Canada's Big Liberal Phony

The buck Sexton Show. This is the buck Sexton Show where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a great American. Again, The buck Sexton Show begins. Analyst brother, He's a great guy. No, I think this is something that, like everything that you have to evaluate on a case by case basis. This is something that I take seriously

and I take responsibility for. I'm just off of myself. Obviously, I'm disappointed in myself and I'm apologizing to Canadian Welcome to the buck Sexton Show. All of a sudden, we are focused on Canadian politics. A Justin Trudeau. He is a somewhat beloved figure on the left he is considered

very telegenic. He is a self professed male feminist, and now we find out had not just one instance, but really a habit, a habit of dressing in at least three instances in black face or it's also people have preferred to it as brown face to look like he's from South Asia, for example. I believe they think that or the Middle East. There one photo I believe he dresses up as is it at Arabian Nights party. So yes, that we Middle Eastern. So he painted his face and

his arms brown. You can see the photos for yourself. This let me just say, and I you know this, I hate cancel culture. The day will come, mark my words when all of you are going to have to stand beside me when I say something that's not wrong or bad, because I'm a good person who doesn't say wrong or bad things, but says something that somehow the left will try to turn into me being a bad guy, or me being a racist, or me being whatever, And it will be on all of you to just say, no,

we know Buck. We've listened to Buck for a long time. We know, we know his heart, we know his mind, and that's just not real cancel culture is terrible, all right. This decision that was made within the corridors of the elite lag in journalism, media, the academy over the last ten years or so, to just try to find something in someone's background, even if at the time it was more more commonplace or less. And I'm not talking about

blackfaced specifically, just any number of things. Support of gay marriage, I'm sorry, support of same sex gosh sport of traditional marriage. What I'm trying to say is enough to get you fired from your job, even at a time when Barack Obama himself was a traditional marriage politician, right saying that he was for a traditional marriage. So they've gone back into people's past to try to destroy them. We know what happens here, right, hypocrisy. We know that conservatives are

held to one standard, Liberals are held to another. And the conservative standard is if we can get you, we're gonna get you. The liberals standard is, oh, let's talk about nuance and all the good This person has done. This just in Trudeau conference was astounding. This guy was It was just he was groveling, pleading. Oh, I'm so so sorry, and I just I understand my privilege and I've I've lived a life with so much privilege, and

I know that that privilege. He just kept repeating the word like there's some evil guy named privilege that made him do this. Was it one case, by the way, And it wasn't like he got drunk. One nine said I'm gonna do this stupid thing. He went to a party. He did this three times, he according to the Daily Mail here. The three photos have emerged in the last

twenty four hours, showing him in black face. In one, he addressed up to seeing Dao on stage at a high school, which is a well known Jamaican folk song about the country's working class, according to Daily Mail here. In another one, he wore brown makeup to attend an Arabian Nights party at age twenty nine, and a third undated photo showed him in full black face in a video three times. This guy does this three times and in the two thousands. This isn't thirty years ago. It's

like ten, fifteen years ago, fifteen years ago. This isn't back in the eighties. Not that I would make it, okay, but this is even more recent. And this guy is all the libs love him. He's their favorite. Oh my gosh, he's so they say, he's so handsome and smart and liberal and worldly and sophistically. His dad was prime minister. He's a spoiled brat. Oh, but I am so good for Canada. I'm here, I am very handsome. Just In Trudeau.

I just want to say the most liberal platitude in this stuff possible, and not to know today he's got a little bit of a different a little bit of a different situation going for himself. Today he's got a problem. I think that people have particular schadenfreuder here. It's a great word that you know. Germans do have some words that are really really useful. Schadenfreud is one of them.

We are enjoying watching Trudeau in particular squirm and man is he squirmy right, I am so sorry about my privilege because all of the privilege that I've had for the many decades of my prig It's like, dude, come on, wokeness in the past isn't supposed to be a free pass, or rather wokens today. He isn't supposed to be a free pass to do anything in your past. But he seemed to think so this is the same Justin Trudeau,

and he doesn't really have a French act. I like to do like a cross between Justin Trudeau and some guy named Jean Pierre, who is you know, trapping beever pelts up in Hudson Bay. You know where you get the offense the best prize in the trapping in the Hudson Bay, monsieur. I like that French Canadian mountee kind of thing. Anyway, he doesn't sound like that, I know, so I should stand my Justin Trudeau impression really needs to get a lot better. But here he is speaking

of Justin Trudeau and how he sounds. Here he is at a at a some kind of forum, and a woman who's on his side, mind you, a fellow liberal, gets up to speak, and he corrects her. Maternal love is the love that's going to change the future of mankind. So we'd like you to look. We would like to say people kind, not necessarily mankind. It's more inclusive, exactly. We'd like to say. We like to say people kind. I think John your correct Sir Trudeau just mansplained to

say that it must be people kind. He doesn't let her live her truth. He doesn't know what kind of struggles she has had with the usage of the term mankind versus people kind. Why not humankinds your Missieur Trudeau, But that's he is a smug, sanctimonious live I mean, the worst kind. And we've seen so many people. We just had a an SNL. SNL cast member got fired from his job in this obviously that's in this country, although Lauren Michaels is Canadian. Fun fact, the guy who

runs SNL, we had him. I don't remember the guy's name. He didn't really make it onto the cast. He's got fired. He said he said he used a racial slur about Asians, and you know that's going to get you in a lot of trouble. But I would just note that, okay, he's a racial slur. Justin Trudeau is dressing in blackface multiple times. He clearly thought this was really funny. He clearly thought this was like edgy and cool. What a moron. I mean, he's always been, by the way, he's always

been an empty suit. He's always been a guy that you know, just because he looks a certain way and uses a certain phrases. You know, Oh, I am I just think that we should say people kind, and I'm good to stare longingly into your eyes Canada. Does you know it's the whole thing. It's just intellectually flimsy got where he is because of who daddy is. And you know, now here we are dealing with once again liberals cannot live by the rules that they want to make conservatives

live by. They can't live by them. You had Northamb in Virginia, not just not just in a black face photo, also with a KKK guy, you know, in a costume, and his story, I mean, the Trudeau is just saying, please, don't be don't hate me. I am, I will do all of the social justice things you want. I promise. You know. Northam's thing was like, yeah, that's not me. Well, like my friend, it is you. Okay, we're not idiots, it's you. No, no, that's not me. And then Mark

Harring came out. And Mark Harry, who is the not the number two but the number three in the I think he's a state attorney general in Virginia. He says, yeah, he should, you know, Northham should probably step down. And then it comes out that Mark Harring had a black face issue, if memory serves, and he's just like, what is with these guys, Libs, Democrats, Justin Trudeau. If you're making a global index of the top ten social justice warriors in politics, I think Justin Trudeau would be a

top ten, probably be top five. Who stops somebody and says, we prefer to say people kind. I mean, what kind of smug nonsense is that? And yet now we find out that not only is he annoying, it turns out he has horrible judgment horrible generally three times. I even I don't even think Northam was in three instances of black face, as much as he's a liar about the black face incident that he had three separate times this sky.

You know, I haven't been to that many costume parties as an adult period, So I mean, I mean, by the way, when he was asked, oh my gosh, there's even more when when he was asked at this press conference, which was great viewing today. I watched almost all of it, but occasionally would switch back into ah way, monsieur jumpel Justin Trudeau he going to the whole He actually would switch into the French. He had to watch it go

back and forth. But one of the one of the members of the press, all of a sudden said, uh, you know, hey, UM, can you just tell us are these all the black face photos that are going to emerge? And he can't. He's like, well, I don't know. It's um, there are certainly three of them. And I am so sad because my privilege just got the best of me and privilege is so pervasive, and you know, he just just blatter, just trying to Oh, I'm so sorry, I'm

so sorry. I'm so sorry. But he can't tell us if there's I mean, John, here's here's here's a fun here's a fun game. Do you know how many you know how many black face photos there are of me in existence? Zero? You know how many black faced photos there are of you in existence? Zero? It's just not hard. This is not hard. So what is this? Uh? I don't know if there's Marrie, this guy Trudeau. Oh, he's just such a self righteous fraud folks about all this stuff?

How homogic cares? And because here, let me just say this. If Trudeau were a guy who was always fighting for free speech and he was one of these liberals that still believed in liberty at some level, I don't think we should have cancel culture. I think we should give good people the benefit of the doubt. People can misspeak, people can share the wrong idea at the wrong time. You know that can happen. If you were that guy, I would say, Okay, you know, maybe maybe you gave

him a little bit of slacker. But no, the guy who says you can't say mankind say people kind can't even tell you if there's a fourth or fifth Maybe it doesn't. He doesn't know. Black faced photos of him out there. This, my friends, is liberalism today. This is leftism in America, in Canada, in Europe. It is an ideology that is all about the elevation of ego at the expense of reason and truth and facts and decency and honor and integrity. It's just believe this thing, do

what we say. Believe this thing, and you'll be one of the good people, and you'll be able to get away with things that the other people won't. You will be elite by just by virtue of agreeing with this political machinery. Use the words we say, agree with the policies that we prescribe, and you will be among the elite. You'll be on the side of the good people and the smart people. Meanwhile, the rest of us say, what happened to decency, honor, integrity, individual freedom, individual rights? How

about any of that? Does that ever get talked about here now? Of course not. Social justice is the only justice that matters to them. Do I think Trudeau is going to lose because of this? I'm not a good person to gauge where Canadian politics are going, but I can tell you this. They'll forgive him whenever a liberal messes up, whenever a liberal should be canceled. Under cancel culture, we have conversations about nuance and forgiveness and second chances.

When a conservative makes a mistake, even a much much smaller mistake than this, any Republican, anyone in Trump's circle, Trump himself, it's because he's evil, needs to be cast out, lose his job, lose his career, lose his reputation. The only way to stop this is to fight back. We either make them live by these rules, or we refuse to live by these rules. But we can't let them have it both ways. And we'll see what happens here with Trudeau. But I can promise you Libs want to

have it both ways. We got a much more show. Come and stay with me. I was on Outnumbered today on Fox and the subject of Greta Thunberg came up, or rather I brought it up in the context of a climate change discussion. And let me just say that I one hundred percent stand behind exactly what I said, would say it the same way, and I respectfully disagree and would say that some of my colleagues on the couch today we're wrong in what they said to me

in response. So we were talking about climate change and the absurdity of some of the climate change stuff that's going on. Later we'll discuss confessing your climate change sins at NBC. Here is how this exchange at the very end of the show today, which has now been turned into a left wing news story, and they're saying that I'm a kid basher. Play the clip. And they also had this young girl who's spent sixteen about the FED

rate next mine because he's a kid. Yeah, no, I'm not picking, but she start fining about climate change in front of Congress. She actually, well, let's talk about this. Let's talk about no kid bashing. Yeah, no kid bashing, especially a kid who is more alert to the challenges that are facing our planet. Thank Okay, I'm sorry. No, I'm sorry all the women, and I like them all very much. They're very kind to have me on their show. They were all wrong there. That is wrong. I was

not kid bashing. I said, should Congress ask her about the Federate? That's a completely legitimate way of posing the question, which is, should Congress be asking a sixteen year old girl about an enormously complicated scientific, environmental, and economic issue in the United States Congress? Should this be done? The answer is no, unless you're a crazy person. I did not bash her. I did not make fun of her, and no honest person could say otherwise. I am sorry,

but my colleagues that on the couch were wrong. They were wrong. You heard the audio. That was what happened. Ah. But now The Daily Beast, one of the great trash heap websites in existence, just full of wokeness and leftists or trying to out hit each other, I mean out you know, being more hip than one another. Here's what

they wrote. Conservative pundit Buck Sexton seemingly thought on Thursday afternoon he was in a safe space to mock sixteen year old climate activist Greta Fundburg by appearing on Fox news he apparently thought wrong. While sitting as the lone male guest of Outnumbered, Sexton joined forces with co host Blah Blah blah climate change of religious belief for people who think they're too smart for religion sex and said, which is true. By the way, they're asking for forgiveness.

Do you think there's a world where it makes a difference. The biggest weakness with this stuff this is again quoting me has always been the spokesperson for the movement. They also have this young girl who is what sixteen? We're gonna ask her about the FED rate next, he snarked, you're damn right. I did. Absolutely, I will double down.

I will triple down. It is absurd, absolutely absurd to have a sixteen year old girl testifying to Congress and saying, I want you to be scared, you must take action. The world's gonna end like we're all a bunch of morons. It's on Congress for bringing her in there. If they brought a five year old in to give us a lesson on voter suppression, I would say that Congress is being stupid and they shouldn't ask a five year old

about this. And anyway, I mean Jessica who he's a Democrat, and I like Jessica, but the whole she's more a lot more that Greta is more attuned to the No. Greta is a sixteen year old girl who doesn't know what she's talking about, So Congress should not give her the platform. I stand behind it. Bring it Daily Beast, and I'm sorry, but the ladies in the couch today they're a little bit out of order on that one.

A little bit, a little bit right now. And I where I go lobbying or I was just spending like three days straight with my organization zero Hour. We were on the Capitol for three days straight, just lobbying, having meetings and meetings and meetings and meetings, and what we get all the time as politicians who will not pledge to take any action, they'll just pat us on the head and be like, good job. You know you're so cute.

Ear soon firing. Maybe someday you should run for office and you can take action on climate which is messed up because we only have about eighteen months left in order to create the political environment in order to solve the climate crisis before it's too late. So as a seventeen year old throwing it on for them to throw it on a seventeen year old shoulders and say, oh, when you grow up, you can do this. Will know

by the time I grew up, it's too late. So I mean, you know, on Monday, I got to meet Alexandro Kazio Cortez, who is a congresswoman who is an icon of mine, and I look up to her, and so the goal is, you know, I was standing out there in the balcony where presidents are inaugurated, and I was looking out and I was like, maybe I'll be standing up here getting inaugurated someday. So it's not like

that that dream is gone. But my dream is not to become an elected official so I can solve the climate crisis, because by the time I'm old enough to be an elected official, it's going to be way too late. Now. Am I allowed? I just want to know, am I allowed to criticize what was said here? I mean, this is a climate activist who's meeting with members of Congress, who's getting airtime on TV, Seattle Times, Rolling Own all. You know, they're they're all doing these big, glowing editorials

and pieces on climate activist Jamie Markolan. But she's seventeen. So if I say what she's saying has no basis in reality and is entirely wrong, am I? That is that kid bashing? Can I wait till she's eighteen? Does that to criticize what she says? Is that the rule? I just want to know what the rules are. We all knew all a long. It's just so funny. I've been telling you that they send this this young girl from Sweden to do this specifically. It's really just a

trap for criticism. It's meant to do exactly what happened. But I'm not going to back down. I don't care. But it's meant to be exactly what happened with me, which, as you say, this is silly, which it is. This is stupid, which it is. Congress should not be giving a platform to a teenager on this complicated issue and treating her opinions on this with some deference in elevating it. It's it is absurd. And now you've got another situation.

Or Jamie Markland seventeen, I met with the I think it's called the Sunshine Foundation or some thing, or the Sunshine Group. I forget that. But it's this climate change activist group of kids. And I don't mean seventeen year olds, I mean like twelve year olds, and they gather and they go and remember when I think it was Diane Feinstein was like, well, maybe like you should actually learn something a little kid, and kind of patted them on the head when one of the kids was saying, you know,

you have to save the world or else. They are fearmongering to your children. They're teaching them this in public school. They are brainwashing them with this lunacy. And then when you try to deep program the kids or say what the kids are saying is even accurate, you're a bad You're kid bashing, classic victimology, left wing tactics. You're oh, oh, could you use a kid. I'm I'm making fun of these young girls. I would be that wouldn't be a cool move. That's not okay. I'm not making fun of them.

I'm making fun of the elevation of children into political discourse by people who are being disingenuous, by adults who are being frauds, who won't admit that what they're doing is crass, is exploitative. You know how many more teenagers get to lecture me or the whole country and go to our United States Congress. Get on TV. Even Jake Tapper the most smug, annoying live on television. Jake Tapper had did all peace on Greta Thunberg guest rate. Do you think that he was like, yeah, maybe this is

a little bit a little bit much. No, of course, not at all. She's so brave trying to help save the planet. You know, real fights, real existential conflicts involved, choices involved, trade offs are hard. Walking around and talking about how you want to save the planet all the time by doing some vague thing that will maybe cut some CO two is just a waste. It's a waste of air, a waste of energy, a waste of money, a waste of effort. But it's so self aggrandizing. Oh

it makes you feel so important. I'm saving the world. I'm saving the world. Who could be more worthy? I swear it. Really it's just drives me nuts. Drives me nuts, really does? It is so disingenuous the way this debate ends up happening. And I've been telling you about all week. They're gonna have it edits sure enough, Daily beasts. Oh

and other sides are picking us up now. Conservative pundit Buck Sexton thought he'd get away, thought he'd get away with what saying that it's ridiculous that a sixteen year old is testifying in front of the Congress about climate change, not about like high school or what it's like to deal with bullying. That I can understand. There's actual expertise there, a sixteen year old on climate change. No, I'm sorry, doesn't know anything. Doesn't mean she's a bad person. I'm

not putting her down. I'm sure she believes everything she says and she's well intentioned. That's all fine. But the Democrats and the Congress that are bringing it there are a bunch of clowns. Stand by it one hundred percent. Not gonna change. No one's gonna make me change on this because I'm right, and you know him right. Being right these days not enough, Oh nope, Not when the woke police come for you. Not when the social justice warriors think that they can, you know, add add one

conservative to the body count. You're gonna have to do better than that, Libs. Not today, Not on my watch, Hey, Libs, I don't think I'll let you be arresting me today. Be hand. I think that's where we are on this one, and I have to say I was I was disappointed with the reaction on the couch. My point was not only not only was my point not worthy of the accusation, My point was correct. I would make it again a

hundred times. I'm right. You know that I'm right, which is why you listen to the show, because it's the best show. We'll be right back. First of all, I want to thank the whistleblower for coming forward, for having the courage to follow the procedures as they're written in law, to make a lawful disclosure to the Congress and to the Inspector General of conduct that was gravely concerning to

the whist a blower. Under the law, when a whistle blower does that, the Inspector General has two weeks to investigate that complaint, to determinis urgent and credible, and to afford that complaint to the Director of National Intelligence. The Inspector General made exactly those determinations, found that this was within the jurisdiction of the Director of National Intelligence, that it was an urgent matter, and it met the statutory requirements that it dealt with a serious or flagrant abuse,

violational law, or other misconduct or misuse of resources. What then is supposed to happen is the Director of National Intelligence has seven days to review the complaint, and then they shall provide it to the Congress, and they shall instruct through the Inspector General, the whistle blower how the whistle blower can come directly to Congress. In the absence of that whistle blower law, there is no lawful mechanism for an intelligence community employer, detail layer contractor to raise

a complaint about serious misconduct. Libs will never learn. Folks, I'm sorry, Eddie, are so much from Shifty Shift there, But the libs will never ever learn. They just can't help themselves. They will believe what Adam Shift says. They

will run with this story. You would think, given the very recent and in depth and repeated history of oh now they've got Oh there's a new thing that came out about Trump, this is it, He's done, maybe newspapers would be a little more circumspect, just a little more skeptical before they ran with, oh, whistleblower, very serious things about President Trump, very serious. Oh my gosh, Trump's days

in office are numbered. I assure you they're only numbered by the next election, and the next elections looking really good. What is that? What is the heart of this whistleblower complaint? Well, before I even get into the details of it, I can tell you this, there's no shortage of people inside the federal government, particularly inside the federal bureaucracy, who are

part of the hashtag resistance. They think that Trump is a bad and evil man, and anything that they have to do, anything that they must do in order to fight back against Trump, including misuse of their official position, including violating their oaths of office, they feel justified in that.

And if they can find a way to use the system, you know, like Komey and McCabe and Brennan and Yates and Clapper and Struck and Page, and if they can find a way to use the government system itself against the president for political purposes, they think that's a great idea. They see no problem with that or in that. In fact, they just see an opportunity. That's what they see, and that's so that's the That's just the necessary backdrop I

think for our understanding of this whistleblower complaint. Oh my gosh, what are we going to do here on the same week when they're all they're they're subpoenaing Trump's taxes. Oh, there's a whistleblower complaint. Oh the emoluments class. It just it's hard. It's hard to keep up on this, it really is. So this is from CNN aka Anti Trump Central. I know, I know, don't get mad at me for reading from CNN. It's just if you want to know what the Trump haters are saying, you got a one

stop shop at CNN. It is the Trump Derangement News Network. Here's what it says. The Intelligence Inspector General suggested the House intelligence community today that the whistleblower had concerns about multiple actions. Oh no, good, heavens. The Inspector General did not specifically say all the acts of concern involved the president. One source said the Inspector General referenced a sequence of

events and alleged actions that took place. Another source disputed that the Inspector General provided substantive details regarding the whistleblower claim.

CNN earlier reported, citing a source familiar with the case, the complaint was prompted by concerns over a phone call between the president and a foreign leader Inspector General Michael Atkinson was pressed for details, but was mostly resistant to the queries, saying he is not allowed to provide details of the substance of the complaint because he was not authorized to do so. He's discussing the process for his

handling of the whistleblowers concerns. So here we go. Now we have another Oh, it could be huge if true, huge if true against Trump. That's what they'll say. And I saw today and now keeping on this is none of this is very First of all, Trump has already said this is just fake news, it's crap. None of

this has been verified. So if this turns out to not be the exact story, then you know, excuse me for telling you what the crazy stuff is that they're saying about Trump, but we have to we have to know. Here's what we have been told that Ukrainian President Zelenski was on the phone with Trump and this is this

is the allegation that's out there. And then Trump told Zelenski that if you reopen the probe into Biden and specifically whether or not Biden made a made the Ukrainians fire a prosecutor who was looking at a Ukrainian gas gas company or maybe an oil company, gas company, I forget fossil fuel company that was paying Hunter Biden, who we all know has a very messy past and background, paying Hunter Biden millions of dollars, so that prosecutor had

to get pushed aside. This is the story. And if I recall my old colleague at the Hill, John Solomon, was the one who broke this story. Colleague, or rather that prosecutor. How do you get pushed aside? And now there's this story out there that maybe Trump would say to him, open up again. What's going to open this up again? Take a look at this again? Is this true? I don't know. I think it's very unlikely to be true.

And I think that the Lib media never learns its lesson about whether or not they should just go all in on these stories. Although this then goes to my theory, which is that the audience for these publications in Your time, CNN and elsewhere, they don't get mad when these stories are wrong. They understand the intent behind the stories is not the truth. The intent behind these stories is to attack Trump. And if it works for a few days and then it falls apart, well then that's fine because

for a few days. There was a perception that was created, there was a negativity around this. There was an oh my gosh, Trump is, you know, terrible, And then when it turns out it looks like he's not terrible, or at least he's not terrible. For this, they go, well, let's just move on past it. Let's just move Once we've done the damage, then we move, We move on and don't pay any attention to it anymore. Now, once we've we've created this mess, we have no journalistic obligation

to clean it up. I do think that's very likely what happened here. Does anybody really believe that there will be a reckoning for Trump based on this this whistleblower? Of course not. But then again, does anybody really believe that there's gonna be a reckoning for Trump based on the tax returns in New York State? Of course not. New York State already has it at the I R s already have you. This is just more blathered, more nonsense than the left all the time. Oh, I'm wondering

when they're going to decide that they hate this. Guy O'Brien, who is a President Trump's new national security advisor, just a quick note on this is the privilege to serve with the president, and do we look forward to to another year and a half of peace thro strength. We've had tremendous foreign policy successes under President Trump's leadership. I expect those to continue. We've got a number of challenges, but there's a great team in place with Secretary Pompeo

and Secretary Esper, Secretary Minute and others. I look forward to working with them and working with the President to keep Americas safe and continue to rebuild our military and and really get us back to a piece of strength. Boster. I'll keep about the American people, I say, from the many challenges around the world today, Oh my gosh, who is this man? Liberal media is going to turn on

They've never heard of this guy before. Although he did get sent he was like the special envoy at the behest of the president, a free Asap Rocky, who I believe is a hip hop artist whom I learned about in the last few months because of some stuff that went stuff that went down in Sweden and so O'Brien was sent to get Asap Rocky out of Swedish prison, which I gotta tell you. In Swedish prison. I think they bring you a lot of very well appointed, inexpensive

furniture that you can build yourself. And the food's probably very good. It's a lot of a lot of pickled herring and very very expensive beer. For those of you you who've been too Stockholm, you know what I'm talking about. If I look, if I had to go to prison and like a relatively major company, I mean a country, I think it'd be Sweden. I mean, if you could go to prison in Monaco, there's only one jail cell and it does have a of the ocean. I remember

reading about this. But if you're going to go to prison in a country with more than ten million people, I think it would probably be Sweden. It'll be like, is your peer look comfy? Does your peer feel softer? Is that no, you'd watched Sesame Street Sweetish the Swedish chef Okay whatever. So anyway, they try to get asap rocky out or they did get a zap rocky out. And now this guy O'Brian is a natural security advisor.

We need to stop thinking that everybody who's going to hold the senior government job is has to be a famous person or a person we've all heard of. I'm sure he's been doing this a long time. He seems fine. We'll learn more about him over time. Libs will freak out about this. They'll find a way, they just haven't found it yet. Trust me, we're not here today because of famous Arches or famous Smith. In fact, we're not here. We're not here because of man at all. I got

news for Elizabeth Warren. Without a man, you would not be here. In fact, without a man, none of us would be here because in fact, there had to have been a man involved in the procreation process for any of us to exist. So to say that further, you know, without a man, I'm just it's just not true. It's just factually hashtag fact check. You need to have a man or else. Without that, none of us would be And a woman, wow, look at that. It's almost you know,

unitive and procreative. And there's a there's the male and the female and they go together and this is what this is the species and oh wow, two genders, not thirty seven two. But Elizabeth Warren gave her speech down in Washington Square Park where as much as producer John mocks me, and that's where I do all my speed chess searching for Bobby Fisher. Remember that movie. I like that movie. I actually watched it a bunch of times.

I don't know why. I guess just like anything with Lawrence Fishburne and Ben Kingsley, I'm like, yeah, I can get into this. It's about a little bit. It's about a old nerd who plays a lot of chess. Let's be honest. He's like, I just I want to play chess, but I also want to have friends, you know. It's like, yeah, whatever, It's like, I had a let to defeat people of the chessboard because that may make them feel bad about themselves.

It's a kid, You're gonna get so many wedgies unless you just, you know, you gotta step it up, buddy. You know you gotta be a rude, terrible person. That's probably true. Apparently, and apparently a kid basher. All look at this, all buckers bashing kids again, bashing little little not you, Actually, Bobby Fisher, was that a chess player. This guy's name was like Josh something or other I think can't remember's name their character from the movie, But yep,

more kid bashing. Oh you're so mean to the kids. It's not true. What you know, we we understand. We understand that people say all kinds of things about the Buckster that are not true. It's not fair, but that's the right life. Life goes on. We have to move on. So Elizabeth warrem is down there. And what I think is interesting is that today you have the Drudge Report essentially say saying that the big headline is Warren rising

her nomination to lose the crowds the momentum. I do think that this is the borrow from Yogi Bearra deja vu all over again. I think that Libs didn't learn any of the lessons they needed to learn from the last time around with Hillary in twenty sixteen. And I think that they they view Elizabeth Warren as being able

to get done what Hillary couldn't. And she brings all that, you know, breaking the ultimate glass ceiling, you know, woman's empowerment stuff, you know, feminism, blah blah, all that brings all that to the table too, all of it, all of it. So the problem with Elizabeth Warren is that it will come up a lot during the campaign that she's not just a fraud. It's not like she just did things. Let's say that were shady in business or which would be bad. But it's that she's a fraud

that is worth the ridicule. I mean, she's a fraud. And that she was listed in the Harvard Directory as the first Native American professor in the history of Harvard Law schools. That's something that is worth noting. There was a story today in the Babylon B which some of you I'm sure familiar with, that was Elizabeth Warren admits to appealing. Sorry, Elizabeth Warren admits to appearing in paleface at party. So the Babylon B is just one example

of what you can expect going forward. We have not forgotten about the fact that not only did she lie about that whole Native American thing to advance her career for a very remember, these are all the same people at all. Trump lies about this and he lies about that. I always ask, what's the big lie that Trump has told? You know that that his crowds are the biggest and his buildings are the best, and you know that that's

really just braggadocio, that's exaggeration, that's hyperbole, salesmanship. What's the big lie? We're like, oh my gosh, how could Trump lie about that. I mean, I don't know what like this Stormy Daniel stuff. I thought that in the post Bill Clinton era, sexual conduct was considered you know, between consenting adults was considered private. And we don't need to worry about this, you know. It's just lives constantly changed the standards to suit there, to suit their women at

any point in time. Elizabeth Warren wasn't just somebody who used racial fraud to advance her career. She's also someone who very clearly still believed or thought that she could pull one over on us as recently as what was it a year ago now that she came out with that DNA test and it was like, look, I'm actually Native American. You're like, well you're yeah, you're about one one thousand and twenty fourth Native American. Yalloon. It was just a crazy thing to do. It was a crazy

thing to do, but she did it. And she's also I just think that she's a complete and utter demagogue. And I think that she doesn't really believe out of the stuff that she says, or rather she knows that it's not true, but you'll say it because it appeals to people. But if it's between her and shooes me or I don't know where I am Biden. I can understand why they might want to go with Elizabeth Warren over Biden. I mean Biden is. Oh, here's here's a perfect example. We got a great biden Ism for you.

You get a tax break for racehorse. Why in God's name couldn't we provide a eight thousand dollars tax credit for everybody who has childcare costs. It would put it would put seven hundred and twenty million back million women back in the workforce. It would increase the GDP to sound like a wonk here by about eight tenths of one percent. It would grow the economy, not not to sound like a like a wonk here, but uh you know, I mean, I mean at least seven hundred and twenty

million women in America back in the workforce. He said that. Okay, he said it. And look, I do three hours alive radio a day. I misspeak sometimes I stumble. People are very hard in this audience. By the way, if I if I have a day or I'm a little tired, a little too many alms, a little too many, a little too many, I means I hear about it. Fuck, I listen to you because of the precision of your speech,

and you don't use unnecessary filler words. I expect that you keep that tradition going, or else I may just have to find somebody else to listen to it. Like I'm sorry, man, I was a little a little hungover. Me and producer Mark. We're out drinking some muzzo, and things got a little crazy. You know what stuff happens? Do you like uzzo? By the way, could we do that at some point? I think so? Sure? All right, cool, drinks a uzzo. I gotta celebrate your your upcoming nuptials.

But sore, here's what happened, Biden says, seven and twenty million women. Look, you can stumble like this. Fine. He says it, though, and he doesn't catch it, which makes you think that he is he's a practiced demagogue. You know, he's just gonna say these things because he thinks it's what he's supposed to say. But he doesn't think about what he is saying. He doesn't give it any any thought processes. It's just, well, this is what you're saying. You got the people to clap, he Biden. I mean

that's that's the approach. And that's what I mean by he's a He's a perfect demagogue. That's how he does things. Warren's a demagogue too, but at least she knows what state she's in, and she doesn't think there are seven hundred and twenty million women when as we know, there are about three hundred and thirty million people in America. So unless there's a whole lot of women who are being hidden somewhere, I don't think that there's seven hundred

million of them here. But then you have, well, what's the alternative. Who who's in a who's in a better spot than Elizabeth Warren or Biden. I mean, I'm just like, I'm not gonna go away yet because I'm I'm just you know, I really think that we should take all of your guns. And and in case you are curious about like whether Betteau wants to take your guns away, the answer is like, yeah, he does. And he's talking of bro Cuomo, Oh yeah, Creatine and swoll Club baby

boo yah. Are you in fact in favor of gun confiscation? Yes, when it comes to R fifteens and AK forty sevens, weapons designed for use on a military battlefield, the high impact, high velocity round that is fired from those weapons when it hits your body. I gotta pause for as I've said, there's nothing, there's no such thing as a not high impact, not high velocity round coming out of a firearm. You know, if you get shot with a with a thirty eight,

that bullet's going very fast. It's gonna hurt a lot and will kill you. You get shot with a twenty two close enough, you will be very dead depending on where it hits you. They're all high velocity. So unless everyone's gonna have a twenty two, but then you have well that's not useful particularly it. Now someone's gonna say, buck, I can kill a I can kill a deer with

a twenty two and six hundred meters. You know, we always there's somebody in this there's always a wise guy in this audience who's like the gun supersmith, who could you know? He's like I once had a sling shot and I killed the saber tooth tiger while we're in myn NRA A T shirt. So I don't think that, you know, I'm like, okay, fine, you know you are the sling shot guru or whatever, so good, good things.

But I mean, Beto wants to take your guns. And then you have mayor Pete who's just bitter, and then Kamala, whoeverone's really forgotten about. The only ones that I the only ones that don't really just agitate me that much, are Yang and Tulsi. And Tulsi's left wing, don't get me wrong, and she says things about the president that are horrible, that are untrue, But I just I don't find her deeply unlikable the way I do most of

the rest of these Democrat candidates. They're not inspiring charming people. You know. Say what you will about Trump, and I think he's done a lot of great things as president, and I think he's been a very solid president and all things considered, and the guy's an incredible entertainer. Is an unbelievable energy and electricity that comes from him when he's on stage during these arenas, and you're gonna put

Biden or Warren up against that. I'm here because I think that we should not have to rely on men to be here, Oh America, Do you really want to hear that for the next eight years? Possibly, I hope not. We'll go right back. So I'm proposing medicare for all who want it. It's it's just a little bit different from the idea of medicare for all, whether you want

it or not. The way I see it, if we take a version of medicare, we make it available to the American people, and that public alternative, which I expect to be better, will outcompete the private ones. But instead of just assuming that I'm right and ordering you to switch over whether you want to or not, we're gonna see if we're right. We're gonna put it out there and let Americans choose, because I trust you to make the right decision for your family when it comes to

your health. Think about what this would actually mean they at mayor Pete who is I think you could argue the I think you could argue the wonkiest of the Democrats, meaning the biggest wonk, like the the smartest on policy issue of of all the Democrats. I think you could argue that. And I think that what he's saying here just goes to show you how far left the Democrat Party has really gone. Because if you open up a public option that someone can just choose, then guess what

people are going to be pushed onto that. Employers are gonna say, why why am I gonna why am I going to pay for your healthcare? What I can just say, go get the public option. Everybody will just be pushed on the meta. You know, the system will break down very quickly in this way because a lot of employers will say, well, I can get a great savings now by pushing you onto the public option. It's going to

do it. And Medicare already does not pay enough to a lot of hospitals to cover their costs of the procedures that are done. Medicaid is even lower levels of reimbursement. And if you have higher usage of Medicare by people in the system through this Medicare for All program, then you're just going to increase wait times. You're going to create shortages, You're going to create rationing within that program.

That's just what's going to happen. But liberals still, just like with with all central planners, they think this time they'll get it right, this time it will be different. Unfortunately they're wrong. There's another thing that Mayor Pete had to talk about here, and that is and this is just a ghoulish and deeply disturbing story. There were there was a doctor, a doctor in South Bend, I'm sorry, in Illinois rather who had two thousand fetal remains found

in his home. Here's what Mayor Pete said to react to this. Like everyone, I find that news out of Illinois extremely disturbing, and I think it's important that the fully investigated. I also hope that it doesn't get caught up in politics at the time when women need access to healthcare. There's no question that what happened is disturbing, it's unacceptable, and it needs to be looking. This does remind me a bit of the liberal position after nine

to eleven. Remember, the liberal position after an eleven is the biggest thing that we have to be concerned about. We had almost three thousand Americans killed, died in crashes, some of them died in fires, jumped out of buildings, crushed to death, almost three thousand them. And the primary liberal takeaway from this for a lot of publications and a lot of liberal journos is I have to really

watch out for all that is homophobia. Here we have a story about a doctor who was keeping thousands of dead babies at his home, and you notice how Mayor Pete immediately switches into Yeah, that's a little that's that's disturbing. Let's just hope it doesn't affect women's right to terminate a pregnancy and to do this procedure that leads to the dead babies. This is a piece today from David Mastio. Abortionist Ulrich Klepfur kept thousands of dead babies but inspires

little curiosity. Yeah, this is a story that's gotten largely buried by the mainstream media. There's something sick, he writes, in America's abortion industry. What else would account for a doctor who collected thousands of dead babies in some kind of twisted hobby that he hid from his allegedly unsuspecting wife.

Two thousand, two hundred and forty six fetuses were found medically preserved in Ulric Clepfor's garage last week after he died on September third, and now the attorneys general of Illinois and Indiana are investigating how the human remains got from Klepf's network of Indiana abortion clinics to his rural Illinois home and what laws might have been violated. Klepfer isn't the only abortionist to enjoy keeping trophies of his

grizzly work close to hand. America's most infamous baby killer, Kermit Gosnell, also kept body parts in milk jugs and glass jars at his clinic in Philadelphia before he was convicted in twenty thirteen on three counts of murder for snipping the spinal cords of babies born alive. Like Gosnell, Clepfor's clinic shut down after state inspectors found worrying medical and record keeping problems two thousand dead babies at this guy's house. He was keeping dead babies as though they

were mementos or trophies. How is this not a major national news story? Well, you got a sense from Mayor Pete as to exactly why that is. If they have to suppress this story, if they have to make sure that no one hears about the above ground mass grave of dead babies at a doctor's home in Illinois from abortion clinics, if they have to make sure that that gets suppressed, no one really hears about it, because it'll protect those abortion clinics from further scrutiny, then that's all

completely fine. The Left goes along with it. They have no problem with whatsoever, as long as it protects a woman's right to choose. Single most important thing ever for the left. Mayor Pete, who lectures us all so often about the Bible, well, the Bible says this, and the Bible says that. I'm quite certain the Bible would have a lot to say about keeping the bodies of two thousand dead babies at your home over two thousand and

some kind of sick hobby ritual. We don't even know what this guy the guy's dead who was a doctor, which is how we found out about this. But liberals aren't outraged about this the way they a normal person would be. You know why, because they consider I just go back to the David Delayed in videos and the

Center for Medical Progress. They consider these tiny bodies, these tiny human beings, the remains of little human beings, to be just medical waste like someone's you know, like like a tumor that was cut out of somebody, or you know, someone's residue after a surgery. That's what they think of this. So and they won't admit that publicly, but that is the truth. And Mayor Pete is a disgrace for his

stance on this issue. But we already knew that. The other test, and I think this is a test that's not well understood by some of the candidates in the race and not what has not been well debated is is our democracy up to this task? And that is a really non trivial question, because I mean, it clearly isn't.

Right now, so far we have not. We haven't been and and and when you lose a national race, as we did in sixteen to a climate denier, that creates a real concern because you can't act urgently on climate if you have a climate denier in the White House? What would acting urgently on climate mean? And I would want to ask why didn't Obama do this? When Obama had a majority in the House and the Congress, I mean a House and the Senate. Why didn't he take

dramatic action? I mean, if we only had you know, ten or or twelve years or whatever to live, we only had what fifteen or twenty years to live when Obama came. If the science is so clear, why didn Obama do something? Why does Obama not care if we all die from climate change? Clearly it doesn't care. Why would Obama buy a fifteen million dollar house on the beach. If we were going to be certain that the entire Eastern Seaboard floored, a lot of place is going to

be underwater in thirty years. It seems like a strange purchase at least might affect your You could say, well, back, he'll sell it when things get really bad. But yeah, I would think that you'd be a little more concerned about this if you were concerned about it at all, which I don't think Obama is. But this climate change thing, you can't even make up how absurd this has gotten. Now you now have what is it? I think it was NBC. I gotta make sure I get this right.

NBC News had a confess your climate crimes. Yeah, here you go, confess your climate crimes on a website, and people started putting stuff out there like blast the ac cook at this is NBC News. I'm sorry, blast the ac cook a steak once a week. Where do you fall short in preventing climate change? Tell us with climate confessions? Climate confessions? Real thing, brucer Mark, do you have any climate confessions? Did you have a burger this week? You

evil selfish man. I mean, I've been on the diet, but I still eat pork and beat and all that kind of look at you. Are you going vegan just for that, you know, just to get into a wedding shape? Well, vegan really put me in wedding shape. I don't know. I think vegan makes your teeth fall out. And you know I'm meeting extra protein. There we go, extra protein? Oh, I just kind You have a climate? You are? You? Are you a keep the apartment for I keep my

apartment of sixty eight degrees all the time, all the time. Yeah, I get very warm, very quickly. Yeah, Brucer John, what about you? Where do you keep it? You don't have a mic? Okay, fine, he's not looking at the mic right now. He's busy cutting the show. And I don't even have a c That's how environmentally friendly I am. Yeah. I don't buy that for one second. Nonsense. Have you ever been in Have you ever been in an apartment? When the ac goes out, you have no choice but

to sleep in it. It is a It is a an eye opening experience. Let me tell you that, because it's very If you're used to sleep in a sixty eight degree room and all of a sudden you're supposed to sleep in a seventy five degree room. It's not happening. I'll sleep with at least a fan, at least at least a fan as absolutely. But so people saw this confess your climate sin craziness. Okay, he's some Bennett, they're saying, you know, he sounds kind of like good. Okay, guy

from South Park? You know that guy. What's his name that you know? The teacher guy? Who? What's that Michael Bennett? Yeah, no, I know, I know his name is Michael Bennet. Who's the teacher from mister Mackie? Thank you? Okay, here he's Michael Bennett. Sounds like it. Why did you climate de Niro in the Wright House? Okay? People saw this confess your climate sin thing, and they they decided to say that, like I sleep with the air conditioner on year round

and justify to myself by recycling. Oh my gosh, I fly too much, partially due to work. But on the flip side, I do not own a car. I will use the easiest method of transportation for the distance I am traveling. I travel off into conferences. Flying, I think about the emissions and I try to justify with the plane is going there anyway? These are people's actual climate confessions. They feel guilty about this stuff, They feel concerned about this.

They think that there's some some issue, some worry that they should have because they fly on planes occasionally. Well then some other people started pointing out how completely and utterly bonkers this is, and they started trolling this thing, which was a lot of fun. They're just like, I eat steak, I leave the acon at sixty year round. Yeah, that's what that's what we should do. Just lean into him. Man, this is the people who leave this They they're nuts.

They're just wrong. They've lost their minds. It doesn't matter if we use straws, it doesn't matter if you use AC. These are all good things. Actually, AC has probably saved a lot of lives from heatstroke over the last one hundred years. But that's a conversation for another time. The origins of this were Ronald Reagan nineteen sixty seven, when he wanted to clean up the air down in Los Angeles the smog. It led to the Clean Air Act

in nineteen seventy. Richard Nixon in nineteen said, bipartisan they'd be rolling their graves right now of what the Republican administration is doing, and moreover, what the Republican Party is doing complicit complete silence on states rights, but also free enterprise. I'll repeat what I just said. They're calling private sector corporations to the mat and threatening them. Again. I don't

think this. I know this from the personal conversations I've had and by the actions of the Apartment of Justice. What happened to the Republican Party? What happened to California. California, for those who just won a little bit of a a little bit of a refresher, was in fact a pretty reliable Republican state. At the national election level, California was a place that was solidly Republican. You had Eisenhower back in nineteen fifty two. Okay, so the Golden State.

The Golden State went for the Republican presidential candidate more often than not for a long time. He had two solid Reagan victories nineteen eighty four. Nineteen eighty George W. Bush won the state of California against Ducacus. But then again, I was seven years old, and I wouldn't I would have won the state of California against Ducacus in nineteen eighty eight. But in the twenty sixteen election, For example, Hillary Clinton, the scandal ridden, charmless, pantsuit clad ultra grifter

and twice presidential loser. She crushed President Trump in California sixty two point three percent to thirty one point nine percent. What has been the huge change there, Well, only twenty five percent of the state's almost twenty million registered voters or Republicans. So this is now the ultimate liberal stronghold.

You've had more than anything else. The single, the single biggest shift of any kind in California is demographics, and it's immigration, particularly illegal immigration from Latin America, notably Mexico, but other places as well. And the state is now has now been flipped. It's a Democrat state. You're not going to win in California statewide, and you're not going to win as president. And so then you get to what happens in a state where there really is only

one party in power. Well, there's no real accountability. And that's why Gavin Newsom was complaining about Trump and environmental regulator rather the lack of environmental regulations. Doesn't seem to understand that the rest of us looking at this, say, no, California should have to live with the decisions that it makes is a state and live with them for quite a while. California should have to deal with its own

bad policies. Right now, there's this big push to get federal dollars in to deal with the homelessness crisis there. You have a homelessness crisis in San Francisco, a homelessness crisis in Los Angeles. When I was in LA I don't know, maybe six seven months ago, going around, you'll just see you'll see what looks like a tent city, people living on the streets. And I would note that there's a lot of open air drug use, people who

leave those drug needles in the street. I mean just when people say things like leaving a drug needle in the street, I know it sounds like, well, you know, okay, how would you feel if you're eight year old, you know, was walking down the street and stepped on a used hypodermic needle And it's a terrifying thought. But I do think it's important to understand how would you feel about that people are leaving needles all over the streets in San Francisco, all over the streets in Los Angeles. New

York streets are getting more dirty and unsafe too. And there's a reason for this. There are liberal policies that have created this situation. Right, we should be getting more efficient to the government level. We have better we have better technology, better resources. We're pouring all this money into it. The problem of homelessness and housing. You know, I think, what's the word housing insecurity? As I think what they call it. I mean, I've had to move ten times

in my life as an adult. This is not my eleventh time, so I think that in some way I'm housing insecure two and I asked to love. This is why we had the two roommates. They guess they're Bernie Sanders. Nobody own a bit of a witch job can afford a two bedroom, two bath condole with water views, probably a nice balcony, maybe into a parking Nobody can afford that.

And I'm like, yeah, I can't afford that now. And I don't have a minimum wage job, and I'm almost forty, so I don't really know what the what the burn is getting at there. But in California, the homelessness crisis is a combination of a lot of factors. But what I look, they have better weather, which this isn't a silly point. This is a real one. That means that the nation's homeless are more likely if they can get

to California. If somebody wants to choose a life on the street, much better to do it in Santa Santa Monica than try to do it in you know, Minneapolis. Theneapolis is a pretty rough place to be trying to sleep on the street in January. So the climate does play a role. Okay, fine, but it's gotten a lot worse. In California has been a warm you know, has been a cozy place to set up shop for a long time. So it can't just be that. So what else could

be the situation? Well, if you really want to look at a policy level as to why there's greater homelesses, it's been Gavin Newsom can whine about TROMP and say what happened the Republican Party. Yeah, we're we're for conservation, we're for clean water and clean air. CO two doesn't make water and air not clean. The CO two thing is a delusion that keep trying to fold this in.

That's a delusion. They're wrong And if they weren't delusional about it, then they wouldn't listen to teenagers testifying on incredibly complicated issues in front of Congress. It is Congress that deserves and Democrats and the status who support them the deserve mockery for this. They can try to do the whole oh human shield thing. Oh she's a teen. I know what they were I know what they were doing.

I was disappointed that some of my colleagues that I on the couch jumped Look, they just jumped the gun. They were just they were wrong. They were wrong on outnumbered saying no no child bashing, no kid bashing up? Wasn't bashing a child? Go back and read the transcript, and that they all kind of parroted each other on that I thought was I thought that was unfair clearly, and it was unfair and incorrect. More importantly, but the climate change stuff always gets folded into clean air and

clean water. When I had that, when I was in DC, they sent out some notice not to drink water out of the tap. This is true because they were concerned that there had been a raw sewage leakage into drinking water.

So in DC, living a few blocks from the White House, I got a note from the DC city government, which is even more dysfunctional, I think than the new York City government, which is saying something saying, you know, hey, sorry, but you may have like a little bit of fecal matter in your water untreated, you know, just a little raw sewage. So if it's a you know, if you have a little bit of that in your water, just heads up on that. You know, it should work its

way out of the system in a few days. Needless to say, I became an heavy on and peria man for a couple of days, even for brushing my teeth. It was like I was back in the Third World with the CIA. That's one thing. There's that feeling, man, when you're in some place and you're drinking water that that isn't there's not really indoor plumbing, but maybe they have a kind of a hanging cistern of sorts and you can turn a little tap and you forget that you can do this to wash your hands. You do

not want to brush your teeth without water. That stuff that you get creepy crawlies in your mouth. Man, it's you don't want to know what happens. So anyway, the idea that I don't care about clean water is obviously nonsense. Because I was freaked out about the poop in the water in DC for days, even though I don't know how much there was and what could have happened. So this is a straw man that liberals create that we don't care about the environment. That of course we do.

Everyone does. Nobody wants rivers to be so polluted that you know, you can get sick from going in them, and there's all kinds of heavy chemicals and everything else, and so we have an EPA. The EPA does things to prevent that from happening. But the EPA also has a lot of excesses and a lot of idealogues, and instead of focusing on the real mission, which should be making sure water is clean. I mean, Flint, Michigan's a real problem. That was a real problem. Our climate change

is not. Climate change is an imaginary problem. But instead of just agreeing to work with us on what's real, they would rather try to mock us and ridicule us for not wanting to join them on what's fake, including Gavin or Newsom. So they complain about us on the environment, and then they also plane when we don't want to give them additional federal dollars to bail them out from their bad urban policies, and here are some of the

areas where they are making this problem much worse. Housing is very difficult and expensive to build in Los Angeles County and in San Francisco because of all the different zoning ordinances, all the different regulations, environmental regulations. It's a very hard thing. Building housing for middle class people is not cost effective in these places. And because it's not cost effective, guess what, lib socialists, people don't do it.

And because developers don't want to build cost effective housing where they can make a profit because they're in business, in those places, you have housing shortages. What happens with a housing shortage, prices go up. This is a problem of econ one on one, they can pretend it's not there, but the problem is definitely there. And then you also have the other side of this, which is just the quality of life crimes issue, which I was getting to

with hypodermic needles and leaving this on the streets. I remember what it was like in New York when it was a free for all. It was a very bad, scary place to be. You did not want to be in New York City when things were looking really bad back in the day, it was rough. It was rough.

If you called someone because you had a homeless person who was living in your stairwell of your building, good luck trying to get them to come and take the person out, and trespassing, and people would be urinating and leaving their drugs there and doing all kinds of things. Nat was just life in the big city for a while. And then eventually Giuliani, thank you, Mayor Juliani came along. I was like, you know what, We're just no more

of this. People work hard, people of all backgrounds, all ethnicities, all religions or work at hard in this city doing the best they can. They deserve to feel like when they come home they don't have somebody taking a you know, a urination break on the front on their front steps, and they shouldn't have to worry about their kids stepping on needles walking home from school, and we're going to clean it up. Libs don't like to do that stuff because,

you know why. It involves making arrests for things. It involves arresting people. It involves putting people into the system and punishing them, not just saying, oh, we're going to give you a lot of free stuff, so you know, there's certain things you can't do even if you're really

down on your luck. Quality of life crimes liberals do not want to enforce, and housing policy liberals are a complete mess on and they just want to shovel more federal dollars at this so that the very same Democrats in California who have been doing this stuff to get elected, they're going to continue to get elected because they're going to shovel the federal dollars to the people of California that you know, and they're gonna tell them, oh, look at all this money I brought in, And even if

they don't deal with the problem, they're gonna say, but look at all the money I got for us, all the pork that I brought home. That's all this really is. So you know, that's that's what I see going on with California. Darn it. You sent to tweet recently blaming Fox News for some of the uh for distorting some of the errors in the reporting. Why are you blaming Fox News for this failure? I actually didn't blame Joe.

I just retweeted the Vox article which I thought, you know, kind of finally added sort of a little bit of balance to this, which is that I just have to jump in real quick. Okay, I hate this thing when reporters, you know, here's an you know, Jake Tapper is the guy who does mister mister neutral Tapper. You go in his timeline, He'll retweet things that clearly show he's a liberal all the time. But he's just retweeting them. Man, He's just retweeting. He's not really, you know, making making

a statement one or the other. Just I'm just retweeting stuff. Not a lot of right wing stuff being retweeted from these CNN anchor types and the New York Times the same Thinger. Oh, I didn't blame them. I just retweeted.

I just shared all of my followers the vox piece, which I really do think that you know, voxes is beta male central um, the vox piece that was blaming Fox News for this whole debacle, which any any honest observer sees this and says, Okay, this is the New York Times just stepping on Rake, after stepping on Rake, just come boying hit it right in the face over and over again. But my man Sager and Jetty, he took over my chair at the Hill Sager's a great

guys from the Daily Caller. He's got big things ahead. He did a really solid job today in this interview. Continue please basically set out to do a book that revisits these events in kind of a calm way, with the benefit of ten months of investigation. We've written a book that's almost three hundred pages. We spent ten months doing it. It's you know, these paragraphs that have been pulled out and seized upon or two paragraphs in that book,

so we haven't highlighted them. They're not the focus of this. But your paper did that our Payton, No, on our paper, we did this Debor Ramirez excerpt in which that was also one paragraph, and unfortunately that line was removed and it was put back and corrected. Oh yeah, it was. It was unfortunate that it was removed. It wasn't removed

because it undercut the entire thrust of the piece. People have been making jokes that this New York Times book is the result of a couple of reporters who took on a project with for a book and didn't want to give the book advance back, which I think is true.

I think at some level, you know, they were so ideologically driven to try to find the counter narrative to Kavanaugh that what they didn't do, what they didn't focus in on, was wait a second, what if Kavanaugh is totally innocent and all the facts that we find are really just going to prove that, no matter how hard

we try to find alternative facts. And now they're in a place where because they've published this book and because they put their names on it, and they've already been out there in the public eye on this, then you know, you look at this and you got to say to yourself, Okay, I guess they're going to take the heat on this and keep trying to defend it in public because they got to earn out the book advance. I really mean that.

I think that there's some degree of just old fashioned we gotta we gotta make enough sales here, and if that means we have to make fools of ourselves, we're willing to do it. But they're there. They haven't been willing to say anything other than it was just errors. They haven't owned up the fact that it's completely and totally ideology driven. It is ideology driven. And then you get to another and this really annoyed me today, and there are a few things I've been a bit annoyed

today in general, but rightfully so libs. Libs are getting a little rowy today, a little bit, a little bit, Producer Mark a little bit, and libs are getting rowdy with me, and I don't like it, and also saying things that are untrue and that should annoy any any anyone who's paying attention. And one of them is that these these New York Times reporters are out there saying that I want to make sure I find exactly what it was, but they're saying more or less that Kavanaugh

asked them, yeah, asked them to lie. This is the huff Post headline. New York Times reporters say Kavanaugh asked them, It says, asked them lie so good job, huff Post, Huff Post English, not so good, asked them lie in exchange for an interview, asked them to lie. So this is just a desperation move because it is almost certain you would have to assume that what they're talking about here is that Kavanaugh said I will speak to you

off the record. There is no way that Kavanaugh, who is brilliant, who is far smarter than these two women. There is absolutely no way that they asked him for an interview, and he said, only if you lie to everybody about us having an interview. The real way to do it, I mean, or rather, the way that this would have been asked is could we do an interview?

He said, I'll speak to you off the record, which means you can get information from me, but you cannot use it or cite it or tell anybody that we spoke. That's what off the record means. You have to wonder if the New York Times just does not know that the answer is. Of course, they can't fail to know what off the record means. That's not that's not possible. They clearly know. But this was too enticing of an

opportunity for them. This was too exciting a chance for them to find a way to bash Cavanaugh and to say that, oh, he would have insisted that we lie if we had this interview, just because I mean, there's just no way. No one should believe them. No one should believe them because they've already been telling lies all week. But notice how they keep trying to seize on something else to turn the onus, to switch this around and make Kavanaugh out to be the bad guy. It's just

not it's just not gonna happen. It's not gonna work. By the way, Mary Ann Williamson, what happened? Maryanne Williamson. You know this is a departure, but you know, we had we had a moment backstage at the bill Marshaw Mary Anne and I. She was like, Buck, you're wrong about everything. I know. I just don't think your policies are anny good. But Darling, Honey, if you can unleash that spirit, if you can reach for the stars, who knows how far your spirit can go. And I said, uh, okay, Mariann,

I'm gonna get it. I'm gonna get a tequila soda. Now. It's been real. But you know, she's out there still being treated like somebody who understands policy issues. That the one thing I liked about her was that she seemed like she wasn't hateful and mean. But beyond that, there's still a lot of stuff about mary and Williamson that, oh honest, people can look at and say, yes, she doesn't really know what she's talking about. And one of those areas I would assume is nuclear energy. What are

your issues with nuclear energy? Well, I know Germany had said at one point we're just going no nuclear. But then when they said no nuclear, there was a problem because they had a hard time keeping up at the other standards that they agree to. What is wrong with that? If something goes wrong with nuclear energy? I don't think people have really stopped to take in the harm. See, we need an integrated politics. We need to go beyond hard data. We need to go beyond just thinking about

the facts. So I want you to think about this with your heart. Something goes wrong there? What have we been talking about? How can we even consider us I'm with you, Mary Edge, So maybe we'd all be a little warmer, a little cool I mean, Americans, we have to decide what is That's the problem I have with NCLAR What are we talking about? Are we a little warmer, a little cooler, not too hot, not too cold, just right? What are we even talking about? That's a perfect question,

Mary ed What are we even talking about? Stupid question? Yeah, it's a stupid question, that's for sure. Let's talk about Iran. What's going on there? Team, We'll be right back. You are now answering the Freedom Hot Capital Operation Center, all sense of programs muski Cats strictly need to know Team Buck is cleared and ready for the Buck brief. I think it's abundantly clear, and there is an enormous consensus in the region that we know precisely who conducted these

attacks was Iran. I didn't hear I didn't hear anybody in the region who doubted that for a single month, the Iran folks. Unless you want to take the position that you can't trust anybody in our intelligence community anymore. You can't trust the United States government, you can't trust the Saudi government, which that wouldn't be hard to do at some point unless you have access to yourself, to the remains, the wreckage of the drones and the missiles

used to attack that Saudi oil infrastructure. I guess you could always say, well, I'll never really know. You know, we'll never really know. You have to rely on others who are presenting you with information and facts and even the evidence. They could show you, the photographs of the site, the complexity of the of the attack. You know, the Hoothies in the past have fired off rockets from Yemen into Saudi Arabia and it's blown up on an airport tarmac.

Or something, but it didn't hit anyone or anything. Generally, it just was a miss. And the Iranians have a much greater sophistication clearly than the Hoothi rebels do. Now Iranians are also arming the Hoothies and assisting them training them. So is it conceivable that the Iranians gave the Hoothies the training and the equipment. Sure, But then you also have, as we've been discussing, where did this attack come from? Where did it originate from? If it came from Iranian soil,

then we clearly know it's Iran. There's some that have been saying it might have come from Iraq, which would be interesting because there you'd have Iranian proxies operating on Iraqi soil, to give an extra layer of disbelief, for an extra layer, a fig leaf of protection really for the Iranians for what they what they've done here. But I'm happy to see so far the President has not reacted with a military strike. As you know, I am opposed to US engaging in a major military strike on Iran.

And here we have Secretary of State POMPEII, who I still think is one of the most squared away best voices in this administration on foreign policy issues. He's saying, Look, it's it's going to be more sanctions. We're not going to do nothing here. But let's let's remember this, folks. It wasn't an attack on us. And if Saudi Arabia is in the OH, if they get attacked, well we'll fight in their place, or we'll take action on their behalf. You know, Saudi Arabia is not in NATO. All right,

I'm in Saudi Arabia. We're not supposed to do their fighting for them. There will be more sanctions. We have set about a course of action to deny around the capacity and the wealth so that they can conduct their terror, to prevent it from conducting their terror campaigns. And you can see from the events of US week there's still more work to do, and we're going to continue to drive towards that end. I think that's the right move. Um, we're trying to make sure that the Iranians are economically

starved as much as possible. The Iranian regime, I should say, the IRGC, the elements of the Iranian government that support terrorism. And then you also have Secretary of State Mike Pompey, who was just talking more about how diplomacy here could get it done as long as we make the right moves. I was here in active diplomacy while the foreign Minister of Iran is threatening all out ward to fight to

the last American. We're here to build out a coalition aimed at achieving peace and a peaceful resolution to us. That's my mission set. It's where President Trump certainly wants me to work to achieve, and I hope that the Islamica Republic of Iran sees it the same way. I don't think this should be that complicated. If the Iranians, if they did to us in some way, I mean, if they blew up a US ship and killed Americans. Remember they've already had they went after an unmanned drone.

I mean, they've been doing some things that are provocations. But we're also blocking countless billions of dollars of economic activity to them, which I think is the right move. But we're not failing to do anything here. That would not be an accurate statement, and I think that what we are seeing is that the Iranian government, the Iranian regime's feeling the heat. The most important thing for us

here is just we don't want another war. We just do not want a war in the Middle East based on all of the factors that we talk about here on the show at a regular basis. We've done this too many times in the past. We have not gotten the outcomes that we have wanted in the wars that we have waged in the Middle East. It has been

very expensive. We have lost American lives and sometimes lost American lives in circumstances where it would be difficult to explain what the real strategic objective was for putting our soldiers in harm's way. And so I I do believe that there's a shift right now in the Republican Party that we're still getting used to, which is we are not going to do the rest of the world's fighting for it, even if we think that there's a strategic interests. Yeah,

we have. We have. We have an interest in keeping keeping oil flowing in the Middle EASi just because we want global gas prices to remain stable. But this is not enough in and of itself for us to engage in a major military exchange with Iran. I am very confident that if we blew up a bunch of and

I can't say that I know. But let's just say that we sent over a carrier group and just laid waste to a lot of Iranian oil infrastructure and really punished them, kept casualties low, but really punished critical Iranian oil infrastructure. They would not then say okay, we're even. They would do something else. They do something a little bit more of a provocation. And I do have some here. Here's a theory that I cannot tell you is vetted

in any way. But perhaps the situation inside Iran right now because of the economic pressure, because of the three percent drop in their economy last year looks like a six percent drop in the economy. Remember, if we just have a couple of quarters of negative growth, we consider

it to be a recession. They're in a recession. And then some perhaps the Iranian Guardian Council, which is the true power inside inside Tehran in that Islamist government apparatus, maybe they're under more pressure than we realize and facing an external enemy US Saudi Israel just because it's Israel, whoever it may be, is a way of maintaining some stability internally, and perhaps they're even willing to take major risks as a result of that you know, remember the

Iranians fought and I think very few people recall this, but there was an Iran Iraq war back in the eighties and it lasts did for almost the entirety of the eighties, and there were there were huge numbers of casualties. It was the longest war. I mean, if you go back and you look at longest declared war of the twentieth century, the Iran Iraq War of the eighties was the longest declared war. And the casualties are are believed to be somewhere in the range. I mean, certainly hundreds

of thousands, perhaps above a million. Total casualties are about are roughly a million if you want to look at most of the estimates. I mean, that was a big, nasty, vicious war between these two countries, and we were selling a lot of arms to Iraq. By the way, during it, there was a proxy component there because of the Cold War and the relationship that we had with Iraq and the relationship that the Iranians had with the Soviet Union, which now of course is a relationship that the Russian

Federation as in that country with that country. So the Iranians are no stranger to long, protract and protracted fights. And if you're part of the molocracy, and if you're part of the security apparatus, they're the irgc um the besiege, you're the the paramilitaries. They're really the the Iranian equivalent of the of the brown Shirts. You know, they'll go around and beat people up and and they're they're the

the official thugs of the thugocracy in Iran. If they have to fight some kind of war, at least that means in their minds that they get to maintain power. And we're not going to want to take the country over. So you know, there's some complicated, complicated calculations that are going on across the table from us with the Iranians. And keep in mind they also could be making miscalculations. They also could be very very wrong here. And that's

something else that I think we have to keep in mind. So, um, we have more coming up. Team stay with me. So, guys, I have some updates from my efforts to uh find the source of what is what is officially an illegal noise an illegal noise um in my apartment coming from some nearby building. I have been able to get the Department of Environmental Protection for the City of New York,

which is not the federal EPA. It's the local version of the EPA d ep to come and and all I need, all I need to get justice is a piece of paper that should be freely available to me that says exactly what was done in my apartment. Buy a city employee as part of their job, right a report that I know exists. You know what I found out today? Uh? Well it was actually great because they're very technologically savvy now, so they just send you these

email notifications. I got an email notification today, Producer Mark. How long for the Freedom of Information Act request from the City of New York to get my maybe five line DP report? How long do you think this is going to take? At least six months? That's right, my friend. February fourth is their estimated date, February fourth, Like, sitting here, how is this possible? How can how can it be helpful?

What if I had like a toxic waste dump in my apartment or if they take readings on that, they I'd wait six months to find out if my legs are going to fall off from all the radioactivity? Well that would be an emergency. How do you be quiet?

You know what I'm saying. This is ridiculous, But even more ridiculous, the great part about this is that the same day that I receive an email from the City of New York telling me that I am that I am going to find out about this February second, I also receive an email maybe two hours later that says your request has been posted online. And then the request posted online is followed up by an email, you know, saying that your documents are posted. I go and then

and then I click and the link is dead. And then I'm like, I can't see There's no way to see anything here. And then risteven email is saying your foyer request falls under a part of like the City's something something code, where we cannot share the information with you.

So it seems that in one day, the City of New York has told me that for a simple piece of paper to tell me about a noise reading in my own apartment that I need in order to get some relief from the situation, I have been told that to wait until February. I have been told that my request has already been adhered to just click here. And then I have been told that Oh no, just kidding. We're never going to tell you this stuff. We're never going to give you the report. Welcome to city governance,

my friends. That's what we're dealing with these days. It's crazy world we live in. Friends. I'll be right back, Team Buck. It's time for roll call. Roll call everybody, it is time for it. Let's see what we have here now. First and foremost, we have Team Buck at iHeartMedia dot com. Is the email address with that, We'll get to it. We have Benny, not the Jets, just Benny,

Hey Buck. How many more slanted, biased, non attributable, fake, misleading news articles will it take before conservatives on Capitol Hill begin using Alinsky's tactic of ridicules, Man's most potent weapon. If a conservative is asked to comment on a story from the New York Times, they respond every time they didn't read it, nor do they comment on anything with a particular fraudulent source, then maybe the American people begin to see the New York Times as the joke. It

is shield time, Benny in Mississippi. Benny, I would like to say that this plan of yours will work, but I think unfortunately that is unlikely. New York Times still has a lot of resources, has thousands of employees. I find it very unlikely that if we're going to be able to get The New York Times to shut its stores anytime soon. Look, and this, let's keep this in mind. I don't actually want I'm not a canceled culture person. I don't want news outlets to go out of business necessarily.

Some of them should, like Gawker, that was good for the world, But I'm in general, I just want there to be honesty. What they do, I mean, what they do is dishonest. At The New York Times. They pretend that they're an objective media outlet, and they most certainly are not. And does anyone really think otherwise at this point? And that's what I love to ask that question. Does somebody want to have the debate about whether The New

York Times is a liberal newspaper or not? You'll say it and people say, no, no no, it's not, and they kind of want to mutter this under their breath, and then I want to say, well, okay, well then what is it exactly? Someone explained this to me. Karen writes she can't remember when or where or when that party was, but she claims Brett Kavanaugh assaulted her. She remembers she only had one beer. When my alcoholic clients say one beer, they usually meet a forty ounce bottle. Karen and Karen,

it wasn't. It wasn't really a credible accusation. And the more we've thought about it, the more distance we've had from it, the more absurd. The whole situation was. I leave that, I leave that where it is. I just I didn't believe her then, I don't believe her now. I think that her motivations to lie were very clear. One of the things that kept coming up was that you had the left pretending like, why would she lie?

She has nothing to gain by lying. Lie for reasons of ideology, lies for reasons of fame, money, prestige, all things that the people that she cares about, who are clearly leftists, will now ensure her for the rest of her life, and she'll be treated as a hero. They will have the most appealing popular Hollywood actress in about ten or fifteen years, playing the brave, the fearless Christine blasi Ford in the HBO movie In the Netflix series whatever it may be, I assure you, just give it time.

Oh and the New York Times reporters that Molly Hemingway and Carrie Severino have just been wiping the floors with over the last few days by pointing out all their all their ridiculous errors and flaws. They'll be treated as the one who really broke the true story. You know, they're they're the real journalists who got to the heart of this, not a bunch of hack lib clowns, which

is in fact what they are. So yes, indeed, next up we have oh you know what, actually we will get to I wanted to get into some of these there's some good stuff today in the Fate on the Facebook side of things, So let's let's get to that. Member at Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton, we now do roll call in both places we have we have roll call multiple avenues for the role call, so please do check us out there on Facebook dot com slash

buck Sexton. By the time you hear this, by the way, um, I will already be underwear my speech at the Women's Natural Republican Club courtesy of the Young Republicans of New York City, and I will try to get full video of that speech and post it on fate. Posted on Buck sex dot com. We have a website, yes, right, producer Mark, we do. It's pretty too. It's very very nice,

very nice website. So we're going to start putting more things on that, and we will indeed including hopefully the speech, assuming I can get the full audio video of it. Benny rights Buck, I take grief every time I fry bacon due to the mess, time and smell, and then bombarded with cute Hillary voice. Why don't you just bake it in the oven? Much like my eggs. I cook my thick cut pepper bacon low and slow and turn off in. Please back me up that no true bacon

connoisseur would ever deign to bake bacon shields high. Another Benny, but a different Benny. Yeah, man. Look first, a couple of things about the bacon. You cook bacon in a pan, people, let's say, oh, but it doesn't make a mess if you cook it in the oven. To that, I always want to point out you have to use an entire like an entire roll of saran wrap or silver foil or what ever it is. So that's not true. I mean,

there's just a there's a mess. You have to throw all this stuff out, all you need with you're gonna cook bacon in a pan as somebody who cooks a lot of bacon, is some grease catch cup where you keep all the grease because if you dump it all in the trash, it'll actually sometimes burn a hole in your trash and it'll smell like your whole apartment will smell like bacon. I don't know, John, do we like that? Is that good bacon scent? Yeah? They're probably. I'm sure

there are bacon scented candles. I don't know that it definitely are there definitely are. Yeah, So I'm essentially doing a bacon scented candle the old fashioned way. But you want thick cut too. You know. I was in a rush the other day and I was in the store and I bought normal person bacon, you know, like Oscar Myer or whatever, and it was just and I cooked this stuff and it's like it's just all grease. There's

nothing there. There's no actual bacon, damn it. You want thick cut, and you want to go to a butcher usually and have them cut it for you. If you can, you can do in your grocery store, but have them slice it and say I want it to be thick, you'll taste more of the pork flavor, and it won't be such a greasy mess. As you can see. I get into my bacon, my man t to the j asks Buck, How have you not made it on Shapiro Sunday Special yet? I can't believe Kennedy beat you to it.

I don't know. I don't know. T J asked Ben. I'd be happy to go on anytime, Adam Buck on Eddie Murphy, how can you not include the Golden Child Shield's Eye? I don't think so. Man, I'm throwing a flag. Have you guys seen the Golden Child? I don't think the Golden Child is now. I can't. I can't get behind that as a good movie. I feel like I saw it once a long long time ago and didn't think it was very good. So do you agree with me? By the producer mark, the best Eddie Murphy movies are?

You do not have to put them in order, but the Top three or Beverly Hills, Cop Trading Places and Coming to America? Yeah? Absolutely, yeah, I mean I think this isn't that. I really like Doctor Doolittle also, but really younger than you. I've never seen that one really. Yeah, I've never seen that really, but it's funny. Pluto Nash was one of the biggest box office bombs of all time, which is always a fun thing to look and see. How much money can be wasted in Hollywood on a

bad project. The answer is a lot. Anthony writes Buck, you're an important voice for the modern day neo conservative movement. I would call it in response to you're taking calls the other day. I agree, less is more meaning. I think there's important voices that need to get through to you in your audience. And I have a suggestion. Make it a bit of a competition, perhaps one day a

week or an everyday challenge. Offer up to the audience one caller who will win the opportunity to present the world the kinds of questions you'll love to respond to or answer. Sorry, Producer John, this will be busy, challenging work for you. But what better way? That way? You mean, Producer Mark, But Producer John helps out too. This would be busy challenging work. That's very important part of this

challenge perhaps the beginning of roll call. Put it out there, Rucer Mark, do you want to take this on as a project? I think roll Call works perfectly the way it is. I think that's the right answer. I'm with you on that for now, especially because we're we're trying to move to a new studio which is gonna have all this video capability and all this other stuff. It'll happen by twenty twenty one. No, man, I'm gonna I'm gonna put I'm gonna put my foot down. We're moving

faster than the City of New York. I'm a noise complaint, that's for sure. I look, I really think I got a few ideas with the City New York. One is, maybe maybe Buck for may or really does need to happen. The only problem is that I'd have to I don't know if I could still do a radio show if I was running for may or? Could I? There is there a law against that? Didn't Bloomberg used to do

a spout once a week. Yeah, But I don't know if you can host a show if you run for you know, I think there's is an equal time thing? Or John, Am I right about that? Could I run for office while hosting a radio show? Maybe not hosting, but bloom Bloomberg used to co host with John Gambley and got wr huh on Fridays, I believe, and uh, the Blasio's on w NYC once a week. Yeah, but that's as a guess. That's that's of course, politicians can

be guests. I just think that there's I don't know why I think this, but I believe there's some regulation that will prevent me from because otherwise, right, wouldn't the thing if you're a politician you want to have your own media. Well, when I worked in Westchester, a lot of the mayors from the different towns had radio shows and they were in office at the time. Really yeah, so I don't know if that was legal or not, but it has I don't like it. I mean, buck

for mayor. Think about all the noise we'd make. It'd be so fantastic. I'm from here. I drive the Libs in saying I'm gonna be way more interesting than whatever whoever their candidate is. It's not I understand. It's not gonna be the Blasio again. It's gonna be somebody else. I'm not exactly sure who, but I don't know. I'm thinking about that. Guys, are you ready for that? Prucer Mark, You're ready to be campaign manager. Absolutely, Brucer John, You're

gonna be the muscle. You know, anyone any like any like union guys show up, like any any union guys show up, be like, excuse me you you talked to producer John over here. They're like hey. They'll be like hey John, good to see you again, buddy. Uh. Anyway, let's go back here to the the role called Monica Rides. Brisket is the barbecue for the guy. Odds you are correct, sir, It is number one. It is the ribbi of barbecue.

Now this is true. However, let's all be very clear that brisket, while it is, I think when best executed, the best of the barbecue meets. Although you guys gave me legitimate answers. I will take ribs, I will take pulled pork. It's just as long as you don't say chicken or people that would say like cheddar, sausage and things like this. I'm like, that's what you keep in your freezer for when you come home drunk and you

don't want to be hung over the next morning. You don't go to get that at a That's like a side dish, that's not a main The sausage they have with those places. I know it's like a thousand calories a link, but who cares. But the problem with brisket is that it can be either it has to be in that sweet spot. It can be too fatty, too moist and fatty, or it can be dry. You gotta get it right in the sweet spot or else you're you're gonna be in bad shape. Um, but I agree

with you on and Ribbi is obviously the move. Look, I would take a good, a good, solid, all American Ribbi over and I've had Kobe beef one time before real from Japan Kobe beef. I'd take a good an Rebi over Kobe beef. Anytime you eat Kobe beef and you think your gall bladder might just spontaneously combust, it's just so rich, and you know, it's like you're drinking baking greases, you're eating a steak. Some of you are like, yes, sign me up for the Kobe beef. Maybe maybe Jennifer,

All right, Hey, Buck, finishing up the podcast Wednesday. Now you're set up in New York and expanding the show a couple moos. We're talking about how you need to do and instill live while cooking allah AOC, just don't be moronic like her. We love the idea of cooking with conservatives. First show request how to sear the perfect rebi and a discussion of the solvency of social security. Also, the correct answer for best BBQ is indeed brisket. All right,

there we go, Steven Buck. Thinking about your gun control woes, you should have Ken Blanchard on from The Black Man with a Gun Podcast. Never heard this before. I think you'd be surprised to see the to be the roots of gun control are actually very racist. I've heard about this a little bit in the past, my friends. I think I know what you are alluding to. Anyway, we don't have much time here now, We've got one one more here, one more Kelly, right, Bunk. You'll love this

French bulldog and its attitude toward dieting. I know you love them. And it's a YouTube video. Angry French bulldog on diet throws tantrum. It sounds like me an angry French bulldog on a diet, although I'm not on a diet yet, so I need to make that happen. All right, everybody countdown to downtown is coming up here. We'll be downtown. It looks like the show will actually be available for your on podcast third a week from today, right, producer Mark,

that's when it will actually happen. Think so, We think so. We're trying as fast as we can here. Yeah, what'd you say. It's out of our hands. It's out of our hands. We're doing the best we can. But it will happen soon. So subscribe on iTunes or the iHeartRadio app to The Buck Sexton Show. Doctor Merl Shields High