffect. They were all exactly the same xerox copies of the ballot. They were all

providing across the board. There wasn't a single Trump vote, and none of the voters are registered. They had to manually enter the names and address us in a birthdate of one one, twenty twenty, which would override the system and allow them to enter non registered voters, of which I saw several that day throughout the day. That's how they would override voters that were neither in the electronic pull book or the supplemental update at pull book. Thank you?

Is she lying? I don't think so. If she is wrong, if she's mistaken, then it's incumbent upon the people that are so sure that everything's fine here. Don't show us that is she telling the truth? Yes or no? We need an answer. There's still a lot that we have to find out about this. This is not over. You're in the Freedom Mind. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. It wasn't just Michigan where there were some pretty bold allegations made this week again in public named people people

who have put out Swarnaffi David's. They're putting all their credibility behind it. They clearly believe what they're saying. They're operating in good faith. There's no reason for them to do this otherwise there's no benefit that no one's gonna make them rich or famous because of any of this. Here is a witness in the Arizona hearings, right. Arizona is another place, and you're gonna have Nevada in the

crossairs this week for election challenges as well. And I think there's gonna be some really stunning stuff presented there based on my sources involved with the Trump the Trump election legal effort. But here's what was said in Arizona play clip two. I kept looking at the screen because it seems very odd, and in the bottom right hen corner was a yellow, yellow banner, and I got into a position where I could see the yellow banner which

said low confidence. Then I started paying much closer attention to the signatures, thinking, this didn't even make sense to me because the signature on the ballot that was being compared to other signatures didn't even resemble in any way what they were comparing it to. They were completely illegible.

They were just scribbles on the ballot. And there were five screeners screening low confidence ballots for an entire afternoon that I was in there, and I asked Celia what the low confidence said, and she said, just not to worry about that, that this was a new program that they were testing. Scribbles don't match the signatures, doesn't matter, just scribbles. That's all you need, is an Arizona. Does that woman sound at all like she's been coached or

she's making something up? No telling the truth? More from the Arizona Hearing here play five the Wednesday before the Friday that we quit votus ten days before they quit tabulating. They thought they were done, and then more truckloads of ballots would come in. I'm like, how can you not know how many ballots are still out there? Should show

what I'm sorry? Would you repeat that? Yeah, they thought they were done, And there was multiple times the people that were running the rooms, thought they were done, are almost done, or we're going to be done Wednesday morning, then Thursday morning, then Friday morning, then it went on

the whole next week. And I'm like, I might ask the question, like, you don't know how many ballots are still left to come in, So I don't know, I don't know who does again, process, project management, a lot of sloppiness, a lot of ways that things could have slipped in that shouldn't. Now we're going to continue to chase all of this down. But I've been saying this all along as well, So we need to manage expectations here to stop the fraud. Would have been much easier

before election day. Ballots can be challenged in advance for people, for places that have early voting and mail in balloting. There was a lot that could have been done that wasn't done. And once those votes make their way into the general, count them pile if you don't have exact chain of custody, very difficult to get rid of them. End the tie is going to go to counting the vote. You and I both know that, So we have to stay all this and we will. Thanks for listening to

the Bus Sesson Show. Podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. You know how you can always tell that there's a problem with Democrats don't want you to find out about when they start lying about something, when they misrepresent things that you can prove they're lying about, but they don't care.

They're just hoping that enough people hear what they say, don't check it, and then it has the required or the desired response, which is to just assume that it must be true. I mean, you should never assume that what Chuck Schumer says it's true, but some people do. Nonetheless. Here he is the senator from New York talking about how he claims Bill Barr said there's no evidence of voter fraud. Play Levin Well in response to Attorney General Bill Barr, I guess he's the next one to be fired,

since he now too says there's no fraud. Trump seems to fire anyone in that regard. It's not what he said, very easy to check this. Attorney General Barr said there's not enough. There's not enough fraud that they have seen to date to overturn the election. That's a very different thing. Isn't it. But you know, they keep playing games with this. They keep pretending that people don't have access to the Internet and can't see what was actually said. And a

lot of people won't. That's what's so for us. There are a lot of people that will just assume that Chuck Schumer's a senator, he wouldn't lie about something so obvious like that. Oh No, he's Chuck Schumer. He lies if he's if his mouth is moving, he's probably lying. That's what happens there. And then there's there's Preet Barrara.

This was a Obama's Obama's hitman going after Denish to Susan, remember that, try to try to send Denish, try to send Denish to prison for something that people usually get a fine for. Anyway, you know, he's a big lib Preet, with no surprise, started some podcasts with his podcasting brother. Now their producers suing them for millions of dollars. I'm sure he's a really good, ethical individual and not some power mad prosecutor lib headhunter. Sure, sure, yeah, But here

he is telling you more of the same. Bill barr who, let's all be very clear, they tell you it can't be trusted. They said, how much do they spend the last last let's say, twelve months, how much time? When they were talking about Bill Barr was that he was Trump's, you know, Trump's little throne shining toady, that he would do anything for Trump, which a total lie, total smear of Bill Barr, who I know some of you are frustrated with him with the Durham probe. Are about to

talk about the Durham Special Counsel. Huh, A little different. But I think the Attorney General has done a very good job. And I have not forgotten. You know, you got to give people credit where it's due. I have not forgotten that ag Barr got ahead of the hysterical effort to use the slimy smear job of the Muller report and the ten possible council of obstruction. He got ahead, and he's like, yeah, well it's our call, and there was no obstruction. He diffused that bomb that they threw

at this administration. Don't forget that. Don't forget that. I know right now, and I'm seeing a lot of people even but what I like on the right being very hard on ag Barr. Guys, it's not a miracle worker. All right, Well, he's doing things in accordance with the law, and they hate him. They hate the attorney general on the left precisely because he's competent and doesn't fly off the handle and doesn't get drawn into the sometimes loose cannon vibe of the Trump team. I'm just it's true.

You know, it's true. We operate in reality here. So that's why when Prete Berrara, who I think they're considering for attorney general, at least I've seen rumors to that effect. When Prete Berrara is out there talking about Bill Barr, you know that they're misrepresenting what's going on Play sixteen. Interestingly, it was a deliberate choice. He has to have known that the President was not going to like it. You see, the allies of the president are attacking Bill Barr all

over the place because it's seen as a betrayal. This is the same man, Bill Barr, who on this network on CNN with our colleague Wolf Blitzer a few months ago basically said, I expect, because common sense tells me so, that thousands and thousands of ballots will be fraudulently filed and sent to the United States from abroad with no proof or evidence whatsoever, and for him to say in the face of what he knows the president wants and what the president's other lawyers are doing Rudy Giliani and

at all. I think it's a deliberate thing for him to have done. And I think it tells you how weak the President's arguments are about fraud in all these states. Notice he doesn't give him any credit. And Bill Barr is ten times the legal mind that preparare is who Preparra really made his name by going after rich hedge fund guys and making a big show of it. And he didn't get the really big fish. Usually he just would get somebody down down the food chain and crush them.

Say look at what a tough guy am for the Southern District of New York. I really really like to do the show trial thing. That's who pret is. And I told you he also he went after he went after Danish de Sus, a clear political hit job. I mean, Janessh broke the law and he admits that, but it was come on, it's a traffic violation. Give me a break. Gave a little extra money to a political campaign, Pay it back, pay a big fine, go about your business.

Don't do it again. Should be a deferred prosecution even should anyway, it's outrageous, outrageous. Oh and you know who you know who Pret's mentor is to really understand what we're dealing with it, You know Preet Berara's mentors, James Komy. If that lanky, unself aware weirdo slimeball is your mentor,

you got problems. You got big problems. And remember, Comey was given some really sweet gig, seven figure gig to be a an advisor to a major hedge fund when he little buddy Preet was running the US Attorney's office, was the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, which does those kinds of Wall Street financial prosecutions. That's a great insurance policy to have in your back pocket. Isn't it pay weirdo Komy a million bucks? So it's

really good? You think it's really good. Buddy is going to investigate, investigate the hedge fund that Comy's working for. No, I don't think so. I don't think so. No chart is brought against that fund. What a surprise. A lot of other ones had at least investigations. Friends, now you know how Now you know how the game is played.

You're seeing it all around you. He's seeing it. And speaking of de Nih, I totally agree with He had to hit a tweet today where he said that you can't figure out what's going on in the world by looking at the news media. So understand that it's on you to figure it out, you know, And I would tell you listen to this show, read as many different sites and authors, and you know it's you're creating a mosaic every day in your own mind of what's going on.

That's what you should be doing. Don't trust any one source, any one site. You know some people you should trust a lot more than others. But you should always be looking for various perspectives and opinions and even beyond that facts. There's an editorial process for what facts are presented to you more than others. How many of you could tell me, for example, off the top of your heads, And I don't say this is any sort of a criticism. I was doing a deep dive into this earlier than the week,

so I was looking at it. You know that there are major cities in this country where they've already had thirty forty, Almost fifty percent of small businesses closed, perhaps never to open again. San Francisco, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Chicago, Boston, New York thirty forty, going up to fifty percent small businesses gone, they're coming back maybe some who knows right, But that's not a figure. You see a lot. What do you see every day? Oh my gosh, the COVID

cases are higher and higher and higher. Yes, the panic, the panic porn and the media that you see all the time. The consequences of a lockdown that don't actually have the benefits that they promise, that don't protect us in the way that's advertised. You don't see that, do you. The editorializing of which facts to present and which facts to suppress. Now some good news about the Attorney General.

I'll spend some time on with you. Now. I have been critical, or I should say, perhaps cynical about the prospects of the Durham Probe to find real justice. Remember, the Durham Probe was set up within the DOJ to look at the Russia collusion hoax, which that's what it was, to look at the Russia collusion hoax top to bottom and see if there was any criminality and produce a full report on just what happened there. Right, Okay, I

had said that the bureaucracy will protect itself. But also in the back of my mind, I had always thought there's a very real chance that if you hit a Democrat administration, they're just gonna slow roll and then slowly kill that investigation. I mean, they're just draining of draining of resources. All the things they said Trump was going to do about the Mueller probe that he didn't do, including just shutting it down. A Democrat in this case,

a Biden administration would do. So that was always a possibility that I had in the back of my mind, and that's why I felt like there was a clock on this one. But Attorney General Bill Barr, he's a savvy cat. This is not this is not his first rodeo in DC. Remember he was the Attorney general before under George H. W. Bush a long time ago. So he knows what's going on, and he has come up with something that's going to be very upsetting for the ah,

very upsetting for the Democrats. A special counsel designation. He is the Attorney General and he can do this. Ah. Yes, a special Council designation of the Durham Probe. What this means is that they can't just make this thing easily disappear without showing everybody what a bunch of frauds and hypocrites and liars the Democrats are. Now that that does not mean they're unwilling to do that, but at least now it's like the trip wires, it's like the Claymours

are put in place, so to speak. If they decide to shut down this investigation, it will cause a political explosion because what were we told for years by Democrats during the Mueller Special Council, Not only is it wrong if Trump were to shut down, but the very thought of shutting it down was impeachable, and had he shut it down, which he did not do, he should have

been impeached and removed from office on that alone. On that alone, that's corruption, the kind of a kind of corruption that should get you, as a president removed from office. Very clearly established that standard. There's no question. They absolutely set that in stone. They can't walk away from it. Now. They might try, but they can't. And so with that, I say to you, now they are going to have

to deal with what we did a dogged prosecutor. I do not believe that Durham is a partisan in all this, and so his findings may be somewhat disappointing. I also still stand behind my initial assessment, my initial prediction that it's unlikely you'll see James Combie or any of the rest of them frog marched out of their homes or offices in handcuffs. I don't think you'll see that happen, but you could. Now there's a special council. It could

get ugly out there. And remember, there are people who are tied very much into the Obama orbit and the Obama administration who are at issue in Russia collusion, who if not back under a Biden administration if it happens.

I'm just looking into the future here. If they're not back under a bid administration, would certainly be a let's just say, a pr blow for the Biden team if top Obama people ended up having at least the referral of criminal charges against them for the hoax they perpetrated with Russia collusion and the usage of the FBI and the intelligence community apparatus to go after and prosecute a political opponent, which is what they did to Donald Trump

and his top advisors and his associates. That is what happened. Don't ever forget it. They will lie to you, they will gaslight you, they will pretend that you're crazy for saying it. They used the deep state apparatus of Hillary supporters within the government to try and stop the Trump administration. Shut it down, get him thrown out of office, prosecute him, ruin his life. That's what they did. They cheated and

lied to get there. And now with the designation of Durham as a Special counsel, there's at least some chance I could be wrong and this may be worthwhile. After all, you're in the freedom Hud. This is the Buck Sexton Show Podcast. Now for the other side of this reality of the deep state and Komy and whether there'll be any justice. I often say this to you because it's

true and it's important. There are some cultural differences between the right and the left, particular in how we treat those on our side who fight the good fight, at least from our perspective. Right on the right, if you're a conservative and you go out there and you make the case and you get chewed up, you know you're General Flynn. You're any number of people who have been attacked for being Trump supporters. You're Sarah Sanders having lunatic

scream at you and restaurants and all this stuff. And then you leave the administration and you're looking for a job. There are only a few places you can go. Why is that? On the left? When you fight the good fight for their side, so that means the dirty, underhanded and evil fight. But when you do what they need you to do, when you're James Comy, what happens to you? Do you get arrested? Do you even get criminally investigated?

Even though you leaked documents to the New York Times that you took in your capacity as an FBI director and a sit down with the press the United States and should have been mark classified, and you said, weren't Mark classified. So therefore you just get away with the whole thing. You know what happens to you? You get a seven figure book deal, You get six figure speaking gigs and a prestigious and I'm sure sure a well compensated teaching job at Columbia University Law School, one of

the five best law schools in the country. What's James Comey gonna teach sanctimonious nonsense from a deep state superstar. I mean probably, But you see, there's a message sent here.

If you do the Democrat's dirty work. Anybody working in the government right now, anyone who's supposed to be a nonpartisan civil servant, if you're willing to leak that stuff that takes down a Republican, if you're willing to follow in the footsteps of Comey, protect a Democrat from prosecution like Hillary Clinton, who should have faced criminal charges for what she did with her email server. If you do all those things, they'll take care of you. We need

to come to grips with us. We need to understand it. This happens. The left takes care of its ideological soldiers. They do their assassins, their hate men, whatever you want to call them. They take care of them. They always land on their feet, good jobs, board seats, speaking gigs, books, or just you know, a consulting gig, whatever it may be.

On the right, we have all these conservative businessmen. You know what they say when when I try to talk to them and say, why don't you hire some of these people, they say, ah, I know, I don't I like my business. I don't want to get boycott. I don't. This is one of the reasons the left gets away with what it does and why we have a tough time beating them. Thanks for listening to the bus seton show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,

or wherever you get your podcasts. Battlefield Georgia, it's just sweeks away, friends, and it's going to get more and more intense as it gets closer. The balance of the Senate here is what is at stake. Who is going to be in the majority? Huge implications. Honestly, for whatever happens with the presidential election, we still need control of the Senate. So to tell us what's going on there, and also just look more broadly at what's happening across

the country with these voter issues. We've got our friend Ryan Gruduski with us now. He is the author, if they're not listening, how elites created the national populist Revolution. He's worked on many political campaigns and knows this game inside it out. Ryan, Great to have you back. Thanks for having me. So, what's happening right now in Georgia?

You were down there for a few weeks. Tell me about this state of play, because there are a lot of people that are asking me questions like buck, hold on, if we have so little faith in what happened in the presidential election, and there clearly were problems. I mean there are votes, thousands of votes that weren't counted and issues like that. What's going on down there right now? Is the state GOP in command and control? Or should we all be worried? Well, let's say it's you a

US incompetent. I mean, it's it's it's the problem with a lot of red states is that they're so used to winning and winning easily that they don't They oftentimes don't have the most efficient people running the show because it's considered they can just sleep through an election cycle. Their secretary of state isn't bumbling more on, there's no there's no doubt about that at all. I'll break some

news to you. The deputy secretary of state, Uh, this woman who's been apparently making a lot of the calls back a few months ago, she wanted and this is a leaked to me by several people within the state party, she wanted to have one of a rapper do a public announcement to sit there and try to get um, try to get poll watchers, the rapper who sings a

loop whose name I'm literally blanking out on. But anyway, she wanted to have rappers that they were and try to get pole watchers the biggest there's two fundamental party B I believe after Cardi B. Yes, Cardi B. That's the one she wanted Cardi B. If you know that is you want to Cardi B to get poll watchers in Georgia for the Republican Party. It's just a joke.

The problem essentially comes down twofold one is that they have they have The Secretary of State did not mandate that counties report how many absentee battles they had in on election night. So to Cobb, Gwinnett, Fulton, all these counties did not sit there in report how many how many battles were outstanding, And the problem was they kept unfounding them. They found towns of thousands and poll watchers were forced to leave major pull sites and even though

votes were still being tabulated. So there's opportunity for fraud even if there isn't election fraud. Even if there was an election fraud, the ID the opportunity for election fraud is boundless. Another big problem is they created the system, the local county board of Elections create a system called drop boxes where you can sit there and just drop your ballot in the box and they would be picked up and they were secure apparently and brought to the

council later on. That is illegal under Georgia state law. Under Georgia state law, a ballot has to be delivered in person by two people watching the value being delivered. Because what also is illegal in Georgia is ballot harvesting. Now when you're dropping off tons of ballot or you have the potential to drop off tons of ballots in a drop box which apparently has a camera, but the cameras aren't being used to sit there and watching people

delivering more than one ballot. They're being used is that they're making sure that nobody's destroying the drop boxes. So you have a problem with that as well. These drop boxes. No one is assuming as of right now to sit there and get these drop boxes removed, and every county's allowed to decide how many drop boxes they want in the county. All those things are really working against us in the state. Party really needs to ratify a lot of these problems, and I have a lot of confidence

in the state Party. I think, listen, they need to pick up one of these sentence. David Purdue was just a few thousand bout shot of missing a runoff. He's well liked even in areas, but a Trump wasn't well liked in the outside suburbs of Atlanta. Stays Abrams has been taken has been running around screaming there's nine hundred

thousand abs and tee ballots already in the mix. As usual with Stacey, Abrams have come to realize that oftentimes she takes credit for things that she doesn't necessarily deserve credit for. Most of these absentee ballots are for seniors that normally would get absentee ballots. There's not a huge surge and the number of appsonde ballots in the city of Atlanta, um it's pretty evenly dispersed statewide because it's

just for seniors. Um So, so we're looking pretty good on the hound Perdue and shouldn't panic over this nine hund because I've seen that number thrown around a lot. Nine hundred thousand apsodes, So yeah, people, I reached out to people yesterday in the state Party and they said it's not that serious. And then I looked at the breakdown of every congressional district and it's almost exactly evenly dispersed through. I mean, there's a little bit more in Atlanta,

but it's not sizeably more. It's not like eight hundred nine nine thousand toil one. The rest of the state. It's like seventy five eighty thousand, eighty nine thousand, and seventy eight thousand, so almost evenly run across the entire state of Georgia. There's been a Ryan Grudusky author if they're not listening, how the elites created the National Populist Revolution, and he was down in Georgia seeing for himself what's

going on there with these upcoming races. Ryan, there's been all this, all this dust up over whether the GOP, and it is a GOP controlled state, would allow for signature matching in the recount in Georgia, it seems and anybody reading or paying attention to this, it seems like, why wouldn't they allow that? Can you tell us what's going on? So this is what I've heard, and I can't exactly confirm this from more than just like voice

of mouth from people and the state Party. Is that when Brian camp became am the governor, he was originally the Secretary of State. When he vakee the position of Secretary of State immediately upon winning the governor's election, the former governor and Nathan Deal appointed somebody at a long standing government bureaucrat to sit there and to become the active Secretary of State. For several months she dealt with the law. This woman who was appointed the onslaught of

lawsuits from Stacy Abrams. She conceded a lot of points to Stacy Abrams and allowed her up apparently to sit there and get away with a lot of things like having the NAACPP polewatchers, having a motor voter, which is allows everyone who is a driver's license in the state to be registered voter sat there in Okay. The idea of not matching signatures. The big problem is is because of COVID, someone in the state Party of the secretary of State's office thought that we didn't want to sit

there and spread COVID. I guess people sharing a pen. So in some cases they did not have to sign at all to sit there and get to vote. There's a lot of it's a lot of ineffective people running different state parties. However, I will sit there remind people two important things that worked against President Trump that clearly were that there's no there's no evidence of being fraud or bad runing state parties. One, David Perdue did outperform

in all the suburbs of Atlanta. And secondly, and most importantly, the ninth Congressional District, the second most Republican congressional district in Georgia. It's north west Georgia. That district pretty substantially underperformed as far as turnout goes. They had about seventy five thousand fewer votes come out of that district than in the neighboring districts. And that district, being one most Republican, would have delivered Trump. The state would have delivered David Purdue.

The state. It's in the Schattanooga television market, and that television market did not have a single ad running for the entire duration of the campaign, and the social the last few months there was the Democrat and the Democrat congressional candidates dropped out, so there wasn't a grassroous movements that they're in trupt from the Congressional Kansas that they're trying to pull people out. A lot of the state legislaties were unh were I didn't have a Democrat opponent

because it's such a Republican area. So grassroots efforts is that there, I'm kind of maybe pulled the striplers of the low hanging fruit or the or some of the low energetic voters. Is that they don't get them out, that would have probably made or broke the state. I think that they're kind of realizing that now, and also some of the Georgia Republican Party that's just involved in Georgia right now, and the RNC has also has over four hundred and fifty people on the ground right now

in Georgia. So they're mobilized and they're energetic, and they run a pretty efficient operation. It's been a Ryan Grdrewski, author of They're Not Listening How the Elites created the National Populous Revolution. Ryan, I'm sure you've seen some of the testimony out of Arizona, out of Michigan. I've been speaking to people on the ground in Pennsylvania who I think Pennsylvania there's clearly issues. I mean there were Clearly. When I say issues, I don't just mean allegations of fraud.

They change the election procedure in a state where you're not allowed to do that without the legislature actually making those changes. So I think Pennsylvania is going to be a place where the lawsuits could actually Georgiana. Those drop boxes are against state law and they still had them there. That is, I mean, it's literally in the statute and CINC then says how people should be allowed to vote absentee, and these drop boxes violate the state law. I don't

why aren't they sewing? And we've got a GOP there. You're talking to these guys, Why why aren't they sewing? I bring it up till I'm bloom in the face. Maybe I'm not speaking the right people. I don't know they are. And I will say one thing. The at Trained General's Office is investigating these groups that are trying to register new voters right before the runoff, because allegedly I saw this firsthand in New York City, several apartment

buildings my friends live in they had dropped. They had they had literature being dropping from their house saying registered to vote in Georgia. So they are investigating those groups. I don't know why they're not doing for the drop boxes. I coming from the world of campaigns, I will say

two things. One, after a vote is already cast, it is extremely unlikely that a judge is going to sit there and strike that ballot, simply for the fact that they do not want to deter people from voting and sit there and try to say and argue this is not a legitimate ballot. It's just the way judges usually work. Secondly, if the Georgia State Legislature right now try to convene to change all these laws some sixty days before election day, there would be a very very hard time from that

to get past. Also, a judge a joke's will rule you can't change election law within sixty days of an election. I think that the more likely thing to do right now is to sue over clearly violations the law. And also for the secretary of State's office, and I wish there was a stronger secretary of state. I asked everyone said, what was his past job? He said he was just a rich guy who wanted to be a statewide elective official.

I wish that the Secretary of State's office would have sat there, and I don't know had Marshalls had somebody there in I mean most of the boats in Atlanta are counting in one giant supercenter. Have someone said there and monerists that don't believe they would leave with them?

That wasn't secure. They found sixty thousand absentee ballots days after the election, and they said, oh, we forgot to click the up little button on the computer for sixty thousand ballots to show those should have been stopped immediately and checked out and inspecting them when they were actually even put into the computer and process. All these things are extremely worrisome. I will say I do have more confidence in the Republican Senate Committee being involved on the

ground in Georgia than I do the Georgia goop. But after this happens, Georgia needs to realize they are not South Carolina. They are looking closer and closer to being Virginia, and they need to really realize that they are in a changing state. They need extremely competent people. It can't be the good old boy system where someone's great uncle who has been loyal the party becomes chairman of one of the most important counties in the state, which I saw time and time and time again. We got to

ask you this before let you go. Ryan, You've seen what's going on with these hearings in Arizona and Michigan, and there's one in Nevada. I believe it will happen tomorrow. Is the case? Is Trump's case in your mind? Is it getting stronger or is it just disappearing over time? I don't know. I'm not a lawyer, and I've never run absentee ballad challenges in any of these states before. If it was New York, I can tell you a much more substantial than I can do it in any

of these states. I will say that Trump's tone and conversation has changed over time. You know, at the Christmas party yesterday, He's sat there said see you in four years. It's more likely that he's talking about running again in twenty twenty four than he is that he will be the president in twenty twenty one. Ryan Grodusky, Everybody, they're not listening how the elites created the National populace Revolution. Check it out. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is

the Buck Sex and Show podcast. You're ninety to ninety five percent immune after the second dose. But if there's still a lot of COVID circulating in your community, then you can still get infected, much less likely, but you can still get infected, and you can still get sick. So that's part of the reason why, at least for a short period of time, until there is widespread vaccination, we need to have everybody still wearing masks when they're

out and about. But look, once we get to seventy eighty percent of Americans getting vaccinated, that will really bring the pandemic under control, at which point I think, certainly in low risk situations, we don't have to be wearing masks anymore. Life will really begin to get better. And I'm hoping that's by the way, like May June, not like in twenty twenty two or something. So I do think there will come a time when we don't have to wear masks as much. But that's not going to

happen until a lot of Americans have gotten vaccinated. So let's be very clear about what this doctor on the view is saying, because I've been telling you that this is going to be what happens all along, because I understand their mentality. Even if you are vaccinated, you still have to wear a mask. Think about that. So, even if you get a vaccine that is ninety five percent effective, far higher than what they were even projecting six months ago,

you're still gonna have to wear a mask. You wear a mask until they say so, wow, Yeah, these are the new rules, this is the new world we live in. Still have never heard anybody explain why we're not going to have to wear masks in flu season. Oh those the tens of thousands of people who die every year from flu, they don't count. Masking isn't a big deal, right, Why not enforced us all the time. I know I

shouldn't give them ideas because I'm worried. I'm starting to think that they might bring this back even after this pandemic has gone. Yeah, why not? Right, they like this? Do this because I said so? Do it. Yeah, I've got a vaccine. I'm ninety five protected against this. That means ninety five one hundred people of the vaccine aren't going to be infected at all, or aren't going to show any symptoms and be able to transmit it to anybody.

And and they're still saying everybody has to wear a mask. You see mask, mask, mask? Now, Remember At the beginning of this, they said, don't wear masks. But that's how obvious it is. I'm sorry, I'm not letting this go. That's how obvious it is that this protects you. That at the start of this, when they thought there was a three to five percent fatality rate, far higher than the actual fatality rate by a factor of hundreds, they said, don't wear a masks. But now it's it's essential that

you do this. It's essential. They're not going to let this go. No, I get vaccinated. I'm not wearing a mask. They can arrest me not doing it. When I get that vaccine to my arm and I'm ninety five percent good to go. I'm not wearing a mask anymore. Not on the treadmill, not on the elevator, not out on the streets. We gotta draw a line here, folks, we gotta draw a red line on this. Enough is enough.

These people are out of their minds. But notice this, This is what happens when you give people some power and put them in charge. Why can't they make every decision about your life. It's life and death. Why can't they tell you what you can eat, what will Because we know the lives like to do these things. Whatever they can get away with dictating to you, they will do.

Oh you think that this is just for COVID. You don't think they're going to pull a climate emergency on you and tell you that it's sorry, the world is at risk. It's about saving the world. Gotta tell you everything that you can do about your life, your business, you name it climate emergency. I'm still a Paul that how much people have gone along with this idiocy all along. Just do whatever they say. They show you what frauds

they are constantly, But we're supposed to do whatever they say. Okay. Sure, at least doctor Rand Paul is out there saying people need to say enough is enough. Okay, they need to start telling people to go blank themselves when they say, oh, you've been vaccinated, you still have to wear a mask. What is the chance that a person who has vaccinated, anyone, an individual? What is one in one hundred thousand they're gonna give it to somebody and that person's actually gonna die?

And really, well crunch the numbers on this. What are the chances that any one person? Here's Rand Paul saying exactly what I'm saying. Is that. Don't don't let them get away with this nonsense blit twenty. Trying to take some precautions is reasonable, but they're now people saying. Doctor Fauci included that when we have a vaccine, you're still gonna have to wear a mask. So people do need to push back. I'm one of those who are immune,

and I keep pushing back. Thirteen million Americans have had this. We don't need to tell them if to wear a mask. Notice though, it's just it's become a cult now. Even if you've had COVID, they want you wearing a mask because you know it sends a symbol to other people. Oh but I thought this was about life and death and health. I didn't think it was about the symbolism that some people want to see. I'm telling you right now, hard line on this one. I get vaccinated, not masking up.

Maybe for private businesses, but not in my own home and my own building, not on the streets. No, sir. Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast at the iHeart Radio app for war every you get your podcasts. Times are tough, but I want you to know that help is on the way. Last week I announced the nominations and staff for critical foreign policy and ask the security positions, a first rate team. It's going to keep us safe and secure.

And today I have the pleasure I have the pleasure of announcing key nominations and appointments for the critical economic positions and the administration a first rate team that's going to get us through this ongoing economic crisis and help us build the economy back. Not just build it back, the build it back better than it was before. You

Bonne Louis, remember that the stout fires, Louis. Yeah, here's Joe Biden telling you that the economic the economic genius, the people that he's bringing in, is going to really get things going for the economy. Their version of helping the economy is taking more from people who are productive and trying to find more ways to spread that money around at the government's whim and act like that somehow making us all better, richer, wealthier, more prosperous. That's what

they do. That's the situation. But you're supposed to believe that this is going to make your life better. We had eight years of Barack Obama's economy. You remember that you didn't get that was good. No, they had to make excuses all the time. Oh, he inherited a depression. Oh, it was so terrible when he came in. That was what you heard for years. Yeah, it's not really so good. Yeah,

I know, but they made excuses for it. And then eventually, because this is America, got back on the economy got back on its feed, was doing pretty well, wasn't great, wasn't what it should have been. And then Trump came in the economy booms. You know, I we're gonna go We're gonna go back to Okay, maybe it's not as good, but everyone's gonna pay their fair share. There'll be more redistribution of wealth, more of the government in charge of your life. You're spending all of it. That's what we're

heading back to you. That's where we're going here, and I think we should all remind ourselves of that, plus some heavy doses of social justice and left wing lunacy via economic policy monetary policy. Here's Janet Yellen telling you what she plans to do if she becomes Treasury secretary, which is Biden's plan. Play ten gender disparities to keep women out of the workforce and keep our economy from

running at full force. It's a convergence of tragedies. So it's not only economically unsustainable, but one that betrays our commitment to giving every American and equal chance to get ahead. But I know this team will never give up that commitment.

As you've said before, mister President elect. Out of our collective pain as a nation, we will find collective purpose to control the pandemic and build our economy back better than before, To rebuild our infrastructure and create bitter jobs, to invest in our workforce, to advance racial equity, and make sure the economic recovery includes everyone, racial equity, climate change, This is what the treasury, this is what would be

Biden administration. Treasury secretary thinks is her mandate. Gosh almost like the Libs understand all along that the economy is just a giant opportunity for social engineering and social justice tinkering. Oh yeah, they know. Get ready for a lot of that. Get ready for that to become more standard. Assuming that you know these legal challenges don't work, I think, can you all just give me, give me a give me. The expectation here is that I'm whenever I talk about

Biden and his team administration. I'm not thrown in the towel, but I'm just dealing with what we're being presented here. As this transition is allegedly going forward, okay, or the transition is going forward, it's allegedly a done deal. So I'm not saying it's a done deal. But this is what's happening in Democrat Land. This is what's happening with Biden and the folks around him. So I think that's

it's worth at least dealing with here. It's worth at least looking at what's happening and understand that the Democrats are planning to do everything they can to mold the country more in their image, which is going to be a full throated embrace of the kinds of corporate diversity, rhetoric and all this stuff that we see. I think it's just in New York now they're talking about mandating

diversity on corporate boards. You're going to see a lot more of this, some of these social justice issues that America hasn't been constantly bombarded with by the Trump administration. If anything, Trump has been holding back this tide. They're going to come back. There's going to be a whole lot more of this, and we need to be ready for it, because they haven't changed at all on any of this. In fact, here I remember just just a

little bit of a review. Under the Obama administration, Barack Obama himself as president, was so devoted to the idea of making bathrooms I believe it was in South Carolina, could be North Carolina, though I gotta check, but in one of the Carolinas, but so devoted to a federal education policy that would mandate transgender student bathroom usage of their preferred gender. Right now, Notice, you can anyone can transition,

and that's to be celebrated at any age. You can be five, eight, twelve, doesn't matter if you transition, it's affirmation. It's celebrated. You'll see, though, the Left has a problem with people who then want to transition back, because well, what does that mean? Does it mean that they didn't actually need to transition the first place? Does it mean that this is just a decision? If this is innate in who you are, how can you transition twice? How

can how can you affirm two times? Right? There? They again they will always have this cognitive dissonance. What they're saying it is best summed up by the very very obvious question, but one that they don't have a good answer for. What is a woman? Ask a liberal this, you see this all over social media, what is a woman? And they will hesitate for a second. I would I would sit here and say, a woman is somebody who is a female, has female anatomy and has you know,

XX chromosome, Right, that's a woman. They would say, well, a woman is someone who self identifies as a woman. M But then when you dig into that a little bit more, you say, well, does that mean that I can I can I self identify as a woman today

and change my mind tomorrow? If not, why not? No really pushed them on these issues, right because there always there's a desperation on the left to create in their minds, and this goes very deep into the into the culture of left wing politics and the Democrat Party in America.

They're desperate to create this notion that they are fighting in a new civil rights struggle, that they're the great heroes of periods past where there was real oppression in this country, where we do have a legacy of slavery, and you know, women were not allowed to vote in all these different areas where they're needed to be changes over time. There needed to be fights that we had to have right, fights that we had to have to

be a more ethical, more moral country. Never perfect, but certainly needed to be better than we were on some of those issues as a country. You know, the great stain of our past slavery. Were monstantly reminded of this, not just by the Left but in any history class that's worthy of the name. Okay, So with all of that, now they're looking for another way to pose as the great heroes of the moment, and they've picked because we now have gay marriage is the law in all fifty states,

We now have transgender rights. Is this the latest frontier? But this is running into some problems because it's not clear even by the left's own rules and dictates, well how does this all work? But one thing that you can be sure of is that whatever radical left disposition is fashionable, at any point in time, you'll have people like Chuck Schumer agreeing with it. And here he is talking about what he wants the Biden administration to do.

Play clip twelve. Joe Bien said that on his first day of office, he will give trans gender students access to sports bathrooms and locker rooms in accordance with their gender identity in all federally funded schools. Do you think he has the ability to do this and do you agree with this decision? I agree with the decision, and I know he'll check things out thoroughly, legally, agrees with the decision. That's right, Chuck Schumer wants anatomical males twelve

year old boys who are identifying as female. We should really dive in more to why there's this huge surge in people identifying as different genders all of a sudden, and why the left gets very angry and anyone actually does research into this. But a twelve year old boy who identifies as a girl is now going to be using the girl. You know, under a Biden administration would be federally mandated. This would become an issue of federal regulation,

a federal education policy. They'll be using the bathrooms of your twelve year old daughter, and the same locker room in the changing areas and all that stuff. I remember when he even ten years ago, if you said this is where the left is heading, because I was a part of those debates, they would tell you never, we would never do that. I used to use examples like, what about a male inmate in a prison who's got a twenty year sentence. It says, you know what, I

want to be in a female prison. I identify as female. If you're a biological male, you are a lot safer in a female prison than you are in a male prison, as well as other reasons why some people might choose to do that. And I said, well, isn't that can't we all agree that that's crazy as a policy, And they would say, oh, of course, we're not trying to

do that, we're not making that our new stant. Well turns out that is now possible they have to go through, so there's some process they've put in place to prove that it's a real transition. But now they will put biological males in with females in a prison system. Now they will put biological males against women in sports. And I'm sorry to and this is sad. This should not

be happening. It's wrong for the women who have their ability and their skill relative to their gender, because that's a real thing effectively nullified by someone who comes in who says I identify as female, and all of a sudden is winning, winning all the races, bigger and stronger than the women, Like this is a surprise to anybody. Oh but liberals are also Oh but we want to be the nice people and we want to feel inclusive

of it. It's not inclusive for the girls that have been, you know, trying as hard as they can, working long hours at the track so they can get as fast as possible. To have some guy come in who's six feet tall and one hundred and eighty five pounds and has you know, much greater muscle, muscle mass and much less body fat relative to his peer group, which is now females, and is beating all of them. They clap

for this, They think this is good. There's even a transgender female who was fighting an MM for a while, which is really dangerous for women to get into the ring with a guy. And I, hey, when I have all these people who confuse feminism girl power with what I'm talking about, Okay, let's not live in a delusional world. Let's live in the real world. Women are overwhelmingly going to be smaller, lighter, not as fast, not as strong as men of comparable age group and activity. That's just reality.

We all this is true. We all know this, but they want us to forget this. They also want us to forget back to the transgender student issue. Oh and I brought up Obama. Obama during his administration was threatening federal funding for public schools, made it very explicit, federal funding for public schools unless people use the bathroom of their gender identity. So they'll and that's I mean when you talk funding with schools, the Department of Ed folks,

that mean they'll you know, they'll do whatever. Now, I mean they'll Okay, hey, sure, you know whatever you want us to do. So get ready for more of this. And these fights are also going to coincide with a lot of efforts at cancel culture. These debates are going to be full of lies and smears meant to hurt people's careers, meant to hurt their livelihoods. If you won't call I think I think her name is Ellen Page just decided or just announced I should say yesterday that

she is a man. If you use the wrong pronoun, people are going to come after you, and they might use the force of law against you. You know you'd say, well, how would they do that? I mean, if you're in an office setting. Now, and someone is a he and you call that person a she is that is that now discrimination according to unfortunately the Supreme Court and Neil Gorse, which seems like it is so now you have to lie about somebody's gender as a matter of law. That's

the country we're living in now. Gender is a is a binary. It is a real thing. It is or is not. We can all observe it, we all see it. We all know there are cases where gender can be unclear as a physical, biochemical manifestation. But that's not what we're talking about. And if it is what we're talking about, all these other people who are just psychologically affirming some other gender don't. That's a different thing. So they won't they won't actually use that as the explanation for this.

But this is coming your way, and this is this is happening. If there's a bid administration, there's gonna be a lot of stuff that you're told you better believe, you better sign on for, and they're gonna they're gonna try to force you to bend the knee. There's a tremendous amount of rage and resentment stored up after even only four years of Trump. Here the left wants a purification of America through leftist pain. Get ready for it. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton

Show podcast. We just don't have time to time. We have a couple of weeks left here. Obviously it is required by partisans support to get out of the Congress, but it requires a presidential signature, and this government is in place for sure for the next month. Yeah, they'll just wait it out. They don't care that people are suffering. Democrats will wait this thing out. Does not matter to them. That's the plan, That's what you see happening. And they're

going to play this game too. I mean Senator King is an idiot. I mean this is he's a particularly dumb fellow, but he'll play dumb, even dumber than he is, in order to this whole What do you mean the Republicans won't just go along with our proposed bill. The Republicans have offered up money for COVID suffering, for COVID problems. Democrats are saying, yeah, we'll agree to pass that, but you also have to do all these other things that have nothing to do with COVID that we want. They're

holding the funding hostage. That's what they are doing. But Senator King is going to say, oh, order to understand what's going on here, play eight, we really tried to come to a middle ground and we got to waiting. Frankly, and I don't understand what the Majority leader's problem is. But John, there's an important thing about the Majority leader that isn't in the civics books, and that is that he or she has absolute power over what comes to

the floor of the US Senate. We can have a bill supported by ninety nine senators and if the Majority Leader said I'm not going to bring it up, it doesn't come up. And there's no mechanism, seriously to make that happen. So he's got to listen, and I'm hoping he's going to listen to the members of his caucus saying, look, we need to do something. It's urgent. People are going to be losing benefits, people are going to be losing their places to live, They're going to be evicted, schools

are going to have really serious problems. We've got to do something, and we've put forward a good faith effort to make that happen. No they haven't. They could have just signed the bill gone forward with the bill. I mean, voted for the bill at Trumps signed months ago, but they won't For listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcast, remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or

wherever you get your podcasts. I guess you can use a snappy slogan like defund the police, but you know you've lost a big audience the minute you say it, which makes it a lot less likely that you're actually going to get the changes you want done. But if you instead say, let's reform the police department so that everybody's being treated fairly, you know, divert young people from

getting into crime. And if there's a homeless guy, can maybe we send a mental health worker there instead of an armed unit that could end up resulting in a tragedy. Suddenly a whole bunch of folks who might not otherwise listen to you are listening to you. So the key is deciding do you want to actually get something done or do you want to feel good among the people you already agree with. Oh Obama said stuff that god him in trouble here with the left, not allowed, not allowed,

not allowed to do it. By the way, he didn't even say that he wants to or that he opposes defunding the police. He just said, it's not a smart slogan, and that's obviously true. Defund the police is crazy. It's a crazy it's a crazy thing to say. Right now. I understand that when you when you push and I've talked to activists about this, when you push people on defunding, what they'll say is, oh, but it's about a it's

like a conceptualized future. When you ask a leftist what does it mean to defund the police, they mean all the things that Obama was saying, bo, We're gonna do more of this, We're gonna do more of that. We're gonna send you know, a healthcare worker or a social worker or a psychiatrist, not a cop, for all these different things. And we're gonna de escalate it. We're gonna do all this. That's all nice. It's a little bit like saying though, and it's a different context. Sent police

are not soldiers. But imagine if you were, you know, imagine if you were taking an approach to a military conflict and you said, let's defund the military, and then you said, well, hold on, no, you can't do that. Said no, But by defund the military, we just mean not having air strikes on civilians by accident and not having you know, collateral damage and casualties and things like that. So we're just going to defund the military to get

to that. People would say, well, that's completely insane, because you're already trying to do those things. They're already policies in place for problems. You know, you don't want to blow up the wrong house with an air strike, you don't want civilians to get killed. The answer, of course, is not to take money. It take all the money from the military and act like you don't need a military. So I mean defund the police in the same way

as insane. They look at problems. Most police in the country, you know, ninety nine percent of cops ninety nine percent of the time, and that all the statistics bear this out, are acting, you know, reasonably, are acting in good faith, and are doing a good job of protecting people. That's the reality of law enforcement in America. That's what we

actually see on a regular basis. But what the radicals, what the you know, what the left pretends we see is just an endless stream of evil cops murdering people for racist reasons, and so we have to have this sweeping overhaul of the police across the country. And that's just, it's just, it's it's I don't know what I'll say. It's crazy, it's crazy. But you see people you know, like Rashida Talib and Ilhan Omar and others, they have blasted Obama for this. They're they're upset with Obama for

saying this. What would be more obvious than what Obama said. He wasn't even passing moral judgment or any judgment really on the stupidity and insanity of defund the police. What he was doing was saying, hey, guys, don't use that slogan. That's a bad that's a bad political move because people who are normal and not brainwash leftists are gonna say, you're gonna defund the cops. What happens, then you're you're gonna defund the police. And so then who's gonna come

when someone gets shot in my neighborhood? Who do I call when there's a burglary? Oh? Well, then you hear all these different things too. Well, of course, it doesn't mean there's no police, doesn't mean there's no police, defund the police. There's no police, Okay, someone explained to me. Then what that does mean, right, if you keep going these circles, you say, so you want to get rid of the cops, except when there's a need for a cop,

you're gonna say, well, there'll be cops there though. But they see, this is just that urch folks at the bottom of this, at the base of this, there's just this anti cop sentiment that the left has because ultimately the left is full of people that want to throw childish tantrums and do what they want to do and

get away with it and not face consequences. And the left has created this vision of America in their heads where people are constantly being are being punished by police for reasons of race or reasons of class that have

nothing to do with individual behavior. Right, It's not that people are committing crimes, it's that the cops are bad again, so divorced from reality, so separate from what is observable all around you that it's it's hard to fathom that anybody would say this out loud, never mind that they would try to base a national level policy shift on this. But that is what they do now. The Democrats can try to forget about this as much as they want. I mean, the left can do whatever they want here

to try to make all this go away. But here's the truth of the matter. The Democrat Party lost pretty much across the board in this election in terms of the momentum and the trends, the waves. They lost in state houses, they lost seats in the House overall. They you know, they they look like they're not even they're not going to take back the Senator, though I know

that's not a done deal. And a big reason for the reason, or a big reason rather why the Democrats didn't do better was because in suburbs actually of major cities, there are a lot of people who, even if they didn't like Trump, they did recognize that this defund the police stuff is crazy and that it endangers people and that the lawlessness. Remember there's a kind of psychosousness of mass lawlessness that happens when you see looters and rioters

getting away with something in your hometown. People feel less safe, and those who are the criminal element see that and they see the lack of consequences and say, oh okay, so that's the political environment right now. Remember politics drives law enforcement. Unfortunately, right there has to be the political will to enforce laws and to hold criminals accountable, or else law enforcement does not have the support it needs

to do these things. So when you have that kind of mass lawlessness on display, people turned around and they say, hold on a second, what else can I get away with? If I'm a criminal? And if you're a good person, if you're a law abiding person, you say, am I going to be safe? You're going forward with this Democrat point of view? And this wasn't just this isn't just a rhetorical question. This isn't just thinking aloud. This had

an effect on the most recent election. This was a real thing that we saw a play out where people who could have gone for Democrats could have gotten more Democrats elected to the Congress. Now you'd say, oh, buck well, why wasn't enough for Trump to have some sweeping victory

over Biden? Because the media has been four years saying that Trump was hitler And unfortunately the media is still powerful and unfortunately, you know, there are enough people that listen to them, and I don't think that the and there was COVID, right, I mean, so you add all these things together and you had a bizarre year where not Trump was a was a powerful enough political slogan

unfortunately to at least get us to this point. You know, but Barack Obama saying this about defund the police just goes to show you that even even Obama recognizes that there's a cost to all this. Now, I'm also going

to tell you this. I think that there's a degree of second tier or second level politics all around this where Obama doing this, saying this kind of helps push this narrative that the Biden team, right, because Trump, I mean, Obama and Biden are linked vice president president and we all know this, but kind of pushes this idea forward that, oh see Obama will call out defund the police because it's a way of saying that, you know, Biden and his incoming team, who are really a lot of them

are Obama recycled recyclables or whatever people that came from the Obama administration, that they're not going to be radical. They'll even upset Rashida to leave, you know, they'll even upset il han Omar and say things like this. I

think that that's for public consumption. I think at some level this is actually a pr exercise designed not so much to change then the police narrative as to allow the media, with this what they believe will be this new Biden administration, to continue to tell everybody, Oh Biden so moderate. Oh Biden's a guy, he's not radical, you can trust him. There is no big deal. And I think people recognizing increasingly that they'll see I believe they'll see in time that's not true. You know who won't

see it though? That blow dried, imbecile Joe Scarborough play seven Democrats who think Joe Biden wants anything to do with any investigations regarding anybody whose last name is Trump, doesn't understand how Washington works. And Joe Biden is interested in moving legislation forward. Joe Biden is interested in getting things done his first one hundred days, just like Gerald Ford. Yeah, you know, he pardoned Richard Nixon because he wanted are

long and national nightmare to be over. Joe Biden is interested in getting things done. I mean, Joe Scarborough is a Joe Scarborough's a Democrat and has been for years, or he's just whatever he has to be on TV. There's so much of that, isn't there in the media that people that will say whatever doesn't matter, it doesn't matter whoever will pay them the most. They're almost like ambulance chasing lawyers. It's just all about wherever they can

get the most cash, and there's no ethics involved. There's a lot there's a lot of that in politics in general, but particularly in political media. You'll see people have no allegiance to principles or ideas, and what I think is so fascinating. They also will accuse people that support Trump of exactly that there's this projection that goes on when I mean, I can sit here and I have I've told you about things that Trump has done that I

don't like, that I disagree with. Stylistically, there are areas where I would have taken it. I would have wanted the president, I should say, to take a different approach. But on the ideas, I think the ideas are really powerful and important and strong and on with the movement represents. I think that he's proven with things like the trade deals. I think he showed with results that those of us who had our qualms or had you know, questions about this, well,

turns out he was right. He was right on China, he was right on trade, he was right on the border. These are things where Trump proved the model, so to speak. But the leftists and that the people that want to now be the former Republicans who have a there's a new found respect for them among Democrats. That's the term that will be used, a new found respect. People like that.

They you know, you turn around, you say, what exactly were they doing all this time, for all these years when they were representing certain political interests and pushing forward certain ideas. Was that all part of a scam? Just because they were it was benefiting them them, I mean benefiting them at that time, Like Joe Scarborough. Yeah, yeah, that's what it's all about. Joe Biden wants to get

stuff done in his first one hundred days. Yeah, like what, who even knows what Joe Biden represents other than the Democrat Party And he'll be essentially a you know, marionette for a left wing interests and big corporations and big tech. But well, what are Joe Biden's big ideas. I'm not Trump. I'm gonna come in and I'm you know, no joke man, I'm gonna sign these bills and we're gonna we're gonna build back better. Yeah, we're gonna shore your Babiscoba Scarby.

Remember remember Joe Biden with some of those great moments of the CAMPAIGNE trow, we go, Scary, scar that's your next president, everybody. If the Democrats get their way in this whole recount fight, that's what's gonna be. And they're gonna tell you he's a genius, great leader. Yeah, and look,

and you know, maybe he's right. I can't wait to hear him at the first Day of the Union address when he lays out the buying agenda and it's you know, we're gonna build back better and we're gonna we're gonna do all these great things, and we're gonna do the discovery. You're in the Freedom Mind. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. On the same day that bar said that a judge forced his Department of Justice to tell us

something else that it had been keeping quiet. They are investigating allegations of people seeking to bribe their way into pardons. That comes out just as we hear that Rudy Giuliani and others are asking for exactly that pardons question is for what talk about a guilty conscience has not even an investigation, Yet you want to pardon, and you're telling me everything you do is legit, but you want to pardon.

The New York Times is reporting tonight that, along with the potential Giuliani pardon, Trump has discussed with advisors whether to grant preemptive pardons to his kids, Ivanka, Don Junior, and Eric, and also to his son in law Jared. What does that say that he wants to excuse them for things before anybody's even saying there's an investigation. Now, bad news for Trump translates into good news for the

drama finally ending around this transition. Maybe, and let's just put aside for a second that I think we all know that there's essentially no chance, there's essentially no chance that Chris Cuomo will go back and apologize to these people that he's effectively claiming need a pardon here. Oh there's reporting. Yeah, Well, when the reporting doesn't actually bear out what's being said here, do you think he's gonna say, oh,

maybe Rudy Giuliani didn't actually need a federal pardon. I'm just saying, if we get to that point, which is likely, I assure you they will not go back on Eric's Cuomo will not go back on Eric's and you know, put down the metrics weight gainer for a second or whatever, and you know, put down the weights and actually be smart for a second. Not going to do it. He's he's gonna just skip past this after he's done with

the smear job. But also think about how they never give any thought whatsoever to why Trump would have to pardon himself and his family. It's not because they did anything wrong. It's because they'll try to manufacture. They lied about Russia collusion, They created a fake crime that did not happen, and then they investigated people and then they got them jammed up on process crimes from the hyper

over zealous investigation as we know. And they even lied about what was done in the investigation in the case of General Flynn to ambush him and to take him down. So why would Trump and why would his family members need a pardon to protect them from these psychotic libs. That is why they would need a pardon. That is why they may have to do that. And I understand it's bad optics, but I'm just gonna say this. Do you trust Democrats when they claim that they would not

bring an investigation against Donald Trump. Do you trust him? I don't trust them. Why wouldn't they They've been saying for years that he is a criminal, that he's gotten away with everything, and the process is the punishment. So even though there's no criminality, even though there's nothing they could find. Do you don't think that they would get joy out of putting Trump through numerous federal investigations and burning up millions and millions of dollars in legal fees

and all the stress and the deposition. Of course they would. There's no good faith from these people, this whole all. We're the Democrats. We think we won, so we're all good faith and we care about the republic. It's all bull. It's all bull. We know it. So I understand that it wouldn't look good. But maybe Trump does need to pardon himself in his whole family. Because the Left or a bunch of barbarians, they get in charge, they run

the DOJ, they'll bring investigations against Trump. They investigated him for three years over Russia collusion, which didn't even exist. Thanks for listening to The Bus Seston Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts at the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. There ain't no party. Look at Team Buck party because a Team Buck party don't stop. Yeah,

we got bucks turned up to eleven. It's time for roll call rollco everybody, Facebook dot com, slash buck Sexton, Team buck at iHeartMedia dot com if you want to send us an email. Also, I'm on TikTok, buck Sexton and Instagram buck Sexton. Yeah yeah, may get it happen. May get it happened, Producer Mark, Anything exciting going on your world this week? Man? It feels like every day is groundhog Day? You know. It's like that. Remember that Bill Murray movie. Do you ever see it? Yes? I

have seen it. Great movie. It's a little bit like that. Wake up radio all day, go to sleep. Wake up radio, all day, go to sleep. I feel like you must do something exciting. No, I don't do anything exciting. I do the same thing you do with a little more free time radio radio radio. I wonder, you know, if if a vocal box could have a six pack, could have six pack apps. I'm sure my vocal box would because that's where all my energy goes these days, spending

a lot of time on that. So yeah, I wish I could have cool stories for people, but I feel like New York you know, we're gonna we're gonna be shutting down more and more. It's not gonna stop. So you know, it's gonna time to hunker down. Man, get ready for some Netflix, nap time and radio. Of course, that's it. It was gonna be the worst vacations we've ever had when we take off at the end of

the year. Yeah, I mean, we'll figure something out. Tell me this, Uh, what's the latest and greatest with with you and and your friends? The New York Mets. Any news there? They signed a relief pitcher. All right. Things are moving slow right now because of the economy and everything and all the uncertainty. You know, the hot stove is what they call the free agency in baseball. But it's been kind of a cool stove lately. I hear that. Alrighty, well,

let's let's uh dive into the roll calls. We're checking with producer Marks. Yeah. By the way, you do anything fun for Hanukah in general? Yeah, we might see my in laws Lightermanora to exchange gifts. So yeah, that's the stuff. It's more fun when you're a kid. Is there like a special meal? Not really. I mean I think my in laws might make make lotcas. I was gonna say, when do you do the hollow bread? Hollow bread is

technically every Friday night for sure. Okay, Yeah, learn something new, alrighty. I love lakis by the way, I will say that I have appropriated that from your people, and I love them. What's not to love about fried potato pancakes? Fried potato pancakes you throw a little bit of Oh and if you go, if you're really gonna go bougie and go with either homemade or fresh apple sauce, amazing. And I actually like them with sour cream. And I'll throw a

little hot sauce on them too. Who telling you? Game changer? Game changer? All right, Robert, Team Buck As always, thanks to all your team does to bring us information and rational analysis of the news. I'm particularly fond of how you approach the COVID nineteen lockdowns, mask wearing and the fact that these little dictators will not relinquish their newfound power until we the people stand up and say no more. She'll die. Robert, you have excellent taste. Thank you so

much for your support. We do very much much appreciate it, and yeah, look I'm I'm not even somebody people keep saying my name pops up now along some fact checks with people like Barrenson and Atkisson for being you know, anti mask, and that's not even really. Yeah, I have questions about the effectiveness of Everyone has questions about No

one knows how effective they are. I think the general public maybe thinks they're I shouldn't say the general public, but a lot of people, the experts probably think they reduce it by I don't know, you know, sixty percent, eighty percent, something like that. That's how they reduced this, That's what they would say. I think it's maybe like two percent. I mean, so I think that it's basically not really helping very much at all, and it's really annoying.

But I don't know, But I do know. What I do know is that mandates as a policy do not work, all right. That is just looking at mask mandates, compliance and caseload for COVID. Mask mandates do not work, all right. This is a public policy debate, and it's one that we should have. And the data is not on the side of the people insisting on infringing upon your freedom, and people say, word is it say you don't have

to wear a mask in the Constitution? I say, okay, Well, we can also take the position that you have to do one hundred pushups every morning for your health, because there's no prohibition against that every morning, one hundred pushups. I'm gonna arrest you if you don't do it. Police powers, right, at some level, the state's infringements upon individual autonomous autonomy aren't even a question of law. It's a question of don't be a bunch of jackasses. This is crazy and

we're at that level, all right. In case that wasn't clear. Jeremiah buck Love the show. I listened here in Grand Junction, Colorado on k n z Z. Jeremiah, We love our Grand Junction Colorado audience. Colorado is it's big team buck Country. I gotta tell you we do very well. Producer Mark, you know that we do very well in Colorado, can't. We love our Denver affiliate. We got well Denver, but we all where Colorado turns out we're big. We got

a lot of podcast listeners in Colorado. So love you folks. Thank you so much for your continued support. Who exactly certifies the election in each state. I thought it was state legislatures, which is why Rudy and co. Are working the geop lad legislatures in those states. But the secretaries of state in these states keep certifying results. Arizona just did today November thirtieth. Do the results then go to

the legislatures after the secretary of state. So confused, Jeremiah, I cry, Uncle, I give, I'd have to check and see. I think, yes, I think the I think the legislator legislature certifies, and then the Secretary of State like certifies the certification. I honestly don't even really know. I mean, then now you're getting into state by state how this thing works, and you know the process is enormously complicated. So I will look into this because I want to

have a good answer for you. I know that it's certified at the state level, goes to the electoral and then then the state chooses their elects to go to the electoral college. I mean, that process I understand, But as for how the secretary of state mixes in with the actual legislature. You know who man politics, Man, it's crazy. Burke Buck love your show, but listen while I work at night. Your impressions, especially a fouch Governor Cuobo crack

me up regarding the Vanderbilt kicker Sarah Fuller. I'm a big college football an SEC fan the league in which Vanderbilt plays. While I agree with your overall point about women playing men's sports, your analysis of Fuller's kick is incorrect. It is what is referred to as a squib kick, which is a type of on side kick that's intentionally short. Producer markin back me up on that. Fuller is the goalkeeper for Vandy's women's soccer and is definitely more than

cable of kicking the ball long. Just want to provide a tiny clarity, tiny clarity your analysis more accurate in the future. Shields high Well Burke, I love it, you love the show. I also think you're wrong here, so so I appreciate that you don't. You know, it was not an on side kick, and the fact that she would go for a kick that put the other team

at their forty yard line. This was not strategy. This was the best that they could do, or the best that she could do, I should say under the circumstances. In my view, I've seen other people who are really into sports analyze this, and they say because that that became the thing of Oh it was a squib kick, producer, Mark, wasn't a squib kick. I did not see any squib kick.

I mean, again, I don't know much about these two teams, but a squib kick is something you do if the other team has a really great return man and you want to keep them all away from them. So that is a strategy, right. I can't say if it was being used in that, Burke. I think you're right about what a squib kick is and that it is a possible situation. But this was from what I saw it was. It was not a squib kick because as a squib kick also, you would kick it so that it would

be um you'd wanted to try to bounce. I need to give you more time. I know it's not an onside kick, but you usually kick it up the middle and kind of have it hop around so that you don't get it to the right kick returner. This was just a really short kick, Ben. I mean, hey, team, if I'm wrong, let me know. But I think I'm right on this one. But Burke, we love you, cool name and you like the show. See your team Buck Forever Pablo Buck. I listen to your show daily, enjoyed

your Dracula podcast. Well, Pablo, that's because you're a scholar and a gentleman. I was curious if you could possibly do something similar for Lincoln's first election. This election was very complicated. I believe it went to a vote on the House floor. I think this would do very well, be informative an interesting Shields High. Well, Pablo, I think that's a cool idea, but I can't tell you that I'm going to have the time really to do that

and address that. So while thank you for bringing up to me, I cannot make false false promises here because we are still scheduled for six more Shields High episodes early in the new year. Going to be getting you all kinds of good stuff there. That is the plan. We're gonna get you Malta, siege of Vienna, Lepanto battles. I like big battles, and I cannot lie You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. More roll call come in your way. Remember gonna bucksexon

dot com a check in on latest stories. Also Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton. If you haven't followed me on Facebook, please team, great way to keep in touch, see what we're doing, and uh check us out there and for all the fate of the Uh. I was gonna say, Facebook youngsters, that's not right. The TikTok youngsters out there. Buck Sexton's on TikTok, don't stop gonna groove it to you. Drop. What is it? What's the lyrics? Mark?

Not what you just said. Ah, I was close. I was close, though I don't think so, but you know, so somebody want to think there was like a rhyme and you know a thing with a rhyme, you know, something like that. All right? Uh Graham, Oh wait, no, sorry, let's go to Brian here. Sounds like you had a well deserve relaxing holiday, Brian. I did, but it was a bit fattening better than that. Uh, you know, because the real damage that I did was I went in,

I went in hard in the paint on Thanksgiving. But then the leftovers the days after I was like m pecan pie for breakfast. You know what I mean? You had some of that, Mark, didn't you. Of course I had an entire anniversary cake in my fridge. Oh yes, yes, sir, I mean because you could convince yourself. When you've got food like that in the fridge, you're like anything. I can eat anything for Thanksgiving, breakfast right the day after. Yeah, yeah,

it's it's lights, you know, anniversary cake or cereal. It's like the same thing, man, same thing. These are These are the conversations I have in my head after Thanksgiving, which is also why now I've grown very fond of sweatpants and find belts to be evil. I don't like belts because they tell you when your belly is growing, because there's little notches that get tighter and tighter over time. So belts are bad. Sweatpants with their draw strings and

their generally comfy nature, are your friend. That's what I've decided. That's what I almost exclusively wear now. Yeah, it's great too, Brian. Question, it's December second, Why has center Kamala Harris not resigned her Senate seat. Perhaps this lawyer knows what's coming and is not going to give up yet, Just in case, Brian, I don't have a good answer. I've seen people point

this out. I wish I could say that I thought it was indicative of Kamala not having a whole lot of confidence that you know she's gonna be she's going to be the VP, but I think she thinks she is. I might just be either an oversight or maybe there's no reason to do it now and she likes staying in her senate role for the time being. You know, I don't know. I'd have to look into a little bit more. I've noticed this, and I've seen people pointing

this out. But to me, I don't. I don't like to get excited about things we shouldn't get excited about, right, I don't. I don't like to look at indicators that I want to believe are true and then believe them for no good reason. Now that may not be the case. Maybe maybe she is hedging her bets. I can't say. I just I don't have a read on this one. And I like to tell you all that too. Sometimes.

I know, I talk to you guys for hours and hours a day, and I appreciate so much how many of you listen across the country, and I always really do put it one hundred percent into the show and give you the best I've got. But I also want to tell you when I just sometimes I just don't,

you know, I don't really have a take. You know, that's why when when we're talking about the Mets pitching staff, we go to Producer Mark because Producer Mark will continue to have takes for us on that right, Yes, always, yeah, So that's you know, I know my wheelhouse and so on, or even if it's within my wheelhouse, but I happen to be asleep at the wheel or not not up on it. And so that's that's one that I gotta

tell you. I think I think it's clear, all right that I thought it's clear that it's not clear to me Graham not to be confused with the Graham Cracker. I used to eat those back when I elude. They were quite delicious, actually, you know what, I really liked for a while too, mostly because the ads were super catchy. Producer Mark, you might have been like in Amba or a tadpole at the time. I don't think you necessarily existed. But Teddy grams. Do you remember Teddy Grams? Of course

they're just want to eat those ty grams. But I think you just confused a song from Full House or am I that young that I don't realize that that was I just did. I think my brain just used the Full House Teddy Graham's song a Teddy Graham's ad, But actually it wasn't the ad. Yeah, I think you did that. That was Uncle Jesse singing to Michelle. That's right, that's right. He was a very talented man, as was Aunt Becky, who I believe is walking around now in

orange pajamas all the time as a prisoner. Am I or is she now? Or is she about to? I think she's in. She's not in for long though, so free Aunt Becky makes me so sad they locked up our Aunt Becky producer Mark over college admissions. Come on, crazy crazy all right? Um? Anyway back to sorry Graham, you just you triggered me with these uh Teddy Graham. Back in the day that Teddy Graham. I think they had a cereal they had the cookies. I like them.

I might like them mostly because of the commercial. I also remember I used to buy and I would always want to get for Christmas for my mom, who's so so kind to her children. She would get us whatever the Christmas toys that we wanted, even when it was absurd, but but I remember, you know she would. We would always want to get these things. Do you remember these um cars that you would make this track four and

they would do these commercials. It made it look so cool, and you'd make the cars go fast on the racetrack that you would build, you know, I'm talking about yeah, like a hot wheel, Yeah, kind of like kind of like hot wheels or whatever. But the commercial would always looked amazing, and then you'd get it and it would like right away the car would fly off and the whole thing would break and it was crap. I went through many iterations of those. Anyway, Graham says, buck. I

love the show and pass the buck often. Well, Graham, you're a great man with a cool name. I'm curious how you feel about Bill Barr's pick as Trump's best cabinet. Personally, I think he says the right things, but no action. There hasn't been any constitutional protection provided by suing states about these draconian lockdowns, no results in the Durham probe, non existing on the general Flint issue other than dismissing charges. Unable to find anything to celebrate the ag Barr pick about.

My pick is Mike Pompeio. He has been loyal, strong, calm in an excellent tecretary of state. Well, Graham, I told you at the earlier in the show, if you're listening, that the getting in front of the effort to impeach Trump, I mean, Barr may have saved the Trump presidency. It

would be very clear about that. They were going to try to rally and impeachment and get instant based on the ten articles of obstruction possible obstruction or whatever and instances of obstruction, and Bar got ahead of that and they got the charges against Flynn dropped. So there's have been some pretty good stuff here. And they've got a special counsel now for the Durham probe, so let's keep an eye on that. Thanks for listening to everybody, Shields Hi

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android