China's Interference In Our Election

hours without a phone call. Try doing that sometimes. One of the laws that have to be confirmed and I think reaffirmed our state laws, so it's not in our purview, but the state law are set, and then we have federal elections. So what we've heard about what happened in Wisconsin, what happened in Nevada, I think is absolutely true and we have to prevent it from happening again. I think state legislators, legislatures will need to reaffirm that election law

can only be changed by a state legislature. So I think there's a lot of work to be done. While we will not dictate it to the states, I think we should have hearings going into the next year, hearing from state legislatures and what they're going to do to make sure election law is upheld, not changed by people who are not legislators. And we do have an interest

in that. I don't want it to be federalized. Many on the other side of the aisle would just soon federalize it and mail everybody a ballot and we'll have this universal corruption throughout the land. But what I think we need to do is keep it at the state level. But we can't just say it didn't happen. We can't just say, oh, four thousand people voted in Nevada that we're non citizens and we're just going to ignore it. We're going to sweep it under the rugs. So the

courts have decided the facts. The courts have not decided the facts. The courts never looked at the facts. The courts don't like elections since they stayed out of it by finding an excuse, standing or otherwise to stay out of it. But the fraud happened, The election in many ways was stolen, and the only way it'll be fixed is by in the future reinforcing the laws. The fraud

happened welcome to the buck Sex and show everybody. I wanted to do a deep dive with you today into what we know so far and make sure that we separate out the difference between getting justice in the process and having the process continue to hold and go on as it stands, it's not the same thing. A process does not guarantee a good result. Our electoral process not only does not guarantee a good result from the perspective of candidates, but also from the perspective of whether or

not it was a free and fair election. That's what we are seeing. There are not the safeguards that you would think are in place, because so many of them were removed by Democrats intentionally. They pushed aside so many things that would be there specifically. And they do this all the time. They don't like voter id they don't. They always fight any effort to make it harder to commit fraud. And so what Rand Paul is saying here,

and he said this during the hearing. I read it the entire transcript of this Senate hearing yesterday, and what Rand Paul is saying is absolutely true. There was fraud, and no one can prove that there was not. The fraud that is even specifically being alleged. The courts are just saying, look, not our deal, not our situation. We're not getting involved. They have decided to just leave this

to the process. They're not going to change it. And that's what I've been telling I've seen this coming all along. But that's a far cry from saying that there was nothing that actually was fraudulent about this election, which I know you're going to be told, and they're going to

tell you that a lot. And the people who spent four years lying about Russia collusion as a means of undermining our democracy, undermining the twenty sixteen election, now they're going to pretend like they've been honest characters in this whole drama, and they weren't. There were frauds. They were abject frauds. But that's something that we have to continue to push to get the answers about what are the

specifics of the fraud. I read through you know, Ron Johnson, Senator Johnson had some pretty fiery moments during that hearing. I looked at all the different questions and you had Ken Starr there, you had you had Krebs, the fired election security guy. His writ his mandate really was just about foreign interference in the election. Then he's saying that it was great in terms of preventing that, But he has no answers about did people double vote in Nevada?

Did people who were legal aliens vote in Nevada? Did people who voted too late in Pennsylvania? Should their votes be discounted? There are all these very legitimate questions, But I mean, let's just start with this. How many dead people voted in the election. If someone tells you the answer is zero, they're lying to you. How many people double voted in the election. If someone says there were zero, they're lying to you. How many legal aliens voted in

the election, and so on and so forth. It's not that this stuff has been disproven. It's that we don't have a platform. We don't have an avenue for getting this to a place in the process where anything can be done about it, because judges will not toss out large quantities of ballots. Democrats flooded the zone. They made it so that this election was a free for all. They knew what they were doing when they did it, and we're dealing with the result. That's all I've been

telling you. I'm as certain as you are that there was fraud, and I think there was substantial enough for aud that it did cost Trump a few of these states. But we've been unable to prove it in the process, and that's not going to change because the judges won't take it up. They say there's no standing, they say they know there's some procedural reason why they can't do this. And so what I've been trying to tell you is to prepare yourself for that reality. I'm not saying don't push,

don't bring the legal challenges. I've supported them every step of the way. But I have seen what is going on here. I understand how bureaucracies function and how they can choose to not function when they want to, when it's in their interest. And that's why don't ever let them tell you, because they will there was no fraud. That's gas lighting, that's a lie. And don't ever let them tell you that mail in balloting is not somehow an enormous open invitation for more fraud than or otherwise

being an election. I want to tell you a little story, one that some of you may know. I'll take you back to the northeastern United States, traveling from New York to Baltimore. In eighteen sixty four, President of Abraham Lincoln

is running for reelection. It's toward the end of the vicious, bloody, very high casualty Civil War, and as a fellow named Orville Wood, who is tasked with making sure that this newly instituted system in a number of states like New York, of mail in ballots for soldiers from the front lines

would be executed properly. Now may not surprise you to know that what all was said and done, over seventy percent of soldiers were voted or voting for Abraham Lincoln in his National Union Party, and that there was plenty of reason to understand why, given all that they had sacrificed, all they had fought for, that Lincoln was going to be the recipient of those votes in ants of the actual counting. So what did the opposition do here? Well, you had this guy, Orville Wood, who was just a

merchant from northeastern New York State. He was a supporter of Abraham Lincoln, and he was supposed to visit the troops from his hometown to see how things were going with this mail in voting. And everyone knew that the result of this eighteen sixty four election was going to have a profound impact on the outcome, the final outcome of the war. Lincoln wanted to continue until absolute victory. But the anti war Democrats. Yes, that's right, the Democrat

I know. Is it amazing you look back in our history, so much villainy falls at the feet of the Democrat Party. But the anti war Democrats, they were called copperheads at the time. They were looking for some kind of a way to get a negotiated peace with the Confederacy. And they also of course opposed the abolition movement in its entirety. So this is another way of saying they're the bad

guys in this tale. So the troops from New York were able to vote from the front lines mail in, and sure enough, when this fellow mister Orville Wood gets to Fort McHenry in Baltimore, he's visiting the ninety first New York Regiment. There's an army captain who says something about quote, checker playing with soldiers ballots. Checker playing with soldiers ballots? What's going on? What is that all about?

And then Wood goes to visit wounded man at Newton University Hospital, and then he hears more about this, and he keeps hearing soldiers say that something funky's going on with these mail in ballots. Sure enough, he went all the way to the office of Moses Ferry in Baltimore. Ferry was chosen by New York Governor Horatio Seymour to oversee this process again for enlisted soldiers on the front line fighting a terrible war, and their voice needed to

be heard for the republic right. Their voice was an essential part of this electoral process. And Wood enters this guy Ferri's office, and he pretends that he's a George McClellan supporter, and sure enough, he is brought in on the scheme. There's a guy sitting across the room signing ballots from names that had been brought from Wood's hometown. In fact, would ask them if he could deliver these

fraudulent ballots. That's right, they had a fake ballot operation going on, just signing the names of soldiers on the front lines who were not actually at all involved in casting their ballots. And so he got involved in this process, this mister Wood. And it was during this convert it was during this process that he found out that there are about twenty co conspiracers a co conspirators who are working not just in Baltimore but also in DC, all

delivering votes for McClellan. And sure enough he found out that they were passing names of acting enlistment, active enlisted men, the wounded, dead soldiers, officers who never existed, just straight up old school ballot fraud, all based in mail and ballots.

So they were just filling this out and going to these going to these obvious lengths if you were around them, because it was already rumored what was going on here that they were trying to make sure that they delivered a state, they delivered the election for Lincoln's opponent, and so they also were people who opposed the abolition movement. This was critical. If Lincoln had lost reelection, it would

have changed the trajectory of the country. You have these men who are involved in this mail in balloting scheme for Democrats, and they're sending back crates of fake ballots to be counted in this election and would call the

authorities went to call on them. Obviously there were no phones and shirt off On the morning of October twenty seventh, eighteen sixty four, two weeks before the election, there was a military commission held and the men confess to this scheme and they were initially sentenced to life in prison.

This was taken very seriously to be involved in ballot fraud in a time of war, life in prison, and Lincoln, before he was shot, was a supporter of that sentence, to give you an idea of how much he thought this was a grave offense. So the people who tell you that there's no election fraud are either historical ignoramacies or their liars. This is just one of many instances of election fraud that have happened in this country. But

this one specifically used mail in ballots. This one looked at a process that really hasn't changed all that much. And the moment that you allow people to do this, and you separate the chain of custody, you disaggregate the showing up in front of people with observers, people recognize that it's a lot easier to cheat. And so what did the Democrats do in eighteen sixty four to try to end the abolition movement and defeat Abraham Lincoln towards the end of the Civil War. They cheated with mail

in ballots. Yeah, but don't worry. The Democrats of today are here to tell you that they would never do such a thing and that there's no such thing as cheating in an election. They are liars, they are frauds, and we will not let this pass. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast.

I think it would be healthy for the country, Lou if we had a debate on January sixth about all this, because the mainstream press certainly hasn't covered these hearings in these states where there's been such concerns about how the election was done. So let's let this, let's let it play out, and let's have a real debate on January six I think that when you have, Lou, when you have over a third of the electorate think this election was stolen, that is not a healthy situation for your country.

And yet the left says, oh, you gotta stop now. You can't have a debate, you can't keep the president campus to always legal options. We shouldn't even have a debate on the floor on January sixth. That is just wrong. It is wrong, and it also is about showing that we haven't forgotten what happened for the last four years is about reminding the Democrats that the fraud that they perpetrated against the president with the Russia collusion hoax will

not go unpunished. It really is stunning. It's amazing. Now they pretend like we don't remember anything, We didn't suffer through all the nonsense, all the idiocy of the Russia hoax, of Russia Gate. They talk about the need to protect our sacred democracy. They called the president a traitor, they had a special counsel looking at him and his family. They lied about FBI investigations. They used the surveillance apparatus

of the intelligence community against a presidential campaign. This is the kind of thing that does happen in pseudo democratic dictatorships all over the world. That's what happens. The security apparatus is used to crush the opposition. And Trump wasn't just the opposition to Hillary Clinton. He was the opposition to the political elites and the establishment. So they circle the wagons. They did everything they could to destroy him,

and they still weren't successful the first time around. So when they do the second time around, come up with a way to change all the rules of the game, which they did, that is a fact in an election year, in ways that they knew would benefit them. Why would it benefit them? Why all of a sudden just always assume that when there are fewer rules for an election, it benefits Democrats because Republicans don't like convenience. Republican voters can't use the mail. No, I think we all understand

that Democrats do fraud when it comes to elections. This is their province, this is their expertise. And as long as there's no voter id as long as there because who shouldn't be voting? Convicted felons for example, who do they vote for? If they can Democrats? Ten to one? Legal aliens shouldn't be voting. Who do they vote for? Democrats? So if you eliminate all the safeguards, if you get rid of all the guard rails, what do you have? A free for all that's going to, at the end

of the day benefit benefit the Democratic Party. And that's what happened. So make no mistake about it. I'm not telling you Joe Biden won the election fair and square. I'm telling you that they managed to abuse and manipulate the process in such a way we cannot use the process to get a just result. It's not the same thing as saying, yeah, well, you know, Joe did a great job. Of course not, but it's a recognition of

where we are. If you don't have judges who're willing to take this up, if you don't have the courage at that level of this process, then it's never gonna it's never gonna work. And we have seen nothing that would lead any of us to believe that that's going to change anytime soon. So that's why I'm trying to say, we still need to fight for the answers here. I read through that transcript, yes or There's so many questions, did or did not? Three thousand or so people who

are illegal aliens? Did they vote in Nevada or did they not? We should be able to get a definitive answer on that. The courts won't take it up, though, and the people looking into it don't have law enforcement authority, they don't have subpoena power. Did or did not? Did they or didn't they have people who were dead voting. My friend Sean Parnell says that when he had in Pennsylvania, they did a canvas of nursing homes. They found a few thousand ballots. It all looked like they had the

same signature, the same handwriting. Is that is that a lie? He wouldn't lie. So what's going on? Ah, that's right. The process does not have fast enough answers and remedies for this, and that is what we are continuing to deal with. Thanks for listening to the bus Stson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. How far integrated into the Ukrainian economy did Hunter Biden get one of us? On

the border Borisma? Somebody wants to look at this time on the border Barisma. Somebody needs to look at his business dealings regarded to China to see if any crimps were committed. But may yeah, I think, to just see what kind of conflicts, if any, the Biden administration may have.

Absolutely falling on a special council to look at all things Hunter Biden, to see if he presents a conflict for the Biden administration regarding his business dealings in Ukraine, which is overrun with Russian agents and any activity have of the Chinese government. A special counsel to look into

Hunter Biden. I think it's a good idea. I also wish that Attorney General Barr hadn't been unfairly maligned by so many on the right and attacked by the President when he should he should have been I'm just going to tell you it was not was not a fair assessment that was going on here. The President's very upset about the election. I understand that. I share that that sentiment,

but it's not Bill Barr's fault. It's just not And you would want a competent Attorney general in the role right now who understands what the deep state and the Democrats have tried to do in the past, to be in a position to appoint a special Council. But I don't think it's going to happen now. It should, though, remember this, everything that was done to Republicans by the Democrats as part of hashtag resist, we should revisit upon

them now. We could call it Operation Reciprocity, like the Clear and Present Danger CIA operation from the movie Clear and Present Danger, which, as you know, I like to reference on this show because I've seen in a million times Operation reciprocity. We do to them what they do to us, isn't that necessary. Isn't that central to our system?

If we have equal justice under the law, doesn't that equal justice have to mean that Democrats are subject to the same kinds of investigations and the same aggressive checks and balances that Republicans were during the four years of

Trump's Trump's term. I certainly think so. And in fact, if you look at why a special council exists, the Hunter Biden case, in many ways even more so than Russia collusional, though there are Obama administration figures that will be in a Biden White House, But it's really for exactly this kind of a circumstance where you have the

son of a president under federal investigation. That is why you'd have a special counsel to insulate that legal effort from the pressures that come directly from the commander in chief. So there's a great This is a great example of when you should have a special counsel, and I call it for one right away. I'm glad to see that there are others who are now saying, yeah, special counsel. Nice. Some of us think faster than others on this stuff.

Do I think one will happen? Though? Now, why is that there is still a kind of virtue signaling that exists on the right. There are still a desire to seem like at the most opportune moment. Some people who are Republicans, who are in prominent positions, they want to be the one to seem like they're above it all.

This is kind of the Romney approach or the Romney also is just very bitter about Trump, and we know that, you know, he's actually an egomaniac and that Trump offends him, and so that's why he voted to have the President of the United States removed from office the way that he did. But there are Republicans out there who want to say, no, no, we don't do that, we don't

play rough like that. And that's still very widespread. And some of them are prominent senators, some of them are political consultants that get to go on Fox News every five minutes. They still think that we aspire to make the Democrats at the end of the day, to make the Democrats like us in the way that we conduct ourselves in these political battles. Democrats don't give don't give a squat about what any of you or what I think about their conduct during Trump that's been very clear.

They don't apologize, they don't ever say that they went a little overboard. They only are upset about one thing, and that is that they were not ultimately successful in destroying the Trump presidency. And that is it. That is it. But they are very happy that they feel they were able to stack the deck for this election in a way that benefited them, and that made the frauds so easy and so made it so easy and so amorphous

at the same time. Right, it can happen in so many different states, a few thousand here, a few thousand there. How do you track all this stuff down? That it was bound to be an enormous benefit for them, and it was and it was. But should we have a special counsel to look into Hunter Biden? Yes, we absolutely should.

I mean, this guy was saying back for his make Believe what c nohawk holdings, everything that Tony Bobolynski said on Tucker Carlson's show in that long interview that I'm sure many of you saw everything that was said was true that Bobolynsky said. That guy clearly just spoke up because he's like, this is appalling. The Bidens are corrupt and we're seeing more and more that China is our

primary national security and economic concern, no question. I mean it's by far by Miles and Miles and the Democrats spent four years with this Russia hysteria that came at a cost, not only a cost to the administration, to the Trump administration, but also the cost of making sure that we didn't as a people, as a country, pay nearly enough attention to the threat from the Chinese Communist Party,

and we are paying for that. That was a mistake, that was an error, and that's why when Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, these individuals are going to be able to now direct foreign policy of the United States. I mean Hunter not officially, but you know he can always talk to his dad. And that was the whole hook. That was the point. Hunter was selling access to his power,

full and connected dead. That's why he's asking a Chinese oligarch, according to emails that have been released, for ten million dollars. I can tell you ten million dollars is a lot of money. Ten million dollars is something that you know, you usually got to do a considerable amount to get that kind of cash. You know, this isn't fifty thousand dollars under a table for some local city councilman or something. This is this is real money, and we're supposed to

pretend that this didn't mean anything. Why would we believe that the Democrats were so willing to corrupt the Justice Department, to have FBI agents lie, to have senior DJ officials cover up, to have James Comey go forward and bail out Hillary Clinton by saying that no honest prosecutor would bring charges against her for clear violations of federal statute.

Why would we think that? Now, oh, when a Biden president, and see has the problem of a son who not only was It's not just that Hunter Biden was doing corrupt stuff, it's that he was leveraging his dad, his relationship with his dad, and bringing his dad into it. And his dad is looking like he's going to be president friends, he is now officially the president elect. That is a fact. I know, I don't like saying it

out loud, but it is a fact. And you have Hunter Biden knowing this whole time that he'll get a pass. This is the great double standard. Democrats are so emotionalized about their politics. They view it as so intrinsic to

their very being. They're so certain that they are good people, that they're the better people out there, that if they have to break rules, if they have to dispense with principles, at the first moment of any any problem for them, they it's all it's all for the greater good, you see, it's for the collective good. And they're just simply fine with that. They have no problem with that. I do,

and I think that we need to understand it. It's gonna get ugly now, and we have to make it ugly because otherwise there's no way that they will ever think twice about doing what they did to President Trump. We have not achieved justice for what Democrats did the first four years the last four years of Donald Trump's presidency, not even close. And unless we understand what this game is really all about now and how they're playing it, and meet them on the battlefield the way they meet us,

we're just going to keep losing. We're going to keep losing. I say, no, you're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Did China seek to influence this last election? It's a very important, very straightforward question. Did the CCP did our chief global rival and likely future all out enemy, the Chinese Communist Party, did they

actually have a hand in what happened? Now? I remember when Russia buying a pittance worth of Facebook ads was considered an urgent national security crisis, and that that meant that we couldn't really trust the results of the twenty sixteen election because a couple of troll farmers in Russia put some stuff up about hashtag lock her up on Facebook. Remember that that was Russia interfered in the election. Russia interfered, That's what they told us. Well, did China interfere in

this election? And what does that mean about what our response should be if China did interfere as Joe Biden, even the legitimate victor, even based on the process as riddled with errors and fraud as we've already seen as it was, right, do we add this on top of all of that, We're gonna treat this guy like it's legitimate, even though we have even more problems with the integrity

and authenticity of this election process. So the Intelligence communities classified Assessment on Foreign Threats to the election this year was supposed to be released tomorrow, and now they're saying it is delayed. Why would it be delayed. Well, let's get into this for a moment. Quote this afternoon. This

was from yesterday. The DNI was notified by career intelligence officials that the intelligence community will not meet the December eighteenth guidelines set by Executive Order and Congress to submit the ICs classified Assessment on Foreign Threats to the twenty twenty election. According to Amanda Shock, Assistant DNI for Strategic Communications, the IC has received relevant reporting since the election, and a number of agencies have not finished coordinating on the product.

The DNI is committed to providing this report to our customers expeditiously. Now I'm somebody who was involved in these kind of assessments at the CIA. I used to write assessments like this, part of them about things going on in the Middle East. So I know this process very well. And you know what the problem is here, I can

tell you. And I don't have any specific knowledge of this process of the classified and what's being said behind closed doors, but I know how the bureaucracy works, and I know how the various parties involved your fight over there. They call it their equities right there, their interests in

this and here's what's going on. There are people who are very pro Biden, who are jubilant, and most of the senior ranks of the especially we're talking about the analytic condre, which I was a part of, which is, you know, the nerd society in the intelligence community. Most of the analytic cadre are Democrats. I'd say seventy seventy

to eighty percent are Democrats. That's just a guess. But again, I spent a lot of time around these people I know, and most of them are overjoyed that they think Joe Biden has this thing in the bag. It's all over. He's the next president of the United States, and they're gonna do everything they can to try and protect this guy.

They're gonna do everything everything they can to make sure that there's not even a dissenting opinion in this intelligence community assessment that could be used because it will make its way to the press. And there's also there are there's the unclassified version of this, which is what everyone's talking about now. It's supposed to be they're supposed to be released, right, so there's a classified assessment of it, and then usually they'll do it an unclassified executive summary

that'll make its way out, though that takes longer. That takes more time. But why would they be so worried about this? Shouldn't they just the usual standard for the IC. The usual standard when I was in was that if there were really strong dissenting opinions, you include them in the reports, that you have a full spectrum analogy of what's going on. And when this doesn't happen, the intelligence

community often has horrifically flawed analysis that's completely wrong. So the issue here is most likely that they don't want There are people who probably think that they're up for maybe a big promotion or a much better deal for themselves in a Biden administration, and they don't want to be a part of anything. And also for ideological reasons, they want to make sure that there's nothing that could

harm good old blue collar Joe. Because even if China didn't influence the election in a way that was determinative, even if China didn't do enough, well, we remember from Russia Collusion that no sane, intelligent human being thought that some Russian Facebook ads changed the course of the twenty sixteen election. But there was some Russian influence operation online their fare or we can't ever know. Sorry, Trump's invalid.

That was their take. And some of the smarter people who are Democrat deep staters inside the IC, they're seeing this and they realize, WHOA, we got a problem here, because if it comes out, if it makes its way to Congress, and then there's an unclassified version of this that gets released, they declassify portions of the executive summary

and release it. And it turns out that China tried to help Joe Biden after his son was asking a Chinese oligarch, which is basically a Chinese Communist Party businessman. You can't be a wealthy Chinese businessman without the Chinese Communist Party calling the shots for you, asking for millions and millions of dollars that guy. Yeah, not a surprise that they that Joe Biden would be the choice of the CCP, is it? But they don't want people to know.

They don't want people to be able to draw upon this and to hold the Democrats to hold Joe Biden to the same standard that Donald Trump was held to. In fact, this would be even a very different standard because at least this is real. At least this is a country that has the kind of influence to project itself onto our politics and change an election. China targeted sanctions against states with the whole trade war and agricultural issues meant to hurt Republicans. China actively works to the

benefit of the DNC. We know this. They would much rather have complacent DNC elite establishment figures who all want to be on the board of Facebook or they all want to be getting some consulting agreement from Google. Those are the people that they want in government doing their bidding right, because they are going to be able to say, hey, do you want access to our Chinese market? Do you want to get rich or you want to be principled.

That's what the Chinese Communist Party presents to Democrats and to some Republicans, and they fall for it too. Do you want to get rich or do you want to be principled? In stand up for America, Donald Trump said, you know what, go blank yourself China. We're gonna do this the right way. You think that a Biden administration is going to do that. You think you think that's gonna happen. Of course not. This is an enormous win.

I'll tell you right now. I mean I think I think China's financial prospects for the next few years look very strong because Biden's a whimp and he's gonna get rolled by them, and it's in his interest to do so. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Let's talk about the threat from China with someone who knows it well. He's a Mandarin speaker,

he's a former naval intelligence officer. He is a host at One America News and I'm buddy of mine, Jack possobic Aka posts so in the mix here Jack, great to have you Seesia, how Bogyo and my thoughts, my thoughts exactly to be here today. Yeah, So tell me this. What do you think is the slowdown for this? I mean, this would be a big thing. This would be a bombshell if we have an intelligence community assessment that says that China worked in this election to influence on behalf

of Joe Biden. We got Joe Biden's son and emails asking a Chinese Communist Party connected businessman for you know, a wire of ten million dollars and I'm pretty sure the rules that have been established, Jacker, if there is foreign interference, we need get a special counsel, and maybe the election is just not legitimate. That's what happened for

four years. Yeah, it's really amazing what's going on. So to give people the backstory on this, the d and I report is due to be on the President's desk by tomorrow, by Friday the eighteenth. This is set by executive order. You know, this isn't one of those reports. Oh,

we'll get it done when we get it done. No, no, no no, no. This is set by executive order for the Intel agencies writ large, which comes under that sort of capstone of the DNI as an intelligence community assessment, to be on his desk forty five days after the election. And by the way, this was something that when the President signed it, this had bipartisan support. Obviously, we want to know if any foreign government is interfering in our elections.

This was certainly shoved down the throats of every conservative, every Trump supporter for four years straight regarding Russia. But now suddenly we've got this guy Chris Krebs who's going out and testifying and saying, oh no, there was no there was no interference whatsoever, most secure freest and ferris we've ever had. Right. Well, now it turns out and I was getting this information reporting it out yesterday afternoon, pretty early before the DNI made their announcement that there's

a huge dust up going on. It's really kind of turned into a massive battle at the highest levels of our see literally the highest levels the DNI over whether or not to include assessments regarding Chinese interference. And what's really interesting, and I know, you know how to read between the tea leaves on official statements from the IC

as well that they actually mentioned in the DNI's report. Now, what I had said in my reporting for One American News was that there was continuing intelligence, continuing raw intelligence coming in regarding Chinese operations. What the DNI said was there was new relevant information that was received after the election. Now, reading the tea leaves a little bit. The intel community doesn't usually find out about stuff like that that big by the you know, long after the fact, forty five

days after the fact. What most likely is going on here is that one of the sixteen agencies you probably know which one that was had the information and didn't share it with the others, and now they're upset about it, and so you're getting into this sort of I'm not sure what if I can say that on air, sort of a match of sorts regarding who, you know, who gets to actually cover this situation, who gets to work

that problems, to work these targets. And now D and I Radcliffe is saying, look, you guys have an issue. Analytic trade craft which we all we all learn, right, Analytic tradecraft would say that when there's disputing assessments, you include them both, Yeah, and you include the reasons for why and you and you set that out. That's basic one oh one level stuff. But for some reason, one agency is saying, no, you shouldn't include any assessment even

though there is raw intelligence. Yeah, and Jack, as as you, I'm sure recall it's hard for outsiders to understand you from the You come at this from the naval intelligence side. I come in from the CIA perspective. How intense and how how much these bureaucratic turf battles can get deeply personal.

I've seen adults in conference rooms with you know, draped with American flags and all kinds of regalia of the of the federal government where people were cursing and screaming in each other's faces over over things like this, over what's included in an analytic assessments, over those on the in the outside world. This becomes incredibly heated and contentious. So that's one part of it, and that's it's it's

what you alluded to before. It's who gets control of this issue going forward and the resources and the White

House attention that would come with that. But I also have to think, and we're speaking to Jack Pisovic, former former naval intelligence officer and one American news host, I also think that when we look at this, there's probably some elements and it might even be the majority of this where there are some people who are very pro Biden, who are senior up in the ranks at I don't know which agency I could I could take a couple of guesses who think, Okay, we got an incoming Biden administration,

we got to protect as much as we can this team of adults that's coming in from the back. The backlash and the blowback of any China that becomes a big problem for the Democrats. Any China issue of influence the election makes Joe Biden an even bigger target for the stuff that we're already seeing with Hunter Biden everything else. So I think they may be covering for him. That's

exactly right. And we saw this as well when intelligence became politicized during an election in twenty twelve, when the Benghazi situation happened, and you sought the intel agencies for at least for a time right when it mattered, they were doing everything they could to defend Barack Obama to make sure that their assessments were in line with, oh, this cover story about a YouTube video rather than a terrorist attack, until after the election when the truth just

exploded all over the place and everybody knew what happened. And we've found out, of course that they all knew at the time what happened because it was obvious. Right, that's a similar situation to what you're seeing now. Is because they're also looking at making sure that they're in good standing it with what they perceived to be the incoming administration. They want to make sure that they maintain

that relationship. And they're all also people there who are looking at it from a perspective of keep in mind, and a lot of people have to know this that there's different stripes of and different you know, sort of factions within the IC. But you do have your cold warrior types who for them, Russia will always be the great bear. They are always America's eternal enemy, and everything you know that the IC does has to be geared

towards Russia. But then you also have a younger type, and I think these is like the Pete buddhaj Edge types of of IC officers, who he himself was a reserve intelligence officer, that they get their mindset from CNN, Washington Post, New York Times and then they go into the IC and so that that mindset, that framing of everything that's going on in the world starts with some

pretty some pretty far left right. It used to be kind of centrist, but now they're a little bit more far left in terms of their perspective, in terms of their coverage, so they already have an outsize view of Russia being a threat versus China, who we know, of

course has way more money, has way more resources. They have the wou MoU fifty cent army of Chinese bots that was influencing US social media networks in the run up to COVID nineteen and after the COVID nineteen pandemic hit our shores, right, we know that China was using

these operations. So it strikes me as ridiculous that the Intel community wouldn't have found any information about Chinese influence operations because we already know that they're here speaking of Jack Posomic, host of One America News, former naval intelligence officer, at Jack, what do you think the Chinese Communist Party is going to try to do in a Biden administration? Meaning what are their goals for the next four years.

We could talk about their goals the next fifty years if we really want to be terrified, but let's talk

about the next four years. Well, so they're going back to the same mode that America was in in terms of our relationship piece to be China under In the waiting days of the Obama administration, there was this phrase they used and it always shocked me, and I think it shocked a lot of people out in the world when they heard it, but not so much in here in Washington, d C. They talked about the managed decline

of America. America is a declining power. America is on the road to give America a soft landing these are the types of phrases you would hear. And so the question that I always asked was when President Obama, or at times he would hear Joe Biden talk about this when he himself went to China, remember he was Obama's personal envoy to China, going around with Ji Jinping, going to Situan University, bringing a son on air force to These things all happened regardless of whether Twitter will let

you talk him about them or not. And so they want America to be in that declining status, moving towards where at place, quite frankly, where the UK was after World War Two, when America was then on the rise. They want China to be in the driver's seat as the rise to a global maybe not a hegemony, but a global superpower in terms of where the United States used to be. Right, I always try to explain this people. It's not necessarily that China hates the United States. They

don't have disdain for us. They actually, in many cases have a lot of respect for America's past achievements. That being said, they want to be where we are. A Chinese guy tell me once, I want to be in a position where I see Chinese families adopting American babies and not the other way around, and that, you know, and he didn't mean it in a negative way, didn't mean it as an insult. He just meant that's where he wanted. They want to be that, they want to

be the global hegemon. There's no question about that. They're working toward that all the time. Jack. I also want to ask you about that the Hunter Biden situations, specifically because you and I were corresponding early on about this to make sure that you know, we were all lined up with what was really happening, and you know, you verified important things for me to make sure that we knew that that story was quite real when it was

when it was breaking right before the election. Do you think it's fair to say that Hunter Biden is compromised by the Chinese Communist Party? I don't you know. When you're in the IC, you're taught to look for flags, compromise flags. You're taught to look for these these indicators, right, and you're supposed to stack them. We're all given this training about, uh, this person has four indicators, this person

has five indicators. I've actually worked on which obviously can't get into but I've actually worked on some of those situations. I have some experience with some of those situations from from an operational perspective on how the CCP works. Um. You know, so when I saw that Eric Swalwell situation, it said, well, yeah, this is textbook. It didn't even shock me at all in the least times. I would be surprised if they weren't doing that, right, I would be.

I was the only surprised that leaked publicly the way it did. Hunter Biden is quite possibly the most compromised person that we've ever had being this close to the White House. And I'm not saying that based on you know, my opinion, right, I'm saying that based on the emails, the reports. The money is ties to these private equity firms that he still has stakes in. Right. They say, well he's off the board, and so okay, he took his title off, That doesn't mean he doesn't still have

a stake in the firm, right. That's what matters. The money. And just from a perspective, you know, we know that China uses what they call yellow operations, So yellow involves anything that's intimate. Hunter Biden's a guy where and I remember, I've had access to this hard drive. He filmed all sorts of things and just strange videos, even when it was just himself, very strange videos that this guy was filming.

And to think that the Chinese don't have other videos of him as well as these videos that we've seen, is, you know, be ridiculous to think that they don't have that kind of stuff. So, yeah, you do have a situation here where very clearly this is someone who's compromised financially and compromised personally. And so with Joe Biden, it's really strange that he's taken this absolutist perspective. Right he

told us at the debate. Memory go back to what he said to the American people, my son has not taken a cent from China. These there were no transactions. It was a smear. And now it's well, these transactions were looked to and nobody said there was anything any problem with it. And then the latest is that Hunter Biden's come out and said my father had no information

about the right. It's just it's just a cascade of changing lies like the Hilary email situation, by the way, right, right, it's crazy, exactly right, And so you need to be upfront with the American people. It's as simple as that. Be upfront with the American people. And if there's something to happen that was wrong, be a man, be an adult. And I say this to Joe Biden, this is your son, all right, this is your son. It's time to step up and be the role model that Quite frankly, it

looks like he never had. Jack Besobic one American news network. Jack, great to have you, my friend. Take care, Thanks so much. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. It's gonna be tight in Georgia, everybody. You need to keep hearing it. I know we've got stations down in Georgia. So there are people who are registered in the state of Georgia who are listening to this show right now. And this is going to be a very close election for both of those Senate runoff

seats right now. The Democrats are playing a pretty clear game, or maybe in a sense, we know what their game is, but they're making it muddled, right. They're trying to avoid us understanding what's really happening here. And here's the situation. The Democrats are hoping that We're going to become a little bit complacent, overconfident that people who are understandably furious about the presidential election in Georgia aren't going to turn out.

That would be disastrous. Not only is there the Senate balance, which is the biggest single issue in play here, but these candidates have been Warnock and ass Off these would be really problematic left wing legislators. These are not moderates. You know. This isn't like a Susan Collins kind of a situation on the Democrat side. These are leftists who are running. So it's not even just a function of the balance of power, which of course is the primary issue.

But you got guys like John Assof. I mean, this guy is a he's a trust fund baby, the classic limousine lib who wants to push the more radical left policies of the Democrats onto the nation if he gets into the United States Senate play clip twelve. I think that the GOP attacks at this point are in garden variety fearmongering, race baiting. Look, they've been lengthening my nose in their ads to remind everybody, but I'm a Jew. They've been running racist tax against Reverend Warnock, and what's

emerging in Georgia is the New South. You've got the young Jewish son of an immigrant, mentored by John Lewis, running alongside a black preacher who holds Doctor King's pulpit at Evanezer Church. And we're traveling the state right now. You see this bus behind me talking about health, jobs and justice. So the GOP can run their playbook, which is fear and division. We're talking about what we're gonna do for working people at a moment of crisis here

in Georgia. Yeah, calling them racist and anti submitted. This is what you're going to get from us Off and of course you're gonna hear similar stuff from from Warnock too. Never mind the fact that Warnock is being entirely protected by the media establishment. I mean, they will do anything to make sure that we don't know that that not enough Georgians know that this is a guy who said

you can't serve the militarian serve God. At the same time that this is an individual who is not in the political mainstream us Off and Warnock, but they are that the Democrats right now are full of a kind of a kind of hubrist They feel like they've got the momentum, and they understand that we face a very very different country for the next four years. If the Democrats have a majority in the Senate, that that is going to be problematic, that is going to be a

serious challenge for us going forward. So for all of Team Buck George out there, and I know we've got a lot of listeners. We've got people all around the Savannah area, I know who listened to the show, and we've got people in the suburbs of Atlanta, and we've got various stations out there in Georgia. You please your vote. I mean this election, this could be a Senate election that comes down to hundreds of votes. It's one percent in the polls that I'm seeing right now, and it's

probably going to be even tighter than that. Norm Coleman got his seats stolen from him by Al Frankin by a margin of literally hundreds of votes. We have thousands of people that listen to this show in Georgia alone, and perhaps tens of thousands, and I would really like it if all of you listening in the state of Georgia right now would please go vote and tell your conservative Republican friends, family, you know, Bob the mail guy, Susie the coffee shop owner, you know whoever. Say you

gotta get out there and vote. You've got to spread the word. If we go into the middle of January, if we go into a Biden inauguration with the Democrats picking off these two Senate seats, we are in for a rough ride, friends, and it's not too late. We can stop it. So let's do that. Thanks for listening to the buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.

It's Harsani time, everybody. Our friend David Harsani from National Review in the mix now with all the biggest, most important stories of a week, at least the ones that he most wants to talk to us about. David, great to have you back. Always a pleasure of thank you. So I had to laugh. This week we had Steve Schmidt, who I am. I am not shy about criticizing for his absurd commentary on the show on a regular basis.

I do think maybe offers up I don't know if he is the dumbest political commentator, but offers up some of the dumbest political commentary you could find anywhere, and has been doing this for the amusement of Democrats for years. A former Republican GOP strategist or whatever. Now it comes out that he and other people from the Lincoln Project are Democrats. I mean, they're formerly joining the Democrat Party.

I remember what I was saying, that these people are called Democrats two years ago or three years ago, you know, whatever, me even before they had the Lincoln Project and they were saying, oh, no, they're the real Conservatives. Turns out not so much. David now and Steve Schmidt is especially no shit. But you know, the things he says are

especially dishonest and miss you know, misleading and nasty. But he's not very bright guy, and he's always I mean, once you start going after senators like Collins in Maine or other moderate Republicans, you're no longer anti Trump. You're just a Democrat, which was always my problem with the

Lincoln Project. You want to you want to go out there and campaign for Democrats, that's fine, But if you want to be on CNN and other stations pretending you're a Republican who is just so hurt by the mean things that Donald Trump says, you're misleading the public, right, and it's a scam and a con and that's of course what those guys are running over there. So I don't really understand why he couldn't. It's weird that he had to tell everyone he's going to be a Democrat

when he could have just continued that con. I guess that because they had such a little effect on the election, they're going to try something new. I don't know, but but yeah, I mean it's such a joke. It seems to me like there's gonna be a whole lot of former conservative or whatever they call themselves, you know, GOP strategists at CNN and MSNBC who only had they've only got two options become Democrats or no longer be on

TV and pushing this nonsense. Because I mean, if you're looking for overrepresentation of a set of political beliefs, the people who claim to be so much the real Republicans during the Trump presidency, who are on TV all the time, you had Nicole Wallace from the Bush administration, Steve Schmidt. I mean, I can't even think of all the off the top of my head right now. But yet all these former so called former Republicans who I mean, oh, what's his name of Rick Wilson? These people were so GOP.

So what happens now? I mean, I get the con can't continue kenn It No, It's like there's always going to be an industry of former Republicans who just can't take it. This is not something new. It's gone back. You know, it was happening during the Bush years as well, people who just simply could not you know, where has the Republican Party gone. It's terrible. Four years from now people are going to be saying, you know, at least Trump did X and Y. You know, this is even worse.

It's always the way. These guys were especially terrible because they didn't only attack Trump and I'm fine with going after politicians. They mocked conservatives, They mocked conservative beliefs, and but they do it under under the title of a former Republican, you know, the real conservatives. And that's what just annoys me so much because it's no longer an

ideological argument. It's just about personalities. And these people are just on TV so that they can make liberals feel good about themselves as they sort of mean conservatives, and it's it's Also the problem with that is that you have networks that are putting these folks up for that very reason. They don't want to have real debates. They want to have How many conservatives are really on CNN? Let's say, I mean, I don't really want none. Now

the answer is none. It doesn't exist anymore. But go ahead. I know that I don't want to insult you know. I know that we both no se cup right, I think we both worked with her at the same time. But she's you know, she's out there ripping the Second Amendment, you know, saying you know, she's just basically just a liberal who still calls herself, I guess a conservative, and that's just misleading. I just think we deserve, or reviewers deserve a better debate, or maybe we don't deserve it.

I don't know, but that, you know, it's still design. I feel like there's no debate allowed at these places anymore. In fact, I think there are very few places in the media in general where there's any effort to allow a real airing of ideas, and I think it's because a lot of it is driven by audiences. I mean, I will say that it's true, it's very true on the left. It's even a little bit true on the right.

You know, you'll have if there's an exchange of ideas that doesn't result in someone saying, you know, in someone effectively clearly trouncing and sort of belittling the other person. You know a lot of people who are just disinterested in that now. I mean, they don't even really want to hear the exchange. Not everybody, but that that's very common. And I think that's what the media ecosystems that exist

right now have done. And it's a shame, and it's it's it's much more pervasive on the left and it is on the right, but I do see it in both places, and and I feel like we understand the real crux of a lot of these arguments, as as the American people less than we otherwise would because everyone's just kind of protecting their brand now. No one, no one actually wants to get into it. I think that's right. And you see people threatening to cancel their New York

Times headlines when you know someone writes i'm sorry. There are subscriptions when someone writes a headline they don't like or covers a story they don't like, and obviously. You know, I get a lot of mail about you know, National Review as this writer or that writer, like it's hard for people to understand that you can have more than one opinion, or when people attack a publication, they say, you know, the National Review says this, or the National

Review says that when it's a columnist. It happened at the Federalists as well. You know, hard for people to understand that that you're going to have a lot of different opinions and debate, which I think is healthy. So yeah, I think you're right. It's a lot of I just think a lot of audiences just no longer want to hear it anymore. And I hate to say, and I this will sound biased, but conservatives probably are that way because they're so sick of these big institutions being so

biased that they don't want to. In their view, they're like, we don't need this debate here when we constantly hear it elsewhere. So I get that part of it, but I agree, and I also think conservatives are so sick of the fake version of these debates that I mean, it's it's it's kind of like the West Wing effect, you know from the TV show by Aaron's working the

West wing. It's like, oh, like the Democrats if I have all these snappy comebacks and are just so wonderful and like good looking and smart, and the Republicans always like I just I just love Jesus and I hate women, And you know, it's like that's that's what's what you get on the West wing, as though those are all Republicans, right, They're just they're a bunch of Bible thumping, anti women, kind of maybe racist, and all the arguments kind of boiled down to that. You're like, oh, okay, I guess

that's the way it really is. Sometimes they see the light right it comes over to the right side and they see it. Yeah, and then they have some really some really sort of sacharin violin music in the background as the conservative you know, they play the clarinets in the background as a conservative goes, wow, you're right. I never really thought of it that way. You know, find they find their heart and their humanity and vote with It's a funny thing. It's just a little off topics.

When people tell you to stop being partisan, they just mean stopping republican. It's never, you know, the other way that they mean it stop being a partisan and just embrace gun right gun restrictions or stopping a partisan and do this and that. Yeah, I mean it's again it's we hit this quite often, but it's just it's sort of an institutional problem now and I'm not sure what can be done about it. Went with these fake Republics like, no,

you know, I used to work with Tom Nichols. It's a fine guy, I guess, you know, and all that, but he's never really been a conservative. You know, there's no what views of his are actually a conservative? I don't know. And yet he's on there pretending to be this uh you know, firstwhile Republican who who has you seen the light and is fighting against evil with it in his own party. But he's never been a conservative.

So it's just dishonest. We're speaking of David Harsani of National Review, and David speaking of the lack of honesty in public conversations. I gotta say this, so so, Pete Buddha Judge is now supposed to be the incoming Biden administration Transportation secretary, and some of the articles, some of this stuff on this have honestly been hilarious already. Pete

here's from NPR. Pete Buddha, Judge, president elect Biden's pick for Transportation secretary, said quote he has a personal love of transportation, recounting train trips on Amtrak while in college, and said he proposed to his new husband chasing in an airport terminal. Oh well, no, I mean this, this is a step away from I'm not a doctor, but I stayed at a Marriott Expressed last night or whatever a holiday and express whatever it is. And look, this

is the media is actually doing this. Pete Buddha Judge like trains in college, so he should be the transportation secretary. It's amazing when you compare it to like what happened with Betsy Davas or you know, any any anyone actually in the Trump administration. Pete, Pete actually mayor Pete. It's like a thermonuclear cliche generator. You know. He says stuff like and I'm making this up, but it's probably pretty close, you know, like, uh, we don't build roads, the roads

build us. You know that kind of thing. And he's perfect for for the job where where a little is done and it doesn't really matter. So I mean, I met ray La Hood when he was Obama's transprotect Transportation secretary, and he was one of the most ridiculous people I've ever met in person, and I would let him run anything either. So I think this is a pretty good

spot for me. Yeah. I guess you're going to see a lot more of this though, And I remember when say what you will about is foreign policy in action. But the CEO of Exxon Mobile, which until recently was the largest and wealthiest corporation in the world, I mean, the most valuable I should say corporation in the world, Rex Tillerson had that job, and when they were going to make him Secretary of State, they acted like Trump had picked some some like inebriated fool off the beach

somewhere that he thought was funny. To me, it's just there's no that the media has so little in terms of standards and principles they apply now, you know, political journalism. If we want to be more specific about it, David, then you just feel like they don't care anymore. They don't know. I mean, how is this possible, the double

standards to be this blatant? Well, I mean, well, I don't know about that part, but I do know that it's fun when you think about how they would talk about Trump as this person was completely unprepared for the job. But yet Obama, who literally I cannot tell you what he did other than run for president essentially for about eight years before he became president. I don't even know what he did before then. I know he's a community organizer.

I don't even know what that means. He never ran anything, but he's treated as someone who is like incredibly proficient and everything and knowledgeable and ready to run a giant or biggest organization in the world essentially, where where Donald Trump actually has ran pretty big businesses et cetera. But so there's always gonna be this double standard, and may or Peace just far part of it. And I gotta ask you because I didn't get a chance to talk

to you about this sooner. But you know, bet, I mean, I'm not Betti Us, the wife of Jill Biden. Sorry I was blanking on an a for second, Jill Biden, where do you come down on the doctor the doctor Biden controversy. I've noted on numerous occas that the only people I call doctor people can prescribe me morphine and doctor Ja those are the two I've been persuaded to maybe do I'm not doctor, doctor Ja. I've been persuaded

to maybe called doctor Dre a doctor. But Kyle Smithew writes at the National Review, wrote a scathing column and read her dissertation, which is just complete garbage. I would say that I don't call people doctors who aren't medical doctors. I find it pretentious. I think it creates against the egalitarianism of American life for someone to demand that you

call them by their credentials. And I think it's kind of laughable considering what she's a doctor, in no offense to others who have been lucky enough to be able to go to school long enough to get that degree. David Harsani of National Review check out his latest at National Review dot com. David, always a pleasure. Thank you, you're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. I've also had a personal love of transportation

ever since childhood. More than once, as a college student, I would convince a friend to travel nearly a thousand miles back to Indiana with me on Amtrak. Though I know that in this administration I will at best aspire to be the second biggest train enthusiast around. I spent a spring break in graduate school aboard a cargo ship studying there. Travel, in my mind, is synonymous with growth, with adventure, even love, so much so that I proposed

to my husband Chaston in an airport terminal. What does that avenue of being transportation secretary? Exactly? That doesn't matter. I mean it matters. But the media is, Oh, it's amazing, it's great, you know, modern modern romance in an airport, airport, whatever lounge or wherever he proposed, proposed to his husband. You know they oh, they all love the story. They

love the whole thing. It's going to be quite an amazing feat to watch the transformation of the national media from being viciously psychotically opposed to the current administration to transforming and becoming an administration pom pomp squad. Right, they're gonna love. The national media is gonna love everything. They're gonna you know, two four to six s eight, Who do we appreciate Biden. It's gonna be it's gonna be tough to sit through. It's gonna be tough to deal with.

But that's what the good news is. You can come here at least I'll tell you the truth about old man Joe, and what a joke, what an unbelievable farce. This whole thing is, this guy is gonna be president. But I guess the good news is that you two can be like a D minus student with with rock bottom credentials in every aspect of your of your formative years. Uh, and you two can be president of the United States. I don't know, you know anyone anyone can be president?

All right, we get that from Joe Biden, and the media is going to find ways to try to convince you that this is just great and it's fantastic, and they're going to be straight up activists. They're going to be effectively. It will be as though they are receiving paychecks from the White House directly. Kaylee McKinney, the outgoing White House Press Secretary, knows this. Play nine. I asked reporter after reporter after reporter along the campaign trail, why

aren't you covering this? I said, you have a laptop. You now have a firsthand witness, and Tony Bobo Lenski literally the business partner of Hunter Biden, and you have a campaign and Joe Biden, who will not deny the facts of this case. Remarkably, if they're not true, all Joe Biden has to do is come out and say this is not true, this is falsesss defamatory. As President Trump did with Russia Gate, which was a hoax, none of that happened. They did not deny it, and the

press didn't cover it. It was the biggest act of journalistic malpractice in four years since the Russia hoax that they propelled in twenty sixteen. Journalism has to get to a higher standing place in this country. The American people deserve better. They don't deserve censorship, and the reporters of today need to take a look in the mirror because they don't deserve to call themselves or reporters at this point. They are, in fact, activists. Sounds like something I'd say

here on this show. In fact, I have said they're they're not journalists, they're activists, I think about a million times. And it's true. But it's also not going to change. Doesn't mean we shouldn't point it out, doesn't mean we shouldn't try to hold them to account. But remember it's not viewed as a shortcoming among journalists to be an activist. You'll be promoted, you'll become more famous, you become richer. These are all good things for people rights. That's the

way they view it. So the incentives are all aligned for the continuation, the perpetuation of this insanity. Just understand that thanks for listening to The bus Essence Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. We're still battling COVID, and there are still people out there who want to try to blame President Trump for all of it. They view

this somehow is all Trump's fault. Somehow, the COVID pandemic has shown us the full extent of Trump't derangement syndrome. Not only is Trump to blame for it, he should even be criminally prosecuted for it. It doesn't seem to make any sense to a normal person, does it. But over at NBC News, you can get on TV if you're willing to say that the president is effectively a mass murderer responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths. And I'm not exaggerating. This has aired on national TV news

programs Play three. I mean, the two worst presidents of the last hundred years are the last two Republican presidents, the current one, Donald Trump and George W. Bush, which speaks volumes about the modern Republican Party. And also when you compare Trump and Bush, Push killed hundreds of thousands of people abroad, you know, brown and black people in

far away countries that we don't care about. Donald Trump kill hundreds of thousand people, are presided over the deaths of hundreds of thousand people preventable death here at home in the United States of America. And that for me, you know, you talk about morally abominable, it's sociopathic. You mentioned earlier in the show. The four words that will be the epitaph is we want more infections, We want

more infected. What about who cares? In those emails that jumped out at me, this guy Paul Alexander writes, if we have more cases, more people infected, more more positive tests, who cares? And you take who cares? You add it to Donald Trump's it is what it is. You add it to Jared Kushner's that's their problem when people in New York are dying. This is sociopathic. This is not just morally abomniable and I think people should be held

to account. I think they should be prosecuted. The people behind these preventable deaths should be prosecuted when they leave office on January twenty prosecuted for what what? What's the crime exactly? And an eersolized respiratory virus that can kill people kills less than one percent of the people who get it, but it can kill people, And you're going to prosecute people for what exactly? And how do we factor into this this moronic rant? I mean, you need

to hear that this was on NBC. Okay, this is NBC News. Maybe it was MSNBC, but NBC owns MSNBC. It's all the same thing as a national cable news channel. And you say, well, why would anyone say anything that insane? I mean, you just think this through. Is Donald Trump responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths that have occurred in Europe? Is Donald Trump responsible for all the deaths

from COVID nineteen in China? In South America and countries like Argentina and Brazil which have had a very tough time with COVID nineteen in Mexico. I just want to know what really is the moral guideline that's in place here. Can can we establish that, can we understand where all this really is? Doesn't seem doesn't seem like it doesn't seem like they're willing to let us know. They just want to use this as a as a weapon to attack Donald Trump, and that is what they continue to do.

And there are some on the on the on the right who have really sort of given into this, and I think they've realized that that it's just so much easier, it's so much, so much more palatable to go along with this consensus that, oh, we know what the right thing is to do. It's just those big, bad, mean Republicans won't do it. Really, so, we know the right thing to do, but we won't we we won't do it because of Trump. That's what they really think, that's

what they really believe. I mean, even Chris Christie, it seems convinced that he took his mask off for a second and that's when he got sick. He has absolutely no idea how or when he got sick, none whatsoever. I can assure you of that, he has no idea. This is a sub microscopic virus that is transmitted freely

in the air. I just read a study yesterday that says that people in a narrow hallway might be able to be infected by aerosolized particles up the sixteen feet behind the person that was on the Daily Mail, based on a study that was just released, a pure reviewed

scientific study. Sixteen feet, all that six feet. You know that Tom Cruise went on that crazy ram we won't play it for you here screaming, and everybody on his movie said, because two people were close to each other at a computer treating, you know, dehumanizing people, screaming at them, he'll be fired. No paycheck for you. You're out of here, a little psycho. That guy's a nut job. But Chris Christie is also in this whole. Oh you know, it's

it's my faults. He doesn't know, He doesn't know if when he took off his mask is when he got infected. There's no way for him to know. But he wants to be part of this newer, less crazy Republican moment here. That's what some of these you know, the Rubio Christie Romney GOP, they're trying to bring this thing back. And I don't think it's going to happen. But I can see what they're doing. Play clip eight. This message isn't for everyone, It's for all those people who refuse to

wear a mask, you know, Lion isolation and ICU. For seven days, I thought about how wrong I was to remove my mask at the White House. Today, I think about how wrong it is to let mask wearing divide us, especially as we now know you're twice as likely to get COVID nineteen if you don't wear a mask, because if you don't do the right thing, we could all end up on the wrong side of history. Please wear a mask. We're wearing masks. Checkass. We're wearing masks. We've

been wearing them for months. You have to wear them in most places in this country where there is dense population, you have no choice wearing them all the time. California is wearing them, New York's wearing them. Cases are skyrocketing. So what exactly is the message here? Wear masks more? We're already doing it. Double up on the mask, where's your N ninety five masks? Put on a face shield two and maybe a kerchief around the N ninety five

and maybe a medical you know, cotton mask. On top of all that, I mean, at what point do they realize something is up here and it's not our lack of compliance. That is not what is driving these up. That is a completely unreasonable just it's a nonsensical view of this. But they don't want to admit that maybe what they've been telling us is us not true. If masking works to reduce the spread of COVID nineteen by five percent or ten percent, it's it's it's just extending

and you remember reducing the spread. It's just a duration issue. So what are really the chances that they're saving anyone from getting infected? Would get infected anyway you're reducing get five or ten percent a month, let's say, Is that is that worth all this irritation, all the stuff that we're going through right now, the lack of freedom. It's all about compliance. Do what you're told. Chris Christie's like

I took my mask off at the White House. He doesn't know he could have gotten infected a thousand different ways that day. He is no idea. But now he gets Now he gets to pat on the head from the New York Times. Now he gets to be treated like he's one of the good people, you know, And now they want you to know, don't worry. We won't punish you for your lack of mask wearing. We won't actually throw you in prison because we can't actually scientifically prove this is a good idea, but we insist that

it is. This is common with telling you that place seventeen, he has said a hundred day mask mandate. Other than that, what specifically will this administration do to turn this pandemic round? Yeah, and the hundred days of the mask he's urging like there's no punishment, they don't have to, but he is saying, as a leader, please everybody work with me here for

the first hundred days. Let's everybody just wear a mask and see the outcomes there, because of course the scientists and the public health officials tell us they'll be really great outcomes if everyone does wear a mask when they're in public. It is about getting through the pandemic around making sure that everyone has access to the vaccine and that they take it. And how do you go about doing that when you know there's so much mistrust, especially

in the community of color. And that means about listening to the people. It means about remembering history and why people feel the way they do, and then also reminding folks, this vaccine is just about one thing, and one thing only saving lives, and the vaccine is about saving lives. You'll notice that our rejection of science that those of us who have problems with the mask mandates a lot of us at least who feel that way, don't have a problem with the vaccine. I think the vaccine is

based on solid data. I think the vaccine should be should be something that people choose to take. And I think that there are going to be people. We are already seen a little bit of this. There's going to be adverse reactions. There is a risk. There's always a risk to a vaccine. There's no question about that. No matter what the vaccine is, there's always some risk to it.

I think that on the whole, most of them are are very you know, not necessarily a flu vaccine for a lot of people, but you know, the MMR vaccines, and I think that this has been an enormous benefit to public health and has made us all live longer, happier lives. So I'm very pro vaccine in general, and I'm very pro this vaccine, and I think it will save a lot of lives. We'll help a lot of people. But notice that, so it's not just that there's some luddite,

anti progress, anti science mentality that's pushing this. It's someone explained to me why we have these rules in place, and when the cases are low, it's, oh, look, we know how to handle this. The rules are so helpful. And then when the cases are high, with the same rules in place, they go, well, you're just not obeying enough. No, that's not I'm here in New York City and they have had everyone you see outside, even not even just to indoors, of course, but everyone you see outside now

has a mask on. You knowin five percent, if this was really effective at stopping transmission in public places and you have ninety percent compliance, wouldn't wouldn't our case load just fall off of a cliff because of this. Wouldn't it be just a tiny, tiny number of people getting sick. No, but that's not what is happening, and they won't even think about why that is. Maybe it's because yeah, sure, you're let's say you're in a virus cloud in a

room with someone and you're wearing that mask. You're being really good, but you know, you touch something and then you, and then you touch your nose or you touch something, or then you touch your mouth. Guess what you're still getting. And people say, oh, well, then just don't do those things. Do you know how many times you touch your face every every fifteen minutes or so. It's an astonishingly high

number and everyone does it. But Kamala also when she's asked about people like Avinusom who are big proponents of all these rules, and then they don't themselves follow the rules. If it were really about saving lives, wouldn't they be more about compliance. I'll tell you this. For example, I'm very strict with myself and with others about firearms safety, having seen and been on the range a few times when people have had a fire or safety lapse and

how life threatening that can be. You know someone who oh it jammed. Oh, they turn around and they point the gun at somebody thinking, oh, no, it's jam You know I mean that that's do you see that happen once or twice and you realize firearm safety? So I practice what I preach, right, I say that everybody that I'm with and myself, we have to be held to a zero mistake standard when it comes to all guns are always loaded, keep your finger off the trigger until

you've made an affirmative decision to shoot. Know what your target is, what is around it, and know what is behind it. Right, I mean, these are things that you you train yourself to think about because you're in a zero mistakes and you live by them, and you expect others to live by them. Right yet, and that's because lives are at stake. A mistake on the firearms range

can cause so on their life. If lives are at stake with COVID nineteen, and the people pushing these policies really believe that, why do they keep violating the very policies that they claim are saving lives? Why is that anyone? They don't have any ideas on that one. Maybe it's because they don't really believe the things that they're saying. Here's Kamala Harris when I asked about Gavin Newsom, who clearly violates the guidelines he enforces at catastrophic costs on

everybody else. Play eighteen leaders on both sides when it comes to the pandemic, they will put down strict guidelines and even your colleague in California, the strict guideline but yet they don't follow through. What kind of message does that sin to the American public? I think we all have to understand that right now, this is a moment for everyone to sacrifice, and if we're going to get through this together as a country, then we all have to do it. Yeah, it's not an answer. You know why.

It's not an answer. You know why you won't answer because there is no good answer other than they don't really believe the things that they're saying. They expect you to comply. They have no interest in complying themselves. Why is that. You can certainly come up with it yourself. Certainly understandable why they feel that way. We all know. The hypocrisy is very clear. It's very obvious. And yet they tell you shut up anyway, do what you're told, wear that mask. It's not going to stop until we

make it stop. You're in the freedom This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Well, you know, I do think

that we need new leadership in the Democratic Party. I think one of the things that I have struggled with, I think that a lot of people struggle with, is the internal dynamics of the House has made it such that there's very little option for succession if you will, you know, and I think that one could just I think it's easy for someone to say, oh, well, you know, why don't you run, But the house is extraordinarily complex, and I'm not ready. It can't be me. I know

that I couldn't do that job. And so even conservative members of the party who think Nancy Pelosi is far too liberal for them don't necessarily have any viable alternatives, which is why whenever there's a challenge, it kind of collapses. And that is I think the result of just many years of power being concentrated in leadership with a lack of you know, real grooming of the next generation of leadership. Wow, what I had to blame. What she said is kind

of true. So this is listen to anc go oh okay, yeah, Actually Nancy Pelosi has made sure that there are no successor. Nancy Pelosi reminds me a lot of actually of people in media, in the news media in particular, who want to pretend that they're they want to pretend they're the only one who can do a job that a lot of other people can do, but they want to make sure there's nobody else right behind them that could take

over the platform. So there's certain people that they'll allow to do things, but there are others that they want to sort of keep away because that everyone realize, Oh, this person's younger, better, and a whole lot cheaper at this job. And Nancy Pelosi, it is time for her to go. She's not going, it's not going gonna be Speaker of the House again. It's pretty remarkable when you think about it, and they're really I mean, who among

the Democrats could take over that job? And forget about whether you liked I'm just saying who would even be able to at least AOC is self aware enough to know she has nowhere near the institute knowledge to be effective in that role. And it's it's clear that there is no effort to bring up other people within the Democratic You know, Pelosi, she rules that thing with an iron fist and an airmez scarf, and that's how she

does it. Are they going to get this deal done where they get COVID or leaf to people though, I'm you know, I'm just gonna say it. If Republicans can't get this thing done, I worry about their fortunes in Georgia. And there need to be direct payments. People need cash on the barrel right now. People need money, who have lost their jobs because the pandemic. They need help. The GOP has has got to step up here and make sure that's a part of this. I'm increasingly seeing this.

If we lose Georgia, it looks like it's going to be because we deserve to lose Georgia because we're not doing the things we need to do to win the Senate seats. And you know, there's been a lot of distraction right now and not enough of the focus that's necessary to get it done there. And I'm just I'm pleading with all of Team Buck Georgia to get out there and do everything they can for those two Senate seats.

Thanks for listening to the Bus Seston Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Like Soft Butter on Warm Toast. Time to spread some freedom coast to coast. It's time for roll. Call Facebook dot com, Slash buck Sexton or Team Buck at Iheartsmedia dot com if you want to send us an email, and also please do check out buck Sexton dot com. We've got stories going up there,

and it is good times, good times all around Brewster. Mark, you realize it is almost Friday. I'm very excited for Friday. Do you realize that on Friday you actually go on vacation for quite a while. Yes, I will not see you for fifteen days. Well, I guess I haven't seen you since March technically, but you know what I mean. I will not speak to you for fifteen days. It's gonna be very sad for you. Is missus Mark going to be able to She gonna be able to take

care of you? I think we'll be okay. She is also on vacation, so this would be the most time we spent together in a long time. Oh, that's very nice. Do you guys have anything funny? Have anything fun going on? No, We're gonna watch a lot of movies, cook some stuff. Now, just enjoy as much as we can being together while doing absolutely nothing and not actually going anywhere. What is the top of the producer Mark movie list? Well? I actually said to my wife yesterday that maybe maybe on Christmas,

maybe around the time. There's two holiday movies I would like to watch this year, Elf and Home Alone. I just have the itch to watch these two classics. No Princess and I watched Home Alone last weekend, in which I've seen a million times, but it's still great. You've seen them both a million times, but they're still amazing in classics. So yeah, so you've seen Elf many times. Of course, there there may be a there may be a best. Um. I think that you could argue that

those are two of the top five. Oh yeah, you know, I think that that's I think Elf might be one of the top Christmas movies of all time, Like it's in the running for number one, is what I'm saying. Granted, I'm not a big Christmas movie aficionado, just I don't celebrate the holiday, but I know a lot of other people who do, who really love Elf. And I mean, I know you guys didn't do you guys didn't do

that thing. Um, you didn't do that thing where you like did the tree anyway just for like fun sake. Oh no, No, My wife's parents would never love that. And I think my grandmother would roll over in her grave if I ever put a tree up in my house. Yeah, Okay, there we go. So no trees. You got to hank Hanneka. Sorry, hanaka, candles off. Did you see the video of Smokey Robinson. No, what happened? You've got to watch it. Go just search Smokey Robinson on Twitter. Maybe we can get the clip

for you tomorrow. But he was doing a cameo. Do you know what those are? Yeah, So he's doing a cameo and he is wishing somebody a happy hanaka. That's what the person wrote. So he goes and I would like to wish you a happy chinooka. I don't know what that is, but happy chinooka. It is one of the funniest videos I ever seeing. You have to watch. I just want to be very clear. I think Team buck All wishes you a happy chinooka, as do. I thank you, and I have no idea what that is,

but thank you. Um, and I remember, you know I got one of my so I I went to bar Mitts was growing up because I grew up here in New York City. Um, and my first girlfriend was Jewish or she was half Jewish, but I think who's raised Jewish? And I saw went too bar Mitzvuzz and Bob Mitzvu's. But I also remember there was a real breakout moment where Adam Sandler had the Honakah song, and it like really created a fest There was a festive song about

honecka all of a sudden. Yeah, I mean there are there are other songs, but that's the most popular Honecks song by far. Yeah, that that's what I mean that. I think that is TiO what people think. If you ask somebody who's not particularly religious, who's Jewish, if you ask them what is the ultimate Honikah song, I feel like they may say, well, of course it's the Adam Sandler Hanaka source. Nobody says Dradel, Dradl, Dradel anymore, it's all about Adam Sandler. Yeah, Adam Sandler man, that guy.

That guy had quite a run, doesn't really do I mean, oh no, he did that uncut Gems movie, which basically gave me like harp palpitations. But yeah, I mean that was a great movie, even though you didn't like it. Yeah, but his stuff in the nineties early two thousands amazing. I think my brothers and I probably watched Happy gol Moore together at least a dozen times, So that's fair.

The price is wrong. Um so yeah, anyway, we got all we got all the good, good things all around, and folks, just so you kind of have some sense of where we're heading here, I'm gonna be with you Monday Tuesday next week. The Godfather Michael Palic will be taking over Wednesday, which is that Christmas Eve Day. That

is twenty third of December. Okay, so that's the twenty third, So then so the twenty third and uh and then and then he will be with you the Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday of the week after Christmas, and then right we are off. Yeah, so we're so we're on the holidays. We'll have best of shows. If you want to listen to something, we'll have best of shows posted so it'll be really good content that you might not have might not have remembered or heard or anything like that, so

you can definitely check those out. And we're planning other a lot of other fun things. So I'll be with you guys Monday and Tuesday of next week, and then the Godfather takes over next Wednesday. Producer Mark will be gone the following week. I turned thirty nine, it's my birthday week. I will be off that week. Godfather will be in Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and then we'll have a

best of show Thursday Friday for New Year's Eve. So and the Godfather is great and he's going to do a very solid job as he always does, taking over the Freedom hud. So that's that's and then January third we come back and it's all systems go. You can come back January third. I'll be in on the fourth. Oh, the fourth, right, the third would be Sunday, which would be that would be a bit of a surprise. I

don't think the Affiliates would air the show. Um well, there would be no way for them too, because we're not on on Sundays, so that would be kind of a strange deal, it says when everyone to know that that's the Plants. I'll be with you pretty here for at least a couple of days next week here. But this is really the only time of the year that I that I take any vacation, you know, that's the only time of the year when I actually take vacation. So I'm and then producer Mark and a Grab be

hanging out all the time. So that's how it's gonna go. Yeah, basically January fourth on, we'll be here. There you go, because we don't really we don't. We don't like we don't like other vacations. Oh, I like vacation, but the pandemic is made us not be able to take much. Yeah, that's true too, can't really do very much. All righty, let's get into the roll call. Jason kicks us off here. Buck. I'm a nurse on a COVID only unit, where I've

been since the start. Like another listener commented, we haven't been testing for flu. In normal times, anyone who comes in contact with a provider and has respiratory symptoms is tested for flu, but that was largely replaced by COVID tests. I assume this was mostly due to the very limited supply of test kits. The same test kit is used

for both covid and flu. I have had one patient that was both covid and flu positive, but for several months, patients were only tested for flu if it was important to the differential diagnosis and treatment plan. Numbers for flu might start to tick up going forward, starting a few weeks ago, COVID testing is now often part of a panel using one test skit that includes covid, flu and other common respiratory viruses. Jason, thank you so much for the expert analysis here on this. And first, so it

is possible to have covid and flu simultaneously. So that's because I had asked about that, or at least to be positive for both covid and flu. And I'm looking at the data, and the data is saying right now they're basically, i mean, almost no flu deaths so far in the United States in this country, which is just not possible. So something is going on. I'm not I'm not being conspiratorial. I'm just saying something is going on,

and we should figure out what that is. And you know, what if someone dies from respiratory symbtom Let's say someone's positive for flu and covid and they die because of the respiratory symptoms that are very similar for both of those, what did they die from? I mean, I just I think that we should understand that we have we're developing rules and and looking into this, right so, you know, something's going on here, something's happening that we're not being

told or we haven't figured out yet. And and the test, the way that all these tests go on, I want to know. I mean, if PCR tests really are picking up old or effectively virus that's not at a clinically infectious or at a level of clinical infection. That means we're getting a lot of false positives around the country too. Now I know there's high hospitalizations and deaths too. I'm not saying that the testing is driving this whole moment of fear, but are we doing a lot of testing

that is finding COVID that's not actually there. I think we should know that. I think that's important. John writes, Hello, Team Buck, I got a question for you regarding the vaccine and how it's going to play out. I'm currently a student in university here in New York, and I'm wondering if they're going to try to force you to have the vaccine to return to campus. What do you think is going to happen as the vaccine becomes more widely distributed. What do you think the process will look

like for the average person to get vaccine? And thank you for the shows. I enjoyed to appreciate the radio and TV show every day. I wish you and everyone a very merry Christmas and a happy New Year. John. Yeah, I look, I'll say this, Um, I think that it's gonna I think it is going to be required for people to get the vaccine to go back to certain schools and university settings. I think they're gonna say you have to because they already do that for other for

other situations. You know, I think you have to get the measles vaccine before you go to school in some places. I have to check what the different rules and regulations are, but um, yes, so that's going to be a part

of this. And I think that for the average person to get vaccinated, you're probably gonna have online sign up for different providers in your area, and you're gonna have a very specific time because they have to thaw the vaccine from the minus nineties celsius temperature that it's at. You've got to thaw the vaccine and then they have to give it to you at a very specific you know,

in a very specific order. I think that if you're basically a low risk, healthy person, you'll be be able to get this vaccine by signing up online for an appointment that a provider near you, probably in May or June. That's my that's my best estimate from everything that I've read.

That's what it sounds like, which means that we're making it through this entire You're going to go through this entire respiratory, you know, respiratory illness season, at risk of contracting COVID, just if you have not already had it. That's that's what we are actually facing here. So yeah, that's where that's where this is. And I'm so glad you enjoy the radio show and you watch the TV show on the First. You can always download the First TV app and watch my show. There. I lead into

Bill O'Reilly. We got Jesse Kelly, Dana Lash, great people at the first Scott Buck today around four thirty pm on k y kN in Salem, Oregon. I heard you close out just prior to a commercial with a statement, We're not going to go back to sitting on listening to Milton Friedman. It would be my opinion, listening to Milton Freedman is exactly what we should be doing. It hurt me to use his name as some buy word.

I wish he was here to defend capitalism. No one else is love you love your show, but respect the Milton Scott. I grew up reading Milton and listening to Milton. I'm not saying that any I'm not saying that Milton Friedman doesn't doesn't have tremendous value. And I was I was, Scott maya culpa. I was flippant about it. I was

flipping about it, and and I shouldn't have been. So let me go back and and say more of what I was trying to say, or more of what I meant to say, and not make a flip in comment about about Milton Friedman. It's just that we need to deal with the political fights and the consequences of decisions with the world as it is presented to us now. And I think that there's this conservatism, especially in the early two thousands, sort of had this had this nostalgia for

for Reaganism. And yes, the principles and the ideas of Reaganism can carry through, but we have to understand we are in a period of different challenges and deal with the world as it is today, not harken back to the conservatism of you know, yesteryear, the conservatism of a different era and expect that to somehow be the answer to all of our problems today. I hope that's a better, better example. But Scott, I I agree with you. I shouldn't have said, you know, Milden Free I should have,

you know, said like the Weekly Standard or something. You know, it's just some conservative publication instead of an individual that does not really have all that much value in the current context. Well, the Weekly Standard shutdown, so that clearly doesn't have much value. You're in the freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast, finishing off roll call here on this uh snowy Thursday. Well, I guess it's not snowing anymore, but they're lost snow on the

ground here in New York. Joe, I love your show. Well, Joe, the show loves you. Been a fan since I first heard you when you filled in for Rush. I am oss and a big fan of the shield type podcast. I listen to other historical podcasts, but they tend to be extremely long. You cover it so well and do it in a session I can sit through in one setting. Well, Joe, thank you so much. And yes, I plan and we're doing.

We already have some tape. We're gonna be doing more, so Shield Tile will be more of a thing in the new year. And we also are going to be putting some history podcasts up on YouTube, so you can go subscribe YouTube dot com. Slash Buck Sexton we're putting a YouTube stuff up there. If some of you been

asking what are we doing on YouTube right now? There's so many restrictions on political commentary that as we've tried to build a YouTube channel of our wonderful Team Buck audience, it's been very challenging because we keep getting throttled and demonetized, so they won't show our videos to anybody, and they won't let us make any money off the videos that people are seeing. And we're working through that now on YouTube to figure out, okay, well what can we do here.

I'm also on Rumbull putting stuff up on Rumble, but you know, I want to use as many platforms as possible. My goal is to have my content reach as many conservatives and just as many people. I mean, I want, I want to convert libs if I can. I want my content because I believe in it. I believe in what I do and what I say to reach as many people as possible. So we've had some trouble with YouTube, as many others have as well, because well, it's engaged

in conservative censorship. So that's why people like, well you have this big audience at radio, why do you have a huge you know, YouTube channel, because they won't let us build a YouTube channels. That's big. We keep getting shut down. Dan Right's uncle Buck. The election sham has splintered the Right into an extreme faction, the same way the Squad and the Bernie Bros. Have. Last week, Rush even mentioned Secession, which went viral. Extremes are moving in

opposite directions and taking greater control of the narrative. I have no idea where this road leads, but one thing is for certain. I no longer recognize this country as the one I grew up in, and I'm not an old geezer. We're around the same age. Do you see this country in ten, twenty thirty years and beyond? Ps Prucer Mark, what are your thoughts on Stephen A. Cohen

taking over the Mets? Producer Mark will let you go first on the Mets, just to make this quick other than meeting my wife, getting married, job stuff, all that best thing to happen in my life, in my life in ten years. There you go, there you go. I think I think Producer Mark has answered your question. Sums it up well? Right, Yeah, I think I think that covers it. And as for a worth think the country

is going in ten twenty years, Dan, I am. I'm a happy warrior and a cautious optimist and where we keep fighting through and we're still in the greatest country in the history of the world, and it's worth fighting for every day. And even when we lose battles, we did the right thing by fighting for our principles and that's what we'll continue to do. And there's remember there's seventy seventy three million of us that voted for Donald Trump in this election. Okay, we're not alone, friends, We're

not alone. I know right now there's a lot of frustration, but we will band together and we'll try to make this continue to be the best country in the history of the world, which is what we've got. It's pretty remarkable, what you think about it. There's a lot, even in this very tough time, there's a lot to be thankful for in life. And that's why I say, you know, after you listen to this show, let's kickback, relax, take a breath, and read a good history book, hang out

with the dog. If you got one shield tie