Democrat Dirty Secret

of talk radio. Buck Sexton. Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. Everybody, Thank you very much for being here. We got a lot to talk about today, as always, just some raking news for you as we go to the airwaves here, there is this shooting at YouTube, at YouTube headquarters out on the West Coast in California, and so far from what we're seeing, it is a female suspect who was who is now dead from a self inflicted gunshot wound.

So she committed suicide, but not before she shot four people, none of them based on the reporting so far, fatally, but so far law enforcement sources. They held the press conference right before we went onto air. They're saying they believe this was a female targeting her boyfriend perhaps and perhaps an ex boyfriend. I don't know if this would be qualified as a possible but what would have been called years ago at least a crime of passion. We

we don't have those details. We just female shooter. She is dead. Shot For people, they are at the hospital, but police said that they are being treated for their wounds and they are expected to be okay. And that's all we have. So you can imagine, though, shooting at YouTube, all all of the the wheels started turning in everyone's minds.

Oh my gosh, this is I think, not only is this a way to seize a tremendous amount of attention because of the high profile of YouTube, there could also be some messaging here about, you know, attacking the platforms that are spreading other messages. And everyone was very spun up right from the get go. But it looks like this is just, uh, you know, a terrible situation. But only the shooter is dead. So that's the good news, as much as you can say there's any good news

in a situation like this. Nobody else has been killed, and it's certainly nothing along the lines in terms of casualties and and and the the horror that we have seen in well some weeks back, this is a very different situation. Police have the whole campus, the YouTube campus,

on lockdown, and they're gonna be giving us updates. If we have anything beyond that, anything new throughout the course of the show, we'll certainly tell you on air what we've got, but for now, so, a woman who went after her boyfriend not even clear if I don't know producer Mike did did we know if she was even trying to hit other people or did she just did she draw down on her boyfriend and hit by standards, it doesn't that That's the one thing I would want

to know because why would she you know, if it was about her boyfriend, why is she shooting other people? I mean, maybe he was in he was at a party, right, Yeah, the first report was there. It happened at a party at YouTube, so she might have she might have just essentially snapped or gone after him, pulled out a weapon in a crowded space and just started firing hit him

and some other people. Doesn't seem like this was a a premeditated mass shooter scenario where somebody was trying to just commit you know, mass casualties and plan it all out like what we've seen. You know, she didn't come in with a rifle, two bags of of magazines, you know, pipe bombs and a flakfest on it. She she came

after her boyfriend from what we know. So if I have any more on this for you, we'll let you know, but for now, because it was it was dominating the news cycle for the hour before we went on the er because everyone assumed shooting. But we don't have much more on that, So let's get into the the the other big news of the day, or that the continuing story that we're falling very closely here, and that has to do with the the immigration showdown that's happening, where

the illegal immigration showed on that's happening. You have this caravan of people, which was estimated a little over a

thousand people. They've walked hundreds of miles from Central America on their way to the United States through Mexico, and as I pointed out to you, Mexican government, at least until today, was letting them walk through, even though Mexico enforces its own borders and has immigration laws that it has no compunction about following through on it is trying to or it is doing it was doing nothing, and now we have a situation where it looks like that

may have changed. But here's the President said earlier today on this caravan of illegals. Although it's interesting they're really asylum seekers because technically we're gonna get into this. We've got an expert in immigration law joining us later on to discuss. But technically there it's it's a caravan of asylum seekers. That's what you'd call it. Here's what Trump

said about it. Though now the caravan doesn't irritate me, the caravan makes me very sad that this can happen to the United States, where you have thousands of people that decide to just walk into our country and we don't have any laws that can protect it. And the wall because of the Democrats, has been delayed. But it's very sad to see it, and it's sad even from both sides. It's sad for the people in the caravan, and it's sad for the people of the United States.

It's really sad that we don't have laws that say we have a border and if you don't do it legally you can't come into the United States. To me, that's a very sad thing for the people of the United States. As I was saying, I mean the president is correct in uh, he's not. How do I put I'm trying to think of how to how to say this. His arts in the right place on this one, or

he's correct in substance but not on the specifics. There you go, meaning that it is crazy that this is what the law currently is for migrants from Central America. They can just show up and claim asylum, but that is the law that the Republican controlled Congress has done nothing to change. That is just how much more frustration can we manage before we just decide why do we why do we even waste our time? Right? What's the point of voting for Republicans if this is the situation

we're going to be in. I mean, there's only so much that the president won't be able we'll be able to do. I would know that it's not just Trump who is obviously people like me, that a lot of folks are opposed to this situation of the migrants approaching the border. But even libertarian Rand Paul had to weigh in earlier. The people that are marching up through Mexico should be stopped at the border and they should be sent back. We should not allow people to come into

our country and break the laws. I'm all for legal immigration. Immigrants are buying large, good people, and I've added to our country where a nation of immigrants. But we should not allow people, particularly eleven hundred of them marching up to basically sort of thumb their nose and say, well, we don't care what your laws are, we're coming. They should be opped at the border and sent home. If it requires a change the law, we should do it.

But I think there is some leeway within the executive branch that they may well be able to do this if they want to. Isn't it isn't fascinating that you've got someone from the legislative branch who's like, I mean, you know, we might do something. Trump might do something. We gotta kind of see, you know, not too hot, not too cold, just right here, you know, which is it who's really in charge, who's supposed to be making

the call here about what to do? And I think there's a huge opportunity that's being missed right now by everyone who is on the side of the administration. I think there's a big opportunity that's being missed, and it is Democrats should be asked one after another, what do you think about this? I mean, they should be pushing as many Democrats as they can to answer, you know, whatever it is. If it's the walking rocking around as a reporter on Capitol Hill, and you know, I mean

mrs speaking, Mr Schumer, you know we're Senator Schumer or whatever. Oh, Congresswoman Pelosi, what do you think? I hate that the fabric of America and they'll do the jobs that Americans won't do. Uh. That that is good to get on the record. Um that Democrats are really complicit and in fact favor massive foreign and what's what's the right word. You know, people are saying invasion. That's a bit strong, right, Invasion implies military, but in a massive foreign intrusion into

US sovereignty time and again is too much. Remember this is not the only instance of this. This is just one that we're all aware of, and it's created something of a of a political showdown. But there were I I forget. I think the number of of youth border crossings in the last year has actually been pretty high, and we're we're seeing a surgeon people trying to get across the border. And this is where I have to say, we've seen the administration trying to negotiate on some of

these points with the Democrats. We do crossover, we do cross over into territory where Republicans have to act here. They can't just say, well, we couldn't get a deal with the Democrats. Well, you know, we couldn't get a deal with the Democrats. No, it has to be has to be more than that, because we voted in a Republican Congress, Republican h House and Senate, and we have a Republican president. So they've got to be able to do something here. But the dirty little secret of the

Democrat Party is they favor all this stuff. They're all all about it, all about it. They think that this is a great idea. The more impoverished immigrants, legal and illegal from a third world, the better. And all of your faculties of reason tell you that that's probably not a good idea for the economy, for the welfare of this country going forward, for our political cohesion. That there is something about being American. It's not just you know, you show up and you can do things that you

want to do. You can be a part of the economy. Here there's something it's supposed to be more than that, and Democrats largely reject that. So that's what we see happening here and know with this h caravan, which by the way, they have I believe, um Mexican authorities have said that they are stopping them now right because of Trump. But yeah, we'll see and we'll see how long that lasts, and we'll see where all this goes. Trump has claimed credit for the sidelining of this caravan in Mexico, but

we'll see. Um, if this in fact is going to go away or not, my guess is no. My guesses they will arrive at the border and and then we'll start talking about, Okay, well where do all these migrants end up going? Where do they show up? You won't hear the stories about the migrants who are entering communities or they have already been margarets in Central America, uh placed, and they become part of MS thirteen that's been happening all of the country for a few years now. You

won't hear those stories. So we'll have to keep following this one. The media has done everything in its power to suppress the truth about the opioid epidemic and its ties to Mexico and the drug cartels. As you know we've been discussing here with frequency, doing everything in their power to suppress the truth about those who come into this country claiming asylum and then go on to become criminals,

members of gangs. The youth crossings, unaccompanied youth that were crossing the border, many of them are much older than they say they are. They provide documentation, and that's how we end up having nineteen year olds in the ninth grade and some of these high schools who speak not a word of English. That doesn't really help us, does it. That's not a good thing for us, for America. Just saying eight four four eight to five eight four buck,

talk a bit more about the immigration situation. Also, we've got updates on the Mueller probe coming up later on some follow up to the the media's spat with Sinclair all. They're so upset about it, and they are just in high dudgeon about the whole thing. We'll get into that and uh, a whole lot more. And we've also got an expert joining us on the specifics of immigration law

later on the show. Oh and Christian privilege is now a thing that they're teaching people in school that there making sure we get rid of crusaders as mascots too. Don't forget at that. But it's got a lot more to talk about, don't we, Christian privilege. I'll probably an hour too. That's gonna get me fired up. Our team hit a quick break, will be right back now. The caravan, which is over a thousand people coming in from Honduras, thought they were gonna just walk right through Mexico and

right through the border. As you know, and af there's a phenomenal deal for Mexico. It's been a horrible deal for the United States. We're renegotiating it now. And I told Mexico yesterday that because of the fact that their laws are so strong, they can do things about it that hard to believe the United States can't. I said, I hope you're going to tell that caravan not to get up to the border. And I think they're doing that because as of twelve minutes ago, it was all

being broken up. We'll see what happens. I don't mentioned it before, but I think Mexico will actually use lethal force for people to try to eagally cross its border to the south, so they have very strict border control. Larry in Ohio, what do you think about all this? Enjoy your show, Thank you, Larry. Enjoy hearing from you. What's up College? A couple of months ago and I wrote President of Trump to forget that damn wall and put military personnel down there to guard our southern border.

We're gonna get there. We're gonna get into that discussion. I finally heard out of the President Trump that he's thinking about And another thing, put the pressure on Mexico. Stop all commerce between Mexico and the United States. And Bill Ford wants to Bill Ford's in Mexico. I hope he's got a good market for him because he won't be shipping any to the United States. And also stop hit him in the belly with finance. No. If we would attacks the remittances, that would certainly have a big impact,

of big effect. It's one of the ways people have I have talked about possibly paying for the wall. By the way, remittances from Mexico from the US to Mexico each year in the neighbor the fifteen to twenty billion dollars. That's just money leaving the U. S. Economy going to Mexico. Stop all mail mail from going to Mexico because he llegals in here are sending billions of dollars back home to their families. Stop postal commerce, all right, Larry wants

a lockdown. Larry, thank you for calling my friend. I do appreciate hearing from Larry is like, no more commerce, no more mail. Jason in Destin, Florida. He's also got immigration thoughts. Hey, Jason, Hey a book. How's it going? Man? All right, thanks for your call. Yeah, I was talking to the guy to answer the phone. They're about sending all the the immigrants over California because they're more than welcoming over there and pretty much give them everything everything

they want. And uh. But the bigger issue that I'm sitting here thinking about it and we look back what we're doing is kind of I don't want to kind of be a harbing jurything. But but past administrators, especially Democrats because the folks eyes have been involved in doing it.

But but we've been messing around with other countries for for decades and messing around overthrowing other people, UH, dictators and such Olivia, Gadaffi, Killery and Obama over through Gadaffi, and that's why Italy short was just pounded with immigrants all across from across the Mediterranean. They lost eight hundred people died in a in a boat trying to cross the Mediterranean to get to Italy. Um. After that, they overthrew Gadaffi, they overthrew Um. They did the same thing.

Bill Clinton did the same thing with I need, I need a way to tie this all together, Jason, What are you trying to tell me? Well, people are coming up here trying to seek asylum from South and Central America where they're starving to death. I'm not saying we had a you know, the absolute hand in it. But the Democrats, Obama and Hillary and Bill Clinton and so forth, even Bush, they didn't help you. I'm not I'm not sure I see an intentional blowback situation here, Jason, But

I will give it some more thought about that. I appreciate you calling in. We are going to talk more about the military getting sent down to the border, and then later on the show we'll have someone from me an expert, uh, a friend Art Arthur from the Center for Immigration Studies joining and then we'll talk about all the other things too. That's all coming up. He's holding the line for Amra buck Sex in his back so forth. But dreamers, they have two options. One is to wait

for the courts to rule on this. The other one is what they what they already called Plan B. And Plan B is to wait onto and to see if Donald Trump is going to be re elected or not. But for many of them, Donald Trump is not an option right now. And you know, the real wallet right

now on immigration is called Donald Trump. Trump is the wall Born Ramos, one of the most prominent, one of the most prominent spokespersons out there for illegal immigration, and it's really is kind of a nationalist in exile, right. I mean, he's very much in favor all the time of immigration from Latin America into America as someone who is himself Latin American, though he lives in America. I think he may have actually moved recently back. He's thinking

about moving back. I saw some story about that, but doesn't advocate for this for you know, for other immigrants, it's it's always just Latino immigrants, which I think is interesting or why why why do we have that distinction? Um, But then again we also are not allowed to ask these questions. You know that you you start to really get into the underlying themes here and you do analysis beyond just the headlines, and you might run into some trouble.

I saw on one of the shows on Fox one of the guests recently brought up a brought up a book that I've actually read, and it is it is considered a UM. It is a highly politically incorrect book. We could say that it's called The Camp of the Saints by Gen rests By, written back in the seventies.

The basic premise of the book is that Western civilization or Europe in this case France specifically becomes overrun by huge a huge wave literally on on enormous oil tankers and cargo ships, but a huge wave, a flotilla of like hunt of at the time I think it was other hundreds of thousands or millions of people from the

Indian subcontinent. And you know that the book is that there's a lot of things that are said that people say are racist, and you know the author, and it's popular among white nationalists of course, so but many of the arguments. Um, I think Stein was Stein brought it up on Fox a couple of days ago. He just he just mentioned the book. I didn't even see the interview.

I just saw the headline on it. But many of the arguments you hear from the different sides, and it is interesting because they mirror the discussions that are had currently about you know, the is there going to be an impact on the culture? Oh, how could you ask such a thing? That's so racist? We even ask such a thing. So it's as I said to you, Um,

it's interesting to read the book. Whether you think it's uh, you know, whether you think it's terrible racist or not, it's still you should be familiar with with the some of the arguments. It's written in as a novel. But people say that there's a degree of um, you know, foresight as through the clash of civilizations between the rest

of the West and the rest in it. But the one of the issues you're never allowed to talk about is the and then putting aside that that book and everything else that comes with it, it's just the clash of cultures. At what point are we overwhelming our ability to assimilate? At what point do we have we taken in too many immigrants. Is there such a thing, I mean, all immigrants legal and illegal at one time? Is it?

Can there be a number that's two I right now we're taking in a million a year, or we are permanently legalizing a million people a year. It's a lot. I know America's got about thy million people living here, but still a million years a pretty heavy number. And overwhelmingly the each year, the new peep will that become permanent, permanent residence of the United States are the family members of immigrants because of chain migration. So this is the effect.

This is what's happening here. And there's also another component of this that I think doesn't get very much attention, and that is from uh That is from the fact that there is something different about a contiguous landmass to our own being the country that is responsible for a massive part of immigration over the last thirty years. In fact, the majority of all immigration to this country comes from

one country, and it is Mexico. And when you have people like Querey Ramos who are saying that there will be electoral ramifications in this country for our refusal to allow lawlessness primarily facilitated by our next door neighbor another country, in this case Mexico. Uh, this is a a unique problem set we are dealing with. This is something different

than the immigration we deal with with other countries. You know, there's also a history here that we never really get to talk about, a history of the US fighting a war with Mexico, the sense of Mexico having lost territory. There are groups that still talk about a a rayon quista or a reconquest of lost territory um and but a reckon quista via political means right, via a sense

in a sense political conquest. I mean, this is very You have to take these things somewhat seriously when you look at the demographic realities of what's happening in a place like California, where this is now what the rest of the country is is going to be dealing with if we don't start to change our immigration policies. Where you have people who have a a political block that is strong enough that they make demands of the govern not to enforce the law against certain communities, that's an

interesting phenomenon, isn't it. And that's what's been happening in California. So no, I I and look at this, and I think to myself, it's time for the Trump administration to really lay it all down, laid on the line, and make the case and and then there's what can be done. In the meantime, the President spoke about sending the military to the border. We have very bad laws for a border, and we are going to be doing some things. I've

been speaking with General Mattis. We're gonna be doing things military until we can have a wall in proper security. We're gonna be guarding our border with the military. That's a big step. We really haven't done that before, or certainly not very much before. Trump sending the military to the border to help out, to do what he can to try and prevent further illegal immigration in the country.

But I mentioned before, I may have been off with UH whether they're willing to use lethal force at the Mexico Guatemala border, But there are military outposts there permanently, and there are are some fenced areas too. Just interesting, isn't it. You Know, the moment that an American talks about offense and military at our border, you will hear people like Jorge Ramo say that that's racist, it's violent, xenophobic,

it's terrible. Meanwhile, Mexico has military installations enforcing a border, you know, armed personnel enforcing a border that also has fencing, although not partically good fencing on their boarding with with Guatemala. So you know, this is the central, the central issue of the Trump It was essential issue the Trump campaign. It is also central to the administration's chances. I think of retaining Republican majorities in the House in the Senate, because if we lose on this, as I keep saying,

we lose on everything else. And that's why Democrats have become so irrational and unreasonable when it comes to immigration. That's what I see happening here. Eight four four to five. You've got some thoughts on this. We uh are going to talk about Christian privilege coming up in the next hour. That'll be interesting. That's what they're teaching people in college now.

First it was white privilege. Now it's Christian privilege. And there's of course male privilege too, but that's hashtag the patriarchy. This is what people learn in school. Now. That's why we have a trillion dollar student loan debt that's never gonna get paid off. No one's learning anything particularly useful in a lot of these disciplines. Um, but that will be coming up in the next hour, and also any of your thoughts, let me know what's on your mind.

We'll hit that in more. We'll be right back. Do we have Trump with the what was he with a lot being minister either day? And he was just like, don't call on them, they're fake. We have we should get that. That was fun. I saw that today. Don't call on American don't call that American news station calling your lot van station because we got fake news here.

Like I've said this to people too. You know, even on my most that the days I'm the most frustrated, not just want to say frustrated with the administration, I'm frustrated for the American people. I just want good things to happen in this country, even for the crazy Libs who won't appreciate it and don't understand it and won't be thankful for it. I just want good things to

happen for this country. But even on my worst day where I feel like things aren't going the way they should for administration, I'm like Trump is the most entertaining politician I think ever. I think it's probably fair to say he's the most entertaining politician in this country. I mean, how could you compare them to you know, a hundred years ago? Who knows, but it's pretty amazing you think about it. Bryant has got some thoughts from me up

in North Carolina or down in North Carolina. Hey, Bryan, Hey, how are you, sir? I'm good. Thank you for your call. Okay, I I love your show. Thank you, and you know I love to listen to you. I feel a butt coming here, Brian, go ahead, okay. But I wanted to make something clear earlier. And I don't mean to differ with your college education, which college educated, which I am too. But you said this, You said you was scared to say it was an invasion. I didn't say I was scared.

I said I'm not sure that's entirely the most accurate way to say. Well, the only thing, the only point I'd like to bring out I think it isn't It is an invasion. It's not a military invasion, but it's a political financial invasion. They're they're doing it in a different way. And if you look back through the history world history, which I know you study, but if you look back through that the Spaniards, which Mexico is from from,

you know, there's some Spanish descent. They were conquerors. Yeah, we're being conquered and we just need to realize that we need to just change our sinth and realize it's not political because Mexico has no means to do that against us. But any it's true, I've worked. I'm a registered nurse, and I have to take people. I'm not a racist person. I have to take care of people, all all races, all set, you know, it doesn't matter.

I just you know, I'll say their life this as quick as I'll save anybody else's, because that's a whole other issue. But what I what I look at, I mean, and I've worked. I was actually before that, I was self employed and I have I have worked some people of mexic Can dissent and they were two of the

best workers I've ever had. But they came in, gave us an illegal social Security number, and we were started taking taxes out where we started getting Yeah, but Brian, people, when when I when I talk about the policies involved here, I have no problem or animosity with any individual illegal immigrant. You know what I mean. It's I don't either. And we even one of the boys was young. He was twenty some years old. I'm forty nine. He was a lot younger than me, but me and my dad, who

was in business together, agreed to sponsor him. And I told him, I said, I don't have a problem with you coming too. This is country. Just do it legal, just do it the right way. You know, pay pay to taxes like all of us day because we don't like paying taxes either. Were over taxed to death. But I said, you know, it's it's still I say that all the time, Brian. Right, Like, if someone told me they weren't paying their taxes, I wouldn't dislike that person.

I wouldn't even I wouldn't even necessarily think less of that person. I just say, well, you're probably in trouble and they're gonna come after you. And I can't say that I don't understand why, right, I have a feeling. Yeah, so you know, I'll just said what I think it is. It's a slow invasion and if we don't recognize it a law, and you know, I'll support Trump. Yeah, I hear you, Brian. I look, I appreciate your calling my

friend and your thoughts. We've got a bunch of lines let though, so I have to leave it there with you for now, but thank you, sir. Chris in Burlington, North Carolina. Hey, Chris, Hey, how's it going, book? It's good? Thank you for a ring? Yes, sir, the question I had it there, I guess kind of question or comment of I'm trying to figure out what your thoughts on

it would be. But there's like a point, you know history, I think me and the guy on the phone before, we're talking about from ninety one to like nineteen sixty five where there was absolutely no immigration. They shut immigration down. Yeah, to give folks, you know, time to assimilate, become an American, everything like that. What are your thoughts on if that could happen or would or if and when it will happen.

Do you think that's like a possibility of things that could happen or do you think that's just out the window the left? I think we're a long way away from that. When the Democrat Party is effectively a party that wants uh de facto or or or as close to open borders as possible. Right, they want nearly unrestricted immigration. They just want to be able to count their future voters as they come into the country. That's really the idea.

So we're a long way away from being able to really shut down immigration, legal and illegal in this country. And look, I would never want there to be a complete shutdown on immigration. I just want our immigration policy to turn into you know, we we are compiling uh the the A team from around the world. What do we need more of in this country? Do we need

more astrophysicists, Do we need more primary care physicians? Do we need more you know, you name it right, whatever it is that we need more of in this country, or whatever standards we want to it for immigrants, we should put them in place. We should enforce them and then have an actual policy discussion about how, what, what the numbers are that we need and then just go about it that way. I mean, America should treat our

immigration policy the way a corporation treats its hiring. You want to get the best people, the people that you are gonna that are gonna have to contribute the most, the fastest, with the least amount of you know, additional or excessive support. And that doesn't make us. Canada does this, Australia does this. Other countries do this, and there are countries, by the way that also just don't really take you know,

Japan just doesn't take immigrants. And by the way, that's a huge problem for Japan and the countries in a stage of slow die off because they don't. I'm sorry, we don't cross talk. What do you say, Chris, I said, Well, I mean you're thinking like Japan. They probably thinking, hey, we have no folks as it is. No, they don't. Oh no Japan, No, no, quite the contrary, Japan is actually aging out, uh. And there's a whole bunch of

reasons for that. But Japan is facing huge uh economic dislocations going forward because they just don't have enough people to support there. There are a whole villages and towns in Japan right now that people say feeling not like I haven't been I just read about it a lot, uh that feel like retirement communities because there are no young people because no, they haven't been able to replace they don't have uh, you know, it's essentially replacement level childbearing.

They haven't been doing that for for decades now. But Chris, I appreciate you calling from North Carolina. We gotta run into get ready for a break here coming up. Oh yeah, demographics in Asia are fascinating. Uh. India has far too many people for its infrastructure and its economy, which is gonna cause all kinds of problems. China because the horrific one child policy has thirty million, too many males because males were more highly prized for economic reasons under the

one child policy. UH. And Japan has too few people. In South Korea, it's actually not that far behind. They're not having enough babies and you need people actually for an economy. So they're trying to turn the mechanization and robotics in robotics more specifically in Japan to make up for the shortfall. So they got big problems in that part of the world because of demographics. All right, we got a lot more coming up, including Christian privilege. Is

that a thing we'll discuss. He's back with you now, because when it comes to the fight for truth, the fuck never stops. Welcome back to the buck Sex and show everyone. We have the news that broke just before we came on air, and it talks to me talked about in the last hour. Um that is this shooting. It the YouTube headquarters in San Bruno, California. It seems so far all the facts point toward a uh dispute between a girlfriend and boyfriend, and she shot her, the

shooter shot her, boyfriend, shot a couple other people. Um. I saw a report that said the woman was shot many times though, so there there might have been additional intended targets beyond the boyfriend. Will we'll let you know as we find out more, but no one has been killed other than the shooter who took her own life. And we have very little in terms of specifics beyond that. So if we get more as we are on air, will certainly tell you I will tell you about it.

But in the meantime, we just know YouTube shooting at the YouTube headquarters. Female shooter dead, three people. Oh I'm sorry, so it's three three wounded, one killed. Yeah, So well we'll see what There'll be additional information coming out. I'm sure it's the question of it happens while we're on air or not, but we'll let you know as we can.

So we've got an eye on that. And like as I said, it was initially suspected that it could have been an active terror but that's been completely wiped away. And people are saying, no, no, this is this is a It might be a crime of passion. I don't know what else. That's what it would have been called. Right, when you have a quarrel between two people have a romantic relationship, can turn violent and can even turn deadly.

So that's that's all we have to go on so far. Um, just as as a brief aside, I did see that the Austin Police Department has said that they they believe that the Austin bombings that we were covering here extensively a couple of weeks ago were domestic terrorism. So, just as an aside, I wanted to follow up on that. So we we were going to talk about Christian privilege in a few minutes. But before I get there, I'm I'm seeing that there's a tremendous amount of pushback to

Trump militarizing the border. They're saying, and you have to wonder, what exactly are we supposed to do at the border. What would be acceptable? Are we supposed to set up a a welcoming committee. Are we supposed to just taking anyone who gets there? What should we tell the people that go through the legal immigration process and I've spent thousands of dollars in many years trying to come into this country the right way. Sorry, you know, you're a chump.

You could have you could have done it this way. I just don't even see what the Democrat argument, Well, the good the good faith argument is for their side. I know what the real argument is. It's about power, and it's about establishing themselves as the political party in this country, not a party among others, were among two at least, sorry Libertarians, um, but the political party. Um.

It's about power, it's about pre eminence. But the more you look at what's going on with the immigration debate right now, the more I think there should be real outrage from the American people about how much the media apparat us has covered up what's really happening here and what has happened in this country for for many years. And there has been an active campaign of disinformation from the media about the effects of immigration. What's and I

might I say immigration illegal immigration? Um, what illegal aliens due to the country in terms of economic costs, in

terms in terms of crime. I would note that there was this pushback from when Trump was talking about this during the primary, people say, oh, you know, illegals are less likely, they'd say immigrants usually, and then they play these games of what we're talking about illegals, we're talking about all immigrants, but you know, illegals are less likely to commit crime than native born Americans, which is a consistent fallback position here, which is that immigrants two Democrats

are better than Americans, meaning people that anyone who arrives in the country is just inherently, obviously better and more worthy than anyone of any race, creator color born in this country who was a citizen. Right, That's seems to be the fallback position or the their knee jerk reaction you get from Democrats on this stuff, and that alone

is troubling, annoying, and somewhat condescending. But I'm I'm hoping the Trump campaign, I'm sorry, the Trump administration comes together on this and finally takes a stand here, because if they if they don't, just you wait and see what it looks like when you have Democrats writing laws again in the legislature and a Democrat administration in the White House. It's gonna be Amnesty is gonna be top of the list. Like we're not even talking about getting rid of Obamacare

right now that that's not even getting any discussion. Do I hope that there will be something on that. I yeah, i'd say I hope. I do not expect, and I would bet against it between now in the mid terms, I would actively bet against. They're proba look in Congress doing something on Obamacare. If immigration is it, folks, Okay, maybe they'll they'll try to do additional tax cuts are great? Immigration?

Is it? Immigration? And trade? Actually, I've see I see here that the United States is now proposing This is according to CNN, take that with a grain of soft uh, proposing thirteen hundred Chinese Chinese exports that could be targeted four tariffs. Mm hmm. This is expanding quite a bit. Here's what they write. The United States plans to apply the tariffs about fifty billion dollars worth of goods to punish China for its theft of trade secrets, including software

patents and other technology. Tariff would be applied to all the products, according to the US Trade Representative, which is a wing of the White House. So White House is saying, you know what, we're going to recoup some of our losses. We're gonna get back some of what China stole because it's just wrong what's been going on here. It's just wrong. And I would note that no one disagrees that that's what China has been doing, right, or at least no

one who knows anything. You don't even hear Democrats coming out and saying, oh, no, this is all xenophobia. No, no, no. China has been stealing intellectual property for us at breakneck speed for many years now, and that just turns into economic advantage and prosperity for them. So what the administration is saying is, you know what we're gonna We're gonna start to recoup some of those losses. And even if that doesn't really work, because it depends on how this

all happens. That we're talking about very large, complex economic systems here, even if that's no good, at least we're putting China on notice. He got to stop doing this. We are paying attention and we aren't going to allow it.

And this is an act of of political will from from this from this White House and from this President, because what he's doing is is dealing with the problem that's been a long time in the making and addressing it in a way that will take a long time to bear fruit, most likely, and getting a lot of heat in the process. This is exactly what you don't see most politicians willing to do right. No one will deal with the debt and entitlements because that's a long

term problem. It's been getting put together for a long time and it's gonna take quite a while the solvent and won't be popular. Trump is swimming upstream on this issue of dealing with China, and it's theft of intellectual property and trade secrets, everything else that it's been doing, which is finally an administration that won't just bury its head in the sand and pretend that this isn't going on, and is willing to you know, see some see some short term pain in the economy here, I mean, or

at least in the markets. In the markets have been getting whiplash, the the the four oh one k you know, many hundreds of dollars going up, going down. I mean in totality. Uh, you know, not exactly the kind of thing that if you're Trump and you're hoping for the

most robust economy possible, you're gonna see. But the alternative is it just let China continue to steal our most sensitive and intellectual property, steal military secrets, industrial secrets, and do nothing and just suffer in silence, you know, talk about it sometimes, have conferences, you know, think tank conferences. You're saying, maybe we could get China stop sting for no, maybe we should do something about it, which could also

bring about some reforms with how China does business. That is possible. I'm not saying it's likely, but maybe the Chinese will lay off a little bit. Maybe we're not just wasting our breath on this. Maybe it's not worth it to them to continue to antagonize us through this continuous campaign of theft, which is what's going on. You know, if you stole information like this from a company and then use it for your own gain, you'd you'd be

in all kinds of trouble. But if a nation state does that, we've been led to believe that we should just ignore it or it's not a problem for us. False. False. So look, things are gonna heat up with China in this trade war. But I'd like someone to tell me what they think the alternative is. If it's just sit around and let China pillage us constantly, that's not acceptable. Switching gears here for a moment, before we get into the talk about Christian privilege, I want to tell you

about G four tequila. G four tequila is distilled from a unique combination of fifty harvested rain water and fifty percent spring water, and G four brings bright, clear, crisp aromas and flavors of pure agave together. Like I'm somebody who does enjoy a little bit of tequila here and there. It's my favorite, actually, of the of the adult beverages. And I have a whole bunch of bottles at G

four Tequila at home. I've got the an Jejo, I've got blanco, I've got the different aged varieties of G four. You should really check it out. I'm telling you. G four tequila is absolutely delicious. You can find them on Facebook. Just google G four Tequila and find the nearest dealer you possibly can so you can try them out. Delicious. You'll never think of tequila the same way once you try it. I've got it at home, Give it a shot.

G four Tequila, and we will be right back. Of all the pervasive stupidities, of all the incorrect ideas held by the academy and media in this country. The inability to understand that Christianity outside of the United States is very persecuted, that Christianity outside of the Western world is under siege, remains one of the ones that it's just the most frustrating because it's so clear, and yet here

we are. We have a story just out today that George Washington University, which is among the most expensive, at least it was a few years ago, among the most expensive private universities in the country. I actually lived right off g W USE or g W g W you I got. I messed that one up, but people know what I mean. I lived right off the campus. I know the area pretty well one summer when I was an overworked and underpaid intern in d C. Important life experience.

But they're hosting a Christian privilege event this week because they want to say that sevent of Americans. Uh, I have a special privilege by being Christian, because America is roughly seventy Christian and I just have to stop and and want to lose it. I mean, are they really just saying that any group in the majority in any country has special privilege and needs to check their privilege, or are they saying that to be Christian in America or in the West is to be singled out for

special treatment, because actually the opposite is true. Christians are the only group among religious groups today that can be completely and utterly uh piled on by the media, by the by the Democrats, by leftist you know, you can mock Christians, you can uh you know, humiliate their traditions or try to, you can heap scorn upon them, and people will laugh and laugh, laugh and think it's funny. It was recently uh Beijar right over on the View, which apparently is still a show. Kind of much a

shock to me. How wow, joy Bayha. I think that was pretty good actually without playing an audio sound, by just going off the memory banks. Yeah, Now, why do you love guns so much? You're a bunch of Christians, that's why. Uh, she's among the dumbest people that I know of who's paid for her opinion on television, among the dumbest. I wouldn't say she is the single dumbest, but she's definitely in a special category. And you know, I don't like to be mean. I'm just trying to

be honest and accurate. But she said something snarky about and actually about Christians and how to apologize for it because guess what, joy A lot of your audience are Christians. And while it's people will say, oh it's America. Yeah you're allowed to. You'll notice you can. You can criticize Christianity. You can make all kinds of movies mocking Christianity. And you know you had that movie Religionousts a few years ago, and uh, all you can do? You know, Christopher Hitchens,

someone who's work I've read extensively. I have, even though he's an atheist, a militant atheists, really uh knew that he was never going to have a problem writing about the Christian faith and mocking it and deriding it. And Christians weren't going to do anything. They might disagree with them, they might say that he's being nasty and unfair, but it was a different faith that would constantly threaten his life when he would write books will remain unnamed though,

because you know, maybe maybe it was the Amish. Maybe the Amish were the ones. I'm just I don't I don't want to. I don't want to cast any aspersions. But now we've got colleges teaching classes on Christian privilege. I just wonder if they because they are so concerned

with oppression in the third World. I'm wondering if colleges and the media would spend any of their time explaining to college kids that, in fact, Christianity is horrifically oppressed in much of the world, that Christianity is punishable by death in some countries, that there are major wealthy Islamic countries in particular that ben an outlaw Christianity, and that at least on the books, they'll say, oh, we don't enforce it, would execute someone as a function of Shariah,

as a function of their legal system if they were to be an apostate one who left Islam and became a Christian. No churches in Saudi Arabia, folks, No crucifix is allowed in public, No, no, nothing not allowed. No public religious Christian displays period. It's true, and some other

Muslim countries too. By the way, the place that is as a percentage of the lowest region of the world that you break it down by continent and region, the lowest as a percentage of the overall population that are Christian is the Middle East, which didn't happen because of the normal EBB and flow of people choosing one religion or the other, or migration, or it happened because of extermination, an extermination that's actually still occurring in Iraq, that's still

occurring in parts of Syria. And oppression and violence and hatred, and I think there were there was just a family of Christians was just executed on Easter in Pakistan. They were in a in a rickshaw and they were killed, four of them. That's just you know, another day in Pakistan.

Churches get grenade attacked in Pakistan. My parents told me stories about one of their parish priests in Upstate New York who tell stories about how they have to be careful in Nigeria at Catholic churches there, or just any Christian church. There's a lot of Protestant Protestants there too, um, but they have to be careful in any Christian church because of suicide bombers, because they specifically Islamic radicals will single out churches for suicide bombings, and you go down

the list. I mean, of course, Christianity is is is oppressed and and has banned in North Korea. Any authoritarian status regime that is I mean, or totality, I should say totalitary, not authoritarian. I know some mean you say, Buck, that's not accurate. Totalitarian regimes, many of them are either banned Christianity or just deeply opposed to it. And Islamic regimes are deeply opposed to it in panic and Christians are under assault all over the world. But yet our

kids are being taught that there's a special Christian privilege. Um, this is all part of efforts to just delegitimize what is an an essential part of our history, our culture, and for a lot of us in this country, our day to day. And it also comes from such a

place of ignorance to that they just don't know. I mean, I even I had a little somewhat snippy Twitter exchange with an ABC News political analyst and a while ago where I had to explain to him that Christians are Actually he was like, oh, it's so ridiculous that you're focused on Christians in Iraq. He wasn't even sayings to me. But I jump in and say, Christians are basically being extreminated in a rock You idiot. How much money does ABC News pay you to be in ignorimus? I forget

the guy's name. Actually, otherwise they call him out, but he's he's like the head political annials over there, and he's a moron. Now, I'm actually saying people are dumb on the show today, which must mean that I'm kind of a snarky mood. But I'm only saying it when it's really true. I'm only saying when it's really true. Sorry. Um, we're gonna come back. We've We've got Andrew are Arthur joining us here in just a moment. Team Um, I'll be right back with him. We're gonna talk more about

the border and laws. Stay with me. The Mexican border is very unprotected by our laws. We have horrible, horrible and very unsafe laws in the United States, and we're going to be able to do something about that, hopefully soon. Hopefully Congress will get their act together and get in and create some very powerful laws like Mexico has, and like Canada has, and like almost all countries have. We

don't of laws. We have catch and release. You catch and then you immediately release and people come back years later for a court case, except they virtually never come back. So what we are preparing for the military to secure our border between Mexico and the United States We have a meeting on it in a little while with General Madison everybody, and I think that it's something we have

to do. There you have the President talking about what the situation that the border really is right now, We've got somebody who's an expert in all things immigration immigration law, Andrew are Arthur is with us. He is a Resident Fellow in Law and policy for the Center for Immigration Studies, which is based down Washington, d C. Are great to have you back, Thank you for heavy Always good to be here. All right, So a bunch of questions that I'm really interested in what you can tell us about.

First off, the what are the weaknesses in US boardy border policy right now? Is a function of law in terms of this caravan, because I think the perception isn't This is what I've got as well, is that if this caravan is from Honduras or El Salvador or a combination, right, we don't really know, but if it's coming from Central America and they get to the border, people are gonna say, well,

I'm claiming asylum. I'm I'm fleeing a violent country where I am oppressed, and border patrol will take them in. What's the reality Art, That's exactly the reality, Buck. I mean. The fact is that uh, Congress amended the law to expedite the removal of individuals like this, individuals who are caught entering illegally, individuals who were apprehended at the ports of entry without documents, and it's called expedited removal, and the whole idea was that they would be quickly removed

from the United States. There was a caveat to the expedited removal rule, however, that if any alien apprehended claim to fear of return, that they would be referred over to an asylum officer who would make a determination of whether they had a credible fear of removal or not. Now, the standard for asylum is a well founded fear, which is less than more likely than not. But still, you know,

a fairly strangent standard credible fear is lower than that. So, uh, you know, if there's a likelihood possibility of harm or that someone love was harmed in the past, they'll pass credible fear and they will be put into regular removal proceedings in front of an immigration judge. At that point, they go from border patrol who apprehends them CBP to U s c I s the asylum officer to uh ICE detention, and they get put in front of a

Department of Justice immigration judge. So four different agencies get involved in the process up to that point. Now the immigration judge uh you know, at that point can release the alien. If the alien is apprehended within the United States, ICE can release them in any situation. And unfortunately, during the Obama administration, we saw the vast number of those

individuals be released and disappear. So they the likelihood here is, under current law, if this caravan makes it all the way to the US Mexico border, a lot of them won't only be able to enter the United States, they'll be able to stay. Well, it's going to depend on how the Trump administration responds and how the immigration judge is response. Let me let me retract that for a second. They would have under the Obama administration. Certainly regulation has

been allowed to stay. So it depends that. Now it depends and we're and we're gonna have to see the will of the president. But the president seems to indicate that the presidents indicated in the past that he was not afraid to use the tension more broadly than the Obama administration did. And quite frankly, it wouldn't surprise me if we don't see the vast majority of these individuals detained until such time as an immigration judge can hear

their asylum claim and until they take an appeal. So generally it takes about anywhere between a month to about two months for an immigration judge to hear an asylum claim, and then the appeal itself could take another two two to four months, so those individuals could be in detention for a lengthy period of time. Can Congress just why won't Congress try to change this law? Is it just a function of yeah, they don't have a supermajority and

the Senate will will filibuster. It seems like having h laws in place that allow for a mass of foreigners to show up at US borders and just say that they're claiming asylum is an invitation to the very abuses that we've seen. Absolutely, and Congress needs to tighten up the credible fear standard. Uh and frankly, UH, DHS needs to tighten up the standards that it's asylum officers used when they find credible fear. Let me give you an amazing statistic buck that of all credible fear cases that

are adjudicated are found to have credible fear. So of those people at least that's been true in the past, have been found to have incredible fear and referred over to an immigration judge, so that expedited removal process doesn't work in their case. It's being Andrew are Arthur, who is a resident fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies in d c H. Talk to me about the president's

UH sending military to secure the border. Well, you know, there the president has a variety of different options as it relates to that UM. With respect to UH the support that the military would give it the border, they would probably play primarily a secondary role. They would play a logistical role with respect to border enforcement, as you know. But just to inform your listeners, we have a sophisticated ray array of devices along the border, including aerostats, which

are basically large blimps that are tethered to the ground. UH. They're all weather and can see people uh thermal imaging along the border. We have you know, centers along the border to identify where people are, as well as cameras and those the vices can be monitored by the National Guard. We've certainly seen that happen in the past or the military, and that would free up border patrol agents to actually make apprehensions along the border. So what about Trump possibly

using military funds. I know what we're doing kind of around the world here an immigration, but since I've got you and everyone's listening, I wanted to make sure we cover a lot of ground. Uh. Speaking of covering grounds, it's quite a transition the wall. The President has said that he is going to consider using military funds for the purposes of constructing a wall beyond what was in

the omnibus. Can he do this? Well? It's interesting because people forget the fact that that was actually how the wall began. In two thousand and six, the US Army Corps of Engineers, through one of its offices, actually did most of the logistical planning for the wall that was completed during that period of time, and Corp of Engineers and National Guard unit's actually used the construction of the

wall as part of their training regiment. Keep in mind that you know, when you're training to be an engineer, you need to actually build something um and this was something that could be built quite frankly. Uh, you know, a wall has a house has four walls, a wall only has one. But it's the same basic concept. Uh that continued until about two thousand and eight. Now CBP actually paid for the supplies, but D O D paid for the labor. So the president can do this then,

I mean, you know, I just I hear both. I hear people saying he absolutely cannot, he absolutely can. Where do you come down on this? Well, the restrictions in the budget on the president's ability to do this. But you know the fact is that if you view it as a training exercise and you just happen to be building a wall in a certain place, that doesn't really Uh, that wouldn't appear to train to me to transgress the

restrictions on the president. Another important thing to keep in my bucket is we're not just talking about, you know, a wall everywhere, because, as you and I both know, the Rio Grand is a significant portion of the border. Levies are a core function of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. We we can remember that from back in Hurricane to Trina, when all the fingers were being pointed and levies actually function as a wall in certain places they provide a wall along a river bed for

flood control. And quite frankly, it would serve a dual purpose in this particular instance, if one were imaginative enough about drafting the proposal kind of like a moat, kind of like a boat at times negative wad exactly the opposite, but the same idea. It isn't it isn't is it? I mean, we we do what we don't. Um. But one more thing, Andrew or are I want to ask you? Um?

If the President could focus on one thing right now for immigration purposes, if there was one thing that he could really put the entire efforts of the White House towards, what should that be? That one thing? With the mandatory e verify. If the fact is that the vast majority of people buck who are coming to the United States are coming here to work, uh, to you know, make money for themselves, make money for their families, uh send

back home. And if you had mandatory verify, which is possible where we could know where every employer in the United States could verify in real time the employment eligibility of new every new employee, it would turn off the job's magnet. And the fact is most of the immigration problems that we see would go away almost overnight. Andrew are Arthur, everybody at the Center for Immigration Studies c i S dot org for all of their latest research

and analysis. Are always appreciate you joining us man. Thank you very much. Pleasure is mine. Thank you again. Today we're gonna roll into a break here we come back. I've got some updates for you on the Mueller probe. Um and it's it's latest victim or if you are a hateful never Trump or you're just like, oh, it's justice, but I don't think so. I don't think so. I'm

gonna give you that and more coming right up. It should have been the call that was made when Muller was appointed that we should never have seen the appointment of a special Council as the first step. First that should have been done within the Justice Department, Investigator general, inspector general, maybe Office of Professional Responsibility, maybe assigned an existing career person to do it. Then let's see is there evidence of criminal conduct. We have to make sure

we never confuse political sins with federal crimes. And I think this is going about it the right way, in a calibrated step by step way I think it would have been. Look, the answer to having one bad appointment of a special Council is not to make a second bad appointment of the special Council. I'm against the criminalization of political differences, whether it's Republicans trying to criminalize Democrats or Democrats trying to criminalize Republican I got I gotta

agree with Professor Dirsh. There the Dirsh getting done. Um, there never should have been a special counsel. And I have been consistent on this one all along, my friends, they're absolutely, never, ever, ever should have been a special counsel. It was a doomed well, I shouldn't say doom because it's not about actually justice. It says it was it was doomed to be unjust. But the purpose of it is injustice, so it all makes sense. Actually, the purpose

of the Special Council is political. It is the criminalization of politics. And I think that the machine, the swamp, saw this all as an opportunity for well, the system to strike back, and they had some people in the Trump administration that we're not wise to this one. You know,

they didn't see this one coming. So I agree with yours, But you know, you've got some updates here on on the on the Mueller probe, which I just want I like to start some of our Mueller Probe segments now with there never should have been a Muller probe, right, it's not something that should have happened. It is something that should never have gotten to this point in the

first place. But now we've got someone who's going to prison Dutch Harry Potter and if you've seen this guy, but that's kind of right, you know, I'm talking about this Dutch lawyer is technically not Harry Potter. He has some name, um that is Dutch. What's this guy's name. I'm forget what his name is. Alex Vanders Vaughan got it fun to say, not to be confused with. You're on Van der Slut. Remember him, Natalie Holloway guy, remember

that that whole thing. And I think he got sent to prison for a long time for a different I did. He's the other. He's a different Dutchman who got himself in a lot of trouble. This guy didn't do anything I was gonna say particularly bad. This guy didn't really do anything bad. This guy, Vanders want let's just getting this is rough. This is some rough stuff here. He's going to jail for thirty days. This is our CNN, right,

said a Dutch lawyer. I was gonna try to do a little Dutch accent, But my Dutch accent is just a bad version of my German accent. My German accents just a bad version of my Russian accent. A Dutch lawyer tied to former Trump deputy campaign chairman Rick Gates became the first person to be sentenced in Mueller's investigation, a federal judge sending him on Tuesday to spend thirty days in prison and pay a twenty thousand dollar fine

after he admitted to lying to investigators. Vanders. Jan Vanders, one who worked with Gates and former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort while he practiced law at Scanting, very very famous international law firm, admitted to lying and failing to turn over emails to Mueller's team in February. So you gotta think first of all that this guy is a lawyer himself. Maybe that's why they came down a little hard on him, because why about he didn't do anything illegal?

Why lie about this? He didn't do anything wrong until he lies? Now he's going to prison for thirty days. Now, look, I'm assuming that the prison he goes to for thirty days is probably not the worst. But but I can tell you I know people who have someone actually just recently told me the story of being and being held being detained just for twenty four hours in New York City, and it's traumatizing. So you you do not want to

people like, oh, it's only thirty days. I don't think this lawyer, who probably walks around wearing uh three thousand dollar custom suits, I don't think he's particularly accustomed just spending time in any kind of a federal lock up. So this this is gonna be rough. Plus he's reputations destroyed, and for what everyone it's nothing? Do we really think? I mean, I would love to have someone from the

anti Trump media have the discussion with me. It will never do because they'll they'll get buck slapped and they know it. But I would love to have someonething anti Trump media just just try to take the position that it wouldn't have been easy to get Hillary and Huma and Cheryl Mills and the whole Hillary email squad for some version of lying under oath of the course of

that investigation if they had wanted to. This is where you see the difference between how democrats get treated by the system and how people tied to I don't know vendors want what is and he probably is like Dutch Reform Party or something. I don't know what is, you know,

political affiliation is. It's just in Holland. I'm guessing it's a choice between a political party that's supportive of of a huge welfare state and high taxes, and one that's supportive of an even huger welfare state and high taxes, which, by the way, is what we're heading for in America too. So I don't think I'm just poking fun without understanding that situation. But I feel like, at what point do we realize this whole thing is a farce. They're going

after Vanderswan here for a process crime. Nothing bad happened. He now has a felony on his record, probably has to he probably loses his h Yeah, he loses his law license with this one. Um, And you know, the guy's got a wife and kids. You know, there's real consequences here. You know, the little hyenas over at MSNBC and CNN. You know, I'm like, hey, yeah, another yeah, another one bites the down. They get all excited about this.

This isn't teaching Trump a lesson, This isn't getting even with the Trumpsters and magun all the rest of It's just ruining some dude's life for nothing. But it's important for you to remember that because Democrats don't care if if they if they can tie it to Trump, great, even if not sends a warning to the others puts them unnoticed. This whole thing, the whole Mouler probes a sham. The deep state strikes back. Our three coming up team, stay with me in the White House. We have perhaps

the worst and most stay interest president. This president is the worst that I've ever seen, the worst president in the history. I would even argue that he is the worst. After one year, Donald Trump is the worst in the history of the American presidency. Welcome to our three of the buck sex and show everybody, uh so that there you had just just a little little taste, just some bit of what you could expect from the overall media sense of where we are a year and change into

the Trump administration. They're not saying that the president is not so great. They're not saying that he has failed to make America great again. They're saying he is literally the worst president ever, the worst president ever. And when you sit here and you look around, you gotta think yourself a whole lot of second, how can the media say the worst president? And remember, I'm not They're not saying worse than Obama, They're not saying the worst one

they can remember. They're saying the worst ever. Know, there was a you go back far enough, their presidents who were like segregationists, and presidents who were on the wrong side of the slavery issue, and you know, you get into some of the stuff you think the worst ever and they wonder why we have a hard time believing them and listening to them. They wonder, why is it

that we don't trust them? Um, And it's because if we pay attention to what it is that there actually saying over time, you know, if you try to hold them to account for what their analysis, because remember, we're just we're just reported, we're just reporters. If you look at what they've said in the past, you have to take a step back and say to herself, wait, hold on a minute, weren't we told by and I mean by mainstream outlets. Um, weren't we told that fascism was

coming to America a little over a year ago? And and almost as bad as Hitler was what people were saying, right Trump, Trump was creeping fascism in America. Here we are one year into it, and you know what we've seen time and again a president who, for better or worse, and I obviously think for worse, but a president who hasn't been able to enact some of his agenda because of a federal judge somewhere. A president who hasn't been able to enact an important part of his agenda because well,

maybe the Congress didn't want to go along. Notice how he doesn't do what Obama did, which we got a pun on the phone when there's the pun on the phone, and he just designs that he's going to via executive order, pushed for policy that he couldn't get through via Congress, and people say, oh buck, what about the wall in the military. We'll see if that actually happens. And by the way, if he uses his authorities commander in chief, I think that's legitimate. He's not just saying I'm doing

this because I can do it. He's saying on the commander in chief, it's a national security threat. We're gonna build a wall using our defense fonds. Okay, so, but you have to take stock of this moment in time when all that the media has been telling you about Trump and the administration has time and again been at a minimum proven to be hyperbolic and in many ways just completely and utterly false lies. You could say that, yes, in fact, it was a case of fake news. It

has been again and again. Oh one more thing before I get into I just want to follow up a little bit on the on the in a sense, the unintentional hilarity of all these massive media conglomerates that have legacy advance atage over their competitors complaining about Shinclair Oh Chinclair Tribune merger gives them the whim wassh. We're gonna get there in just a second. But first, remember the alt Right? Remember the all Right. Wasn't that a thing

at one point? Oh my gosh, the al Right runs, the runs the wine house, the remember the guys that the losers with the tiki torches and Charlotte's all there, Nazism is coming back to America. Well, what happened to the all right. I thought they all right, was about to control therry. Now they all right. You see occasionally these little news stories about how they're like all thirty of them are squabbling with each other, and that a lot of it. Oh, they didn't like to tell you

about this. A lot of the alt right propaganda that was on the Internet was being magnified by bots and trolls, which I would know means that it wasn't actual people that were necessarily sharing or promoting some of those stories. Right, some of them were, But I'm saying that there's there was a magnific cation effect by bots, by trolls, And if you look at some of the Russian propaganda efforts in our social media, it was along the lines of

the ault right. But are we really supposed to be worried if if Russians are tweeting out alts right memes during during an election. I think the answer is no, We're not worried about some Russian hackers convincing the American public that fascism is in fact a better political system. But we were warned so much. And I said this on election day. Uh, back in the day, I was saying, you know this alt right thing has become such a construct of the left. I mean, this is classic to

what they do. And here we are a year in and after they've been warning, goes, oh they all right and more it's so terrible. I don't know. Have you have you seen a lot of neo nazi marches happen around the country. The answer is no. Have you seen

a rise in fascistic policy from the Trump administration? The answer is no. But you know, when I asked that question, and we've been talking a lot about immigration throughout the course of the show today, when I ask you that question, there are a lot of Democrats who would point to enforcing immigration laws on our federal books as as kind of like fascism. It's kind of like fascism. They would say that it has, you know, a hint of the racist,

fascistic tendency in it. And you're like, well, you'll notice that Democrats aren't willing to openly say they're in favor of amnesty. Democrats pretend that that we should have rule of law when it comes to immigrations. Are are they on this creeping fascism too? I just don't want us to completely When when you got Trump at fifty percent approval, higher than Obama at this point in his presidency. And

let me keep it. Keep in mind, that's after Obama, with all the amazing story and hope and charings and all that stuff. I had spent a trillion dollars of stimulus, right. I know that some of that spending still had to be rolled out, but you know he had already gone approval of spent a trillion dollars on all of his favorite, you know, pet projects of all kinds of the Democrat Party. And you look at his his time in office versus Trump, and you got polls this week so showing Trump more popular.

In the media still says he's the worst president ever. What I just want to ask them, I want to enforce some standards of sanity here in America in the media. In what way is he the worst president ever? Other than his personal style and habits, which sure they could say that's the but no person of any real thought processes cares all that much about that. Does it really affect you if the president is a little gruff, for a little rough around the edges with his language? Answers No,

of course not so. And what do I see the worst pread of the economy is doing great. Unemployments super low, Black unemployments lowest has been in decades. Hispanic unemployment so lowest it's been in decades, passing tax cuts and quite honest, doing a very kind of mainstream geop playbooks so far with with a little bit of you know, populist rhetoric. And but you know, all the things that Trump has actually done so far are other than taking on the media,

which I would know. That's why they hate him so much. That's why he is I mean, I'm I can answer my own question, why is he the worst president ever? Because he has held the mira up to the media and shown that they are in fact feckless little cowards overwhelmingly, not all of them. There are great people the media too, but overwhelmingly the mainstream media is full of fectless people with no integrity and a complete lack of spine. So

they're saying he's the worst there. I just want to know and somehow that the alt right has basically disappeared, whereas a year ago there are poised to take over the country or it was just being hyped in exaggerated by the media because it was a way of bashing Trump. You can pick which one of those is more likely to be true. Well, I'll let you come to your own conclusion about that one. Um. But then, uh, back to where the media is on all this stuff. Uh,

Mika Brazinski over at Morning Joe. She really it's really having a tisk tisc moment when it comes to Sinclair and what's going on over there. Um, here's dangerous. You know, edges here are that he's trying to undermine the media, trying to make up his own facts. And it could be that while unemployment and the economy worsens, he could have undermined the messaging so much that he can actually control exactly what people think. And that is the That is our job. That is their job to tell people

what they what they think. That's their job. You see, I'm not just coming up with this because I do insightful analysis here in the Freedom Hunt. The reason he's the worst president ever is because he's taken on the media. That's why they say it. There is otherwise, no, there's no objective standard for that statement unless it's really just about about journalists who are whining about their lack of power,

their lack of prestige under this administration. That's it. So it really tells you a lot about the profression profession of journalism at this point in America, doesn't it. It really is illuminating when you hear that Trump sure enough is hated by the media, not because of what he does as president, because of how he makes the media field, makes them shad, makes them sad on the inside. We got more Mika on Sinclair, I'm gonna want to hear this.

Those are the journalists who are the highest paid in the market. I noticed a lot of men who are, uh, maybe in their forties, fifties, and sixties. Those are the highest paid journalists in the market by far, especially compared to the women sitting next to them. I can tell you that for sure. And they should know better, All of them should know better. This is a really embarrassing moment for journalism at this point. We can't afford to um be anything less than perfect. We have to try

and strive for perfection and fairness every day. And this was a massive feeling. Is it interesting that she's whining about the disparity between male and female anchors and other networks without knowing any of their circumstances and negotiations or anything else. I think she makes half as much as b d I Joe. I think she makes like he makes five million and she makes two points something. So what why? Why is that okay? At MSNBC, she's calling it out and she says that these local networks that

are own by Sainclair, why is Mika? You know, this is just what you see, folks. There's no objective standards, there's no integrity. It's just people in the media. They are often the worst. They're like actors, except they think that everything they say is based in fact and their contents. They're they're creating a narrative for all of us to

live in. But just start to think more and more of these news readers and and this, this so called mainstream media as a bunch of whiney, self indulgent actors, and everything else will make sense. We'll be right back, Hey, Tim, I wanted to switch gears for a second here and bring in our friend Tyler Merritt, who is the CEO of nine Line Apparel. He is here in studio in New York City making a rare big Apple appearance. Mr Merritt, great to have you here. Hey, thank you so much

for having me again. As you folks all know, nine Line is one of our wonderful sponsors here on the Buck Sexton Show. But not only are they all about America freedom and commerce because we are capitalists here, but also exactly still gotta make a buck, but you guys also do a lot of really good work for the community.

Tell me about the Nine Line Foundation Veterans Village. So our initial initiatives were to help the severely winded veteran community, those who've lost multiple limbs and how to get back to some sense of normalcy. UH, nine apparel. We we have a lot of veterans that work for us, and it's really year indeed to our heart to give back to the community we once served. Nineline Foundation really does focus on the individual efforts to get back to some

sense of normalcy. And while we used to and still do work with severely wounded physically, we're doing a lot more with the emotional mental health care and rehabilitation that's out there, and specifically looking at veterans homelessness. UH. For the last several years, the the the number of veterans UH taking to the streets due to drug and alcohol issues has climbed, and we've seen a increase in the number of veteran suicide and these things are linked together.

So we want to come up with a solution and not just rhetoric of how might we be able to do this. Government is not going to fix it. UH. A lot of philanthropic organizations like the Nineline Foundation, like the Gary Conese Foundation, like Tunnels for Towers, these organizations can come together and really do a lot of good for our vetching community. What are some of the actions

that you take as part of Ninline Foundation? What are some of the programs will give us some of the specifics so folks who might want to get involved and understand what they'd be contributing to. Absolutely, so we actually have no overhead. UH. We we do focus on the individual at a time, so we have no paid employees, So donation dollars go directly to uh the individuals in need and and we focused our efforts on an individual at a time because we wanted to make a big

impact on on this community. And this is considered a hand up, not necessarily a hand out. A lot of these guys, especially in the special operations community, they're not asking for help, but they really needed, uh, you know, going to war and coming back with two fingers when you left with all twenty digits. It's a big change. And there's a lot that these guys have to bring to the table, you know, just their share will to continue to be optimistic and motivate other individuals who are

severely wounded. It's incredible. It really does put you into perspective of life. When you visit your buddies at Walter Reads and and all they want to know about is tell me about prosthetics. Don't tell me about what I can't do, tell me what I can do. So providing them a wheelchair accessible home like the one we just completed earlier this month with Serinic Morante, it allows them that sense of freedom where they can feel, uh, that

new sense of normalcy return into their lives. We're speaking to Tyler Merritty's CEO of nine Line Apparel. They are a sponsor here of the show. They also do some fantastic philanthropic work, specifically in the area of helping our veterans, which we're discussing now. Can you give us a sense, Tyler, of some of the initiatives that you're either partnerships to help veterans, UH that are coming up or things are

events you're planning. Just give folks a sense of of where some of these efforts are are going to be in the months ahead. Yeah, So anyone is in the New York City area, UM, there's an event on Armed Forces Day at mom at the airport where we're gonna be flying. I believe it's May sixteenth, calendar form A right, fair enough, but it is our Enforces Day weekend. And there's two events we have going on. One we've we've done year after year. There's our fifth run. UH. It's

a five K ten k in Savannah, Georgia. UH. It's last year. We raised about seventy five dollars for our foundation. It was a heck of a good time. If anyone's in the Savannah, Georgia area, go to Nineline Foundation dot org and you can learn all about it. But it's a it's a night run. They'll be beers, they'll be bands, they'll be good festivities. UH, and it's all for a

good cause. And then this local area in New York City same day, UM partner with an organization that is flying in veterans from around the country to just congregate and meet and mom at the airport. So people with private aircraft, helicopters, airplanes are are grabbing a veteran and they're they're taking them uh to meet in a central location. The whole idea, it's very similar to the premise of

our apparel company. How do you close the gap between those who serve and those who don't, you know, the fire fighters, the police officers, military members and their civilian counterparts, Because there's a big disconnect that civil military divide. It's it's prevalent in the United States still, and the only

way to get over this disconnect is have conversation. And that is what nine Line Apparel in general does, is it opens up conversations for those who have never served and for those who serve to kind of explain, you know, why they joined and what it means to give back to your community, and just for everybody listening if they want to see more of what you're doing on the foundation side, what's the website, what's the social media call outs? What what should we tell them to go to? Absolutely

so nine line apparel dot com. We do definitely list all of these initiatives as well, but Nineline Foundation dot org is where all the philanthropic activities are centralized. Nine Line Foundation dot Org. Fantastic, everyone, go check it out. I know veterans issues are absolutely crucial to folks listening to this show, and you have a really great opportunity to do something good, to help out, to help our veterans,

and also to have some fun in the process. If you can make your way down for this ten K five k in Savannah and and some of the other events that will be up there to do. Check it out. Tyler Merritt, CEO of nine Line Apparel Company, Great to have you, my friend. Thanks for visiting in New York. We like seeing you up north. Hey, thank you very much. I'm gonna have to go ahead back that seven other now, alrighty today we're gonna roll into a quick break. We'll

be right back. Many of you know, I'm not somebody who gets all that excited about Poles. You guys are down and it makes sense that most of them, all of them says who polls. I gotta admit it says who Poles says? Oh, it's one of my favorite. That was Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen. One of my favorite exchanges to the entire election. Cam Paying says who and by the way, he was right because the polls were wrong.

But nonetheless it's just kind of a fun one. I don't get that excited about poles sometimes, though they do give you a snapshot of something that's worth discussion that doesn't have to do with an election. And I saw this on Pew Research today of American adults haven't read a book in a whole or in part in the last year in any form. Now, I just want to say that that doesn't mean that those people necessarily aren't reading.

Most of us are reading all the time. But I would put out there and this is a reminder for me as well. Even if you're someone who reads a lot of newspapers and it's just reading in your day to day in life, books are a special category. It really is worth it to spend some of your time working through an actual book. I forced myself to do this. I have several books that I keep on my bedside table so that way I can change it up depending

on what I feel like. And also I have a kindle that I'm pretty obsessed with because it allows me to highlight as well as do some other things, I can look up words, so for example, there will be no mixing up of archaic and anarchic. And I'm also in the habit now, and I wish I had started it years ago. Of forcing myself is too strong, But making a point of reading books that you know, we

all know what the plot line is. We all have heard of them, we've all read them in the or we've all been told about them in the past but never actually got a signed. So, for example, right now, I'm reading Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, which some people think is one of the great novels of all time. It's certainly is a groundbreaking work in the genre of what would become science fiction. Although I gotta tell you I'm much more a Bram Stoker's Dracula guy. I'm just not as

excited about Frankenstein. Shelley's writing is a little more dense. It's a little harder for the modern I to get through. I know people will say the language is beautiful in it. Dracula almost reads like a screenplay. It holds up so very well. And I only read Dracula last year. So I'm going back and reading books that we all know and I've heard of but haven't necessarily read. So that's something that I'm I'm allowing myself to do, giving myself the space to do it. And I have to say

it's great. I'm somebody who went years without reading anything that was outside of the nonfiction realm. I just didn't. I had this idea in my head, I don't have time for novels. I gotta say now, I make time for novels, not exclusively, but I will at least have one piece of fiction that I'm writing at any given sorry reading at any given time. And I even went through a period when I was in the government where I have to tell you, I feel like I just

stopped reading books. Now I didn't stop reading, and I'm sure a lot of you feel the same way. I was reading eight hours a day for my job. I mean, that was my primary job in the government. Was just a constantly read But the same way that I have an affinity that I've talked to you all before on this show about where I like actual physical books and

to have them and to be around them. And there's now research that shows that just having books in the home and being around books has positive effects makes you want to read more makes you think about what's in the books more. Well. This is a constant effort on my part to try and honestly expand my horizons and

expand my my reading list. I think one thing I will do this week is post online the last five or six books that I've read on my kindle, because that's kind of a fun way I think of sharing. So I'll do that on Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton. I think that's a fun way to share with all of you what what I'm up to you in the realm of reading. But I say this, you know, I saw this pupole, and I don't say, oh, every needs to read books in any kind of a self gratulatory tone.

I have to remind myself. I get so caught up in my other work and and particularly reading editorials and news wire and all the stuff that comes in the news cycle that I don't really allow myself the time. And now I've got into a pretty solid habit of I fall asleep reading every night. Now. Some people say it's bad for your eyes, and some people will say that it's not necessarily the most conducive for romance. But I find that it's a good way to relax my mind.

And at night I read things that aren't generally speaking, aren't tied into what I'm doing for work. I just read things to read them before I go to sleep. I really like it, and I just would say that I think it's one of the most important skills in life. And for those of you who have children who you still have the ability to h give suggestions to or try to guide, that the habit of reading is up there with being on time and person a little cleanliness,

you know, personal hygiene. Reading is really a critical life skill. And that there of us adults who haven't read a book in the last year. Look, I know a lot of them are already reading for other things they do. Um, a lot of them are just super busy with life. I understand it. But the same way that we gotta make time for certain things, I think each and every one of us needs to make time for books. Um, not a lot. Not. And they don't have to be dense.

You don't have to sit around and read the you know, the Brothers Karamazov or A Day in the Life of Ivan Denizovitch or something you know. It doesn't have to be the Gulag Archipelago. Notice I'm really going after the Russian authors here. Uh, you can just read whatever you feel like reading. But a book is different than a

magazine article. A book is different than what you're gonna pick up in a newspaper, and just the mindset, the narrative, and I think the effect that it has on your on your thinking and the way that your brain is processing. It's just it is different. So that was what I was. That was what the Pew article or the Pew pole made me think about today. And I wish I like Frankenstein more than I do. I can tell you all go read if you've never done it before, read Bram

Stoker's Dracula. But Frankenstein, it's one of these books where I'm kind of reading it to say that I've read it, you know what I mean, So I could say I've been there not. Buck is not impressed. That's my review. All We got a roll call coming up, team, so stay with me. All right, We've got a lot of great messages in the Freedom Hut today, so let's get to it. Hey, team Buck, it's time for roll call. Like I said, lots of great messages to get to and so here we go Facebook dot com slash Buck

Sexton if you have thoughts to share. And if it sounds like I am stalling right now, I am because my computers frozen. So there is that. But I'm about to get into it live radio. You gotta the show. The show must go on just because just because. Okay, there we go, good to go. Um, let's get into it. First. Up here we have Mike, who writes, Buck the Memphis Bell was is a B sevent teen bomber. Currently it's being restored and we'll be on display this summer. Love

the show and your commentary on Fox News. Keep it up Shields high Mark, Well Mark, thank you very much. Kind of you to say. And I just realized that I read the wrong name there, Mike, Thank you very much. Gosh Buck, get it's together. Sorry about that, Mike. It's okay. The people call me Bob all the time. I go into Starblarck a Starbucks, and the mois b U C K. Buck and then sure enough Bob, Bob. My name is not Bob. Not there's anything wrong with Bob. It's nice name.

Next up we get Taylor, who writes the following, uh, Buck, your back backup beeper noise is the same voice for Hillary, and they're both equally wretched. By the way, is that Butter dripping off this photo of a steak? You might ask, damn right, it is? It's great on Sam, And also why not Butter? Is I think good on almost anything? So Taylor, you have a point there, My friend appreciate it. Uh. Next up is Cheryl, she writes. Sacramento police chief releases

video of shooting within days for transparency. Immediately the protests started, and they stopped traffic on the freeway as well as jumping on cars in downtown Sacramento. They've interrupted NBA Kings games at least twice, disrupted public hearings regarding community grievances and recommendations. They say they will not stop until the police responsible for the shooting are convicted. Uh. This is in response to this Stefen Clark shooting. I would know.

I watched the video and and here's what I here's what I can say in the Stefen Clark shooting. It's dark. You've got law enforcements saying let me see your hands. You've got a guy who's running around in backyards and and clearly trying to evade police. He was on his grandmother's property when he was shot though, so he wasn't actually trespassing at the time he was shot. And it looks like one of these terrible accidents where law enforcement

believed he was a threat. Under the circumstances. It was dark out, it's tough to see. And if they feel like he didn't show his hands, they pulled and they drew down, they fired him. Now. I know this is a tough area though, because I can understand for people who are more skeptical than I am of law enforcement. They say, so all a cop has to do is yell, you know, put up your hands, and then shoot you. And even if you've shown no threat and don't have

a weapon, that's fine. You know, this is where if the officer believes that he or she faces you know, is in is in danger, essentially is in mortal or severe physical danger, they can use lethal force. Uh. In the video, they yell gun, gun, gun, and start shooting. So you know, the assumption is that they saw a gun, right. I don't think that these officers. I'd be willing to bet quite a lot that these officers didn't go to work that day thinking, well, let me just shoot somebody.

It's a it's a terrible thing, um, but it's it's a it's a tough case. It's a tough case. I don't think the law enforcement officers meant meant to do anything wrong, and I think by the book in terms of the procedures, I don't think they'll be found have done anything wrong. But I also understand the sensitivities here. A young man was killed who wasn't actually hurting anyone and didn't didn't actually was a threat. There may have been the perception of a threat, but didn't pose a

threat to anyone. So it's it's a very sad circumstance. Now it's to all the protests. There's a lot of people who are I think, upset about it. I think there's also a lot of people who view this as an opportunity to push a political agenda, which would not be surprising given what we have seen in the days and weeks following the Parkland school shooting. Ah. So, Cheryl, thank you very much for your note. Next up we have Lauren, She writes, Last man Standing is the best.

Just listen to yesterday's show and wanted to second the opinion ps I think you referenced Crazy Stupid Love the other day with the Steve Jobs New Balance shoes thing, and I was dying laughing, Lauren, that is true. That is true. I was in fact referencing, uh, that line from Crazy Stupid Love where the guy who plays Gosh,

he's from the office. I'm blanking on his name right now, very well known actor h Correll, Steve Carrell is playing the kind of you know, divorced dad or separated dad, and he wears the new Balanced sneakers with the suit that that was a reference to that, So Lauren got me. See, Lauren didn't just it's not an action movie quote. That's

just a movie quote. That's the next level. But I think we're gonna open it up by the way to I feel like we've kind of plumbed the depths of action movie quotes for the foreseeable and so we may switch it up and go into comedy movie quote Friday or just you know, general movie quote Friday, I got big Plans, Team, I Got big plants. Uh, next up, Robin, She writes, It was Oh, Robin was out at Whoa Whoa. She wrote the following. This was in Fort Wayne, Indiana

last weekend. It was so gracious of you to give us your time. Today, we are praying for you to have safe travels and a glorious, blessed easter. I will work on developing d s M criteria for Trump delusion disorder. May I suggest you call it Trump defiance disorder, similar

to opposition all defies disorder. So Robin is a trained psyche ecologist, and I told her when I met her at the Woe Who event that I wanted to do more research into the real underlying science of Trump Trump delusion disorder or Trump arrangement syndrome, because I think it's a real thing. I think it's actually a form of mental illness. Now, I don't think that it's just a way of being snarky about your political you know, opponents. But Robin, thank you so much, lovely to meet you

and your family. Uh and God bless all Right. We have Eric who writes is this where we send stuff for roll Call? I love your show, great voice, obviously it is Eric. Amazing analysis and spot on Hillary impressions. They get me every time. I routinely share links to your podcast with my five thousand Facebook contacts, hoping to get more people addicted. The only thing you've ever been incorrect about is J. J. Abrams, who is by no means overrated. Anyway, you completely rock and we very much

appreciate the amazing job you're doing. Your listeners get more bang for the buck as it were, Shields High. Eric. Well, Eric, first of all, thank you so much for a very kind note. And look, it's cool that you're wrong about J. J. Abrams, but I'm so glad that we agree on everything else. You know, we kind of be boring friends if we thought the same about everything, right, So it's good that we have a little bit of a of a difference here, So thank you very much for that. And next up

is what hold on a second? Sorry once again? Oh here we go. Um, we have Michael who's writing in to tell me what was this? Um? Oh no, a lot of things, Michael. I gotta I gotta actually read through this before I can give you a real answer. Uh. Next Larry here right, say Buck, I've been traveling for the last few weeks and I missed most of the podcast. Can you please give me a rundown of your shows for the past three weeks? Uh? Larry and Rhode Island. Um, Larry.

They were amazing shows with tremendous depth of knowledge. They were heartfelt. You'll laugh, you'll cry, you'll you know, download the podcast you'll see So go check it out. Jeremy. You know one more here for Jeremy. Listen to the podcast from last night. We need more John Oliver impressions along with Hillary and Commy Bear, maybe all three having a drink together at a bar Shields High. Jeremy, I'm

glad you're John Oliver. You know, it's like you can just make jokes like this all the time, and Americans who think they're sophisticated will laugh at it because it's so funny, because he sounds so funny. Oh isn't that right. Uh, He's actually not funny. So there's that. I'm gonna close it up here, Team Jeremy, thank you for the message. I gotta shut down the freedom Hunt for the Night will be act tomorrow. Until then, She's high