CNN: The Enemy of Truth

and abroad. And now we're bringing this battlefield proven liquid directly to your door. Strikeforce Energy Liquid packs, available in four flavors, have zero sugar, zero calories, and are made with only the finest ingredients. For the fuel to power through your toughest fights, simply adds strike Force to sixteen twenty ounces of water, tea, lemonade, yogurt, even a nice

cold beer. Go to strike Force Energy dot com, enter discount code buck at checkout, and for every packet you buy, we will donate a packet to military members around the globe. Strike Force Energy dot Com discount code buck. Because strike Force Energy is the fuel for the fight you are entering, the freedom hunt. The media flips out when Trump says there could be violence after the election happens, but we all know which signed on violence is likely to come

from if it were to happen. We'll talk about that. And also allegations of racism against a Republican governatorial candidate looks bogus to me, folks. We'll talk about that. And also what is rapid onset gender dysphoria. Here's a hint. The left doesn't want you to know, so we'll talk about it. Matta and more coming up. This is the bus Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to

decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, America, let me rank you're a great American Again, The Bucks Exton Show begins. Florida elections are always competitive, and um, you know this is a guy who, although he's much too too liberal for Florida, I think he's got huge problems with how he's governed Tallahassee. Uh. You know, he is an articulate spokesman for those far left views, and he's a charismatic candidate. And you know I watched those

Democrat debates. None of that it was was my cup of tea. But I mean he performed better than the other people there. So so we've got to work hard to make sure that we continue Florida going in a good direction. Let's build off the success we've had on Governor Scott. The last thing we need to do is to monkey this up by trying to embrace a socialist agenda with huge tax increases and bankrupting the state. Welcome

to the Buck Section show, everybody. I played for you there some audio that was from from Fox where you had the the gubernatory all nominee from the Republican Party for the state of Florida, Rhonda Santis, and he was talking about the the Democrat candidate who just came through the primaries or Florida just had their primary, and he was discussing their differences on policy, and he said what you heard there, He said that let's not let's not

monkey things up. He means to say, let's not mess things up by doing things like what does opponent wants to do, which is corporate tax rate hike or you know, any number of far left progressive policies. But you see, the santiss opponent is African American, and because of the term that de Santists used here, now the left is playing the game they always play where they're just saying that De Santists said something racist. Oh that's right, he's

a racist, folks. That was you see, that was a dog whistle to use the term monkey up in a general sense in reference to policies and to the way that a state is being run is racist because the person who opposes you, they're saying, happens to be black. They are creating a racial connection where there where there is no, a racist connection where there is none. Um. But this tells you a lot about the way the left, the way the left plays the game. They they this

is one of their favorites. I would note when somebody has a turn of phrase or or says anything that could be even vaguely construed as as racist, even if they will admit that it's it was accidental, they'll say, well it was it was kind of a Freudian slip, then that it was accidental. And I know there are different times where this has come up. I think of

the I feel very badly for him. Still, Honestly, this wasn't I don't know if he was an ESPN and now, but it was about a tennis match and he said that, you know, Serena Williams was in our no venus. Williams was engaged in guerilla meaning little warfare Spanish for a little war guerilla tactics. But he said guerrilla because that's the Americanized version of it, guerilla tactics. Uh, because he was doing it or she was doing an all of the above approach to try to win the match, right,

moving around strategy and everything else. He was just throwing everything in the kitchen sink and he said guerilla tactics and he got fired for that. I got a lot of trouble. You know. The guy's life is, you know, altered for the worse because people don't like even the possibility of something being said that some could think was racist. I remember during during the during the Olympics. Remember I forget what it was. I think it was like a

few years back. There was a young woman, African American woman who was on the US team and she did an event and then right afterwards previously scheduled commercials for and it was a commercial for I think an animal hospital or something. But they had a a a small monkey that was engaged in an acrobatic event or whatever. But it was supposed to be. It was completely separate from the Olympics. But it's just because of the frames and how it changed over, and people were outraged about that.

It was clearly, you know, there was no intent there of any kind, but there was outrage right there was these those two things had nothing to do with each other. No one was trying to make them have anything to do with each other, No one was trying to imply any kind of a racial slur or anything else, but they still got so upset about it. This is how the left does what they do, folks. It doesn't matter that it's unfair, It doesn't matter that it's a slander.

If they can get away with saying something was a slur, even an unintentional slur, they will do it because it is so politically useful. In the case of the of the Guerrilla Tactics, by the way that that incident, I

really break this down, folks. Does anybody you think that an announcer who who is who is describing the game would would say, would would intentionally use a racial not even you know, a racial form of language or in a racially tinged language to talk about one of the greatest female tennis players of all time, and it is that it's the equivalent of saying, this guy wanted to basically, in a career sense, light himself on fire on live TV.

I don't think that that's what he was trying to do. Okay, I don't think anyone really thinks that that's what he's trying to do. But there's so much sensitivity around it. And here with with the Santists, they realized that, you know, de Santists, I think is is gonna He's gonna win. He's gonna win it. And this was their big opening today. Oh my gosh, so much, so much anger and raid thrown at the Santis about about this comment that that no, what what what are they really saying here? It's a

dog whistle? Really, they think that the Santists would just insert that phrase in that way and deal with all the allegations of racism that he knows is going to come from the dishonest left for dog whistle purposes. It's just idiotic. There's no it's not just that there's no motive for him to do it. All the motives go in the opposite direction. But they but they and they're not really analyzing this in any kind of a serious sense. Uh, there was on MSNBC and analysts who offered this. I mean,

this is where they go with this on MSNBC. Look, I played the audio for you heard it, you know this is how they analyzed it over um over at. Well, actually, no, I'm sorry, before we get tell MSNBC analyst, here's how the opponent, Andrew Gillham himself was talking about dis Antists recently. Wait, producer, Mike, was this in response to the comment or is this just in general? Yeah, Buck, this is a sponsor. It's in response to the comment. Okay, that's uh, he was

on with che folks. Here's what the Here's what the opponent. Yeah, here, here's what the opponents said about a plate one. It's very clear that Mr de Santists is taking a page directly from the campaign manual of Donald Trump. But I think he's got another thing coming to him if he thinks that in today's day and age, Florida voters are going to respond to that level of derision and division. They're sick of it. What we're trying to offer in this race, ever, was a state? Was that racist or

a fignative speech? Well? Well, Uh, in the handbumc Donald Trump. They no longer uh do whistle calls. They're now using full bullhorn. That is so slimy. That is so slimy what he just did there. Notice how he he was asked a specific question after chef Smith, you know, butcher the phrases. Is that a figment of speech? It's figure of speech, chep But anyway, good thing to pay him, you know, ten million dollars a year or whatever. Uh. The question that was asked was was it was what

dissentists said racist? And what his opponent who's up there grandstanding on TV, says is, well, Donald Trump says racist things, which is a way of saying, well, I'm not gonna say that what he said was racist, but I kind of want to imply that he's a racist and make my base think that I'm kind of saying he's a racist. I mean, it was just a it was a slimy maneuver. Uh.

And that's what That's what gilhim did. That's what he offers up now he'd much rather have for based turnout purposes, Gilmill much rather talk about that than, for example, what he uh wants to do in the state, which he also told Chep Smith here, let let's hear about this

play play two es. Since you mentioned money, Mr Mayor, you you also ran on universal health care, lots more money for schools and especially for teachers, raising the minimum ways to fifteen dollars for for all Floridians, specifically, Mr Mayor, if elected governor, how are you going to pay for that? Yeah? Well, what we have proposed is an increase in the corporate tax rate, which in the state of Florida is lower

Alabama and Georgia. Right now we're at five and a quarter and we've suggested going up to just over seven, which puts us in line with many other states. And part of what we've it creates a billion dollars uh and funding for our public education system. Uh. And part of it is is that I just don't believe that corporations choose states to locate in when they are forty out of fiftieth in the public education system. Yeah, it's not even none of this even really holds together. I

mean it's just yeah, corporations and public education. I mean, what now they sign up where they think they have a favorable business climate, I mean public education? Uh boy? Um. He also I think he wants a fifteen dollar minimum wage. You look at it's the progressive it's the progressive wish list. This guy eyes offering up uh, and and the left is embracing us now. And you know a figure he's he is, uh, look, he's he's somebody who they probably

are already thinking of at at a national level. I mean, he win wins the governor's race in Florida, they'll start, they'll start talking about this guy going way beyond that, which is obviously already a big job. But it's so frustrating to see it. And I know that we've come to expect it. I know you expected to, but to to try to pile onto de Santis here and say

that he implied something racist. We we gotta push back against this this stuff with all, with all that we can, folks, we can't let him get away with this game, right. We can't let him tag people as racists who haven't done anything to deserve that at all, full stop. We can't allow that to happen. It's it's a smear tactic. It's a grotesque mischaracterization on purpose by people on the left.

And you know, MSNBC jumped in I mean this guy, when this guy Mark Thompson, when even further play play twenty three, this andrews the benefit of the doubt in thinking that he uses this term in non racist ways otherwise and maybe didn't think it through. Is there any possibility of that. No, there's no possibility that whatsoever. But people used the term monkey something up or No, you've not heard it everyone, that's not. No, I don't. People don't say who says I've never hear anybody say that.

And for people say that non racist terms that's in in the environment in which I live is an African American, That's not something that's normally said, I don't know. I don't know anybody who says that. Frankly, maybe that's just I'm divorced for that. But look, it's not a dog whistle. When you say monkey in reference to an African American, he might as well have just said And where Donald Trump needs to condemn this, De Santis needs to immediately

apologize and or drop out of the race. I wanna be very very clear about that this is absolutely racist, and if he gets away with it this time, he's going to continue to do it. They did it to the Obama's referring to them as primates, and now he's going to do it to Andrew Gillum. Monkey up to hack together hardware for a particular task, especially a one shot job or an extremely uh temporary solution to hack up or mess up. That is from Webster's dictionary, folks.

So now we're at the point where we're gonna say that things that are in the dictionary as a general term are inherently racist, and we don't actually think that they're real terms. This is the you're getting a snapshot of the leftist mindset here. That doesn't matter the fact that you can go into a dictionary as I just did and find that a monkey up is a phrase in common usage. But now you'll have commentators go on

TV that say, that's not even a phrase. And you know what, even though it's wrong obviously in anybody with with literally three seconds of research, you can prove it wrong as I just did. People are gonna hear that they're not gonna want to do the research because you know what, they want to hear that a Republican is racist, and this just reinforces that, and that's what the MSNBC audience wants. To be told. They don't want to be told the truth. They want to be told the RHN

descentis is a racist. So they put somebody on TV. He will say, oh that thing that he said, Yeah he's a racist, and taking even further and say he might as well have just used an explicit racial slur. This is this is stupidity. I mean, this is and this NBC should be ashamed of itself. But I don't know if they're really capable of Shane. They should be ashamed of themselves. Though, Um, we we have a lot more.

We gonna talk about my friends. Um eight four or four night two five on the lines if you want a chat eight four four nine buck. I'm back in the swamp in d C. Men in his swampy down here today it's like it feels like a hundred degrees. I was walking around that I was basically swimming through the air. That's how human and gross it is. And then there's all the swamp stuff that goes on with people that are selling access and all the rest of it. But we've got we've got a pack show for you.

I did see this headline. I want to dig into a little bit of Sarah Palin not invited to the McCain funeral. Huh um, there's there's something there, I think, something that we need to need to discuss a little bit of. And then I mentioned President Trump's comments about violence possible violence with the election. I will get to that coming up. Where where does politically motivated violence come from these days? We all know it's left, even though

they pretend otherwise. We got that a more Stay with me. Let's be clear also about what's going on here. The theme here is I'm Donald Donald Trump, and I'll protect you from the scary black people. ANTIFA is widely perceived as an African American organization, and this is just part of the same story of Lebron James and Don Lemon and Maxine Waters and the NFL players and the u c l A basketball players. This is about black versus white.

This is about Donald Trump's appeal to racism, and it just happens all the time, and we never say it, or we don't say it enough for what it is. But that's what's going on. I mean, Jeffrey Tubin there, the chief legal analyst at CNN, is a moron. He's a moron, And you know, I don't like to call names, but he's actually an idiot. That's the dumbest thing I've heard in a long time. Antifa is widely considered a

a black organization. That is an outright falsehood that anybody who pays any attention to the news cycle should know that is a complete and utter lie. In fact, I can tell you having covered protests in person, where Antifa was in their full you know, battle rattle, head to toe street warrior gear stuff I've actually never seen personally. I'm not saying it doesn't mean is I've never seen

a black member of Antifa. I mean, if if we're talking about Antifa as the black block that shows up, remember black block of reference to the clothing had to tell, the black block that shows up at some of these events and engages in violent counter protests, they call it. I mean, I'm not saying that it is, but I've actually never even seen somebody who wasn't white, who is part of a black block and engaging in violent coast

so called counter protests. It's really just rioting. But there is no person Okay, forget about my antecdode for a second. There is no person who thinks and Tifa is a black organization. That is that is lunacy, an idiocy from somebody who is revered over at CNN. I mean, you should be laughed out of the building for saying that. And he was black. No, it's not, Oh oh my gosh,

it's it's amazing though. Folks who they will elevate. I mean they're probably they're probably paying that guy a million dollars a year plus to go on TV and wrap rap rap, say a lot of stupid stuff. He's a terrible legal analyst all the time. He just tells liberals what they want to hear through the the the the facade of objective legal analysis. I mean he's just there to launder liberalism for seeing his audience. That's what that's what he does. That is his role. Um. I don't know.

Perhaps he does that well for them, but I just I had to just jump on that. I mean, Antifa is known as a black organization, not by anybody who knows anything. Dumb person I was gonna call him. I can see the a S word right, dumb personally, Yeah, dumbass. There we got, Thank you, Mike gave me permission. The guy's a dumbass. Things are getting crazy. Feel a little better, Yeah, getting wild on the show. I feel a little better about things. Yeah, that's right. I feel like I got

to let loose there for a second. Sorry if you got young ones listening and asked, is another name for a donkey? Um? So there you have. We will talk about this Trump comment about violence in the election. I think it's very important to dig into that, maybe a little bit of what's going on with Palin and the McCain funeral and and oh so much more so sing He's hold in the line for America. Buck Sexton is back. Welcome Mactine. We've got a lot of lines lit. I

want to take some calls from our friends out there. First, George in l A. George, welcome to Freedom of Man. I'm sorry we didn't get to hang out in l A. We were in I was in your hometown for a few days. Oh yeah, and you saw all the scooters, those shooters all over the place. Man's craz schooners are taken over. Really well. I just wanted to tell you Shield high Buck, you have really a sharp analytic mind, and to be able to sit there and look at all of these factors coming up and be able to

comment on them. Uh, just thank you directly. I really appreciate that and your honesty and straightforwardness. And um, I feel a kinship because I was kind of I'm old enough to have had uh college and graduate school experience to be able to look at things and you know, uh judge antecedent conditions and what the consequences are after

you know they're there. And I just wondered, what do you think or how how are we going to deal with these um uh you know neo Marxist Olinsky I type people if they can't or won't even deal with standard usage of the English language, Well, this is you know, it's become a big issue for me, and I've been thinking about doing more in depth research and quite honestly, I think there's actually a book a book in this for me, because I really want to attack the issue

of the way the left changes and then leverages and weaponizes language. And it's usually a gradual process, and it's something that has has that tremendous effect in our in our national political discussion. And you know that, how do how do you deal with people a change language? I don't know, I mean, how do you argue with somebody who says, for example, that monkey up is not a phrase that's that it's inherently a racist because it's not a phrase that is a that is a lie that

is just not true. It's it's objectively not true. But how do you argue with somebody when they reject truth that that is at their fingertips. By the way, be very easy to find out. Uh, you know, I I have a problem and and luck, I'll be honest with you. It comes up even on my show where people will on my TV show where where you know, somebody will say, uh, you know, undocumented immigrant and they'll want me to say undocumented immigrant and I'm just no, un documented immigrant is

not a that that does not exist. This is this is conjured up. There's a made up phrase. If we're talking about somebody who's in violation of US law in this country when it comes to immigration, they're an a legal alien. Now. That is the term. And the reason I won't call them an undocumented immigrant is that it's specifically designed as a term to make it seem like it's just a question of getting them the documents that they need and then everything is okay and they're just

like other immigrants. But that's not what's happening. No, they're described in the law as illegal aliens. Yes, and so that's that's why, you know, but look, they do they do this too with with with abortion, with any number of things where they play all these games with language that we can't really get to the truth of the matter. And and you know, George, your question, but how do we deal with these neo Marxists. One, we have to fight on these issues and not not concede. I'm gonna

talk about and George, thanks for calling in Shields. I I'm gonna talk about the rapid onset gender dysphoria issue in the third hour today of the show. I really hope you stay around for that, folks, because I've read into this one in depth and it has to do with transgender rights, which is considered very much in the

vanguard of progressive ideology right now. I mean, they are really said on the whole transgender rights crusade or GHAD because I want to be inclusive for it could be for anybody, um, but they're really set on this, and you know they they are fanatical. I mean, that's what you have to say. They are actually fanatical on that issue. And I haven't. I want to describe to you, uh, why they're so upset and and what it is that bothers them so much about transgender transgender rights or this

issue that affects transgender rights. I should say, um, but I wanted to a a Felix. Felix in Pennsylvania. We haven't heard from me in a while, buddy, what's up, hey, Block? I guess I mean, it's just just you, me and A and a mid sized US city worth of our friends listening to this. So sure, Felix, we can we take a bitter from you? Yeah, I guess so. Man, You're gonna have to give us some thoughts here. We got to move on. We got every line lit. I

got a suggestion for President Trump. He needs to tweet out that Webster's you know, uh dictionary definition on monkey up. And that's that's the way to deal. I I think I think it would be good with the deal because I think that awesome. Hell yeah, we're all listening, buddy, Okay, Felix, we gotta go. I feel like Felix, you know, we love you, buddy, but a little too much. Uh. I don't know if he was trying to get the satellite uplink going there, or his calms were his calms were rough.

We can't have rough colms here on the show bill in Mississippi. Hello, sir, I just wanted to say, Hey, I'm here here, mm hmm, Okay, I'm sorry. I just want to say the only uh Anti people I've seen are so mad max Emo wanna be basement dwellers. But the reason why I called it, I'm over ifty years old, and anybody that's ever listened or had a job or anything, when something wrong happens you, you always did somebody say, I have somebody throw a monkey ranch in it and

messed it up. So that's a phrase that I've lived with all of my life, is that somebody throwing a monkey ranch into something to mess it up. And that's all the Santos was doing, was using a praise that all of us, if you our entire life. Yep, I am not backing down on this one all. I totally agree with you, Bill. There is no place whatsoever for people to to well. What they're doing is they're lying.

They're lying about what they think he said. Because it's on tape, we can all hear it, and we all know what was going on, and it's just you know, you think about how much damage could be done if people like you and me, Bill listen to the mainstream media and listen to the analysis on on MSNBC. You know, think about the damage that will be done to to De Santis and his family and his reputation. It's it's

really scandalous what they've done. I mean, it's really it's it's beneath contempt to call somebody a racist when you know they're not a racist, just because you want to ruin them. And that is what the left is doing. That's what they're that's their approach here. I think it's. Yeah. And the thing that makes it so bad is every one of them know and they said it too over their life is you know, somebody throw a monkey ridge into something that messed it up, you know. So, I

mean it's not like they don't know bad. They just won't. Yeah, I know, they're they're they're they're playing dumb on this one right now because it serves their purposes. Bill. I appreciate you calling it from Mississippi Shields High. You know, the Democrats, democrats, democrats can't trust them, can't trust them. You know they're always always playing fast and loose with

with the truth. By the way, we are going to talk a little more in the in the next hour for sure about uh, the Trump Trump Mexico trade deal, that that they were saying was not only was the deal not gonna happen, they were saying the deal was bad and that we were thinking for a trade war. Now it looks like the deal is happening and everybody thinks it's a good deal and we have Trump to thank for it. When does when does the president get

credit for this stuff? I know that I'm supposed to sit around and weep about what my imaginary eight year old daughter thinks of about Trump's comments on Hillary. I know that that's what they want me to do. Oh my god, Trump and hill Um. But no, I just look at what's happening to the country. I look around that I see so much and I hear about so much prosperity. And you know, I I visited one of

our one of our sponsors actually here on radio. I visit one of our sponsors recently, and you know, they've gone from a couple of hundred employees to over a thousand employees and just the last you know, eighteen months or so. Uh, you know, I see these things, and I know that you're trying to take a snapshot of

what's happened to three million people across the country. But you know, I remember it was liked in the Obama administration when we were being told that America was going to have pretty much lackluster growth and our best years were behind us, and you know, we just need to find a better way to distribute, redistribute the wealth of the country already had that's gone away. Doesn't that feel better for everybody? Don't you feel like I feel like

I've got more of a shot. And I'm in a brutal business, by the way, but I really do, and I feel like I feel like there's a better chance right now because of the approach the government's taking. And and and really what I mean is it's less likely that the government's going to to get in my way. And that's enough. That's helpful. It's just such a change in Tony.

They were writing, they were writing editorials about, you know, the in the latter part of the Obama illustration, about how you know, it's not Obama's fault, the economy is not so great, and you know, this is just the way it's gonna be. And now we're finding out what was it today? They actually had to revise upward GDP growth of the last I think it's from four point one to four point two even better. It was great,

but it's even greater now. You know, we went from like eight, you know, even from getting an A to getting an A plus. And some are thinking that when it comes to economic growth in en we could be getting an A plus plus. And I will I will tell some of you. I don't know if it's still in our arch carves, I should find it. You know, late last year I was I did a whole show where I said, guys, I'm telling you twenty eighteen is gonna be great. The economy is gonna be booming. Don't

listen to the naysayers. You know, the stock market got so hot last December and everybody, you know, with cryptocurrency and everything else. And I said, no, good Trump, he gets it. He doesn't have these ideological hangups about how you didn't build that or you know, it's not you know, America is not as great as we think it is, and we really need to do more for other countries, and climate change is a big national security and economic issue we have to address. I mean, all the those

are ideological impediments to national success. We don't have them anymore because we got a different guy at the top and different people around him that are executing on an agenda. All right, I know, I know more on that in the second hour. I gotta finish up on this notion though, of of violence if Trump were too or if the Republicans were to win, because the left is trying to make a lot of this and I've got I have definitely some analysis to share it with you on that.

I think I'm gonna hold off on some of the Bruce or and the latest on the Trump Tower and the collusion and all this other nonsense until tomorrow because my colleague John Solomon at the Hills just broke a big piece on it. But I want to I want to have John probably join us on that one because I want to get into the details with him because he's want of broke the story. So we'll get into that probably tomorrow. We've got a lot more coming though, team um And like I said, that third hour, you

really if you find the whole transgender rights thing interesting. Uh, you really got to stay with me to the third hour right of the show, so we'll be right. Quite a a snub here, folks. Sarah Palin apparently not just not invited to pardon the double negative, they're not but it wasn't not invited to McCain's funeral, bright bart And this is confirming a People magazine report saying that she was told through an intermediary to stay away from the ceremony.

So it's not even like you weren't invited to the party, it's you're not invited and don't show up to the party. In this case, obviously it's a funeral, not a party. But you know what I mean, I mean, this is this is the invite was not lost in the mail. This is don't show up, don't show up? Um, this is uh wow, you know what a what a slap in the what a slap in the face. I'm actually a little I guess there was a lot of bad

blood there for a long time. But anyway, you know, thoughts in prayer sue McCain and his family, and you know, I know it's a tough time for Megan. I saw the h I saw the video today of her and it looks she lost her dad. I mean, I can't I can't imagine, very very difficult thing. Um. But there you know the politics around this, folks. There's still a lot of people reporting on it, and you're going to see more of this and with the whole paleent situation. Wow,

but I didn't want to finish up on this. Trump warns of of violence, Um if Republicans lose the Fall elections. You know, the left is saying this as though Trump is somehow instigating or he's the bad guy here. Uh, And what they really mean is Trump is pointing out that the violence comes from Antifa, right. Trump is is pointing out that they will freak out if they lose the election. They will, you know, lose their minds even more so. I don't know what that looks like. Um,

I don't know what that looks like. But also warns of violence. I Republicans lose the fall, lose the Fall elections. So if they lose, there will be violence. If they win, there will be violence. That's not as contradictory as some people think because the violence comes from the left and if they feel like they are ascending and there in power, then they'll be but you know, then then you'll have antifall all fired up and everything goes. If they lose,

they'll lose their minds even more. This is the equivalent that sort of trump you an equivalent of what I used to I used to joke around when I was the University of Massachusetts Amherst. I'd go visit, you know, I was down the street at Amer's College. And when uh, the Patriots would win, some people would riot and light trash cans on fire and flip over cars if it was a really big game. And when the Patriots would lose, some people would riot and flip over cars and uh,

act like maniacs. And you might see to yourself, what, well, that's just because that's what they wanted to do. They are too emotionally invested in this. They need to calm down, and they are going to act poorly. That is like Antifa. If the Democrats win, there will in fact be uh, you know, there will in fact be Antifa movements that feel like they are you know that this is a moment where they should make a statement, and they're gonna want to push even more and push even harder. And

if they lose Oh my gosh. Then then they're really then they're really going to think that the dark Knight of fascism has arrived at this country. And we you know, and I worry that some of them start to take the rhetoric seriously and then things because what we've seen so far, yes there's violence, there's destruction from Antifa, but you know, it hasn't yet crossed over in that threshold of all out riots or you know, Antifa hasn't yet

burned down whole neighborhoods. But we did see that under the Obama administration when Black Lives Matter, Remember, neighborhoods were burned down, folks. You know, I'm even Washington, d C. Where it's forgotten out of most residents, But there were massive riots, uh after the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. And a whole the whole section of a neighborhood got burned down. So it's not that far back in our

history that those kind of things have happened. And I do think that it's worth noting that there was no realistic expectation that no matter what happens on the Republican side there there's not gonna be right wing riots in the streets. This is not gonna happen. But with a with Antifa, they were gonna be ryants. I think no matter what, I just couldn't tell you right now which one.

I think it'll be bigger if they lose, but they'll still be pretty substantial destruction and and really you know, abhorrent activity from the left even if even if they win the House, because they'll feel like that's a validation of their crazy anti fascist or whatever they call it beliefs. So it's heads you win, tails you lose that you heads you win. Gosh buck, you know, can't food and once can't get can't get fooled again. I'm trying to do this. Heads you lose, tales they win. There you go.

That's what I'm trying to say. Uh we we will discuss Google and whether it is biased. Trump called them out for it. I've got that coming up for you. Also the Mexico US and Canada trade deal and then third Hour rapid onset gender dys for you. That's coming up, folks. I'm really into home security. It's essential wherever you are across the country, whether you're in a city or out in the countryside. By yourself. That's why I'm such a fan of Simply Save home Security. I know I talked

to you about them on the show regularly. It's because they're an incredible company, folks. I got some news for you. They're worth over a billion dollars now. With a simply Safe system, you get protection against intruders, fires, working even during power outages or down WiFi. So if somebody comes in realizes you have a simply Safe system and tries to break it, it'll keep working even if they smash your keypad. Okay. The system is so easy to use.

Even I can use them. I'm not so good with technology. I'm telling you this is the system for you. Order your simply Safe system now. My listeners get free shipping and free returns. Just visit simply safe dot com slash buck. That's simply safe dot Com slash buck protector at home today with again simply Safe dot Com slash Buck month for full monitoring. Folks. Check it out for yourself. Simply

Safe dot Com slash Buck. Yeah. I think Google is really taking advantage of a lot of people, and I think that's a very serious thing, and it's a very serious charge. I think what Google and what others are doing. If you look at what's going on in Twitter, if you look at what's going on and Facebook, Uh, they better be careful because you're you can't do that to people. You can't do it. We have tremendous we have literally thousands and thousands of complaints coming in and you just

can't do that. So I think that Google and Twitter and Facebook, they're really treading on very, very troubled territory and they have to be careful. It's not fair to large force is of the population. The President still still staying staying on message here about these social media giants and the way that they are affecting a discourse in this country. Folks. It's this is the single most important

issue that people don't get fired up about right now. Well, some people do, but this should be considered a much, a much bigger thing in the minds of a lot of folks in my opinion than it is. Because this they can control the way we discuss political issues, They can control the way that information is shared, and they can do it without having uh, you know, transparency. They can do it without us even knowing what's going on. Right at least when they used to have the full

mainstream media at their disposal. At least when that was the case, it was clear who was saying what, and it was is that they were, you know, presenting one side of the story. Um, you know, here's the and then, by the way, you know Eric Weinstein, who's one of these liberal professors that has realized that the liberal left has lost their minds um he he did an experiment

today to show that because because here's what happens. They you know, Facebook gets caught and says, oh no, we're not doing that, and then it turns out they are. Twitter gets caught and says, oh no, we're not doing that, and then they get and then they say, okay, we are. Uh. And and that's because people push them on this. Here's Eric Weinstein, who is this this uh, managing director at at Oh I'm sorry, manage director at Teal Capital. I'm I'm wrong about about his background. I thought he was.

I was confusing him with a different with a professor. Um, but he's at a Teal Capital, he says. From gun control to mind control. Tried locating non gun products on Google yesterday with guns in the name glue, Guns Gone, Pistol, and he's nope, soldering guns, gone shotgun microphones, forget about it, poof with the flick of a switch. Uh, folks. He shared all this on I mean this one viral. He shared all this on Google. Explain to me how their

algorithm is not making a political statement. How Google's algorithm is not changing what you see, folks, when you look for an issue that you care about, when you look to buy something, when you look to be connected with something or someone on the Internet, and you use search thinking that it's just gonna give you the best, the most efficient, the most accurate. Explain to me how it is that when this guy and he has all the screenshots.

Eric Wantey at Teal Capital, very serious venture capital funded Silicon Valley, Okay, that this guy is just saying, look, this is crazy. He did a search for glue gun on Google Shopping and nothing shows up. He does a search for squirt gun on Google Shopping and nothing comes up. I need someone to explain to how that can happen.

And there's so many other instances of this, folks, where you know that there's something is up, and to tell me that the algorithm but no, I'm sorry, that's that's not what's I refuse to accept their idiotic explanations for this. These are folks. Social media giants are very smart. Uh, and and the people running them are very intelligent. Okay, let's not let's not get this twisted. They know what they're doing, they understand the power they have, They have

almost unlimited funds and resources. And we're just beginning to come to grips with the fact I think as a country that these social media companies are as liberal as the faculty lounge at Brown University. And they are. They are liberal propagandists. And the only reason that they're not being open and honest about this is because is they don't want to lose market share. They want to maintain their power and all the wealth and all the money

that comes with all this. Uh. But you know this is this is becoming something that they can hide from anymore. They will not be able to keep keep claiming nothing goes on. I mean, this is you know I shared on the weekend or this on Twitter because Twitter said that death threats against Dana Lash's children did not violate the platform's policies last week. I told you about that, right, Well,

this is what I said in response to it. When a social media company makes the wrong decision, it's a mistake. When it keeps making the wrong decision, it's a policy. When it won't stop making the wrong decision, it's politics. And that's where we are now. They get caught and we see that, you know, sure enough, they they are doing the thing that they claim to not be doing. They get caught doing it, and then they caught doing it multiple times, so it's not you know, aberrant, it's

not a one off. And then they say, well, you know it's not where we're not really doing it or we're gonna fix it and something. And then then they let us know they're not really gonna stop doing it. It's because they want to do it. They just don't want to be caught. They don't want to have to deal with the consequences of it. Uh. You know this, this is not going to get better anytime soon. This

is gonna keep getting worse and worse. Uh. And the denial that Google has, you know, Google denying um that they have any politics whatsoever. I mean today on Google Maps, you may have seen this the Rayburn building was I think was Rayburn? No no wait, I'm getting my build

I'm getting my congressional buildings, and it wasn't Rayburn. I'm forgetting which one it was now, but whatever, want one of the the Senate building that they say they're gonna rename for um, you know, renamed for McCain, which has now become this this issue that I don't think, you know, I don't think it's gonna the Russell Building, not Rayburn, thank you, sorry, the Russell Building, pardon me, folks. The Russell Building on Google Maps today was renamed in favor

of John McCain. They already did it and then they changed it back. You know, Google on different days will have you know, all their search stuff will be rainbow for like Gay Pride month or all. And they're making statements and they're making decisions all the time, just like news organizations are. And they can do that. They are private companies, but they should at least be honest about it. And then there's this other point that I don't think

enough people understand or hear about. And then is that okay, private company, yes, but the FCC regulates private companies. Sinclair was not able to merge with Tribune because of the FCC, folks, which was just infringing upon speech and free association. And you know, it was a corporate merger that wouldn't get a because of some bs about reach into local communities that the FCC regulates based on the old cable model.

I mean, it's crazy. So I don't think that this is as simple and straightforward just oh well, they're private companies, so they can do whatever they want. If they are going to be the massive arbiters of what we're hearing, what we're seeing, what we're buying, that they are, then they will be subject regulation. You'll notice the Democrats are a little quiet on regulation of this stuff because they don't want to have regulations go into place. When there's

a Republican administration and a Republican House and Senate. Usually they love regulation. Usually they think it's fantastic to regulate all kinds of things. I think that's I think it's a very it's very important. Look, Google is there's stuff going on in Google. There's no question in my mind. Search is an immensely powerful thing to have control over and to to be able to just say, oh, it's

just the algorithm. You know, we have no say in this, or it's ut there's nothing we can do to change this. That's very very convenient, my friends. It's very convenient, and it's not true. And Trump is calling them out. And that's why there's there's some nervousness in some quarters here because I think there's a recognition that the the game

is changing here. This is not gonna be able to continue on, and these social media companies they're gonna feel in there while it's eventually if they don't, you know, start being an actual neutral pathways to speech and and searching all the rest of it. Eight four four nine to eight to five eight four four nine hundred buck. We will discuss a bit of CNN's need to backpedal on something that they won't backpedal on, and then also

wrap it onset gender. Just for your fascinating concept. I think you'll probably hear better here for the first time, but you'll be really interested. I know I was to read about it. Uh, And that's all coming up. Hiring is challenging, folks, But there's one place you can go where hiring is simple, fast and smart, a place where growing businesses connect to qualified candidates. That place is zip recruiter dot com slash buck, Folks, I have colleagues at

the Hill that we got through zip recruiter. I have used this interface. I know how simple it is, how effective it is. If you want to hire somebody for any job, but particularly to get a job that involves any kind of a skilled laborer, or you need somebody you know quickly who's the best at whatever it is, you want to go to zip recruiter. Go to zip recruiter dot com, slash buck, zip recruiter dot com slash buck. Folks, that's what you want, I'm telling you you can try

it for free. That's right free at this exclusive web address. Hire for whatever your job needs are at zip recruiter dot com, slash buck. Zip recruiters the smartest way to hire. You're gonna get great candidates so quickly and fill that job with the best possible person at zip recruiter. I'm going to tell our Naster partners that I intend to immediately renegotiate the terms of that agreement to get a better deal by a lot, not just a little, by

a lot for our workers. A Trump administration will end that war by getting a fair deal for the American people and the American worker. The era of economic surrender will finally be over. I think it's a very growthy trade deal. This thing does a lot. It keeps the integrated supply chain going in North America. That is huge for business confidence. Um, it opens up a lot of markets. It protects intellectual property. It actually extends some patents and

copyrights for new drugs. All this is very helpful. It protects workers, Okay, it has a higher domestic or North American content. That's a good thing because you know, we don't really want China to uh to come on and encroach. They won't let us in their place, so we're gonna have to protect our own workers. It shows you two sides with goodwill can sit down and work out what is essentially a free trade deal, free trade, fair trade and get it going. Nobody thought we could do it.

You know, it wasn't that amazing. That was Trump on the campaign trail saying what he was gonna do. That was then, and this is now Larry Coudlow saying, yeah, they look, we got this deal. Gun looks like it's going through. It's great. It's pro growth, protects us but fair to them, and it's just gonna be good all around. But wait a second, I thought Trump was a buffoon who couldn't do anything on the economy. I thought Trump didn't know anything. Oh wow, following through and yet yet

another promise. Here on this U S. Mexico trade deal, he's looking good. You know. I had a union rep. It was very union like on my on my TV show today and and I'm we I got talking. He was a represents as steel workers or iron workers and iron workers I think, and he was saying, yeah, you know this, we gotta see what's in the I prip. But it's actually pretty good deal. So I'm like, okay, So now we get even union people are saying it's a pretty good deal. Free trade people are saying it's

a pretty good deal. Maybe it is just a pretty good deal. And you know, at some point, I think it's fair to take stock of what the media was saying was gonna happen versus what has happened. Trump said he was going to get a great deal. Here we are now talking about this deal. It could be really really good. What were they saying about this though? Um, they were they were claiming that. Well, here here's what

they were originally saying. Play clip for We're in the Mason stages of a full scale trade war, and the President simply seems to want to escalate. It's not just my state that is involved here, it's our nation. It has significant consequences for us here at home, not only just economically politically. If you alienate Mexico over the wall, over and and over knocked that, what you end up doing is electing this summer a much more nationalistic, much

more radical Mexican president who will not cooperate. Well, that's what they were saying. Now where are we? Oh well, why don't we hear from um? Why don't we hear from the Mexican government? Actually, because you know you're hearing there. Oh my god, it's gonna be so bad Trump. Can't you know? Trump, we're in a trade war in Mexico. Is gonna respond with all kinds of punitive person all what what terrors is Mexican really gonna get in a trade war with US? I don't think so, right, But

what does the Mexican government think of this? Because I'm sure that there's some Democrats who, in their usual whatever Trump is doing is bad, whatever Trump is for I'm against mindset, would say, well, you know, the Mexican government is not they're not getting as good a deal here or something. Well, here's what the Secretary of Foreign Affairs

for for Mexico starts play five. It's really significance. I think it's a breakthrough and it shows that two countries can actually get together and do a good deal, and a good deal for both of them. That is reciprocal, that is fair, and we allow growth on both sides. Is good for Mexican workers, is good for the American worker. I think that's a brilliant deal. Okay, so can someone tell me where where Trump has been wrong? Here? Can

somebody tell me how you know how this is the disaster? Oh, it's a trade war and look what Trump is doing. And um meanwhile, you know we see this and this is looking good hole around for I mean, isn't it just amazing when you at what point do we start to say it's it's It must be like the media doesn't really believe what they're saying, or or they just don't mind being wrong all the time. They are wrong all the time on this stuff. They keep being wrong

when it comes to Trump. This is why, you know, even when I'm not even sure and hey, those of you losing the show No. Early on with the whole trade thing. I was saying, guys, Trump has earned the right, in my mind to do this his way. He's beaten, he's beaten the conventional wisdoms so many times. Am I really going to be the one to sit here and say, well,

are you gonna free trade? Free trade? He has single handedly changed our national conversation about trade, broken us out of the constraints of whatever the trade deals were that we had were the best deals. It's just it makes no sense when you approach you just as a reasonable person. But the echo chamber effect was so strong. Trump has broken out of that, and now he's already getting results. And even though he's showing results, they're still wrong all

the time. Here's a on on CNN. This was just the last in the last few days. Uh. Here here's what I'm sorry. Yeah, this is a Washington Post reporter on CNN. Play clip six. Trump really needs a win, right, He needs a win before the midterms. He wants to be able to say that he has renegotiated and after. In that case, he needs Canada on board. And you have this very short window to get Canada on board. Otherwise the whole deal could fall apart on the Mexico side.

We love Canada and we want to have Canada as part of the deal. But in case of there that for whatever reason Kinda is not able to join, well we'll still have a deal with the US and we'll move on. So that was what they were saying. You know that, okay, And to be fair, not a full scale prediction that Canada wouldn't be a part of this, but you know, very very concerned, and Trump needs a win.

Here's a headline from just a couple of hours ago, folks, Canada rejoins nough to talks as US autos tariff details emerge. You know, this is uh, it's almost like Trump's approach to all this stuff is working and he's right, and these naysayers are are wrong. And the haters in the media, that's right, the haters in the media, they are just they get angrier as they go along because Trump keeps showing that he understands this stuff better than they do and he's in a better place on this one. Oh.

By the way, this is over at MSNBC. Here's what they're saying about the deal. Play seven. I think it's a great big PR stunt. This isn't maga. Okay, this isn't going to do a lot for the American economy or workers. In fact, in NAFTA was never a problem. The whole thing is like a phony issue. He's just making everything up as he goes along. There is no there is no deal. He says he can get Canada to step in and do a deal in a day. No, no, he can't. He's come up with a name for a deal.

There's only one problem. He's got no deal. How wrong can one guy be in one day? I mean, Joe Scarborough seems like he's trying to hit the Guinness Book of World Records. And and with Scarborough, this is just all about ego by the way, you know he he he feels snubbed by Trump and now he's trying to tell everybody how terrible Trump is all the time and act like he's so much smarter than Trump when he's

just making a buffoon of himself. I mean that the U. S. Mexico deal is a PR stunt that's just idiotic, and and trade real trade experts say that we no matter what, need to update NAFTA. It's not a PR stunt. So you've got idiots going on TV at MSNBC saying stupid stuff. You've got Joe Scarborough there who just looks, you know, all the time, it's the same thing with him, looks like Trump is, you know, putting the proverbial turd and

the punch bowl in front of him. And meanwhile, the country is actually getting getting a great deal out of this and things are going really well, and it's because of Trump, I think. Um, the reporting of this story got mixed up and in the course of a criminal investigation, we were not the source of the story find it to be. And obviously this is a high bar one of the most humiliating and scandalous moments and the entire

media behavior of the Trump Russia saga. You know, I've been on your show to talk about a lot of these humiliating moments, and this might be one of the worst ones yet. Um, keep in mind that, in addition to all the facts that you just what's so crucial about this is that after Lannie Davis went on CNN with Anderson Cooper, into Anderson Cooper's shock, admitted that everything CNN had been breathlessly hyping is true was actually false.

Namely that Michael Cohen was there when Trump learned about the Trump Tower meeting in advance. The Washington Post in the New York Post listened to that and they said, wait a minute, we independently confirmed CNN stories based on an anonymous source, and our anonymous source was Lannie Davis, who was now saying the whole thing is false. So they did what they had to do and what they what they should have done, which is they attracted the story.

They outed their own source. They said, our anonymous sources Lannie Davis, and we now attracted because he says its fault. CNN couldn't do that because they lied to the entire world. They said, as you just played that, they tried to get ahold of Lannie Davis and he refused to comment, when in fact, of course Lannie Davis was also their source, and they don't want to admit that they lied to

the world. So there they can't retract the story, um, and they can't admit they lied, So they're just continuing to stick to what everybody knows it a lie, but not many people care because people think a lot of people anyway that it was done for the right political agenda. I gotta tell you, I was Glenn Greenwall. He was on Fox there on Tucker Show. He's totally right, folks, This this debacle at CNN is delicious. You know, it's not an apple, it's a banana, or it's not a banana,

it's an apple. Facts. First, the most trusted name and news all that stuff, CNN so full of crap. First of all, they they you know, they they always talking about their reporting and and they're really just often printing gossip about Trump from whomever they can get it from. And and they don't care if it's true, if it's plausible, it doesn't really matter. It doesn't really matter. They're really just looking for a way to hit Trump, and any excuse that they can get to hit Trump they are, uh,

they are happy with. And even if it means that they have to eventually walk it back or or admit that it was you know, total and utter nonsense, they they just don't care. But in this case, it's so over the line. I mean, they have gone so beyond the bounds of what a news organization should be, you know, willing to do here or you know, how it should correct itself, how it should police itself. The folks they've lost they have lost it over there, they really have.

They have lost their minds. So so just so I can give you the details, You're probably like, Buck, what the heck are you talking about? Right, because I love this stuffs and we're so serious. Yeah. Right, Uh, here's what happened. So there's this big story from Jim Shooto, former Obama administration appoint Jim Shootot. You never hear him. You know, maybe we should just start calling it liberal CNN.

You know, they used to introduce me on CNN's air as, you know, conservative political pundit, and then they would say and political analyst Van Jones, Well, why am I conservative political pundit? But he's just a political analyist. Someone explained that to me. I mean, I actually spent real time working with the government. He's some guy who got famous for getting fired from the White House, right, I mean,

what exactly makes that determination? You know, we should just start saying liberal CNN, Liberal ABC, you know, liberal MSNBC. They say conservative Fox News, so why not? But but liberal CNN with the Jim Shooto. Uh Bernstein, Carl Bernstein of Woodward and Bernstein fam Man, that guy has been

dining out on that whole thing for a long time. Uh. And one other journalists I forget who over there, big journal Three guys on the by line for this story that says that Michael Cohen, according to sources, Michael Cohen, Um, I'm sorry, Yeah, Michael Cohen knew that Trump was uh knew about the meeting at Trump Tower before it happened. So Cohen, Trump's lawyer says, Trump knew about the Russia meeting at Trump Tower with vezzlant Sky before it happened.

Would this, by the way, be criminal? No, I mean it just but it feeds into the oh my gosh collusion and Russia frenzy and all that stuff CMN side multiple sources. The problem with that is that Cohen had said to Congress under oath that he did not know that that Trump did not know in advance of the meeting. So now if that is in fact true, if seen in stories true, Cohen is in perjury jeopardy. So Lannie Davis, who is Cohen's lawyer, goes out and says, oh, we'll

hold on a second. Um, you know this is not true, this is inaccurate. And then the Washington Post comes out and says, Okay, well, we ran that story too, and Lannie Davis was our was our source for it. So Lannie Davis was the source for the Washington Post version of the Trump knew about the rush about the Trump Tower meeting Donald Trump Senior new before it happened. The Post says, okay, Landy Davis was our source. If he saying that's not true, then it's not true. CNN, however,

refuses to the Post retracted their story. CNN refuses to retract their story, claiming multiple sources, and they say that you know that their critics don't know the full extent of their sourcing, and so they won't change anything. They won't walk it back. And then on top of it, you look at this, you say, hold on a second, who's going to know more about this? Who's gonna know more about Michael Cohen's position on this than Michael Cohen's lawyer, Folks,

who's gonna know more? To answer, is nobody's gonna know more? So? Is it is CNN story even believable? No, it's not believable. Now that that Cohen says that Trump or Cohen's going to testify to the Special Counsel that's what got people really excited that Trump knew about the Trump Tower meeting before it happened. Right, it's just not it's not credible as a story. But then on the sourcing issue, here's where CNN got itself into a lot of trouble. Uh, And this is why they won't back out of it.

They didn't just say that they had multiple sources. They said multiple sources for the story and Lanny and and they asked Lanny Davis for a comment and he didn't have one. They were intentionally trying to throw people off the scent of their source, who clearly is Lanny Davis at least one of their sources, right, I mean, clearly it's Lanny Davis. Okay to anybody who's being serious about this.

But they were dishonest because they wanted to make it seem like they were checking all the boxes so that they asked Cohen's lawyer, but they also wanted to cover for the fact that the source was the lawyer. This is you know, this is like patting a bibliography when you're writing a paper. You can't do this. It's unethical, it's wrong. CNN did it, and they're not gonna walk it back because they know that in the current media climate it would create an even bigger feeding frenzy for

them to walk it back, I think. And the reason for that is this isn't this goes into this big bin of this was not a good faith error. All right, this is not a good favor. But we we have the initial Here play a play clip twelve. This is the initial reporting they did on our play. Sources with knowledge tell myself and Carl that Michael Cohen claims that then candidate Donald Trump knew in advance about the June meeting and Trump Tower, in which Russians were expected to

offer his campaign dirt on Hillary Clinton. Crucially, these sources tell us that Cohen is willing to make that assertion to the Special Counsel Robert Mueller. It's very, very significant because the president has denied any fore knowledge of this event, and this meeting goes to the question of intent to collude. You've been saying for a year that we need to follow the money, follow the figure out this cover up. So how did you do it in this case? Talk

us about how you got this reporting. Well, I talked to sources. Cohen was saying that Donald Trump the candidate for president of the United States at the time, had authorized the go ahead for that meeting to take place with his son. All wrong and and and if not outright lies about the sources, certainly dishonest, certainly trying to play fast and loose with the truth. And let me just say this, folks, You know this is you know, see, if CNN wants to be the opposition to Trump, that's fine.

They have a First Amendment right to be the opposition to Trump. But we all have a First Amendment right as well to say that they're being dishonest about it, that they're lying, that they are often guilty of fake news. And this goes into the theory that I've told you for a long time, which is that when you have every wrong media story that has to be retracted or corrected, he's damnag jing to one person and one political one political party, and never do they have to attract your

corrector story that is favorable. We understand that there's more at work here than just making errors. This is agenda driven. And I don't even think that they necessarily get that. They're not upset about the mistakes they've made if it's damaging enough in the short term to Trump and feeds enough of the anti Trump frenzy. I think they are. They're fine with running fake news and then doing triage afterwards.

They'd rather run with the false story that's damaging day one and then day seven, because remember they don't correct it right away, they slow walk it day and then day seven they'll issue some and not retraction but a correction. Oh yeah, so the basic premise that whole story wasn't correct, but you know, we stand by the rest of it. This is how, this is how to play the game over there, and this is why all of the chin wagging and all the pompous b s from the the

biggest names at CNN. People are just rejecting it, you know, and and anyone who's being honest with themselves. You know, if if you want that, if you want hashtag resistance, you should turn on MSNBC, because at least you know what you're getting with CNN. They are living in a fantasy land and that this story is still out there and they think that they can get away with this. Oh yeah, multiple sources stuff is preposterous, utterly and completely preposterous.

But you know this, this is what you're dealing with them, you know, the most trusted name and news. Yeah right, alright, team, stay with me. We'll be back in just a moment. We are going to talk about the rapid onset gender dysphoria, which is I think you're gonna look, we're gonna go deep into that discussion. You'll know more about it for listening to this show than I bet pretty much any other show in the country right now, because I really

have done some research into it. Very big, uh well scandal on campus about this, but it affects the whole discussion about transgenderism and transgender rights and tells you a lot about the tyrannical left and how it does what it does. We'll be right back with that more. I also proved that the polls still are are pretty useless when it comes to some of this stuff, because none of the polls had him winning. Um, which just makes you think, Okay, who knows what's actually gonna happen when

you when you get to November. Yeah, sort of what we saw in to a lot of the posters scratching their heads trying to figure out the result after the fact. Andrew Gillham here the Tallahassee mayor on the Democratic side. I read this morning he didn't lead in a single poll in the run up to this, So that tells you, you know, we're we're sort of flying blind journalist, trying

to see what's going to happen. Yeah, exactly, Florida. When people start talking about a blue wave, you want to point out to them, Florida is likely to be a desert island for the Democrats with no wave at all, given these kind of outcomes. And by the way, in Arizona, President Trump was very gracious and supportive of Congressman excally she was the first woman to fly in combat and has a remarkable record. Don't win the center race there, and again, the so called blue wave is gonna disappear

in the sand. And I think you're gonna see if anything more of a red wave by the time we get to November than a blue wave. You know, folks, you got a bunch of a bunch of insights there from one was from us from what c NBC's Becky

Quick talking about Florida. And then of course I'm in New New g Newt gingrich uh that for for the the polsters out there, they gotta get this one right, meaning they gotta get the mid terms right or else people are really gonna start asking some some some tough questions about what exactly is the utility of all this all this polling um right now, according to the average on real clear politics, the battle for the House of Representatives, you got a hundred Democrat versus uh GOP with forty

three toss ups. That's what they've got listed here. And then for the in the Senate battle GOP forty forty five with seven toss ups. So so here's here's what I just want to say. One is that is that you gotta take polls with a grain of salt, and that doesn't make you a flat earther. And a lot of people out there are still you know, the polsters. We saw what happen in twenty sixteen. I will never forget the New York Times saying that Hillary Clinton had

a ninety seven percent chance of winning the election. On election at ninety seven percent chance. Folks, if I told you you had a ninety seven percent chance of waking up tomorrow and feeling fine and a three percent chance of dying in your sleep and not waking up, I think most of you would sleep Okay, you know, I don't I don't think. I mean, I think that you'd

be like, well, that's not amazing to hear. But if I told you your fifty fifty probably wouldn't sleep awin, right, But ninety seven percent chance of waking up tomorrow, you're gonna You're gonna take those odds. You'll be Okay. They thought ninety seven that Hillary was gonna win, as we know, and then the the odds changed overnight. It's the most

amazing thing. Sometimes, just for fun, whenever I'm having a bad day, I'm gonna have producer Mike put on that, uh that montage again from election night where there's like, oh my gosh, up his winning. This is so fun, so fantastic. Ah. But that that what you saw here in Florida. And I do find this interesting, uh is because everyone looks at Florida's all all races in Florida are very tight. That's kind of the basics of it.

You have the Democrats can win, Republicans can win. It really depends on the candidate at the time and the issues that are at hand. Um, but you know, I think you're gonna have Rick Scott beat incumbent Senator Nelson. That's my prediction on that when I think Rick Scott's gonna take it, and I also think that Rhonda Santists is going to gonna win the um the governorship, you know, I I do think that that it's likely that the Santist is gonna come out come out on top there.

And you know, this is this is where we start to get what happens if the Democrats, What happens that the Democrats don't win. I mean, I know E've ben discussing this all along, but I don't know if they could handle you know, that they might actually make good on their whole like I'm gonna move to Canada. They some of them might flee. I don't know if they

can handle two more years of Republicans in control. Even though I think not only are things good in this country, it's not like their life is so you know, their life is in such disarray because of Trump. I mean, that's all just that's all just their their perception. By the way, I just gotta tell you all tomorrow we're gonna have a an interview on Hill TV. I believe we're gonna air it tomorrow that I did with a Lissa Milano. That's right, that a Lissa Milano U of

Twitter and Project Runaway fame. H. She is an activist now mostly not even really an actor anymore. And I'll just tell you this. It was interesting to go to her mansion in her gated community, uh, and have to get through armed security at the gate and be on a list just to even get on the roadway to get within miles of her house. And then of course the gate at her house and the security that came up and met me there, at least the personnel who met me there. Um. And and of course she's very

pro gun control. And I gotta say you shoul watched the interview because I thought I was too polite, which is a problem, which is a knock that some people have on me that I am. I am too polite to people. It's just, you know, my parents raised me right, but in media you kind of sometimes you gotta be a little bit of a jerk. And I gotta work on that a little bit. That's that's a note for me. She thought I was mean. She thought I was mean.

She was complaining afterwards that I was mean to her, and I'm like, God, mean, do you that was the biggest cream puff interview. I'm like ashamed of how friendly and and and kind I was. I mean, I asked her some questions that she had trouble with obviously, but you know, I was very nice. But for all her millions of Twitter followers, she she doesn't like it with somebody asked you a real question, So get ready for

that tomorrow on Hill TV. You know, I was out on the Left Coast for a few days and they got a lot of coffee shops out there, but you know what they didn't have, My friends coffee. That's all about freedom, America and deliciousness. That's what you get with Black Rifle Coffee. Okay, this is my coffee company. This is my coffee brand. It is delicious and when you go and check out their website, you'll see this is a company it's all about veterans, patriotism and giving back

to the veterans community and to America. You will love these guys. I know them personally. The folks and Black Rifle Coffee are doing it right top to bottom. Go to Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck you'll get fifteen percent off your order. That's Black Rifle Coffee dot Com slash Buck do what I do. Join the Coffee Club. They'll send it to your front door every month. You'll have all the coffee ground up, whole being or cake up. Whatever you need. They've got. They've even got a decalf

option for you. Now, folks, go to Black Rifle Coffee dot Com slash Buck Again Black Rifle Coffee dot Com slash Buck for fent off your order. If you want the best home security system on the market, one that you'll find intuitive, easy to use, unobtrusive in your home right, it fits right in with whatever you've got. It's not some big system, doesn't require installation. You can do it yourself. Folks,

Simply Safe is what you on. Okay, they give you twenty four seven monitoring for only fourteen dollars and cents a month. Seen at PC mag The wire Cutter all have said Simply Safe is their top pick for home security. I have a Simply Safe system at home. Let me tell you that it gives me a little extra piece of mind knowing that whenever I closed my door, I know that my windows, my front door and fire of all kinds of possible concerns, leaks, burst pipes, intruders. All

that covered because I've got simply safe. Order your simply safe system. Now my listeners get free shipping and free returns by going to simply safe dot com slash buck. That's simply safe dot com slash buck again one more time for the best system in the business, simply safe dot com slash buck. What is rapid on set Gender Dysphoria Team If you don't know, that makes perfect a new concept? Uh. And this is gonna take us right into the heart of the war over what is now

considered the culture war over transgender rights. Transgender rights are now civil rights. This is what they are telling us. This is what the left is is pushing culturally in every way it can with TV shows and social media campaigns, and increasingly we are being forced to use pronouns that do not correspond to sex. And as I've told you, that's wrong. I disagree with it. He is not a

she and she is not a he. And being told that I have to be a party to somebody else's incorrect self identification or or even delusion is problematic in many ways. But I'm also not going to be a martyr. I'm not gonna put myself in a position where I could be sued or or even have have professional action taken against me. So and uh as at a certain level, you will concede to the mob, and we're getting very

close to that on this transgender issue. But this is a big, a big story that's getting very little play because of what it really entails and has to do with, not just the illiberalism of the left, which is now beyond any real debate. I mean, it's it's a reality, it's a thing. But but also and particularly on college campuses, and Brown University, which we're about to talk about, is among the worst. And I have a particular disdain for Brown has a long history of being Brown was a

social justice warrior factory before that was cool. You know, Brown was the has been the most left wing prominent university. People say it's elite because it's Ivy League. I gotta tell you, I've I've never been particularly impressed with the product as in the students that come out of Brown. I know there's exceptions, you know, and I'm sure you gotta you know somebody who's a friend of yours, who's a you know, Rhodes scholar, Navy seal who went to Brown.

I'm not saying everybody, but in general, I find Brown produces a lot of people who think they're much more impressive than they are. That's been my personal anecdotal experience. But the transgender fight, or the fight for transgender rights it's being discussed, received quite a uh an unwelcome bit of science recently, and it comes courtesy of a a a peer reviewed article that came out at at Brown University that had to do with this notion of rapid

onset gender dysphoria. Now, folks, I get really deep into the weeds here on this left wing stuff so that I can explain to you. But you know this is this is where it all happens. And the people that are making these decisions at a Brown University about a scientific paper, it is a scientific paper we're about to discuss.

They're the same ones who want to tell you that you know, your ten year old should be showering with the ten year old of the opposite sex right next to him or her, and you know this is that. So so it's important. This matters. It matters because the truth matters. That also matters because national level policy is affected by this thinking. Do not forget any of you

who have children. Remember that the Obama administration was threatening to pull federal funding from grammar schools, from primary schools across the country, but particularly in South Carolina because of the battle going on there over this unless they adhere to the new Department Education transgender bathroom policy. So this affects you. You know, you can't just say, oh, well, this isn't my problem. Now this is gonna be a problem for everybody, or this is gonna be something you are.

You're gonna be forced to submit. That's what they're gonna say. You're gonna be forced to submit to their lunacy. Here, now, let me give you the what happened. I mentioned Brown. Brown University had a um published right through its through one of its uh through one of its graduate programs a student. They're published in the journal plus one a case study on on and not a case that you're a a scientific journal on rapid onset gender dysphoria. And

this is from the Brown University School of Public Health. Okay, so they just published this, and here's gender to sphoria. So we understand the definitions. Gender dysphoria is when somebody has feelings that their biological sex does not match up with the identity of what they think their sex should be. Essentially, I am physically female and think I'm actually a male. Now this and then this leads. Uh. People used to call a gender identity disorder. Now it's called gender dysphoria.

They've changed that. Don't forget that, folks. They change the terminology as a way of skewing the debate and to make this a it's not a disorder, right, remember that, the same way that it's you know, it's not chained migration, it's family reunification on the immigration issue. And with transgender surgery, it's not it's not a sex change operation. It's a gender affirmation process. Ah. Isn't that interesting how they've changed the emphasis. They have changed the way that we should

think about it merely by changing the language itself. So on gender dysphoria formally gender identity disorder. But we've gotten rid of that now and gender dysphoria, okay, fine, we'll use that term. It's sooner it'll be you know, gender affirmation. Uh, you know, gender affirmation conception or something off, some other way of describing it. Uh, but wrap it on set.

That's what this study looked at and wrap it onset gender dysphoria is based on this paper and the significant research that it draws upon, you know, hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of case studies. Um. It says that essentially, gender dysphoria maybe a socially pressured and learned condition. Oh my gosh. People don't want to hear this. What do you mean? This is going to bring them back to the days of oh, well, you know, are you are you born same sex attracted? Are you born gear? Or

do you become big? Remember that was a big debate for a long time, and now that that's gone away at everyone now well I shouldn't say everybody, but the predominant view is that you know, you are born with a certain sexual preference. Uh. But think about this. With gender dysphoria, people are are being led to believe that this is an innate Uh, it's affirmation now right, it's you actually becoming who you are, and that your brain

is the disconnect between the brain and the body. Here on gender, the brain wins, right, The brain knows what you really are the fact that you have male or female genitalia is irrelevant. That's what you're being led to believe with gender dysphoria. Well, what happens when they look at this study is that, and this is of of teenagers with gender dysphoria. Here's something that won't shock any of you who just think about things and don't accept everything.

That the that the mainstream media and the liberal left force feeds us kids teenagers who are same sex attractive, who have other people in their lives, who become gender dysphoric, meaning they believe that they are now you know that they are now part of the transgender community. Those kids are more likely to themselves become members of or or

want to be members of the transgender community. There is a copycat effect at work here, and that there is a social pressure effect at work here, meaning that when you are subjected to social media that prominently supports the notion of genderis for you, guess what more teenagers start to say, Yeah, I'm gender dysphoric too. Now. Look, I know there's people would say, oh buck, maybe it's just awareness or they there's a lot of ways to break

this down. Here's what the study actually says. Quote. Among the noteworthy patterns Litman the research are found in the survey data of parents reported their child had one or more friends become transgender ident deified at around the same time, reported an increase in their child social media use around the same time as experiencing gender dysphoria symptoms, and reported both.

So I mean almost half of the people who are are teenagers that are claiming to have adopted gender dysphoria here or that they have gender dysphoria a condition, developed the condition when somebody else they know has it, and developed the condition when they have a much greater usage of social media where transgender and transgender rights are a

prominent topic of discussion. And it goes on quote the pattern of clusters of teens and friend groups becoming transgender identified that the group dynamics, dynamics of these friend groups and the types of advice viewed online led to the hypothesis that friends and online sources could spread certain beliefs.

Exact amples include the belief that non specific symptoms such as feeling uncomfortable in their own skins or feeling that they don't fit in, which could be part of a normal puberty or associated with trauma, should be perceived as gender dysphoria. Folks if you can't hear it already. There are lib heads exploding all over the place on this one. Gender dysphoria transgenderism could be a trait that is, or rather a condition that is socially imposed or socially advocated

for is essentially learned via environment. Through social osmosis of sorts, one becomes gender dysphoric. We're not. That's not supposed to be what happens here. It's supposed to be who you really are at your core. Right, this is this is a medical condition. It should be respected. It's a civil rights issue. That's what we've been told. This study is implying that there's a great degree of peer pressure involved

in this or pere imitation. She continues on the belief that the only path to happiness is transition and the belief that anyone who disagrees with the team is transphobic and should be cut out of their life. That's all part of it. Additionally, six parents reported their teen or young adult had one or more diagnoses of a psychiatric disorder or neurodevelopmental disability before the onset of gender dysphoria.

Forty percent reported that their child had experienced a traumatic or stressful event prior to the onset of their gender dysphoria, including being bullied, sexually assaulted, or having their parents get divorced. This suggests that the drive a transition expressed by these teens and young adults could be a harmful coping mechanism

like drugs, alcohol, or cutting. With harmful coping coping mechanisms, certain behaviors are used to avoid feeling negative emotions in the short term, but they do not solve the underlying problems, and they often cause additional problems. And quote my friends, Wow, this is a study based on real research, peer reviewed published in a journal that is challenging the whole notion

of what makes somebody transgender. It's essentially saying that transgenderism is rooted in trauma and in many cases a psychiatric disorder, and those two things can also go hand in hand, and that it is increasingly the result of social pressure and imitation of peers, could be a coping mechanism and is not in fact a a a civil rights issue, but is a psychiatric and social issue. Wow. This is

this is radioactive stuff on the left. They've been waging this campaign for a while for us to believe that that effectively, if you have any questions about transgenderism, if you wonder that maybe a teenagers shouldn't take massive doses of hormones irreparably damage his or her body for the future in ways that we can't even fathom right now. If you have any questions about that, you're basically morally the equivalent of a racist. You're a bigot. You're backwards thinking.

Don't you see how important transgenderism is to civil rights movement? Well, here's a study that suggests that transgenderism is something very different from the affirmation of one's core and inner self. It could be rooted in social pressure, in psychiatric problems, or in trauma. We'll continue this in just a moment. The FBI calls home title theft one of the fastest

growing crimes. Brace yourselves, folks, because having your credit card stolen is nothing compared to the hell you're in for once an identity thief takes control of your home's title and folks, I was out in Los Angeles and and I actually had a a an uber driver who's telling me about her situation of home title theft. It was it was scary stuff and it cost her She said thousands and thousands of dollars to try to get it fixed. It was a nightmare. You don't want to go through it.

It can happen to you. All they need, all the bad guys need is internet access. They'll take your information, replace your home's title with an alias of their own, and borrow every penny against it. You don't want to deal with it, folks. For just pennies a day, home title Lock protects my most viable asset, my family's home. Registered now for a free analysis and discovered if your home's title has been compromised. That's a sixty dollar value.

Free visit home title lock dot com. Again, that's home title lock dot com. So we're continuing on with our discussion. You of rappid onset, gender dysphor you, I mean this is this is a big story, folks, because they're gonna do everything that can to suppress the truth here. Uh. They don't want the science, never mind the science to be settled. They don't want the science to be pursued because the Left has made such an investment in this notion of gender is fluid, and and this is there,

this is their new civil rights struggle. The struggle for transgender rights when you have evidence that's pointing to this as a as in fact a psychiatric disorder. And by the way, I don't say that in a disparaging fashion, all right. I think that mental health is every bit as important as physical health. I think mental health and physical health are effectively one and the same. But I believe that if somebody has a psychiatric disorder, a psychiatric problem,

they should be medically assisted. They should not expect there to be a societal movement to uh normalize and in fact celebrate what would be a disorder. And for people who say, well buck, people used to say that about homosexuality, well, first of all, people used to say a lot of things. And if we're gonna play that game, then I'll also say that there are some people who believe that they should have a limb removed that they they just do not believe that they should have the legs that they do,

and they want them to be surgically removed. Should we and they really believe this this is a real disorder. Should we have doctors remove their legs? Should we do that? Uh So? Um, I just I just wanted to put us in in the proper context. Here the Brown University where the study was done, which is thinks of itself as on the forefront of you know, transgenderism and gender rights issues and all the rest of it. And Brown

is you go back and look at his record. I mean, this was the place where you know, students there was people have been expelled for any any violation in the eyes of the social justice gods and your toast at Brown. Um. But but here's here's what they did. They pulled down. I mean this is the equivalent of book burning in a sense, folks. I mean they digitally deleted UH this journal entry in plus one Plos one about rapid onset gender dysphoria, and the dean of Brown University just a

few days ago wrote the following. In light of questions raised about research design and data collection related to Lisa Litman study on rapid onset gender dysphoria, Brown determined that removing the article from news distribution is the most responsible course of action. Folks, Fox, come on, come on, We're not all idiots, right. This has nothing to do with questions about uh data collection and research design. What a

bunch of cowards at Brown, What a bunch of utter cowards. Okay, just say it, Just say what's really going on here? You do not want this study to be out there with Brown's you know, with Brown's impromoter on it because it challenges core beliefs of the looney left when it comes to gender. That's what's really going on here. Here's and it continue by the way. I mean, I can't read the whole statement to you, but it's it's exactly what you would expect, a lot of just you know,

merely mouth, weasel word nonsense quote. The school's commitment to studying and supporting the health and well being of our sexual and gender minority populations is unwavering. Our faculty and students are on the cutting edge of research on transgender

populations domestically and global. The commitment of the school to diversity and inclusion is central to our mission, and we pride ourselves on being a community that fully recognizes and affirms the full diversity of gender and sexual identity and its members. These commitments are an unshakable part of our core values as a community. End quote. That's right. Gender diversity is more important than the truth at an American university.

That's what this is. That is what they're saying, forget science, who cares about the data? Who cares about science? It's more important than we be inclusive to the full spectrum of gender identity. And this is what we were up against. You know, these are the people on the left to want electuross about truth and facts and science and all this other stuff, when they really just want the affirmation of their emotional needs through politics. That's what really this

all comes down to. Uh. They want the data to support their virtue signaling on gender on everything, and when it doesn't, they scrap the data. And they also send a very clear message here, folks, to anyone else at Brown or elsewhere across the country. You think about doing the numbers on this running the numbers, they're gonna come

after you. So next time they try to tell you, oh, well, you know this is what the experts say, just say no. Actually, the experts are mostly scared on this issue because that's the truth, certainly the truth of Brown folks. Sometimes science gets it right. What am I talking about this time? Well, it turns out there's a little study that broke over the weekend that says that eating red meat and cheese

is good for you. Folks, come on, we've known this all you and I have known all along that, of course eating red meat and cheese is good for you, because red meat and cheese or what great Americans eat. Okay, this notion that we should be eating the processed, carb heavy, sugar laden crap that the big food companies want to just keep because it's shelf stable, because it's easy to ship, it's easy to to store, and it lasts forever. The that that should be a part of, or a major

part I should say of you're you're diet. It's just it's just crazy. Okay, it's crazy, but that's what we were told for a long time. Now, it turns out according to researchers at McMaster University in Hamilton's, Ontario, they found out that people who scarf down higher levels of red meat and cheese are likely to live longer. That's right, folks, eat that burger, pound that seddar, because you will live longer. According to this study quote, our findings on full fat,

dairy and unprocessed red meat do challenge conventional thinking. Those eating the most dairy and red meat saw their chances of early death fall by twenty five percent, and fatal heart attacks decreased by two percent. My friends. Look, I've I've run this experiment before. I went through a period

where I was trying to do that. You know, I was trying to eat whole grains and and toast and all these things, and trying to eat these you know, sort of smaller lighter uh carb you know, heart healthy car bladon meals and and I was really struggling to shed any excess weight. And I mean the best shape I've been in recent years would have been about eighteen months ago, when I had dropped about fifteen and was lean for me, uh and I was eating I was

eating three eg gaumelets and bacon every day. My cholesterol was fantastic, my body fat was way down. And it's just I'm telling you, you want to eat real food, and real food means things that you want to eat. It doesn't mean the high sugar crap that they're put

in front of you. But it also just reminds us, all right that that, you know, a little bit of humility in this whole world of of diet and science and everything would be a nice thing from the media, you know, did they change our dietary advice all the time? And yet we're always told, well, the scientific consensus, the scientific consensus, consensus is not science. All right, we all know this consensus is not science. It's all about proving,

it's all about the data. It's replicating the same experiment over and over. Um. And you know, oh, by the way, another study. Oh no, I'm sorry, darn it. Wait is this the same study? This would be amazing, folks, if this just came across my screen. Now, I think it may be. I think it may be. Um, hold on, new research. This the same one current advice two No, folks, this is this is additional evidence. This is the European Society of Cardiology. According to NBC News, it's time to

reconsider low dairy diets. That's right, Cheese and yogurt found to protect against death from any cause and debt and also death from cerebral vascular causes like stroke. Folks. Another study here that just this is from today. I wasn't even thinking that these were I actually thought I had two pieces of research in front of me here that were the same story. You know, so I wanted to but no, actually, these are two different stories. This is amazing.

This is dot from the Medical University of uh poland take that as you will. Who lead this study say that the average age of the participan anyway, They went into all the different details, but this is the point. The consumption of any kind of dairy associated with a two percent lower risk of death from any cause, folks, eight percent lower more total mortality risk with a dai area of a lot of cheese. I mean this is eat red meat and eat full fat cheese, folks. That's

what you're being told. You eat real food, Eat food as it exists in nature. Don't believe all the you know, all the fad based dietary craplet's out there. Eat real food. Uh And you know that this is you kind of know this intuitively, but then when you see the science go in this direction, it's just a great day for America.

Eat red meat, eat cheese. Now. I know people say a book you know, everything in moderation and yeah, yeah, yeah, I want to do a steakhouts not long ago that had all the calories listed for steaks, and like, I don't want to know how many calories are in my ribbi. I know it's too much, Okay, I don't need to

be told this. I'm here to enjoy my ribbi. But you know that the point here is that this all this stuff about stay away from this, stay away from not eat all this cardboard tasting crap, the stuff we were told for so long it was wrong, it was wrong. And now you're being told to eat the food that you want to eat, eat the food that tastes delicious. And I just think that's in general and exciting, an exciting proposition. Um, And I'm happy about all all that stuff.

So you know, I got good news for you today, and i'd like to share with you. That's what I'm here for, folks, here to bring you the good news and others will skip over the mainstream media. Can't trust them. We're gonna get into a roll call here in just a moment. Also, please make sure that you subscribe to the podcast of this show, because there's extras that go into your feed, like Shields High and also the Freedom Hut podcast, which this week is going to be a

phenomenal one. We'll be right back, Hey, tem Bug, it's time for roll call. Call. It is back my friends the dub Step and uh I watched you know, I flew back from Los Angeles? What was it last night? Got in kind of late, was doing a rising this morning on about four hours sleep as one does and b D no big deal as the kids say. But I watched Deadpool two, which I I liked Deadpool one. Brandon, you support this. I thought Deadpool one was very good for what it was. I did enjoy Deadpool one did

it was good. It was funny. Yeah, I liked. I liked Deadpool one. I thought it was good. H Deadpool two was okay, kind of lacked plot and and purpose, but there was a lot of There was some funny. There was a lot of funny stuff. I thought there's almost too much funy stuff. But one thing is a recurring joke in Deadpool two is dub steps, specifically uh them making fun of dub step, and I just thought that was that was amusing because it is it had its moment in the sun. I don't know if it's

ever to come back. For those of you who don't know, dub step is what it's kind of like what we played as the intro. It is, um, how do we put this? It's like heavy beat electronic music. How would you did, Brandon, You're you're a DJ? How do you define dub stat I think you gotta nailed it pretty well. Okay, heavy electronic music, heavy electronic music like very beat beat and base heavy electronic music. All right, fair enough, let's get you a role call Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton.

That is the role call rallying cry, that is where we do all the things that we do. And let's get right to it. We have Nicholas who writes Buck. I listen to your show as many others do. I am concerned if conservatism is lost in this November's election, what will happen to our country? Are we headed to another civil war instead of segregation, though it will be between Dems and Republicans thoughts, Nicholas, I am unlike some of the others out there who know that being a

catastrophist is good for business. I'm here to tell you that we're gonna be okay, it's gonna be all right. Doesn't mean it's gonna be easy, doesn't mean we're not gonna take losses and take some hits. I'm not saying that there won't be some really ugly stuff if Conservatives, well, if if the GOP loses in this midterm election, you can mark my words. They are going to try and

criminally prosecute a member of the Trump family. I don't know which one, I don't know how, but that will be the mission, that will be the goal that That's something that I'm I'm very confident of. And think about what that will do to the country, you know, think about how they have been willing to destroy somebody like General Flynn the service country for thirty years in the military. But what what was Flynn's real sin? Was it that

he lied or was it that he supported Trump? We all know the answer to that, right, we all know why he's facing a federal why he had to plead guilty to a federal felony. UM. But I don't think we're heading for a civil war. I won't say that, um And I I think that ultimately, one thing that that we have on our side here is the country's doing. I give things. The country is doing really well. We We've got an incredible economic boom going on right now, jobs, manufacturing,

the economy across the board. Plus uh, the you know, we're we're not We're not in the midst of a major war. We're not in the midst of you know, receiving daily casualty counts about our true troops overseas. Uh, you know, there's a lot to be really thankful for right now, folks. I mean, I'm not saying everything is great and we had no problems, of course not. But

things are good. You know, we don't have this sense that radical Islam is about to fly a bunch more planes into our buildings or or you know, park truck bombs in front of major populated areas, and and that was our reality for years, for years in recent memory. So the country is doing really well, and I think that's important for all of us to remember, Brian, which also means I think we're not going to the Civil War.

Listening to the the end of Monday's podcast, I imagine a scene in my head starring you and the Godfather Buck. I feel like I want to trash the trash talk the Boondoc Saints, but I'm afraid it will anger some of my listeners. Godfather. If you do, you may want to lay low afterwards. Buck, can you cover for me on Tuesday? Shields high? Buck, Shields very high? Brian, you may be onto something I could neither confirm nor do not.

People love the Boondocks Saints is producer Mike within earshot or is he getting is he getting a phone number for one of the lovely ladies that works in finance in the building on the different floors or whatever. Oh, so he is getting somebody's phone now, alright, producer, producer Mike Man, that guy's always you gotta keep an eye, producer Mike. He's a ladies man. Um. But anyway, the Briant, I mean, Brandon Boon, Brian's writing Brandon, I'm talking to

Boondocks Saints. What's your grade for it? B plus? Nothing crazy? You know, I think it's I enjoyed it, but I never got the immense hype. I I don't understand the immense hype either. And the best part of the movie is the is the intro and the intro music. That's the best part of the whole movie and the rest of it. I mean, when you, okay, let me just

do this. When you compare the gun play in Boondocks, saynes, I know, people say this is unfair, but compare that to like John Wick and just the and they're very similar movies in a lot of ways. Right, there's a there's some similar stuff going on. John Wick is like John Wick is just incredible and it's just so stylish and well done. I was surprised by how good John Wick was. I agree with you, right, I think boo, I think John Wick is great. Uh, and you know

John mccew delivers. It's not quite as awesome as John Wick one, but it delivers. It's solid anyway. But Brian to reach it to each his own. Melissa, greetings, I wish you would have Mic Rohan as a guest. Besides being an excellent raconteur, he has a wealth of knowledge about choosing trade at schools over college. I think he would be great on the show. Thanks. Keeping the shields high and are plums leveled? Oh? Look at Melissa throwing in a little reference to the ancient Roman javelin known

as the peelum. It was a weighted spear with a wooden shaft and then it and then at the end the tip was metal and it kind of had a a a metal projection out of the top as well. I'm trying to describe the peelum to you, but it's uh, the way it was weighted. It was a very effective short distance throwing spear. At the Roman legions carried legionaries carried David next up here. UM. Oh, by the way, Mike, sorry, Melissa Micro is a guest. It would be fantastic, Folks.

I'll always be honest with you. There are some of these guests that you ask us for and there you know, they are respect They respect what we do here in the freedom hout it. And it's just tough to coordinate schedules, you know. I was actually trying to get my last trip out to l A. Of course I reached out to Ben Shapiro. I'm like, Ben, we'd love to sit down to an interview with you. And Ben says great, you know, and and we just couldn't make the schedules

work this time, but next time we'll do it. So you know, there's plenty of folks that are on the radar. I'm trying to trying to get involved with UH and have on his guests and particularly his podcast guests, and it's just a question of getting them out of time when they can do it, um, and when I can do it. T J writes Buck long Time No Talk. I was in Europe for the last two weeks. Try to keep up with you on podcasts, but hard to do while on vacations. All right, t J. You're allowed

to take a break. We had lots of good food, good beer German of course, good wine Tuscan, and fun in general. But nothing's as good as the good old us of A. This especially became apparent when the last day I was talking to my distant relative. Apparently in Germany it is illegal to home school your children. The state literally requires you to send your kids to public school. This was definitely alarming for me as my wife is expecting.

Although it maybe likely that our child ends up going to public school, I just can't fathom being required to send them there and really brings into perspective how free we are. God bless the USA from t J. T J is a great American patriot and a friend of the show. Um, yeah, man, it's you know, Europe, there's a lot we we we are more free. I think we often get this sense from the media, and it's because they love the the big welfare state stuff in Europe.

But that, oh, Europe is just as free as we are. False. False. There's really no First Amendment in Europe does not exist, certainly not the sense that we think of. It doesn't even exist in great Britain, folks, the First Amendment free speech is way less protected in the UK there. It is in America way less protected. So you know, don't don't forget that when everyone's said, oh, we should just be look at European socialist going now, I'm not sure

about that, folks. There's a lot of downside that comes with that. Uh, and I would not want to just sign onto it. Um Alan writes, Hey, Buck, did you get a chance to stroll around Venice Beach? Interesting place? You should have seen it thirty years ago. It was not so gentrified. Just read about just read about Hillary and her thirty thousand emails. Can you imagine the power the Chinese would have over her if she became president and they had all those emails? Scary stuff? Alan, Yeah, Alan,

I really want to Okay, well, two things. Let's first deal with the Hillary emails. Then I'll talk about Venice Beach for a moment. I really want to get verification of this story about the Chinese hack of Hillary's emails. I look Daily Callers put it up. I like the folks the Daily Caller a lot, but but I want to make sure that we're on solid ground there. I don't want to pull a CNN and run with the story because I would honestly like it to be true in a sense, I mean, as much as it would

be bad for the country. I've always believed that Hillary's emails were hacked and somebody does have them, so it's not like it would be a new thing. We just would know it now we know the truth. Um So I want to get a little more a little more background on that one. And then as for the discussion about um Venice Beach or rather ask for your comment with Venice Beach. Yeah, I did get to Venice. I was on the boardwalk. I gotta say, it's a little you know, a little bit like the East Village on

a beach. It was okay, I'm not I mean, I didn't love it. I wouldn't run back to go to the boardwalk in Venice. I'm more of a Santa Monica guying myself, which probably surprises none of you. A little little more of a Santa Monica dude. Uh so, Yeah, but miss Mallin had a great time. It's beautiful weather, and look, I understand California. It's very seductive folks. Put all the liberalism aside. California is a very seductive place to to call home. We're gonna leave it there for

today in the Freedom Hunt. We're gonna have Jesse Kelly and Sean Parnell this week on the Freedom Hunt podcast. Folks, that's gonna be amazing, So I'll be sure you subscribe and download to that. See you tomorrow from The Freedom Hunt live from d C. As always, Shields Hie. If you want the best home security system on the market, one that you'll find intuitive, easy to use, unobtrusive in your home, right, it fits right in with whatever you've got.

It's not some big system, doesn't require installation. You can do it yourself. Folks, Simply Safe is what you want, Okay. They give you twenty four seven monitoring for only fourteen dollars and cents a month. Sen at PC mag the Wire Cutter all have said Simply Safe is their top pick for home security. I have a simply Safe system

at home. Let me tell you that it gives me a little extra piece of mind knowing that whenever I closed my door, I know that my windows, my front door, and fire of all kinds of possible concerns, leaks, burst pipes, intruders. All that covered because I've got simply Safe. Order your simply safe system now. My listeners get free shipping and free returns by going to simply safe dot com slash buck. That's simply safe dot com slash buck again one more

time for the best system in the business. Simply safe dot com slash buck