"Chill Greta Chill"

You're a great American. Again, the buck Sexton Show begins. Analysts, Remember, so the men of women at home need to know what's happening. A lawyer at the f creates fraudulent evidence, alters an email that is in turn used as the basis for a sworn statement to the court that the court relies on, am I stating that accurately. That's correct. That is what occurred. Welcome to the Buck section Show, my friends. Yesterday you had the Inspector General testifying in

front of the Senate up on Capitol Hill. Ooh rough for the Russia collusion truthers. Rough for the conspiracy theorists who have spent years now doing two things making outlandish claims about the president, saying that the president is a traitor, the president worked with Vladimir Putin, fact, is now Vladimir Putin's puppet because of the cheating that he did in the election, and that anybody who looked at the lack of evidence for any of this was somehow themselves a

conspiracy theorist. And anyone who question whether the process was not just problematic but perhaps entirely biased of investigating this theory against the president, they were shouted down. There was about a ninety percent media consensus. Oh that's right, libs of the media is liberal. There's a ninety percent of media consensus that was clear on the fact that the president must have done something wrong and the FBI did

nothing wrong and there was no bias. Now we know that if you still believe that you're either delusional, a liar, or dumb, there's no fourth option, and you could just be a little crazy. You could be somebody who does know that that's not true but says the opposite. So you're a liar or just really really stupid. And there are unfortunately a lot of journalists who fall into that category.

Just to start, and there's so much that we can get into here, and I by the way, I know there's also we got to get into Elizabeth Warren's foreign policy today. We got to get into the possibility of this white supremacy unit getting stood up at the NYPD in the next few months. I mean, there's all these things that I want to get do. So we're not going to just just do Inspector channel today. But this is important, and you know, the media wants to skip

right past it yesterday. As I told you, they pick and choose what parts of testimony they air on their channels. And I think that there's a couple of reasons for this, or there's more than one reason for it. You have, for example, the desire ta pander to the audience at sen editor MSNBC, the people that are at home. They don't want their little tender liberal sensibilities to be rattled

by any of this. And then you also have the delusion among many in the press corps, many producers at the major channels, that they aren't in fact bias, they're just making sound editorial decisions. This is laughable at this point. But let's just start with what Ted Cruz said there. Here is what we know, we know that there were major errors, big screw ups in this entire situation of the report. We will get into what some of the biggest ones are, but here's where they want to focus

your attention away from the single most important thing. It is simply not credible. It is not feasible, It is not plausible that all of these things happened, and that it had nothing to do with the fact that the people making these decisions at the FBI or within the DOJ absolutely despise President Trump, and we know many of them despise President Trump. That is, that is beyond dispute. But they want you to believe that all of these mistakes were made by people that we know, in many

cases hate Trump. That is established, and by people who are willing to break rules for some reason in this process, including in the case of former acting FBI Director McCain lying under oath and putting himself in criminal jeopardy comey, violating FBI regulations, and defaming his own institution in the process, or at least hurting its reputation dramatically. Despite all of that, they want you to believe that this is just a coincidence.

They want you to believe that there's nothing beyond just egregious errors. I've been pointing this out, and yes, some of you have seen. I've been going pretty hard in the paint on Twitter. I've been going after it. Not just because the President retweeted me six times, high five

Producer Brandon. I mean, that's pretty cool. I want a dozen, though, I want a dozen retweets in one day, but because I really believe that it's important that there's counter messaging to all the lies that are out there and the mains to remediate. I mean, CNN should be torn down to the studs and rebuilt as a news organization. I mean the whole place. It's just it's just rotten to

the core. Same as MSNBC. But MSNBC is just the slightly more honest version of NBC News, which is every bit as liberal, but tries to hide it a little bit more. It's a little less obvious about it. All of this going on. They don't want you to take away from this that there was biased, that there were people who did the things that they did because they don't like President Trump and because politically they had an

agenda Inside the FBI. Now we're going to get to the journalists, and the journalists are a joke and all this, I mean the ones that I was having fun yesterday, you know, tweeting at Jim Shooto at CNN from twenty seventeen. The dossier, according to my intelligence sources, has been largely verified. That tweets still up. That's a fun one. That's a fun one. So many of them, I mean, there's so many of them. You go back and see these people are all clowns. Do you know how many tweets I

have to delete? Or any of my friends on the right who have been defending Trump because the facts were in his favor all along. Do you know how many tweets we've had to delete about this or apologize for zero? My friends, I have been wrong a grand total of zero times on Russia collusion. Who at CNN or MSNBC or the New York Times, the Washington Post that was covering this or any other liberal media outlet can say the same thing. None of them. They've all been wrong.

It's just a question of degrees. It's a question of how egregious their wrongness has been. And yet many of us on the right, we haven't had to backtrack on anything Oh, sorry, I guess we missed that by a lot. Isn't that interesting one of the reasons why you're much better off coming here every day to find out what's going on in the world than you are listening to some of these talking heads at the various lib channels.

You already know that not just if you agree with me, just because they're wrong, and a lot of them aren't very smart. So then that brings me to the Ted Cruise point here, why is it on this point of this is the fundamental fight right now? Was there bias or not? But aside, we all know there's mistakes and people that don't admit that. I mean, now you're you're getting into a degree of denialism or you can't you can't actually have a conversation about this with somebody like that.

If someone thinks that the FBI didn't just do a total face plant on this whole thing, the most sensitive political case in its history, then there's nothing to talk about with them because they're they're delusional. They have there's no anchoring principle for them, there's nothing, there's no ability to exchange thoughts and ideas. They're just orange man bad, Orange man bad, that's all they know. They've been brainwashed.

Brainwashing is a real thing that happens to people, and the liberal media has brainwashed a whole lot of folks that no matter what the actual evidence shows, no matter what the information is that comes out of this processes and matter because you already know that Trump is orange man, an orange man is bad. That's really the full scope of the argument. And by the way, we're still going through with this this orange mad bad impeachment, which we

will get to that as well. But Ted Creusa, as a lawyer at the FBI, creates fraudulent evidence, alters, an email is used at the basis for a sworn statement to the court that the court relies on. Why and I want a serious, plausible explanation for this. Why would anyone do that if it was not for political bias? That can't even there is no reasonable explanation. There is no answer you can give that works in this context. What is there to say exactly? Why would a person

do that? Why risk one's career, one's reputation, perhaps even one's freedom too intentionally? And by this is clear this was intentional. Someone sat there thought, you know what I need to do. I need to make sure that Carter Page, who's an ally of the United States government, looks like an enemy of the United States government for the purposes of this spying, and yes it was spying. Why would anyone do that if they didn't think that they were

a part of the hashtag resistance? How could you explain that? Now, this is why it's so. There's two reasons why this is so important. One is that this could have undermined the entire case against Carter Page, And if they only got a FIZE on him once, by the way, that would have looked a bit weak, right, So they need to extend this out to keep looking This is a similar concept works when you're talking about government corruption within

the federal bureaucracy. They double down, and they double down, they double down. Why would they do that? Well, for example, if you work at a financial firm and you deal with something called a rogue trader. This has happened many times in the past. I think actually it happened at Baring's Bank, which was I believe the oldest still functioning

bank in the world, and took it down. Where someone once they've done in a few illegal trades that they're hiding they're essentially gambling money they're not supposed to, and then they lose. Guess what they do at that point They gamble more, and they gamble more, and you know why, because they figure, Hey, if I get lucky and win back the money I lost and can put it back, no harm, no foul. So the FBI here trying to

get the renewals of Carter Page. They're thinking, at least it'll look like we were somewhat right if we can get these renewals, and maybe we strike jackpot where we can at least create some narrative that this wasn't all a big anti Trump operation. So this is why the

fis or renewals were so important. Foreign intelligence surveillance acts supposed to be used against spies and terrorists and has always been this sensitive area of national security law, which is really effectively an end run on the Fourth Amendment, one that we accept because of national security concerns. And now a lot of people are saying, maybe we shouldn't

accept that. But on this point of the changing of that vise application by this senior figure than the FBI, you have to ask the question, Okay, so maybe this was necessary to salvage to salvage the entire the entire thing. That's part one. And then you also have to look

again at what was the motivation behind this. How could this person not feel terrible doing this to an American citizen, making somebody seem as though they are a spy, making somebody seem as though they're a traitor to justify your investigation. There is no way they have my friends, They have no explanation for this. And then this is the even bigger point. Now, look at all the mistakes that were made,

the mistakes in quotes that were made, and mistakes. There are things not typos, things like, oh, we had exculpatory evidence, but we didn't share it. Oh we knew this source was crap, but we didn't tell them. This is like a power mad prosecutor hiding evidence of innocence and trying to create a false narrative of guilt to crush somebody. That is what the FBI was doing. There's no doubt about this. There's no dispute for a reasonable fact based

intelligent human beings. But now look at that one instance of clear and egregious willful misconduct, not a judgment area. Was that just the one time that they got a little sloppy in this and were all of those other errors than omissions and mistakes and the other things that they did that the IG had to essentially come hat in hand before the Senate and say this was really bad, which is what he said yesterday. Me didn't want to cover it. That's what this was really bad, folks. What

they against a presidential campaign. This should be really bad if it was against a guy who owns a bait shop down the street from you. You know, I thought he might be a spy. This is against a president fidential campaign. Now you look at all the other incidents and you think to yourself, hold on a second, were those intentional as well? But they just knew that they could hide behind the facade of poor judgment and stupidity, which is what the FBI is offering up as the explanation.

But remember they have no real explanation for any of this. And this is what's going to translate into the assault on Attorney General bar It's why you've already seen that machinery going. They're going to kavanaugh him. I'm telling you get ready for it. But I want to work through some more of the points from this Inspector General report, because the bottom line is there was spying on the

Trump campaign, it was all based on lies. The process was abused to continue the investigation, the investigation was weaponized, and yes, there absolutely was bias in this process against a political candidate. Can't I just happen to be Donald Trump?

A Republican? We believe that in the FBI's most sensitive and high priority matters, and especially when seeking court permission to use an intrusive tool such as a PISA order, it's incumbent upon the entire chain of command at the organization, including senior officials, to take the necessary steps to ensure that they are sufficiently familiar with the facts and circumstances supporting and potentially undermining a PISA application in order to

provide effective oversight consistent with their level of supervisory responsibility.

Such oversight requires greater familiarity with the facts than we saw in this review, where time and again during our OIG interviews, FBI managers, supervisors, and senior officials displayed a lack of understanding or awareness of important information concerning many of the problems that we identified, and that is why, as you will see in the report, our final recommendation was to refer the entire chain of command that we outline here to the FBI and the Department for consideration

of how to assess and address their performance failures. They screwed up. This is what the Obama appointee IG of the FBI is telling you. They screwed up big time. There can be no doubt about that. We know this. The screwups are mind blowing. This is not small potatoes stuff. These are major mess ups in the most major thing the FBI was doing at the time. This wasn't just some investigation of some drug dealers somewhere where things went awry and people, you know, were cutting around the edges

a little bit. No, No, the most important thing the FBI was looking at at the time, and this is how they handled it. They have people that just don't know any better. They have people that don't know the rules and regulations. Remember, they're able to get a FISA war and they can get all of your electronic communications, everything you do, and anything they find that, by the way, that could be criminal they can use against you. This is police state tactics. This this is what we're talking about.

But we just believe the FBI was honorable enough, good enough, and smart enough not to abuse that opening for police state tactics. That is what they did. They abused it. Now we're looking at the why. Here's a way to get to the bottom of this. Was this standard operating procedure for a FIS in terms of the mistakes that were made. Because here's how, just like I told you, watch how the Clinton Foundation donations will crater after the election, and then we will all know that it was all

just an influence peddling scam. If they were to just randomly sample some other FISA cases and see none of these kinds of errors in that process, oh, then we'll know that these were mistakes that just happened. These were all political hits. Those FISA warrants, they were renewed a number of times, correct, three times. Based on your experience and maybe your report, there's a reason why warrants are renewed.

They're renewed because they are producing useful information. Correct, or they should be producing useful information, they should phrase it, and your review of those warrants would indicate that they were producing useful information. Correct. I'm not sure that's entirely correct, and I don't know how much I can say about that in this setting, Well, they were producing information. They were producing information. I'm not sure how I would characterize

whether they were helpful or not. It is tough to tell whether Sydney Bloomenthal is just a complete and utter buffoon or just so desperate because of the circumstances of the Democrats that he's making a fool of himself because there's no argument here to be made. He's effectively asking the Inspector General in this moment, Hey, I'm sorry Richard Bloomenthaal, not Sydney Bloomenthall, thank you. Yeah, because this is Denang.

Dick got to catch me on that one. This is the guy that said he fought in Vietnamin he didn't, And I was like, how do you get to how do you get You know, Dick comes from Richard, not Sydney. So this is a yes, this is Dnang Dick Bloomenthal saying sorry about that guy. Sidney Bloomenthal is Hillary Clinton's little henchman who was running around doing stuff and Libya got caught up in some of those emails. All right, But Bloomenthal here is saying, well, because the FISA warrants

were renewed. They must have been good FISA warrants. Would you ever see a Democrat make this argument about any other law enforcement process. Well, because you know, law enforcement was wire tapping the suspected terrorist's home, and they did it a few times, and there were stuff on the wire taps ipso facto ergo, therefore the wire taps must have been legitimate. No, no, Dnang Dick, that is not true. That is not how this works. That is why we

have oversight, because there can be government malfeasians. One of the more fascinating things that I saw, and this was a commonplace theme for years among the defenders of the deep state praetorian anti Trump effort in the FBI, one of the things you would see are people were former

national security in some component. You know, they were an x NSA lawyer, or they had worked at this or that agency, but they hate Trump and they would come out and be like, oh, and Asha Rangapa is one of the best examples of this over at CNN, and she, you know, she's one of these people who's mean on Twitter and she's just an idiot, never write about anything, but sn's gonna put her on TV. Oh gosh, it, please explain things to us. Wrong about everything everything we

see it. Now, these people are wrong. I've just been We've just been going through and land basing tweets that were put up by all these experts the last twenty five hours. It's so fun because they're just they don't know what they're talking about. They're just wrong. But one of the ways they got to be so wrong was to fall back on something that Libs never would normally do, which is to suggest that if the government in a law law enforce and capacity is doing something, of course

you can trust the government. Of course, there's no problem. There's no concern here, there's nothing that you should be worried about. This is bizarre. Democrats don't usually feel this way. Democrats usually think that law enforcement is biased against minorities, so it's racist, think that law enforcement is patriarchical, and you know, just go on the list of all the complaints they usually have about law enforcement. You know, law

enforcement carries guns. So unless they're unless the Libs are calling the shots about who has the guns all the time in their way, they don't like that show. Bloomenthal has no idea really what's going on the dossier which people were defending. I mean, I mentioned before shootout over at CNN, who was one of the big dossier defenders him and Tapper. I mean, these people, they tried to use propaganda and lies to outs to President the United States to take him down. You know what could have

happened in this whole process. Trump could have just said I'm done, I'm resigning, I don't want to handle this special counsel thing. You know. He could have. I'm not saying that would have been smarter. He was going to but they put so much pressure on him, They tried so hard to end this presidency and other people, I think a lesser man than Trump, at least somebody with less intestinal fortitude, might have considered just drop it out.

In fact, we were hearing, we used to hear from libs he wasn't going to run again, and he doesn't even want to do this anymore. He's going to resign any day now. The end is near, the walls are closing in. We'd hear this all the time. It wasn't true, but they would say it. I think some of them, probably even I mean Joe Scarborough, perhaps the worst and most dishonest political analyst at MSNBC, although no, I can't say that there's others that are worse, but he's in

like the top ten. He was one of them peddling this. There are many others as well, none of them, by the way, I apologize for any of the misinformation, the lies, the inaccuracies, the poor analysis, and I am being I am being kind. I wish we could do like a late night version of this show where I sit here and just have it would only be it would only need like three two or three ounce mescal and you know I'd be ready to rock. And you know, we could do like the salt the salty verbiage version of

the Buck Sextons show late night. I kind of liked that idea. I think that'd be fun. Producer Brandon would hang out. I don't think we'd be able to keep up with the saltiness of produce user Mark. I mean that guy he is, He's a spicy a meat the ball. But yeah, that's the thought we have here. I don't know if we ever get approval to do it, but

it would be kind of fun. But when talking about this FISA, it would be useful if I could say things in a more profane manner sometimes because that's the only way to describe some of these people, some of the acts they engaged in, some of the individuals. I mean, here, for example, is Lindsey Graham just asking the question of Horowitz. I mean, how bad is this stuff? How bad was

this investigation? This spying on a presidential campaign. You've looked at all the data, You've looked at everything, we have the facts. Now you had all this time to go over it. How bad was it all? Please play clip six? How would you describe the behavior here of knowing that the subsource disavows the docier that was the primary reason you got to warrant finding it. A lawyer doctored an email to keep the investigation going in a way unfair to mister Page. This is not routine. Do you agree

with that? It is definitely not it is it certainly better not be routine. And I don't know any reason to think it is routine. Is it kind of off the charts? Band? It's pretty bad, thank you? It's pretty bad. Yeah, you don't say. And the Libs Democrats are walking around and they're they're in this fantasy land of oh, you know nothing. Yeah, it says there's a legitimate predicate for the investigation. By the way, attorney into a. Bar is going to crush that, and they know it. We'll get

into that in a few minute. That's why they're going after the Attorney General, who's my favorite member of the cabinet at this point. Although I like my man Pompeo too, he's cool. I don't know. It's Hulk versus thing, Pompeo

versus Bar. Those are my two with two dudes, my brose, but Bar is going to crush their last respite here of the never Trump dead enders in this Russia collusion situation or this anti Trump really not just never Trump, these anti Trump dead enders in Russia Clusian situation is that well, it was bad, but it was done in good faith. That's not true. This is why I started out with the most clear evidence we have that it

wasn't done in good faith. Oh and speaking of the lack of good faith in all of this, here's an interesting part of this as well. Senator Kennedy asked the Inspector General about the people who were involved in this, the people that were making all of these decisions and determinations about whether to get a Fiz or warrant whether to open crossfire hurricane on George Papadopoulis, and they didn't shut it down when they had George Popadopoulis with informants

talking to him being monitored in real time. I mean they were running people in spying operations against them, being like, no,

the Trump campaign and coordinated with Russia. That was seem to be an important little tidbit that would seem you know, if someone thinks that they're speaking to a perhaps a co conspirator or somebody they can co opt, or somebody that you know is certainly not paying monitored by law enforcement, and they're like, no, I would never do That's crazy, you think the FBI, But they didn't take notice of that.

How do they get together this group of idiotic misfits at the FBI who would make so many mistakes, mistakes that all go in the same direction, mistakes that are damaging to Trump. How do they bring together this group of FBI idiot avengers. Let's hear from the Inspector General. Please play clip four. They knew the law. They should have not only known the law, they should have done every single policy that they had to deal with. You I mean they were handpicked by mister McKay right, they

were hand picked. Okay, this wasn't their first rodeo. It certainly wasn't, with maybe an exception or two towards the end of relatively new agents coming on board. Well, but that that is, it should not have been an excuse. Just pretty clear. Well, it just seems to me that it has to be one or two things, either incompetence or intentional conduct. I agree, it's either sheer incompetence, intentionally or something perhaps in between. We've got so many different

people here. It's first of all, wouldn't be fair to lump everybody into one because there are different actors coming in at different times. Some people have more touches of this than others. I think it's fair for people to sit there and look at all of these seventeen events and wonder how it could be purely incompetence. It's gotta be fixed. At a minimum, somebody's gotta be fired. Yeah, agreed, completely.

It's gotta be a changing the culture. Also, I think Inspector General is basically saying, look, uh, you know, come at us, because we deserve it. Man, this is a disaster for the FBI a disaster, and he said there that it's an understandable why people wouldn't think that all these mistakes, So it's not a conspiracy the people the media running around. Oh but the IG said that there was a legitimate predicate and that there was no bias. No, he didn't find definitive proof of bias. But how often

do you ever find definitive proof of bias. These are the same morons who run around saying that any judge who doesn't give them what they want is obviously like doing Trump's bidding. The Attorney General is doing Trump's bidding. Can't trust those people to be nonpartisan just because the outcomes are things that the Libs don't like. Bring this back, though, for a moment, to the notion of the handpicked FBI team,

the best of the best. You know, this is the fantastic four, or however many there were of FBI agents and investigators who pulled them altogether. Annie McCabe, who assigned these individuals, who would have known not just from professional interaction but personal interaction, the political predilections, the political proclivities of these individuals. Annie McCabe, who had a wife that was running as a Democrat and got a lot of money from Terry mcculluff's DNC and right around the time,

a lot of stuff. That's right as Annie McCabe, isn't it who lied lied under penalty of perjury during during FBIDO J investigations of this whole situation and has been referred for criminal prosecution. Former acting FBI Director Annie McCabe lied about leaking to the press and then had the unbelievable gaul to yell at some subordinates about how they were leaking to the press. That's who that guy is. Kind of sociopath, does that? Oh? Somebody who still thinks

James Comey's a good guy. McCabe is like little mini me Comey. Oh, whatever Colemy does is great. Everybody in the FBI was crying when Comy had to go. McCabe had a deep personal affinity and professional linkage to Comey. He was his protege, which, by the way, I don't even need to know any of that other stuff. Anybody who's Comy's protege is radioactive, toxic as far as I'm concerned,

not to be trusted, not to be listened to. And yet McCabe was the one who pulled together all these individuals, including a number of individuals that we have text messages of that show any person who can read and think that they were deeply anti Trump. So a severely anti Trump now disgraced former FBI director with close ties to James Comey, who was fired by Trump and who had a personal vendetta against Trump, that same individual pulls together

exactly who works on this case. Where they are all of these mistakes, egregious mistakes that undermine the very integrity and public reputation of the FBI, including a mistake that wasn't such, it was in fact intentional, the fabrication of evidence, a criminal act, all against a presidential campaign intelection year, and we are supposed to believe that it's just the way the dice landed, that all this happened. There's no conspiracy.

I mean, if this was a mob case, you'd look at all this and say, oh, there's a conspiracy here. But they just keep telling you, they keep lying to you. They'll just make it all disappear, law go away. Oh that's why they're transitioning into impeachment. Some of us have

been saying this all along. I was on Brett Bear Show almost two months ago, and I said, I think that their roleing with this impeachment thing now, even though it's a desperate hail Mary looking kind of impeachment, because one, they just need to impeach this president because the left

wing base is insane and demands it. And two they're gonna need something else to They got to move into something else right away when this Inspector General report comes out, because this looks terrible, and the press, the lackeys, the people that are going to be telling you in twenty twenty that Elizabeth Warren isn't a fraud, that Joe Biden isn't an idiot, and that Bernie Sanders isn't a communist.

They're the same people who have been telling you for three years that Russia Trump collusion was real, the FBI did its job, and Trump and the people around him are traitors. Same people, folks, You want to believe them? You know, that's that's on the people foolish enough to buy into any of that handpicked team of anti trumpers buy McCabe, and we are we are supposed to think somehow that has just happened the way that it did, that there was nothing more insidious going on than that.

The FBI with the best of the best, that's what this was supposed to be. What you're spying on a presidential campaign. They knew exactly what they were doing. They used a briefing to get close to the Trump campaign. The FBI used a briefing close the Trump campaign to try and prod for information to use against the Trump campaign.

They use their access as FBI agents supposed to be protecting a possible incoming administration, they used that access, or rather the incoming in administration to try and undermine them. I mean, this is this is nuclear meltdown level bad from the FBI, and there's political bias all over it. Media wants to just say, well, you can't prove everything here, can you. I understand you want to do whatever you have to do to keep your family safe and secure.

But there's one thing that can feel a little strange and maybe you don't want to deal with it. Life insurance. First time I had to deal with life insurance, I was in my twenties. I was deploying overseas and I figured, well, I've got to do the responsible thing and take out a policy in case the unexpected happens, so you need to do the same to make sure your family is safe facing an uncertain future. And that's why I want you to check out my friends at Ethos Life Insurance.

You see, with Ethos there's no hassle. It's modern life insurance for people who don't want to waste a lot of time and detailed contracts and people that are trying to oversell them something ethos Is approach is simple. They just take technology, industry expertise and a human touch to find the right policy for your budget. Only takes about ten nights and you can make sure your family has the financial security they need. Get a fast, free and

personalized quote right now at Ethoslife dot com. Again that's Ethos Life. Here's the question that I'm struggling with, which is worse. Is it worse to have a foreign government trying to meddle in our elections or is it worst to have our own government meddling in the election? Because that's I think exactly what this report shows. It shows that our government, the most powerful law enforcement agency in the nation, the FBI, effectively meddled in an ongoing presidential campaign.

And the thing that gets me is you expect it from foreign governments. I'm not saying it's good, but I'm saying that you expect it. They've been doing it for years. Russia has been doing it for years. We know they tried to do it this last cycle. China has been doing it. Others have been doing it, and we know what steps to take. We've got to take them more effectively. But when our own government does it, how can the American people have confidence? And what do we do? I mean,

what do we do? And there's one actor here I think who has not gotten the credit that they collectively deserve, and that's the Democrat National Committee. I just think, you know, I've heard my friends on the other side of the I'll complain about Hillary Clinton's campaign and how ineffective it was, and how the DNC did to do a good job in twenty sixteen. I beg to differ. This is the

most incredible. The DNC pays for the steel dossier, solicits the steel dossier, and then gets the Federal Bureau of Investigation to go get FISA warrants, surveil an American citizen, surveil a presidential campaign, all on the basis of this manufactured garbage that they paid for. I mean, that's extraordinary. I think Holly makes a good point there, everybody. I also think that we forget even if the deep state conspiracy did not manage to destroy the Trump presidency, it

has been a massive hindrance to it. It has slowed it down. It has bogged it down in the nonsense of the process of the Mueller probe and everything else. And it's almost like people don't realize the countries at a time of relative peace and booming prosperity. Let's get to our friend David Harsani. He's got a piece up on National Review. The Obama administrations abuse is a massive scandal. David. Great to be back. Always a pleasure, Thank you, all right, man.

I mean I have had people I spoke to it. Unnamed Democrat who goes on TV a lot of Fox. It's basically like, yeah, stop, really, you know, some mistakes are made, not a big deal. And I look at people now who say this. There are a lot who I think for professional reasons, they're just they're just pretending that reality isn't what it is. But give me your case for why. I mean, you and I agree on this.

This is a huge deal. This is not a small deal. Yeah, I mean, the reality is that that Democrats don't have to worry very much because the press is not going to treat it as the massive scandal it is. I mean, if we if I hate to even frame it this way, but it is really no better way to do it. If if George Bush had used the FBI in this kind of way to spy on the Obama campaign, it would it would be the biggest story of the of

the century. It would Washington would have melted down. You know you, I mean, you have a dossier that's made that's completely just fabricated stuff. Some of it may be coming from aren you know, intel from foreign sources. Disinformation. Let's just say it's disinformation, right. You use that it's the essential ingredient for you to get warrants from a court that already gives warrants to pent of people who

ask to what I'm saying. You're lying to a court that will basically give anyone of warrant who wants one good point. What does that tell you? And then you know, you open this investigation, which it seems to me that it's very easy to do. Low, I forgot I forgot what the terminology was. But anyway, but to propel it, you need to continue to lie. And you know, I can't even believe people aren't calling for an investigation. This

is just a massive deal. And I mean, just can I just add, David, I mean, you're talking about the low the low predicate for opening investigation. I told again one of these democrats, I talked to you over at Fox the other day by the FBI standards, and I was telling her that I was serious. I could open a FIZ on you speaking to her, I mean, I could open a FIES on anyone, right, And then you know, they pretend that that there was some high threshold to

get this thing moving. But if that had been the case, they wouldn't have needed the dossier. They wouldn't have fabricated evidence, is what they did and changed emails. What could possibly about I asked this at the top of the show. What could possibly be the justification for that? I mean, you're an FBI guy. These are all hand picked people by McKay. We've already had that testified to by the IG.

How could anyone looking at this understanding that they are playing with the most politically fiscile material imaginable here within the FBI, and you're going to fabric you're gonna lie about evidence in writing people tell me, I mean I saw someone who used to be like a libertarian type, you know, who used to be very concerned about FISA warrants and the METADAT and all that stuff, saying, ah, you know, definitely, the FBI sort of screwed up here.

Seventeen times they screwed up in the skewing in the same direction in the same case. Now, obviously you have prosecutors sometimes who do what they have to do, unfortunately to push a case. But you're talking about one administration which runs a dj and the FBI spying. You know, it's an independent Oregon but it's still under in that administration spying on the other opposing party, and it's in a democratic during an election. I mean, I don't know.

I just I think it's it's a huge scandal, and uh, you know the way the media treats it, and they have really no choice because they can back away that it's so many of them said this was nothing that for them now to turn around and make it into a big deal. They can't even do it. If they wanted to what do you think the tone is? Like? I mean I used to sit around and hear them at CNN in the different editorial meetings talking about things sometimes.

What do you think places like that? Are they just complete, completely bereft of any introspection over their role in all of this, you know, I mean, does does does my favorite over there, Jake Tapper, still think that he's a really honest and series journalist with no extra grind against anybody? I mean, how does this? How does this actually continue on? Well? I mean, obviously we both know people can fool themselves into believing things, especially when it comes to politics and

it becomes tribal. And I think CNN, you know, not particularly anyone there, but just in general, that channel has positioned itself to serve the anti Trump. For them to turn around now and then help Trump to talk about this story in a real, in an honest way is just not going to happen. So everything probably just remains

the way it is. But the excuses that they've given, and when you go back and read these stories about the Devin noon Az memo and all of the mockery that went on, would meanwhile, he was right about everything pertaining to the pertaining to the FISA warrants. Yeah, and I'm weren't there members of Congress who were saying that he needs to step down. He can't be the you know, he can't be on the on the intelligence community anymore.

He said, they say this about everybody, They say people are Trump stooges, and the show called Trump's Huges it turns out are correct, right. I mean, I I don't remember how this went, but I went back and I was proud of myself for writing that we should just at least listen to the memo before we dismissed this guy, because it seems plausible what he's saying. But you know, this is when I still believe that, you know, there were straight reporters doing good work, and you know, places

like at the Washington Post sometimes. But anyway, um, do you think that's not the case anymore? About this stuff? Oh about this stuff. I was going to actually write something about this. I mean, I can't even open that newspaper and believe anything anymore. And I'm not saying that to be like, you know, or you know, kind of a jerk about them. I don't know that I can believe what they're reporting about the presidency or the White House in any way anymore, because two years from now

it might turn out to be false. So sometimes I'm actually upset at Trump and I'm like, wait a minute, this might not even be true at all. And that's I think, how a lot of people feel about the media. So it feels to me like there's absolutely no accountability whatsoever for the people that got this incredibly wrong the whole time. I mean correct, did anyone run a correction?

Did anyone think back the story? But it's a giant story about that that swears that the parts of the uh, the dossi are true and so far than so on that No, no correction, nothing, just move forward with nothing nothing. I also think it's not worthy that none of the journalists seem to have any I mean, maybe this would be happening behind closed doors, but you haven't heard about any blowback that a lot of these journalists, assuming they were not And I'll I mean, I think I'll give

them this. I don't think they were entirely fabricating their government sources, because they just put them on the payroll, you know, they put Clapper and Brandon and these people on the payroll. So it's not like it's hard for them to find, you know, a high level government source to speak to them about these things. But their sources

had to be lying to them. Well, I mean yeah, I mean we knew this in the middle of you know, at the beginning, because you had like CNN reporters in Washington Post reporters peddling things that turned out to be untrue very quickly we learned. And yet clearly they were going back to the same sources. I forget which reporter

was one of the reporters that they might be. A CNN reporter had supposedly two sources telling him something completely wrong, the same exact wrong thing it was about about an email. I forget exactly what it was about. But clearly, you know, they don't blow their sources after they get screwed like that. I mean, it's it's crazy. You have no reason to protect sources that undermine you in that way, and they

just kept going back to them. Guys, We're gonna come back and talk to David in a second about Times Person of the Year and also this Trump policy meant to protect the Jewish community in this country, will be back, all right, we're back with our friend David Harsani here, and I just David the President. Look, I think the presidents tweets sometimes are sometimes I'm not a fan, but sometimes they're amazing. And he tweeted out this morning about

about Greta. I'm trying to find the exact verbiage here, but he tweeted out about Gretteth Thunberg that she basically needs she needs to chill and go, like, hang out with some friends and see a movie. You have written on the Greteth Thunberg thing. And I just note that even people that I think are sometimes somewhat reasonable about in the media, they buy into this, Oh you can't you basically can't say anyone quite a Thumberg. Girls. People jump down your throat and say you're a bad person,

who's who's bashing kids. What do you say about this situation? Well, I mean, you know it's my colleague Charles Cook put it well when he said that you can't be both the shield and the sword, meaning you know, you can't use this person to, you know, smite all the terrible people and then stand behind her and not allow anyone

to react to it. So I think there's a you know, there's a way to talk about children who are used by the by the way, I mean, I think her parents and the producers and new and officials and all the people will give her money, they are abusing this child. That's what I think. I don't blame her. So I think the way you talk about it is you don't mock her, but you mock her ridiculous ideas, because she's a ridiculous person, not the girl, just the idea of her.

And you know, she's just mimicking things that other people have told her. So I mean to make her person of the year, she has literally done. And I went through all the Persons of the Year going back to the twenties or ever it started, and I had to say, yeah, I'd admit that time actually did a very good job, and mostly in picking people that actually molded the twentieth century, you know. And it's just really kind of impressive in a way to look at it, and then you have this.

It just shows how unserious the media is and how unserious many of us are about the world these days. It's just stuff, the clown show. I mean, here CNN has their headline about this this morning, is Trump again? Mack's teen climate activist Greta Thunberg. I mean, I really, I really got to say that to any adult who listens to this girl, I think it's fair to question certainly their judgment and maybe their intelligence. Well, I mean they tell us I have to. You know, they keep

saying take her seriously. So when I do take her seriously and I write about the idiotic things she says, you know, I am. You know, I get a text for being triggered by a good girl. I mean, you can not have it both ways. The same thing goes for that David Hogg or whatever is I don't pronounce. Yeah, they tried the same thing with him. I remember that. Yeah, so he is allowed to basically call gun owners terrorists and murderers, but no one is allowed to react to

this sort of thing. It's just ridiculous, and her her being on the covers ridiculous, especially in a year where you have young people in Hong Kong fighting for freedom and then you put this girl who was in a million dollars sailing yacht going across the ocean to the UN as a Person of the Year. It's just it shows that the media is who disconnected from history in in a really serious way. But again, I mean, David, you know you've worked at some major media outlets that

have you know, actual liberals working at them. What is your what is your take on the people that put her on this platform? I mean, I remember during the UN Summit or whatever it was, you know, she was on CNN, was running story after story about her, all these different major outlets, Times, the Post are what are they thinking? I mean, I really mean, it's what what is wrong with these adults? I don't know. I mean I think they're siloed, you know, and with people who

think just like them. They don't really they're not critical. They tend not to be critical thinkers. And I think that's something we all suffered with some extent. We need to look at the things that we believe and give them a good thorough you know, intellectual you know. Look, but I don't think that that happens at all in

these institutions. And I think then they just see conservatives as evil people or dumb people, and anything they believe conservatives, you know, liberals quickly just to reflexively, perfunctorily push back against and think is stupid. So that to them, this because they believe in this climate apocalyptic climate change theory as if it were a religion to them. This is Joan of Arc. Basically, yeah, Greta must work on her anger management problem, then go to a good old fashioned movie.

What they friend, Chill, Greta chill is what Trump treated out this. Now, let me quickly say, I don't like teenagers yelling at me and telling me what to do, because that's smart. So I'm not mocking her for her problem or anything like that. But she has no basis to tell me how to live my life. She doesn't know anything. She's you know, I'm sorry to say, a high school drop out of his parents let her play act saint. I have it a zero interest in listening

to what she has to say. Yeah, I've been saying this too. It does remind me. It's it's almost like some of the some of the religious groups and some of these societies where they were where they revere, you know, a child as God king, because you know, that's how the dynasty works. And that's what this is. I mean, this is the elevation of a as you said, not even finished high school kid into some kind of global profit. It's it's it's just it's on its face, it's completely absurd.

Can you tell me what, David, what happened here with this executive order? And there's all this pushback on Trump signing an executive order meant to protect the Jewish community. I haven't dug into this that much, but I've been seeing some chatter. What can you tell us? Well, initially it was reported by the New York Times incorrectly. It turns out that he was going to sign this order protecting college kids from anti Semitic movements and things like that.

It's kind of yeah, so the BDAS, but in general, it would have re categorized Judaism as a nationality. Then this of course upset a lot of people, especially Israel haters who don't want to think of Judaism in that way. But it was wrong to begin with. That was just a language from the Obama era that was used as a way because religion, I think, is not part of title whatever it is and colleges, so you know, they used that kind of language just to make sure they

can put Judaism under protection. It isn't like anything, Majors. But of course people start freaking out and actually comparing Trump to Hitler and Stalin because those people also had categorized Judaism as nation as a nation, which is actually wrong, and especially Hitler's case, it was more of a racial thing.

But just nonsense and ridiculous pushback to Trump, who has been an immense friend to the Jewish people in my opinion, for all the bad things that I think he might have done, that is the great one of the greatest things I think he's done. And it was just typical, you know, just if Trump does it, it must be bad,

like they have to find a way to make it bad. Yeah, I mean everything he does, he brings, you know, makes Jerusalem the embassy, brings the embassy to Jerusalem, and everyone shouts about how that is actually anti submitted because more people are going to be mad at Jerus. I mean, imagine living your life like that. It's just it's not it's not a way that we would talk about any other people. But when it comes to Trump, everything he

does is bad. It's just it's really kind of corrosive to any kind of debate or you know, or discussion or reporting everything. It's just the craziest it's ever been. David. It's just the craziest it's ever been. Yes, I think obviously it's the crazy. I once wrote a column about how if you had told me when I was fifteen to Donald Trump would be president and you know Bill Cosby would be in prison for rape and you know

OJ was a murderer, I would not believe you. But but as far as politics goes, it's just it's just absolutely nuts. Some days I'm like, this is the best, this is so entertaining. And some days I'm like, I can't believe this is you know, this is the nation. That's the way I feel that. I like, what a time to be alive, and especially at time to be writing about him working in politics like we have. This is the most entertaining president in the history of the

United States, in the history of the world. I mean, there's no one else who even comes close. See when he became president, I'm like, God, this he's a nut and this is going to be crazy. But then what he did was he showed us I'm not saying he's not a nut, but he showed us that everyone else are all said they're all nuts as well. Like you know, when I see someone like Adam Schiff running government, I'm like, oh my god, we are You know, these people are

not serious and no more serious than Donald Trump. They just act in a way, you know, they act put they put on errors, but they're all they're all clowns. It's absolutely true, everybody. David Harsan, he check out his ladies at National Review dot com. He's got a piece there about how the fives of use is a massive scandal. David does great work. David, thanks so much for joining us,

my friend. We'll talk soon anytime. Thank you. The Crossfire Hurricane team obtained information from Steele's primary subsource in January twenty seventeen that raised significant questions about the reliability of the Steel reporting. This was particularly noteworthy because the files the applications delied entirely on information from the Steel from sorry from the primary subsources reporting to support the allegation that Paige was coordinating with the Russian government on twenty

sixteen US presidential election activities. However, the FBI did not share this information with department lawyers, and it was therefore omitted from the last two renewal applications. Let me unpack this for a second, and we mentioned this with David before,

but this are just these are important things. And look, I want you to be able to listen to this show and know every point you need to know, so that when some lib comes up to you and says, Dacier might be kind of true, you're like, actually one, two, three,

Freedom Hunt, represent checkmate, You're Donzo. So that's one of my goals here is that you listen to this show and you'll know everything you need to know, so that not only you're aware of the truth, but also if you come up against somebody who still believes in the lies and still believes the dossier, for example, was founded in anything other than fantasy, opposition research and disinformation Russian Disinformatzia Disinformatzia like the Informatzia I would be a great

name of, like a really ironic Williamsburg band, you know, the Disinformatzia. I think that would kind of be cool. Anyway, the Phiso situation here gets even sketch here, because what he's telling you is that there's the Steel dossier, right, This guy Steel, paid by the DNC, by Hilary's DNC, by her campaign, paid to hold together this stuff on Trump. This guy who says that he felt an urgent need to stop Trump from being president the United States. He

goes around, he talks a bunch of people. He's got these sources. It's just gossip. It's there's no verification, there's nothing. He's just yeah, I know people. I know some Russian dude, some Ukrainian dudes. Whatever, We'll talk to them. And after they had gotten the FISA opened up on carter page, they go for renewal and it comes up that guess what one of the And this is where it's a little bit there's a little bit of a dodge that liberals will use here, a little bit of a game

that it's not. They found that the dossier itself in this way was entirely refuted, although it is refuted, but that there was a subsource, a primary subsource of the dossier. So one of the main people giving information for the dossier told them in January twenty seventeen, Yeah, the dossier's probably all crep. Dossier's probably not something that guys should rely on. And they left that out to get a fire,

to get fies and renewals. That's not that's not the kind of neglect you can explain by people being dumb or ignorant or lazy. That's intentional. That was done for a reason. And it also goes to the entirety of the dossier was a lie. I mean, they're what you have here is investigation built on lies and then perpetuated with more lies. And now they tell us well, because everybody was too stupid to know any of those lies were lies when they happened, there's really not a huge

problem here. No, it's an enormous problem. I don't think they're for right thinking people, for intelligent human beings in this country. I don't think the reputation of the FBI feel you asked for a miracle. I give you the f B. I the greatest Christmas movie of all time? Barnin, Barnin, don't don't give me your Christmas story and your miracle on goal On you know, Dirty Third Street or whatever you know. No, sorry, we all know what the greatest

Christmas movie of all time is. Come out to the coast, have a few laughs. You remember, you guys all know I'm gonna watch this year. I'm gonna watch it, probably with my brothers. This is what we should do on Christmas Day, have a viewing of Die Hard. So the dossier was a central source for the dossier, proved that the dossier was crap, essentially another way of saying the dossier was crap. And by the way, they hid that

from the FISA court. So I think that that's an important part of all this street or No, But now I gotta move now because I know we've we've gotten deep on this stuff. But this is now forward looking. This is where all of this is going because it's not over yet. It's not over yet. Libs, Sorry, we're not done with you, because this attorney general understands exactly what the liberals have tried to do here, what the

Libs have been up to. He knows, and he is the single greatest threat to the democratic establishment right now other than Donald Trump himself. Attorney General bar They're going to come at him with everything they have because he also has one of the finest prosecutors and they've all everyone has known this for a long time. Durham is a fair prosecutor. There has been no there was no deviation from that until oh wait a second, he's been appointed to look at the origins of the entire Russia

collusion conspiracy. Oh no, we don't know if we can trust this guy. Oh no, he's a partisan tool. Now, this is what they're going to be saying. They're going to have to undermine bar and Durham. Durham will be a little tougher because he doesn't really play politics. They've already objected, though, to the statement from Durham's office. They've said, Oh, something must have happened now all of a sudden, Durham isn't the ethical fellow that everybody has known him to

be for all of those years. Something must have happened, something must have changed. You have Dick Durbin, for example, going after Attorney General Producer Brandon, can you please play clip eleven at your convenience? This Attorney General, William P. Barr, has become a partisan tool of this administration. When he aspired to this office, he told all of us face to face, I want to stand up for the integrity

Department of Justice. I want to make sure we have someone there who is going to stand up for the rule of law. And look what we have now. He is critical of an inspector General widely respected. He is critical of the FBI, for goodness sakes, an investigative agency that his department depends on and he's pursuing these wild eyed conspiracy theories traveling to Italy and other places with mister Durham. I mean, I'm afraid mister Barr's credibility is

zero at this point. Nice try Durban. We know exactly what you're trying to pull here. I know what you're trying to do, and I don't like it. Critical of the FB. The FBI is critical of the FBI. Durban, You imbecile. The FBI has completely and utterly be clowned itself. Of course the Attorney General. It would be insane if the Attorney General was not critical of them, but he's now saying that that undermines his credibility. No one in the FBI is standing up saying, hey, you know we

did a great job. Give us, give us a trophy. There are the people involved in this, not only that, should they be hanging their heads in shame, they might be in some trouble. Got to see as they dig into what they what? What are their professional lapses all about? How do they come to this point? But also notice how Durban calls the Attorney General's meetings abroad a conspiracy.

How does Durban know that you know what Durban knows about the Attorney General traveling overseas, nothing, but he's already he's already laying the groundwork. This is propaganda. This is this is straight up malicious pr right. These are the tactics of the demagogue. Get ahead. You don't know what's going on, and you don't know what the results are, but you know that they're not They're not going to be good for your side, because we've seen everything so

far shows us that. So you got to get ahead of it and say these are bad guys, bad people. Don't listen to them, you can't listen to them. And as part of that effort you have and I gotta love this. You have Eric Holder who has written in editorial in the Washington Post about how just sad he is that Attorney General bar is no longer somebody that can be trusted in this way, no longer is somebody that we can look to to tell us the truth.

This is astonishing. But you have Attorney General Holder attacking him in this op ed. And William Barr is unfit to be Attorney general, that is what he has written here. Now, I just before I get into the laughable nature of the charges or the allegations or whatever you want to

call them against Attorney General Barr. I just want to say that it's a it's a rich thing for Eric Holder to be the guy who is making this allegation, considering that Eric Holder famously described himself as President Obama's wingman, that Eric Holder famously was the guy who presided over a federal law enforcement operation that pushed weapons through straw purchasers into the hands of Mexican drug cartels, probably so that they could engage in some you know, sweeping gun

reform and saying, oh, look that the cartels, it's all our fault, all the violence there. So they push gun dealers to sell the straw purchasers. This was Operation Fast and Furious back in what twenty eleven, twenty twelve. They pushed them to do this, and then one of those weapons ends up being used to murder Boarder Patrol agent Brian Terry. About one hundred people were killed by guns directly,

I mean the serial numbers tied to that operation. Eric Holder held in contempt of Congress for not being willing to even discuss anything about it, just, you know whatever, trying to trying to be clever about ways to undermine the Second Amendment. And this is where it is, my friends,

this is what we are now dealing with. And then also there's that little problem of Attorney General Holder at the time being a just a senior Department of Justice employee, but the one directly involved in getting Mark Rich under in the very last days of the Clinton administration, Mark Rich had absconded from the United States. He was a billionaire financier and he never faced justice. He fled and

he was pardoned in absentia by Bill Clinton. The guy was doing illegal oil deals with the RAM and it was under sanctions. He was doing tax evasion. I mean, the guy was a crook. He was pardoned in absentia by Bill Clinton, and Eric Holder got the signatures, got it done. And you know why because Mark Rich's ex wife was a big Democrat owner. It's just it was just a just a pay to play or paid to pardon. Might as well to sell a pardon to the highest bidder,

you know. I mean, there's so much that was wrong with this, but you know, pardon somebody that's fled the country and never faced justice at all for crimes they clearly committed that are still crimes. It's not like he fled the country as some kind of a i know, for a conscience crime. He wasn't a conscientious objector or something. That's Eric Hold for you. Eric Holder's the guy who thought that that wasn't such a big deal. You know, he's admitted sins. You know, maybe maybe that was kind

of bad. Yeah, you don't say. Eric Holder's Justice Department also refused to prosecute a member of the New Black Panther Party who was standing at a polling place threatening people, holding up baton and dressed in the uniform of the New Black Panther Party. Didn't want to prosecute him under civil rights violations, under intimidation at a polling place because you know, I just didn't want to. Yeah, that that

Attorney General Eric Holder. And he's not coming out and criticizing Attorney General Bar Attorney General Bar as ten times a lawyer, Eric Holder ever was that goes without saying or I guess I just said it, So it goes with saying Attorney General Bar was already the attorney general of the George HW. Bush administration. No complaints about him being a you know, a hack right wing apologist or anything.

That no, no, none of that. Considered a very competent, very solid attorney general then was in the office of Legal Counsel and the DJ and is a lawyer's lawyer, I mean as a guy that anybody who's worked in the higher echelons of the DC and New York legal profession knows this guy's the real deal. And the Libs are just gonna lie and lie and lie about him. Eric Holder is writing this. He's unfit to be Attorney general, he says of Bar and what a disgrace. All the

people that were working the Obama administration. I mean they were all they were Obama loyalists, no matter what the situation, no matter what the cause that we're talking about. But they have to treat Bar like Kavanaugh because they know that Bar is a threat to them, and so they will choose to treat him like Kavanaugh as and they will do everything they can to destroy him. They will do everything they can to ruin his reputation, to intimidate him.

You know, they think it's probably like John Roberts or you know, he's running enough me and editorials about John Roberts in the Supreme Court. All of a sudden, he starts agreeing with liberals, you know, it kind of wants the heat off him a little bit, you know, and can justify it by saying, we got to protect the institution of the Supreme Court. I mean, you know, Roberts is if he on his constitutional responsibilities and interpretation a lot of it. People believe it's because of the pressure

that's brought to bear. They're trying to bring pressure against bar The good thing is Bars like bring it on because he knows. He knows, my friends, all that's going to take is one email on one piece of evidence to show that Brennan or Clapper or Comi or one of these deep state actors took what was a conspiracy peddled by the Hillary Clinton campaign against Trump and decided to run with it. And this whole thing and the whole thing unravels. Now, will they ever admit that they

were wrong? No, of course not. They'll pull a Comi. This guy, doesn't matter how many facts come out to show that he's a lie, that he's unethical, that he's a scummy, scummy individual. Never admit that he was wrong. But that doesn't mean that we won't have proof that he was wrong. And Barr and Durham are going to

get that and then some in this investigation. I told you that there don't expect there to be fireworks, don't expect, you know, there to be quote heads rolling, so to speak, over the IG report, that the bureaucracy would always kind of protect itself. Benefit of the doubt goes to the the employees.

The AG report that you're going to see with Durham, that's going to be the one where Democrats really just need to hang their heads in shame for well they won't though, because they have no shame, but they should. As we gather this afternoon, our thoughts turned to the

grieving families in New Jersey. Yesterday, two wicked murderers open fire at a culture supermarket and kill for innocent souls, including a brave police officer who faced down the shooter and very bravely faced the shooter down with one hard America weeps for the lives lost with one voice. We vowed to crush a monstrous evil of anti Semitism whenever and wherever it appears. And we're working very hard on that.

And I can tell you that that we have a lot of people in government working very very hard on that and we appreciate their work. It's not easy. As David Harsani was saying before, the President is a friend to Jewish Americans and also a friend to our ally Israel. I would just note that this terrible attack, this anti Semitic attack, as we know now by two members of the Black Israelites. Whatever that ideology, whatever, however we religion.

I guess it's a religion interesting enough for Sheeta to leave. How did delete a tweet right after that shooting because guess what she thought? She tweeted that the attack in Jersey City was the result of white supremacy. Initially, Black Rifle Coffee is celebrating it's fifth anniversary. So to celebrate that, they decided to start a little something called Black Rifle Friday. Now, some of you may think, is that a fictional holiday,

you know, like Valentine's Day, created to sell stuff? And the answers yes, because Black Rifle Coffee is all about capitalism and America. You've got to get in on the coffee club, my friends. Sign up and see all the great benefits you'll get when you belong to the most patriotic coffee club in the country. And let me tell you how do I start every day with a delicious cup of Black Rifle Coffee. This is my coffee company.

You should make it yours too. This is where I get my morning jolt, This is where I get my afternoon pick me up. Black Rifle Coffee support a company that serves culture and coffee to those who love America. Visit Black Riflecoffee dot com slash buck to get twenty percent off your first purchase. That's Black Riflecoffee dot com, slash buck for twenty percent off your first purchase. Again, Black Rifle Coffee dot Calm slash But we do not have all the answers yet. Today is the start of

a journey. But this is Europe's man on the moon moment. The European Green Deal is very ambitious, but it will also be very careful in assessing the impact and every single step. We're typing a European Green new deal. Yeah, does it sircut? Here we have Ursula vander Leon guten Tag talking about the need for a European Green deal. Yeah.

The European Commission President. She is very precise and very committed to luring the rate of sea or two wins the world by making shows that you don't have too many cow fault or you ride too many bicycle was a little motos on a motorbike? What day? You know what? You know what I mean, I messed up a bicycle thing where you get the idea. Europe's in this thing too, a green new deal. Oh, let's let's all just jump

into this insanity. Do you look at the CO two emissions from say, China and India over the last twenty years, going up, up, up. I'm not going to stop anytime soon. The US has actually gone down since the year two thousand and No one seems to care. No one seems to care about a few things. One that we're doing more than the other primary CO two emitters too, that it doesn't matter what we do if they don't do a whole lot more than they're doing in India and China.

And three this is all crazy. CO two is not a problem, it's not. It's just that I wish there are ways. I wish there are ways to bet on these things effectively. You know, I wish there was a market where I could say that that the prediction of the climate change. There is a market. It's called that For example, the beachfront housing market. It has not budged because of climate change. Oh it's all gonna be underwater. Nope,

thirty your mortgage. You're not getting a good deal on that beach house in Florida or in California, or you name it. Moth's Vineyard. Have you every been to Martha's Vineyard, Brandon. It's pretty amazing. You know, it's nice to the Martha's Vineyard though, I'm just gonna say it, Nantuckett. It's like a little mini Martha's Vineyard. But it's even cooler. Martha's Vinyard is very, very nice. I used to go there. I went to a beach. I will tell you. I

was brought there by my college girlfriend. And the beach was, in fact a beach that you needed a key to access. And let me tell you the most interesting part of that beach, Brandon, it was a nude beach. And it's true. Now you know what. You know what the reality of a nude beaches. It's not it's not what you it's not what people they here nude beach. They're like, yeah,

they think it's gonna be a Budweiser commercial. But like old men, I saw some people on the naked Beach in the Vineyard, and there was not a single one of them I think under the age of sixty. So you know, we were all very free. We were very free at the naked Beach. There's a lot of breeze, the sea, salt air. But no, it's not not what you think it's gonna it's not. It's definitely not a beer commercial out there. I can tell you that a different meaning to freedom. Hut. I'm sure it's that's a

super free freedom. Hut. Yeah, that's what it was. But I do remember being there that was did I did I wear a bathing suit or not? So this is the problem when you go to naked beach and if you don't go naked, now you're kind of the weird you know. Now you're the weirdo. Now you're the jackass. You know what I mean? Why are you hiding? Exactly? And it's kind of are you hiding? Yeah, there's there's that too, and there's nerves. There's nothing to hide at

the naked beach. You just let that sea breeze blow all over the place. I think producer Nick is like, what the hell are you doing? He's he's got a fair point. But I'm just telling you there is a Naked Beach and Martha's Vineyard. But you got it. Only the special people are allowed to go. You gotta have a key, you gotta be invited. I know some people. So I went to the Naked Beach. Oh what are

we talking about? Real estate? Talking about coastal real estate? Sometimes, you know, I go little you a little cut up. And there's also amazing restaurants in the Vineyard and Nantucket, and it's where all the fancy, super rich, you know, journos and media types and all that. That's where they all go. You know, if you want to see where like Chris Matthews and you know, I don't know, I'm probably Anderson Cooper, and they go to the Hamptons. It's

the Hamptons, Nantucket and Martha's Vineyard. But you're not going to get a good deal on oceanfront property in any of those places, despite the despite the warnings from the climate change alarmists that we're all going to be under water in those areas, and you know the terrible things. The wets are going to get wet, or the colds will get colder, the hots will get hotter. This is

this is amazing stupidity. I'm kind of stunned that people really waste so much emotional and intellectual energy on something it's so obviously preposterous. But speaking of obviously preposterous and a waste of intellectual energy, let's talk about Elizabeth Warren for a moment, shall we. I thought this was as just one of these moments where you know, I don't

know who's really at fault here. Is it the policy advisor that nobody's ever heard of, who decides that she's going to have to do, who has to answer a question that nobody would have a really good answer for. Or is it the person that she's supposed to be speaking on behalf of in this case, Elizabeth Warren, who, let's be real about this for a minute, wouldn't be able to answer this question her self. Really, wow, heart believed we should have a foreign policy where the corrupt

and the rich aren't able to just run everything. You know, my daddy was a male man, my mom was a homemaker. I grew up thinking I was Cherokee. You know, there's all this stuff. You know, Elizabeth, it's always the same. Oh, I'm so folksy, you know, I have this kind of uniform. I wear all black except from a little sweater, colorful sweater as a bit of flair. Do you when you used to go to work, Brandon back in the day,

did you ever wear thirty two pieces of flair? Did you go with the minimum thirty two pieces of flair? Or did you actually want to express yourself? I just watched that this weekend. Did you really? I didn't know that, and yet here we are talking about it. That's one of the better That's one of the better moments because

we've all had that. Lumberg is the best character in the movie, by the way, because that degree of soulless passive aggressive exists in office culture in so many different places, and it's very you know, you know that the guy is crushing is crushing your life and your very being with his annoying bureaucratic requests and his complete lack of

respect for his human being. But unless he's being like abusive or you know, it's very hard for you to do anything about it, unless you show up wearing flip flops and you're like having a meeting with the two bobs. Yeah, that'd be great. Yeah, I'm gonna come in on Sunday. Yeah, Lumberg is amazing that. He's the best. He's the best thing I think in the whole some people like Milton Adams or whatever, he's okay, But Lumburg is a character

for the ad because we've all had a lot. I mean, I mean I at the CIA, I had a person just like Lumberg, just like Lumberg in terms of that approach program director. Oh, I'm sorry, I'm sorry. You wanted to go. Oh oh, you think you're going away for the weekend with your girlfriend and see your family. Oh you think you're Oh no, someone has to stay here and foot and out Eustace reports all weekend. Oh oh, I've had that. It's terrible. Yeah, person didn't really sound

like that, but that's what I heard. You know. It's like the mom from from the I was gonna say the Brady Bunch, Charlie Brown, baop, you know what I'm talking about. So, yeah, the teacher from the Peanuts. Yeah, oh wait, so I was to talk to you. That's right, the teacher from Pean Is it the teacher for Peanuts yet? Or I thought it was the mom. No, there's the mom from Bobby's World. There's a teacher from Peanuts. I'm

getting them. I'm mixing my cartoon characters here. Okay, all right, sorry, Brandon, Brandon's on point. I'm getting a little confused. Uh, let's get back to a foreign policy, shall we. No, No, you can't. Don't run away from the board. Board Brandon as well as producer Brandon. We gotta have you because this is what happens when you ask Elishabeth Warrenge campaign staff, You ask them why is her foreign policy? You got to be different from any of these other pseudocammy foreign

policies out there with these Democrats. And here's what gets said. Please play us seven listen. I think Senator warren Is is uninterested in sort of criticizing fellow Democrats, but you know where what she believes is that it won't be enough for us to just turn the clock back to pre Trump and sort of go about business as usual.

She believes that we need to have fundamental shifts not only in our foreign policy, in our policies writ large, but to use foreign policy as an example so that so that our foreign healthies are actually benefiting and resonating with working Americans. And that's not nibbling around the edges, and I think that is one of the things that makes her distinct. That's amazing. By the way, even Prouser Brandon is kind of like chuckling a little. That's amazing.

That is the most fantastic talking head spokesperson non answer answer to require. I mean, that's they should study that in schools about non answers from people that work for political campaigns. Here, it's like, we're not going to turn the clock back and have business as usual. We're gonna have fundamental shifts and change foreign policy. Writ large by bring it back to working people. She just does this whole. It's just like it's like anti you know, paint by numbers.

It's foreign policy answer by numbers. And never rust anybody who uses the term written large and doesn't make fun of themselves for it. All right, it's a huge It's a DC tell. Everyone in DC always says, well, writ large. They also love to say close the loop, circle back. I'd love to say, uh, you know, written large is the big on optic. You know, from my optic, have just my perspective or from how I see it, or just say the thing don't have to be like from

my optic. These are things that this is DC speak, and people that go to places like you know, international relations master's programs, which is pretty much I'm sure what you need to be the policy advisor for Elizabeth Warren on foreign policy. But I've never heard of this person before.

But her answer was just amazing because one, she didn't have an answer that was you could tell she goes well, first, let's make sure that because she was asked, how is Elizabeth Warren's foreign policy different from the other Democrat candidates? And you know, oh, first, I just wanted to make sure that we're not you know, bashing she's stalling. I'm like, I do a ton of TV and radio and things. You guys all know this, so I know the ins and outs of this back. I mean, I could definitely.

I have trained people. In fact, there are people that now host things at Fox that I trained how to do TV. But that's a story for a story for another time. And the other are friends of mine. I mean, I'm so happy that they've done so very very well. But I mean I could train. I mean, am I am I the old aging samurai warrior of media that does not want to teach everybody the skills because I cannot trust them to use them for good. But when I do raise that katana sword, it is as a

true master. Answer is yes, Although do samurai carry katana? Now? Do they have katana stories that only ninjas? Haven't you watched the eighties Ninja movie recently? You're my pop culture. You and producer Mark are here to make sure that I know the things I'm not sure. I mean, can

you please find it? Do samurai carry? I cannot leave the audience astray on an issue of Marshall prowess and ninja skills, So I need to know if he's like running the board to all these things that I love throwing these little stupid tasks like hey, do samurai carry katana swords? They call it something else. Um. Anyway, I understand how to how the game works, especially when you're asked a question you know that you don't have a good answer to the first thing, are we Is that right?

What do they carry? According to the Internet, Samurai's traditionally carried two tempered steel swords, the katana bam for fighting. And I can even this. It's a touchdown a twelve inch dagger. I can't pronounce how it's actual spelled uh wakazal w a k i z a s hi. Well, I have no I don't know what that is. Wakizashi WA's That would also be a cool name for a band in Williamsburg, the wakazashi or Pokemon shore. Um okay, yeah, the little little sta long sword, little sword, I know,

I know that stuff. Okay. So now that we've established what ancient samurai carried in case you need to know, um, this is this is a perfect encapsulation of when people don't have an answer in foreign policy or don't have an answer to something and they just want to they just want to talk, you know, they just want to discuss and sound they want the listener to think that this is a smart person without the person understanding, the

listener understanding that whoever's giving this answer is just completely like making it up as they go along. Like that's really the that's really the goal here, that's the real goal of this. And that was a particularly a particularly good example of it. You know, Yeah, we're just gonna like do business. We're not gonna do business as usual. We're gonna have fundamental shifts and we're gonna rit large turn back to foreign policy, that works for working people. Brendan,

what does that even mean? Like do people do people sit around in Kansas saying themselves like, well, clearly, if we did just a little bit more to get this, uh you know agreement going in Latin America that will figure are out the realities of law enforce and for the tri border region, I'll be able to pay my bills more effectively. I don't think so, you know, there's something there's some foreign policy matters where like you know,

Main Street neither cares nor should care. But I just I just love this though it's just to spin the talking points together. Whoever is you, I salute you, Sasha Baker for giving the most amazing non answer answer I have heard in quite some time. That was a lot

of fun. I might break my no movies in the theater rule once again, you know, because I did go see Joker, which I thought was worthwhile and I enjoyed, and I like the way that they not just the way that they executed the story, but that they made it interesting. They created they added layers to an area of the Batman franchise, They added things to it that

fit and that were cool, that made sense. And then of course there's just a human exploration of evil and really just you know, psychosis and the descent into evil, and it was very, very interesting. So then we go to this Richard Jewel movie, which I think I'm gonna have to check out. Here's actual Now this is the the Olympic Park bomber situation. I'm gonna have to dig into this story a bit more. You know what, Preacher brand that it would be fun to maybe try to

get some people from the movie. I mean, I don't think Clint east Wood would do the show easily. I mean he would love the show if he listened to it. I mean Clinton I would be very sympatico obviously, but we would should we should get somebody if we can, to come on and talk about this. Because here's how I know. I want to see the Richard Richard Jewel movie. Libs hate it, so then you know, it's got to be good. You know, I used to have a teacher back in the fourth grade. It's say, if it's black

and white, it's got to be good. That was his which Bodo is not true, not true. That's right. I refuse to bow to the black and white movie propaganda that says that. Oh, if it's an old movie. No, most old movies had indicating instead of acting, had cheesy dialogue. I know, Send Me or All Buck, what about you know, Gone with the Wind or whatever your favorite. And there's some good ones, you know, north By Northwest. I've seen them. I took film class. But most old movies are boring

in Lane, Okay. You know, sometimes I want to see a ninja fight and you know, some some guys drinking too much and maybe some you know, some stuff happening with some ladies and not a lot of clothing off. I'm just saying, like this is you know, it's at our tab in folks, it's supposed but where was I? Um, I have no idea what Brandon, You're completely we just crossed the streams. I don't even remember what was Oh, Richard, Yeah, are you are you planning to go to go possibly

see this movie? Would you check it out? I would like to see it that you don't know if I want to pay for it. It's not exactly a date movie, is it. I mean they could be. I guess well. You know, there's a big problem because the reporter and it's based on real people. The reporter in it. They take some dramatic license and they the reporter sleeps with a I believe either law enforcement or somebody else's I

didn't see the movie yet as a source. And all the journals now people are upset because she's the journalist. As she passed away, she's not around to protect yourself. And that looks because it's based on a real person. I got on. But but I thought it was interesting because you also do the journalist whore like that never happens. Oh, yes it does, as it does. Journalists sometimes get a little close to the source. Biographers get a little close

to the source. Hello, General Petreius. You know, things happen. Things happened. I just thought it was so funny that in their in their haste to bash this one aspect of the movie, that they said. Of course, they said it's sexist, it's a sexist trope that a female journalist would sleep with the source and all this stuff. And then there was that guy who I think is facing prison time from a Senate an intelligence committee for sleeping with the New York Times journalist who he was given

information to. That's just one that comes to mind, and that was like two years ago. So Oh wait, but I want to just give you some of Richard Jewel's actual testimony. Hold up, So the Richard Jewel movie is out, I believe are about to be out. It's Clinicswood directed. I think Clinicswood have done some great stuff recently. I really enjoyed Grand Cerino a lot. I think it's a very good movie for what it is. I thought The

Mule was a little contrived and kind of boring. To be honest with you, I really didn't like The Mule very much as a movie, but I did think Grand Cerino was excellent, and I thought American Sniper was excellent. So Clint has done some fantastic work, lots of fantastic work. But here's the real Richard Jewel testifying back in ninety simember. This guy they, you know, there was this bombing in the Olympic Park and his name was leaked by the

FBI to the media. And then even though it was clear to FBI early on that this guy really didn't do it, they kind of kept putting him through the ringer play clip nine. Please before you today, not as a Republican or a Democrat. I have no political agenda. I've come before you, simply as an American citizen with

rights just like everybody else. One year ago today, the FBI and the media joined together to launch an attack on me of unparalleled proportion in the history of this nation, an attack calculated to betray me to the world as some type of abnormal person with a bizarre employment history who was guilty of the Centennial Olympic Park bombing. It

was all a lie. Two days ago, the Justice Department issued a written report about its investigation into a few of the unlawful acts committed by the FBI and its investigation of me. You already pick up on this, I'm sure, but this movie comes at a particularly opportune time, given that it deals with FBI malfeasance, given that it deals with what is clearly an FBI that sometimes cares way too much about the press narrative, cares about the political

pressure around their work. So in a sense, this has been a problem for a long time and nothing really ever changes. I think what's going on now with the FISA abuse and the deep state cougains Trump, I think that's all much worse. But at least this is a This is a way of remembering that FBI whether it's this Waco Ruby Ridge. You look at some of these different situations, high profile situations the FBI has been involved in, and we all understand that there's going to be mistakes

that are made. But there are mistakes and then there's hold on a second, this is crossing a line. This is also a continuation here of Richard Jewell had to say, play clip ten. This is that same testimony. While I have not had an opportunity to study the OPR report in detail, I did read redacted summary yesterday. I submit to you that the Justice Department cannot be trusted to

investigate itself because that report is also a lie. It is filled with false statements, have truth, and gross distortions of the truth. Read it. It reminded me of reading the FBI search warrn affidavits against me. Apparently, truth to the Justice Department simply is simply whatever the Justice Department wants the truth to be. Within a few days after my name was leaked to the media, the FBI knew that it had a public relations disaster on its hands.

The organization that prided itself on being the best investigative agency in the world had quickly and with the world Watching pointed the federal government's finger of guilt at the wrong man, and they knew it within days. Not only did the FBI, yeah, I accused the wrong man, it's agents in Atlanta and officials in Washington actively participated in publicly humiliating me. Pretty haunting stuff to hear, given what's gone on this last week. What we've found out, isn't it.

Here we have someone who did nothing wrong and whose name was leaked to the media and turned into media circus, and he was destroyed, his reputation, ability to earn a living. I mean, there's so much that damage that was done to this fellow, and it was because of many of the same reasons that we see damage done today when law enforcement is far too close to the press and they're chasing a similar story, whatever that may be, instead

of where the facts lead them. So I just I couldn't help but listen to that Richard Jewel testimony and think, Wow, has there really been any reformer than the FBI? Have things gotten better in any meaningful way since then? Then? Keep in mind that that was nineteen eighty six, That was before nine to eleven and the stovepiping of intelligence between the CIA, the FBI, and other national security agencies.

We of course have to hold them two standards. Have to hold these different government actors to standards that are fair. We can't ask them to be perfect, but we also can't allow them to be incompetent and even worse, malicious. We've definitely seen incompetence with this whole PISA abuse. I think we've also, beyond reasonable doubt, seen maliciousness and that has to be rooted out, stem and branch. Rock and roll,

fellow patriots, we made ours go up to eleven. It's time for roll call, all right, he heard the man. It's time for a role call. Hey, listen the bucks Xton the show where we all do radio voices. Brandon, what do you think could I be a DJ on w W K k r X tu V Hey playing the greatest hits of the nineties, the two thousands, and some stuff from nineteen forty five, just because we feel like mix it and up. As long as you hit

the post, you're hired. What does that even mean? Oh so you don't know yet, You got to it's the It's the intro to a song, you know, when you're kind of talking over the instrumental and as soon as you're done talking, that's when the lyrics kick in. All of a sudden, Potawan becomes obi Wan over here. Oh yeah, no, I didn't know anything about this. It's called hit the post.

That is that when you do the like so the song start playing and you're like and now step into a warm bath of jazz and like it's playing or no. I don't know if you would do it over jazz because there's not much lyrics. But if you hear I'm getting all nerdy about it. No no, no, no, no, no, get to I want to. We want to learn. I mean, what if you know, if this whole like talk radio thing doesn't work out, maybe I get to be a DJ.

I mean if you're introducing like a Tailor Swift song per se, right, you know which which I would love to because t Swift and I know there's something there. A fourteen second intro before she starts singing about whatever her boy broke her heart. So you're talking for fourteen seconds and as soon as you're done, she comes in. You ever wonder on the down on the radio people the DJs time it out so well. Hm, that's that's what you do we gotta hit the post? I gotta

hit the post, all right, that's cool. I did not. I did not know that that's kind of fun. I do remember when I used to tape radio off, like tape it with a VA, you know, a cassette, you know, and I would hate because like I wanted just the music, because I wanted to, you know, basically steal the music

for myself. Yeah, back in the pre MP three days and they would have the guy be like, hey, like get your tickets for blah blah blah, and you know, and they'd be talking over it, and I was like, no, I do not want to work out to DJ whatever his name is. DJ disc jockey. Quite a term that's gotten a lot of usage. You can think about it over all the years. So sure. And it's also a sacrilegious and classic rock because you're not supposed to talk over the you know, the iconic guitar solos or riffs

at the beginning. I once got yelled at by talking over the beginning of a Stairway to Heaven. I was about to say, if you talk over stairway, do you get in trouble? Yeah? I got yelled at my youth I was like, He's like, it's such a long intro before Robert, that's super long intro. You can't just be like, you know, who's got his own Stairway to Heaven. Producer Brandon, That's not no, that's that you're not allowed to do that. Huh. All right, well learn something that hit the post though.

We got to work that in. Gotta figure that out. All right, all right, I'm sorry I said roll call. I know I wasn't. I get I get distracted. I'm trying to leverage Producer Brandon's rock DJ by the way, produce your brand, and I'm saying it now on air so that we don't get Tomorrow we are going to talk about your podcast, which is for those who are serious metal heads out there or rock aficionados, whatever your

preferred terminology may be, is about what is it? Just Just give them the one line or prayse and we'll get to appreciate appetite for distortion. So if you like anything guns and roses and fits in with our six degrees of gen R. Bacon instead of Kevin Bacon, that's what we talk about, guns and roses and everything related to the world thereof. All right, cool, we got that team buck emails. Let's do it, Team Bucket. iHeartMedia dot Com.

Harry right, Oh, veggie eaters, let's see, hey buck. My stepdaughter was vegetarian for about todler to about sixteen during high school. She would come home and sleep for a couple of hours, totally exhausted, change your mind, and became and began eating a couple of fast food burgers in the way home every day. Stopped crashing when she got home. Her levels of energy increase. She became less surly. Eat critters. Humans need be vitamins, which are hard to get otherwise.

By the way, I read that, otters link arms so they don't float away from each other and get lost. Otters are my wife's favorite creatures from her time in Alaska. She'll tie Harry Well, Harry, thank you. There's a lot of antiotter propaganda out there. A lot of people say mean things about how otters make little otters. For example,

like there's a whole no on big serious. There's a whole thing about how they're very you know, aggressive, and they're they're evil because of what they do to I'm just saying there's an otter patriarchy basically that's a bad thing from what I'm told Michelle. Good day, sir um, Well, this is something else. This is an invitation to go speak somewhere. Let's not get into that, Kevin, right, sir back, it's a pleasure to listen to broadcast. It's a sad day.

Oh yeah. By the way, if you do want me to come speak at your you know, meeting of Great American Patriots or the Rotary Club or like whatever you got going on, just go. You can send it into this inbox and we'll see it. So people people like to have the Buckster come and speak. I'm a fantastic live speaker, by the way, FANTASTICA not gonna lie, fantastic live speaker, Kevin writes, buck It's a pleasure to listen

to broadcast. It's sad day when Time magazine awards, which should be a well deserved award to a petulent child was only a matter of time. However, given the credence they gave to David Hogg, tell me, how can one be underwritten as a survivor when said survivor wasn't even at school at the time. Impeachment wise, I hope McConnell drags the hearings that, as long as possible, expose them all, including Obama, Lauretta Lynch, the whole troop. I hope you

on the staff have a blessed the holiday season. Shields High. Kevin from Omaha listening on k f A B one of our wonderful affiliates out there in the great state of Nebraska. Shout out to all kfaby Omaha, you guys rock. Here we go, h Fiona. Oh yeah, Producer Nick just wrote the truthfulness of hog not being at school is questionable. Thank you. I don't know I start. Thank you a

producer Nick for the fact check there. Producer Nick is like, he's like the eye in the sky for us, but he doesn't he's not actually in the studio with us. So that's why you don't hear me talking. Although it would be fun, Producer Nick, since you are like the Almighty and you see all you know, maybe we could create a way to sometimes have you being able to pipe in from the remote location the bunker, the Freedom Bunker, where you are currently. I'm just a thought, man, just

a thought. But you and Producer Brandon could talk about the best rock bands of all time? Is punk rock its own genre of rock, or should it just be in the greater rock pantheon for example. I'm just trying to start. I'm trying to start some stuff here. Is that? Was that a good one? Is that a thing that people fight over? And I probably just made that up? I don't know. I think you made it up. Yeah, alright, Fiona, all right. I'm a transgender person and support our president.

Oh nice, thanks, Fionna. I feel that more LGBTQ should support our president and can't understand why they don't. When I ask my community members what potus has done to disparage us, or what policy he's enacted that takes gay rights away, they draw a blank. Now that we're on the precipice of impeachment and Mike Pence is on deck, I think it's more important than ever to try to reach the lgbt Q members. Peace baby, Fiona. Well, Fiona, you know, I'm very pleased. It's nice to have somebody

not just who's LGBTQ. We do have a lot of folks from that community who listened to the show and who write in, but specifically someone who's trends and appreciates what we do here. Welcome, welcome to Team Buck and thank you for listening. And as for all your point here, I mean I totally agree. I mean Trump is he's in no way anti anti gay, he's not anti LGBTQ. And he's the first president. I mean he was holding up the gay Pride flag on stage during campaign events,

you know, proudly holding it up on stage. Do you think the media ever said, oh wow, I mean, I guess he's no, of course, because there's there's so there's such deep roots to this. But you know, identity politics on the left are always a means to an end, and so it's not even it doesn't matter if somebody is good to one particular group within the identity politics world, because all the way the left brings us up, all those identity politics groups have to work together against the other.

And the other in this case is you know, conservative, traditional Christian patriarchy, etc. Etc. Republicanism, conservatism, So you're not allowed to deviate from that. So even if somebody, say, even if somebody's the greatest friend ever as president to the gay and lesbian community, for example, it doesn't matter as far as much of the left or as far as the left is concerned because it's about mobilizing that

community for other purposes. I mean, this is classical. It's about mobilizing the LGBTQ community not just for their own rights, but for all the rest of the left wing agenda. So you're not allowed, it's not allowed to be identity politics policies a la carte, they do not allow that. That is a distinction. So any Fiona, thanks for writing in RC right. Buck wondering if you read your mail aside from at the end of your show. If so,

do you have time or interest in chatting? Thanks Randy, Randy, Yeah, I read. I read all the mail that I can, everything that comes in, pretty much. He has kind of an interesting little thing at the bottom here, Shield's eye, sweeplow, thrust once, drink black rifle, stand and repeat. All right, cool, Randy, Thank you man, Thanks for listening to the show. Let's see so many emails coming in. Oh good heavens, how do we get to them all? There's so many, so

many hundreds and hundreds to say. Oh but I'm from team Buck and I haven't pulled things to say today on the show, Dan writes, Buck, why is nobody talking about the similarities between the Daniel Ellsberg wire tap in nineteen seventy two and Trump spy spy Gate twenty sixteen people were imprisoned for that. Well, Dan, why don't you write in with more detail, my man, so I can

read it on the air. But very few people, I think today that are having conversations about spygate even remember what happened back in the Ellsberg era in nineteen seventy two. So it's incumbent upon us those who do have some knowledge of it, or do have some understanding of the history here to remind everybody about that and bring it all to the four SO team. That is going to

be the show today. Hope you're enjoying it. If you haven't already, please do check out Pluto channel two forty eight, the first you can watch what goes on here in the Freedom Hunt. It's a great way to catch up on the show. Enjoy the show from your smartphone anywhere, anytime and until next time, which is tomorrow. Shieldside Global Verification Network is the only dual certified veteran owned background

investigation and vetting company. They are federally certified as a veteran owned small business and they are headquartered at Chicago with officers throughout the nation. Their riskmunigation experts work with startups all the way up to Fortune one hundred companies. So for all of your background check needs, call Global Verification Network. No data or client information is ever offshore, and all of their employees located here in the United States. Keep it all here at home in the US and

go with a veteran owned and operated company. For all of your background check needs, Global Verification Network call eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine. Again, that's eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine. Or go to MYGBN dot com. Again, that's MYGVN dot com Global Verification Network. Leave no stone unturned.