Buck’s First Thoughts - 12/10/20

intentionally suppressed by social media, was in fact true. Hunter Biden is officially, by his own admission, under investigation by federal prosecutors who are looking at his foreign ties and possible money laundering. And where do we think some of those foreign ties may be? China? That's right, starting to see the Democrat Party was doing a whole smokescreen operation

for four years. Yes, they were attacking Trump on Russia, but their Russia fixation seemed to also serve the very useful additional purpose of preventing people from paying more attention to very high level Democrat connections to our true national security threat, our true economic challenger, the People's Republic of China.

And here is political with the peace the federal investigation into President elect Hunter Joe Biden, Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, has been more extensive than a statement from Hunter Biden indicates. According to a person with first hand knowledge of the investigation, on Wednesday, Hunter Biden said he had been contacted about a tax investigation of the US Attorney's office in Delaware.

In addition to Delaware, the securities fraud unit in the Southern District of New York also scrutinized Hunter Biden's finances, According to the person with direct knowledge of the investigation, The person said that as of early last year, investigators in Delaware and Washington were also probing potential money laundering and Hunter Biden's foreign ties. The person spoke on the condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to discuss YadA, YadA, okay.

In addition to the probe to Hunter Biden, federal authorities in the Western District of Pennsylvania are conducting a criminal investigation of a hospital business in which Joe Biden's brother, James was involved. Federal officials have asked about James Biden's role in the business. According to a second d blah blah okay, there is no indication Joe Biden himself is under investigation, but this could complicate his presidency and shine

an unflattering light on his relatives dealings. You don't say this is the best the Democrats could do. Really, here we are, and this is not a Russia collusion fairy tale. This is not something that was cooked up by a bunch of lib unethical journals at the New York Times or James Comey and some other smug weirdos at the DOJ. This is real here, we are, just a little just

a month or so past the election. Still have challenges in the courts, I know, but the election day has come and gone, and now they're like, yeah, it turns out Hunter Biden is under serious criminal scrutiny right now. I thought Joe Biden was going to restore honor and dignity to the White House. That's what they told us. I thought that Joe Biden was a totally straight shooter. I thought that Joe Biden was somebody that he didn't

have to worry about. Good old Scranton Joe, blue collar Joe who's been living in multimillion dollar houses despite being a public servant his entire adult life pretty much. He's been living in multimillion dollar houses for the last forty years. But you know, blue collar Joe, Sure, sure he is. Now this is where there's so much that I want to jump into here. Let's start with this. The media actively lied to the American people right before the election.

We need to understand that the Democrat aligned mainstream media ninety five percent of Democrats supporting and voting, and the independent journalists or they're registered independence, but they're all Democrats. That's just a game they play. They did more than just support their guy. They lied about information of the public interests in the public interest in order to make sure that there would be an outcome that they desired. That was what it was. And the social media companies

now work hand in glove with the mainstream medias. You know, they're essentially just an extension of it. Although really they're more powerful than the mainstream media Google, Facebook, Twitter. They can kill any media outlet they want to. They can throttle you, shut you down, cut off your funds, cut off your reach. You're done. What are you gonna do? You're gonna go to ask Jeeves dot com good luck?

So what do we make of this? The people who were lecturing us for four years about the need to protect our sacred democracy, The people who have been claiming that the big threat to our future was Donald Trump lying. He lies. That's what they always said. They all lied to you. They were all either actively engaged in or complicit in this lie, which I gotta be honest with you. I've told you all along. I don't think that this was necessarily going to be the end for the Biden campaign.

But then again, we didn't really know whether there was money laundering tied to all of this. It's one thing to say Hunter Biden is involved in sleazy dealings. It's another thing to say he could be a felon involved in hiding money that's getting paid to him by agents of the People's Republic of China. That's a bit more. That's an escalation, right, Getting getting paid a little bit on the side is one thing. Being a convicted felon

would be another. The media lie, do you? They actively work to suppress the truth because they think they know better than you about who should be president of the United States. The media lied, do you? All? Right? So we start with that. It's so funny too. Now they're like, oh, yeah, underreported story they're saying, or you know, didn't get that much attention. These are the news outlets saying it. I remember when it was oh, this is all a lie.

Think about the Hunter Biden story, the progression. At first it was fake news, they said at first there was no Hunter Biden laptop. Then it was the laptop was stolen and so therefore the information on it was inadmissible or something in a journalistic sense. Then it was oh, it was hacked, which all these things were not true. And then it was oh, there's really nothing there, there's nothing on the laptop, nothing to see here. And now it's oh, yeah, it turns out the laptop was real.

It wasn't stolen, it wasn't hacked. It was one hundred percent true, and there is a federal money laundering investigation into what the who the media is calling the president elect's son. He's not the president elect until the electoral College meets. That is that is actually the process. They can say this all day, but it does not actually change the truth. Right. This would be like saying, well, we don't actually have to say that there's this guy's

an alleged murderer. We'll just say he's a murderer in the press because you know that alleged thing. Let's skip past the jury trial. No, I say, no, I say, we we have these rules for a reason, and if you're going to ask us, ask us to respect some parts of the process, you can't then count others. But of course that's what them. He does all the time.

Show us your principles, they say to conservatives when it's in the interests of the left, and the Democrats when it advantages them to pretend that they also have principles, and then we see them abandon any principle at the moment they think that that is helpful. We're not supposed to notice this. Oh what are they going to say? Now? Hunter Biden is not a problem for Joe Biden. Remember it wasn't just that Hunter Biden was doing this. Wasn't Hunter Biden got caught, you know, selling weed at a

party or something. This guy's a forty something year old man, and he was leveraging his dad and including his dad in these discussions to get rich. And he's a total screw up. This guy. We all know that. Everyone knows that, even his dad knows that. So we know that he's not some criminal genius or something. It's not like he covered his tracks well. So if they look into this at all, it's very likely that they'll find out that there were some problems here. But do I think they'll

really look into this. I've already had some friends reaching out and asking, do you do you think that a Joe bidendj would even begin a serious investigation or allow the continuation of a serious investigation of possible money laundering of the president's son. The answer is no. And I know people don't want to hear that. I know we want to think that the system isn't that rotten or that corrupt. I'm here to tell you the Democrats have made it that rotten and corrupt. That is where we

are now. Look at Russia collusion. They are promoting people in the media and in government from the Obama era now who were big Russia collusion hoaxers. If you were a Russia collusion PP tape truther, you have benefited from that because the whole point of it was the smear, the sliming, the attack on Trump. It wasn't about to ending our democracy. Nobody really believes that because nobody really

thought that there was Russia collusion. At least nobody was moderately intelligent, but they pretended, Okay, yeah, we can run with this, We'll do this story night after night after night. The first three years of the Trump presidency were dominated by a story in the media that was a lie that they pretended to be just, oh, we're serious journalism, we're looking into this. Absolutely not true. The whole thing

was a fraud. The moment you understand that we are now in an information environment of warring propaganda machines, you start to see everything more clearly. If you are not a polemicist these days, you are controlled opposition for the other side. That's where we are. You're either fighting against this or you're not worth people's time with what you're doing. Right, You're either taking a stand against the leftist Democrat media collective,

or what are you really doing. I'm talking about for people in the media, not for everybody, and so this is where we find ourselves. This is where we are. People ask me what should be done? Now. Do I think a Hunter Biden investigation would be allowed to continue under Joe Biden? Absolutely not. They'll shut it down. Bill Clinton lied under oath as clearly as anyone can lie about anything, never even faced a criminal charge, didn't have

to pardon himself, didn't matter. Does anyone really think that it will be different under a Biden administration? After all the lectures we got about our sacred democracy from these Democrats, you think they're going to change? Absolutely not. So what can we do other than point out the lies, other than try to shame them? They won't They won't be shamed into honor or decency, but they should be shamed anyway. And the media is atrocious in this country. It's a disgrace.

But what else can we do? Appoint a special council? President Trump is the president. Attorney General Bill Barr is the head of the Department of Justice. This is a perfect example of where we need a special counsel because this investigation is going to be fraught with political pressure and considerations. So we need someone brought in from the outside to have full autonomy to investigate Hunter Biden and his associates up to and including Joe Biden if and

when he becomes president of the United States. Why not Someone explained to me why we should not do this, Oh, because it's mean, because it'll make the Democrats have the SADS. It's an even better reason. Look at what they did to us. If they get away with this, and they're they're on the edge of getting away with it. If they do, they will do it again and they will have benefited from it. Maybe it's time we start fighting fire with fire. A special council on Hunter Biden sounds

like a great idea to me. Thanks for listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get the latest news and information from Buck by heading to Bucksexton dot com. What was interesting was how much, how how much we all said the same thing. We were a lot of people from different countries talking about freedom of the press in their country, in Europe and in Asia and in Africa. And Donald Trump has had a very very corrosive effect

on the freedom of the press. I used to stay in the beginning in twenty seventeen that this was just rhetoric, but the fact is that he's called us the enemy of the people, and the term fake news has been repeated by fifty presidents, prime ministers and other national leaders around the world, and it's it's become a calling card or authoritarians. And so I do think there's been a

very prosive effect. But I would like to say that I think that at least in this country, our system has the court that the system is held in terms of democracy. The press has done its job, The courts, that the separation, that the course have done their jobs. So I am not as um, you know, negative and pessimistic as some of my colleagues internationally. That's what you'll hear over at MSNBC. I wanted you to get to listen to that drivel because that's a pretty good summation.

The libs, the journals are lunatics. I mean, they're they're completely deranged. They think they've done their job. Oh I'm sorry. The suppression of speech that is going on that's coming from social media is that's something that they talk about. Do they fight against that? They have no problem with it. They are in cahoots. They are a part of this. They are the authoritarians. That is the tragic irony of this whole situation. We all see it. Yes, the press did.

The press did their job by lying to the American people about Russia collision for three four years. Now, that's their job. They have no credibility, They show no ethics, no decency. They never apologize it's just creating this frothy mouthed rage machine of anti Trumpism. That's what they did. When she says we did our job, you know what she's really saying, yeah, because we think Trump lost the election.

Now that is in the journal's view, their job. Their job was not to present the American people with facts. You know, they talk about democracy in the media all the time, and they talk about free speech. They're enemies are free speech and journalism as a profession is actually the enemy of the American people right now. It's true because they're liars and there's no accountability and what they

do is disgusting. But when she says that they accomplished their mission unfortunately, or they did their job unfortunately from the perspective of a leftist, there's some truth to that, because here we are still fighting it out over this election, still wondering if we're able to get some justice here, and the journals are all saying, well, we weren't able to do it in twenty sixteen, but we rebounded and

got it done in twenty twenty. Does anyone really doubt that they found their purpose to be destroying Donald Trump and stopping him from having four more years they suppressed the Hunter Biden story. The reason fake news resonates so much, and let's remember they were the ones, the elite journals, were the ones that popularize the term fake news because their whole initial pitch was that Trump voters are so dumb they believe all the fake news stories from Russia online.

And then Trump said, no, you are the fake news completely turned it around. Was actually one of the most brilliant things he did in his presidency. He took their weapon and used it against them, and they hate him for it. They absolutely hate him for it. And now they want to tell you that what they're going to speak truth to power if and when there's this Biden presidency, which is going to be just a joke. This guy, Joe Biden is He's a clown. He I don't care

if he ends up being president. I don't care. He's still be team always will be. Nothing impressive about this guy, nothing worthwhile about his leadership or his vision. Just a guy who shows up and does what he's got to do. Whatever that took, saying whatever he had to say, shilling for the credit card companies out of Delaware for a long time, and now he's supposed to be some man of the people who unites us and brings us all together.

Just wait until they shut down the Hunter Biden investigation. You know what they're gonna say if there's a Biden administration, they shut down the Hunter Biden probe. I can assure you I already know what the talking point will be. But Trump pardon people, and Trump is so bad, and Trump, you know, Orange Man bad. That's all they'll say. They won't even they won't even be able to connect the dots with wow. So Biden's actually really corrupt. You're in

the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. For more buck head to Bucksexton dot com and remember to subscribe to the podcast. Well, firstly, I feel bad for the taxpayers in Texas that have to finance this ridiculous and frivolous lawsuit. You know, we should note that A. G. Paxton, you know, is a member of the Trump campaign very involved with that. Also that he is currently under federal indictment for securities fraud and also being investigated by the FBI.

So I see this more than anything as an effort to ingratiate himself to a man who could potentially provide him with a presidential pardon. Yeah, that's what it is. Always. It's always it's always angling for a pardon from Trump, isn't it. They're not even to live liars. Aren't even creative, are they? They just all repeat each other and think we're so smart. They all repeat each other. They think

that that's clever. You have seventeen Republican attorneys general have already backed Trump in this lawsuit out of the state of Texas. So here's what it says. This Now, this is the New York Times version. Understand, this is supposed to be the way they write a news story. This is not. This is not the editorial page. But you

really won't be able to tell the difference. Despite dozens of judges and courts rejecting challenges to the election, Republican attorneys general in seventeen states on Wednesday backed President Trump in his increasingly desperate and audacious legal campaign to reverse the results. The show of support and a brief filed with a Supreme Court represented the latest attempt by Trump loyalists to use the power of public office to come to his aid as he continues to deny the reality

of his loss with baseless claims of voter fraud. The move is an effort to bolster a lawsuit follow on Tuesday by the pro Trump Attorney general in Texas that seeks to delay the certification of the presidential electors in four battleground states that President Trump lost. So shall see, Okay, that's the that's the way the I mean the New York Times, it's just going all in with editorializing as

a news story. Not a surprise there. Notice that lawsuits to Democrats, this is just one of many ways how we can establish that they don't have principles. They only have desires and wants, and they shift whatever principles they have or just scard them in order to achieve those desires and wants. Here's what here's what you should remember about all this. Democrats celebrated the usage of lawsuits and

the Federal Bench. Activist judges on the Federal Bench constantly ensnaring and tangling up President Trump in every aspect of his agenda that they could with bad faith lawsuits and legal decisions. Right then, when I say bad faith, you can tell, because when the Ninth Circuit keep doing something to stop Trump from doing something right, they just can you know, what's coming, and then the Supreme Court has

to step in and say, no, you can't do that. No, that's not what the law says about the judges below them, the Obama appointees in particular on the Ninth Circuit, that's not good faith, that's abusing the process. But they loved lawsuits and judges and the law when they were particularly when Trump had the House and the Senate. I'm just

gonna say it, not enough done. Not enough done during that period, tax cuts pretty much it And guess what's gonna happen if there's a Bide administration The taxes go up. I know people don't like to hear this, but this is the truth. Didn't get enough done, and you can there's a whole bunch of reasons why. One of them is really bad personnel at the top level of the of the new administration in twenty sixteen, horrible, horrible people.

If anyone who's gonna write me some email now and say, oh that's not yeah, really you want to bring back Scaramucci and Amarosa and Rex Tillerson in it? Yeah, that's the crew. I don't think. So. There was a lot of time lost in that transition period. And afterwards. Some of it was, of course because of the d I understand the ambush by the Democrats and the Russia collusion

truthers and going after General Flynn. But I'm gonna tell you this much, if there's an incoming by administration, they're going to try to hit us day one with as much left wing crazy stuff as they can get away with the executive order already seeing. And this also ties into the legal issues I was talking to you about. There are hundreds of migrants who are moving in a caravan from Honduras toward the US southern border right now. Why do you think that is? Why would the caravans

start up again? What has in the minds of people in Central America, for example, and as well as other countries all over the world because they don't talk about this that much in the news. But it wasn't just people from Central America during the border crisis under the Trump administration who were showing up. There were people from Pakistan, There were people from Haiti, there were people from China, people from all over the world showing up the border

saying I'm fleeing, I'm fleeing oppression. They basically reading some key is actually reading an off little piece of paper. I'm fleeing oppression. I want I want asylum in your country. And who are you fleeing? What oppression do you have to I'm fleeing oppression. That's all they know. That's all they have to say. Okay, I guess you passed the

credible screening test. Let's let you into the US. But you're gonna show up at your hearing, right, You're gonna show up at your credible theory at your first immigration hearing to see if you actually get asylum. Oh sure, promise.

We all know how that worked out. Why would a migrant caravan, this was an Associated Press story that I saw start making this way to the southern border again because they know the first order of business for Democrats will be the elimination of the filibuster if they can get if they can get the majority. If they don't have the majority, and then they'll be all these other

things that'll happen anyway. If they don't have the majority, the first order business will start will be executive orders from Joe Biden, and among those executive orders will be immigration, the extension of dhaka as a kind of permanent status and they then will move toward amnesty. And once they get amnesty, what you think the Texas is going to

stay red if there is amnesty. Think about this, Think of all the states, because after amnesty, you know what happens the pathway to citizenship, or maybe it's all at once, maybe it's all together. Goodbye Republican governance and administrations and all the rest of it. Those are the stakes right now. And people are coming to our southern border because they know that under a Biden administration, what they'll do is tell the public one thing is happening while the bureaucracy,

while the bureaucracy allows another thing to happen. That's what they'll do. And they'll say, oh, they're going to show up. I can tell you when I was living in a DC working at the Hill dot Com doing that show Rising, we had all these debates, all these people showing up, and I had been down at the border a few times. I've been talking to border patrol and you'd have all these Democrat talking heads that would show up and say, everyone shows up for their hearings. There is no crisis

at the border. They're all fleeing oppression. It was just a propaganda campaign, lies all lies. There was an exploitation of the goodness of the American people underway. We were allowing people to come here with one under one set of rules, and they were the first thing they were doing was breaking those sets of rules. They weren't even willing to wait at the points, at points of ports of entry. They would cross the border illegally, which is it is actually an illegal act. Believe it or not.

It's like federal trespassing. To step across the US Mexico border that itself is a is an illegal act. So they would do that so they could get arrested, and then they would claim asylum, and then they will would hope to get lost in the court system, get a delayed hearing, or just not show up for the hearing. And if they show up for the hearing and the hearing goes against them for a psylam, you know what happens next? They have to wait for a deportation hearing.

How many people do you think show up for the asylum hearing get denied, and then how many people show up for the deportation hearing again just to see if they can actually get there. They've already been in the United States for months and months. At that point, maybe a couple of years. You think you're gonna show up, But the propaganda machinery of the Democrats will kick in a high gear in twenty twenty one. If Biden is calling the shots again, they're gonna say, oh no, everyone showed.

They're gonna lie all over again. They want things that they believe are justified by the lies. It's not even really a lie because the Democrats think it's so important. That's their attitude. That is how they approach all of these things. So you should you should remember that as they seek to give us all lectures about how the press did their jobs and Trump was a threat to freedom of the press. How is Trump a threat to freedom of the press by hurting their feels, by making

them feel sad? What did he do? He made fun of some of them. The most insecure, vain, and often sociopathic people I've ever met, and often intellectually worthless, are national political journalists. Terrible, terrible people go into this profession, lots of them, and they hate it when anyone points out, who are you and what are you doing your whole day to day? If I'm here to speak truth, to powers of fraud. We all know that, right. Do you think any of them? Do you think any of the

New York Times to washing the posts? They're gonna speak truth to power and bide administration. And can anyone say that with a straight face. It's laughable. No one really believes that, but they'll say it. They'll say it anyway, And unfortunately, people with minds that are easily molded, the easily brainwashed, will say, yeah, that's true. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get more from Buck by following him on social media at

buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Everyone is so. It's when you cannot get people to even when someone tells you that they won an election that they lost. That's going to a whole another level. And then you have people believe you, believing in you because they trusted in you and they thought they were doing something that was noble by and they thought they were standing up for the right thing when they really weren't. They were

you were leading them astray. And the common enemy is not us. It's not the media. I mean, listen, maybe it's someone else's not me. It's not you. To the best of my ability. I tell you the truth every night, and if I screw it up, I apologize and I corrected. But these people are being lied to and have been lied to for at least the past five years. I like the sort of calm and unity based Tony of ton Lemon were we the media, We're not the enemy. He works for CNN, He's an anchor at CNN, the

Commy News Network. I mean the way that that place transformed itself into an institution of pure anti Trump propaganda over the last four years, that they should study. Future generations should study this. It's actually remarkable. I mean, it's awful and it's wrong, but it's also pretty fascinating. They suppressed the Hunter Biden story. We have the tape right of from James O'Keefe and and Project Veritas, which you know,

we always have these tapes that come out. I keep telling us, Yeah, CNN superliberally lie to all of us. I mean, I understand that it is. Maybe I'm using to hear them in the lies, but we're not learning anything new with this, just putting that out there. Yeah, I can tell you, as I've said, what they're saying on the cneditorial calls. I know what they're saying on then editorial calls. Having worked there, I understand the mindset.

But yeah, they actively suppressed the Hunter Biden story. That's what they did. And now they want us to believe that they're on our side. They're just they're just there for truth, man. Yeah, they're just telling us the truth. You know that this is all this is all what we should expect, I suppose. And then there's Steve Schmidt. I have a question for you. You know, why is it that the people who are like all helping Democrats?

Are they the Democrats now the never trumpers? Or here you go, the dumbest political analyst on television at MSNBC, Steve Schmidt MSNBC, Steve Schmidt. Here he is Play eight. We're in a fight now between an autocratic movement and a democratic movement. And the only way to win a fight is either through submission or through exhaustion. And here's the deal. And this is what I would say to

the people that Kim described as deluded. They are in a party that has let out of the underworld a mixture of conspiracy theorists, white nationalist, white supremacist militia groups and all of those people are part of their Trump coalition, right, they are in the mainstream of the Trump coalition, groups like the Lincoln Project. Our review is very simple. There is no compromise with these people. They must be driven

back into the underworld of American politics. They have no place at the table, and that any political party that wishes to associate with them has to become so toxic that they have no chance of winning elections. So basically, I'm a Democrat. Well, ninety five percent of the Republican Party ninety seven percent the Republican Party might even more like ninety nine now that supports Donald Trump. So they don't have a voice. They don't have a voice at

the table. Steve Schmidt does as long as he's taking money from left wing billionaires to pretend to be a conservative who makes anti Trump ads. These people are ideological mercenaries and you're going to see them. They're now going to be maneuvering. What is their role here in a possible post trump ero What are they going to be adding to all these Well, they're Democrats, so I think their role should be that they get to go around and tell people the truth. Fond it they're actually Democrats.

Now I think Joe Scarborough does that, or if he doesn't, it's laughable he should. These people have switched parties over Donald Trump. So when they used to talk about protecting unborn babies, for example, that was just all for show. They don't really believe that now they're Democrats. When they talked about the rule of law and supporting police and secure boarders, and I don't mean they've done that recently.

I'm talking about, you know, go back ten or fifteen years with some of these guys when they were you know, Romney McCain Republicans. When they would say those things, they didn't actually mean it. It didn't matter to them. It was just the thing they had to say that was of the greatest benefit to them at that moment in time. A lot of this, a lot of this going on, and just remember we should not we should not allow them to pretend that they weren't working for Democrats in

this last election. They absolutely were. So they've gotten in a way, they may have gotten what they want here. And I hope that this lawsuit out of Texas will get some traction. It's unlikely, folks. We are now at December tenth, the Electoral College certification by the States happens on Monday, and then we have a few weeks, but it'll be over the holidays, there won't be a lot going on, and then they'll be the actual Electoral College official tally and or rather, I'm sorry, the Congress will

certify the official tally. And at that point that's all she wrote. So we have a few weeks here. There could be something and I don't know if you want to use the term miracle, but there could be something unexpected that comes together here. But what's the downside? I keep telling my friends who people who are conservatives who view me as as a fighter but reasonable, which I think is a nice I'll take that that. I'm I fight, but I'm I try to be reasonable. What's the downside

of fighting? Why not make this as difficult for the Democrats as possible? Why not drive them insane? Oppose resist right, hashtag resist. Now it's our turn. Now the shoe is on the other foot. Now we're the ones they're gonna say, slow it all down. Attack with everything we've got, use every advantage we have within this system to defeat the people. The Democrats, Biden who corrupted so thoroughly our entire political system.

You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast from more buck Head to buck Sexton dot com and remember to subscribe to the podcast. The election fight is still under way and it could go all the way to the Supreme Court. Our friend Sean Parnell, former Army ranger and congressional candidate in Pennsylvania, is at the tip of the spear on this one. Sean. Great to have you. Hey, it's great to be back as always, Buck,

thanks for having me. So tell me, tell me where this stands right now, because people are looking still at Pennsylvania and thinking that that may be where the wall is breached on this election. What's going on. Well, look, we brought a just to provide context for listeners or viewers, we brought a lawsuit through the Commonwealth Court, through the PA Supreme Court, and ultimately it ended up at the Supreme Court that that asserts that Acts seventy seven Pennsylvania

is universal. Uh, mail in absentee ballot law is unconstitutional. And look, it is facially unconstitutional. Uh. It's clear. We've been in three courts, as I mentioned, three courts on this, but only one of those three courts has has bothered to even evaluate this case on the merits. And in that instance they said, if plaint tips are likely to move forward on the merits, we will win. That Acts seventy seven is is facially unconstitutional um. So we brought

that case. Uh, it went to the Commonwealth Court where we got a favorable ruling. It went to the PA Supreme Court where they dismissed it on a legal doctrine called latches, basically saying that I brought the lawsuit too late. But here's the here's the here's the kept twenty two that they put us in is that I couldn't have challenged the law any earlier because two hundred years of PA Supreme Court case law says candidates can't challenge elections

prior to them being finished. So I couldn't challenge the constitutionality of Act seventy seven for the election, couldn't challenge it after. And then the PA Supreme Court dismissed it with prejudice and said that essentially I can't ever challenge Acts seventy seven again. So we brought it to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court after hearing both sides of the argument. What they did was dismiss our petition

for injunctive relief. Only right now, what we asked the Supreme Court to do, and this is important, was just temporarily halt the certification of Pennsylvania while we debated the constitutionality of Acts seventy seven on the merricks. Now the PA Supreme Court said, no, we're not going to halt the certification. We're going to allow that to move forward. But the critical piece here is that they did not dismiss our case like so many in the media have reported.

We are allowed to petition for what's called a writ of certiori, which basically is legally ease for we're in the Supreme Court to hear the case on the merits

and back. I think that they have an obligation to step in and rule on the merits because the people of this country deserve some clarity and they deserve to know if the elections that we conducted here in the in the in the Great Commonwealth the Pennsylvania are and deep constitutional, because right now Act seventy seven it's a black letter of the laws, as people say, it's it's clearly unconstitutional. And so this is the way that our

system was intended to work. We're going to the courts for clarity, and so far we haven't had much success with the High Court of Pennsylvania or the Supreme Court, but we're hoping that they'll take up this case and allow for our petition for certiory to pass and eventually rule on the merits sean a view of some sense of what the timeline is on this, because there are a lot of folks who are seeing the days pass on the calendar, and you know, Inauguration Day is going

to be here before we know it. So how how do we view the time situation? Yeah, so we we're going to submit our petition for certiori today. Um, I don't know how long the Supreme Court is going to

take to act on that. The Supreme Court, as I've sort of learned as this process has gone on, the Supreme Court is a is an enigmatic body, you know, and and quite frankly, uh, you know, the nine Supreme Court justices are all very very smart people, and they sort of do things that their own way in their own way, and a lot of people were reading into oh, it's a one sentence denial. Well that's sort of typical. That's that's what they do. And and oh, it's a

nine zero opinion, there were no descents. They don't they don't weigh in on things like that. That the truth is, it could be it could have been a five four decision. We have no idea, and anybody that is reporting it was nine oh with no descentse has no idea either. So m we're hoping that our petition for certiari will be taken up in an expedited waybuck to try to try to give the American people a sense of clarity.

But but I'll add one more thing that the only date that really matters, that it constitutionally matters for the Supreme Court is January twentieth. So again, one of the things that I've learned throughout this process is that the Supreme Court can pretty much do whatever at once with regards to issuing a remedy as long as they follow

the constitution, of course. And so you know, the idea that you know with the media narrative is oh, Parnell wants to throw out two point five million mail in ballance. That that's not at all what we're asking to do. We're simply asking the Supreme Court at this point, the Supreme Court to follow the Constitution of the United States, and so we're still in the fight. Many in the media have reported to the contrary, but we intend to have our petition filed at some point today, hopefully you

can do. Sean Parnell a former Army ranger, current congressional candidate out in Pennsylvania and Western PA, and he's at the forefront of this legal fight. Sean, what would be in your mind a just outcome from the perspective of the Supreme Court with regard to your specific legal challenge. Well, well, it's a great question. I'd love for them to hear him on the merits first, and whatever whatever outcome or whatever whatever ruling that they that they provide, of course

will honor, you know. But I'm the reason why I'm I'm so steadfast in my pursuit of this is because Buck, I believe that Pennsylvania and perhaps our nation is really in the midst of a constitutional crisis. So in Pennsylvania, let's say the Court says, yeah, twenty twenty was messed up. Act seventy seven is unconstitutional. We're going to kick this back to the legislature to fix this problem. You want to pass Act seventy seven, do it the right way,

pass a constitutional amendment. Well, the problem with that course of action, while I would certainly accept it, and while many people believe that would be imminently fair, fix it moving forward, Well, you're gonna have fifty percent of the people in the state of Pennsylvania say, wait a second, the election in twenty twenty was unconstitutional and they'refore illegal. Fifty percent of the people aren't going to be okay

with that. And you know, on the flip side, you know, if the Supreme Court says that yes, Act seventy seven is unconstitutional, therefore any ballots submitted under that system is also unconstitutional, illegal, and we're tossing these ballots, well guess what. That is also a very explosive decision, and the truth of the matter is, but there's really no easy answer here.

What would be what would be covered? Sean just knows what would be covered under that umbrella of Acts seventy seven ballots if the Supreme Court did that, which would be a huge move. What would be covered? Yeah, well, okay, so you know, like any ballot, any no excuse absentee ballot would would if the Supreme Court did that, right, and I really want to say if, because they could

do whatever they want to remedy this situation. Right, if they did, they would just be no excuse absentee ballots, like any absentee ballot that was filled out in accordance with the Pennsylvania Constitution. Like you know, military service is one of the provisions where you can vote. Absentee, having to work, having to be out of town, you're working at a poll when can't vote, all of those provisions are covered under the Pennsylvania Constitution. Those ballots would still count.

So again, anybody out there that's saying, oh, Parnella wants to discount military ballots, that's a lie. That's not true. The only thing we're talking about is no excuse absentee ballots and the reason why this is a dilemma and why two point five million people Democrats, Republicans and independents are fired up about that and guess what they should be. But let's make sure that they're they're focused and putting

the blame in the right spot. We're talking about a general Assembly that passed an unconstitutional law, a governor that signed an I lamented an unconstitutional law, an attorney general and the State of Pennsylvania who failed to appine on the constitutionality of the law at the time that it was passed, and the Secretary of State that manipulated that law the benefit her own party and water down ballot integrity. The blame for disenfranchisement of the people of this commonwealth

rests squarely on the Commonwealth government. And Buck, you know me. You know me for a long time. You know that I'm not a politician. You know that I'm not afraid to stand up to my own party. And that's part of what I'm doing here. For the General Assembly is controlled by Republicans. I'm suing the General Assembly, and I'm suing our radical Democrat governor and our radical Democrat Attorney general.

Right because this is a constitutional issue. The Constitution shields us all from government overreach, Democrat, Republican, and everybody in between. And that's what I'm fighting for. And at the end of the day, Buck, the most important part of the constitutional amendment process in this regard right and changing time, place, and manner of elections here in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

And by the way, Act seventy seven represents the most radical change in our Commonwealth election ever since, since the founding of our country. The most important part of the constitutional amendment process is that the people have a say, And it was it was the it was the intentions of the framers of the PA Constitution to make the

amendment process that way, to give the people say. And also every instance in the state of Pennsylvania upheld by the Supreme Court PA Supreme Court, by the way, every instance of an unconstitutional expansion of absentee ballots, it's been struck down. It's been struck down by the PA Supreme Court. So in order for the PA Supreme Court to even rule against us, that have to overturn one hundred and eighty four years of their own ruling president, which is

why they dismissed us on on a technicality. So I'm in this fight because it's the right thing to do. It's not the easy thing to do, is not what most politicians would do, But we're in this for the people and we're going to continue fighting for them. Speaking of Sean Parnell, Congressional Canidd, he's involved in this lawsuit they're filing today to try to get the Supreme Court to hear it on the merits to see if it is agreed by the court that Acts seventy seven in

Pennsylvania was unconstitutional. Sean, before we let you go, you've mentioned me before that when you check the signatures on ballots that came in from specifically some nursing homes in Western PA, that it was fishy. Do we have any

further information on that? Do we have any confirmation? Because I think one of the big challenges people have is we hear so much in all these affidavits or read and here from witnesses on these affidavits of fraud that they saw but ironclad proof as in one hundred signatures from different ballots that all look the same, that would really be helpful. Where are you in that? Yeah, that's

a that's a great question. And so for your listeners and viewers, we did a random sampling of two thousand ballots here from boar different nursing homes in Beaver County. We did a freedom of information requests to grant access to get access to that information. After looking at it for five minutes, we realized that most of the handwriting was the same and the signatures appeared to be forged. So what we've done, Buck, is we've turned that information

over to the district attorney in Beaver County. He's looking at it. He's asked us a couple of follow up questions to get information on the ballots and where they came from. And if once the district attorney's investigation is done, he'll send it up to the US Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania. And so here's the challenge, Buck, We're in a very short timeline right to certify this election, as you mentioned January twenty, it's going to come around

pretty quickly, right. The problem is it were in a very short timeline and it just takes time to do these investigations. So right now the district attorney here in Beaver County has those ballots and has that evidence, is in the process of conducting an investigation. Hopefully he finishes that investigation soon and sends it to the next level. Hornell, everybody, the man is in the fight. He was when he

was an Afghanistan and now he is back here at home. Sean, my friend, good luck, keep us in keep us in the loop. Okay, yeah, thanks Buck, I appreciate it.