Buck’s First Thoughts - 12/9/20

and doing so in the most pernicious of ways. And here we are now with the official declaration from YouTube. But you have to understand. YouTube is owned by Google, and it has a parent company, a company known as Alphabet. And this is the most powerful internet company in the world. That's actually even more powerful than Facebook or Twitter or any of the others. The only thing that comes close to it really is Amazon. But Google is effectively an

internet monopolist. They can demonetize you on YouTube. Sure they've already done that to me, but they also can make sure that you are dropped down in search results. They can decide what is seen about you and what is not seen about you. Enormous amounts of power. And not only this is a private company that led the American people and led the regulators in DC, led Congress to believe for a long time that it was effectively a neutral,

algorithm based internet search and communications company. I mean it does a lot of things, right your Gmail, your Google searches. I can't even name all the things that Google's involved in right now, but they've let you know because they've put out on YouTube while we're still trying to figure out what's going on this on in this election. There are lawsuits currently out there in court that are making

certain declarations. If you say that you support those lawsuits, that you think they have merit, that you think they're true, you run the risk of being canceled. And this is not theoretical. This is not a conspiracy. Official statement coming out from YouTube this morning, we just shared an update on YouTube election efforts, including how we're handling community guidelines. Our policies. These are This is a quote from official

YouTube Public affairs. Our policies disallow content alleging widespread fraud or errors change the outcome of a historical US presidential election. We allow this type of commentary for current elections as election officials work to finalize counts. December eighth was the safe Harbor deadline for the US presidential election, and enough states have now certified their results to determine a president elect.

As such, starting today, we will remove new content uploaded on or after December ninth, twenty twenty alleging that widespread fraud or errors change the outcome of the US presidential election. For example, we will remove videos claiming that a presidential candidate won the election as a result of widespread software glitches or counting errors. This content that includes sufficient context may remain, similar to how we allow COVID information that

is sufficient with ESDA content, etc. Etc. Okay, if you say that this election was stolen now on YouTube, you will get your content pulled down. You will be demonetized. Now, you may think, and this is a big problem, we have so much of conservative media. We have these places we go, we have these areas where we think, okay, at least there's there's some safety there. Talk radio is really the ultimate example of that. We still we use the really the oldest method of mass communication short of

the printing press in existence to great effect. And we have one cable channel. I know there are a couple others, but they're not in the distribution that they need to be in one hundred million homes to compete. We have

one major cable channel and that's it. And a lot of you, I know are I've seen your notes, I've seen your messages about what's going on over there, So I'm aware of your thoughts on that and the rest of the media ecosystem, which determines what people are reading in the news, what people think is going on in the country. How dangerous is COVID. You have no way of knowing. The only way you could know is by

reading media outlets. The only way you can actually get a real sense of this nationwide is newspapers, website, TV, radio, etc. That's true of all of us. This is the flow of information, which means it is our mass perception in the public of what's happening in this country. And the most powerful companies involved in that are straight up saying, Biden one, it's over, shut up, or we'll come after you.

They're straight up saying it. And if you think that this that there are some people that are going to withstand this with their websites or withstand this and you know, continue on as is, at least on these platforms. I gotta tell you something it's not going to happen because they will do this. They can demonetize YouTube doesn't need conservative creators, doesn't need them, doesn't care. Same thing with Twitter, they don't need you, they don't need us. Very very

wealthy companies that can withstand this. So what happens is also other companies that rely on Google for their ads, other media organizations that have enormous budgets and have a lot of payroll to meet, they're going to start falling in line. This is like a dictate from on high. This is essentially the left wing controlled Internet telling you it's over. Shut up, you're not allowed to talk about

this anymore. If you do, we'll hit you. And then what happens is they don't hit the people that go along with it, and everyone forgets why is this person growing so fast online? You don't think that people are cutting side deals with these companies. You don't think that there's controlled opposition that are so called conservatives who are basically never trumpers, but they make deals with these internet

companies so that they don't get touched. You can see who's upset about this and who still profits, who still grows and has no problem here who's getting throttled and who's not. Oh yes, there's money here, there's influence, there's prestige. There's a lot at stake for people. Watch very closely. Who speaks out about this and who just has the follower account keep going up and up. Who's just minting

money while being a conservative? That's the game. This is how they run the most effective influence operation imaginable on a massive scale. This is how the This is how the left wins. This is how they win. I don't have an answer. I have a rallying cry that we fight, that we talk about it, that we raise the alarm, that we demand the appeal of Section two thirty. People say it won't do, it's not perfect. Well, this is awful what we have right now? What I mean, the

the advantage the internet monopolists. Yeah, maybe they'll have a competitor or ten years from now. What if the country looks like in ten years if you can't say things that you believe to be true on the internet, And remember the creators that they go after, the content creators and the pundits and the commentators and the you know, the the reporters. They all they have to do is shut them down. And then how do people that are trying to you know, operate, operate at their jobs that

aren't in the media. How do they get the information they need to know what's really going on? You know, where they get it from? The websites that aren't throttled, the websites that aren't shadow band, the people who are all of a sudden having all their stuff shared freely. We had just begun to go toe to toe with the left wing mainstream media apparatus the last really the last ten years or so, because because people realize that

half the country wasn't being properly served. I mean, there's a reason that Fox News is a ratings juggernaut, and there's a reason that even though there's a tremendous amount of money to be made in conservative media, there's always

these hurdles. You can't get the right sponsors. You know, if you're a major corporation, you won't go with them right that they won't do that for You can't get Mercedes Benz if you're a cable news channel, they of all of the on the right, on the left, or you can be lunatic MSNBC and you know, Amazon will sponsor you and all this. These are all of the impediments.

So you want to know why a party like the Democrats who are for defunding police, socialism, abortion for all nine months of a pregnancy, toxic identity, politics, open borders. You want to know how they're able to say that they now won the election because of what I'm telling you, This is how they win. We have to fight against this,

We have to understand these mechanisms. I know there are people out there who want to say, oh, but you know there's someone in the administra and the Trump administration and you know, now this is eight D chess and we're gonna know. I'm telling you that's not true. They think they've got us. They think they've got us. You're

going to see a drop off. You're going to see people all of a sudden, they'll they'll be this this focus on other things, palatable stories for the right, but not digging in on I mean, you know, I dig in on COVID as hard as I dig it on the election stuff, or completely being bamboozled. We're having the wool pulled over our eyes as a nation. People are losing their livelihoods, they're going bankrupt, their lives are being

ruined and they're not going to be fixed. In ninety days when the vaccine starts to hit critical masks, they're not going to be They're not lives aren't going to be fixed. They're not going to be made whole. So that has to that debate, that argument that stopping the madness has to happen. Now they're shutting it all down. I'm trying to come up with better answers. I know there are these platforms, but they're nascent platforms. There are alternatives.

The Trump administration still has the power of the executive branch. Maybe there are ways that they could use it to some effect. In the meantime, I know they're focused in on what's really happening with this election, But keep in mind now the people around the administration who are trying to get the word out we're trying to talk about and they do it by keyword now, So if you talk about let's say suitcases and Georgia, you are targeted.

There are people who build their whole businesses on this. Google can destroy name a website that is a favorite conservative website of yours, with the possible exception of foxnews dot com. Google can basically destroy them, cut off their ads, drop them down in search. Facebook the same thing can destroy them. When I worked for a website years ago, the Facebook traffic that we were that was taken away from the site when they changed the algorithm was catastrophic,

led to a lot of layoffs. This is real power and its power to determine the conversation. It's power to tell you what you can say, and to tell you what you'll see and what you'll know. The Internet was initially this free and open playing field for ideas for communications.

That's what it was. That the promise of it. I'm going back now to the nineties, you know, the CompuServe an aol era, right, The Internet was this place that put us all in connection with each other, but also gave you access to this repository that was endless of

ideas and information and facts. And now the left, because they are collectivists and because they are inherently totalitarian in their mindset, because they think that they have all the absolute answers and no one else can have alternative answers. Now they want to use what was the greatest, the greatest apparatus for the spread of information and the increase of communications. They are using it now in a way really similar to China to control your mind. You don't

think that's what's happening. They are programming you. They're showing you what you can see, they're showing you what you can read. And anyone who tries to get in and tell you a hold on a second, that's not the truth. They shut that person down. They make them scarer, They make it so that they can't get followers, they can't pay their bills. Maybe they got to find a new job, a new industry. Maybe they got to learn to code,

go work for Google. I know, for the ride. For conservatives, we're generally just culturally in our media taste, we're not as as tech involved. You know. Somehow we don't have a single major and all props in respect to parlor and Rumble, I'm not I'm all on them. I use them. They're great, But we don't have a single major, critical mass social media platform that never mind his right wing

that is devoted to the ideals of free speech. For those of you who are saying you want to, you know, you want to go listen to like some local radio guy right now, he's like, wow, No, we're gonna win and we're we're gonna win and just yelling all this stuff. Let me tell you, We're not going to win if this continues. We cannot beat this machinery's message unless we

attack the machinery itself. You want to see how this election fight goes and want to be able to win the election fights that will come after it, We must address this problem. It is essential and it doesn't matter if you're on Twitter or Facebook or these things. It's the most powerful tool for controlling the conversation nationally that exists, bar not no question, and it has been now weaponized

officially against Trump, against his supporters. We are we are in COVID lockdown, and now we are in election information lockdown. Doesn't really feel like America, does it. Thanks for listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get the latest news and information from Bucks by heading to buck Sexton dot com.

Remember Russia collusion. This was a truly bizarre, deranged, evidence free theory that the Trump campaign and then Donald Trump himself worked with the Russians to somehow steal the twenty sixteen election. This was treated as gospel by the mainstream media for three years. I mean they still do now. But this was something they continued on pretending was true. Was there any effort ever to penalize people online for

the lies of Russia collusion? Has any scrubbing of social media accounts or websites occurred where they said, you know what, sorry, that was all a lie and that was used as a political weapon to undermine the sitting president President Donald J. Trump? Was there any of that, know, But now that they think the power is transferring to their hands, in fact, they're ensuring the power will transfer into their hands with moves like this, Now they're going to want to use

it and they want to engage in reprisals. They're looking to make examples of people too. And they pretend that this is around some principle. I mean, why aren't we having these social media CEOs sit before the American people that explain how Russia collusion is not something that was ever throttled, band shadow, band shut down, demonetized, never led

to any of that, even though it was all lies. CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, the Washington Post, the LA Times, go down the list, PBS, all these different channels and stations just full of insane lies about Russia collusion. Oh any day now, Oh. Rachel Maddow built a huge audience at MSNBC lying to them like a bunch of idiots about how Trump was a Russian Kremlin asset, never apologize for it, never penalized for it. So I want us to understand what the new rules are. They can lie

about the president, the sitting president. They can call him a traitor, they can call him a criminal, they can call him anything they want, and they can use the media ecosystem as an echo chamber. So they convince enough foolish Americans that this is actually true. But on the other side, for real questions like what are we doing on COVID and what happened to this election, they shut

it down. So not only will they prevent us from getting answers, they use that same information control, that same apparatus of propaganda to lie to our very faces. They say they're doing this to prevent lying and to protect facts and accuracy until they all have to be held to account for Russia collusion. This is a farce. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the buck Sexton Show podcast from more buck Head to Bucksexton dot com and

remember to subscribe to the podcast. Are now for some good news, although in a way it's also troubling that it came to this. I told you that General Flynn was pardoned by the President. You'd no doubt have seen or heard that a lot of places. It was pretty big news when it happened. And in response to that, you had Judge Emmett Sullivan produce a thirty four page opinion from the Federal Bench that shows you what final stage Trump derangement syndrome looks like. General Flynn is an

innocent man. They ruined this guy, and they used the law to settle political scores against him. They ruined this guy, or tried to based on lies, deception, the destruction of his constitutional rights. It was all politicized. It was a partisan hit. That's what they did to General Flynn. We all know it. This is very clear. But it took a pardon from the President of the United States to

get a federal judge to stop going after him. And then he wrote a thirty four page thirty four page opinion from the Bench where he talked about how Flynn is guilty and the administration shouldn't have done this, and this is you know, yes, they have the power, but this is a miscarriage of justice. Like a lunatic. He continued a prosecution by judge after the Department of Justice, which is the prosecutorial arm of the federal government, dropped the case and told him we never should have brought

this case. But he thinks he's respecting the system by trashing it because he doesn't like a decision that they made. It was their decision. What is this guy doing? Yes, General Flynn is no longer in criminal jeopardy and he has been officially pardoned. But we also need to know that Judge Emmett Sullivan is a Trump deranged lunatic and he should be and I mean this removed from the federal bench and barred forthwith right away. That's what should happen.

This guy is scary. Do you think if you're a person known in public life as a conservative, as a Trump supporter, do you think that you could get a fair trial and Judge Emmett Sullivan's courtroom. This guy's a federal circuit judge in DC. It's a pretty big deal. You think you get a fair trial? Absolutely not. This guy's a disgrace, a disgrace to the judiciary. But he shows you what we're up against. This was unheard of when the when the DJ says, the judge doesn't get

to pick somebody. Does a judge get to say, you know what, I don't like this guy. I'm gonna bring him into my courtroom and prosecute him. It's basically what they did to Judge Sullivan, I mean, to General Flynn, completely insane, but I'm very so so it's good that General Flynn is no longer in criminal jeopardy, but they dragged him through four years of this madness, four years of this insanity for what, for what? To make an

example of him? And unfortunately that still stands. Do you think that now people might have second thoughts, especially to support Trump if he's leaving that Oval office in January, which and I'll leave it to you. I'll leave the percentages to you, but certainly as a possibility, I think we could say it's a probability. I've been saying that for weeks if that happens. Do you think that people are going to be a little bit concerned about what could happen to them if they go forward and support

Donald J. Trump? You think that may be something to consider her because I do. I do. I think there are going to be a lot of people who say, oh, what are my risks here? What's going to happen? Here is the Attorney General for New York State, Leticia James, who is straight up threatening like a mob boss, threatening prosecution of Donald Trump by her state when he leaves office. Play seven. It's important to understand he is pardoned from federal crimes, but he has not pardoned from state crimes.

Last year, I introduced a bill in the state legislature which would close the pardon loophole so that individuals such as the President of the United States would not evade justice. It's important that we have this check on presidential powers, and in the legislature, the state legislature. I'm so happy they passed that bill and it is now the law in the state of New York. President Trump cannot avoid justice in the great state of New York. People have

asked me, should the president pardon himself? The answer is yes. What's what happens if he pardons? If he writes a preemptive pardon for himself and his family members? Think about this? What? What what's the downside? Oh, everyone's gonna scream Oh, look what he did. He's a criminal. They're saying that. Anyway, there's no fair minded person who looks at Trump and look looks at what's going on right now and says, yeah,

he'll he'll be left alone in private life. They'll they'll back all, don't let him go all, you know, go lead a quiet family life with his kids and grandkids. And nope, no, we chanted lock her up. And then hillar reevaded justice even though she did break the law. They will go after Trump and they'll fabricate crimes. That's how they play the game. We play, you know, two

hand touch. We're playing flag football here in politics, they are putting on brass knuckles and hitting us in the back of the head when the ref is not looking. That's how they play the game. Unfortunately, I think we're going to get another another lesson than that here very soon. They're gonna they're gonna go after people with prosecutions. They're gonna go after people with the irs. Oh but they talk of unity, remember that in their little self congratulatory delusion.

We just want the American people to unify. But remember New York State charges. It is true, you can only pardon yourself from federal charges. You can you cannot clear yourself, even as president, from state charges, and nor could he clear his family members from that. And they've been talking about this for a long time now. You might say, buck, but can they really get him? I don't know. Can

they fabricate a crime? They fabricated Russia collusion. But even if they can't convict Trump or any of his family members, they can certainly investigate them, hound them, go after them, harass them. I think Ivanka Trump just what was it a week ago? Was was deposed having to do with inauguration spending? What? Yeah? Do you think there'll be any? Let the asking is, do you think there'll actually be

any federal criminal charges about the inauguration spending? No? No, not not against Ivanka, not against any of the drums. Not gonna happen. But why well they they've got somebody the DJ WE dont wants to harass them. It's like it's auditioning for a bigger, better role on a Biden administration. This is what they do. It's it's appalling. Look Trump is and I want to be very clear, A Trump is not giving up the fight. He's He's staying in

this to the absolute very enemy. I think he's gonna fight this until the day that the moving trucks arrive, and God bless him. Why not? Why why pretend that everything is fine here? And why pretend that the Biden administration in any way that these Democrats have acted in good faith. They put forward this quasi senile clown, and we're all supposed to say, yeah, you guys have the best interests of the nation at heart. Sure I don't think so. Not gonna happen with me. I mean, I

can't speak for anybody else. Here's the president though, just just letting everybody now I'm doing a little bit of trolling Play eleven. The next administration will be the one ultimately implements a lot of the distribution of this vaccine and will oversee much of the future of the way Operation Workspeed goes forward. Why not include members of the Biden transition team as part of this summit that you're

hosting today. Well, we're gonna have to see who the next administration is because we won in those swing states and there was terrible things that went on. So we're gonna have to see who the next administration is. But whichever the next administration is will really benefit by what

we've been able to do with this incredible science. The doctors, all of the people that came up, the lab technicians work, the work that's been done is incredible and it will be incredible for the next administration, and hopefully the next administration will be the Trump administration. We'll see. But I like that he still goads them and he's showing them he's not backing down one bit. They think they can tame Trump as he's in these weeks of December before

what could be a presidential transition, and they're wrong. He's not going to back down. He's not going to give up. And what you see now is more and more reason to continue on with that fight. Even even if we don't win. We stay unified and we show the other side that we got we got some backbone, we can dig in. We're willing to take this all the way, to take this to the match. You're in the Freedom Hunt.

This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get more from Buck by following him on social media at Buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. You know what the President isn't doing is telling anybody telling America's what they should do in the meantime while we're waiting for this vaccine he distributed to general population. He's not communicating the message about what they should do to curve the spread of

this That's what Biden is talking about. Biden is talking, you know, obviously darker terms, obviously not putting nearly as much emphasis on the vaccine, but talking about the near term, the next few hundred days, in which basically Americans still have to do a lot to protect themselves until we can get that inoculation. That's right. This is what you're going to be told every day from now until the

end of January. We haven't been told enough. Did you feel like that we haven't been told enough about social distancing? Wear a mask, wash your hands. Here's a question that I asked yesterday on Twitter, you know, before they banned me. But here's a question that they ask on Twitter, and that I asked on Twitter rather and I gotta tell you, as I look at it, it's amazing to me how

unself aware so many people are. I said, about this COVID stuff that we're being told all the time, I asked the very real question, does anyone have an explanation of how it's possible. Mask compliance is the most widespread it has been all year in this country, but we now have more COVID cases than we did in March of twenty twenty and April, after months a viral spread with no mask mandates and almost no public masking at all.

And I said, please answer me before Twitter bands this question, because as we know, social media companies are run by idiot libs and they can't think for themselves. Okay, so what is the answer to this. What's amazing to me, and this tells you so much, is how many people respond to this with because it's blah blah blah, Are

you idiot? And there's a hundred different people with a hundred different reasons why I'm an idiot for not knowing what they're approved consensus left wing Fauci seal of approval answer is it's because people aren't masking up enough really, so they didn't really think about the question very much, did they. We went from basically no masking in March and April, very very little, very intermittent here and there,

and certainly no mandates. We went from that to eighty percent ninety percent mask compliance, and somehow cases and cases are higher. Some of them were saying, because cases are not hospitalizations and deaths, idiot, Really, hospitalizations and deaths are also higher. But you just go, you go down this list because Europe figured it out and we didn't. Really, Germany just said it's all time one day death record from COVID Germany is a six the eyes of the

United States. They had almost what was it, five hundred, five hundred plus dead in one day, So it's you know, two or three thousand dead in one day in Germany if you made it a comparable to the US population. Oh, and I thought the Germans figured out the whole thing. I thought the Germans had the answer. It was those dumb Trump supporters. It is so dangerous and so wrong for people to think it's okay to blame disfavored political groups in the United States and group in this case

half the country that supported Donald Trump. They're the reason for this virus. This is idiocy. There's no basis for this, and they can't answer these questions when you bring them up. And my favor, of course, as I've said, is it's so obvious, you idiot. And then they tell me something and I say, well, your other liberal blue check. Friend over here who believes in the science has a different answer.

So which one of you is correct? And if it's a hundred different things, maybe it's not obvious us, is it. All you have to do is ask the questions. You don't even have to take stands right now. Just just ask the questions you're not supposed to. And when you get unsatisfactory answers and you're told shut up, peasant, do what you're told. You know exactly what you're up against. Anyone can observe that what the media, the left, the Libs have been saying was going to save us. We

can control this, we can flatten the curve. Clearly, that is not true. Clearly it is called an observation of reality all around us. I know people here in New York who are getting COVID. I have friends in LA who have just gotten COVID. I know people all across the country are seeing cases and hospitalizations spiking even more than they did the last at the beginning of the pandemic. So this is now called second wave that we're seeing, right,

this is the second wave. But if we have gotten so much better with our people, remember we have better treatments for this now, So somehow the virus has spread more and it's spread more efficiently. Okay, maybe there's a mutation that's led to the increased spread. We don't know. That's a real answer. I could handle that as an answer. But where a mask like what Cuomo says all the time, that's not a real answer. That's not me saying that

it doesn't work at all. I'm just saying the reason that we have this huge spike in cases is not lack of mass compliance. That is madness. People are masking up all over the place. I know people who are very mask conscientious. They're sick or they've gotten sick. So what are they? Is it their fault? Oh no, it's only a Republicans. When a Republican gets COVID, it's his fault. So when Rudy Giuliani gets COVID nineteen, the media says, see,

he's reckless. But when Jared Polis, the governor of Colorado, big mask maniac, when he gets it and his wife gets it, it's oh, gosh, it's a virus. I guess it can really spread. Gosh, this is real contagious. Is this is tearing us apart? We should be unified against this. We should be united as a country. This is this is an external enemy that is mixing in our in all over our society, this virus. And instead people have

used this as a wedge. They've used this for further division, and they refuse to deal with what we can all see and observe. They are lying to you, and just asking them to explain themselves results in them saying that you are the liar. You're in the freedom Hut. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast from more Bucks. Head to Bucksexton dot com and remember to subscribe to the podcast. We do have Jenna Ellis of the Trump legal team. She's on the front line of this whole thing, so

she's joining us now live. Jenna, thank you so much for calling in. Absolutely thanks so much for having me. So. I gave the audience a little bit of a primer on that the Supreme Court denied injunctive relief today. But that's not the same thing as saying, because I have people, is it all over? No, it is not all over. But tell people what they need to know about Pennsylvania and let's go through some of the still active legal challenges. Yes, well, importantly,

this is Mike Kelly's lawsuit. It's not one of the Trump campaign's lawsuits, even though obviously there are a variety of individuals and organizations that are very concerned about election integrity as well they should be, including the Age of Texas that filed a great case that we can talk about that in front of the Supreme Court late last night.

But importantly for Mike Kelly's a stute in Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court only denied what's called emergency injunctive relief, which basically he was asking the court to stay the certification of results pending the outcome of that case, and the Supreme Court denied that, But they did not deny the petition for the writ of sert, which is the legal term of course for actually going in front of the

Supreme Court and having them grant hearing the appeal. So the appeal is still pending, the case is still very much alive. It's only that injunction of the certification of results that was denied today. So all of the reporters need to correct their fake news headlines. Yes, tell me this where what is the Trump campaign legal situation in Pennsylvania? Specifically said, that's Mike Kelly's case, what is your case?

Right So in Pennsylvania right now, we had an appeal that went to the Third Circuit on a very narrow issue that was denied. We have not yet appealed that to the Supreme Court. We do have another case that's pending out of Pennsylvania that was the one on all of the late ballots that Justice Alito ordered to be segregated out. That case has been pending for a couple of weeks in front of the Supreme Court. Whether or not it will be heard in unison, possibly with Mike

Kelly's consolidated. Sometimes the Supreme Court does that. That's very possible in this instance. But that's the case that we have pending right now in front of the Pennsylvania are out of Pennsylvania, and of course we also have the State Legislature Avenue where we have had the hearings in front of state legislatures, including Pennsylvania, asking them to exercise their authority under the Federal Constitution to say for themselves even without a court order. Listen, we look at what's

happened in our states. All of the rules were blatantly violated. We can't certify false, illegal results and so we're going to take back the method of selecting our delegates and make findings a fact and determine what slate to move

forward with. So that's been really the route that Mayor Giuliani and I have taken with the state legislators over the last two weeks to encourage them to exercise their constitutional authority because they're the last stop the gap, to really be the voice of the people, and to make sure that corruption does not reign in elections and make sure that they are the ones that step in and say no, we're not going to send a false flight

of delegates to the Electoral College. We're speaking of Jenna Elis. She is one of the lawyers representing the Trump campaign in these various lawsuits try to get to the bottom of what really happened and what fraud was at play in this election. Jenna, you mentioned this Texas lawsuit though

from the the Texas State Attorney General. Can you please tell us about this because I don't think I mean, I know the media is not covering this stuff fairly, but I don't think they've even really covered this much

at all. Yeah, which is actually shocking because this is a huge thing that a state attorney general doing four other states, and so this is Texas that's doing four other states and basically telling them that you know, your states did not follow the rules in your states for elections, and so this was an election official violation of all

of the state rules. And because of that, then there they are essentially disenfranchising the rest of the American public because with a certification of false results based on illegal activity, then that would tip the electoral college in favor of the candidate that didn't actually win. So this is a

huge lawsuit. It has what's called, of course, original jurisdiction, where under Article three of the US Constitution that contemplates the judicial branch, when a state sues another state, then that does not go up through the traditional court route, but is filed directly in the Supreme Court. So this is bypassed the rest of the lower court and will be heard directly in front of the Supreme Court. Because

it's not an appeal, they can't deny it. And even just a few minutes ago, we learned that the court, the Supreme Court put this on expedited briefing schedule, which means that they know that this is a really important case. To hear before December fourteenth. That's the date, of course, that the Electoral College is anticipated to vote, even though we do have Supreme Court precedent in prior cases and prior elections that really it's the January sixth date that

is of ultimate significance. Is how the Court put it, ultimate significance, that that's the date that the Electoral College votes are counted and certified by Congress. And so that's really the date that we're looking at. Speaking of Jenna Ellis, she is one of the lawyers for the Trump campaign. And Jenna tell us what's happening in Georgia. The big least news story worry about. All this had to do with the box or the suitcase or whatever it was

of ballots under the table. And within twenty four hours I was seeing everywhere it was, you know, the media was saying debunked. And then also we've had this Secretary of State for Georgia, Raffinsburger, who said it's all been counted. It's been counted three times, We've done the signature match. What's going on there? Tell us what's true, what's not, and where your where lawsuits stand with regard to what

happened in Georgia. Yeah, well, importantly, Georgia is one of the four states that Texas is doing, so that's Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. But we also do have a Trump campaign lawsuit that's going through the regular channels in Georgia that that's basically asserting the same thing that Georgia election officials didn't follow their own state law and because of that, that resulted in an irredeemably compromised vote total, and that

certification it's false. And so you know, for this precarious state to just say, well, we've recounted these illegal ballots multiple times, that really gets you to the same false result. So we had to go through the recount process, had to go through some of that procedure, that fact finding investigation,

before we could bring this lawsuit. But now with what we do know, especially with the witness affidavits that said that they were kicked out of that state farm arena around ten thirty and they knew that ballots were being counted late into the night. They signed those affidavits right after election day, and that video, far from being debunked, only confirmed exactly what the eyewitness testimony showed. I mean, this would be no different than in a criminal case.

You know, someone saying that they were an eyewitness to an armed robbery and then later, right before trial, you find the video that confirms it. That's exactly what's going

on in this case. And so for mainstream media that wants to just push this aside, say you know your legal challenges have failed, this is you know completely, you're at a time all of these different excuses, they're just trying to ignore the fact that there has been such widespread official misconduct and that these results cannot be permitted to stand. Because this is so important to election integrity. And this is not just about President Trump or the

campaign wanting to overturn election results. This is about wanting to make sure that the result itself is fair, it's constitutionally sound, and it's free and fair, because that's what our constitution requires of our elections. Can you tell us what is the status of the signature match, because you hear different things about this in Georgia's specifically, yes, So

the campaign just as of last week. In fact, the day before we went into the hearing, we requested through our local council for a fifth time this signature matching, so it hasn't been done. The governor Kemp, of course has called for that, but for some reason won't actually require his Secretary of State to do that. So it hasn't been done in any way meaningfully, and it certainly hasn't been done on a level that would get to every legal vote being counted. And the illegal votes, of

course shouldn't be counted. And that's what the Democrats are never willing to acknowledge, that only the legal votes that are cast according to the law of the state and ultimately the United States Constitution, should be counted in any election. And so there has not been the signature match that you would because because one area here and we're speaking to Jenna Ellis for anyone who's joining us here, and she is a member of a Trump legal Trump campaign

legal team in dealing with the various lawsuits in these states. Jenna, we see these things about X number of dead people voted, an X number of illegal aliens are believed to have voted. People. You say that, now, everyone jumps. That's actually the federal criminal statutory term for it, right, It's actually called the legal aliens. Still, folks, believe it or not, in federal law.

But all these people that you know, we see these numbers, how do we get the proof of how do we get to stand up and say, here are people who are dead who voted, and you guys don't have an answer for this, you know what I mean. It feels like we're waiting for that, the allegations and the affidavits to turn into factual data about fraudulent voters. Can you dig into that for me a little bit? Yeah, well,

we actually have that. And this is what's been so frustrating about being denied an evidentiary hearing on a court level. So for example, our case in Pennsylvania that we just talked about a few minutes ago, that's now at the Third Circuit and they denied that really narrow issue. What we appealed from was that judge that denied simply an

evidentiary hearing. And he did that in a way that and I won't you bore your audience, but he did that in a way there was actually a lead really incorrect because he made a finding on the merit of the case and on the evidence when no evidence had been presented in court at all. And so for all of the media and the leftist liberals saying, where's the evidence, where's the evidence. We haven't been granted an evidentiary hearing yet,

and that's what's been so frustrating. But what we have been able to do is get hearings in front of these state legislatures and put on a stample and a very important sample of our witnesses that we have, you know, fifty more one that will testify to saying, you know, I saw these these ballots come in, or there were duplicative ballots, or you know, I was told by an election official to just go ahead and allow this person to vote when they didn't have an idea, or their

signature didn't match, or some other thing that was against the law in that state. And so, for example, in Arizona, we know the data and we know the numbers. We know that eleven thousand votes were an over vote in that state, meaning that eleven thousand votes were cast more than there were registered voters. So how is that even possible? And that just alone would change the outcome in Arizona.

We know that thirty over thirty six thousand people who were those illegal aliens who were not eligible to vote under US laws voted in that election. We have the evidence to show that over four hundred and fifty thousand ballots were duplicated and did not show the actual intent of the voter based on all of the election officials who completely ignored the law in Arizona. So we have all of these facts, we have the witnesses, we have

the data, we have the evidence. It's just a matter of being able to present that in court and to have these judges try to just deny this based on some sort of procedural issue or really just trying to pass the buck and they don't want to hear these cases should frankly outrage every American and that's what I'm really grateful that Kin Paxton and Texas are now taking this case directly to the Supreme Court, because this needs

to be hurt. If we allow election officials to simply disregard the law in their state, then they're overturning an election within and they're just saying, we're going to completely ignore the law in our state and we are going to do whatever we want in the election for the outcome that we prefer. And that is not the rule of law in America. And I don't care if you

supported President Trump or Joe Biden. You may like the outcome of fraud this time, but I guarantee you that is not at all what you want to have as president, because America is always built on a rule of law, not a system of rulers. Jenna Ellis of the Trump legal team, Jenna, before we let you go out, I know you are very busy. I just want to know what can the folks listening expect from the team, you know, in broad strokes in the next couple of weeks. Well,

we'll definitely continue fighting. So I mean, I've been on the phone with the Mayor Leanni, and you know, we're continuing to advance both of our parallel strategies, both in the judicial branch as well as the state legislatures. Georgia has a hearing coming up this week and we're very hopeful that they will push through that resolution take back their delegates. And we're also going to be watching really eagerly to see what the Supreme Court does with this

Attorney general case. So I think there's still a lot of avenues, there's still a lot of fight left for election integrity, and don't listen to the mainstream media. This is definitely not over yet. We're just getting started. Jenna Elis everybody. Jenna, thank you so much for your timing for your work. We'll talk to you soon. Thanks,