Breonna Taylor Was Not Murdered

passionable intelligence. Make no mistake, you're a great American Again, the Buck Sexon Show begins analyst, he's a great guy. No, welcome, friends to the Buck Sexton Show, and honor and privilege to have you here with me. As always fired up here for the election season, getting ready to see where all of this goes. And I am a little surprised. I'm gonna be honest with you that at a time when there's a to call it a heated election would be quite an understatement, and to call it an acrimonious

Supreme Court battle would also be an understatement. But there's a relative pause here in the main narrative from the left. I think that perhaps, and I've been saying this all along, that my expectation is that they will say completely unhinged, insane things. Let's recall it was not long ago they were accusing the you know, the grown up equivalent of an altar boy of Brett Cavanaugh, that they were accusing him of being a serial gang rapist from high school.

And they will say anything to try to stop Amy Coney Barrett. The problem is their usual attacks, even if they lie, I think they've recognized they're going to have to get really creative with their evil. They're they're going to have to extend themselves, get a little bit to outside their comfort zone with the usual sexist racist. I mean, they could call Amy Coney Barrett a sexist, but I think we all recognize that wouldn't really work all that well.

You know, they could claim that she had, you know, sexually assaulted somebody in high school or college without any evidence or any underlying, believable, credible story whatsoever. But that probably would also be a bad idea. So what are they turning to here and what is this really all about? They're having to go after her Catholicism. Comparing the possible elevation of Coney Barrett to the Supreme Chord as a chapter in a real life version of the Handmaid's Tale.

I'm pretty sure that the Handmaid's Tale they got the whole reference. Isn't it in the Gospel of Luke that Mary says I'm to be a handmaid of the Lord when she is told that she will give birth to Jesus. Anyway, the Handmaid's Tale, that's what they're telling us. It would be if we had the elevation of any Coney Barrett to this Supreme Court seat, and they have the votes. The Republicans have the votes, So the narrative so far

hasn't worked. They're trying to come up with something. I don't know if they really believe that defaming a Catholic for her faith, I mean, for just being a mainstream believing Catholic defaming one is a good idea right before the election, although I will say Catholics who in majority vote Democrat have largely turned into a you know, for a lot of Catholics, I should say their Catholicism is

something more akin to being in the rotary club. You know, it's a little bit more like like a community organizer group where you go twice a year and you know, you tell people you're Catholic, but you don't really believe it, like you don't believe any of that stuff. And there are a lot a lot of those Catholics are going

to vote Democrat. A lot of those Catholics are going to be fine with all of this because they don't take offense to the slandering of their faith, because it's really more of a of a cultural and social tradition for them. But maybe it's gonna back far on them. I can't tell you that. I can't know in advance. I somebody who was raised Roman Catholic and went to Jesuit school and studied for years in school the Scripture

and the New Testament. I'm amazed at how many Catholics think that the Democrats are the ones that really represent their ideals. But nonetheless, that's what ends up, That's what ends up happening. That's the new reality that we all live in here. So they're going to try the process moves, They're going to try to just do what they can to prevent this from happening. As I've said, here's Chuck Schumer saying that they're going to use tools to delay this.

Play twelve. Do you believe that you have tactical options to slow them down. Yes, A, we have tactical options to slow them down. We will use every tool in the tool kit. Now, admittedly McConnell has changed things to change the rules, so we have fewer tools and they're less sharp, but every tool we have we will use. I mean, what are they going to do. They're going to try to prevent access to the building. I think

that's a very a very likely pathway here. You know, the activists, the Democrat stormtroopers, they're they're the ones it'll make sure that people can't actually show up and vote on this. They're going to say, well that this is a terrible day for women's rights. Isn't an amazing The Democrats argue consistently that the elevation of an eminently qualified mother of seven to the Supreme Court is somehow a

loss for women. Yes, modern feminism has done so much for women, hasn't It negated huge parts of who they are and undermined motherhood. But anyway, I mean, that's that's not new. We've been saying that for a long time. I only wish that people would wake up to this reality. They really, they really want to force as many women as possible. And look, women should be allowed to choose

whatever their destiny. If they don't, if they don't want to get married enough kids, great, you're allowed to do that, of course. And if you want to be a person who's only chasing a that's fine. But a lot of women that I know have been pressured into being little cubicle warriors, you know, trying to make partner at the at the you know, the city law firm or something, and they're miserable. They're absolutely miserable because they don't have time to have a family, they don't have time to

raise kids. They're doing these things. But if you even say that out loud, people shout at you. Oh, you're like one of the bad people in the Handmaid's Tale. Or this is the same way that the left has. They have a few cultural cultural analogies that they like to make, or that they have a few cultural references that will come up constantly in politics. They love Harry Potter and they love The Handmaid's Tale. Those are the two things. I don't know other people like Harry Potter too,

but they're the liberals need to read another book. But I think that they're going to do everything that they can to frighten people around Amy Coney Barrett, and it's not gonna work, but it does create a frenzied state of mind for the Democrat base, so that then they're more willing to do the insane things that Chuck Schumer can't say out loud, can't tell people they're going to do or they should do, but he is hoping that they will, and then they're just going to say things

that are obviously factually wrong. I mean, here's CNN's Allison Camarada, for example, making a claim that anybody with a passing familiarity with our legal system and the constitution would know is not really an accurate statement. Play three. I think one of the interesting discussions about abortion is that the country is generally divided, I mean almost split right in half about how they view it. However, in the latest Gallop polls, twenty percent of the country, Oh, I should say,

only twenty percent of the country wants to outlaw it. Okay, So you can feel differently about the different nuances of it, but only twenty percent wants to outlaw it. And that's ultimately, you know, obviously, what would happen if Roe versus Wade, we're done way with and so it's just interesting. I mean, obviously we're seguing into a political stance here, but if the country does, you know, would support the direction that

this is going in. She left out that eighty percent of the country believes that third term abortion should be illegal, or maybe it's seventy some odd percent now, but huge majority of the country thinks that third term abortion should be illegal. Europe, which is a very progressive place, Europe,

has restrictions on abortion. Most eurowe depends on the European country, but there are European countries where, you know, the first trimester you're allowed to but beyond that they say that this you know, the science, this is the European argument. I mean, the real argument is life at conception, but the European argument in these states would be that pain and consciousness because of the development of the fetus has reached a stage where four months in and this is

a baby. Obviously Democrats won't admit that, No, it's not a baby, it's something else. It's just a clump of cells that's growing that looks a lot like a human that has a heart and a brain. But what she says about how it would obviously be outlawed is obviously untrue. There would be some states that outlawed. There would be some places that don't want abortion to happen, but there'd be other states. It would become a states issue, which makes a whole lot more sense than the Roe v.

Wade decision. And then you'd have places where there was this practice going on, you'd have other places where there wasn't. Federal funding would probably have to change. You wouldn't have federal funding for clinics that do abortion. So I mean, it would be a huge victory for the pro life movement, obviously, no question about that. But it wouldn't be illegal everywhere. But they're just going to say things like it would

be illegal well where where specifically? And I think that you know, California and the morality, for example, in New York and California of its abortion practices would feel very different to a lot of the residents if they couldn't force Texas and Alabama and Wyoming to also have abortion right, if they couldn't force these other states to do it

under federal law. So there's also that there's the creeping fear of, oh my gosh, what if people can actually stop and think about what has been going on and who has been supporting this, and how grotesque and immoral it is. But this is the most they can do. It's really all about Row. I mean, the people that say Amy Coney Barrett is such a setback for women and that they're all terrified about her more than anything else. It's Roe v. Wade, which is now a plank in

the Democrat Party. It's really essential to the Democrat ethos in a way where I don't think that they can handle the prospect of not having that horrible Supreme Court decision in place. I think it emotionally damages and drains them just to think about it. But they haven't come up yet with the Amy Coney Barrett destruction routine. They haven't shown us their hand. I'm wondering what it will be.

Perhaps it will just be process. They'll be Catholic bashing, they'll be anti women stuff, of course, But maybe it really is just they're pulling the fire alarms in Congress and forming human chains at the front door and hoping that does it. You're in the freedom mind. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Justice Ruth Vader Gigsburg lived an inspiring life. She paved the way for women in the law, and America warns the passing of the true

public servant. The Constitution of the United States provides that the President shall appoint judges to the Supreme Court. And before the week is out, after we honor the life and memory of Justice Ginsburg, President Donald Trump will do just that. This Saturday, President Donald Trump will nominate another principled conservative, a woman, to the Supreme Court of the United States. And after the United States Senate fulfills their duty to advise and consent, we're going to fill that seat.

They're going to fill the seat, folks. I gotta say, I'm pleased that the Republicans really never missed a moment. I think there are a couple of things that come together on this one. One is that by filling, by filling the seat, they are likely more likely to keep their seats. So this is one of those great moments where political self interest coincides with the supposed policy preferences of the Republican Party, right with the obligation to voters

that the Republican Party has. So what's best for our Republican politicians is also best for the people. Who voted for them. Look at that. It's amazing how that comes together.

That's that's very encouraging. It. It does not seem at all to me like there's going to be some wavering on the part of Republicans and mccollins and Murkowski they can duck out and you know, this may be this may be an instance, this may be a sort of kumstance where you say, well, let's let them do that, or I should say, not not be too hard on punishing them, because we'd rather have Colins and Murkowski than a Democrat, and they don't want to lose reelection, so

they're taking this more moderate path. But you just remember you can't trust them though, so they're going to be Republicans you can't really count on. It's better than a Democrat, but not not much. Mid Romney. I was very hard on him in the first twenty four hours when well, to be fair, there was an announcement that came out from someone close to Romney. According to the media, I

think they tried to set the narrative beforehand. I think something was going on here because there was an announcement that said that mid Romney was not going to vote on a Supreme Court nominee until after the election, or you know, would not think that was appropriate. And then the Romney camp, such as it is, said no, no, no, that's not true. So something something happened there for sure. But that was why I initially thought Romney was going

to make Benedict Arnold look like a team player. Turns out even Romney seems like he's going to hold the line play for I think there's some perception on the part of some writers and others that, to you, what happened with Merrick Garland was unfair. I don't agree with that. I don't know whether you think it was a good decision or not, but it wasn't unfair because it was consistent with history, it was consistent with precedent, it was

consistent with the Constitution. So the idea that the Merrick Garland decision was unfair and therefore it has to be made up by doing something which also wouldn't make a lot of sense, which is saying to President Trump, you can't get your nominee either. That just doesn't follow for me that Garland decision was consistent with history. The decision to proceed with the new nominee is also consistent with history and precedent. And that's where I come out. Yeah,

my friends, mid Romney's correct. Here. Look at this, the Americ Garland thing. Not the same situation, folks, Not the same deal. It's very straightforward. There's no reason that they can try to pretend. And sorry, Democrats, elections have consequences. The one thing Obama said, the one quote from Obama that I gotta say, is useful and true. So what is one of our maximus on this show. We give credit where it's due, and we're giving credit to Mit on this one so far, and we're gonna give credit

to even Barack Obama for elections got consequences. Yes, it is obvious, but it is true. So I think that we are going to go forward here and the Libs, I will say, watching them squirm over this one. They're just so upset about this. Oh my gosh, they're gonna have a conservative Supreme Court and it's not even gonna be that conservative. You see here, here's the problem. And I want to I want to say this before we start making fun of more silly Libs. Because of what

a conservative's judicial philosophy is. We don't get as much perceived or actual political value out of a Supreme Court. We don't want a super legislature of the Supreme Court. That's not what I'm advocating for. That's not what those of you listening to this show want. Maybe some of you want that, but I mean, generally speaking, that's not what we want, because all we're asking for is that there are judges who understand the law and apply the law based upon what it says and what the intent

of the Constitution has written with its amendments. Is not that they have something they prefer and then they shoehorn that into a dishonest, pseudo legal framework to give people the policy outcome that they prefer. That's legislation, that's not the judicial the judicial realm. And that's why I think, you know, as conservatives, it's not like we're gonna get We're gonna get a Supreme Court that says, Okay, you're gonna have universal concealed carry across the country in every jurisdiction,

which I think we should have. But and you're gonna you know that they're gonna have a flat tax only of fifteen percent, and we're gonna you know, that would be great, that would be great, but it's not gonna happen, right, we don't. We don't have a conservative Supreme Court is not a magic wand for conservative policies. So so liberals should really chill out a little bit about this. But the problem is a liberal leading Supreme Court is a

magic wand for their desired outcomes and policies. So they're losing that. It's like a kid that's take having his favorite toy taken away. They're look, I want it back. They're so sad about this. Too bad. Elections have consequences, too bad. But that's the key difference you're gonna see here. So in the on the one hand, I want to tell all the Democrats and liberals out there just calm down. Okay, the world's not gonna end. It's actually gonna be a

better place. But they won't like it as much. But the law will be the law. That's all we want. We want the law to be fair and applied evenly and equally and morally, not to have it be some scam to make Chuck and Nancy happy. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts. The iHeart radio app or wherever you get

your podcasts. So Rebublicans are committed to forcing a conservative justice onto the court forty two days before the election, someone who could destroy the Affordable Care Act and overturn Row and strike down carbon pollution legislation the Democrats might pass in the future, then you just have to make those Republicans pay the political price, every single cent of it, because every single vote makes a difference for what the universe of the possible is going to be going forward.

And that counts for election night and whether the election night is close and they try to steal it through the courts and the Supreme Court justice they just confirmed, and that pertains to whether the Democrats can add justice as to the Supreme Court at the election, or grant statehood to DC in Puerto Rico, adding new senators, or anything else. All of those discussions depend upon maximizing the short term political price over the next forty days so

that it can pay off one term. That should be the plan. No one can lose sight of that. I just love listening to the Libs panic over this stuff. It's really enjoyable. I just want to make a montage of Libs in a frenzy around how they think America is over because we don't have Ruth Bader Ginsburg anymore to hold up the far left agenda in the Supreme Court. It's not true. It's gonna be okay. America is gonna

be okay, folks, despite what they may be saying. But they often transition immediately into telling us what they really believe, which is that they just they need more power so that they can use power against the other side. They will in the same sentence, they'll they'll in the same breath. It feels like, say that Republicans don't respect norms, so give us more power so we can destroy all the norms like a like a child that's, you know, gotten a little sand in his eye from somebody playing with

a toy near them in the sandbox. The liberal response is, now they're going to run over there and and bash the kid on the head with their little plastic pail right there. They want to they want to escalate, so they claim outrage at the initial minor. It's not even an infraction, but we'll call it an infraction. They're they're what they're doing, what the Republicans are doing is one hundred percent legitimate legal within the rules. You know, that's it.

I mean, if somebody were to claim after a Super Bowl that, hey, we missed that we missed that final field goal because they tried to they ice the kicker with a time out beforehand. That's not fair, that doesn't count. People would laugh at them, right, they'd say, no, those are the rules, right, those are the rules. This is about having an adult perception, an adult view of life, and liberalism is a refuge for a lot of people

from that. They think that there's some some emotional safe space that they create through these left wing echo chambers of the media and Hollywood and academia, where they don't have to grapple with what is a reality that they find uncomfortable. They'll just negate it. They'll come up with narratives that pretend that what has happened has not happened. Oh okay, that those aren't really the rules, that there's some price that has to be paid by Republicans for

all that. It's nonsense. It's done. Say, look, if they want to advocate for more power for the left, of course, that is politics, that is the very very heart of our system. Fine, go for it. But to pretend that

there's some grave injustice that has been done here. No, what's really happened is we've lifted up the rock of our system and looked underneath and seen a lot of kind of creepy, crawley, unsettling stuff about our judicial system, which the liberals have weaponized and used to their advantage for political purposes for decades. I'm conservative, sit around. I mean, I have to sit here and say in a Rov.

Wade is bad law. It is an indefensibly dishonest application of the law and a Supreme Court precedent with massive implications for the country. And we just sit here and you know, okay, hopefully one day we'll overturn go through, we go through the system. And that's just one of many,

many examples. I mean, I want to take it all the way back to Wickard v. Filburn, where they're saying, effectively, commerce of any kind has to be interstate commerce because even intrastate commerce affects interstate commerce, and therefore you can regulate all commerce at a federal level. That's the decision that has been the many headed hydra of judicial will overreach for now going on one hundred years. I mean, it goes back to World War two era, I believe.

So that's a terrible decision, But that's another one that needs These are things that need to be revisited, right, these are areas, and yes, with it Obamacare, all though, with Justice robertson the court, I think out of a collegial and professional deference to that Bush pick Oh, I thought Bush was going to give us great judges. Nope, Nope, not so much. Who could have thought that Roberts would really just be the second incarnation of Justice Kennedy? Who

could have thought that that? Well as some people, I think, we're worried about it at the time. But and even Gorsetch with the LGBTQ decision based on the Civil Rights Act, I mean, you know, even Gorsetch gets a little bit of a progressive impulse to do what he thinks should be done instead of what the law says is to be done. But they're they're back back to the limp panic. I think it's fascinating and it's very entertaining. It's very it's very fun to watch them as they continue on

with this nonsense. And here's an example. Because they've now I think, woken up to they can whine about it as much as they want. But the Supreme Court thing, this is happening, right like they have the votes, It's gonna happen. Trump's gonna name the justice on Saturday. Now, I'm not saying what I've told you, of course. I mean my other prediction is they're gonna try to do

physical blocks of this. I mean they're going to try to just do something to shut down the system, not to use the rules within it, but to actually just override the system of the United States Congress and the Senate and the confirmation process. So I'm not saying they've given up, but they spend a couple of days you're not gonna hear a lot more about it was her dying wish. It was Ruth Bader Ginsberg's last wish. We're hearing that for forty eight hours. Who cares I do?

I cares zero. Every other rational, well adjusted American cares zero. That is not a thing that that does not matter. Right, this should be like me telling the irs. You know, uh, you know, my uncle Mortimer over here says that I don't have to pay taxes, So that was his last wish. Sorry, no, that's a nothing. No one cares, So they're gonna have to let that one go. That's gonna be, that's gonna be dropped by the wayside. I think, dude, like it was the last wish, no, no no, and the assaults,

which is why I mean I disagree. Some Republicans are saying, oh, we should have I should say some commentators on the writer saying we should have a different shouldn't be any Coney Barrett. It shouldn't have to be a woman. No, no, we want a woman if we want this to happen. Because I know this will sound crazy, but you have to remember we're dealing with crazy here. The left has

gone nuts. They're not rational, they're not reasonable, they don't care if we put forward a male Supreme Court justice. They would absolutely run the Cavanall playbook over again. They would try to would they would accuse this whoever. It doesn't.

You can find any judge, any judge anywhere, any conservative judge anywhere the country who's a man, and they would find someone to come forward and say he raped me, he sexually assaulted me, he abused me, and that person who, just like the ones who came out against Cavanaugh, would think that she was doing a great service for women to save Roe v. Wade, completely justifying the lie. Son wouldn't feel even the least bit like she was being

a political hatchet woman. And what she's doing is grotesque and horrific. No would think that she's a hero. Oh remember, why would Christine blasi Ford come forward? That was what they were saying. Why would Christine because she wants to be a hero to the left. No, she does. She risks everything and gains nothing. I remember that in twenty eighteen.

I remember people saying that, and I and you can check this when although I guess you have to dig through some of the tweets, you listen to those early shows. I was like, Christine blasie Ford is not telling the truth, folks. She's either confused or just a liar, but she's wrong very early on. And I will say that that process also for a lot of conservatives. I wouldn't say it radicalized us, but it stealed our courage a bit. It showed us that anybody could be Supreme Court now Supreme

Court Justice then nominee Kavanaugh. That the Libs, in their lust for power, would do this to the people that you respect and love the most. And not feel of moments for more so, for it, do you're conservative, whatever has to be done to stop you, to ruin you, is fair game. There's no morality, no decency, no no honor that would prevent a Democrat from doing what they did to Kavanaugh. They've never backed away from it, they've never apologized for it. It It was the most grotesque political

character assassination I have ever seen. It was all lies, and that was That was a sea change I think in the thinking of a lot of people on the right. This is why also like the never trumpers, these people they but wait a bat, we mean, I mean the Goldberg French article that now everyone's kind of just laughing at. I mean, those guys, I'm sorry there. It's just weak. It's just weak tea. It's it's it's not it's not

intellectually worthy, it's not morally worthy. It's just they've boxed themselves into a position, these never trumpers, and now they'll desperately try to use, to use the most eloquent prose they can to be pusillanimous backstabbers to their own side. That's what really happens here with the never trumpers today. And it's It's sad, but it's true because if you saw what happened with Cavin, I mean, there's just no justification for that. It can never be okay and it

should never be forgotten. And a lot of us remember that's why when the Libs cry over this, our response over the possible elevation of Amy Coney Barrett, I think it's who it will be when the Libs cry over at our response is crime Moor. Libs. They earned this, They earned this. And I also remember when people were saying that it was sexist and wrong to even suggest during the Obama presidency that Ruth Bader Ginsburg may be too old, maybe time to retire. The Libs said no,

they would not give up their superstar hero RBG. And now they're paying the price for that decision. You know, elections have consequences. Decisions have consequences. The decision to go after Kavanaugh, the decision to keep RBG in place, well beyond I mean, how many cancer treatments, how many health scares was she able to have before reasonable people would just say, look, they're three hundred and thirty million Americans. I don't think we have to have somebody as the

Supreme court justice. There's a lot of good judges in the country. Nope, they wouldn't let it go. The cult of personality would not allow it. We had to hear about not only is she the greatest jurists that the liberals have ever come across in their lifetime, but we had to hear about the all the overhead presses and burpies, and that there was this creepy cult of RBG that they created. It was it was weird. It was weird. She was right about Kaepernick, I will say that said

the Kaepernick protests were basically stupid and disrespectful. She was a smart lady. There's a smart lady, There's no question about that. I just think she's wrong on some critical moral issues of our time. She was smart. But now now it's just ram at home time, folks. May it happen. Get ready for what the other side's gonna do. Though. What makes me uncomfortable is just that I can't I know they're going to do something so sickening and underhanded

to try to stop this. It just makes me comfortable because I can't see what it is yet, because they really have so few options that nothing within the realm of sanity would be acceptable, possible, or sufficient. So what would a crazy Lib do to stop Amy Coney Barrett from becoming an ex Supreme Court justice. That's the question we have to ask to understand what the Democrats are going to do next. You're in the Freedom Hud, this

is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Well, I don't want to talk about who I'm meeting with, but I've spoken to many and we're getting close to a decision. We're gonna be doing it on Saturday. We're gonna be meeting on Saturday. A lot of paperwork to do, and I think it's going to go very quickly. Go ahead, part Oh, I don't think so. I will det nine justices. You did that with the unsolicited millions of ballas at this ending, it's a scam, it's a hoax. Everybody knows

that they really aren't doing everything they can. The Democrats are doing everything that they can conceive of to undermine the sanctity, integrity, reliability of this election and also of our very processes of government. And what's pretty astonishing, but I think very obvious, is that they do this knowing, knowing that it's going to send the country down a

very dark path if Trump wins. Right, they understand that they're making these decisions right now, not because they think Trump is going to cheat, but they worry Trump is going to win. It's not the same thing, and they want to have some excuse. They want to have some mechanism for agitation, just like Marxist. Right, what's the most important thing. It's not that you have solutions. It's not

that you have good ideas. It's that you know how to exploit people's frustrations, envy, their agitation at their own failures and at other people's successes. That's all you need. And Trump's success here and getting reelected will drive them insane. Now is it going to happen? I you know that I'm putting everything that I've got into this. But it ain't over until the zoftig female vocalist sings, so we shall have to see. And I did appreciate Keilly mcinenny.

She said this yesterday. It's it's exactly what I did my show. And later on the day I see Kelly mcinenny is saying the same thing about Don Lemon. You know, Kelly's an old friend of mine now almost a decade. Here's what you said about that the LIB plans here play nine. Democrats cannot win their argument on the merits, they cannot win on president, so they must search and destroy. John Lemon said the quiet part out loud last night.

He said this, We're going to have to blow up the entire system if the president does his job as outlined in the Constitution. That's the difference between Republicans and Democrats. We fight to protect the system, We fight to protect the constitution. When Democrats say out right, we are going to blow up the entire system because we do not get our way. This president will proceed undaunted by Democrat threats. President Trump will fulfill his duty. President Trump will appoint

the next Supreme Court justice. President Trump will protect religious liberty. President Trump will protect our freedom of speech. President Trump will protect our Second Amendment under this president, and our rights will be upheld, our Constitution safeguarded, and this president will fill that. Kayley's been in a great job as

Press secretary, and she's laying it down there. Why is it that when the left is upset, we all just assume that there will be riots, that bad things will happen, and that that doesn't filter into our broader political conversations about maybe there's a political party here that needs a major rethink, realignment, needs to spend some time and introspection. It's not the Republicans. Folks. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast,

the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Oh my god, I don't know. We won't call them fascist comments, fascist fascism, fascists, called fascism, fascism, fascist, fascist, notions of fascism, xenophobic, racist, ste magogue racist, sexist, xenophobic, autocratic, and fascistic. Donald Trump is a fascist one like a fascist or a tyrant or an autocrat fascist Rhederick, fascist language fascists. I'm glad

that you're starting talking about fascist Hitler, fascist Rhederick. He's talking the way fascist taught autocratic fascist in Nazi Germany before the rise of Hitler, fascist language Hitler, fascist Hitler, Hitler, Hitler, Hitler, hill Hitler, Hitler Hitler from what Ado Hitler preached in the early thirties. Let's just say it once and for all, you know, Morning Joe really is for people with ninety

five IQs who think they have won twenty IQs. But in case you didn't already know that, I hope that's supercut of what they talk about on Morning Joe or they're discussing Donald Trump. I just I saved you. I don't know that shows on for like three four hours in the morning. You know it's sitting around Joe Scarborough, Wax and Philosophical and MSNBC. That's right, just doing the little dance for the Libs. Oh, Joe is a Republican, but now he's seen the light. Do your little dance

for the Libs. Joe, do what they want like a little puppet, little Mary in that. Oh, they pay you very well. Who needs integrity? Who needs to stand for something? To care about something? Oh? Oh, I'm sorry. It's all because of Trump. Scarborough and Mika were super buddy buddy with Trump while he was running for president, but then he decided he didn't like him so much, so now it's he's a fascists, what frauds. All the worst people

in America TV journalist. They really are the worst. The worst, the most worthless, the most worthless as compared to their pay scale are TV journalists and the most replaceable and yet most arrogant at the same time, it's it's pretty amazing, pretty Summark. Where did that super cut even come from? Of that's that was great? It's going to give it a How do we know? I believe Tom Elliott from grabyan oh gramy okay, because because that's a great one.

Just fascism, always a fascist, always a fascist, always a fascist. How is Donald How are we even having this conversation anymore? Donald Trump is a fascist because of what exactly? Because he sounds like a fascist? How is that true? Like? What are they even saying? It's just it's just words fascism for the left, which, as we know, fascism is a ideology that shares the same roots. It's a collective of ideology, shares the same roots of communism and the

fascists and the communists. We're fighting over the same recruits in the nineteen thirties and into the nineteen forties, and you know, there's just there's not you know, democratic socialism is what the fascists in Nazi Germany were, we're called. Nonetheless, they say this, It reminds me. There's a movie from

the nineteen eighties. I think I think it might be a wit Stillman movie called Barcelona, and there's an American who's like a naval attache, who's clearly a Reagan style Republican and and he walks around and these these left wing Spaniards, because Spain is very left wing at the time. They're all these countries, European countries that you know, are much less impressive now than they were three, four or five hundred years ago, and they want to blame somebody,

so that they tend to blame America. That's there's that grease. It's definitely true, and grease hasn't been that awesome. And oh god, going back now a couple of thousand years, uh, you know, but you go back to uh to the Barcelona movie, and they just walk around a people call an American who wears a military uniform. They just say fascist. Fascist. That became the the political slam that they would throw

around that and it was true for a while. People would just say fascist is a word that has used to mean I think your politics are ugly and I don't like you, But that's not what fascism actually is. So so I think it's interesting that they complain about the demagoguery of the other side, or they say that Trump is a demagogue, is a demagogue and of course a fascist. But then they use terms that are inaccurate to describe a guy that they don't like, just because

they're sparing them effectively, that's what they're doing. But this is all part of the crime. More lib phenomenon, cry more lib as we should say to them about Amy Coney Barrett. And and I'm going to say this, I plan on being a sore winner if we are victorious in this reelection. I'm not gonna say, oh, it's okay, Libs, you know you'll get them next time. And we're all Americans and everything else. No, I mean, we all are Americans and the country is going to be better off

if Trump wins. But no sympathy, no sympathy for the Libs. If they lose politically, right, like I said, they get they get the benefit of living in a country that will be wealthier, better, more rule of law, base, more prosperous, so they'll be safer, they'll be wealthier, they'll be treated equally under the law under Trump presidency more than they would under Biden presidency. So that's why I don't feel sorry for them, because it's just an emotional state that

will be violated for them all, it's all psychological. It's not based in reality. And of course they are left wing interests and things that won't benefit as much fro Trump winning. But I mean, you're average American, even if they don't know it would be better off with Trump as president for former years. Joe Biden is a loser. Democrats have known this for decades. But Hillary was Hillary was supposed to be there their dynasty for eight years, and we know this. They tried, she lost to Obama.

They tried again, she lost to Trump. Right, it was all it was all on a Hillary, and they didn't have a bench that they could go to, so they put forward this guy who's you know, it's like they've brought a journeyman professional uh you know, basketball player at a retirement and everyone's like, look, the guy's got two bad knees. He was never that good to begin with, and they're saying, no, let's make him the franchise player of a brand new expansion team. He's worth twenty million

dollars a year. And we're looking at them like, you guys are nuts. We know who this guy is. This guys is impressive. Why would we I mean, this is the There are so many fundamental questions that Democrats can't

answer today that they should be forced to answer. Why would why would democrats expect us to believe that a presidential candidate who had run three times previously and who was a third tier even fourth tier candidate, then now when he's passed his prime too old for the job, clearly show signs of slowing down election, now he should be the lead of the free world. This, I mean, he's just a retread. I mean, this is a a rebrand of a weak brand. Whatever works, whatever works, That's

all you're going to hear. And the way they plan to get this done is merely by saying over and over again that Trump is a fascist and that he's basically Hitler. And meanwhile, the people that are telling you if you don't wear a mask constantly, including outdoors, for which there is no scientific evidence to support that that's a good idea. None doesn't exist, They can't have there's not a single study that shows there is any considerable risk.

Whatso not one outdoors doesn't exist. Walk around New York City right now, ninety five percent of people on the street are wearing masks outside by themselves, and people say, oh buck, but maybe it's more No, it's not more convenient. It's annoying and uncomfortable. They're doing it because they've been brainwashed. All right, I keep my mask in my back pockets that if I have to go into a store or something,

I can, and so I do. But in that environment where we have such an abuse of science, such an abuse of these they're claiming that Trump is the fascist. If he had even authoritarian tendencies, never mind an actual authoritarian design on the future of this country. He was given the greatest opening imaginable for that, a pandemic disease

that they say he didn't take seriously enough. Trump could have been the one to say, federal executive order, shut down the following businesses, federal executive order from from the White House, from the desk of the President, everyone has to do X, Y and Z, you know, and he didn't. I mean, some things obviously, shut down the travel but I'm talking about really oppressive tactics to deal with this virus, including counterproductive ones. The most oppressive voices during this have

been Democrats all along. Some Republicans have gone along with them, but the people pushing for the most draconian, scientifically unsupported responses to this virus have been Democrats. But they call Trump the fascist. Look, ultimately, it's just there. They don't like him, and so they're going to say terrible things about him. Whether they're true or not doesn't matter in

the least to them. They simply do not care. They'll say anything that they think will work in the public mind to make him seem like a bad person, a person of bad character who's done a bad job. The words are almost irrelevant. You know. They could call him, you know, a stupid potty head or something, and you know, like like a third like a three year old, you know, a stupid silly you know whatever. I can't even think

of what three year olds say. But you know what I'm saying, I mean, they could they have the same effect. I mean, this is what they're doing. It's just what I don't like Trump. I don't like Trump. Uh. You know. John Heilman another one of these lib journals. He's just sort of clinging to a form of relevance. And now that people know more about the world, I think than know that they should not listen to people like this. Here's what he says about Trump play five, and someone

commented the quo was nice. Death culture got there at GLP, and that really is. I mean, this is the other thing. It goes back to another, like said one of the core I mean it really does. I'm using a phrase like death cults about one of the great American political parties in our nation's history. To say that we would have one seemed hyperbolic, But it increasingly does feel like the Republican Party has become a death cult and it's

all about Donald Trump. And I do think again, one of the things that sets Trump apart, like what are the things that set Trump apart from every other president? The pathology of the lying, the cruelty of not taking this, you know, not making the virus central when any other president of any party that we've ever experienced in our lifetimes would have made the virus friends center. Republicans are a death cult. Yeah, we want people to die. Sure,

we don't care about people dying. Where did the most people die from this pandemic? Per capita? Blue states run by Democrats, where Democrats are in charge of state and local health authorities and Democrats are in charge of setting policies new York, New Jersey, Massachusetts the worst hit place. Illinois, Michigan the worst hit places by COVID nineteen. Democrats in charge.

But Trump is running the death cult. Governor Cuomo sends thousands of seniors with COVID nineteen back into their nursing homes by order of the state, creating a huge spike in deaths in those nursing homes from COVID. But Trump is running a death cult because of what decision that he made exactly. Oh, his rhetoric or his tone or

it's pathetic, isn't it. Their arguments are just garbage. You're in the Freedom This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast charges today in the case involving Brianna Taylor, a EMT who was killed in Louisville, Kentucky, back in March. This case has gotten a tremendous amount of attention from the media. You've seen celebrities like Lebron James, I mean huge, you know, followings on social media have a have taken a lot of time to focus on this case. Here's

what we know after today. There are three officers involved in this raid. It was it was executing a search warman. We shouldn't call it a raid. It was executing a search warrant. And we have been told that it was a no knock, a no knock raid, that was what they said. Turns out that wasn't true. They did knock, the police did announce their presence, so they banged the

door and said police open up. And then a guy involved here, Kenneth Walker, who was believed to perhaps alleged to be involved in the drug trade, he shot at those officers. The officers return fire, and in returning fire, they accidentally hit Brianna Taylor. Look, it's a tragedy, all right. That woman did not deserve to get shot at all. That was not a It was not justified in the sense that she posed any kind of a threat and

that the officers meant to shoot her. But she was in the line of fire for officers who were returning fire because one of the officers was shot by Briannic Taylor's boyfriend. So here we have a case where the cops say open up, police, then they enter after giving notice of their and some guy pulls out a gun and shoots an officer. What do we expect the officers to do? What is the you know, what does the mob and we're preparing for riots across the country now

because of this case. What are we demanding of police officers in this circumstance? How many of them have to get shot before they return fire? Now, we're really to believe that this guy, Kenneth Walker, didn't know that these were cops. Three am. They're knocking on the door, they're saying police, and he opens up start shooting. You know, there is a culpability here for not knowing who you're shooting at two, meaning who you're attempting, who you're trying

to shoot. The problem on the other end here is that police, in trying to return fire on Kenneth Walker, hit a bystander in this case. Now, there are charges that have come from this, and I'm trying to read into this because it's just it's just just breaking today, breaking now. Actually as I'm as I'm addressing you with this and I'm trying to make sure that I get these these correctly. But there are three charges of effectively

reckless endangerment from one of the officers. From what I understand, it's that they're saying he fired his weapon too many times under the circumstances and endangered other people. It's a Class D felony, could go to prison for five years. So really this is they wanted to charge an officer with something so that they could say that they put charges out there because people are so you're so upset about the death of this woman, and look, it is just be very clear about this. It is a tragedy

that Brianna Taylor died. Okay, it is a tragedy. This young woman died. It was it was an accident. It was a tragic accident. These law enforcement officers were not trying to shoot her. They were returning fire and she was. It was in a dark hallway in an apartment building and she got hit. And you know, the family is going to receive a large I believe actually already has received a large payment from a city of Louisville. I mean,

this should not have happened. But to say that the officers involved were criminal, were racist, were were murderers, which is what we've been led to believe by the media for a long time here, right, this is part this has been a BLM rallying cry over Brianna Taylor for months. It is not the case. It is simply not the case that they murdered this woman, that it was excessive

or brutal force. It was exactly what I described to you, police returning fire legitimately, and the Black Attorney General for Kentucky said exactly that it was a justified use of force from police officers to open fire on Kenneth Walker. So you know, this is just a question of you know, what are you supposed to expect. What are the officers going to do now? The charges against them, the charges against them, or rather against one officer, two of the

officers are facing no charges. I mean to me, this is just they want to say that they found a criminal charge here. And this is a troubling precedent that keeps getting set in different places across the country, where because the mob is so upset, let's at least give

them something, let's charge to play kate the mob. We saw this in that terrible case in Omaha where there was a lawful self defense and the individual there, Gardner, was essentially fed to the angry mob, I mean, fed to the wolves over this one because it was a black BLM protester who attacked him, and the mob doesn't doesn't want anyone to think they're allowed to defend themselves against the tactics of BLM, so they brought in a

special prosecutor. Here we have the Kentucky ag saying we're going to charge these men even though officers Mattingly and Cosgrove, I'm sorry, we charge a man one officer, even though officers Mattingly in Cosgrove were justified in their use of force because the third officer fired, you know, fired too too many rounds. I mean, put a reckless endangerment charge. Come on, we know what this is, folks, putting a criminal charge on someone to try to mollify the mob,

and you know what, it's not going to work. Get ready for mayhem, because that's what the left does. Thanks for listening to the Remember just subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Let's get a view from the front lines of the fight. Friends. We now have Congressman Matt Gates with us. He is the well, of course congressman from down in Florida, also podcast host. He's got a new book out, Firebrand Dispatches

from the front Lines of the Maga Revolution. He is, indeed on those front lines congressman. Great to have you on. Oh thanks for having me. Buck. Let's start with this man, because you're in DC right now, You're you're in the Capitol. There are protests going on, more stuff expected. What do you think is going to be happening on Capitol Hill while we have this super intense election and then monumentally fierce battle over a Supreme Court seat going on at

the same time. Well, you know, the Michael Bloomberg political operation wrote a memo that had a few things in it that were right. One is that it's very difficult to convince people to vote for Joe Biden, that there needs to be a modelization effort more than a persuasion effort. They view that as a losing battle. And also that Donald Trump is likely to win the vote on election day.

And so the entire scenario you see playing out from the legal vector to kind of the street theater that you see going on, you know, just outside the window where I am right now, is that they want to create space between Donald Trump's election day win and some other moment to try to deprive him of the presidency or undermine the legitimacy of his presidency. And during the

pendency of that period of time. They want to create confusion over mail in ballots when they were postmarked, what can be counted, and the hopes that that will allow them to take power even if it is not that which is vested to their political operation on election day as a result of the electoral College. So I think we're in that dire a circumstance and I think that it just shows how transformational President Trump is that these

are the links they're going to. And we've seen reporting that the Bloomberg operation is spent a lot of money to pay off I mean, you're a conection from Florida's you know the political scene down there as well as the national level. Very well, they're spending money. Bloomberg is spending money to pay off the debts of convicted felons as part of this mobilization. What can you tell us about that? Yeah, well, not all convicted felons, like not

if you're white, Buck. So they have written memos identifying specific racial and like voter propensity segments of the felon population that are trying to get their rights restored, and they're going and paying off those specific things to try to incentivize the vote. Now, that's a very dangerous thing

to do. It's a felony in the state of Florida to either directly or indirectly offer something of value in exchange for someone altering their voting behavior, not even who they would vote for or not, but whether they would vote or not. And in this case, you literally have the Bloomberg political operatives writing the confession saying that they are doing these payoffs for these political outcomes. I've encouraged our state Attorney General to direct the statewide prosecutors started

an investigation. She says she's on top of it, and so I'm hopeful that we'll be able to determine if this is even legal what's going on, because let me just tell you something. If Sheldon Addelson was like forgiving casino debt for people that we're going to go vote for Donald Trump, they would be storm in his house like it was Roger Stone. To point out that is a terrifying thought. By the way, it's like a zero dark thirty moment. All of a sudden, they come in

through the windows. They're repelling in with the MP fives to get Roger Stone. Of course, as we know, very very different when there's a Democrat who is in the government's crossairs. Tell us what you're expecting here for how they can block the Amy Coney Barrett nomination. We know that they can't do it on votes. We know they can't do it under the constitution. But they're the Democrats.

Pelosi and Schumer out there, among others, are making this case that they you know, Pelosi said a quiver of arrows. Schumer as well, he's just being Schumer making stuff up. But he's saying, Oh, we're gonna find a way. Is there is there something we're not looking I've been saying that that they're gonna lie down in the streets, they're going to block access to the building, they're gonna pull the fire alarm, They're gonna, you know, things like that.

Is there something we're missing, either procedurally or otherwise. No. I mean, look, we have the power and we damn well better use it or will demoralize our own base. My expectation is that Mitch McConnell is going to hold this vote a very approximate to the election, probably before the election. I'm also expecting the Democrats to try to use a various procedural endeavors to try to jam that,

but I don't think they'll be successful. But like, what's rich to me, Buck is that they spent years saying that Donald Trump was undermining our institutions, that he was just like great threat to throw off all norms of democracy, and now because he's likely to get reelected, Democrats are talking about packing the court and like maybe even impeaching the Attorney General of the United States just to create

a procedure bomb the Senate. Ludicrous. Yeah, they're they're threatening the very institutions that they claim Trump has been a threat to for years. I think the irony is lost on very few people that have not suffered from intense TDS over the last few years. So your book, Matt, you're you're talking about being on the front lines of the Maga Revolution. And right now, obviously the president's out there making this case to the American people. But why

why he should get four more years? For you? And when you're speaking to whether your constituents or you're you're just addressing a national audience on cable news or shows like this one, what are the what are the biggest points that you that you make about why Trump should get why has he earned. You know, the first time around, it was based on ideas, charisma. You know, the promise of Trump. Right now, we've had him for four years. What are the big areas where you say, look at

this and it will be that. Based on what we've already seen, Donald Trump has changed politics by keeping promises. You look at our relationship with Israel. You look at the way we became an energy producing country, an energy dominant country, and then of course building the strongest economy that the United States has ever known. This is a guy who's done it once. He can do it again. But I think he's done something even more important for

the next generation of conservatives. He's led a political realignment. No longer are we going to be the Republican party that invades everywhere and invites every illegal alien to cross our borders just because it's good for corporate America to have cheap labor. No longer are we going to accept trade deals that impoverish regular towns in our country so some multinational corporation can add a little bit to their next bottom line. So I think there's a real America

First theme to our politics. I think that's animated in specific policies. You know, I think that Republicans frankly didn't do the president a great deal of service at the beginning when we had unified control of the government. We should have done a lot more on immigration, We should have done it a lot more on entitlement form. I

blame the failed leadership of Paul Ryan on that. And look, the reason the Russia probe went on so long is because you had folks like Trey Gaudy out there shilling for the FBI, you know, saying that they were doing nothing wrong, when the rest of us were saying, look, this is a coup underway. Because they do not like this man so much, they will let any any end, or they will let the ends justify any means. And now, in fact we know people are getting indicted and impleading

guilty for changing evidence before a secret court. So the book is kind of my walk through that and my hope that going forward we're a populist, excited party and that we're not going back to the Bushes or the Chaineys or the next you know, the next iteration of establishment conservatism. How is it looking for us in Florida right now? And this is obviously I mean, I think people will say Florida Ohio are the two most important.

I mean, you gotta get Florida and Ohio. Are we going to be in a position on election day to win? And why? I mean you're probably Look, you're optimistic. I'm optimistic. So we both think Trump will win Florida. But why is going to win Florida. I want the audience to hear that. So I'll give you a look. At twenty eighteen, I was very involved in Governor de Santis's campaign. There was no poll we ever took during the general election

where we were ahead. We were always like two, three, four points behind, and then you know some polls we would maybe be tied at the end. Ron de Santis wins a very close race. The turnout model in Florida, I think is going to really be good for the president because you've got a lot of seniors that are NPAs that are not here for the webtobia. I mean the web tobia for senior voters in Florida is year round golf, not riots in the streets and reparations coming

out of people's bank accounts. And so I think that that will help this date. Also, Miami Dade County looks very different for Joe Biden than it did for Hillary Clinton. These a lot of working class Hispanics in Miami Dade County, maybe just a generation or two removed from actual socialism,

and they don't want to go back. They want to be a part of building a great country, and they I think are very turned off the Joe Biden Kamala Harris embrace of what you see going on in Portland and San Francisco and some of these places where quality of life is deteriorating rapidly. How's the President in spirits these days? I know you're in constant contact with him. Hey,

he is real excited about this Supreme Court pick. You know when we talked about it the other day, he talked about the sizzle, the substance, just getting someone that was a total package that could really go in there and add something to the jurisprudence of our country and really build on this Trump legacy of reshaping the court, like all these Republicans that were the never Trumpers, And oh, he violates norms, like would they have preferred Hillary Clinton

to make these three picks? We'd have like the purple haired, genderless warlord from the chaz as the next Supreme Court justice rather than the folks we have there who I think are going to interpret the Constitution and not embrace the judicial activism. That's very antidemocratic. Florida Congressman Mac Gates. Everybody download his podcast. Also pick up his new book, Firebrand Dispatch from the front Lines of the Maga Revolution, Amazon dot Com, other places you can grab it. Congressman,

great to see you man. Come back soon. Thanks Buck, I appreciate you man. You're in the Freedom hud. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. We've talked about the Brianna Taylor case today and the decision that was made there in Kentucky. And I also mentioned the Gardner case who tragically was was pushed to commit suicide because they were charging him with murder when he defended himself against assault outside of his own bar in Omaha, Nebraska. And now we have more footage as well in the Kyle

Rittenhouse case. People are saying that he committed first degree murder. That's that's an outrage. Here here's the Fox right up of this additional video footage that aired last night on Tucker Carlson's show. Newly released video footage from the night Illinois teenager Kyle Rittenhouse shot and killed two people during unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin, last month, could support the claim that the seventeen year old was being attacked by demonstrators

and acted in self defense. The footage, provided by a nonprofit organization affiliated with Rittenhouse's defense attorney, was shown on Tucker Crossing Tonight on Tuesday and raised questions about the events that led up to the shooting. Rittenhouse faces felony charges including first degree intentional homicide. Okay, they're charging this kid with first degree murder, folks, but among many other charges. His attorneys argue Rittenhouse argue acted in self defense. So

here's what you see in the video. The footage shows Rittenhouse running with a fire extinguisher. Rosenbaum appears to chase after Rittenhouse when a single gun shot is fired. Now Rosenbaum, Joseph Rosenbaum, is a convicted child molester who was committing arson. So those are the kind of people that are part of the BLM movement. Convicted child molester Joseph Rosenbaum was

letting things on fire. Quote surrounded Rittenhouse, squeezed four shots surrounded ritten House rather squeezed four shots in Rosenbaum's direction. Seconds later, three additional shots were portedly fired by an unknown shooter. One bullet graze Rosenbaum's head, while another penetrated his right growing his left thigh in his back. Kyle Rittenhouse fired four shots initially that night, another four were fired. We still don't know who fired them. No one else

has been arrested or charged at this point. According to video's narration, an unidentified protester strikes Rittenhouse in the head, causing him to fall to the ground. Another protester attempts to jump on Rittenhouse, who then fires two shots into the air. Yet another protester then strikes ritten House in the back of the head with what appears to be a skateboard. While reaching for the team's rifle, Rittenhouse fires

a single shot, striking the man in the chest. The video appears to show another protester advancing with a handgun aimed at ritten House, who fired off around and struck the man. Arm struck the man in the bicep. So you got a convicted cham molester who's lighting fires A bunch of you know who has the first exchange here with ritten House. A bunch of shots ring out, likely at ritten House. Someone's firing at him, and then the mob tries to and we've seen this video many times,

physically assault him. The mob tries to take his weapon and I'm sure kill him with it. Somebody who's who's attacking him has a pistol in his hand when he's doing it. I think they just didn't believe that Rittenhouse would actually use his rifle. I really think that that's a big part of this. They figured, you know, he's just some you know, maga hat wearing, you know, wannabe. They just figured that he wasn't really going to do anything with it, and so they could attack him and

beat him senseless, maybe kill him. And that's and they found out at least some of the people attacking him at that was not true that he was willing to use the rifle that he brought to that that riot scene in self defense. And this is this, friends, is is a really a foundational issue for our rule of law in this country. Do you have the right to

defend yourself? The police officers in the Brianna Taylor case, they were being shot at after they knocked and said police, If if we're going to say that they're not allowed to shoot back. Then you're you're saying that cops can never shoot. So at least they didn't try to charge those cops with murder, but that would have been out It would have been outrageous beyond words. But they are charging one officer with three counts of of of reckless endangerment.

There's that. And then you also have this case in Kenosha where someone used a rifle to defend himself. They're charging the first degree murder, I mean, a depraved really the high crime in our legal system. I mean, you could get the death penalty for first degree murder. They're going to execute this kid because he didn't allow himself to get beaten to a bloody pulp and maybe murdered with his own weapon or murdered with the weapons that

these other lunatics who are rioting had. How could any person of good faith and any person with a decent sense of justice see what's happened in some of these cases, See what happened in Omaha where when a prosecutor reviewed the footage it's on video, said, yeah, you can't actually tackle a guy to the ground who's got a gun and try to beat his face in and think that he's not gonna shoot you. Sorry, that was the first pass at it. But oh no, the mob demands a scalp.

The mob demands there has to be charges against people who are trying to defend themselves. It's appalling, friends, it should not be happening. But this is increasing the country that we live in where prosecutors know that it's not just their election prospects, because prosecutors in many places have to write district attorneys have to run for office. It's an elected position. And other prosecutors who are just on a line, prosecutors, as they say, they don't want their

careers to stall out. They want to be elevate if they want to be the attorney general for a state or maybe the Attorney general United States. They want to be an a USA or the US attorney. They don't want to just be a district you know, an assistant

district attorney. And then there's the safety considerations that are raised for that for the prosecutors and the politicians that are that are pushing for some of these things, because if you if you believe in self defense, now you may and you're a public figure, you may find yourself on the wrong side of a mob gathering outside of

your home. You may find yourself in a situation where you have an angry mob that has gathered and that's threatening your wife and children because you believe the Second Amendment and the right to self defense are in fact the law. Because they are, but people don't want that, They don't want that attention. We are seeing a very a very unfortunate period here of cowardice that is growing within the legal system, and the angry mob is exploiting it.

Thanks for listening to the bus show past. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Our friend will Rick Cardella from the Washington Examiner is back in the mix, back in action here with us now. He is at the Washington Examiner. Will great to have you. Thanks for having me back. So I know you're you're very very clear on your

your thoughts on the legitimacy. If we're going to say that the Senate has rules beyond what are kind of official rules, right that the senators get that the mcconnal rule doesn't preclude if anyone even cares, which I honestly don't, But the McConnell I mean meaning that, you know, I think that the rules are the rules, but if people are going to hold them to the McConnell rule, there's no reason not to fill the seat. Explain. Yeah, look,

the McConnell rules. But if it is a rule, and that's if that's what the left wants to use, that's the exact reason why Donald Trump has the authority to nominate a judge and for the Senate to hold a vote. Look, you know, he said, you know, this is when Barack Obama was president. Obviously in twenty sixteen Arms Starring twenty fourteen, when the Senate won, when the GOP won the Senate, Barack Obama was president. That's when there was Anton and

Scalia died there after. If they wanted to Barack Obama nominated somebody, Miss McConnell said, Look, we just had an election here in the mid terms. We took the Senate. The people obviously want to change. Let's wait and see what happens for the next election. You know, let's make this a referenda about judges. Twenty sixteen was in part, in large part about the next president nominating judges, and

that GOP Senate approving them. So if the McConnell rule is the reason, or they're left using the McConnell rule of the reason not to appoint judges is absurd. It's the exact reason why they should nominate and appoint judges. What do you think they're gonna do? I mean, I keep asking people this because I'm wondering if there's some

you know, some plot that I haven't. I'm just sitting here trying to war game out because you you know, man, they are losing their minds over this empty seat right now. You know, the timing for them. Look, the timing for them is bad. There's snowkind the Democrats, they know they they are. Is it not good for them? I'm not gonna pretend like I'm not kind of enjoying how bad it is for them. Do you do you see any pathway that they have, in any realm to try to

stop this? You know, what are they gonna do? No? And I see I see their attempts as damaging. Look what they're left is saying right now is we want, we want the opportunity to appoint a judge. Well, they're coming up with every way to violate the Constitution or to denote it entirely, but thinking, you know what, we're going to pack the courts with people who like liberal orthodoxy.

The problem here with these things being so content is that leftist activist judges turned the court into a political body where once stood a neutral legal institution, and it's completely insulated from the body politic from democratic prost The left did that, and what they're saying is, hey, you know what, we're going to double down more in this lunacy, and it's not going to win over any of the people. This is actually going to probably helped Donald Trump coming

up in the twenty twenty election. It helped him in twenty sixteen when Mitch McConnell said the twaite for the next election, people in large part wanted Donald Trump or to be the one to appoint these judges. I don't think people. And this is going back. I read Robert Bart's book. I'm read reading his book, Attempting of America. He wrote nineteen ninety. Even at that time, Americans and polls and so on showed that they wanted neutral justices,

not activists on the court. And I think that still holds today, and I think that works in Trump's favor, and the left just going bananas saying he's gonna he's packing the court because he gets to nominate another justice is absurd. They're coming up with these crazy we're gonna get two more states and we're gonna have four more senators. You know, they want to add Puerto Rico in the DC in order to you know, they want to abolish

the electoral College. They want to destroy the Constitution, and at the same time say hey, look we're trying to save I mean, that's that's that's pure absurdity. Speaking of will rot Cardella down the Washington Examiner. Uh, there are protests that I see friends of mine in DC are posting video from their windows of the marches in the

straits that are going on there. I think people often forget DC is, after San Francisco, the most liberal, most Democrat heavy major city in America, and by by party affiliation, I mean DC the swamp is as blue as it gets. And you have these marchers as well as the people that come from out of state, these more antifas style agitators who will join in with the lunatics in DC. Are you expecting, I mean, are there preparations going on now for you know, unrest, riots, things like that leading

up to the election and beyond. I mean, how are things looking down in DC? Well, they should be prepared because since May twenty fifth, since the George for the George floyd A death, there's been something going on every single day. Riot. You know, Donald Trump had his RNC acceptance speech on the White House that was a debacle. This goes on every single day. And I want to add that the DC is not liberal. These are socialist Marxists.

These are people who are down for the cause. I'm talking to everyday, people on the street, on the streets, the people who live here. You know, I'll walk down the street without a mask on. I'll have people telling me to put one on. Give him, you know, looking at me, nasty walking completely around, walking on the street. They'd rather dodge cars and walk there. Why kids, they don't wear a mask if I'm walking or running. Why why can't we get doctor Fauci? Mean he loves the

press so much. Tell everybody, hey, stop stop yelling at people who are by themselves out in open air. You know, on a sunny day to wear a mask, you're being a jackass. Because that is what the science universally says. There. There's absolutely no justification for a person by himself, out in open air having to wear a mask. It does not exist. Why why can't we hear that from these health authorities? It would be nice to, you know, de escalate some of the insanity a little bit. Well, it's

typical of the expert class, the elite class. What if there's no panic, why would anybody listen to doctor Fauci. You see this guy on Times one hundred lists again. I say this every time I come on that in Style magazine with the sun glasses on it. He's sitting there with his legs for us. If people aren't panicked or scared or yelling at each other, they would look at doctor Fauci for anything. Six months ago, no one knew who this guy was. Six months later, he still

hasn't gotten a thing right, not one thing right. Tells you wear a mask, don't wear a mask. Beat you know, kids, this is going to harm. Remember that whole thing where he was talking to Rampall several months ago about how this is terrible for kids and it's going to give them the Kawasaki disease. That just disappeared. Never did anybody say this guy was brutally wrong. It just disappear year out of the headlines, and people are still listening to

them again. I think it would be a good move for Donald Trump to fire him ahead of the election and say we're not going to be run by an unelected expert class anymore, and they're not going to put him. I'm not going to allow them to put Americans against Americans. I think that would be a good move for him. I think so too. I'm I'm worried that we're already transitioning now into another moving of the goalposts where because you're seeing this well, I mean it's coming out from

some of the different folks. I saw the testimony today on Capitol Hill from red Field over at the CDC, and they're already starting to say, well, you know, even when the vaccine comes, like, we got to keep all these restrictions in place. Oh so now it's now it's post vaccine lockdown world we're supposed to live in. It means people are completely insane. Oh yeah, they look, they've hold and they love the control. Look. I want to tell the viewers out there that a mask walking past

somebody's not going to help you. There's only one way that this disease spread long before ask mandates and now, and that's fifteen minutes close contact, mainly indoors. If you're an older, vulnerable person, that's what you should probably want to avoid. You don't really need to worry so much when you're at the grocery store. These are not major vectors per spread. The mask will not protect you if you're in a situation with somebody who's fifteen minutes or

longer of close contact that's talking, shaking hands indoors. I don't know why the CDC just won't come out and say that they think that. I think that they think that, you know, these vulnerable people wear a mask and then that can hang out in those situations. Still, the CEC actually has it on their website. Thing. It's not going to make it different. It may help. Well, what also what may help is if I cover my call for sneeze with my hand or or my arm, so you know,

it's very inconsistent. No one knows what they're talking about. That's the problem here, and no one's been fired for it. Again, Look all these Americans, we make a mistake at our jobs, we get fired, okay, and then we have a hard time on our resume getting another job because we don't have a recommendation. This has never happened. This isn't going to happen to doctor Fauci. And the problem is it hasn't happened since he was in then, since he was

a bureaucrat in the eighties. He's probably made how many several hundred mistakes, still has a job. It's fascinating, and no American can really identify with it, because if we make the same mistake, we're out of a job. Well, Rocardella, the Washington Examine, everybody will always going to talk to you man, come back soon. Thanks, fuck, thank you. You're in the Freedom Eye. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Yeah, we've wanted to see a Phase four relief bill get

to the American people. It's why the Chief of Staff and Secretary Minution have been in negotiations. Unfortunately, though, they've been in negotiations with a fundamentally un serious partisan named Speaker Pelosi, who when we would exceed what she asked for was school funding, let's say, she then would reject the money that was an excess of what she had

previously asked for. Democrats I think showed what they were about when they fill a buster bill that would have provided three hundred dollars a week to the American people through December twenty seventh. They fillip us for debt I believe last week. So at this point the onus is really on Speaker Pelosi. So we encourage her to send one off bills, perhaps airline funding or other elements that we could work through the process to get to the

American people. It's always been this president's priority to do that. Why isn't there a COVID relief bill? Everyone agrees there should be. The government continues to mandate that businesses can't operate, can't open. There's not a COVID relief bill because Nancy Pelosi doesn't want there to be, and her claim is

just not enough. So nothing is better than something. In Pelosi's view, If you're suffering right now, if your business is closing, if you can't pay your bills, Nancy Pelosi wants it to be clear that you need to keep suffering. And then their justification forward is, oh, no, I want to get you more. Well, let me tell you that's very little comfort. To people who have a hard time actually paying the bills that they currently have. It's very

little comfort. Indeed, the other thing that you're hearing a lot these days now is we've returned, We've returned to mask shaming just in time for the election. I'm seeing a lot of this now, and I'm so fed up with New Yorkers who are overwhelmingly Democrats eight to one Democrats who are just little mask maniacs. Now they're wearing them. They're on a bicycle by themselves by the Hudson River,

nobody around them. They're moving fast. They got a mask on, and look if they want to do what that's I don't care. But they're doing it, and they expect you do it too. Outside bend the knee, wear a mask. Why because that's what the good people do. You see, this is how this is how democrat brainwashing works. This is how they this is how they do things. I gotta say I liked earlier today there wasn't trying to see if I can if I can find it here

on the fly. There was a Matt Walsh tweet. When the left is upset about something, we board up our homes and call in the national guard. He writes, there's no both sides argument here. Leftism is evil. It's a blight on the earth and everything about it. It's bad. I agree, I agree. I don't. I don't respect the Democrat ideology. I don't think that it has some some good stuff anymore. I think they've really become uh, they've really become terrible. They've really become something that just just

just needs to be defeated. But the mask mania is just a part of it. And there was there's a fast oh sorry, the mask shaming. Of course, here's Chris Cuomo, who likes to lecture America about obeying the COVID rules while he's going between his various houses in the Hampton's as a multi millionaire checking to see how while he's COVID positive and very sick. But you know, he's a good guy to listen to. On this play thirteen third

worst loss of life in our history. I'm sorry for the family's loss, and I'm sorry that you had to hear this from your president. It affects virtually nobody. It's a it's an amazing thing. Then this, I'll never lie to you. Press secretary tells you the death toll has the president awake at night so worried that he stands maskless in front of a tight crowd again tonight, telling jokes instead of holding maybe a moment of silence for

the two hundred thousand stolen by this pandemic. Maybe trying to prevent some of these good people in this crowd we're too close together and without masks, from sharing their fate. There's a lot of them were wearing masks. I watched the rally last night. Asn't happened. A lot of them were wearing masks. Not everybody, but if a mask works, shouldn't that You know, why do we never get partial credit?

This is this is important. Think about this. You have a hundred people in a room, and you don't know how many of them have COVID, maybe two, maybe ten, it's gonna be a small number. But fifty percent of the people are wearing masks. Of masks are so effective, then we should feel like we're probably gonna be okay. Right, it's not that easy for this to spread. I'm just saying fifty percent is better than zero. It's substantially better,

isn't it. And then there was a big chunk from what I could see on the screens big chunk of that were in masks, even though let's also remember that if they're outside, they should they wear a mask. Is that the same thing wearing a mask outside? Where was all this uh outrage from a quom over at CNN when there were daily mask gatherings outside, sometimes masked, a

lot of times not masked. Over the BLM movement. I'm sorry, I haven't forgotten yet that the blue check mds out there, and not all of them, but a lot of them. We're trying to convince us that well, even if it spreads the virus, these BLM protests are worth it. That's what they were saying. That was the real That was the real story from even if it spreads the virus, the BLM protests are worth it. Oh okay, I'm never letting that go. There's something else I want to tell

you about too, because there's so little time. I mean, we look, we've lost the COVID narrative battle on the right and people that try to keep this all in perspective, We've we've lost the you know that, the dominant narrative and all of this because the left has just been they've been utterly, relentless. But you know, there was a piece that's making the rounds now from a former senior former senior scientist at Fiser in the UK talking about

PCR testing. Now, I don't want to get to you, look do I I'm not a scientist, but I can read and I understand a lot of stuff, certainly more than seeing that anchors do. And here's what I can tell you what he's saying about the test. There's a very small percentage of overall when these when these PCR tests are done, a very small percentage of people actually have COVID. Who are you know, when they're when they're doing these tests. Let's say it's for every ten thousand

tests they're doing. You know, let's say if you're looking at one percent of people that actually have COVID, you extrapolate that number. There's always also a false positive rate, and the false positive rate for PCR testing on COVID right now is looking to be like it's substantial. They're not. They're not exactly sure what it is, but it's built

in that it has to be substantial. And right now, based on very he walks you through how based on very widespread testing where they're doing thousands and thousands and thousands of tests every day there, at least in the UK. He's talking in the context of the UK, based on the numbers that they see of the percentage of the

population with COVID overall that are doing these tests. Because of vast majority of people that do the tests do not do not come back or do not actually have COVID, I should say, and the false positive number by percentages, the false positive number is larger than the positive number per every ten thousand tests done. Now it's not a lot out of one hundred. You think, okay, well two

percent of cases are false positives. We'll think about how many false positive cases then you're generating every day, and when you're doing ten thousand tests, and if only one percent of the population actually has COVID, but two percent of the population is testing positive through these and that's it's established. I mean, this is not a conspiracy. PCR testing has a false positive rate. They'll find a strand of like decade RNA from a virus infection from six

months ago positive. So it's at least two or three percent false positive rate. If you're oh, and I know this sounds a lot but if your overall actual COVID positivity out of every ten thousand percent sample is about one percent, and your PCR test false positive is two or three percent, guess what. Most of the cases in the UK under this model that they're reporting as COVID positive who are overwhelming to get asymptomatic don't actually have COVID.

Look at the numbers in New York. We're below one percent of cases are positive in New York City. So if you have a two or three percent false positive, right, you're doing ten thousand test today. Guess what? Thanks for listening to The Busson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Oh, I can't forget about that Senate report and Joe Biden Son Hunter Biden and what we see going on with

going on with all that. Here's a thread that explained some of this from Kim Strasslo at the Wall Street Journal. The Johnson Grassy report raises the many and disturbing conflicts of interest surrounding Hunter's business dealings while Joe was vice president, but it also made clear the Democratic nominee as not being straight with the public, Joe Biden last year said I've never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings.

That's pretty definitive, right, Yet, accordinated testimony from former Obama official Amos Hochstein, he briefed Joe and his concerns about Hunter and Bisma in twenty fifteen. October twenty fifteen, and shortly after his conversation with Vice President Biden, Hunter, Biden contacted Hackstein and asked to meet. According to Hackstein, Hunter became aware of Hackstein's West Wing conversation with the Vice President,

who had mentioned it to Hunter. So Joe Biden was specifically briefed on the US government's concerns about Hunter and Barisma, and he specifically brought up those concerns to his son. How does that comport with I have never spoken. If Joe isn't asked about this at the debate, it's journalistic malpractice.

Well then we know it's not going to happen. The report similarly shows that despite former Secretary of State John Kerry saying he had no knowledge of any of any of this, he in fact was also briefed on Hunter Biden. Seems a lot of people in the Obama administration knew this was a problem, but nobody acted. This is all relevant given Biden's claim he has a more ethical choice in this election, voters might legitimately ask if the wink not approach to Hunter's wheeling dealing will be business as

usual in a Biden administration. So now that that's that's a very good version of the takeaway here that you should all have from this. But I'll give you some of the specifics. As people are saying Hunter Biden, you know was m oh, I love this. The New York Times Republican inquiry finds no evidence of wrongdoing by Hunter Biden. That's the that's the New York Times headline. The New York Post headline, same same sort they're talking about. Quote.

Senate report links Hunter Biden to prostitution or human trafficking ring. Oh, that seems like a very different takeaway than what the Democrats had. Hunter Biden sent thousands of dollars to people who appear to be involved in the sex industry, according to report released Wednesday by Republicans in the US Senate.

The report says, this is the New York Post version, Unspecified records show that Biden sent funds to nonresident alien women in the United States who are citizens of Russia and Ukraine and who have subsequently wired funds they recie from Hunter Biden to individuals located in Russia and Ukraine. The records also note that some of these transactions are linked to what appeared to be Eastern European prostitution or

human trafficking rings. The allegations are containing a footnote to a section of the report that details potential criminal concerns and extortion threats involving the son of Democratic Vice presidential and former Vice President Joe Biden, the Democratic president of nominee Rather, and other members of the Biden family. The report sites extensive public reporting concerning Hunter Biden's alleged involvement with prostitution services. Records then filed the committees do not

directly confirm or refute these individual reports. So, yeah, they're saying Hunter Biden plays a lot of spends a lot of money on prostitutes who are tied to human trafficking. Now, look, I understand Xabach, that's the son. It's not Joe Biden, is it. Do you think let's just let's ask the question, just so we could all be on the same page here.

Do you think that if Donald Trump Junior was sending thousands and thousands of dollars to prostitutes that he was now using the services of and including prostitutes who might be tied to human trafficking ring, so they themselves are perhaps being human trafficked and their money that the proceeds they're making from that process is going to the horrific process of human trafficking other people as well, you know, from the overlords that are doing all this stuff, Russian

mob and so on and so forth. Do you think that if if Donald Trump Junior was involved in that, it would not be the biggest news story in the country for a couple of days and all the news outlets would be saying, oh my gosh, yeah, we all know this, right. I mean, the double standard is mind blowing, but it is certainly it is certainly real. You know, you can't avoid it. You can't can't assume that it's gonna get any better either. It's actually gonna get worse

between now an election day. But the Barisma stuff, Look, I was working with John Solomon at The Hill dot Com at the time when he was breaking those stories, and they were pushing all this stuff on the Barisma you know, friends, Yeah, there's it's corrupt. It's bad. It's also not going to win us the election. It's also not going to lead to the the ultimate gotcha moment.

Democrats are fine with corruption on their side, and the media will just ignore how gross it is so we can make as much noise about it as we want. But it just this dog won't hunt friends. The Bearisma thing is not I was never a proponent of how this is going to take down. I know some people on some shows, you know, it's a constant, you know, Ukraine,

Bearisma update and everything else. I don't like making false promises to my audience about what I think is going to be achievable by the GOP or achievable by our side in politics. I didn't do it with Benghazi. I didn't do it with Hunter, with the Hunter Biden Beisma thing. I certainly haven't done it with the Durham probe or how many months now if I've been telling you, I don't think the Durham probe is gonna lead to really much of anything. I always tell this audience the truth.

Too much respect for you and too much care for your respect for me to do otherwise. So while the Beisma story is interesting and it's valid, I'm not I mean, look, clearly the guy it's it's corruption, but it's not criminal corruption that is going to cost Joe Biden the election. So how much more do we really want to talk I mean, it's a little amusing and because the double standard and everything with the Democrats, and it's also galling, but how much more do we really talk about? Well,

I'm talking about Hunter Biden. I mean, the guys a degenerate loser, and you know, Joe Biden is obviously gonna you know, they're not gonna hold him accountable. The media's not gonna hold him account for his son, even if they would do that to a Republican. So I think it's a story that I'll keep you updated on. But don't expect you know, uh, you know, smoking gun here, don't don't expect bombshell. You know, Hunter Biden. This this guy impregnated a stripper in the back of a CD

club in DC and then try to fight the paternity payments. Okay, that's who the soon to be if the Democrats have their way, President of the United States. Son Is media has no problem with it. You're in the freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. The show ain't over yet, folks, keeping it real, It's time for roll call. Roll call everybody. Thank you so much for sticking with us at this point in the show. Um, I think that this is one of our favorite parts of the show.

So it's always fun when you get to this point. And uh, let's then let's jump into it, shall we. Uh? Facebook dot com, slash Buck Sexton, teampocket, iHeartMedia dot com if you want to email us, or if you want to send a Facebook message, Instagram, Buck Sexton, let's do it. Brad Rites, Hey, Buck, I like that you played President Trump's reaction to rbg's passing. I consider myself to be

good at reading people in their expressions. I encourage you and your listeners to check out the actual video of that reaction. If you watch his eyes, you can see a very genuine person who cares about a life. You would never get that kind of reaction out of Hillary when she learned of Benghazi, or Biden when she referred to when he referred to George Floyd. They just look like someone who lost a pawn in a chess game.

Shields high, you know, Brad, I do think that Trump doesn't get enough credit for what is really a fundamental human decency and sympathy that is a part of who he is. I think that the left likes it just always portray him as an evil monster who's racist and a sexist and a rapist and all these things. But people who actually know the guy will tell you that he can be very sympathetic. He likes to help people out.

He can be too loyal, It's one of his It is one of these things you know when you go to a job interview and they say, you know, tell me your weaknesses, and you say, so, I take too much into my own hands and share too much of the credit, right. I mean, people try to play that. But there are some failings that come from a good place, and I mean loyalty can be one of them. It is possibly be too loyal the people that work with you. It is possibly too loyal the people that you've appointed

into certain roles. And I think Trumps that is his thing. Now. His loyalty doesn't extend to people who trash him or who go against him. Obviously, people are saying, oh, but look who works for Trump? Yeah. I mean, if you go at Trump, he's gonna go back at you. But you see the people that he gave jobs too, and that he's stuck stuck with through a lot, and yeah, I gotta say that's one of the areas where I

think the President. I appreciate where he's coming from on it, but it has been a tough thing for him, and I think it's cost him at different times. Chris next up here, Hey, bucking Mark, completely enjoy your daily podcast and have since your two hours show at the Blaze.

Love to hear Mark as your residence sports anchor. Or. At least I will until the Mets, Knicks, Giants or Rangers actually start winning, whereupon he'll become an obnoxious and insufferable New Yorker just won't let you know that another Californian has left the building. No longer will I pay the highest income, sales, carbon or gas taxes in the nation. No longer will my exceedingly high taxes go toward a

bottom five education, roads, crime, homelessness, or friendliness. Idaho doesn't have the lowest taxes in the nation, but the whole state is so friendly that I've strained my arm muscles waving to everyone. Masks are mostly optional. I love it an Idaho. I moved here and instantly my daily anger with the Left, and they're stupid, shortsighted policies, subsided. So don't move here. I need you to stay edgy and angry,

because that's why you're so entertaining. Well, Chris, don't worry about that, because it's certainly getting more and more tense in New York these days. I can't handle these lives. They're they're just nuts. They're just nuts. But Mark's not in New Yorker. You actually don't really have You don't really haven't much of a New York I mean I can pick it up a tiny bit, you don't really

have much of it. I used to, and then when I decided I wanted to be into broadcasting, I realized you can't have a New York accent and be doing play by play for games. So I got rid of it. What are the like? What makes a what makes a good play by play? And like I could say on a political talk radio, one thing that I always look for is is this somebody who has has a cadence that is easy and enjoyable to listen to and follow and beyond that is saying things that are not exactly

the same that everyone else is saying. Right, those are just some of the things you want for a good political talk radio host. What makes a good play by play guy? Huh? I was always told when I was coming up by my mentors to be conversation. Act like you're having a conversation with the audience, even though you're telling them what's happening. And you want good energy, you want a good cadence. You don't want somebody to be boring.

You want a play by play guy to pick the right spots to go crazy, like Mike Breen for example. I know a lot of people aren't watching the NBA, but when you did, he's the main guy on ESPN and ABC calls the finals and whatnot. But he has a signature called bang and he knows when to pull it out at the right time. So the best guys like that just know when to have the right energy, pick their their moments, and are always clear and concise. We have a you know, call things and they set

up their analyst. Well that's always important too. Who's the guy who is like, uh, it's pandemonium baby? Is that the Dick fight tal. Yeah, he's not a play by play announcer. He's a color commentator. Wait what wait what that's not the same thing the play by play guys. The one who goes they score, and one's like, and Smith passes the ball. Due guys passes the ball back to Johnson. Johnson that's okay, But isn't that? Oh wait,

so color commentary? How who who? Nowadays? Mark, it's you Mark Albert play by play or color comments play by play. So nowadays a color commentator usually is a former player or coach. So they're analyzing what just happened and giving you background information and telling you why it happened, stuff like that. And they were kind of as a team.

I got announced, you got the one guy who's like, and they're passing it through and they're doing you know, and then the other guy's like, yeah, that was a really like good call. Or those two they work together exactly. Now I understand, okay, because I was like, how does that work? Or there's one guy doing one guy doing the play by play, one guy do because I've heard before in the radio, just straight play by play, right, that'll happen too. Yeah. Baseball games there's a difference between

radio and television. On television, the analyst will speak more. On radio, you want to hear what's happening. So that's what I was, Okay, All I learned something new every day, Adams, Hey Buck producer Mark is gorgeous or whatever I have to say to get this aired. But what's your opinion

on this? Hey, Adam, here you are, buddy success. If the Republicans end up not confirming a new Supreme Court justice, do you think it's really because is they want to gain brownie points with the left should Biden end up winning? Or are we to believe this great moral quandary? We know believe it to be this great moral quandary when we know it's not love your show, shields high are No. I think they're gonna do it, Adam. So I don't

think I think that they're gonna do it. So I can't really answer your why would Republicans not do it? Because there is no good reason. So they're gonna do it. We're gonna We're gonna get this. I don't overpromise on this show. That's one thing I try very hard. I don't overpromise to you guys. What I think is gonna happen. I think we're gonna get this Supreme Court nominee through, and I think we're gonna do it before the election.

I think it needs to happen before the election, David writes, is amyk Cooney Barrett willing to not be liked Roberts changed his mind because he wants to be liked, David, is a good question. I'd like to say. The answer is yeah, although I don't have much to go on with that other than my gut, my instinct. So yeah,

I think I think she probably is. As a mother of seven who is pro life and avowedly pro life and is a Catholic and doesn't care that people mock her faith, I think she probably is willing to take the slings and arrows, so to speak. Kirk Buck, on Monday's show, you played AOC's comment that we must vote for Biden to protect our democracy and protect the most innocent and vulnerable. Are you kidding me? What irony? It is?

The left and r G RBG. You guys got to stop writing rg B ruth Bader Ginsburg RBG, God rest her soul that are responsible for maintaining and supporting laws that actually do kill the most innocent. It is the innocent in the womb via abortion. I'm sorry, but that one tops them all. As you often say, the left has absolutely no shame. It shows that we are not just in the middle of a political battle, but we

are oftentime in the middle of a spiritual battle. The fight over the next Supreme Court seat is for sure both well said Sir Well said Scott buck As a Supreme Court justice, where are the inherent a political standard needs to be met or where the inherent political stentard needs to be met? We had a justice holding on for pure political purposes while RBG had a right to serve until death. No one wants to discuss the ethical breach of why she chose to do so. By the way,

your Sports Talk with producer Mark cracks me up. Reminds me of hanging out with the girlfriend back in the day talking sports love the show. Whoa, Scott, Hey, I know what you're saying with that, Like I'm the girl that needs producer Mark to explain how the touchdowns happen or something whatever. I mean, that is exactly what happens. Whatever, I demand the recount, All right, everybody, thanks so much

for listening today. Check ont bucksexon dot com. Pass the buck to somebody in your life Tell them to download this show. Iheartapp, Spotify, iTunes. Till tomorrow, she'll high