Democrats Go Full Alinsky On The Border

on The buck Sexton Show. This is the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Mag no mistake, America, You're a great American Again, the buck Sexton Show begins. Remember No, I'm heading out to pass Texas right now, and we are going to do a job. We're going to continue to do what we're doing. I think we've made a

lot of progress. We've actually started a big, big portion of wall today in a very important location, and it's going to go up pretty quickly over the next nine months that whole area, and we'll be finished. It's fully funded construction, which I know a lot about is begun and it's a much better wall, much stronger wall, and a much less expensive wall than we've been building. Then we're gonna have a lot of wall being built in the last next period of time. Welcome to the Buck

Saxton Show, my friends. Great to be back with you here on this Monday. So the President is still fighting for this wall funding. Democrats, of course, are completely dug in opposition, as as completely as completely set as it could ever be. I mean, the Democrats aren't budging an inch on any of this because it's all about a win for Trump, and they know that they don't want to give Trump a win. They want it to be

Trump cave to them. Doesn't matter what this means for the country, doesn't matter what it means for the border. They don't really care about either of those things. With push comes to shove. They care about their power and their future in the jobs that they have in Congress.

That's what they care about. And they also care about continued flood of illegal immigrants into this country, illegal aliens roaming the interior at a rate of now who knows, I mean the number of illegal aliens in the United States, as I've discussed before, they say it's eleven million. That's laughable.

It's much closer to twenty, and there are plenty of sources, including border patrol and immigrations and customs enforcement, who can't get The thing is they have to go with the official number, which is based on census data because there isn't a single official elsewhere in the government because government agencies are prohibited from collecting information. The libs don't want us to know how many people are in this country illegally.

The government itself does not want us to know because then people would recognize we've been scammed for decades, for decades, and they don't want to deal with the consequences of that. They don't want to believe that the American well, they don't believe that the American people can be trusted with

that information. You see, we're two xenophobic. We bring in a million legal immigrants every year to let them permanently live as part of our family in America forever, a million a year, and we're still called xenophobic by the left. A million people. That's a major city worth of immigrants every year, and we're told that we're xenophobic because we just want people to come in as part of that one million. We don't want an extra three or four

or five hundred thousand every year. It's a few hundred thousand illegal crosses at the border, and it's half a million visa overstays every year. Now, not all of them stay permanently. I get that, but I look at these numbers. I know what the numbers are. The numbers going up by a quarter of a million and a half a million, you know, every year, depending on the year of the illegal aliens in the country. It has to be has to be what else is happening, Well, they're all going

to Canada, I don't think so. They're definitely not all going back to Honduras or Mexico or El Salvadora or wherever. They're not going back to China and Bangladesh and India and the other places we're seeing illegal aliens cross. Trump is right on this issue. And by the way, their latest polling today shows that Trump is that Rasmuston has them in fifty two percent approval, which is fantastic for

this phase of his presidency. And Republicans are more trusted than Democrats on immigration by not a wide margin, but by a real margin people. The American people, according to poll out I saw today trust Republicans more in immigration. What does that tell you? What's the difference in Republicans and Democrats on this issue? Enforcement, enforce the laws. That's where we're really separate from the Democrats. They do not

want laws to be enforced anymore. By the way, it's nine points higher than at the time of the of the shutdown. Producer Mike just gave you that information here. So now as I look at where this is heading, because we're gonna we're about to hear all kinds of of of sob stories about you know, what the shutdown is going to do again. And I'm not saying there wasn't real There weren't real adverse consequences for good folks.

There were, There's no question, but oh my god, the media and remember, none of that had to happen if Pelosi and Schumer just would give five billion dollars to build necessary asked for by border patrol, asked for by ice fencing at our southern border. So yeah, I mean, from a process standpoint, Trump is responsible for this, but

he's not actually responsible for what happened here. All Democrats have to do is give them money for offense at the southern border, which is what sound border policy requires. That's all they have to do, but they won't do it because they won't give Trump a win, and because they don't want the border to be secure. Let me give you to that. To that point, exhibit A as to why is it that Buck comes on radio night after night and says Democrats are a de facto open

borders party. There's a lot of they use a lot of you know, oh no, we were not open open borders. I mean years, come and go as you please. We're not for that. They want there to be. They want the status quo of continued large numbers of illegal aliens to come into America and stay. That is what the Democratic Party wants, full stop. I mean, it's just it's just obvious. It's just true. They like the mass violation

of our laws. They like the lawlessness that creates also a dependency on government in this country by people that aren't supposed to be here and are going to need additional help and assistance. And also they view it as just creating new voters for people say, oh, illegals don't vote one. I don't believe that. I don't know what the numbers are, but I don't believe that illegals don't vote.

And two because you have some states where they give driver's licenses their motor voter laws register them at the DMV. It's just not And there have been some cases of people that are voting who are illegals. But Texas, I know, is looking into this now. But their children are going to grow up in this country and they're going to vote.

And I understand how this squorks, right the mom and dad are illegals, or mom or dad or is in illegal and you're gonna want to support the party that tells you that mom or dad will write all along and there's nothing wrong with you know, this is just part of the American dream now. So there's obvious political benefit for the Democrats from this obvious and we all know it. But in case the reasoning I just took you through is not enough, we now have the Democrats

showing us their hand once again. They want a limit as part of the negotiation that broke down over the weekend. I think it's back on again, but it's part of the negotiation for to avoid a government shutdown, and that involves border funding. Democrats want a limit on immigration and custom enforcement detention beds. Essentially, they want a limit on

how many people ICE can hold in custody. ICE is currently authorized to hold forty thousand people, but there are forty nine fifty seven immigrants in detention as of this week, So I think it's one. It's fascinating that NBC here says that President Trump has repeatedly said ICE is holding dangerous criminals, including murderers. While ICE held immigrants in fiscal year twenty eighteen who collectively were convicted on fifty four thousand,

six hundred and thirty charges. Okay, only one thousand, six hundred and forty one of the charges were homicide. So the current crop of illegal aliens in custodyc This is you always have to read between the lines with the Lib media on immigration. The current crop of illegal aliens in ICE custody is responsible for one thousand, six hundred and forty one murders. That's a lot of dead Americans for this illegal alien process to continue playing out, isn't it.

I'm just I'm just saying, if we enforced the law in this country, if we did not have a lawless policy when it came to illegal aliens in the American interior, we'd be one thousand, six hundred and forty one Americans richer, we would have a whole bunch more people around. But I think it's interesting NBC. Well, of the fifty four thousand criminal charges, only sixteen hundred or murder. Okay? Well, also, how many are assault? How many are aggravated battery? How

many are sexual assault? Rape? How many are you know, just going down the list, robbery, burglary, armed robbery, you know, we get into thaft. We're certainly into the thousands there. Okay. So I thought that illegal aliens don't commit crimes and are better than Americans, because that's what Democrats tell us all the time. Democrats want us to believe that illegal aliens are better and more law abiding than Hispanic Americans,

Black Americans, Asian Americans, white Americans, everybody. They're better than all of us. Magically, the only people who come across the border, according to Democrats, are just better than the rest of us, the ones who come across illegally. Wow, that's quite a system we have set up. I guess we're just really lucky, aren't we. Nonsense, right, we know this. It is a big pile of malarkey. But they want

fewer beds. They want fewer beds. And this is the key point, because Democrats are complicit in what is happening right now to our immigration system, and is happening as a result of decisions made by tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens who have gotten word about this. The system is overwhelmed. We cannot process all of the people who are coming, and we legally cannot turn them away if they know what to say. So we now

have a southern border. This is all a fact. And I've spoken to border patrol and Immigrations customs enforcement at the highest levels about this and they have confirmed it to me in no uncertain terms. We have a southern border where if you know how to play the game, you and you're willing to be a tiny bit patient with the detention process, you will end up in the interior of the United States. And we do. And people say, oh, no, bok, there's going to be a hearing and nonsense. They are

never going to see the inside of a courtroom. We cannot handle this. Our system is not set up for this. And the Democrats know that. So what do they want to do? They want to d resource, defund critical parts of the enforcement architecture for our immigration laws inside this country. Fewer beds for ice detainment. You know what that means, fewer people can be held and then and then deported.

It means that they'll say, well, now you need to do more prosecutorial discretion with who you're going to hold and then deport from the country. They want to make it more difficult. They want there to be fewer resources available to the people that are charged with enforcing US law and in this case, holding and processing and booting out of the country a lot of people that really

should not be here. You know, if you are an illegal alien and you have killed somebody, once you have served your sentence, I really don't want you in this country. You should be gone back to your country. Right. We do not need illegal alien murders, We do not need illegal alien rapists. Then you start working your way down line and say, hold on a second, where do they

draw the line? You know, at what point are they willing to say that our laws are just that they should be enforced The answers Democrats don't want them enforced. But instead of being honest about this, what they do is throw up roadblocks every time Trump or anyone tries to assist our law enforcement and federal government agencies with processing handling dealing with this massive inflow of illegal aliens. We have people who say that, oh, we don't have

immigration crisis. I say, we have a backlog of nine hundred thousand immigration cases that's gonna take a decade to work, and we have more coming in all the time. Where does that backlog? What happens to people in that backlog? In the meantime, they stay in this country, they work here, they have kids here, They're never getting deported. Folks, It's never happening. And as you have more and more coming, we're gonna get you a million two in the backlog,

a million five in the backlog. Ice is gonna say, we can't we can't even hit. All we can do is trying to process the murderers and the rapist because we can't handle the rest of the Yeah, that's right, overwhelming the system. The Democrats are going full a Lynsky on our border. That's what this is. We need to recognize that. And Trump is the only one who is really making this case in an effective way. He's right on the border. He has been right on the border

I certainly hope he has a chance to make the case. Tonight, we will talk a bit about the Democrat debacle in Virginia coming up here, because, believe it or not, it got even worse over the weekend. Northam made it even worse. I mean, this guy is Virginia. I love you, great state. I've spent a ton of time. I've probably spent more time in Virginia than any state except for New York.

Wonderful place. I don't know what your Democrat neighbors are thinking, though, I just I don't know what they I don't know what they're smoking, but sounds like fun. We'll be right back to who are up against? People that want to allow criminals into our society? Can you explain that one? You know, most things you understand, but they want to allow criminals into our society. Convicted felons, kidnapping, These are people that kidnap people. The Democrats want them to come

into our society. I don't think so. Kidnappings two thousand and eighty five. Homicides that means murder, murderers two thousand twenty eight. I mean it's incredible. Sexual offenses one thousand and seven, thirty nine just came out two minutes ago, Homeland Security, Department of Homeland Security. I don't know, maybe we're in a different country than I know of how many,

how many thousands of murders, rapes, robberies, are sins? How many of those are you willing to accept from the illegal alien community as just the cost of the cost of the way things are because the Democrats see, I'm willing to accept the number zero because they shouldn't be in the country in the first place. So this isn't like, oh, there's crime in any society. Yes, of course, I'm not saying we're ever gonna get to a zero a zero

crime rate in America. There will always be people that you know, choose the who's the wrong path and do the wrong thing and then hurt their their fellow human beings. That's that's always that's always existing, always will exist. We try to deal with it. We try to manage it

and limit it as much as possible. But I think it's fair to say that when it comes to limiting crime from people who aren't in your country, I do not worry about crimes committed by people, you know, by people in Vietnam, because they're not being committed in this country. I do not worry about crimes being committed by people in Brazil because they're not in this country, right, But people who come into this country aren't supposed to be here. That's a concern for me because wait a second, they

weren't supposed to be here in the first place. And this is the philosophical shift that Trump is trying to get people to understand. It's not that sixteen hundred murders by illegal aliens is you know, it's not that that's a little too high. It's sixteen hundred murders too high. What is going on here? Why do we have anyone in the country tree illegally who is living in the shadows and going through all this difficulty and committing murders.

This shouldn't be happening at all because if we enforced our immigration laws, they would not be here, period. So our tolerance for illegal alien crime should be substantially lower than our tolerance for a societal crime, because you know, nothing is perfect, right. But again, Trump is making this case. I hope he really digs into tonight. I think he will. I'm gonna be watching Live right after the show, so we'll talk more about that tomorrow, but let's discuss Virginia's

situation in a moment. What has been a difficult week. And you know, if you look at Virginia's history, we're now at the four hundred year anniversary, just ninety miles from here. In sixteen nineteen, the first indentured servants from Africa landed on our shores and Old Point Comfort what we call now Fort Monroe. And while also known as slavery. Yeah, this guy Northam, what is his deal? He's given an interview to CBS. They're really being very, very gentle with him.

I think there were some weird restrictions too, maybe with Northam interviewed with Washington Post or somebody where they're they're doing everything they can to help keep this guy's political career afloat, because it has been struggling mightily since his whole black face. Oh no, that's not me, but everyone knows it is him. Controversy. How can anyone take this guy seriously? How can anyone pretend like he's a person

of substance? I don't know, but here we are Democrats just recognizing that I think the most likely person to resign out of Northam Fairfax, and herring is Fairfax. Fairfax has now called for an FBI. Remember he's a lieutenant governor. Two women have accused him of sexual assault, and both of them on the record had sexual relationships with them. So there they are entirely credible allegations. That does not

mean they are proven allegations. There is a difference, certainly important for law, but also important for us to keep in mind for due process reasons. They are unproven, but they are credible allegations, to be sure, which is different than the allegations made against Kavanaugh, which were not credible, but they wanted them to be treated the media, the Democrats wanted them to be treated as already proven by

the mere fact of the allegation. Here we have a different situation of oh, no, these are credible allegations against Fairfax, and I find it. I mean I find them entirely believable given the circumstances that he has or that the women rather have alleged. But he may be the one who who was forced to resign. Here it looks like there may be public testimony from these women. Fairfax has called for an FBI investigation, which I've noticed is now this is now the hail Mary Pass tactic of Democrats

or left wingers who are in trouble. I want an FBI investigation. Notice how they wanted this. They wanted to inflict this on Kavanaugh and it did nothing, which we all knew it would do nothing because this wasn't an FBI matter. The FBI really is in no position to investigate or adjudicate this. And they said, well, it's really a background check. Well the FBI doesn't you know. They kept changing, moving around the goalpost so that the FB just so there'd be some investigation to give them more

time to figure out another smear of Kavanaugh. But Fairfax, you're calling for the FBI. You have two crimes, alleged crimes, one committed allegedly in North Carolina, the other allegedly committed I think in Virginia. I'm not sure about that, the two different states that much I remember, and the FB I would have jurisdiction in neither place. So what is the FBI is supposed to do here? But it's it's just a talking point to say, oh no, I want

to prove my innocence, bringing the FBI. Like the FBI or just these magicians who can figure out everything right away. Still looking for that Russia collusion some of those FBI guys, I don't think they're gonna find it either. I think that Russia collusion investigation is gonna get shut down real soon. But I think Northam knows that if he just plays his cards right at this point, he can stay. Here's

what he said, play three. How you think you still deserve this job when so many people are calling for you to step down? Well, again, we have worked very hard. We've had a good first year, and I'm a leader. I've been in some very difficult situations, life and death situations, taking care of sick children. And right now, doctor, Right now, Virginia needs someone that can heal. There's no better person

to do that than a doctor. Virginia also needs someone who is strong, who has empathy, who has courage, and who has a moral compass. And that's why I'm not going anywhere. Man, there's a lot of hutzpah on display with this guy. Pretty brazen stuff from the good doctor. I mean, never mind the fact that he starts out the interview by calling slavery indentured servitude, which is which was a which was a wow. Moment like this guy, I've never heard somebody make that mistake before, but I mean,

you know, you could get into anyway. It was. That was a bit of a surprise. But then he goes into saying that he's the right man, he's the perfect man for the job of governor. Right now, he has thrown the state into a a governmental crisis, and yet he is the perfect man to fix it. You know, this is like the stockbroker who, once he's lost your life savings, is like, you don't understand. I am more

motivated than anybody make that money back for you. So borrow some money from your brother and give you know. That's that's who this guy is. Now, since since I burned your house down, I'm exactly who you want to build your house for you now I owe you. This guy is whoo man. He is next level. But I think he's staying. I don't think he's going anywhere. I don't think I don't think I don't think Herring is

going anywhere. I think that justin Fairfax is the one and the greatest jeopardy of resigning, which would mean that as this plays out, the Democrat Party in Virginia would have three politicians all in trouble, two of them admittedly and provably for wearing black face a long time ago, then saying ridiculous stuff about it now and lying about it now and everything else. And then a black guy who's accused, who's lieutenant governor, without any actual proof other

than the accusations. He says he didn't do it, and he's the one who might resign. That is an interesting look for the Democrat Party. I've got to say, we'll be right back from actual experts at the UN, from the Donald Trump's own administration saying how dire this is. The UN said we have twelve years before complete disaster. We talked to the representative of the Marshall Islands and he's calling it what could amount to genocide if we allow things to go as they are. The reports aren't

just hey, it's going to get bad. The reports are people will die, millions and millions and millions of people will die, and there's real economic damage that can happen as well, billions of dollars in economic damage from crops to deaths, to losing oceanfront homes and businesses in over the next century. Dogs and cats living together Massisteria so be good for goodness sake. Whoa somebody's coming, Doctor Bankman one of his I mean, one of Bill Murray's finest roles.

That was Katie tur Or, not doctor Bankman, just saying crazy stuff. I got news for you, Miss Turr. Who's one of these people that all of a sudden, I'm supposed she's kind of came out of the woodwork over at MSNBC and now now she's an anchor, so she must know something. These people don't know anything about anything. I'm amazed at how flimsy, at how weak the intellectual depth is with so many of these these TV these TV news anchor types, you know, and uh, you know,

Katie tur I've got news for her. Yes, you know what. Millions and millions of people are going to die. In fact, billions of people are going to die. We are all going to die. Hopefully we will have children and replenish our species, but we're all going to die. It has nothing to do with climate change. This is normal. People cannot and would not think this way if they had not been endless propagandize too, and if they did not, you know, there is a place in the human mind.

Some would even say in the human soul where where we desire purpose. It's one of the reasons why you actually want work. It's why, you know, an endless a life that was nothing but lying on a beach eating grapes, you know, would be fun for a few days, maybe a few weeks, maybe a few months, but after that you're going to be a fat, lazy guy who eats

a lot of grapes and is sunburned. You know, you actually want purpose, whatever that is, whether it's you know, raising the best family you can, being the best you can at your job, helping the most people you can, you know, serving your country as best you can. People desire purpose, but people also desire higher meaning. Many of

us fill that with God. Many of us have that is the higher purpose is to serve what is eternal and celestial, and and you know what is the purpose of our existence, which is to love and honor God. That that's what many people do, and many people view as their reason for being here. Oh way, I mean, I don't spend a lot of time talking about religious stuff on the show because that's not that's not my brief.

But it from a political and philosophical perspective, this really matters, because what's happened is that that part of the mind. And you know my line on this, and it's true. It's that climate change is a religious belief for people who think they are too smart for religion. What they've done is they've just inserted this climate alarmism into that. And their purpose is because you know, the earth. If you don't believe in God, the only thing that is

eternal is the earth. And in fact, primitive religions worshiped the earth. Right. This is this is you get into people who are animists to who you know, impute celestial or create deities out of inanimate objects. Right, I mean, you know you have the most primitive religions worshiped the on, worship the moon, worship the stars, or you know, or bears because bears are big and scary, although I'm a big fan of bears. Now, what you have is a kind of New Age earth worship where our species only

exists to protect the earth. And people really believe this and oh, by the way, a fringe benefit of all of this, or for many of them, it's the it's the actual central purpose because they don't care about anything other than the self. They are, They are truly and

cosmically selfish. And what they realize is that they can mobilize the masses on this climate change silliness, although it is very serious because if they get their way, you're gonna have people will die if they get their way, you know, people will freeze to death in winter, people will die of malaria. I mean, there will be consequences if we give up fossil fuel. I mentioned the Great Leap Forward. Sixty million people starved to death in the

twentieth century, sixty million because of crappy government central planning. Right, millions starved in the Ukrainian famine because of crappy government central planning. What they're telling us is the is the converse of historical reality. What the Katie tours and you know, she's just represented. She's just spewing the talking points that all the other bigger, more famous, h stupid rich TV

people say. And but but what they offer to us, what they give us is that if you don't engage in this kind of massive central planning, that's when all the terrible things will happen. If you don't let the state make all these decisions for you and in your life in order to prevent the awful things. You know, then you're complicit in the the famines and the floods and they coming. I mean, yea, let me tell you what the Marshall Islands is really thinking about, which I

know you're up Laddnight worried about the Marshall Islands. The Marshall Islands is thinking, yeah, we gotta, we gotta be all in on this scam because all these wealthy countries where they're actually building stuff and doing stuff. Productivity, that's what you know. Wealth is human endeavor that you know, is pulled together and the excess of that human labor, or rather the fruits of that human labor is wealth. That is wealth. It is us doing stuff, making things

that is That is what creates wealth and prosperity. Right. The countries that have a lot of that. I'm sure Marshall Islands has some nice tourism and probably some I don't know that goods now that's Kazakhstan. But I'm sure they you know that they do some things. They want to be in on the scam, and I understand it. It's a good scam to be in on, which is that the developed world, the first world, is supposed to and this is at the heart of all this inter

governmental panel on climate change stuff. The first world is supposed to subsidize the economic progress of the third world, change for us being less prosperous ourselves by using less fossil fuel or less hydrocarbon. Right, That's what the game is. That's why there is a global Marxism, a global redistributive impulse that is at work here, or you could say a global globalism. It's it's your global globalism. No, but really that's that is part of this, of this rubric,

of this framework. They want to look at the developed countries and say you because they try to argue that we the reason we're wealthy is because of our exploitation of other countries. That's one of the primary myths that are perpetuated by Marxist intellectuals around the world, that the reason America's wealthy is because of our exploitation of other countries. But when that isn't enough, and they still of course believe that, they will say, well, the reason we're wealthy

is because of our ex exploitation of planet Earth. And the only way to make amends for that exploitation is to make other places wealthier giving them our wealth so that they won't have to exploit too. That's only fair. You see. It's the same mentality though the same route. Fallacies about capitalism, about the creation of wealth, about the basics of economics, all of that is encapsulated by this Green New Deal alarmism, and this green New Deal stuff

is it is whackadoodle. You know. Ocasio Cortez has some advisor who I think they just think is smart because he kind of looks like Malcolm Cladwell, so he must be smart. Libs love the all the pretension of the intellectual class. They love the facade of intellectuals, but they don't actually want to have to have any knowledge and argue with people who also have knowledge. They just want the benefits of appearing knowledgeable without the work that it

requires to get there. Right. This is a favorite thing of lips. They like to be ostentatious with the minimal knowledge they have so that they can belong to the class of elites that think of themselves it's very knowledgeable, but really aren't. But this guy went on Tucker Carlson's show, and Tucker's like, look to frequently ask question that you put out here when the New Green New Deal roll out.

When that happened, you know, the freaking asked questions said, you know, we're gonna stop air travel and we're gonna get rid of cow farts. And then Okazio Cortez's people said, oh no, that's a forgery, that's a fake. It's Republicans making it up. And then it was oh no, it's not that. It was just a mistake from someone up. But we didn't mean to put that out, and her adviser told Tucker that it never went out. That's just

they're just lying about it. They're just love because what we saw with their ambitious proposal is that their ambition for the Green New Deal, and for Ocasio Cortez greatly, I mean monumentally outstrips her knowledge, her wisdom, her critical thinking, all of it. And it is a for some, it might be a sign of the end times that the most prominent and the most influential Democrat in America right now is effectively on policy matters and ignoramus. That is troubling,

But we cannot walk away from it. We have to

stare this down and be honest about it. With only three days left until Valentine, it seems like everybody is selling Bouquet's drug stores, supermarkets, gas stations, you name it, your special Someone deserves the best, though, and that's why every Valentine's I order from my rose authority one eight hundred flowers dot com right now you can get eighteen red roses for twenty nine ninety nine, or upgrade to twenty four assorted roses plus a vas four ten dollars more.

This is an unbelievable offer from one eight hundred Flowers eighteen red roses for twenty nine ninety nine, or upgrade to twenty four assorted roses plus a vas for ten dollars more. Miss Molly's getting flowers, don't tell her from one eight hundred flowers Beautiful two dozen roses. I'm using this exact same deal. I recommend you do too. To order eighteen red roses for twenty nine nine nine, or upgrade to twenty four red roses plus a vas for

ten dollars more. Go to one eight hundred flowers dot com. Click that radio icon entercode buck. That's one eight hundred flowers dot com radiocode icon buck offer expires today. My Danny ended up. It's a janitor, but his little girl got the chance to be a public schoolteacher, a college professor, a United States senator, and a Canada for president of the United States. Make daddy ended up as a janitor. I'm gonna get me a beer. Uh Okay, first of all,

what's what's her beef with her dad? Janitor is an honorable profession providing a real service. And I mean this, I'm not I'm I mean this about any I've done jobs that were not, you know, glorious jobs, and anybody who's ever done that has respect for people to show up and do a good job at a job that is needed every day. So I just didn't really like her whole you know, mac daddy was just a janitor. But like I'm a really important person running for president.

I just don't. I know a lot of politicians do this. Okay, but that's you know, this is yeah, this is America. You know, the parents work hard and the kids have a shot to do something else. A question actually for you, buck, Yeah, we're discussing that here. Why do they think we care with their grandparents and parents did? Dude, it's all I

think it's the You're so right. I think it's the political consultants who tell them, you know, you've you've got to connect with the heartland and with the people and tell them you know, you know you used to do this all the time. John Edwards, Ambulance Chaser in Chief. Yeah, and he shows me like, you know, my my dada and my dada worked in a in a coal mine and what was Oh and the other one, Oh, the best one of all these days is is kasik rhymes with well kasik And uh, you know he's gonna say

something else, but I can't. He is Um. He's always talking about how you know, my daddy was a male man. It's like, yeah, okay, your dad had a job which he received a paycheck for and healthcare benefits and was probably able to retire like a lot of people I know these days, Like what why are we supposed to feel sorry for them? Like I don't understand what their problem is, you know, I think they just do this because they think that it makes them more relatable. I

think it's weird. That's completely weird. I agree. I think if they think it normalizes him, Yeah, they think it normaliz Like I mean, like my you know, my parents were like we're blue collar and so like not fancy at all, but like I'm super fancy. So yeah, I just think it's a weird. I'm glad you picked up on that too, like you and John, because it's just such a weird thing to say. My daddy was just a channer. He was just mopping up vomit all the time.

It's like like your father was doing an honest day's work for an honest you know, an honest wave. Like. I don't think anyway. I think it's weird, and I think a lot of a lot Look, Kasik as a Republican. A lot of politicians do this. Yeah, I guess when you're when you are a politician, you own like three or four homes and your base doesn't. I guess you gotta like, you know, be more normal. Yeah. Elizabeth Warren

is a socialist who's worth ten million dollars. Yep. I think I told you Mike twenty recently, and you guys thought. I mean, she says it's she marked it down as ten million, but I'm sure it's I mean, it's probably higher than that, but she's worth ten million dollars. I'm not worth ten million dollars. I'm not worth a million dollars. So I sit here and I say, Okay, hold on a second. I'm being lectured about paying my fair share because I work three jobs and so I get tax

that are certain rate. I'm being told I should probably pay more. Meanwhile, I'm not worth anything, and she's worth ten million dollars. I need to work. I need someone to explain to me how that's supposed to work. But anyway, guys, she's she's out there and she's obviously now officially running for president. I think, and there's a part of me that doesn't want to say this because I think that she just has no shot. I mean, the whole one one twenty fourth native American thing is just that was

such a blunder and so obtuse that way. You know, I read it over the weekend because I was really curious. They feel like the left's answer to all this is, oh, she didn't professionally advance because she said she was Native American. Now, let me say that that is highly highly subject to interpretation.

And you know, the way that they went through this is to interview, Oh, guess what the faculty of the University of Pennsylvania Law School and the universe see of Harvard Law School, because that was the huge leap in her career. She hadn't a kind of you know, undistinguished legal career before that. And again I don't like people who I don't like when people put down any state school. Some state schools are are considered a lead. But you know,

Rutgers is a fine institution. Rutgers can get a great education. There's some great lawyers that come from there. And I don't I'm not casting any stones, but Rutgers as a just because of the way that Harvard Law School specifically worked, You're not going to go from Rutgers in your undergrad to Harvard Law School as a professor. It's just rather Rutgers as your jd. To Harvard Law School as you professor,

as you're as a professor, it just won't happen. And same thing University of Pennsylvania and those are both I think Harvard's number two. Those are both considered top ten law schools, and Rutgers not a top I don't think it's the top one hundred law school. So it just doesn't happen. And that it happened for her is on

its face highly highly suspicious. That Harvard listed her officially as an American for diversity purposes in their literature for a decade is also indicative of something that she can never explain because because the Left says, the Boston Globe prove this is their big thing, The Boston Globe prove that she's not a race fraud, that she's not folk a hauntis I don't buy that because I read through their whole analysis and all things and say, first of all,

they they do this whole dig in deep with they said, okay, well, one professor on the hiring committee at Harvard said that, yeah, it came up that she was Native American in the hiring process. And then we asked him some more and he said, okay, well maybe i'm mister ember. Essentially, they're like, this guy got pressured into recanting, is what happened. He's gonna be not welcome in the faculty lounge anymore at Harvard. Luck because they all they all love Elizabeth Warren, they

all share her politics. They don't care that she's a fraud. See that's and there was one professor who said that it came up. Why would a professor say that if it didn't happen. A lot of them would say it didn't happen because they're not idiot. It's their Harvard law professors. They understand when journalists are asking about this, they know what's going on. So they're lying for her. That's not that doesn't strike me as odd at all. It's an easy thing to lie about. Well, it didn't really come

up to my recollection. You know who's gonna hold you of that. And you get to help Elizabeth Warren along the way, you know, her race fraud. You effectively give a bunch of libs on the faculty at Harvard who are super libs to wash this away, right. Oh yeah, no, she's not did engage in race frauds, shure. You know they also say that. So so that's the main thing. They ask these different professors who were on the hiring committees, and they all say that it was because of her

amazing work and amazing work of the classroom. And I mean it must have been really amazing, because she's the only under she was the only person from a state law school that became at her time at least was a professor at Harvard in the law school. So it's just you know, these are some, and she also, at key points in her career made a very conscious effort to change her design nation officially to Native American. So

I don't buy that it didn't professionally advance her. I'm sorry, I don't because when she's asked, she goes into some meandering story about identity and members of her family had passed away, And I'm just like, so, people in your family passed away who weren't Native American, and you decided to start calling yourself Native American to identify with them. That is bizarre. But it did open up this other possibility to me, which is that maybe maybe she's actually

delusional and the same way that Rachel Dolazoll. I think Rachel Dolazol convinced herself that she was black. Now that's crazy to you go with me, because she's obviously not black, But I think she convinced herself that she was black. You know, people can be convinced of a lot of things. There's actually a psychological condition that I've talked about because it comes up in discussions about transgenderism, where people want a limb to be removed because they think that they

should not have it. Now, this is obviously a mental mental health disorder, but it is. It is a real thing. You know, people can think all kinds of stuff. Maybe Elizabeth Warren really did think she was a Native American. But is it a better look for it would be president of the United States to be utterly delusional. I'm not sure. You know, at least with the fraud thing, You're like, yeah, she played the system. You know, it's gross. We should make fun of her for it, and she's

a fraud, but I understand why she did it. You know, it's like, okay, maybe that person's a bank robber. I don't agree with it. It's not okay, but they were doing it to steal money. But if the bank robbers like, no, I'm not a bank robber. I'm actually a pink unicorn who's just getting money for the you know, magical world that I'm building, you might say, WHOA, we got a

different kind of problem here. I don't know if that's what we're talking about with Elizabeth Warren, but I've I've read in detail the docs around her, and you know, there's there's stuff up here. I mean, now, as you know, she's also filled out a state our registration card for Texas with stating that in her own handwriting, and she's Native American and she would kind of turn it on and turn it off at different times in her adult life,

which it's just not normal and it is inexplicable. I also, look, this is my challenge to those who want to be who want to be big Warren supporters out there, and I there's a bunch of them. This is my challenge. Okay, I just need someone to tell me why she decided this is true? Why Elizabeth Warren decided to plage your eyes? To plage your eyes a French recipe, pretend that it was her own family recipe, and submit it to a Native American cookbook called Pow Wow chow enlist herself as

Cherokee in the book. Producer, Mike, do you have any theories on this because this is like what this is like something a crazy person would do. Ye. Bizarre, It's really bizarre. Like it's not even her. I mean she she she plagiarized it. She took it wholesale from a from a like a Julia Child cookbook. Yeah, she's she's actually why as you were speaking of this, me and John, we're going back and forth on how if she really, you know, was maybe be misled by her family early

on in life. And I was just like, man, she's been doubling and tripling and quadrupling down on this myth forever and it's just bizarre. Everything she does about it is this is this bizarre behavior and it's just to me, it's it's way. He does not matter how deep she goes, she just won't stop. Want she want. The light is keeps, she keeps it going. It's it's it's pretty amazing. Then

then we had Warren, though, and here's her pathway. I think she's got the whole social justice, economic warfare left thing going for her. And you know, the hardcore left, I mean, the Democrats are insane, as you know, I mean the Democrat Party. Look, they're smart, normal, nice Democrats, but they don't run the party. They're not in charge. The Democratic Party's insane. It's an important principle for us

to be working from. The Democratic Party is nuts. And Elizabeth Warren, though, I think it's going to do surprisingly well among Democrats because she's going to go with this extreme anti Trump position. Play clip two. Every day there's a racist tweet, a hateful tweet, something really dark and ugly. Are we going to let him use those to divide us? You know, here's what bothers me the time. When we get to twenty twenty, Donald Trump may not even be president.

In fact, he may not even be a free person. There you have a sitting Democrat senator who is suggesting the president the United States is going to be in prison and the next what year and a half? This is as gross as anything that you know, all the people that say, oh, the undermining of the institutions, and look what Trump says about Hillary and lokrrop and oh, I'm sorry, Hillary actually broke the law and got a pass full stop. Okay, Hillary is a criminal. She just

got away with it. That's what happened. People can tell the other things, they're making it up. They're delusional. But her saying that Trump will go to prison, this is going She is going to pander to the most insane elements of the Democratic Party. It is going to be outrageous. She is going to try to turn herself into the epitome of the hashtag resistance. That's where she's going with this. She's going to make herself the fierce anti Trumper and

say the most vitriolic, nasty stuff. And I just want to say this ahead of time, because the left has been telling us about how Trump is so uncivil and Trump. No, they just don't like Trump because when they roll up their sleeves and they try they try to throw low blows, Trump just just smacks them down, just lays them out cold, you know, And they don't like that. I don't like that. Now what you're gonna see here a bunch of Democrats.

They're gonna try to go after Trump. They're gonna just kitchen sink everything they've got after Trump as nasty, as dirty, as undermining as they possibly. He's a racist, a massagist, he should be in prison, he's a trader, he's a criminal, all this stuff, and Elizabeth Warren is going to be one of them. And that's at least in the short term, going to mean the Left will forgive her. The Left will let her stay in this even though she's a joke. She's a joke, not a funny joke on my dad.

Has no charm whatsoever, has absolutely no personal charisma or magnetism. I really don't understand why people like her. And I'm at least like Tulsey Gabbard. You know she can give me some surf lessons. It sounds like fun. We'll be right back. I go hard for freedom every day. I try to represent the values that you and I share and fight with libes wherever I can to make sure the truth prevails. But it takes a lot out of me. You know what gets me going? Black Rifle Coffee. That's right.

I need my cup of Black Rifle every morning and every afternoon because it is simply the best coffee you can get on the market. It is absolutely delicious. I mean this stuff. It's got a punch up telling you and the flavor is fantastic. Just pick the roast you like. I'm a big fan of the Freedom Blend, but you can also go full black or silence or smooth. Go on the website and you will see have it delivered to you every month. Joined the Coffee Club. This should

be your coffee of choice. Wake up with America's coffee, Black Rifle Coffee. Visit Black Riflecoffee dot com slash buck and receive fifteen percent off your order. That's Black Riflecoffee dot com slash buck for fifteen percent off again, Black riflecoffee dot com, slash buck join the coffee club and fifteen percent off your first order. And ridiculous means deserving

or inviting derision or mockery, absurd. He does he really mean that attacks on incomes over ten million dollars at seventy percent, which is widely popular with the American people, is ridiculous. Is that an adult conversation? Yeah? I think he thinks it's ridiculous and it's confiscatory and that it's anti growth. That would be his point. What is will Derek Jeter or another athlete not hit another home run because they're gonna get taxed at seventy what's the economic

behavior that he thinks it's antigrowth other than his own pocket? Adam, this is I'm not doing this, Steve. You gotta answer the question. I'm not so Steve Schmidt. I don't like asking him the christ you know it's yeah, it's antique growth. What does that? What does that mean about? Can we

get mister Steve Schmidt? Mister Iran John McCain's terrible president, terrible losing presidential campaign and apparently was a was a prolific leaker from what I'm told by the way, to the press about that about his own campaign, Um can I can I just ask why this girl I'm gonna I'm gonna send me say, I'm gonna answer things. I'm gonna tell the people that Trump is the racist, sadist, a monster, the devil's bad Steve Puff marshmallow man, but even meaner. You know, Steve Schmidt is this guy that

is held up at somebody we should listen to on politics. Look, I he was on solid ground there. He's the guy who's taken the Schmidt position. He I'm sorry the a Schultz position here, where you know a seventy percent tax rate is is bonkers and would have some bad bad if you actually made people pay that in a very bad Look what's happened in New York State. They've lost billions in revenue because people who are wealthy are like, Okay, New York State, you want to just take more of

my money, I'm leaving. I'll keep my house here, but I'm gonna go to another state and file for taxes there because there are consequences to these confiscatory left wing socialist approaches. But stef Smith doesn't laugh to answer questions. You doesn't like it. He's mad, he's bull. He was on his own podcast. There who storms off their own podcast. Somebody comes into your house, you better tell them what's for dinner, if you know what I mean, you better

tell them what time it is, Steve Schmidt. So not a SMBC. Hey it's Trump, but scared enough. Question two. I just think that's such a such a weak move to bail on your own to bail on your own show. I don't know, guys, I promise you I'll never bail. I'll never bail on this show like i'd like with that caller. Then I'm just gonna bail on my show. I don't like it. You know. It's like, uh, it's it's amazing. Oh gosh, you know, I'm excited. We're gonna

have my my buddy. David Harsani joined later and he was a little side done. He's gonna talk to us about anti Semitism. Democratic Party, Ilhan and Talib Ilhan Omar rather and Talib, these two new female congresswomen and Muslim congresswomen who are just going after Israel and are part of the uh the BDS movement and you know, trying to boycott, divest, and and they're they're really a post Israel. Uh.

You know, David Harsani and I go way back. He actually was the first person that ever really encouraged me to write an editorial instead of a straight and a new story for the play. So well, I'm I'm a Harsani fan from way back. He'll be joining us in a little bit day Air for All. This is another one of these issues that is in our current moment of Oh, let's just offer everybody, you know, unicorns and rainbows and candy land, and somebody else will pay for it,

and it's all gonna be amazing. And the government never does a bad job with mandates or with things that exceed it's mandated. It's always government always knows what to do. Yeah. Right, there's an op ed in the New York Times of the weekend daycare for All. The progressive to do list is missing a very important idea. And this woman is a columnist at the Nations, so he's very left wing. I mean, the Nation is essentially a communist front in

this country. I don't mean that it's sponsored by the Soviet Union or something like that, but it is so far left that for it to be taken seriously, is I think, an affront to seriousness. But it is something that is representative of the far left Bernie Sanders wing of a Democrat party, I mean, which is just open socialism, statism, and collectivism. The nation is at least honest about that, whereas the New York Times and others much less so.

But this piece goes into how, yes, they're talking about free public college, healthcare for all, a living wage. These are all good things, but what about how we need to have universal universal childcare? And this piece, let me just say, makes almost no effort. I don't think it makes any effort. I just I don't want to give you a complete blanket statement there without being but I'm pretty sure it makes no I've read through a few times. Makes no effort to say, how are you going to

pay for this? How are you going to pay for this?

I mean, it tells you that, yes, people spend a lot of money in child care in a lot of places, and yes, this is a challenge for for young couples where you have one person working the other one, you know, can't stay home and have their same lifestyle, and they but they can't really afford childcare and there's some interesting numbers about that, how sixty nine Rather in Alabama, for example, the Economic Policy Institute says that it's five thousand, six

hundred and thirty seven dollars a year for an infant and four thousand, eight hundred and seventy one for a four year old, which is sixty nine percent of the average rent and thirty three percent of the cost of in state tuition at a four year college in Alabama. So, yes, childcare is expensive. But what about this quaint idea of people raising their own children and someone staying home with the children. Why do we have to abandon that? Now?

One of the reasons why we are well, one of the things about this that we're not supposed to really discuss is that one of the issues with childcare is that you have an explosion in the last thirty or forty years of single mothers. So that obviously makes the stay at home model difficult because stay at home mom who wants to work is going to have to have

somebody who's going to provide childcare. But you know, to look at this just as a function of what would be good in an economic sense, and I do not concede that that's the case, because this would be a wildly expensive program, and I don't know how we cannot afford the programs we already have. I am here, I am being a little get off my lawd on this. I know, but we cannot afford the government we already have.

That is a fact. It's just a question of when it all starts coming apart, when the wheels start coming off the bus. Might be ten years, might be twenty, might be in six months if things get really ugly with the economy, who knows, probably more like ten or twenty years. But point is, this is now going to be another massive entitlement that the left is pushing. And I give this guy or in cast I don't know

who he is, but he's on Twitter. He pointed out that if you were to go back in time, back to nineteen seventy four, you know, because because the New York Times just had this piece on daycare for all that was the title over the weekend. Go back to nineteen seventy four and a piece in the New York Times that talked about a daycare for all program, which is what the Soviet Union had. And I just there's a lot going on here. I want to read to you from this nineteen seventy four op ed in the

New York Times. Actually, no, I'm sorry, it's not an op ed report. It's it's it's a straight news story in the New York Times about what it's like in the Soviet Union. Quote Zoya Edenko is the model of the young Soviet mother liberated by a local daycare center that mits her to hold a job with her three year old son in a state nursery. She works as a guide and teaches English at a night school under

the highly subsidized Soviet daycare system. Missus Edenko pays a modest ten roubles about thirteen dollars per month for six days a week of childcare. She drops her boy off at about eight am and picks him up at seven pm. He gets three meals and a snack daily. Child rearing never had much attraction for missus Edenko. I went back to work three months after my son was born. She said.

I could have waited a year legally and still kept my job, but it was difficult for me to bring up the baby, and I wanted to get out of the house. My mother in law lives with us, and

she took care of him. The very idea that some American women want to stay at home and raise their own children astonish this thirty year old woman, for her work was the only satisfying outlet, and despite her frequent contact with English speaking foreign tourists, she knew nothing about the range of voluntary and community activities done by non working women. Don't American women want to get out of the house, she asked, Don't you want to work? Don't

you want to earn some money and get independence? Privately, many educated Soviet mothers take a much more skeptical view of the Soviet daycare system and regard the competence of most daycare workers as below desirable standards. Now let me just let me stop there for a second here, isn't this a little eerie? I mean, this is in the Soviet Union in the seventies. Really, I guess you could argue probably the height in the sixties and seventies, the

height of this of Soviet power. And this is just a report by the New York Times on the universal daycare system in the Soviet Union. But notice how there's some interesting attitudes among Soviet women, and there's some shortcomings and pitfalls of this whole program that come up. The women who are more educated and better off in the Soviet system do not like the daycare system that they had.

I think that's certainly interesting, but it goes on the idea that some American women want to stay home and raise children. Astonished a Russian woman, don't want to get out of the house, she asked. The vast majority of Soviet families require the salary of a working wife to make ends meet. Repeatedly, Soviet citizens expressed astonishment when they learn that an American father can support a family of two, three,

or even four children without his wife's working. Many are also surprised that American women would willingly have more than one child. That is suicide, said one fort year old mother. Even with a preschool group for our daughter, we have a hard time coping. Others have little choice in the matter for financial reasons. One young father reported putting an eight month old baby into a nursery rather than waiting

because the financial strain was too great. Without the wife working, this man earned roughly double the average family workers salary of one hundred and forty rubles or one hundred and eighty six dollars a month. You know I think this is you start to see this year and they call them upbringers, by the way, that's what they call the people that work in these facilities. But you start to see, how, what should we be thinking about when we when we

talk about this issue of universal daycare? If if I had told these these people back in the nineteen seventies that we would win the Cold War, and or in cass On on the Sky on Twitter, he's a blue check on Twitter. I know who he is, but he points us out if we had won the Cold War. And you know, you go forward a few decades and now in America, it's the norm for you know, in the seventies, Americans stayed home, and or rather American women, a lot of them stayed home, and that was fine.

And once salary, I don't know a lot of families, it feels like where one salary is sufficient. So we've had all this economic progress, We've had all this growth and explosion of wealth, but our society now is increasingly set up to have a two income earning household in order to support a middle class lifestyle. That's I don't have an answer to that. I just think that that's noteworthy. I think that that's interesting, and I appreciate it that some folks are looking at this and saying, hold on

a second, something is wrong here. Now. I mentioned that the explosion in unwed mothers in this country has led to a lot of people point too, and this is not you know, I know they're single mothers who are listening to this. This is not to disparage any individual at all, but statistically, single mothers, particularly single mothers from poor communities, who live in particularly poor high crime zip codes,

are there there children, they're male. Children are very likely much more likely than children from any ethnicity and from any socioeconomic status, from a two parent household to have serious problems with crime and all these other things. So, you know, the social science on this is pretty clear on the social research. But you know, you at so you have you have a lot of single mothers, and then you also have this economic expectation that you're going

to have to a two income or earning household. I mean, I think you could look at wages and you know, where are real wages now compared to where they were then. And this is a complicated economic argument, but it's just you know, in the seventies, one you know, you could stay home and have three kids. You know, a mom could stay home, raised three or four kids, husband working middle class job. That would work. I don't see that as much these days, and certainly that translates into argument.

Then there then there's this other part of it, and this is where you really are going to see the problem. I think with having a daycare for all model as they did in the Soviet Union, folks didn't exactly work out great for them, she says. A mother of a seven year old girl, this is back to the quote from his Peace, said she found a privately run play group which was technically semi illegal because of Sylvia with Union, for her daughter because she felt the upbringers in these

state institutions were poorly qualified. Another mother with three children said she objected to the extensive indoctrination in state nurseries and kindergartens with their songs about the motherland, lenin and border guards on watch against hostile foreigners. Still, others said they disliked having children raised so much by people outside of the family during their early formative years. Women conceded that the concerns were those of a minority of educated,

middle class intellectuals. Yeah, you don't say so. In the Union, the people who had a higher level of education, a higher level of most likely economic and intellectual freedom. We're like this whole daycare for all thing is not a good idea. People are not good at their jobs, the children are not bonding with the mother and with the family the way they should, and there's indoctrination that's going on. Now.

I'm sure that the left would make an argument here that we would do our our government would do a better job in this than the Soviet Union would. But I also would want to say that the problems of indoctrination and of incredible expense and of you know, think of like the VA for babies, you know, meaning that a state run institution that is supposed to provide you care and services. But the VA is only for obviously for medical needs and for veterans and a a small percentage

of the the pulation. But that's a really state run enterprise. It's got a lot of problems. Imagine if you expanded that out, you know, times ten or twenty x, and we're trying to provide care and watching and feeding and nursing and all this stuff too babies across the country. I don't think the state would do a good job of this. I don't think that the state should be in the business of promoting this, which I know is

probably very contentious. And I also know for sure we can't find ways to pay for this without dramatically raising taxes, which even people say they want this don't want to do so. A view of the Soviet daycare for all program in the nineteen seventies and now the fight over daycare for all today in the pages of the New York Times, and I like a little little trip down memory lane for everybody there. I hope you found that instructive. A little bit of a little bit of the history

can sometimes illuminate our present in interesting ways. We're back. It's the fact that someone within the White House spent three months collecting this information, which is really really hard to do, and it also sends sheds light and the fact that many people who work for us weren't hired for us, and how close you're definding who did it. I'm hoping to have a resolution on that this week when it find that person of persons, and it's likely

going to be a career staff. Are you going to learn a lot about how hard it is to fire federal workers. You know, people say, Buck, I don't know. I don't like the term deep state. The president himself told me, what was it now for four or five months ago. I don't like the term deep state. It's conspiratorial. I actually think it's a pretty accurate description of someone what we see in the federal government. And I used to work in the federal government, so I know something

about this. And you know, this is yet another instance of something that just does not happen to Democrats when they're in office, in that is sabotage from the inside. It is a uniquely left wing democratic approach to an issue, approach to an administration, approach to politics, that when you are a federal bureaucrat, you would take it upon yourself to either leak really sensitive information to obstruct presidential orders

and plans. And we keep seeing this happen. I cannot remember this happening a single time during the eight years of the Obama administration. I do not remember somebody leaking the president's confidential schedule at any point. And we know that this keeps happening with Trump. And it's just indicative of the fact that you have a major confluence, an ideological alignment of statists with the party of the state,

which is the Democratic Party. So if you're somebody who really believes that government should be bigger and more involved and more that the federal government is incredibly necessary in all of its missions, not in it's just core missions, and it's constitutionally mended in every Department of Education, Department of Health and Human Services. You know, you break down all these different things, all of that is oh so necessary. We should have even more, and we should celebrate all

of our federal bureaucrats. If you think those things, you're a Democrat. And if you're a Democrat who thinks those things, you don't like Trump. I think that's quite obvious. But you know, Mick Mulvaney said that the League of Trump's schedule, which led to all these idiot pundits saying, oh, Trump doesn't even do his job. It doesn't even do his job. Can they just figure out is Trump an evil genius

who's single handedly destroying the world and destroying America? Or is he just a lazy fozo eating cheeseburgers all day. It can't be both. I just want them to at least be consistent in their stupidity, like pick one flavor of stupid libs. But Trump isn't paranoid. They are out to get him, and I think that we see yet another instance of it with this leak of a schedule. I hope they find out who did it. I doubt they will. Yeah, yeah, I know people have heard of

the AAARP. It's a pretty well known organization. But what's not nearly as well known is that the AARP is pretty much for retired Libs. Whether they know it or not. That's what they're pushing over. There a lot of liberal agenda items under the guys of oh, we're just trying to help out and represent seniors. I got a better idea for you, AMAC. Why do I recommend AMAC? Well, AMAC gives you all the benefits of AARP, but it supports your values. It's not some liberal left wing organization.

So you get the discounts on car insurance, hotels, roadside assistants, dental plans, but you're also supporting an organization that is pushing for fixing social security, border protection, lower taxes, stuff you believe in. Stand with AMAC as they fight the good fight by becoming a member today, joined right now at amac dot us slash buck. That's am ac us slash book. AMAC is better better for you, better for America.

Most of the things that have always been aggravating to me is that we have had a policy that makes one superior to the other, and we mask it with a conversation that's about justice and two state solution. When you have policies that clearly prioritize one over the other. When I see Israel, you will institute law that recognizes it as a as a as a Jewish state and does not recognize um the other religions that are that are living in it, and we still uphold it as

a democracy in the Middle East. I almost chuckle because I know that if you know we we say we see that in any other society, we would criticize it, we would call it out. We do that to Iran, We do that to any other place that sort of upholds its religion. Oh. The Democrats are so excited about some of their new congressmen and congresswomen, particularly the females, and the diversity of the incoming class. And now I have to say that they've run into a couple of

problems here. For example, Ilohan Omar. She is an immigrant to this country. I believe she's a Somali, and then went to Kenya, as many Somalis do, to flee the situation there, and then moved to Minnesota. She is now amer of Congress. She seems to have some problems though,

with Israel and Jews. She recently said, and we talked on the show, that Israel has hypnotized the world, which seemed certainly suspect, and then in responds to influence of pro Israeli lobby in this country, she tweeted out, it is all about the Benjamins. Well, some people did not like that obvious reference to cold hard cash and Jews and Israel. In fact, a lot of people, including people on her own party. So she has now apologized. She wrote,

anti Semitism Israel. This was today, and I'm grateful for Jewish allies and colleagues who are educating me on the painful history of anti Semitic tropes. As if she didn't know. My intention is never to offend my constituents or Jewish Americans as a whole. We have to always be willing to step back end thing through criticism, just as I expect people to hear me when others attack me for

my identity. This is why I unequivocally apologize. At the same time, oh, look at that, I reaffirmed the problematic role of lobbyists in our politics, whether it be APAC, the NRA, or the fossil fuel industry, because I guess those are the only lobbyists. It's gone on too long. We must address it. So do we accept this apology? And why is Ilhan Omar acceptable to the Democratic Party even though she definitely doesn't like Israel and I think she kind of doesn't like Jews. I think that might

be fair to say. But I want to bring on my friend David Harsanyi, who is a senior editor at the Federal to shed light on this issue. He wrote a piece the Democrats anti Semitism problem isn't going away. Mister Harsan You always good to have you on the program. Thank you for having me. Um so, I got sorry about the long winded intro there. I just want to set some of the table here before I, you know, hand the feast over to you. Tell me, I mean, is Ihan Omar an anti Semite? From what we see

so far? Is that fair to say? Oh, I think she's an anti Semite, because it's not some slip of the tongue or some sort of you know, trope that is that you can confuse in some way. I mean, and she said this before, and she's everything she said seems leads me to believe she's an anti Semite. But the thing is, it's not the tropes that are the

biggest problem in my estimation. Those tropes are manifestations of her of her belief that Israel and the Jewish state should not exist, which to me is a functionally anti Semitic and far more serious position than making, you know, than throwing some one line or is it at Jews. So to me, that's the main problem, and that's why it's simply apologizing for saying something stupid out loud is

not really enough and it doesn't really speak to anything. Now, obviously there's some interesting there's some interesting dynamics at play when it comes to American politics and support for Israel, because you have some you know, you have some Democrats

who are very supportive of Israel. You have some democrats, including Jewish democrats, who are deeply critical of Israel, and people like Ilhan Omar Will point to the Democrats who are also I mean Glenn Greenwald, for example, Jewish and credible. You know it is really an Israel Basher. I don't even think it's critical. I mean he has a problem with the state of Israel and so ilhan Omar will point to someone like a Glenn Greenwald and say, see, I'm not the only one who thinks that Israel's in

apartheid state or is engaged in horrible oppression. I mean, how do you how do you untangle all those threats? David, Well, it's difficult because I I don't think any serious person that has ever said that being critical of Israel is makes you an anti Semite. Obviously, you know, Israel has had many different kinds of governments, including socialist governments that

people have been critical of and from all sides. The problem for me, at least my view, is that if you though believe that the very project of Israel is a Jewish state is somehow false, or you know, a colony, or you know whatever, then you are being anti Semitic. Jews need a state to defend themselves. History has proven this over and over again, and denying them that ability to have that state, I think is anti Semitic in

its own way. It doesn't necessarily mean you're always, you know, some big Jew hater, but in the end, that's what it is. Hate the bashround people like Greenwald or whatever. But I mean, I think it's it's pretty obvious that that wing of the progressive movement are you know, have a problem with Jews in general, and it doesn't matter if you're Jewish or not. There are plenty of self hating Jews. Karl Marx was a self hating Jew and others as well, who you know, those people probably admire

in some way. So yeah, I mean, I give Greenwald credit at least for being he's at least interesting in that he doesn't always he's not just not on the topic of Israel, but just in general. Like on Russia collusion, he will call it out for the lunacy that it is.

But then on Israel or Greenwald and I have actually, you know, have actually clashed before because I mean I think he's he actually has a sort of fondness for terrorists that comes across I mean, if you are a radical Islamist psychopath, Glenn Greenwald will find a way to explain how you're not that bad, which is obviously sets me off in all the wrong ways. But in Russia collusion, he's good. I mean, you know, you have look. I like people who are free thinkers, or at least I

like the thought process that they engage in. But for someone like you can't fall into a soul and know what he thinks about Jews or not right, I mean, but the bottom line is, and I do agree with everything you just said. I think he's actually far more interesting and maybe far more honest than many other progressives.

I think that that's great. And but the bottom line is he seems to be I think, at least from reading him, that terrorists, you know, Hamas to al Kaita to anyone else, has a legitimate case of you as a legitimate case to do what they do because of American imperialism or Israeli imperialism or whatever. And I think

that's a really a moral position to take. So that's my problem with him, is yeah, no, Look, and I brought his name into this conversation, so I just kind of wanted to give a fuller context for what I read again as his views, and also have debated him, you know, once or twice in the past. But on this point about the rising anti semitism, is there a rising anti semitism Democratic Party? I mean, I think I've seen Mark Levince some other folks saying that this isn't

just a thing, it's a thing that's getting worse. Do you see that as the case or are we just seeing it now? Because you know, we can look back and look at photos of say Obama shaking Farakhan's hand, or look at Farakhan's Twitter account and see it is not suspended, but learn to code, We'll get you suspended. Is it getting worse or we just more aware of it? On the left? Definitely getting worse. I mean, I'm not a spring chicken, right, I've been around. I know what

the Democratic Party was like then and now. I think Obama had a lot to do. Listen, Obama's a reflection of where the Democrats were going. He's not a person. I mean, he led in that direction as well, but obviously it's also a reflection of voters. And I think we saw it then and he's now changed the entire dynamic of Israel's support in America. If you notice, it's kind of like even right now in the Democratic Party,

it's kind of young against old in a way. The younger freshmen a lot of them are, you know, very reluctant to say anything bad about you know, Omar or anyone else like that. But it's the older sort of people who do. I think that's the split and progressives because they're hard left or anti Israel because they view it as a colonizing force. And with that comes a lot of anti Semitism, and it always has. We've seen it on college campuses, and now it's bleeding into mainstream politics.

And you know, there's Rashida to Leab as well, who I don't know. I don't know who. I mean, do you have an opinion on who's been more egregious in this regard to Leab or Omar? Are they pretty much in the same boat. I think they're in the same boat, and those are obviously she's a you know, she's a Palestinian and she has sort of you know, perhaps you could forgive that a bit, even though I think she's completely wrong on the reasons why these things are happening.

I mean, I don't want to forgive her, but maybe some people might want to um. But in the end we have to judge people and the things they say in the positions they take, and both you know, we didn't. We just learned today that she had written for a Farercon newspaper in two thousand and six. You imagine, Uh, can you imagine a Republican congressman writing for the David Duth newsletter and then being able to just scirt by and no one, you know, even finding that, no one

even fact checking that op war research. Nothing. Um, it's just it's it's hard to imagine. Yeah, and you know, and this is this gets into an area where where I mean, I have some opinions from my previous life, and I think, you know, because because they're a there's a On the one hand, I think that Omar and to Lab they're new. They they there's this excitement around them, their women and their minorities. So there's this this particular,

you know, this particular shroud of protection around them. You know, they can get away with saying more. I mean, I think I think that that's patently obvious. But you know, you touched on a couple things with Omar. I found an interesting that one this is Somali who lived in Kenya. I mean she she had a somewhat similar route in that sense to on her CLI, who I think is brilliant and has really changed the global discourse in some

ways on some of these issues about Islam specifically. But her fixation on Israel is one telling and two telling, as in, I think it tells us a lot about what she really thinks because it doesn't come from a Palestinian, you know, she doesn't have any personal connection to Israel

or interaction with Israel at all. But beyond that, David, the Muslim world is full of I mean, I'm the Muslim world is there's a lot lot of people in the Muslim world who are deeply anti Semitic, I mean, and anybody who says otherwise does not know what the heck they are talking about. No, I mean, I don't know if anyone's done to Poland in the United States, where I think this, you know, the Muslim community has is not probably that way, but you know, across the

world it's very different. It's high, high levels of anti Semitism. Seventy eighty percent of people are So that's a problem, and and it's it's something we're not allowed to talk about. Like every time I mentioned Omar I'm told she's the first Muslim congresswoman, as if that somehow should should dissuade me from being critical of her. I don't care if she's the first Martian in Congress. It doesn't matter. When you're saying crazy things, that's it's it's unfortunate actually that

she's that kind of person. But she's an anti Semite, and you know, we act like she's twelve years old and she's learning. She's a thirty seven year old woman elected to Congress. She doesn't know how not to be a bigot yet. I mean, I think that that's just unlikely. So, um, I just think we think this causes any problems from a from a like a political electoral you know, who's going to win elections perspective. Does this this cause issues you think for the Democrats? I don't know. Um, probably

not many, frankly, because you know, it's it's complicated. But there's been a long term project on the left in the Jewish community to disconnect Jews from Israel, to disconnect them actually from their faith in a way and pretend that Judaism is just sort of an outgrowth of liberalism. And this is obviously a longer discussion. But I think

that's bearing fruit. And I'm not saying all Jews are that way, but you know, the reform movement, for instance, within Judaism is actually just a liberal advocacy group at this point, and it's it's really distressing that we can't sort of keep those you know, segregate those communities into you know, and compartmentalize our faith in our politics, because politics and faith now are almost the same thing from most people. David Harsani, everybody check out his latest at

the Federalist. He is taking the Democrats to task for their anti Semitism problem. David always good to have you all, my friends. Thanks for making the time, Thanks for having me man today. We'll be back in just a moment. Folks, my friends. Three days left until Valentines And I know you can get flowers from all these different places, but don't you want the most beautiful, aromatic, eye popping, perfect roses. That's what I want. That's why I've hooked up Miss Molly.

Don't tell her it's a secret, with two dozen beautiful roses to be delivered on Valentine's Day from one eight hundred flowers. Guys, gals, this is the way to go. Okay, I order every year on Valentines from my rose authority one eight hundred flowers dot com. I recommend you do too. Get on it now, don't wait to order eighteen red roses for Valentine's Day for your sweetheart for only twenty nine ninety nine or upgrade to twenty four so assorted roses plus of a's for ten dollars more. Go to

one eight hundred flowers dot com. Click the radio icon it enter code buck. That's one eight hundred flowers dot com. Enter promo code buck. You got a hurry. Gotta jump on this right now, because the offer expires today in our nation's heartland, at a time when we must heal the heart of our democracy and renew our commitment to

the common good. I stand before you as the granddaughter of an iron R. Miner, as the daughter of a teacher and a newspaperman, as the first woman elected to the United States Senate from the state of Minnesota to announced my Canada's favorite president of So if you missed it, that was Amy Klobshar from Minnesota. I think she was the one. I think that my my buddy Pete Hegseth from Fox News. He ran for senate. When I first met him, he had just on for senate in Minnesota.

He lost in the primary, but I think Cloba schar was the one who beat the guy who won in that primary. But anyway, so Cloba Shark. That was the first time I heard of her. And you know, now she's she's out there. I hope I have I might I might have that one wrong. Don't quote me on that, but I think I'm right. Um. But now she's announced that she's running for president, and it was amazing because

she announced it and it's, oh, it's very Minnesota. Yeah uh she and the Minnesota's listening to this, like Buck, don't even try your Minnesota. Your Minnesota accent game is so weak. Don't channel um. But I sound a little bit like a bad missus doubtfire when I'm trying to sound like I'm from Minnesota. Here's the thing, I always assume everybody from Minnesota is so nice. All. I used to go camping in Minnesota with my dad and my brothers. We went for years. Elie men Eli Eli Eli. That's right,

Eli not eli eli. Minnesota. We went for years and critical boundary of the boundary waters, the critical Wilderness area. I remember going up there and everybody in Minnesota was so nice. What happened up there though, where the state has gone practically communist. That's part one. It has the climate of Siberia, that's part two. And you know, some of these people are come out of you are not

that nice, at least the Democrats. You get Al Franken, a mean, nasty, grasping groper, and now you got Klobaschar who it turns out, is not a nice lady. I can tell you this. Whenever you hear stories about somebody who's a Democrat, if it's a Republican, they'll be like video evidence of it, and they'll do expose as in the front page. You'll you'll see a Republican being mean

to staff. You'll know about it, right. But whenever you see stories about a Democrat in media, politics, Hollywood, even any of it, about how they're abusive to staff, it's almost always true. I mean, I can't think of a time where I read about a Democrat who maybe was abusive to staff and it didn't turn out, oh my gosh, that person's a person's a terror. The Cruella Deville of Democrat politics and Amy klobaschar Man. I hated Kula Deville. She wanted to make all those cute puppies, all those

cute Dalmatians into a coat. Side note, Dalmatians really beautiful to look at. Not very nice dogs in terms of their temperament. And the Dalmatian owners out there. You can get mad at me if you want. I read this stuff from the American Kennel Club. But I'm telling you yours maybe sweet, you're you're fufu or rufous or whatever, may be adorable, but generally Dalmatians are known to not have a particularly sweet temperament. I'm just telling I just

bring you the truth, folks, I just bring you the truth. Anyway, I didn't like Krola Deville, and I don't think I'm gonna like Amy klobaschar who gave this announcement. It's because all the stories now about how she throws objects. I mean, she's not just nasty to staff. She throws objects at staff, like she threw a purse at a staff member. She people quit in tears because she's so mean and so nasty.

And I'm telling you the media covers us up because they'll say, oh, it's sexist to criticize a woman for being mean. If she were a man, they would just say he's being assertive. No, that's not true. I have very colorful language for a lot of men that I know in media in particular, who treat their staffs badly. Okay, I do not. I do not say that, Oh, so and so is assertive, like Keith Olberman was famously vicious to his staff, Like anybody in media knew that. Nobody

said that he was assertive. They said he was an sob pos Okay, So I hate this this nonsense argument. Oh they're just saying she's a woman. No, I'm sure she's nasty. But I like how Trump said she announced this, and he said Amy Klobisher announced she's running for president, talking proudly of fighting global warming while standing in a virtual blizzard of snow, ice and freezing temperatures. Bad timing. By the end of her see you looked like a

snowman woman Trump. Sometimes Trump, I just gotta say it, man, you complete me. I hate awards ceremonies. I really think that when you get beyond high school, we should get rid of awards ceremonies. Okay, so before we dive into this discussion. A couple of exceptions. Military awards, military decorations not a part of this discussion. Okay, awards for real things, for real heroism, you know that that's that's something else.

Obviously we'll put that aside. But awards for the arts and for media, I just I just don't get it. And I do feel like people in the media, because they're so both insecure and so in love with themselves at the same time, that's why you have all this stuff. I mean, whenever I hear somebody say, now you know I was on a show that Emmy nominated, I'm always like, okay, well, were you nominated for Best Actor or were you just on the staff of the show that got nominated? Like

is that? I mean, if you're the catering guy on the Emmy nominated you know, Big Bang Theory or something, I'm happy for your professional success, but I don't think that we need to hear about how you are Emmy nominated. Feel the same way about all these journalists and these journalism awards. Oh I got a Pulitzer or I got a Peabody, I got there's all these different I can't

even keep track of all this stuff. Who cares? You know, the upside of writing a great piece is a lot of people reading it and maybe you having some sort of influence on an important issue or on a national conversation, or just showing the best of your craft. And I just feel like most most of you listening, for example, whatever your job is, the reward for a job well done is being good at your job and knowing that and getting paid to do that job that you're good at,

whatever that job is. And you know, I wish that we in our culture more of a celebration of just being good at what you do, whatever that is. You know, this is some of you will probably think of the movie, or if you've seen it, you'll think back to, you know, Jiro Dreams of Sushi, which is a really really good documentary about one of the most famous, famous little sushi restaurants in the world that's in a subway stop in Tokyo.

I forget what it's called. The main guys obviously named Jiro, and you know, he has this apprentice who spends ten years trying to make the perfect tomago, which is the little egg custard, and after ten years finally wons his mentor Jiro, who's the most amazing sushi chef you know in the world, etc. Get He finally gets it right and he tells him this is right, and he cries, Now you don't have to necessarily cry because you make

your tomago perfectly. But whatever you're doing doing that thing, I think it's Saint Francis dis Sails who says, be exactly who you are and be that perfectly, or do not wish to be anything but what you are, and be that perfectly. That's why then this whole award ceremony thing for these many times like this is my long way of saying, I didn't even know the Grammys were all last night. I woke up this morning, I went to do rising and they're like, are we gonna do

a segment on the Grammys? Like what? What? Well, it turns out that I'm not the only one and all time low for the in the demo, at least for the Grammys. I just don't understand why people care about this, And I guess more and more people are agreeing with me because it just strikes me as incredibly self indulgent

and unnecessary and self referential, just the whole thing. Also, I think the state of American music right now is a country music aside, because I don't know anything about country music, which is something that I should really address some of you right now. We're booing me, and I

earned that. I did start listening to punk rock recently, old punk rock, like the New York Dolls and the Ramones, and because I didn't really and so if any of you have country rock suggestions for me, like really great contemporary contemporary country music, country music, and if I said country rock country music, uh, send it to me Facebook dot Com, slash Buck, sexon. Because other than country, which I cannot speak to, I think the state of music

in America right now is pretty terrible. So I definitely didn't watch the Grammys, but I do want to do roll call in a moment. Hey, team Buck, it's time for roll call. You know. I started listening to some dubstep again. I'm I'm I'm not gonna lie to you guys. I didn't even like that expression, because I never lie to you guys. But I can't lie to you. But listen to some dove step as I work out, and if you pick the right stuff, I think you can

actually do a pretty good job. So We have Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton for those of you who like to get in on the role call action. First off is andres rets Hottie Buck getting caught up on your podcast. Currently on a monument to left wing idiocy, I thought to note something about AOC. AOC may be great at theatrics, but primarily to those that relate or have a tendency to absorb abstract left wing concepts. As such, I don't believe she the individual is at the heart

of this political hallucination. Just a thought, what if senior Democrats find AOC to be the perfect canary in the coal mine to test Operation Crazy Eyes. In this way, they can test the waters to essentially see what happens so others don't have to risk further embarrassment. AOC will get these support and coaching she needs in order to function as the conductor on the crazy train. She'll do it,

She'll say anything. It's an interesting theory. I mean, I think that AOC really believes she's not knowledgeable enough to not believe what she's saying and still say it, or rather, she's not knowledge enough to be cynical about what she's saying. That's what I was trying to say, I don't think that she even knows how wrong she is and what she says she believes based on the way that she says that says things, and also just the the approach of the social justice left, I can hear it in

her voice. I mean, she is steeped in the approach to not just politics but life that you get from HuffPo and Salon dot Com and Talking Points, Memo and Daily Co's. And I have a whole I think I've mentioned this to before. I have a whole left wing web browser that I keep open. I mean, here, my web browser has all those things I just said, huff Post, Daily KOs, Politico, MSNBC, CNN, BuzzFeed. Well, it used to have Gawker. I need to get rid of that. Gawker's dead.

Now he's gonna Dare, Spiegel, Bloomberg, all this, all this stuff. I mean, I have to keep in touch with the left so I know how crazy they are and what kind of crazy they are. And one of the ways to do that is to read their stuff. So I read their stuff, and I think, Okayzy Cortez is in earnest about the things that she says. I really do. I think that she believes this stuff as nuts as it is. Dave Write Shields hie Buck. Just listen to your show on Friday's podcast. Love your segment on the

Green New Deal. But I think the point not being discussed is that the original New Deal failed. Had anybody asked AOC what everybody's supposed to do for a living? After all, the building retrofits are complete, make work projects have an ending. They are not a career. David, you

raise a very interesting point there. No, I don't think that she the left has managed to rewrite history of the New Deal so that we are to believe that that FDR essentially saved the American economy, that the FDR public works projects, all the different ways that there was a mobilization of people to work for the state in a time of war, but it was very much a war on you know, economic malaise. They used the same

the same kind of rhetoric. They didn't really call it a war on poverty per se, but the same idea that it did not work the way that liberals have been told that it worked. But you see that, and unfortunately Causio Quartez does not. It's also interesting that we are reminded regularly by the media of the failings of previous presidents and previous leaders in this country, stretching back

for centuries really. But for some reason, the interment of Japanese Americans into concentration camps that is excused for FDR in that it is not discussed. They won't they won't say that it was okay, but they will omit it from the conversation. They will omit it. They will not engage in much analysis of that. Karen writes, if you don't like going to the gym, get an exercise matt, some dumbells and leg weights, and work out in front

of Netflix in your apartment. To kill, kill, to kill, kill, two birds with one stone, as they used to say. You know, Karen, I've actually done a fair amount of home workout stuff. It's great, you know, especially when you realize how much of a challenge your own body weight can be. And really, I think that a great measure of fitness, one that I needed to work on, is your ability to control and stabilize and move your own

body weight effectively. I mean, that's why, you know, with all this exercise craze stuff, and I've been talking to friends recently who are, Oh, I do Berries boot Camp. I don't know how many of you even know it. Burries boot Camp is producer Mike give it on Barry's boot Camp. The lady instructors are apparently quite lovely. But you know Barry's boot Camp And what's this other peloton where you can pay a lot of money to have an exercise bike in your living room or your bedroom.

All these different advanced and boutique I believe they call it boutique fitness crazes across the country. That you look at the old school stuff they have people do in the military. You know, when you think of boot camp and you think of doing push ups, jogging, pull ups and carrying heavy stuff, that pretty much covers it. And really your ability to do push ups and pull ups, especially for the male physique, gives you a very good

indicator of your upper body strength and where you really are. So, you know, I see guys sometimes and I'm by no means any kind of expert or anything like that. I mean, I'm I'm a I'm an enthusiastic, uh maybe advanced beginner and all things, all things Jim. But I see guys that are in there and they're doing a lot of like wrist curls and shoulder shrugs and stuff. And you know, for the experts, yeah, that's stuff. You know, you gotta

hone that one, you know, muscle group. But for most of us, it's the basics will actually get you pretty far. At somebody who has, you know, gained and lost weight multiple times, substantial amounts of weight multiple times throughout his life. That's been my experience. So any of you who, by the way, have like personal physical transformation stories or think you know, let me know, man, I'll love reading about

that stuff. Facebook dot com, slash buck Sex, and one of my favorite Instagram accounts is is a body transformations account that's supposed to be a fitzspiration or I think that's what you call it fitspiration where people see it and it's amazing what individuals can accomplish. Andrew writes, I call it your podcast. Don't be so hard on yourself. I myself once repeated a mistake in etymology someone had

I trusted had told me too. By the way, I remember the other thing you'd said recently that really meshed with my long held beliefs. You label the Left as having no coherent ideology other than to tear everything good and decent down. And you labeled them iconoclasts. You don't just keep your finger on the pulse of the news. You see through the Google's propaganda machine for what it truly is and what hides behind it shields high keep up the good work. Well, thank you, Andrew on both counts.

I'm always very frustrated when I share any piece of knowledge in the show that I don't have to correct because it's not knowledge, it's phone knowledge or whatever, or how much just wrong Buck, it's wrong, And that's something that I don't like, ivn't do, but I will do because I want to tell you the right stuff. And then as to the left's desire to tear things down, I think that's very much the case, and I'm glad

that I'm not a little on that one. A gentleman named jar rights the only thing AOC was missing was who's coming with me? Who's coming with me? You could call me sentimental, but the fish are coming with me. Yeah, I know what we're going for. The little Jerry McGuire reference. Jerry McGuire is a great movie, although I do remember still with its seared into my brain that I tried to watch it once at my grandparents house, and I figured I told them there was some profanity, and they

were okay with that. But my grandmother, my wonderful and dearly departed grand other, sat down with me to watch Jerry McGuire, and she happened to sit down in about about two minutes before a scene in Jerry McGuire that is memorable and involves loud females. I can't you know what. I can't even I can't even go there, guys, I gotta just all I'm telling you is that Jerry McGuire is a great movie. But you know it's not for not for the kids. Not for the kids. There's unless you.

I guess you could brought probably the TV version of it where they cut out the curses and the one sex scene is probably fine. That kid was really funny. Whatever happened? Do we know what happened to him? Jonathan lipp Nikki I even remember the name. Did he turn into one of those you know, celebrity kids who ends up, you know, chasing down smack on the wrong side of town or something? Do we know? Nah? I don't know what happened to him, but the human head weighs eight

pounds on rights. Heard a great AOC joke yesterday. What happens when AOC eats ice cream too fast? Answer? Nothing, whamp wamp. Thank you for sharing the joke. Patrick writes, Bocon has really missed her opportunity to use her struggle for childcare during law school as an excuse for infanticide. WHOA, Patrick's that's quite a turn you just pulled there. NJ writes, Hey, Buck, I love the show. I just finished with Black Panther,

and I have to agree with you. It is hot, garbage, lame script, terrible acting, and the social justice stuff throughout dreadful, just dreadful. Anyway, keep up the great work, shield Tie. You know what, Thank you. I'm giving a little round. I'm somebody else will be honest about Black Panther. Black Panther's a terrible movie, all right, Brett Easton Ellis. I think recently the pretty well known gen X or gen y or whatever author Brett Easton Ellis came out and

said that nobody in Hollywood really likes Black Panther. And it's true. It's a bad movie. You can enjoy it. I look, point break is a bad movie. I love Point. Break the Rock is kind of a bad movie. I love the Rock. You don't have to tell me that it's great. I love it. It's just not a good movie. It's like, makes no sense. The plot is bizarre. There are huge plot holes in it that you know, we could talk about all day, you know, I I I problem with Black Panther was not only is it a

bad movie. I didn't find it that enjoyable to watch. If you enjoy it great, I can't tell you what to enjoy one not to but the plot, the acting, it's just it's just ridiculous. It's the most advanced society in the world, but they picked their leader by having a hand to hand combat, fight to the death in like an elevated Jacuzzi. Basically, I mean it may it

makes no sense, folks. Okay, it's just free yourself to think freely about Black Panther and you will feel measure like, Yeah, I know I've been told I have to like this. I don't. I don't have to like this. I don't. I'm telling you. It's okay. Team, We'll have more coming up tomorrow. I'll talk to you then. Shield Tie Global Verification is the only dual certified and veteran owned background

investigation and vetting company out there. If you need any kind of investigative worker, if you need background checks on employees, I mean this is this is something that my friends are Global Verification Network excel at no matter what size company, they have risk mitigation experts who will talk to you about the specifics of your needs, handle whatever issues that you might have or any any time constraint concerns. They will tailor make the service for you. You need to

check them out. Even if you've got somebody who currently does your background checks, call Global Verification and see if they can get you a better deal, better service, better results. Call eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine. That's eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine, Or go to my GVN dot com again, that's my GVN dot com and team Make sure you let them know that Team Buck sent you