Caravan Lies

veterans of the United States Special Forces. These guys are amazing. Black Rifles Coffee Club makes things so easy. Just pick your blend amount you want and they'll ship the coffee right to your door. Check this out for yourself. They offer three, six and twelve month prepaid and pay as you go subscriptions. The best tasting, most energizing coffee imaginable, and they help veteran first responder causes. Black Rifle Coffee

is the gift that keeps on giving. Visit Black Riflecoffee dot com slash buck for fifteen percent off your order. That's Black Riflecoffee dot Com slash buck for fifteen percent off. You are entering the freedom hunt. Lies, lies and more lies from the media about the caravan for weeks all the way up to today. Just what is the truth of what's been going on south of our border and what can we do about it? Plus general motors cutting about fifteen thousand jobs. People are starting to say they're

worried about the economy, China, the trade war. We will get to the truth separated from the fiction, and also the latest on the Mullar probe coming up on the buck Sexton Show. This is the buck Sexton Show where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a great American Again, The buck Sexton Show begins Analyst, No, here we look at children get being subjected to tear gas.

That's the United States causing that. That's outrageous as we have seen the images of the children and the women, and there has got to be a pragmatic and compassionate answer here that does not involved here gassing children. That is not who America is. Little questions whether or not anyone actually through rocks. Yesterday MPR was reporting that actually it was relatively peaceful, Welcome to the buck section, Cheryl.

The media is lying to you, lying through straight out falsehood, lying through misdirection, through exaggeration, all kinds of lies, omission, misdirection, you name it, lying to you about what's going on with immigration with illegal aliens. With every aspect of this debate and discussion, they are constantly throwing up nonsense and hoping that we don't catch on. Do it. Let me just give you a quick, a quick and dirty here on the lies on immigration. You're just hearing there about

tear gass and children. No, they deployed tear gas against a mob, a mob that was using women and children as human shields while they threw rocks at border patrol officers. What it's border patrols supposed to do? Put down their shields, no tear gas. So yeah, I just threw rocks at us because you know there are kids around here. They have use of force protocols for a reason, and the use of force protocols were adhered to. But here are the biggest media eyes about the caravan crisis. Number one,

it's mostly women and children. No, it is not, but you've heard that from so many people. Oh, it's women and children. It's women and children. That's not true. Why have you been told that so many times with the media, Well, because it's easy for them to lie about this. It makes their base happy. Number two, it's mostly valid asylum seekers. No, it is not. In fact, we'll play later for you.

A guy at MSNBC made the I'm sure unforgivable over there, mistake of reporting on the truth of what is going on with this caravan. Big, big problem. You can't can't tell people the truth. They're not asylum seekers in a valid sense. They are fraudulent asylum seekers. They will say what they are told to say, what they're being coached to say at the border, when in reality they are economic migrants who are seeking to be in the United States.

People keep saying, oh, they're seeking better opportunity. Yeah, I mean also they're seeking a large, safe, wealthy welfare state, which is what America is for a lot of legal aliens. So there's that. Number Three, another big media lie here. No criminals. Remember we were talking about in the early days the caravan, how there's probably criminal elements and there's

a safety issue here. Oh no, no, no criminals. They were saying, Well, now it turns out that just based on whom they've already identified so far, we're looking at about six hundred criminals, which is roughly ten percent of the caravan overall, are known criminals apart from the criminal act of trying to cross in the United States not at a port of entry illegally. So there are plenty of people to look at here and say, oh, that that's actually a criminal. That's so that's a big line.

Number five, no external organizers, No external organizers. Well, who are the people that are showing up and providing legal advice and food and water and assisting them? And oh, you mean there are organizers there? Yep. Of course. Number six, that the troop deployment is not helpful. It turns out the Customs and Border Patrol disagrees with the notion that the US military presence of the border was not helpful. They found that to be quite helpful and they could

use more assistance. And then another lie here number seven, that there's no un there's no threat to US personnel posed by this whole caravan. Play play five and play six. Here Brandon Plan both kind of challenge that this was a peaceful protest or the majority of these people were claiming asylum. We ended up making about forty two arrests. Only eight of those were females, and there were only a few children involved. The vast majority of the people

were dealing with their adult males. One of the groups that I watched one of the groups that actually several of them were arrested. They passed ten or fifteen marked Border patil units walking east to west or west to east. I'm sorry, numerous uniform personnel as they were chanting, waving a Honduran flag and throwing rocks at the agents. If they were truly asylum seekers, they would have just walked up with their hands up and surrendered, and that did

not take place. What I find uncomfortable is that people would intentionally take children into this situation. What we saw over and over yesterday was that the group, the caravan as we call them, would push women and children towards the front and then begin basically rocking our agents. Our agents were being an assaulted. Large group rushed the area and they were throwing rocks and bottles at my men and women, putting them in harm's way as well as

other members of the caravan. We needed to disperse the group, and with that assaultive nature, it was it was imperative that we dispersed them from the area. And we started off the show with all these people like, oh, they're tear gassing children. That's just a lot. They deployed tear gas against rioters and rock throwers and some people happen to have children there. This would be like saying they're

they're they're shooting children. They're shooting children, Uh, you know, at when when the police have to intervene in a terrorist incident. No, they they shot at people who were terrorists and there were children nearby because they were trying to save lives. It would not be it would not be a proper description to just say, well they shot at children. Yeah, there were bullets that were flying, but they weren't actually trying to hurt the children. They were

trying to get other people. I mean. But this is what I mean. This is this is what the media does, whether it's you know, reporting on how Hamas operates against Israel or reporting on how our own border patrol deals with people trying to get across the border. They just find ways to twist it, to lie about it. Here's a perfect example. There are photos there are journalists, lots of people down there. I was actually going to go down there this week, but the last minute my travel

plants had to change. I wanted to go, but I basically couldn't get somebody to cover from me on Rising and so I had to I got responsibilities, but I was trying to get down there for the whole week. Hopefully they'll get down there soon. There's plenty of people covering this issue, lots of media down there. They see what's going on, they know, but you can do this anywhere. They pick one photo, one photo to talk about on TV as though that's indicative of everything that's happening and

the entire problem. You know, here's the media just freaking out about this play eight. But look at the photo. See for yourself. That group and includes men, women, and several children, some of them trying to cross after being denied access to the port of entry where they could legally claim asylum. One photo shows a mother struggling to scoop up her children and flee the fumes. And in this photo shared around the world, shows a family running

from the fumes. This is a shameful American moment. It's a shameful American moment. Those children, those pictures are the pictures we saw at the end of the Vietnam War. Comparing this to the end of Vietnam War, I mean, these people have no shame. They also seem to have no brains, but they have no shame. They're all talking about the same photo. I saw that there was one photo they really like, just like when we had family

separation to shoot the border. Remember, they showed the child who was crying, and that was emblematic of the whole situation that was supposed to symbolize all of it turns out that she wasn't even separated from her family. And when you learn the backstory of the photo, it's propaganda. It's it's not an honest representation of what was going on there. And to say that what's happened at the border to find one family with a woman, you know, who's grabbing her child by the arm, I gotta tell you.

If you've got small kids and you think that bring them into a riot situation is smart, you know, at what point do the parents deserve a whole On a second, what the heck are you doing here? Moment? You know, put your children in harm's way? And that way, what if just this mob that's trying to crawl over the fences and overrun border patrol, of one of them, you know, runs into your child, runs over your child, A is it trying to flee the to your gas. I mean,

it's just a dangerous situation. And the fact that there are all these reports that they actually try to push them the women in the caravan forward, push the children forward, goes to show you, at least in some cases, what kind of men we're really dealing with here. Are these people of honor and integrity who are trying to come across the border. If they're putting women and children in front as they are antagonizing and assaulting police, I think we all know the answer to that. And also this

notion that throwing rocks is not a big deal. Let me tell you to all the libs over at c in An MSNBC who were acting like that's just you know what happens, man, No, it is not. If they were to try throwing a rock at a DC Metro cop, they'd be lucky if the worst that happened was that the guy pulled out of baton and went to work on their knees. While they arrested them. You don't get to throw rocks at people just you know, think about this form. What if one of those rocks actually had

hit a border patrol agent in the temple? I mean, what if it hit him in the nose? Did you want to be that border patrol agent. We're not talking about mean words. We're talking about protests. We're talking about people who are engaged in assault with a weapon, using a projectile here. You know, I like that that Tom Homan's out there, somebody's out there with real back and

real knowledge calling this stuff out. This idea that the tear gas was an overrepresentation, no notice that we're never dealing with the substance of the issue, which is there's an invasion of illegal aliens trying to overrun a US border patrol sector and with the Democratic Party cheering it on and running interference. That's what's happening. But then they'll find one photo, They'll find one aspect, oh, the tear gas that was used. That's the entire news story from

their perspective. Emotionalize it, personalize it, go a Lynsky on this. Don't allow this to be a real national level policy discussion. Don't allow people to figure out that what's really at stake here is is the United States a country or not? Do we have sovereignty? Do we have control over our borders? I mentioned Tom Holman, he's laying it down play ten. A lot of these people, based on iron intelligence, have been deported before, so when they enter the country, that's

a felony. But one thing I want to say, they'll put the nastairs on tier. Guys need to get this out for those stairs put on you in the forum, strap a gun to your hip, get rock stone at you and tell me there wasn't a better response. It's non lethal law enforcement response. I was proper concerned they're being assaulted. Yeah, what do they want them to do? What do they think the proper response is when law enforcement is being assaulted? I remember that's what Border patrol is,

sworn law enforcement. They are armed law enforcement officers. A lot of them, by the way, are veterans, and a lot of them are Hispanic and Latino. So while we're always told that they're racist, terrible, you know, like the stormtroopers from Star Wars, the truth is that these are Americans doing a very important job. Many of them are minorities, many of them are veterans, but the left will spit on them anyway, just like they'll spit on ice. Abolish Ice.

They were saying all Summers people are a disgrace, a total disgrace. I'm a Democratic party. They've lost they have lost their mind on this issue, and they're not to be taken seriously because they are unserious. It's troubling that

this plays out in the way that it does. It. It's bothersome to me that we have to sit here and watches CNN and all these other channels engage in just the worst kind of distortions, the worst kind of of left wing propagandizing about how some as though, you know, the Trump administration has set up a bunch of thugs at the statue of liberty, turning away the you know, the tired, the weak, and the hungry of the world at all this No, we have a border with people

that are trying to buy force overrun it because now we've finally figured out that the scam that they're running, and enough people understand what's really going on here that letting them into the interior of the United States is no longer really an option. So what are they doing although they're forcing this confrontation, but after all of the lies the leftist told on this, why would you believe

anything they have to say on immigration? Now? Why should we listen to a single word that Pelosi and Schumer and you know, the CNN, MSNBC, New York Times, Washington Post fraudulence complex engages in you? Why should we listen to any of their nonsense at all. They're not telling you the truth, They're not presenting the facts to you in order to illuminate the issue. They want to spread a narrative. This is about power for them, and I wish conservatives would would wake up a little more to

the fact that this is it. This is the end game. If they can truly de facto eradicate our southern border, and if more caravans come, more people come, more illegals come, and then they're able, whether it's through lucky timing for them in terms of the presidential election in twenty twenty, if they're able to get the House, the Senate and the presidency at one time, the first thing they will do is amnesty. And the Republican Party is dead, It's gone,

it is finished. Because as I've been telling you it's ambacy for twenty million eleven is a lie. Oh, speaking of lies, another lie. Got a jam pack chare for your the teams. So stay with me. I'll be right back. Clearly, this goes back to Barack Obama's presidency when he created the DACA problem without ever trying to solve it. He said, literally, come to America illegally, bring your kids here illegally. He

never tried to fix it. They never. In fact, when Pelosi had the House state a supermajority the Senate, they never tried to bring a bill to fix the problem. They wanted a political issue. President Trump comes into office, Chuck Schumer initially was willing to work with him on a solution of DOCA that included funding for the wall. Then the radical left went nuts and Chumer pulled that

deal off the table. We've tried to pass bills through the House to solve the interior loophole problems that you've cited so many times, as well as funding the wall. Not one Democrat. We've had two different approaches on this. So no matter where you are on this, there was a chance for you to vote to solve the problem. This is a legacy of the Obama administration. Again, with our media the way that it is, they don't spend any time telling anybody that, but it was the Obama administration.

You will recall that had the lack of well, I was gonna say lack of wisdom, But I actually know that they've wanted this all along. They were looking for ways to allow there to be more people to come into the country who are leaving third world countries where they have very generally speaking, low levels of education and ability to speak English, and they go right to the front of the line, so to spin the plan. That's

been the all along. What this has has done for the left, this idea that if you show up at the border with a family unit, you must get let into the country. You know, I don't think that. I don't think a Honduran migrants came up with this on their own. By the way, there have been international NGOs pushing this. There have even been some of our foreign partners,

you know, foreign national activity pushing this. And it's really a form of lawfare against the United States, right using the law as its own weapon of war against this country, in this case, a weapon against our immigration policies and for those who are open borders extremists, which is increasingly just the Democrat Party. This has been very effective if it's just women and children on the board, or why

are we being so mean? You'll notice that they did this for a while as well with refugee policy, and they kept saying that there are you know, there's no there's never been a threat against the United States. We don't need to do extreme vetting. And then all actually we let in a few people that either themselves or they're immediate family members were terrorists, so that change that conversation a little bit. But just like what they've done here,

lie after lie, it's all women and children. There are no criminals. They're never going to get here anyway. They have no credibility anymore on this. But we need to fix it and to fix it, which brings us then to the conversation about funding in the wall and the shutdown. We will certainly get into that and oh so much more teams they would be. She says that she's hoping that they give her a chance to work. That's what we've heard from this family. This family hasn't really talked

about asylum per se. They are saying that they don't even want to come to the United States, and definitely they're going to be asking for permission to work for three to four years. From what we've seen, the majority are actually men, and some of these men have not articulated that need for asylum. Instead they have talked about, you know, going to the United States for a better life and to find work. Whoa somebody better code read that MSNBC reporter, because what is he doing speaking the

truth about the caravan? That is unacceptable over at MSNBC. You are not allowed to do that. You have to stick to the narrative. You have to stay with all of the lies, right. I mean, they've made it very clear where they stand on this stuff. They don't want people getting all all upity with the facts. Much better for them to believe that this is a group of women and children fleeing certain you know, violence, murder, extermination.

If they stay in Honduras country of nine million people that is not currently yet war and if we take in these people, by the way, then why shouldn't we have to take in all the rest of the millions of Hondurans who would rather be an American than in a Honduras. Does anyone want to even try to answer that question. No, you never get any any answers from Democrats on this stuff. You just get more of what they have been doing all along, which is essentially lying

to you about all this. Here, let's just have some fun for a moment. Remember when Jim Acosta got into trouble and and that whole back and forth with TROMP and it led to them the press pass revocation, all that stuff, right, Remember all that stuff that happened there, and what Acosta is said then, which this was now what two weeks ago. I just want to take a little go in the in the in the way back machine,

if you will, for a second. Here, now that we know what's happened, I mean here, here's here's what it sounds like with order at the border crossing of Sandy Cedro in California, with migrants rushing play clip three bombas vambas were. You know, they're all saying, let's go, let's go. They're trying to overrun and climb over a wall. Remember when Acosta was given that whole lecture to the president,

and the President wasn't having any of it. Here's just a little just a little little taste of what that was like. Play clip one for your campaign had an ad showing migrants climbing over walls and it. But they weren't actor not going to be doing they weren't actress. Well, no, it's true. Do you think they were actors. They were an actress. They didn't come from Hollywood climbing over walls. Your campaign has climbing the walls. They're not going to

be doing that. Now you could say that Will Buck he's he's making an analytic judgment there, or you know, he's essentially speculating. But to that, I would respond, why the heck is a White House corresponded, challenging the president with speculation. If he doesn't know what the heck he's talking about, maybe he should shut his dumb mouth. How about that he says they're not going to be doing that, Well, we know, in fact, they are going to be doing that.

So I would just note that, you know, maybe maybe a little bit of humility from the press going forward on this stuff would be would be in order. But that's we know that's that's not gonna happen, right, No way that's gonna happen. And then that brings me to other places, and I've been telling you that the real Yeah, if there's anything you can take away from from this part of the show so far, it's how much you

have been lied to about this caravan. And that's really emblematic of how much we are all lied to about immigration all the time. We're constantly lied to about this, lie after lie after lie. And remember when they were saying that one, it's not an invasion, which I think when you have a mass of people and you have to deploy tear gas and they're overrunning your border, that's an invasion. And also the caravan they were saying is not even gonna be a thing because it's not even

gonna show up playlip two. There is no invasion, there is no emergency. They're panicked about this fake invasion. For everybody out there that was telling me, no, it's a real story. We're worried about the caravan to come in, and Trump's strong enough to I go back to what I said about Martians coming to my backyard. Well they're not coming. The caravan's not coming, the leprosy is not coming.

So there's just Joe Scarbrow going er and say, you know, maybe I shouldn't have said that maybe I'm a buffoon and my show is really about snarky, snarky liberal sensibilities getting a platform to be shared with other snarky liberals so they can feel so superior in their stupidity because there's so much dumb stuff that is said on that show. I mean that, of all the shows out there these days that are not on CNN, I've got to say MSNBC is among the wol Morning Joe is among the

worst offenders for just being pathologically anti Trump. Like they can be anti Trump, that's fine, but they're anti Trump to the point where you can't take anything they say seriously because they are unserious. Right, They're not trying to present facts to people. They're trying to present a very specific and curated anti Trump narrative. It's just anti Trump propaganda, that's what they are doing. And you know that they've been wrong about this for weeks and weeks and weeks.

And do you see anyone saying, you know, maya culpa, any of these big media's ong in your heads. We were saying, you know what, maybe they won't say they lied, but we got this one way wrong. Turns out, the caravan wasn't as you know, of course not. They're not gonna do any of that. There's no honesty, no introspection

you can expect from the media. They will just continue to do what they have always done, which is saying what they have to say in the moment that is of greatest of greatest use utility for them, and then just move on and act like it never happened the moment that it goes bad for them, That's what they do. This. It reminds me of why also, you know, the funding, we're gonna talking more about the shutdown of the next hour. I will get into that. As you know, I tend

to be pretty cynical about the whole shutdown issue. Here's what Lindsay Graham says about that place seventeen secure the border is going to be a bottom line for the president. He's got a twenty five billion dollar playing I don't think he expects to get twenty dollars all at once, but he does expect to get five villion, like the House authorized without a bunch of strains attached. They're not

going to give him that money. Democrats are not. They'll do everything that they will go full Kavanaugh if they have to. They will throw out the decency rule book in a heartbeat. They don't care. They have to stop Trump from getting that funding for the wall, because this is why there are so many lies about this, This

is why they report so recklessly on the topic. They know deep down that if a wall is built, and if that wall is beyond doubt proven to be effective, which will be the case, then it will be very hard for people to take liberals seriously on any of the other issues that they are running around screaming to be expert on, wise on knowledgeable about. These people are just essentially engaged in mirroring what the rest of the so called cool kids, smart set mob is saying. They're

wrong on immigration and they're wrong on the wall. I predicted this on Sunday when I said that Muller is not going to be able to use manaphor because he is a proven liar, and you can't put a liar on the witness stand. Just like he's not going to be able to use coursie. He's not going to be able to use anybody who he got to plead guilty to perjury or lying to an FBI agent. You know the number of witnesses that he has that are credible are shrinking by the day. So I think the dirsh

is right on this one. It's getting harder and harder for Muller to for anyone to really believe that Muller is going to have a real chance at a at a bombshell final act here, because he's just jamming everybody

up with perjury charges. Well, if you're going to throw perjury charges at everyone all the time, who are you going to have left to make your case that Trump is, you know, the guy who colluded with Russia, that Trump is a bad guy, and that Trump is uh, you know whatever it is that I don't even know what they think is supposed to happen or is going to happen. I just think that they're they're pretty delusional about this.

Here's the latest, I mean, Paul MANA four, according to Muller, has repeatedly lied to federal investigators in breach of his plea agreement. This is according to a Special Counsel's office and prosecutors saying that manaphorts crimes and lies about a variety of subject matters. Relieve them of all promises they made to him in the plea agreement under the plea, under the terms of the agreement, Manaphort cannot withdraw his

guilty plea. Defense lawyers disagree that Maniford had violated the deal. In the same filing, according to The New York Times, they said Manaford had repeatedly met with the Special Counsel's office and believes he provided truthful information. So they've asked for a District of Columbia District Court judge to set a sentence in date. Who has been in solitary confinement in a detention center in Alexandria, Virginia. Why is Maniford in solitary? What is that all about? But you know,

this is just shows you think about. And I know this is not somewhere Everyone's gonna want to go with me. But hold on a moment. Let's just try think about what would have been the result of approaching Hillary Clinton's little army of crooked liars people around her, people Whoma Abbydeen, you know, the Whoma Abode was married to, you know,

the the per of Anthony Wiener. What would have been the result if in the email investigation they had taken the Muller approach, they had had a bunch of you know, right wing zealots who used the law in every way they could to destroy as many many people they could around Hillary. Does anyone really think that Hillary Clinton, she who is married to, did not have sexual relations with that woman. Does anyone really think that there wouldn't have

been charges. It's just so galling this whole thing to see that the way that justice is done if you're a Democrat versus justice if you are a Republican. It's so fricking annoying because it's so obvious, it's so very very clear that there's a double standard in place. Now I'm hearing from some of my sources, some of my

people here in the Swamp that they Clinton Foundation. There may be some Clinton Foundation bombshells that are dropped that, if my sourcing is correct, are going to raise the issue of not only where there no charge is brought against the Clinton Foundation, but there was really no desire by federal authorities to even look into the Clinton Foundation when there was smoking gun level evidence of malfeasance, all the stuff that you would think was going on to

Clinton Foundation, people whose salaries were way too high, people who were abusing the funds of the organization for their own purpose. This is beep. I mean that was all happening. Of course, we're talking about the Clintons. There is no level of corruption that they will stoop to, or that they will not stoop to. Pardon me, and and the idea that they weren't going to be charged, it's just crazy.

It's just crazy. It has been along. So we'll continue to follow the Muller probe, I know, the Jerome Corsi wiki, leaks, Assange, all that stuff. We got my man Sager and Jetty going to join us the next hour from a Daily caller Jelly Caller broke a big story on that today. Yeah, Roger Stone involved. I think Alex Jones went live for a while today, you know, with the whole whatever the

heck Alex Jones talking about. So clearly there's there's some interest in in those stories too, and I will get to that just just before we get into the economy and the White House Press briefing. It happened today first time, first time in the month of November there's been a White House Press briefing. Yeahs Acosta was there. We'll get into it, and was there so he can give us some atmospherics on what happened today at the White House. I thought this was, you know, we've got the Jesse

Kelly situation playing out, and it was great. Jesse on radio yesterday, we had him on Rising this morning. He was on Tucker Show last night. I'll be on Tucker Show tonight at eight o'clock. Those you want to see eight o'clock Eastern, so you can check that out. That'll be fun. That's right, Fox News, you know how to find it. But there's this this slow recognition that is I think finally beginning to you know, settle into people's minds. Here.

There's this slow recognition that, oh, we really do have a problem here with the social media giants being overcome with progressive bias, and that's where you get stored. Not just the Jesse Kelly Twitter banishing that has happened, but

also Google, which is the parent company for I'm sorry. Alphabet, which is the parent company for Google, introduced a feature for Gmail that automatically completes sentences for users as they type tap out I love you, and Gmail might propose you or or rather tap out I love a Gmail might add in you or it, but users are out of luck if the object of their affection is him

or her. This is a Reuter's story. Today, Google's technology will not suggest gender based pronouns because the risk is too high that it's smart composed technology might predict someone's sex or gender identity incorrectly and offend users, product leaders revealed to Reuter's in interview, Gmail product manager Paul Lambert said a company research scientists discovered the problem in January when he typed I am meeting an investor next week,

and smart Composed suggested a possible follow up this question, do you want to meet him instead of her? Yep? This is that's right. This is what these companies, these mega giants of Silicon Valley, are worried about the possibility that they may, through essentially AI, misgender somebody. Now, how can this be such a terrible the notion of mis gendering, Given the complexities that the left offers up for gender, shouldn't they then be willing to admit that, you know,

it's really tough to get somebody's gender right. In fact, I would offer you that mis gendering shouldn't be offensive at all anymore to the left, because we don't know what anyone's gender is by looking at them. You used to think, oh, male female, That's something that as a rational functioning adult, I can probably tell just by looking at somebody, right, But no, no, not anymore. Somebody could be somewhere on the gender spectrum and you have no idea.

So that being the case, until we can eradicate all pronouns, which I know there are some radicals on the left. Dude, that's what they want to do. Shouldn't there be a much greater acceptance of mis gendering. I mean, some of you might think to yourself, oh, well, you know Bob and accounting. You know, you know he's a he. You don't know, you don't know Bob's truth. You know, maybe Bob is hiding something from you all this time, so

you can't say, hey, man, how you doing. And instead of just getting everybody in trouble for this, maybe we should just accept that we have no idea what anybody's gender is. Now. I know this is stupid, obviously, but the point I'm making here is this whole thing is dumb. But the Left is that they can't crawl out of this insanity. They've created it, and now they're stuck with it, including Google. Social media giants are full of left wing bias.

You know it's true, But there are some places you can go now where you don't have to worry about people shadow banning you, people deciding that you're violating the terms of service. It's all nonsense, right, go to snippy dot com. And if you've looked at snippy dot com and left in the past, you need to look again. Thousands of my listeners have joined snippy dot com, expressing their opinions and stirring up lively conversations. Snippy is an

unbiased social media platform. It's all about conversation and community. Snippy not only encourages freedom of expression, but guarantees its users the ability to discuss topics freely without suppression from administrators. So you know, Snippy's a place where you can express your thoughts and share your opinions totally freely, all right. It's free to join, by the way, and open to everyone. So go to snippy dot com. Let your opinion matter,

no shadow banning, no suppression of conservative thought. Now, with an updated user interface and exciting new features available in the app store and for Android, Snippy your new alternative social media. Oh there's great disappointment there. There's disappointment that it seems like GM would rather build its selectric cars in China rather than in the United States. We are going to be looking at certain subsidies regard electric cars

and others, whether they should apply or not. I can't say anything final about that, but we're looking into it again. That so, GM is cutting a lot of jobs, all right. There's there's been some bad news for General Motors, and that is that they're going to cut fourteen thousand, eight hundred jobs in the US and Canada, and they're going to stop production at a few North American factories. All right.

So this is the first time since the Obama era restructuring of General Motors that they've had this kind of this kind of moment of recognition, moment of reality that is that has hit them. This is going to reduce the cost that GM currently has by four point five billion dollars they say, by twenty twenty, which will free up money you invest in electric and self driving vehicles. Now, of course, the Autoworkers Union has said this is calida and it's terrible, and people are all upset about it.

There's a lot going on here, let me start with a few things. Let's go back and share a little history here. Okay, the Obama administration, for purely political reasons, didn't allow General Motors to go bankrupt. The Obama administration realized, you know, the people that say, oh, Trump, he's so involved in different companies and picking winners and losers, and

he's an authoritarian on economics and all this. I don't like everything that Trump does when it comes to his rhetoric on different private companies, and I don't know, I don't agree with all those different things that he says. That said. Obama took and his administration took really severe action in order to save General Motors. And keep in mind, all it really did was use the taxpayers to bail out General Motors. And that then because the government was involved,

because the government eventually took General Motors into receivership. I mean, the government was what was for a while, you know, the part owner of General Motors. What that meant was that they could do things like, for example, decide that they're going to break contract with bond holders for General Motors, who are supposed to be taken care of first under contract under the law as part of a big giveaway to the United Auto Workers Union. That's right, autoworkers unions, unions,

Democrat power base. They were given a lot of special favors and attention by the Obama administration, when in reality, what should have happened here is that you know, General Motors for Chrysler, all of them, all of them should have been allowed to go bankrupt because all that you had with the bailout was the continuation of an unhealthy corporate culture, unsustainable cost structure or in place because of UAW that's right, union demands. And now we've they finally

run out of room to maneuver. I mean, now they have to go to this point where they're saying they're gonna lay off fifteen thousand people, dramatically cut costs and and take this whole pardon the expression, great leap forward on electric cars and on you know, on you know, self driving cars, the cars of the future, if you will. Who knows if they're going to be good at that stuff like that. That's not that's not been there their

strong suit in the past, that's for sure. But what's happened here is that they you know, they were able to continue on as they you know, continue on with a lot of problems, a lot of structural problems in place, because there's just a you know, General Motors. It's like

General Electric. General Electric had a a diseased corporate culture that allowed it to become essentially largely a financial institution, not one that just makes light bulbs and things and planes and engines and you know whatever, or engines for planes, but also become a major lender, and it become a financial when you know, ge financial was a huge part of it, of its profit for a number of years.

And you know, people would say, oh, General Motors a General Electric rather this great American company, and you know, it hasn't made the necessary hasn't made the necessary changes to its corporate cultures. That company is in terrible shape. Right. General Motors had problems too, but the problem is really that one its strategy has been wrong. The cars that it built. People just don't want cars made by General

Motors as much as they want other cars. And some of these autoworker autoworker contracts that they have because of the unions are just the costs are too high. You know, what General Motors did, and this is what the administration is pointing out with with saying I'm maybe the subsidies will change. They decided to set up shop in China. They build General Motors cars in China. I know you can say to me, oh, buck, but you know they

sell those cars into the Chinese market. Yeah, but point is they could be making them here and selling them in the US market. They can't even sell US cars in the US market and make a profit on them. And they're having tremendous issues. You know, these other major you know, Japanese and Korean automakers, they've set up shop here in America. They're selling their cars in our markets.

They're selling their cars and they're made here. But General Motors are set up overseas because yes, it wanted to get access into the overseas market. But it's also a question of they realize that the cost structure for them is better overseas. So you know this is And by the way, the Vault is one of the ugliest cars. I'm sorry, if you're a driver, don't don't get mad at me, but I think it's one of the ugliest

cars I've ever seen in my entire life. And so, you know, I think there's also just been some design flaws and design issues here. But you know, people have this nostalgia for the you know, the great American car company, and GM has needed a really serious come to Jesus moment for a long time, and I think it's it's maybe having it now and might not be enough to really turn all of this around. But then there's there's not just general but that was the big the big

news item from the week. Then you've got the overall economy. You've got China. I mean, could Low, very charming fellow. This Larry could Low is the head of the Council of Economic Advisors UM. He came out today as part of the White House Press conference, talked about the economy, talked about China. Let's get to some of that play thirteen. The US is coming to the Semit in very good shape. Our economy is quite strong. It's scrong at three percent

over the past year. Second quarter was four point two, third quarter was three point five, perhaps to be revised upwards. A very strong holiday season, so called Black Friday, very strong. We've had tremendous investments, business investments, energy investments, will prices and gasoline prices coming down. That helps consumers of course,

we're in very good shape. China not so good. I'm not here to critique our second guest, the Chinese economy, but most observers believe China to be in a slump, whereas the United States is in a very strong, solid position going into this summit. Yep, the US economy, based on the numbers that we use to try to gauge these things, is still very very healthy, still doing very well. Yeah, there's been a stock market correction, trust me, I've it's

been a rough two months for the buckster over here. Man, some of my portfolio has been getting. The good news is it's very little money. I just I'm just more interested in investing that I am actually trying to make any real money because certainly not flying around on the Freedom Hut Express in the sky. I don't have a G five in my future. But you know, the market has had a bit of a correction. But the market is not everything. It's just an It's an indicator among

many others. I think what Kudlow is saying is, look, the uscon He's still gonna by the way, China's got issues. He's bringing this up because there's gonna be at the g twenty summit sit down with Trump and h and She and Hijinping, Chinese premiere, and they're gonna look at this issue once again of okay, where are we on trade policy? Where are we on the whole tariff well, trade war people are calling it, but the tariff situation because so far, yeah, there's been some downside to it.

I was talking to you about GM just a moment ago. GM for all the United Auto workers running up the you know, running up the tab too high and the fact that the cars that they're making just aren't very good. GM also says that they've got a billion dollars of additional costs because a steel price is because of the steel tariffs, and that's real. You know, you've got to factor that into all this. People want to say it's bigger than it is because it's once again an opportunity

to bash Trump. But could let's say, look, there's gonna this is part of the process. There's gonna be some pain here to get to a better place. And Trump is hoping we can all include in China get to that better place. Play fourteen. President said there's a good possibility that we can make a deal, and he is open to it. But on the other hand, if these conditions I mentioned a few moments ago are not met,

not dealt with. No President has said, look, he's perfectly happy to stand on his tariff policies, which ten percent last two hundred billion dollars scheduled to go to twenty five percent. That's not a certainty, but that's the schedule. And he has said as recently as yesterday the day before, if need be, if things don't work out in this US China summit meeting, he will invoke another two hundred

and sixty seven some hi billion dollars in tariffs. Trump's doubling down on this, not gonna change, not going to back off one bit. Trump is very serious about seeing this thing through with China. I hope he's right. If he's wrong, we're gonna talk about it here, but it's too early to know. One thing's for sure. Though Trump's not messing around. This is the one issue where I don't think he's gonna blink no matter how much pressure

people try to put on it. You're gonna be doing a lot of online shopping over the holidays, and you're going to be exchanging all kinds of sensitive information on your computer, on your various devices. Are you safe? Do you know that your stuff is being protected? Because I've seen how easy it is to hack into things, and

I've got some experience protecting individual information. And you know you need Express vpn if you really want to be safe online, if you want to maintain your privacy, because Express vpn has easy to use apps that run the background on my computer, phone, and tablet and protect me from hackers. They do this by anonymizing my Internet browsing, by encrypting data and hiding my public IP address. You need Express vpn. Okay, it's less than seven dollars a month,

so easy to have, so easy to set up. Protect your online activity today and find out how you can get three months free at express vpn dot com slash buck. That's Express vpn dot com slash buck for three months free with a one year package. Again visit ExpressVPN dot com slash buck. There's any shutdown, it's on President Trump's back. First, left to our own devices, the Senate and House could

come to an agreement. Second, the Democrat the Republicans are in control of the presidency, the House, and the Senate. A shutdown is on their back stick to the one point six billion. We're trying to get the President the money he would like for the wall. That's part of the year and funding discussion, which is ongoing. That's one of the many things we've got to wrap up here

at the end of the year. I don't think there's going to be a government shutdown, and I say that to you with a lot of frustration, because I kind of wish there would be a government shutdown. I wish that the Republican Party was full of the courage of

its convictions here. I wish that there was a willingness to go to the mat on this issue, because it's not going to be not going to be a good thing for Trump to run for reelection in twenty twenty without having at least procure the funding for a wall. And there's even more pressing issue of look at what is going on at our border. One of the great lies of the Democrat left is that a wall wouldn't do anything. Nobody wants a wall. A wall is irrelevant,

A wall won't help well. You talk to border patrol, you talk to people that are actually on the front lines of trying to defend our sovereign borders. They'll tell you, oh no, as they've told me, a border would in fact help. A border is a good idea, is something that should be pursued, and it should have been pursued earlier than this. It should have been something that the Trump administration and the Republicans were willing a long time ago,

a long time ago, to fight for. So you know, this is why also I want to say a long time ago, I mean the last time that they had an opportunity, for example, the last time that there was an opportunity for them to go to the go to the mat on this and have that shutdown fight. And you know, I would just also point out that it is in fact the law. It is the law to build a fence. There is something called the Secure Fence Act.

How many people remember this? How many people remember that there was the Secure of Fence Act And this was passed many years ago. And we're told now that this is crazy, that this is somehow completely out of left field. But the reality is that you've already had people public Law one or nine three sixty seven, the Secure Offence Act.

It was passed with bi parties and majorities in two thousand and six, received two hundred and eighty three votes in the House and eighty in the Senate, and it required the federal government, according to the Washington Examiner here to build reinforced fencing at least two layers deep along about seven hundred miles of the border. Specified the areas in California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas where fencing would be installed. You know, that's something you have to remember.

Any barrier system isn't about preventing all entry. Right, you don't have a fence around your house, for example, because you think that no one can climb over the fence. But you may have a fence around your house so that one people know not to cross. Two they can't just drive their vehicle right up to your house. Right, it does give you some gre protection. Three they can't just walk, They have to actually climb, and depending on how high the fence is, it makes it harder for them.

And that's what border security needs to be about. Lessening. We have two thousand apart from the migrant caravan, we have two thousand arrests happening every day at the border of illegal crossings. Do the math. Two thousand, three hundred and fifty six days a year. It's a lot of Oh but then but it's eleven million, buck, it's eleven million. Sure it is because you have half a million people leaving the West to go back to Mexico every year.

Bull crap, no way, all right, that's just this is the word we're lied to about this issue constantly, constantly, Just like I was saying all the big lies we have been told about the caravan in the first place, right, they lie to us about the wall specifically, they say a wall will do nothing, except we see that a wall is doing lots of stuff. A wall is, in fact, very useful. And that just brings me back to oh,

and it wasn't. It wasn't racist and terrible in two thousand and six, and it wasn't for the whole border. Keep in mind, if they're just certain areas where there's a greater likelihood of a crossing, if there's just certain areas seven one hundred miles of fence, it would have made it harder. So maybe that two thousand a day drops down, Maybe that two thousand a day. And remember there's a lot of people that aren't even being caught.

It's more like, you know, half that number are caught trying to cross, because a lot fewer people overall are crossing illegally into the country. But no one, no one ever talks about this, No one ever brings up that they just don't enforce the law and immigration. They don't enforce the law and building offense, building a wall, it's already there. They just don't do it. They don't fund it. You know, Gosh, Darreth. They need to have a fight

over this issue. Let's really have it out. Force the Democrats to show the American people that they are a party that is in favor of illegal immigration. They're in favor of the boarders. But look, the shutdown, if it's gonna happen, it'll be on December seventh. And I think there's not going to be a shutdown. I think that Republicans will once again once again take the path of least resistance on this one. And the path of least resistance,

as we all know, is gonna be. Oh, let's come up with a you know, some kind of attempt ary funding measure, a fancy legislative way to kick the can down the road, not take a hard vote, not deal with any of this difficult stuff, and then when the next election comes up, say, you know, build the dang fence. You know everyone's gonna all of a sudden be pushing for pushing for a wall to be built, and that's just not it's just not gonna happen. Then it's not

gonna happen an election time. So we'll see. I think the shutdown talk is probably much ado about nothing. It usually is, but in this context, I'm hoping that I am wrong, because we should shut the government down over this. Trump must get funding for the wall. Now is the time eighteen months ago and twenty five or thirty million

dollars ago. If you had said we came up with Carter Page as a possible suspect, he hasn't been indicted, or mister Papadopoulos, or now we're going after Jerome Corsi and Roger Stone because they may have been playing fast at moose with the truth. That's like saying PG PJ. Barnum exaggerated. If that's what this whole thing was about, it I could call it a circus, but it's a tragic circus. And what you get the impression, Tucker, is that what you cannot get in quality indictments you're trying

to justify with a quantity of indictments. They're indicting everybody, and indicting everybody that was a victor. David Hanson talking about where the Muller probe is right now, I keep having people that will rattle off, Oh, but there are twenty Russians and Menaphort and all these and I said, yeah, none of this has anything to do with the Trump campaign, which is the only reason there's a special counsel. But what is this whole coursie info wars Roger Stone debacle?

What is going on here? We've got Sagar and Jetty with us. He is the White House reporter for the Daily Caller. Daily Caller broke big story on this today. Saga agreed to have you back. Hey, thanks for having me a book. Can you just walk us through here? What what the heck is going on? Jerome Corsi is now involved in this whole Muller saga. Roger Stone's name is popped up again. What is happening here? Sure thing?

So Corsi and Stone go back along ways. Corsi is you know, best known for pushing Birtherism in the you know, in the twenty tens. He was also behind some of

the swift boat stuff during the Bush campaign. But anyways, basically what Mullover is focusing on is communications between Roger Stone and Jerome Corsi with Wiki leaks, and so what Corsi is now being current is being targeted by Muller for is allegedly lying about an effort for a by Stone to get him to reach out to a sage about the forthcoming emails, and some of his other communications with a concern ovative journalist in Britain who is allegedly

in contact with Wiki leaks. And so it's it's very very complicated weird web here. And you also have this story today of from The Guardian, a British a British left wing newspaper that says that Julian Assange met with Manaphort before what was it in twenty sixteen, before the emails came out. Some people are having a hard time

with us. What's your take on it? Yeah, I'm a very suspect of this story because for I noticed first of all that the dateline was in Quito, which is a capital of Ecuador, which suggests that, you know, maybe this information is coming out of an Ecuadorian diplomatic source, but there's been no confirmation on it. Both WikiLeaks and Manafort have issued a flat denial. Now that doesn't mean that this story is not true, but that you know,

that's that is definitely something to be read into. And I think the most interesting thing is that they actually edited some of the language in the story after it came out where they said that an apparent meeting. They basically hedged the claims that the meeting had occurred within the story after it had come out, and everybody went bananas over it. So I am waiting for a bit

more independent confirmation. I've been trying to confirm him myself, but you know, both Lely, I think it's very important to know that both Wiki Leaks and Manaphort saying that it is a completely flat out false story, and it should be pretty easy for any US government authority to know, you know, based on flight manifests or what or surveillance records, what have you on, whether he was in the Ecuadorian

embassy or not. Yeah, I absolutely do not believe it is possible in any way that the US government the British government would not know about a meeting between Manaphort and Julian Assange, who is living in a tiny room. I mean I actually interviewed Assange I don't know two years ago now from the Ecuadorian embassy, meaning that I connected with him online and we did an interview for a podcast and I was like, what's it like over there, dude. He's like, there's not a lot to do here, not

much of a party going on. I mean, tar about living under under a microscope. The moment he steps out of that embassy, they're going to arrest him. Everyone knows that. So he's been living in this diplomatic community space for a while and and essentially or not to community people, the immunity of the building. And you know, people are now saying, oh, at just the right time, we get this story that breaks that there might have been this meeting, and we all know this about right, this is how

the so the the alleged collusion could have happened. You have Manafort saying to Asange, hey, get these Hillary emails or get there weren't even Hillary's emails though, you know, Sager, one of the problems I have with this, it's not even a good evil plan, right, It's not even a good bad guy plot, right, Yeah, yeah, You're absolutely right, Buck. I mean, he lives, like you said, in this tiny room in the Ecuadorian embassy. The idea that that would stay secret for over two two and a half years

just seems patently absurd. And then if you go down you know, if you go down the road on that in terms of alleged for knowledge or whatever. Even even let's go back to Jerome Corsi, he was thinking, according to his own emails and draft records, that this was stories about like the Panama papers in relation to John and Tony Podesta, which of course that's absolutely nothing to

do with what it ended up coming out. So it really does seem like a lot of these guys were just trying to guess on what sort of so called damaging information was out there, and then Wiki Leaks did end up dropping it, and then you know, some weird characters both either tried to claim credit or they just used it as they would any APO dump in a campaign. Yeah. I interviewed Roger Stone a few months back and he was basically like, yeah, I might get I might get prosecuted.

I was like, Wow, he's very in soussion for a guy who might be heading to a federal prison. Yeah, I thought to Roger quite a bit. Rogers convinced that the Mueller team has it out for him and that they're going to try and diet in and he should probably be pretty scared because if you look at what's

going on with Jerome Corsie, you have a guy. So of course he deleted all of his emails and so then in the course of an interview, he was asked about something and he said, to the best of my recollection, I did not do X. Then they produced an email showing that he had done that, and they allowed him to revise his statement. What they're trying to nail him with now is lying to the FBI, and he's saying, no,

I didn't lie. I just didn't have the records in front of me, and I didn't remember this email that I had sent over two and a half years ago. And so if you look at the you know, just the technicalities that they are getting people on in this case. You know, Roger, you know, I think the president said the President said one of the reasons that he won't sit down with Mueller's because if he claimed it was a cloudy day and it was actually blue sky, that

they would indict him for lying to the FBI. Well, there is there is a judgment that comes into all this. There there are some gray areas, and if you have a prosecutor that really does want to make an example of you, I mean one, you know, one situation that folks should be reminded of is what happened during the

whole Scooter Libby debacle. I mean, people keep saying, and I've had to point out to some very prominent lefty news anchors, they keep saying that he was indicted for revealing the name of a of a CIA officer, of a covert employee of a CIA. That's what happened Scooter Libby. No, he was. He was prosecuted for lying about a conversation with a journalist who already knew about this person's identity, which is what you never gets brought up in this

context at all. So you know, what is a lie worthy of prosecution and what is somebody misremembering is a grayer? You know, you were there today in the West Wing, I assumed during the press conference, first one in a while, Yes, yeah, I was, I was there first one in the last month. This subject did come up. But Sarah Sanders. You know, she stuck by it. She said there's been no collusion.

The President's not really worried about whatever this man, this latest development is, and that when the Mueller report comes out, he's also not worried because he knows he didn't do anything wrong anything that was a surprise to you from the press conference. Name what was it? What's it like having a costed back of the room after all that mess. Yeah, I mean Jim asked several questions as he normally does. He takes quite a bit of time. Uh, he likes,

he likes to get several follow ups in there. But you know, overall today was actually pretty run of the mill. Lots of policy. There was only a few Muller questions. There wasn't a Usually what happens whenever something's going on with the Muller investigations, you get about twelve different versions of the exact same question with the same answer. But you know, today it was only fourteen minutes and most of the briefing was talking about the President headed down

to Argentina for his G twenty summit. So we have a surprising amount of policy that was that was talked about today. Saga and Jetty. Everybody follow him on Twitter. Also read his latest at Daily Caller Daily Caller dot com. He's a wet else correspondent Zager great workers always my man, Come back soon, Thanks Buck. All right, team, let's let's talk a bit about the economy coming up here in a moments. A lot of talk about that today from the White House. We'll get to that in just a moment.

Even Obama's undersecretary for Science didn't believe the radical conclusions of the report that release. And you have to look at the fact that this report is based on the most extreme modeled scenario, which contradicts long established trends. It's not they on facts, it's based on it's not data driven. We'd like to see something that is more data driven. It's based on modeling, which is extremely hard to do

when you're talking about the climate. Our focus is on making sure we have the safest, cleanest error in water, and the President's going to do exactly though there is this climate change hysteria out there, as you know, something that we I try not to obsess about it in response to the left's obsession, because if you're listening to

this show, if you were a climate change alarmist. You probably wouldn't be able to listen to me because you would think that I was essentially hoping for the destruction of the planet, which tells you a lot about how crazy climate change alarmists really are. You know, I managed to sit down today with a woman who's basically from the Obama administration. She worked. I forget what she was doing, but she was all about how Trump is removing all

of these regulations and it's just so bad. He's removing all these regulations because we need clean water. And I said, ok, what's one regulation he's removed that has made water less clean? Tell tell me what the regulation is, and oh and I and a lot of sort of well, the General Waterway Treaty blah blat, a lot of a lot of claptrap. And then I managed to ask. I said, Okay, so Trump's gotten rid of tons of regulations. Is there one regulation that Trump has gotten rid of that you agree

with him on? This is a person, minds you, an Obama administration official appointee. This is somebody who all she does is promote promote regulation, not deregulation. Couldn't come up with a single one, not one. There's not one regulation that Trump and this is her life is to study regulations apparently, and couldn't come up with a single one. I'd sit here and think to myself, you know, this is the problem with libs. They don't really think through

their arguments. They're just always an advocacy mode. And on climate change, you see this in a way that it's just breathtaking and it's arrogance and its dupidity. At the same time, this idea, yea, that climate change is going to destroy our economy. This is nuts. I don't know how else to put it. I mean, if people really believe this, then we should be taking radical, dramatic steps to destroy our economy today, because that's what it would do. That's what it would take in order to prevent this

climate change catastrophe from actually happening. He hears. The Wall Street Journal take on this headlines warned of economic doom after the US government release its fourth National Climate Assessment last week. Yet a close reading of the report shows that the overall economic impact of human cause climate change is expected to be quite small. Projecting human cause changes

in the global climate is a major scientific challenge. Estimates of the temperature increases due to rising greenhouse gas concentration are uncertain by a factor of three. Trying to make projections for a particular region compounds the uncertainty. Estimates of the economic impact are less certain still, in part because as yet unknown modes of adaptation will mitigate the effects. The report's numbers turn out to me not all of

that alarming. Final figure on the final chapter shows an increase in global average temperature of nine degrees fahrenheit would directly reduce the US gross domestic product in twenty ninety by four percent plus or minus two percent. That is, the GDP would be about four percent less than it would have been absent human influences on the climate. That worst case estimate assumes the largest plausible temperature rise and

only known modes of adaptation. My friends, we're told the economy is going to be in deep trouble because of a four percent projected worst case scenario drop in twenty ninety. And let me say, and I tell value this with absolute certainty. If I am wrong, you can show up and slap me right across the face. In twenty ninety. Let me tell you this right now. I guarantee you,

I guarantee you this is true. Nobody who is talking about what the economy will look like, where it will be, what we are doing in twenty ninety has any idea what the heck they are talking about, period, full stop. They have no I mean, this whole exercise is laughable.

It is preposterous because, first of all, based on real math, real numbers that we can count, and this maybe should keep you up at night, based on the amount of debt we are compiling in this country year and in year out, we are going to have the destruction of US Fiat currency decades before this four percent drop in

GDP in twenty ninety. And I wouldn't even pretend to be able to tell you what decade what it's gonna happen, right, I mean, does anyone really think that you can have fifty fifty trillion dollars of US national debt and doesn't doesn't really do anything. That's fine, they'll pay that back. Someone's gonna get paid back to fifty trillion. You know, we're getting there. One more big recession, one more big

spending Democrat administration. All of a sudden you find yourself in a place where, oh wait a second, oh that's right now, We got to spend another ten trillion, which is what Obama spent over his eight years ten trillion. And now that's not all spending. That's in debt in addition to the spending offset by revenue year in a year out. But but this is what I mean. I saw a CNN splainer. It's the fancy way of saying explainer.

I saw a CNN explainer where they're like looking at the year twenty one hundred and how there could be I think they said it was a ten percent drop in GDP by twenty one hundred. I sit here and I think to myself, are these people idiots? Or is this just a cult of stupidity? Who really thinks that our economic projections in the year twenty one hundred from today are valid in any way, shape or form. I mean, who even knows that we're gonna have a planet in

twenty one hire? Don't only get me started on all that, right, I mean, we could have a nuclear nuclear holocaust, all kinds of bad stuff. But think about what the country look like economically in nineteen sixty All right, so fifty years ago, and now not even fifty We've got to go back seventy years right, So think about what the what the financial prospects were for America and for all this stuff back in nineteen forty, and think about what

they're will be like. In what they are like today, these people have no idea what they are talking about. This is lunacy in this climate change report. Not only in twenty eighteen should we be in prospective. We should move beyond introspection to reconstruction and figuring out a way

to link our ideals and our practices. And in Mississippi, with the history, the ghost of Mississippi, the blood of Mississippi from its rivers, where Emmett Till died, where Meger Evers died, where those three civil rights workers, two Jews and a black person died, we have to come to grips with it in twenty eighteen. And the only way to do that is to take a harder look at what we've been able to do and not able to do, and then put, you know, roll up our sleeves, so

to speak, and work together. Cindy Hyde Smith is a racist, a white nationalist, a white supremacist, a racist, a white nationalist, a white supremacist. That's being said on Cable TV about a woman who is probably going to be the next Senator from the state of Mississippi. But that passes for Democrat analysis these days, that passes for an astute assessment of what's going on in our national national politics. You know, we're going to find out here soon. What's you know,

what's going on? I mean, this is going to be a close, a close race. We've got the election coming and results coming in tonight. I will not be able to tell you who has won because of the timing of when we're on air and when the results will be in b Thursday. This was gonna be tight. You've got Cindy Hyde Smith up against SP Mike esp who you know well. On the one hand, they're saying that that Hide Smith is such a racist, that guy that's I forget his name, Michael Eric Dyson, he is he

is not a nice fellow. Always say everything is about how everybody else is racist, and so they love him at CNN and MSNBC because that's all they ever want to talk about is how everybody who disagrees with them

as racist. But this guy ESP, when you look into his his background a little bit, you know, we're told about how you know, Hide Smith said this one thing that you know, in the context of Mississippi was insensitive and all right, fine, How many of you have been hearing from the media, for example, that Mike esp was indicted on I think it's fourteen counts and while he did, he did in fact manage to evade or rather he

managed to beat the prosecution. The fact is he was involved in some very shady stuff back in the day and had to step down from his from his post. You know, Mike esp is somebody who has a checkered past in politics. He was acquitted in this gift's case. Okay, So he was the former agriculture secretary and he was forced out in nineteen ninety four by people saying that

he took gifts from lobbyists. Essentially, thirty corruption charges brought against him and a lot of other people, by the way, went to prison for this, fifteen convictions, eleven million dollars in fines, and SP's indictment was that he took thirty five thousand dollars in gifts. So, you know, he's a guy who how many of you have heard this about him? Oh? The answer is I'm sure very few, because the media is not talking about this at all. He was acquitted.

But this guy wants to talk about ethics, that guy wants to talk about good leadership. I think that it's only fair to point out that he was certainly surrounded by a lot of people who are engaged in some really corrupt, nasty stuff, and here you have. You know, I just think that's necessary background that we should all know. But they just want to call Cindy hide Smith racist. That's the whole point of everything that they're putting on

TV now on the left, all the Democrats stuff. They're trying to find a way to trash this woman, and that's that's the purpose of their coverage by speaking of just calling people racist, and that's their form of an argument and the smear tactics that you get. You've got this guy, Max Boot, who maybe I shouldn't give him any more airtime on this show because he's someone who has embraced his status as a turncoat to all that he once believed in. And he used to be a

stalwart neo conservative and considered himself a conservative. Now he goes on on CNN and finds himself trashing not just Trump, but all the people that support Trump and all the ideas beyond, and you've never really made the full break with the right until you're willing to just be a complete shill for the climate change alarmists. You have to be running around saying the same stupid talking points about how science has settled on this and all the rest

of it. Here, here's what Max boot now does because he's an anti Trump, never Trump jerk play twenty. Okay, you're trying to filibuster because you're embarrassed by about what I'm gonna say, which is that you and I'm embarrassed. I'm embarrassed about Okay, I'm embarrassed by your filibuster, and I'm embarrassed by the fact that you will not call out this blatant racism on the part of Sidney hid

Smith and Donald Trump. You offer this kind of values and neutral horse race analysis, and you refuse to condemn the descent into bigotry of the Republican Party, the Party of Lincoln. This is a disgrace to what the Republican Party has stood for for so much of its history. The Republican Party has stood for racism. Max. That's really interesting because the Democrats are the party of slavery, segregation and Jim Crowe, but the Republican Party stands for racism.

This is this is a recurring theme. Though. Find something that a politician says that maybe is you know, that was ill advised, but with no ill intent, and turn it into oh my gosh, this person is so racist. They're the most racist racist ever and that's all they want to say. Oh, I mentioned the climate change the thing because boot that was last night. Remember he's one of the Look, he's a he's a trader to conservatism, and so he's going on TV doing calling the Republican

a Mississippi racist, calling the whole GOP racist. And now he's written in the Washington Post within twenty four hours of that appearance, I was wrong on climate change. Why can't other conservatives admit it too? See? This is what I mean. He This is how you prove your fealty to the to the left. You have to go with there are there are a few things that you have to do. You have to say that climate change is man made and a serious problem and bend the knee

on that. And you have to be willing to call everybody who disagrees with you racist. This is what the Democratic party does. Now, this is how it functions. Doesn't make arguments, makes accusations, makes allegations, and Boot and others who are essentially boot liquors of the left. Now, it's just pathetic. It's really sad in a sense to see.

But I guess they hate Trump so much that they are willing to tear down everything that they have ever stood for in their adult lives and their professional lives in order to score some cheap points against Trump. Now, or maybe it's just to pay the bills, you know. Maybe I'm just taking this to an ideological place when it's really just an economic thing. They just want to make that cash, want to make that money, you know, and CNN's paying them and Fox isn't, so they'll go

on CNN and trash conservatives. But Boots a disgrace. I know. It's the holidays, And if you want to give the gear of freedom, my friends, you can do that via Black Rifle Coffee. They're freedom to drink delicious coffee every day, just like I do. In fact, you can sign up for the coffee Club, which means you'll get it sent to your door all the time. You can sign somebody else up for the coffee Club at Black Rifle, and then you'll never have to think about getting coffee again

because it'll come right to you, all right. So this is the gift a great tasting coffee made easy, and in the process you're supporting a veteran owned and operated company. I love Black Rifle. I'm making Black Rifle converts left and right. It's also a company with awesome guys running to go check it out. The best tasting, best coffee imaginable, Black Rifle Coffee. Go to Black Riflecoffee dot com slash

buck and receive fifteen percent off your order. That's Black Rifle Coffee dot Com, slash buck for fifteen percent off again, everybody listening, just in time for the holidays. Black Riflecoffee dot Com, slash buck. Many of you know that I have friends at The Federalist and try to have a pretty good rotation of a guest from the Federalist dot Com who come on to this show. People like Ben Dominich who's the co founder of it, Sean Davis, Molly

hemmingway En s Felcher. There's there's a whole crew over there that I think does really excellent work, and I really like getting in the mix on radio and on TV.

This is one of the best federalist pieces I've read in a while, though it comes from someone named Chris Bray, who's a former infantry regiment and sorry, infantry sergeant in the US Army and has a history PhD from UCLA, so really obviously impressive in terms of his credentials, which is necessary because he's about to in this piece essentially pull apart the notion that you can judge people by

their credentials. That's kind of the irony of this. He wrote this, Our culture war is between people who get results and empty suits with pristine credentials, And there's a lot of really profound stuff in here. He goes right to the heart of what I think is the real animosity that you have, particularly among among journalists toward Trump,

and that is that their status is threatened. There You've often heard me say that their sense of self is threatened, meaning that their sense of their own importance in the world, their own the necessity that society has for them, that is all in doubt because Trump comes along and cast doubt over it. That's why the whole fake news issue does really Bother places like CNN, even though their ratings

overall are up in the Trump era. And it's because they like to think of themselves as the guardians of democracy. They like to think of themselves as the essential protectors of you know, truth and liberty and freedom and all this other stuff, although they're generally pretty anti liberty and anti freedom in the press these days. But he goes through how throughout history and he's got a PhD in history.

There were different groups, whether it is the elites in Vichy, France, who were I don't know why I just pronounced that weirdly, France Frost and now he Biont who were supposed to be running that country, who had all this fantastic schooling, or the elites in China where your Confucian, your Confucian scholarship, reputation and skills. If you are a good Confucian scholar, then you are in charge of an area. If you are fantastic, you are in charge of a whole region.

And you know, if you were the best, the best, you're a national administrator. And then the British showed up during the Opium Wars with guns and we're like, guess what we're in charge now? And being a Confucian scholar didn't really matter anymore. Point year is that we have a society that is particularly obsessed with credentialing, as shown by universities. But universities are not in any way good proxies or good sorting mechanisms for how capable and how

honestly how worthwhile a person is professionally or personally. These universities have been so polluted with social justice indoctrination, and the liberal orthodoxies are so uniformly enforced at them that you can't really expect somebody who comes out of a certain school to be able to defend their point of view to be impressively in any way, because there are a lot of different reasons why they take people too.

Even the admissions process at these places is tainted in a sense by this left wing, redistributive, intersectional social justice this ideology. But I think he makes some really fantastic points in this, And here's one. He talks about the Obama administration and he writes, quote staffing up new administration, Barack Obama hired Cementa Power, Cass Sunstein, both professors Professor Stephen Chow, Professor Christina Romer, and so on and so on.

Donald Trump hired general CEOs and governors, people who are credentialed by lives of action and management. This isn't disagreement. This is a difference of foundational premises. He also says, for forty years with oh this is this is the really most profound part of this. I think that we do not separate people into a class system in this country anymore based on their ability or even their wealth. You know, usually you'd think of wealth as the thing

that determines where you are in the strata. And of course wealth does matter to some extent. With all that, but to the issue specifically here of how people think of themselves within class structure. It's really about virtue signaling and postures and cultural positions. Here's what he writes. Quote, for forty years, with gathering uniformity of purpose, our credentialing institutions have taught postures rather than skills, attitudes rather than knowledge.

This isn't invariably true, and many fine scholars have taught many excellent practitioners, but the overarching trend is toward training in intellectual and psychologically uniformity, toward the world of excellent sheep. The hollowing out of our credentialing institutions has been abundantly clear for years in well known examples like the discussion of rape law at Harvard and quote, it is not about creating an intellectual space tantrum over at Halloween costumes

at Yale. What credentialing institutions teach is mental rigidity, intellectual cowardice, and fear of disagreement. They narrow the mind and constrain the ability to act. Our elites largely can put the wet stuff on the red stuff. It's referring to firefighters and the most important part of their job, because it's triggering and unsafe to mention. This is this is really true. I mean these places. This is why also you see such a there's such a uniformity of belief coming out

of them. This is why when you ask, well, why are so many people that go to Ivy League schools liberals and so many of them really liberal? The answer is because they're taught to be liberals. Because that's what these schools are teaching people now, and they're also constantly picking up from those around them that if you want

to be considered smart, worthwhile socially acceptable and elite. You have to adopt certain postures, certain premises, and that's what they're spending a lot of time focused on, especially at the at the undergraduate level, but increasingly at the graduate level. People ask me why, you know, why didn't get an advanced degree? Thought about it? For example, I thought about getting an MBA. I thought about, at one point even getting a master's degree in international relations. But the answer

is I didn't think that I needed one. The answer is also that it was going to be really expensive, and I didn't want to take on a whole bunch of debt because I don't like debt. I don't want to take on debt. I would rather live simply and frugally than owe somebody and live my life wondering if I'll be able to pay them back. But this is the real the credentialing, the fall of credentialing institutions in the public's eye is one of the main Now you

could say to me, buck Trump went to Wharton. Yeah, that's all true. But on the right there's a greater acceptance of who you are is really a compilation of the choices you make and what you've done. That's who you are, who you are is not a resume, It's not a sheet of paper that I went to this place and this place in this place. I mean, I can't tell you how many people when I was in government, I would see a resume and oh, I'm talking Rhodes

scholars and speak this language and that language. And then you meet them, you know, this person is just not used to thinking rigorously about anything. This person has learned to play within a certain system in order to advance himself or herself, and that system skews to the left. And that's really what you pick up from all this. That's what you pick up from these institutions. I mean, the basic legal training, for example, of a law school

is pretty much the same everywhere. According to all my friends who have gone to law school. It's just a question of the elite status that you attain from going there, but also how you talk about these things, the way that you view them, the way that you present yourself. A lot of this is just about flash. It's certainly

not about substance. And Democrats hate this stuff because ultimately they're the ones who are always trying to hold up their dominance at the academy as somehow evidence of their intellectual superiority. So in the Obama administration where you had all these professors, that's a perfect example of how the real world comes hard and fast to people who think that because they have a fancy sounding pedigree, everything's going

to be easier. He ends as piece Chris Bray again, I thought this is really good at the Federalists, and I would recommend it to you. I'll put it up on Facebook. In short, Trump declines the authority of the cultural sectors that most assertively claim it. That's the conflict, and that's why it's being played in a relentless tone of hysteria. There are credentialing authorities and credential holding elites who can see the path to their own obsolescence, like

the Empress Dowager. They will not go quietly. Yeah, that's right. That is why there's such a tantrum going on. Trump is a threat, not just to them politically, to their sense of who they are, how elite they are, how special they are, and they can't abide that. Hello, the Foreign Secretary. I saw this on the BBC Twitter account earlier today, and I gotta say I like Boris Johnson. I think he's a pretty interesting guy. I've heard him

say some really good stuff in the past. I don't follow British politics closely because I got my hants full on this side of the pond. But this was I thought this was pretty great. Today this is This is Boris Johnson trying to do a little visit promo video as Foreign Secretary, their equivalent of Secretary of State Roland Ster. The Foreign Secretary has to do a quick bit of filming for his official Twitter feed. Okay, yeah, high folks,

Boris Johnson, Foreign Secretary. I'm here in Lisbon, in Portugal to celebrate what is the oldest alliance and friendship in diplomatic history, going back to thirteen eighty six, going forward through the Napoleonic Wars through to the Second World War. But of course this was a place that was I think of what happened the same world w catalysts? What are we doing the same world? A neutral? Wasn't the fourth the Oars? What are we doing? The Zords? Love it?

The use alls, well, what did we do in the as we were? Dol Oh? Oh yes, neutral? Neutral, that's right? Oh Portugal not really not really our best ever, ally, not not the best I've ever seen not not in fact our ally at all in the Second World War. Oh that's quite That's quite strange, isn't it? Okay, let's get back to it. Boris Johnson, Foreign Secretary. Take two, Boris Johnson, the Foreign Secretary. I'm here in Lizabeth's. Portugal

is our fourth biggest trading partners, trading partner. Last we are Portugal's fourth largest. Portugal is not our fourth largest. What what do you mean? But Portual's not not our fourth third largest, fourth largest? What's going on here but Portugal? Ow? Bloody hell? Take three, high folks, Boris Johnson, I'm here in Lizabeth. James Bond himself was said to have been

born in Estherill, and today James Bond was born. Well, you can't put one for you might the great idea, the idea for James Bonne was born, the idea for the James Oh, come on, what do you what do you mean? The idea for James Bond has written right there in script, Sir James Bonne Borne he idea James Bonne a person at least in literary fiction. Sec Oh, come off it. I love it with British guys fight man. It was that was great but but, but but the idea, sir,

the idea? What do you mean? It says right here in my briefing book, James Bond born born in esterill, Man. Life would be so much easier if I had a British accent, really would. People would listen to me on all the different cable networks and just say, well, that guy's so smart listening to his British accent. Even if I said things like well, James Bond born here. In fact, I believe he went to preschool just down the street. He was quite a rambunctious young fellow in his early days. Yeah,

or he's a fictional character. It's all pretty much the same thing. Oh, we got one more take from the Foreign Minister of the UK here. It's a great friendship, it's a great partnership. It's built on shared values and we're gonna take it from you, right. They go, oh, all right, now we can finish. Oh we're all finished. Oh great, fantastic. That's fun stuff. Man. People don't realize how much social media is changing the way that we

see each other as well. I mean, I've been telling you for a while that the biggest problem with credibility for journalists is not even the fake news that they peddle. It's that because of their social media accounts, we are all now able to see just who they really are and what they think and what their biases are. And they act like that doesn't mean anything, or perhaps we're all too dumb to figure out who they are based on their social media profiles. But with politicians too, you know,

everybody is now a pundit. I mean, everybody has instantaneous publication access. They can just decide that they're going to share a thought. In that thought, if it has enough interest from people, can then go viral. So it's it's a bit of a game changing experience. But even politicians now walking out with their staffs trying to come up with clever things to say on Snapchat and just I'm gonna just say this one time, I don't understand the dog filter thing on Snapchat or the bunny filters or

whatever the animal filters. No one looks good with an animal filter over their face. This is why Snapchat, I think, is a company that's not long for this world, because everyone who's below the age of thirty is going to figure out, oh, when I put the weird dog face filter on, I look like a dog face, which is not good. Mic drop buckets out, Roll call coming up, rock and roll, fellow patriots, time to spread some freedom coast to coast. It's time for roll call. Alrighty, roll

call is where it's at. Folks always like to hear from you at Facebook dot com, slash a buck Sexton, So please do send me your thoughts, your insights, your pithy remarkable quips. Paul kicks us off today. Hey, Buck, I've heard some talk regarding the FIS a mess about abuse of classification authority. During your time as an analyst looking at classified material, what percent of documents would you

guess didn't really need to be classified? Also, do you think this kind of thing happens deliberately for CYA reasons? Or is it just lazy swamp dwellers taking a shotgun approach and just classifying huge batches of documents without bothering to go through them. So sorry you have to live in the swamp. As a former denizen of Fairfax, I can honestly say you are taking one for the team. Shield tie Paul, Paul, excellent questions. Let me try to

take these in order. Do I think that there see. See, there's mostly overclassification, which is a huge thing in the government. I mean they classify everything. You know, they would classify a ham sandwich if nobody stopped them from doing it. And most of that is a combination of laziness and better safe than sorry attitude. And I can understand with some things a better safe than sorry attitude certainly is

the way you want to go. But when you are talking about taking that approach to pretty much everything, then you're really misusing the classification system because then that also prevents transparency, so people can't get access to government documents that they should have access to. And it also means that people like me, when I was in the government and had a top secret clearance, take a much more no big deal attitude when you know there was stuff.

I mean I remember being in the CIA and coming into contact with information that was kind of wow, oh my gosh, this is really this is really serious, this is really sensitive, and you have and it's not that often that that would happen, but you can imagine that it certainly does, and you remember when it does when you're the person it happens too. So that's that's a part of it. As to the CIA aspect, well, yes,

there's definitely overclassification. In fact, we saw some overclassification already in a very high profile setting with the whole Muller probe and all of the FBI and deep state shenanigans around it. When you had McCabe who was the deputy director and at one point acting director of the FBI. McCabe had a seventy thousand dollars conference room table bought for him for the executive directors or for the rather the director's conference room, and he just didn't want that

information out there, and that's all that was. So they classified it and later it came out. So it's really all of the above, lots of different reasons, but over classification is a big problem. And as to the swamp, yeah, this place does not grow on me. In fact, I really do look forward to this show every day because it's like I get to connect to my folks, my people, my like minded patriots. And that's one of the beauties of this show is that it's almost like I'm sending

up the distress began every time the show starts. You know, save me, Team Buck, Save me, because I am I am deep behind liberal lines. Here in DC and outside of Fox News, the White House and Republican Congressional offices, you are in You are in hostile territory here as a conservative, Steve writes Buck Comma. Steve Well put another, Steve writes, a crazy uncle echo of your sentiment regarding Media Matters, note the spelling. The people there have such

repulsive personalities. I'm convinced that it's an employment requirement that the only action they get is online. They don't have to worry about birth control. From Steve Steve, I think Media Matters is a detestable organization. I think that move On is a detestable organization. And I really mean this apart from disagreeing with their politics. I just think that people who work for those places should think long and

hard about what they're doing with their days. You know, what they're doing with their lives at this point because their organizations that exist to smear and undermine and destroy and have there's no good faith. No one at Media Matters operates in good faith. It is essentially a media

character assassination squad that abuses the tax code. By the way, in order to be a five O one see three nonprofit Peter writes, Buck, I'm a big fan and wanted to let you know your calm, reasonable and reasoned voice for all things pro Usa is truly inspirational and also is saving this country by getting the word of logic

and history out there. You make me laugh routinely. Your quip months ago about the Southern Property Law Center chipping away at the load bearing walls of Western civilization had me giggling for days. When we can laugh at such a tragedy, life is much better. Shields High, Peter, thank you so much for the very kind and encouraging note. It really does mean a lot, and please keep listening to the show. Please tell some friends about it too.

Remember they can always download it, folks, and our downloads are going up earlier than they were before, so you usually should be able to listen to this show by seven Eastern time because some of our guest interviews and some other things we're able to get done in advance, so you can. You can usually get the show by, you know, earlier than you used to. I can. I can tell you that much earlier than you used to

be able to. Josh writes, I love your show, but I'm done wasting my time I pull off the highway, I might commute home to message or tweet you no more have a great life Sexton. Um, well, Josh, I don't. I don't know, man. I mean I just got to your message now. Thank you for saying you love my show. Please keep listening to the show. We just we get a lot of messages in the inbox and I can't get to them all on air, or the whole show would just be people writing to me on roll call.

Maybe we could do a whole Friday like roll call extravaganza. That'll be kind of fun for the end of the year. Um. Maybe that's an idea. But Josh, come back, my friend. Listen to me on your commute at home. Don't give up the freedom. Hud is here for you. We're just a little understaffed and and rambling. John, who has a very very groovy last name, John writes. Your mention of people who want to have limbs removed reminded me of this song as recorded by Billie Holiday, All of me?

Why not take all of me? Can't you see I'm no good without you? Take my lips I want to lose them. Take my arms. I never use them. Wow, that's intense. You took the best, so why not take the rest, Baby, take all of me, John, thank you for sharing. I'm actually, I'll tell you a fan of Nina Simone, Billie Holiday, Ella Fitzgerald. I go through phases where I'll listen to a lot of that genre of music from that from that period of time, Nina Simone

in particular. I've always actually really enjoyed listening to an Elaphitzgerald kind of just even though some of the songs are very kind of emotional and sad, ell Fitzgerald usually puts me in a good mood. Mary writes, can you tell mister Sexton thanks for the giggles each time he mocks Hillary's voice? Well, Mary, you're welcome. That's about as close to Hillary's voice as we can get tonight. But she says you're welcome, So there you go. Mark write's

book Shields High. Shouldn't the Democrats be loudly and actively warning all immigrants trying to come here to stay away? You don't want to come here right now? You know, since Trump is literally hitler, you know, Mark, you raise a good point. The country on the world stage is still a place where lots of folks want to come and even if they're gonna get tear gas, you know, even if there's going to be some difficulty for them

in that whole process. So clearly America, as far as the rest of the world is concerned, or at least people that have to take action based upon their perception of America. Other people don't really think that we are basically in Nazi Germany here. We just don't know it yet other countries recognized, or at least refugees people from

other places recognize that is the case. You know. I would also just say that's one of the major stumbling blocks in this whole argument about how these people from Honduras and Al Salvador and Nicaragua and all the rest of it, that they are refugees or that they're asylum seekers. They've been offered asylum in Mexico, they have chosen not to take it because it's not about being safe, it's

about wanting to be in America. This is very similar to if somebody on the street was saying, I am starving, please give me food, and you said, all right, I got you. Here's a you know, here's a cheeseburger and some fries. And they said, oh, I'm sorry, so I only eat prime rib medium rab because I am not a savage. Well that would seem strange, right, If you're starving, don't you just want food? And aren't you grateful for that food? If that is really your argument, then you

should be able to follow that through. Sherry writes, definitely another vote here for Pickles on the side when it comes to burgers. I really enjoy your show and try to recruit more listeners for you when I can keep up the good work. Your schedule sounds grueling, but a lot of us out here appreciate your dedication. Sherry in Pennsylvania shared, thank you so much. It really means a lot.

The schedule is grueling, but I love what I do, and the one thing that I look forward to every day, as I've told you so many times, is this show. That is the one thing that I am always excited to do. I'm always excited to hear from all of you and get a chance to address you here in the Freedom Hunt. So yes, thank you so much for listening in Pennsylvania. Please do spread the word, and we

got one more here. Jackie writes, you have to have pickles on the burger have to and more nuts in brownies, Jackie. I know you're entitled to your opinion, even if it's wrong, but come on, I mean, it's one thing to say pickles on burgers, but nuts in brownies. I was gonna say that's nuts, but that's too weak. You know, that's just crazy town tonight. I'm hoping as soon as I finish radio, although it's kind of late, I might make myself some some what is it going to be a

lemon butter sauce for some soul? I'm trying to expand my fish cooking abilities and my fish repertoire, my culinary seafood exploits. So I'll let you know how that goes. Team and honor and a privilege always to talk to you. I'll be back here, same time, same place tomorrow. Shields high email security is everything, and you shouldn't trust it to one of those left leaning comie companies out there. Okay,

you need to try I Patriots dot Us. I Patriots dot us is a new conservative alternative to all those super lib email services ipatriots dot us is secure, includes more of what you want, okay, thirty gigs at cloud storage, larger attachment sizes. Your emails and files are safe with an anti virus, anti spam encryption system that is phenomenal.

Ipatriots dot us won't sell your information or support liberal agenda items like a lot of those other free email providers and ipatriots dot us email is compatible with most mobile devices here iPhone, iPad, Android, Windows Mobile, BlackBerry. You name, but show your a patriot. Go to ipatriots dot us now choose your membership program. Input your desired ipatriots email

address during checkout and our promo code buck. Make sure you do this and our promo code buck for ten percent savings during your first year of membership