Cocaine Mitch Is A Very Ruthless Person

is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American great, You're a great American again, The Buck Sexon Show begins. Analyst, he's a great guy. Now, Hello, team, good to be back, misterius. Sorry to be gone yesterday. Down with my good friends to Stansbury Research yesterday in Baltimore. We got a book draft in book will be coming out in the next ninety days. Turn it around as quickly as possible to get it out in the out

in the public for election time. As these things go, you got to make sure you time it properly. But I did miss doing the show yesterday. I trust my friend and colleague Madison Jessiato kept you all informed and entertained. Here in the Freedom hunt. I was able to catch a good amount of the latest round of last minute desperate arguments from the Democrats about why we should extend, extend this sham of a trial because we need more witnesses.

Remember when they say to you, as they have been endlessly, when they say to you that a trial without witnesses is not in fact a trial, that leaves out that the Democrats alone called seventeen witnesses. The Democrats did not allow any Republican witnesses, nor did the Democrats allow for the president's counsel to be present at any phase of the depositions. And there was no cross examination of these witnesses.

So they were able to line up an entirely one sided case so that they could use that evidence, whatever you want to call it, You could use the testimony of those individuals to get the House of Representatives to have an entirely party line vote to impeach the President of the United States. And then when it made its way over into the Senate, they realize, well, we don't have the majority, so party line vote won't do it. In fact, we need a two thirds majority, sixty seven.

That's a tough number to get to, and so they had no open what do they do now? They try to extend it, But the processes has been entirely unfair all along for those who are now claiming if it's a trial, which is interesting because it's not a criminal trial. So really the only procedural safeguards that are in place are what appears fair to those running it in the House and the Senate. So if it's not a criminal trial, then it's up to the people that are constitutionally bound

to hold this process. But if we're going to talk about fairness, how about this. It is an essential characteristic of our system of justice that when someone is accused of something, they have the right to contest to cross examine that accuser. In this case, not only is there no ability to contests to cross examine the accuser the whistleblower, we are not allowed to know officially who the whistleblower is.

The American people are being told that there's a political process underway to judge a president and perhaps remove him, and to end a presidency before it has even completed its first four year term, because we know he's going for eight and there's no willingness to name the central accuser of this whole thing, the person who got it all started. How could anyone claim that this is fairness.

Why is it the case that we have no ability to cross examine the individual who may have very well colluded. There's that word conspired behind the scenes with Adam shaff members of his staff in order to bring this absurd complaint against the President of the United States. So this hasn't been fair. And that then brings to where I depart from some of their conservatives out there, who say, let's do the witness thing. Mid Romney we know, has

said that. Susan Collins of Maine has said that. But Lamar Alexander, Oh, Lamar Alexander, Democrat of Tennessee, has said, I'm sorry. Republican of Tennessee has said that he will not not push for witnesses, that enough is enough on this one. Let's just understand that there's no good faith

coming from the other side. So if the main reason that many people give for why we should extend this and have witnesses is that it would make the process seem more fair to the American people, No, you can't reward the tyrannical, maniacal efforts of Democrats to cheat at every phase of a process, and then when they haven't gotten their way, when really the whole process was boomed from the start because of the way they approached it, when they haven't gotten what they want at the end

of it, to give them another shot just because you want to see him like you're the good guys, This is foolishness. This is foolishness. This should be finished, off

ended done. Does anyone really believe that if we were to allow for a week as Adam Schiff is not saying, we need a week of witnesses, does anyone really believe that if we pushed for and if the Senate voted in favor of this, Democrats would then say, when the inevitable result of an acquittal happens for the president, that Okay, it was a fair trial and the president was acquitted. I guess, I guess we made a mistake on this one.

I guess we had an error in judgment. Nobody thinks that, no intelligent human being believes that that is the case. No one thinks that if we play nicer with the Democrats at this phase, there will be anything to benefit the Republicans, or just our general perception of this that results from the Democrats willingness to admit that this whole thing was unfair and a scam all along. So why is it that we on the right seem so unwilling to learn, not even lessons of the past, the lessons

of last week, of the last three months. Why do we refuse to learn the lesson? I can't really give you a clear answer. All I can say to you is, well, we seem to think that we get a merit badge, We get a pat on the head as conservatives for being too nice to Democrats who have been engaged in all kinds of historyonics, cheating, false accusations, just the worst kind of behavior. Why reward Pelosi a nadler, and Schiff and Schumer with additional days to smear the president when

that's all this is? There is nothing new. I do not care what John Bolton has to say. If John Bolton says, yes, there was a quid pro quo, it will not change my opinion of these proceedings one bit, because ultimately there's no crime, The president didn't do anything wrong, and there's nothing to see here. It's stunning that there are still so many who don't seem able to figure

out what's really going on. There is a stop at nothing approach from the opponents of this presidency to tear this president down because he is such a threat to them, to their privileges, to their power, to the perception of them as wise, erudite people that should be running the country. The political class, the media class. He's a threat to all of this, so they hate him for it, and they view whatever they have to do as necessary against

this president. I mean, really with Democrats at this point, it reminds me of the old story of what the scorpion and the frog. Some people I've heard say the turtle and the frog, the same idea the scorpion and the frog. The very short version of this is there's a river. Frogs can swim, Scorpions can't. Scorpion goes up at the frog and says, hey, can you take me across? And the frog says, hold on a second, you're a scorpion. I don't want to get stung. Scarpion says, come on,

I'm not gonna sting you. Yeah. I sting everything else, and I sting people all the time, but I'm not gonna sting you. I just want to get across the river. He goes all right, scarpion hops in the frog's back, gets out in the middle of the river. Sure enough, damn stings him before he drowns because now he's paralyzed. Looks up at the frog, looks up the scorpion and says, why do you do that? Now we're both gonna die? What does the scorpion say? It is in my nature?

We know what is in Pelosi and Schumer and Schiff and the Democrat socialist left nature. We know who they are, we know how they play the game. We think that there's something to benefit our side, something to benefit the country by dragging out this boring, disgraceful sham of an impeachment, horrible judgment. Any conservative who is advocating for witnesses, I think is showing really bad judgment on this issue. I'm not saying they do so in bad faith. I just

think they're wrong. How much more do we have to see? Why take the risk? By the way, who knows? Let's remember this, speaking of the nature of Democrats, you know the Democrat party as the scorpion that will kill the frog even if it sinks both of them. Right, That's that's who we're really dealing with here. Cavanon was about to sail through. They tried, you know, oh well, his

credentials are impeccable. There's really no case against him. Everyone loves him and he's great, God great's job, brilliant, gold standard resume, everything's lining up. What do they do at the eleventh hour Try to out a bunch of crazy people to lie about it and then have the whole media appara to say, well, there's no evidence and these stories don't even add up, and it all seems like bs.

But you know, let's destroy this guy's life because we've got to make sure we don't have a conservative on the court. You want to give them another week, remember the game last time. Let's have the FBI investigate the allegations of it. Was the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my life. FBI's not there's nothing to investigator. That can't figure anything out. FB has not some super secret squad of investigators that has a time machine. This is absurd.

But the whole there are some Republicans We'll all look like I'm more even handed and fair minded. What I mean, We're going into Super Bowl Sunday. As John Madden would say, just wap it down. And this thing, it's absurd. It needs to stop. The message we want to send is that we understand how the other side plays. The message we want to send is that we've already seen enough frogs drowned to know that we're not going to give a piggyback to a scorpion anymore. How about that for

a lesson, GOP You're in the freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. We're dealing with a purely partisan impeachment with bipartisan opposition, no crime, no violation of law in an election year. Okay, never happened before, no investigation, no due process, nothing. And what they're telling you, I mean, we can talk all we want, and we will, but but what are we talking about at the end of

the day. We're talking about removing a president of the United States from a ballot in an election that's occurring in months. Who thinks that's a good idea, particularly when you're dealing with a purely partisan in eachment that was warned about from the Framers. Okay, so the only appropriate result that won't damage our country horribly, maybe forever, but

certainly for generations, is a verdict of acquittal. Sipoloni has done a fantastic job throughout He's really made an he's earned a name for himself, a worthwhile name at that. He is an excellent lawyer, and he's been among the strongest of all the people speaking in defense of the president. Although you know, the dirsh really got under the Libs skin on this stuff because they are even lying about how he's now abandoned one of his defenses. I might get to that later if we have time. I have

other things to talk about that other than impeachment. Some of you been saying buck enough on the beachment, like I'm trying. So there's the obsession of the media. It's the obsession of the people that their job is to actually bring you facts and things that matter. So, yes, got some updates on coronavirus. People are saying that there's a racist response to coronavirus in the media. What people just don't want to die from a preventive from an

infectious disease. That there's not this We don't we don't need to make this about wokesm right, We don't need to make this a woke issue. We can just make this that people don't want to die from an infectious disease. But but back to what the Democrats have been pushing for here all along. Think about this for a moment. Imagine if they got their way. Imagine for a moment if the Democrats did, in fact manage to remove this president.

They talk about how they want this country brought back together. They've got these candidates like Joe Biden who will say, oh, I need to unify this country. I've been so polarized. What could be more polarizing than in an election year after We've had three years of really exceptionally good governance from this president, a record that is crushing. This is the best presidential record of my adult lifetime, of any president. That's just a fact. There's no one else who can

compare the first three years of their presidency. For as long as I've been old enough to really pay attention, no one else who can compare to what Donald Trump has done. And you get an election coming up. They say he's horrible, he's in a front of the constitution, he's all these things, and so they won't allow the American people to make a determination about him. They won't allow the political process to play out. Instead, they are

pulling all of the fire alarms in the building. You know they can't win the debate, so what do you do. You make a lot of noise, you bang on the doors, you pull the fire alarms. They're desperate to do something, and that's what we see going on here Joe Biden, for example. The good news for Joe Biden, or rather the good news from Maziehrono, is that Joe Biden is dumber than any current sitting editor. So congratulations to Maisie Herono because Joe Biden is dumber than she is, which

is stunning. That's quite an achievement com we have. Well we'll get to Masie Arono in a moment. But here here's Joe Biden talking about this, not when he's asked about whether this is partisan, because Biden, by the way, has always said we should not have partisan impeachments. Play clip twenty four mark only in nineteen seventy four, wrong in nineteen ninety eight. Why isn't it wrong now because it's not a partisan impeachment. He violated the constitution. Perry

Democrats voted for the House. Well, that doesn't mean that the facts, the underlying facts tours whether the Constitution has been violated. That's the issue. That's the issue. The com

was the Constitution violated. Even if it's a party line period, even if it's party line vote, it just goes and reflects on those who know in fact, in their heart and their head that in fact it's a violation of the Constitution to do what he did and at vote no. That's party line vote, But that doesn't make it right. A party line vote that is based upon something that

doesn't relate to a constitutional violation is a different thing. Blather, Just confused, mister magoo blather from Joe Biden here Ersten. A partisan impeachment or a partisan impreachment is uh, you know when there's not the partisans who are being partisan because the Constitution and the thing about the Yeah what Joe Biden, folks, I got it. I laughed. I actually led, which is a rare thing for me. That happens sometimes

when I'm reading through Twitter. But I laughed because Tucker had this whole thing about how I'm even just thinking about it, that's the whole thing about how Joe Biden should be Did you see this Prouser Mark, how Joe Biden shouldn't be in the race. He should be feeding pigeons from his ice cream coating Flooria and they had a little graphic of him breaking off bits of his ice cream code and feeding it to pigeons in Florida. I think that's I think that's fair at this point.

Thanks for listening to The bus Essen Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Mitch Kano is a very ruthless person. He can cut the voltinos what he needs to do, and this is why he took the last day or so to really put pressure on his caucus so that they would not be that fourth volders coming forward here saying that they have their votes. I wouldn't be surprised we're still hoping, because you know, that's what we do

around here. That's a that's a campaign at as far as I could serve for cocaine. Mitch Mazie Horrono dumbest current member of the Senate. Joe Biden, formerly of the Senate, dumber than Mazie Horono. But you have Rono's saying Mitch McConnell is a quote, very ruthless person, cocaine, Mitch. Don't play games. Cocaine. Mitch is a very ruthless person. So I think that she's cut a free campaign commercial for

Mitch McConnell. And give give Mitch credit. He's apparently exerting a lot of a lot of authority among his caucus, exerting a lot of authority among members of the Republican members of the Senate to make sure that they don't fall victim to the absurd, absurd demand now that the Senate has to do the work that Democrats were unwilling to do. Democrats don't play by the rules. And then they turn around and say, well, you have to play by the rules now, No, that that's not how this

is going to go. That's not how this should work.

It would be an error. I don't even care. By the way, and people that say they want witnesses, and I'm talking about conservatives now including something that I think are very smart and that I really like as people, I think they're very wrong on this, because even if you extend this thing out and nothing bad comes of it, we should re establish here, or I guess, just establish a new principle that the other side doesn't get to cheat and then hold us to the most precise and

extreme interpretation of inherently subjective rules. Anyway, they don't get to say we're gonna go, We're gonna go bare knuckle. You guys have to be really nice and generous with

the rules. Trump Ism is a rejection of that wholesale that is the great thing about the president instead of sitting there while you know over ninety percent of the media just trashes a Republican and they and the Republican just has to meekly take it, as you know, the commander in chief Trump's like, no, you're a bunch of fake news, your clowns, you're jerks, And he's right to do.

So why is it that only on our side that the president should always get trashed by people pretending to speak truth to power when they're just little lackeys of the left. So I think it's important here. It's about it's about establishing a principle that principles have to apply

to both sides in politics. We're not going to do this anymore where where we're boy scouts, we're the hall monitors and they get to be the bad boys skip in school, smoking cigarettes around the corner, riding on motorcycles or whatever the cool kids do. I've actually never been on a motorcycle, so I note. I gotta say. People sometimes approach me and they ask me about theories that

they have. I don't want to call them conspiracy theories, because when when I've had folks reach out to me, especially about Epstein things, I'd up saying, yeah, I think, I think you're probably right. Yeah I think, and that might be considered a conspiracy theory. But there are conspiracies, and sometimes you have to theorize to understand what the

conspiracy is. But generally when people ask me, especially those who trust me listening to day in day out, if they see me on the street, or if they write me an email and they say, have I've got I've got this kind of out there theory, And I always appreciate that they trust me to analyze it for them, and I tell them the truth. I think, now that's a little too far off, or you know, I'll try to say something if it's really out there, like I

appreciate your creativity or you're thinking outside the box. Those of you who know this show, well, no, that's my most affectionate and respectful way of saying I don't see it, but you're still you could be right. You could be right. I just don't think it's probably in a particular instance the case. But I've had people come up to me recently they want to talk to me about what is going on with and I say, come up to me. Yes, some of talk to me, but also reach out to me.

What's going on with John Roberts? Why why is John Roberts? Do they people have I said, do they have something on him? Do they does the left have something on him? And I would be inclined to say no because there's no evidence of that, right, I don't have any evidence

of that. But I also can't say that that's completely crazy because I have no way of explaining to you why when they did this whole Q and a session thing with senators, where do they have, Oh, we get to have the one team the president's defense team or the prosecutors, the House managers trying to make the case to remove the president. Questions posed by senators and you had Senator rand Paul who posed a question and this was the response. This was the response of the Chief

Justice who's presiding over all of this. A producer Mark, please please play whichever twenty two. I have a question to present to the desk for the House Manager Chief and for the President's Council. Thank you. The presiding officer declines to read the question as submitted. What why that's stunning? Why does the presiding officer in this case the the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who's really just supposed

to be a traffic cop. No offensive traffic cops, but you know, supposed to be a traffic cop, determining that the process proceeds as agreed by the Senate. But the Senate is running the show. He's just there. He's not really there as a judge. He's there a little bit more just as a you know, a guy to referee a little bit. But he doesn't have the same power, he would say in a federal court where the judge gets to determined like, you know, judge can clear the room,

judge could send you to prison. Judge has a lot of power in a courtroom. He's just there to kind of make sure that the teas are crossed and the eyes are dotted, and you know, no one keeps everybody up too late, they break for lunch, that kind of stuff. Why did the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court refuse to read aloud rand Paul's question. It's not up to that, he's just reading out questions. Well, here is what rand

Paul's question was. Quote. This was out on Twitter. My question today is about whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with shift's staffers to plot impeaching the president before there were formal House impeachment proceedings. Do you know why we are told that John Roberts would not read out

this question because they have to protect the whistleblower. There is no absolute statutory protection for the identity of the whistle blower. It does not exist. There's protection from retaliation inside the government for that government employee for raising and complaint. That's fine. The whistle blower can keep his little civil service job. That's not what we're talking about here. But to pretend like the whistleblower is some super state secret

that the name Eric Scharamella cannot be. You can't. If you put this out on social media, you'll get banned. If you put this out on different platforms, they will take your account down. They'll suspend you. It's absurd. Why how is how are we at this point? This really does feel like something out of the Soviet Union. This is one of the only things that has happened in

the Trump presidency that is so absurd. Even though even knowing that the Trump are the anti Trump Democrats are a bunch of deranged fools, this is so absurd that I can't even explain to you how we really got here. It doesn't even make sense. There's no real dispute here. We've already had news organizations or pour on his name. There's no statutory protection from uttering his name. Bring it. Arrest me for saying Eric Scharamela. You gotta be kidding me.

This guy wants to work to undermine and destroy a presidency from inside the government. Don't don't the American people and don't the senators who are supposed to vote on this have a right to know if there was collusion conspiring among Democrat partisans with this individual before the impeachment process had even started. Why don't his motives matter? People that this is absurd, By the way, there's so much intellectual dishonesty around this. People say, oh, it doesn't matter.

He presented the complaint, the complaint was true. Well, the complaint is true in so far as there are narratives that are injected into it that are highly debatable and arguable about what the motivations of the president were, about what benefit would have been conferred on the president and his reelection even if this quid pro quo had gone through.

The initial complaint reads like an editorial. There's all these assumptions baked in about the president didn't have a legitimate reason to do this, and the president didn't have any other considerations in the temporary hold on aid to Ukraine, aid that was an excess of what his predecessor Obama would give. But oh, that's right. We're told now that the war in Ukraine is an urgent national security interest

to the United States. I don't know what is wrong with the Chief Justice, because it's only possible to say that you put aside whether there's any statutory protection for the whistleblower's name, and there is not, and there's there's no claim other people's right cancer. You gotta protect the whistleblower,

protect firm retaliation. It's the Inspector General of the intelligence community can make the determination wholly on his own at any point in time, by the way, to release the name publicly say yes, this is the whistle blower because he believed it would come out later. They've created this absurd alice in wonderland alternate universe where the name isn't already out there and we have no need to know

what the name is officially. But even if you take this claim or it's beyond crazy, even but even if you accept that there's some need to protect the identity of the whistle blower, Eric Scharamella, even if you believe that, how could they know they're protecting the identity of the whistleblower by asking about holdovers from the Obama National Security Council conspiring with Shift staffers to plot impeaching the president. How could they know if that would touch on the

whistle blowers identity or not. Because they all claim they don't know who the whistle blower is. Adam Shift says he does not know who the whistleblower is, So well, how do we know that there'sn't somebody else at the Obama National Security Council involved? They can't know. No, Their whole point here is to shut down any inquiry into this area, because you know what happens if we find out the answer Rampaul's question. The whole thing collapses, and

they know it. They know it because we understand the reality here. Just like I was right the entire time about every aspect of Russia collusion, I'm telling you I'm right about this. Sharamella and some other Democrat partisans inside the MSc, the National Security Complex reached out, someone reached out to shift's staff and they worked with them to create this complaint. And the whole thing was meant as a partisan hit job from the beginning. It's not about

fear for the Constitution or anything else. And the motivations matter tremendously because your motivations, if you're talking about a political process to remove a president, should be known to the people that are judging whether or not that president should be removed. But here we are. So when people ask me what do they have on John Roberts, I don't know. But just remember this, Bush judges not so good. Sometimes Trump judges pretty fantastic. From what we've seen. You're

in the Freedom Hut. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. The analogy is not applicable to the president situation because first, to the extent that opposition research was obtained, it was opposition research that was purchased. Oh, let's back up for Mecca. They're they're back back up for a second. Um um

how Keem Jeffries how Keem Jeffries. Uh is asked a question about whether or not there was foreign interference foreign interference in the election based on the fact that you had a foreigner, Christopher Steele, paid to go ask a bunch of foreigners, mostly Ukrainian subsources, about gossip about the president of the United States, and then that was used through the FBI apparatus to get an investigation going of Carter Page. We know that this was all bunk, This

was all garbage. It was crap. But isn't that foreign interview. Isn't going around to ask a bunch of Ukrainians what they think about someone running for president and then presenting that under really false pretenses to the FBI. How is that not foreign interference the election? Hakim Jeffreys here says it's because it was paid for. Oh okay, So under this logic, let's be very clear. If President Trump had said, hey, Zelenski open an investigation into the Bidens. I'll give you.

I'll give you a million dollars cash. Well, the Jeffrey's rule says that that's okay because it's paid for. That's for an interference and election that's paid for. I saw my friend Annie McCarthy over the weekend's Peace and National Review. I totally agree with this. I've been saying all along. It wouldn't have even done anything if there had been

investigations of the Bidens. Look at the Clintons. Hillary was under indictment for over a hundred violations I'm sorry, under investigation, rather than indictment under investigation for over one hundred violations of the Espionage Act, which she did violate. She was running for president as somebody under felony investigation, and also

the destruction of evidence that happened. They did everything they could COMI made sure the whole thing was massage so that nothing bad would happen to Hillary and her buddies. And they ignored that, and she did win the popular vote despite the fact that she's just like a horrible candidate who's so unethical it's insane. And the Clinton Foundation and they know there's no there's nothing, nothing to see there.

It was all on the up. They have shut the whole thing down and Hillary didn't become president basically, But Sure was a great charity. It wasn't about anything else. It wasn't a pass through a slush fund for Clinton access. Sure. That's why I'm sure the government of Saudi Arabia or all these other places that are giving money the Clinton Foundation, it's because they care so much about women's empowerment and climate change. But this is what the media wants you

to believe. They want you, they want to treat you like we're all so dumb, we can't understand anything that's going on here. How Keem Jeffries has asked the question, what about the foreign interference that occurred with the Clinton campaign against Trumpets as well? I was paid for Oh okay, that's a great answer. Not people are not asked to explain this. I've been saying this all along. They're not asked to explain why. That's not why what happened with

the dossier was not foreign interference in the election. But even beyond that, this, the entire Democrat case here is based upon the and this is where Annie McCarthy's piece in National Review comes into play. What I've been saying that this Democrats the corruption is the water in which they swim. It wasn't it wasn't going to derail Biden's presidency. Just the announcement of an investigation in Ukraine. Nobody even cares about Ukraine. I know Democrats will oh Ukraine. No

one cares about Ukraine. Really, none of these people talking about it do. Oh but if Ukrainian Prosecutor General or whatever he's called it announced that they're looking into Hunter Biden, that would have ended. No Democrats would be fine with that. This whole thing is bonkers. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. It's a little bit interesting to me and my colleague, the

Deputy White Housecounts, referred to this. It's a little bit ironic to me that you're going to be questioning conversations with foreign governments about investigations with when three of you, three members of the Senate, Senator of Menendez, Senator Leahy, and Senator Durban sent a letter that read something quickly like this. These were they wrote the letter to the

Prosecutor General of Ukraine. They said they're advocates talking about the Congressman, they're strong advocates for robust and close relationship with Ukraine, and we believe that our cooperation should extend to such legal matters regardless of politics. And their concern was ongoing investigations and whether the Mueller team was getting appropriate appropriate responses from Ukraine regarding investigations. Of what the President of the United States, and you're asking about whether

foreign investigations are appropriate, I think it answers itself. Jays Eklo, I know I've been given a lot of high fives to Sippoloni here, but Jay Saklo has also really impressed me in this process. I love the Jennifer Rubin thing. Can you imagine if he actually it was in front of a real judge. He's on I won a bunch of cases in front of the Supreme Court, but other than that, he's never been in front of a real judge. I don't know how the Washington I mean, I don't

know how someone could be I think she's a performance artist. Now. I think Jennifer Rubin of the Washington Post, who pretends to be a conservative so that she can have this this make believe situation of criticizing the people on her own team because she's the truth teller, when really she's just doing the bidding of the Democrats. There's a whole slew of people. Now, I meant got Tom Nichols. Tom, I'm I'm so I'm so disappointed, you know, I'm so disappointed.

And what's happened with that guy? He now is saying he will vote for Bernie Sanders over Donald Trump. That's how conservative he is. This is what some of these never trumpers, I mean, they've just spiraled. The derangement is just worse and worse and worse. You're going to vote for a socialist over Trump because you hate what so much? The mean tweets. I think some of the Trump tweets are fantastic, by the way, not all of them, but some of them. When he retweets me, that's amazing. I

haven't gotten a Trump reaching in a while. The way, producer Mark, I'm a little sad about that. What's going on? You know what? What where's the low reach out to the Trump team immediately? Yeah, can complain, you know, I'm like, I need like at least one every couple of weeks. You know, he's one to take complaints level head. He does like when people criticize something that he's doing. He loves a big he loves constructive criticis you know that I'll get him tweet about you, but not a good way.

That's all right, because like book Sexton, his hair is absurd. Okay, he doesn't know what he's anyway. I mean, your hair is basically a darker version of Trump. You know, that's what. He should love it, but he might he might slap it down, or he might be angry that he can't grow a beard like yours. Have we ever seen him with facial hair like the rows I've seen, I've seen photoshop Trump beard. Sure, and I you know he's a clean shaving Yeah. I don't think it was a beard guy. Yeah. Yeah.

So like I did have someone once tell me in DC that I had Trump hair, but it was not a This is many years ago. It was not. I don't think they got met it as a compliment. I think he was a mean lib. And I just say before or after Trump was in politics, way before. Oh yeah yeah, back then people just not the Trump hair. Yeah, but I mean obviously the Trump here. Now I have to wonder. You know, there were different times in history

when very well known leaders set trends. You know, Alexander the Great, for example, went clean shaven, and it is believed that that was one of that was different from Greek Macedonian men same idea at the time would have would have had beards, and then all of a sudden you went through a period of non beardedness. I think also Julius Caesar, is you know that there's there was not a lot of facial own ancient room to begin with, but Julius Caesar clean shaven. You have these different figures

through history. I think maybe the Trump hair could in time become a thing. So you think everyone's gonna do their hair? Not everyone, but I think it might be not everybody because you gotta have a lot to pull off that that is swoop. To pull off a swoop at that level is not an easy thing to do. And I'm somebody that respects a good swoop. But I think you might see some people with the Trump hair going for not just impersonators. You know that I pack

last year, which I'm going to this year. The announcement was official today. You can check that out. So go to seapack, everybody hang out with the Buster. I was told that I did the best on the spot Trump impression for the Daily Caller of all the assembled random pundits. So well, congratulation, thank you. I know I'm gonna get you a medal. I got that going for me, which is nice. Where was I on this secalo calling out hypocrisy?

Foreign investigations. Foreign investigations are fun as long as they're investigations of Republicans. But beyond that, the entire premise that the Democrat, the Democrat, the Democrats case against Trump so speak, is that there was no basis to ask questions about Hunter Biden, and that asking questions about Hunter Biden is a massive abuse of power, important enough to impeach a

president because it amounts to cheating in the election. Those are all enormous leaps, nor miss leaps, I would say, unfounded, absurd, ridiculous leaps. But that's what they've had to do. They take nothing, They make a mountain out of a mole hill. They take something that's so small and decide to make it so much bigger, which has been the case all along. Oh but well, I wanted to get Rand Paul the way in on the why, because I don't have an answer for you why the Chief Justice would not answer

rans question. Here's the senator himself asking that place six. As you may have noticed, we had something slightly atypical downstairs. I asked a question and the question was refused. Now it's been reported that this questions about this or about that, and it's been refused for one reason or another. I can tell you that my question made no reference to any whistleblower or any kind of person or a complaint from a whistleblower. I think it was an incorrect finding

to not allow a question that makes no reference. I gotta say this, Why hasn't Why hasn't any Republican senator read aloud into the record from the floor of the Senate everything that we have been told and everything that has been reported about the whistle blower thus far, they have immunity, Not that they need it, because there's no crime or there's no statutory protection anyway, but at least then we could say it is officially out there in

the record. This the journalists that are just waving their hands, you do not know the name of that, We do not know the name of the whistle blower. That is really disconcerting. This is this is one of the most egregious abandoning, one of the most egreedist moments of abandoning

supposed a journalistic principle that I've ever seen. I do not understand how anyone thinks that it is acceptable and that still wants to claim the title of journalist to pretend that there's not a national interest and that it is not news to see who this to know who this person is, and people say, oh, it's about his safety. Everybody I know in conservative media basically gets death threats. All that. I mean, They're like, you know, you're in

the public conversation. There are crazies out there that will write your horrible things. People write horrible things to me, and I'm super nice, so I don't know what the problem is. Mostly nice all the time, So it's just bizarre. But anyway, so now we'll move on to the I'll try to get that I'm hoping that this is all I'm hoping Monday, we don't have to talk anymore about the Senate trial because it's over. That is my hope and prayer. Right now. We will see if that is

the case. But then we'll get into what is the narrative, and one way, one way or another, there will be a fight over the main takeaway of this whole Senate trial. One way or another, there'll be this argument about what did we really learn here. This is also why I don't think that it makes any sense to make any concession to the Democrats at this point, because they already have their narrative. They've already told us what it is,

and it will not change. I guarantee you it will not change based on any decision made the next couple of days about witnesses. Here's what Speaker Pelosi is saying about this, Producer, Mark, would you please play clip four, Well,

he will not be acquitted. You cannot be acquitted if you don't have a trial, and you don't have a trial, if you don't have witnesses and documentation, and that I would hope that the Senators, if it comes to a tie, or if there's a question of hearing testimony or doctor perceiving documents, would leave it up to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Republican appointed in a Republican majority court. I would think that they would have confidence and the

Chief Justice of the United States. That is really his title. And that's interesting to me that they're afraid of breaking a tie with the Chief Justice of the United States. Does the president know right from wrong? I don't. So here you have Nancy Pelosi is saying that there was effectively, there hasn't been a trial. If the trial does not give the Democrats what they want, hasn't even been a trial. The president will not be acquitted. This is delusional. This

is really the definition of delusional. No, Nancy, the president, when the Senate votes, assuming that it votes the way we all believe it will, he will be acquitted, just like he is the president. But this takes us to the fundamental the the origin story of Trump't arrangement syndrome. First, the first symptoms of Trump't arrangement syndrome as they manifested themselves after the twenty sixteen election, and that was the not my President marches. That was unsettling. I remember I

was in New York City. I was walking across flat Iron flat Iron Area, which is one of my favorite parts of the any name for the flat iron building because it looks like a flat iron and there were these marchers, you know, and they were all screaming, not my president, not my president, just yelling, you know, and shouting in unison, walking down and marching down the street. And I kind of wanted to be like, you can you can chant I hate the president, the presidents of buffoon.

He's a bad guy, you know. I hear he order his stakes well done and has them with catch up. I mean, you know, you can say that stuff if you want, But to scream not my president, no, that's just wrong. That would be like screaming I'm not screaming. I'm not screaming. No, you're allowed to do that, but you're wrong, right. And then this initial impulse from the left to pretend that they were not living in the reality in which they were actually living is troubling in

and of itself. But this is not the first time. Let's just do a little quick review of Democrat delusion on very big issues, on momentous, serious things. Democrats lose the two thousand election, they say it is illegitimate. Democrats lose the twenty sixteen election, they say it is illegitimate. They lose in the Supreme Court, they say it is illegitimate. They lose a Senate impeachment trial, they say it is illegitimate. Guess what, when they lose the twenty twenty election, they

will say it is illegitimate. Now, this is not the argument that you hear from Conservats. We're not always saying, oh, you know, they cheated, it's not real, the results don't matter. No, that is not what happens. That is not the reality of the conservative opposition to the left and the socialist Democrats. I don't know why they really think that this is an acceptable place to always go, but that is what

they do. They have, They have this tendency, and it really has become It really has become, I think, a psychological crutch for Democrats to accuse the other side, to accuse the other spectrum, the other side of the spectrum ideologically of doing the things that they themselves do over

and over and over again. A great example of this is they claim Trump is destroying institutions and destroying the rule of law, and in order to stop Trump from doing that, Democrats maniacally undermine and destroy institutions of government and the rule of law. But any anything to tear down Trump, anything to do whatever they can to bring him down. So Pelosi says that he will not be acquitted, even though we believe he is going to be acquitted.

And if that happens, that's a binary it's a yes or no, it's not Pelosi gets to determine whether that acquittal counts or not. No, that's not all this is going to go. Will there be Democrat votes for it? That's the big the big question. Play clip seven here. Mark, Yeah, I'm increasingly optimistic that Republicans will move to a final verdict before TUSI. The president will be acquitted in a bipartisan manner. We're not blocking anybody's witnesses. We're just not

going to legitimize the House. Choosing not to call a witness dumping in our lab and put us in a spot where if you called the witness should be dealing the courts out of judicial review of impeachment. Hopefully we'll get a bipartisan acquittal. This president deserves no less. Hopefully they will not extend this farce even further, allowing as to do more damage, waste more time. It's time to vote, Republicans, it's time to vote in the Senate, and this thing

shut it down. Acquittal for the president, and let's move on to reelection. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. But I also am very proud of our managers. We believe that they have been magnificent custodians of the Constitution by dint of their content, their presentation, their historic perspective, and their tone. They had

made us all proud. And I've told our colleagues they give us a magnificent example to follow, and they do one of the most entertaining parts of this whole Shamona. I do want to move to other topics, but I just impeachment is and so I think we're almost done here. For I think it's almost I do believe Cocaine Mitch because he's a ruthless person. As Mazie Herono says, very person Cocaine minched on playing of games. I do think

that this will be over soon. But I will take some solace in the humor that has occurred here, the unintentional humor we've seen from Democrats, And one of my favorite parts of that has been watching Nancy Pelosi pretend to have a tremendous, deep reservoir of love and respect and admiration for a Constitution that I'm quite sure she has neither read nor understood, but sure enough, just a lot of impatient managers in the Constitution. They've done a

phenomenal job. They've made us all so proud. This is people will look back who are who are honest? They will look back and what the Democrats have done here with disdain, disdain, because now this will be this is a precedent that has been set, This will be used again in the future. Anytime you have a a president who has the opposition party in majority in the House of Representatives, impeachment just becomes a petty weapon, a vote of censure, a vote of oh look how much we

hate this guy. And I do think that we should remember there is the possibility at some point in the future of a president who engages in conduct who of either party it could happen. I mean, we all know it's going to be a Democrat, but it could be either party theoretically, who engages in conduct that is so egregious, so illegal, or so deeply depraved and morally wrong depraved.

I mean, what really is to pray though? When you're in president odd States and you got things going on, and you know you got interns running around and so maybe even to pray. I don't know how we're going to get Democrats to agree with that is, but conduct that is so bad that any normal person would say, Okay, yeah, the guy's got to go, and there will be this president said of well is this really? Is this really bad conduct? Is this? Does this call for the ultimate

sanction against a president? Well? Remember what the Democrats did. They did this whole thing where there was a weak case, and they they pumped it up. They tried to make it seem like something that it wasn't. They did not care about what this would do to the institutions of government that they claimed to care so much about. And now that precedent becomes a built in defense for any president who decides that he or she doesn't want to go, even when it's really time to go. So, I mean,

democrats don't think that far ahead. They got problems, like they think they're gonna lose the next elections. Maybe we should spend a little time on that. Thanks for listening to The bus Essence Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. He said, Impeachment light they're going to crush you in November. Well, I'm glad he's acknowledged it's going to be me. He's so worried about me, he got

himself in this mix to begin with. Look this, I find this defense absolutely astounding. Yeah he did it, but it doesn't matter. I mean, George Washington's rolling over his grave and his farewell and dress saying, you know, the greatest threat to republics is being interfered with by foreign countries. Anyway. You know, when the dust ris didn't do the same conscience law I did, desuits didn't do the same constitute at Joe Biden shounds a lot. He's half asleep some

of the time. He really, this is gonna be the President United States of this guy. I mean, say, what's you're all about? Trump? The guy is dynamic, you know what he's talking about. He's got beliefs, he's got positions. It's highly engaging, highly entertaining guy reasons. The guys you know you beat me in November. Look, Joe Biden has always been and I say this as much as I can. I say this as a as a student of the game,

the game of politics. Joe Biden is a mediocrity. He always has been he and I actually give him credit in a sense for getting so much further along. He's getting so much further along in his career then anybody could have anticipated based upon his background, his skill set,

his work ethic, all of these things. So, I mean, you look at Biden back in what was the two thousand and eight when or no, two thousand and yeah, two thousand and when he was running for president thousand and eight, yes, and you know, trying to be the nominee then didn't really get above one percent of the vote. I mean, nobody thought this guy should be president. And then Obama, who did have a meteoric rise and was very effective in getting and getting himself elected to office.

There's no question that you can't Unlike Pelosi, I'm not gonna be like Obama wasn't good at get at winning elections. No, Obama was good at winning elections. Say what you will. That is a fact, Pelosi. You know, Oh, acquittal, He's not acquitted. No, that's that's a that's a yes or no. That's a true or false statement. And Trump will be acquitted. Obama did win elections. You know who didn't win elections?

Joe Biden. Joe Biden did not win elections. Joe Biden's only been able to win elections in Delaware and no offense. But Hi, I'm in Delaware. I actually was in Delaware yesterday, so I could have taped that and that would have been true. I'm technically not in Delaware now. I'm in New York City with producer Mark hanging out, having a great time. But Delaware is a relatively small, not particularly you know, earth shaking state when it comes to its political, national,

political importance. I'm not saying this. I've been to the Delaware beaches. They're quite lovely one, very nice people in Delawares. No, I'm not going to anybody. But if you're looking at a place where you're going to find the next president United States, you wouldn't think it's a guy who's just done exactly what he thinks he needs to do in order to stay in office in a state where if he had kind of harnessed the political Democrat party apparatus,

that's what you can do. This guy's a career politician. A lot of people around him, though, a lot of family members. As we see get rich and then Joe Biden gets rich by giving speeches based on the time he's been on government, because Obama said, all right, I'm gonna pull a guy out of relative political obscurity, and Biden was like below Kucinich at well, I mean, Biden was a joke in two thousand and eight, and now we're supposed we're supposed to believe it. He's this great politician.

No Obama needed somebody who was of the establishment and wasn't really going to cause problems and gave this this this talking point really of foreign policy credibility, when really they're a foreign policy reliability with Joe Biden, the reliability being that he's reliably wrong. It's wrong all the time. So that's that's a one reason to you know, that's

one reason to have him around. Just ask Joe Biden what should I do on this foreign policy challenge, and then whatever he tells you, do the opposite of that thing, and you'll be in great shape. I'll never have to worry. So now I take you to Oh, well, before I was going to move on to some of these other candidates for a second, this is also why you have such a ridiculous process that was playing out, and that isn't playing out now with impeachment because Democrats are desperate.

They're desperate. They should be desperate. Look at this field of candidates they put forward, Look at the positions that they're advocating for. But Joe Biden, also, this guy was like bottom of his class at law school, has told a lot of lies in the past two about his background. He's a very Guy's really am a bs er And people will say, well, Buck Trumps would be, yeah, but Trump's are really successful Trump. When Trump bs is, it's like because he wants to get a billion dollar you know,

office tower built somewhere or something. You know, he's a salesman. When Biden's bs against, like he's just making stuff up about his background because he wants people to think he's he's real smart. He's not. So he's a very unimpressive fellow. He's too old for this. And also, I mean the thing with that thing Tucker says about him feeding the seagulls in Florida, Yeah, that was It's very funny because

it's very very true. And there must be some sense the Democrats must know that this is not gonna He's not gonna work. By the way they should if I'm Joe Biden, and I'm clearly not because I don't talk about people stroking the blonde hair on my legs at the public pool. Weird stuff, by the way, weird stuff. But if I were Joe Biden, the pledge, I would make the only the only way that he gets around this because he is he is too old. And remember age is age is not just the number we're talking

about this. There's some people who are incredibly I mean, there are eighty year olds listening to the show who are like, Buck, I'll do more push ups than you all outrun you. And that's real. I know that Joe Biden is not one of them. I meaning that Joe Biden mentally has clearly gotten a little fog ear, a little slower. He's just not up for this. And it was, oh, it's so mean. Look what they say that Trump is crazy and that he's too People have said he's too

fact to be president because it's a health risk. They're insane. The Democrats are. They make health an issue when they want and then when you bring it up on the other side, it's, oh, why are you being so cruel? And when Hillary like flops into the back of a car in the height of an election season and everyone's supposed to pay no attention to it. How many times have you flopped into the back of a van recently when you're asking to have the nuclear codes in a

matter of months. I think it's legitimate, right, And you remember they tried to hide that at the media. Oh, it didn't happen. It's conspiracy. It's crazy. But Biden is a deeply unimpressive fellow. He's not up for this. If I were Biden, I would say that I was only going to run for one term, and I would I would name my VP pretty much right now and have to be somebody who's who's younger and has a greater

vibrancy that I think that would be. And not that I want to give the Democrats good advice, but I think that would be a smart move for him, because eventually the air is gonna the air is gonna come out of this Biden balloon for his election, and people are gonna there's not gonna be able to keep just pushing this thing through. But then you look at Bernie. Bernie's old Bernie. I mean, you know, we look. I do want good health for all these Democrats. You know,

we're human beings. First, Bernie had had a heart attack. I mean the guy is also really up there and doesn't see him like he is up for this. Put aside his positions for a moment, Warren. I'm not talking about Warren's health. I'm talking about what Warren had to say, because that is it was a wow moment here, Elizabeth Warren. Um, this gives you a a preview of the governance you could expect with Elizabeth Warren as president of the United States.

Pretty smart. Please play Cliff twenty. I'm gonna have a secretary of Education that this young trans person interviews on my behalf and only is this person believes that our secretary or Secretary of Education nominee is someone who is committed to creating a welcoming environment, a safe environment, and a full educational curriculum for everyone. Well, that person actually be advanced to be Secretary of Education. You like that? You like it? Yeah? Like it? You're gonna get it. Okay,

let's unpack this for a moment. Elizabeth Warrenier is telling you the American voter said this publicly at a forum, town hall, whatever, saying that she is going to have a trans child. I believe they said it is going to be like a nine year old, but I don't know if I forget if she gave an age right before we cut that clip. But a child, a transgender child, would have the final say in an interview process for the Secretary of Education, a cabinet level position. Elizabeth Warren

thinks that's a normal, intelligent, groundbreaking thing to say. There's a lot going on here. First of all, I the obsession with pushing transgenderism on children. This should be a red line of sanity for people like this should not

be happening the way that it is now. And all you have to do is look at the efforts to really dig into whether this is happening because of social pressure and ideological contagion, and or whether this is just the innate and natural state that they're eight year olds. That not only I mean, it's one thing for an eight year old or or you know, nine year old to think that he or she is a different gender,

but that we need to immediately take dramatic action. To quote a firm that belief is this is this is crazy and this is a problem, and they're right now you see it a little bit. Just like the entire trends agenda, they will what is today on the edge in a year, in two years will be the demand. What today is the the vanguard, the forefront of this politicized issue, they will make the standard. It'll be a

civil rights crusade. You know, of course we should give you know, hormone blocking therapy to fourteen, thirteen and fourteen year olds who think they're transgender. You know, of course we should engage in this, in this practice that even modern medicine, that this has never happened before. So people say, oh, doctors think this is safe or lying to you? They have no idea. No one really knows what's going to happen in twenty years when you give a thirteen year

old puberty blocking treatment. This is this is insane, this is abuse. But put aside for a moment Elizabeth Warren's claim here about transgender children, which again she's just trying to be super woke. That's what this is. The wocust that she can be put aside that claim for a moment. Having a child of any of any background persuasion, I don't care. Just let's start with child. Put aside the transpart of this is irrelevant to me in this part

of the conversation. Having a child interview an adult and having the president of the United States ask the child if the adults should get the job is a pretty good summary of how crazy libs have gotten. You know, this is the Greta Thunberg sin drome playing out now again in public for all of us to see. We're adults on the left are elevating and idealizing the political beliefs of children as unassailable and essential to the conversation

that adults have about politics. This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. I mean, this is this is beyond normal human stupidity. This is only possible through ideological brainwashing on the left. And let me just give you a well what a Felisobeth Warren just you know, before I picked my secretary off Defense, I would just want to know, I'd take a six year old and I'd have the six year old sit down with the four star general I'm considering, and I'd say, do you make do you

make the six year old feel safe? And I'd ask him does he feel Because if you can't make a six year old feel safe, how can you be my secretary of defense. That's a really good question, Elizabeth Warren. I suppose we'll have to answer it if you become president. You're in the Freedom Hut. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. I don't have a you know, one of those things. What do you call a thing that you blow into on your birthday that goes, you know, it makes the noise and is it? Is it a kazoo?

What do we call it? Did you make the noise? One more time? Let me one more time? Twice is enough. I don't want to spoil you, but what's the thing called? You know when you do the oh my god, yeah, the thing I don't even I don't even know if I could ever. I don't know if I've ever known what this is called. I just know that it's like a party favor that you give the kids. That we don't have those today on fortune. We don't have party

hats either. Party hats look particularly absurd on me because you know, yeah, you have to tell me when to bring this stuff here. Yeah, we don't have it, but I wanted to. I want to tell everybody that Producer Market and I are in here, and we are we are celebrating Brexit Day. Everybody, Hello, Brexit today. The UK is separating from the European Union today. It's fantastic. I hope. There's been a lot of interviews on the BBC with guys who like, ohn't really care what happens with the EU.

You know, my in governor, No like the different You know they don't all talk like that, right, I like some of them do. I don't really won't tell you anymore. A drunk englishman Hello, Ley, always find some old, crusty englishman a lot. I don't really care much about any of these things. Again, you watch a lot of movies, buck, I've never been to England, but I can imagine they don't all talk like that. I just want to walk around the pub be Brexit day, lad, it's going on,

you know what I mean? No, I understand, yeah, yeah, yeah, So I think Brexit Day is today at eleven pm. The European Union loses the UK after nearly fifty years of membership. It's forty some od years. I forget what it exactly forty seven years? So I mean this is if you believe in sovereignty, if you believe in national identity, if you believe in a nation state and a people getting to determine their future. This is a happy day

for the folks of the UK. Of course, this was a bitterly it was bitterly divided when they initially had the Brexit referendum, and the establishment within the EU and within the Great and within Great Britain's political system was very opposed to this. Because there's there's a deep connection, a correlation between elitism in Western societies, including here, and internationalism.

This is why people that go and get fancy degrees that are essentially worthless at fancy sounding but increasingly dumb and not particularly worthwhile institutions of higher learning, they train you to be very pro you know, pro I am F, pro un pro international criminal court, all of these things. Those people didn't like this, but the people had voted for Brexit are actually going to get, actually get a Brexit. Prime Minister Boris Johnson is the guy that you're gonna

be hearing some speeches from on this one. They got flags lining Parliament Square and the Mall. They've got the Mall as a ceremonial avenue leading to Buckingham Palace. You know, I've only been I'm actually gonna go to London this spring, which would be fun because I've only been one. They ever been once before. I was twelve years old. I barely even remember. Maybe, man, I just remember. Remember everybody had a fancy accent and the food wasn't very good.

That's what I remember. Do you think we have fancy accents? No, they think our accents are super unfancy. They all think Americans talk like this. I've heard how Brits try to impersonate us. I'm on to you, Brits. I got eyes on you, just like we try to impersonate. It's im quessions are perfect. Can we know exactly how they sound? No? I think so. Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, if the

iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. And we're reclaiming a very proud heritage as a manufacturing nation again. Do you remember when the previous administration, the head of the previous administration, I won't mention names, I'm sure you'll never guess the name, but said that you need a magic wand to create manufacturing jobs. Well, we found the magic wand because we're going to be hitting seven hundred and fifty thousand manufacturing job in the not to listen it.

Oh you do all these great deals. Everybody says, thank you, sir, this has never happened. Everybody said, it's impossible to do, it'll never never take place trade deals like this, And then we built our military, We've cut taxes, we've taken care of regulations, cut more than any other president and the history of our country. And we did that in three years instead of eight years. How many awesome trade deals can you remember, President Obama? Or just trade deals

forget about also, we don't need that qualifier. How many really important trade deals do you remember President Obama getting done in his eight years? Eight years? I mean maybe there was. I'm sure that there was, if you can get some Obama pro Obama hacked from the administration years to come forward. But what about the trade deal we have with you know, the people of Micronesia or something. You know, I'm sure they have some deal somewhere that

they'll point to you. But Micronesia, fun fact, part of the coalition of the willing under the Bush administration. Just just putting that out there, that was a real thing I think they sent. I'm not. I think they sent one guy, one person, so they were technically a part of the coalition of the willing some old them, old history from back in the day. But the president here is making a few points. One we were told. While everyone now who hates the president likes to pretend that, sure,

the economy is booming. Oh, of course it's booming. Of course it's great. Because Obama was presiding over the weakest recovery since the Great Depression, because the job's numbers, because economic growth and prosperity on a GDP GDP reflected level, we're so weak. They had to come up with some explanation for why it was the way it was, and so beyond that, they just had to say, well, this is the new normal. Right. That was a storyline that you would hear under the Obama years, especially in the

second term. You know, America, this is the way we're going to grow now. We got too many things here, too many problems, too much debt, whatever it is, too much foreign competition. You know, if you've been an investor in the last couple of years, if you've been invested in America doing great, you've been investing in like the international stock market and China. Let me tell you, it has not been a good time to be owning any

any Chinese, any Chinese stocks. So that's a reflection now right now, what you have is the media trying to come up with a way to downplay Trump's successes. And he's trying to remind everybody as he's signing this trade deal that we were you know that Obama said that there would need to be a magic wand to bring back these manufacturing jobs, that there would there's no way

to do these things. So it turns out if you remove regulation, you lower corporate taxes, and you just have a more pro business, pro you know, private property and respecting contracts, approach to economic activity, good things can happen. Oka, I hadn't get told you just I know this is a little dry, especially late and a Friday. We're about to get a roll call. We'll have some fun. I'll tell you about the stake that I had last night. That was truly I had a stake last night. It

was almost like a religious experience. It was truly amazing. But here's what the US Mexico Canada Agreement does. If you're curious, because you probably won't hear this that many places. This is from the Office of the Trade Representative the

United States Government. Agreement highlights include creating a more level playing field for American workers, including improved rules of origin for automobiles, trucks, other products, and disciplines on currency manipulation, Benefiting American farmers, ranchers, and agribusinesses by modernizing and strengthening food and agriculture trade in North America. Supporting a twenty first century economy through new protections for US intellectual property,

and ensuring opportunities for trade in US services. New chapters covering digital trade, anti corruption, and good regulatory practices, as well as a chapter devoted to ensuring that small and medium sized enterprises benefit from the agreement. So just trying to streamline, protect and facilitate business, just trying to do

everything can. And then if you look at the actual agreement itself, it has telecommunications, digital trade, intellectual property, competition policy, state on enterprises, labor, environment, regulatory practice, is anti corruption. I mean, it's it's a sweeping it's it's it's a major, a major agreement that will affect a lot of things and will make the business of the American people easier

and that this president isn't just sitting around saying. Remember, the big Obama talking point for a long time was when Obama could when Obama couldn't follow through on the promises that he had made to Democrat voters, it was Republicans are obstructionist. That was always what we would hear.

In fact, they said Republicans were such obstructionists that even when Obama decided that he wasn't going to go to them anymore and he was just gonna do end runs on them, it was because it was quote the right thing for him to do to use the pen on the phone. Remember that got a pen on the phone, and he would use that pen and phone via executive order to institute policy that he couldn't get the Republicans in the Congress to go along with because they are

Republicans and they didn't want to do these things. But the excuse was always obstruction. Not only have Democrats generally been opposed to this president's policies and the hashtag resistance in the federal judiciary has just made his life much more difficult as president than it should be in a

fair and just legal environment. They've been trying to destroy the president they've been you know, we're in the middle of an impeachment trial right now, and yet he is still delivering on promises, including in this case, a promise that involved Democrats. I would have to ask, I mean, for especially for those who are independent voters, or I would want to know what would they want the president

to be doing differently. I don't mean fake you know, fake news people that they're going to put up and say, oh, he's a who's an independent? You know, they're going to find a lot of They're gonna find a lot of suburban moms in the Midwest who are going to be like, oh gosh, like I just think that Trump's super mean. You know, you know, he's super mean. And I'm sure there are some moms that feel that way that that's fine, but that's going to be a recurring thing. You'll see.

They're gonna find suburban moms you're oh gosh, those tweets, Oh yeah, those tweets are mean, and they're not going to find people that they can put forward as the independent or undecided voter, which is which is always the most the most beloved of all American voters at election season, right. I mean, no one cares about the buckster because I'm voting Republican and this sea of insane blue. But they're going to find all these people that, as I said that,

do they think Trump is mean? They don't like his style. I would want to know what do they think that Trump should be doing differently? If you're really going to judge this presidency on the merits, what would be a better approach than what we were seeing from the president in terms of policy. Oh, I saw today that there

is I think a Politico article. Politico is a politics site for people who think left of center is center, and in that are article they talk about the constitutional crisis that the president poses by trying to build this wall. It's not a constitutional crisis. This is not that big a deal. You should just be allowed to build a wall. Should happen. He's the commander in chief, Army Corps of Engineers signing them do this, protecting US national boundaries, borders.

Should be allowed to do this. And the courts that are going to try to stop them from doing it are allowing ideology to dictate their legal interpretation, which we keep seeing. This is the nationwide injunctions you get from these federal courts or effectively, any judge who is a leftist, a leftist that happens to be wearing a black robe. Any judge can decide that they're going to override the

policies of the President of the United States. You're going to you know, even in that environment, though the president has been able to deliver. And look, I hope we just have another fantastic economic year, because this is really good for the American people. We are getting wealthier, more comfortable, more secure. Worry about the fact that we got a trillion dollars year deficit. It's bad. No one seems to care anymore. I don't know. There's like a late on

a Friday. So I feel like I'll just tell you this because I know people are buck Let's hear a producer Mark talk about hockey. We don't need to hear you talk about the deficit. It's boring. No one cares. Okay, twenty two trillion in counting, it matters. It matters at some point. There are pressures from carrying a debtload that large, pressures on the economy that affect all of us, but

they're unseen. In many ways. It's not as straightforward as just oh gosh, it's making us all poorer or less free. That's a real thing. But also there's the possibility of this thing implodes and all of a sudden you have a real crisis. And when you have a crisis of that magnetude a financial crisis, and who knows what exactly it will be. But when that crisis hits, it's too late to turn it around without massive economic damage. If we're going to tackle it, the time would be now,

but I know, go to a new election year. Everybody, everybody right now wants to believe that Uncle Sam is Santa Claus and there's an endless stream of money to just throw it everything we want for ourselves. It's not the way it works, folks. But that's my pitch. That's my pitch for today. And we got to care about the death of deficit, but nobody does. You're in the freedom hud. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast Live in Toronto, where the Stars virus got world scale attention.

That's because the only people who died outside of Asia from that virus were in Canada, and most of them were in Toronto, with only forty four people dying in total in Canada. It had a huge impact on our city. We lost a lot of tourism, we lost millions of dollars. The most importantly, we saw a lot of stigma and

racism towards Chinese people. It's important that we do not repeat those racist notions that happened here in Toronto, and we all need to be aware of this when we talk about the current coronavirus on our social media channels, we've seen lots of people saying things like this always happens in China and relating it a lot to the

types of foods that Chinese people eat. But it's important to remember that Western food practices are what created mad cow disease, and also Western meat consumption has created a big issue with antibiotic resistance. We need to listen to and trust to public health professionals, and we need to not overreact, and we need to not use this as an excuse to be racist. Wokeness. Wokeness is more important than your safety, my friends. This was some videos making

the rounds over the weekend. People sharing this all over social media in response to the coronavirus outbreak, which is obviously in China right now. I think under ten thousand cases and under two hundred deaths, but it could grow very rapidly. Here's the truth. We need to be able to speak about what caused this and where the risk factors are without people thinking that this is about whether

or not there's some cultural offense. Given there's nobody, nobody is hearing about this and being racist against I mean when I say nobody, let me step back from that for a second. The conversation is not about more random morons on the internet who are racist, not just against

Chinese people, but to be racist against any people. The other's people are always going to be around their morons, But we do have to understand if there was you know, if this is going to continue to be a problem, is there a a a food source or a way of handling certain food products animal products in this case that leads to what could be a pandemic. We want

to stop that thing from happening. And when you know, when people's lives are at stake, when their health is at stake, all of a sudden, they get a little bit more uneasy, not some libs are still crazy about but a little more uneasy. But all we don't want to be culturally insensitive. They mentioned SARS. SARS comes from and they did analysis of this. SARS comes from the practice in a part of from eating the civet cat, which is I guess a type of wildcat and they

eat it. And that's where Stars came from. So it does matter that there are certain practices and there's there are these videos that are making the rounds right now of what we would consider really kind of an exotic meat market. I suppose in Wuhan, which is where that

this is. That's ground zero of this coronavirus outbreak. By the way, I wonder you know people have been this is for real, people have been doing searches on Corona beer and virus a lot now because there are people that think that they're most about I remember the first day I said, had nothing to do with sure enough, this is not a well named there's not a well

named virus. I'd be willing to bet. And this is an aside to the bigger concerns here that you might actually see a little bit of a drop in Corona sales because of this, because that's just the way people oh coronavirus. And I don't know. I remember the band Anthrax after the Anthrax scare in this country was really upset about that situation, so that this this can happen. Uh, but this storyline that we're hearing now that you can't discuss the practices in the food practices in China and

ow it affects us. First of all, it is true that most the flu virus that we're worried about year and a year out. You know, new strains of flu virus do tend to come out of livestock and you know animal food handling processes in China. This is just this is the truth. This is where it often that you know, bird flu, swine flew these things, they come

out of China. So that's real. And for him to you know, this is a moment where oh, well, let's just let's make this about cultural criticism in some way, he brought up mad counties. I think I'm trying to how many people have actually been killed by mad cow disease. It's like a handful. I think four p four people

in the United States have died of mad cow disease. Ever, so to say we're responsible for mad cow disease, it's kind of like, well, and I'm pretty sure you also have to eat like the brains of the cow for that to be an issue. So yeah, not. We We handle our produce and our livestock very very hygienically in

comparison to what's done in some other countries. When you see the video in Wuhan of this market where they have bats and they have you know, big boa constrictors and they've got rats and dogs and cages and they're eating all these things. These are all these are all for human consumption, and it's just sort of laid out on tables and it's it's not it's not a hygienic practice. Okay, it's just not. So it's it's not to we're not putting down any individual. We're trying to find ways to

avoid pandemic disease from happening. But in the world, this world on the left, in this country, better to say that, you know, our use of antibiotics and animals is equivalent to people eating what maybe contaminated bats or drinking bat soup, which I gotta tell you there are some things that I'd be willing to be a little risky in terms of giving it a shot. You will never catch me eating bat, bat anything on the list of animals as

we've discussed. Bats are very low on the what I'm willing to eat, I would take I Actually, I think i'd go rat before i'd go bat. What do you think, Mark, would you go snake before you go rat? None of the above, None of you have to What if you're with Indiana Jones and Indiana Jones the Temple of Doom and the only food you have available is whatever they give you, I'll promise you that it will never happen. But if I had to choose one of those, I

think I at least have heard of snake being eaten before. Yeah. Do you remember in Indiana Jones when he opens he's like slits open the boat, constrinking the Temple of Doom, and that guy is like eating and the babies, oh man eat buck. Yeah, that's a good movie. This isn't fear factor. Okay, I have bugs Like I did eat crickets in Mexico, and uh, I think they were not very good. So I would not recommend that people eat crickets. So people like it. It's protein. It is. It is protein.

So eventually we're supposed to stop eating all like good meat, and we're supposed to start just eating insects and vegetables, I think, until they realize that insects are living creatures too, and then they will tell us that we can't eat them either, and then that the plants have feelings. That's also where we're heading. Eventually, plant based burgers will be you know, it's veggie murder. So I don't know what we're supposed to just eat, like spores, molds, and fungus.

I'm not really sure what we're gonna be left with. Doesn't sound exciting to me, though, you know, algae. Algae is a living thing. I don't know, you know, if we're really gonna be if we're really going to be true humanitarians, I don't think we can eat plants or algae. I think we just I think, you know, you just have to Humanity has to starve. How can we drink water? It might have feeling more single celled organisms? Am I just gonna just just ingest amibo without any sense of

whether what are those Amibo's hopes in dreams? You know? What is that paramecium? Or that I'm running out of it? If you're over my head, yeah, I didn't pay attention to science. I'm just saying you know the flagellum. Am I just gonna eat flagellum without anyone even caring that flagellum has feeling sounds like a new product from Jello. Thanks for listening to The bus Essen Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeart Radio app, or

wherever you get your podcasts. The show ain't over yet, folks, keeping it real. It's time for roll call. So exciting to have some roll call time with all of you. So thank you for letting me do that. I always appreciate it. Missed you guys yesterday. Glad to be back. Not planning any more days away anytime soon. So that's the good news. Uh, here we go. Let's get to it, shall we. Here we go, Facebook dot com, slash buck Sexton exciting stuff. Oh I was gonna tell you, so

I had to. I visited my friends at Sansbury Research last night talking about some book stuff, and then we had we had dinner, and we went to a place in Baltimore called the Prime Rib, which there are also offshoots of this, I believe in Washington, DC. I've never been to those ones, but the original Prime Rib is in Baltimore. It may be that may be the best steak place I've ever been in my life. It may

actually be number one all time. It's that good. I'll have to go to Baltimore for Yeah, you gotta check it out. I will tell you what they have, the prime rib, so you can get prime rib obviously, but we also have the prime rib steak, which is a tomahawk, a rib by tomahawk, which is what I tend to go for. And and that's fine, even though it's a very distakes about the size of my head, there's no

judgment there. I finish at all pretty much. Yeah, this morning I still feel a little heavy from them, the meat sectarians. Yeah, I was really I went after it. Um I didn't. By the way, I didn't think of any people go to steakhouse. So can I have a wedge salad? You're not being healthy. You're just having a bunch of lettuce drenched in blue cheese. Just just be a man and eat your steak. Yeah, I signed dishes. Ain't a Brussels and a sparrio. Whatever you want to

do with that, that's fine. But people always take up all this room with the wedge salad. Ye, why why wedge salad? Yourself. When you're at a steakhouse, you're gonna have some delicious red meats. Those are delicious. Oh you can't have Yeah, I was gonna say, I don't know. Isn't that an outback steak? That is an out back steakhouse special? Yeah? Yeah, so yeah, I mean that maybe if that's kind of exciting. But I see people and they're like, oh, let me eat like a head of

lettuce drenched in blue cheese. Which I'm not saying it tastes bad, it tastes good, but you're taking up precious room, precious volume in your gullet. Is that another word for gut? I don't know. Yeah, for the steak. But this is what happened to me though, And I feel a little I feel a little cheapish about this. Now. I was with some great friends last time. We had a great dinner. But I I saw this, this option on the on the steak for is there there's a party going outside? Yeah,

there's a Super Bowl tailgate about to happen. Oh yeah, people are about to rock. Did we get invited to this party that's happening? Oh yeah, there's signs around the building. Okay, Well, I'm glad people are having fun while we try to save the republic. No, it's all good, it's fine. It's just I just hope they know that they sleep under a blanket of freedom that we provide them while they're partying. You know, it's because we're in here making sure the

country continues to function and the presidency isn't ruined. Um. But so so I saw the steak and it was a tomahawk. Of course, I ordered medium rare. I might have actually, in retrospect, stepped it up to rare. I might just go all in. I saw this. Have you ever seen this before? There was an option for how to order your steak in terms of accoutrement. One of them was called oscar. Do you know what? Do you know what ordering your steak oscar is? I did not

know this until last night. I was like, what is that? That sounds like fun? It is taking about a fist size of lump crab meat and just pouring Hollandaiz all over the lump crab meat and then putting one single thing of asparagus hashtag healthy on top of its healthy. I gotta tell you it was amazing, but I felt a little judged, like the table looked at me like, really, you're getting a You're getting like a thirty two ounce tomahawk ribire right and whatever? It was big. It was

a big steak. And then you're gonna have a fist size lump crab meat drenched ineffectively just butter with some herbs. That seems a little excessive, you know what I say to that? Challenge accepted exactly. Wowlenge was accepted. It was good, although I still I'm a little like, how do you eat on? Did you not eat all day? Correct? Okay, I did. I had a muffin from my my brother's company, Susie's. I did not eat any food other than that. But my stomach is like still a little fold today. Yeah.

I would imagine there's not really a lot of room for anything. I recently went to Have you ever been to a Brazilian steakhouse? Oh? Yeah, I how did they keep bringing all day? I just have to eat there? And then one guy I went with did not eat any of the side dishes, didn't go to the salad bar, nothing. He was like, I'm just having me. I kind of appreciate this purist attitude because a lot of people they

go to steakhouse and they fill up. When I see people at a steakhouse eating, if it's a good steakhouse, eating like bread, big things of bread, be shorthand that's not smart. No, I mean, look to eat his own, eat whatever you want. But if we're if you're really gonna go game time, you gotta save room. You gotta save room for the protein. Wow, the real we're really in the middle of a party, so usually they're downstairs,

so I'm surprised that's right. Next Kay, Well we can go out there and you know, drink some of their booze and hang out and it'll be fun. All right. I gotta get to roll call, which means all of your thoughts brought to me here. Thank you so much. Here we go, let's get too Rich. I was go falling Tuesday during your show with your impressions of Bernie and Warren made me laugh out loud since I was

honoring my birthday with their caucuses. I trust you will be following the candidates and giving your impressions along the way. Thank you again for your enjoyable commentary. Rich. Thank you so much for writing in and your kind words are very much appreciated. Frank first love the show. My wife is the hockey fan of the family. But I think Producer Mark segments should be called Producer Mark's penalty box

or maybe producer Marks not neutral zone. I think the penalty box is going to win out on this one. Let's see Mark, you even know what the neutral zone is? That was my question when I saw this man. Oh no, I thought that was just like a thing that he had made up. No, the neutral zone is like the area between the blue lines, like in the middle of the ice. This is why you gotta take you to a hockey game. Yeah, I guess I'm taking you. But whatever, same idea, we gotta go to hockey games. I guess

I can learn some of these things. I did have a nice chat with a fellow who was a was a hockey player once, and he was he was very well known for this happened recently, actually a few weeks ago, very well known for fighting. And he explained because I was very curious about this, he explained to me that first of all, they've cracked down a lot on fighting and hockey from when he played, because he's now retired, and you know, he was talking about playing. I guess

fifteen or twenty years ago. And I said, I don't really understand. How is this okay? And he said, the first of all, if you really hurt somebody, day will something like you can get arrested, like if you hit somebody in the face, if you like really pray the ordinary, if you do something that's out of the ordinary. And I said, but I don't understand. How does it work? Is well, well, teams have like fighters, yeah, and it's known that they're going to be a fighter, and there's

like a hole. It's almost like this ballet of there are these different guys that are involved in that component of the hockey match. But like most of it, like you would never if you started a fight with Wayne Gretzky, people would have looked down on you. He had a guy named Marty McSorley that was on his line specifically

to protect him. Somebody hit him, mcsorley's coming after you. Yeah, see this this is what there's like, this whole thing about how it used to be line brawls, like the entire all five players on each side, even the goalies would get involved. Sometimes he go in the bench. It was crazy back in the seventies eighties even early nineties. Yeah, line brawls. Line brawls which like look at the time you're like, oh, this is awesome, but like looking back at it's like, oh, this is barbaric, and I hope

these guys are are okay? Why it was not really a hockey figs I grew up. I remember I remember playing the game on Nintendo Blades of Steel, and this would happen. There'll be like bench clearing brawls. You could actually start. Well, there used to be NHL Hits Blades of Steel. Little. Yeah, I know it's the wrong generation for you, but still, yeah, that's a thing. Um, good good stuff. I did not know about all that. I did not know about line brawls. You learned something learning YouTube.

There's a lot of videos of them. Kendall writes in First Buck. First off, I want to say I love your show Never Quit. It gets me through my days at work. I enjoy listening to your takes on everything and impressions. However, this message would have spurred from your January twenty eighth episode, when producer Mark brought up Techmo Bowl and the Raiders team with Bo Jackson being unstoppable. I love Techmo still play with my brothers when we go home to visit, but we had the rule, just

like we did with Golden Eye and Odd Job. Another fave that you mentioned, which I love, you couldn't use the Raiders in any type of competitive setup like the season mode. Techmo was incredible, no penalties and great halftime shows. Thanks for keeping us on this topic or letting me get in on this topic. Keep up the fantastic show you guys. She'll tie. First of all, I'm sorry, it's not against you know, this is not nom There are rules. It's not against the rules to play with with odd

Job in Golden Eye. You know, people can whine about this, but Odd Job as a character it's allowed. Then. As for Techmo, I don't know if that's if Bo Jackson is so much better than the other players that are. There was like a Michael Jordan basketball game where like basically every time you shot with Jordan you made it so if you're playing against that. There were certain video games back in the day, like we mentioned a couple of days ago, Madden No. Three with Michael Vick Unstoppable,

Like certain players are just so good. Nowadays it's not as bad. Yeah, Like even though, like, for example, in hockey, Connor McDavid is the best player in the game, but he's not always going to score. He's not like Bo Jackson in Techmobile. Connor mcdays he really the most valuable player in the nh Oh yeah, he's Gretzky esque. What teams he played for? The Edmonton Oilers, actually same team Gretzky played for. I thought Gretzi was an la king.

He was. See look at that from the video game trading. That was back when there was no salary cap. So basically the King's bought him and vandon't he needed money, and honestly, him being a king's what really started hockey in America. I hear Edmonton's lovely this time of year. By the way, you enjoy sticking your face in a freezer with with like wet hair. Western Canada not the

best place to play hockey. So let's see we get here and now we have Steven Hey Buck tell producer Marked a man up and watch the Mandalorian and Steven I'll let you tell producer Marked there man up. He does get a lot of shade for things he can't control. However, I really like him on the show that's just the way Shields High See. He likes you. He just wants to watch him telling you the man up is a

great message. Here we go. I'll take it. Yeah. PS, glad that Trump knows where Wisconsin is on a map, but it's actually been within within forty miles of my house. Very cool, Stephen, Thank you so much. Let's see next up here. We have so many messages. Jeff, hey buck love the show. First time message after two years of listening. Thank you so much, Jeff, appreciate it. I just want to say that you were correct. Do not listen to

the ill informed listener. Porsche is that is the correct pronunciation, not Porsche. Oh oh, you and Mark keep up the good work. As for the ill informed listener, look up a Porsche commercial on YouTube. As proof, Shields High See us speak a tiny bit of said German, and when you've taken at least two years of high school level chairman, you know that the pronunciation is posha and not posh. Now is the time on Sprockets when we dance that

sound like the sweetest chef. That's not sweetest German dude, but sound like the character like that. Yeah's how I would imagine the sweedih chef would speak German for some reason produce a Mark said German chef atone we cut e was very precisely and mechanically like we are doing the inside of a pm W. It's very special. They're having a real party outside. Man. I think they have anything to kill, you see anything to kill out there? I don't know. I think this is just a line

for the food. Oh, there's a line for the food. Yeah. So like just to paint the picture for everybody on the raid, one should just walk out there and tell those people who work on the music side of this business that producer markus here in producer Mark, don't wait in no lines. Yeah, I'll just walk to the front of the line. But basically, the kitchen and the performance

areas right next to our studio. Jeremy, Jeremy spoken. Your discussion on the population for not being less than many American cities should be sufficient evidence for Democrats to want the electoral college. Too often they point to the middle of the country and think that only the electoral college favors Republicans. However, if the popular vote were to be used, this outproclaimed intellectuals of New England would be forgotten. Shields High, Well,

Jeremy has spoken. Thanks so much, man, Buck, you are correct. Poor is a two syllable word. They even have a YouTube video out to help people pronounce it correctly. You are awesome, Shields High. You want to think I'm wrong, I'm right even when some people think I'm wrong, I'm right. Unlike producer Mark who thought that Clemson was in Alabama. It burns, it burns. We can't a little about that way. You know, he's right a lot, so we can't let

him let that one totally slip. Erica listening to your Wednesday podcast when a Bloomberg ad came on, I was surprised and then amused. The ad got cut off mid sentence with a sound by a Trump. Yeah. Eric, I think we've explained this before. People are sending a lot

of messages about this. There are rules for political ads, and you can't, you know, FCC rules, Federal Communication Commission rules that you can't not take ads on your air for political part, you know, for a political candidate of one side and all the other, especially if you're gonna be on terrestrial radio as we are. We're on one hundred and sixty stage now on the Buck Sexton Show. So that means that we have to I have no choice in our commercials but to take ads from Maya Bloomberg.

And that includes the podcast as well. And that includes the podcast as well. So can't you any there's no I mean, I'm sorry, guys, there's nothing we can do about that. So those of you that don't want to hear Bloomberg ads, but also you know, you know, listen to Bloomberg ads. He might be like, hey, why do you have that big soda? You don't need that big soda. I'm Mini Mike, and I approve this message, you know what I mean. Like he said, listen to what is

listen to what his ads are. Nicole writes, wow, the girl that is in fetter today, Um, okay, please come back. I'll just read that part. Thank you, Nicole, I missed you all. Thank you for having me back, or rather for wanting me back. I do appreciate that. Willie. In German, it's posha. If Ferdinand was French, the EO was not pronounced. Koch is pronounced wrong, does not matter which one c h and German is a soft G. In some areas it's a K. But it is the most common for

it to be as a soft G Porsche. It was a soft G that was in German. Who guten tag? Yeah, Ike Nama Buck, I might teach producer Mark a little German in here v heysenz v hysnz Mark. Uh, yeah, that's I did take two yus of German in high school. I remember about thirty words, so fun, fun times, Robert Uh, he says, if I hold up the sign, but you can't see the sign, so that's no good ruth. Um, I've never heard a Republican adam your podcast. Um, so what's going on there? Well, I mean tell us some

Republicans to advertise on the podcast. I don't know where are you g I mean Bloomberg is spelling one hundred million dollars though, so there's a lot of money he's thrown around, right, that's that's not on us. I think Bloomberg just paid the company X amount of dollars. So it's on every podcast, and I think it's I think he's just blanketed the airway. Yeah, I'm sure Trump will follow sue once it's after the primary. He doesn't need to spend the money, now, why would he? Yeah, that'll

be fun. Team. The weekend is upon us. I'm back every day next week. Very excited. So thank you so much as always for listening, for being here, Please pass the buck. Tell a friend to listen to the show. Also, if you have not already and you listen to us on radio or podcast, check out Pluto TV channel two forty eight the first until Monday. Have a great weekend. Everybody Shield's Hot.