Comrade Warren versus Comrade Sanders

This is the Buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence, make no mistakes, Great, You're great American Again the Buck Sexton Show begins, Remember the due Welcome to Buck Sex and show. Everybody, man, we have a debate coming up tonight that I feel like about five of you listening are probably going to watch, because only about fifteen people across the country really seem to care. I'm just kidding. Democrats,

of course care. They'll be watching this thing. And there's one there's one storyline that's getting the attention. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. They had been very chummy with each other. They had been very friendly with each other in this contestacy who will be the Democrat, the Democrat winner of the primary until now. And that's because what the Iowa Coxes are just a few weeks away, and this field of Democrats is going to get winnowed down very quickly.

You're going to have a fight over who is the most progressive candidate that plays out who is the true heir to the Democrats socialist throne in this country as it Elizabeth warners at Bernie Sanders, And that's how you have a particularly nasty little fight going on right now between these two. The basics of it are that there's a story that was running in a bunch of different

news outlets. CNN picked it up in others that Elizabeth Warren claims that Bernie Sanders told her in twenty eighteen that a woman a woman couldn't win the presidency, which, of course is in a field where wokeness is your currency, where being the most woke candidate is considered among the very most important things. Sure enough, we find out that

Bernie may have a wokeness issue. Never mind for a moment that the Oscars will have It seems a greater diversity on stage of directors who will win nominations, then there will be diversity of the Democrat candidates who are at the top of the field in this primary. In fact, you'd have to think long and hard who is still in it that would even qualify under the Democrat the Democrat definition of diversity. Buddha Judge is a member of the LGBTQ community. Okay, who else is still in the mix?

Who else is still in this race? Elizabeth Warren, as we know, is a fake minority. But I don't think that's something they're going to be touting all that much as diversity for this Democrat field. But I had to I had to laugh, because you know, Warren, she is upset because of what Bernie campaign people had been going around and saying about her. She's upset because she says that there were unfair attacks leveling And now whether that's true or not, I don't really know. I will say this,

it's fun to watch Democrats fight in this way. It is entertaining, there is no question about that. But this non aggression pack that had been in existence between Bernie and Warren has gone away. It'll be the single most interesting thing to play out tonight. I wonder if and I don't even know who's moderating producer marked, we know who's moderating the debate tonight? Which which left wing network

that pretends to be Blitzer World? Oh, CNN, my favorite, my favorite CNN is don't you know, I don't know what they're gonna do here? Because CNN was completely and I was there, I was in the building, I was hearing all the discussions, talking to producers. They were completely in the tank for Hillary Clinton. There's no there's no

question about that. They were absolutely positively doing everything they could to make sure that Hillary Clinton was going to be the next the next of the Democrat nominee and then of course the president beyond that. And so they're not really it's not really a Bernie building. It's not really a place that you could look to and say there's a lot of fondness for the outright socialism of Bernie Sanders as opposed to the soft and incremental socialism

of say, Hillary Clinton. Do they feel now at CNN like they have amends to make for this, that their unwillingness to go forth and give a fair shot to Bernie Sanders to comrade Sanders, the Democrats socialists from the state of Vermont. Maybe now they make months. I think the answers, No, Warren is just culturally more in line with the Democrat elites. They look at her, she's a Harvard professor. Yeah, Bernie Sanders has been a senator for

god knows how long. But then look at Warren and she seems to the Libs to be a bit more sophisticated. Perhaps she just appears that way, she comes across that way. It's a little bit less of a character. And journalists who spend a lot of time thinking about how they look and how they sound and how they are perceived, this really matters to them. So I think that they're still going to be a bit of favoritism against Sanders in favor of Warren, certainly from within the CNN building.

And tonight in the debate, we'll up to see how it plays out. I don't know if I'm going to watch it tonight. I have a life too, you know, I don't know how much. Maybe I'll just I'll sign producer Mark to watch this one for us and take notes. That'll be a because he loves that. After he finishes his third job, by the way, where he's been working for fifteen straight hours, producer, Mark, Aren't you aren't there like wage laws that are being violated here by having

you work like four days straight at a time. Isn't this an issue? I plead the fifth Okay, I'm just making sure you know, Heaven forbid the you know, New York Labor Relations Board finds out that this guy hasn't been able to get more than an hour of sleep in like a month whatever. You were on vacation for a bit, so I can't really work the week in December. Yeah, but he but he crossed, he'll he'll cross the one hundred hours threshold in a week. No, no problems. So anyway,

I need I need my nap time. But here's what I want to say about tonight's debate. I think that there will be not a lot that's memorable because we already know what these Democrats are going to say. They're just going to fight it out. Now. The factionalism of

the Democrats is going to come to the forefront. You're going to see people who have been playing nice with each other all of a sudden when there's the realistic possibility of knocking somebody off, you know, when you can vote somebody off the island when only certain people are getting a rose. Can neither confirm nor deny that I watched The Bachelor for the first time ever recently. I just was curious. It's a cultural phenomenon and I thought I thought I needed to watch it because you know,

hashtag culture um. But the the war between Comrade Warren and Comrade Sanders stunt, it will be the single most interesting thing, assuming that it actually breaks out Warren's campaign. There are initially questions about whether Bernie really had said he didn't think a woman could win, which you know, I mean, I guess for Democrats this is oh, you know, this is a horrible thing to say. How how could he say something so horrible? I mean, I don't know.

I'm not sure that Republicans would really get as upset about somebody expressing an opinion. I mean, it's not a not an opinion that people generally want to hear. But it could you know, it could be true. It could be true that it's more difficult for a certain person from a certain demographic, a certain group to win the presidency based on polls, based on data. I mean, you can look at this, right, what you know is an

atheist likely to win the presidency. People might want to believe that that shouldn't matter, or maybe believe it matters a whole lot, but there's certainly data that would back that up one or the other. Is it harder for a woman to win the presidency? I would think no, But I'd have to look at the most recent data and see. And even then there's what people will tell polsters, and there's what the reality is. But you know, adults could have this kind of conversation, but Democrats are not adults.

Democrats like to fling things at each other and get into fights and decide who the most woke is, which has really just become It's an excellent shorthand for the social justice obsession and the political correctness obsession that has completely overtaken the American left and the Democratic Party. But

I thought this was great. There is a technique in and there are a couple of ways to say it so you don't have to, but the one that I like, I believe it's it's called predorizio, where you say, I'm not going to point out, you know, I'm not going to sit here and say that my opponent hasn't read a book in ten years, because that wouldn't be a nice thing, right, that's the pretense that you're not going to say something that you are saying the underhanded way

of attacking somebody. Bernie Sanders apparently said this to Elizabeth Warren. And here's the back and forth between comrade Sanders and comrade Warren. Or rather, here is how comrade Warren says this actually went down. This is a statement that she put out because she loves Bernie so much. Quote. Burnie and I met for more than two hours in December twenty eighteen to discuss the twenty twenty election, our past working together on our shared goals, beating Donald Trump, etc, etc. Etc.

Among the topics that came up was what would happen if Democrats nominated a female candidate. I thought a woman could win. He disagreed. I have no interest in discussing this private meeting any further because Bernie and I have far more in common than our differences on punditry. I'm in this race to talk about what's broken in this country and how to fix it. Blah blah blah blah blah.

I have no interest in further elaborating on this meeting, now that I've elaborated on the single most incendiary charge. I'm not even sure this qualifies as Preteraitzio, but it feels kind of close. It's like she's it, and then she's pretending like she hasn't said it, or you know, she she's saying I don't want to elaborate, but I've already elaborated in a way that is going to do the maximum political damage to my opponent. You know, don't mess don't mess with Warren Man. You come at the

Elizabeth Warren, you bet you best not miss Bernie. So we'll see how much of a difference is there really is there really between them? I would wonder if you could actually set up Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders supporters, and we will get into some of Bernie supporters in a moment. I wonder if you set them up side by side and ask them to identify differences on policy between these two, how many could actually tell you any

in any significant way what their differences are. I would guess the answer, and I would love to run this experiment. Although I don't think a lot of Bernie and Warren supporters will talk to me. I would love to run these experiments because I would guess the number is very,

very small. In fact, I think if you asked most political pundits, what is the difference really as a matter of policy between Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, which you would hear is, well, you know, Warren's like a little more wonky or something a little more academic. That have some very vague generalized way of separating out these two candidates. Here's the single most important takeaway, my friends. You have right now a Democratic party, that is in which there

are really only two options. The old school Democrat head fake Clinton Biden apparatus where they pretend to be centrists and technocrats when really they're just corrupt, self dealing go whichever way the wind blows, appease the left wing mob leftists, right. I mean, that's you've got that option, the politics as usual the Democratic Party. Or you have the movement far into socialism that Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and even Pete

Buddha Judge represent. This is the modern Democratic Party. It has now transitioned into a ready to go, turnkey socialist party. It's just a question of how the chips fall in the next few months. That's where we are, and that's what you should remember as we see these squabbles playing out about how everyone cares so much about the middle class and the rich are just the bad people. You're in the freedom und This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.

Here's the thing about revolutionaries, when they come from the left, there's a pretty standard template. They create a lot of anger at what they view is the ruling class, the excesses of that ruling class, the elites, the rich, the aristocrats, the oligarchy. To borrow from Bertie Sanders, it's one of his favorite words, and the way you know, you really know it's Bernie send because the oligachus, I'll tell them

what they do. I do think by Bernie Sanders sounds a bit too much like Yogi Bear, but it's close enough, it's close enough that you certainly know that's Bertie sent I did watch a lot of that cartoon back in the day. But revolutionaries come in promising that they will get rid of this oppression and that they will give nothing but benefits, sweetness, honey, and light to those who

are part of the oppressed classes, the working class. In this country, we act like the middle classes an oppressed class, which I think is if you were to look at that a historic or global standards, is flatly and obviously ridiculous, But nonetheless it seems to work for some of these politicians.

But you have to also remember that there's always an element when you're talking about people like Bernie Sanders who are calling for political revolution, there's an element of extremism that can become in few used into what they're really

into the real ethos of the movement. There can be true believers who hide their real intentions and hide their real their real feelings about what's going on in the country in order to get enough support that they can then ram their plans down the throats of everybody else in the country. All right, So this is what I meant before a little bit about the head fake from the old Democrat Party. I mean the old Democrats, meaning

the Clinton, Biden, Schumer Pelosi squad. That group tries to present themselves as just more care, more caring version of the generally capitalist, free market and constitutionally minded Republican Party, right, just a better more you know, more more caring about the oppressed, more caring about the poor and and better at governance. Although as we see from California to New York to every other major blue enclave, it's the policies that Democrats fight with Republicans on that are so clearly

the worst policies, you know. It's the ones that we look at them, we say, hold on a second, why wouldn't you arrest people for shoplifting, for example, which we'll talk about later. Democrats view that as a tool of oppression. If there are any racial disparities in arrest rates in a city, that's clearly evidence of racism. I mean the areas where you have arguments between left and right in how to govern a city or how to governor state. This is where we tend to say, okay, look at

how it works when we do it our way. Look at how it works when you do it your way. But that's the old approach of the Democrats. Now you have Bernie Sanders, you have this revolutionary I was going to say revolutionary guard, but that's giving everyone a bit of an arom tingle. I think revolutionary group inside the Democratic Party that just wants to be more open and

honest about this. And you have to think, who are really the supporters of this group, Who are the people that are going to be influencing the thought processes of those in power. What is the Bernie bass really like? Well, I can tell you as someone that operates in the realm of media commentary on a regular basis. Bernie bros, I mean, the Bernie true believers are among the worst people you will come across on the Internet or anywhere else.

They are horrifically nasty, often threatening, just incredibly fiercely, insanely defensive of Bernie Sanders. Now, I understand that they would turn and say, well, we'll look at Trump supporters, But of course I like Trump supporters, so I don't you know, And I understand that I come at this from a certain perspective, and I know plenty of Trump supporters who are super nice. Every Bernie Sanders supporter that I deal with or that I come across is either spewing just

complete and utter nonsense. It's about how socialism is going to be this cure all for all the inequality in society, or their rabid partisans who are really kind of scary. It's not so much that they want to fix the problems in this country. They want payback against those who have made the problems in this country, and that includes

Trump supporters. That includes those who have done well, people who are self made, who have become well off, or who are as Bernie Sanders calls it, the millionaires and the billionaires. Those people need to be punished. It's not just that they need to be Their so called greed needs to be constrained and government regulation needs to relieve them of their wealth. They need to be punished. They might even need to be ideologically cleansed. They need to

be re educated in some way. I'll take you to this project Veritas situation in a second. Thanks for listening to The bus In Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. It looks like James O'Keefe has done it again. Oops, he did it again. He played with the libs, got lost in the I don't know how does the rest of it? You you were younger than oh, you actually were too young for Britney spears. You don't even know

Britney spears. No, but like you weren't you were like in you were like an ambo when Britney spirits breaking onto the scene. She was like, yea, when I was in high school, Britney Spears, was it man? Yeah, so shouldn't you be able to know? It's? Oops? I did it again. I played with my heart and I lost it again. I lost it again. Yeah, yeah, okay, I'm not singing it. I'm not you right, of course you

would not do that. Um. But yes, indeed there is a there's a new project very toss video that is at a circle and it's making the rounds the truth about twenty what we should have James has done. Here we go, Oh sorry, expose pardon me exposed twenty twenty dot com from James O'Keefe. Okay, And this is going to be particularly interesting to people because there's there's a

real Bernie Sanders moment right now. I mean, the Democratic Party is in the process as I sit here talking to you, of deciding whether or not they are a socialist party. They can call themselves other things, that doesn't matter. They will be a party for socialism. Elizabeth Warren is running around talking about how it's just a matter of executive decision she would forgive student loans. I mean, this is just the president at that point. The preside United States.

She could just walk around with a blank checkbook and say, hey, I like you, here's a billion dollars from the treasury because I like your smile. Kid, good luck. This is this is absurd, but that's what she's Well, we'll get into that a bit more later on. But the choice of whether or not we go down this road to socialism, which, if you want to borrow from Hyak, is also a road to serfdom for all of us. In a sense.

It's a road to government control, to bureaucrats having a much greater say over your life, over your day to day affairs than they ever should. This will have ramifications that could stretch for who knows how long in this country, but also around the world too. Other places have looked at us, have mirrored our economic approach, have seen how much wealth and prosperity has been created by the American people for the American people, and say, you know, maybe

we should get in on that. You know, we've run this experiment many times. You know, do you want to be South Korea or do you want to be Venezuela. Do you want to be Hong Kong, you want to be Singapore? Or do you want to be North Korea, free market, individual ingenuity, rewarded, rule of law, private property, freedom, liberty,

things that are good that we like. Do you want those things or do you want people that think they know better than you making the determinations for you about what you should do, what you should have, and how and where you should be able to spend your time and your money. This is that these are very important questions for society. These are These are not little differences.

This is not a you know, a coke versus pepsi and I was people always tell me they can I was never able to tell the difference, So maybe I have a weak palette or something. It's always been the same to me. But this is not a coke versus pepsi decision in this election at all. This is a socialism versus freedom decision. And you have people that understand

also what the real difference in trajectory would be. People are beginning to see this, I think, because you have true believers on the Bernie Sanders side who are running around and letting everyone know they're kind of they're going off off script because Bernie Sanders is supposed to be like the cuddly you know socialist who just eats Ben and Jerry's lives up in Vermont, hangs out, just wants

to give you free healthcare. Man. Remember this. What socialists don't tell you is all the amazing goodies that they're promising, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Buddha Judge, all of them. What they won't tell you is that that all comes through government coercion. That if you don't want to do these things, you have no choice. If you don't want the government deciding what doctor you can see, when you can see

that doctor. If you don't want the government telling you how much of your money you can keep, how much money is going to go to other people that should be yours. That is the result of Remember, people make money often paste on their time, not necessarily because they're all hourly employees, and that's certainly a part of it too, But you put your time into an endeavor and then you're rewarded for that. So when they're taking money from you, I mean they're taking hours. They are taking time from

your life and giving it to other people. There is a rot at the center of this redistributive approach to governance, and it needs to be identified now we should all be very very clear on this. The Bernie bros who, as I said at Ore and even Democrats will often complain about them for being for I mean, first of these these people are delusional. I'm sorry Bernie Sanders. Does anyone really think Bernie Sanders knows how to run anything? Does anyone think Bernie Sanders would be good at running

a business? That Bernie Sanders understands what really hard work is? Why because he has been representing and almost you know, a state that is a Democrat state with very little diversity, where he just gets to run around and promising you know, the sun, the moon and the stars to everybody, gives speeches, goes to the Senate. What legislation has he authored? What has he done? That's important? Guy, I was an independent coxing with Democrats for how long he wants to lecture

you all on hard work? I love this. Ricky Gervais who had his phenomenal and we love the show that what was it a week ago had his phenomenal opening speech to the Golden Globes because it was it was funny and it was true, and watching the hangers on the toe of the entertainment media try to do what they could to protect the delicate feelings of people who

are really lucky. I mean, if you're sending that audience at the Golden Globes and you're somebody who's either being honored or just invited to this thing, and you work in the entertainment industry, you're really lucky, and you should be thankful and grateful and humbled by your good fortune instead of thinking that it confers some extra special intelligence upon you as an actor or an actress to tell everyone else how to do the how to live their lives.

Ricky Gervais is like, look, I used to be poor and it was terrible, and now because of a lot of people that like what I do, I become very, very rich, and my life is super comfortable and easy now. And I know that, so I don't tell other people what to do. I don't lecture them, and I don't hector them because I know it's tough for them. It's not tough for me. Thank you to those people for not making it tough for me anymore. All Right, This

is what we all instinctually know is true. This is something that we all recognize as being the reality of having been in the struggle and having been in a better place financial than economically. And so Bernie Sanders going around always talking with the middle class. And I mean Bernie Sanders hasn't had great healthcare and paid for by

the taxpayer, I mean the federal federal government. The Senate has incredible healthcare and has been living on a really nice salary and doesn't really have to you know, doesn't have to sweat it that much. Folk. It hasn't been that bad for Bernie. But he wants to tell you all that. And by the way, he's got three houses. I mean, this is the other party. He's a socialist with three houses? Why does he need three houses? He asks billionaires why they need billions? Why does Bernie Sanders

need three really only needs one house? All right? If you're going to take the socialist set their word, if you're gonna believe the rhetoric, why does he get away then with living large and in charge? I just wouldn't want someone that. Why's Elizabeth Warrenworth. I think they asked himate six to twelve million dollars her in her husband. That's a lot of money. It's a lot more money than I have. I would like to get to a million. Producer, Mark and I both of the same goal. We would

like to get to a million. That sounds like fun. But Elizabeth Warren is also going around playing the oh, I care so much about the middle class and the struggle that people are in and everything else. She's had more of a building you know, she's had a more interesting resume building experience than Bernie Sanders, of course helped in no small part by being a fake Native American. But they they're playing this game of trying to present

themselves as caring so much. Meanwhile, to bring us back to Project Very Toss and James O'Keefe and the Bernie Bros. This is again, this is exposed twenty twenty dot com James O'Keefe's projected Project Very Toss. This is a Bernie organizer who's talking about how he feels about what's going on here. And I think we've got it all bleeped and whatnot. But be prepared for that play it. Sixteen cities burning people could even be re educated. Maybe we

gotta try. Maybe. Like so, like the Nazi Germany, after the fallow of the Nazi Party, there was a tone of the populace service in Nazi Germany had to spend billions of dollars re educating people. Should not be an asked, how are you gonna have to do the same thing here? And that's kind of what Bernie's like in Hey for education for everybody, because they're gonna have to teach you

not to you Nazi. Now they're going to say what they always will in the circumstance, which is that this Bernie Sanders Field organizer is not representative of broader sentiment among Bernie supporters. But let's ask ourselves the question, is that really the case? Do you think that there are a lot of Bernie supporters, people that want Bernie Sanders the president of the United States, who believe the things

that Bernie Sanders himself says about Donald Trump. That Donald Trump is a massive national security threat, that he's an authoritarian, that he's a traitor, that he's a Russian studge, that he's a Russian asset. I think a lot of them do believe that. And this is where I start to sound a little bit more ominous, perhaps than I usually do. But I'm willing to take crazy people at their word.

I think that true believers should be listened to when they're telling you what they really think, you should say, hold on a second, maybe it's worth thinking some notes here. They have been claiming for years that Donald Trump was a threat to the most sacred institutions of our republic. And this isn't I don't think anyone would deny that that has been going on. They'll say Donald Trump is a white nationalist. They'll say that he is a racist.

They'll say that he is a national security threat, that he could have war breakout with North Korea or thrown at any moment. They say all of these things, and let's not forget. And I don't want to. I don't want to unfairly paint the entire Bernie supporter because I have some friends who are Bernie supporters actually, and I liked them. There are very nice people who support Bernie Sanders. I'm not I'm not a crazy person. But there's also this faction within Bernie brow world that is nuts. And

there are some of the most ardent Bernie believers. And it should not just pass unnoticed or unmentioned that, you know, while we're while we had the media lecturing us all the time about Trump, you know, saying throw that bum out of here or whatever at the at the different rallies he's had, and how Trump was inspiring violence. I heard that. I remember that story so many times during the general election in twenty sixteen. It's at CNN. I

was on TV having to talk about this. I was like, guys, you know, he uses tough talk, He's not actually inspiring violence. It was a Bernie Sanders supporter, very clearly, openly, avowedly who for reasons of healthcare defense, tried a mass assassination of specifically conservative members of Congress, notably wounding and almost killing Steve Schoolies, trying to kill Senator Rand Paul among many others at that baseball field and Alexandria, Virginia, Virginia.

It was an attempted mass assassination of members of Congress from a Bernie Sanders supporter. Now I'm not saying that Bernie Sanders supporters are all like this. Of course that's stupid and that's a strong man argument. But there are people who are Bernie supporters in positions of actual influence who really do think that Trump supporters perhaps need re education of some kind, who really think that they're all just stealth white nationalists, a danger to this country in

ways that we have to deal with. I mean, I can promise you and I generally also have an issue with the hidden camera stuff when it's low level people who are blown off some steam who work at sea. I don't. When James O'Keefe, you know, hits a home run, I'm the first to say, great work, James. I think

some of this stuff. For example, at CNN. You know, if someone asked me about any company that I'd worked for after hours, I think that I'm having a drink with a peer and I start mouthing off about things there. I think it's I question the wisdom of airing that stuff as a journey because it doesn't because they can always just deny that and say, oh, well that's someone did the higher ups say, that's just some disgruntled employee

who doesn't know anything. Doesn't mean anything. You know you've got if you get someone high up and off the food chain. I think that matters in this case. Though. If you've been exposed to Bernie Brows, you know that there are a lot of them who really think that that when Bernie Sanders talks about a political revolution in this country, he means it, and that there will not be any sit down and compromise and halfway with say

Trump supporters. There will not be any effort to try to reach some consensus position about what will be good governance benefiting the most people, or good government's rooted in principle, which is going to be an even trickier thing. It's one. It's one thing to try and be in a position to negotiate with your political opponents and find a little what you like and a little what they like. It's

a whole other woman. You're saying, no, no, it's just about what's right, and try to convince them of that. In the realm of individual rights, collectivists are always going to give you tremendous pushback, and they will reject arguments that are rooted in individual rights, individual private property, and they'll always come at you with the collective good. So Bernie Sanders should not be underestimated as a political force, not just in terms of his ability to win the

Democratic nomination, which I think must be taken seriously. If he is able to knock Elizabeth Warren out of serious contention, and all of a sudden the pressure rises on Warren to get out Bernie Sanders picks up Warren supporters. He's the frontrunner, folks. This guy's the front or of the Democrats, someone that I and I really mean this. I would not trust Bernie Sanders to run my ten year old neighbor's lemonade. Stand. I mean, this is not someone you

want to charge of anything. But if you point that out, Bernie bros. Are gonna come for you. And as you can hear from mister Oh, We're gonna put the Trump people in re education camps. Bernie Brows are crazy. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. I got something for you guys. It looks like Cardie B is learning the value of limited taxation. Brucer Mark,

would you please? This is Cardie B on Texas. So you know the government is taking of my taxes and Uncle Sam, I want to know what you're doing with my food tax money because you know what I'm saying, Like, but you donate, like when you donate to a kid from a foreign country, they give you updates of what they're doing with you do nation. I want to know what to do with my FOD tax money because I'm from York and the streets is always dirty. Who was

voted the dirtiest city in America. I mean, she's wrong about New York is the dirtiest city in America, but she is right that it would be nice to have a better sense of where all of our tax money's going. So and it also does it does kind of hurt. You get forty percent of your money getting taken away by the federal government. Close to it, I guess I think the top tax r it's thirty seven percent now in federal federal incompent might be it was thirty nine

if memory serves. But Cardi Bell of a sudden's like, I want to keep my money. What is the government doing with all my money? Now? She's not an astute political observer, but I do like when people learn the lessons of real life. Guess what if Bernie Sanders wins the presidency, Cardi, he's gonna take a lot more of

your money. Thant try more like sixty maybe seventy. That's what you're going to be paying as a top rate if Bernie Sanders gets his way and Congress goes along with it, or maybe they just go executive order route. Something else we've got to look at. Thanks for listening. To the Bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcast, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get

your podcasts. All right now, some of you might say, Buck, they can't really go socialist, even if Warren or Sanders or Buddha Judge or whomever AOC if she were old enough to run for president, which she would be not for quite some time, or even for Senate I think for a little while, whoever it may be. In this current political environment, it would be either Warren or Sanders. But you have this understanding, we all have this understanding

of how the system works. You'd say, but Buck, no, no, no, Look at the things that Obama wanted to do. There was really a three legged stool of socialism. One leg was healthcare. They got that one without a single Republican vote, or they couldn't go all the way on it, but they set it up. It was a major incremental stap to create further momentum into socialism. They did do that

with Obamacare. That's why we're now already talking about Medicare for all, where we're talking about these more all in government socialist healthcare programs. They wanted to do environmentalism, green energy, stuff climate change hysteria, but they knew that that would come with a price tag that many of the Democrats at that point did not want to pay, not just a price tag that consumers don't necessarily want to pay and that politicians don't want to pay at the polls.

So that was a problem. And then there was also immigration, right, there was immigration. There were these areas where the Obama presidency was trying to and that was get an amnesty, going get an amnesty from the whole the whole country.

That has the California effect. You have all these new illegals that are then either raising people who are likely to be Democrats, growing up a Democrat households because of we all know that people who are recent immigrants of the country are more likely to vote Democrat, and people who are illegals, obviously are people that are related to illegals are more likely to want to support democratic causes or to vote Democrat. So that was another part of it,

and they almost got that through with Republican help. Okay, fine, didn't happen though, because Republican voters said, hold on a second, this is just amnesty. You can call a comprehensive immigration reform.

It's just amnesty though, and we all know that, all right now, all along, though, there's this trend, right the Democrats, the Democrats socialists want something and they can't really get it because of the political realities of the Congress, the legislative branch, and people in Congress who want to keep their jobs want to keep their positions their seats. So

that means that there's a slowdown. That means that there is some bullwork, which a ward that has been ruined by the crappiest pseudo conservative public location in the entirety of the Internet. But there is supposed to be a break, a speed bump, if you will. There we go replace that with the replace will work with speed bump to prevent Democrats from just going all in on socialist plans. Well, here's the issue with that. What happens when Democrats decide

that the president is just going to do it. Ah, You will recall that Obama, through the EPA, through regulation, was pushing for socialist green policies, right redistribution of wealth from the energy sector to green energy projects and activist groups. And although I mean this is there were ways that they try to use the executive branch to do exactly that.

Obama took it even a step further, and when there was different action for childhood arrivals DOTA right dreamers, Oh, I'm not going to We're not going to prosecute them for any for illegal presence in the country, which is the law is that they camp in the country illegally. And then it was, oh, we're also not going to prosecute their parents, and oh, by the way, we're going to give them work permits and bring them into the

system without any act of Congress whatsoever. And that was stopped, i believe by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, and they had to actually stop put out an injunction because the Department of Homeland Security under Obama wanted to just give out these ID cards to illegals under the DAPPA program deferred action for the parents of childhood arrivals, and at that point they would have been so close to legal status that everyone knows that they would have had

to have been. The idea was to get them as enmeshed in the system as possible, so then they would have to be part of a larger deal, and all of a sudden deferred action for child arrivals turns into five or six million people getting amnesty and in getting amnesty law largely through executive fiat. Now, why am I all wrapped up in this now? Because we've seen this play out in the past. We've seen how this is.

The Congress is not going to save you from socialism, is what I really want you to take from this. Don't think that because cocaine, Mitch is putting judge after judge, great judges. Trump has gotten better judges in the Supreme Court all the way down to the circuit courts across the country than any president in my lifetime. So credit where it's due. And Mitch McConnell is just a lean,

mean judge confirmation machine in the Senate. But what we're hearing now from candidates like Warren and Sanders is something you must keep in on. When I talk to you about how they want to implement some socialist scheme, you probably would think, well, hold on, buck, do they have the votes? Do they have what they have with Obamacare a philibuster proof sixty seat majority in the Senate as well as a House majority. I can they get it?

Excuse me? Can they get it through the procedures? For the Congress such as they are, Well, what if the president, what if a socialist president Sanders? What if Comrade Sanders or Comrade Warren just comes along and says, no, we're just going to do this thing. This isn't really all that theoretical, because that's exactly what Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders are promising you do. On the issue of student loan debt. There is over one trillion dollars of outstanding

student loan debt out there. Elizabeth Warren's idea, as she's just said this now, is for people making less than one hundred thousand dollars a year, up to fifty thousand dollars of student loan debt would just be wiped away. Would just be wiped away. Okay, that's interesting. How would that happen? She'll just tell the Education Secretary to quote

and modify their loans. This is this is just by waving one's hand as president over all of these tracks, all these financial obligations that people willingly entered into, it would just all of a sudden be money that is no longer owed. You see. Also, the Obama administration, by taking private sector lenders out of a student loan business. Yes, there was an efficiency savings there, but it also meant

that guess what, you know who? You know who the lender is now for people that want to take out you know, twenty thirty fifty one hundred thousand dollars of student loans, you know, the lender is you. You are the lender. They say it's the federal government. But the federal government isn't the lender. You are the lender. It

is your labor that funds the federal government. It is your labor that the federal government takes a piece of under threat of force, by the way, and redistributes it for a whole slew of government program some of which we think are reasonable, unnecessary, most of which are not. It's your money. Government doesn't have money, and government can. Only. The only reason the government's creation or printing of money has any value is because of the value that we,

the American people, put into that by our labor. Otherwise, you know, I mean, the government of any country could come along and just and governments have done this. We've seen this experiment played out. I mean, try to try to see how how much you can buy with a trillion Zimbabwe and I forget what the currency is in Zimbabwe, but you know, a trillion Zimbabwe and whatever it is over there, it's not going to get you very much. We have seen this experiment play out and has predictable results.

Elizabeth Warren is effectively trying to socialize the debts that people have run up, overwhelmingly people who are middle to upper middle class to go to colleges that they paid. You know, they could have gone a community college, which is effectively free for most people in most places. They wanted to go to a state school or maybe a private school. They took out loans. I also have to wonder if democrats ever think about the implications of these things that feel good for them to say and that

will get additional support for them. But if you are someone who just finished paying off your student loans after twenty or thirty years of sending in that check every month, and I'm sure it was painful and it was annoying, I sit here right now with producer Mark doing a radio show and not sitting in some cubicle working for some financial firm or something, largely because I didn't want to go to business school and incur a couple one hundred thousand dollars a day, just didn't want to do it.

I also loved doing media, but I didn't know if I'd be any good at it before I did it. But I figured it. Heck, you know, Yolo rolled the dice. Didn't want to take out loans. But if I had thought that I could take out two hundred grand and loans and have well, that's a lot of loans, but that's that's what going to the business schools that I was. By the time you actually pay them off, that's what

it is. If you're taking out the whole because it's about sixty thousand intuition, twenty thousand living expenses, then when you add interest over the life of the loan cycles about two hundred and grand, that's what you're paying off. But if I thought I could go and even get fifty thousand dollars of that just wiped away, that would be nice. That's that's a pretty that's a pretty sweet deal, isn't it. But then you have to ask, will what about the people that have paid off their loans after

twenty or thirty years. Don't they feel like there's some there is something inherently unfair. Of course, there is why or why do some people get the benefit of this timing and others don't just because Elizabeth Warren needs votes. And then think of some of the other downstream implications of this. Why would a college give out any financial

aid anymore? Why would you know, university of whatever, university of left wing absurdity give people a ten to fifteen perhaps even a full ride scholarship to go to their school when they know that, Oh, just take out the loans and just you know, just let those loans ride awhile, and eventually we'll have another Democrat will come into office and just wipe it all away, don't. You don't really pay it down, just pay the interest on the loans, don't pay it on the principle, and you can just

eventually it'll all be wiped away for you. There's been a huge transfer of wealth, by the way, from the American people to these bloated, ridiculous universities across the country. I mean, these places have billions and billions and billions of dollars in endowment at the very top end schools, and their tuitions are sixty thousand dollars a year now

pretty regularly. That's that's really where it is, and they'll even tell you that that doesn't even cover the full cost of educating a student based upon the structure they have set up for these four year colleges. So you have to wonder why, I mean, are they are they education so much better now than they were thirty or forty years ago. Many of you probably have or some

of you listening went through this yourselves. But those of you who around my age, you have parents who will tell stories about how they were, you know, pulling weeds out of the ground from someone's yard and you know, doing a little bit of roofing or working as a dock hand. Right, I don't know whatever? A store clerk? Ice cream scooperum, prison mark, what's the like, what's the most job job you've had? I mean, right now, you work in media, you're fancy, what was the most job job?

You know? This is actually hilarious. Ice cream Scooper? Really? Yes, I was unaware of that. Yeah, yeah, Hershey ice cream shop? What was your favorite flavor of ice cream? I mean at a Hershey's ice cream shop? Obviously chop chocolate? Right, Okay, there's no better chocolate ice cream than hers Just making sure you didn't say strawberry, because it'd be like crossing the streams and you'd have total protonic reversal and you'd have to imagine every cell in your body exploding at

the speed of light. That's what happens if you say strawberries your favorite. I didn't realize that's what happened. That's what has science. It's hashtag science. So it isn't true that it's actually really hard after a while to scoop the ice cream out, though I've been told that it gets you know, they don't just more challenging than you than people think it is. If they don't just wet the the scooper for no reason, by the way, right helps it. Yeah, See producer Mark had a job. Job.

It used to be that you could have that job job and if you were going to you know, NYU or if you were going to GW and DC or wherever, you might be able to over the course of a summer, you know, payoff maybe a semester or a half a semester, that's school. If you're going to pay off a year at NYU or GW, now you better be making about one hundred and fifty grand. And like after taxes, you'll

have some money to pay off that. It's ridiculous. Why is it so much more expensive now, Well, in part it's so much more expensive because of people running around saying that what everyone should get a four year college education. You have to get a four year college education. They don't understand there's a supply and demand component of the workforce. It's not just everyone doesn't just get to be in

the best richest, best, you know, highest paying jobs. We don't all get to be top you know, corporate lawyers or heart surgeons or you know whatever. I look. I wish I could have been a heart surgeon. But math hashtag no math for buck. But instead what you have are people saying, take out these loans and it will just be wiped away. Take out these loans, the taxpayers and the hook for it. Moral hazard doesn't matter here.

You know, learning your lesson doesn't matter here. And there's the bigger, broader lesson that I want you all to take from this too, is what if a socialist socialist senders or socialist war and just says this, and the education department goes along as part of the executive you could say it's going to be maybe it'll be wrapped up in the courts or somebody who brings some kind of a challenge. But who knows if that'll even work depends on what judge you get and what the system,

what the situation is the time. But beyond that, it's just like with amnesty. Once you tell people their debts are canceled by the government, they're gonna act like the debt is canceled and they're gonna have a and they're gonna have a strong case to be to make that that's the case. So now you have socialist Now you have socialist rhetoric about you know, socialist rhetoric about the reality of just having a president who wiped stuff away. Absurd, absurd,

But that is where we are. Elizabeth Warren is saying, if I am president, I will effectively give you up to fifty thousand dollars if you are predominantly a you know, upwardly mobile young person who took out loans and they don't want to pay them off. This is a payoff. She's just taking money from you, the taxpayer, and given it to people that she thinks are going to vote for her. And if they'll do it with student loans, let me tell you something. Democrats, socialists will do it

with whatever they want. What happens if a President Warren comes in and says, I'm declaring an amnesty and I'm telling the Department of Homeland Security to give people. Okay, maybe it gets challenged in corp. But what if they say, no, we don't care, We're gonna go ahead with us anyway. What are you gonna do? How are you going to stop them? It's the right thing to do. They'll say, that's what Obama used to say whenever he wanted his way,

Gotta go around Congress. Congress isn't acting, so I will act. That was what Obama got away with saying. The press was like, oh yeah, that sounds right, that sounds constitutional. I don't underestimate the comrades They're coming for all of us. You're in the freedom Heart. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. She said that she wanted to see the rules of the road so that she could appoint appropriate

managers to present the case to the Senate. She did not say, while I'm holding down until the mitchellcounell agrees to witnesses. So let's get back to what we really should be doing. Which is or focusing on, which is what kind of a trial are we going to happen and the Senate? Is it going to be a fair

trial or is it going to be a rig trial? Alison, Just as the President tried to rig his reelection by by trying to get the Ukrainian president to go along with his political scheme, he's trying to, with the help of Mitchellcowna, rigged the Senate trial by not calling appropriate

witnesses and producing documents. The President has been stonewalling this impeachment process the whole way, and now that he has an opportunity in the trial to present his case and presenting his case easy, but presenting facts and evidence, not saying this is a witch hunt, that is not evidence. That's just a rhetorical what I call rhetorical. It's nothing progress. I think Mazie Herono is the dumbest person in Congress. I really believe that. I actually don't even say it

to be amusing. I actually think she's the dumbest person in Congress based on what she says publicly, in the way that she conducts herself as an elected official, and so in a sense she provides very you know, She plays a very necessary role because it makes, you know, former members of the Senate like Joe Biden look not quite so dumb by comparison. Joe Biden, I think, is also a bit of a dumb ass, even though he's

been Vice president United States. Remember, they can call Republican president's vice president stupid all they want, and then we're supposed to always accept that. Right, George W. Bush was so dumb. George W. Bush is smarter than Al Gore, has always been smarter than Al Gore, and always will be smarter than Al Gore. Okay, so as much as the media can try to just brainwash everyone into thinking otherwise, you know, Maisie Arono here though, Well, we got to

talk more then. Now we're getting to the impeachment, s off the articles, the transmission of the articles, blah blah, that's coming up. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. The Senate was never going to pre commit ourselves to redoing the prosecutors homework for them, and we were never going to allow the Speaker of the House to dictate Senate proceedings to Senators.

House Democrats have already done enough damage to the President international unity. Mitch McConnell's going to hold the line here, I think, which is good. He understands who he's up against here with these Democrats. He knows that they have no honor or integrity whatsoever in this process, and so all of their scheming, in all of their insinuations, they're smears.

All this stuff that they're doing right now about Mitch McConnell is just desperation play But perhaps there's nothing really more desperate and disgraceful in this whole situation than what has just what has just come to light, and that is that they're now doing the Russia Russia playbook against Mitch McConnell. This is from a CNN reporter, So not somebody, not someone on the ride who's trying to find some

way to bash Nancy Pelosi. Which really, to bash Nancy Pelosi just let her speak publicly long enough and she'll say something really stupid or really dishonest, and then watch all the Democrats scrambled at her. Oh, Pelosi is a great strategist. Pelosi is a narcissistic loon. But anyway, here's what the CNN reporter shared this morning. Pelosi told her colleagues in private that Mitch McConnell is acting like a rogue Senate leader. As she said before, she mused that

sometimes she wonders Mitch McConnell has Russian connections. As per attendees at the meeting. Oh yeah, that's right, folks, because Mitch McConnell is not doing what Nancy Pelosi says he should do in the Senate. Remember, the Senate has the soul. This is the Senate's world. By the way, thank god that Republicans held the Senate in that last election, which was not which was not something that could be counted

on upfront. I mean, you look at the Kavanaugh effect here, and it is I do believe that it's very likely that Kavanaugh and the Democrats shameful, shameful effort to destroy that man, That Kavanaugh's effort, I mean that Kavanaugh's effect on the Senate that kept it in Republican hands was in fact the difference maker here. Could you imagine if you had a Senate majority now, they wouldn't they wouldn't get to the two thirds vote. Even if you had

had a couple of seats go the other way. But if you had Chuck Schumer running this thing and not Mitch McConnell, oh my god, this should be a circus beyond circuses, should be like the craziest thing you've ever seen. I couldn't even think of something at the time, but you know, something to get to the biggest circus ever. I'm not really sure. Also, I feel like circuses have become they're a little out of fashion now, especially they're

not allowed to have animals at circuses anymore. You know, people get very mad about like elephants being trained and lion tamers and all that stuff. That's pretty much all gone now. You can't really do that anymore. How times change. But fortunately Mitch McConnell's in charge. Mitch McConnell's in charge, and so he is not going to allow for the

shenanigans some Democrats. But just remember this. While everyone was so aghast yesterday, oh my gosh, President Trump retweeted a photoshopped image of Nancy Pelosian Chuck Schumer in front of an Iranian flag with a turban and a headscarf, respectively, and people were saying, oh, this is so horrible, and now could he do this? And well, they call Trump a Russian trader all the time, and the evidence for that is still zero. There's no actual evidence that Trump

is a Russian. I mean, not only can they not prove these a Russian trader, there's zero evidence for this. This is a without evidence claim. Oh, he says nice things about Pudin. Obama says nice said nice things about Cuba and the Castros all the time, you know, or things that were too nice about them. Oh, you know, it's too friendly to them, for sure. I guess he's a he's a Cuban asset. I mean, this is absurd,

This is absurd. But they say whatever they have to say to get what they want at the time they want it, and that's that's all that really matters to them. Tomorrow is supposed to be the day that they will transmit the articles of impeachment. There'll be a vote to transmit them, and then Pelosi has told the Democrats, who

you march in lockstep? I admire the Prussian precision of Democrats as a as a political party when they want something, there is there's none of this concern over principle, you know, that somehow the Democrats they don't they don't have you know, Amash's and Rand Paul's and these other characters who have big problems with their own party on this stuff. You know, every the Democratic Party's like, yeah, we'll do whatever Pelosi says,

so they'll vote to transmit these articles of impeachment. I still very much believe that the correct, the correct approach here for the Senate is to just shut this whole thing down. Just shut it down, shut it down, say okay, great, thank you for these articles. This is a sham. Let's vote. Oh the president's innocent, see you later. I think that's it.

All this stuff about, oh, we need to have witnesses and we need to know, we need to have whatever whatever Miss McConnell says we need, that's the reality of it. We saw what happened in the House. We saw the way Adam Schiff said, all the rules, where's the whistle blower? By the way, notice how there's all this concern over

witnesses who will testify at the impeachment. Whatever happen the whistle blower, the single most important person in our republic at one point, Oh, he's going to bring down the President and tell us tales of corruption and all this other stuff. Meanwhile we turn out and say, hold on a second, we don't get to know who this guy. We can't have it confirmed by the press who the whistle blower really is. They have no interest in getting us the truth on that matter. And beyond that, we

are not going to hear from the whistleblower. We're not going to hear from the whistle blower in this impeachment farce. Why why does he Oh, he's not the only one who thinks that he has or that he's not gonna have to test by and apparently not even Republicans are talking about this. I would also want to know why does Adam Shift think that he is not supposed to testify here? Why does Adam Shift think he can avoid

this playlip playclif twelve. Look, I'm not a fact witness, so other than mollifying the president, I'm not sure why the Senate would call me or Nancy Pelosi as a witness. Is a fair trial though you could very well see the case where the bidens would have to be there. Yes, you think that is a good thing politically, You think that's a good thing for impeachment as a whole. I think what the senators would have to evaluate is do the Bidens have any relevant testimony? And I think the

answer is that they don't. What is an issue here is whether the president withheld military aid, withheld official acts like a White House meeting in order to course a country, to announce investigations, not even conduct them, but just announce them to help smear's opponent. And there's not much light that Joe Biden or Hunter Biden can shed on the

President's conduct. So Adam Shaffer is like, no, no, we don't need to hear from the Bidens, because I say so, No, he doesn't get he doesn't get to make that determination. That's not That's not how this is going to go. It is absolutely relevant that we hear from Hunter Biden in this if we're going to call witnesses at all, which, again I want to be very clear, I do not think that that is the proper I don't think that

that's the right way to go. I think that it makes much more a much more sense under the circumstances to have the Republican majority just say thanks, this is this is crap. This impeachment is ridiculous and just throw it out, like the pizza you pull out of the fridge. It's been sitting there for a month that you thought was actually a week, and it smells and it has like green fuzz on it. You know when it goes When the pizza goes fuzzy, then you know it's really

time to not eat it. By the way, producer Mark, did you see that the latest craze right now? Right before I get before I get to to nuts here? Are you a pro or anti pineapple topic on pizza? Guy? Absolutely against opposed? So you're a purist of course, why would you have a pineapple and pizza? That's disgusting? So I'm I've actually never had pineapple on pizza, so I cannot speak to whether or not it's a good thing. I haven't even It strikes me as a bit of

culinary sacrilege. But now there's a new trend Kiwi the fruits get here. I don't even want to hear about it. On any fruit does not belong on pizza, anything sweet. Technically, a producer mark tomato as a fruit boom mine, Yeah, but you don't usually put its tactically vegetable as a cooking termament. It's a vegetable, but it's technically as a scientifically speaking, it's a fruit. I mean sure, but that's the sauce that's not You're not putting tomatoes on a piaman.

You could, but yeah, well, I mean, you know those aren't sweet. I mean, I don't know what kind of timentez you use, but I use my son Marzano as they're delicious. Yeah, but you know so so kiwi on kiwi on pizza, No no bueno for you. You don't do that? All right? Well, I'm just saying, if you pull the pizza out of the fridges smell bad, you'd throw it across the room and say not for me. Right, That's what the Senate should do with these articles of

impeachment as transmitted by the Democrats. They should just say this is ridiculous. We're done here. We're done here because you have you have these witnesses that come forward, and even if the Republicans get to get to decide who the witnesses will be in the Senate, there's always the possibility that something you know that the Democrats can seeze on something dishonestly if need be. But they'll see us on something to use against the Republicans and that whole proceeding,

and why give them any more leeway? I think there's also a lesson we learned here. If Democrats play hardball, bare knuckle politics in the House, Republicans need to do the same in the Senate. If nothing else, haven't we learned as wartime conservatives, as I like to say, that we have to be willing to fight against our adversaries the way they fight against us, or else we just consign ourselves to losing, or else we just accept right up front that we can't win. We won't win because

we're unwilling to do what is necessary. So I think that's I think shutting this down is absolutely the way to go. We shall see if I am I am correct. Oh we got a little more from from shifty Oh no, no, wait, no, forget that. We've heard enough of shifty Shift. Shifty Schumer though almost as shifty as Shifty Shift. This is one of those things that you could practice saying to work

on diction. You remember that stuff seashell, She sells Seashells by the seashore, producer Mark says, says the radio host in real time on the show. I'm not having some kind of an episode over here. I'm just trying to take everybody back to you know how you learned diction? All right, play Chuck Schumer Clip nine. If he says everything's fine and he did nothing wrong, why is he's so afraid of Bolton and the other three witnesses we've

asked for testified. If he did nothing wrong and he's not afraid, why he won't he let us get temporary document contemporaneous documents. If the president's so right, then all these witnesses and documents will corroborate his case. I think he's hiding something and that's why he's so afraid of witnesses and documents. Oh, isn't this so cute? This is like when Democrats conveniently momentarily forget that, say, pleading the fifth is not an admission of guilt. They'll only say

that if they don't like the person, Oh, guilty. An innocent person doesn't plead the fifth. If they like the person, they say, no, you have a right to avoid self incrimination. You don't have to answer the questions the government, whatever it may be. And this is another instance where the Democrat position becomes because Trump will not go along with their attempts to destroy him. He's clearly guilty. Because Trump will not assist them in the annihilation of his own presidency,

he must be guilty. This is what they say, that he fights back against this process is all you have to know. It's all you have to be told. Clearly, he must be a bad guy because he won't give them. He won't waive all executive privilege, give them all of his documents. Have everybody you know do what they say, or else you're guilty. This is this is the way that Democrats think fairness should work in this process. Absolutely absolutely observed. But they've got nothing, folks, They've got nothing.

They've made a mistake. They got there, they got their base, they got the voters all fired up thinking maybe they were going to be able to finally take down Trump with this scam, with the sham of impeachment. Turns out's not gonna happen. By the way, Rand Paul here is saying that he might force a vote on Hunter Biden testimony at the gop UM. What if this is interesting?

Why would he do this? Goop back impeachment witnesses. Yeah, so if the Goop says there's gonna be witnesses that that Rand Paul is going to force calling witnesses, including Hunter Biden. My colleagues can't have it both ways, calling for someone blocking other. If we're gonna give a platform to witnesses, the Democrats demand, I look forward to forcing votes to call Hunter Biden and many more. Yeah. Absolutely, I mean this is this isn't this is no leeway,

no halfway situation. You shouldn't call it waited. He should shut it down, Shut it down. Listen to the Buckster on this one Buckster, the grand strategist from inside the Freedom Hut. I'm telling you, Mitch McConnell, I'm telling you Republicans, just just just slap it down. You know, it's like, hey, are you gonna try it? Are you gonna try to producer Mark? You know, in the big game and you're in the end zone. Do you try for the pick or do you try it? Or just wap it down?

Just wap that ball down because you don't want the guy to get a touchdown. I'm not even sure you know what you just said. You know what I'm yeah, it's when they you're not gonna get it. You know, if you're own defense or defense and the balls coming into the receiver, you want to try to be fancy and catch that interception, or you want to just wap it down down. You wap it down, Sure, exact took a while to get there. Well, I'm trying to you know,

I'm expanding. I'm spanning my verbal palette to include some sports and nowties great producer Marker and I did watch exactly and karate chops, buck slaps, Mitch McConnell. Listen to my man, don't call witnesses, don't withdraw all this, just as the great John Madden wouldn't say, just wap it down. You're in the Freedom Hut. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. You know, my son Adam is literally my

policy advisor. I'm not joking. If you ever met him, I mean, my team everybody will tell you it's like, oh, it's Adam speaking. You know, he's a person and he's like, I'm so tired mom and people saying capitalism and socialism.

Why not peopleism? You know? He one time I wasn't a meeting which Chairwoman Maxine Waters and two other colleagues about pushing this amendment to stop fossil fuel investment US the government stopped investing fossil fuels, and he whisp, it's to me, Mom, Can I have a piece of paper? And of course he doesn't know how to whisper, and I give him this piece of paper. You know, he sometimes likes to sketch, so I'm thinking he's drawing over there.

Before that meeting ended, he handed me the piece of paper I had posted it, and he said, Mom, you gotta tell him this say is we only have until twenty thirty. Like he was giving me these talking points. And at the end of the meeting, I put it up and I shared to share me Chairwoman Waters in my colleagues, and she just smiled. And I thought to myself, God, if we could just clear the room and sometimes put kids in the room. Democrats really believe this. That's where

she did to leave. They really think that children had more wisdom about policy than adults. Apparently, this is this is the Greta Thunberg situation. This is why so many blue check journos create these false these these false anecdotes about their own children. You know, Dotty, I just want to know, why is it that Medicare for all is being opposed by those who, because of chronyism and obsession

with capitalist free markets, refuse to put people first. Said my five year old, Your five year old didn't say that. And oh, by the way, Libs, I don't care what you're five, or your ten or your fifteen year old thinks about any policy matter whatsoever. And the fact that the Libs do care is in fact a data point about how little we should care what they think about anything, because they have very poor judgment and they are emotionally unstable.

Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. A quick bit of news trivia. If you're today a team, what is the number three

trending topic on Twitter in America right now? You might think it was the big LSU Clemson game last night, which I know about because I love America and freedom, And even though I did not know that this game was happening until it was actually on the TV screens, I know that it was very fun for people to watch, and I enjoy the enjoyment that other people get from watching collegiate athletes playing the sport of football because I am I am a real American and a normal American

that people can relate to. So go LSU Clemson stuff. What other? Do we know what the mascots are from them? By the way, they're literally the same mascot. Are you serious? Yes, they're both the Tigers. No, that's not possible. I swear to you they're both Tigers. Yeah, are you messing with me? They really are both the Tigers. That was a joke on Twitter all yesterday. Who's going to win the Tigers

or the Tigers? This is like when Michael Malice try to convince me that that Aaron Paul the YouTuber was a relative of Rand Paul's, And I was just like, well, how do I know if, like I mean, it could be sound possible, right, He's like, oh no, it's real. And then as soon as I was like all right, I didn't know that, He's like, you eighty, that's not real. I'm like, wow, what I know? For the longest time, I didn't know Chuck Schumer and Amy Schumer were related.

They are related, right, Yeah, I didn't know that for a long time. Interesting, um, do you find her funny? By the way, I find her. I think the movie certain thing. I saw a movie that she was in, and it was one of the worst things I've ever seen. I think it was some kind of a dating movie. I forget what it was called, the one with lebron In, and I think, yeah, that was one of the worst movies ever made. And she should be ashamed for all eternity as an as an artiste for being involved in

that garbage. The check probably cleared, and probably Adam Sandlers made a lot of bad movies. But you're telling me to go see the what's the movie the Gems which got snubbed, not even combination. People are very angry about I love this this boy. I wasn't even thinking I was going to talk about movies today. But wait, don't go anywhere because because I got to ask you a

thing about the game. Um, but someone who writes for GQ, like a sex advice collin for GQ Blue Check person was upset to the point of profanity about how there were no women in the movie nineteen seventeen and how like why do we about this? Yeah, why do we have to keep why do we have to keep watching like this thing about the World War One? Like oh, like World War One, like such a big deal. It's

actually a pretty big deal, darling. It's actually a pretty it's actually a pretty important kind of shape the modern world and also cost europe An entire generation of young men because of government and bureaucrat's stupidity and really created also the groundwork that led to World War two. And uh yeah, it's it's so I think you can say

a big deal, but but no, apparently apparently not. And it's really what you what you find is that trench warfare and World War One, as you know, is the patriarchy. That is the patriarchy. Just dudes, how do you expect to fake putting women in that battle? I mean not that were women in the army at that time? I don't think so. No, m no, there's nothing we can do about that now in twenty and twenty. No, But wokeness means not having to not having to bend the

need of reality. Sure, they're really should there should have been a whole female battalions in nineteen seventeen. Who were you know, we're running with like you know, women's march t shirts on running across that field just for the artistic merit of it. That would have made it a much better, much better film. Yeah, I hate factually incorrect movies. I know, I get angry about that too. Oh wait, but so the LSU ding LSU Clemson game LSU one, right, yes, and do we like this? Is this? Is this good

for us? Sure? Yeah? Is the freedom of pro LSU? Were pro pro Clemson? You get to decide. I guess that's you. It's all on your pro LSU. I don't know. We're probably pissed off half of Alabama there. Oh, I was Clemson in Alabama thing? Yeah? Where's Clemson in Alabama? Big rivals with Alabama? Yeah, this is a whole, This is a whole where LSU is right Louisia. Oh my god. Yes, okay, I thought I got that wrong. I was worried for

a second. All right, no, no, yeah, but yes, their quarterback Joe Burrow will be the number one overall pick in the NFL Draft this year. He'll probably go to Cincinnati, which really stinks for him. But yeah, well, you know, at least he can hang out in Miami in the offseason. So this is the you might think, buck, aren't we talking about the LSU Clemson game? Because that's the number three trending topic. No, no, no, no no. The number three trending topic on Twitter has to do with the

LSU Clemson game. But it is not actually, no, not actually the game at all. The only reason you know about this game isn't it. Yes, this is true. He just called me out, but it's accurate. Um. Vince Vaughan, who isn't an actor with a tremendous range that goes from movies where he plays Vince Vaughan to other movies where he plays slightly older Vince Vaughn. But I do like him. I mean I think I think he's made some great I think Old School's Great, Wedding Crashes is great.

These are fun movies, no question. He was horrifically bad in the second season of True Detective, but I'll let that slide. Vince Vaughan at the LSU Clemson game went up to the President of the United States and his wife, shook hands, exchange pleasantries, and went about the rest of his life. And the Left is freaking out about it all over the social media. Avage Vaughn. Trump's our passion as people freaking out, I don't understand. They gotta get a grip they gotta get a grip. It's just not

that big a deal. The guy was just saying, Hi, this is the same thing that happened with Ellen and George. W Oh, yeah, that's right. Yeah she was. I give Ellen credit. She was like, I'm you know, he's a human being. I'm a human being. Sometimes human beings are

nice to each other, you know. I was like, yeah, you know, well when you're an Ellen also, it's like, come on, like they can't who doesn't, Like I was gonna say, it's like there's some people that even the left, even the left, no matter how how angry they get, like the wokeness, when overcome you know Ellen, Yeah, I mean Oprah, Ellen, they can pretty much do the thing that baby Yoda does where they like stop the you know, the bad guys from moving. They can just freeze them

and their Twitter. Yeah, they can just stop Twitter. Oprah can just wave her hand and like Twitter will freeze. Same thing with Ellen Um included. You know, because they're on the they're like very powerful figures to the left and on the left anyway. So Vince Vaughan was pleasant to the sitting president United States of the commander in chief, and people are all freaked out about that. Um, that's a real thing that is going on right now, Vince Vaughan,

they're saying should be canceled. I mean, Democrats are completely insane, folks. This is this is a real thing that is happening

right now. That's how much they've been convinced that that Donald Trump is a menace, is a danger, is a bad im It's not possible to have reasonable conversations with people who think that it is a transgression to shake hands just as an American, as any person, as an American, shake hands with the sitting president of the United States, a president who has done what's the terrible thing that he's done again, exactly what countries has he invaded and destroyed?

What what you know internment camps? Is he set up for people and sent American citizens into What's the really horrific thing that Donald Trump has done? Always loved us. Oh, they misrepresent something that he said at a press conference a few years ago. That's what the thing that we're all supposed to be terrified about. These people are crazy.

But that's also why when I saw this morning, you know, CNN was running some story on how the ocean is warming at the same rate as if we dropped five herosium as sized nuclear bombs in the ocean every day. I I mean, I know that's supposed to be released. That's like something it sounds to peep. Oh my gosh, that's so so scary. The ocean, I'm gonna let you

in a little secret, is really really big. So even if it sounds like, oh my gosh, five nuclear bombs in the ocean a day, that's that's a real But it's a really big ocean, all right, So let's not get too worried about this. But they're trying to find the most viscerally disturbing imagery possible to describe what is a naturally occurring process that has always been occurring. Temperature of the ocean has always been going up, going down. That's just the reality of the planet we live in.

But they want people to be terrified, and as part of that terror campaign, they come up with ways to play upon the fear that they've created. I mean, this is now the climate change stuff, you know. Look, it's you see this with the way that that Trump is treated as the worst person ever by the left, there's the exaggeration has gotten to the point now where there's

no backing down from it. I mean, they've really convinced people that Donald Trump is the scariest, worst person ever, and so there's no they're not willing to they're not willing to try to scale that back at all. You also have this with climate change. If you want any attention for your climate change, cause what you end up having to do as a lib and as a media outlet now is just saying the most outrageous, frightening things possible, and and then and then people will click on it

and they'll want to hear it. You know. Then you have to say the world's gonna end in twelve years and other world's gonna end in ten years, you know, not six seven you know that, not six minute apbs, seven minute abbs. That's that's where we are on this.

It reminds me a little bit of the local news trick that you still see sometimes where it's like, well, you know, good evening, I'm so and so, and here's the you know, attractive female that appeals to the largest local demographic viewership we have here, Um, whatever that may be. And uh, you know, tonight we're going to talk to you about the mayor's race. And also the thing you have in your home that may kill you unless we

tell you what it is coming up later. This is the This is a kind of a caricature of what but I mean that that really happened. I mean you look at local news, they'll do that. People go, oh, I better know or else this thing's gonna kill me. That's now. Look the climate change people, it's it's you know. Here we have another scientist who says, unless we take climate change seriously, we have six years left. Now, we

have four years left, now, we have ten years left. No, we're all gonna die because when you set the bar at that level to get anyone's attention, you have to take you have to take the dial to eleven, you know, not ten eleven, not six seven. All Right, you see what I'm saying. You're in the freedom. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. This is very interesting and I didn't get a chance to address this earlier, but let

me share with you. This just broke. This is a a piece in the New York Times Russians hacked Ukrainian gas company at the center of impeachment. Give you some of the details here, and I quote with President Trump facing an impeachment trial over his efforts to pressure Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. And his son Hunter Biden, Russian military hackers have been boring into the Ukrainian gas company at the center of the affair.

According to security experts, the hacking attempts against Barisma, the Ukrainian gas company on whose board Hunter Biden serve, began in early November, as talk of the Biden's Ukraine and

impeachment was dominating the news in the United States. It is not yet clear what the hackers found or precisely what they were searching for, but the experts say the timing and scale of the attack suggest that the Russians could be searching for potentially embarrassing material on the Bidens, the same kind of information that mister Trump wanted from Ukraine when he pressured an investigation of the Bidens and Barisma, setting off a chain of events that led to his impeachment.

Then then as now, the Russian hackers, from a military intelligence unit known formally as the GRU and to private researchers by the alias Fancy Bear, you so called phishing emails that designed that are designed to steal using names and passwords. According to a Silicon Valley security firm that

detected the hacking called Area one. I guess we're putting a lot of faith incredibility in this Area one, which, by the way, this is blown up in the media's face before it did back with the Washington Post and their whole Russian fake news thing. They cited some security expert online cyber group that was a joke that was like nothing, didn't really exist, but the Washington Post ran with it because it was anti Rump. That was early in the Trump presidency. Let's unpack this for a minute.

Ukrainian gas company at the center of impeachment, Barisma, is hacked by Russians. That's what they're saying. Why would we be Why would they tell us this, Why would they tell us this, Why would they be concerned about this too? There are a few things that could be going on here, and I'm not quite committed in my mind yet to which one I think is the most likely. So I'm just I'm working through some of the options here with you.

As I see it, you could have an effort to just bring up Russia again right now in the whole impeachment situation, and oh, the Russians are trying to help Trump, and that's Anything that can be talked about as a Russia issue gets Democrats excited. Anything that is in the world of Russia stuff gets Democrats excited. Okay, that's possible.

So it's just it's just a distraction from the excuse me whoa distraction from the impeachment situation, and it's something that we have to just move past as quickly as we can because it doesn't meaning. Here's another possibility, though, What if we're being told this by the New York Times.

What if they're telling us this because there are concerns, There are concerns that maybe somewhere in the Barisma files, somewhere on the Barisma servers, there could be information that it doesn't even have to be criminal, remember that, it just has to look really bad, perhaps not even involving Hunter Biden directly, but about Hunter Biden in some way.

All you need is one director of you know, a Barisma, or one CEO or you know, somebody's high up the food chain over there writing a colleague some email like all right, pay that pay that you know, idiot Hunter Biden fifty to eighty thousand dollars a month whatever you got to pay him, because that means that his dad will lay off us in this whole corruption thing a little bit, you know, just because of the appearance of it.

All all you need is an email like that, and the Democrats' efforts to use this thing as a means of removing the President United States and preventing his reelection turns into a nightmare for them. That's all you need. And what I think it's so interesting is that there's also it's very clear from the way this is reported on that if if the Russians found and word this is the way that the left thinks. The left thinks

about these issues is really on a loop. Right, it's Russia, right, They think about this stuff the same way all the time. If the Left found a or sorry, if the Russians found information that did in fact look bad for the Bidens in Ukraine on this Barisma stuff, you already know that the press would treat this like it was not.

You know, when they get information from wiki leaks that hurts Bush, when they get information of any kind, when they get leaks about natural security that hurt a Republican, the press runs with it. The public has to know

how we got it. Whether it was illegal or not, doesn't matter if and then, by the way, you saw this with the Bernie Sanders Hillary Clinton situation, with the DNC emails that were released, journalists were very like, oh, I don't know, you know this is although that's a little different because they were they were still talking about democrats and democrats, right, So there were some different equities

that got brought into play there. Do you think that they would accept information that was dumped by WikiLeaks or anyone else that looked bad for the Bidens as anything? They would say, it's Russian disinformation. I guarantee it, guarantee it. At this point, they would come up with whatever storyline they had to as reporters, as journalists who avoid tree that information like the incredibly newsworthy stuff it is. Look

what they've done with the whistleblower. They have pretended for months now that the whistleblower is not his identity, is not a newsworthy item. That is a lie, that is a joke. That is ridiculous. If Russia found information on the Barisma servers that look bad for the Bidens, the journalists already want to make sure that or if anyone found that information about that's another important point here. You're

here too. If someone in Ukraine comes forward a whistleblower, you could even say, with information about the Bidens in Ukraine, let's say it's a Russian operation. This is now that not only is this the weapon they use, this is the sword and the shield, this is the weapon they use against Republicans, and it's what they will say to defend the Bidens that they have to see. It was any information that comes out about the Bidens with regard to Burisma, doesn't matter who puts it out. There's a

Russian intelligence operation on behalf of Trump. That's what they're doing here. Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app before wherever you get your podcasts. The show ain't over yet, folks, keeping it rio. It's time for roll Call Facebook dot com, slash Buck Sexton for roll call purposes, also Teambuck at iHeartMedia dot com and let's go. Yesterday, I got a little too a little too chatty with producer Marks we We.

I trampled on your roll call time a little bit. Today, I wanted to give you a little more time for that. By the way, I also wanted a programming note that I'm going to be out in Los Angeles Thursday Friday meeting with some folks. Got some things gotta take care of on the West coast, the left coast, and I'll be back next week. But i'll be gone Thursday Friday. My man Ben Weingarten, it's going to be in on radio and on Pluto TV channel two forty eight, the

first that's what's gonna what's up. Well, we have a show Monday too. Oh yeah, Monday, while I'm on Monday. But that's like a holiday. So I'm just letting the listeners in correct, thank you. So I'll be out for a few days. This is the last stretch of Buck out of the Hut that I think is going to happen for more than a day. You know. I'm not expecting to be out for more than a day between now in the election. Really, that's my That's what I'm thinking. It's going to be the case. So this is the

last one. So yeah, I just let's see my man Ben Winegardne. We're doing a great job. Facebook dot Com slash Buck Sexton Joe. Joe writchen and he has the following, I will slay him. Oh ho ho die die die. I can't. Of course, he's writing to me in reference to the movie for Getting Sarah Marshall, where the protagonist played by the guy who's from How I Met Your Mother. I forget his real name. You don't talk. You know this guy Jason Segal or Siegel? If yeh, Jason Siegel.

I think his name is, yeah, Jason Siegel where where he plays like a heartbroken boyfriend who goes to the Turtle Bay resort on the north side of Oahu, which is actually where it is, and yeah, and he has Kristen bell is there. And also I can't remember the little burnette actress's name. She's a Ukrainian of anyway. Whatever, it's a good movie. I've seen him many times. It's a little raunchy, certainly not for the kids to watch,

but I have enjoyed that movie. And I like his whole Dracula theater thing because that reminds me of like I did the Dracula show here for Halloween, which I kind of want to return to and do an update of at some point. All Right, Dave writes book. Enjoyed the Michael Malice interview. Yeah, Dave, Michael and I are buddies and his show You're Welcome, and we had a long chat which chat for about an hour just about everything.

So just go to I don't know how you even find it, but look on Michael Malie's Facebook or Twitter page. I'm sure he hasn't linked up there. I retweeted it on Twitter, but if you want to listen, by all means, we had a long, long chat TJ long time no speak. In regards to legalization of weed, I've been pondering whether raising the tobacco age to twenty one is a foreshadowing

of what maybe coming down the pipe. Maybe they're planning on a federal legalization of weed, and to make it easy, they're setting the legal age of twenty one for everything. Just a thought. Also, it's the only way that I

can just fire Republicans supporting more nanny state nonsense. Yeah, I don't know when we're going to reach the conversation of the conversation changing to the legitimate federalization of weed, when that's really going to happen, I mean meaning it's it's no longer illegal marijuana, right, now anywhere in the United States is a legal inner law. It is. States can't change that. States have been allowed, with kind of winking a nod from the federal government, to decriminalize for

their own purposes. I believe New York State is going to be following that. It's going to be following that path as well pretty soon. Here. I mean, I don't know about you, Producer Mark. I can't even walk. I feel like I can't walk more than five blocks without whoa, somebody's smoking some kind bud on the ste I noticed a lot more when we were in Midtown. Yeah, not

as much down here, but yeah, we'll Tribecca. We're down and tribeccas were the show, a part of which is for the Triangle below Canal for Canal Street, part of Manhattan, which is fancy. Yeah, very boug very fancy. It down here we are not fancy. Now we're in a fancy Nor is the Freedom Hunt fancy, but we are in a fancy area. Yeah. I prefer it down here to the tourist trap that where our old studios were. Oh man, if you're talking about a place to go for a

walk and hang out, it's way nicer around here. Yeah, it's beautiful down around here. Yeah. I always tell people don't when you go to New York Man, don't hang out, don't hang out near Times Square, don't hang out in midtown. Don't do it. Don't do it. So let's see who we have here. Next up, Karen, regarding chocolate, I am very skinny and I eat lots of chocolate. I never eat anything less than eighty five percent pure chocolate. It's the sugar that makes one fat, not the chocolate. Okay, Karen,

thank you for the update. I just like all of the chocolate. So there is that. Steve Buck, amazing show and analysis. Steve, amazing analysis of my amazing show and analysis. Keep up the great work you spend time and energy on mainstream media advocates and PR branch Ministry of Information for the Socialist Communist Democratic Party. True your audience or some percentage is already aware, yep, Steve, I know. But we're trying to do counternarrative building here. That's part of it,

you know. It's it's we got to fight back against the lies that are told throughout the has become the only king of people here, Stephen. All this talk from Lee and Paul has me wondering when the Founders were still running the country and sent the navy and Marines after the Barbary pirates, did they wait for a declaration of war or did they use executive power to handle it?

That strikes me as very similar. Yeah, well, this is this has been a a debate that does stretch back to the origins of the public and it's one that will always be with us, you know. Is what is in the purview of the commander of chief of the executive branch when it comes to the power to make war and what does the Congress maintain as its own authority under those circumstances. So, yes, indeed, Eric, this is very long. Eric, I gotta skip this for now. Derek,

not to be confused with Eric Buck. I took a couple of psychology classes in college, and there has been surveys of women who like men with beards. Most women like two types of men. Whoever, that is dependent on other things. Buck, keep keep growing that beard, she'll tie, Okay, Derek, I don't know, speaking of of kind, Bud and relaxing, Maxi and relaxing, I don't really know what we're going for their dark but I appreciate it. Here we go. No,

that's something else, roll call. A lot of weird links gonna send to be in a roll call today. Jeremy. Oh, you know, roll I always think of Jeremy, and then I think of Jeremy. Spoke, Jeremy, you spoke. And it turns out Pearl Jam is gonna be on tour soon. For those either like Pearl Jam, Eddie Vetter and all that stuff. I've been on a nineties music kick recently, so I've been enjoying that. Jeremy. I'm so sick of celebrities opening their mouths trying to stay in the limelight.

Colin Kaepernick in particular, the only way he's going to get drafted as if there's World War three, even then, I don't want him on our team. It's also interesting how Lucie was rushing to get the impeachment vote, but now she's stallin. I see what you did there, Jeremy. Keep up the gray work shields high. Jeremy's playing word games. Thank you, Jeremy. I appreciate it. Man. Let's see we have more coming in on the role call Mark, Hi, Hi Buck. I hope this is a correct place for

role call I put this together. I hope you like it. I don't always need to carry a shield, but when I do, it's shields high, Buck Sexton. Thank you Mark. Yeah, man, gotta keep that shield high so those bad people do bad, bad things. Yeah. Somebody who wrote in about this too. Thank you guys for pointing out. I know it does say on Google that I am married. This has come up a few times in the last year, both personally and professionally. People have been like, wait a second, you're married.

I am not married. I have never been married. Um, I yes, that is so. I don't know what that's the way. I don't want to tell you, guys, other than there are some websites that say that I am married. We're hoping Producer Mark is rooting for me. He showed me how it's done, he got it done, so he's you know, he's trying to trying to blaze that trail. And I'm only ten years older than Mark, so you know, hopefully I'll get there. Do I have to start running

your dating apps now too? I mean, producer Mark already is very good at social media. He'd probably be great at dating apps as well. That's how I met my wife. Really Yeah, Tinder really yeah. Oh wow, I'm a shocked too. Congrats you're like, that's like a real success story for the for you know. I'm just I know about this from that Tinder generally generally has a reputation for being a little bit more of a naughty app. Yes, you know, I'm not the only I have heard of other people

who have found legit love. Here's the thing about, it's the biggest all the dating apps. And so if you're just looking for volume, which you kind of are the dating world, right, you want the most options, the most possibility. It makes sense. But I've heard that there's some pretty some pretty wild stuff. Oh yeah, if you go I am not. I am not on Tinder, I can tell you, and I've heard there some pretty wild stuff. If you go through a female's Tinder app, hundreds of stuff, stuff

people send them that is not necessarily just matches. Oh like me, I'm not that good looking. I would get like five and yet and the married the married man who's building a life or whatever figured out Tinder in a way that you know the rest of us have it yet, So good for you. But that's very cool. I'm I'm a statistic helmet. Did you did you see now you already married, you can tell anything. Did you know on the first date you're like, this is this? This is going well? I mean, look, I think it's

too much to say. I know I'm gonna mary this. People always say that. I feel like you never know. As I said to her, I definitely knew I wanted to see more of her. I didn't know the first date that I was going to marry her. When did you start getting when you start getting a little bit like when the little voice start saying maybe this is the one in a couple of months. I think that's industry standard. I think it takes two months to get to like really know whether you're really interesting. Yes, I

definitely knew. I didn't want to like dumper or anything right away. I knew I wanted to see where this went. And then well here we are. Where was the first date? Actually a green turtle? What is that? It's a chain like Applebee's type. Oh, we was near where we both went to school. Hafstra Nice so like local, local joint for you guys to go go hang out and stuff whatever. Nice, very nice. You're learning a lot of stuff, Yeah, learning a lot of the things when you go when you

have to meet the parents. Ah, that was like four or five months in. That was awful. You know who else needs to meet the parents meet? I need to meet Producer Mark's parents because I have no idea who I am nor that I Yeah, I still think they probably don't know who I am. Yeah, even though I met I met marks mom and dad. I went to the wedding and I introduced myself and they're like, who are you? And I was like, look, that's cool. I

don't expect you to know my work. I do spend about four or five hours a day in a room with your son, just the two of us. Did my in laws knew know who you were? Oh? Yeah they know? Yeah, yeah, yeah they knew. My Wier's family was on the Weiss family was on was on the ball. Prucer Mark's family. His mom was like, who are you? Are you a waiter? What are you doing here? I mean you were dressling a waiter? All right, you that's enough of that. Um but yeah, man, So you know that the tinder can

can result. Tinder can be a love match, Yes, I can. Tinder can be a love match. All right, good, good, times. Oh we got more role Call. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. All right, we're gonna do for roll call. Now we're gonna geto some of the emails. I feel like sometimes I neglect those who send in the emails. I just go right to the Facebook, even though we should spend equal time on both. Um Lo right, hey Buck, I really love everything you're

doing for the first and the podcast. Just at the we need a second amement alert for our phones. I signed up for the first email and enjoy the info from the first. Keep up the great app keep up the great job, lo Loo. Thank you so much, man, I appreciate it. Tim. This is just titled roll Call, very very effective, Tim. Hey Buck, have you seen Kurt Russell's very best underrated action classic Soldier. It's actually a prequel set early in the Blade Runner universe. It's totally awesome.

Check it out Shields High. Tim. I haven't even I even heard of that movie. I didn't even know that was a movie, so I cannot say that I know anything about it. Maureen rights in the headline here and the email member Team Bucket. iHeartMedia dot com. If you want to send us emails. Please do by the way, please do send Facebook message, even if it's a one liner. We'd like hearing from you, even if it's just a, you know, an email to say, hey, producer Mark is funny,

or you know, congrats on his marriage. I'm glad he came back from Jamaica, didn't bail on the hut forever. You know, whatever it is you want to say, you know, it doesn't have to be long, just send us, send us your thoughts. We we love hearing from you. Oh Buck, thank you for making me double over with laughter as you describe the heroics of recently retired Diego the tortoise and his amorous adventures. The vision of him just rolling over in utter exhaustion after finishing feet up in the

air is just so funny. Thank you for that and for so much more. You're simply the best, which is why I've spent thirteen people to you. They all listen to your podcast now and watch you on Pluto TV. I'll be sending more along the way to Maureen in Newport Beach. Maureen, thank you so much, great email, and I really appreciate you sending more people to the Freedom Hunt at me. It makes a huge difference to us.

It keeps Proucer, Mark and Me employed, which we really appreciate because the show, actually, you know these shows these days, you need to be growing. If you're not growing, you're dying. So the show needs to be constantly getting bigger, and that means I need you guys be telling people about it.

As for Diego, I mean, I lost it yesterday. I will tell you that I crack up a few times even after the show because you have to see you have to read the whole story about Diego and how he saved his species by having a lot of sex as a whatever. He was a grand tortoise or something whatever they call it. But the video of him after he has done his business falling over with his little sort of fin like arms in the air is really

it's really amazing. You really need to check it out because a lot of guys will watch it and be like, yep, I've been there. Uh let's see here, Jonathan, right. Your impersonations are amazing. It's what sets you apart from all the other people out there. Takes a special kind of intelligence to embody a person or personality through imitation, and your impersonation of Hillary Clinton sounds nothing like her, but him embodies her evil nagging wife persona. So well, this

guy is smart. I like this. One of the main reasons why I want to go to Hell is because I would be married to Hillary Clinton have to put up with their horrible voice, with her fake Southern accent and her fake Northeastern speech accent, and her cottage industry of corruption. I will say, these politicians need marking on a daily basis. I truly believe that our politicians can be set on the right track. Thank you so much,

Jonathan Man, Thank you. I'm glad you enjoined the impersonations will bring some of them back, especially in the debate season. We'll have that going for sure. Let's see here, William hey Buck, listening to your podcast recently, you mentioned the issues of public education. Here's a fix. It should be

contemplated in a ruby red state. Since the public school system is established by state constitution, create a movement to a end the state, amend the state constitution to devolve the requirement of public schools the locality of city country. The locality would then decide whether to have a traditional public school system or have no system. An issue tax atchers attached productions for private schools. All right, cool, William. I don't know if that will work, but sounds like

it might. So I like outside the box thinking, especially about the school system. That's our show today. Tomorrow's last for me this week. We'll have wine garter in Thursday and Friday, and I'll probably watch, maybe I'll live tweet some of the debate tonight. We'll see, we'll see how feel, We'll see if I have time to go to home depot. I don't know if I have enough time. We will be talking tomorrow though, friends in the hut, as we always do. Shields High