Buck’s First Thoughts - Democrats Will Ram Through Amnesty

I get it. I'm with you on all that. But what he did in the nursing home fiasco was far more egregious as a matter of public conduct, and far more damaging to the Democrat party and brand and the media too. That's a mega scandal, not not a thing that can be apologized for, not a thing that you can just wave aside with a hand and a few tears and say, oh the other times, I promise, that's

not the way this works. We need to continue to hammer home the point here that Cuomo had people on his staff intentionally change numbers about deaths during a pandemic. This would be like a general lying about troops killed in battle so he could keep his job. That's how serious this is. You have to understand the degree to which this change thinking and this mattered at this period

in time of extremely important and tense decision making. Maybe people would have thought differently about, Oh, I don't know, the great Barrington Declaration about focused protection for seniors if they had known just how egregious the government misconduct, how awful the decision making was in New York. Remember New York and New Jersey number two and number one, respectively for COVID death per one hundred thousand people in the

United States, both very deep blue Democrats states. Let's remember that. And yet somehow Cuomo was a hero. He was second only to Fauci, to whom I can only say he needs to go Fauci himself, second only to Fauci in terms of the hero worship from the media. What the heck was this all about? How did this even happen? There's so much going on here. First of all, you have the fact that if you're a Democrat, you can get away with things that you would never be able

to if this were a Republican. Imagine this were Christy Gnome. Imagine this were Ron Descantists. If Ron Descantists hid fifteen thousand nursing home deaths by by undercounting it by fifty percent, So whatever they said it was roughly you got seventy five hundred. Let's say something along that along those lines. If he said that it was seventy five hundred, it was really fifteen thousand. People would be demanding not only he resigned. And when I say people, I mean universal.

There would be universal, nationwide condemnation. In the media. It would be the top story. And there's just this kind of muted, halfhearted reportage on it from the Democrat outlets. You know, yeah, it looks like maybe a crazy thing happened. Man Cuomo was undercounting nursing home deaths by I don't know, like fifty percent or something. Wow, they really don't math so good over in the Cuomo office, do they. Yeah,

tough to do addition and subtraction. This mattered immensely. And if this were a Rhonda Santists, it would be the number one news story. I mean, you know, you remember when during the Bush administration there was that misconduct in Abu Grabe and that was on the front page of the newspaper day after day after day after day, and I remember being a pretty young guy at the time and saying, Wow, So this is how you make a story really stick. This is how you really tear down

an administration with the story. I mean, George Bush wasn't giving that order, but Abu Gray was on the front page of the newspaper of the New York Times, for example, I want to say twenty out of thirty days or something like that. It was a long time ago, but it was so much coverage of it, just saturation saturation coverage, And they could do the same thing with promo. This

is a really big deal. We've had Democrats and we've had the corporate media lecturing us month after month after month about listening to the data, obeying the science, doing what Fauci tells us, and the hero of the pandemic was actually the villain. And we're not supposed to think that this is indicative of broader problems and the way

they approached this whole thing in twenty twenty. We're not supposed to make the connection that clearly they were willing to go along with this in part because they knew that Cuomo was a useful weapon against Donald Trump in

the election year. That Orange man bad who liked hydroxychloroquin as an idea, and you know, wasn't running around quadruple masking that maybe they were a little bit unfair to the point of sheer dishonesty about Trump in the election year and were willing to prop up people like Cuomo. Here's this piece the Wall Street Journal New York's Andrew Cuomo.

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo's top advisors successfully pushed state health officials to strip a public health report of data showing that more nursing home residents had died of COVID nineteen than the administration had acknowledged. The July report, which examined the factors that led to the spread of the virus in nursing homes, focused only on residents who died inside long term care facilities, leaving out those who had

died in hospitals after becoming sick in nursing home. As a result, the report said six thousand, four hundred and thirty two nursing home residents had died, a significant undercount of the death toll attributed to the state's most vulnerable population. The people said. The initial version of the report said nearly ten thousand nursing home residents had died in New York by July late last year. One of the people said, according to those with knowledge of the report, unbelievable. They

went from ten thousand to six hours. That's a pretty big difference, isn't it. Why would they do that well, because they knew that that number would really shock people, and they knew that other states that also have senior citizens would be a point of comparison. And what they're now going to be able to do is say, hold on a second. The data was fudged here in a way that was meant to prevent accurate comparison. How can

you know whether your public health officials? How could you know whether your governor is doing a good job when they're lying about the very data that they claim is supporting their position. And let me tell you this right now, this is not the only instance. It may be the most egregious, but the only instance of fraud through numbers manipulation during this pandemic. We will find more of this.

There are other cases where people either cherry pick numbers, and I'm talking about governor's state health officials, maybe even Fauci himself. They cherry pick data to fit a preferred narrative and suppressed anything that challenged what they wanted the people to believe. If this were if Chromo were the CEO of a publicly traded company, or any company for that matter, if Chromo were the CEO of a private corporation, this kind of activity of hiding numbers like this, if

they were profit numbers, for example. I mean, if he were cooking the books, he'd be facing prison time. But he cooked the books in eventually on deaths during a pandemic, when decisions were being made that were directly affecting and in some cases, as we see now, causing those deaths, and we're supposed to just forget about it, no big deal. Everybody was doing their best. Cuomo was giving us such great press conferences. His brother over at CNN was doing

such funny stuff with him at night. They should have had a duo show. Well, I guess they did. These are the people, these are the voices, These are the platforms out there, all these different Democrat and Cuomo aligned groups and individuals who have been telling you all on to trust them believe them, and they missed. And they also slowed this down right. That was another part of it. They were hoping to delay this, and they managed to delay until after the election, which is why now they're

willing to finally let this all go. Why now you're seeing all the sexual harassment stories and you know there are people who are actually sitting down to do interviews with the accusers. All this is happening because Cuomo's extreme usefulness has passed. You know, you see this with Cuomo, it reminds me of what I believe will happen soon with Joe Biden, where eventually the Democrats will no longer be able to prop up Hiden Biden, who's declining. We'll

figure out this guy really isn't up for this. It'll be apparent, it'll be embarrassing, it'll be sad, and they'll say, oh, yeah, sorry, I guess we missed that. But he beat Trump, didn't he. This is how they play the game. It's the Harry Reid approach to politics. Remember Harry Reid lied about Mitt Romney's tax returns. You know, I'm no Mitt Romney fan, but when asked about this, just complete slander. Harry Reid laughed and said he didn't win, did he? And he

was right. This is how democrats, this is how your corporate media approaches their job. They are on a team. They have picked a side, and in this case of Governor Cuomo, the side they picked was lying about thousands and thousands of deaths and causing Remember it's not just

that they were embarrassed by the number. I mean, to understand the full scope of this, you have to recognize that Cuomo, because of his unthinkably stupid decision to try to clear out hospital space faster by forcing COVID positive patients back into nursing homes, he caused more of these deaths. You see, it wasn't just this number looks bad for

the state of New York. It's Cuomo made a decision, and some of that decision making, or some of that decisions ramifications, led to people's moms and dads, grandmas and grandpa's dying in nursing homes, not allowed to see their family members, maybe allowed a last zoom call. It is awful beyond words. But he was telling you, he was giving you lectures, and even if you don't live in New York, he doesn't care. He was America's lecturer in

chief during COVID. That's what Cuomo was. He was telling you, if you don't mask up, you might kill somebody. You might cause somebody else's family member, loved one to die. How dare you do exactly what Cuomo says or else talk about what psychologists would call projection. This is so far the biggest scanalthough there are many, and there's going to be a lot more accountability that we have to force on the lockdowners as we have more data and

more of the truth can finally come out. But what Cuomo did was the most appalling decision and the most dishonest aftermath of any major policy choice of the entire COVID nineteen pandemic. And we're finding out about it now. We will not let this go by the way. I've known about this for months. You've known about this for months. It's been reported the New York Post. Now we just have more and more information. It looks even worse than we thought. The mainstream media is finally touching on this.

The mainstream media has finally come around do it because it served its purpose to suppress it when they did. But do not forget this Cuomo lied, seniors died. That is what happened. The Democrat Party should own this. They are responsible for this, and the corporate media's credibility is even further sullied if that was even a thing, that's possible. Just how much did the media love the love Gov Governor Andrew Cuomo. The Cuomo sexuals, remember that that was

a thing for a while. People were walking around with t shirts on such a hero. He's such an eligible bachelor. Oh gosh, people were batting their eyelashes at Cuomo because he was so amazing. He was keeping us safe. The guy's a thug, a bully, and a liar, the worst of politics, and also a sexual harasser on top of all of that, which we will also get to here he is according to the media over the course of this. Really, I really want you to just sit back and take

all this in. Remember Cuomo live, seniors died. Cuomo made an unthinkably stupid bullying decision, threatened nursing homes, basically used his pandemic superpower or ultra authoritarianism and superpower sounds like he's a hero, but use the authoritarian emergency powers. There we go that he had and then lied about it when it was a disaster afterwards, and then tried to shame everybody else who wouldn't keep listening to him. This is what you're the guardians of our republic, right the

Fourth Estate. This is what they were saying about all of it. Play too, playing bye for Governor Cuomo's Press convers Is Daily Briefing, David, We're sitting by for Governor Cuomo's Press convers Is Daily Briefing. How would you contrast Cuomo and President Trump's handling the crisis, truth versus mendacity. Governor Cuomo out there day after day after day. Everything Trump isn't honest, direct, brave, real leadership. I'm the kind

of President of the United States should have provided. Governor Cuomo is clearly living in a totally different reality, the actual one, than the President of the United States. Governor Cuomo has become a national leader for a lot of people. Andrew Cuomo has become the leader of the Democratic Party. He is conveying incredible strength. You spoke to National Guard troops today in a stirring speech that if I wasn't listening carefully, I thought you were sending soldiers off to war.

This has been a remarkable show of leadership by Governor Cuomo in recent days. He's providing hope, but not false hope. Governor of Cuomo, I think, is one of the heroes on the front lines. With all of this adulation that you're getting for doing your job, are you thinking about running for president? Andrew Cuomo, who has a daily television show now and has become in some way as the shadow president. Maybe Trump is just a little bit mad that Governor Cuomo has become a kind of acting president.

Dealing with hardship actually makes you stronger. That's what Governor Cuomo said earlier today. That's what I'm gonna go teach my kids right now at home. Brian Stelter, that guy is Oh my god, It's like the equivalent of pouring estrogen in your ear or something. I mean, this guy is. It's unbelievable. I gotta tell you that that to me. I listened to this and I just I just shiver. It's just so gross. The whole thing is so obtuse

and absurd. What what was going through their mind? Oh well, we know, notice how many clips we can pull of them saying unlike Trump, Cuomo is great. Unlike Trump, Cuomo speaks the truth. That's that they're just their brains were fixated on this, fixated on this. You know, an honest assessment of Trump during the pandemic would start with he

basically did everything foul. She told them too. When I spoke to the President in May in the Oval Office, the one thing he actually shook my hand in promise. The one thing that I asked. I said, sir, please don't allow for there to be a federal push, a national push for and across the board lockdown. Let's not And he said, I totally agree. I get it. He had been listening to Fauci a lot up to that point. He'd been listening to Fauci, and we've all seen what

the results are. Remember, this is going to be treated like it's an objective discussion about the data and what's best for the country. But really, as you see from the teachers unions, this is about what is best for different individuals, their power, their money. They don't want honesty about what's happened during this pandemic. They certainly don't want accountability for people that we're propping up liars, frauds and

thugs like Andrew Cuomo. I mean, the fact that this guy, I would put money on it right now, is going to finish his term as governor. He will not resign and they will not impeach him just shows you how more lead decrepit. The Democrat Party in the state of New York and across the country is they're gonna let this guy stay. If he stays, who goes? And let's just remember this, They're not going to impeach. Democrats will

not impeach Governor Cuomo, but they impeach Trump twice. The first time and I know this was in Congress, but the first time over a phone call to the Ukrainian president where nothing happened. Cuomo sent seniors to die in nursing homes like a moron because he thought he was so smart and he was drunk with power, and then he lied about it to everybody. If that doesn't make you resign, what does. Governor Cuomo said that he has

never propositioned anybody. Do you believe that he was propositioning you? Yes? For what sex? And then he explains at that point that he is looking for a girlfriend, he's lonely, he's tired. You've just finished dictation and the Governor is telling you he's lonely and looking for a relationship. Yes, you have been quoted as saying that. He also asked you about if you'd ever been with an older man. Yeah, he

asked me if age difference mattered. He also explained that he was fine with anyone over twenty two and how old are you? Twenty five? What were you thinking as he's asking you these questions. I thought he's trying to sleep with me. The Governor is trying to sleep with me, and I'm deeply uncomfortable and I have to get out of this room as soon as possible. And to be clear, what made you think that he was trying to sleep

with you? Without explicitly saying it, he implied to me that I was old enough for him, and he was lonely. He was trying to sleep with her. Can we all

just state the obvious year together? I mean, that's none of us have been in the workplace and had conversations and you know, maybe you know, shared some of our personal live with friends or colleagues or whatever, but we also know when you're the governor of New York and you have a twenty five year old attractive female who's alone with you, and you're talking about the age at which you're willing to have a sexual relationship and your need for a sexual like short of drawing a map

or like producing some kind of a contract with his expectations at her expectator, Like this is pretty clear. It's entirely credible. All these women who have come forward, these are credible allegations. You know, we could go back to the Kavanaugh era, remember, and they kept saying credible allegations ends Kavanaugh, and I was completely losing my mind over this. I mean I was, I was furious. I mean, this

is what I said. A lot of us became wartime conservatives during Kavanaugh because we saw that there was honestly no there was no floor, there was no basement of moral depravity. The Democrats, including Kamala Harris by the way, leading the charge there in the Senate, don't ever forget that that there was no low. The Democrats would not god to destroy somebody for politics, that they would lie just in the most it was just the most mendacious, disgusting, idiotic,

obviously untrue garbage about Brett Cavanaugh. It was, and any person who doesn't see that, it's just not very smart. It's not possible to look at all that not possible to look at the three accusers, including the third accuser who's like giggling and talking about gang rape that she saw when she came back from college. I mean, the whole the whole thing or Julie Sweatnick was her name, The whole thing was so absurd. Avanti Avanati is It isn't amazing to see. He was the hero of CNN

at the time. Don't you see a pattern here? When you were useful against Trump, if you were a wet up in against Donald Trump, you were given this this cloak of invincibility and the elevation. You were treated like a conquering hero. It didn't matter how disgusting you were. Michael Avanati is the ultimate slimy lawyer. He makes Michael Cohen Trump's good friend for a while, unfortunately makes Michael Cohen look like an ethical council. Avanati was stealing millions

from a paralyzed client. That guy was on TV. He was on CNN I think more than any other guest over a period of two months. It was as though he was he was paid to anchor a show. He was on all the time and he went forward with obvious lies about Brett Kavanaugh. But I digress. You know that that whole thing gets me so fired up, and I'll never forget. I had people, I had a CNN anchor reach out to me directly and say, you've got to stop what you're saying about Kavanaugh. You're going to

destroy your career. And people on our side who think you're smart but don't agree with you will never take you seriously again. And I restrain myself from actually writing, you know, go fauci yourself, but I thought about it. I did tell them to, you know, leave, like, don't ever reach out to me again, and you're out of your mind. I think something like that was what I wrote. And yeah, we have not had any context since, but that was the mentality. It was all hands on deck

to destroy an innocent man because it was necessary. They thought that was moral. You see, that's the problem with the left. They believe that morality is entirely situational, that there's no universal truth, there's no natural law. It's just whatever they need when they need it. That's a central principle of the left. That's if they have a principle. The principle is there's no such thing as a principle. But they kept saying, I'll bring this back to Quomaa.

They kept talking about the need or that kept talking about the credibility of the allegations against Kavanaugh, and they figured if they repeated it enough, well keeps getting called credible, it must be. It would be difficult to come up with a less credible allegation than the one that. Yes, even you know the professor who leveled or you know

the psychologist who leveled against Kavanaugh, she couldn't prove. She couldn't prove that she ever even met him, Christine Blasi Ford couldn't prove that she even ever met him, had no details, no corroboration, no nothing, and had lied about things like she was afraid to fly unless she's going to Cabo, then flying as fine, right? I mean, the whole thing was such a scam, such a fraud. If that's a credible allegation, me saying that I assassinated Abraham

Lincoln's a credible allegation. I'm sorry, do you can you prove that I don't have a time machine? Do you know that for a fact? You don't know me? I might have a time machine? You don't know, right, that's the level of credibility we're talking about with the allegations against Kavanaugh absurdity. But these allegations against Cuomo, everything lines up, everything is exactly. There's a pattern, the same kind of pattern everyone knows, and there were whispers about it before too.

The word always gets out a little bit about these things, right, word always comes out, And nobody was really surprised by this. That's what's so amazing. The Democrats protected him as long as they could. They propped this jerk up as long as it was feasible for them, and as long as it was advantageous. That's the big difference. As long as it was an advantage for them, they propped this guy up.

And here we are, here we are. I gotta tell you, the fact that he's not going to resign is so troubling. But also in an their sense, he's an excellent reminder of how of how corrupt Democrats are with all of these things, and how two faced they are, and how it's all just about power for them. You know, meet me two things, right, I mean, first of all, let's not forget Joe Biden was credibly accused of sexual assault by a woman who knew him, who worked with him,

who was around him. You know, remember when it was what does she have to gain accusing a Democrat who's going to be president of sexual assault? You really got nothing to gain because your life is going to be ruined. You'd never even hear about that anymore. Do creepy Joe sniffing women's heads, grabbing them, touching them, saying weird city. I have never met a stranger and held her head from behind and kissed her head and sniffed her hair. That is a weird old move. Joe Biden did that.

That's a matter of record. That's not even that's not even an alligation. He apologized for that, but not not an issue to say nothing about Joe Biden. It doesn't matter. See. One of the things about Trump was that he was blowing out into the open the truth that we had known about the Democrats for so long. When he would say things like, you know, I could shoot somebody on Fifth Avenue, and you know, my supporters would stay with me,

and the Democrats all lost their minds about that. A lot of Trump supporters said, look, he's obviously exaggerating a little bit, or he's you know, he's trying to make a point. It's hyperbole. But that has always been true about Democrats, Bill Clinton, going down the whole list. It's always been true that they can do whatever they want as long as they're useful for the power of the people on the Democrats side. And the same thing as very much true or Cuomo. We're seeing this play out

in real time. Very I was gonna say, it's discouraging, that's not even really true. This is who the Democrats are. There's no surprise here. None of you are sitting around saying, wait a second, they're really unethical. They'll lie about Kavanaugh, and then they'll defend Kavanaugh, who's clearly innocent, and then and then defend Cuomo until they can't. They just they

couldn't hold it back anymore. It's like Harvey Weinstein. Weinstein was a big friend of the Obama He was a big donor to the Democrats, you know, you see, and then eventually they're like, oh, there's too many allegations, too much stuff comes out. So then they you know, like like an old horse getting sent to the glue factory. That's what they do with Weinstein, with Cuomo, you know, Sorry, you're more useful now for us to do some virtue

signaling and pretend like we're an honest press. They don't take these people down when it matters. They don't take them down when they're actually going to politically lose as a result of it. Get on the whole list. Everybody knew Charlie Rose with the crusty claw. I love that law, and that was a crusty claw, Matie. You know Charlie Rose was grabbing. I heard about Charlie Rose being an old creepster. I mean like twenty years ago when I was working at CBSC. If you news, everyone's always known

that guy was an old creepster. You can own this list, all all these prominent democrats that it took so long and then finally and then they want to plus because the media finally covers the story. No, when they were powerful, when they were necessary to carry the message for the left, they were protecting the same things. True a Cuomo here, But you listen to these young women. Look, we also

all know. We sit there and you see these women talking about this, and you go, yeah, they're telling the truth. You know, we can actually make these guys sometimes you don't know sometimes it's kind of hard. Sometimes it feels like he said, she said, no, this is she said, and she's telling the truth. And she said, and she said, because they're a handful of them, they're telling the truth.

Do the Democrats really care? What's fascinated, of course, is they actually do care about the sexual harassment more than they do the order to send seniors into nursing homes, which undoubtedly put more of them at risk and killed more seniors than would have otherwise died. They care more about uncouth inappropriate comments said to women. He didn't, you know,

he didn't sexually assault anybody. I mean, there are there are some things Cuomo did not do, but I mean, he clearly likes young women and tries to use his power as a means of getting them into bed with him. And now it's come out, and that is what the media is hoisting them up and destroying him over. That's what they're hoisting them up over. Not's the seniors and the nursing homes, because that goes after much more than

just one man being a lecterous old fool. That goes to something else, goes to the way the media lied about COVID in so many ways to defeat Donald Trump in twenty twenty. The only way I know how to improve it is with a shredder. It's not even a coronavirus bill. Calming this a coronavirus bill is like calling Harvey Weinstein a feminist. It's chock full of spending porn, billions of dollars to states and local governments that have

seen the revenues go up. Billions of dollars to pension programs, billions of dollars to schools with no requirements that they open. It's it's a it's an orgy of pork, an orgy of pork, the senator, Senator Kennedy says here, it's like calling Harvey Weinstein a feminist, Kennedy. Kennedy's definitely writing out

his lines beforehand, that's for sure. I don't also thought I was reminded of this because I mentioned Harvey Weinstein before in the context of incredibly powerful, wealthy, influential democrats who they cover for as long as they can, and then they want applause when the person is no longer useful to their cause and they, you know, throw them to the wolves. This coronavirus bill, that is, I mean it's not a COVID bill, it's just a Democrat spending bill.

And we should come up with a better name for one thing, that one thing. We're Republicans, I think continuous continue to fall down on or or a major shortcoming they have is we need catchy phrases for things too. This is politics. We need shorthand, we need slogans, you know, we need better ways of referring to some of these things, because the second you call this a COVID relief bill,

you're basically playing their game. The moment you concede with that word, that one point nine trillion dollars sounds like it's going toward helping people who have been so affected by COVID. But nine percent of the actual bill does so. Nine percent. I mean, if it were like sixty or seventy percent, I'd say, oh, you know, it's politics. They're gonna put some other stuff in there. It's basically all

not COVID stuff. In fact, there's a whole there's there's provisions about, you know, additional spending for education, and most of it doesn't even happen next year. It's built in, it's layered in over years and years, tens of billions of dollars. Oh, you mean the teachers unions want their payoffs and they want their prerogatives, and it really has nothing to do with their safety. They're so scared. Yeah,

that's what I thought. Not a surprise, the tense of a Biden administration and of a Democrat majority Congress acting and even the most the most basic bipartisan fashion. I mean, that didn't last a day, did it. And Biden came into office in his attitude, or I should say the handlers around him and the special interests and the people that are telling him what to do. The attitude was we won, you lost, Go jump in a lake, you know, go blankety blanking blank or blank. And we've seen nothing

but that since then. And this is I think in part of a hangover of the way that Donald Trump psychologically broke the Left and they haven't put themselves back together. I mean, you know, Humpty Dumpy, all the King's horses and men can't put the Democrats fragile emotions back together again. I mean, they're having a tough time here because Donald Trump came into office and made fun of them for four years for being a bunch of shrill lib lunatics,

and now they want payback against against everybody else. There's real anger out there. But you know, Ted Cruz notices that they're not even pretending to be reaching the other side. And you look at the way that Republicans passed real COVID bills with Democrat votes last year. It's actually possible, folks, that's not some theoretical Democrats are going to put pass this probably without a single Republican vote in the Senate. And you know, who knows how the House is going

to go play ten. We're getting ready to go through an unfortunate bit of political theater. And the reason for that is that the Democrats have made the decision to be hard partisans rather than to work together in a bipartisan manner. Last year, Congress passed five separate COVID relief bills. Every one of them was bipartisan. So it's not just

empty words. Republicans here have demonstrated that we are ready and willing to roll up our sleeves and work together in a bipartisan manner to address COVID, to defeat this pandemic, and to get people back to work. Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, and Nancy Close could have done the same, but they made a decision instead. This is not a COVID bill. Nine percent of this bill focuses on COVID health spending is a partisan wish list paying off the Democratic special

interests that brought them elect And it's cynical. It's got Chuck Schumer's bridge to Canada. The last I checked, a bridge to Canada is not going to defeat COVID. It is not. Sorry Canada, that's not the way it's going to work. But Republicans did buy partisan things to help the country during COVID. Democrats won't do that now why. And what we are doing is building the capacity to address the needs of those children. And we are guided

by some core principles. Number one, we act in the best interests of the children, and we act in the best interests of the American people. And thirdly, we adhere to our values and principles as a country. And so in fact, the numbers are si magnificant. The challenge is significant. Yeah, and our plans are well underway as we build the capacity to address the needs of the children, and we are rebuilding from scratch. Oh, it's all about the children.

What's Buck's law of politics for Democrats, the moment they tell you it's about the children, you're being lied to. Okay, just remember that it's always true. The moment they say it's for the children, the moment Nancy Pelosi comes out, you know, with her Chanelle scarf loosely draped around her mouth because she cares so much about COVID and goes the children. Indeed, ye know, we're gonna get get them the things that they need. Yeah, that's because they've got

something else going on. Why do we have a what is he saying now, DHS Secretary of Mayorcas a significant challenge at the border. Why do we have this because of the Biden administration. That's why we have a huge spike in people coming to the border. They are literal early wearing Biden T shirts. Okay, can we make this anymore clear? Illegal immigrants are showing up and wearing T shirts that say Biden let us in at the border.

I think we know why they're showing up. And Democrats are already I mean, House Democrats are already pushing bills, trying to get bills ready to go for mass amnesty. I said, I've said this all along you know, policy, I'm good at predicting elections. I don't think anybody can really predict elections, but policy I can usually see coming. But we're going to have to have a whole reckoning here as a country about what's going on with our immigration policy right now, because this is about to be

the central fight. And really what you're going to start to you're gonna start to see is that they want open borders because sovereignty is for suckers. Sovereignty a nation

that can control its borders that requires effort. You know, it's much better create incentives for people to come and give them even more incentives when they stay to vote for one political party, and you effectively create and a voter base of anybody from anywhere around the world who feels like coming to America and availing themselves of all of the benefits of being here illegally. Right, we're supposed

to have a process for all of this. I mean, as Milton Friedman said, it is one thing to have free immigration to jobs. It's another thing to have free immigration to welfare. And you cannot have both. You can have a welfare state or you can have open immigration for jobs. You have both you've got a big problem. Do you think we have a bit of a welfare

state in this country? Is it fair to say? But this has been a long time in coming, As you know, the dominant liberal media narrative on immigration has been a series of shifting lies for about the last forty years. In the Trump era, the main leftists argument on immigration shifted into outright moral blackmail from the left. This is what this is how it would always go. You know this, if you ever tried to talk to somebody about immigration policy, this is how it happens. Do you have a problem

with a million illegal arrivals from a Central America? You must be racist, they say to you. If you ask any questions about who will pay for these new illegal arrivals in terms of the benefits and welfare, that's a racist question to ask. If you wonder how social Security and Medicare will remain viable programs when millions of illegal aliens will need similar benefits when they reach retirement age, it's racist to even consider such things. It's just always

about how it's always racist and xenophobic. You're not allowed to ask any questions based on, oh, I don't know the simple math of how are we going to pay for this? Who's gonna pay for this? How's this all going to go. That's more or less the extent of the intellectual discourse you can expect from leftists on the issue of illegal immigration, because they much prefer to engage in ad hominem attacks against anybody who has a problem

with open borders. It's so much easier. As you know, illegal alien is a term that appears in the federal legal Code. Many times leftists now say that it is hateful, and they're actually in the process of changing this. They might have already changed it by the time I talk to you. In the federal code. It's hateful to say words that are written in federal law when it comes to immigration. But they were. They used to insist on illegal immigrant, but they disliked the fact that there was

illegal in there. So if you're gonna call something illegal, you're kind of admitting it's against the law. That's a problem. So then they moved on to the more orwellian term undocumented, which is absurdly vague and inaccurate. They have documents somewhere they're not undocumented. They just don't have documents that say you're legally allowed to be in the United States. Calling an illegal alien undocumented is like calling a trespasser a

pre invite guest. Now keep in mind, this phraseology fight is coming to us after decades of brainwashing the American people with platitudes meant to conflate legal and illegal immigration to misleads citizens about the costs of illegals and pretend the problem was less massive all along than in reality it is. Loaded misleading claims like America is a nation of immigrants, and immigrants do the jobs Americans won't do, have become second nature for many American commentators, in particular

news anchors policy analysts. They say these things as though they are written in the Constitution itself. I mean, CNN actually seems to believe that Emma Lazarus's Great Colossus poem on the base of the Statue of Liberty is the foundation of federal immigration law. You know the poem. For anybody who doesn't know this, Just so you're clear, the poem was for a fundraiser. The plaque is there for tourists. Okay,

that's where the Great Colossus bone. You know, and give me you're tired, you're hungry, or I don't remember all the poem, but you get it. Historically, ellis Island was actually a place where immigrants could be rejected on the spot after a week's long transatlantic journey. You got about two percent of all new immigrants as island were for medical or mental health reasons, told to go back on the boat and go home. So people were turned away even at Ellas Island. Not a lot, but there were

people turned away. The Leafe's rewriting of immigration history isn't simply an academic matter. It's been used to create narratives that support illegal immigration at the expense of rule of law and sovereignty. So that's now it's at the point where we have to see what's going to come next, what's going to happen. We are at the extremes now, We are at the phase where we would have to think about what becomes of this country when there's another

mass legalization. Remember we had a mass legalization under Ronald Reagan in nineteen eighty six, and they said it would only be whatever. It was a couple million, and then there was going to be very secure border and no more illegal immigration. We got the amnesty, and then we got millions and millions more illegal immigrants in the country.

And you know, if all of this is fine, if it means if it is meaningless, as the left now pretends, why do we even pretend there's a thing called assimilation?

Why have immigration laws at all? If immigration, including illegal immigration, if illegal immigration is only good, if it is only upside And there are some radical libertarian think tank types who will always say that right, oh the more, if we could take them, if we could take five hundred million people from China the United States tomorrow, it would

make us wealthier, That's what they'll tell you. It'll be a better country then, to which I say, okay, if five hundred million Chinese arrived in America tomorrow, which I know that's not going to happen, but we're just as a thought experiment, would it still be America? It's still the same country. Don't we have cultures, norms, more rays, shared history, tradition. Doesn't all that come from being here and being an American? And that we have an assimilation

process for people to become American over time. But you know, when you show up yere illegally, and you know the first day you step on us soil, you're not an American. You're not by law, and you're not by any other definition. So how do we actually view this as a society. These are the conversations we have to have. And then, of course there's the the question of the official count as of twenty seventeen. They were saying, and it's it's

true now too. I mean, I just have the twenty seventeen number in front of me, but they'll say about eleven point seven million illegal aliens the United States. But that figure is an estimate based on voluntary census data. That's right, it's all census data they're using. The real number of illegal aliens is probably much much higher. Right.

There were those math nerds at Yale, and I say math nerds with reverence, just a couple of years ago they did a PhD project and they looked at all the available data and these are you know, these are math whizzes, and they estimated the number of legal aliens was more like twenty million, which is close to double the official figures. It's pretty remarkable when you see that. We're told the number has stayed constant. Illegal aliens has stayed constant for like the last ten or fifteen years.

Net migration zero. You hear all these things. Meanwhile, when I've been down on the border and talk to border patrol, members of border patrol, you know what they say, that's ridiculous. We're catching illegals crossing over all the time, and illegals aren't in large numbers going back to where they came from, especially if they come from Pakistan or China or the Philippines or wherever they're not they're not coming, they're not going back to their home countries. The once they get here,

they stay. But we can't even we cannot have an honest discussion about immigration in this country. And again it see even just the notion of immigration. I'm talking about illegal immigration. We can't have an honest discussion about it because that would mean the left won't get its way quite as easily. But do you see how they're ramming through this spending bill in the Congress. See how their plans now or to just continue doing exactly what they want,

doesn't matter what the Republicans think. That's the plan for amnesty too, That's how they're going to ram through amnesty.