Democrats Have Nothing On ACB

great guy. No welcome friends to the Buck Sexton Show. We are twenty two days out from the election, and in some ways it really doesn't feel like it, does it not nearly the same kind of frenzy of political activity out on the streets. We don't have lawns in New York City, so I can't speak to lawn signs. But everyone's still locked up inside. Things are getting colder. People are worried about COVID, and this week we're going

to spend really on a Supreme Court nomination battle. There's going to be something of a rest spit from the main effort of the election for a few days. And we've already seen what the opposition to Amy Coney Barrett looks like so far, and the answer is it is unbelievably weak. I mean, it's really quite pathetic. You saw this over the weekend. You had a number of prominent news sites that started doing one of two things. They either changed the definition of court packing to include this right,

which is filling a Supreme Court seat. No, that's court packing. No, that's called filling a seat. That's not packing. Or they started to use this phrase de politicize the court, depoliticize Supreme Court dominations. What the heck does that even mean? Well, it's what you do when you don't have a real argument,

It's what you do when you're flailing. And clearly the Democrats are at this point, what are they going to say the incredibly brilliant, universally beloved mother of seven who adopted two black children from Haiti and has already been through a Senate confirmation process to be an Appeals Court judge and was just pushed through without really any issue other than being asked, does the dogma? The dogma lives

loudly within you? Which was great for Conservatives, Catholics and Republicans that that question was out there, but she's already been confirmed to that. Why would she not be confirmed here? They have no argument, friends lost. This is nothing but sour grapes, sore loserism from Democrats. That's all it is. They have no other argument. History is with the Republicans

filling this seat. Common sense, basic politics. Elections have consequences, the single truest and most useful phrase that Barack Obama ever uttered. I think, at least as president, elections do have consequences, and we are seeing right now what that can mean. So far, it has been pretty pathetic watching Democrats dance around the full on assault on Amy Coney Barrett's character that we all kind of know is coming. We all believe that they'll do something completely disgraceful or

disreputable here. That's their only option. What else are they going to say? ACB and I refer to her that way because it's convenient, but also because it really triggers the lives they hate that she's no RBG. Correct, she's not, and for the purposes of a constitutionalist on the Court, that's a great thing. That's a great thing. But they're going after everything around this moment. So far, they're trying to set the stage and set the narrative. You had Democrats.

Senators spend the day talking about how important the Affordable Care Act is. Senators talking about how Donald Trump has done a terrible job on COVID. These things have nothing to do with ACB. Nothing. This is all about. It's supposed to be about deciding whether or not this woman, who is eminently qualified to sit on the Supreme Court is in fact going to sit on the Supreme Court.

That's it. There's nothing else, which is why all along I've held out that we should have just had the GOP, should have called for I vote, Have it done and over with, Allow her to be a vote on this, get it in the books, get her put in that seat, Dunzo,

move on to the next challenge. That's it. But no, senators can't help but want to take every opportunity to give speeches in front of the American people to a national television audience about how much they love the Constitution, or about how much Republicans and Donald Trump hate America, or whatever it is that they're going to say. You're hearing a variation of a political stump speech. For most of these senators, nothing particularly worthwhile or interesting for many

of them. Senator Ben Sass of Nebraska gave a Civics one oh one lesson today. I suppose some people seem to like it. Other people felt like it was kind of a waste of everyone's time. Senator Dick Durbin also did much of the same, going off on some lengthy speech about the need to protect pre existing conditions and how the Supreme Court is supposed to be this sacred body, and none of it really adds up to anything other than they are upset that they're not getting their way. Now.

I know Sasa is a Republican. I didn't mean to throw him in there with Durban, but I don't trust him. It's gonna say, I don't trust the guy as a Republican at all. I think he's more about Sass than he is about the GOP, that's for sure. Some of you can disagree with me, and that's fine. But onto what they're going to do. Now, they've tried so hard, they've they've they've tested and then thrown out. They're all

these different narratives. They're still clinging to the weakest of all I think, which is it was it was Rbg's last wish. I do not care, neither does any other Republican. It's not it doesn't matter. Rbg's last wish is not meaningful for a government proceeding that is representative of what is best for three hundred and thirty million people. Okay, doesn't matter the same way that the Democrats pretend. It does not matter that RBG was on the record and

explicitly against packing the court. So who was it that tried to pack the court? Just it's it's worth taking a moment to look back in time for a second. Who was it? It was? FDR wasn't oh a big Democrat, the Democrat who ushered in really the overreaching federal government authority, the enormous fissures and breaks in the Constitution. So it was in fact the Democrats who once again, as part of their will to power, tried to push through court packing.

They don't get their way and they want to change things. It's back in nineteen thirty seven, so it stayed at nine back then. But that was also because the composition of the court changed enough and the decisions changed enough to Roosevelt's liking. What was it about the not the Green New Deal? Oh, but New Deal legislation. So let's understand this as we have democrats today lecturing us about precedent and history and making it up as they go along.

That FDR, perhaps the big government patron saints. I don't know if you want to call him a saint, but you know, the big government exemplar of the twentieth century couldn't get the Supreme Court then to agree that some of his New Deal actions were in fact constitutional. So what did he do change the people making the decisions about the constitutionality? A very Olynskyite approach. Now that's what

he wanted to do. It was not successful, obviously in the judges stayed at nine, but it was that same impulse. We have power, we want to do things. We are collectivists, and we believe in state authority. So we're just going to go for it. It doesn't matter that there's a founding document that we're all supposed to adhere to that creates the basis for all of these government actions known as the Constitution. It's not supposed to matter. And then

you have this other, this media. It's really amazing, this media effort where it is almost like and I say almost because it is like Actually, I'd be willing to bet that if you were able to track down the emails, you'd find out that there were members of the media who are getting emails from Democrat list serves and Democrat email lists and things telling them to start referring to the de politicization of the court and also just say that it's the Republicans who are court packing. This is

classic gaslighting, and that's exactly what they're doing. Now. They do something, or try to do something. In this case, they haven't done it yet, thankfully, but they try to push through a court packing scheme and when it doesn't work out for them, when they public or at least the institutions that are watching over this thing, say look, you guys, they're allowed to do this. You can just wine and wine. They say, well, yeah, well you're the ones who are packing the court. What. Yeah, you're the

ones who are doing it. You cheated. This is the logic of an eight year old who stole a piece of birthday cake, knows he's about to get and so he blames his six year old sister. She did it, Cast dispersions on the other side, undermine them, and hope that your side is able to get what they want out of the equation. That's what's happening here. Democrats, in so many ways do act like a spoiled eight year old. That's really the central id, the central ethos of the party.

I want, therefore, I demand, I want, therefore I should get. Constitution can't be an impediment to it, the rule of law can't be an impediment to it. And even the stellar credentials of ACB and the fact that here we have a truly obviously decent, kind, ethical, brilliant person who's going to be in a role where she will make good decisions and stay in her lane. She's not going

to be a super legislator. She will at some point, i'm sure, disappoint conservatives because she won't do things that are outside of the constitutional scope of a Supreme Court justice. It's the left, it's the liberals who want something very different. They want a super legislature that is not accountable to the people, and that will give them at the key moments in the courts decision making process, will give them the laws and the political victories that they want. This

is for all of us to see. It's quite obvious. It's quite apparent and for all the smarmy lib lawyers out there with their much heralded credentials because they went to some institution that is now just churning out erudite leftists as fast as possible, who have who have bad judgment, but unfortunately have strong enough legal credentials that they now largely control the legal profession. I mean, the left has

overtaken not just undergrad programs, but law schools. Speak to somebody who's gone to law school in the last ten or fifteen years. There every bid is down with BLM and social justice and you know, Occupy Wall Street and all this stuff, you name it, big corporate law firms. It'd be shocking if Americans actually really understood how far this leftist ideological rot has extended throughout the legal profession. But ACB's going to withstand all of that. And here's

my prediction for the week. And this is one of these predictions where I hope I'm wrong. You will recall that Brett Kavanaugh was also sailing through stellar credentials, perfectly situated,

gold plated resume for a Supreme Court justice. Nothing about the guy didn't add up to, yeah, he should be voted through and that's the way the beginning of those hearings went till all of a sudden we knew that there was this allegation that surfaced, and then this woman showed up, and it was all just run through the Democrat apparatus. You had very powerful figures prepping and assisting and pushing for blasi Ford. And then of course two other women came forward, each one less credible than the

next with their allegations. And there are a whole bunch of allegations of people that made their way to the Senate that didn't actually make their way under the Senate floor because they were so absurd that even the shameless and disgraceful Kamala Harris and the rest of the Senate Democrats on the Judiciary weren't willing to use because their allegations from women who, it was demonstrable, had never even been in the same state as Kavanaugh, never mind had

actually been the victim of some attack by his hand. Brett Kavanaugh was a manifestly innocent person and a good man, and perfectly suited to be a Supreme Court justice. Amy Coney Barrett is a good woman and also perfectly suited for the role We're going to go through a few days here where it'll seem like everything is just fine, and then at the very last moment, as we were just a few weeks away from an election, I think Democrats will spring the trap. I don't know what it is.

It may be a process thing, it may be blocking access to Capitol Hill. It may be someone coming forward who claims that they heard Amy Tony Barrett saying anti LGBT slurs thirty years ago, with no proof and no nothing, but something along those lines. They're gonna try, and it's going to be ugly. That's my prediction. So just get ready for it. We're gonna I think we're gonna go through a few days of pretty smooth sailing Democrats flailing, looking weak, looking absurd. But I know, I know this

left wing mentality. I know what this Democrat Party has become, and they're going to try something ugly and disgusting in the next forty eight hours or so. You're in the Freedom und This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Well, I can tell you that we're getting this question. It's a common question being asked because American people who have watched the Republicans pack in the Court of the last three and a half years, and they brag about it.

They've taken every vacancy and filled it. Did you know that they've sent to us and we have approved only with their votes? That might add ten people who have been judged unanimously unqualified by the American Bar Association. Do you know how many judicial nominees came from Obama who were judged unanimously unqualified? None? So we are dealing with people on the court packed into the court with little or no qualification, who are going to be there for

a long time. So it's understandable the Republicans raised the issue of court packing, changing the definition. That's Dick Durbin on the Senate Judiciary Committee changing the definition of court packing in real time. That is not what court packing is. You can say I don't like their nominations, you can say a lot of things, but you can't say that

that's court packing, which is what they're doing. They're claiming right now that the words that we are using to talk about this nomination process don't actually have a specific meaning, that they can change the meaning of those words in

real time. What is that reminiscent of? There's a great irony in all this isn't there then, at a time when we're talking about who should sit on the Supreme Court, somebody who believes the Constitution is a document that has meaning and that the words have implications that are not subject to whims and interpretations not rooted in the actual text. Right, you have textualists and you have living constitution people. Right, it's just whatever I want it to be whenever I

want it to be. That we'll look at what the Democrats are doing right now with court packing. Court Packing isn't that thing that we've all agreed it is for as long as we've been using the term. It's some other thing, it's some other concept. Let me now, let me now shift into that conversation. It's stunning, it's disgusting, it's unfair. But that's where we are. That's where we are. Depoliticizing is the other term we're using. The Associated Press has heard it a talk about and this was the

quote from the weekend. Bullock said that if Coney Barrett was confirmed, he would be open to measures to depoliticize the word, including adding judges to the bench, a practice critics have dubbed packing. Oh so now, we're gonna see. This is why I always tell you watch the words the Democrats use. From a legal alien to a legal immigrant, to undocumented immigrant to undocumented period, just given documents, then they're just American like everybody else, right, the same thing

doesn't matter. Look at that. There are so many instances of this. Oh, pro choice, women's health, women's health rights. Say abortion, guys, you're talking about abortion. No one has any problem with any other women's quote health rights. But they can't use the actual language that we all agree

mean something, because then they'll lose the debate. So what do they do to change the terms of the debate when they're not deep platforming, as you can see, when they're not shutting you down, silencing you, what do they do? Change the way that you can use the platform, change the words that are acceptable, change the definition, at least in the public mind, so that now they can say whatever they want about a thing. Deep politicizing. Oh okay, sure,

isn't that so? Isn't that so quaint? We all know what they're trying to do here, We all understand what's happening.

But you're seeing the fundamental dishonesty of the Democrat Party on full display for all right now, whether it's on changing the terms of our discussion over the Supreme Court vacancy that will hopefully soon be filled by Amy Coney Barrett, or saying that Joe Biden, you know that there is no right for the people to know there is no reason for the people to know if Biden would even engage in court packing. Fundamental dishonesty from all quarters. That's

your Democrat Party in twenty twenty. Thanks for listening to the show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. Church Bird, your nomination for a life time appointment to the highest court in the land comes before us under a cloud.

You've been nominated by a president who shows contempt for the Constitution but does not hesitate to tell his loyal followers that you are being sent to the bench to do his political chores, abolish the ACA ruling, his favor on any election kind of test. And even more, you cannot feel good about a president cheapening this historic moment, the future, the affordable character, and so many other issues

hanging into balance. Voting rights, civil rights, the right to privacy and choice, environmental protection, gun safety laws, marriage equality, dreamers, work protection. These are the stakes. If we wait just a few more days, we'll know what the American people have to say. Yeah, Dick Durban is wasting everybody's time with this nonsense. But that's what he's been doing for decades in public office. So no surprise. Why is it Amy Coney Barrett's fault that Democrats don't like Trump? She's

just been appointed by, Yes, the actual sitting president. Sorry, libs, it's true, not my president, not my President. I can't wait. I hope, I hope I get the opportunity to hear those chants again on November fourth this year, just like last time, day after the election, right through the Flat Iron district of Manhattan on Broadway, Hundreds and hundreds of people on a cold, rainy night, too, marching through the streets. Not my president's like, Well, unfortunately not true. You can

say not my president as much as you like. It doesn't actually change the reality. But Democrats like to live in fantasy lands of their own creation, and then they watch MSNBC where they see that expounded upon it gets

even more attention. So what Dick Durban here is saying that there's a cloud under this is just Look, it's also obvious, right, But the problem is that we have to smash even the dumbest arguments the Democrats use, because otherwise it stands out there and they'll say, see, they have no response, they have no way of telling the truth about this one. It's also completely inaccurate. Amy klobaschar Oh, she's outing on the Midwest and she's gonna tall you know,

I was gonna be president. Oh, unbelievable. I do think she probably would have been better on that stage than Kamala Harris. But you know, she kind of has a voice that the registers up around here. Sometimes. Here's Amy saying that the way to deal with this is to call out the most psycho libs possible, call them up and have them harass every Republican member of the Senate. You know, go go outside, you, Mitch McConnell's house, and just bang a bunch of pots and pants together. Here

she is clobishar seventeen. Let me tell you a political secret. I doubt that we will be a brilliant cross examination that's going to change this judge's trajectory this week. No, it is you, it is you calling Republican senators and telling them enough is enough, telling them it is personal, telling them they have their priorities wrong, So do it. And it is you voting, even when they try to do everything to stop you. It is you making your own blueprint for the future instead of crying defeat. So

do it. This isn't Donald Trump's country, it is yours. This shouldn't be Donald Trump's judge, it should be yours. Well. Unfortunately, unfortunately for miss Clovish, are Senator clobush Ar, I'm sure she would want to be called that the president is the duly elected commander in chief and executive who gets to make determinations about who will be on the Supreme courtin next and it looks like it's going to be Amy Coney Barrett. And there's a big political problem that

this poses for the Democrats. You'll recall back in twenty sixteen, right, take it, take a step back, or take a trip down memory, laying with me here. Back in twenty sixteen, there was a pretty widespread concern among the political experts such as they are, and the polsters and all the rest of them, that this was going to be a very difficult sell, that Donald Trump was going to be a very difficult pitch for Evangelicals and for more traditional Christians, right,

not pro choice, left wing socialist Catholics. I don't know what's wrong with my fellow Catholics out there. Sometimes a lot of them, a lot of lib Catholics running around who think that having the state in place of God is a good thing somehow for their faith. I don't know. I think it's pretty unfortunate, but that's where we are. But you'll remember that there were people very understandably concerned about whether Donald Trump, who is a thrice married billionaire

from New York. Those are just the fact and not a man who anybody would think of as chaste in his personal behavior. Again, not judging, but just speaking facts. Whether Evangelicals and other more traditional morality based Christians, including a lot of Catholics and conservative and Orthodox Jews, you know, whether they would be able to come forward and vote for Donald Trump knowing that he had lived his life as a more let's say, in a more libertine way.

But the decision that they made was, well, it's not about Trump personally, it's about the policies, and it's about what he will pursue in the truth is, Donald Trump has been among the most, if not the most pro life presidents in history, based on his statements, his appearance at the March for Life rally in DC, and everything that he has tried to do, as well as the appointment of judges, which is what we're really going to

get into now for a second. As we're heading into this reelection, and there will be there, right, there'll be the two conversations about independence and swing voters and base turnout well for base turnout purposes, Evangelicals and other Christians on the right have to look at Trump's record and what he's actually done in office and feel pretty darn good about the whole thing that their bargain that they made in twenty sixteen. I'm gonna vote for this guy,

knowing he's imperfect. Of course, some would say, Buck, we're all imperfect. Knowing he's imperfect from the perspective of Christian teaching and morality, as again we all are. But what will he represent as the president of the United States, What will he be pushing for, and what kind of judges? Most notably, and this ties into everything, ties into Roe v. Wade, It ties into gay marriage. It ties into all these different social issues and social justice issues that will come

before the Supreme Court and continue to well. Neil Gorsich, Brett Kavanaugh, and soon to be any Coney Barrett, three of nine judges on the Supreme Court will soon again, assuming that ACB's nomination goes through, just fine, We'll soon go through. And once they've gone through, that will mean or rather once the final one goes through, the President will have had quite a hand in the federal judiciary.

You add to that all the federal judges. I keep telling you, Mitch McConnell, Cocaine, Mitch ain't playing no games. He fills those federal judge seats, doesn't care, just just keeps the machinery going. Okay, Harry Reid wanted to play hardball, get rid of the filibuster for judicial nominees. Guess what shoes on the other foot. As we warned them, it would be. And Mitch McConnell has been taken this sport

car for a ride. Man. He's having a good time getting as many constitutionalists as possible onto the federal judiciary, and he'll have a Trump in his first four years. Is setting records with this so you're getting judges who are constitutionalists. But also if you are a Christian and you believe in religious freedom, if you believe in free speech, and if you believe in the right to life, Trump has had a profound impact in his first four years

on those issues with the judicial appointments alone. And to really put this into stark contrast for everybody thinking about this, and this will affect I think, and this should I hope reach some people, because the show is now completely coast to coast and we're in so many states and large metro areas that you know, we're very thankful for

how many people get to hear the show. But one thing that I'm hoping some of you listening to this will take from it is imagine for a moment, if Donald Trump had not defeated Hillary Clinton, which I don't think any other Republican would have been able to do from that field in twenty sixteen. Look, I don't think Ted Cruz would have beaten her. I don't and I was very favorable to Ted in the early days of the primary. But you know, I thought he had a

really good shot. But I was wrong. And Donald Trump doesn't become president of the United States, Hillary Clinton, does you have three not even, not even people of Ginsberg's intellectual and judicial caliber. I mean, I disagree with Ginsburg. I think she was a very smart lady and she understood the law. She also used her position to advance left wing agenda items. But she was a talented lawyer. Right, this is this is just calling it what calling it

what it is here. But some of the other picks that you've seen, I mean, Soda Mayor, her decisions, it reads like somebody who should who spends all their time, you know, weeding through comments on msnbcman Soda Mayor on the Supreme Court is just a judicial travesty. The decisions make. I mean, we all know. It's just it's just having a left wing activist, not a particularly keen understanding of the law, not particularly well versed in our history and judgment.

I mean, look, sodomy Or is a disaster. You would have had three Sodomyor like judges on the Supreme Court. In terms of their philosophy, which is just a straightforward hey, sorry, we want this thing, no matter what the issue is that the left wants it. Sodomiyor basically signs on for it. No matter what it is. And if you look at Ginsburg, I think in Citizens United she was within I think that one was nine. Oh, but I mean, you know there were times when there was a civil libertarian component

of Ginsburg. And again I think that she was wrong and a lot of stuff. But I'm just saying it's there's wrong, and then there's just not even pretending the law matters. And I think that's what you get with Sotomayor. So you see what has Donald Trump done in his

first four years in office. He often talks about the economy, but his most successful and unchanged by COVID, his most successful record to point to is on judicial nominations and the decades long, generations long impact that this president has already had or will have. I mean, he's already put this into place. A lot of people that voted from in twenty sixteen who are like, look, we've just got to at least get conservative judges. We can have Hillary

in charge. They've got to be not only pleasantly surprised, they've got to think to themselves, we want more of this. We are, as Trump used to say, not tired of winning when it comes to judicial nominations. You're in the Freedom Hud. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. We've taken a different path at times, Bort Thomas, Alito Kavanaugh. I hope we don't take that path with Judge Barrett. She doesn't deserve that. I don't think it makes this

hearing any better. In the American people, I believe would not deserve a repeat of those episodes and the Senate Judiciary Committee's history. To my Democratic colleagues, I respect you all. We've done some things together, and we've had some fights in this committee. I've tried to give you the time you need to make your case, and you have every right in the world to make your case. I think I know how the vote's going to come out, but I think Judge Barrett is required for the good of

the nation to submit to your questions in hours. This is going to be a long, contentious week. I would just ask one thing of the committee, to the extent possible, Let's make it respectful. Let's make it challenging. Let's remember the world is watching. It's not going to be respectful.

I think we know that much. It's always interesting too, when you see members of our elected bodies, like the Senates not even just in the Congress, who are trying to go after somebody who is just intellectually more adept and quite honestly more capable than they are. Tony Barrett is a better legal mind than almost any of the Senate Judiciary members that will be questioning are, and perhaps at the same level as all of them. I mean, I think that you probably is right up there with

someone like a Ted Cruz. I think she is right up there with someone like a Mike Lee. And I would bet that they would tell you that that's true. You know, she's and perhaps even they would say, you know, in a rare moment of humility for United States Center or that she actually exceeds their legal knowledge and capability. So they're gonna be people that are attacking her, and

it's just gonna be pathetic but also upsetting. And I remember, look, Lindsey Graham, you guys know I gave him a hard time sometimes because of his you know, I'm gonna get answers. I'm appearing on Fox tonight and we're gonna get to the bottom of Russia. Colue. I'm always like, look, lindsay, come on, you're not There's no Durham report there. You know, this is the whole I'm gonna get answers. Let me go on Fox News now. Thing it does, it does

get old after a while. And I just gotta say what he did in the Kavanaugh hearing though he's kind of for he's kind of forgotta forever, you know, get out of jail free card me. I mean that was important. We were watching the Democrats and they didn't realize it at the time. Radicalizing the Democrats during the Kavanaugh hearing radicalized millions of conservatives into wartime conservatives, people who understood what the ideological battle in this country had shifted to

what it had become. That's what really occurred here, That's what was really going on. But in the moment, Lindsey Graham was the one who stood up there and finally gave voice to those of us at home who wanted to scream through our television sets. This woman, Blasi Ford is a liar. This is disgusting. The other women are lying. It's gross. They have no evidence, they have no support for their allegations whatsoever. It's all very conveniently timed, isn't it.

That's full of holes. And Emmy Coney, I mean, sorry, Christine Blasi Fords. These three names get confused in my head. Blasi Ford said that she couldn't fly and so she had to drive as a delay tactic, they get more time to prap and have people, you know, work on her image and all this stuff. And then we find out that she used to travel for fun, for vacations

all the time flying. Yeah, she lied. It's a liar. Oh, she needed two doors installed in her house because she was so scared about what Kavanaugh did thirty years ago, which he didn't do. And she couldn't even prove that she'd ever met him, even in the same building as him. Couldn't prove it, not even a little bit. I'm gonna say, prove it. No corroboration, nothing, just an allegation out of

thin air. So Lindsey Graham stood up and he threw a punch when we needed someone to stand up and throw a punch at the bullies on the other side. And I will always be thankful for what he did there. So that's why I always kind of hold my fire a little bit, even though I think that on other stuff, I'm not a big not a big fan of some of what Grahams were doing. But like I said, get out of jail free card. So what else are they

going to try this week? I wish I could tell you I knew they're just gonna say a lot of this for sure. Play three. When Justice Scalia died in February of two sixteen, Senate Republicans refused to consider a replacement for his seat until after the election. At the time, Senator McConnell said the American people should have a voice

in the selection of their next Supreme Court justice. When asked in October twenty eighteen if Republicans intended to honor their own rule if an opening were to come up in twenty twenty, Chairman Graham promised, quote, if an opening comes in the last year a President Trump's term and the primary process has started, will wait till after the next election. Republicans should honor this word for their promise

and let the American people be heard. Simply put, I believe we should not be moving forward on this nomination, not until the election has ended and the next president has taken office. Nope, too bad. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts. The iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. But these are nonetheless the consequences of her stated views on

the law prevailed on the Supreme Court. And if Republicans are successful in filling this vacancy prior to November tenth, well then we know these ullers will almost certainly prevail. So that's what's at stake here, That's what weighs heavily on me as we beginning these here. He's also weighs heavily in the minds of the remonters I represent. I've heard from them off and then lovely since Justice Skins

breaks past, and they're scared, Judge Barrett. They're scared that your confirmation would live the gary healthcare protections the millions of Americans that ought to maintain and which Congress has repeatedly projected limited. They're scared that the clock will be turned back to the time when women had no right to control their old bodies and when it was acceptable to discriminate against women in the workplace. Sure's your cold pasture of glay here. Yeah, maybe it's time now do

some oil painting in the backyard. Was the grandkids? Did these guys ever stop you know how we have an age requirement for certain offices, right, you have to be a certain age to be president. You have a certain age to be in the United States Senate, and a certain age for the House. You know how we have that.

I think we also at a point now where we need to consider an upper limit for elected office because people's egos are overtaking their ability to think fairly and rationally about whether they are in fact the most energetic, the most mentally acute, and best representative for the people in their place, because they just look people want to be important. You see this in the media all the time.

You see people get addicted to being important and having other people listen to them and having power and just being a normal person is terrifying to folks who have been in that role, have been a senator or for forty years. Look at Joe Biden, right, look at look at Lahey, and look at Nancy Pelosi. And you know I'm telling you honestly, I mean, I think Trump is agewise, at the upper limit of what somebody should be to

be the president. And Trump is also somebody who has a tremendous amount of energy and vitality for his age and is in very good health. In vaccines, we're speaking about the president's health. He said that he's here. We are, folks, it's Monday. I said, we gotta wait till monday to know for sure. The media is not going to focus on this. I'm just taking take a little break from the judge stuff for a second. Here Trump's saying he's right,

good to go back in action. Seventy four year old or maybe three, but seventy plus year old Donald Trump, with some concern over some additional aggravating factors, got COVID beat it in three four days. He's telling you himself. You say he's fine. Doesn't even happen anymore. Play fourteen. The note that you have revealed from your doctor which says you are no longer considered a transmission risk. Does

this suggest you no longer have COVID? Sir, Yes, And not only that, it seems like I'm immune, so I can go way out of abasement, to which I would have done anyway, and which I did, because you have to run a country. You have to get out of the basement. And it looks like I'm immune for I don't know, maybe a long time, and maybe a short time. It could be a lifetime. Nobody really knows. But I'm immune.

So the president is in very good shape. Here we are, folks, I'm ament of celebration that the media will just ignore president. It's fine. It wasn't just a stunt. It wasn't just oh he wanted that shot outside the White House after he had been released from Walter Reed where he took off his mask and they were all saying he's Musolini, because they're psychos, because they're crazy. Another president beat this thing. And now, really, you see the two narratives. You can

beat Joe Biden. You can be a h gotta wear the mask all the time, and I gotta be you know, hey man, I'm a mask mania. And you can avoid people and stay in your basement. And look, I have never said that anyone shouldn't. You know, that's freedom. You want to stay in your basement, you want to not live your life, fine, but Trump now shows us that no,

you can. You should be able to make the decision to live your life knowing that there is some risk that you could get COVID nineteen and yes, knowing that that means you could in fact transmit the disease to other people as well, not intentionally, But this is the world we live in. Viruses are in the air, Viruses are all over us, actually all the time. People don't ever talk about that, but it's true. It's really just a question of your immune system. There's a constant, ongoing

battle between your immune system and microbes. But we don't think about that very much. But the president beat it. And there's a study out of Harvard just today that says that looks like at least four months they think, according to the study out of Harvard, Harvard Medical School, will give you protection. So that means Trump is fine. Trump can go out there and he can shake hands and high five and kiss babies and all. He's good.

Based on what we know about epidemiology, based upon what we know of the virus, no reason, no reasonablieve otherwise, certainly up until the election, and probably deep into twenty twenty one. So who made the better decision? Really? Remember they were all jumping on the president and saying, look at a reckless he is. He got it, yeah, And they were saying he deserved it, and they were saying they hope he had a bad, bad outcome. And the

president responded with, Look, I'm the president. I gotta be out there. I gotta do things. I've got to represent my people, and that means that there's going to be some risk. There is risk to the president every time he goes to any even that's why he's got the Secret Service with him. Right. This is not a risk free job, as a number of US presidents from our

past unfortunately can't attest too. But if you look at the history books and as recently as Ronald Reagan, it was very apparent to presidents that there are risks with that job. It is not risk free. There are risks from bad people, there are risks from bad diseases. That's just the reality. And now we have a president who has recovered from the virus and is fine and is

a symboled to so many other folks. If seventy four year old Donald Trump, now, look, I understand he got very good care, but they use drugs on him that they use on other people as well. But Donald Trump, yes, he got in there early because he was being tested frequently. But you know, first of all, forty percent of people

they tell us are asymptomatic entirely. So even if you get this the chances are that there's a good chance I should say that you will have no symptoms, and the chances are very high that you'll have very minimal symptoms. I oh, who is even paying attention to the fact that the World Health or Organization one of its top officials over the weekend. Now, look, I know we were bashing the WHO because it was way too China friendly

with this Wuhan coronavirus stuff in the beginning. Fine, but they do look at this issue, and we were told that we should listen to them, and that it was only just some kind of a Trump conspiracy to even question the WHO. WHO officials come out and said, look, we should we should not have lockdowns as the go to policy. Just said it, just like, look, we should not do this. This does not make sense. It's too damaging, it's too costly to society. Stop using lockdowns as the

primary the primary move here. But you know, look, there's a reason, friends, that the long lockdowns we're seeing were never considered the wise response to a pandemic in all the policy and academic literature written on this, and there was a lot of it before twenty twenty. Actually until April of this year, the media and our expert class have failed us. They're never going to admit their catastrophic errors. But that's what has happened here, that's the truth of

our fight against COVID nineteen. Lockdowns did not work and exacted a terrible toll on society, one that we can't even really begin to calculate. A tremendous amount of dress

and stress put on people all across the country. And if you look at the country by country breakdown, you know what one of the look one of the single biggest differentiators here between countries with really bad outcomes and countries that were pretty okay with this has to do with the percentage of the population that had serious health problems before COVID nineteen. That's just the facts. This is just data and numbers. You know, you look at South Korea,

look at Japan. They have far less diabetes and far less obesity than we do. And so when you're and also when you add that to the way that we calculate COVID deaths, where there are now clear examples right bright red line kind of examples of someone who dies from an accident to our self harm, but they test in the person has COVID nineteen. They say it's a COVID death, I mean, Dave. And there are incentives in the system for doctors because you get federal money for

the hospital. There are there are incentives for coding it as a COVID death. And no one's going to challenge you or be upseted you for saying it's a COVID death in the in the sort of consensus media democrat world, they're going to say, see, this is a person who's taking the disease seriously. That's what they'll say. It's pretty stunning. So we continue to see this pretty stunning. Indeed, you're in the Freedom Mundy. This is the Buck Sex and

Show podcast. So we are now beginning the fastest economic recovery and history. We created a record eleven point four million jobs just in the last four months. That's the fastest ever. The US has seen the smallest economic contraction of any major nation anywhere in the world. So we've seen the smallest going down. If you look at it, that's an incredible statement. Our opponents will crush to come back with unscientific lockdowns. They want to lock everything down.

Here we go again. They want to lock it down now we're not gonna let it happen. We're not gonna let it happen. So important you get out in vote. You got to get out in votes. Not going to be a second lockdown, music to my ears, at least at the federal level, especially as I have to sit here and worry about what they're going to do in New York, where I believe we are going to go into an extended lockdown again in New York City, at

least where I'm currently doing the show. I remember when I spoke to the President in May and I was in the Oval office with them, spent forty five minutes or so close to an hour, I think, sitting there just talking about everything, just the two of us, nobody else in the room, and one thing that I really wanted to hammer home, and he completely agreed with me. To his credit, he completely agreed with me on this. I just said, Sarah, we can't do a second lockdown.

This is madness. And he said, Buck, there's not going to be a second lockdown. We're going to put out the fires as they come up, but there's not going to be a second lockdown. It was, you know, that was a one time thing to get us prepared because we were caught off guard by this. You know, we didn't have the you know, the ppe and the ventilators and all these things that everyone said that they were going to need so badly. So so far, the President

has kept his promise on that one. And I asked him, said, promised me, You're not going to do that, Sara. He said, We're not going to do that. So that's a promise so far that has been kept. And I'm happy that the President understands why that would be such a bad idea. But I'm also deeply concerned because with Democrats, this is this is now an article of faith. They're going to want to have a lockdown and then have Biden bring us out of it, and in his own good time,

federal mask mandate. He's saying this, And I keep asking people, if we're gonna federal mask mandate, why not have a federal mask and goggles mandate? I mean, why not really go all in, right? Why not we could make enough goggles for everybody. Shouldn't we all to wear goggles and a mask? And then shouldn't we just do a full hooded ventilator system so that you really are actually getting protect that works, whether that would protect you from the virus,

But why too expensive? Too much? I thought this was about saving lives. Notice how the way that they the way that they argue with people like me who will say, masks probably have some effect. I don't know how big it is. I I don't deny that it is helpful in some circumstances, in some ways, but it's minimal, it's insufficient.

It's not enough to stop this thing. Obviously, it wasn't enough to stop the Spanish influenza pandemic of nineteen eighteen, when they had mask policies in cities by the way, and people were dying and numa's were Trust me, nobody was like saying, hey, you know, I'm just gonna go

out there. I shouldn't say nobody. There's always people, but you know, people were wearing masks, folks, And I'm sure the people that stopped wearing them in nineteen eighteen were the ones who said, this isn't saving us, so what are we even doing? But anyway, I just note that the Biden campaign has made this a huge, a huge virtue signal, which we all know, which is why I don't think I've seen a photo of Joe Biden out

without a mask on. I don't even know in how many months other than at the debate obviously, who knows that they're even going to be a second debate. But I'll tell you this. I rode on an Amtrak train yesterday and I just have to kind of laugh. Here's what here's the little window into the future of what you get if you allow democrat status types to determine

how we're going to respond to this pandemic. For the future, this is what your life is going to be like, not just for all of next year, maybe deep into twenty twenty two. You're going to have policies like I sat sat there on amtrack dealing with this where you have no one's allowed to sit next to you. Now, I think maybe if you're of the same it's same household,

but who even knows. With that, you'll see these experts that are right, hey, when you're having you know, special fun fun time with the your significant other, well, you gotta make sure you wear that surgical mask to protect the protect them from COVID. That's a real thing. I know you're some of you are giggling. That's a real thing.

Got to wear the mask for special fun fun time. Okay, that's the craziest thing, I think, I mean, how much and then take the mask off while you sleep next to each other in the same room, in the same bed for the rest of the night. Right, But you know, a husband and wife doesn't matter. Gotta protect each other.

It's absurd, it's stupid. We all know it's stupid. But I just point out all the stupid policies and people get mad at me, and I say, well, are we just supposed to all do dumb things because some people are scared and so they get to make all the decisions for all the rest of us. You know, you could go swimming in the ocean and get eaten by a shark tomorrow. It can happen. In fact, I think

the most commonplaces in the country for sure. I think the most commonplace in the world for shark attack might even be on the coast of Florida. I think it's what's right up there. It's coast of Florida, east coast of Australia and off South Africa. That's where you have the most certainly the most shark attacks in total. I think the most fatal shark attacks too. Now, why am I talking about shark attacks? Because if I ran around telling everybody who's going into the ocean, what are you doing?

You could be eaten by a shark. Technically true, but I think people should be allowed to swim. Now, I understand they're far more people getting COVID shark attacks, but I'm just saying that when it comes to day to day risk mitigation or our own lives, people should be allowed to make their own decisions. And for people who say things like, oh, well, look what about seatbelt laws, buck, I'd say, yeah, plenty of people don't wear their seat belts. I got news for you. Plenty of people still don't

do it, still don't do it. And also the fine for now wearing a seatbelt isn't fifteen hundred dollars or prison time. It's like a fifty dollars. Who cares? And you know that's also just acting you, that's not affecting anybody else, And it's it's such a minor inconvenience that even I think some libertarians say, all, I mean, you know whatever, wearing a mask, it's not a minor inconvenience.

It's I'm really annoying it's oppressive, it's psychologically deleterious. I really have I believe that I'm gonna go to the gym today. I'm gonna be doing deadlifts with a fricking mask on, like an idiot, alone because no one else will even go to the gym because they're so scared. Where I am alone in you know, a room that's probably fifteen hundred square feet with the windows open, But got to wear that mask while I'm deadlifting. It's it's insane, right. But so back to the Amtrak. So I'm on the

Amtrak where you know, blue collar Joe takes it. You know how long the Amtrak Acela is from Delaware to to DC to Capitol Hill. It's actually like the greatest commute imaginable in a lot of ways, at forty five minutes. I don't know, maybe it's forty five minutes to Baltimore, but anyway, it's like an hour. It's like an hour. It's quick. And that's what Joe Biden was doing, you know, once or twice a week or something. It wasn't even that often. It's crazy, But I'm on the a sell up.

They won't let somebody sitting next to you, but you have people mandating because it's a sign seating now sit in front of you and behind you. And I was sitting across from somebody, and I kid you not. She had she had a little mask on, and she pulled the classic Biden maneuver. Remember when Biden pulled down his mask to cough into his hand and then pulled his mask bask back up again. She had a coughing fit, you know, coughing right, you know, right next to me,

pulled her mask off for the coughing fit. So just like, you know, based on what we're all told, just like virus, virus everywhere, right, all kinds of whatever. She's got, just coughing all over the place, and then pulled her mask back up. And I'm sitting here like, oh gee, thanks, So I got the coughing, which is actually expelling the virus, you know, fifteen feet or whatever it is. But but the mask wearing, you know, when you're breathing. It's so dumb, folks.

And then I sit around people who are you're eating a bagel of cream cheese no mask on for you know, thirty or forty minutes, but for the last twenty minutes of the trip. I put that mask back on because that's going to protect us. It's idiocy. You know it's idiocy. It makes no sense. Don't listen to the lockdown libs who judge you and mask shame you. Thanks for listening to the Bus Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. It

is Columbus Day. It is not Indigenous People's Day. It is Columbus Day, name for Christopher Columbus, the Italian explorer who on behalf of the Spanish crown, discovered the New World change global history, and is somebody who for this accomplishment, we celebrate him, right. We don't celebrate him because he was a nice guy, because he was just a big

old cuddle bear. We celebrate Christopher Columbus because he's somebody who changed the course of history and brought about a change in the historical trajectory that resulted in a system, the American system, that then spread around the world that has resulted in more people living longer, healthier, better lives. More people pulled out of poverty in the twentieth century into the twenty first century alone than at any other time in human history, and probably all of the rest

of human history added together. I know that sounds mind boggling, but it's true. Here's a proclamation on Columbus Day from the White House. More than five hundred years ago, Christopher Columbus, in trepid voyage to the New World, ushered in a new era of exploration and discovery. His travels led to European contact with the Americas, and a century later, the

first settlements on the shores of the modern day United States. Today, we celebrate Columbus Day to commemorate the great Italian who opened a new chapter in world history, and to appreciate his enduring significance to the Western Hemisphere. When Christopher Columbus and his crew sailed across the Atlantic Ocean on the Nina Pinta and Santa Maria, it marked the beginning of

a new era in human history. For Italian Americans, Christopher Columbus represents one of the first of many immeasurable contributions of Italy to American history. As a native of Genoa, Columbus inspired early immigrants to carry forth their rich Italian

heritage to the New World. Today, the United States benefits from the warmth and generosity of nearly seventeen million Italian Americans, whose love of family and country strengthen the fabric of our nation for our beautiful Italian American communities and Americans of every background, Columbus remains a legendary figure. Sadly, in recent years, radical activists have sought to undermine Christopher Columbus's legacy.

These extremists seek to replace discussion of his vast contributions with talk of failings with discoveries of atrocities, and his achievements with transgressions. Rather learn from our history. Rather than learn from our history, this radical ideology and its adherents seek to revise it, deprived of any splendor and market as inherently sinister, they seek to squash any descent from their orthodoxy. We must not give into these tactics or consent to such a bleak view of our history. We

much teach. We must teach future generations about our storied heritage, starting with the protection of monuments to our intrepid heroes like Columbus. This June I signed an executive order to ensure that any person or group destroying or vandalizing a Federal monument memorial or statue is prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I've also taken steps to ensure that we preserve our nation's history and promote patriotic education. On this Columbus Day, we embraced the same optimism that

led Christopher Columbus to discover the new world. We inherit that optimism, along with the legacy of American heroes who blaze the trails, settle the continent, tame the wilderness, and built the single greatest nation the world has ever seen. In commemoration of Christopher Columbus's historic voyage, the Congress, by joint resolution of April thirtieth, nineteen thirty four, requested the President proclaimed the second Monday of October each year as

Columbus Day. Now, Therefore, I Donald Trump, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the Laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October twelfth, twenty twenty as Columbus Day. I call upon the people of the United States to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

I direct that the flag of the United States be displayed on all public buildings on the appointed day in honor of our diverse history and all who have contributed to shaping this nation. In witness here of I've here unto set my hand this ninth day of October and the year of our Lord two twenty and of the independence of the United States of America, the two hundred and forty fifth Donald Trump. That's just one thing that if Joe Biden becomes your president, you can kiss all

that kind of stuff goodbye. Joe Biden will be showing up talking about Indigenous People's Day. You know, it's fascinating, isn't it. For BLM Democrats war Kente ploth scarfs you remember that. I mean it was Nancy Pelosi Kent take cloth scarf? Right? What such a shameless pandering, such demagoguery, and among many others Chuck Schumer. Yeah, because they're really all about They're really all about, you know, African history. I mean, but Joe Biden, you know, I might show

up on Indigenous People's Day. What I mean, I don't know was he gonna wear it, wear a a feathered headdress or something, or is that is that? No, that's not allowed. Kent take cloth is allowed, but Native American garb or anything like that not allowed, seems to who knows where the rules are different from the left than on the right, that's for sure. But all of this, this talk of American optimism and the brilliance of Columbus and what he did, that will all be entirely forgotten.

And there's another part of this history that's forgotten as well, and that's Columbus as as a as a point of pride. And one would think if they really looked back, and I think if more people knew this history, particularly if Democrats, by the way, don't know his They know a little snippets of history that are useful for the socialist left narrative of control today, but they don't actually know history as as just a broad thing. They generally have no

idea what the heck they're talking about. And I mean the ones that are making these arguments. I mean, I mean the sixteen nineteen project, which now people are calling for it to be stripped of its pulitzer, which will never happen, even though it's it's changed its mission statement. That's how that's how fraudulent that whole thing was. They've said it was about establishing a new day for the American founding. And now they're saying, no, it's not about that.

We've we've scrubbed that. Not not true. Oh interesting, But people forget the struggles. You know, there have been waves of immigration into this country in the past, and the struggles that different immigrant groups had, notably Italian Americans who did face real discrimination. And I know people hear this now and they think, come on, Italian, we got you know, Cuomo is the governor of New York and you know

Rudy Julia Annie was the America's most famous mayor. You think of all these Italian Americans who have big political names and have become so well known. But if you go back into history a little bit, there were some very ugly incidents of bigotry against Italian immigrants in this country.

And Columbus Columbus Day was was a thing that they drive tremendous pride in because the Italian Americans were generally doing menial jobs when they got he or didn't speak the language were and especially for those who were more Sicilian and from you know, further south and more central in the Mediterranean Sea, they were known to be usually a little bit darker, and so there was there was a racial component that would come out to the anti Italian rhetoric of the time. And I know now it's

it's like talking about anti Irish bigotry. Irish were banned from or barred from jobs, Irish need not apply. Irish weren't allowed to where Irish were thought of as criminals. Irish were thought of as as as thugs, thieves, untrustworthy.

Now then the Irish became you know, they went from being the quote thieves to then becoming the cops in pretty much every major American city and then running you know, the political machinery, and now you know, they're all over the place, right And I'm basically half Irish by by heritage, roughly roughly fifty percent Irish, and of that stock, my ancestors came over on one side during the Potato famine in eighteen forty and settled in Brooklyn, New York, just

got right off the dock, and this is where they were, and that's why I've got I've got very long roots here in New York City. But the Italians, there's one incident that comes to mind. I mean, there were eleven

Italian Americans who were lynched. Also another thing, lynching was a terrible crime that was done mostly but not exclusively, against African Americans from around eighteen called eighteen seventy, getting into about reconstruct era into the nineteen twenties or so, you had a few thousand people in the United States who were lynched, and about two out of three were African American, but there was about a third of the lynchings that occurred were not the horrible crimes perpetrated against

African Americans. There were. There were terrible crimes against against other people, including whites who were trying to push for black rights in the South. There were a whole number of them who were lynched, and immigrants, different immigrants were lynched in eighteen ninety one. I don't even know how many of you would would know this this story. New Orleans one of my favorite cities in America. I love New Orleans. It's such a fun place and it's such

such a cool mix of different cultures. But it wasn't always a happy place with regard to how those cultures interacted with each other. That's and that's putting it mildly. I'm depending on the time in history, you can obviously point to a whole lot of problems there, but there were. There was an assassination, effectively. I believe it was the police chief. It might have been the mayor of New Orleans. I have to go check. I think it was the police chief, and he was killed. And they believed that

it was the Italian American population. This was eighteen ninety one in New Orleans. They thought it was the Italian American population. There already was this sense of mafia ties and criminal activity with the Italians, and they and they had already had a number of people tried and acquitted, and they were still being held in the jail for some reason, and others were still awaiting trial. And a mob formed broke in and murdered, murdered, hanged and mutilated.

So they shot them, and then some of them they hang and they ripped apart the bodies. They took body parts as trophies. Eleven Italian Americans killed in eighteen ninety one in New Orleans for I mean maybe one person, and I would be willing to bet a whole lot of money it wasn't one of the eleven. From what one person did to the to an official of the city of New Orleans, eleven lynchings all at once. So there was a dark there was a dark history here

of discrimination against against immigrant groups, including Italian Americans. And Christopher Columbus is part of the the pride, and that's why they'll talk about the pride the Italian American community fields. But hey, you know, we were early contributors to this American project, right it was it was an Italian who even discovered this place. It's an Italian a Metago Vespucci,

for whom this country is named. And so that's all part of you know, it's interesting the left sees this need for other groups to have heroes elevated, and and they're right in many cases about the heroes that they're choosing, right, you know, they're they're a right to want to elevate um, you know, people from the Latino and the African American community who have contributed to this country throughout its history

and ways. Absolutely, and I'm all for that, right, I mean, I think that you could you could argue that, you know, Frederick Uglas is one of the true founding fathers in many ways in this country. But with Italian Americans it's considered it's all a sacrifice to wokeness now and that's why.

Not far from where I'm doing the show is the large statue of Christopher Columbus in Columbus Circle, named for him, where I used to avoid the area because that's where CNN's headquarters were and I didn't want to bump into bump into Zucker and challenge him to a breakdancing battle. That would have been good Instagram content. But now it's Christopher Columbus statue there has to be guarded by the police because they know they're going it's going to be defaced.

It's going to be defaced because the Left is decided that the history of this country is really a history of exploitation, rape, genocide, imperialism, murder, theft, and exploitation. And what's interesting is that, I mean, depending upon how they're going to set up their parameters for how they would judge any country, you could say that about any great civilization. There's always violent, there's always wars, there's always internet scenes, struggle,

there's always all of these things. But is that the majority, Is that what most of the history really was, or did it create a society where people overwhelmingly lived in peace prosperity and some degree of happiness. America is the greatest nation state that has ever been the greatest force for good in the world, and it's only possible because of people who are willing to take risks and willing to be leaders. Christopher Columbus certainly played a large role

in all of that. And Columbus is somebody who I think we are right to honor for the accomplishment and that is it for the discovery. No one is saying that everything he did was great, or that he was a perfect or wonderful man, or just saying this guy made it. It's like he won a big race and we are giving him the trophy for the race. And that's it. You're in the Freedom, hud. This is the

Buck Sexton Show podcast. I think this is a perfect time to tell you all that we already have the next Shield's High episode done and we're going to I've been talking to producer Mark. We're going to create a series of them, so I have a bunch to release in succession on a predetermined schedule at once. But that's for those of you who are listening to the radio show right now on a radio. One of our wonderful

affiliates across the country. This is another reason why we really need you to subscribe to the podcast of The Buck Sexton Show, because this is not going to air on the terrestrial station. It's only gonna be a podcast extra. Already have one done the First Siege of Malta. There's gonna be two Siege of Malta podcasts. I think there's gonna be two Lepanto podcasts, which will be different from the one I did years ago for a whole bunch

of reasons. And I'm also considering, just as a little special gift to producer Mark, doing a Dracula history podcast or release this year on Halloween. I'm thinking about it, so we might that one I might not have time to get to, but the other ones are already happening. So just please do subscribe to The Buck Sexton Show the iHeart app. You can also subscribe in the Apple

Podcast Store or on Spotify, which is very easy. I know they're a bunch of libs who are trying to get rid of Joe Rogan or censor him or whatever, but they also paid him one hundred million dollars, so there's that. But Spotify is a very easy interface once you start using it. I was skeptical of it at first, and I've got to say I use it all the time now. So quite as great as the Guy Heart Radio app. Though no, no, the IR radio app is

way better obviously. But I'm just trying to give people options. I'm just gonna give people options, and so we'll do that. That's the plan. But we already have one in the can, so Producer Mark, and he's got it. Producer Mark, can you confirm receipts? Everybody knows I'm not just blown smoke. I will give you this one. He did actually record a podcast. There you go, the history the first Shields Hype, not the first one, the most recent shield Ties in

the can. I'm gonna have another one done and we're thinking we're gonna start releasing them in November, take it into December, and then people have some fun stuff to listen to over the holiday period if they didn't get to it during the weeks. So we released them, you can listen them all in succession, and that's that's the plan. And all this Columbus they talked too has got me. I mean, I want you guys to understand, Wait, why

was Columbus trying to find the new world. We always hear he wanted to find the route to the spice markets and the riches of the far east of South Asia and what is and China. But also they wanted to do an end run on the Muslims on the

Ottoman Empire. They wanted to get around them because they knew that with a stranglehold on trade, the Ottomans were so wealthy, so influential and powerful, especially once they took out the Mamok the mam Looks in Egypt and then added the Barbary the Barbary coast to their empire that they needed to find a way around this or else they would not be able to economically keep up and the Ottoman conquest would cane and just take in all

of Europe. So Columbus and his voyage in fourteen ninety two plays directly into that and the period that I'm talking about with the Siege of Malta, and really part one is what leads up to the Siege of Malta. Would you be basically the first half of the sixteenth century. I know we're nerding out a little bit here, but you're gonna love it. The Buck Sexton Show. Subscribe to the podcast Shields High episodes coming. Thanks for listening to

The bus Sexton Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. A Navy veteran and Trump supporter murdered in cold blood over the weekend at a protest. Why isn't this a bigger news story? You're probably asking, Well, I think we all know why. Lee Keltner, who had been a long time hat maker in the Denver area. Lee Keltner was attending a protest, according to his why, to show his support

for police and Robert Matthew. Robert Doloff was contracted as a security guard for I nine News, some local news outfit in Denver, and theyre ins on video. There's photo of this exchange too. You have Keltner. It looks like they exchanged words in the video. There's different photos and videos out there. They exchanged some words, I'm sure you know,

hostile ones. I think Keltner slapped Dolof across the face and then at a distance of what looks to be about ten or fifteen feet, sprayed some mace out in the air. There's big photos of this all over the internet, and Doloff just drew his weapon and dropped the guy right there, shot him right in the forehead, killed him instantly. How he could think he was in any kind of real peril from somebody's bringing mace from ten feet away at a protest? Remember their police all over the place.

This is broad daylight. There's a protest. This guy Dolof just pulled and shot, shot him right in the forehead. Also tell you this, generally law enforcement, you know, you shoot for somebody in the head, very easy to miss even a close distance. This guy doesn't have any law

enforcement training, has no law enforcement background. In fact, Doloff, who is currently being held on first degree murder charges as he should be, Doloff is somebody who doesn't even have an active license on file or no license at any point to be a private security contractor. Now I'm nine News is saying they went through the Pinkerton Security Agency to get this armed guard. Why would I nine need an armed guard at a protest where there's police present.

It's interesting, isn't it. You're gonna have an armed guard with you. I thought these were peaceful protests. Let's just start with that. That's where we've been told so many times it's all about peaceful protests, but local news reporters think they need somebody who's strapped, who's just with them all the time. Wait. I thought that the journals don't like guns. I thought that gun ownership is bad. This guy, dole Off had a concealed carry permit, no special no

professional training with a fire and whatsoever. So he's just a guy with a gun. And Pinkerton, a security agency, didn't know this. There's something fishy here, folks. Something is rotten. There's something we're not being told. And based on the political back and forth over this, I have some ideas.

I have some ideas about it. For one, this was initially reported as a shooting by an Antifa member, and then people like me said, well just wait this week, we'll be told over and over again that the right wing is responsible for all violence. And they said, see, it's not an Antifa guy, And I said, I don't, I don't. They're still gonna say that the rights are responsible for all the violence. Doesn't It doesn't change anything. And I've said, and okay, well, what do we know

about Dolof? How does a guy with no security training or background, become a private security contractor for a local news organization in Denver. Well, what comes to my mind is, you know, there are times when, for example, in a country that's in the midst of some kind of a civil war, you'll pay off one member of the militia or a couple of members of a militia to provide security for you. Sometimes you'll actually contract with the bad guys to protect you, so to speak, right, that's the

safest thing to do. You know, if you're going to go into parts of Lebanon, you know you asked for permission Hezbollah. So I have to wonder here, and this is again this is analysis. I am piecing this together. I have to wonder if this was a situation where the best they thought, the best protection for I nine was to have a guy who Antifa knew and didn't have a problem with. Now they're gonna say he's not a member of Antifa. They don't know, and already it's

come out online. Guess what this guy Doloff who drew his weapon and shot a guy in the in the head, who posed no mortal threat to him whatsoever. He's in a Supremember, he's in a security guard role. He knows he's strapped. He's supposed to be de escalating. He's supposed to walk away from this conflict, not a law enforcement officer, not affecting an arrest. And what we find out about him is that he who wants to guess, is Doloff, Robert Matthew Robert Dolof who's in custody. Is he an

Antifa guy? M Is he a radical left wing guy who loves the protesters who are doing all the antifa stuff? Yes, he is all over social media, So we are to believe it is a coincidence. That's some some you know, scraggly looking, skinny guy with no military or law enforcement or even private security training whatsoever, just happened to be the armed guard contracted to protect a local news station.

That I'm sure he's very favorable to all the BLM protests, because Denver is overrun by leftist lunatics except for the wonderful folks, for example, who listened to this show on ninety three seven, one of our favorite affiliates. But we're told this is a coincidence. It just so happened that this guy has photos of himself at Occupy Wall Street protests in the past, is supportive of BLM and is

effectively in his public pronouncements online a left wing radical. So, a left wing radical gets contracted to be the security provider for a local news station murders a pro police Trump supporter in cold blood, and we're supposed to think, oh, it was just a bad security guy. No, this was a leftist. This goes on their Ledger friends, this goes on their side of the body count from political violence. This guy's a leftist. That he was contracted as a

private security guard doesn't mean anything. He's a Bernie Sanders loving ANTIFA supporting BLM, social virtue signaling leftist. And he pulled a gun and he shot a guy because he got heated. That's it really not very different. And he was what he was doing was criminal, by the way, to be posing as a security that's actually a criminal violation in Denver. Can't do that. Can't be a security guard for somebody who's really just actually a guy who

has a gun for reasons like this. And they're going to tell you that this has nothing to do with the left, nothing to do with the Democrat Party. You know, I guess he was just killed by an idea. Yeah, the media working very hard to make sure that this guy is not considered a leftist who murdered a Trump supporter, and the anti Trump anarchists who are planning to kid nap Governor Whitmer are treated like they're all run around

in MAGA shirts. In reality, they say Trump is an evil tyrant who won't do what they want, and they want to bring down all of society. They're anarchists. But somehow this is on the right. That's what they'll tell us. That's what all the news reporting has said, even though there's video of these guys saying how much they at least one of the guys, one of the ring leaders,

saying how much they hate Trump. You know, this is another one of these instants where you say why is it that when oh, you know who organizes rally was John Tegan Tigg from Thirteen Hours the movie, who was a contract or, one of those contractors that was defending Americans against the terrorist attack in Benghazi, who was very very severely wounded, if memory serves, fighting to defend the facilities, those US facilities, the annex and that special Consulate compound

or whatever it was where they had Ambassador Stevens so tig pulled this together. This it was a patriot rally and there was a Antifa soup drive they called it. That had to go there a counter protest. Do you know why they're doing these counter protests? You won't often hear there's from people. I think it's important that we all get this on the record. The counter protests are meant to intimidate. They're meant to shut down speech that

they don't like. There's no point in why why hold a counter protest for you know, fifty or one hundred patriots gathering in downtown Denver to say they backed the police and they support Trump and their patriots. What's that? What's the harm in that no Antifa shows up to menace them, to say, see, we can get one hundred with a two hundred people here and the moment the cops aren't looking, we're gonna hit you in the head with a lead pipe, and then say we're mostly peaceful.

We're mostly peaceful. You should see the mug shots. One hundred percent of them white, one hundred percent of them look like exactly what you would think Antifa losers look like. Over the weekend in Portland that that were arrested. These are white libs who think they're fighting some war on behalf of BLM against the authorities in Portland who were all Democrats. But it's amazing. You look at these photos

and they all they all look like Antifa. You look at them and go, yep, that's what Antifa looks like. Who are just kind of crazy looking eyes and sort of scraggly, and you know the whole thing. This guy dole Off looks like somebody who would be an Antifa. He looks like an Antifa guy. Amazing, anybody would think he's a good security guard. Although I'm sure he probably told them guy, I know an you know, don't worry. I know these groups, and that's what we're gonna find out.

By the time we find that out, though, people are forgotten about this one. And that's that's how he was able to get in here. Oh, I know this gang, I'm cool with them, don't worry about it. You'll be safe from Antifa. That's probably the protection that he was providing, right, trust, how often do you think I'm wrong about these kinds of things? Rarely? So we'll see if a Denver p least I don't even know how left wing they are and how willing I'm when I say the police, I'm

talking about the brass. I'm talking about the people running running the department, whether they're willing to get to the truth here or not. They are holding him on a murder one charge. It looks like he's in a whole lot of trouble. This is this is not a justifiable use of force. If Keltner had jumped on top of him and was you know, pounding his head into the pavement, or had a gun on him and drew for it. And you're a security guard, you're in that professional role.

You're arm somebody else isn't, and you know you're getting rowdy with them. And if you see there was a guy I think he's a producer from my Nights I nine saying horrible stuff to Keltner. On those around him, you know they looked there was an instigation here. Political violence comes from the left once again, because the right doesn't believe in this stuff. It is not a mainstream geopee believe that if you're upset, if you're angry, you're

allowed to hurt people and destroy things. It is a mainstream Democrat belief absolutely and supported by our cowardly, disgusting enemy of the people, mainstream media, for whom you should have nothing but utter contempt at this point. Contempt. Don't watch them, don't listen to them. Get your news elsewhere. That's the only way to do it. You're in the freedom. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast, speaking of

psycho libs, which I think we do every day. He's back, folks, a guy who's absurd pseudo intellectual grandiloquence is really unsurpassed to this day. It's a combination of the talking points from HuffPo mixed with somebody's crib notes over Shakespeare. Right. But here he is Keith Olberman talking about how we must get rid of all of these people from society place to have it. Let us brace ourselves, ask is twofold? The terrorist Trump must be defeated, must be destroyed, must

be devoured at the ballot box. And then he and his enablers and his supporters and his collaborators, and the Mike Lees and the William Bars and the Sean Hannity's and the Mike Pences and the Rudy Giulianis and the Kyle Rittenhouses and the Amy Coney Barretts must be prosecuted and convicted and remove from our society while we try to rebuild it, and to rebuild the world Trump has nearly destroyed by turning it over to a virus, remember it, even as we dream of a return to reality and

safety and the country for which our forefathers died. That the fight is not just to win an election, but to win it by enough to chase at least for a moment Trump and the maggots off the stage, and then try to clean up what they left. Lock them up, lock them up, ACP, clear them out from our society, prison, prosecute. Look, the problem that Keith Olberman's going to have is that his I'm insane routine that he always does is really

not that far off from the Democrat mainstream. Now, I mean, chardon Nancy has like says the craziest stuff, even crazier than Alberman every day. You know, Nancy Pelosi, the Democrats, they've they've gone way further left since Keith was doing his thing over at MSNBC. I just note he was their biggest name, folks. He was their biggest name at MSNBC for years and was paid ten million dollars a year by al Gore's current TV network to have never more than a few thousand viewers at a time, So

he didn't have that MSNBC platform. Nobody cared anymore. But this is who the left chooses to elevate. But it's worth noting that these are the kind of lunatics who you'll be hearing a lot more from if Biden does end up winning this election. Speaking of Biden, this is great. I've eve been talking about the changing of the definitions of court packing and what the Libs have been up to with that. Here's when Joe Biden is asked by a local reporter about court packing. This is amazing. I mean,

he's just saying stuff. Now you go, what does he think he's doing? Play one, sir, I've got to ask me about packing the courts. And I know that he said yesterday you aren't going to answer the question until after the election. But this is the number one thing that I've been asked about from viewers in the past couple of days. Well, you've been asked by the viewers who are probably Republicans who don't want me continuing to

talk about what they're doing to the court right now. Well, sir, don't the voters deserve to know I'm not going to play his game. He'd love me to talk about and I've already said something on court pack He'd loved that to be the discussion instead of what he's doing now. He's about he's about to make a pick in the middle of the election. First time it's ever been done, first time in history, it's ever been done. It's just lies, evasions. It's absurd. This is the guy who wants to be president.

Was there ever anything where Trump was asked what he would do if he became president in twenty sixteen, He goes, that would be a really big story. But I'm not going to answer it because it would be a big story. Liberals heads would have exploded and they would have been right. Biden is telling you straight up, No, you don't deserve. You don't deserve to know the answer on this, because this will help the other side. Me telling the other side what I would do would help them. Therefore, me

telling the American people. Therefore, I have no obligation. I have an obligation to be evasive, to lie, to be untrustworthy to the American people. Oh, I'm so glad. This is so funny too. What they're doing right now is packing the court. See Biden get the talking points, the media gets their talking points. Just conflate everything, pretend like words have no meaning. This is court packing. That's court packing.

Everything is court packing. Muddy the waters make it hard to discern what's actually happening and what's true for people who are just casually trying to observe politics and governance in America, and by changing the way that they use these words, that's what ends up happening. It's very difficult to separate it out. So that's what we see here. Oh they don't you don't have a right to know,

You're all right to know. And then there's Chuck Schumer just letting you know that this is straight up transactional and this is really just about politics. For the Democrats play for the Republicans are rushing this through. As you know, it's totally different. Critical that will be a second theme we will mention today after they held back Marthal and eight months before a presidential election, and we know why

they're doing it. The number one reason is to get someone on the bench who will undo so many of the things people need and turn the clock back. They can't do it themselves. They're afraid to do it themselves. Although a lot of these Republicans voted eight or nine times to repeal ACA, and so they'd get trying to get the courts to do it, and I think it'll be American people will look very unkindly on it. Yeah, political stuff. Chuck Schumer's telling you that's that's what the

real draw is here. That's the real reason for all of us. Everything else is just bla bla bla bla blather. It is sheer an income poopery. They have no process argument, no constitutional, no legal argument against this. So they're just gonna throw everything everything they've got at the wall. See

what sticks. And let's just all get ready for this, Amy Coney Barrett, Oh my, it's gonna be quite a sight when the Democrat Party wait his all out war on this eminently qualified, brilliant, deeply impressive mother of seven. But it's the party of feminism, they tell you, folks, Sure it is. Thanks for listening to The Busson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Ain't no party like

a Team Buck party, because a Team Buck party don't stop. Yeah, we got Bucks turned up to eleven. It's time for roll call. Roll call it is. Let us get to a friends Facebook dot com, slash buck Sexton Team Buck at iHeartMedia dot com if you want to send us an email and uh yeah, and on Instagram, just send send a direct message to Buck Sexton. Oh yeah, there you go, Michael writes, gut your book in the mail. Buck can't wait to dive right in hope to get

you to sign this one. You're a phenomenal patriot on my personal hero shield time my friend. Well, Michael, that is very kind of you. I am humbled that you would say such nice things. It does mean a lot. I do really appreciate it, and I'm glad you are enjoying the Socialism Survival Guide and eight radical predictions that will come true after the election. You can get a

bucksextonbook dot com. And I think we're actually gonna do an additional promotion with my friends at Stansbury Research coming up soon here, so we can really get this thing out to the masses far and wide. But I remember, I'm telling you about stuff that's happening, not just right now and leading up to the election. I'm saying, Look, this is what you're facing after the election. These are

the big structural political problems. And I hope that everyone understands that each chapter of the eight predictions and eight chapters in the book, and it's meant to be very readable, very quick, two hundred and twenty pages, you can always refer back to. It's really understand at least as I make the argument about immigration, about the debt, about statism, about socialism, about all these things. Bryce, Right, could it be that Nancy's newfound interest in the twenty fifth Amendment

is meant to smooth commalis transition to becoming president? So Bryce, I think I might have mentioned this last week, although maybe it was on a different show. I've heard this this theory and a few times from a few places, and I don't think that it's I don't think it's likely true. I can't say it's definitely not true, because's crazy, and that's it's crazy. But I think it's very unlikely that it's the case. Here's why everyone expects that Biden's not going to finish out. And I think I mean

I've heard Democrats say this too. There he's not going to finish out a second term. The guy's going to be uh in his mid eighties. It's gonna be one hundred year old president. I mean, this is crazy. So, you know, there's nothing wrong. It's great to be in your eighties. But a lot of people show that the

happiness indexes for people. You know a lot of people's happiest parts of life are are in there in their senior years when they've you know, they've had they've accomplished so much and they can, you know, think more about family and what really matters, and you know all that stuff. So I just don't think that somebody necessarily should put the pressure and stress on themselves that it's not good for any of us to be president in their mid eighties.

I think that's that's asking a lot. But Biden, No one's going to need to do a twenty fifth Amendment thing with Biden when the when the Democrat Party, when the apparatus tells him, hey, you step down now for health reasons, and you will be the name Biden will be a forever protected just like Kennedy. We're a lot of scummy, bad Kennedy's right, either Teddy Kennedy, right, guy drown a woman, philandering, alcoholic nut job? Right? But did the Democrats bidding? And here's a ly another shot at

Tenney Kennedy. So Yo Shaw Walter, I always think of a what is the chief? Is it? Proucer Mark? Is the Chief Wigham from the Simpsons? Yes, Chief Wigham. He's got kind of a boshed an accid, Right, you did sound like him for a moment there yet, right, he's got sort of that you know, yoda ick been I blena. Yeah. So anyway, wait, is that Chief Wigham? Is that the mayor? Am I getting the mayor confused with the mayor? And just now you did, but you're doing a different voice there.

Roy's superintendent whatever his name is, of the schools from the I'm thinking of. There's either the mayor of Chief Wigham, who clearly has like a Kennedy esque Boston accent. It's one of them. A lot of them have similar accents, fair enough. So anyway, Teddy Kennedy was was completely protected by the lib establishment media. And uh, you know there's also you know, there's also the reality here of Biden

recognizing that for his future generations. He's gonna want to have as much of the Democrat apparatus support as possible. So anyway, point is he can step down, be a hero of Democrats always in forever, not have to really do anything as president, and he will be the one who delivered the Democrats from Donald Trump for four more years. So they're gonna love him forever. I mean, he will go down. Biden's children's children's children will get into Harvard

even if they're morons, doesn't matter. They'll they'll pay. They'll be able to write books about just being Biden, right, I mean, all this stuff will be you know, there's so much incentive for him, and all he has to do is step down and no one's gonna care about it. No, they're not going to have to push him out. I don't even think Joe Biden really I think he wants to win the presidency. I don't know if he really wants to be president. I think he wants to play

golf and make a lot of money. Honestly, I don't think this is a guy who would see it as a big downgrade. Gets to be president for two years, so he will be president, you know, the so the ego is all covered here's the guy's obviously got a massive ego. The egos all gonna be egos are gonna be covered up. But he gets to uh, right off into the sunset of hero. Who doesn't want that? Right?

It's kind of like Michael Jordan, you want to retire at the absolute peak of your game or you want to come back at the you know, they will do the Washington Wizards thing and everyone's like, wait, he's not really Michael Jordan in the same way, and you know, no, no, so we'll see. But yeah, no, I don't think the twenty fifth Amendment. I think it's all just meant to troll to troll Trump. Oh here we got the president actually weighing. You know that. Why don't we Why don't

we hear from him? Mark play fifteen for me. Well, I think she's talking about Joe Biden, because, to be honest with you, he's the one that's got the problem, and obviously it's obvious to anybody that watches him speak. He's the one that got that has the problem. And they want to put a super radical left person in like Kamala who's worse than who's further left than Bernie Sanders, and you know that whole thing is breaking up now

because the Left isn't getting what they want. All of a sudden, they're back into fracking and all the things that they talked about they wouldn't do, and now they're saying they're going to do them. And yeah, twenty fifth, ammon, it's all a big ploy. It's a game. It's trolling the present. We're all quite aware of it. More roll call here Buck on Life Attorney. This is from Adam on Life Attorneys normal. What I will miss the most

is not having to wear pants shields high. Adam. I love sweatpants now and it is very what I have to put on adult, like normal person pants, which I've had to do occasionally. It's like, what are these? You know you don't like them. I've gotten really used to wearing sweatpants all the time. Sweatpants are great. You know, I could wear them in black or navy blue, so they dress up a little bit. But I don't know. Producer Mark, is that your goal? Are you a sweatpat?

I could? I could picture you being a robe guy. I am not. I am a hotel as a rope guy. But Linley Quarantine it's been sweatpants pretty much every day. I think five times since March I've had to put on jeans. Well, when you think about it, sweatpants are the most comfortable garment for your lower your lower half. So why aren't we making more of a thing of wearing sweatpants more. You know, Well, they're not the most

functional when you're out. Yeah, yeah, that's true. Like I like a little pocket, you know, I'm not going to ride the subway and have someone pickpocket me because I'm wearing sweatpants. Well, there are different kinds of sweatpants now. They make these stretchy fabrics and things where they can look like they can look like dress pants but feel like sweatpants. I think that's the move. Oh those sound great, an get me something. Oh they're great. I can send

you some. They're good stuff. But yeah, no, Adam, I agree with you. The ability to continue to dressed down and relax maximum relaxing is is fantastic. So I'm all about that. I agree. Uh, Susan, Susie. When a couple of guys they were up to no goods started making trouble in my neighborhood, I got a one little fight and my mom got scared. She said, you're moving with your auntie and uncle to Bellair? Remember then, Yes, everyone does. But what does that have to do with Susie? Um,

I forgot, I got into it. Oh, maximum relaxing, that's why. Ah. Remember I'm just saying, if you can't recite the Fresh Prince theme song, are you really in nineties? Person? No, I watched The Fresh Prince all the time. I actually watch Martin, which I believe is the proper way the show was pronounced Martin all the time. Martin Lawrence's show. I think that was before my time. Yeah, probably a little bit, dude. He was great. Bad Boys is I think an underrated The Bad Boys the original is an

underrated movie. It really holds up. Yeah, it does. It's a good action flick good. It's so much better than the Miami Vice remake that was done years later with Colin Farrell because yeah, let's have an Irish guy play Crockett what are we doing America? And Jamie Fox as Tubbs, who was better as Tubbs. But I mean the Crockett Colin Farrell, he had like this ridiculous blonde mullet. It

was horrible, horrible movie I've seen it a few times. Anyway, Susie, let's get to what you have to think and say. I think Trump should set up his own debate without the CPD, with Biden, with two moderators, one the Trump campaign picks and the Biden campaign picks. Perhaps that way we could get balanced questions and the moderators could keep each other in check instead of turning it into a

two on one debate. It could be outside and social distance, following current scientific research for protection for in person events. I also think a timers should be added where the audience see how long the Canada has been speaking when the moderator tries to cut in. It seemed like Pence was getting cut off the moment he was getting momentum regardless of his speaking time. If rules are rules, let's

show everyone is held to them equally. Well, Susie, the Biden campaign just doesn't want to They don't want to do this again. They don't want to go into another debate situation. I think that they believe these I mean, these polls are nuts. I'm seeing poles. Biden had seven points,

eleven points. You know that they're they're preparing the Democrats for I think a huge disappointment, which God only knows how they're going to react to that, because there's no way Joe Biden's winning this election by first of all, that winning it by double digits as fantasy land stuff. It's going to be one or two percentage of the electorate that determines this probably one percent of the electorate that determines this whole thing. So that's that's what all

the polls should show. But Democrats, it's kind of like the media, they don't even understand their own biased They don't even understand how they may be missing this one or why it is that the polls are over sampling Democrats. So we'll see. But yeah, Susie, I don't think. I don't even think there's gonna be really a I don't know. I don't think there's gonna be another debate. I've been saying all summer there's gonna be one. I think you'll get one, and that's probably it. And I think that's

where we are. You're in the freedom, hud. This is the buck Sex and Show Podcast. Back into Roll Call. Remember if you want to be a part of this fun, send us an email team Bucket. iHeartMedia Dot com Matt Hey Buck, Mike Pence did a fantastic job crushing Kamala Harris in the debate. Honestly, it got me excited for twenty twenty four because I think that Pence is a strong presidential candidate. Likewise, in the same way that Pence

is gentlemanly styled compliments Trump's boisterous attitude. I think that Jim Jordan's take no prisoners approach would mesh well with Pence. A Pence Jordan twenty twenty four is my hope. And as a bonus, Ted is for United States Attorney General. Keep up a solid work, Buck YouTube producer Mark, thank you so much, Matt, I appreciate it. And Pence is

a presidential Candidate's interesting. He hasn't gotten that much early attention for that, but let's really think about I mean, I would take Pence way ahead of Nicky Haley and some of these other people that have already been raised as the next, you know, the next round of Republican candidates. So I think Pence would be a very very solid choice. You know, the guy brings that Midwestern russ Belt Republican

you know, working class support to the table. Would have been a vice president for eight years under President Trump. Zero scandals, zero personal you know, personal shortcomings that would prevent him from being the president. I don't know how much that stuff even really well, it matters if you're a Republican. It doesn't matter if you're a Democrat, of course, But I think that's he's he'd be a very serious candidate. But he's also the kind of guy who doesn't you're

not going to hear about that. So you're really deep into the Trump second term because he's he's doing his job and he like, he appreciate he's the number two men, and he's good with that, and that's what this is all about. So but I think you're right, Matt. I think he would be strong and Jim Jordan as his veep. I'd want to see Christy Nome. I think Christy Nome is fantastic governor South Dakota. I think she's just doing a great job and has really showed people what real

executive leadership looks like during the COVID pandemic. And she's she's one to watch. Folks to see her as a as a vice bybe even a presidential contender herself. Mike isn't it an also interesting before I get to Mike, Republicans tend to want governor's people in executive roles in the past to run for president. Democrats always have a senator, always kind of have somebody who's from within that bureaucratic body.

Just a little bit of if you look, if you look at the path, that tends to be the way. It is just a difference difference there right right, John Carey Senator, Hillary Clinton, Senator, um Joe Biden, Senator. We like governors Ronald Reagan, governor, George W. Bush governor? Right, wasn't he Governor Texas? I'm not making that up? I might yeah, so yes, indeed, uh oh, Mitt Romney, I know, I know, boo, but whatever, Massachusetts Governor Mike Buck, did

you happen to watch the Ladies French Open final? This phenomen is likely to dominate for the foreseeable future, barring injury, Mike, I missed all of the French Open, which I'm very sad about. I saw Rafa nadal One, one of the one of the three greatest of all time. I'm here and some people argue they think that he's tech. He should be considered the greatest tennis player of all time, even ahead of Federer. Now that's a that's a tough one.

That is a tough one. I did see. I did see that the NBA Finals happened, and I asked producer Mark about this, because the ratings were down huge, hugely from the last NBA final seventy percent. But Mark had a very important context for this, Mark, what was the why were the ratings down so much in your opinion, or what's one What are some of the reasons for it? In my opinion, it would be well, first of all,

the game was a blowout from the very beginning. It was like a twenty thirty point game the whole time, and it was competing with Sunday night football playoff baseball. I think there was some tennis yesterday, and I mean NBA Finals aren't normally in the middle of October. So yeah, so a lot of a lot of changes on that one. Buck writes in Love the Show. Perhaps it's the name.

I like that Buck, great name. I think the twenty fifth Amendment thing actually has nothing to do with Trump but rather one percent and warning to Biden if he doesn't stick to all the liberal crazy horse hockey he's agreed to keep the information flowing shields high. Well, Buck, despite your brilliant name, I don't know, if I look, you could be right, You could be right on that.

I don't see it that way. I feel like if it was time for Biden to go, he'd and the people in you know, Pelosian Schumer sat down with Biadam or Lek. Look, we're gonna take care of you. We got we got board seats, set up a few Biden's greedy folks. Look at his Look at what his hunter Biden has done. Look what Biden's done since he left office. This guy wants to be super super rich. He doesn't have that much time. You think he really wants to be president for eight years. This guy gets to be

president for two years. The best deal for him is to beat Trump, be president for two years, handed over to Kamala right after the mid terms, and then walk away as a timeless hero of the Democrat left. And so look, that's if I were Biden's you know, personal life coach, I'd tell him that's the move, buddy. What he want to get dragged into another economic recession, perhaps a war with China? You know who knows what's gonna happen? You want to go through all that in your mid eighties.

I don't. I don't think so. Friends, that's the show for today. Please pass the buck. Get somebody new in this election season to listen to Buck Sexton Show. Best way to do it is just send them an email or a text message with a link to the podcast. We'll put it out on social media until tomorrow. Shields High