Deep State Dead Enders

that he was a Russian asset. Nonsense. We'll break down the latest on that and everything else on a freestyle Friday buck Sexton Remission, decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, America, You're a great American again. This is the buck Sexton Show activity former CIA analysts. I can speak for three hours without a phone call. Try doing that sometime. It is no. You do have the right to fight back, and I'm fighting back.

Not for me, I'm fighting back for the people of this kind. No collusion, There was no collusion, no collusion, no collusion. There is absolutely no collusion. There's no collusion. The fact is, there is no collusion, no collusion. There's no collusion. This is a investigation where many many millions of dollars as would explained, and there's no collusion. This is a a win for this president who for now two years has essentially been screaming there was no Russian collusion.

He is backed up by Muller. Maybe every time he said no collusion, but more than two hundred and thirty one time so far. Maybe every time he said no collusion he was telling the truth. This was an illegal takedown that failed, and hopefully somebody's gonna look at the other side. Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. You need to hear that, folks, you need to hear your president's

voice on this again. We need to all remind each other that the Democrats failed in their soft coup against this president, and that they're now lying about how, oh they were right all along. Sure they couldn't prove Russia collusion, but look at the obstruction case that has been created now by Muller and his team of angry Democrats. Look at all the behind the scenes shenanigans going on to

the Trump administration. If you were facing the destruction of your presidency, the ruination of your reputation, and possible imprisonment for if not you, your immediate family members, because Democrats are a bunch of cry babies who can't accept that they lost the last election. I think you would lash out too. I think you would say, this is nonsense. I'm the leader of the free world and the commander

in chief. I'm gonna let some little piddly bureaucrat try to destroy me because he wanted Hillary and all of the Democrats around her to be in charge. I don't think. So how do we stop this? What can we do? I've got constitutional authority to fire. This is an employee of the presidents we're talking about here. But no, no, Now they say, oh, well, it wasn't really ever about a plot between Trump and the Russians to throw the election. It was about all the other stuff. Front page of

the Washington Post today. I just told the whole tale of left wing propaganda for you right now. The headline is paranoialize and fear Trump's presidency laid bare in report. You know what they don't have on here that the stories that were run night after night for two years, on six hundred days of stories dominated by this one theme that the president is illegitimate, that he stole, that he actively worked with the Russians to steal what was

rightfully Queen Hilary's. And it was only a matter of time before the truth came out, and people like me and you who did not believe this, we were rubes, buffoons. We just weren't very sophisticated, you see. Oh, but it turns out we were right. So we're the smart people in this equation, aren't we. But the Democrats now moved past this and pretend like that was never the story

that was. It was always about obstruction, you see. It was always about getting a window into how the president deals with his staff behind the scenes, and how he's told people to lie. How many tears am I really supposed to shed about the president trying to deal with a media that is so dishonest, that does pedal fake news all the time, that is trying to destroy his presidence, he destroy his family if they can, and so he

gets a little creative with the truth sometimes. Yeah. Do I think that President Trump tells some FIBs here and there? Of course, of course he does. Does every politician tell FIBs here and there? Yes? Does President Trump tell lies about things that affect your life and mine in profound ways? That's a different question, isn't it. Remember Barack Obama, Barack Obama said that you'd be able to keep your plan. That was a lie, and it was one that he knew,

he knew was untrue at the time. That's a lie. That's not an exaggeration, that's not an embellishment. That's a lie. Obama's a liar, and Obama lied about something that a lot of you listening to this show. It hurt you, it affected you. Trump, you know, saying that Jim Acosta is a clown and then saying, well, maybe I didn't say as a clown or whatever it is. I mean, all this stuff they're talking about behind the scenes, Who cares? Why is this supposed to matter to me so much?

Because I know that, and we're going to talk more about some of the fair weather friend Republicans later on in the show. But I understand what the Republican Party is supposed to do here. I know what the media rules are for Republicans that are not Trump, and that

is lie. I'm sorry. That is Lose with dignity, lose with grace, but lose don't don't defeat the Hillary machine, don't stand up to the open borders left to the Marxist Democrat vanguard that's trying to seize the government authority to take as much of your wealth as they want to redistribute it, to put us in this crazy green new deal to take control of your healthcare. Let's not win.

Let's just all sit around and say, well, you know, Trump's business practices were very bare knuckle back in the day. I'm sorry, I'm not going to play the game the way they want me to. It's a basic strategy I try to try to deploy. I don't take advice from my sworn enemies about how I'm going to conduct my side of the battle. And this is what the media is always trying to do, and so many Republicans fall

for this. The big takeaway from yesterday is that the President of the United States did nothing wrong when it comes to Russia collusion and the election of twenty sixteen, and all of the efforts that he had behind the scenes to stop this machinery of destruction that the Democrats created with this special counsel that never should have been appointed, that never should have been allowed to exist. All of that is in my mind, justified by the fact that

it was an illegitimate investigation. Mother never should have had the authority, never should have been in a place where he was allowed to do these things. It was all part of this plot. There was a conspiracy theory cooked up by Democrats, the media, and deep staters to stop and then destroy a presidency. That's what happened. The most fascinating part of this for me, and this is what I want to look at a lot more with you in the weeks out, because I'm not dropping this. I'm

not leaving this behind. I'm not forgetting about this at all. How did this get started? As I was reading through, I've really read thoroughly through part one of this, which is the Russia collusion component. Part two. I've gone through most of it, but I have some some more that I needed to dig into. Remember, there's no criminal charges from any of it, so it's not like it's that urgent. But the parts where they describe the origins of the

investigation into alleged Trump campaign Russia collusion don't wash. Doesn't make sense. Not gonna accept it. I simply do not believe that George Papadopoulos mouthing off about something that I had heard rumors. I heard a rumor from a friend of mine who's in the National Guard. In June to twenty sixteen. He's like, yeah, you know, I hear someone's got Hillary's emails. This was just a thing. This was

in the rumor mill. And by the way, it's not a strange rumor to come up with because Hillary had deleted thirty thousand emails, because Hillary was engaged in a massive cover up. You know, we're supposed to forget all this. They want to lecture us on the propriety of Trump in office and did you obstruct? Did you do this to you that Hillary endangered national security recklessly, and then

they just gave her a pass. Not only did Trump not work with Russia to steal the election, that didn't happen, Komey and Lauretta Lynch and the Democrat establishment in the deep state, in the national security apparatus made sure that Hillary could even stay in the race. What really should have happened is Hillary should have had to step down and deal with the criminal acts, step down from the race,

and it would have been Bernie versus Trump. And the great irony here is that would have actually been an interesting contest. I know a lot of you think that, you know, Bernie's a clown and all that stuff, and that's fine, but at least, Bernie is presenting ideas that are I think he believes. I think they're disastrous, But I do think he believes. I mean, the Hillary is just a fraud, just a construct. She is the liberal establishment made into a human being, completely hypocritical and phony

and lacking in connection to normal people. Might as well have been a robot running programmed by the editorial board of the New York Times and the you know, the CNN newsroom. And that's why she didn't win. It's not because of Russia collusion. It's not because of a few Facebook bots. I but this is just absurd. But how did we even get to this point? We do not I'm telling you right now, we do not have answers yet. How did we get to a place where the spying

on the presidential campaign could even happen? This is a big, big deal bar The Attorney General thankfully is already on This is why Democrats freaked out so much, because if the narrative finally comes together, if we can point to all the evidence we need so that it is irrefutable. Although Democrats will still refute, they'll deny any reality. At this point, it doesn't matter. But if we get to the point where we finally have answers to the questions

about how did this happen? How do you pretend that carter Page is a Russian asset? Do you spend five minutes as I did. I came on this show, you know this. I interviewed carter Page, I talked to him, offset I went through his whole story, backwards and forwards. It is inconceivable that any intelligent human being in the FBI or the DOJ believe that carter Page was a Russian asset and working for Putin. It is inconceivable. But that's what they went to the FISI court three times,

signed off on by a judge. Now, Democrats also usually are very critical of law enforcements, powers and authorities. But here a law enforcement of SACO saying they never make a mistake at the FISA court. No, no, no, of course not. You know, democrats default position is all cops, all law enforcement are bad, corrupt and racist. Except for Comy and everybody at the FBI who was trying to take Trump down. They're amazing, They're great. I see them for what they are, folks, you see them for what

they are. There's great comfort in that there's comfort in being right. And this week we found out that we were we have been all along, or we found out more details we've known, but now we have additional information about it. But the unrepentant left wing attack dog media trying to pat itself on the back that I say, see, we got all this stuff right. Yeah, except for all the all the stories night after night that would lead any person to believe that, wow, the president must concluded

with Russia. Look at all these Look at all these experts they bring on who talk about how the president is a witting or unwitting Russian agent. Look at the former senior government officials, the former CIA director they put on TV say the president did something tantamount to trees

and that's a quote. I'm sorry, but if you're a news organization and you put a government official, on our senior government official of the Obama administration on air to say the presidents committed treason, you don't get to walk back in a year or two and say, well, I mean we didn't report did he committed treason? We just gave a platform to people who said that that's what happened. This is the dishonesty. This is the depths of the depravity that the Left has gone to in this because

Trump broke them. Trump broke them, they still can't handle it. What are they gonna say? Just I know we have to go into a break, guys, But what are they gonna say when Trump wins reelection? There's a party that says that. The laughs and says, I mean, what are they gonna say, China stole the election? Actually? Maybe anything but recognize that the Democrat Party has a lot of really bad ideas, a lot of really shady and shifty people at the top of it, and doesn't do a

good job when they're in power. Maybe that's the problem, Oh Friday, folks, which means that we got a lot more show to get too, will be right back. I think it validates the decisions that we made, certainly in July of twenty sixteen to start the initial Russia focused investigation, and then, of course the decisions that we made in May of twenty seventeen to include the president in that

investigation personally. As you know, Rachel, the FBI, the standard for predication to open an investigation in the FBI is an articable factual basis to believe that a threat to national security might exist, or that a federal crime might have been committed. Andrew McCabe there still standing behind this idea that it was not completely and utterly insane. That

was the acting FBI director, folks. He thinks that it's not completely crazy to still believe that there was any reasonable basis to think Trump was a Russian asset, that Trump was selling out his country, that he was a They're saying, the president's a trader. That's the acting FBI director. This isn't some you know, random internet troll. This isn't some left wing TV show host. That's the acting FBI director. Formerly. Now he got fired from the FBI. But they are

completely unrepentant about this. The deep state coup plotters do not do not in any way feel chastened by the fact that now we know what they did, not the full extent of it, but we at least know that what they did was disgusting and disgraceful. They're also trying to redefine terms here to make it seem less insane

that they still cling to these theories. Clapper, who was the Director of National Intelligence, is now talking about how, well, maybe they didn't really collude but they kind of colluded play clip six. I think if there wasn't active collusion proven, then I think what we have here is a case of passive collusion where in some cases unwillingly to include the candidate Trump himself, who retweeted messages that had been

planted by the Russians in social media. Passive collusion, folks, That now means that if you see a meme on the Internet and you retweeted, if someone says, you know, Hillary Clinton is bad, guess what if you retweet that, you're a Russian asset. That's just crazy, all right, That's just unacceptable. But that is what the D and I is saying there. You know that any kind of social media that you share or that you retweet, anything like that, if it comes from the Russians, you're a part of

the Russian disinformation campaign. You're basically a Russian spy. They have defined these things in a way that any serious person knows that they're crazy, but they don't think they're crazy. All right, We all have more show coming up. Team. We are going to have Michael Knowles from the Daily Wire joining, which is going to be fun, So stick around for that. Plus take some roll call time. It's going to be a fantastic show. It's always a fantastic show.

And I have a special surprise for you guys, plan for Monday. I thought it was gonna be today, but it's gonna be Monday. So let's consider that a teaser. Be right back. If the Special Counsel, as he made clear, had found evidence exonerating the president, he would have said so he did not. The evidence would have to be quite overwhelming, into monstrapole and such that it would generate bipartisan support for the idea that it renders the president unfit for office. Now many of us do it think

the president's unfit for office. But unless that's a bipartisan conclusion, an impeachment would be doomed to failure. I continue to think that a failed impeachment is not in the national interest. Are they going to impeach him? Is that gonna happen? Is that where this all goes next? For the Democrats? I know that right now the general political consensus on

this tends to be No, they won't impeach. They will have hearings, they'll make a lot, they'll make a big deal out of this, but they won't impeach him because they know that it will be ultimately unsuccessful and could backfire on them. Right that's the consensus opinion right now. I'm not sure that that's the case. I am more along the lines of I think that the Democrat left has completely lost its mind. I think that they are.

I think that they're going to have to deal with the fact that the Occasio Cortez wing of the party is ascendant, that the Bernie Sanders socialist wing is ascended, and they are going to make the twenty twenty election a referendum not just on the Trump presidency but on the future economic and political trajectory of this country in ways that would have been unthinkable even ten years ago. Are we going to be a capitalist country or we're

going to tend towards socialism. Are we going to be a country devoted to the protection of individual rights and limited government, or we're going to be a country that thinks the government is your best buddy and going to do everything for you and can therefore do anything at wants. This is all what's coming now. Ari Fleischer thinks that this is going to be over at this point. Here's what are He's a smart guy, and I appreciate his opinion.

I think he's I think he's wrong on this one, but I do want to give you his point of view, because maybe maybe I'm wrong on this one. I'm unlike some radio hosts who think they know everything. I recognize that I'm sometimes wrong. It is rare, and so what happens, you better save with the flavor. But I leave open the possibility that I might not see this one the way that I should. Here's a different opinion from mister Fleischer. Play twelve. I think it's over unless the White House

stops it from being over. That the Democrats are about to walk a plank and fall off of it into the ocean with their conspiracy theories and their Truther collusion theories and their obstruction theories. Let them walk that plank and fall into the ocean. But what I'm wrestling with

this morning is the President's tweets this morning. If I were the president, I would have basically declared victory with the Muller Report and everything they came out, and move beyond it and then just let these grassy knold truthers play with it. So the president's tweet suggest that he was upset with something in the Mullah report, which only makes it look like he's got something to worry about. So that's the part I don't understand from the President.

But I think the White House can't and should move beyond this. It's over except for the conspiracy theory. I don't think it's over. I think ari is. I think already thinking about this like it were. It was the Bush administration back in the day, and we're planned by a certain set of rules. I think the rules have changed now. I think Trump is broken the left. I think that they are detached from reality. I think that they are unmoored and they're gonna want their political pound

of flesh here. They're gonna want the the pain, so to speak. They're gonna want to bring the Rockies to Trump, and you know that's gonna be that's gonna be difficult. That's gonna be a tough thing for them to tone down. I think that they're gonna look to I think they're gonna go to look. I think they're going to find a way to justify and peaching. I mean, look at the campaign they've got going now to undermine bar and how much bile is being heaped atop a very good

and very honorable guy. I mean, they're they're just saying all kinds of crazy stuff about this. I mean, Ogan Gidley, White House Deputy Press secretary, he was on this one that they talked about Played thirteen. Saved our case was the fact that the President did nothing wrong. The media is moving to discredit Attorney General Barr, which is ridiculous because he's a has a long history of incredible, impeccable credentials. But this is not his report. It's the Mueller report.

They've seen all the information. They did not have anything to get him on with as it relates to collusion, They did not have anything to get him on as it relates to obstruction. Yeah, they're acting like Bar was the one who saved Trump, when in reality, Mueller and I've read through now almost the entirety of the report. I've got a little bit left to go. It'll finish this weekend. But the truth is that Mueller did everything

he could. I mean, Mueller's part two of the investigation is almost like the legal equivalent of an interpretive dance. All within I to taking down Trump. I mean, just just contort the law in whatever way you have to do the most the most tortured interpretations of different statutes possible to try to extend them just enough to ensnare the president the United States. And there's so much included in there that has nothing to do with criminal conduct.

There's so much included in the report that it's just, you know, I heard this thing that you know, I heard one morning the president you know, stubbed his toe and yelled out and cursed like an idiot. You know, ha ha, I mean, there's it's just an APO research dump.

This is what this report was, APO research, paid for by you, by me, by the taxpayer, using not just the resources, but the power of the Federal Investigation Authority that we give to special counsels, all the all the spy tools they could want, all the resources, couldn't come up with a criminal charge. Does anyone really doubt that the people who sent SWAT teams to arrest Roger Stone and locked George Papadopolis up for forgetting the month of

a non criminal conversation that was meaningless. Does anyone really think that those people would not have pressed charges against Trump if they could have. Does anyone really think that they gave this administration they gave the President or any of his people the benefit of the doubt, of course,

not that would be preposterous. But the same people, same Democrat media left that has been lecturing us for two years now about how Trump undermines institutions and undermines our system of God and the process now are willing to cast out on the entire process. Oh, the Attorney General doesn't really make the call. The Congress makes the call about what happened here. That's not true, that's not that is not what the law says, that is not what

the Constitution says. But they're only in favor of institutions when the institutions do what they want and when they're in control of them. Democrats only like institutions and laws and the constitution when it works to their favor. The moment it doesn't, they're all disposable. The role of the Attorney General itself, that's coming under assault right now. We'll get into more of their anti bar efforts coming up.

The sad day for the institution of the presidency, a sad day for the institution of the Department of Justice. The Attorney General did a grave disservice to the country by misrepresenting significant parts of the Mullah report. The Attorney General of the United States here was acting as the president's lawyers, not the people's. Barr's words and actions suggest he has been disingenuous and misleading. General Barr. He might as well have been in the White House a press

conference room as the spokesperson for the president. This is so unfair, so dishonorable, such a smear, but you're you're hearing it from Democrats all all across the country. Now, just just ruin the Attorney general's reputation, and what are the real things that they point to here? They just lie about him. He's done nothing wrong. Everything that Barr has done has been by the book and has favored

transparency and favored fairness and favored the process. Everything he has done is by the book, and he knows the process. He has done this before. You will not find a person of any reputation in DC legal circles. Because I've been asking people about this this week. You will not find anyone who's as that Bob Barr. I just said, Bob Barr, Bill Barr, sorry, and that keeps happening. Bill Barr is a highly competent, highly ethical respected member of

the legal profession. Everyone says, everyone knows, everyone knows, and yet the Democrats are running around saying terrible things about it. I just want to know, if you criticize ilhan Omar, they say it's incitement to violence. If you say that Bob Barr is a terrible human being who's hurting the country by lying about the Mulla report in service to the President of the United States, you're a Democrat. You're a media star getting paid millions of dollars a year.

These these people, it's so gutter and low to do what they're doing. They have the word dishonorable. I know I keep using it, but they really don't have any honor. They don't back away all those and those are some of the most prominent Democrats at the country, including Shifty shift there. I mean not that he's that prominent, but he's just oh, it's just it's just such a snake.

But they're they're going around completely destroying somebody's reputation. They have no good faith argument to make on this whatsoever. He didn't spin he didn't. They would have said that no matter what. But what's amazing means there's no hesitancy in this. You don't see these Democrats who are coming forward and saying, you know, actually, actually Bill Barr is a really really ethical, reputable guy, is a good guy.

And this is a this is all you know. You can say what you want about Trump and the report and everything else, but to say that Barr is a problem here is just to be a lot, just to be disingenuous, it's to be dishonest. That's just wrong, man,

It's just wrong. You know. Five pinocchios. And this debate actually played out on My Hill Show, which as you know as a conservative and liberal show, and Joe Degeneva, this has gotten picked up now by some other websites, who was a well known lawyer and a confidant of the presidents, had an exchange for sure that that is a fair thing to call it with my co host

on the Attorney general's credibility. And while I certainly do not I do not criticize my co host because we do a show together every day and I have a professional obligation to be always respectful and responsible and talking about my co host. Since this is making the rounds right now and getting a lot of attention, I will let you here I will play for you the exchange that they had on the issue of of Barr's credibility. John, Please play the clip. They lay out here the considerations

that guided our obstruction of justice investigation. Number one. First, a traditional prosecution or declination decision entails a binary determination to initiate or decline a prosecution. We determine not to make that. And the very first thing they cite is that guideline from the OLC that a sitting president had listened to Bill Barr he said, he said he asked Muller three times report Well, because Andrew Wiseman wrote the report.

Bill Barr said he asked Muller three separate times, did you base your decision on the fact that a sitting president cannot be indicted? And Mueller said, I did not three separate times. I don't know what's in that report. Well, that what I taught English before I went to law school. I'd like to kind of take that sentence in parts it because it didn't make sense to me. But I can just tell you this, the decision was not based on that. It literally says, here are the considerations our

instruction of justice mulation. I'm asking if Barr is a liar is really the questionnaire because it says very clearly here, you know one should have said I would have brought charges because I can't bring charge. That's exactly. So let me just say something right now about what you just said. Don't you dare suggest that Bill Barr is a liar. He's I've known him for thirty years. He's one of the finest lawyers this country has ever produced. He came

back out of retirement to serve this country. There's not one shred of evidence that anything he said, either the other day or now or today was a lie. Don't ever say that in front of me about Bill Barr. You have no evidence that he lied, and you know it that I'm telling you. You said he may have lied. What I'm telling you is that what he said this today in the press conference is in insistent with what's

in their facts. Not a lie. That's okay, fine, it's not fine that were on national television calling the Attorney general a liar. I didn't say that, you suggested it very strongly. All right, I think we're done here. I think we are good. Well, then that was that was a testy exchange. Yeah, I was like, whoa it's just got That was also Victoria Tensing, who was the lady who was speaking at the beginning of that clip. But that was Unrising, and some folks saw it and it

is now making the rounds. So the issue of the integrity of the Attorney General does get some people very fired up. And I would note that you know, if you're going to, uh, you know, if you're gonna make claims about somebody, that you better be ready for people to make the counterclaims. And who that was? That was spicy, that was a little who. I got the vapors. I was sitting there like, oh my gosh, oh, I do declare.

This is getting Usually on Rising, we have a pretty it's a morning show, and we try to be smiley and happy even though we're talking about politics and some pretty intense things. At least I try to be smiling, happy because the only way I can get through the morning, because I am not a morning person. But that definitely that the tone there got pretty intense. Joe Degeneva did not did not mince words, did not beat around the bush.

But I look, I think that it is generally very bothersome to me this campaign to say that Attorney General Barr is a bad guy because we all know that the truth is that the liberals will never no attorney general who is not an anti Trump zealot, and even an attorney general who is acting Attorney general like Rosenstein, who is an anti Trump zealot, who wanted to wear a wire, who wanted to invoke the twenty fifth Amendment. Now they say that he's not trustworthy. There's no attorney general.

These people on the left would be okay with none. So how can I take this the criticisms of Bar seriously. Oh, the answer is I don't, because it's just all part of the narrative, part of the undermining of the credibility of somebody who is in the administration right now and is doing a very effective job of doing the right thing and playing it by the book and not getting

bullied and not backing down. I think Barr has been fantastic and we should be thankful because look, for all of Trump's great qualities, he has brought some stinkers into this administration. He just has, folks, you know it. I know it too, some stinkers into very senior positions. Barr is not one of them. Bar is rock solid. When are Republicans gonna learn that trashing their own side doesn't

have the beneficial effects that they think it will. When a republic is going to learn that not having Trump's back isn't something that they'll be rewarded for by the media over the long term, it doesn't mean that they're going to be able to bring the country together. There's not some healing that happens whenever they trash Trump, whenever they attack this president. All they do is play into the hands of the deranged left wing media. That is

all they are doing. They are giving the Democrats what they want, and Democrats don't do this on the really big issues. You know, this is where we have lessons to learn from the power hungry march in lockstep progressives. This is where the Democratic Party is an enviable political machine. They stay together when the going gets tough on issues that matter, and we always have the McCain factor, the

Romney factor, the you know, go down the line. These Republicans, who at the key moment in the biggest political battles in the nation turn on their own side, either either leave the ideological battlefield, so to speak, or decide that they're going to fight for the other side. When do Democrats do this? Someone show me a time where the Democrats leave ranks when it really Where are the Democrats who broke ranks on Obamacare? Find them for me? Please?

Oh you mean that they all with Prussian military precision, did exactly what Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, wanted. That's right, they did, even though many of them had to know that Obamacare was one being sold on false pretenses, was alive, was a desat, was a disaster waiting to happen. Why am I upset about this? I see this statement from Mitt Romney today, just trashing President Trump on Twitter. He writes a quote, it was good that Mueller's team

found insufficient evidence and charge Trump. The business of government can move on. But then he went on with this quote. Even so, I am sickened at the extent and pervasiveness of dishonesty and misdirection by individuals in the highest office

of the land, including the President. I'm also a paul that, among other things, fellows citizens working in a campaign for president welcomed help from Russia, including information that had been illegally obtained that none of them acted to inform American law enforcement, and the campaign chairman was actively promoting Russian interests in Ukraine. I mean, Mitt, what do you think you're accomplishing here? Buddy? What does he really think he's doing? Oh,

he went on reading. The report is a sobering revelation of how far we have strayed from the aspiration of the principles of the founders. Now I get it. This is where never trumpers would come at me with buck But what mit saying? I mean, you know, it's just this is true. Look Trump, Okay, guys, the Trump administration was in a fight for its life for two years, completely ambushed, sandbagged, undercut, and just screwed over by the media and the Democrat Party working as part of a

deep state coup to destroy this presidency. And you know they they now want to want to question the manner in which Trump had to fight back against this. Remember, legally it was legal, folks. Trump did not operate the law. But now we're supposed to be so upset about the fact that, you know, Trump got angry and wanted to roll up as sleeves and fight back. We're supposed to be so upset that during the campaign. I mean, now we're revisiting this again. The Trump people heard that there

was information. I mean, what if let's just say this, What if a Russian lady sat down with the Trump campaign and said, I I'm a defector from the FSB, I have information that Hillary Clinton has been selling secrets to Russia. Here you go. That are they supposed to say, Oh, no, I don't know. We don't know about this, so we can't take this information about Joe. I don't know. I can't do that. Sorry. They didn't know, they didn't know what was being offered. They don't know what the information.

What if it was a check for half a million dollars from a Russian government backed bank to Bill. Oh, that's right, that did happen. Well, we're supposed to pretend that that's not a big deal. I mean, there's such an effort to decontextualize everything that went on here and in the campaign, Hillary Clinton violated the Espionage Act over one hundred times, one hundred separate counts plus. Were supposed to just pretend that that was nothing. They had to

rewrite the statute in real time. That's what Camy the Renol Lynch did to get Hillary off. And we're supposed to worry about Trump taking immediate information that had been illegally obtained. Journalist traffic in illegally obtained information all the time, The New York Times, the Washington Post. They traffic in illegal leaks as often as they can, as long as it hurts Republicans or hurts the country. Sometimes they just

want to hurt America because they're sickos. But now we're expecting this, you know, romneyesque boy scout attitude about oh, I can't take that information during a very bitter presidential campaign because it was illegally obtained. The information was gonna get out either. They were gonna blast it on the internet. Folks, who cares at that point? What the you know what the attitude is of the campaign. They're they're gonna tell

the They're gonna tell the government. Oh, they're gonna tell the Oh, I'm sorry, they need gonna tell the FBI that was already investigating Trump and his campaign. They're gonna go to the FBI to make sure that they know about this illegally obtained information. This whole thing is a joke, an unfunny joke, but that the campaign chairman was promoting

Russian interest in Ukraine. Guess what Romney, not that anyone really seems to pay attention, as Manafort was actually trying to bring a Russian back political party in Ukraine more toward the Western point of view. Menaphort actually could have been pretty helpful in some way. I'm not saying what he did was ethical, but it's more complicated than people led to believe. And oh, Menaphort wasn't sharing polling data with a Russian To all the imbeciles in the media,

the guy was Ukrainian. Stop saying he was Russian. Facts are supposed to matter, but they don't matter to the media. Romney, what are you doing, dude? At two? Romney at two. There's been a lot of focus on justice this week, and really, I would say injustice in the case of the two year long witch hunt against Donald Trump, it was it was a witch hunt. It was all false premise. That was a very accurate description of it. And for the historically illiterate Democrats out there, witch hunts did find

people guilty. There was a witch hunt fund a dozen people. Actually, yeah, yeah, JITs. Witch hunts do find people guilty of That's the whole point is that it's not about finding it guilty. It's about finding anybody because of the hysteria. But there are some other issues of justice that came up this week, and they're trending in the right direction. We have not a chief full justice yet, but for one George Mason University.

I am very pleased, very proud to say George Mason University has decided to from what I see so far, this could change. It could change even you know, right after I say this on air. But they're gonna keep Justice Kavanaught teaching a summer course. They're not gonna cave to the mob on this one. People. Oh, it makes me feel unsafe. Makes you feel unsafe to have a sitting Supreme Court justice. Think about how stupid that is.

By the way, the allegations against him are from the eighties, so we're going on like forty years ago here and there are ridiculous allegations that did not happen, and we all know it, and these women are liars and there's all that, right, So you start with that. But that's gonna make a student feel unsafe today. This this this theory is based on you can't you can't learn from a guy who even if what the one person said was true, what was her name, Blasi Ford, and she's

she's just she's I think, honestly disturbed. Um, but he tried he grabbed a girl when he was drunk in like nineteen eighty three maybe, And so college students today feel unsafe. That's and that's the only that's the only allegation that's even vaguely, even vaguely possible. I wouldn't call it credible, even vaguely possible, and it's not possible. I think it's a lie. But you're gonna feel unsafe today because of that. Oh my gosh, I can't study with

Kavanaugh because of the allegations against him. These students just just a bunch of wackos. But as we know, it's also part of the they're organized groups behind this. There are these left wing groups that will use social media and will gather together online to weaponize college students for the purposes of, you know, attacking favorite targets of the left.

You know, And you have to always remember there these groups out there like Media Matters, and Media Matters is one of the most disgusting and dishonorable public interest organizations in the country. It's just it's just an attack. It's an OPO research dumping ground and smear and boycott machine for the Democratic National Committee. That's all it is. And people who work at media matters should be ashamed of what they do because it is shameful. They don't they're

not educating the public. They're not they're not making good faith arguments. They're not serving any honorable purpose. They're a disgrace, an out and out utter disgrace. So now that I've said my piece about that, I would just point out that George Mason sticking with Kavanaugh even though you got people like this guy Brian Fallon, who is a former Hillary Clinton advised you all all these people from Clinton world,

they're so bitter. Oh they're so nasty because they thought that they were just gonna just waltz right into the White House, get that big fantacy office, eight years of love from the media and all these big DC parties. Oh that's right, the clichde DC, Georgetown, COLORAMA cocktail party circuit. Baby, that's what was gonna happen for eight years when Hillary got into office. That's what they thought. Er happy learned

how to put Hillary didn't win. Hillary didn't win. But Brian Fallon said here quote George Mason's Mason's decision to stick by Kavanaugh to spite student protests seems like it must be done or driven. The Cookes and the Federalist Society gave a school combined thirty million dollars in twenty sixteen alone. My friends, No, I think George Mason's decision is driven by the fact that it's absurd, completely absurd, not not worthy of serious intellectual response. That students would

feel triggered and unsafe. That's what they're saying. They feel unsafe and triggered by a sitting Supreme Court justice teaching them a class. They are so lucky, and I think I look to be fair, I think most of the George Mason University students know this, But they're so lucky

to have that opportunity. Someone with not just the legal mind, but the background and the personal experience of dealing with the law at the very highest level of this country, at truly the highest level, lucky to be studying with them. And they're going to try to shut that down because they've watched, you know, too much of the Colbert Report or whatever at night trashing Trump. It's total total nonsense. It's just idiocy, absolute idiocy. So that's one bit of justice.

They're standing by kavan Off for the course. I got another one for you, a little bit of a justice round up this week. Remember Jesse Smolette. Yeah, that's right, he was in Hawaii recently. I'm not letting this go, folks. I know you're like, bucker, You're really that's right. I am like a pitfall that's latched onto a bone here, my friends. I'm not letting this go because the Jesse Smolette thing, the only justice that we really can get is to shame those who were part of letting him

get away with it, which is what he did. He got away with it, and I don't think there's gonna be any real justice there at all. They're gonna there's not gonna be any justice for Jesse because justice would mean that he has to pay for what he did. Pay literally as in write out a check for one hundred and twenty grand, which is what he should have to do, but also it should be on his record that he's a liar. I don't think he's gonna go to jail forever and all this stuff. I'm not some

I'm not I'm not a leftist. So I'm not a wacko, but it should be on record that what he did was wrong and that he's a liar. And then if he gets in trouble with the law again, he's gonna spend he's gonna do some real time. I mean, I think he could have spent thirty days in the county lock up for what he do. I think I think

that would have been about right. If you're asking me what would be fair for what he did, Yeah, I'd say I'd say spent a spent a month in a cell that seems and have a record that seems right to me. Maybe two weeks, but maybe a month something. Some of you're probably yelling six months. Buck, You're such a whimp. I know, I know when it comes to criminal justice sometimes when it comes to non violent offenses, I and this is this is a non violent offense.

Although I guess he no, that's right. The violence was done to him, but he wanted it to be done to him. But it wasn't even really violence. I think he hit himself in the face. We don't even know I did the nine er and brothers like slap him a little bit. I'm not sure. I don't know if we ever got clarity on that, but yes, when it comes to non violent crimes, I can be a bit of a softie. So maybe those are you yelling six

months buck? Okay, maybe you're right, But I say two to four weeks would have been a fair sentence for him, and you know he got away with it. But why am I bringing it up other than I just like to remind you all of the media aiding and abetting that hoax from beginning to end and abetting his escape afterwards, escape from justice. Well, there's some people who still have

some ethics left. This just came in today Fox News with the story two ranking executives inside the Cook County State Attorney's Office have submitted their resignation, including State's Attorney Kim Fox's chief ethics officer, April Perry, whom Fox cited as the person who advised her to recuse herself from the just Smollett case that has rocked the Chicago office. This is coring to a Fox earlier today. Mark Rochert, the director of the office his conviction integrity unit, has

also submitted his resignation, according to a Fox. Now, remember this is a Fox story, but this is foxx Fox because that's the prosecutor's name. Fox spokesperson Perry and Rott are scheduled work there last days in May. Quote. While I feel lucky to have been able to spend the fifteen years of my career in public service, I'm looking forward to my next endeavor. Okay, that's not exciting. Sorry, I didn't need to read that part to you, but

that's from the resignation letter. Obviously they're not trying to be too caustic toward Kim Fox, the prosecutor on the way out. But I mean what she did was just just outrageous, outrageous seal the case, no penalty for Jesse. We got text messages where she's like, he's a stupid actor who lied. We all know he'll ever knows he lied. But Jess now walks around something I didn't lie. Ah. Sorry, not not letting this one go. We either all live by the same law or we don't you know the law.

And this this ties into a lot of what we're seeing, ties into our discussions and UH and our our policy debates over the border right now and immigration. It ties in certainly to everything that is Russia collusion related the law is every bit as much a binding agent for our nation and for us as Americans, as our languages

and as our culture is. I mean fact, our law is rooted in language obviously, and our culture is very much affected by the law, and in fact that our culture and the law really go hand in hand in anyways. You know, no one ever pulled you aside unless you went to law school and walked you through all the different statutes. And yet we all have this understanding of what's legal, what's not, you know what what what the

law says? We just know. We pick it up from our from our lives, we pick it up from the culture around us what law is. And yet now we look at what's happening in this country and there's a two tiered system of justice in place. Those for the connected, the politically favored, and the politically powerful. Politically powerful and favored are not always the same thing. But for the politically favored and politically powerful, there's one set of laws,

and for everyone else there's something else. And jose Smallett is a very good example of that. He was politically favored and politically connected, and so he got away with it. That there are some people for whom this was too much to stomach. At least that's somewhat reassuring for the Cook County Prosecutor's office. But it's not enough. It's not enough. I plan to stay on this story. Buck the pitbull

with the bone. We'll be right back. As somebody who is very familiar for my military training with weapons of war, somebody who carried a rifle and epistle around land on the orders of the president. Um, there are some weapons that just don't belong in our neighborhoods in peacetime in America. We've already decided that this is within the Second Amendment, because we've decided that somewhere in between a sling shot and a nuclear weapon, we can draw a line. And

that's not unconstitutional, it's common sense. And that's why I think if all rifles need to be on the table too. Oh I love how Mayor Pete just throws that in there the end. Yeah, that's all right, gotta band them.

This is part of what you're seeing play out now where the candidates are all trying to outmaneuver each other from the left, from the Democrat side, and so everything that you know, you every stereotypical far left position that they're all going to run away from when they want to try to, you know, win that last two or three percentage points of the country of the voting public in a few important states. Right, that's they're all gonna pretend like, oh no, no, we like guns. Democrats like guns.

Two oho Ohioans. Democrats like guns, two Hoosiers, which I just like to say, because now I know that they're called hoosiers. Well, so whoa, whoa. You know, Democrats like guns two Pennsylvanians, But they don't. They don't. And may Or Pete's construction here, I would I would say first that he carried I mean I also carried a long gun and a side arm in a foreign country on the orders of the president. And guess what. Doesn't mean that I inherently know more about the Second Amendment than

other people. It doesn't mean that I have different Second Amendment rights than anybody else. It does mean that we should be able to have a serious discussion about what may Or Pete's really saying here. And he's just being disingenuous because he's smart enough to know. And I do give credit where it's due. I mean everything points to him being a very very bright guy. Speaks a lot of languages, you know, unlike a lot of the Democrats,

you were just just kind of dumb. Honestly, a lot of the very prominent Democrats out there are just not impressive, not very bright. Mayor Petz a smart guy, and he knows better. I'd like to think he knows better than to just say, well, you know, it's like, you know,

sling shot versus a nuclear weapon. Yeah, okay, there is constitutional jurisprudence that's already been that has already been decided on this, and it stretches all the way back to the American founding, stretches all the way back to the origin and the era of the Bill of Rights, which is weapons in common usage. This is what came up

in the dcv. Heller case. Where here in the swamp where I in the District of Columbia, the decision had been made that by the government authorities, the local authorities, that you could not have a gun of any kind in your home, and they just would not issue permits for guns in the home. And this is where you get into Okay, well, that's just now a complete abrogation and that's an elimination of a constitution protected right which local governments can't do. They can't just say sorry, your

constitutional rights don't apply. The First Amendment doesn't apply in although they do that too in this city or this town. The issue came up and Scalia wrote about this in the majority Opinion of Weapons in common Usage. And this is why even at the American Founding, Yeah, it would not have been considered common usage for you to have a foundry made cannon in your backyard. So maybe some restrictions on that would be at least something that judicial

judicial review could look at. But I know a musket is a musket, and everybody had muskets. And now the common usage firearm. Really the most common rifle in America is the AR fifteen. So it is by definition, because it is the most commonly owned rifle, it is in common usage, which means that it has covered under Second Amendment jurisprudence. I just I think that may Or Pete has to know that. But he also is trying to stick out and trying to get ahead in a far

left field of Democrats who are anti gun. And they're not anti gun because they think it's gonna no serious person. There is no real argument for an assault rifle band is going to stop violence in cities. It's just not. There's no data to back that up at all. You have a tiny, tiny fraction of murders in this country every year are committed with rifles, A tiny fraction. So

why do they want to ban assault assault rifles? Because it makes them feel good, Because democrats feel morally superior to their political opponents, which means you and me when they can say we banned assault rifles. We don't like weapons of war on our streets. Mayor Pete's also smart enough to know that he wasn't carrying a I'm assuming he was not carrying a semi automatic rifle when he

was in a war zone. He was carrying a fully automatic most likely M four when he was abroad, a weapon then I'm also very familiar with from my time training with and carrying that rifle. So that's not even it's if you're really going to be specific about this, a weapon of war, then in the context of a rifle would be a fully automatic and yes, there are restrictions on that. There are restrictions on whether you can have a fully automatic rifle. You have to get a

special federal license. And you know, some of you listening to this no much more about that than I do, because you've gone through that process. But there's just a lot of disingenuousness on the talk about assault rifles and the left now trying to just they're just trying to get donations going. And Eric Swalwell one mother thing. You know, Congressman Swalwell who made his name, uh, he made his name by being part of the Russia collusion delusion and

being on TV every five minutes to say that. You know, they're gonna get Trump on this, They're gonna Trump on that. It turns out that Swallowell wants to debate the head of the NRA, and that's not gonna happen. It's Ali North. But I saw Dana Lash, my old colleague and friend. Dana Lash has offered publicly to debate swallow on guns, and he goes, oh, I'm not going to debate an

underling buck back. I think Swallowell as chicken, folks, because I think he knows Dana Lash would serve him up like a roast chicken in a debate and he would have no shot whatsoever to come out on top of that one. So I'm hoping Swallowell takes Dana up on her public offer to debate him. We'll see if that happens. Yo, I was really inspired to he said you were not

get money from the open and you did. You took some NAX contributions from eight different fossil fuel industry CEOs and executives and lobbyists from Time March twenty nine, and that has made it hard for us to believe that you're going to keep your promises to address the climate crisis. Well you prove it today by returning that dirty money and signing the new fossil fuel Money Quedge. Thanks, really

good questions, appreciate. So you're right. And I was just told as we drove in the new set it on one of the last days of the FEC filing period. HHR from a logist. You're returning nut chart from alagyist jew. Yes, I'm like so excited to answer the question where you're calling the out for hypocrisy because betto is all about total authenticity, which is why I'm going to do a listening tour without a shirt on, playing guitar, going town to town, city to city and I'm not trying to

steal your girlfriend. I promise American males, I'm not trying to steal your girlfriend. Um yeah. Betto caves in here says that he did take money from an oil and gas lobbyist, and now he's gonna return that dirty money because climate change. This is a frustration for me, folks, because we're gonna see all the crazy Democrats stuff because this is their primary and this is what's gonna happen.

We're gonna see all the crazy climate change nonsense and see this just continue to you know, do what they do with all this stuff. And and we're thinking, oh my gosh, this is gonna be such an easy pathway to victory because any normal human being who is not completely brainwashed by left wing crazy, any normal person is going to say, I can't put these people in charge of the country. These Democrats, they're they're insane. I mean,

they're they're so left wing, they're so out there. Look at the stuff they say about the Green New Deal. Look at what Beto says about taking money from a lobbyist that has money the oil and gas I mean oil and gas that is so demonized by the left.

Even though if you were to make a list of the wonderful things in life, if you were to make a list of the effect and I really mean this, the effect that fossil fuels have had on every aspect of our day to day lives, and how beneficial they are, that that fossil fuels are the are the necessary precondition for a modern economy that we have had people that have been saved in I mean, you know, you can't

even really qualified. I was gonna say millions of lives have been saved by FOSSi it's probably it's probably more than that. I can't even begin when you add in all the products, all the productivity, all the transportation, all the heat, all the I mean all these things that are only possible because of fossil fuels, and they just treat it like it's this evil thing. It's so terrible.

I mean, this is if you're trying to find a way to hate yourself, to hate your society for the prosperity that it enjoys, you won't do better than fossil fuel because it's central, central to the prosperity that we enjoy. It is central to all of the benefits of a modern economy. And the left views it as some kind of sin that we must do penance for. The left use it as some terrible scourge that has to be

eliminated over time. And that's why I went betas like I'm just going to get rid of all the money from fossil fuels. You think yourself, well, this guy's just silly. But they're gonna move away from this stuff in the general election, that's the problem, and the media will try to put this stuff all down them all out of the memory banks. They're gonna do what they're gonna do,

what they've done with Russia collusion. Well, this is the biggest talk about fossil fuels, the biggest gas lighting campaign I've ever seen in my lifetime. Is the media now saying, oh, we didn't really promise that there was going to be collusion proven here. Yeah, yeah you did. Yeah you did, night after night, show after show, segment after segment. You were leading your audience's mainstream media to believe that collusion was going to be proven. It was just a matter

of how soon and how much. Instead, of course we know that it wasn't proven at all. But this wacky left wing Democrat party that is out in the open for us. Now, remember that it's going to get a whole new code of paint when it comes to general election. It's gonna be all about, oh, we just want to give you free healthcare and free this and free that. The Green New Deal, though, is where is where their insanity really bubbles up to the surface in a way

that no one can ignore it. They're gonna walk away from a Green Deal. What's why Pelosi understands this. She knows that the smarter or it should say savvier Democrats understand that this is all just meant for public consumption within the radical left right now. This is all meant to just get This is meant to be a fight among leftists for the base of the Democratic Party. But they're gonna walk away from it. So we can't get

too excited. We can't, you know, be too psyched about the prospect of running against the Democrat party that's banning cow farts and air travel and all this other stuff that we saw from the AOC Green New Deal debacle, because they're gonna act like these conversations right now or something like Betto is immediately bending the knee when someone brings up, oh you took money from a fossil fuel lobbyist. That's gonna go away. You know, that's gonna that's gonna be.

They're gonna be a slightly different Democrat party. But speaking to go away, man, I mean, we talked about Mayor Pete before all these all these different stories I see here. This is in Politico why the media dumped Betto for Mayor Pete and Fox News. Betto' rourke no longer the shiny new candidate says, he's still in a good place, man, Betto. You know, he thought because he wrote it, he thought that he wrote the Democrats a song that was just

about them. It's not a song that he wrote for anybody else, And he just wants to play it on his guitar in the corner of the house party. But he totally is not like making a move on you. He just wants to look in your eyes and seeing emotional lyrics that he totally wrote for you, not anybody else, promises. It turns out that wasn't enough. Betto. Mayor Pete came along with his far superior resume and actual intersectional credibility because he is a gay American, So us fall into

a category that intersectional. The intersectional left views as a necessary diversity candidate. You know, they want to have different people represented from all the different groups in this country. That intersectionality focuses on Betto maybe changed his name to sound more intersectional, but nope, does not count. Does not count. And then you also the problem where Betto gave wait here here, I want to make sure I get this one,

get this one totally correct. Student asked Betta O'Rourke why he gave less to charity than her sister, who just graduated at the University of Virginia. Bettos cheap. That's why Bettos a multi millionaire. He married as super gajillionaire, and Betto and his wife gave one thousand, one hundred and sixty six dollars point three percent of their income to charity, by far the lowest amount revealed in any of the recent tax returns that have been shared by the twenty

twenty presidential candidates. Elizabeth Warren gave fifty thousand out of an income of nine hundred and five thousand, five point five percent. Look, but Warren, I'm I'm fair minded. Warren's charitable giving is respectable. She also knew not to be overly cynical, folks. But she also knew that she was going to release her returns and she was running for president. She's been running for president in her own mind for

the last ten years. But yeah, five five percent is respect I mean on a million dollars of income, so it's not like they're hurting for money. Five percent is respectable. A thousand dollars when you're worth millions and millions and millions, that is not respectable. And if it's really like World War two level sacrifice that you're calling forward, that's what he says. He says he wants world War two level sacrifice to be with the American people embrace. I'm sorry,

A thousand dollars of betto just doesn't cut it. That's like not even the price of a new Actually, I have no idea how much a new good acoustic guitar cost. Do you know, John, I have no what what is an acoustic guitar cost? What is a new What is a new fancy skateboard cost? Probably like three hundred bucks? Right, that's I have no idea what a skateboard cost. I'm guessing here if I do a quick skateboard search, you know, what is it? What is a new fancy skateboard. Yeah,

it's a couple. It's a few hundred bucks, a couple hundred bucks. Okay, so betto gave the equivalent of like a couple of skateboards to charity. That's not enough, Beto, not when you try on the rest of us that we can't live the lives we're leading and we're a bunch of fat cats. Need to get more to charity. But Democrats want to be charitable with your money. See that's the way state hast always want to do it. That's the way the Marxist ideology inflicts itself on your pocketbook.

Gotta give your stuff to other people. It's not their stuff they gave, it's your stuff. I have a classic get off my lawn moment to share with all of you. Some of you know, probably because I don't like excessive noise. I don't like people who are inconsiderate. I don't like fidgeting,

I don't like whistling. You know, people who spend time around me know that while I'm a very gregarious and understanding and warm fellow, I also expect people to behave in a certain way, and I include strangers in that I don't just mean people that I know, I mean just everybody. And this is one of the reasons why I sometimes avoid certain public venues or activities where you're exposed to people who sometimes just act like barbarians. I'm just gonna say it. And music concerts, I think, are

a particularly common source of bad behavior. Live theater, Oh my gosh, I hello, I'm taking a found call right now because people up on stage doing this. I think it's not kats is it? What? What my listening? Oh no, it's it's Hamilton. It's no way, it's not Hamilton. It's it's Hadwig. And they're angry. And I don't know what play I'm in, Actually, no idea, but I think people are looking at me because, you know what, this is what they do, and this is what they do in

the in the theaters, you know. Actually it's forty seconds Street. I think I'm watching forty seconds Street, but I can't really see because the lights are in my eyes. Um yeah, people do things like that. I always remember when Kevin Williamson wrote a piece about how he got up at a theater and took a phone out of somebody's hand who kept taking phone calls during a play and threw it across the room. Now, aggressive might get you sent to jail for the night, not for a long but

I'm with him in spirit. Well, it turns out I have a fellow ker mudgeon when it comes to the way people should act when they are at a live event of any kind. And that fellow kur mudgeon is the one and only mister Bill O'Reilly. He recently on his show The Bill O'Reilly as the o'rilly Factor, or The Bill O'Reilly Show Online, whatever whatever the specific name is. But mister O'Riley was at a Fleetwood Mac concert and let me just say that's his first mistake, because that's right.

I'm gonna tell you guys this, and I don't care how much you get mad at me for it. Fleetwood Mac very overrated. Oh I know, I've just ruined some of your youths. Youths, but Fleetwood Mac is very overrated. You are a rude, terrible person. I deserve that, and I agree. But Bill was talking about how a bunch of millennials we're not acting properly out in public place. Seventeen.

The mu Zeke of Fleewood MACS classic. It's timeless, and there are some songs where you want to jump up and dance, and that's fine, that's fine, But the millennial generation Z people would never sit down. When the time it started at the time it ended, they were standing up and there were people behind them. You know. Some of these people were seventy five eighty and they couldn't see. And the millennials didn't care at at all because I

saw confrontations. I actually had one, but the guard and ushers liked me all right because I've been going there for many years. But this drunken guy stands right next to me and my party on the aisle. Not he didn't have a seat. He just kind of ran down, stood on the aisle weaving like this, and I said, hey, sir, you you know blocking our vision, and you know, I gave him a look and then I stood up, all six foot four of me, and he ran away, and

then the usher chemist did you want me to? I said, no, just make sure he doesn't come back. I like how bills like, all six foot four of me, like he's gonna man handle these kids. I like it. I'm gonna land base you, son, oh man. But I will look. I'm with Billow, I'm with him on this. It is

very annoying. It is very annoying when you are at any live event and people fit and there are seats that human beings are supposed to sit in, but some people think they're gonna stand the whole time, you know, because guess what, some people can't stand the whole time or don't want to stand the whole time, but they also don't want to stare at your behind the whole time. So I'm with Bill on this. And this is why, this is why we can't have nice things. So I

can't get nice concerts. I went to a concert some years ago and it was before the concert started and all the lights were on and it was a standing only venue, so there were no seats or anything. And I was there. I was there with a with a date at the time, and we're just standing, we're just talking, and a guy tapped me on the shoulder from behind me, I mean, and he looked like somebody who sells glassware on the road for a living. I mean, I will

say that, so I probably shouldn't be surprised. But he tapped me on the shoulder. He goes, hey, can you just stop moving your head so much? And I looked at him, and I was so taken aback because there was no music. There was nothing happening. There was an empty stage and there were just people milling about. But he was standing behind me looking at the stage like the show had already started. It had not. There was not it was not a warm up band. There was

nobody on the stage. And he told me to stopped moving my head, which I had not been moving. I was not dazzing. I don't know what he was smoking or injecting or crushing up and snorting, but it was some really powerful stuff. I can tell you that. Oh man, people are just you know, there's certain things, folks. And here's another one for those of you who are saying, oh, I'm gonna go to the Fleetwood Mac concert book as

Fleetwood Mac is great. Please Freetwood Mac. I know. But see then you're gonna say, Buck, you probably listen to Dave Matthews band, don't you. You probably have nostalgia for Dave Matthews. But I'll say that's true, and you know what, Dave Matthews Band is the Fleetwood Mac of old millennials and generation. Why and the Generation X. That's right, that's right. Boomers are to Fleetwood mac as Jen gen X and why and and millennials are to Dave Matthews Banner. I

can't Jen, why must come after gen X? Right? So people that are born in the late seventies and early eighties and in the mid eighties, Yeah, we all, we all secretly like Dave Matthews band. I know you're saying, Buck, I don't like Dave Matthews ban but you're you're just kidding yourself. It's like people who pretend that they don't like any Nickelback songs. You like some nickel Stop lying,

just stop lying, you like Nickelback songs. But the other rule that I have, don't do this thing where you go to anything that's a live event and take out your camera and take a grainy video of it. You never watch the video you take on your phone. Okay, you don't do it. No one does it. We all think we might, Oh, this will be a memory that

last forever. The video looks like crap, The audio is terrible, and everybody around you behind you has to stare now at this light that you're holding up, especially if it's supposed to it's supposed to be kind of a darkened room and create an atmospheric effect, and they got to stare now at the light you're holding up in your hand. No no, no, no standing the whole time when there are seats and no holding up video camera phone mode

thing when you should be enjoying a live event. This is get off my lawn and I have spoken, Bill O'Reilly style. I'll be right back. Team often talk about how crazy things get on campus here on the show. It's one of the reasons why we have partnered with the Leadership Institute because we want to actually fight back. But I need to tell you about the latest incident of campus craziness. And this one involves our new friend

Michael Knowles from the Daily Wire. He's a senior writer over there, is also the host of the Michael Knowles Show, and he's gonna tell us what happened to him. Michael, Happy Friday, my friend. Good to talk to you, but thanks for having me on. So what happened to you? My man? You went to a college campus and they did not respect the Socratic virtues. They decided that they were going to take a different approach. That's putting it pretty mildly. I was invited to give a speech at

the University of Missouri, Kansas City. The topic I was invited to speak on very very controversial. It was called men are not Women. Now this these days very apparently provocative, and you'd be like giving a speech on how the sky is blue was two equals four? I mean, I feel triggered, right I feel triggered right now. But you can keep talking. You know, I expected this to be basically the most boring speech I've ever given. I'm stating

basic factive nature. And I go into the room and I notice immediately there are about a dozen left wing looking students, you know who you can kind of tell the blue hair and that sort of thing. Yes, they're both very angry facially and also very obviously based on dressing decorum in cells. But continue, Yeah, people who go together a lot, And so I started speaking. From the very moment I started speaking, they begin to scream like maniacs,

screaming uselessly like banshees. You can't want to hear it in the video because the microphone is going to the broadcast. People in the room who came to hear the talk could not hear over their screaming this one on for that twentyness. Finally they decide to leave. They walk out, someone unlocked the fire doing it back, and some mask antitho weirdo jumps in and sprays me with a super circle full of some unknown chemical substance. Smells a little strange,

had a weird color to it. Fortunately the police were able to get this guy down quickly. There was initially that it was chained, which is kind of what I thought it was. Then a number of people started saying that it was bleach. It looks as though it was some non toxic combination of household chemicals. But of course, either way, it's a warning shot. It's saying that if a conservative goes to campus, you're gonna get shouted down, and ultimately, if you don't shut up, you might be

physically assaulted. I would I would have guessed it it might have been something else, an issue, my friend. I'm glad your thought didn't go right there, But I mean, and the and the idea that it's sterile would only have given me a tiny bit of tiny bit of brief. I gotta tell you. There have been some rumors that there are many unsavory things in whatever they shot at me. I'm going to keep that out of my mind as long as I possibly can, to convince myself to go

back to these campuses. The next morning, instead of getting an apology, which is what I expected from either the chancellor of the university or the people putting it together, instead of that, a letter went out from MC Chancellor Molly Aggrawall snearing me baselessly as some sort of bigot, extreme and encouraging the students who got up and screamed from the very beginning, basically endorsing the hecklers veto and saying that invited speakers on campus and harassed, perhaps not

physically assaulted, but the implication being I think that I brought it on myself. You know, I was wearing a short skirt and I was basically asking for well, I mean, if you were wearing a short skirt, as we know, male female, there's no differentiation that can be made here,

So it's not you know, you never know what. Probably I think I would have gotten a better reception had I've been wearing this good But nonetheless, that was the message that went out for the most chancellor basically to say, hey, listen, conservatives, we don't have your back. We're going to turn a blind eye to assaults, We're going to encourage Heckler's vetoes, and we're going to be utterly intolerant of any other point of view than our leftist orthodoxy. This is a

disgrace to higher education. This chancellor certainly should resign or be fired. This is the state of liberal education in the United States. Are you going to have to press charges now, by the way, for the mysterious substance that was sprayed on you? I mean, I'm somebody who look, I'm I'm all about letting bygones be bygones. But actually I'm also someone who believes injustice and consequences for behavior

like this. And if there isn't any consequence for somebody to assault it an invited campus speaker, you've just been the next person at risk, and maybe the next time it will be bleached. Right, So, so where's the legal status of this? That is my issue here. I'm with you. I would let it go. I can take a punch. It doesn't bother me personally as much. But that is

the question. First of all, it's up to the prosecutors, and there is a ton of video of this guy physically assaulting a speaker and resisting arrest and the whole other. But I think are there any CNN stories yet posted where they say video appears to show I always love that, like video appears to show a guy getting punched in the face. No, no, I'm pretty sure the video shows him getting punched in the face. No no, it'll say conservative speaker pounces on video. How I came getting assaulted

by that? It is your fault for pouncing after after you were sprayed, So you know that that is something to keep something to keep in mind, did you? Was it really from from your perspective? Was it the topic which is great, by the way, men or not women? Was it the topic that triggered the so much? Or is it your affiliation with the formidable fellow note as Ben Shapiro that you know, you're just like you're just part of his little band of Mary Avengers and the

left freaks out or is it a combination? Why why they get so Could you seem like a very you know, non threatening, nice dude who wants to have a talk with people. You know, I don't get it. I feel I've always thought I'm a genial guy. I didn't know I was no intimidating, since there is part of that obviously, that neo Nazi Orthodox Jew Ben Shapiro, that's due in the pression all the time. So I think probably my

vegitation preceded me through that association. But I do think there's something special about this issue, this very basic fact of nature that men are not women and women on that man. There's something in particularly that inflames the Left about this because it goes to the heart of so many of their fantasies. It goes to the heart of so much of their ideology, not just not just transgenderism, but intersectionality, the questions of objective reality, of subjective feelings,

of oppression, of victimhood. This basic fact, I think, cuts to the heart of that, and so they are they pass on it because if men are not women, they can convince them, they can define all of reality. Was a line in Alice in Wonderland. Humpty Dumpy says, in my language works me whatever I say they mean, And Alice says, can you do that? Can woly mean just whatever you want them to? And Humpty Dumpy says, that's

not the question. The question is which is to be master, and the left is trying to be master by redefine all of reality, and we conservatives are not letting them do it. We say no, reality will re assert itself, and they go mad when we tell them. At basic truth, did anyone even try to make a case as to why women are men and men are women? Or do they just make like animal noises at you? They literally made animal noises. I mean they literally just streaked because

of course there's no argument. If they had an argument, they wouldn't need to shout down in silence and censor and assault speakers who invited to campus. If they had an argument, we'd make our argument, they'd make their argument, and they would be seen to be correct. But they don't have that. They seem not even to accept the premises of logic and rational argument anyway. That obviously is at the heart of liberal education. So it's so worrisome

when universities behave this way. And the most troubling aspect of all is that the chancellor of the university, who should be teaching these kids no better, he should defend liberal education. He's the one who's most loudly of all encouraging them and egging them on. And I just want to tell you something, Michael. We did. We did a pretty deep dive fact check and and your your talk men are Not Women has been awarded zero pinocchios, zero

pinocchios fact check true men are not Women's. I wanted you to know that we put our resources to make sure that we got the right answer here. Well that's good. I think the Washington Post gave me about seventh pinocchios. They consulted a slew of gender theory professors, all of whom insist that men are women and women are men. Talk about an irony too. The left is always assailing the right to say that we're denying science, and because

they talk about global warming or whatever. Then we go and we state the most basic fact of nature and they absolutely lose their mind. Somebody tells me I may be denying science. There we go, everybody, Michael Miles. You can check out of stuff at the Daily Wire and also listen to the Michael Knowles Show available one fine iTunes platforms all over the place. Mister Knowles, great, great to make your acquaintance, Please come back soon, but great to talk to you. Team we'll be right back. Hey,

team Buck, it's time for roll call. It is bittersweet, but I come on now to tell you that it is the end of the show, the end of another week, so I won't get to talk to your team for a couple of days. But that all said, this roll call also means that everybody's been working for the weekend, and the weekend is in fact here. I'd willing to guess that a lot of you are listening to this on the weekend already because you listen via podcast, which

is always a fun way to do things. So my friends, Facebook, dot com, slash box, Sexton, that's how you do roll call. You know how you roll And uh yes, indeed I am gonna get a big boy email though that will happen, Big boy email, doll for Buck, the big boy email. We're gonna get it set up for the show. It's gonna be amazing. It's gonna be fantastic and should really work, mate trips that I can say. It's gonna be amazing,

the best email anyone has ever had. You gotta I gotta be able to do the facial gestures and the hand gestures for the trump that doesn't really work otherwise, all right? He uh. William sent me a photo of him outside of the Nine Line apparel store in Savannah, Georgia. Look at that very cool, William. I really like the nine Line folks, and I'm glad that you're able to go check out their very large, very cool store. Karen

just made scramble eggs your way. Wow, the super low heat really makes a difference, Karen, Welcome to the scrambled egg revolution. It's true for those who don't know, your scrambled eggs will be better if you just do this very simple thing. Cook them very slowly, and the moment you think you have too much heat in that pan, you take the heat off the I mean you take

the pan off the heat source. Do not try to just adjust the temperature, because any kind of direct heat, if you're already getting too high, is gonna mean that you're gonna overcook them. That's the number one thing people do that I think is a problem when it comes to their cooking of eggs, particularly eggs of the scrambled variety,

which is my favorite, is that they overcook them. They turn them into those little rubbery looking things, you know, they kind of curdle up and they get all rubbery and hard, and you could throw them against the wall and they'll bounce around. You don't want that. You want delicious, perfectly cooked eggs. You want rubbery, ridiculous eggs. So go low heat. Now, some people say that, buck, if you're going to crack the eggs in the pan directly, you're

you're a savage into that. I say, well, I'm a savage who doesn't have to worry about making a big mess, you know, with my whole bowl, and people to do the whole thing of the little bowl and they, you know, stir it all up in there. That's for omelets, my friend, not for scrambled egg. Scrambled egg. The way to do it is put a little piece of paper towel down on your kitchen counter next to your heat source. Obviously not on the heat source. That would be stout burn yourself,

not good. And you put that paper towel, just just one sheet, and you crack the egg flats, you know, on the flat surface of the counter, and then you go right into the pan. One two three. That's the way to do it. And then you've already the cleanup is easy. You just got a little paper towel. You throw that away. If you crack it on the edge of the pan, you are much more likely to get eggshell in your egg. And folks, nobody likes that, you know,

when they crunch into the no one likes that. Nobody wants that, all right, everybody wants to be eating those eggs, perfect perfectly cooked, perfectly cooked. I don't know why English got hard for me. There any cares you can tell. I'm very passionate about the subject. The other thing I try to convince people off because I know I'm right, is that they should eat thick cut bacon. Don't eat that. Look, all bacon is good. This is like all chocolate. All

chocolate is good too. And whether you're eating a Hershey's bar or you're eating something from me. Which is a great place to go if you want to spend about five dollars per tiny little piece of chocolate and get you know, a dozen pieces of chocolate for sixty or seventy bucks. Chola is very famous place for the best chocolate. They have the very fancy flavor. It is mande fique. But you have to rob the bank to have the money to pay for us. At Chuck, you also could

do it. I like Hershey's Hershey's American chocolate. Yeah yeah, all chocolate is good. All bacon is good. But thick cut bacon is better than thin bacon. Trust me on this one. And it is worth it to go find a butcher and have the butcher cut the bacon too, the thickness you desire, you know, have the butcher cut the bacon, for it's worth it. You can always freeze your bacon so you can get a whole bunch of it, you know, get get a couple, get a two pounds,

and that lasts me about a day and a half. No, get two pounds of bacon and keep some of it in the fridge and keep the rest of it in the freezer, and you're good to go. And you just thought it out as you needed. But that thick cut bacon is so much better the really thin stuff. You know, it just just doesn't get it done, just doesn't get it. You don't really get the full bacon flavor. It's just

grease and fat. You don't want that. Fil Right's regarding international or inspirational buildings, you overlook Washington's National Cathedral thin in nineteen ninety, after eighty some years of construction. Yeah, National Cathedral is nice. That's that's a that's a fair point. I'm not saying Phil that it doesn't exist anywhere. I'm just saying that they don't make them like they used to when it comes to cathedrals, when it comes to a lot of things, they don't make them like they

used to. Adam, my tay Buck in regards the investigation, could Trump sue ever involved in a Rico case, kind of like how he did the shipping of all the illegals to Nancy's home city, Shields High, Adam, I think the answers probably no, But I do appreciate the creativity that you are willing to bring to this issue. So indeed, dare you have it? Paul? All right, Buck Shields High.

On this good Friday, as we remember Jesus's sacrifice, let's also celebrate the minutemen at Lexington Green and Conquered Bridge who fired the shot heard round the world. Maybe you could read disaccount of that day's battle with some appropriate marshal music behind it. Thank you Paul from Michigan. Well, Paul,

at least we got a shout out for it. I don't have the time unfortune for a dramatic reading of it right now, but I do appreciate you reminding everybody that is well as good Friday first and foremost, it is also the day that the Minutemen took on the British Empire at Lexington Green and conquered Bridge. See what else we have here? Marshall writes, please book send Muller and his stooges my way signed Bigfoot. She'll tie all right, Marshall, absolutely, and let's see we can get to Tessa in on

this action. Yeah, I mean look Bigfoot, sometimes writes into the show. What can I tell you? I do? I have a colleague that is going to watch the very violent, scary but entertaining Bigfoot movie, she said tonight because I told her about on the office. So I've become an evangelist for this this film. Um Mesa, all right, I tuned it on APM to catch your show. I'm away back from work and I got Glenn Beck. What's the

deal News Talk ninety nine five in New Orleans. I don't know, um maybe they made a change down there. I'll have to look into that one. So Mesa, well, we'll see. Let's see what else we have here. Mike writes, hey, Buck, a longtime fan. Nice job on Fox News this evening, sir, enjoy your radio show. Well, thank you so much, Mike. I appreciate it. It was a good session on Fox News. And I'll be on Fox News this Sunday as part of the panel for the Media Buzz Show with Howie Kurtz.

So that will really be an interesting discussion given what's gone on this week. I can assure you of that. Katherine, right, Buck, we need you as a permanent guest on Brett Show. Oh, Katherine, And I really enjoy doing Brett Show. It's a great panel, and I think I'll be back next month on it. Usually they try to get me on once or twice a month, so we'll see if we can make that happen. But I agree with you that the more Buck on, the more Buck on the Brett panel, the better for America.

How about that? And then we have here Jack, who writes, hey, brother, I'm a little mad about no jokes about Mayor Pete. Have Commie bear do it? L ol? May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather? Yeah, I I mean may Or Pete. I gotta think of funnier stuff to say about him. I have to listen to see if he's really some of thee that I could do an

impersonation of that would be worthwhile. I have to work I met Rump because it's I know you guys are all a buck your trumps here, but if you can see my face and I have the swoop, I mean, I can do the Trump hair swoop. We're like separated at birth Trump and me. I mean, his hair is blonde and mine's kind of a light brown or whatever.

But we've got exactly go home to mommy. He's going home to his mom, say a loo of mummy exactly, Scott hey Buck only had about time to read twenty five pages of the Muller report, but I'd love to have a scorecard and how many times publicly reported and no evidence of collusion pops up in it. I'm gonna dig back in it. Cannot wait to hear your analysis,

shields high here in New Hampshire. Well, Scott, I hope you enjoyed the analysis I gave you of this whole thing today, and I'm looking forward to getting more answers for you about some of the big questions are raising. How this. What's really gonna bring the whole deep state edifice crumbling down around this whole investigation is how this thing got started. That's where they're going to have a lot of problems. I think so. I think that they were shady. I know they were shady. I just I

think we're gonna be able to prove it. Roll Call Part two come up in a moment. Team stay with me. Ain't no party like a Team Buck party, because a Team Buck party don't stop. Yeah, we got Buck turned up to eleven. It's time for Roll Call. Thomas writes, another great show today, Buck, I agree with your guest who was talking about the glaring omission of the Mullah report. There was no mention of Hillary Clinton and her involvement in this Greek tragedy. I've been talking about this for

six months. As it currently stands, a special counsel, aided by a gaggle of lawyers and forty investigators, spent two years in search of a crime that never happened. They spent twenty five million dollars and thousands of man hours to produce half a report. Ha only in America. I pray to God that when the DOJ and IG horror which his report is presented in May or June, that it brings a long list of indictments or this country may indeed explode. I didn't expect the Muller report to

have any surprises. I did expect some mention of Hillary in the DNC involvement in it. Nothing. I can only speculate that those key elements were redacted because they are part of an ongoing criminal investigation. The Muller investigation was a counterintelligence one. I don't think Agbar sufficiently explained that in his press briefing. It was never put in context with the failure to get results, which is why many people believe the whole thing was a waste of time

and the progressives feel betrayed by Muller. A prosecutor cannot exonerate anyone from a crime that never existed. It is not possible to commit obstruction of a crime that never existed. Amazing how few of these so called legal eagles in Congress knows little about how these investigations are conducted, with the goals of each type. Maybe Thomas a lot of eloquence here in this message. Thank you, sir, appreciate it. Good to talk to you. Terry writes, answer your damn phone, Terry,

Sorry mister call when you tried to call recently. I do want to do someday of the week where we just we do kind of an open line. I mean you'd say, Buck, what about Friday? You have a people are hanging out on Friday. It's Friday night? Do they really? And I feel like during the week might be better. So I'm gonna think about that. Maybe maybe we do you know, wild Call Wednesday or something. I don't know. That's other people gonna calling like, yeah, yeah, it's wild

Cale Wednesday. I'm a Buck Sexton show, getting that Get that whole radio Top forty Radio with Buck Sexton Wild Wednesday. So Bobby Newport, uh, here we go. Esther rights, will the real puppet master please stand up? Why so quiet? Barack? Thank you Sexton and you and your team for giving me my daily dose of common sense politics. Well, I will pass that a wrong along to producer Mike and DJ John John. Esther says, thank you, You're welcome. Esther exactly, John.

Speaking of John Buck, one thing I don't think I've seen any evidence or alluding evidence too, is that Hillary had a part of her being let off the hook for the server and email scandal. The same goes for the attacks on Trump's campaign and presidency. It almost seems like she's innocent for just this piece, even if Obama is involved, doesn't seem to lead to Hillary unfortunately. Can you please take your share of thoughts on this one.

Thank you a loyal fan. I don't think I've seen any evidence or that Hillary had a part of her being let off the hook, John, So I think you're asking me just so I'm clear on the question if Hillary exerted any influencer, did anything elicit to get the decision that she wanted, which was obviously the non prosecution decision from the Department of Justice. And I would say that the bigger problem is that I don't think she had to do that. I think that that was done

for her. So in many ways that's even more concerning that the apparatus of the DOJ and the federal government and the Attorney General at the time, Loretta Lynch and James Comey they knew. And this is why Loretta Lynch had that tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton where he was like, I just want to talk about grandchildren and not whether or not you're going to prosecute Hillary, because that's not like on the front of my mind a few days from the declamation decision that you're going to give to

Comey to back you up for the whole country. Yeah, no, I think that they they knew, I mean, Queen Hillary was never gonna get prosecuted. That was never gonna happen. They just went through the motions and that the fix was in from the beginning. So I don't think you could say that Hillary took any action to make James Coomey not prosecutor. But she did take actions to destroy evidence, to lie, to break the law. But she's a Clinton, So I guess we don't expect much more on that one.

And now we have Edward who writes, this is not the way our legal system works. How do you prove a negative? You cannot. So he either obstructed justice and can prove it, or he didn't indict or innocent. That is how our legal system works. So damn tired of hearing. But we didn't clear President Trump of obstruction charters. Our courts don't clear people. They convict guilty people. Edward, you know more about the law, apparently than Bob Muller and

his team of angry partisan Democrats. So there we have it. Another fantastic Buck sex and shown the books. Please team, do me a solid, do me a favor, Share the iTunes link with one friend this weekend, or at least tell somebody, Hey, have you heard the Buck Sexton Show. It's pretty awesome. The guy's got a podcast. He's kind of funny sometimes. Talk to you all Monday, Shield Hie