Above The Law

in with her email. We'll get into that and all of the implications coming up on the buck Sexton Show. This is the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. A mistakes American, you're a great American. Again, the buck Sexton Show begins. No, Welcome to the buck Sexton Show. Everybody, Oh my, what a day. We knew it was coming. We knew it was coming. And uh and and here we are, sure enough lots of additional information about just

how swampy the Deep state swamp is. We're going to stop it. We're gonna stop it. Struck texted page. That's what they said at any Inspector General port. Now, look it's five pages. I haven't been able to read through all of it. I've read through as much as I

can since it was released. But it is bad. It is bad, and you've got a lot of people running around trying to do damage control for the FBI, for Hillary Comby by the way, what a what an incredible transformation over time about the way that an individual is viewed in the public eye, right it is just astonishing. Um And when you when you look through what's really gone on here, you can't help but think that we shouldn't have total faith in the FBI's ability to handle

itself without political bias. Right now. There's no it's just not possible. I mean, if I had told you a few months ago, let's say even a year ago, that we would have a text message from a senior FBI agent, one of the most senior FBI agents involved in both the Hillary Clinton email investigation at the highest level. That FBI agent also was the one who interviewed General Michael Flynn.

By the way, FBI is a big place. This guy's just happens to be involved in all these different things and then is involved in the Russia collusion the early early side of the Russia collusion probe, and that we would have a text message from him stating that to his FBI lawyer girlfriend. So somebody else who's involved in this at a senior level, that they would stop Trump from becoming president. I think you'd be like buck nowhere, No way, that's just not that's not realistic. Well it is.

It's what happened. And here we are now looking at this, dealing with the reality um and just trying to pull together how how crazy this whole situation really was. Anyone now who says to you that there was nothing to see here is either ignorant or a liar. There were problems.

The FBI Zone Inspector General has found problems with Comy and has come away from this unable, I think, to do much to make me feel any better about the situation, other than at least there's an Inspector General report and it has brought some facts to light. Here. Here's one fact I want to know about. Why was it that the Department of Justice, From what I understand what I've been able to see in this report, which is very long, I'll be spending the weekend reading it, why was the

do you what? Why was the initial text exchange between Struck and page redacted so as not to include the will stop him part of this. They're having a conversation about about the Trump campaign. They hate Trump, and somehow the government initially thought that they would give that to the Inspector General. Of course, I mean the FBI would give it to inspector General, but not to Congress. I

think I think that's a pretty big issue. I think it's understandable that folks would see that as exactly what I've been worrying about all along, which is that the fix was in. The fix was in other parts of this. I found interesting, uh that an agent texted another agent that no one is going to prosecute Hillary Clinton even if we find unique classified after discovery of Wiener's laptop. My friends, they were not going to prosecute Hillary ever,

under any circumstances for her violations of classified information. They were not going to do it. It It was never going to happen. So that means that Hillary Clinton, while running for president of the United States, was to be held above the law. They would not prosecute her. I wonder as well, what else were they unwilling to prosecute Hillary Clinton for? What else were they going to skip over? In their various uh adjudications about what was going on

at this point in time. It is appalling what has happened here. It is completely and utterly outragious. Got Rudy Giuliani weighing in here on. I mean, there's so many different people. We we we gotta break down all the pieces. I'm gonna spend a lot of time on this today. I'm just gonna say it because I've spent all day reading about this, and this is this matters. This matters. This is about the Federal Department of Justice, which affects

all of us in all kinds of ways. And if we can't trust the d o J to be non political, we are have a we have a very real threat to liberty in this country. We're gonna talk about the coming component of this. Cabe Comy was insubordinate and way outside the lines. Of course, he tweets out today that he's not and oh yeah, I disagree with them, but I respect them Somehow. Comy always thinks he's above approach.

They'll never get it. I'm sorry from that guy. We got Hillary Clinton email investigation part of this destruck page text. But I think the biggest thing is you and I have been sitting around here for a long time, and you get mocked and ridiculed by people who are anti Trump for the notion of a deep state. You get mocked and ridiculed for bringing up that there are obviously very powerful, very senior individuals that were involved in trying

to change the outcome of an election. You know, I think it's now obvious to us that there were some powerful folks in law enforcement and intelligence who were sending each other messages about how much they hated Trump and how they were going to make sure that they stopped him from being president, openly talking about undermine forgot about the Russians undermining democracy. These are powerful government officials. He

are trying to undermine democracy. And we have the texts one of my missing by the way, we don't have the conversations, but I guarantee you the conversations followed along with what we saw in some of those text messages, the the notion that and you see this, all these pathetic attempts to obfuscate, to push aside. And they're saying, well, why why would they have reopened the email? You know,

the reopening of the email investigation was bosh. I mean, mistake after mistake, malfeasans after malfees, and so many things here that just stink. It's rotten. And they'll say, well, while they opened the email investigation, you know why they why do they do that? I say, uh reopener. I mean, and because it was gonna leak, they were gonna sit on it. They tried to sit on it. If it leaked and they were sitting on it, what would that do to the election? Right, But here's Juliana. I mentioned him.

I want to get him in here. It's like you sitting next to me. Hey, Rudy, I'm actually having him on my show rising tomorrow. What's up? That's how we roll, right, thank you. Producer Mike just gave me a thumbs up. We're getting some fantastic guests. As an aside, that Sessions interview I did a clip of it was picked up by pretty much every major news outlet in the country, not every Okay, and people can get on like CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS. Yeah, so broke some news with that one, folks. That was fun.

Good times. We do all kinds of things in the freedom. All right, Guliani will speak and I'll be quiet play eleven. First thing we're going to get as a report from Inspector General Harrow. It's on Klee's hand Linker Hillery, which I think is gonna be very very critical. I think should be uh call me realish have a chance to be prosecuted as a result that we'll see result or it could be prosecuted. M hmm. Wouldn't that be interesting?

You know, I don't want I never wanted this. I don't want the criminalization of political differences to become the norm in this country. But given the frothy mouth frenzy from the Democrats to try and take down Trump, take down his family, send anybody in Trump's orbit to prison for any at all infractions real and imagined, maybe the only way to get it to stop is to fight back. And maybe that means holding them to the same standards they hold our side too. You lie, you're gonna get

prosecutor you'll have FBI A're gonna get prosecuted. One thing that comes across here is the is the Hillary claim that she didn't know what the confidential She told the FBI agents that she didn't know what confidential markings were. That's a that's a lie. And I'm already saying people giving me a back and forth on on online social media. Oh, let's not a law, you'll be prosecuted for. Okay, So Pidopolis can get prosecuted for lying about the last time

he talked to somebody, that's all, that's it. But Hillary can lie about an essential point of knowledge for her day to day job that affect the state of mind that she had, the Men's reissue would have when she was engaged in this criminal act of using her unclassified email system to move classified information around. And that's not a crime, folks. It's like there's no standards anymore for any of us. It's like the law is a complete joke.

That's what's happened here. Progressivism has taken the law and bastardized it. They have contorted it, they have destroyed it because the law doesn't really matter to them. It's just political. It's power. There is no underlying foundational principle that will stop them from thinking that they have the right to be in charge of your life and my life. That's where we are now. I haven't even gotten into the

Clinton Foundation, and I'm McCabe. Even after he was supposed to stay away from it, kept trying to reinsert himself in a mean, you have some people here. I've been saying this so long. This isn't a coincidence. The same names keep popping up, the same people involved, over and over again, and the judgment always goes in favor of one side and against the other. We're we're going to

dig deep into this team. So I want to hear what you think, by the way, if you have any big takeaways on the inspector General report or just where you think we are now as a country. I mean, the mull Mulla probe should have been shut down a long time ago. So I'll just repeat my my statement that I think Muller should be shut down. Uh, it won't be, but I wish it would be, because it's just a drag. It's a drag on the whole country.

You know. Fine, if they want to prosecute man of for it, for tax fraud or something later that they've got their scalps. Let's just stop with the charade. Or is it the sharade? I think people say it both ways. Eight four or four wight to five. We have a show that will rock this freedom hunt coming up. Jim Jordan Mark Meadows, and I sent him a letter a couple of weeks ago urging him to do that. He has the power, and I think he should do it.

The American people deserve the truth on this. Heck, Donald Trump has been treated as poorly as anybody by some of these jokers, so he should definitely pull the trigger on that absolutely. You know, look, President has the power to bring this thing home. He can do it, and we're gonna stand behind him. You know, there was a

pathetic attempt today. It was it was pretty clear a pathetic attempt to try and distract from this by the Attorney General in New York by breaking out Well we'll get into that too, but I just it's so obvious what's going on here, folks, I and I will tell you this. It is very important to remember as we move through not just today's show, but all of our

shows here. The more information we get about what happened during the election and after the election, involving the government, involving the Department of Justice, the intelligence community, the worst it looks for the Trump haters, the better it looks for the Trump supporters. That's just a fact. With with greater transparency, all these anti trump efforts look increasingly weak, strained, corrupt, and pathetic. You know, you go over to It's such an amazing day for this too. You go over to

Fox News for a second. You go to Fox news dot com and the IG refers to uh refers five FBI workers over political hostile messages. Hostile messages. Okay, And then you go to CNN and you had earlier today. No, no political was it. No, no political bias at work here, okay. So just Trump hating. That's not political bias, just hating the incoming president or the soon to be president. It is incredible. Um. I want to get more into this, but also want to take some of your calls here

Beverly in Mobile, Alabama. Hey Beverley, Hi buck, let me thank you since glampeck. Thank you so much. Yes, but I really hate the way that the American people are being I too insulted because either they obviously they were too stupid to say the truth, or they hold us in such content that they don't care that we know. Yeah, no, it's it is. They must think, Beverly, that we can't remember anything that we don't pay attention, or or they think as they are so oblive and so all powerful

that we can do nothing about it. Even if we do see the truth. We do have our we do have our guy in the White House though. So the good news is there's there's a happy ending to this story. Yeah. Hey, I don't think they know how enraged how I mean? They just keep hitting us again and they can and again with this corruption. And I think that this thing here has just absolutely put the nail on it. And we're gonna see a red tsunami this election coming up.

And of course Trump is going to be re elected, but it's going to be in such overwhelming numbers. They're gonna hear the voice of the people. I hope. So Beverly shields high and thank you very much for the call. Mike in Belleville, Ohio. Hey, Mike, how are you doing. I'm good. I want to I want to tell Beverly not to worry. Things are going to continue to get better. I personally volunteered in two thousand and fifteen to help

the Republican Party in my area. I canvas probably four and Republican voters and Democratic voters to question each one of them. I had to document it, email it, sent it in the wave that happened there. I got such a great response, and I just want people like Beverly to know that the American people are not stupid. These people know exactly what's going on the deep state of

exactly what we've seen today. Christopher Ray, no matter how they want to portray him, just covered their rear ends and I think everybody sees that, Buck, and it's gonna come to fruition in the mid terms and once again when President Trump is re elected for a second term. I think that the people are just on top of it. They see exactly what's going on. We can see right through the deep state people what what's happening out there. And like I said, Buck, I think that it's going

to be a great, great election coming up. I hope so. And I think I think you're right, Mike. I certainly hope you're right. Shields high, and thank you for the call. You know, it's it's amazing to watch how like I get it right. Well, we've got a little bit of Christopher Ray, I have heard is a very straight, straight shooter and apparently a very honorable guy. I've heard that from people who would know, but they got to try to defend the institution. But the facts speak for themselves here.

There was something very rotten at the top of the FBI and the d o J over the last few years and probably long before that too. He's holding the line for America. Buck Sexton is back. We've been investigating this for a year and a half. FIS abuse and other matters. We now are at the end. We need documents that to actually get to the bottom of what actually happened in this situation. They now just in the last week's have kicked out the staff, the lead investigators

on this. Now they've kicked out all of the House Intelligence Committee members. So the only ones that are going to provide documents to in the whole entire House were representatives only two Republicans, Paul Ryan, the Speaker, and myself. This is totally unacceptable. It is a classic case of obstruction of a congressional investigation. People in America should be alarmed. This is a way to hide information not only from the American people, but to their congressman. There's two ways.

There's two ways. One we can hold Mr Rosenstein and others in the Department of Justice and contempt and impeach. The other way would be for the President of the United States to to demand uh them to to order them to give us all the documents. Those are really the only two ways there we go, and that's where

we are. I want more documents, more transparency, d o J. From what we have seen in this Inspector General port has lost any benefit of the doubt to do its own housekeeping, in its own house cleaning on this issue. That's why we have oversight. That is why there is a Congressional Oversight Committee in both the House and the Senate, dealing with intelligence, dealing with justice. That's why they look

at these issues. That's why they're there. This is very troubling and I just I wonder at what point some of the Trump haters who used to be I mean, they'd say they're still conservative, I guess, but you know who used to be kind of on board for the GOP, and I wonder at what point they realized that the fix was in against Trump here it really was. You know, you have these text messages. I mentioned the one about

stopping the president. And keep in mind that if you had the detective on a case, send a text message to the prosecutor on a case and you let's say you were the defendant, the detective sends the prosecutor, which is kind of like struck in page here, we're really gonna We're really gonna nail this defendant no matter what. I don't care what the evidence is. And that came out, you'd be a freeman or woman. I don't care what

you did. I mean, that would be a mistrial. Maybe they'd try you again, but that would be a big problem. So why are we to think that a similar act of just hubris really from these people. Remember, we're not picking and this is what's so important. It's not Oh look at this. People say the dumbest crap about this.

I'm really tired of it. Who blueload to have opinions? Yeah, you're allowed to have opinions, but you're not allowed to show extreme bias against subjects of active investigations you're involved in. They say, it's not a political bias, what's a personal bias? Whatever it is, it's clear they freaking hated Trump. This is really an extension of what I've been telling you about for a long time. Because the Democrat Party is

the party of the state. Now, the state itself is full of Democrats, meaning that the actual government apparatus has become infiltrated and been overtaken by progressive ideology much the same way as the media and college campuses. And because progressivism is an invasive species of the mind, it does not allow for other ideologies to flourish. It doesn't even allow them to exist. Progressivism is like of those little ugly monster fish that comes in and like kills all

the other fish, right Like, that's what it is. Progressive Ism is an invasive species of the mind. You have to remember that doesn't allow for doubt, it doesn't allow for self criticism, it doesn't allow for modesty. Honestly, I think it's got real problems with kindness and decency too. Some of the text messages here that this report revealed unnamed agents one and five. You're discussing their jobs. Quote, I find anyone who enjoys this job an absolute effing idiot.

If you don't think so, ask them one more question. Who are you voting for? I guarantee you it will be Donald Drump You know what that we know whether calling him Drump because you know who started the whole Drump thing. John Oliver's Goes Out show on HBO where he drops a lot off bombs because he's so edgy. You know, his name is really Drump, it's not even him. That's where they get that. So, so you got a bunch of John Oliver watchers in the FBI who hate

Donald Trump. Okay, look, they're allowed to have their opinions, but we're also allowed to say, hmm, maybe there's bias here. There are reasons that these things exist, like recusal reassignment. Continuing on with the quotes here, quote I forgot about Drump. That's so sad and pathetic if they want to vote for him, Agent five responded, someone who can answer a question,

someone who can't be professional for even a second. In September, Agent one and five conversed again, bashing Trump supporters as quote retarded. I'm thinking, I'm trying to think of a would I rather instead of spending time with those people? Agent five cent Agent want to ask stick your tongue

and a fan. Agent five later wrote, I would rather have brunch with Trump and a bunch of hip of his supporters, like the ones from Ohio that are retarded and you know, h people right, this kind of stuff, you gotta think to yourself, what is their problem you're really gonna refer to first And first of all, I will say, and you know, I'm not I'm not I'm not a language police person, but I really don't like I really don't like the R word as a as a pejorative. Uh you know, I I really don't like.

I'll just say that I don't like it. I'm not somebody's gonna call it for people to be fired or whatever over, but I don't like people using that word, especially given a lot of the discussions that are going on right now about you know, the the sanctity of life as it regards people with with Down syndrome. And I don't like people thrown around the R word like that at all. Okay, that's just an aside, but um, you know, the the FBI guys here. I know that

people will say that they're just sharing your opinions. We all do this, but there's such a lack of professionalism in this. And let me, as I was saying to before, I knew from when I was at the m y p D just a little you know, every day analysts man running around and I was only the NYPD for I don't know, eighteen months or so. It wasn't there all that long? Was a c I A much longer c I A for about I don't know two thousand five,

two tho ten. Uh, if you wanted to say something that you probably shouldn't say, you said it, you didn't write it. So whatever you're seeing in these text messages is the tip of the iceberg of the actual sentiments. I think that's important for you to keep in mind and trust me, FBI guys that are constantly locking people up for what they put in emails, locking people up for what they text each other, the stuff they were saying blows whatever you're reading out of the water. I

can't prove that, but I know it. But this notion that now we're supposed to just move on past this, that the you're noticing Democrats are running with the oh, there was no political buy us involved. Really, you think they think we're going to accept that? Huh, no political bias involved? Stop this person? They want to stop Trump

from becoming president. One of how many individuals were involved at senior levels in both the Russia collusion probe and the Hillary Clinton email investigation, I'm guessing it's a handful. I could probably count them on two hands. I don't know, but it's it's a handful. And one other thing to keep in mind is that they were so set on the Russia collusion stuff. I haven't even by the way, we have to get into a full trash comy session.

That's that I might wait until the second hour on that one, because you know, I thought Comey was a self a self righteous, sanctimonious, lanky weirdo the whole time. I shouldn't make I mean, but being tall is actually an advantage in life, so I feel I know, I don't make I don't make fun of people's appearance, and I'm just jealous because he's so tall, and I'm not it. Okay, he's just fine. He's a self righteous, sanctimonious weirdo. Okay,

strike the lanky part from the record. We'll get to that probably in the in the second hour of the show, because I also want to take some more of your calls. We've got a lot of lines lit up here. But they told us, according this IG report, that they were more interested in the Russia investigation then in the Hillary

reopening investigation quote. The FBI's failure to act in late September or early October is even less justifiable when contrasted with the attention and resources that FBI management and some members of the Mid Year Exam Team dedicated to other activities in connection with the Mid Year investigation. During the same period, the FBI was focused on the Russia and

quote of the Russian investigation. Moreover, given the FBI's extensive resources, the fact that Struck and several other FBI members of the Mid Year Exam Team had been assigned to the Russa investigation, which was extremely active during this September and October time period, was not an excuse for failing to take any action during this period on the Wiener laptop. They needed to take action on the Wiener stuff anyway.

In assessing the decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Mid Year Exam uh lead discovered on the Weener laptop. We were particularly concerned about text messages sent by Struck and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions that were made were impacted by bias or improper considerations. Yeah, they were more focused on the Russia stuff. A lot of time to

do Russia. Russia Russia, not a lot of time to figure out about the classified information on the convicted pervs laptop who just happens to be married to the closest aid to the soon to be expected by everyone President of the United States. O g. That seems a bit strange to me, doesn't it. We're just getting going here. There, there's so much more. I haven't even gotten into that, the commiest portions of this, which are gonna be fun. What do you think, folks, Where do we go from here?

What do you make of all this? Are you angry? You're just like, yeah, I knew well, I knew this, Buck, They're just now they're admitting what I've known all along. Curious as to your thoughts? Eight four eight four to five. Much more coming. Stay right there, man, we got a lot to get into here. I'm actually kind of excited to read the I I'm gonna take the IG Report this weekend. I'm gonna go old school buck on it, where I just sit there with my little mechanical pencil

and take notes in the margin. Just I'm gonna I'm gonna tear that thing apart. Hope you'll uh getting through all five pages. It's not like there's some parts that you can skip over though, right like, oh, here's how we had our findings, you know whatever. But I'm gonna I'm gonna chew on that thing this weekend. It's gonna be fun and tonight to some degree, but over the weekend I'll really get into it because the nuances matter here. Nuances matter. All we got we got lines, lit. I

love it. You folks want to chat, let's do it. Brent down in New Mexico. Hey, Brent, Hey buck shield time man shields high Sir. Yeah, I don't know about unless you're a unless you're a professional athlete. Six seven seems kind of tall. It seems like that's a disacknowledged that all that guy Comy did was spent a lot of time tripping over Steve annoyed people. You know what, I'm just gonna say, comey call me six seven guy

could never done a basketball. He's one of those guys. Yeah, I think he has a negative I think he has a negative vertical. Anyway, go ahead, Yeah, with that said, anyway, I just want to let you guys do it. Thank you personally, because I truly believe that without like your platform for a deep dive in social media. We wouldn't know about this stuff. I mean, third years ago, there's no way that Jenn Rother was going to read an investigating general report on his teleproper, you know what I mean.

So I'd like to thank you, guys, because this really is what tips the scale in our in our favors, because we have more outlets like yours to get the

information that we need. Yeah. Well, and look, man, I appreciate you listening, and I hope you can help spread the word and get other folks to join in too, because I do think it's really important because a lot of the media, not only is there a lot of left wing media, a lot of media is under the delusion that they're nonpartisan, and that just that just needs to stop. Because they are partisans. They should be honest

about it. Everything I say to you, You know that I'm coming to you from the perspective of I think this is right. But I am a conservative. You understand my philosophy, and I'm honest about it. I do not like the dishonesty that others employ when they're trying to get their messages out as quote journalists or writers or whatever it is that they're doing. So I'm I'm happy for conservative radio too. It's why I'm here. And thank you very much, Brent for uh for calling in. Dean

up in Austin. What's up you, Ben? I'm all right, man, thanks for calling in. So for me, this comes down to something that's I'd like to boil things down to very simple terms so that everybody listening to me now at the family table, they can kind of start from that point work up. When it came down to the election, there were two people that we got to choose when we stepped into a ballot box. One was chosen by

the people to represent the Republican Party. The other was chosen by a Democratic party to represent the Democratic Party. So there were two different ideologies right there on how

you put someone forward. Now you fast forward to today and the agency, the most powerful agency, the FBI, the policing agency pretty much all over the world, has people inside of it at the top that had such a disdained bias and prejudice for the person that was elected by the people that those people get to apply the law to us, not only to the president, but to us. So they hate me and they get to apply the law to me based on what their prejudices are. And

it's not everybody. Again, I agree the Rancord style of pure and do the best they can, but the hierarchy controls all of those people and can make life very uncomfortable if they don't follow the line. So what's going to happen now to me in the future? Hey, how will this be taught in our schools as a part of history? Will the truth that hasn't come out yet completely? How will it come out in the schools and be taught so the next generation doesn't get to take a side,

you get to hear both sides truthfully. And the second is how will the courts adjudicate these issues? Now? Will they not be biased? And will they take these people who are brought forward from breaking rules or skirting the you know, the way that they get around it. Will they end up in front of courts that will say enough, we have to apply the law uh truthfully, equally and without prejudice. Those are the two things that concerned me at the end of all of it. How will it

be taught and how will it be educated in court? Now? Dean, there's are eloquent thoughts and incredibly worthwhile questions, and I just I think it's best we're best served by just everyone thinking about it on for themselves right now. I completely agree with you that going forward, this is going and thank you Deane for calling in from up in Boston. You're gonna see a rewriting of this, and the rewriting starts now. They're going to try and mitigate it, limit

the damage, distract, deflects, do whatever they can. Because how do all of these people that have been telling us for the last eighteen months that there is no deep state, there is no problem, that Trumpers are crazy, that we don't understand, we don't know anything, we're all a bunch of you know, toothless hillbillies and don't understand anything, you

don't read anything. How do they explain what this Inspector General report says, which, by the way, I think it presents some very important facts, but the overall conclusions I find highly questionable. The notion about whether there was political bias or not is something I want to revisit with you here because I know that they're saying there wasn't political bias found. I think they found it and just refused to call it that. Folks. You gotta keep your

little furry friends safe. Your dogs, they can't get outside the fence. That's a really unsafe situation, as you know. And if they've been cooped up inside, when you get home you let them out, they're very likely to start digging and they can get under your fence, get out there, and then you get all kinds of dangers. Also, predators can try to come into your yard under the fence. Dig Defense solves this. It extends the protection of your fence underground. No amount of digging is gonna let your

pets out or let predators in. It comes at a bunch of different models and sizes. It's easy to install. All you needs a hammer and a pair of gloves. You have pets digging under the fence. Checkout did Defense right now available on on it lows menhards wayfair and stop the dig dot com online. That's right, stop the dig dot com for dig Defense. The solution de pets digging under the fence and getting out. We're letting predators in. Go to stop the dig dot com for dig defense.

Buck Sexton Mission decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American you're a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show. No, oh, my friends, We've got so much to get into here, and you know that it's good stuff because the media really wants you to focus on other things. Does anybody out there want to try to make the case that this that I'm about, this story I'm about to tell you about,

has nothing to do with the IG report? Hitting today is the New York Times. The New York State Attorney General's office filed a scathingly worded lawsuit on Thursday taking aim at the Donald J. Trump Foundation, accusing the charity and the Trump family of sweeping violations of campaign finance laws, self dealing, and illegal coordination with the president presidential campaign.

The lawsuit, which seeks to dissolve the foundation and bar President Trump and three of his children from serving on nonprofit organizations, was an extraordinary rebuke of a sitting president. The Attorney General also sent referral levels to letters to the Internal Revenue Service and the Federal Election Commission for possible further action, adding to Mr Trump's extensive legal challenges. Oh no, what is Trump gonna do? By the way,

which which attorney general is this one? Because I'm pretty sure the other one, who was a hashtag resistant superstar had to resign because he was a disgusting abuser of women who liked to mouth off about how he was so into the me too movement. By the way, this is pathetic, isn't it. Although I'm glad they do it. I'm glad they make it so obvious and easy for us to see what's really going on here and what really motivates them. They they You have the Attorney generalist

State of New York. You know, you think that he should be somebody who believes in the equal application of the law. You'd think that this is somebody who wouldn't engage in this degree of partisan hackery, that ethics should matter. But no, no time this so that it can be a an escape hatch for New York Times readers, for anybody who doesn't want to know the truth about what really happened at the FBI and the Department of Joe.

This before so pathetic, so very obvious, isn't it. The timing matters, and the timing tells you a great deal something else. I wanted to bring your attention though, because we will focus a bit more on this report and I think this is very eloquently put by our friend Kim Strassel from the Wall Street Journal, and we've had on here many many times as a guest. She's fantastic,

a really sharp mind and an excellent writer. She put the following thread, you know, thread is like a series of string of tweets in a row thread out there. I don't believe, or rather don't believe anyone who claims Horowitz didn't find bias. This is about the i G Report. Okay, He very carefully says that he found no documentary evidence

that bias produced specific investigatory decisions. That's different. It means he didn't catch an anyone doing anything so dumb as writing down that they took a specific step to aid a candidate, you know, like let's give out this immunity deal so nothing comes out that will derail Hillary for president.

But he in fact finds bias everywhere. The examples are shocking and concerning, and he devotes entire sections to them, and he very carefully specifically are very specifically says in the summary that they cast a cloud on the entire investigations credibility. That's pretty damning. Meanwhile, this cast of characters who the i G has now found to have made a hash of the Clinton investigation and who demonstrates such

bias seamlessly moved to the Trump investigation. And we're supposed to think they got that one right end quote him is spot on here, spot on. Yeah, you don't have page and struck in text messages saying So what we're going to do is pretend that there is a much less serious Hillary Clinton violation so that we can stop Trump from being president. Like they're not complete morons, although I have to tell you they're operationals. The Deep States

operational security is not so good. But I think it's because they thought they'd never be caught because Hillary was gonna win. Hillary was gonna win. They wanted to make sure she won. But that makes sense right from their perspective, given that Trump is such an evil monster, they have to do anything they can to stop the monster from winning. And that means very clearly that they were going to abuse whatever powered authority they had in order to ensure

the outcome that they expected. Man, this stuff is, it's heavy when you dig into this more. How much worse is it gonna look for the Hillary side on this before were people finally admit that this was fixed. You have FBI agents saying they were never going to bring charges against her. That means that the statutes on classification, the statutes on National Security Sensitive information, effectively did not

apply to Hillary Clinton. And we can come up with all kinds of complex organs, but at the end of the day, she was Hillary. She was above the law. Now on to comey, oh, comey, you you widely man. You the good thing. He got his book out already and he's made millions and millions off it, by the way, so you know, don't cry any don't cry any big tears for Comy. He's gonna be just fine. But when we find out more about him, we find out that, yes,

he was insubordinate. What he did was outside the guidelines of the FBI, and they say it wasn't political, and I think you could argue that it was commyst But all so, what was the more important decision two ensure that nobody would prosecute Hillary Clinton, or to bring up the email investigation that was completely legitimate right before the election. The Hillary Clinton email investigation. One other thing that came up in this i G report that I think is

really interesting. Comy claimed not to know that Anthony Weiner was married to whom I Abbati this is during over the course of the internal investigation, said he didn't know that the FBI director. I just want this to be

real clear for all of us. The FBI director did not know, according to him, that the closest advisor to the soon to be president was married to the weirdo, underage sexting predator guy who also happened to be a Democrat on a their pugilist for MSNBC and others, you know, running around yelling at people Mr Progressive, Mr Principles of the Left and socialism and all that stuff. Social justice not socialism, but close enough, do we do? We believe

that there's another way to look at that too. If Comey didn't know that Aberdeen was married to Weener, that would mean that when the investigation first came up and there were there was just some random guy that had classified information from within Hillary circle on on the laptop and like that didn't like bring any alarm bells for him. Just some random dude. That's better, folks. It just it doesn't add up. It does not add up. And I

know the Inspector General is trying. They do have in their minds a duty to try to protect the rest of the institution, because I do feel I feel badly for all the rank and file FBI folks who realized that this makes their jobs harder. This calls into doubt the impartiality of d o J on these matters. This calls into doubt how much we can really trust these institutions. But I will also say the only way to regain trust is for full and absolute transparency on all this stuff.

We have to know a full fledged damage assessment. That's what is needed here by Congress and by the executive branch. What really went down. No more secrets, no more lies. They withheld the will Stop Him text from Congress. How do they justify that that's not classified, which also I will add, means that all the redactions they've given out another documents, we can't trust them that those are fairly classified. Either.

You don't get to do this right as an as a citizen, as an individual, will your credibility before a court. He's essential, and if you lie, that is used against you in all the rest of your testimony. Right that you're a you're a liar when the government lies. It seems to think that that we're not allowed to make the same judgment when an institution has been dishonest with the American people. They seem to think that we don't get to ask for a full accounting of that. And

they're wrong, They're wrong. I want to I want to hear from the dirsh on this one of the I meant to get this in earlier, but he's talking about Comey and Mueller here in place seven. I wonder whether we'll see anything about the close relationship between Kobe and Mueller. Uh, we know that these people were joined at the hip, And if a Coomy is criticized, I think the President

will get some ammunition for criticizing a Komy's protege. This is going to be a partisan fight with Blunwithal on one side and others and the President's seam on the other side. And I think when it becomes a partisan fight, the president wins the partisan fight. The president wins because he's been saying, oh, along, that's what happened here. One other note, the Democrats, you knew this was gonna happen.

They do. They do get one little takeaway here for their side, which is that Comey shouldn't have done what he did right before the election, and that they're saying that that hurd Hillary. They get to run with that talking for in place sixteen. But there are two facts in controvertible and not susceptible to spin. One. Donald Trump won that election. So the complaints about the FBI and

Jim Comey and all the rest don't lead anywhere. At the end of the day, the actions reviewed in this report helped Donald Trump win the election, not the other way around. Yeah, but you see what what when he leaves out of this is that this report didn't deal with the Russia collusion fiasco. This was just a Hillary email component. So given what we have learned about how the FBI the Department of Justice handled Hillary's emails, does anybody want to play some bets on how messed up?

And there's a different word I'd like to use, but I am on radio and I can't how messed up The Russia collusion investigation by the same FBI and d o J has been and is still. I think you all know the answer that we all know the answer to that. It's very clearly, very clearly a a disaster, a disaster. Um I want to hear from Mark Meadows on the staff. There's so many interesting voices weighing in all this. Mark Meadows play clip twelve. This is the

tip of the iceberg. Not only are we saying in the fact that classified information actually was compromised contrary to director call me sworn testimony, but we're also seeing that there was a real bias a Russian to go into the Russia investigation at the expense of everything else. So as people start to read through this, I think you'll find that not only are we troubled by it, but

we should be alarmed by it. Another thing I almost left that there's so many different Look, it's a five page report, right, That's why I'm spending so much time in the tay we once spend the whole show, although we'll move on to immigration and some other topics coming up third hour. You know, I just like to give you more just things that I'm thinking about that I believe are interesting for all of us, to all of

us think about together. But they they're saying that Hillary Server was penetrated by an outside by outside actors, obviously malevolent outside actors. Now you can tell me old buck that, uh, you know that doesn't affect Well, we were told nothing happened, and that was part of the nothing to see here chorus. Right, nobody got out. No, they did get access to her server.

So the whole story classified on her unclassified home server, did compromise national security information, did put it at risk. Foreign adversaries were targeting it. I think that matters, you know, whether whether it matters in the in the legal sense or not. It certainly matters in the whether this was a big deal or not. Conversation which should have had, which should have political ramifications for all of us, did

not and would have had stronger ones. By the way, had we known about that before the election, we should have known about that before the election, but they wanted to hide all this stuff. Look, the Hillary team plays rough and they played dirty, and we're seeing it. Team Hillary is not something you want to mess with. Although Team Trump was able to defeat it, the many headed hydra of the I'm with her Hillary squad at the FBI and the d o J wasn't enough to overcome

the Donald. So in that sense, it does have a happy ending. But the story is not over yet, folks, because the Russia collusion farce. The witch hunt continues on. We've got a lot more coming your way eight four four five. I'm gonna switch gears into immigration here shortly. They're pushing that really hard. That. I mean, the the whole press conference they went with today, the White House press conference, was an attempt for the media to distract

from the real impact of the IG report. At least that's what it felt like to me get into some of those details coming up. Information is power, And if you want to have the best information at your fingertips about prospective hires, about a possible tenant, or a major business transaction, if you want to know who that counterparty is you're dealing with, you need the best background investigation and vetting company in the business. That's Global Verification Network.

They never offshore any of your data. They work with startups all the way to Fortune one companies, and they have employees located here in the United States. It's also the only dual certified, veteran owned background investigation and vetting company. They can handle whatever your needs, large or small company, large or small project. Give them a call. Eight seven seven six nine five nine. That's eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine, or go to my

g v N dot com. That's my g v N dot com for Global Verification Network, because you do not want to leave any stone unturned. Democrats want to get serious about it instead of playing political games. They're welcome to come here and sit down with the president and actually do something about it. Don't you have any MP you're a parent. Don't you have any empathy for what these people are going through? They have less? Tryan settle down. I'm trying to be serious, but I'm not gonna have

you a yell out of terms. Chill law and they have These people have nothing. Hey, I know you want to get some more TV. I want to recognize, Go ahead, Jill. Honestly, it's a serious question. These people have nothing. They come to the border with nothing and approach children, and he just you're a parent, you're a count to do children. Don't you have any empathyle what they go through? Chill? Go ahead? Oh, but he's just an objective journalist, you see.

That's ah CNNs Brian Karen or Karram. I don't know, but he's an objective journalist. That's what they'll tell you. He's standing up. He is straight up haranguing, and if there is such a thing as man splaining, man splaining in a weird where he was almost like parents planning to Sarah Hugaby Sanders, and you know tomorrow he's gonna he's gonna up around and be like, oh no, I'm I'm just you know, just the facts, just the facts.

I'm just a journalist. They all do this over at seeing and it's the most annoying game I've ever seen in my life. It's a lie. There liars, lots of liars, unless they'll say that there are you know that, Yes we have opinions, Yes we push an agenda. That's fine, we have free speech in this country. I get it. But this guy is not objective. This is not journalism.

This is a monologue that is rude and disrespectful in the West wing to the press secretary on an issue that I'll break down for you a little more in a few moments, but that the press is just using it some kind of crazy wedge right now. They're trying

to stop people from thinking about other things. Think about this, By the way, I just wanted to get to something real quick, something really made my day to day, you know, I'm new down here at the at the Hill and one of our staffers, one of our awesome staffers named Sean share with me that he met um Charlie from Tallahassee, Florida, and uh and Leanne and that they came up to and they said, do you know Buck Sexton or somehow somehow it came up in the exchange and they it

turns out that that my Seawan, who works on the crew here, met a couple of really great team Buck folks were visiting DC area from Tallahassee, Florida, and they said all these nice things to to Shawn about me, and then that made its way around all the folks here, and you know what that was. I really appreciated that. So I just wanted to say that. So Charlie and Leanne, you know, first of all, Sean said, you guys were great.

And also, it's been a long tough week here. We've I've been working NonStop and there's nothing that gives me a bigger smile these days than and here and from some folks on the team, and Uh, you made me look good in front of one of my new colleagues, and I sounded cool when people are talking about out the water cooler. So thank you very much. It really meant a lot and I appreciate it. We'll be right back. You know, recently, I've been receiving all my style tips

from the clothing experts at Peter Millar. If you're a golfer, if you're somebody likes to get out there and do sports like me, you know the name. If you don't, you should, because Peter Millar is all about quality, value and style. It is the most comfortable clothing I've ever worn, whether it's the nits, the pants, the polos. I'm telling you right now I'm wearing a performance polo and it is incredible. It's my new favorite polo shirt. Check it

out for yourself. The performance Polo is the most comfortable shirt I've ever worn. And I can say that about everything that I'm wearing from Peter Millar these days and right now. You can head over to Peter Millar dot com slash buck to check out some of my Peter Millar favorites. Be sure to use my link and you'll receive a complimentary shipping and free hat. That's right, Peter Millar, M I L l A R dot com slash Buck Peter Millar dot com slash Buck the best performance clothing

you're ever gonna wear. He's back with you now because when it comes to the fight for truth, the fuck never stops. I can say that it is very biblical to enforce the law. Uh. That is actually repeated a number of times throughout the Bible. However, this hold on, Jim, if you'll let me finish again, I'm not going to comment on the attorney specific comments that I haven't seen. That's not what I said, And I know it's hard

for you to understand, um, even short sentences. I guess, but at please don't take my words out of context. But the separation of illegal FAMI alien families Sarah Hugaby Sanders with a buck slap? Do you hear that there? Buck slap? I guess it's a huck slap actually, because she did a good job, you know. Acasta is one of the prime examples of I'm just a journalist. I'm just a journalist. I don't have a opinions. I'm just the facts. It's a lie. Costas that way, tappers, that way, lemons,

that woman go down the list. These are all pundits that, by the way, everybody wants to have the right facts. It's the way the facts are presented, the frequency, the intensity, the purpose behind the presentation of the fact. Just being about the facts doesn't mean you don't have an opinion. This is what this is. The great lie over at CNN. I don't I don't you notice I don't bash what

I bash. At MSNBC are the fake conservatives over there who are just trashing Trump and trashing everything he does reflectively because they want to be on TV. But MSNBC is honest. It's anti Trump, it's pro Democrat. Okay, fine, I can handle that. CNN I can't handle anymore. CNN is just off off the off the radar crazy. It's well, it's just dishonest. The entire thing is a lie. So they're running around calling a president a liar all the time. All you have to do is ask any prominent anchor

it's and end, are you a nonpartisan journalist? And if they say yes, they're lying. That's a lie. Sarah Kilby Sanders knows this, and so she's sick of it. With a Costa with the games here, you know, being disrespectful, interrupting area. But look at Costas playing to his bass. He's almost like a politician. He gets to go through all the steps of being Oh, I'm so I'm so pro immigrant, I'm so pro the Latino community specifically. That's one part of the immigration debate, by the way, that

just kind of goes unspoken most of the time. When most folks are talking about how much they are pro immigrant, they also will very quickly switching too, really, well, well Latino immigrants, And I would say, hold on it, what about do we not like East Asian South Asian immigrants? Are they not really a part of the concern or no, no, no no, it's Latino immigrants almost like the percentage of illegal alien Latinos in the country affects the political discussion

about the rest of immigration almost. But but this all this stuff we I've had the Attorney General here on the show. I've had you know, immigration experts in the show. I've read about this, and they present these lines about the bus for babies, that's a prison boss, and how it's it's new that they're separating families the border. Yeah, the only reason it knew is because before if you showed up with a kid, you it was just okay, you got to go come on into the country, bring

a child, come on in. Bringing a child illegally to the United States or into the United States should not be incentivized. And people say, well buck them not illegal, Well they are when they don't show up with the immigration hearing folks. So they may not be illegal day one, but it's it's on a on a a conveyor belt to illegality. But we notice, you know what I'm seeing that they run around with this lack like it's all

the big, bad, mean Trump administration. Every country in the world that you can think of that is worth anyone going to restricts its immigration. If I show up in Switzerland, which these days, given how annoying I find a lot of the media, sometimes I think about set up a freedom hunt in Switzerland. Don't worry, we'd all still hang out. But if you know, the swamp is so swampy, I just want to go to the Alps and disappear from all the swampness for a while. But they wouldn't just say, oh,

you want to be here. Do you think America's corrupt? Do you think the mainstream media is you know, a fascistic destructive or they're not fascist, but you know what I mean. They're they're destructive organization. Uh yes, come on in No, they'd say, sorry, we have rules here, we have laws, but we have now we have been convinced by our own media that immigration laws are inherently unfair and inherently racist. And oh, by the way, if you don't pay your taxes, which for some of you listening

who are high earners, you know, congrats. By the way, one day, I hope you'd be there myself. Uh you know, if you don't pay almost half your income in taxes to support the massive welfare state in this country, which includes all the illegal immigrants who come into the country. I don't care what they say, but oh no, they don't qualify. They get better. If it's lots of different ways, it's a lie. If you don't pay those taxes, you go to prison, and no one feels bad for your kids.

That seems like an issue to me, That seems like a problem. I we're talking about MS thirteen coming right up. Stunning report in the Washington Post about something that I I don't know why it isn't a national news story. Well beyond just one article. This should be kitchen table conversation coast to coast right now, because it's showing us a problem that is getting worse and worse, is spreading across the country and has very terrible consequences. MS thirteen.

Trump has been talking about MS thirteen, and finally the media I think has realized, well, you know, they gotta do this thing where they cover it because if they don't cover it at all, it's too obvious. But they're clearly uncomfortable with it. Why are they uncomfortable with MS thirteen as a topic. Why do they cover it but give it the minimum right on months? Then they don't cover it. I'm saying, they do it in a way that you know, oh we touched it. We don't want

to stay on it. Remember when the media wants to make a point there, they go to the map, they go to the they go all the way. You know. With Abu Grab, I think was on the front page of the New York Times as a story like thirty some odd times in two or three months or something, and bad over and over and over again, one one instance of abuse of of prisoners, and it was just they just hammered the Bush administration on that for as

long as they could. MS thirteen is a gang that has its well, it was really started in this country. I've told you about it before, has some root and Satanism, you know, Mara Salvatruccia. It is now taking over parts of Central American countries and it has chapters all across this country and particularly in the area where I am.

And that's what the Washington Post story was on. It was on Prince George's County, which is not far at all from where I am right now, Um, Prince George's counties in Maryland, and there has been quite an influx

of Central American immigrants. And there's now MS their team that's effectively taking over some of these schools from a security standpoint, right or or menacing, terrorizing, I should say some of these schools from a security standpoint, stabbing people, hit hit fellow students, hitting them with bats, threatened to kill them. Rape. There was a case of a girl being raped and she recanted because she was afraid that MS th team would have her killed. And we know

that they will kill fellow students. They've done it out in Long Island. So when you when you read these these accounts from these teachers, but that the teachers are terrified, absolutely terrified. There's MS thirteen graffiti. Here's a line from it. A few hundred feet from both schools. The trees are covered in MS thirteen graffiti, empty beer cans, candy rappers, and crumpled assignments around a stump blackened by fire. One tree trunk appears that if it has been used for

knife practice near all the MS thirteen graffiti. MS thirteen is something that you would think the police would take very very seriously, right, they would go to whatever length they had to to stop them. But no, it turns out actually the police are kind of This is a line from Prince George's Police, which have had an officer station at the school, declined to discuss the allegations of

gang activity. Quote this is their house, so we're going to defer to school leadership, said police spokeswoman Jennifer Donalan. If school security isn't telling us about something, then we don't know. Let me tell you. Journalists don't like this story. They really don't. They could run m. S thirteen stories a lot more than they do. But this is the downside. Immigration that we've been told would never happen. There's doll and they'll tell the statistics, well, immigrants are better than

native born Americans. I'm like, that's such a weird are I've been saying that forever, such a weird argument. Okay, so non Americans are better than Americans or less less crime prone than Americans. Really, is that what we're gonna suggest now? And the answers with Democrats, yeah, they will. But when you read through this article, you can't help and it's in the Washington Post, you can't help but feel like, oh, okay, so they're gonna just try to turn a blind out of this and hope the problem

goes away. Police this year to this one, this one school. I'm trying to see what the schools. William Worked Middle School in Riverdale, Maryland. This one school is how the police called to it seventy four times. That seems like a lot of police calls to me. Uh, there are

students who are completely disruptive, They threatened teachers. Now, I gotta tell you that's a situation I really wouldn't want to be in because as any of you who have had to deal with you know, school school aged kids, you know and and have if you've ever been in a disciplinary role, sixteen year old can do a lot of damage. Sixteen year old can kill you very quickly. Sixteen year old can kill you just as quickly as

an eighteen year old. But the sixteen year olds probably gonna unless they actually do kill you, probably gonna get away with it a lot more. Certainly a thirteen and a fourteen year old will I'm gonna try him as an adult. So when some fourteen year old he says he's part of m S thirteen, if your teacher says he's gonna stab you, not only you have to take that seriously. I wonder what your recourse is. Are they

really gonna pull that student out of school? Big problem here that I see with all this is this shouldn't be our issue at all. This shouldn't be happening. They won't connect it to this. But the truth is that a lot of these m S thirteen youths are the result of the recent influx under the Obama administration, with the relaxation of different rules at the border to create loopholes to let people just come and stay, come and

stay over and over and over again. Under the Obama administration application of the law, have you showed up at the border with a fifteen year old. Particularly the last four years of Obama's presidency. You got to stay. You were good that you were in, you were good to go. No Interior enforcement, Oh, don't show up. Your hearing doesn't matter.

And now all you've got are these stories from different news outlets, particularly SNANA about how, oh it's their separating families at the border, the terrible things in the border. The only reason that that's happening is because they told everybody, more or less, come with kids and you'll be fine, you can stay. That's what they've been saying. That has been the message, and so that's resulted in so many

people showing up at the border. And it also now means you've got all these young people that have come from Central America that are being recruited for a Central American based gang that also has deep ties to Mexican drug cartels. I mean, this is scary stuff. I gotta tell you. You know, as as somebody in the media you can talk smack about isis all day long. They're not gonna come for you. They're really not. I mean, it's a it's less than a lightning strike possibility. Right.

I could sit here and make fun of Abu Abu Jihad and Abu Babu. I mean, whoever, right I can talk to all these different guys that be heading maniacs over there. They're not gonna show up at my door. But Prince George's County is about fifteen minute car ride from where I am, and ms their teen some really bad dudes who who make a habit of engaging in extreme violence, extreme brutality show. There's there's that component of

this story as well. But I just think that they can't, you know, the the journalists that they can't help themselves, that they feel like it's unfair to the immigrant communities that have come from Central America recently under these Obama era regulations, unfair to tell the story. And I'm sitting here like, well, it's also unfair to not raise public consciousness enough about this to have sufficient public resources devoted

to dealing with the problem. And yes, at a political level, we don't need to be taking anybody who says they don't like living in all Salvador or ponderous. If hey, my country is dangerous and crappy, is now an excuse to be in America. We gotta take everybody and there is, and this is I think one of the big separations between Democrats and Republicans all on this issue. There is

something about American nous, there's something about being an American. Yes, you can become American, but just showing up here doesn't make you an American. And if your first act in showing up here is to break the law or to twist the law for your own purposes, that's a very bad start. And we are import or in poverty. You know, we got we got a twenty trillion dollar dead and counting. We are importing poverty and all the problems that come

with it. We're importing you know, English as a second language classes, and we're important, And do you want to pay for it? I will say this for all the journalists who would wait, oh my gosh, can you imagine if I went over to see it in right now? They're like, oh, he's a monster, he hates everybody. Like yeah, I mean sure, I'm just we're all we're all so hateful, you know. It would be a really worthwhile exercise. Two.

Put these different pundits that are so in favor of taking in more and more asylum seekers from who are really they're not asylums, and they're just immigrants, illegal immigrants really, but they're using this loophole. Will they send their kids to this school in Prince George's County? Will they send their kids to a school that has a high percentage of recent arrivals from Central America? Will they do that? I can tell you that Chris matthews kids, Jake Tapper's kids, Uh,

go down the line, Brian Williams kids. I mean, I don't know how old they are, don't even know what they have kids. You know what I'm saying. They do not go to these schools. They do not live in parts of the country where they have to come into contact with the recently arrived immigrants from Central America that

used the child at the borderloophole. So I just think there's tum I just think there's tremendous hypocrisy on this issue, tremendous And I think that there's a real unwillingness to tell us the the the full truth and nothing but the truth consistently about m S thirteen and its penetration of our cities. And and Donald Trump, God love him. You know, he's another issue where people said, oh, how good he's so terrible said, wait, wait a second, he's

the one who's actually telling us what's going on. What are all those other people doing? What? What? What? What's been up with them? Why? Why haven't we even know about this problem? You know, someone tell me why we can't know about the m S thir team penetration of high schools in all these different cities. But we'll get lectured by the Obama administration about a rape culture on campus that does not exist, That is a fantasy, that

is not real. Why why is one of those things that we have to be lectured about talking about, but the other one we can't talk about. I think we can guess at what some of the answers are about the politics behind us. Our three coming up, our sponsor this half hour is Anubis. The enigmatic US president is dead. ISIS is attacking on multiple fronts, and the U S Special Forces call on a mercenary cyber warrior to stop

the crisis. This is Anubis. An aging marine sergeant and battle warren Army major face an enemy that turns the Internet into a terrorist weapon and makes our existing concepts of security archaic. A catastrophe of biblical proportions is about to unfold. The president is facing a ruthless, relentless caliphate, and our military and elected leaders have no means to stop it. The only real questions are when and where? This is a Nubis. Today's headline show us what is

happening in the Middle East. Author Eric Anderson reveals the frightening possibilities that remain. This is a Nubis. Eric Anderson is a former undercover US intelligence agent. His new novel is a Nubis with Done Books now on sale at Amazon dot com or visit Done Books at Done Books. That's d U n N done books dot com. Buck Sexton Mission decoding the news and disseminating information. Who is actionable intelligence? Make no mistake American Great? You're a great

American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show at an No Dame. Buck, Welcome to our three of the Sexton Show. You know what are the great ironies of liberalism? There are many like why do they call themselves liberal when they are in fact anti liberal? We talked about that a bit yesterday. It's really am a misnomer along the lines of why are Democrats the party of Blue in this country and Republicans are read It's just well known that in the Western world at least, red is the

color of socialism, collectivism, communism. So why are the Democrats blue and Republicans read? As you you may recall from this show, and this might be worth its own segment at some point. It was a decision really made by media networks in the seventies eighties. I think I'll go back and check on the deep dive we did some time ago. But and it comes from electoral maps and they just picked colors at random, they say, so saith the left wing media networks. But really, when you think

about a democrats should be read, why aren't they? It would be so much more fitting. But also that science proves them right all the time. That uh, science is something that if you are acquainted with it, you will be you will be more favorable toward a liberal Democrat point of view. When we see this coming into contact with reality and failing as a maxim time and time again, all right, we see many instances of oh wait, liberals actually reject science on that. One of the areas is

obviously getting a lot of gotten. A lot of attention recently has to do with the notion of gender and gender identity and the creation of all of these new genders. The gender is a social construct. That there's nothing underlying a person's gender that is biological and biochemical, right XX chromosome, x Y chromosome. They don't no, no, they don't think about that. They don't care about that. It's all a social construct, because if it's a social construct, then people

just get to decide. It's almost like science by the mob. There are other areas as well. You will see an inability to or unwillingness to comprehend the science. I think life is one of them, meaning that the fetus is

a baby, just a baby in the womb. The more we know about fetal pain, the more we know about fetal development, and science just proves to us that it is life, It is sacred, it as precious, and Democrats are extremists on the issue, a topic we will address more another time, but also reject all the advances and science that we have now. There also isn't a tendency

among Democrats to suggest that the science is settled. In fact, you'll hear them say that the science is settled, when true scientific inquiry is never really settled, because it should always be subjected to constant proof you have to test those hypotheses, and then you have to prove them time and time again. You have to look at those conclusions

scientific method. You're supposed to apply this. There's a reason why when you're a freshman in high school and your ner biology class and you're using the Bunsen burners and you're running these little experiments. Yeah, we know what's going to happen with the experiment, but we keep doing them because we want to see for ourselves. Were to test them, maybe water won't boil at that temperature. I mean, that

would be pretty crazy. But the point is you do it so you know that that's the way that it works, right, that you put yourself through the process of a learning so that it is not so you're not entirely reliant on what others have told you about you see this with the so called well the pay gap is more of a social construct issue, though it does have some roots in biology. People start to address this and they get yelled at. So I'm not gonna get all that.

But here's another example of it. When you're talking about the achievement gap between boys and girls in math. Now, this is an area that if you pay attention to it has already cause some people professional considerable professional strife. Larry Summers, the former president of Harvard University, suggested once that there was a perhaps there was a difference in the very very highest achieving AH math I think fields

medal fields medal winners was the topic. And handle though don't quote me on that, I might be awful little bit. But the president of Harvard was at this symposium, this meeting with other faculty, and he said, well, you know, maybe the reason that they're they're almost exclusively or or largely even forget exclusively largely male math geniuses has something to do with in the aggregate biology, right, which is another way of saying it doesn't mean that boys are

better than girls at math. It just means that males for reasons of the way the you know, the cortex connects to the all that different brain chemistry stuff. Right. Not a not a biologist, don't play one on radio.

But there are some differences that when you look at a population in the billions and you're trying to then you're trying to figure out who is at the very very very highest level of one or the other results and differences aggregate population differences of achievement in math in particular between men and women is a subject that gets you yelled at, and Larry Summers, I think I think

he got fired. I think he has stepped down. One of the great lines in the whole thing was this was years and years ago, maybe over a decade ago now, but there was a woman who said, you know, and how dare he raised that subject. I practically fainted and I was like, oh, wow, you mean you got the vapors you know? Oh, I do declare I cannot hear about the achievement gap between men and women without just kidding all in as it. I thought that was kind of I mean that the situation was funny to me.

But this New York Times piece today was looking at a in a eight hundred large school districts, a massive study, and the big headline they took from it is that in wealthy, predominantly white and Asian parts of the country. Remember, this is looking at eight this is looking at math tests. And remember with math or right and wrong answers right. And as much as they try to say that math is culturally biased, no, it's just math. Look, I wish I were better at math. If I were awesome at math.

I probably would have become a hedge fund manager and I'd be calling into this radio show from my yacht in the Aegean with COMMI Bear. But instead I'm doing what I love more than anything, which is radio. So I got lucky. I suppose that I wasn't good at math.

Large school districts and the big take a way they had from this from the two hundred and sixty million standardized test scores for third through eighth graders was that boys from predominantly white or Asian parts of the country, slight that are that are well off slightly over uh outperformed girls in math. And they're they're very concerned about this. Now. I don't want to get into the specifics of you know why that may be, because quite honestly, it's I'd

have to I have to look at it more. And I'm not sure anybody really has that just the straight up answer on this. But it was amazing that when you read this article, and this goes to my initial premise about how they have a difficulty with science, is they drill down into this research. Uh. This is a professor of poverty and inequality and education at Stanford University. So but when they looked at this, and this is from the years two thousand and huge study of all these,

they're concerned. They view this as a problem. They view boys doing better than girls in math in just a small, small percentage of school districts across the country as some social problem that needs to be fixed. Now you may say that, okay, buck, well, maybe that is something to be and I responding, well, you know what, something you gotta keep in mind here, folks, is that when you look at the actual peace and the article and the and the data, girls are way out performing performing boys

on verbal tests. So I just need someone to explain this to me. When you have this data set and by a large margin, young girls third to eighth grade are doing better than than boy is in verbal that's just date. That's just a thing that we all know. But because there's clear evidence here that males outperformed females at the top end of math from third to eighth grade, that is a social problem that needs to be addressed. Well, I need to know why is it not a social

problem that girls are out performing voice? The assumption and you can read in this piece for yourself. So I know that maybe this sounds a little kind of wonky buck while you focused on this, but it's just there's such a perception bias that the left has about these things. You know, they view their intersectional politics the notion that there are these different groups, and one group of presses

another group, and all groups oppressed each other. That is influencing the way they see even things like this where it's a straightforward data set, right, and but they only see it as a problem when when boys outperform girls based on the data, when girls apport from boys, well, you know, of course they do because girls are are better. I mean, these are like kind of nonsensical things to say and think. But I don't know how else to explain why they take this approach other than they they

view women as an oppressed minority. Deep down. They have the sense that women are oppressed. That that, you know, social scientists and and academics, the academics who are conducting conducting this study. Because I look at this, and I'm not alone here, I mean, you have to create and entirely like new access of comparison for girls versus boys

on English tests versus on math tests. Overwhelmingly, overwhelmingly, girls do better than boys regardless of their parents social socioeconomic status. There two takeaways were that on math tests, boys from richer districts tend to do better than girls from richer districts. This is the problem that needs to be addressed. I just why is it a problem? Really? Think about that one.

Why do they see this? And they girls are better than boys at verbal but it's a problem that boys are better than girls at verbal at math in this study. Doesn't that strike you as weird? Why is one of them like, hey, yeah, whatever science? The other one is whoa, whoa. There's because they go into all this, you know, it could be about a set of expectations. It could be messages kids get early on it. It could be girls

aren't speaking up in math. Okay, well, why don't we ask any of those questions about why women do better than men? And you know, because they don't have any ability to be objective. Even scientists now, in many cases, especially social scientists, have been co opted by the intellectual rots of intersectionality. And that's what we see here. Ye.

So there's so there's that team. You want the best and most comfortable gear, you want to wear, clothing that you really enjoy putting on, but you can also wear gear that represents who you are and supports good causes and good people. That's where nine Line Apparel comes in. Nine Line is a veteran owned and operated patriotic lifestyle bread. Go on their site and check it out for yourself. You will see different clothing lines that are all about veterans,

the military, the Second Amendment, patriotism and America. And the hoodies, the T shirts, the polos, all the different articles that you can see on the site are incredibly comfortable. I know because I love my nine line gear. The founder and CEOs in the special operations community, and a lot of it is a hundred and fifty employees or veterans themselves. Go check out what they've got to offer. You. Visit nine line apparel dot com and use a coupon code

buck twenty off. That's nine Line Apparel dot Com coupon code buck twenty It's a great deal buck to zero for twenty percent off. I really like debates where both sides get to be smart, and I like discussions where you can have both sides come in an issue and it's not obvious who's gonna win, right, So for example, if somewhere to say who has better hair, Buck Sexton or Joe Scarborough, there's only one correct answer, you know, and you can try to take the Scarborough round for

as long as you want. You can. You can provide exhibits and evidence or whatever, but at the end of the day, at the end of the day, we know the Buck has better hair, that the two swoops are not even really comparable. They're just vaguely in the same category. The encryption debate is one of those places where I say, I go back and forth on this one, and I know a lot of people who do. Ultimately I come down on the side of privacy over government access, but

it's it's a close call. Let me let me just give you the latest on this. So Apple is gonna make it harder. This just broke this week, actually, I think it just came out today for people to break into iPhones so that the data port that you use can also be used to access and download your data. Apple is going to have a software update, according to reason dot com here that will block port access to a phone's data if the phone has not been used for an hour. Anybody who wants to access the data

will have to enter the phone's password. So this is just enhanced security, that's all it is. And already you know where this is going. The fbis are like, oh my gosh, dogs and cats living together, Massster area, right, And people are really getting upset about this because they're saying, well, this makes it even harder for law enforcement, harder for law enforcement. And I say, you know what's really the alternative.

Any back door that is left for the government to exploit in our devices, one creates a temptation for government to make it too easy to use that backdoor for exploitation and too perhaps even a bigger threat of though I don't know. This is why I love I love I love this discussion because I think there's so many different facets and you can push back and forth on it, and reasonable people, well informed, intelligent people can and do

disagree on this one. So you know what what happens though, when all of a sudden we realize that criminals have gotten their hands on this and now your phone, your data, your whole life could be subject to hacking. They can penetrate and and get all get access to all kinds of stuff, then you've obviously got a very big problem.

So if the government can't force you, because they may have to come in and kick down your door with a swat team, if they can't force you to have a special door that they are allowed to use for your home, why should they have a special door for your phone? Now? Remember this is this is uh a situation though that when they get a warrant and they try, we haven't really fair out where this goes. Because when they get a warrant that they get into your device,

if they can't get in, then what happens? Can they force a private company to violate their own intellectual property? They haven't done anything wrong because somebody else is hiding something. This plays out in really interesting ways, so you know it's but it's also easy to say, oh, keep the

government out of my stuff. And then I say, well, if if i'm a you know, if i'm a member of Congress, I'm a whatever, a law enforcement official or just a concerned citizen, and I know that someone's kidnapped young girl and she is in dire you know, she's in a dire situation, dire jeopardy, and I have very good reason to believe that her All the locational data everything is is stored on some evil doers phone. We

really gonna say, oh, we can't. We can't make them in a life or death situation, we can't make them give access. Gets a lot harder to make the case, then, right, it gets a lot harder. I also think about how we are so we're talking more about technology actually in a in a moment here, but we are so dependent on these devices now for so much people are doing. I see this a lot of time now. They do

banking transactions on their phones. They're paying their mortgage on their phone there, you know, doing a lot of their shopping on their phone. There's so much we are we are living in these in this truly digital world. Now, it's not just for communications, It's become a lot more

than that. It's record storage, it's it's business transactions. And if somebody said to me, hey, Buck, your phone got hacked, I'd be like, I don't know, Like, weren't you're in the like Yeah, I had people who are smart about phones to help me in the c I I don't know any of this stuff. I don't have a hack into a phone. I mean, I know what the vulnerabilities are. I understand from a counterintelligence perspective all the bad things people can do to you. But I'm not like some

character in the matrix. You can sit down at a bunch of computers and like start typing real fast and like I got this, you know, and you see all the different code going on the screen, and I'm stopping the hack from happening. No, I probably call my little brother like hey, man, like I need help, But you're better than me with computers. So there's that. I wonder

what's gonna end up going on here. I think that Congress is still really flirting with the idea of creating uh legislation that to mandate that the government has access and that that creates a real that's a real problem. It's these are multibillion dollar companies now that have they should make it as secure as possible. That is in their business interests. There's nothing illegal about it, you know.

It would almost like be it would almost be like having a kill switch and guns that were being sold in case law enforce and wanted to shut off your gun so it couldn't be used. That would strike me as a problem. So this strikes me as a problem too. But I want to talk about social media use. Actually in a moment, so stay right there. He's holding the

line for America buck sex in his back. I gotta tell you, I think that we're gonna find out in due time that all this time on on social media, you know that that this notion that you have to be putting your whole life out there online and and everyone's just doing it, especially for younger folks, that there

are really negative consequence as well this. I'm telling you, we're gonna find out that this was we were not really prepared for this, and as a species, I mean here, you know, human beings, we just haven't thought out the full long term consequences of exposing particularly I think young people, kids, to a constant barrage of what what everyone else is presenting as their lives, the incredibly powerful echo chamber of facts. You know, I feel like individuality and you know, the

space to make mistakes. There are all these different things that are under assault from this incredible new technology that we have, and we think about how new this really is. I grew up in an era and in a lot of you are you know when I was when I was your age, I had to walk through three ft of snow. No, but I grew up in an era

when pac Man was considered really advanced and exciting. I remember when making cell phone calls was something that only rich people did because it costs seven dollars a minute or something, and the cell phone looked like you were calling it a you know, an airstrike in Vietnam or something. It was a very different kind of setup. And now you've got these kids that are on these devices and I go out. I often have to eat out down here because I don't have Miss Molly around and off

the time to cook. So I'll pop into a restaurant and takes, you know, something to go. I was gonna say a salad, but I don't want to lie to you, you know, a burger usually no bun fries though, because obviously I'm not a savage. And and I'll go in there and and I'll just see that these kids are on these divides. They're always on the device has now become their interaction, their babysitter, their their tutor, their friend there,

you know, confidant. And man, I am so glad that Facebook and all this stuff didn't exist when I was a kid. You know, we talked about things like cyber bullying. I mean, I've seen bullying, and I know about the menace that kids can be to other kids, and I always took a certain I felt a certain obligation. I took a certain pride and in stopping bullying that I

saw around me growing up. Uh, you know, maybe that's just for my own purposes of feeling like I'm doing good things and yami, but I was kind of a bully hunter. But I can't imagine what it's like now. You know, if your kid who's U goes through an

awkward phase or you don't. And but what made me think about this is that the National Health Service in the UK, which I know it's Britain, but we're pretty close to the Brits, right, We're similar ish they think that there was a quote epidemic of mental illness among children fueled by social media. Now this is in the Telegraph, the paper in the UK um and he also says that people need to do a lot more about a

lot more to protect themselves from this. And then this was another statistic that I thought, I thought it was pretty astounding. He wrote that this is from the head of the National Health Service in the UK that the average person in Britain spends twice as long on the

toilet as they do exercising. But you know, of got like not enough time to go out and like kick kick a football around, so we've got to sitting here on the on the I don't know a British people call a toilet like the porcelain thing where they PLoP the business. You know, I don't know what if they have a cool I was gonna say the the telly, but that's obviously for something else. The lou that's right, well done, well done, John. So I was kind of

switching back and forth in different accents. I was thinking, British people love they love the leverage that their accent gives them in America, but they don't like to beat your dancing bear with it. You know, they don't like most of my British friends. I have a handful. You gotta keep a few British friends in your life. If you're like, do different, do the Northern like man queue me an accent for me. Now do like a Southern you know, whateverever it is Dorset, that's not in the South.

I don't know the UK, GR know, London, I guess Cockney. They don't like to jump around to different accents. They take it all very seriously. But back to the social media stuff. We don't even know and let's all just hope. And I don't say this to be a conspiracy theorist. I don't say this because books actually part of he's trying to infiltrate the government. Uh, I'm actually trying to infiltrate the media. I was in the government. But I say this because I think it's you know, it does

give me a little bit of pause. We better hope that the radiation from our cell phones over over a course of thirty or forty years, there's no big deal. That's all I can tell you, because otherwise it's like how an apocalyptic movie comes about and the cockroaches literally take over, right because we're all well, I guess other animals don't carry cell phones around, so it would just be uso that would be gone. But that would be

pretty bad news. Anyways. Social media, I I don't know, I really want to start instituting social media free weekends. I'm trying to get to the point where I have that level of self control, right say, you know what, I'm just I'm just not gonna do it anymore. I'm just gonna stay off the Twitter. I'm gonna stay off these things there. They're they're bad for us. They don't we need people. We need to interact with other people, or even just books and quiet, not constantly on social

media for kids. I just think it's terrible. I don't have I gotta think more about this one. I gotta drill into this one more. But it's just one that I like to bring up sometimes. Roll call is coming up. In just a couple of minutes, it's time for roll call. Indeed, roll call time, time for the roll call. You know, one day I'm gonna I'm gonna be able to throw a party and have a like a big band there at my party. I'm kind of excited about that prospect. That's one thing. One day I want to throw a

party for myself it's black tie. And another time I want to throw a party that is has a big band or maybe ska because that just like went away. It's like a style of music that doesn't even exist anymore. But I digress, all right, roll call, Facebook dot Com, slash buck sex and if you would, in fact like to do some of the roll call, you can just send me a message on Facebook and we can get

right to it from there. First up here, William William, Right, So if the i G determined that Kobe was a commey was a mess up, and Trump was in line with firing him, why is Bob Mueller still employed? William? I get what you're getting at here. I don't really know. I'm at a point now where I have to say I'm increasingly be fuddled as to how we can be in the situation we're in with an with a special counsel that seems like it is on such incredibly shaky ground.

But it's all about politics to the left, It's all about what is politically useful to them. So that's where it is. It's not really about a principle here. Hello, Buck Shields, Hie, love the show. You know what I'm saying. Uh, this is from Denny. I'm really excited about your new project at Hill TV, but I'm having trouble figuring out how to watch a full episode of the show rising all I see your clips. Can you help out a

Freedom Hut junkie? Denny? That is a good question, and let me let me get back to you on that. I I was under the impression that if you just go to yeah that yeah, that the clips play sequential. So that's there you go. Thank you j So John you saw it there, that's right. Yeah, just play the different clips. Just play those clips and that's all you need to do. So there you have it. Will next up here. I'm skimming the IG report at work. Nothing surprising.

I really would like to see the previous draft before McCabe call me at all and all their counsel were given a chance to challenge, amend and soften it up. Well, well, it's already bad enough, but I hear you. I think there's probably a whole lot more that didn't come out today. We'd all be really curious about if we could find out. So yeah, Eric spelled with an A instead of an E. Hey, Buck, congrats. I heard you're working with the Hill and get your

own morning show. That's great. I've been listening to you since Richard Mayberry suggested uh the Investment Hour and through their learned about the Freedom Hunt. Oh thank you very much. Eric. You do some of the best political commentary I've heard in my life. I'm sorry in my lineup, well that would have been That's nice. Too, including people like Bongino,

Shapiro and Levin. Well, I'm very hallowed and revered company there, Eric, So thank you your knowledgeable entertaining, incredibly accurate, you humble when your statements are called into question. Fantastic work. I hope to see you, uh make Porter money. God bless shields hie So. So Eric learned about me through something I do call the Stansbury Investor Our. Any of you who have any interest in learning about the markets and learning, look, Stansbury has taught me how to manage my own money.

I'll just tell you that. I'm I'm a subscriber as well as a podcast analysts with them. I do politics and Porter. The CEO does business and markets and stock market all that kind of stuff, you know, investments, Uh, and they put out all their research. It's it's a really cool company. And if you investor, our dot com is the website you can go to for that. So that's a different thing. But that's if you remember. That's if you're interested in you know, you want to invest

in X or Y or whatever. And they just put out research. They do not manage any individuals moneys. They just put out research on their own thoughts. Uh. Next up, Kevin says Rising just received a mention on Russia's show. Well, Kevin, indeed, I heard about that, but thank you for giving me the heads up. You know there's and what can I tell you? I know I've I've had the honor of filling in for Mr Rush Lamball and his on his

incredible radio show many times. And any time you get a shout out from l Rush Bow is it any any day that happens is a good day. So there you have it. Taylor next up here, as you call him, the greatest talk show host of all time, is talking about Rising. Am I surprised? Nope, Taylor, thank you? Yeah. That was also another they're instant of Mr Limbaugh speaking about the show, which, or you can imagine, mean a young guy like me and now you're trying to make

your way in this business and everything else. I guess I'm not am I am? I still a young guy, John, Do I still get to say that I'm getting old? Man? Things start, you know, my knees, you know, yes, and my knees start to hurt, my back starts to hurt. I don't I'm not I'm not as spry as I used to be. I think once you start using the term spry, everyone realizes that you are in fact not spry. Right.

So that's my ability to rebound after I'm really tired, kind of like my ability to rebound after really nasty hangover is a fraction of what it used to be. Like like I find that, you know, I used to take a power nap, and then I would want you know how it is. I would take a power nap and then I'd say, all right, now I'm ready to get back into day. And now I take a power nap and I'm like, well, it's already two or three o'clock.

Maybe I'm just stay and just keep sleeping till like tomorrow morning, you know, until two or three, I don't know, maybe eight am tomorrow. I mean, I get caught up in it because I get tired. Now I get tired. Duke writes, I'll make it short. Congratulations on rising. We'll watch it and try not to be disappointed. Shield side

from Duke Duke, thank you man. Look, we actually you're gonna get a little a little uh early preview of something where we've it came along and I'm actually I don't want to tell you the backst around it just yeah, but it looks like the tagline for the show is going to become both sides of the story because it's

working really well. You know, we had Crystal do an interview today with John Podesta and I said them, look, if you guys want to have an interview where you just where Crystal and John from the from the Democrats side of things. I remember, everyone here is everyone on this show, well at least that's doing commentary, right, and everyone who's who's a political commentator. He's up front about

what's going on. Crystals are progressive. We said it on day one, She'll say it every day thereafter, or or it's very clear every day thereafter. I'm a conservative. I take the position of a conservative. You know, sometimes maybe I get a little libertarian and some other stuff, and and also I'm a little too nice, so that's when I start to sound like a liberal on certain things. But I'm a conservative, and so we're just up front about this, and I I wish that this were the

case on UM Media shows across the spectrum. So anyway, both both sides of the story is something we're testing out as the way we're gonna be referring to the show from here on. But but it's not you're you're not gonna get shout fest. It's not that kind of a show, meaning I'm not looking to own the Libs as the phrase goes, and the libs aren't looking too, you know, scream at me that I'm a racist, misogynists, you know, evil colonialists, all that stuff. Right, that's that's

not happening. So if you're okay with that, tune in. Check it out if you want, if you want to see up both sides of the story situation, tune in if you just want pure unadulterated freedom hut Buck, you know where to come, my friends, you're already you're already here, right, you know where to hang out with all the rest of us. Um, this is just what I think about everything you know, and influenced by all of you with

your calls, you're writing your emails. I don't have to worry about anyone else feeling, you know, like they're getting their saying from their side. No, freedom Hunt, it's for us. It's a little different TV show, as you know. So if you can't check it out, he'll dot TV Slash Rising is the show I will tell you that I I cannot I cannot overstate at this point how excellent the timing was that Ted Cruz had during our interview. Because I had been pushing here behind the scenes to

wear a tie on TV. I'm like, guys, I'm just more comfortable with tie. If hon to me be on TV, I want to wear a tie. And I sat down and they said, no, no, no, we're more casuals. Morning, I sat down with Ted Cruz and he goes, you know, why can't this young man or they said, He said, we have it on tape. I just forget the exact words. He said, the Hill has to pay you more, you can afford to tie. And we had it on the camera and I was like, you know what, Senator Cruise

is right. So now we're in ties, and I think that's a very good thing. Paul writes Buck, I just watch your debut episode of Rising on Hill Dot TV. Wow. I love the tone you and Crystal Ball are setting. It is so refreshing to see civil political debate without the hate. Excellent job you guys, keep it up. Congratulations, Thank you, Paul. That's that's really what we're going for. You know, we're trying to trying to put it all.

You heard what I said before. I'm not gonna keep repeating myself that how you know both sides and you get it right. That's we We have a specific mission on that show, and that is to bring two different perspectives to the news in a way that is not It's not a steel cage match, and it's not all about rigging it so that inside always wins or loses. That's not how it's supposed to be. Eric Right's, Hey, Buckman not. I'm sure this has been pointed out already,

but just in case. The music on the Rising Show is way loud, and then the volume when you and Crystal are speaking is much lower. Oh wow, I'm watching it now and had not realized the format was where actual issues to be discussed by politically opposed, rational, intelligent people. Brilliant. Hope this thing blows up shields hide Well, thank you, Eric, that's what we're going for. So if it's working, that

makes me very very happy. I gotta I gotta shut down the Freedom Hunt for tonight, my friends, but it'll be back in action tomorrow. Next week is our first week of the Freedom Hute with Buck Sexton podcast. You can subscribe. The link is up. You can go to freedom Houte with Buck Sexton on Apple Podcasts or check that out and until next time, Shields Hid. The FBI calls home title theft and one of the fastest growing

crimes out there. And brace yourself because having your credit card stolen is nothing compared to the hell you're in for once an identity thief takes control of your home's title. You know you've got all your stuff online these days, and there is no bigger better target for the bad guys than American homeowners. You have so much of your equity that they can try to steal by taking out fake loans in your names, and they do it by

getting your home title. Home title Lock stops this. It forms a virtual perimeter around your home's title for just pennies a day. Home title Lock protects my most valuable asset, my home registered now for a free analysis and discover if your home's title has been compromised. That's a sixty dollar value. Free visit home title lock dot com. That's home title lock dot com to check it out now free analysis. Make sure your home title is safe