An Ideology of Bitterness - podcast episode cover

An Ideology of Bitterness

Jul 15, 20191 hr 46 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Trump fights back and triples down. The migration crisis. Mainstream democrats show their Anti-Americanism out in the open. Democrats attack Tom Homan.

Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

You are entering the freedom Hudge. Trump is under siege from his critics for some tweets over the weekend, but guess what, he is fighting back and doubling down. We'll break down all the latest on that, plus a major change in what asylum actually means at our southern border. How this good help stand the migration crisis. We've got that and much more coming up on The Buck Sexton Show.

This is the Buck Sexton Show where the mission where mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistakes, American, You're a great American. Again, The Buck Sexton Show begins. Analyst, he's a great guy. Now, these are people that, in my opinion, hate our country. Now you can say what you want, but get a list of all of the statements they've made and all I'm saying that if they're not happy here, they can leave. They can leave. And you know what, I'm sure that

there'll be many people that won't miss them. But they have to love they have to love our country. They're Congress people and I never used any names, but these are people. Quiet quiet, quiet, quiet, quiet quiet. These are people that if they don't like it here, they can leave and I'd be I don't know who's gonna miss them, but I guess some people will. One of them is

polling at eight percent. So when when I hear people speaking about how wonderfelt al Qaeda is when I hear people talking about some people, some people with the world Trade says some people, not some people, much more than some people. When I hear the statements that they've made.

And in one case, you have somebody that comes from Somalia, which is a failed government, a failed state, who left Somalia, who ultimately came here and now as a congresswoman who's never happy, says horrible things about Israel, hates Israel, hates Jews, hate Jews. Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. President Trump not backing down an inch today after the whole media firestorm, right, let's bust out all the cliches the media controversy around well,

the Trump said, look, here's what's going on. All right, Let's let's look at what matters for a moment, and then I'm want to talk to you about the asylum situation of the border, and we'll return to whether Trump should have said things the way he said them later on. There's an anti americanism that is now prominent in the Democratic Party. It is on display, it is out of the been, and this has always been a feature of

the left in this country. Will want to the desire to tear down this country, to divide this country in ways that we think less of each other based on our ideology and our politics. This has been going on for a long time, but now you really see it. Now you really see it from the angry and bitter caucus within the Democratic Party right the leftists. And it's not even just this squad You've got, you know, Elizabeth war and you've got others. You are just they're just

always bitter about this country. What they want to do is appeal to the victim mentality that so many people have, because you know what the truth is, life is hard, Life is full of disappointments. I'm sure many of you listening to this have things that you wish had gone differently. I know I have things that I wish had gone differently, different choices I could have made. I wish I had been more disciplined. I wish I had focused more on

things that matter. A lot of but part of growth and part of being a productive and worthwhile human being is. You just accept that you're not perfect, and you try to do better, and you have certain hopefully moral code that you live by and you adhere to. But none of us are perfect, and you just assume that along

the way there's gonna be some bumps and bruises. But what if somebody could come along and tell you that all the stuff in your life that's not the way you want it to be, Everything that is either a failure or a disappointment or a frustration, is someone else's fault, some other system as systematic oppression, you could say, some other group or entity or organization or or entire history is the reason why you are frustrated, the reason why, and therefore it is not in your hands. It's none

as your fault. And all you have to do is be a part of the movement to put power in the hands of those who claim that it is all someone else's fault, and they will address this unfairness, they will address this inequality, they will make the frustration go away. Of course that's a lie, right, but that's the big lie at the heart of the Democratic Party. And you see here what's causing the frustration for many on the left. Is America itself the cause of the disaffection, the cause

of the dissatisfaction. It is this country for leftists. Instead of viewing this as the greatest, most prosperous, most incredible nation state ever created in the history of the universe, which is what it is, they look at it and says, it's a place of oppression, of sexism, of racism, of wealth inequality, and we need to do a whole top down refit. Put other people in charge, down the powerful, push them aside unless they're leftists, and then make them

more powerful. Folks. It's all a lie. It's a dangerous line too, is an ideology of bitterness, bitterness toward a country that has given all of these individuals. Yes, the squad, so to speak, but many other Democrats. I mean, they're they're the leftist beliefs that they hold. They didn't come up with them, they're just they're just manifestations of it. This is now mainstream Democrat thinking, especially in Trump's America.

All this prosperity and optimism and growth, and you know, we're becoming spoiled in this country right now by how low unemployment is, how high the stock market is, no major wars. I mean, you look at this, and Democrats are furious with it. They hate how much dare I say Trump is winning? They hate it? And so what do they do? They spew hatred about things. And Trump is sick of it. He's sick of this mentality. And by the way, I agree with him insofar as enough

is enough. We don't have to sit around and get lectured by people who neither have the intellectual depth nor the moral depth to tell the rest of the country how to live their lives and what they should do. We don't have to sit around anymore and clap and and and you know, smile through our teeth at people on the left who want to tear down so much that is great about this country because they think that

they are better than America. They think that this country needs to be dramatically remade in some other not the not the constitutional basis of individual liberty. No, no no, no, something else. What is it. They're not really quite sure yet what it is. They just know it has to be something else. Trump wasn't going to back down. Trump understands that backing down to these leftist, to these democrats,

never gets you anything good. This is This is one takeaway from the Trump era that I hope everybody has, which is they will cavin on you. They will ruin you, they will destroy you. They won't feel bad about it. They don't care what it takes. They act without decency, they act in bad faith, and they feel good doing it. This is the political opposition we face in this country now. This is now a defining characteristic of the left. This

is not something that is a aberrant among Democrats. They really believe that Republicans don't care about dead children at the border. They really believe that Republicans, in their heart of hearts, don't want to defend sovereignty and rule of law,

but are just racists. And the fact that many of the Republicans that hold these positions are themselves minorities doesn't change their thing at all, or that the Republicans will hold these positions are repulsed by true racism and believe in the dignity and individual rights and individual grace of all individuals. That doesn't matter to the left at all. It's just about what the narrative can be, how effective

they can make it. They'll say whatever they have to say at any point in time, that's where we are as a country right now. When was the last time you heard about Russia collusion. By the way, Notice how they moved off of that. Oh. I thought that was the most important lesson the country had to learn. I thought that the president was a traitor and that Russia was destroying our institutions. Oh, you mean that they can't

damage the president with that anymore. It looks like looks like they have to find something else now it's the president as a racist. Oh. They draw this straight line from Trump on the escalator to Charlottesville to this tweet. This is what they're doing. They never are content to just make a case to the American people about their ideas. It's always we have to be our side, the Republicans, Conservatives. We're bad people. We're just bad people. And Trump is

the worst of all of us. That's true. Trump is worse then Some idiot was on MSNBC today apparently said Trump is more racist than a neo Nazi. I think was the quote. And I'm not even sure that's the dumbest thing on MSNBC that's been said all day. I'm quite sure it's not the dumbest thing that's been said all day there, which just tells you a lot about

what gets said over at MSNBC. For those of us who care about politics as a system of dealing with competing interests and trying to bring about the common good, the best for the country, the best for you and me, there are more important things to think about than whether the president tweets or says everything perfectly. And the president knows that, and that's why even if he does perhaps misstep one time or another, he knows that he's in a fight and the other side is just hoping to

make him lose. There are no particular rules they abide by. They'll do whatever they have to do. They will use our own decency against us, just like we're seeing at the border. I might add, the decency of the American people is being used as a weapon to undermine our sovereignty and our rule of law. Our very asylum process itself has been overtaken as a trojan horse for open

borders in America. That's what's going on. We don't want people to live in fear of execution or torture because of their political or religious beliefs, so we have a process called asylum. Guess what leftists are now cheering as that process is being trampled on by people who just want to be here, because yeah, it's a great country with really nice fat welfare benefits, and people want to be here and not in Mexico and not in these other countries that they're fleeing from. But that's not what

the process of asylum was set up for. We will get into this because this is very important. The Trump administration is in the pro by the way, it's gonna go to the courts. It's gonna be a fight over this, but this is where our focus needs to be. They have to stop the lie. It is you know one thing that drives me crazy. Before we have a quick pause here to collect our thoughts before we come back and dive into this asylum fight. They keep saying that

Trump wants to end asylum protection for these migrants. No, he's trying to stop fraudulent asylum claims. That's what these are. When over ninety percent of people are saying something that's not true. You have to stop the massive fraud. But we'll see what the media does is they say, oh, but it's all just a sylum. No, that's not the way this works. They're trying to scam the system, and we should not allow them to get away with that scam. We have more on this team, a whole lot more.

Stay with me. I watched Lindsey Graham today on Fox and Friends talking about the same subject, and frankly, even stronger than what I'm saying, he said the communists, I'm saying that they're socialists. Definitely. As to whether or not their communists, I would think they might be, but this isn't what our country is about. Nevertheless, they're free to leave if they want, and if they want to leave, that's fine, and if they want to stay, that's fine.

Politicians can't be afraid to take them on. A politician that here's somebody where we're at war with al Qaida and see somebody talking about how great al Qaida is. Pick out a statement that was omar, how great al

Qaida is. When you hear that, and we're losing great soldiers to al Qaida, When you see the World Trade Center gets knocked down, and you see the statements made about the World Trade Center, all the death and destruction, I'll tell you what, I'm not happy with them, and it's very easy to be saying, oh, gee, well it's okay.

If weak politicians want to say, and the Democrats in this case, if they want to gear their wagons around these four people, I think they're gonna have a very tough election because I don't think the people of the United States will stand for it. I hope he's right. I know that the version of events, in the version of America that you get from ilhan Omar Aoc to Lee Presley, I know that that wouldn't win a national election.

But how different is the view of America from those four members of Congress to say Pete Buddha Judge or Bernie Sanders or you know, go down the list or Castro who says the president is a white supremacist. I think we actually do we even have him? Saying that we might even have him, I don't even Trump. Yeah, he says it Play thirteen. Everybody knows that acts like a white supremacist. He is a racist. He's made that

clear on so many different occasions. And not only that as the leader of our country, his politics, his strategy is about dividing people along racial lions. So this is this is how is Trump supposed to speak to elected members of government who referred to him as a white supremacist. I just want to, you know what, so does he have to just make, you know, Aristotelian arguments and and try to try to bring them out via you know, the tactics of Lincoln Douglas debate and show the wrongness

of their positions. I mean, I understand some people say, yes, bugga, but you know he's a human being too. And if somebody was calling me a white supremacist, I would let it fly at them because it's a lie and it's a smear. I think Trump feels the same way. I think he's sick of it. This is garbage, this is nonsense. This Democrat, Democrat, Democrat Freudian, This Democrat party is cracking up.

I mean, it's just it's it's whacko there. They've got these people that are running around that are making these kinds of claim. They're saying this insane stuf about the President United States, and their side never calls him out for this a white supremacist. But if you remember, they've they've tried to move the definition white supremacists used to be.

You know, swastika tattoos on your neck, a shaved head and you know Arian nation stuff, and now a white supremacist is I don't think that we should have race based admissions and colleges. Oh that's white supremacy. No, it's not. It's just it's actually the opposite of racism. But that's perhaps a conversation for another day. Trump is not backing down because he understands that backing down just puts puts him in a weaker position going forward. Do I wish

that Trump could use sometimes more precision? Do I wish that he hadn't said something that makes it sound like he doesn't even know that these members of Congress three

of the four were born in this country. Yeah? Yeah, But I'm also asking Trump to be the guy who can go out there and fight against all this stuff and not get fatigued, and not get bogged down, and not despair against the fact that, you know, if this, if the current Democratic Party we're to come into power, I don't know how and when the country would recover from that, because this Democratic Party is not what I grew up But that's not what you grew up with.

This is something else. This is some radical socialist craziness. That's what lindsay Grammar and Linday gram straight up calling them commies. If we'll get on that later. I like it. You know, if they're going to call us white supremacist, maybe we should call them commies. Maybe we should tell Democrats that they're just a bunch of statist, socialist lunatics. Hey,

that's that's one way to go. Because I gotta tell you this, this stuff that we're seeing from from the far left these days, the the vitriol, the anti americanism, and this is how you had an anti fu guy over the weekend. The press is just reporting on and attacked an ICE detention facility. No, you had an anti foot domestic terrorist try to blow up an ICE detainment facility, had a gun, he had got into a shootout with

with ICE officials, and he had a manifesto. And the manifesto was exactly what you'd expect from somebody who was, you know, an MSNBC watcher. I mean, the talking points could have come out of Rachel Maddow's monologue. And this guy is a terrorist and he's you know, where's all the coverage of that anti foot terrorist tries to blow up ICE facility because it's concentration camp taking AOC's language.

Oh is the media gonna hold her responsible for all the vitriol that folks, glad you come here to the freedom hunt, because we've got a lot of fight left this. People who come to our border must have and want to apply for asylum, must have already applied and been denied at a country they passed through. Remember, asylum is about safety, not a choice of for him, the ideas that you want to get people safe, and this is something America has been very generous about in the past.

That's right, that's Ken Cuccinelli. This is what the administration is doing. I wish they'd done it a while ago. They're just going to start saying, if you it's through executive order. I remember, the president has a lot of authority over who can come into the country. These are all aliens. These are all non US citizens who are showing up. They do not have the rights of citizens, despite what the left and Democrats want to give them, and the President should be able to exclude them all

for any or no reason. By the way, if he just feels that it's in the national interest. But that would of course be you know, that would be deaf con one for the libs, they would completely lose their minds and it would be overturned, overturned in federal court right away. And because they just find some judge, they find some left wing Obama appoint toe to say that the commander in chief isn't really the commander in chief. That's what we keep coming up against with this president,

that's what they keep doing to him. But now we see the administration saying, Okay, you have to at least try to get asylum in Mexico effectively before you can ask for it here in America. Because all these Central American migrants, they are taking advantage of the system in a few ways. One is you'll notice there aren't all these Mexican asylum seekers. Why is that. Mexico's got plenty of people that I'm sure would still love to come here illegally or it's still come here period in some

way if they could. But it's because contiguous countries Canada or Mexico, if you come into the country, if you come in illegally, we can push you back across the border very quickly. Non contiguous countries there's a different set of rules. And that's why the Central American asylum seekers have been able to get into the process, into the pipeline in America and not be quickly deported back to

their countries of origin. And the whole point is to just overwhelm the system, gum up the works, and then you get to stay forever. So now we're saying, okay, the administration is going to only allow you to apply for asylum in this country if you try to get asylum in Mexico. Effectively, if you're so desperate to leave Al Salvador or Honduras, if you're really in fear for your life. Mexico is not a country that is in

a state of war. You're not being persecuted politically or religiously in a country where you have the same religion and same language. Okay, that's not happening. So why wouldn't in Al Salvador and say, okay, I'm in Mexico now I'm safe from the violence that I say I'm fleeing in Al Salvador. What because Mexico is too violent is a country to be in. Come on, that's not a serious position. That's an untenable, intellectually untenable position for anyone

to hold. So this is going to force the discussion or force the reality. I should say into our discussion that these are not legitimate asylum seekers. They are scamming the system, and this is going to be you know, it's going to be fought in court right away. But just remember asylum is about safety. It's about people getting to a safe place, and it's not about getting the best welfare benefits and the best economy. And you know that that's you know, having access to the best schools.

That's not what asylum is about. That's immigration, that's different. And if they're in Mexico, that's a safe enough country that they should request asylum in Mexico first, also a country where they share a lot of cultural linguistic background. So why wouldn't you want it If you were really just playing violence in Honduras, why wouldn't you want to apply in Mexico for asylum. I think it's so interesting.

One I'm sure you'd be told this by Latin American experts, is that the Mexicans are often quite nasty to other Spanish speaking peoples in the region, particularly Central Americans. So that's a question that maybe maybe that would come up, but no one's gonna want to talk about that because only America is ever bad to people, only America ever has racism, right, that's the story you hear from the left. It's it's ridiculous. But this is an important move by

the administration. It will be challenge in court pretty much right away. And this is one of many things that has to be done here in order to stop this migrant crisis from continuing on. And the rhetoric is going to continue to be horrible. I mean, I even though everything administration is doing here is proper. I mentioned this Antifa terrorists. Remember, we've got to talk about this here because they won't want to talk about it at the

other networks. A left wing Antifa Democrat Party sympathizer tried to blow up some ice facility where there was detainment going on of some of these migrants, saying that it's like a concentration camp, and he wrote some manifesto. I read his manifesto and he's taking the language of AOC and saying, well, you know, and I understand. If I thought that there were real concentration camps operating this country, would I take up arms against them? Absolutely? I would.

If there are real concentration camps operating, I would take up arms, no question about it. These aren't concentration Only a moron thinks they're concentration camps. But there are a lot of morons out there who are hearing this stuff from members of Congress, and they were lacked on it. You know, I remember when if you said anything mean about CNN being fake news, you're responsible for that one

idiot pipe bomber guy. Well, what about AOC and this member of Antifa, what about ilhan Omar and what she says about how we treat migrants that are coming to our southern border play before and instead of us saying here is a B and C, we're saying there is zero option. And if you ever think that you have a chance, we're going to treat you worse than a dog.

One of our members said to me, if there were dogs in those cages, every single member of Congress would vote to make sure that all of these cages didn't

exist to any So, we live in a society. We live in a society and govern in a body that might value the life of a dog more than they value the life of a child who might not look like theirs, And that is completely sad, saying horrible things about America, about this country, about how we treat migrants, and I'm sick of it, and I know a lot of you are too, And I do think the President should and has a role, has an obligation to speak out about this and should continue to. This is anti Americanism,

straight up, full stop. That's what this is. These are people who are lying about US as a country, us as the American people. And yes they are of us, they are Americans, they are members of Congress. But guess what, Sometimes the people that you really have to worry about are the people who are on your side, so to speak, as Americans, the enemy within can be very real, my friends. The ideological opponents that we face, the most important ones today,

aren't external to this country. They are internal to this country. And I think the President and many of his supporters recognize that. We all know that AOC and this crowd are a bunch of communists. They hate Israel, they hate our own country. They're calling the guards along our border the boord troll agents, concentration camp guards. They accuse people to support Israel of doing it for the Benjamin's. They're anti Semitic, they're anti America. Don't get down, aim higher.

We don't need to know anything about them personally, talk about their policy, man, Lindsey Graham. I like what he's going for here. I mean, first of all, to have a senator called them a bunch of commies is great. You gotta like this. It's like, we all know they're a bunch of communists. Yes, we do. Let them have it. They're gonna run around calling everybody racists and fascists, and when a white supremacists and Nazis, we can start to call them commis, folks, I mean, I call them libs.

We could also say, I think we need to use the term commy more because they're not really even democratic socialists. Well, you're talking about the AOC wing of the party. These are individuals who want so much control over the government and think of themselves as a revolutionary committee of sorts that should have the power to do whatever they want. Well then yes, then yes you do. In fact, I think deserve to call some of them commed. So so

I like I like where Lindsay's heads out on this one. Now, on the specific charge of aiming higher. This is where the Trumpster in the press commerce today was just like, look, man, he's he's not he's not having it. Oh and let me just before we get into this. They have names for us all the time. They call us names all the time, right, they being the left, the Democrats. Why can't we have disparaging terms for them that go to

what they believe in their ideology. I'm not saying the kind of names that you know, would would be ashamed to call anybody. I mean, there are some things you should never call any person, right, but you know, curses and things. But why can't we call them comedies? Why

don't we refer to them as libs? If they're going to run around and say that everybody's a racist and a white supremacist and a neo Nazi and a fascist and all this stuff, why do we always have say, well, and all, they really want to enlarge the government and are not constitutionally bound and they're not originalist. And you know, this is where Trump is a different kind of republic. He fights in a way that is effective because he fights the way they'll fight. This is a fire with

fire situation. He calls them out. I mean, can you imagine. I mean, you know, with Mitt Romney, it was like he was always doing a model un tryout. But he was trying to trying to argue with Democrats and it just doesn't it just doesn't do. It doesn't cut it. It's not enough. So I think and the left clearly understands the importance of dominating the language that we use. And but that's why you know, when Trump says he

disagrees with Lindsey Graham on this one. Look, I think that Trump is usually when he pushes hard and fights back. I like it. This time, I think that he opened himself up for because what he said just was factually wrong and it was it was not necessary, and it did seem, you know, it just opened up this can of worms. It didn't have to happen. So I think it was a blunder. I think it was a blunder. I think it was the wrong the wrong tweet. But Trump,

I gotta tell you, he disagrees, folks. I mean, he's he tripled down on this one today because also I know what Trump was trying to say. Trump is taking aim at the anti americanism of these figures. He's not. You know, this is the thing Trump, Trump's not a racist. Okay,

they can say this about him all day. He is not a racist, but he's willing to say things that the left will claim our racist because we live in this politically correct can't say anything, have to just always be lectured about white privilege and white supremacy all the time. And so Trump breaks out of that mold. To do that is gonna sometimes mean. Maybe he goes a little further than I would if I were him, But then again,

I'm not the president. But he disagree with Lindsay on this one at the Press Commerce Today play clip twenty. I disagree with Lindsay he's a congressman. What am I supposed to do? Just wait for senators? No, these are four So I disagree with Lindsay on that that was the only thing he said, Aim higher, shoot higher. What am I gonna do? Wait till we get somebody else in a higher position in higher office. These are people that hate our country. They hate our country, they hate it.

I think with a passion. Now it's possible I'm wrong. The voter will decide. But when I hear the way they talk about our country, when I hear the anti Semitic language they use, when I hear the hatred they have for Israel and the love they have for enemies like al Qaeda. Then you know what, I will tell you that I do not believe this is good for the Democrat Party. Certainly, it's not the party that I've

known over the years. You know, Trump, he's saying, look, maybe maybe I shouldn't have said it the way I said it. That's that's the closest the Trump will ever get to that, by the way, what he said there. You know, maybe the voter will decide, but he's not backing down on the fight. And I understand tactically, I know why he does not apologize because they don't want his apology. They just want him to concede ground. So they it's trench warfare, folks. It's not like you abandon

one trench, you go back one hundred yards. The other side's gonna want to cease fire. They're just like, Okay, now we're our position to shell you more. That's all they want to do. Trump knows that. So that's why when they play this whole game of what the haven't Republicans denounced? Why haven't they denounced? Look, I mean I've said I didn't. I didn't really like what the presidence that the president knows he might have gone the wrong

direction a little far. But no, sorry, we're not going to play the oh, I'm so sorry game, because the I'm so sorry game doesn't get you anywhere. The Okay, well, this is what I would say now game is what Trump wants to play, which is, I'm still in this fight. You know, sometimes, folks, you know, in war, sometimes the wrong the wrong house gets bombed. You know, bad things happen. And I think the Trump approach here is when you're

dealing with true, truly virulent anti americanism. And and this just this attitude of shocking left wing dictatorial authoritarianism, which is what you get from the the AOC Green New Deal lunacy. I mean that whole wing of and how you know we have to embrace all these insane ideas. You know that if you're not completely on board with transgender twelve year olds dancing in front of rooms full of men, I mean, this is all real stuff. It's

happening now, folks. You're a bigot, one of the big ones that keeps coming up, and you know you're just starting to see it now. Is oh, if you're if you're not, if you're a heterosexual, male. And you do not find a transgender female, which is a biological male that claims to be female. You don't find that person's actually attractive. It's not that that's your preference. And that's okay, you're a bigot. This this is our They've started this.

They've started this, and I'm give it two years. This will become the mainstream position of the Democratic Party because they're insane, because they have lost it. They're an ideology now that is unmoored from any moral principle, from any reality other than power and mob rule. That's what they've become. That's why they're all for open borders. That's why they'll say whatever they have to say whenever they have to

say it. Oh yeah, I think Trump I understand. I think that when when Lindsay Graham said aim higher, I think he meant, you know, take the high road in the conversation. I don't think he meant go for more prominent officials. Trump took that in a surprising direction here. But let's let's just go back for a second to Lindsay Graham, who was was, you know, doing doing a pretty pretty good job on the morning show. It was

on Fox and Fox and friends this morning. Here's what he also said about the squad of four, which is Pressley to lead AOC and oh wait, who am I missing? Frensley to lead AOC and oh Omar of course play ten Well. I think there are American citizens who are duly elected that are running on an agenda that is disgusting that the American people will reject. Talk about what it means for America to have free healthcare for illegal immigrants and no criminalization of coming into the country. I

hope Lindsay is right. I think he is, and I couldn't guarantee it. I'm not sure that what he's saying here is true. I don't know this country. We got a lot of First of all, we've got a lot of people coming in from the Third World who are if they're not voting, they're raising kids who are being told that all this stuff that the left preaches is true. So you got that, and then you know you have the media apparatus is still all in the pocket of

the Democratic Party. You know this Lindsey Graham's faith here that the radical agenda of the left will be rejected the next election. Yeah, if the economy is as good as it is right now, probably, But if we got a big economic downturn and all of a sudden, we're told that the rich people are the problem and they have to pay their fair share, and that's what's really an issue here. I don't know. Lindsey Graham may have more faith, may have more faith in the American voter

than I did. That's for sure. Everybody knows that acts like a white supremacist. He is a racist. He's made that clear on so many different occasions. And not only that as the leader of our country. His politics, his strategy is about dividing people along racial lines. It's called racial priming, and he has done that more successfully than any politician that we've seen in a very long time. It is absolutely racist and an America, and it is an old trope go back to where it came from.

That you know, you might hear it on the street, but you should never hear that from the president of the United States. So I was on Fox yesterday right after these tweets came out, and I saw the Redfromie and I said, oh, oh, this is gonna be this is gonna be one of these new cycles all of a sudden that's dominated by some Trump tweets, and I knew exactly what they're going to say, and I'm of the mind that this is not helpful and that it's not a it was not a smart move for the president,

that he should have said what he was trying to say. Differently, I don't agree with how he said it, if nothing else, just because now we have to spend all this time doing cleanup duty and trying to figure out, well, you know, when can we move on to the stuff that I want to talk about and that the country should be focused on, which is changing in the asylum policy, changing it, you know, getting these ice raids underway, making sure that

they're happening. That's that's what's important, the battle with the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. Trump is great on that usually, and if nothing else, Trump's magic power, his special power, is that he can endure and has endured, being called everything by these leftists everything. He's a rapist, he's a traitor, he's a racists. They call him the worst things that you can possibly call anybody, and doesn't face him at all. He just keeps on, He keeps

on coming at them. And that's why they have one of the reasons why they absolutely hate him so much because they can't stop him, and they can't force him to do what they want or to do. They can't make him fear them the way that they have made other Republicans fear them. Because, you know, Republicans, even the prominent, powerful ones in elected office, they don't want to have

people in the media calling them racist. They don't want to have to go and face their constituents and have people in the audience who say, well, you know this, you know I saw this CNN store they called you a racist. They don't want that. They do not want that. Oh no, no, that's their reputations are very important to them, and they're not willing to withstand the kind of verbal assaults and undermining that Republicans are subjected to, unfairly, usually

by the left, overwhelmingly unfairly. But yeah, so Trump Trump tweets this out, and I think that his supporters and this is where I am on this. Look, he's just trying to say that there's a an anti Americanism that has become far too prevalent and far too prominent in the Democrat Party, and that there are some people who are really representative of that now in the Democratic Party,

and he's just not going to stand for it. And they can call him a racist, and they can do all the stuff that they do and all that, and it's not going to change the fact that Trump at the end of the day, is not going to not going to move an inch based on their allegations. And he's definitely not going to move an inch because of what John Kasik, you know, Ohio, you're a great state with great people. I don't understand how this guy continues to be your governor. But Kasick waited on this one

play twenty two. I don't run around trying to call people communists and their socialists and they hate America. I mean, you see, this is the road we're on. It's just that one thing leads to another. It started in Charlottesville, and all the time and the language becomes more and more acceptable, we become immune this name calling. Where does

it leave us at the end. We're losing a little piece of our soul every time we stand back and allow this kind of rhetoric and division and anger to be announced, that people pushing back saying all right, that's enough, knock it off. Where was a big tough guy in moral voice, John Kasik, when Democrats were trying to ruin a man's life and reputation and destroy him and psychologically torture him on TV in front of his wife and children and friends and colleagues and tens of millions of

onlookers during the Kavanaugh hearing. Where was big tough guy Kasit? Then? Where were all these Republicans that I see now saying, oh, this is a soul, it's a racist. Where were they on the Kavanaugh thing? And I don't want to hear about old book? That's what aboutism. It's not what aboutism. This is about the fight. This is about how they fight and how we are expected to fight. They want us to apologize for the words we use. They want us to feel on the defensive when we're trying to

talk about difficult or touchy subjects. Do they have any compunction? Do they have any hesitation on their side? You know, we had Molly Hemingway carry Severino on last week about their Kavanaugh book, which I bought over the weekend. I'm looking forward to diving into it. I'm planning to get through it very quickly. They point out the Wall Street Journal atitorial today, that the Left didn't really pay any

price for Kavanaugh. Maybe they left a Senate seat or two on the table, maybe, but there was no real price paid. The journalists that tried to run with the smear, and it was a smear, and it was a lie. Those women that accused Kavana were liars, and the whole thing was orchestrated. It was a hit. It was the most disgusting thing I've ever seen in American politics, and it just happened a year ago. The people involved should all be ashamed, in fact, that people involved should lose

their public positions, should be drummed out of public life. Instead, you have people like Kamala Harris who are contenders for the presidency. She was very much involved in the Kavanaugh Smeir. Corey Booker, I am Spartacus very much involved in the

Kavanaugh Smeir. I just want to know where are these these moral paragons, these titans of virtue that we see on the right, these people like like k sik where were they during that whole debacle which was the most atrocious thing I've ever seen in American politics and will be repeated by the left if they can get away with it. They did not pay the kind of price that would prevent them from going down that same path

in the future. We all know this. Why is it that there is this entire class of Republicans out there who are so much more fierce and so much stronger when they are tearing down people who are their allies

on most policy issues, they're fellow Republicans. But in the era of Trump, people that are Trump supporters and never have the same kind of Victoryol Director of the Democrats, have you ever heard Kasi say that the Democrats are crazy, that they're that they are advocating for the mass and fanticide, that there aren't thirty seven genders, that men can't get pregnant, that we can't have a green new deal, that Medicare for all is a fantasy. Do you have your John

Kasi's any of this stuff? Or just say that Democrats senators in the judiciary community who tried to ruin Cavanaugh should live in infamy because there are disgrace not just as sentators, as human beings trying to set a man up and pretend that he's a gang rapist. Remember that was the allegation that was read into the record, a gang rapist when he was in high school. No person with an IQ above twenty could believe that. But that was what they did, a New Yorker with a little

Ronan pharaoh. Oh, they built him up his whole meat tooth thing. And if someone handed him that whole wine Stein story, and yeah, he's stuck with it. But he knew he had a big he had a big scoop and then he used all that credibility at that moment. He was going to be a hero to the left forever.

To try to bring this second woman story forward, Yeah, she was so traumatized by the Kavanaugh incident that didn't happen that she took six days and conversations with lawyers and a therapist to try to help remember if it happened to her. And then a third woman, Sweatnick, who was just a crazy person, I mean truly somebody who is mentally unstable and never should have been taken seriously by anyone. And Vlasi forward is emotionally unstable and clearly

has problems. And now we know more about her past and she has no idea if it as Kavana or some other guy who grabbed her, she has no idea. You know how much she had had her drink that day. She had no idea what's going on in the situation. That's what's come out recently, just making it up as she went along. Maybe she thought she remembered it, but who really knows. I just want to know where all these can And I'm sorry, there's some you know my i's he's a nice guy and he's good on some issues,

you know. David French over at National Review, David, you know you didn't respond to me on Twitter, So I'm gonna say it here. I said, why why does he believe Egene Carrol? Why is he jumping on that bandwagon against Trump? With Egene Carrol's a crazy person who's trying to sell books that she can't sell because the book is terrible and it's all a joke and it's a horrible the whole situation right. Putting her on TV is ridiculous. Anderson Cooper Show, I mean that was great. I mean

that was really Anderson Cooper deserve He deserved that. He deserved that, he deserved to have eg Carol on his show implode in real time. He deserved that. For all the smears about Russia collusion, all the other stuff he's put on TV. Where are these brave Republicans on those issues though it's only on our side? And you know why, because the Democrat system, the apparatus, the media, the social clubs, the speaking contracts, the book publishers. You just you always

want to be a Republican. That they that they give a little pad on the head too, and that they kind of like you don't want to really be totally on the outs with them, and that's all they need and they don't need you to totally. They don't need these guys like Casey to abandon the party entirely and to go. They just need them on key issues to give a little bit of heft, a little bit of friendly fire, so to speak against Republicans from their own side,

and you know you'll you'll get taken care of. You know, you won't be targeted, and quite the same, you won't get kavanade. That's the thing people talk about, how those who speak out against Trump and the Republicans are brave. In a lot of cases, I think those who speak out are guilty of the opposite of braver. I think there's cowardice and there's self interest involved. It's been far too easy. Too many people are willing to vote for the other side, push for the other side against everything

that they claim to have stood for for decades. In some cases, people have switched party affiliation because of Trump. How could you have been a Republican who really believed in the Republican platform for the last thirty years and now never mind the fact that Trump's actually doing a good job. Now you're gonna push for the other team. Now you want what you want, the Occasio Cortes Party to be running the show. I mean, you have to be out of your mind to want that. That's where

we are. That's where we are. Thanks, Casey, always appreciate here of me. He's a jerk. Because if you're going to come to this table, and if all of you that have aspirations of running for office, whatever lived experience and identity that you represent, if you are not prepared to come to that table and to represent that voice, don't come. Because we don't need any more brown faces that don't want to be a brown voice. We don't need black faces that don't want to be a black voice.

We don't need muslim that don't want to be a Muslim voice. We don't need queers that don't want to be a queer voice, and if you're worried about being marginalized and stereotyped, police don't even show up. That seems very open minded, doesn't it. That seems like a call for free thought and free expression from one of these four members of Congress that's gotten so much attention recently.

I'd be very curious. I mean, I could analyze, and perhaps I will somewhat what she thinks she means or what I think she means here, But I would really want to ask Ianna Pressley, Democrat from Massachusetts here, what does it mean to be a quote brown face that doesn't want to be a brown voice? What does that? What does that mean? Are you no longer do you no longer have you being just the royal, the generic you?

You no longer maintain your minority identity if you're not a voice for that minority, Well, who determines what that means?

I mean, I would like to ask Iana Pressley, if let's say, an African American member of Congress who wants to address the family crisis in the African American community right now, particularly of children being born out of wedlock, which every social scientist will tell you is an enormous indicator of problems of all kinds down the line that children without fathers are more likely to abuse drugs, more likely to go to prison, more likely to be violent,

less likely to finish high school. If a member of the African American community, who's who's a congressman were to address, is that is that speaking for the community or is that outside? Is that being a black face that speaks with that that is also a quote black voice. I want to know who gets to draw these lines and how we can think about that as anything other than a kind of racial determinism, that if you are of a certain race you have to think a certain way.

You have to And this goes to the core of the Democrat Parties identity politics. You can be expelled from the community for being the community of a certain ethnicity, at least politically speaking, unless you go along with all

the different things. So, if you're black and you have any questions about the Democratic Party's platform, does that mean that Ianna Pressley and the Democrats question the question one's blackness or if one is brown, does that mean that one questions that I wish the press Corps was interested in exploring these these concerns with Ianna Presley, but I

know they won't be. I mean, they're all terrified. Can you imagine somebody at MSNBC asking a tough question of Ianna Pressley that you know, I still think that there are people who, in the early days, I can think of one or two in particular, didn't even mean to ask AOC a hard question, but it came across as hard, and I think that they were I think that those journalists that did that were put on ice. I think they were punished for that. I don't think that was

viewed as positive. See if Ianna Pressley saying quote, we don't need any more brown faces that don't want to be a brown voice. I think that's something that we need to address. And then you also are just understand better. And then you have ilhanah Omar, who here's the kind of stuff. Here's the kind of stuff that ilhan Omar runs around saying. And I also, again, I think that

we're allowed to raise this as an issue. You play five and one of the progresses that we've gained and the people who are celebrated for that progress are our civil rights leaders. And one of the reasons we celebrate some and don't celebrate others is that some of them believed in non violent movements. And so in the situation of Palestine, what we are doing right now is having hypocrisy in not celebrating non violent movements there and condemning it.

This is what we're dealing with in the halls of Congress. This is what we're dealing with in the rhetoric that is in the media in regards to people who are non violently wanting to resist. Who is who is doing a great job of non violent resistance in Palestine? And I wish she would speak with greater specificity so that I could actually look into what the heck she's talking about. It's not in any way of surprise. I mean, no one sits around say wait a second, elan Omar, she's

got an issue with Israel. Here's the truth, folks. The vast majority of the Muslim world has been told that Israel is bad and oppressive state, should be in a prie, should be a pariah state. And you see this just through the actions of the un if nowhere else but the normalization of anti Israel sentiment and anti Semitism throughout the Muslim world is something that even if somebody is a Democrat who is celebrated by the left now, should still be a problem, should still be shouted down, should

still be debated. And that's where the media falls flat with Omar and all the rest of these celebrated leftists, creating tremendous feria unnecessary. What's happening is the very syndical political strategy by the President his administration. It is literally an effort to help their electoral prospects. It's not about public safety. I am in a city where we had become safer every year. We don't ask documentation status any when our police don't ask documentations status, they work with

immigrant communities and it's helped make us safety. So this is not about safety. This is literally using government agents for political purposes. First of all, it's not really about safety at all. It's about the law. Do they lock people up for tax tax crimes and for financial fraud because of safety? No, they're not. They're not. They're not a threat to anybody. It's not about safety, about breaking the law. A lot of laws you get locked up

for that. It's not about safety. Legal immigrants are in the country in violation of existing federal statute. That's not supposed to be okay, But there he had Bill de Blasi, ka Kaiser Vilhelm, Deblasio, Varrenvillhelm in the house. Yeah, who was gone this weekend. I was in New York over the weekend and there was a blackout and de Blasio was busy in I think he was in Iowa, which

is just so classic. Here's this guy who is just doing slightly better in the polls than Eric Swalwell, who was doing slightly better in the polls than you or I in that we all have zero percent. So that's the one great thing about the Swallow campaign is that it was the ultimate everyman campaign and that he proved that anybody, literally anybody can run for president. So he got that going for him, which is nice. Bill de Blasi is not far ahead of him, though he's at

I think one percent or less of the vote. And anybody who would I mean this, including progressives and leftist anyone who would vote for Bill de Blasio for president United States really have their head examined and that there's there's something wrong with them. Great editorial in the New York Post. I think it was today saying that the I didn't even know this was possible, But the governor of New York under the state constitution can suspend the mayor for thirty days and work to ouse the mayor,

which I didn't know. But hey, you know, we have a federal government, we have states. Cities kind of exist at the pleasure of the state. They don't really, you know, don't. We don't think of it this way because in some places the cities are so large and powerful that politically they have even more sway than the state. But anyway, they were talking about how Deblasio is a total buffoon.

His wife spent eight hundred million dollars plus of money on a mental health initiative that nobody, no one knows what it even did. The homelessness crisis in New York is out of control. There are homeless shelters that are popping up in neighborhoods that are not used to having homeless shelters all of a sudden. This is a new

Deblasio initiative. And this is a guy whose work ethic includes rolling out of bed at like ten or eleven am and then taking a forty minute drive from Gracie mansion, the Mayor's mansion, to his gym in Park Slope, Brooklyn, which, for those of you don't know, is quite a ways away. It'd be like going all the way across a very large city so that he can do, you know, ten minutes of wrist stretching or whatever, pretending that he's working out. I mean, this is not a guy who goes into

beast mode. Trust me. Do you even lift bro Yes and lifts a vates very hard and very heavy. Yeah, and he thinks he should be president the United States. Wow, what a delusion. To keep mind, he was a very close Clinton confidant for a long time that Clintons really like this guy. They thought that he was somebody that I think he ran Hillary's campaign when she ran for Senate. So don't don't ever think that this is someone who's just Everyone understands what a jerk and what a clown

he is. There are many many out there who at one point thought that he was a real contender of the Democratic Party. I mean, look, he thinks he's a contender. He Must's why he's running. I know it's more my problem than yours. So I'm going back to New York. But you guys all know that the Democrats in New York can affect the policy at the national level, and that's that's why it matters for everywhere. Speaking of clowns, Anna Navarro over at CNN gets away with saying stuff

like this on I mean, she she really is. She's the worst political analyst I think on TV. And she's

supposed to be a Republican, which is hilarious. So the Republican who just does the bidding of whatever her Democrat boss is over at CNN teller to do at any point in time, a Republican who hasn't said a nice thing about a prominent Republican and the Trump era period from what I can gather, but she's on CNN, they treat her like she's a cross between, you know, Thomas Jefferson and Copernicus, when really issues more along the lines of somebody who has never read a book. But here's

what she says, play fifteen. This is our country. It is our country as much as it is the Trump's country. And if we're going to start sending people back, I don't know, you know, listen. Ted Cruz was born in Canada. Marco Rubia's parents were born in Cuba, Milannia Trump was born where Slovenia. How about her parents who are here through family immigration. I am sick of this guy's hypocrisy and his ways of dividing this country, pitting people against

each other. And I think it is no coincidence. It is no coincidence that the congress people he's you know, picking on, are all women of color. Are all women of color. By the way, we didn't have this in the clip, but then the CNN anchor went on to say, because the classic CNN anchor question, and do you think President Trump wants you in the country? What do you think? Anna Navarro said it that one, oh man, CNN is terrible. I mean CNN should be it should really be like

disbanded and built anew. I mean, they should just they

should scrap the whole thing. They should pretty much fire the entire the entire executive board over there, get rid of everybody, get rid of almost all of the almost all of the on air talent they have, and they should start fresh because it's a joke, it's a it's a bad organization that represents dishonesty with people who are delusional and nasty, and yeah, I don't know what they think is going to change, where all of a sudden people are gonna look at them and say that, oh, yeah,

they're trustworthy. They put people like Anna Navarro on the air, though, and you just kind of think yourself, how can anyone have such bad judgment? Really, it's just just insane. I mean, she's I'm sorry, you can tell I really I find her to be among the most odious pundits out there. But there you have it. We've all heard reports that the Trump administration is threatening to round up in deport thousands of immigrant families and cities across America this weekend,

no matter their immigration status. I want every Angelino to know their rights and how to exercise them. Remember, you have the right to remain silent. You don't have to open your door to an ICE agent that doesn't have a warrant signed by a judge. You have the right to speak to a lawyer before signing any documents or speaking to law enforcement. And if you need help finding an attorney, you can call three one one and learn more about our Justice Fund and other resources that offer

legal support. And whenever possible, keep a record of everything that happens. Take note of an officer's name and badge number of when and where you're being questioned, so you can use that information in your own defense. And most importantly, I want you to know you do not need be afraid. Your city is on your side. And rest assured. Here in Los Angeles we are not coordinating with ICE, not

on America's side, not on the federal government side. But there, La mayor are SETI is saying your city is on your side against the federal government, against federal law enforcement. That is what he is saying, folks. He is rooting against federal law enforcement efforts. It's no other way to interpret it. There's no other way does he say this? Does he does he put out public announcements. Okay, drug dealers,

there's gonna be a big sweep in the neighborhood. But just make sure that you know the procedural rights that you can exercise that might trip the cops up, slow them down, make it harder for them in some way. You know, Just just understand what's you know. And even if you're saying, well back, this is all true. Yeah, but does he tell the loan just so you know you have the right to remain silent. Yeah, okay, sure, why feel the needs Why would you feel they need

to say that about about a drug dealer suite? Oh? Legal, lumigrants are on drug dealers book. Okay, but it's illegal. It's a crime. Are we now to pretend that these things aren't crimes? You know? I just I wonder where Democrats really on the line here. Well, if they draw the line at their own power and their own whims. But yeah, they're trying to help people who have violated US law in some cases for many years and in many different ways avoid federal law enforce and efforts. Someone

should ask Mayor Garcetti, is being illegal a bad thing? Is? You know? Does he does he not want his city to be free of legal Well we know the answer, of course, no, he wants as many legal as possible. I mean, California has been transformed. It will no longer be a state that will ever vote for somebody who believes in limited government, who rejects identity politics, who does not think that that people should vote in a ethnic and sectarian block together. You know, you'll never have that again.

You'll never have somebody that's limited government, that believes in a constitution that has words with meaning instead of a constitution that can be reinterpreted by status and progressives on a whim. That's gone now in California, it's not coming back. That's the model for the whole country. This isn't a particularly complicated thing to figure out. I mean, this isn't an experiment that you can't work out of your own mind,

but it is. It is so galling to hear a mayor of this, what the second largest city in the country, essentially telling an entire class of criminals, Hey, you know the five O the police are on the way. Here's what you gotta do to try to stay low and stay stay away from them. And you know, it's just the stuff, like you know, you don't have to answer the door unless they show a warrant. Did they really think that Ice is running around without warrants and going

into homes. It's just such a strange thing for him to say. It's it's not even really a dog whistle. I mean, it's it's a bullhorn saying I'm hoping that Ice is a failure in all of this. He is rooting again federal law enforcement efforts. That is what he is doing. It's the mayor of a large city. Remember the LAPD works for the mayor. There's law enforcement officials that have to answer to this mayor. This guy's bad news and his city's obviously got a terrible homelessness problem.

I want to talk more about homelessness here on the show because I'm seeing it. It's it has gotten really bad in New York City, it has gotten really bad in DC. I've been out in LA and seen it very see it very poorly. They're playing out very poorly so and it's largely a mental health crisis that's exacerbated by left wing policies. But that will have to be

discussion for another time. Another issue that comes up here while we have these these ice raids that have apparently started but there could be more of them, is why why is it that now raids of any kind? Uh? And we're even calling them raids. I mean, they're really roundups. It's just going around picking people up and saying, sorry, it's time for you to be deported. They're not They're not throwing flashbangs in and sending in a swat team with a bunch of MP fives to grab these people.

At least that's not my understanding of how these things go down. But there were a lot of deportations into the Obama years. And were those deportations evil and racist and bad? Why were those deportations more or less? Okay, you heard so little criticism from the media then, And look, I've said this all along because it can be a little bit confusing. Why would Obama, who wanted amnesty be deporting people and even being called by some on the

left the deporter in chief. Well, I was saying that this is because they were playing playing the long game, and they realized that if it seemed like Democrats like Obama were operating in good faith with our immigration laws, willing to deport people, willing to enforce immigration laws, then they are in a better position to fool people into thinking that they would take a deal for amnesty seriously and have and the enforcement mechanisms in that deal would

be treated with seriousness, when we know that would just we saw this with the Ambassa back in the nineteen eighties. You get the amnesty and all the other stuff. That's just a suggestion that never really happens. But Sleepy Joe Biden got a little bit of heat for the deportations of the Obama era recently, and here's how that went place seven A deportations. I would make sure that everything

I answer the questions, to answer your questions, no, you don't. Really, That's what the Democrats have created now, this mob mentality of just start chanting and yelling at people and make them apologize. And we all know Biden has learned the hard way, don't ever apologize to them. Trump knows this. This is why even when Trump says something that's wrong, he doesn't apologize for it. He might amend it, he might add to it, he might, you know, say he'll

say something else, but he's not. He's not gonna to bend the knee because then they just then they just push you over, push you to the ground. Don't bend the knee of these people. You don't want to do that. But this is what the Democrats would have to answer. This is what Joe Biden has to answer. If there's nothing wrong with being an illegal in this country, if there's no problem with it, really, why shouldn't he apologize

for the deportations. The Democrat Party has shifted on this issue, just as Joe Biden has come under all kinds of scrutiny and has all this additional heat now because of policy changes that he has over the course of his career enacted where he was on the wrong side of an issue at one point, then he switched right. He was opposed to oppose to force bussing. And now that's just one example. He worked with segregations when he was in the Senate, and now I'm sure he says, oh,

he wishes he had never done that. Biden is not in the mainstream of the at least the Democrat primary voter base, because they don't think that there's anything wrong with illegal immigration. The party has shifted, it has changed. There's no longer a real sense that illegal immigration is a problem to be controlled. In fact, they would like to see such a change that the legal immigration is no longer considered a problem at all. So why shouldn't

he be forced to apologize? When you think of it that way, I mean, he knows enough to understand now that apologizing as terrible idea, But why shouldn't he be forced to apologize? Why isn't he wrong? Democrats like Biden should have to answer this question. In what way are they still in the Democrat mainstream. They don't have answers, folks, because ultimately we have seen their party shift and now the Democratic Party does not believe, you know what, people

cannot be illegal. This is what they say. This is now a talking point. Just come into the country and you can stay here, and there's nothing else that needs to be said about it. This is the talking point that they raise. This is what they say, and I think a lot of us have realized that that's a big problem for the Democrats going into the general election, at least I hope it is. Have we not learned the internment of Japanese Americans? Mister Holman, I'm a father.

Do you have children? How can you possibly allow this to happen under your watch? Do you not care? Is it because these children don't look like children that are around you? I don't get it. Have you ever held a deceased child in your arms? First of all, your chemists are disgusting. I've served I've served my country thirty four years. This is out of fitting as well. I've served my country for thirty four years, and yes, I held a five year old boy in my arms that

in fact, that tractor trader. I knelt down beside him and said a prayer for him because I knew what his last thirty minutes his life were like, and I had a five year old son at the time. What I've been trying to do my thirty four years serving my nation is to save lives. So for you to sit there and insult my integrity in my love for my country and for children, that's why this whole thing needs to be fixed, and you're the memory agree on that. Which team are you on, folks? That's really where we

are now. Do you sign with someone like Tom Homan, a career law enforcement official, and as he pointed out, they're a dad, an American, a patriot who is trying to enforce our laws and wants to stop not just the exploitation of our system by these migrants, but also stop people from taking the risks because they think they will get tremendous benefit from exploding the system. Do you think that you want to be on the Homan side

of this or Democratic Representative Garcia? There the demagogue, the grandstander, the intellectual phony who pretends to understand this issue, pretends to care about this issue, but at the end of the day, it's just about power. It's just about the optics getting that sound bite there. Oh, that's right. Democrats are the ones who care about the children. Republicans don't care about children. Who believes that what moron really believes that.

But this is the way that they debate, This is the way that they argue, This is how they present the issue. One side cares about children, the other side doesn't. One side is racist, the other side is welcoming with open arms to all people from the Third world who break our laws to come here. There are complexities, to be sure in our immigration system. One of them should not be or rather one of them is not in

our discussions. Whether we all want people to be able to be safe, whether we want them to be absolutely no loss of human life. We agree on that. So why do Democrats keep focusing on that. This does have many echoes of what we saw going on in Europe when there was that huge surge back in twenty what was it, twenty fifteen into twenty sixteen of Muslim migrants, many from but not entirely from the Syrian Civil War, who were in many cases true asylum seekers, and they

were flooding onto European shores and whatever. Someone drowned because they tried to come into They try to get into the EU not through a legal port of entry, but they wanted to just run the border. Essentially, it was held up as the Europeans are being heartless and this is so terrible, and then at Angelo Berkel said, okay, well, let's have a million come into our country. Let's just let a million people in, which is what we're facing right now too. Bring a million people in. And they

weren't stopping in Greece. They didn't want to be in Greece, they didn't want to be in Romania. They would walk through other countries. They didn't want to stop in Hungary. They wanted to go right to Germany and if they could make their way all the way to Sweden to Denmark, the best welfare state possible, that's what they were heading for.

That's where they wanted to go. Well, while we can say that we all agree that there's a need to keep people safe from harm when we can, there's not a need to let people pick and choose the biggest what the biggest government funded paycheck is that they're going to get. But it was such a disgraceful attack on Tom Holman, whom I know and who's a good guy I've had many conversations with about immigration. It was so grotesque from these Democrats, and I'm just glad that he

not surprising at all. He stood off and fought for himself on this. I'm glad that he didn't let them get away with it. And that then continued on where you had Okazio Cortes trying to pin family separation, which is not what the policy is. That that's a made up term. There is no such thing as a family separation policy. There is a zero tolerance for illegal acts policy, which means prosecution of adults who break the law. That's all it means. But they want to talk about family

separation as though that's the purpose. So this would be very similar to if we had we have laws against drunk driving, and if you were to say to somebody that you have a when it comes to drunk driving, you have a family separation policy. No, what we have is a if you're driving drunk and a serious safety menace to the public, you will be arrested and prosecuted. And if there's a child in the back seat, you don't bring the child with you into prison. That's the policy.

And that's what Tom Holman had to explain to AOC whom I don't know if she's It could be either, it could be both. It's probably a mix. Whether she's too ignorant or just too disingenuous to grasp this issue.

What's really going on here? But AOC who's an imbecile and who cannot debate, and who does not know anything, who's all about the optics and the sound bites and the Twitter and the Instagram, and she's just she's really like an Instagram influencer who has been turned into the leader of the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, which tells you all you have to know about the progressive Democrats.

I'll just put a compleat ignoramus with no life experience, no wisdom whatsoever, no record of accomplishment or success, I might add, beating Crowley and some district and queens. Yeah, that guy who was a jerk who didn't show up and do anything. It was a machine politician who got caught napping. It's not some miracle that he lost. It's not like she beat some Republican and a super red

district because she's so charming and brilliant. She went up against Tom Homan on she looks she was trying to pin Garcia was trying to say it Homan doesn't care about dead kids, which what Democrats say on gun control, they say it about immigration, and they do this all the time. It's just demagoguery. It's gross. But then AOC tried to pin a quote family separation policy on. Tom Homan was the acting ICE director, former acting ice director,

and here's what he said. Play one. The recommendation of the many that you recommended. You recommended family separation. I recommend a zero tolerance which includes family separation, the same as is whenever US citizen parent gets your when they're a child. Zero tolerance was interpreted as the policy that separated children from there. If I get arrested for DUI and I have a young child in a car, I'm

gonna be separated. When I also police officer in New York and I arrested a father for domestic violence, I separate that mister, with all two respect. Legal assyles are not charged with any crime when you're in the country legally, it's violation eight United States Code thirteen twenty five. Seeking asylum is legal. You want to seek asylum and go through the port of entry to do with the legal way.

The Attorney General the United States has made that clear. Okay, mister chair, the memo is is submitted to the record for review. Yep, she's wrong. I had the same debate on Twitter with Solidad O'Brien and she was wrong. They just jumped right into seeking asylum is not a crime. No. That's like saying, you know, seeking an appeals process in court is not a crime. No, it's the reason you're in court in the first place, as though could be a crime. And the reason that these migrants are in

custody is because they committed a crime. It is a crime to just say I'm not waiting at the port of entry. I'm not going to obey your laws. I'm just going to show up and cross into US territory and surrender. That is what they are doing. That is a violation of a law. As much as Democrats like to pretend that it is not, is AOC too stupid to know that that's a violation of the law. I mean, this is where you have to ask, and I don't

have the answer for that. I don't know. It seems to me that it's not beyond comprehension that she would be too foolish to really understand what's going on here. It seems to me that it is quite possible that she just doesn't know what the laws may be. But it is indicative of this whole debate, in this discussion

going on right now that you hear. You have Democrats who have staff preparing them, They've written out questions, and their whole thing is to try to trip up and attack and undermine some like Tom Holman, and he's just a professional who knows the issues, knows what he's talking about, understands what's going on here. And they are a bunch of whiny, grandstanding, ridiculous brats, all of these Democrats on this issue. They're just being dishonest, disingenuous, and it's the

whole thing. It's disgraceful, it really is. But good for Tom Holman. I don't know Peter Teel, but I like Peter Teele, and I like what he does. I should say, I don't. I just got that. Don't know him personally, but I think that he's done some very important thanks. First of all, he's a prominent libertarian voice but also

a supporter of Trump's, which I appreciate. He spoke at the Republican National Convention at a time when to do so within the ranks of the establishment was very was a brave move, and certainly he was willing to take some risks. Now it's a little easier to be brave. I'm just gonna say it, a little easier to be brave politically and otherwise when you're a billion there, But nonetheless,

bravery is bravery. And also he is the guy who was behind taking down Gawker, which was just a diseased, you know, pimple on the underside of the foot of humanity. I mean, it was just a disgusting, horrible website run by and contributed to by terrible people that ruined lives, ruined reputations, and teal annihilated them and brought them down, and it was it was a great thing. It was a real service to humanity that Peter TiAl did that.

He spoke over the weekend at the National Conservatism Conference, and he said some very interesting things. He's a Remember he's not just a billionaire. He's also on the board of Facebooks. He's a very prominent, very powerful guy, especially in the world of Silicon Valley, and he called out Google and said that federal agencies, including the CIA and the FBI, should look into exactly how far Google's collaboration with China has gone. And he asked him, he asked questions.

I had the questions here that really sent a bit of a shock up the backs of a lot of Silicon Valley folks, I think, and conservatives are perking up their ears and saying, wait a second. He sounds like he's got a point here. Here's what Peter Teal asked at this National Conservatism conference. Number one, how many in fort and by the way, these are three questions that should be asked of Google. This was from Peter teal speech.

Number one, how many foreign intelligence agencies have infiltrated your Manhattan project for AI? Number two? Does Google's senior management consider itself to have been thoroughly infiltrated by Chinese intelligence? Number three? Is it because they consider themselves to be so thoroughly infiltrated that they have engaged in the seemingly treasonous decision to work with the Chinese military and not

with the US military. Because they're making this sort of bad short term rationalistic decision that if a technology doesn't go out the front door, it gets stolen out the back door. Anyway. Add those questions need to be asked by the FBI, but the CIA, and they should not be asked in an excessively gentle manner. I mean, this is somebody who has real backing financially in terms of connections as well in terms of his political clout, and who understands this space really well. Who's more or less

saying is Google betraying America? That's that's quite a charge, my friends. Google is one of the most powerful companies in the world. Not only is it effectively in charge of what you see because of search. Search results are so important, right whatever you type into Google, do any of you use, Maybe you use Yahoo dot com, maybe some of you probably still have. You've got Meryl, and you do the whole AOL thing. But that's not what you should be doing, because you shouldn't pay for that.

I think as of a few years ago, even AOL was still making tens of millions of dollars a month over people paying for AOL subscriptions just because they never turned it off. That's pretty remarkable. It's a great business to be in the people giving you free money. I want to be in that business, the people giving you free money business. But Google also influences every other media media organization, not just in terms of how much you see it through Google results, but Google has a tremendous

amount of influence in the advertising space. And that is how companies, especially online, this is how they sustain themselves, is how they make money. So Google can turn the spigot on, and Google can turn the spigot off. Google can decide that you know you're going to be able to make money online, or Google can say you can. So think of all the media organizations that that influences, and so their ability to affect consumer perception and to

affect media modetization, media success, media coverage is profound. And Peter Teel is saying, these guys at Google will work with China, but they won't work with the United States

military on projects AI related projects. The race for five G for five G Internet is well under way, and Google doesn't seem to have any sense of nationalism patriotism, pride in country, thinks of itself as a truly global company and will work with China, which is constantly stealing the intellectual property of other Internet companies here in America is engaged in true oppression. I mean, I still can't believe and when I was in China, he can't use Google,

can't do it. They've got to shut off and Google will work with China because they want access to that market, you see, and Teal's point about how maybe they just let let China rip them off in terms of technology because at least they'd rather have them do it in the you know, they'd have to be aware of them doing it and get some benefit from China with market access than just have the Chinese hacking into Google stuff and link it from AFAR and not having that market access.

Then think about any information sharing and collaboration that might be going on between the Chinese government and Google and what the implications of that are, not just financial, national security implications, long term technological civilization changing implications of that technology transfer could be. This is where we have to have to sit down and have the talk about how that companies that operate in this country that are US based companies full of US personnel, aren't just about the

bottom line. We have had a chorus of corporate free market absolutism for quite some time now. But there are national security considerations that US companies need to be held to account for, just like I say, there are national security consider rations that universities need to be held to account for, and that Chinese have been pillaging our intellectual property and technology and not only training Chinese nationals to go back to China to compete with US, but trying

to steal proprietary technology from campuses. You know, a lot of elite universities have programs and projects that have proprietary technology that is immensely valuable at approaching it from the oh we're China, we just want to send our students. What's the problem with that? Well, that means that the door is pretty wide open for that technology theft, and no one really wants to look that deeply into it

in this country. No one the government wants to spend too much time trying to track this stuff down, so till he is sounding a clarion call here. And I think that this is the beginning of a much longer focus and an investigation and just what is Google doing with China and have they sold us out? Is liberally a disease of the mind I wouldn't say that we're going to answer that question to the fullest today. I suppose this show in some ways is always answering that question.

I think the answer tends to be yes, that liberalism has become a cult, a social status, more than it is a political belief system, and that there's also an embrace of untruth or non truth that is necessary to be a liberal in good standing these days. So let me give you an example of this. Just came up over the weekend. And I'm happy to have this debate with anybody who wants to have the debate. I'm happy

to throw down over this issue. But doctor Eugene gu Gu MD, he is a medical doctor and he has let me see how many he has, two hundred eighty three thousand, two hundred and eighty three thousand Twitter followers. So this guy's got a big Twitter following, and he shared this. This is over the weekend. Remember this guy is a medical doctor. He's in his surgeons scrubs in his Twitter amatar. He's very anti Trump though he's a left winger. He's a left wing doctor, and he shared

the following. It's a scientific and medical fact that men can get pregnant and also have abortions. Trans men and non binary individuals are human beings who deserve to be acknowledged by society. They choose their own identity, not me, not you, not any doctor, and certainly not any politician. No doctor Goo, that's his name. It is not a scientific and medical fact that men can get pregnant and have abortions. That is false. And at some point we have to just be willing to draw lines and say no,

I'm not We're not doing this anymore. We're not doing this where up is down and down is up, and black is white and white is black, and you know, left is right and right is left, and no, there has to be some basis of truth. There has to be something called the fact. There has to be a

reality that we all have to live in. And when you have medical doctors who have become so devoted, so devoted to leftism that they are able to convince themselves that this is something that they should say, you know, I mean, it reminds me of the chill that went up my spine when doctor Lena Wynn, who is a female medical doctor who is the president of Planned Parenthood now told me that abortion is a healthcare procedure, like

any other procedure, that's also a lie. We all know that it is, if nothing else at least, and it is a highly elective procedure. It's not a not a necessary medical procedure by any extent, and it's also killing a baby. But this is what we see happening now. And what you might think is, well, this will reverse. No, it only reverses, it only stops. We only continue to live in reality if we say to people like doctor Eugene Goo, no, I'm sorry. You don't just get to

make up whatever you want. There is There is objective reality, there's objective truth. See what greater power could the left really have than the ability to subvert the most basic facts. Some of you know that I am fascinated by and have been doing recently some revisiting of my favorite treatments, tracts, or writings on the Soviet Union and the totalitarianism of communism. This is in preparation for a book that I'm writing that will be coming out at the end of the year,

So get excited. But one of the things that they were able to accomplish this Soviet Union was the expectation among not just the population because they were living in abject fear, but of party officials. That the way that you were to show in this central Committee, in the polite Burrow, the way that you would show you were a true believer in the revolution, was to be willing to say one thing on day one and something completely different and opposite on day two, and not blink, not

miss abeat, to wage war on truth itself. That is what the lives. That is what the leftists are doing now. That's why they will say things like it is a scientific and medical fact that men can get pregnant and also have abortions and have a doctor say that, and just complete flagrant violation of all that is true about the medical profession. No doctor, gou you are wrong. It doesn't matter that you are an empty You are wrong, and we need to be willing to say that out loud.

Can roll, fellow patriots, we made ours go up to eleven. It's time for roll call. It's time for roll call. Autobots rollout. Same guy, I think Facebook dot com slashbuck Sexton. I have not had a chance to talk to you all since the weekend. I hope you had a great weekend. I was up in up in New York with the family. I did Tucker Show on Friday, did how He Kurt the show on Sunday, had some fun up in the NYC. Sought Toulu my parents French bulldog who is a total

snuggle monster. French bulldogs are great for any of you are thinking about getting a dog. If you don't want a dog that I know some of you are like Buck, I want a dog that can that can track down pheasant and large bobcat And yeah, I know, but that's a different kind of dog, all right. If you want if you want a dog that you just snuggles, is always cute and cuddly and would never hurt a fly, and it is not good if like someone breaks into your house, it's gonna say, like, hey, scratch my belly.

I'm a French bulldog. French bulldogs are a very good option. My dream dog is an English bulldog. I keep telling my parents said, one day, I gotta get married first, and then I'm gonna get an English bulldog, and then I'm gonna have kids. But maybe it'll be kids first then English bulldog. We'll see. I'll figure that out, but I'm working on it to that end, it is time for the role call. Jeff Actually, that didn't make sense that all is a transition, but we're just gonna skip

past that. Jeffrey, I have been listening since back in the day. I wanted to comment on the marijuana debate. I know you are a proponent of legalization. That's something, But some of the points that you make about the mildness of the drug is not at all accurate in the way that it appears on the street today. The THHC levels have been increasing dramatically from levels in the

sixties and seventies. Also, on the street, all too often other drugs are being blended with marijuana, So there are just a lot of dangers in only marijuana smoking today. Some thoughts, Jeffrey, what you're saying is valid. I know that there are people who will put I think they'll mix PCP in with marijuana. I've even heard of crack laced marijuana. I mean, I don't touch any of this stuff,

so I don't really. This is why when I sound I sound like someone's parents in an afterschool special I talk about drugs, because you know, I'm like, yeah, like the reefer, like the Mary Jane. You know, because I don't know what the cool kids say about the drugs, because I don't do any drugs. As to the the the elevated THHC levels, you're correct, there's elevated THC levels. Look, I think marijuana, I was gonna say, I think marijuana makes you slow, dumb, and lazy. I do. Now, so

does alcohol in excess. Right, there are a lot of things that if you do too much of it's not so does trying to think of what my real indulgency. I just I've got to stop eating French fries. This is my you know, I can't. I mean, producer, Mike, what is your food weakness? What is the thing? Well? Mark? What is your producer Mike out having a stogy with the ladies although he doesn't smoke, What is your food weakness? Mark? All of it? All? Food is my weakness. I mean

except salad. Salad would be my only non weakness. Wow, salad is like your kryptonite. Yes, I mean, I like to tell people you think salad's all healthy until there's an E Coli outbreak and all of a sudden they're pulling that spinach off the shelves. I'm just saying, But yeah, for me, it's I just need to stop eating out. Is actually I eat out pretty healthy, except whenever there's a French fry option, I'm like, Good'll take the French

fries on the side. I know I should get side of greens or whatever, but you know, I don't know, man, it is, it is what it is. But yeah, Jeffrey, sorry, back to THHC. But what I said about THC being a fat soluble versus water soluble drug is true. It THC is not the toxicity. It's it cannot kill you. So it is different in that sense than heroin, which can kill you, cocaine which can kill you, alcohol which

can kill you. THHC cannot really. I mean you'd have to you'd have to concentrate it in doses that you couldn't smoke, and then take it all at once. And you know that's it's just not something that ever happens. Sean rights Buck, I found a leftist with a brain. You should check out Tim Cast. He may have ideas we don't agree with, but he is able to have a decent conversation. Um. Yeah, Sean, I've I've heard of Tim Cast and I'd be happy to check out his stuff.

I don't know his work, but I've heard good things, so thank you for the heads up, Rick Shield. Ye Buck, I have to comment. I have to correct your comment. You've never interviewed Paul Ryan. Ryan was on set at Real News years ago. If you weren't there that day. I seem to recall you're almost always on that show. Rick. I think you're right. I will tell you that I forget sometimes when I've interviewed people, and I like, I did interview Scott Walker well actually a couple of times,

and I forgot about that until recently. I may have interviewed Paul Ryan. I don't even remember now. I don't remember that is I think I did. I'm you're right. Real News we had an interview with Paul Ryan. I might have been there, I might not have. But I've interviewed so many people at this point that some of them kind of blends together. I mean, you remember the presidents, you remember the vice president's cabin officials for the most part,

but members of Congress kind of all. You know Congressman such and such, same same idea. Tyler Right's Buck, longtime podcast listener here and regarding fellow podcast listener Tim the broadcast Engineers roll call submission on Friday about the audio levels are correct, Sorry, Producer Mark. The volume levels for buck are all over the board, from normal to very load where you can hardly hear, followed by earth shattering speaker blowing levels of volume. I use the iHeart app

if that makes any difference. It does not matter whether I listen at work or the truck, personal vehicle, or headphones. Keep up the good fight while the rest of us use the liberal tiers. Your show produces as the sweetener for our black rifle coffee shield side. Well, Tyler, you ended super strong there in your role call message I Producer Mark, are you still you still standing by your guns on this one? That our podcast audio is fine and people just need to figure out their own equipment.

Of course, I'm always guy stand by my work, Yeah, Mark, Mark is Mark is unmoved by your entreaties about the podcast volume. Could it be an iHeart app thing, which would being ones that goes out to the podcast apps. But on my end that seems fine. Yeah, guys, Producer Mark is sticking. He's tripling's He's going trump on this one, tripling down. Joseph totally agree with the role callers of the podcast audio sucks producer. Don't be a snowflake. Check

your audio and listen to your audience. Hugs and kisses and puppies from Joseph. I don't know, Mark. We gotta figure this out, man, because man, it might not be on your end or mayam, but people are. The people have spoken here, man, we gotta figure out must be. Could it be the iHeart app? We send an email to the digital the digital ninjas. I think they all want me to quit my job. I don't know what's going on here, Jessica. Hey Buck, Oh another Wow, this

is another person complaining about the podcast audio. All right, we gotta fix this. We gotta figure out what's going on here, Wayne Buck, someone needs to get this concept into the mainstream. I think you can do it. What concept you say? The biggest foreign influence in our elections, directing influence, vote count changing influence is illegals voting. Motor voter laws have allowed ontold the llegals to registered to vote. I suspect that's just the tip of the iceberg. Wayne.

You know, Wayne, this has been the concern for a long time. You rightly point out that motor voter laws are such that you have people that think that could could in good faith who are illegals, think that they're supposed to register to vote because we have an automatic registration or a recommended registration process when you go to the DMV, and they may think, oh, well, I'm allowed to vote because they are registering everybody who comes here

to vote. As for illegals voting, we don't know what the numbers are. We do know that there is voter fraud every year. We don't know how much voter fraud. And if we don't know how many illegals there are in the country to begin with, it shouldn't be surprising. We don't know how many illegals are or are voting, and whether they're doing it nefariously or not. It's still

illegal and that should not happen. Alex. Right from the sound of it, you're not a soccer fan, but while you're in DC, you should go to an MLS match. DC is second in their division. Soccer games are good times, Alex. Actually that is fake news, my friend. I do like soccer, I don't like it as much as I like tennis, which if some of you I'll just give me a second here I know you're all like, fuck, who cares

about tennis? The Wimbledon match on Sunday was incredible, though Federer versus Djokovic and went into a fit set tie break twelve twelve. It's a shame Federer couldn't pull it out, but it was pretty amazing. And no, I'd go check out a soccer match here. That sounds like fun, Willie, hey buck, How long before an NYC power outage is blamed on GW in California? The utility companies are being sued, but the GW narrative is still used. Oh, global warming is what he means by g W. Really enjoy your

take on events, well, Willie, thank you so much. And global warming is already being used, as I've been discussing, as the the reason for the migrant crisis. You see, that's because they have to stretch too much. It's too hard to convince people that the real problems in Central America are a function of US foreign policy in the eighties. Now, there are some leftists who are going to believe that no matter what, but overall, overall there is it's just

tough to make that stick. But if they can say it's global warming, Oh, then you get all the lives on board, and who's responsible for global warming? US, China, India, the EU and so Central America gets a pass and that's why we're we're the bad guys in that narrative. So Willie, you're onto something, Mark? Right? Little do they realize I'm in DC drinking beard the Trump International? All right? Cool? Man? Oh he sent me a photo. Are you hanging out tonight?

And man, Mark, I'm sorry I missed you guys and your your girlfriend or fiance is love you. Thanks for tweeting out the sending out the photo. Man, I don't know what when was this? This was back on Sunday, Buck in DC for a little birthday weekend getaway stop the Trump International. Nice place. Um, yeah, man, Mark, I'm glad you enjoyed it. And that is usually that's usually where I am. I think I'll probably be at the

Trump tomorrow night, Tuesday night. So any of you who happen to be in DC, if you want to come hang out, I'll probably stop by there see some of my friends. So that's how I try to That's how I try to get down. That's how the Buckstar likes to party. That's gonna be it for the show today. I know that I feel like I'm just getting started here, but thank you so much for tuning in. Always a privilege and honor, a pleasure to have you with me in the Freedom Hunt. We will get into oh so

much more tomorrow. We do that every day, I suppose, get ready for We're gonna have a big Muller week next week. So this week's gonna be about immigration mostly. We'll get into that and until next time, she'll tie

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android