Democrats Flat-Out Lie About the Border

Buck Sexton Show. This is the Buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence, magnor mistake America, You're a great American Again. The Buck Sexton Show begins. Analysts, No, not one congressional leader, including Nancy Pelosi. Chuck Schumer has went to the border to talk to barbato chiefs about the effectiveness of the wall.

I keep hearing the walls ineffective from them people. I don't know what data they're basing it on, but every place a border barrier has been built, illegal immigration has declined. That's a fact. They went through the southern Mexican border last time. Mexico failed to stop them. However, for those that get in that want to come to port a

venture to claim asylum. That we need to make that agreement operational where they wait to Mexico until they get that hearing, because ninety two percent of them will not get relief from the immigration courts and they'll be ordered removed. So we need to keep it in Mexico rather than get in the United States disappear in society with the other twelve thirteen million people. I went and spent some time with border patrol. Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show, everybody.

Unlike Pelosi and her gang of Democrats, I wanted to get as much ground truth as I could because this is the single most important policy issue in the country right now, what to do about border security and how we can approach the broader issue of immigration and all of the issues that are tied into it. So I have been out here in the San Diego sector of the border for the last couple of days. That's why, Yes, I had to have a guest host, our friend Harlan Hill. Hope.

He did a fantastic job. No, he did a fantastic job. Always great to have Harlan sitting in for me. But man, do I have some things to tell you today. The good news is that all the things that we've been saying here on this show about the border. All along are accurate, meaning that walls do work. There is no question that walls work. It is an un serious, anti factual position to say that walls work. It is an irrational position to say that walls do not work. It

makes no sense. It flies in the face of history, reality, and all of the experts I spoke to members of Border Patrol. Some you could tell, maybe we're a little more favorable to this president than others. All of them said here in the San Diego sector that a wall isn't just helpful, it is a game changer. Now I have more stories any which, I mean, we can really fill this out, but you know, I wanted to start with the very broad takeaways from having been out there

and toward areas without fencing with fencing. Saw an apprehension happen in real time. One moment, I'm getting a tour of the fence. The next moment, oh, look there's a bunch of illegals who were making a run for it, hit the accelerator and I had to sit there and watch the whole thing go down. We also had, or rather a male with a very young kid about ten years old turn himself in, and so I managed to see, over the course of forty eight hours, the different components

of how border security is done here. But also I saw the scams that are being run, the exploitation of American law for the purposes of people who want to just skip the whole immigration process as we know it and get access into the American interior and do all of this in ways that the media is just either blind to you or a lying to you about. I've been telling you for a while that ninety percent of the media is just flatly dishonest about the realities of

immigration what's coming on of the border. And now I'm more convinced than ever. I mean, now I'm certain that's the case, because you can't spend any time with border patrol as they're trying to enforce federal law when it comes to illegal alien crossings in this country. You can't spend any time with and not realize that the primary Democrat talking points from Pelosi and Schumer and all the rest of their left wing crew are just false lies,

fake news, whatever you want to call it. Walls don't work, it's a lie. All they need is a ladder it's a lie. Border Patrol doesn't want more fencing. It's a lie. There's not a massive problem of infiltration of illegal aliens into this country currently ongoing, also known as a crisis. There's no crisis, they say. That's a lie. The cartels

aren't getting incredibly rich off of human smoking. In fact, now there's some estimates that they might even be making in some of the plazas, some of the sectors that they break the border down into for cartel control, they might be making more money off the smuggling of human beings than the smuggling of drugs. So there's not a crisis. That's a lie. There's not a major problem of the

infiltration of drugs and human beings. That's a lie. They aren't lying to us in order to exploit our immigration system, lying to the faces of our customs agents and our borderings. That is also a lie. The record, when I was I started out, I went into and I want to walk you through what I saw over the course of the two days, because it's if you're going to talk about the border, if you're going to care about the border, any American should know these things. These are facts. This

is what is really going on. This isn't just the talking point is not the CNN. Oh, it's they're doing the jobs Americans won't do, and they're better than than actual Americans are. They're more American than Americans. These illegals. There's no problem here. There's no security threat, there's no scamming that's going on. There's no risk to our sovereignty, and there's no impact on the economy, on er rooms,

on schools. Lies. They're just lying, lying all over the place about this, and it happened for a very long time. So I want to walk you piece by piece through this.

But one of the most impactful moments that I had was being brought into the initial I mean, other than actually being there on the first day and seeing illegal illegals try to cross, and I would note that some people because I took a photo as they were jumping off the fence on the US side, and then the car I was in chase them down and boarder troll agents got out and they surrendered. I mean, there was no the illegal alien crossers weren't being aggressive or anything.

They knew they were caught and that was it. And the worst thing's going to happen to them is they're out some money and they're gonna get deported back to Mexico. It's a misdemeanor felony the first time to cross, although those individuals had already crossed before. Of course, this was not their first time doing this, as we found out later on, and they were Mexican, unlike a lot of what I saw in the initial and this is what

really stuck with me. In the initial processing center. When you are caught in the San Diego sector of the border and you get brought in for processing, they separate out. Now women who were with children are in one holding cell and then there's a hold, then they break them

down by medical need. There is a in the McCallen sector or down in mcmccalen, Texas and that part of the border, there is a holding cell specifically for illegal aliens crossing with HIV, specifically for legal aliens crossing with tuberculosis, specifically for legal aliens crossing with scabies. Lies. I mean, all all these health problems, and you may say, well, buck, I mean they need help, okay, But we need to understand that this this influx of people into the country

is one not just taxing border patrol resources. I mean this influx of people that are yes, they're they're crossing sometimes illegally, sometimes illegally, but using the asylum process, and this is what we're seeing. It's all these would be asylum seekers coming in. They are taxing the medical system.

When you have one person who shows up two border it shows up and is apprehended by border patrol or turns themselves in and they have to go to an ear an emergency room facility, it requires two border patrol agents to stay with that individual the entire time they're receiving medical treatment, so they get pulled off the lines. So now that's you can imagine how you get You get twenty or thirty people who have to go to the hospital and Border Patrol has to send forty fifty

sixty agents. I mean they say large numbers of agents to go essentially babysit them in an American er, where of course the taxpayers paying for this. So it's not about being unkind or inhumane or mean, I'm not bringing up the holding facilities for people that are coming across the border will have tuberculosis as anything other than just to give the full scope of what the resources are involved here and what we're asking Border patrolled to do.

They set up a frontline triage center essentially for medical screening, medical screening of people that are coming across the border, because a lot of them do have very serious health problems. There's another thing that's just happening now in larger and larger numbers. You have these family units showing up. And the family units tend to show up and they turn

themselves in. I saw that happen. I saw a guy claiming to have a ten year old side just they walked up to the border, to the border fence and said we want to claim asylum, and Border patrol said okay, and they got them. They got them transport and then they processed them in the facility, right and they keep the families together. Now they've reverted from the policy that was in place this path once they've established that it is family Oh, which by the way, they lie about that.

You don't see that reported very often, but they call it recycling children. There will be kids that are someone else's kids who are being used in order to get the benefit of arriving as a family unit at the border. So that happens, But the medical needs are very intense for some of these recently arrived migrants, and now we're seeing more and more women arriving in their ninth month of pregnancy. I am nine months pregnant and I would like to claim asylum in your country. Okay, Well, now

they're going to get processed. Right. Once they get processed, they're also going to get medically checked out to make sure they're okay, and then they're going to be by Immigrations and Customs Enforcement released into the interior of the United States pending their court date, which will probably be

a year or two, maybe three years away. Is there any person right now out there who thinks that a woman who comes into America saying that she has a credible fear And I'll get into the credible the credible fear thing is a huge scam. It's a lie. You are we are being lied to when the media says you're allowed to claim asylum. No, you're not allowed to lie in order to get asylum. It is happening all the time, day in and day out. And I'll get

into y in a moment. I Mean, there's a lot to dig into here, But does anyone think that somebody who arrives in their ninth month of pregnancy. Obviously they're going to give birth in the United States. That child is a US citizen because of birthright citizenship. And now when that parent, that mother shows up claiming asylum in two years, do you think that it even matters where she's from, or what threat she's under, or what her asylum case is. No, Now she's got an American citizen child.

Do you think any judge is going to say, any immigration judge is going to say, yeah, we're gonna send you back now? Obviously not. The incentive now is not only do you get to come into the country and get medical care and give birth in this country and give citizenship to your child, you are effectively guaranteed to be able to stay into in the country with that child afterwards. And this is all using the system and the laws we have they are in place. Now, why

do I say there's a scam? How are they lying about this? How is the word out, what NGOs are involved, who's paying to bring them to the border. Why is it that South Texas is a thousand miles closer for the caravan that came up than San Diego. But somehow they all ended up in San Diego in the caravan rather quickly and went far out of the way to

get there. Why is that who's pushing this? There are people pushing this, There are NGOs, and there are efforts just using the Internet and social media to get information out there to make sure that migrants who arrive at the border know exactly what to say and what to expect and how to try and leverage the processes that we have in place that are supposed to save people from imminent fear of death. This is just being exploited for people who want to be here because it's a

better country. This is Central Americans who come through Mexico and say, well, I don't want to stay in Mexico. And they'll say this, I asked border patrol. I said, what when you ask a Hondura or El Salvadoran, why don't they just stop in Mexico and claim asylum. They're they're granted asylum if they want it in Mexico. They said, we don't want to be in Mexico. Mexico's got all kinds of problems. They want to be in America. That's not asylum, that's immigration. That's trying to come to another

country because it's a better country. That's not what the asylum process is for. It is being abused. You are being lied to, and people in the me ninety percent of the media is perpetuating this lie. And I will break down the scams for you. I'll talk more about the wall, the fence, where this is going. We'll also today get into the insanity. I was on Tucker Show last night. I talk with the insanity of this. Trump is a Russian agent and people are just out of

their minds. Pelosi saying no State of the Union address now pretending to have gotten Secret Service to sign off on this, and I'm seeing now that that's not even the case. But Pelosi, what do we expect from her? And also one thing today, I really would love to hear from a lot of you. We are going to kick those lines open. I know we haven't taken a lot of calls in a while, but I feel like

today I'm out here. If you've got any questions about the border, if you want to throw in your two cents about the shutdown or anything else, team, I want to hear from you. Eight four four nine hundred buck. That's eight four four something you're like, WHOA, I haven't heard the number a while eight four four nine hundred two eight two five. Let's talk border security. Light up those lines and we will be right back. The President's

message has been right all along. We have a crisis at the border, both the national security and a humanitarian crisis. Democrats have got to stop ignoring the problem, sit down with the President at the table and help us come to a solution. The President is right on board of security. The Democrats are wrong. And I think that finally because Trump has focused so much attention on this issue, because he has the courage of his convictions on this policy

question to stay in the fight. Anybody who is willing to learn to pay attention. We'll see. And the numbers don't lie. Walls don't work is a lie. You look back at the San Diego sector specifically, they had hundreds of thousands of illegal crossings in the nineteen eighties into the nineteen nineties every year, hundreds of thousands and an apprehend rate that was maybe fifty sixty percent. Really just

guessing now, the apprehension rate is ninety percent. That means that if you try to cross from Tijuana into and some people told me, I have to say Tijuana, but I'll tell you everybody here says Tijuana. So there's that from Tijuana in the United States, you have a nine out of ten shot of getting caught. That's a pretty high apprehension rate, and it is overwhelmingly due to the wall. Now, how did these walls work? And why would I say that?

Especially yesterday I saw people who got over a wall. Well, they got over a double layer fence that had territory in between it that is US controlled. But what they did was trip sensors on the first fence, and then while they were covering that territory between the two fences and the double layer fence, they were called on more surveillance cameras. Border Patrol was able to respond. By the time they were up and climbing with a ladder on

this second fence, we were already there. You can see if you if you follow me on Twitter, you see I tweetered out a photo we saw them climbing down the fence. We don't we got sixteen miles of fence we're talking about here, folks. We were only able to get there so quickly because they triggered censors and there was a fence that slowed them down and that's why they got They got apprehended. So the wall worked. Right.

This is like saying an alarm system that tells the cops to come to your house and catches the burglar if he gets caught because the alarm system, the alarm worked. It's not saying nobody can kick in your front door. So we'll get into more of these security nuances at the border in just a moment. Stay with me. And it has taken our government hostage. So this president has an opportunity to not create a crisis and to not hold the American people and federal employees hostage. I think

we know this is not about border security. This is about whether it is right, we're wrong to hold the American people hostage, holding the American people hostage, the Democrats, I'll say it's all Trump's fault. Well, why are we at this impast forget about who started it or who's responsible. What's really the problem. What is the core issue? The President wants money for, yes, additional barriers, fencing, wall as well as other aspects of border security. It's a multi

faceted thing. You want more agents, you want more surveillance, tools. There's a whole lot of stuff that should really be added in, and the President wants to do all of that.

He is right on this issue on a pilot, unless you don't want a secure border, if you want the continuation of what we currently have, which is a border where billions of dollars of illegal drugs are still flooding into this country, killing tens of thousands of Americans a year, where you have tens of thousands of family units showing up at the border claiming that they have a credible fear. And I'll get into that aspect of the scam in a moment. If you want that, well, then yeah, of

course you don't want anything to change. But if we are all on the same page, if Democrats do want and I do not believe they do, by the way, and that reminds me of us to talk to you about the state of California, which is on issues of immigration, it is a legal abomination. This place is nuts. And I'll get into how moment. As you can see, there's all there's just a lot to cover here on the border. Because you're just not being told, you're not being told

the truth. Nancy Pelosi says a wall is immoral. It's an idiotic statement. What does that even mean? A wall is immoral? How why are the is? It's mostly offense. If you look at what they've built here in San Diego along the border, it's a slatted steel fence with plates at the top of it that help prevent essentially people from once if they can shimmy up some portion of the fence. When they get to the top, it's even harder because there's nowhere to grip or put your foot.

And that's it. And it's been remarkably effective and really help the Border Patrol get a handle on things. People say to me, well, Buck, can't they go around because the fence does end at some point, Yeah, they can go around, but the fence ends in a rural area. There's not any access roads, so now you're going to have to go on foot to that part of the

US Mexico border. Border Patrol does have sensors agents. I saw one of their surveillance trucks in action today, and let me tell you, if you're trying to cross an open territory on foot and you've got tough terrain to manage, they're gonna find you. Not every time, but a lot of the time, most of the time, sixty percent of the time, border patrol surveillance works every time. I'm just kidding. That's some of you will catch that reference, which I

think is actually, isn't that a San Diego reference? Isn't Ron Burgundy and San Diego. So there's a lot that there's a lot that you see when you actually come out here that adds to one's understanding of how this all goes. But here's the part of this that because I have to debate with libs on a regular basis all over the place on this issue of asylum, they will say, you have a right to claim asylum in this country. Remember, refugee status just means you're applying outside

of the US. Asylum is essentially requesting refugee status from within the US. That's the big difference. It matters to some degree, it's a terminology thing, but largely they want to be refugees. They're saying they're refugees effectively, and they're just a refugee inside the US, so that means asylum. I saw a whole holding room full of maybe a dozen or so guys and that was just from that day who were from Bangladesh. You have Bangladeshis who are

showing up here who are claiming asylum. What are they fleeing O Religious persecution of some kind. You have Chinese nationals who show up at our southern border. They are claiming persecution and fear of violence. All these different individuals from around the world are coming here because they know that right now there is this loophole. It was opened

up by the Obama administration. We have not been able to close it now into the Trump administration because Ninth Circuit judges are just nuts and they will stop anything that truly enforces immigration law or border security. And they're all just reading from the same script. They're all saying the same things. They also try to play games with the unaccompanied minor provision. The record so far according to

border patrol in this sector. Remember this is all San Diego sectory, but this is this is the busiest port of entry in the world in terms of foot traffic back and forth and vehicle traffic back and forth. Is this is where it's all happening. And this was ground zero four legal crossings for a very long time and it has gotten under control. San Diego is the model

in terms of border patrol. This is the model for what could be done along the rest of the border, which is yes, fencing, barriers, surveillance, border patrol agents, access roads. There's a whole bunch of things that all come together that mean that you can get nine apprehensions, which means that you are pretty close to secure. Now they have to work at the ports of entry to deal with the inflow of drugs. Increasingly sophisticated techniques being used to

bring in the drugs. But maybe you can talk more about the cartel side of it in a few moments and what the cartels are doing. But the record so far for somebody claiming to be an unaccompanied miner in the San Diego sector is a thirty two year old saying that he was seventeen. These are things that I had just I've said this on radio. I'm sure people, I'm sure you've got a lot of twenty year olds who are staying there seventeen and guess what now he's able to ask, look at the numbers and see with

my own eyes, yes, that is happening. They are claiming to be miners when they are a decade, a decade beyond being miners. In some cases even more than that, because they know, oh they show up with papers, sometimes they show up with no papers, sometimes they show up with fraudulent papers. They're lying to federal officers. And I

think it's so interesting. I would note that the same people, same Democrats, who were going on television and saying, how dare Papadopoulos or Venders Juan or any of these guys caught up in the Russia collusion lunacy? How dare they lie? Why do they lie? They should go to prison for their lives lying about non criminal behavior. Meanwhile, you have border patrol agents and customs agents being allied to every day. Those are federal law enforcement officers that are trying to

enforce federal criminal law. Do you do you think that there's a huge, a huge push from the same people who say that lying to the Special Council it's a it's a criminal offense. Lying to immigration is a criminal offense. You think that's being prosecuted? Do you think that you think they're they're prosecuting all the people that are saying that they have a credible fear they're from Honduras when

they're really just from southern Mexico. But they think they have a better shot of getting in if they're from Honduras. Do you think do you think that? Then? Of course not, of course not the law. There's a separate set of laws that Democrats have created for people who want to come into this country illegally. There's there's an entirely separate approach to law enforce, and then we're supposed to accept because it benefits Democrats politically. That's that's what this is

all about. That's what's going on. And then you have the state of California, the border fence that we have now here in this sector in San Diego where I'm coming to you live on the radio from San Diego. The border fence that we have, it's about I think ten million dollars per mile for this fence, which I will say seemed to me to be pretty expensive, but it makes more sense when you understand that California expressly forbid any California based contractors from putting forward a bid

to build defence. So you had to bring in a company from Texas, because I mean, you know Texas is going to get it done. Bring in a company from Texas that was willing to build the fence. Here because California did not want any California based companies to be

involved in helping federal law enforcement build dispense. The relationship between California law enforcement and Border Patrol is strained not because people, whether it's LAPD or San Diego PD or any of the other law enforcement agencies that are state or local controlled, don't like Border Patrol necessarily or have some personal issue with them, but because this California legislature has created all of these penalties and all of these

pitfalls in any cooperation. I mean, they enforce the sanctuary status of California at the expense, explicitly and openly, at the expense of Border Patrol being able to get some help to do its job. Border Patrol is not able to be part of task forces that are set up in different cities. Border Patrol is not able to use their full authority all because California is complicit as a state. As a state government, California is complicit in illegal immigration

top to bottom. They favor illegal immigration, They want more illegal immigration. They just won't come out and say it. All the policies they advocate for, they'll make it harder doing for to secure the border. All the policies they advocate for make it more likely you'll have illegal crossings going on because it's a Democrat controlled state. And the Democrats entirely and totally have bought in to this notion

that we really shouldn't even have a border. I don't think that they think there should be a southern border. If they had their way, there wouldn't be a southern border. And I will say this. You spend just a couple of hours along the border between San Diego County and Mexico, which is Tijuana, to see, I'm doing it now, Tijuana Northern Baja, which is that's how they designate the sector. Northern Baa is currently the single most violent part of Mexico.

You had twenty eight hundred murders in Tijuana the surrounding areas alone last year. Okay, twenty eight hundred murders. Mexico as a country is about half of the US population, and per capita has about double or sorry overall, rather has double the murder rate, so double our murders, half of our population. Mexican crimes are solved by the state at a rate of and this was according to a former US ambassador to Mexico who told me this a

while ago. But I think it's necessary to bring us into the conversation about three percent three that's not thirty three lawlessness, corruption, and dysfunction prevail on the Mexican side of the border. Why is that. I'll leave that to somebody else. But to think that that would not become all of California and all of the country's problem immediately.

If you really just gave up on this idea of having a border whatsoever, is to live in a delusion, and unfortunately a lot of Californians and a lot of their state government live in that delusion. I had this is the classic, you know, media guy thing to do. I had a drive over here with the with an Uber driver to get the studio, and I had the guy's a nice guy. We're chatting up. He's a he's a Navy vet, and I could tell he's a little liberal. Just I could tell he had some some of those

like sort of surfer looking jewelry on. This guy's probably a lib. He's got some flip flaps on and surfer jewelry. I don't know, maybe maybe I'm wrong, maybe, but he turned out to be a LIB and he's He said, what he've been doing here? Man? I said, oh, you know, I spent some time with border patrol. I'm just here doing some media work, you know, trying to learn about some things. He said, yeah, you know, walls don't work. I live right by the border. Walls don't work. Told me.

He says, he lives a five minute drive from one of the ports of entry. And I'm sitting here, I'm thinking to myself, this is how effective the propaganda is that people who live near they're pulling a Jim Acosta. They're saying, well, you know, it's I don't see them running through my backyard, although they used to. I don't see them running through my backyard. I don't see all the violence and all. You know, I'm not seeing people O D from Fentatl on my front front porch. Soas

walls must not be necessary and the border must be secure. False. This is not just a California issue or San Diego issue. It is an issue for the entire country. The drugs, the illegal immigration, the drain on resources, the lawlessness, the lack of sovereignty, all of it. And here's just that, if nothing else I need to take away from today Trump is right when it comes to border security. It's really not up for debate. The Democrats are living in

a fantasy. They are wrong, and they are lying to you. Eight four four nine hundred two eight two five lines are open. Got them open, folks, Light them up. Haven't been able to talk to you guys in a while. Eight four four nine hundred buck. We got much more show coming. Stay with me lines. Let all up in this place. Let's get to it show. We first up Scott in Mississippi. Hey, Scott, hey, Buck, thanks to techno call.

Thanks for calling in hey, just very quick. I wanted to mention, of course we understand and know that these Democrats are prolonging the funding the water wall because obviously because Trump's an office, but I wanted to note that, um, you know, we're living in the digital age now and a lot of people, especially the youth, are becoming you know, um they think that for some reason that these people

can come over here some other way. The only way that people can come over here is land, sea or air. You know, by air, they're not really going to get in. You know, Florida is having an issue with the Florida Peninsula coming in from Cuba. But a wall is the thing that we need in order to prevent illegal immigrants for coming in. And I do want to notice that Democrats are they keep saying that we're going to use advanced technology to suffice. Yeah, you know, I hear this too.

I mean, I can tell you what border patrol says about it. Yeah, it's it's great to know with technology when someone's coming. But if you don't have physical barriers, all they have to do is line up people along the border in a few different a few different places, and they are very Look, the cartels are the ones getting paid off by this. The human smuggling networks below them are very savvy about this. They use this tactic.

Yesterday we had at the border an adult and a ten year old turn themselves in requesting the asylum, and then just down about a mile where we were, they had a bunch of guys make a break forward and try to cross over. That wasn't an accident, that was planned. They tried to tie up border patrol resources in one place and then make a break forward in the other. So, yeah, you can know, but you got to have the agents and you have to have the reaction time to get there,

and that's what the wall does. That's what the fence does, right, It slows them down. So you know, you bring up an important point. Guys, We're gonna take more calls in the next hour because I love getting a chance to chat with you. We got a couple of spots open eight four four nine two eight two five eight four four nine hundred buck. We'll finish our conversation about the border. I'm coming to you live from San Diego after spending

time with border patrol. Then we'll talk about the shutdown, the state of the Union, crazy people thinking Trump's a Russian agent, etc. Libs love to whine about all kinds of stuff, whether it's transgender pronouns that aren't being used properly, or pretending that walls don't work at the border, or taxes aren't high enough. Maybe they just need some better coffee. So if that's the case, why don't they just fix the problem try some delicious Black Rifle coffee. I start

every day with a delicious cup of Black Rifle. I absolutely love it. In fact, I am a member of Black Rifles Coffee Club. That means that my coffee gets delivered to me every month to my door and I get delicious fresh roast order coffee that make sure that I start my day off the right way every day. Okay, so you need to check this out for yourself. This should be everybody listening your coffee of choice, but make

sure you go get it this way. Nothing cures a bad attitude like starting your day with the most American freedom, love and coffee ever Black Rifle Coffee. Visit Black Riflecoffee dot com slash buck and receive fifteen percent off your order. That's Black Riflecoffee dot com, slash buck for fifteen percent off Black Riflecoffee dot Com slash Buck. The resident cannot hold public employees hostage because he wants to have a

wall that is not effective. Not effective in terms of its purpose, not cost effective in terms of what the opportunity costs. It is of a federal dollars to spend. And the President said, Mexico is going to pay for this. Come on, let's let's anchor ourselves into reality. Mexico is not going to pay for this wall. President, in order to open the government a dollar dollar. A wall is an immorality, an immorality. Nancy Pelosi says, a wall is

an immorality. Maybe she should actually spend some time either on the border with border patrol or learning about the situation before she mouths off on this. She doesn't I don't know if she has no idea what she's talking about, or she just lies. She knows that what she's saying is false, but Democrats want to believe it's so she says it. I wanted to take just a moment here to update you on on a couple of pieces of

breaking news from earlier today. One is that the FBI has arrested a man in Georgia for allegedly plotting to attack the White House. One of the conversations that I had that came up a few times with Border patrol agents was this issue of terrorism and the southern border because the White House, the Trump administration got a lot of heat and a lot of pushback recently for some of their numbers around that. Now here's what I would say. First of all, this this FBI arrest in Georgia seems

like a pretty classic sting operation. They had somebody human sources close to this individual who was planning to I wanted at one point join the Islamic State. I mean He's an ISIS sympathizer essentially, and he wanted to He's accused of wanting to attack locations in DC, including the White House. The accused name is hush Husher jalal Taheb, and he is now in custody or plotting all this stuff.

I wanted to say this, you know, I had a I had a moment yesterday or yesterday where I saw these South Asian males which means either Indian, Pakistani or Bangladeshi or Afghan descent. They knew that they had some Indians in Bangladeshi's. I don't know if there were any Pakistani's in custody yet. And this was just from Remember, they hold people in these in these cells for no more than seventy two hours, so I'm seeing when I'm telling you that I saw a whole room full of

banglad South Asian males, mostly Bangladeshis. I'm telling you that that's what they had caught in the last forty eight hours. Now. I have been critical of bringing up or or making the issue of terrorist infiltration of America via the southern border too prominent in the list of reasons why. I think it's the just the general human smuggling, drugs smuggling.

I mean, that's why we need a secure border. Tho of the primary stop the fentinel, stop the opioids from flooding into communities that it comes across in San Diego sector, it ends up in Indiana, West Virginia, it ends up in Illinois. You know, name your state. That's where the drug pipelines send. You know, that's where the stuff eventually ends up. It just crosses here as well as other places obviously along the border. Arizona and Texas have some

very active sectors too. But now when you have this asylum process abused as it is, and you have people who can show up and know what to say, they're being told what to say, and the claim is, well, I just I have a credible fear. Think about it this way. It used to be a bad idea from the from the terrorist perspective, from a Jihattest perspective, for example, to come to our southern border when you could very when it's very high likelihood that you'll be caught, right,

So why would you do that? There are better ways. It'd be smarter, quite honestly, if you can get access to Canada to try to come across the northern border, right, because you're more likely to be caught at the southern border. We have more resources here. But remember the game now has changed. So now if you present yourself to border patrol, I saw this happen. You present yourself and say, I have a credible fear. I have no documents on me.

I've just got here from whatever the country is. You yes, have to You will get processed, you will get fingerprinted. But unless they have a hit on you as a known or suspected terrorist and you know what to say, you will be released into the interior of the United States. It will happen. That's the polo, and you'll get a

court date for a year or two from now. So let's just assume him for a moment that you have a Pakistani national, which you know, Bangladesh is what used to be called East Pakistan, right, so this and Pakistan was West Pakistan. But let's say you have a Pakistani national who arrives at our who arrives in Mexico or even makes his way up from Central America, gets to our southern border, says I'm fleeing religious persecution in Pakistan, and I want entry in the United States under your

asylum program. Even if even if it's very flimsy the case that he's going to present to immigration court, he will go through the Immigrations and Customs enforcement process. Border patrol will transfer him over, and this individual will then be released pending a court date. That means released in the American interior, and the court date might be six months, twelve months, eighteen months out, who knows, maybe three or four years out that process unless they already have derogatory

information on this individual. That is the process now. So whereas it used to be, if you were, let's say, a train jihadi, whether you're from Isis or wherever, al Qaeda, you name it, would you wouldn't want to come to our southern border because there's a major law enforce in presence and if they catch you, they're they're gonna detain

you and they're gonna kick you out. And maybe now you're up on the radar, and now it's if you have a what they call from a document's perspective, clean you're a clean skin, meaning you don't have you don't come up on a you know, on the violation of the terrorist system. The terrorist databases that they have, right, that's what they're talking about with all these different possible terrorists that have come up. The White House is bringing

this up. If you show up and you don't hit on any of these databases, and you say you have a credible fear, you're get it. You are getting into the United States. You are going to get in on That is the law right now. You're going to get in unless they can prove that you're a threat or there's some problem all. If you show up with no documents with the right story, that is a huge security loople and it's a relatively new one. It wouldn't have been the case a few years ago. Now it is

the case. So I think that that's important to keep in mind. While I'm critical of overstating the terrorism threat in terms of the other pieces of this. And I know, we just have this guy who's an ISO sympathizer arrested within the United States. If people can say you can radicalize within the US, I know, But we're talking about security and risk mitigation. Nothing is going to be perfect.

There's always a way to infiltrate any system. There's always a way to get around the security processes in place. We want to make it as efficient and smart as we can. Now, with that, I wanted to get to we got. We got every line lit here, so let me get some of these calls here. We got Charlie online too in Maryland. Hey Charlie, Hey Buck chiels I and brother field time and man, what's up? Hey. I'm an old guy who lives on the opposite side of the country, and I see a real need for the

border wall. I think I talked to you some time ago about the military, like the CBEES. I was a CBE for four years, spent a couple of years in Nam and all that stuff. But I I heard a report that I think the Farming Corps of Engineers has a back fund of like ten billion dollars setting narrative they use, and why can't the president appropriate three billion of that give it to the CBS. Let him build the wall, which would be much more efficient, no government contract,

no you know, high cost. You was talking about like ten million dollars per mile there in San Diego. I think a CBS could probably do that about a million dollars a mile, save a lot of money and go to that route. Well, look, there's a chance and you know, it's all very good questions, Charlote. There's a chance that the president is you know, may try something along these lines. That the President may decide that he's going to declare a tional emergency and use funds that are already within

the DoD system. And I don't know, you brought up this fund that exists. I don't know if that's true or not, or how that works, but we know the President has discussed this. The problem is without congressional funding. I mean, I don't think there's any judge out there. There are some limits to how crazy, even Ninth Circuit judges can be. I don't think that a judge is going to say congressionally appropriated funds cannot be used for this purpose, right, I don't, although maybe you know, but

I think that that's much less likely. The moment that the president uses executive authority to build the wall and uses funds that have not been congressionally appropriated for that specific purpose, you will have a court challenge. This will be in the courts, and you essentially have a federal injunction against presidential authority here, which I would know this

is a big problem. One federal judge can put the brakes now because of the one federal judge can put the brakes on national level policy see for the rest of the country whenever and whenever and however rather and that's that's an issue. I mean, this is this is a form of hashtag resistance lawfare against the president. So you know that. That's why I think it's important that

they try to get this. But you know, the Democrats are not gonna I don't know how this ends up because the Democrats are not going to cave, even though I believe the Democrats are. For people who are paying attention to the facts, all this argument, the Democrats are losing, but I don't know how many people are paying attention. And you know, the media is certainly all out to to help the Democrats out. So thank you for calling in, Charlie from Maryland. I do appreciate it. Brent in New Mexico,

what's up, Brent, Oh, Brent, just drop my bed. Joseph in wherever in Texas. Hey, Joseph, Hey Buck. I'm very serious about my point here. The Democrats have won this one. They have proven the Walls on moral They've proven the wall is not helpful, They've proven their point. Let's give the Democrats a win on this one. Let's bring the seabees in there and start at the beach in San Diego and start removing the wall from the beach in San Diego, California to Yuma, Arizona. We just start once

flat at the time, taking the wall down. It's a moral and it's not helpful. Take all the border control along the California border, move it to Arizona in Texas. I've been to San Diego, I've walked across the pedway into Tijuana. I've been on the beach. Okay. If they call it useless, remove it. If they call it ill moral, remove it. Okay. So I sense what you're saying is that they should have to live with the consequences of

their insanity. And if you took border patrol off, and you took the fence down, everything else they would see that there would be I mean, the state of California would essentially collapse. I mean if you had, if you had Tijuana able to just completely come across at will and everybody from the rest of Mexico. Is that what you're getting at, Because obviously what you're saying, you're all the things you're saying are untrue. But I'm assuming you're

doing that on purpose. Yes, there's an air of sarcasm in my bl Yes, that's what I'm going. Okay, yes, you're being sarcastic. Shut down the border crossing, take all of the security. Donald Trump can make a phone call tomorrow, Morney. Take everybody out of the state of California, spread them over Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas. Start taking the slats

down one of the time. Why why do they have to endure walking across the border and going through that little door and you gotta get get permission to walk into America. Well, Joseph, people of San Diego need permission to go to Mexico. Well, Joseph, I appreciate. I'm gonna take your take your idea here in Roma for a second. I appreciate your calling it from Texas. I'd say this, it is worth asking Democrats because I've said, and I get people to come after me on Twitter, for example,

a little blue check journo types. I'll come after you say it's not right for you to say Democrats are pro illegal immigration. I like to turn around and say why not. Why aren't democrats pro illegal immigration, ask them that question, All right, this is this is a version of what I say to you. When you have to argue with a liberal, start from what would falsify what you believe? Or what evidence could I theoretically show you

that would change your mind. Sometimes they'll tell you a lot of times they'll they'll think there's nothing, And that just means that their position is rooted in emotion, not in the facts, and not in reason and history and logic. When you when you are presented with a liberal on this issue, and you and you can say what I say, which is the Democratic Party is the pro illegal immigration party? There they favor illegal aliens breaking the law coming to

this country. That doesn't mean they're going to admit it, but they do favor it, and they're pushing they're doing everything they can to make it easier for that to happen. When they say that's not true, that true, say well why not? Why shouldn't if Democrats believe these things like illegal aliens do the jobs Americans won't do. They're all just trying to be dreamers. They're trying to better themselves.

What's the downside? And you'll see that they stutter and they don't really have an answer because they haven't thought this through. And that's I think the point that our previous colors trying to make, which is if what they say is true, that there's no downside to illegal immigration, that it makes our GDP larger and makes our country stronger and more vibrant than all these things, then why even have why even have border patrol? What's the point?

Why not just allow people the complete free flow of individuals back and forth, if it won't deteriorate our security, if it won't cause major problems with drugs and with the cartels now having free reign into this country, never mind what they already have, why not do it? And when Democrats and the Pelosiites and the sum schum Arians and all the rest of them, when they can't answer or that question, and they won't be able to, you know,

you've got them, and they haven't thought this through. They don't even understand the consequences of the policies they want. They just know that it feels good to say. It gives an emotional high to say we're a nation of immigrants. Bring the more the merrier, including illegals. We're a nation of illegal immigrants is what Democrats believe. They should say that, and they should have to explain why we've got much more.

I will move off this topic. I'm obviously in San Diego, spent two days border patrol talking about the craziness around the whole Trump is a Russian agent thing, and then some other some other topics. Four Americans killed in Syria. I gotta go to break. I'll be right back. I know a lot of folks have heard of AARP, right, but you know, you may already know somebody who's a member, You may be a member. Did you know that the

aarps really all about left wing politics? They fought tooth and nail for government control of our healthcare system via Obamacare. Why don't you get all the benefits of AARP, but through an organization that actually shares your values? I recommend AMAC. Why Amack? Well, first of all, AMAC, like you, is all about conservative values, patriotism, and America. So that means that you're supporting an organization that is pushing for policy you agree with. But it also gets you discounts on

car insurance, hotels, roadside assistants. All the upside of AARP, none of the liberal politics Okay, stand with AMAC. Join the good fight by becoming a member today. The benefits are great, the cause is even greater. Joined right now at amac dot us slash buck. That's Amac dot us slash buck again, one more time, Amac dot us slash buck. The evidence suggests indeed Trump is has been a pawn of the Russians. Put the fact that he said yesterday

I've never worked for Russia. This made you think over and never get about our two previous presidents and broiled in potential impeachments, Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon, saying Bill Clinton, I'd never had sexual relations with that woman. Richard Nixon, I am not a crook. Turned out they were lying. Maybe Donald Trump is too. But when you start to see a pattern where he basically spouts Putin's lines, then we have to ask the most unusual and frightening question

about our own president. Why this president seems to be putting Russia's interests ahead of our own. There's no evidence for this, but it is repeated by journalist after journalists, anchor after anchor, pundit after pundit. Just it's really essentially a form of propaganda, just the repetition of it, right, just said, well, I can't prove this thing, but I'm just gonna keep saying it. I'm just gonna keep I'm gonna keep asking the question, you know, does this does

this person beat his spouse? I have no proof, but I just want to keep asking the question, does you know individual a abuse his children? I don't have any evidence, but let's just keep asking the question. They're smearing people, They're smearing Trump. That's what this is a Russian agent. Who could believe this? Apparently much of the media does.

And this is where you have them conflating disagreements with the president on foreign policy from having any real reason to believe that the President United States is working against American national security interests abroad. You know, they don't like his foreign policy. Therefore he's a Trump puppet. This is I mean a Putin puppet. Rather, this is crazy. But this is a widespread theme. Now. The MSNBC led their APM show with this last night, this lunacy. How do

you even have a conversation with them? I'll get into more of this and then also what this information that we've got now coming in about what happened in Syria that's coming up eight four four nine hundred two eight two five eight four four nine hundred buck. You know, I know we don't take that many live calls here lately on the show because I've got so much to say to you. But tonight I'm in California. Want to open it up a little bit of figure? Why not?

Let's get to it. Uh, Dno in Delaware? D and D. What's up? Oh? Well, A lot, a whole lot. But I've been listening to these different radio shows for what maybe ten years. The question I always have is, is uh is an a prisonable offense to impede the operations of the executive brand of where he one who breaks non federal law? My question is why President Trump doesn't have a secret service arrest the governor to these sanctuary cities? Are some of these lives that he can prove that

Pelosi and Schumer are doing just playing? I mean, there's there is some yeah, do you know? Do you know I appreciate you calling in there? There is some of some as or some legal foundation for what he's talking about with regard to sanctuary cities and obstructing obstructing federal

officers from doing their jobs. There's also giving harbor to illegal aliens that's technically illegal, but these are laws that are not enforced, and I think that there's a sense that they wouldn't want to create some kind of a crisis of federalism where you have a governor or state officials who are being arrested by the federal government. But that doesn't mean that what they're doing in these states is okay. What California should be ashamed of its approach

to immigration laws. California does not get to write immigration law. That is a federal prerogative, and California acts like it shouldn't really count in this state, and it's an embarrassment. But unfortunately a lot of Californians think that it's just fine. The propaganda out here is very strong. Jim in Pleasant Valley, New York, Hey, Jim, hey Buck, thank you for taking

my call. Thank you for calling in. What's up? First things first, man, I've been listening to you for a long time, all the way back when you filled them for the Big Boys, and thank you for your service and everything you do. With that said, I'm all for the border. I'm all for that. As the crow flies, I'm like forty miles north of New York City. So let's go back twenty years. You know, you can't tell me that Chucky Cheese hasn't known Trump forever. You know

what I'm saying. So what I want to talk about it is, is that Schumer is that Chucky Cheese. Yeah, I mean, come on to go to this. Look, man, you were in New York. But what I'm getting at is, I'm all for the wall. I'm all for all of that. Everything you've talked about tonight and everything everybody's men talking about that's going on for the last month and a half. But let's talk about what Trump ran on when he knocked out all the other Republicans going against him. He

ran also draining the swamp. That's what they're pissed off at. That's what Fancy Anty and Chucky Cheese has pissed off with because he's trying to drink his swamp at the same time. Yeah, that's all true. I mean, he is, he is. I think it's exposing much of the establishment, especially the establishments approach and feelings on the immigration issue. Look, I I keep repeating it because it's important that we hold the Republicans accountable on this too. There are a

lot of Republicans. Paul Ryan was basically a quasi open borders advocate. He was, you know, everybody wants to come should come. Yeah, we do guessworker visas for them, but there should be really very little restrictions on it. We should have amnesty for everybody's here illegally. Oh one more thing, and I didn't want to get any of them on the record with this one because I know that there's the official number for how many legal aliens in the country.

Let me just tell you that my whole theory about how you can't look at the numbers of illegal crossings and visa overstates for the last ten years and tell me that the number has stayed at twelve million. Border patrol agents they agree. They're like, there's no way, there's no there's no way. Yeah, a racer. The other thing I want to just add quick and honor to my dead father here volunteered in World War Two. Were like millions of other men did for a submarine duty, you

know what I mean. And it's like go back in history. Man, you know, I'm all four people coming in legally, but are you are you kidding me? This is this is crazy. Yeah, we gotta have a look. I'm with you, gym. We gotta have a legal process and uh good, good on your dad for the for the service. Thank you very much for calling in. Uh, Rocky in Nebraska? What's up Rocky there? Buck? Hey, what's up? Hey? I'm doing pretty good. How are you doing all right? Man? Are you backing? Bucks?

Listening to you from across all across the country? Are you uh back in? Uh? Are you back home? Or are you back No? Man, I'm live in San Diego right now. I'm at a Kogo or i Heart affiliate here. Man. I really enjoyed seeing your tweets and stuff, the pictures from the border, and I'm really glad um u. I listened to you all the time. Buck Man, you're you're, you're, you're the best voice on the radio right now. Thank

you very much. I just wanted to say something about I don't know, did you get to see Nancy Pelosi and Chuck I'm sure you probably did. Yeah. I've been following the news as much as I can, although the cell service and some of these canyons out here and stuff, I couldn't really download all my usual data. But yeah, yeah, like just looking at them, I'm telling you those two are liars. The whole Liberal Party is liars. And I feel the frustration of the country because we're fighting something

that is just not logical. It doesn't make any sense. They've been lying all the time. Global warming is lying, the border is lying. I'm afraid that we'd be We're going to be infiltrated, and maybe we already are infiltrated in our own government. It's looking pretty spooky. There's there's some troubling signs. But anyway, I gotta I gotta leave it there, Rocky, so we got have to run into a break man. Thank you so much for calling it

from Alaska. I do want to talk to you all about what's going on in Syria because we had four Americans KIA there in the last twenty four hours. Very from first of all, biggest things that we're taking losses and that we're losing. We're losing our people still in these combat zones, so we need to always remember that.

And then also I wanted to see I wanted to get into how interestingly enough, both sides of the Syria US troop withdrawal debate are viewing the research well, essentially using this attack to bolster their position on this, meaning that some people are saying, well, because we lost US troops, clearly we should get them out faster. Others are saying, no, we lost US troops, and I think it was two d D civilians and two military, you know, two active

duty military personal two soldiers. Because of that, we need to stay there because it shows that isis is coming back. So I want to give you my sense of that, and then the third hour we'll get into some more just news of the day stuff. I mean, so Pelosi's canceled the State of the Union address, maybe we'll talk a bit more about that. I also have Gillette thoughts. I see, I told you about the Gillette thing before I left. I was ahead of the curve on that one.

Now o Gillette and their toxic masculinity ads. I prefer one Blade, which is what I shave with. Go check out one Blade if you haven't before, One Blade shave dot com. Check it out. That's my razor, and uh yeah, I'll be right back. President Trump is not shared with the Foreign Relations Committee much of as foreign policy objectives or strategies. I've talked for ALIS and they're not clarissing

our policy so it's causing national security folds. My concern by the statements made by President Trump is it you'd set in motion enthusiasm by the enemy we're fighting. So what hope the President will look long and hard before he's headed in Syria. Now, there is a very honest and good faiths well argument we had on both sides of the discussion of what we should be doing right

now in Syria. I get that, as you know, I think that we shouldn't allow ourselves and we should not have US troops to be ordered to set up what would effectively be a forward operating base in Syria for the foreseeable future. And the foreseeable future, as we've seen in a Rock and Afghanistan, means years, decades, maybe forever.

Who knows that that is mission creep that we don't need, we don't want, we do not want responsibility for trying to hold the eastern portion of Syria together in the aftermath of a civil war with many factions international players involved. It's just a mess. Anyone with a passing familiarity of the history of Lebanon throughout the nineteen eighties and the nineteen nineties and what the US mission to try and

quiet things down there. Under the Reagan administration went like would know that this is not something we want to be deeply involved in. That's it. I'm persuadable on the timeline how quickly we should withdraw, but not we should withdraw in a year or five. It's just is it three months, is it six months? And how do we do this? We have been told by the Trump administration

that they have received assurances from the Turkish government. I know we got to take that with a grain assault, but assurances that our Turkish allies in the ground will not be targeted by Turkish air strikes. And that's an important concession. That's something you have to have in place. But now we have to deal with what is the security situation really like for our forces that are on the ground, and what does it say about the possibility

of a resurgence of the Islamic State. There was a bombing in man Bidge, which is toward the Turkish border with Syria, east of Aleppo, the second biggest city, what was the second biggest city until it was largely destroyed in fighting, but man Bidge is east of Aleppo and there was a bombing there that killed two US soldiers and to the most recent reporting I've seen, todd civilians and the Islamic State has already has already claimed that

this is one of their bombings. And this is where I have to say it's very important not to get caught up in this. Well. If we set up a base in Syria, it'll be like our base in It'll be like our bases in South Korea or in Nawah or Germany. No, that is not what we are signing our but that is not what we are assigning our

troops to do. They are going to be in a policing role in what is a civil war that is still ongoing, and they are going to be under threat like this, even if they're mostly in a static role. They're not in Ford deployed. I shouldn't say Ford deployed. They're not in frontline combat roles continuously. Just by being on Syrian soil, there is an instability and an insecurity that goes along with that. We have learned this lesson in different ways in Iraq and Afghanistan. It's one thing

to smash the enemy. Our military is the best that has ever existed at smashing defeat the enemy. Nobody can face us on open terrain, nobody can square off against our troops and come out anything other than the loser. But trying to hold together a society for other people, trying to police their streets or assist in the policing of their streets, trying to reconstruct or construct, depending on

how you look at it. Another country a foreign country, particlarly a Middle Eastern country where we have not established full military dominance, and that is not our purpose there. Right we're supposed to be assisting these governments, assisting the government in Afghanistan and Iraq to be self sufficient. In Syria, we don't even have that option. In Syria, the government is still the only real national government is the Assad regime.

There is no other government, and we can talk about trying to create a political settlement, but there is no political settlement that the Assad regime would ever accept that does not involve them running the country. So these are the realities that we face there. And I think that the losses that we've taken in Syria are a tragic reminder that this is an active combat zone and this is ultimately not beyond the suppression of the Islamic state.

This is not going to be a fight that is ours or a fight that we should we should engage in it. And I would just note I got a fair amount of heat, including from some fellow conservatives, and I think that the main line of attack on this one against me, or the main criticism I should say, was oh, well, this is just because Trump says it.

And I would point to I wrote a National Review I think in twenty twelve that assad was an Arab problem, that we should not have US troops on the ground in Syria, that we should not be engaged in ongoing combat operations, and yet another. So it's not a new position for me. It's not just Trump related or anything

like that. I mean, I'm in writing many years before anyone ever thought Trump would be president, saying this is not a problem, so we want to take on We've seen what happens in Iraq, We've seen what the situation is in Afghanistan, and we shouldn't be adding to our militaries mission in this way. It's just not it's not sound policy. I think now the Islamic State, can it rebound? Can there be a resurgence, of course, but let's remember

that we have destroyed the territorial Caliphate. There is a serious Kurdish ground force in place now, tens of thousands of Kurds that have come together who would be who are there and going to continue to be there because it's their territory, they live there, their Syrian Kurds that would be able to provide assistance and support. It's a groundforce that we did not have before that we could rely on as an ally to stop the Islamic State. And we still have thousands of US troops in Iraq

right next door. Air power we can call upon if need be, you know, not just fixed wing but also rotary wing aircraft. So there's a lot that can be done. And I do think that the President needs to keep faith with the promises that he made, and one of them was that we weren't going to make everyone else's

problems in the Middle East our problem. We weren't going to go looking for more countries to piece together and more problems to solve, especially if the inhabitants of if the natives of that country don't necessarily want to play ball with us. And I look at the situation in Iraq and the strongest block in the Iraqi Parliament is

the Sodris Block, which is named for Maktada Alsado. Those of you who fought over there, I know many of you listening did know that Muktada Alsader is a world class dirt bag and has the blood of Americans on his hands. And this is who the Iraqi I mean, the Iraqi people are, by a majority or at least the single biggest party I should say, support a guy who we very likely could have seen and should have seen,

in my opinion, as a battlefield target years ago. So that our experiment with the Iraqi democracy so far is shaky at best. And don't even get me started on Afghanistan. You all know I do not believe that there is a there is a military solution to that. There is a solution that we are going to drive. We're just we can hang on. We can we can push for status quo, which, whether they'll admit it or not, that is the policy now, status quo. Just hold on to

what we've got for as long as we can. Don't allow the Taliban to take major urban centers, don't allow them to be the de facto government of entire governorates in Afghanistan. Try to prevent that from happening. So I think that we need to I think the President's right on Syria. Scale down the mission, draw down the mission, do it sensibly. But we're right next door in a

rock if a crisis were to hit. We do not want to get caught up in the middle of the Syrian civil war that is ongoing and has way too many players. And that's that's where I stand on that one UM talk. Nancy Pelosi stayed the Union address. Maybe an so the Gillette man, what is it mansplaining or toxic masculinity? There we go, toxic masculinity problem and some other stuff coming up. So I'll stay with me. You want to be smart in twenty nineteen, Well, you want

to be smart all the time. You know what is smart? Kicking off this year by planning out those roles, those hires you have to make so that your business gets up to the next level. You know what else is smart? Making sure that you start the new year off strong by going to zip recruiter dot com slash buck to fill those roles and hire the right people. Unlike other

job sites, zip recruiter finds qualified candidates for you. It's powerful matching technology scans thousands of resumes to identify people with the right skills, education, and experience and actively invites them to apply to your job so you get qualified candidates fast. That's why zip recruiter is rated number one by employers in the US, and this rating comes from hiring sites on trust Pilot with over a thousand reviews.

Right now, my listeners can try zip recruiter for free at this exclusive web address, zip recruiter dot com slash buck. If you love this show, show your support, go to zip recruiter dot com slash buck again to fill any job, any business you got zip recruiter dot com slash buck because zip recruiter is the smartest way to hire. Welcome back to the Buck section show. Coming to you live from well sunny San Diego, except not so sunny. It's been a little rainy. Not to sound like not to

sound like a whiney swamp creature. Here. I'll take what I can get. It was freezing in DC what I left. But here we are all right, all right, our brother Kenny and Boston. He's been holding and holding and holding. Kenny. Well, you're our last call to night, my friend. Then I gotta get to some stuff but thanks for calling in greeting shields of not crossed for a long time. No, we've missed you, Kenny, Yeah, me too. Listen. For about two plush years now, we've been told that Vladimir Putin

was the puppet master. But over the last a week and a half or so, I've been hearing the stuff that Rush Limbaugh was the puppet master. So how is it It's kind of incongruent in my mind? How is it possible that both could be the puppet master? Who's who is saying that? I've never heard. I mean, Rush is awesome and he is the man, but I've never

heard somebody referred him as Trump's puppet masters. This immedia thing now, Yeah, that was over the last week, during this shutdown, when he was going to sign the Continuing Resolution, and I believe that Rush was on the radio saying, oh, no, don't sign it. I hope he doesn't sign it and all this stuff, and he did not, And then at that from that point they've been calling him a well a few of them have been calling him a puppet master. Yeah. Look,

they're just these are hysterical libs. This is what they do. They try to find various boogeymen to fit into this narrative of you know, Trump doesn't do anythinking for himself and he just does what he's told and all all this other stuff that you hear. Look, there are obviously conservative media voices that are very influential, not just on the president's minds that I think, but on the national conversation about these issues, you know, and Coulter Rush Limbaugh,

Sean Hannity. I mean, these are people who are moving the needle on perception on issues like immigration, and that includes the perception of the president himself. I would just note that, you know, this is true of all presidents. I mean, everybody has people that know that they respect on certain issues or just in general, their their judgment and their wisdom, so that that's nothing surprising at all.

But yeah, I mean to your point about how there's there's one, there's one puppet master this week and another than next week. Just like one week they have to get rid of Trump because the twenty fifth Amendment. The next week they had to get rid of Trump because of Russia, and then the next week they had to get rid of Trump because of paying you know, paying off Stormy Daniels and Stephanie Clifford. You know what I mean. That's it changes every week because that's there their emotion.

I'll need is to find a justification for their hatred. That's really what it comes down to. How's it up in Boston? By the way, are you are you like skiing to work? How's it going there skiing to work? We haven't had a flake of snow on the ground here, at least just north to Boston. I think a little bit further north they have a little dusting and something. No, we haven't really had much snow. You have a lot

of rain. All right. We'll tell your Boston buddies, by the way, to tune into the show up there on our Boston affiliates. So thank you very much for listening. I'm trying night best you spread the word. I know it's a bunch of libs up there in Massachusetts, but there's some good, God fearing conservatives in the Boston area. You need to listen to this shows. You tell her you spread the word. My friend Kenny Shields High, thank you for calling in that it reminds you, By the way,

it's a great time to say that. You know, if you're listening to us live at any station across the country. If you ever can't listen live on a station and you want to listen to the show at your on your schedule, at your leisure, the podcast of the Buck Sexton Show is available. It is twenty nineteen. Folks, all of you who are listening should It's totally free. You should be subscribed to the podcast. You can find it on iTunes. You can find it on the iHeart app.

And this is also great because when someone's talking to they're like, hey, you know, I want to learn more about the border. You don't just say, oh, have you heard about this guy the Have you heard about this guy the Buck Sexon. No, no, have you heard about the Buck Sexton Show. You can say, oh, here, I will text you a link to the iTunes the iTunes podcast of the Buck Sexton Show, or hey, here's an email with the iHeart radio app that shows you where

to listen to the Buck sections Show. That is how you can spread the word about the show, my friends, and it is something for which I will be eternally grateful. So please do tell some folks out there about this and that will help us continue to grow. By the way, my I just saw this. This is a kind of a random thought. But my Hill TV co host, the wonderful and talented Crystal Ball, was a Jeopardy question tonight.

So I gotta John, you gotta. I gotta find out a way that I want to be a Jeopardy question. What is buck Sexton? You know? Oh? No, I guess I think I think it would be who is whoops? Right? Guy? Exactly? Thank you. That's what I'm talking about. But I'm a little jealous on my co host got to be a Jeopardy question. I want to be on Jeopardy. How do I got to do that? I have no delusions of grandere. It wouldn't be celebrity Jeopardy would just be I just want to be a normal Jeopardy. You gotta find out

how you do it. I think I think I would clean up. I'm just saying I think i'd be I'd be pretty strong on the Jeopardy front. Uh, talk some smack about that. Oh I didn't play this before, and I want to. And then we'll get to maybe the Gillette ad and I mean the Pelosi State of the Union thing. She we got, Man, I haven't talked. I didn't talk to you guys yesterday. So there's so many things I want to get to the Gillette ad. Maybe we got time for that, all right, let me start

with this though. You know Clapper is uh, you know, James Clapper's out there. He's a former Director of National Intelligence. He's kind of a crusty, old curmudgeon, and he obviously hates Trump and says some really terrible things about President Trump, to include that he thinks that, well, I'll let him, I'll let him say it for himself. Playclip three withdrawing from NATO, even discussing discussion about throwing for NATO. I think is would it would be disastrous for the security?

I think that act would be so destructive to our country. It would be a ground for some profound effort by our part, whether it's impeachment or the twenty fifth Amendment. He can't do that to this country, and I don't believe that he can do it without Senate ratification. Notice how this is, This is something that he's said and is not often challenging the media, but that you could think that foreign policy differences of opinion are grounds for

removal behind the twenty fifth Amendment. Effectively, what that was a Democratic representative, Jackie spire Spear, and I say it inspire. This is a way of saying that if you don't agree with the establishment foreign policy consensus, you're crazy. This is what This is what they think, which I think is in fact crazy. But they think that if you disagree with the approach that we've had of not just being a NATO, but you know, allowing NATO to be what it is. I mean, I don't think Turkey should

be in a NATO. I think we got a problem. I think the Turks we should start to say, look, you guys need to be a little more helpful here or else. That whole NATO situation might have to change. I think that we should at least be willing to ask these questions and retest assumptions about about alliances and about what we're trying to accomplish. And there's always this there's impulse that you see from many people in the press because foreign policies where they think they get to

sound really smart. You know, a lot of people have opinions on what's going on here at home, but it's it's foreign policy where the journals get to flux that afflects their Wikipedia muscles a bit more. You know, Oh, this is what I just looked up. Let me talk about it on TV. But Clapper and the rest of them who think that Trump's difference of opinion with them on a foreign policy matter like NATO is grounds for

removing him, that is really disconcerting. I mean that, for me, is something that we need to take along look at it, and it ties into this broader mentality of well, the establishment and the apparatus of the government, the FBI, the national security agencies, they can be in a place to override the president's judgment on what is international security interests, Which is why that New York Times piece from what was it last week where they were saying that the

FBI opened investigation on Trump because he fired Komey, The FBI already had an investigation into a Trump and Russia and collusion and they're already looking at this. So that to me just indicates even further they don't understand their

constitutional limitations. Whether you want to call it a deep state or just the permanent bureaucracy or the fourth branch of government or whatever it is, there are clearly very powerful careerist elements within the national security bureaucracy that think that they should have their judgment be above the presidents on these matters. And I'm sorry, but you know I wasn't suggesting that people within the DoD or within the

DOJ veto Obama's judgment on matter. I thought Obama had really poor judgment on a lot of stuff, but he was the president and he did get to get his way on stuff. You've noticed that right now within the Trump era, there are all these efforts to justify overriding presidential discretion and decision making, and that in and of itself is really troubling. It should not be happening. And Clapper and the rest are trying to give cover to that that impulse, and I just think I think it's wrong.

It's very obviously wrong. But we got toxic masculinity to discuss. We got all kinds of stuff here, folks. So our three is a rockin. We'll be right back. When do you want to spot that burglar when he's casing your home or after he's in? Ask John who's blink camera alerted him to burglars trying to break in while he and his family were home, Or Shannon, who's blink camera caught a thief stealing packages. Both times, Blink video clips

were sent to police to help convict the crooks. Blink motion activated indoor and outdoor cameras are wire free, set up in minutes, and run on two double A batteries that last up at two years. And if you're traveling, Blinks live feed options lets you monitor your home and check in on pets from anywhere using the Blink smartphone app. No contracts, no subscriptions, totally affordable, and Blink works with Alexa. Blink camera systems make great gifts and they're a brilliant

way to monitor your package deliveries. Visit blink protect dot com slash Buck again, blink protect dot Com slash Buck one more time. That's blink Protect dot Com slash Buck. Blink is an Amazon company. So you have this a Gillette apt that I told you about. I was early on this train. I was one of the ones that figured out that this was going to get a lot of attention. As you know, don't be a jerk, don't abuse people, don't pick on people. And you know it's like, yeah,

we know this has nothing to do with masculinity. That says you can just call this psa don't be a don't be a bad person, which the people either know that or they don't. At this point, I think, um, but there was an end panel. Yeah, I have. I don't even think I've bashed CNN once this whole show. So that is something that we have to take care of right now. There's a CNN panel that got together on this one, bashing tactic masculinity. Here's what they said,

play clip six. I like the odd Actually, I thought it was great, and I guess people are outraged because they don't want to hear that men sometimes behave in a toxic way. I watched this with my eleven year old son because I wanted to figure out what the controversy was here, and we both looked at each other afterwards, like all this add is about is bad behavior. There's

nothing on the line. This is kind of in a way right on target because it is the men's shaving in the locker room after the gym in the morning, getting ready for working. You're talking crazy and you have to say, yo, we can't talk like that. This is not okay men being groomed. I like this metaphor. What is in the water over at CNN. Really, what are

they did? They all go to some kind of re education camp, where's all of our normal impulses as Americans get get wiped away and where it's posted just not our heads and end accept this progressive claptrap. The ad is The ad is idiotic, and Jillette is getting crushed all over the place. It didn't bring anything new, delighted, It didn't tackle any tough issue. It's just yeah, don't don't be a jerk. Who was that, uh, kirstin Powers, I think it was. That's what it sounded like, saying that,

you know, some some men behave in a toxic way. Yeah, we know. Thanks thanks for pointing out that some men are bad. Pretty sure, we're all quite aware of that that men can do bad things. But just imagine for a moment, what would happen if we released a toxic femininity add is there? Are we really going to pretend that that can't be a thing? I mean, I just want to I want to really dig into this room. And why is there all this focus on on this

concept of toxic masculinity? Is toxic femininity not something that? And now I know that there it's wide open for all kinds of jokes here. You know, toxic femininity is telling me a hundred times a day to put the toilet seat down, right. I mean, there's a lot of things that we could all talk about but that would never happen. And it's it's strange because obviously men and women are both capable of being fantastic in every way

and being terrible in lots of ways. So this is kind of a big idiocy, but it has gotten more attention. I just think it's so funny. It's like clockwork. It's seen and they're like, yeah, I like the ad about the toxic masculinity because it's virtue signaling. This is all about showing people. The concept of toxic masculinity is closely associated now with liberalism and progressivism and intersectional politics and being a cutting edge, hip progressive type that that's what

it is. You just put it on the big list of things like climate change and being for DACA and the dreamers, and you know, being for Ocasio Quartet style tax rate seventy percent plus and all this. This is you don't have to think about any of these positions. If you want to be one of the good people

who likes this stuff. You just have to favor these positions, and then everything else gets a lot easier after that, right, everything else turns into oh okay, Well, in that case, I just have to say what I'm told to say here and and then everything will find But by the way, this this uh well, using certain phrases and relying on certain concepts on the left too much so that it becomes mechanical, so that it's wrote so that it's just a phrase to be deployed for a purpose, not one

that somebody really thinks about. That came back to bite at least one liberal here. I have in the past worked with and and gotten to know David Webb's he's a good guy. I know this happened yesterday, but I didn't get a chance to address it. He was talking to a CNN legal analyst named Riva Martin. I will

say CNN's legal analysts are particularly poor. They have a lot of analysts that are are not very good on their chosen subject matter, but they're legal analysts, in my opinion, are among the the the flimsiest in terms of their reasoning and the intellectual ability they display Across the board. All their legal analysts and Jeffrey Tubin, I mean just not good. But Arriva Martin had an exchange with David Webb. Many of you, I'm sure no. David Webb is also

a Fox Foxings contributor. And here's how this went play Cliff two friend. Parts of the media world done the work so that I'm qualified to be in each one. I never considered my color the issue. I considered my qualifications the issue. Well, David, you know that that's a whole another long conversation about white privilege of things that you have the privilege of doing that people of color don't have the privilege of. How do I have privilege

of white privilege? David by virtue of being a white male, you have white privilege with a whole long conversation. I don't have time to get Riva. I hate to break it to you, but you should have been better prepped. I'm black, Okay. Then I say, you went to white privilege. This is the falsehood in this. You went immediately with an assumption your people obviously or you didn't look you're

talking to a black man. This is part of the problem with driving a narrative around a construct like white privilege, privilege is one thing. We're applied wealth, economy, various social factors, but not necessarily determined by color of skin. Yep, that just happened. You had a female African American scene and a let us tell a black conservative analyst and host

that day he has white privilege. Obviously she did not know what she was talking about out but that that that would happen doesn't surprise me at all the same way it doesn't surprise me that a panel at CNN would all say that toxic masculinity is something we need to talk about, because these are buzzwords, these are phrases. These are are ways that you show what side you're on, and you don't have to think them through, you don't

have to apply them judiciously. You know, whenever any male, particularly whenever any conservative male does something you don't like, just call him out for toxic masculinity and you will get applause from the left, from your side. Whenever any person says anything who is white, it obviously doesn't work when you're saying this to David Webb, although that she had to find that out the you know, the hard way.

But whenever a person who is white says something that someone on the left who is a minority or not even another white person disagrees with because liberal white people give themselves a pass from white privilege, right because they they criticize their own white privilege, but then they weaponize

the white privilege as a concept against others. But they say these things not just because it's a way of trying to essentially score cheap points in our argument in her debate, but they know that those on their own side will say, oh, okay, see you're with us, You're with the good side, the good people. And it's it's virtue signaling, and it's it's a means of separating left from right that all it takes is just to say the right words. Team, we'll be back in just a moment.

I think most most people involved in law enforcement are I don't know if then the lingo is still the same. They used to be called essential. I think it's been changed to something else. But I think they're on the job. But obviously we'd like to people would like to see the shutdown ended, and that's why people want to see

some kind of compromise. And you know, you call it the Trump shutdown, but I mean it takes two to tango, so I didn't get to talk to you about incoming hopefully Attorney General bar And I think I think Bill bar will do do a fine job from everything I've seen and heard so far. I think it is interesting also that they keep changing. And this came up when I talked to Border Patrol today. I asked him, I said, how do you guys be able to shut down? They said,

look or working without pay. Trump has already i think, signed a bill that give them retroactive pay, though they will get paid that might be a few more weeks though, But they used to call it non essential personnel, and over time the governed employees that fell into that non essential category really resented that because it does bring people to ask the question, well, if you're non essential, why do we have you doing this job? And so they've

changed it. I think it went at one point to exempt it, but even that sounded a little bit like it was given a special stat and so there was there was a little bit of pushback on that, and then they changed it to accept it. So now you are accepted from a government shutdown if you have to continue to show up and do your job. And I've found these I found these online, mostly on Twitter, people saying you know, a TSA agent I saw looked at me and said, you know, but keep the fight up

against Trump and we cried. I'm like, why do people do this making up anecdotes thing all the time on social media? It's always so obvious. It's like when as liberals that tend to do it from what I see, maybe I'm just maybe I'm biased about this part. I don't know, but yeah, liberals the ones just say you know, my ten year old came off to me and said, I don't understand why Section five of the Voting Rights Act has been changed in such a way as to

not fully protect the voting right. I don't think your ten year old ask you that me wrong exactly. I don't think your ten year old did I think that that's Uh. I think people are having a little bit of a little bit of fun with the truth there, or playing some games with the truth. But on the Bob, I want to say, Bob Barr, it's a different guy. Bill Barr asked about this one, and uh, he said, Look,

I'm I'm gonna do my job. I'm gonna let this thing happen the way it's it's been, it has been happening, and that's it. Play nine. If confirmed. I will not permit partisan politics, personal interests, or any other improper consideration to interfere with this or any other investigation. I will follow the Special Council regulations scrupulously and in good faith, and on my watch, Bob will be allowed to finish his work. My goal will be to provide as much

transparency as I can, consistent with the law. When his report comes to you, will you share it with us as much as possible, consistent with the regulations and the law. Yes, I am going to make as much information available as I can, consistent with the rules and regulations that are part of the Special Council Regulations, in favor of as much transparency as there can be consistent with the rules and the law. See a case where the president could

claim executive privilege. In theory, if if there was executive privilege material that to which an executive privilege claim could be made, it might contin know someone might raise a claim of executive That would be pretty difficult. Following the US versus Nixon, and mister Giuliani said the president should be able to correct smaller report before any public release. So in other words, you could take this investc as a report, put his own spin on corrected before its release.

You commit that would not happen. If your attorney in general, that will not happen. So what problem I mean, you kind of heard some of the highlights here from the hearing. I know you don't sit around. It's my job to sit around and watch all these boring Capital Hill hearings all day and tell you what matters from it. But but what problem could the Democrats really have with this guy? He's already been the attorney general. He did a fine job.

There's you know, he's friends with Muller for Evan's sake, so you can't say that he's some kind of anti Muller Zellot. I think, I think it's all gonna work out just fine. But I hope that he also brings some transparency. I hope that he goes even further than just not disrupting the Muller probe. I mean, at this point, I think the Muller problem is illegitimate, but I think that stopping it would be a terrible idea for the administration, and it would just give the Libs what they want,

which is another excuse to completely freak out. But Lindsey Graham's at least telling him, look, you gotta you gotta also do a little bit of housekeeping here and get this place in order. At the Department of Justice, play eleven. This is a message August eighth, twenty sixteen, a text message. Trump's not ever going to become president, right right Struck responded, No, no, he's not. We'll stop him. March fourth, twenty sixteen, Page

destruct God. Trump is a loathsome human being. October the twenty, twenty sixteen, Trump is an effing idiot as unable to provide a coherent answer, how do these statements sit with you? I was shocked when I saw them. Okay, please get to the bottom of it. I promise you. We will protect the investigations, but we're lying upon you to clean this place up. Has got to be some house cleaning. It goes on over at the Department of Justice. There's been a lot of bad actors over there, very very

senior levels. And I should know that my colleague John Solomon over at the at the Hill has has just broken a story. I'm not going to tell you too much about it now. Maybe we'll get into it more tomorrow. But he's broken a story on The Hill dot com, where I also work, saying essentially that Bruce Orr tried to warn tried to warn senior DJ officials. So maybe

Or wasn't a bad guy in this at all. I don't know, but Or tried to warn DJ officials about the fact that the dossier was bought and paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign and that they should really think long and hard about how much credibility they give it. And they took it. DJ took it to the fires accord anyway, and got the fire fires of stuff up and running based on the dossier right on carter page. And it's bad stuff, bad stuff that we need to we need to get to the bottom of for sure.

I want to get you a roll call here. It's always fun to hear from all of you, So we'll do that. Remember Facebook dot com slash buck sex, and if you want to get in on that roll call action, we'll take it. Just a moment here, we'll have a beat and come right back. Hey, team Buck, it's time for roll call. Somehow it seems fitting that I am doing roll call from California and there's some dubstep going on.

California very hip, very hip, very with its states coming to you live from the west coast, the left coast, but is it really the best coast? All right? Roll call? I have not been able to get into a roll call in twenty four hours, so I miss it, hopefully you miss it. And with that, without further ado, we will see what we've got going on here. And that means first up, Brandon whoa Brandon reads? You mentioned eating better on Monday's show. I would strongly recommend looking into

the Trim Healthy Mamma diet. I have quite a bit of success with it, haven't really changed my lifestyle at all and dropped thirty pounds in a few months. The basic concept is you wait at least three hours between meals, and you can either have a high fat, low carb meal or a high carb low fat meal. It isn't as efficient as keto, but when you have a cheat day like chocolate over the weekend doesn't really set you back. You aren't always trying to stay in a state of cautosis.

I'm sure there are many people who know that a lot more than me about the subject, but this one really works for me. Anyway, best of luck, Shields. Hi Brandon, Brandon, I have never heard of the Big Mama diet, but that sounds interesting. I'm not really sure even how it would work, but there we go. Beth writes, Buck just

watch Chucker Carlson tonight. He has a segment tonight telling us about an abortion activist talking to children on the YouTube show High Kids, telling these children how God is okay with them having abortions. Well, Beth, that is horrific and I haven't seen the segment, but it sounds terrible, so I will take a look and see if I can find it. All right, Julie writes, I love your show.

I was wondering, could you look into a big problem happening with parents with disability losing custody of their children and how they get away with it? Please? And thank you custody to the state. Um, Julie, I'll have to check into that. I don't know anything about it offhand, and right have you noticed the only people talking about ending the Muller investigation are the Dems or the people who accuse Trump of being a tyrant while expecting him

to solve issues with executive orders are Dems? I don't understand it. Well, no, end it's it's because it feeds. It feeds their narrative and it feeds their news cycle needs right, if they can create an entire news cycle that's really just an extended discussion about whether or not Muller's probe is going to get shut down, this creates the fear reflex in their audience of oh, my gosh, Trump is destroying America. And then there's all kinds of

you know, follow on commentary that's necessary. Oh what will we do? It's a constitutional crisis. Dogs and cats living together as hysteria, you get it. So it's only win win for them to speculate wildly about how the molloprobe is going to end. They just keep they just keep doing it, and yeah, there you have it. Chaleene, right, you spoke about keto tonight. Have it tell you three people. My family have been doing it since November. My son has lost fifty pounds. I've lost almost thirty. It has

been surprisingly easy to me. I'm sixty eight and never would have thought it possible. We also use a fitness app to help keep track of stats. Should be plenty for you to eat. That's gluten free on keto. Good luck, love your show, She'll tie Shelleen, Well, thank you, Chlene. It sounds like a lot of people really like this keto approach, and I have heard many good things from many many people. The finest people, only the finest people.

Richard writes, Buck, happy hoos, your hellos, my friend. If you're gonna be in Chicago, Italian beef all the way. But when you order be in the no always gets sweet or spicy peppers, and then there's gravy, So dipp means you submerge it in the goodness with gravy means it gets a good amount put on, and dry means little to no gravy. Dry is just lame. It's like diet dessert. Don't do it. See if you're ordering get Italian beef spicy with gravy or sweet dipped. Wow, this

food looks amazing. It looks not particularly healthy or gluten free, but does look very delicious. Thank you for sending that my way. Nathan writes, Buck, you are a prime candidate for the carnivore diet. Knowing well a lot of a lot of dietary advice coming. What do you guys trying to tell me here. You know, oh gosh, I haven't been quite as strict on my gym routine. But man, it's like jump, everyone's jumping in the mix. Here. We gotta, we gotta. We got other things we could talk about too.

You're prime candidate for the carnivorre diet, knowing how much you dig RIBI check out the Joe Rogan Jordan Peterson podcast where Jordan talks about his experience with it. It's pretty much what it sounds like. Animal products, no vegetables, no veggis. Huh. I don't know. I feel like veggies are good. I'd I'd have to look into this one a little bit more before I could sign on. Eric. Tool is my favorite heavy rock metal band, hands down, at least in my lifetime. I think their biggest single

was Sober. It's a badass band all around, highly recommend and their great addition as a workout tune choice gets the juices flowing. All right, Eric, looks like I'm gonna have to add some Tool to my Spotify playlist. I will check that out, Joel. Right, but caught part of your show the other day, the Global Warming one with the peer reviewed journal of one scientist warning others not to tell the truth about global warming. Could not write

down info. Can you share a link? I did not get a chance to listen as often as as I want to, but thank you for the concise information, and thank you for your time and work. Jerry, Jerry, I have to go back and look at that one. But it was a an academic journal, so I don't remember offhand even what it was called. Was like the journal of something and something or other. It's definitely not anything that you would expect to be fun reading. It's it's not a beach read that much. I can tell you

Here more keto, more keto, more keto. Alright, alright, Kathy writes, Hey buck, Kathy here, love the show. Last week you asked for suggestions on possible guests. Have you ever heard of Michael Cutler. He appears as a guest on our station here. Please consider reaching out to him. I think your listeners would love to hear what he has to say. Shields High. I do not know this Michael Cutler guy, but I will look into him. Thank you for that heads up. Josh comes up with some new stuff here.

He writes, Remember democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhaust and murders itself. There has never been a democracy yet that did not commit suicide. John Adams eighteen fourteen. I really hope and pray we are not seeing this before our very eyes. Well, Josh, that's pretty pretty intense. I have to be honest with I didn't even know

that that was an Adams quote. So I hope you're writing and democracy is not consuming itself right now, Rocky, I don't understand an emergency can be declared and it's expected a judge is going to block any actions to address it for months. If I declared I have an emergency, I'm declaring I don't take care of this expeditiously. I may not ever be able to Rocky, that's a good point.

If you're declaring an emergency, for a judge to overrule and say no, you can't declare an emergency seems like it kind of defeats the whole purpose of the emergency declaration, right, So that's that's something that I do think you re raise a fair point. Thomas writes, Buck, you're doing a

great job exposing the high level crime in DC. Alan Dershwitz is correct when he says the first crime committed in the Muller investigation was for a special counsel to conduct a counterintelligence investigation based in an illegal fis A warrant. The whole thing was contrived from the very beginning and will not prove anything except that the top level of the FBI were biased and corrupt. Even when Muller finally, if ever, finishes his investigation, there will be no indictments

or recommendations for criminal charges. Keep exposing the fraud shields high from Thomas Well, my friend, Yeah, I think that there has been malfees instead a very high level, and I will continue to expose it as much as I can. Here the team that's going to be our show from the West Coast today out in San Diego. I wanted to thank our iHeart partner out here, kogo Ory. Nice of them to let me hang out in their studio

space and do my show from sunny San Diego. All the weather has been a little iffy last few days. I'm just saying, but no, it's been great out here, really really worthwhile trip at the borders, obviously you can tell from what I've been able to tell you about it. I'm flying back tomorrow there's no way for me to be able to get to a radio studio in time. So that means that we're going to have our friend Raheem Kassam who will be in the mix. So Rahim's

in for me tomorrow. He always does a great show for you guys, and then I will be back live with you on Friday. Until then, Shields High. There is a conservative alternative to all those super lib progressive email services out there, I patriots dot us. I patriots dot us is gonna give you all of the best aspects of email. That means it's secure, private, includes more of what you want, and it's better than other services because it doesn't have all the ads and spam and doesn't

sell your information to third parties. Okay, you're gonna get thirty gigs of cloud storage with ipatriots, you're gonna have two hundred and fifty six bit encryption, and it's compatible with most mobile devices. So all the technology you want, none of the nonsense, and none of the liberal progressive agenda that's being driven by the company that controls your email. Okay, you don't want this, show your a patriot. Go to

ipatriots dot us. Now choose your membership program and input your desired Ipatriots email address during checkout, and our promo code buck that's buck for ten percent savings during your first year of membership. Again Ipatriots dot us promo code buck for ten percent savings