BLM Sides With Cuba's Commies

more coming up here in just a moment. But first, my friends, you have got to hook yourself up with My Pillow or just all the My Pillow products out there. I know Mike Lindel, well, he's a great guy. He's the inventor of My Pillow, and his team has sent me up with my pillows from my bed, plus the my Pillow mattress topper, the Geezed dream sheets which are amazing, the My Pillow slippers which are super comfortable, and the best towels I've ever had, the most soft and absorbent

my pillow, my towels called my Towels. You've got to get these products for yourself. I mean, this is what my whole house is outfitted with My Pillow products now because they're just the best. And plus, listeners like you have been supporting Mike through the cancel culture left insanity. They've gone after Mike, They've gotten his products taken from stores.

What can you, as a conservative do right now? How about get a great product from an all American company built by an American patriot entrepreneur, Mike Lindell and show the cancel culture left that companies that stand with conservatives and conservative shows like this one deserve your support and we will not bend the knee. Hook it up today. Go to my pillow dot com. You can get great discounts on all my Pillow products. There, click on radio

Listener Specials. You'll see rotational offers of up to sixty six percent off on products like their pillows, mattress, toopper, and the Geza sheets, but also new products like their slippers, weighted blankets, robes, waffle blankets, and more. All My Pillow products come with a sixty day money back guarantee andrew promo code buck. Remember it's promo code buck when you go to my pillow dot com, promo code buck for these incredible radio specials. These are the products you need

to have at home. I've been telling you that they're commies for a long time now. I don't mean the people that run Cuba, that's obvious. I mean the BLM organizers Black Lives Matter. It's a Marxist communist organization. It seeks to divide us. It seeks to highlight, exaggerate, and exacerbate that which divides us from each other. And it's just too much. Right. We see this going on and it is driving people like me up the wall. I'm

just why, why does corporate America support BLM. Why do all these different democrats not just bend the need to, but but celebrate BLM when their foundational philosophy is not of making America a fantastic place. Dare I say making America great? It's that they want to tear this place apart, replace our foundations with something else, and destroy American unity

in the process. Black Lives Matter put out this statement about the Cuba situation, So if you want to know where their ideological sympathies really lie, you got to see this. Black Lives Matter condemns the US federal government's inhumane treatment of Cubans and urges it to immediately lift the economic embargo.

This cruel and inhumane policy, instituted with the explicit intention of destabilizing the country and undermining Cuban's right to choose their own government, is at the heart of Cuba's current crisis. Since nineteen sixty two, the United States has forced pain and suffering on the people of Cuba by cutting off food, medicine, and supplies, costing the tiny island nation and estimated one

hundred and thirty billion dollars. Without that money, it is harder for Cuba to acquire medical equipment, needer to develop its own COVID nineteen vaccines, and equipment for food production Cuba. It keeps going on and on and on. Cuba has historically demonstrated solidarity with oppressed peoples. Now we look to President Biden to end the embargo, something up Barack Obama called for in twenty sixteen. The embargo is a blatant

human rights violation must come to an end. The Cuban government is shooting, arresting, bludgeoning people in the street for protesting, and Black Lives Matter is putting out a statement blaming the United States government for the problems of Cuba. I mean, at some point you just have to understand that you're dealing with people who have no principles, no common sense, and no decency. And that's certainly the case with the

bl position on Cuba. And this is appalling. People should be outraged that any organization would put something like this out there. But this is what I've been saying along. We have a Marxist uprising within the Democrat Party that's been going on for a long time. The Marxists are ascended, true Marxists, and the suffering of the Cuban people is just simply not something that they are are overly, shall we say, concerned about it. I don't think they're really

concerned at all. I don't think it really matters to them. And I'm just I am appalled, appalled that so many American institutions went along with this, went along with BLM and supported it. But this is this is where we are. Another thing that's coming to mind right now is just how the speech that was given by Biden early in this week was completely off the wall crazy. And I'm going to tie this all together with the pandemic in

a second. But here's Senator Mitch McConnell play one. Yesterday, the President of the United States delivered a speech that was set in an alternate universe. He called these mainstream state laws, these modest integrity measures that are wildly popular with Americans. Quote now listen to this the single the

most significant test of our democracy since the Civil War. Really, this is our new president who promised the Lord the temperature, bring America back together and rebuild a civil society where we can dialogue its fellow citizens. That's the person who's now yelling that mainstream state laws are more dangerous than two world wars, more dangerous than poll test than bull Connor and actual Jim Crow segregation, and somehow analogous to the Civil War. That's what the President of the United

States said yesterday. What utter nonsense. It would be life out loud funny if it wasn't so completely and totally irresponsible. It was absolute bullcrap. I mean, at a crazy level, the Biden's speech. But this is how I think it ties in at some level to the pandemic, And this is how I think it's we need to understand what

we're really dealing with the with these democrats. This pandemic has shown us that there are a lot of Democrats who are are deeply mentally unstable, and over the course of the four years of the Trump presidency, they were conditioned to believe in whatever great enemy the Democrat apparatus tells them they have. So that was something that they were being told, right that it was Donald Trump Russia collusion.

And so now they have this need to believe. But there is an existential and imminent threat and the only way to combat it is to do exactly what their Democrat overlords tell them. And that's where this Jim Crow two point zero worst challenged since the Civil War comes in. And also after COVID, right, people have gotten so riddled with anxiety because they believe the Democrat narrative, which wasn't that the COVID, Remember, was not the primary threat for

Democrats in twenty twenty. Trump's handling of COVID was the primary threat as far as Democrats were concerned in twenty twenty. And so now the people who are really at some level just psychologically and emotionally broken, and I mean millions and millions of them, they're Democrats and they need to be told what the next great enemy is. It's not it's not some foreign external enemy. It's not people that want to destroy the United States, take us over, enslavist,

none of that. Now. The real enemy, of course, comes from within. Democrats don't actually have external enemies. External enemies are always just an opportunity for an alliance against Republicans. So every external enemy to the United States, Russia, China, Iran, you name it is an opportunity. It's an opportunity to pick up an ally to bludgeon the primary adversary of the leftist Marxist in America, the right Conservatives, people like you and me. And that's how you end up having

joy read over at MSNBC. Who is just leading the charge on the most crazy stuff you can possibly say about the GOP play for what is happening to the

Republican Party? Our country, our democracy is currently under siege by one of our two major political parties, one controlled by a twice impeached, one term president who's more Jim Jones than George Washington, A party that thinks so Donald Trump's rabbit hole of conspiracy theories, white grievance, and an unquenchable first for absolute power embraces causes that were once viewed as fringe things like abortion, bounty hunting, now the law in Texas banning books, really any idea that doesn't

render every single white American in history going all the way back to sixteen nineteen and right up to today as innocent and benevolent, even as a noose literally hung outside the US capital just six months ago. It's a party that's committed to turning it up. I mean, does anyone try to ban books that say that, that say anything about bad about any white person throughout history? This is this is idiocy. But she's got about a million people watching that show, maybe more. They believe it. They

think it's true. They think that everybody who doesn't buy into that is a bad person. They think that anybody who's not on board for this is a major threat to the Republic. And they think in those terms too. They think in terms of threat. You know what the real threat is these days, folks? She said, Oh, the country's under siege. Really, we're under siege from Republicans. Are what have we been doing lately? I mean, not enough if you ask me, But what have we been doing? No?

The real threat we're under right now, if we're looking at something that's serious, is well other than a Marxist authoritarian takeover of our entire society and government by the lunatics that are calling themselves democrats for now. Other than that, you have inflation, which is a very serious concern. And I know the word inflation. It sounds like what you do for your bicycle tire, right, It's just not that, it's not visceral, it's not scary. Inflation is so destructive

to the economy. Inflation steals your peace of mind, steals your wages, steals your ability to provide for yourself and your family comfortably. And here's what the FED share Jerome Powell was saying about it, play three. First of all, you're right, the incoming inflation data have been higher than expected and hoped for, but they're actually still consistent with

with what we've been talking about. That the very high inflation readings are coming from a small group of goods and services that are directly tied to the reopening of the economy. It's it's new cars, used cars, rental cars, hotel rooms, you know, airplane tickets, things that we understand. How connection with all respect Jam Powell, I mean, it's it's it's housing, it's appliances, it's food prices, it's electricity,

it's gas. Tell me to what extent is the Federals are willing to see consumer prices increased before intervention is necessary. We are monitoring the situation very carefully, and we are committed to price stability. And if we if we were to see that inflation were remaining high and remaining materially higher above our target for a period of time, and that it was threatening to uproot inflation expectations and create a risk of a longer period of inflation, and we

would absolutely change our policy as appropriate. Yeah, they're watching it, nothing to worry about, they're watching it. Sure. Yeah, the when when you're talking about just the reopened things and its gas, food shelter, that's pretty important. Inflation, it's pretty important, would you know, lumber for building homes. This is what happens when you have a government apparatus that thinks that they can it can spend whatever wants to spend. And

that is the belief. Even even crazy Bernie Sanders is running around saying that inflation is a problem. But his answer to inflation the tax you up the wazoo play eleven. Well, I am concerned about inflation. Among many other things. As I think you know, this bill, this three and a half trillion and then there's another six hundred billion in a so called bipartisan infrastructure bill, will pay for itself.

It'll be paid for in a variety of ways, but significantly by higher taxes on the wealthy and large corporations. So that should not add to the inflation concerns. We're just going to tax them a lot. We're going to take all the taxes, and it's not going to be a problem for the working class. The oligarchs will pay for it. This is what you're told. It's not true,

but who cares. You know what else you're told that making a few percent a year with a financial advisor who's also taken a cut on top of that is necessary if you want to make any money the markets. That's just not true. All you need is carnivore trading, okay, Because everyday folks like you are crushing it there. They call them carnivores. They're getting after it even when the market's tough. Carnivore trading allows you to make great returns.

It's an anonymous team of elite strategists. Their legends among Wall Street heavy hitters, and they've gone rogue for the first time. They're inviting everyday folks just like you and me to see and mirror their explosive trades. Sound too good to be true. Carnivore will let you see the trades they're making right now for two weeks free. Go to get our Trades dot com and use promo code

buck for two free weeks. And if you join you with the Carnivores industry leading promise, you'll generate three times your fees after your annual paid subscription, or you'll get a one hundred percent refund. Go to get our Trades dot com promo code buck. That's get our Trades dot com promo code bucke website for guarantee terms and conditions past performance, not to guarantee your future earnings. All right. Joining us now is Senator Marcia Blackburn of Tennessee. Senator,

great to have you back. I am delighted to join you. Thank you. What should we be doing right now and what should the administration, notably be doing about the situation unfolding in Cuba. Well, first of all, the American people need to know and the administration needs to come out and say Look, this is a fight for freedom. These are people that have been under a dictator for sixty two years and they have no food, no water, no electricity,

no jobs, and they want their freedom. And we're going to stand with the people of Cuba, and by the way, to the Cuban president, we're going to continue sanctions. We're going to sanction bad actors, and if you start firing shots into these crowds, all options will be on the table. Are you surprised at the Biden administrations shall we say, lack of decisiveness? I mean, is there any pressure you think on this White House that may get them to

move with a little more clarity. I talked to Tennesseeans every day, but they are so frustrated with this administration. They thought they were going to have somebody who was a moderate, who was going to stand up to bad actors around the globe, and what they have seen is someone who seems to enjoy putting in place issues and policies that divide, that diminish our freedoms. And there's a lot of buyers remorse out there. So therefore, I am not surprised that they have been so hesitant. You know,

look at their policies. They've had a choice time and again to either say America first or America last. And what they do is they make decisions that put America last. But look at it in relation to the Chinese Communist Party, they've made decisions about not finding out about the origins of COVID nineteen, not holding US companies to account that are doing business in China, companies like Nike and Apple and the NBA. They have had the opportunity to be

firm against Iran, but instead what are they doing. They're saying, well, let's talk about maybe going back into the Iran nuclear deal. And when it comes to Cuba, they are not saying we are against the Cuban Communist Party and this regime and they need to come out and do that. We're speaking of Senator Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee. Senator, I wanted to get you to help help everyone understand here what's

going on with this budget bill. The Democrats want to push through four point one trillion in new spending is the figure that we are seeing. What is what's going on here? I mean, there's I have a few questions to ask you about this, But first off, will they be able with only Democrat votes, they can get this through. Is that correct. Yes, they're going to try to push this three and a half trillion dollars of the new

unpaid for spending through. Now they're trying to say, well, a lot of it has to do with infrastructure, but they're in mind the president and a bipartisan group had decided to take do infrastructure separately, and then this would be three and a half trillion dollars in new spending on top of all of this, and we've got about seven hundred billion dollars left over in COVID money that has not been reappropriated, that has not been utilized, that could be utilized, but oh no, they don't want to

do that. They want to run up the debt and then put future generations in servitude to the federal government to pay off this debt. So what would it mean for them to use reconciliation. I mean, that's the part of this I think the public we hear, okay, there's there's what can be blocked with the filibuster, but a budgetary measure can't be blocked by the filibuster, and then a budgetary measure can have reconciliation I mean, how how much can they just ram this through without Republicans being

able to stop. Well, here's where the dividing line is. They cannot put new federal law in place through a budget reconciliation component. So that is why you're seeing some things have to stand alone and get a vote. When it comes to appropriating money to pay for programs that are already on the books, then of course they can do that through budget reconciliation. What we're trying to do is to remind all hardworking taxpayers out there, you need to be weighing in with your members of the House

and Senate. You need to let them know this is not okay and that you are not going to be supportive of this. They need to hear from you because we've got twenty twenty two midterms coming up, and they are all looking over their shoulder to see who is paid attention. What's in I know it's I'm sure with three point five trillion, then an additional infrastructure spending. Right,

that's the way people are reporting on it. What are some of the key things, Senator Blackburn that are in this that people should because I see things about a lot of climate change, green new deal kind of stuff. I mean, what are we where's this money supposed to go? Yeah, and here's the thing. They backed out anything to do with roads, bridges, highways, railways, runways, and broadband. All of that would be over in the one point to trillion

dollars by partisan bill. And I think you've got about eight Republicans and two or three Democrats that are for that measure working on that that measure. So that's one point two trillion. This three point five trillion that they are saying would to infrastructure. You're exactly right. It's money for the Green New Deal, it is money to grow the unions, it is money for green energy, it is money for childcare and for elder care. They're now calling

all of that infrastructure. But it is not what you think of as roads, bridges, highways, railways, waterways, runways, and broad bands. What would a reasonable I mean to your mind, and taking into account that we're at over twenty eight trillion dollars in debt and their concerns about inflation, and as you mentioned, this is really taking money and making it so that future generations of Americans will have to deal with the financial financial burden here. But what what

is the what would a reasonable bill look like. A reasonable would be what we passed out of the Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, which was surface transportation, and it was about three hundred and fifty billion dollars. Now, that is addressing the needs that people tell us they want to see. Address three hundred and fifty billion versus three point five trillion.

There's definitely a definitely a gap there, Senator Blackburn, We're telling everybody, call in, tell your congressman, tell your senator. This is too much, too crazy. Senator Marshall Blackburn of Tennessee, always appreciate you stopping by with us. Thank you so much. Thank you. More political insights coming up here from our

friend mister Ryan Gerdusky. He is the author of They're Not Listening How the Elites created a National Populist Revolution, and he is a political consultant man who knows some things about some stuff. Ryan, great to have you, Thanks for having me. Okay, so we just had Senator Marsha Blackbird on today talking about the budget bill and what

Democrats are trying to do here. I mean, they Republicans said, Okay, infrastructure, it's been three hundred and fifty billion dollars on infrastructure, which sounds like a lot of money to me, But what do I know? Democrats want the three point five trillion plus, then I think it's six hundred billion on top of it for additional infrastructure or something. It's a crazy amount of money that's built into it. But tell

me about how amnesty comes into this equation. So it was announced just yesterday that Senator Joe Mansion was going to go forward with an amnesty bill that would give amnesty basically the six million plus illegal aliens. They include DOCTA recipients, farm workers, quote unquote essential service workers, that includes any restaurant worker as an essential service worker, and

anyone who's lost their job from COVID nineteen. It's gonna be a massive behemoth of an amnesty bill snuck inside the budget which is never ever ever even been attempted before, let alone done. And the budget bill, mind you, is only fifty one votes to pass. Fifty Democrats plus Kamala Harris Um. That's what they're looking at, and it will be a massive six a million plus person amnesty if they get this. Throw Wait, but how how could that be?

Because when we spoke to the Center, I said, okay, they can basically the power of the purse, right, whether they're spending a dollar or a trillion dollars, Senate gets to determine that and that and that can be done through the through a simple majority vote, or even through the budget reconciliation process when they kind of go in

the back end and address it. Whatever that means. How can they do amnesty, because you know, amnesty is not we're spending more money on it's it's changing US federal law, right, So how does that work in So the way that they're doing is they're sitting there and saying that the budget will um This budget will increase welfare recipients, so therefore it will increase the budgeting United States, and therefore it is a budget bill. That is the reason that

they're going to give to the parliamentarian. I spoke to people from Senator Tom Cotton's office yesterday about this. That the reason their reasoning is this will increase the budget because it will increase welfare spending because there'll be a lot of new immigrants that will be qualifying for welfare, and therefore it is part of the budget bill. There's several hurdles. They still have to get through. This is

not like a done deal yet. Joe Mansion was a very big hurdle and him getting on board is not a good sign. They still have to get Kristen Cinema, who is the most independent person probably in the US Senate, and she does basically whatever she wants. Then there is also the Senate Parliamentarian who can sit there and say that this is not allowed in the budget bill. The Senate Parliamentarian was the one who also ruled that you can't increase in wage and the budget bill, so she

may be a very difficult hurdle to sit there. And to cross third, you have the House Democrats. The House Democrats can only lose four votes to make to get the amnesty through. So four House Democrats and Vonnal seats sit there and split on this um, then that that kills the bill. Uh And and lastly, I mean you have public pressure I think from um from a moderate Democrats, Mark Kelly, who's up for this election. You have the

election in New Hampshire. There's a handful of senators who would be vulnerable in the upcoming twenty twenty two mid terms. Then may be inclined to maybe flinch on this. So Ryan, is the overall spending something that anyone is anyone really gonna care? Doesn't matter, you know, because I remember when Obama was spending a trillion dollars for not the bank ballots, but for tarp right Trump, Oh no, no, it was the simulus, not tarpet stimulus, and everyone was like, oh

my gosh, that's a lot of money. I mean, now we've just been six trillion last year because of COVID. Right, six trillion was a total federal outlay for twenty twenty. Now we're talking about a four point one trillion or three point five is an I see. But then there's I believe additional six hundred billion of infrastructure on top of that whatever. So between three and four trillion dollars of spending, do people care? I mean, does this move the needle? Well? I mean I think I think people

do care. I mean they do care. But there's a certain population that does generally care about depth as it's spending and the debt and blowing up the debt, and that that is the case. However, more people are going to care about inflation. I think this is where this really hurts them. I think that inflation is where they'll be worried about the spending because we're just literally dolling out money, spending huge quantities of it, and inflation is soaring.

I think that that will definitely affect lower income people. And then there's a handful of people in this country that still believe in democratic norms, that still believe that you shouldn't sit there and have one party try to rush something through with the bare minimum of votes. And those those moderates who cared so much about they clutched their pearls for Trump every time Trump was quote unquote

breaking democratic norms. That will be that will care about Democrats sitting there and having a complete paragraph on their own with just fifty votes in a way that's never done before. That will affect this country forever. You know, it's it's worth saying you a country can get back from losing war, or from a bad economy, or from a bad present. It can never change an amnesty. This is it forever, a six million person amnesty that could

flip Texas. And Democrats know, and that's why they're so hungry. That is that they're in do this any which way they can because they think that this will be you know the end, this will be the you know, this will be them in power forever. I mean the parliamentarian it sounds like has a tremendous amount of power in this situation given what Democrats are trying to do, which makes me worry that they're going to use all of the pressure they can, you know, above and below ground,

so to speak, to get this person to budge. I mean, am I missing something? Is the parliamentary parliamentarian party? I spoke so I spoke to two parliamentarians. So one who told me that this is appol not allowed in the rules, a former parliamentarian, so this is absolutely not allowed in the rules. The second one who is who's a council of the parliamentarian, who said it's a fifty fifty chance because there is some precedent in a two thousand and

five budget bill about something small on immigration. It wasn't anything close to this. Um. The current of parliamentarian is pretty down the line and she's pretty she's pretty uh, she doesn't really wave a lot. She was the one who who made sure Democrats couldn't pass them in wage hike in the last budget. She said that that's not allowed and if a minimal wage hike. It doesn't affect spending. I have a very hard time seeing how amnesty does.

So you think unlikely but not impossible, and Democrats business and it's not impossible. There's four major hurdles to sit there and there. If you live in Arizona, you should call Christen Cinema, Mark Kelly, if you live in any swing district in the House, you need four House Democrats to have at least enough concern not to one amnesty in this bill. And you know in this way, And the most deceiving part about about Joe Mansion is that

he's the one who is getting so much praises. I'm going to save the filibuster, and I believe in the Senate, but this is basically a way to get rid of the filibuster without getting rid of the filibuster. Yeah, this is he wants the praise of being the maverick who supports the Senate institution of the filibuster while giving the Democrat hard left exactly and honestly just the Democrat Party generally exactly what they want without the votes that are

otherwise need to do it. That's very Is is is there anything else that people should be aware of that is involved in this budget process that you know they're they're basically trying to hide or hoping no one pays attention to. There's plenty of there's green new deal parts of this budget. There's going to be efforts to expand medicaid, to have K through twelve twelve PreK universal PreK in this budget.

They're going to try to shove every single Democratic wish list in this budget basically except for HR one is they've already said that that's not allowing the budget the voting bill, but everything else in this budget will be shoved in there. You know, come hell or high water, and it's just and mansion is not going to go alone many parts of it, and many other moderate Democrats are not going to go along with other large parts

of it. It's a lot of messaging in this bill, but they will find out whatever they can get and whatever they can push through uh and keep with the absolute barman. I mean, remember, it's only four House Democrats, either of the far left or of the moderates who have to sway to sit there and break from this. Well, why do you think we're speaking, Ryan Grudusky author If

they're not listening how the elites created a national populous revolution. Ryan, why do you think we got so much from the Democrats this week about Jim Crow two point zero Texas voting rights law, the people leaving to go to DC, the Texas State State House Democrats. Is this just all? Is it just all theatrics to raise money or is there is there a bigger strategy involved it because they have to There's an old thing. If God didn't exist,

we'd have to create him. Donald Trump doesn't exist in the public eye, so they have to create the next race, baiting, scaring of my already is and and Cabernet, Antifa, wine moms in the suburbs, so that has the first it was Marjorie Taylor Green, then it was Matt Gates. Now it's now it's Texas Republicans trying to get you know, voter id laws of its Georgia Republicans trying a voter

ideal laws. There has to always be a case of Republicans are five seconds away from reinstituting slavery in their minds. So that's kind of just why it's literally meaningless. I mean, it's a small state law in one state that that has a minimal change is really when you think of it, um, this is not this is not this is not the be all, end all changing of the bill. So that's one of the election law. So I just think that it's smoked nearest to raise money and keep anxieties going

for to keep Democrats engaged. And how long do you think we're gonna have to wait to see what actually happens with this with this budget bill, by the way, I meant to we have we have some time. I mean, it's not going to be done. They don't have a text yet, so first institute the text and then the parliamentarian will have to waive what parts of the text are not are not allowed to be in the budget. So that has to happen first. And they don't have

a text to the budget yet. If they do it very sloppily, uh, there'll be more that you can sit there and peel. So I think it will be some time. So if you have time, and you live in West Virginia or Arizona, call your centers. If you live in Swing House, he's call your congressman and tell them don't don't have an amnesty through the button. Meaning we got a couple of weeks here, Yes, you have a couple

of weeks for sure. And uh, you know, Ryan, I also want to because I know you've been following the election stuff very closely, the twenty twenty election stuff. I'm hearing from people who have been straight shooters. Yeah, I'm not hearing from the uh uh, what's what was his name? Who's the guy who was in Richard Jewel? That lawyer who I'm talking about? That Wood? Yeah, I'm not talking

like Lynn Wood stuff. I'm hearing for people that are serious people that some funky stuff happened in Georgia with ballots, and that they they they have proof it's real. And you know, maybe it was accidental, maybe it wasn't systematic, because there were some double accounts for Trump as well as double accounts for Biden. But have you seen any of this? Does this wash? I went to Georgia and I went there for the runoffs, and I have to tell you it was the biggest disaster I've ever seen

before in my entire life. From election board to the state Republican Party. It was like the first ten minutes of saving Private Ryan. There was no safe place to rush yourrize. I would not doubt if there were some problems going on in Georgia, it would not shock me in the slightest. I don't have any proof of that. I don't have any evidence all off sayings, I would not be shocked. I'm hearing the same thing in Arizona.

So I mean, wait and see. I doubt you know Trump is going to be reinstate there for me or anything like that. I don't think that's going to happen. But I wouldn't be surprised if there were some overcounts or some undercounts or something was going wrong. Yeah, because there's there's like a ferocity from the Democrats about even the most straightforward recount or checking of what happened in these places. I mean, they lose their minds at the very notion of like looking at what went out right.

And I mean the bigger problem in Georgia is they broke I mean not those Democrats. There's Republicans let to do it. They broke the state election law. In order to hold this election, the state election lasses. If you want to promote appsotete battle, there has to be two witnesses, one official Democrat, one official Republican, and only you can end in your own battle. That's the state law. It was like that before twenty twenty, and the Secretary of

State Rattensburger, waived all of those laws. He allowed every county had put in as many drop boxes as they wanted to. Of course, the Democratic counties wanted to drop boxes often as there was a mailbox, and so the state law was completely altered for the sake of this election, and that gage Democrats a huge, huge, huge advantage. But I don't know about the double counting, so I guess we'll wait and see about that. I wouldn't I wouldn't

be surprised what comes out of Atlanta and Savannah. Though. Have they figured out Ryan last one for you? But but have they figured out the Republicans that you have to actually challenge this stuff and get it squared away before the election? You think, are they more serious about it?

You know? I think before the election, I think there's there was one part Arrogancy where you know, I would A lot of the problem with a lot of Southern states is their Republican parties believe they can never lose outside of Florida, and that's why they have a competent Republican party in Florida because they actually try Georgia they don't.

In most other southern states they do not. So yes, I think that, I think now more than ever because election integrity is probably one of the top three issue, or definitely the one of the top three issues for Republican voters. That's why they're making all these masterforms, and now they're going to sit there and probably do something

about it. Listen, if Florida went from the biggest joke in the country in two thousands to the most efficient state accounting ballots in twenty years, I think all these other ships in their act together a lot faster, and should Ryan or Dusk everybody. Ryan always appreciate it, man, thanks so much, thank you. I gotta tell you, at least one person really liked Joe Biden's reckless, dishonest, divisive,

destructive speech. Somebody with expertise, I mean, true world class expertise in just those things, dividing, destroying, lying, play clip six. And I told the President just after the speech, I think he made one of a monumental speech for president to stand there in the shadows of where they signed the Declaration of Independence and attack Jim Crow twenty first

century or something that I was not expecting. And I also thought the fact that he did not in any way, shape or from duct the racial aspect of what we're seeing in terms of the pushback by many states in coming with new restrictions. What else do you need to know other than Al Sharpton liked the speech. I think that pretty much tells you everything you need to know about what Biden said earlier this week. All right, well,

thanks for being here today with me. Remember subscribe If you're not already something you might just listen as a one off, subscribe to the Buck Sexton podcast on the iHeart Radio app or Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts. We are doing this show every day. Tomorrow, Producer Mark and I are going to be doing some roll call and chatting about the weekend, so we'll have some fun there. And please also, if you haven't already, go on Apple Podcasts and give this podcast five stars

and a review hopefully where you say nice things. All right, Excited to be back with you tomorrow. Talk to you then, Team Shield Time