ACB Schools The Libs

a great guy. No, welcome everybody to the Buck Sex didn't show another day, getting closer now all the time to the big decision day. I hope that we get to celebrate in November and it's not a very sullen, very sad month for us. But we'll see, We'll see the ACB hearings. I'll tell you my thoughts on that today. I guess it's the most they've been able to pull together so far. Is some really dumb questions from Democrats? Centator? Is it? It's hard to believe there's not nearly enough

psychopathy from the left. While the Ruth Bader Ginsburg seat, which is actually just a Supreme Court seat, it doesn't belong to Ruth Bader Ginsberg it's not VRBG seat. Really, it certainly isn't stolen now, nor other Supreme Court seats stolen. Despite the rhetoric to libs of the Democrats use it looks like so far, so good. That changes over the course of this show. I'll have to let you know, but I gotta tell you about something else today. And

maybe it's going to move the needle. Maybe it's going to make a difference. Perhaps not. We have to see, but it is. It is good for all of us to at least know that we were certainly right. We were certainly right about Hunter Biden and Barisma and the whole situation. Let's just let's backtrack for a second. Shall

we buy way of review? Friends, make yourself comfortable. Let's let's get into this so you'll recall it came out about what is it now two years ago that Hunter Biden was the recipient of a particularly lucrative board seat on a Ukrainian energy company board called Barisma. Hunter Biden, who had been kicked out of the military for failing a drug test, and who had no knowledge or any reason at all to be on a board of a Ukrainian energy company, doesn't know the energy sector doesn't mean

much about business. Hunter Biden got a fifty thousand dollars a month sinecure. He got hooked up big time, while Daddy Joe Biden, now supposed to be the next press the United States, was the guy who was the point man on policy in Ukraine. I remember it was at the Hill dot com and two of my friends, John Solomon and Sarah Carter were the ones who were really

pushing this story, breaking the big news on it. I remember as it was happening, I sat in the office with John Solomon when he was getting some of the trunch of documents around this issue. That was two years ago. And you will remember that while there was some attention on this, the media pretend that it was just nothing couldn't prove anything, nothing illegal about it. That really became the fallback that there was nothing illegal about what Hunter

Biden did, and therefore we're not supposed to care. Well, they were assuming there's nothing illegal about it, and from what we knew, it was gross meaning it was unethical, meaning there was plenty of plenty of reason to believe that what had gone on was at least corruption from a government ethics point of view. If not a criminal legal point of view, and that was what that was what was a big focus of all these conversations and

all these discussions at the time. But you know, the left circle the wagons, and it was unsurprising that they took the position they did, which was hunter Biden is important for a Democrat who's going to be running, and so they covered for him, right. They made this whole effort to say that it was no big deal. People do this all the time. Look at how Trump corrupts

children are all this kind of stuff. Well, Trump had never held public office before became president, so there was no opportunity for him to engage in the same kind of public corruption that the Biden crime family has, as we know. And the media pretended to be really stupid, and they like to do this. This is one of their favorite games. They all pretend to be morons. But as long as others, supposedly smart people in the media say the same thing, they know that their audience will

just go along with this upidity. They know that there's there's not going to be any consequence, and in fact that they'll be the recipient of, you know, more TV appearances and better jobs and contracts. And things like that in the media business, if they go along with the lie.

Perfect example of this, I remember during the twenty fifteen twenty sixteen period talking at CNN when I was when I was a CNN contributor, speaking to them about the Hillary Clinton email fiasco, and I kept saying, look, if she was operating on an email server and didn't use a classified server for communications, really ever, then there's classified under emails, and that's a huge problem. And it was

much better if you wanted to be on CNN. It was much better for people to hear you say, no, it's no big deal, that's not true, even though that's a lie and it's an obvious lie. Another one was people who acted like they couldn't figure out why would foreign countries like, oh, I don't know Saudi Arabia, for example, Why would some of these foreign countries out there take the position that they wanted to give millions of dollars

to the Clinton Foundation. That doesn't make any sense what Saudi Arabia cares about women's empowerment or combating climate change. But if you went on TV and pointed out what was so clear to anybody with two brain cells, you

were shouted down, Oh, why do you hate charity? There's no proof of that, There's no you know, the entire Democrat media effectively turned into the Clinton Foundations personal lawyers just finding as many loopholes and misdirections and BS explanations as they could, and then people like me who even said at the time, hey, you know, the the donations to the Clinton Foundation, because it is an access peddling scheme. They're selling access. That's what's going on here, donations to

the Clinton Foundation. We're gonna see who's right, because they're gonna fall off a cliff. They're gonna be way down after this whole thing. Sure enough, the Clinton Global Initiative was shut down in the year after Hillary losing the election, and Clinton Foundation you never even hear about it anymore. I thought it was a charity. There's no more charitable causes that are that need help in the world anymore. Right, the whole thing was a fraud, and the people that

went around. I mean, this is why I'm working you through this because there's a pattern here. Right, Once you understand the pattern, you see exactly how egregious this latest effort is with Hunter Biden to cover this thing. Up. They will do whatever they think helps their team, even

at the expense of pretending to be complete morons. Journalists will all of a sudden lack the most basic intellectual capabilities because I don't understand so much easier or you know, that doesn't make sense to me what you're saying that any person could connect the dots on. That's better than just saying, yeah, I don't care because I want my side to win and I'm not really a journalist. They

don't want to say that. So they did it with the Clinton Foundation, they did it with the Clinton emails, and now with Hunter Biden and the corruption around Barisma. Once again we see this same attitude at work, and we have it courtesy of a New York Post piece that goes into emails, emails that show very clearly that there was a quid pro quo. Remember that whole term

from the phone call with Trump and Ukraine. They used it against Trump, But there's a quid pro quo here because Hunter Biden was introducing his dad to a Ukrainian executive and create an executives like, thanks for making the good stuff happen for me. So the quid pro quo here is we pay you a lot of money you make introductions to your father, who runs foreign policy in our country. That's corruption, friends, clear as day. We can

all see it. And this is also a reminder. How does Joe Biden live in a twenty thousand dollars a month mansion? And why is he worth fourteen to twenty million dollars? I think is the range I've seen? How and why is Hunter Biden driving around in a Porsche? What's going on here? Well, turns out there are a lot of ways to pedal influence, a lot of ways

to sell access and make money. Hunter Biden, according to The New York Post, here introduced his father, then Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who is investigating the company, According to emails obtained by the Post, the never be four revealed meeting is mentioned in a message of appreciation that Vadim Pozarski, an advisor to the

board of Barisma, allegedly sent Hunter Biden on April seventeenth, twenty fifteen, about a year after a hundred joined the Barisma board had a reported salary of up to fifty thousand dollars a month. And so what we see here is what was Barisma getting for its money. Well, Barizma was getting access to the guy who was able to pretty much dictate high level policy to a Ukrainian government

that was completely embattled. It had Russian backed insurgents and separatists on its border, It had had a effectively a coup take place in the in the Maidan Square. I mean, you have all this stuff that had happened in Ukraine, country that needs Western support and had the Russian bear bearing down on it. I couldn't find a way to avoid saying it that way, but you know that was what was going on there, and all of a sudden, Hunter Biden's getting meetings for a Breezeman Tide executive with

his dad. Now again, is this criminal. No, for that, you'd probably have to prove a quid pro quote directly from the meeting to a Biden action. But is it politically damaging? Should it? It should be? Will it be? Well, we'll have to see how much do independence, how much does swing voters really care about this? How much do base voters really care about this. I don't know. I'm I'm honestly a little skeptical of that, although you never know.

They claim that there's some polling data that shows that the reopening of Hillary Clinton's email investigation right before the twenty sixteen election, some people believe or say they argue that that was an important moment for Trump. I think that that's revisionist history, but it could be. But so here we have it. Here, we have the email that says that, yes, in fact, somebody from Barisma was or associated with the Barisma board was getting meetings brokered by

Hunter with his dad. This is a pay for access scheme. This is gross. We all see it. Biden has always been a guy who's out for Biden first and foremost. This is not about public service, and he was making sure that his family members were getting rich, fat and happy while he was in a position to be the influence that they were selling. Right. What do you think the media response to this has been so far? It is mind blowing. Friends, get ready for it. You're in

this is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Did you think it was wrong for him to take that position knowing that it was really because that company wanted access to you. Well, that's not true. You're saying things you do not know what you're talking about. No one said that, who said that? What he said that? Don't you think that? It's just one of those things where people think, well, that seems kind of sleazy. Why would he have that job if not for his who his father was. He's

a very bright guy. I guess the question I'm kind of asking, is it right? Yeah? Yeah, well he said he regretted. Have he done it? Here's a very bright guy. Yeah, that's why. That's why Hunter Biden the impregnature of stripper that ran away from said stripper when she wanted paternity payments after getting kicked out of the military fusing drugs. Look, I look, man's obviously had a tough life, and there's a part of me that also wants to say, look,

you know, the guy's a mess up. And there's a better word for it, but I can't use it on radio, But he's a mess up. But you know, this is politics, folks, And if you want Daddy to be the leader of the free world after already being VP for eight years, and all of Daddy's little buddies in the media and the Democrat Party are constantly attacking Trump's kids, who were already super rich and already super influential before their dad

became president. You're gonna constantly be attacking them. I'm sorry. The hypocrisy is too much here. And even Savannah Guthrie is like, I mean, it kind of looks gross. It doesn't it's obviously gross. We are not morons. We understand what happened here. We all's everyone, Democrats everyone. We all

see this was influence peddling. Hunter Biden got this, got this payment because he was gonna arrange meetings for important people with dad, and then dad took actions that might have really benefited the company because Barizma had a record of corruption and this was well known. So do you know what the media is doing now today? Can't make it up, folks. I just gotta tell you what's what's happening, because it's even more interesting than what I could come

up with on the fly. They're straight up saying, nope, these are stolen documents. We won't report on them. I mean, the New York Post is reporting on it. Conservative media is reporting on it, but the mainstream media, the lib media, we will not report on unverified stolen documents. Okay, so after what four years now of pretending the Steel Dossier, which we know beyond any doubt is a concoction of Hillary campaign, paid for rumors, fabrications, gossip, bull just a

giant sheet of bull, That's what it is. You could say it is a sheet of bull, a bull sheet. That's what it pulled. That's what it got pulled together as And nobody can seem to address this properly right now in the media. Why Oh, because they just don't want to, So they're saying it's stolen documents. Some guy who does comms for Facebook, his name is Andy Stone put out quote what's his actual title here? I mean, yeah, communications, a face book. Oh he used to work for Senator Boxer.

What a surprise, A huge lib in Facebook communications. This is why these social media platforms cannot be trusted. Quote. While I will intentionally not link to the New York Post, I want to be clear that this story is eligible to be fact checked by Facebook's third party fact checking partners. In the meantime, we are reducing its distribution on our platform. Friends, this is somebody who is a Facebook official, which is really Facebook is Facebook and Google the two most powerful

media companies really in the world right now. Okay, I mean there are a few others that up there, but Facebook and Google are probably number one and number two or number two and number one. And they're straight up telling you less than three weeks before an election, hey, you know that story that's really damaging for the Democrat candidate, and that tells a narrative of not only corruption but

also just all the lies. Biden lying, acting like we're all such imbeciles that we can't figure out what was going on here. You know, Biden could have come clear and said, yeah, look it was bad, my son shouldn't have done it. But instead it was you. Oh he's a smart boy. Yeah here Hunters a real smart, smart guy. Yeah. Sure, they're telling you they're suppressing this. They're telling you that this is a media outlet that acts as a platform sometimes and as a publisher other times, and right now

it's a publisher on behalf of the DNC. They're actively suppressing this. You're not imagining this. This is not a theory. They won't they won't report on this because they say it's some computer tech guy who gave the information to the Senate Committee looking over this, and now the stories broke clear. The Senate Committee released some of these or talked abouts on these emails to certain news outlets. Since when, explain to me, since when these are stolen documents prevented

the media from reporting on something. They will report on top secret information that is truly damaging for it to be released, but they don't care. They want to tell a story. They tell the story, and they hold a total in their minds, total autonomy to do that. They won't report on this story. Facebook is throttling it. Facebook is suppressing it because this is a bull's eye. Friends,

thanks for listening to the buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. And you know Biden, he can't stand up to the lunatics running his party. He can't even find his way off the stage without him. Look, look what's happened yesterday. He didn't know the name. He said, you know the guy. I think he's a Mormon, right, he said he's a Mormon. He's talking about Mitt Romney.

I forgot Mitt Romney's name. Can you imagine that? Can you imagine? Then? He didn't know where he was. He said, when, hell am I where am I? No? He's shot, folks, he shot. I'm running against the single worst candidate in the history of presidential politics. And you know what that does. That puts more pressure on me. Can you imagine if you lose to a guy like this. The President's very competitive. Fortunately, so I I know that he's giving this everything he's got.

It is it amazing? It feels like eons have passed, at least in new cycle terms, from when on a Friday evening Trump was going to Walter Reed Medical Center and there was this this frenzy from the Lib media of both see he deserved it. And I didn't even want to say what they were hoping for, but you all know what they were hoping for at least at least a few weeks of the president struggling in the hospital, at least at least a you know, prolonged period of recovery.

Looking at Trump, you know, stammering and and uh, you know, dottering around the White House and not looking like himself and dealing with you know, really severe illness. And the guy like four days later was practically you know, doing the moonwalk. And backflips and telling everybody how he's gonna kick button twenty twenty one. Here we are, and we're also at a point that we see the media's credibility is on the line here in a way that it

never really has been before. Because I think if they if they lose, this will if they lose, and that's really what it will be if Biden wins, if they lose this election, because it's the Democrat media and the and the Biden ticket and the DNC altogether. They realize that this game that they've been playing for a long time, where they act like they are the truth scribes of our society and they present information that we all need to know, they're just going to keep losing, keep losing

that perceived authority. And by the end of four more years of Trump, think about this. Trump has been calling them out, saying their fake news, saying that the enemy of the people. So what I'm trying to tell you is that this time around, it's personal for the media. This time around, it's it's existential to what they view as their profession and really to their purpose. Will they continue to be this media apparatus that gets to tell everybody what reality is, and we're all supposed to nod

our heads. Oh sure, that's just you're just speaking the truth. You're all truth tellers. If they get a Biden administration, with all the access they have, with all the things that they'll do, I know that they view this as an enormous win for them, not just ideologically but but

professionally financially, it'll be a big win. You have to remember, within administration comes all kinds of you know, the lobbyists change out, you know to some degree, and all the administration positions, and all the patronage and the appointees and the think tanks and all this stuff, all this stuff that's out there. And you know, I turn around and I say, what happens if? Sure enough, what happens if they lose again? Right, then what do they do? What's there?

Because the conservative media having a President Trump for four or years would be in a much better position to continue to show anyone who has the ability to think, clearly, this is all this media apparatus that exists in the country is all a fraud. I should probably call them apparatchicks now to start going back to the Soviet era, because there really is something very deeply Soviet about what

we're witnessing. I'll talk to you in a little bit about the war on sexual preference as a term now not allowed to say that anymore, not allowed to say war on sexual sorry, and I'll say sexual preference and we'll explain how that came up yesterday. And the speed with which they almost institutionalize this newfound change was amazing. It was jaw dropping. But first understand that there is

no dishonesty. There is no level of complicity that is beyond the Democrat media right now, and you're going to see that in everything as it plays out going forward for the next few weeks. It's just it's all in. It's all in. In twenty sixteen, they thought Hillary was gonna win, Yeah, they were. They were stacking the deck for her, and there was the Billy Bush tape and that was the October surprise. And I still think the

Democrats have got it. There's some dirty trick they're going to play, although looking increasingly like they don't have any any They just don't have a card to play against ACB, not one that's gonna work. They don't have it, So they're probably gonna then focus all that additional rage on Trump, which we all can expect. I think that that's very

likely to happen. One thing I wanted to also say here, the rhetoric from the left is increasingly not only is a divorce from reality, but it's it's troubling to hear somebody who will say these things, especially when they have you know, millions of listeners or viewers or anything else. They're doing real damage to our societ. They're just doing it because now we have a system that rewards people, whether it's in politics or media, for the most hateful

and outrageous claims about the other side. It's it's not a side effect. Now, that's the goal. That's the goal. Don't don't ever try to be held up by honesty or decency. Just say whatever you have to say to just crush the other side. Here's Chris Hayes, who used to be kind of a more of a mild mannered, nerdy lib guy, you know. Now he's been an anchor for a few years, so he's you know, big man on campus kind of thing over at over at MSNBC. But while we're having this ACB hearing, here's what he's

saying about the Republican tradeoff play play twenty three. How likely is not fully out of the woods? Is? Doctor today released a letter that acknowledged that Wally is improving, he is basically still experiencing symptoms self reported, and yet there he was in the hearing room today speaking without a mask. So committed to ramming through a justice to giving Trump and Conservative as a six stream majority on the court for generation so they can do things like,

I don't know, maybe takeaway Americans' healthcare. So committed to that project that even though he might have contracted the illness at the last big event for this justice, even though he is still experiencing symptoms, he rushed back into that room to breathe all over his colleagues. He could have done it on zoom. I mean, we've all spent seven months working relatantly. But no, no, no, no, no, why Well, because they just don't seem to care how

many people get sick and how many people die. So long as they can push their justice through, they don't care how many people die. They don't care about people die. This is really I want you to hear this. I know it's frustrating, it's even enraging. Perhaps this is now mainstream thought on the left. They believe this. Republicans don't care our loved ones, ourselves. We're at every bit the

same risk as Democrats are from this virus. I know you're going to say Democrats states have had much worse records against this, but you know, as human beings, individuals, we're all at risk from this. As I've been telling you, the risk for a vast majority of us is quite minimal, but there are risks, there's no question about it. But

we don't care about people dying. That's so interesting because on the other side of this, first of all, that's it's a stupid slander, but Democrats excel at stupid slanders. On the other side of this, you have the costs that the media will not pay attention to. Right now, You're going to be living if you if you watch mainstream media, if you turn on ABC News, which I don't know why anyone watches that warmed over, you know, poll tested socialist crap. I don't know why people think that.

You know, I'll just turn on NBC News tonight, you know, and see the same thing. I don't. Oh, well, big news story that's from a left wing opinion but it sounds authoritative, and then at the end it's like, hey, here's a mama duck swimming around in a pond. I mean, it's so stupid. People watch this stuff. They won't tell you about what is increasingly clear, which is the enormous cost to life and psychological and emotional well being from policies that it used to be we had to look

at lockdowns as a tradeoff. Now increasingly it's just a self inflicted wound. The data is not supportive of these things as working. They do not work. The only thing that would really work to stop this virus would be to stop society, and we can't do that. Even the Libs after and I mean really stop it. I mean everyone, you cannot move. You are in place for two weeks, no grocery shopping, no doctor's visits, no hospital visits, nothing, two weeks shut down. And even that might not do it.

But we can't do that. That's crazy, that's insane. Well, it used to be we thought of this as all a big tradeoff. By the way, I think this is a much more important issue than the hearings. I'm just

gonna say it, fighting against lockdowns. We are heading into a winter of lockdowns in this country again because it's been handed to the states and people are terrified, and blue states and even some red states, look at Texas are run by people who don't have the courage, don't have the political and intestinal fortitude to say, I'm look,

people could take whatever precautions they want. I'm not using the power of the state to erase constitutional freedoms and rights to make people who are overly anxious or who are capitalizing on this panic and fear happy. This is this is what has been shared. You know, doctor Atlas was was on Fox last night and here are just

some of the stats that he shared. Forty six percent of cancers during the lockdowns were not diagnosed, fifty percent of chemotherapy appointments were missed, and fifty percent of immunization schedule were missed for young children, those are guaranteed. Okay, we didn't we didn't cut cancer in half by having lockdowns, because then we really would be in lockdown forever. Right. All that means is we're missing hundreds of thousands of

cancer k is delayed perhaps for months months. You know, when those those people who are going to we're not gonna you know, necessarily know what the real toll is here. They're going to start unfortunately, some percentage of them are going to start dying, you know, this late this winter, next spring, next summer, because then instead of being stage one, they were stage four. You know, we're instead of being stage two, they're stage three. Whatever. It may be enormous

cost to this, and that's just one thing. Two hundred thousand missed cases of child abuse during lockdowns. The child abuse didn't disappear, just not seen because people don't go to school, which is actually the main reporting mechanism from where people where people see the abuse. This was one of the most sobering statistics. Twenty five percent of young people, according to the CDC, are considering suicide. Twenty five percent of one and four or have considered suicide during lockdowns.

You do start to have these moments. I look, I've had moments obviously nothing not thinking anything seriously, and nobody he should ever have those thoughts, and they should get help right away if they do. But he will start to wake up and just in a general sense, he say, what's the point. I can't see anyone, I can't do anything, just gonna keep feeding myself and watching screens all day alone. That's really what lockdown is. Oh and if I go outside,

I have to put on this moronic face diaper. You know. I was very happy Tucker last night, just reminding everybody on his show. Hey, the people that are telling you that if you don't mask up, you're literally and that is the word that he used as Cuomo used literally killing people. They were laughing at masks earlier this year, and now the science has changed so much. Here's something

that I want you all to keep in mind. Friends, All of the data on two highly infectious airborne pathogens, measles and chicken pox, will tell you, and it is considered necessary science, science based, evidence based practice that you must have a properly fitted N ninety five mask and goggles on. If you do not, if you are an adult who has not had measles or the measles vaccine or chicken pox of the chicken pox vaccine, and you're going to be in an enclosed space with somebody who

has that has one of those viruses. Cloth mask entirely insufficient, entirely insufficient, And if you wear one, you have a very high probability, very high possibility of catching of catching one of those viruses. So why is it so different here, Why is it all of a sudden that masking is

supposed to be saving all of us. Well, I'll address this a little bit more because I look, I think this is the most important issue in the country, bar none, the issue of lockdowns, of COVID, of our fight against this. You're in the Freedom hud, this is the buck Sex and Show podcast. Media is not going to talk to you about this. So that's what my job is to tell you things that are important that other people who

have a political agenda don't want you to know. Europe is going into lockdown and they're getting deeper and deeper into it. Madrid, England, France, a bunch of countries, Ireland, Holland, Brussels, Belgium, rather well, some cities, some countries. You get what I'm saying. They're going into lockdown. Why is this a story that the media that's usually obsessed with telling us about how terrifying COVID is. Why are they not really covering this?

I mean they can't entirely not cover it, because it's certainly news in Europe. It's out there, it's on the internet. But they're not running a major broadcast. CNN is not opening up, it's this is a big story. Remember what happened. We saw what went down in China, but then also in Italy, particularly in northern Italy, and we realized what

was coming for us. Now. Look, I don't think it's going to be like it was then, but I'm just saying we can watch things playing out elsewhere and understand there's a very good chance that a similar problem will face us here. How is this not a bigger news story because right now there's the same reason the Hunter Biden thing is a non news story. Right now, there is only one agenda of the news media, and it

is to defeat Donald Trump. That's it. Anything that interferes with that they think is bad, anything that helps with that they think is good. That's it. And here's the problem with European lockdowns. Look at all the smug jerks, all the mask shamers, all the different people out there who think that they're so much better than Trump and Trump supporters, because they're not. They're not as pro mask a lot of Trump supporters. Look at the rallies, they're

wearing masks. But the narrative that's been created here is COVID came back in this country because of irresponsible people like Trump and Trump supporters, people like me who like, why am I wearing a mask for stupid reasons and then seeing that people aren't wearing them when they should be wearing them, and this is just all nonsense. We

are supposed to be the problem. Well, the issue is that if enough people figure out that Europe is having spikes and cases again, including places that have already been in very severe lockdowns, that's a reminder to all the rest of us. Hold on a second, it's not Trump and Trump supporters faults. It's just not. It's illogical. It makes no sense to believe that. But Democrats need people to think that, so they go in and vote and say,

if I vote for Biden, things will be better with COVID. No. Unfortunately, the tragic irony here is a vote for Biden will make everything COVID related worse because he's going he's learned all the wrong lessons so far. The Democrats the left love this control, they like this power, and they're just going to continue to use this as a political tool. They're going to take us deeper into shotdown. That's what's going to happen. Downs are on the ballot in a

few weeks. Friends, Remember that lockdowns, your livelihood, perhaps your freedom for certain is on the ballot. Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Speaking of COVID lockdowns and all the damage that it's been doing, still have millions of people who don't have jobs that they should have were it not for the government deciding that they weren't allowed to continue working, who are not getting those supplemental benefits that they had been in the past, if they've lost their job, let's say, for since the beginning of the pandemic, or at some

point midway through. And this is where you would think the federal government would would just step up and help out. But no, because what have I told you? You'll see this, This is a thread, This is a theme that will run through everything. What have I told you? Nothing matters to the news media and the Democrat Party right now other than beating Trump. Nothing can be allowed to be a distraction from that. It cannot detract from that. It has to be it's all systems go that is the

only focus. The journalists get up in the morning, the CNN and MSNBC and ABC News. They get up and their mission in life is to make sure Donald Trump doesn't get reelected. And that's also true for Nancy Pelosi and the entire Democrat Party. The suffering that's out there, they don't care. They're the ones first of all that we'll just go out and say Republicans don't care about

people dying. So how do we respond to that overheated rhetoric. Well, one way is just point out, well, the Democrats definitely don't care about people suffering financially, their businesses suffering emotionally. And you have this class of elites, you know, you have this class of elites that still manages to have their jobs. They work remotely, They probably have more time at home, more time on the couch. It's not so

bad for them. They don't care. None of them are going to be storming Pelosi manner with pitchforks and torches, screaming that she actually do something right. That's not going to happen, but chardonnaye. Nancy is openly standing in the way of people getting the federal benefits that the Trump administration has already said we would, we will sign this, will get this done. Republicans will push it through the House,

the Senate. Trump will sign it. People start getting their direct deposits, and that's money for groceries, that's money for rent, you know, money to pay for essential pharmaceuticals. I mean, this is this is serious stuff. People need help out there. Not everybody. Some people are you know, pretty fine, pretty it's fat and happy right now, emphasis on fat, given all the COVID mac and cheese and sweet treat eating

that's been going on. I can't speak for all of you, but but you know, some people are not not really suffering at all about this, and they don't care what's happening to the working class. While the Democrat Party pretends to be the champions of the working class. They Nancy, if you remember, this is the third go round here where she has said, no, I'm going to take hostages. I'm going to hold the funds the American work or the American people need hostage to my left wing legislative agenda.

Because that's how Nancy Pelosi is. That's what she's doing. And it was a bit of a shock yesterday to see and It really wasn't because wolf Blitzer is some big man of the people. I'm just gonna say it, all right, wolf Blitzer, guy's a millionaire many many times over, you know you. But she got really nasty with wolf Blitzer. It was kind of amazing because CNN is just carrying water for the Democrat Party all day long, twenty four seven.

It's gross, it's obvious, it's pathetic. That's what they do all day long. And they'll say, oh, but what about Fox. Fox has Democrats on, Fox has real Democrats. Fox has Poopoo Pete Buddha Judge, sorry for mispronouncing his name, Pete Bouddha Judge on to represent the left wing point of view.

I mean Fox will actually have these, They'll have real Democrats strategists, not you know, CNN will have on some Republican He's like, yeah, have never really worked on a campaign, but I'm just here to, you know, get punched in the face for the amusement of CNN viewers. It's crazy, all right, but CNN all day long, it's all they do. And Polo, it's not enough, Queen Pelosi, Queen Nancy expects one hundred percent obedience and servitude from CNN. Her view

is she owns CNN. CNN owes her right. You know, she's above them. They are her scribes. She tells CNN, the New York Times and others what to say, what to think. Look, she's the most powerful elected Democrat and most powerful elected woman in politics in America. It's just a fact. I know it hurts me to have to say it out loud, but it's true. And so she expects them to just bow down, take their orders and

say thank you. Nancy may have another that's it, But yesterday wolf Blitzer found out that that really is what she thinks. Here's how the exchange where this is over COVID relief funding, and here's how this is how Nancy v. Wolf. How it went. The Wolf can snap back apparently play five. But let's not goin to you everdently do not respect the chairman of the committees. I wish you would respect the knowledge that goes into getting the meeting the needs

of the American people. But again, you've been on a JAD defending the administration all this time with no knowledge of the difference between our two bills, and like, thank you for giving me the opportunity to say that to you, and these are incredibly difficult times right now. And we'll

leave it on that note. Thank you so much for joining leave it on the boat that you are not right on this wolf, And I hate to say that to you, but I feel confident about it, and I feel confident about my colleagues, and I feel confident in my chairs. Oh, we're not done. Just you know, there's more, but we wanted to pop in here for a second to say, first of all, wow, it's kind of nasty, right, I'm a wolf, kind of just trying to say, okay, thanks to you later, and she's like, no, no, no,

you're an idiot. Just so you know you're wrong. You're wrong before we thanks for having me again. Sure, you're wrong. Just FYI like unnecess slamming the door into his butt after she's also kicked him out of the house, You know what I mean, Not necessary, petty, petty. Nancy's feeling the heat. You know why, there's polls out there on the show that American public blames Nancy more than Trump for the hold up in the COVID aid. This may

be backfiring on the Democrats. Nancy's feeling that heat. What is Nancy Pelosi is ruled by polls and power. That's it. I don't think this is no principle. It doesn't stand for anything. Stands for Nancy Pelosi and the borg you know, collective of the Democrat Party. I don't know how many Star Trek fans are out there, but you get what I'm saying. You know, Nancy Pelosi is like the hive mind that controls all the agent Smiths of the Democrat Party, if you like the matrix more so, this is all

about why can't we get funding out to people. Trump the Republicans have said one point eight trillion dollars. Nancy says, no, not enough. Now, a reasonable person would say there's urgency here. People don't have money for their bills. They're running up credit card debt. They may be losing their home soon if they haven't already. They're under a lot of stress. They don't know when their jobs are coming back. If ever, let's get these people help. And there is an obligation.

I think it's so important. Do you think conservatives here the government needs to help people. The government decided to take away their jobs. The government decided to shut down the economy. It's not your fault. If you can't make a living, you know, at your shoe store anymore, because you're not allowed to have customers in the store on

government med it, that's government's fault. So instead of just saying, you know what, you're right, there's more stuff to be done, but let's get the money out to people police, he goes, now I want more, or I'm going to hold the American people who are suffering hostage. It's exactly what she's doing, and wolf Blitzer kind of knows it. He's like, hey,

but I mean, can we get the people money? And then Nancy goes and says, you're covering for the Republicans, which for a Democrat, for someone watching CNN, I mean, that's the gravest insult imaginable to a CNN watcher. If it's being called a mass murderer or being called an apologist for the Republican position for a congressional a congressional spending bill. We all know that the second one is way worse, much better. Be a mass murderers can still

believe in climate change. Mass murderers can still understand which pronoun to use of somebody's preferred pronouns Pelosi and uh and the wolf. They were not done, Blake clip seven, No six. It's not about me. It's about millions of Americans who can't put food on the table, who can't pay the rent. And represent them and the long food. I know you are them. I'm just present them, and

we know them as we represent them. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good, as they say, Speaker, always the case, but we're not even close to the good. All right, let's see what happens, because every day is critically critically important. Thanks so much for joining your sensitivity to our constituents needs. I am sensitive to them because I see them on the street begging for food, begging for money, not am speaker, thank you from we feed them.

We'll continue this conversation down the road, for sure. We'll take a quick break. We'll be right back. Let's just be clear, No, Nancy doesn't feed them. That's the point Nancy saying, we'll feed them if you buy us a new car. We'll feed them if you give us more stuff. Republicans, that's what's actually happening here. There's no problem with the PPPE and the unemployment benefits. Republicans like let's go for it. Nancy won't do it. Nancy wants bailouts for cities that

have been poorly run and running up debts. And you know why they have debts. This, this is when you really get it. This is when the rubber really meets the road. Friends, Why are cities facing so much in the way of problems here? Public sector pensions huge drain. Other than police police unions, who do you think the teachers unions and the municipal employees unions, who do you think they're all completely in better with the Democrat party? Of course, what are the two things that drive large

cities deep into the red New York City, Chicago unit. Well, there are two things, public sector union demands and pensions. Medicaid, that's it, programs that Democrats are obsessed with. So what do they want. They want to use the suffering of the American people to get a federal bailout for poorly run cities. And they're publicly saying, sorry, that's not that's not what this is about. You don't get to, you know, give us a wish list. You know, Nancy's standing over

the patient. The patient's dying. Nancy's got the two electric paddles, you know, in her hands. You're like, bloh clear, they do that whole thing, and Nancy's got them in her hands. Republicans said, okay, we've turned on the device. Do it, and Nancy goes, I want a pony, and then I'll do it. Wait, what what do you mean? And then she goes, we're the ones that try to save people during a heart attack. No, you're you're the one who's

demanding a pony, Nancy. We see what's going on here, and I'm glad that Wolf Blitzer decided to try to regain some shred of dignity here by saying, okay, but there are a lot of people who are suffering. And then this is what I love too. This is the ultimate, the ultimate fraud here, Nancy Pelosi. He's a seventy eight year old kazillionaire, Nancy Pelosi. I think she's worth forty to seventy million or something like that on the congressional form.

You're worth a ton of money here, ladies rich and then some I mean really her husband is, but you know she that's her money too. And she lives in a in a straight up mansion, I mean like a baronial castle. Practically in San Francisco, and she really cares so much about the poor and struggling people. Anybody who believes that's an idiot, doesn't care, doesn't know these people, She doesn't spend any time with them. Nancy Pelosi hasn't worried about paying a bill in over fifty years. So

come on, folks, Come on. CNN accidentally pushed into a moment of journalism by pushing back on the Speaker of the House, trashing one of their best known anchors. Just trashing him, I mean, really abusing the guy. Actually look kind of bad for him. But you know why this is happening, because Nancy knows that people are figuring this out, that her scam is not working as well as she had anticipated, just like it had in the previous times.

And now she can't allow for the Republicans to get their way in her mind, because that's a political victory right before the election, that people are really gonna feel, they're going to see the money in their bank accounts and it's going to be clear that wait a second, we could have had this a month ago, six weeks ago, but Nancy wanted to play games. I don't think I'm putting those lunatic Libs in charge. I don't think so. No, Instead, what she has to do is make sure people are

either miserable and blame Trump that's the game. Or she gets this bountiful you know, two point four trillion dollars or whatever does she's demanding now, not one point eight trillion, and gets to look like a hero, a savior of Democrats cities across the country, which will help with base turnout and also show that the Republicans cave to her. It's all politics, friends, It's all you have to know about Nancy. What is what is benefiting her, not what

helps the people. True the Democratic Party as well. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. The Democrat Party hates fracking, they hate call, they hate clean beautiful call. I see what they do with call down. They hate domestic energy production. And Biden will shut you down. He wants to shut you down, just like your governor's got you shut down right now, they better open up your stay. That's right, they want

to shut it down. Friends. I've been telling you it's on the ballot, and you know there's big problems ed because first of all, they're lying about what's already happened constantly. They're always telling you things. The Democrats who have made decisions about COVID are in a furious again Soviet style rewriting of history contest all the time. Perhaps the best the example of this is Governor Cuomo himself, who has the worst, the single worst record on COVID of anyone

in the United States, perhaps the world. Maybe the Chinese Polite Borow was worse, the Chinese Communist Party, but you know, inhumane and evil, but probably pretty effective in some ways. Here is what Cuomo says now about the nursing home order that I have seen that exists, that is out there. There's evidence here, there's proof, there's smoking gun. Here is Governor Cuomo the possible attorney general of a Biden administration. Friends,

just remember that play seven Willie. I hate to get technical with you, but sometimes these seeing things and technical. There was never a directive that said we will send COVID positive people back to nursing homes. The directive, which was modeled on the federal directive, said you cannot discriminate. But the state law clearly says a nursing home can't

accept the person unless states can treat them. Having said that, would my health department have followed the federal guidance, obviously not knowing the political issue it was going to create. But there was no issue in reality, is what I'm saying, because we never did have a scarcity of beds. We always had additional hospital beds and emergency beds, So no nursing home was forced to take someone we never got there,

just a lie. Can't discriminate against on the basis of COVID means when someone comes out of the hospital and they're supposed to go back to their they want to go back to their nursing home, even if they may still have COVID. We're here and all the time they want Trump to still wear a mask, and then he's been testing negative. But can't discriminate in this context means you gotta take them back or else you're going to

get sued. That's what it means. This didn't happen, ever, a rolse This happened in New York, and New York had the highest death rate, particularly in nursing homes, of any place in the United States. Almost is trying to rewrite history. It's all politics. He says, Yeah, just not the way he says it is. Play eight. What do you say to those families who believe that the death of their loved one was preventable. One of the things I find reprehensible about it, Willie, is the president did

create that impression, which is cruel. It's cruel. It's cruel to say that the families who lost people in nursing homes, well, this could have been prevented by a different government policy. It makes their pain worse. It is not true. If you want to rewind all the tape. We should have been testing staff before they walked into a nursing home. That is true, and that's back in March when we

didn't have any tests. We were told asymptomatic spread wasn't possible, that you had to have a symptom, so the nursing home workers without symptoms were allowed in. That was bad information. I want to say what he said. Notice how he hides behind the family members of people that have died from COVID. That's his first response to this, because he's scummy. Thanks for listening. To remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.

The ACB hearings in their last day, and so far, the best summary I can give you of this is that Amy Coney Barrett should send the Democrat Senate Judiciary members a bill for the week long constitutional law class that she has been giving them. She should she should ask for payment in full. She should ask for payment up front next time, because she's been taking them on a school bus all week. Nobody has been able to trip her up corner. In fact, they look pretty sad,

pretty pathetic when they try. And it's largely been for the public I think a waste of time. It's all just proform a nonsense from the Democrats about you know, oh we love Rov Wade and Obamacare. I mean, they mostly turn this into an Obamacare commercial and reminded Americans that abortion for all nine months of a pregnancy is the most important, most necessary thing that the Democrat Party

stands for overall things. But there have been some notable moments, and one that will I think affect you and me already through a change in the rules, changing the rules of what we're allowed to say. But first I just want to point out that I love the state of Hawaii. I think Hawaii is one of the most gorgeous places in the world, and Hawaiian people are great. I've been to Hawaii a few times and I love it, and I've dreamed of moving there before. I just feel like

it's such a it's just so beauty. Anyway, there's a lot about Hawaiian I'm a big fan of. Even with all of that, it's hard for me to forgive the State of Hawaii for foisting Maizie Herono upon us. It's stunning, and I don't usually say this in this way. It's stunning that this woman has been elected any I mean, if she was elected the head of her local school board, I would be shocked. Who thought this was a good idea?

She's a United States Senator and it was a struggle to even understand what she thought she was saying yesterday, and she's reading from notes handed to her buy her staff. And I love this too. They asked Amy Coney Barrett, can you show us your notes? At one point held up a blank piece of paper that said the United States Senate on it. Hadn't written a thing, had no notes whatsoever, everything just going from memory and always as

completely fluid. I gotta say more impressive in this questioning period than either Kavanaugh or Gorsitch were, I'm just gonna say it more impressive even even fredlinc and those are very smart guys, but even better grasp of the law, even more able to engage in recall and a little bit of back and forth intellectual jousting which usually she to continue this medieval metaphor unhorsed her opponents rather abruptly.

It was not hard for her. But with all that, we still had to hear from Mazie HERONU yesterday and what became apparent, and this is true of a lot of Democrat lawmakers and Democrat lawyers too, is at a fundamental level, they don't really understand the purpose of the law. They think that the law, it's it's true of the

Constitution as well. They think that these are just social constructs that you shift or change as needed, and that there's nothing there's nothing below, there's no important reason that we all agree exist for this thing. It's always this movable,

moving target. Okay. So that's one part of this, And there's another part of this, which is that I think that they're really just unable to understand a lot of the arguments that Amy Coney Barrett makes so they misunderstand the purpose of the law, and they don't understand the people that know and try to explain to them, they're not really even able to process it. They don't understand

these complexities. Maisie Herono, here you go. Here, here's an example of where she says something out loud, and everyone who was watching this yesterday felt like it's like she had taken all of her brains out of our skulls, put them in a microwave for five minutes, and then handed them back to us. We're just amazed what's going on here? Play clip one. So when you say that you're going to make a decision based on the law real life stories that we've been talking about, you would

consider those to be part of the law. Yes, when we are talking about the law, it includes real stories from like what now, You might think, Buck, that's got to be the craziest thing the crazy Mazie said yesterday, Right, that's got to be the top of the list. But no, no, there was something that was even more outlandish that happened. Play clip three. To ensure the fitness of nominees for a lifetime appointment to the federal bench or to any of the other positions for any of the committees on

which they appear. I ask each nominee these two questions, and I will ask them of you since you became a legal adult. Have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors or committed any verbal or physical harassment assault of a sexual nature? No, Senator. Have you ever faced discipline or entered into a settlement related to this kind of conduct? No, Senator. She's asking a female Supreme Court nominee if she's ever sexually assault at someone. Yep, Now

I understand the Democrat responds to this is she asks everyone. Okay, that doesn't mean it's not a stupid thing to do in the first place. And for those who say, why buck,

is there a problem with this? Okay? Should everybody who wants to be in public office be asked on a during a televis I'm not saying that this shouldn't come up in background checks and there's other stuff that goes into this, folks, But in a televised Senate hearing, should somebody be asked, you know, if they've if they've ever molested a child? Should everyone be asked that question? Have you ever beaten your wife or beaten your husband. I

suppose should everyone be asked that question during a televised hearing. No, this is grand standing from crazy Mazie. That's what's going on. What the heck is this? But it gets it gets worse. I keep trying to tell you, a Papa, we're not even done yet. We haven't even gotten all the way all the way through this, and yet there's more. This

is this is where the language change comes in. Senator Mazie harrono As brings this up because earlier in the day, Diane Feinstein asked a question of of ACB, and ACB responded and used the term sexual preference. Now, I will tell you, and perhaps this is going to be a big problem for some people. I have used the term sexual preference in my life, probably thousands of times. I mean, I don't even know, maybe even more. I mean, how many times have you used a phrase in common usage?

You know, limo a word in common usage? Does you like black hawk down? You remember this all right? How many of you have used a phrase in common usage? And we were we were just told yesterday and it was a fascinating real time case study of how the left tries to win arguments by changing the words in arguments, the actual meaning and the definition and the usage of the words. I don't mean by just switching in other words, I mean no, that's no longer, that's no longer a potato,

that's a petunia. Well, okay, but I guess then that wait, I thought we're talking about vegetables, right, It doesn't matter, doesn't matter, that's what they do. And here's an example of it. May and Maizie went to bring this back up.

Clearly your staff at hander to this one. If you want to just see, if you want to see proof that we are largely ruled by idiots in this country, not everybody, but largely ruled by idiots, watch some of the Senate testimony from yesterday and watch Mazie Horrono's questioning, I really mean this. You will never think of the United States Senate in quite the same way this. This person is really yeah really, but here's when we found out that sexual preference is now a sexual preference is

now a slurer effectively against the LGBTQ community. Not not allowed play clip too. So, even though you didn't give a direct answer, I think your response to speak volumes, not once, but twice. You use the term sexual preference to describe those in the LGBTQ community, And let me make clear, sexual preference is an offensive and outdated term. It is used by anti LGBTQ activists to suggest that sexual orientation is a choice. It is not. Sexual orientation

is a key part of a person's identity. That sexual orientation is both a normal expression of human sexuality and immutable was a key part of the majority's opinion in A Burden Fell, which, by the way, Scullia did not. We get it, we get it, we get it. Sexual orientation is used by anti LGBTQ activists. No, it's actually the phrase that has been in common usage for as long as I've been alive, and no one meant it as any kind of a slight. It was just meant

to be descriptive. You know, your sexual orientation. I'm sorry, your sexual preference. Now orientation. See, that's what we're supposed to say. But orientation means you're positioning relative to other things. So if it's relative to other things, and that must mean it also is some degree of change and subjectivity. But I'll get into that in a second. But this is what they came at Amy Coney Barrett with yesterday.

And as much as I don't think this is really going to do anything change anything in this hearing, I think Gamy Coney Barrett's going to get confirmed and Democrats now we're just resigned to the reality of Wow, we can't you know, without without a white male Christian to attack, Democrats are a little bit defanged. They just don't. They don't have the same firepower. They need a white male

Republican Christian and then their tricks work. You make mother of seven female, adopted two kids from Haiti, you know, yeah, that's and you have to specify a mother of seven. You gotta say female because it could be a male mother of seven. You don't know, you don't know. And this is left wing dogman. Now you're saying, come on, no, that's real, that's real. That's what they want. At least that's what we're supposed to do. So now it's no

longer sexual sexual preference. It has to be sexual orientation, which is interesting because I mean, I would tell my sexual preference is women. This is not hard to think about or say. It's very clear that I prefer I am sexually attracted to women, so why And you know other people are sexual intersecution, some intersecually attracted to men, and so on so forth. You know all this, Why

is this offensive? Oh well it gets too as as Maisie was saying here or she was reading off of her Q cards, the immutability of sexual will use the term nout orientation. And notice that now they've changed this rule as of yesterday. I've never heard this before in my life, and I study wokeness and I fight wokeness. This is a new one. Had never heard that before,

sexual preference, never heard it. But I do remember being at a party a long time ago and someone said he's a guy who prefers prefers men or something like that for a guy who was same sex attracted, and somebody else got a little bit snippy. This is a long time ago, and I remember thinking, like, how gets that? What's the He didn't say anything disparaging? Why is that? But because they because the whole thing is, oh, you're you're born this way and it's always that way, and

there's no choice involved. That's why, and that's necessary for it to become In the leftist approach to this, a protest did characteristic like race, you know, like your gender. So here's a problem though that they create with this. See see they're they're illogic, and their irrationality creates more inconsistencies, creates more problems. Now, you can change your gender. We know this. You can change your gender, and it's not based in anything physical. So it's actually not people who

have I'm forgetting that. We don't use the H word term for it anymore. There's another term for it, I'm forgetting. But where you have some male parts that some female parts, usually vestigial of one and more of the other. But it's not that it's not physically based, it's psychologically. It's how you feel inside that determines your gender. But if you can change your gender, how is it you can't

change your sexual preference? Right if you so? So if you're a man who says that I'm really a woman, so I'm a trans woman now, and I believe they want you to just say woman too, you can't even see. And if you say someone's old name, that's dead naming, right, there's all these new rules that we have to live by. You're a trans man who's attracted to a woman who says you're a woman, and once you make that transition, you are now attracted to men whereas you had been

attracted to women. That does happen, doesn't always happen that way, But so then that means that sexual orientation is at some level. It has to be at some level preference, because if it can change based on emotion and psychological desire, then it's not immutable. They tell us that gender is on a spectrum. Gender I'm just I'm just working you through. This is the left wing woke logic here. Gender is on a spectrum, it's fluid all these things. But sexual

preference is locked in stone. You're born with a certain sexual preference that it cannot be added to or shift. How does that make any sense? So you can have all male body parts x X or sorry x Y chromosomes and think that you're a woman in society has to completely accept and protect and actually now celebrate and cherish that. You know, men can get periods too. These

are phrases the left uses. It's true, but we're supposed to believe from the moment of birth you are either same sex attracted, or heterosexual or bisexual or I don't know what else there I know there are other things that would go into this, and you say that way forever. Where's the evidence for this? Where's the science, Libs? But it's not about that, you know what. It's about changing the rules and making all of us snap to it, do what we're told. You're in the freedom hud. This

is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Oh wait, what another thing I want to throw in the mix? Here? Hat tips Steve Krakauer, who put this up on his Twitter account. He is the editor host of the Fourth Watch newsletter, so he did a quick look up to see that as of last month, Webster's Dictionary included a definition of preference as orientation or sexual preference. Today they changed it to add the word offensive. I mean, they're actually changing definitions online friends, in real time to attack

Republicans and reflect their political wims. We have proof, we can prove it. That's what they do. I'm sure they're changing all the Wikipedia entries now to This is the Soviet rewriting of history. They can't win on the facts, so they change the facts. This is just one example of it. But they do this constantly, and they feel

justified in doing it. In fact, they think that they're doing this because are such good people, because they speak truth to power or whatever other nonsense they tell themselves at night. God lives really need to get a grip. But Trump wins a selection, that's going to be something that I don't think's happening anytime soon. Thanks for listening to the Buss and Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.

I got another incredibly stupid question for you, courtesy of Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee trying to take down ACB. And this one is pretty remarkable, I guess, not surprising in its own way, but but remarkable. Nonetheless, you have Senator Corey Booker here, because remember, for a lot of these Senate Democrats, this is really just about getting camera time. They treat these hearings not as an opportunity to get too important truths or speak to differing judicial philosophies in

a way that's illuminating. This that's not an AT's to come on, Come on, what is that week sauce right now? Nothing that's actually worthwhile. No, it's about grandstanding. It's about getting camera time. It might as well be a cable news hit on MSNBC for these Democrats. And I do think that particularly the TV news media has just has done so much to poorly influenced political discourse, especially for

these for these Democrats. It exists on the right too, and I sometimes even call it out on the right, but it's really on the left. I mean, if you want to keep getting elected to the House of the Senate, you just got to be on an MSNBC like every ten minutes. You know, you gotta do it. So that's something that goes I think unnoticed a lot of the time.

But okay, here we go. We have we have Corey Booker who asks Amy Coney Barrett this question because he's trying to remember he was he was I am Spartacus well with this question. He definitely didn't sound particularly smartacus womp womp. But Corey Booker asked her a question that I guess he thought this was worth while for some reason.

Please play thirteen. I'm going to ask you some questions that if you had told me five years ago that would be questions asked at a Supreme Court nomination hearing, I would have thought they wouldn't be possible, but unfortunately I think they're necessary to ask you, and I hope that you'll give me direct answers. The first one. You've already spoken towards issues of racism, how you deplore it. But I want to just ask you very simply, and I imagine you'll give me a very short, resolute answer,

but you condemned white supremacy. Correct, Yes, thank you. I'm glad to see that you said that. I wish our president would say that so resolutely, unequivocally as well. But we are at a time that Americans are literally fearful because their president cannot do that in the resolute manner in which you did. I'm I'm sorry that that question had to even be asked at this time. All Right, I don't want this question to be asked, and it

shouldn't have to be asked. But and I know what your answer is going to be, and it's not going to tell us anything we don't already know. And I can't believe it's gonna be asked, but I'm gonna ask you the question. I mean, this guy, what a clown. Honestly, he's asking a woman who is mother to two Haitian children. Those are her kids, asking her if she condemns white supremacy. I'm look. I know that he says that he knew what the answer is gonna be, But why has he

asked the question? Oh, we all know why he's asked the question so he can turn this into some speech about how Trump doesn't condemn white supremacy, which is a lie. We've noticed last week. We had to go through this. It's the cycle all over again. They say, oh, he won't condemn white supremacy, and then people finally go, okay, fine, they start pulling out all the clips and all the Times, and the Press secretary and all these people have said

the President condemned white supremacy. Right, They grab all this stuff, and then they wait a week or two and they go, you know, the president doesn't condemn white supremacy. And you just want to sure throw things at the wall. What do you if we're doing this again? Yes, we're doing this again, doing this again. Gas lighting Shae, there you go, there you go. I was supposed to be a gaslight noise. It kind of just sounded like I was slurring my

words for some reason. Didn't really work. But gas that actually comes from a play. I believe the term comes from a play, although who knows, maybe they'll they'll they'll tell you, they'll tell you something else, they'll change the definition of the dictionary. Yeah, asking her if she's she condemned white supremacy. She's got two black children, but she

needs to be asked that. Sure. It is worth noting that the left has nonetheless attacked Judge Amy Coney Barrett, including her adoption, and they did this particular in the early days of this nomination process online because they say that there's a I think it was Ibraham Kendy, professor at Boston University, who said that there was something colonial and therefore exploitative or I can't remember his exact wording about a white woman adopting two children from Haiti. It

was really really ugly. First of all, it just untrue and ugly stuff to say, and a lot of Democrats and including Democrat professors, excel at that stuff. Here's what ACB said about that play. Ten some butt head professor at Boston University who says that because you and your husband have two children of color, that you're a white columnist. The implication is that you're a racist, and that you use your two children as props. Do you use your

children as props? Senator Kenny, It was the risk of people saying things like that which would be so hurtful to my family that when I told Senator Graham this morning, but my husband and I had to really weigh the costs of this. It was saying deeply offensive and hurtful things, things that are not only hurtful to me, but are hurtful to my children, who are my children, who we love and who we brought and brought home and made part of our family. And accusations like that are cruel.

You know what. One of the problems that Amy Coney Barry Barrett has with all this is one of the challenges that she really has. There are a lot of leftists, a lot of Democrats who see her and they recognize someone who, no matter how much they tell themselves they believe in climate change, and they wear masks all the time, and they watch Rachel Maddow and they read The New York Times. They see someone who is smarter than they are, kinder than they are, and a better person than they are,

and it really bothers them, It really unsettles them. Part of the narrative that you tell yourself as a liberal. Is that because of some of those things I just mentioned to you and many many others, you at least get to look at half the country with some disdain. You get to look on everybody who doesn't agree with your politics. I mean, as a conservative, I always tell people, don't don't look at libs. I mean, some of them are obviously crazy, a lot of them are, but you

don't look at them with disdain. If anything. I wish they would agree with more of what I say, and I try to find points of common humanity and common understanding with them whenever possible. It's hard these days because they won't let us, but I do it. And on an individual level, I have plenty of friends who are liberals, and I think our interpersonal relationships in decency are more

import than any professed political position. You know, I always say that I will not I do not attack liberals who are friends of mine on this show because and that's just a rule, that's just that's just how I go about my life, that's how I conduct my business. But that all said, there are still a lot of a lot of liberals out there who see Amy Coney Barrett,

and she is a reminder of their deficiencies. She is a reminder that it is possible, in fact, to believe actual Catholic teaching, to get married, to have a career, to have a big family, and to be happy, and to be really, really smart. Yeah, now many of us, I mean, if you're listening to this show, you know that that already has existed all along, and that's but she's a real symbol of it. There's resentment for Amy Coney Barrett. There's resentment among those on the left as well.

You know, we have so many of these liberals and I think this is this is also getting to a real sore point for them that they won't bring up. But you know, Pelosi before when I was when we were talking about getting the aid package for people from COVID, Pelosi really clearly went into high outrage because there was even a suggestion that she wasn't taking care of people who have been hit hard by COVID, that she wasn't doing everything possible to help those who are suffering during this.

And it was interesting because, well, well she's not, but she wants everyone to think so, and that's a very

important part of her self regard. There's another area where a lot of particularly very wealthy white liberals think of themselves very highly, and it's in that they care so much about underprivileged minorities, particularly Black Americans and African Americans, who have obviously, you know, in different parts of the country, disproportionate rates or rates of incarceration and not finishing high

school at the same rates and all of that. Right, So the libs always talk a big game about this, but it's fascinating because when you start to get down to a little bit, there are a lot of I know, a lot of white liberals who really don't spend any time with minorities. Certainly not I mean maybe minorities who went to their you know, went to their class in heart or went to their university, went to Harvard with them, but not minorities who are struggling. They don't know any

They don't they don't have any over for dinner. They don't spend any time with them. They don't go into the poor, high crime neighborhoods. No, they go march with other idiot libs complaining about the police in those neighborhoods. Right. They don't actually spend any time in these places. They're not they're not volunteering their own hours to try to,

you know, provide mentorship, an additional educational opportunity for these kids. No, No, your classic, your classic white lib is watching Rachel Maddow thinking, yeah, Republicans are so racist. Here's Amy Coney Barrett, who's I mean, I'm not even getting this, doesn't matter what she looks like, but she's also know telegenic, because I think the word

I can say without getting in trouble. It's a telegenic woman, mother of seven, legal superstar, clearly, and she clearly doesn't care about skin color and did something beautiful for two children from Haiti, made them her own children, right, you know you got you got Corey Booker who's saying, oh, do you condemn white supremacy? The whole point is, oh,

Republicans are also racist. What's Amy Coney Barrett who's adopted two kids from Haiti and loves them as her own, loves them as as she does as a mother or all of the rest of her kids. And I think that that upsets live at some level because they like, they like the stereotype of the at least being able to believe. Yeah, and even the Republicans that are kind kind of fancy sounding out there. You know they're they're

a little bit racist. They're a little bit racist. Amy Coney Barry, I keep saying on Sorry, Amy Coney Barrett did something selfless and beautiful and expanded her family and showed that she is someone who should be lecturing the left actually on how to take action based upon your morals and beliefs and to do so with dignity and poise. They just resent all of this. Who is this Republican, pro life woman who's had this family in this career and adopted these two black children from Haiti and has

pulled all of this together. You can't have that and be a Republican. You can't act that way and think that way and be a Republican. You're an evil Trump supporter if you're a Republican. Oh. Maybe what the left sees is that they're some of them at least, and this manifests itself as more hatred. But eventually they might be able to smarter, ones might be able to process this over time. What they see and what's happening here is they resent her because she is a living refutation

of what they've been brainwashed to think. The right is all about. In so many ways, she is a perfect example of what many on the right and conservatism aspire to in so many ways and hold up as well. We might look. No one's perfect. I'm not saying she's some ideal for all of us loved, but there's some impressive stuff here. And on the other side, they don't

like this. They're much more comfortable, They're much happier living in this fantasy that anyone who's a Democrat cares more about the poor, about minorities, has better ideas for the advancement, not just the advancement of women in the workplace or professionally, the advancement of women's happiness and fulfilling very deep purpose as a woman, like what are the best ways to achieve that? Men have to think about the same things too.

The left has no answers, and as I've said, Amy Coney Barrett is just a reputation of so many of the false answers they offer. You're enough freedom life. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. And I want to emphasize, you know, just given these list line of questions that you're asking, that you know I'm standing before the committee today saying that I have the integrity to act consistently with my oath and apply the law as the law, to approach the ACA and every other statute

without bias. And I have not made any commitments or deals or anything like that. I'm not here on a mission to destroy the Affordable Care Act. I'm just here to apply the law and adhere to the rule of law. She's just saying, look, I'm gonna be a really good fair judge, and obviously I have all the skills and experience and knowledge to do this. I love it. For about two days there was this whole she doesn't have enough time on the federal bench. Elena Kagan was never

even a judge. It's made a Supreme Court justice. Okay, I don't look Kagan smart. I'll say that I disagree with her, but she's a smart lawyer. She's capable. Not all the Democrat Supreme Court justices are smart. But you already know how I feel about that. But then when they can attack, and you're gonna hear a lot of this in the closing moments, the closing arguments from these ACB hearings. Would you notice I kept this for later on the show because it's important. But you know, everyone's

gonna forget about this in a few days. I want us to get back to the political fight here. I want us to get back into lockdowns and back to the economy and all this ACB's gonna get through. There we go, it's gonna happen. And now we're getting to two out of three, two out of three of the big three. Trump beats COVID, Trump gets ACB, Trump beats Biden. If we get to if we get all three of those in one month, it's gonna make gonna make the year twenty twenty field just a little bit less bitter

and awful. I think that's true. I think that's fair. But they're they're gonna in the closing moments, they're also just attacking this on weak process grounds. One of my favorites is that this is a a stolen look John Avalon, the guy's a lib. He's over at CNN. He does whatever they tell him to do. It's fine. A stolen

Supreme Court seed play fourteen. Of course, that's exactly what President Obama's nominee, Merrick Garland was denied, but Republican senators assured us that this was the new election years standard. That was a lie. So when Mitch McConnell complained about the Democratic playbook of double standards, broken promises, and raw power, he was engaging in some premode projection. Here's some way to gate it. Judge Amy Coney Barricks actually sitting in

a stolen appellate court seat right now, that's right. Obama's nominee, Mary Selby was the first woman in first African American to serve on the Indiana Supreme Court. She was flat out and denied the Senate vote. That's because Republican Senator from Indian Dan Coach blocked it. In contrast, Democratic center from Indiana Joe Donnelly granted to vote Damie Coney Barrett when she was nominated by trauma and when Trump got into office there were one hundred court vacancies. How did

that happen? What exactly does he not understand? Does he understand how government works? This should be like saying, but Republicans don't vote for bills that Democrats want. Sometimes, Yeah, that's the system we have. And even while talking about lying, he misstates what the McConnell rule was, which is when the president and the Senate are not the Senate majority is not the same party. That's the rule. That's not happening. So they're not even and who gives a crap what

the McConnell rule was. There was a filibuster for judicial nominee. So Harry Reid came along and said, yeah, well there doesn't have to be so laws the law, and that's ultimately what this comes down to. The law is the law. The Constitution is the constitution. This process is clear. They have no means to try to subvert it. And that's where that's where we find ourselves. My friends, they're just

just whining and they get nothing. Maybe we really are by the time you hear this, maybe it'll really almost be all done in ACB. We're gonna have this vote. It's hard for me to trust that, though yesterday I was feeling like they must have some trick up their sleeve, but I couldn't think of one. You know, I've been telling you that, and maybe I couldn't think of one because there isn't one. Sometimes you just run out of divisions and you can't win the war. Thanks for listening

to the Buses and Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts. The iHeart radio app or wherever you get your podcasts. Before we get to roll call, I just want to say, are they really claiming that like Trump is not allowed to dance to YMCA over at CNN? This is what this is what I'm seeing play fifteen. You know, they play that song like every night in every gay bar acrossing them here. But you know, and last night I think it was Macho Macho Man and

that one too. You cannot write this stuff, but he is having fun and dancing on the graves of two hundred and fifteen thousand Americans dancing. Not allowed to dance, folks not allowed to dance. M people have died, can't dance. You shouldn't be able to watch a movie either. You shouldn't be able to enjoy your food. You should just lock yourself at home and just breathe into the same stifling mask twenty four to seven and just beg for forgiveness from the Democrat overlords who say, if only you

listen more, nobody would have died from COVID. No joy, no fun, no human contact, no dancing. That's that's ah, that's what we're heading for if we allow them to continue this abject madness. But that's also a that's a real litmus test. I remember some I remember a teacher telling me when I was in grammar school. He said, you know how you can really hate, You really hate somebody when the sight of them eating food really bothers you. And when you think about that, it makes it makes

some sense. And I'm sure some of you have had that before. You see someone and you just go, oh, just look at that person just stuffing his face. You know, they may be having just like a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Doesn't look at that person just the way they're oh, the way they're chewing, and they're just such a gluttonous It doesn't matter if they're super skinny and eating health it doesn't matter they're but they're getting some enjoyment out of this process and you find it gross.

That's when you know you really hate someone. If you hate the sound of someone chewing, but only one person or you know someone specifically. If you hate chewing in general, then you're like me because I just get bothered by noises. It's a problem. But if you hate the sound of one individual chewing, then you you know what I'm talking about. And if you also, you know, the best one of the best things that I that I think I've I've

learned as I've gotten older. Is all you have to know about whether a person is really on your team, whether they're a real real friend, is are they legitimately happy for you when something good happens and want the best for you and has nothing to do with them. You know when a friend of yours, when you come to a friend and say, hey, I just got you know, hey, hey Bob, I just got that promotion. Is Bob like, oh, that's great. Let me let's I'm gonna take you out

stakes on me. You know that's fantastic. I'm so happy for you. You know, you must have told Ethel, you know, the wife back home that I don't know why Bob's married to Ethel, but you know they met when they're in high school. And you know the whole thing, right, that's if you tell somebody that you know you got that big promotion and he goes and you say, hey, Bob,

you know I got the promotion. I don't know who's Bob and this I've lost the plot with that, but I say, hey, you know I got that promotion, and your friend responds, really, I thought you didn't even like that job. It's really all you have to know, folks, It's all you have to know. Tells you everything else.

It shows you their hand all at once. And when you have members of the media who can't allow the President to the United States in an off the cuff moment at a rally, which is supposed to be an entertainment, and it's supposed to be at a rally, to just like dance to some music for a second, it means you hate you hate the sight of that person chewing his food. It means you've crossed over into well true trum Trump's arrangement syndrome. You've crossed over into the realm

of irrational disdain. So I think it's I know, it's just a little moment there, but they really you've heard me say, they really hate this guy. And always remember this, friends, we don't we don't hate, you know, we don't hate the Democrat politicians. We make fun of them when we need to. We disagree with them vehemently. We want to defeat their ideology. But the ones that can be brought over to our side, I say, great, the water's warm, jump in and the ones that we think are you know,

doing a lot of damage the country. We have a process, we have a political process to push back and fight back against that. But ultimately, they're human beings too, and you know, we want we don't want anything bad to happen to them. We want them to be healthy and just you know, to spend time with their family and grandkids and have moments of joy too. And don't ever lose. Don't ever lose that. Don't ever allow these political fights to turn you into a person who hates the sight

of a stranger dancing and expressing joy. Don't ever let that happen. Now we can do roll call. Hit it like soft butter on warm toast. Time to spread some freedom coast to coast. It's time for roll call. Indeed, it is time for roll call. And this is also the time of day when I see the dog. It's time for I've got her back again, producer mark the Little French. My parents let me have her. They thought I was sad without her. In fact check true, so I've got her again. But she goes this is nap

number three. At this part of the day, I didn't know you lost the dog. For a while. I had. I had to give her back to my parents technically their dogs, so I had to give her back for a while. But now we're like shared custody. Now I'm like her her uncle that you know takes her to ball games, but you know that's and and then keeps her for a few days. So now you'sually gonna have to get your own dog. I know, but I feel like, you know, as long as she's around, I don't you

gotta shar shared custody. I'd have a I'll have to figure this one out. But one day, one day, you and missus Mark are going to get a four legged friend. Oh absolutely, as soon as we get a house. The second purchase as a dog. Well, I guess you don't know what I mean. I was visiting friends down in Baltimore, lovely place, Baltimore over the weekend. But actually they live outside of Baltimore. It's quite beautiful, but uh, and there are they're surprised. There are some really nice, kind of

gothic looking structures. They're old. Baltimore has got some cool stuff, but there's obviously some really rough areas of it. But they're in the suburbs. But I was down and they have a little a little kitten, and I always feel like kittens are a trap because kittens are great, like they're so fawn and soft and cute, but then they grow up into cats. I'm just saying, yeah, they're awful animals. Whoa, whoa. We love all cat lovers here on the buck sextage.

If you love cats, good for you. I just don't like them, but you know what I mean about. There was a little tiny kitten too. It was like a little fluffy furball phase. It's tiny. It was like jumping all over me and stuff. Yeah. I guess kittens are cute. When they turn into cats, they just hide from you. Yeah, I have I always have this dream too that one

day I could have a pet fox. And there's a there's a an Instagram account called Juniper Fox that I follow where it's a person who has two pet foxes, like they're like dogs, except they're wild foxes and they live in their house. I saw a Facebook video the other day as some woman that has two squirrels as pets. I mean that sounds amazing. Really, Mark, why didn't you send this to me? Sign me up? I'm sorry. I

love animals. Yeah, any cute animal stuff. You could always either send me like important stuff so that we can keep doing the show, and any pictures of animals, but also yeah, cute, cute animal pictures. I'm all about it, all right, all right, Brandy, I'm sorry for the delay. Here we go, Hey, Buck, what do you think of all these polls saying Trump is behind Biden? I don't get it. He has huge crowds and enthusiasm. Are the

polls all wrong? Is Trump going to win? Shields High? Oh? Brandy, you ask a great question, but it's one that I can just give you my my best sense about. And my best sense is, yes, Trump is going to win, but I cannot guarantee it, and I wish I could. I am not. I'll tell you this. I'm more confident that at least New York City and other Democrat parts the country you are going to go into lockdowns than I know that Trump is going to win the election. Which is not to say I don't think Trump's gonna

win the election. It's just i'd say I'm I'd say I'm sixty seven er five or you know, something like sixty seventy percent sure. But there's a good chunk I mean there's about a there's about a one in three shot here that Biden, in my mind, wins this thing. I'm like, I, folks, gotta keep it real. I can't tell you lies. And then as for the crowds, well, you know, Democrats right now think that good people avoid crowds. So it's tough to know how much of that is

lack of enthusiasm for Biden. But also when you add in all the fraudulent mail in ballots that are going to be collected by ballot harvesters and all the other stuff, gets a little little tougher, you know. I don't know, it's gonna be very, very tight. As for the polls, I think the polls are not representative of what's going

to happen in this election. And I think it's because there are enough people who are Libs, who are in these polling companies, who feel like it doesn't matter if they're wrong, they better do everything they can just suppress Trump turned out. I think that's what's happening. But maybe that look, folks, if the freedom hunt has to become, you know, the freedom fort where we're all gathered together every day because we're heading into a Biden administration, and

we got to get ready for the oncoming. I mean, this is why we say shields high. It's all about, you know, all about being able to handle the incoming you know, incoming administration in this case, but incoming in a whole bunch of ways. That's that's really a secret to life. And if we have to, we'll we'll band together and we'll do it and we'll be fine, you

know what I mean, We'll figure it out. I'm not gonna you know, one thing you'll never have is me Trump lost that we can the Republic is gone, and look, it's gonna be bad for the country. I'm not gonna lie. I'm probably gonna sell all the stock that I own. And I'm not kidding when I say, you know, gold, there's a reason I love gold so much. There's a reason I own gold. There's a reason I got a gold sponsor. That's not that's that's for real, folks. That's

all for real. Because you get you get an abiden and modern monetary theory stuff and the AOC wing and the history of fiat currency. And I really mean this, the history of fiat currency, currency that is not tied to any actual observable, demonstrable metric of value. It's very clear, and it's very bad. Eventually it collapses. So I do have concerns about that, but I'm not not really yet. I'm not not going to do the catastrophist thing because who knows, maybe maybe Trump wins and we're able to

make some good things happen here. That's and I think it will happen. But Brandy, so you got me on this one, and that was where my mind focused in on You're in the Freedom. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast more role call he with Richard Buck. I thought Obamacare and Rowe was settled law constitutionally. Is the left tipping their hat that they've built a judicial house of cards since the seventies that could fall if

we get some traditional judges in there. The dams have reaped what they have sewed, rack up the cases and knock them down, shields and gavels high. Yeah, Richard, you're right about this. I mean they realize that there these victories that they've had from the Supreme Court are fragile and could be and are temporary in that sense. And they've led themselves to believe that whatever they achieved via the court, which means they couldn't get it through normal

legislative process. Whatever they get handed by the court is permanent. But that's just not true, or it doesn't have to be true. It has been true so far, at least with Rowe, but it does not have to be true. So we will have to see if perhaps this is the the beginning of the end of that perception. We'll see. I remember I've told you this ACB would be a very good judge. Doesn't mean conservatives are gonna like everything that she decides and we're okay with that, right. That's

where That's how I view things. Sometimes I don't agree with the law. You know, look, even would like the like the Roger Stone thing for example, you know General Flynt. I don't think actually lied. I think that they miscons they misrepresented what he said and they that's why they didn't think he liked So I think they just they set him up and that was an ambush and they lied about it. So it was it was, you know, fraudulent, the fix was in. But you know Roger Stone, I

like Roger. I think I like Roger. I think the entertaining guy. But you know, he kind of he kind of didn't really you know, technically, yeah, he did some stuff, so you know he's being held accountable for that, um so. And then, uh, although they want to send in a prison for nine years, that's insane. He should have gotten a slap on the risk probation and you know, let let to go on his way. That's it. Let's see here, Kathy Buck. I love the show. It's my favorite drive

home radio. You guys crack me up while informing you of the day's Democrat. But I gotta clear this up. Jersey gravy starts with beef bass, usually a Demi gloss made with bones. Marinara, he is a vegetable based Hey, Mario Luigi. I always thought they were the same, just like you, until I got really into cooking shields high. Uh. Producer Mark is this is this? Does this? Uh? This Jersey thing? Jersey gravy with beef bass? You're a Jersey guy? Any any any way in on this? All right, let's

start off with one thing. I'm not a Jersey guy. I mean, technically, you are a resident of the state of Jury right now. I'm a resident. That doesn't mean I'm a Jersey guy. Fair enough, Uh, yeah, I think that's true. Marinara sauce is just kind of tomato sauce that doesn't have anything in it, and usually other sauces have stuff in it, you know, be vegetables or something. The producer Nick who is he would know better than me. He's never, he's never, he's never heard of this before.

So maybe this is like a Jersey specific thing. Well, I mean, if you buy a jar of tomato sauce, so you go to a restaurant, usually they cook it with vegetables and whatnot. And I believe Marionaro sauce, you know, it's just tomatoes, just you know, vegetarian. Maybe I don't know. I don't really care. They both are delicious. Fair point. No, I had I had a gluten free there's a great gluten free Italian place in New York. And I have my brothers over last night because I got one brother

now who just moved out. He's moved to Austin. He moved today. Actually, people hear the show. So KLBJ. Austin, you have one of the Sexton boys now among you. He's moved there. So if you've got any advice or any from all our KLBJ. Folks. Any advice you know, and he'll kill me if he hears me say this. Any lovely single ladies in their thirties who want a handsome ivy league educated to entrepreneur, you know, verys a single man. I'm just putting it out. I'm just saying,

I'm just helping my brother. I'm just helping my brother. But he's down in Austin. So there you go. Rob Buck been listening since the days of the Blaze. Glad you'll be resuming Shields High series. I'm thrilled to hear it. I'm also a keen student of history and thoroughly enjoyed Shields High. I've often wondered if you ever have more time to create episodes. Can't wait to hear them. Keep up the great work. All hail the hair, and yes, the beard as well. Rob. I think that's the first

beard props I've ever gotten. Usually it's like, yeah, you look like you're trying to buy beer somewhere, you know, But yeah, thank you. I appreciate that I've gotten better at shaping and trimming the beard. At first, it was kind of just like the Tom Hanks beard from Castaway, except not as full and and now I understand Beard Beardo dynamics a little bit. Do you think that's the thing, Producer Mark beardics, No, No, I like, I feel like

I just made up a word. But yeah, now I understand how to contour and shape and and do all that good stuff. So that's kind of that's kind of where I'm rolling. And as for the Shield's High, Yeah, we already. We already have one Malta in so at some point if I don't get others, Producer Mark, You're just gonna say, I can't, we can't wait anymore. He's gonna release it. But well, I'm gonna get others done. We're gonna get Malta one and two, Lepanto one and

two U and Dracula. I think Drakula. That'll be fun. And that one's got to get done soon because I want to do it for for the Also, maybe I should do Madam. Is it Madame Bovary? I think is her name from Romani or something? Who you know? Some of you know what I'm talking about. She liked killed all the people and swamming their blood or something. It's bad stuff but scary anyway, Sorry, not the way I want to end the show. Thanks so much for being

your team. Back tomorrow. Pass the Buck to a friend this week, Tell them about the Buck Secting Show, give them the podcast to listen to. Shield's High