3-D Insanity

home and abroad. And now we're bringing this battlefield proven liquid directly to your door. Strikeforce Energy Liquid packs, available in four flavors, have zero sugar, zero calories, and are made with only the finest ingredients. For the fuel to power through your toughest fights, simply adds strike Force to sixteen to twenty ounces of water, tea, lemonade, yogurt, even

a nice cold beer. Go to strike Force Energy dot com, enter discount code buck at checkout, and for every packet you buy, we will donate a packet to military members around the globe. Strike Force Energy dot com discount code buck. Because strike Force Energy is the fuel for the fight you are entering. The freedom hunt, the media is in the midst of a tsunami on ignorance when it comes to plastic guns. We will discuss that and also the

latest on the immigrations and customs enforcement debate. Should ice be abolished? Of course not, But there's a lot more to the story than just that. And the Mueller probe is looking like it's gonna be winding down or is it. We've got that and more coming up on The buck Sexton Show. This is the bus Sexton Show where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Mag no mistake, American, You're a great American Again.

The buck Sexton Show begins a Sexton Buck Sexton. The democratization of guns online, giving people the ability to three D print their own guns, would make it feasible for felons, miners mentally ill to have access to firearms. This is about weapons of war being made in people's living rooms and in the living rooms of foreign terrorists abroad. People who want to have these guns will be able to get past security, whether it's airports security, so the risk

of a hijack plane goes up. Political events where there's frequently uh security. Uh, You'll be able to slip past um with a gun and perhaps assassinate a public public figure. Terrorists will want them. Uh, criminals will want them. Coming to a theater near you, coming to a school near you, coming to a sports stadium. These ghost guns are the new wave of American gun violence. You will see them around our streets, in our airport courts, are trained stations.

They are undetectable, untraceable. Forget about the t s A guarding the plane that you board. Welcome to the Buck Sex and Show. Oh my it is It is rare that we can start off the show with so much wrong in such a short period of time. Uh. And we had all these different all these different democrats say, I didn't think this is gonna be such a big deal. People have norn about this for a while. There's been a court case stretching back a long time. And you've

got this is not a new issue. We covered three D gun printing on Real News on the Blaze TV. I want to say, in twenty twelve, so six years ago. I mean, this is not new, folks. This is nothing new and different. It's just the court case about this and the possibility all this information getting out there now and oh my us they're downloading these schematics. I would like to see one of these journalists who is complete

or they're completely apoplectic about this right now. I mean they'll forget about it in today, you know, there'll be a Stormy Daniels interview. They'll focus on that. I would want to know how well they think they do if they try to three D print in a R fifteen. I keep saying, there's they're there are a thousand people who have downloaded how the three D print the a

R fifteen. You can read the studies of this and those of you have who have and a lot a lot of people listening to show not only have extensive background in uh in firearms themselves, but you know are are are true experts in shooting and tactics and the manufacturer firearms. And I am none of those things. But unlike a lot of journalists out there, have actually trained with weapons, lots of different weapons, fired all kinds of guns.

I mean, gosh, I fired. You know, I see everything from a pistol up to uh, you know, squad automatic weapon forty uh forty mike Mike grenade launcher, you know, all kinds of fun stuff. Um, and you know, I sit around here and there, something like Buck, why didn't you get up on the two forty golf? I also got up on the two forty golf ones. Don't worry that happened to um. So, you know, I sit here and I think to myself, what are they really? What is the point they're trying to make it? And I

think that there's a lot. There's a lot going on here about why they're so upset, because when you look at the individual arguments, they don't make any sense. First of all, you've seen a lot of people be clowning themselves today. And when I say people, I don't just mean random strangers. I mean members of Congress, people who are supposed to know the law. No about the law. Right, if you're writing the laws and you're talking about the laws,

hopefully you understand what you're talking about. But a lot of them don't. Really. You get a lot of people out there running around, and certainly journalists. Oh my gosh, when when journalists come to guns, all of a sudden, it's like I just like, I don't understand why people need to have like automatic Bazuka semi auto silencers when like, all you really need is like what Elmer fudd has like the shotgun that you can get bugs bunny with, Like that's all you need. They it's it's because it's

a cultural thing. You know, I grew up as a young kid. I grew up you know, my dad would take me target shooting when I was a kid. I mean, this is just and for so many people, you know, I think I've even posted photos like I'm like ten or eleven years old, you know, holding up my little target. I mean, this is just some of us grow up with this. And and for other people just guns are ikey and I just they don't go with my shoes. I hate them, you know that they don't like guns

because guns are a cultural marker. Well, once you start to see the whole firearms debate, as in the Second Amendment to all of that as just a a proxy fight for all of the cultural stuff that's attached to it, then it starts to make more sense. How can people that know nothing about guns be so opposed to guns? How can people who live in areas where guns are all ready effectively banned hate guns so much and hate lawful gun owners that don't live in areas where guns

are banned. You know, you got people in like Chicago, where you basically can't have a gun. I mean there's some hoops or us. I'll say New York. That's better because I actually know the laws in New York. Well, in the New York City basically can't have a handgun. And you have all these people that I know in New York who live in a place where you really can't legally have a hand I mean, you can get a premise permit. It takes five months and five dollars, and it has to have a trigger guard, and the

rules are absurd. I mean, if somebody breaks into your home in New York and you happen to have a premise permit for a firearm, your most effective self defense tactic is going to be throwing the safe. You have to keep both the gun and the ammunition in separately and locked. Mind you at that burglar. So hopefully you've got an arm like Nolan Ryan or else you're in some trouble. But I know all these people in New York and they don't know the first thing about guns,

you know, they really are. They're just terrified about the scary looking chainsaw bayonets that they've seen, and they don't want to get chopped up by the little chainsaw bayonet, and so they want people to ban all firearms or or as many firearms as possible. You think yourself, well, they already live in a place where you really can't have guns, and they're still gun violence or they're still shooting. There are not very many in New York, a lot

more in Chicago and other places per capita. And they never think that this is an issue where they have to educate themselves. And that's what I find so fasting. And you see this once again with a plastic gun debate. It's just about taking the side that you think your tribe, that your side is on. It doesn't matter how embarrassing your lack of knowledge. Maybe it doesn't matter how incredibly um ignorant you you know, the left is on anyone side. But that just I hate guns, le muc band guns.

I mean, that's the approach. And you see this with with the plastic gun debate. I mean, here's what they what they don't know, and what we should all know. We talked about this because this is now become by the way, and some of you're gonna point out, you know, Buck, the President tweeted out, Yeah, the President tweeted out that he'll look into this seems strange to him. I think when the President gets a little more I don't. I don't think he's been paying very close attention to this.

And that's okay because it's not that important. But when you look at this a few things. First of all, it has been legal from the earliest days of this country to build your own firearms. You can, in fact do that. You're allowed to build a gun. You're not allowed to sell a gun, but you can build a gun, that's right. And a lot of drones like, oh my gosh, you can build a gun, like how like does Michael

Cores make guns? Like I don't understand, Like, you know, they seem to think that there's a way that or that that there's no way that somebody could come up with building a gun on their own. And people have been doing this for a long time. In fact, I saw a fastening video to get today of a guy who uh built a lower received ever for an a R with old aluminum cans that he smelted down. It's pretty pretty cool video. Actually, It's like, Wow, this guy's

got skills. You can build your own firearm. You can do that. The lower receivers, you all know, is the part of it that is considered a gun by the a t of Everything else is cosmetic and an accessory or or an accessory. Rather it's not. But the lower receiver is the gun. That's the gun gun, right, that's the part of it that has a serial number. And and up until this point, you know, there's been all this debate and discussion about what happens when you start

having people looking three D print plastic guns. First of all, I've never even seen a three D printer. Okay, they're very expensive and pretty unwieldy, and not a lot of people have so this is not in common usage yet, and everyone needs to just calm down about that. But you can make and I think it's called the uh forget. There was a name of one that they I wanted to see, the Equalizer. But that sounds like a show with is that with like Kelly Savalis or something? Who's

in the producer Mike? Who's the equalizer? Isn't there? Well, there's a movie out now Denzel Washington. Oh, it's Denzel Washington. I thought it was like an old show. But did they maybe they remitted as the movie. I don't know, I don't know what I'm talking about. I don't watch enough cop shows. Okay, So anyway, the equal what's the

name of the gun that the guy made? You know, the one who's at the center of this, the libertarian, quasi anarchist guy who uh, you know, he made a there's one prototype of a and it's like Cody Wilson, right, yeah, Cody Wilson. Yeah. Well, what's the name of the guy the gun that he made? I want it's like the

Defender or something, but I forget what it's called. But you know, it's this very rudimentary plastic handgun that you can make, and it's big, it's bulky, and let me tell you, most plastic guns that have been made via three D printers have at least a substantial risk of blowing up in your hand. The moment that you're introducing is it called the Defender, the Liberator, the Liberator? I

was close, the Liberator, that's right. So but but but the moment that you're introducing gunpowder into something that's entirely plastic, you know, good luck. Uh. Now, there's so many different layers of this. I mean, the first layers. Is three million guns already in circulation the country, a lot of ways to get guns that are a lot easier than

three D printing them already. Liberals one day will tell us it's easier to get a gun that it is to buy a stick of gum, like it's so easy, and then you know the next day we're being told, oh my gosh, everyone's gonna gone three D print them now because it's like all the gun restrictions. Well, which is it? Which is it? Is it hard to get a gun? Is it too easy to get a gun? Uh?

You know they've they've said it's too easy, and now they're saying, well, it must be kind of hard because everyone's gonna buy super expensive printers and build really crappy firearms on their own when they could just go buy a like really excellent block for you know, something like that and some of your like buckets more like six or seven. It depends where you are, and you know, as it used and are we talking on ninety six? And what are we what are we working with here?

But the plastic gun terror is not something that we need to be nearly is worked up on just based on the technology where it is so far just based on on what you're really able to do, as I said, and no one's gonna be able to build an a R fifteen. I think that is that is successful from scratch. Using this, Now, can people build a lower receiver that will go into an a yard. Yeah, I don't think it's gonna be a very good one. But I'd also note that it's illegal for anyone to have a gun

that they build themselves if they're a prohibited possessor. So the same laws are all in place. So now it's just a question if somebody is legally able to have the metal version of a gun, they could theoretically plastic print a a crappier version of the gun, but maybe they wanted for collectible purposes or something else. And the liberal response to this right now, and the gun control response is what we want to to ban the information and allows you to do this, which creates a whole

other issue, not just content. Two chip away at the Second Amendment. Liberals now, because they hate guns so much, are willing to create a massive loophole in the First Amendment, it seems, and we will get into we we have more of this. Whatever happened to liberals and the First Amendment. I thought, free speech, what's all that's right? Not only they not wanted on college campuses and safe spaces and

deep platforming and all the rest. Now they're worried about information about how to build a gun, which a lot of you are like, Buck, I know how to build a gun. I had. I had a listener years ago. He had an FFL. I mean he was a professional, but you know he He's like, I want to send Glenn a custom built a R fifteen that fits into a briefcase. And where I was like, well, you know, I don't know. I figured maybe maybe he was, you know, and Glenn I saw him one day all in air

like assembling it. I'm like, oh, I guess the custom build they are got through. You know, you got a lot of gun experts in this audience, but this plastic gun I thing. Man, they're just they're terrified of of weapons that look. I'll walk through some of how Yeah, Okay, the metal issue is their metal on these we're metal detectors and everything else. So we'll talk metal detectors, we'll talk First Amendment. There's some additional layers of this that

I think, because you're gonna hear a lot about this. Now. This has become a thing because the media is freaked out about it. It's now a thing we'll discuss. Uh. And it's also a lot more interesting than manaforts taxes, which they're all obsessed with now, so manaforts attacks cheat allegedly. Okay, there are a lot of people. We'll get to some of that. Eight four four five eight four, buck, can you hear from them? A gunsmith's out there if you've

got thoughts on this whole three D printing thing? Have you? Have you ever fired a plastic three D printed gone to be very curious to hear from you. I'm guessing it's probably a crappy experience, but maybe it's fun. I don't know. I wouldn't do it. If someone handed me the the Liberator and said, buck, fire this, I wouldn't do it. It's not worth it. I wanna get a shard of hard plastic in my eye. Of course i'd

be shooting with ipro, but that's a whole other thing. Alright, team eight four to five, we will be right back. We now live in a world where a three D printer cartridge has become as deadly as a gun cartridge. And that's because these downloadable firearms are available even to those who could not pass a background check. It's the ultimate gun loophole. Why buy them if you can print them at home instead? Why why buy them when you can get a cartridge. It's like a guy's gotta be

where is he from? Up in mass Is that where he's from? Where I'm with the College of the Massachusetts cartridge? Uh? That was I don't want to some member of Congress. I forget which one he's talking about this? Oh, Senator, oh, Senator Markey. Is he from? Where is he from? No, he can't be. Why is he saying cartridge? He's from the north the mess Oh yeah, yeah, he's got to be from it all the only people say cartridge from messagery. All right, that's what I thought. All my people in

Boston say, hell, what's up everybody up there? Uh? So back to uh oh wait, we got a caller wants to talk about this before we get the break. Jody and salt Lake, Hello, hey, buck Ossy talk. So not only do we have First Amendment implications, but I thought this um, this uh shuttlement, I guess is what you would call it. Between Cody Wilson and the d J

through Defense distributed his company. I thought part of it was that an A R fifteen was no longer designated as a military style gun or an assault gun, but that it was a sporting gun by definition in the settlement. And if I'm wrong, please correct me. But I thought that was part of it. So I don't know. I'll have I'll hand that off to Yeah, Jody, I'll hand that off the producer Michael. Actually don't know off top of my head if that's in any way involved in this.

I do know that one of the fixes that they came up with for the Liberator was that you had to put a metal piece in it so that you know, because this is one of the problems every saying oh now there will be you'll be able to sneak these on the planes and get through metal detectors with them. A few things about that. One is is ammunition is

still metal generally. I've yet to find anybody who can come up with a plastic a fully plastic cartridge and uh and bullet right, So I don't think that's I don't know, it's not as easy as just well, I'm just gonna have a plastic gone and metal bullets and it's not gonna bean. You know, you can maybe have a piece of plastic that has no bullets in it.

That's one part of it. It's also bulky because to have the to be able to handle the you know, for the plastic gun not to absolutely blow up in your hands, it's got to be a pretty big piece. It's not like this is small, so it's not easy to it's not as easy to conceal, at least not yet. Now. The technology, Jodie may advance and get better, and we may get to a point where the plastics and the polymers are so strong that this is not really an issue. But then we get to the whole notion of well,

you're gonna ban the information? What is what is that gonna do? It's already out there right now, you're just anyway, let's Jodie, thank you for calling in OSS squad where we're gonna deal with this part of this, the First Amendment implications of this. But folks, this is getting bigger with every passing hour here today that they've decided to

make this I think abolished ice. They realized was a loser of an issue for them, so they're not trying to get the left wing base fired up over the ban on plastic guns and three D printing of plastic guns. Let's talk about the First Amendment implications and uh, then we got a whole lot more. So stay with me. He's holding the line for America, buck Sexton his back.

I don't know what liberals really still will defend at this point other than illegal immigrants, abortion, identity politics, class warfare. You know what, what really gets? What can you count on them? What will liberals say? Even if I don't like it, I'll defend it because I understand the underlying principle. The First of Hendment doesn't fall into that category anymore,

It just doesn't. They believe in deep platforming, which is just a dressed up way of saying preventing people from being able to speak in places where they're invited guests. But they don't like the ideas. And I heard this. I saw this link of a of a professor Jordan Peterson from Toronto. I saw this link of a speech that he gave. It was a speech for a while ago. I mean, Professor Peterson is a very thoughtful, interesting guy.

I would note that we had him as a guest on the Buck Sex and Show before like anybody even knew who he was. And now he's, you know, of course, gotten huge, and he's all over the country, all over the world, and congrats to him for for doing the work to get there. But I saw this speech he gave a while ago, and and I was because this is what I do. I'll tell you one of the things that I like on the weekends. Maybe this is my way of nording out when I'm not reading history books.

And my Cortez history book is going very well, by the way, I'm really enjoying that. But I listened to speeches given by UH academics thinker as people that are people that I respect or even sometimes opposite people that I disagree with, but want to hear their arguments so that I can slice and dice those arguments when I come on radio later. So I like to listen to

speeches as I'm doing things around the house. And I was unpacking this weekend from my move down to d c X. I'm now a full time swamp resident, folks, I know for crazy UH. And I was listening to Peterson and there was this noise that I kept hearing, and I thought, oh, man, you know, this is what's this bad audio quality we've got during this Peterson speech. Couldn't they couldn't the University of Wherever do a better job recording this? I mean? And then I realized, Oh,

now that's not an audio quality problem. That is a pack of morons who had been removed from the removed from the auditorium, who were outside pounding on the doors for the whole speech. Folks. I mean, you know, just pounding on this thing whenever they could, as long as they could. Pounding on doors to stop someone from being heard in an auditorium didn't stop him from being heard. It just meant that you heard this weird rumbling sound

in the background. It's like, this is a really this is like a commercial for the regressive and intolerant left today. They and they think they're heroic for doing this, so they have no real devotion to free speech anymore. Culturally, progressives and leftists do not believe in free speech anymore. They don't, they don't. They They have all these carve outs and cutouts and uh and back backdoors on this.

You know, there's hate speech, and there's uh, there's deep platforming, and they're safe spaces, and there's all this stuff that they used to essentially shut down speech that they don't like, and I would know that. You know, for a while, my opinion on all this had been that we should never we shouldn't engage in the same tactics of name and shame that they do. And some people are saying, no, buck, mutually assured destruction is the only way to get them

to stop. So you've got to go through the tweets of of prominent leftists and and call them out for their hypocrisy, because if you don't inflict pain on them, they'll never stop. I don't know if that will get them to stop either, but you know, I understand why people are willing to try it, because the left has really embraced this idea of of destroying people's careers in their livelihoods by in many cases misconstruing what they've said and and finding ways to shun them from the public space.

What gets me thinking about all this, of course, here we are wherever he's talking about pre venting three D gun printing information from being able to be shared, and there's this in court right now, and there's all these issues, uh, surrounding it, and ultimately what they're really talking about here is stopping the passage of information from one person to another. They're doing it under the guise of anything you put

on the internet is a four. It's a say it has to do with and my terminology here the specifics don't hold me to the specifics of the word in because I forget. But it's a essentially a foreign export restriction that by putting the ability to make a three D gun online, you're violating export restrictions on firearms. So they are treating the knowledge about how to build a firearm as the same as a firearm. Which where does

that stop and start? By the way, Yeah, and you look back at some of the cases in the past where people I think, uh, somebody printed a manual about how to be a hit man and then someone used it in the murder. I heard about that. Today you get all these lawyers, and all these lawyers are popping

up on tv DA talking about this. I saw a piece that there was a guy who put the the basics of how to build a hydrogen bomb online and then they realized and they wanted to prosecute him or make him stop of course, once you put it online, it's online, right, there's no there's no put in the the genie back in the bottle. By the way, is is genie in the bottle? Is that a Is that a microaggression? Can we can? We got a ruling on that, producer, Mike,

Are we allowed? Um, he's he's busy answering phone calls? I think yeah, he's he's busy. The lines are lit up. Every wants everyone wants to talk about three D guns. I'll get you guys in in a second. You gotta gotta be patient. I got I got a lot to say, and I'm greedy with the microphone today. So where was I? Oh? Yeah, you can't put the genie back in the bottle. Back to my microaggression. And they're trying to stop the spread of this information. That's not gonna work, folks, It's just

not gonna work. And in fact, what they do here is create a greater interest in this. They create a sense that you know, this is now forbidden information, forbidden knowledge, which means a lot of people are just gonna want to download it just because. But what could you extend this to beyond? You know, we've had this debate before is the society. By the way, the hydrogen bomb guy, it was all already online. He just pulled it together.

So I don't think they were able to really you know where we're gonna start throwing people in prison for setting Wikipedia. I don't. I don't think so. Um. I think there's one of there, one or two other cases. But how let's let's really think about this for a moment. If we take the libs seriously here, which we should not do because their libs and we we we prefer to own the libs. But if we take them seriously, what about information online? What about detailed information online about

um pathogens? Uh? And what about microbiology things that can be weaponized that are far more terrifying, I would note than anything you could do with a plastic three D three D printer. Do we restrict that information too? What about the basics of building explosives. We're gonna start to throw people in prison for downloading the anarchist cookbook. We're going to tell people that the basics of chemistry that are necessary. I mean, I there was a time when

I knew how to build homemade bombs. I was trained actually how to build a homemade Bob had forgotten. Now it's you know, I didn't have to build me any thankfully, so um, but I you know, it's it's something that I had familiarity with. It was something that I did train with. And I will say that firearms training was always was always there was a part of me that, you know, shooting guns. I like shooting guns. But bomb

making is I always put me on edge. I I did not you know, handling the C floor and handling the uh what is it? The T A T P and all this stuff that was not The detonators in particular, detonators not something you want to make any missteps with. They're real small. But get me the detonators. Let's see who can get that? Quote? By the way, where are my detonators? Why do you will a couple of you will a couple or true quote ninjas? But I don't I don't know how many people are actually gonna be

able to lay into that one. Um, And I'd give you more, but then I would give it away. So but we're gonna criminalize that. The spread of information online, that's the very troubling you know, we only do that in very specific circumstances. You do it in the case

of some national security information. But I would note only if you are a party to the legal um uh receipt of that national security information, meaning that if if you put national security information out there that you have access to, you go to prison if other people take that information though and run of it. And they didn't never have a clearance, so they didn't never have a you know, a a a government non disclosure agreement that

they had to sign. They're not gonna get in trouble, so they know even with that, and then the the other one and the big, you know, the big bright line that we have in society now is on you know, on underage pornography. That's a place where people will just say it's information, But the spread of that information is a is a very very serious federal crime. And it's because of the the continued victimization that he that happens through the spread of those of those images and all

the rest of it. Um. But we don't do that with weapons, we don't do that with tactics. We don't do that with information that can be misused. And he's in the and and it's up to the user how it is misused and That's why that you get to a very fundamental debate about liberty and the individual in the state here with whether or not you can say that the government will restrict this, and this is not

Remember this is not government information. So they really have they have no right under national security grounds because they're not the originators of this, they have no right to restrict it. They're telling private citizens. You can't tell people about this thing. And the thing is a plastic firearm, which, by the way, you know you can make a plastic gun without a three D printer. Folks, This is not revolutionized it. Maybe it makes it a little easier. You

gotta spend a lot of money get the printer. But this is not the the terrifying moment in tom that I was like, Oh, it's gonna be used. I'm seeing who was it, uh, some member Congress saying it's gonna help terrorists. I just saw this. This is a flash that got sent to me the last few minutes. Oh it's gonna help terrorists. Um, you know, terrorists have been trying to come up with bombs. I can get through

scanners and stuff for a long time. By the way, anybody scanner in an airport the ones you go through now that they'll pick, there will be a big bulge on you now where you're trying to get your plastic firearm through. But this is not new. There are lots of ways you can mold the manipulate plastic that don't

evolve a three D printer. And think of the precedent that we would be setting if all of a sudden we were saying that because information can be acted upon and then misused, we're going to have federal restrictions lists we're gonna want. We're gonna send people to prison for printing three D H three D gun specs online. We really gonna do that? How are we gonna enforce this?

And of course it's gonna pop up overseas countries where they either don't have the will or the ability to regulate the internet as tightly as as we do, and the ability to prosecute people like we do. They're they're not gonna be able to stop this. So it's just folks, it's anti gun hysteria. And it all goes back to the stuff that I've been telling you about how most anti gun opposition you come across in the media and from people on the left is much more about antipathy.

It's much more about the dislike that those people have for the kind of people who own guns, then for guns and violence and all the rest of it, because they don't like, you know that the coastal elitist types. They don't like you know, guys named you know, Billy Bob, who I want to just have a room full of

shotguns or something. I mean, they have this very caricatured view of what if, you know, they don't realize, they don't even know that there's, gosh, I don't know, fifty or sixty million gunners the United States roughly something like that. They don't even know. Uh, they have no understanding. And what's worse, in some ways, they don't even care to understand. They're not even embarrassed when they get this stuff really wrong.

When you see journalists who are saying, oh my gosh, people can make their own firearms now, it's like they already anyone can already make their own firearms. It's just a question if this is an additional technology that would allow it and allow you to make it not a very good gun, by the way, and all the same restrictions apply around this gun and around a plastic gun, as would apply around everything else. You know, do I think the technolog she's gonna get to a point where

the guns will be pretty good. Yeah, that's gonna happen. But we also realized that prohibition, prohibition of firearms is an unrealistic goal in this country anyway. So there's that eight four four five eight four four nine. Buck your thoughts on this, and then the Mueller probe, Oh my, so much more coming your way. Stay with me, all right, lines are lit. Let's talk three D gun folks. We've got Shawn in North Carolina who has some real expertise

in three D printing. Sean, thanks for calling in. Hey, buck um die hard by the way, but the accent was a little white um on the quote. Okay, you're correct on the quote. To tell me about three D printing, you know about this, I'm told so, Yeah, I I make I make tools for in special education, like education, national tools for people to use, and so I spent a lot of time three D printing things, everything from my lightsaber to like Greek statues a lightsaber what yeah, yeah, wow, Okay,

it doesn't work. I mean, yeah, I figured, buddy, I like it. Tho'll go ahead. Um. And the thing is, whenever you take one of these plans and you put them in, it always prints every object internally hollow. So if you try to just take a plan offline, if you didn't know what you're doing with settings and everything else with the printer, it will print it internally hollow. So there's not going to be enough material behind the

explosive end of the bullet to do anything. It's just gonna blow out the back and blow your face off like a really bad dip gun. You'd be better off modifying a cap gun from the Yes, you're telling me that this whole plastic guns, they're not even good guns that people will be making on this thing. Well yeah, and and and the plastics shatter really easily with any pressure.

I mean, it's just it's just bloody dangerous. But it was funny when someone sent me an email asking me if we could make it in a college department and watching everyone's just like heads catch on fire when they realized, like, oh, it was hilarious about three or four years ago, So it was it's old dudes. Um. And yeah, I'm I'm a Pacifist and a Quaker, and I would look at the thing and go, that's stupid. See that. The quaker with three D printing expertise says, no big deal, folks,

Hey Sean, thank you for calling him man. She'll sorry. I appreciate it. Let's take Rob in Mississippi. Hey, Rob shell time, Bob. Sorry I've read that wrong, Bob. Good to have you. Well Rob, Bob, close it off. What's up? Same thing? Well, she'll tie, she'll tie to you. I can't tell you how easy it is to make a zip come. I grew up in an orphanage in Chicago, and we made zip comes all the time, and none of them ever blew up. The key to it is use a low powder ground. Yeah. Up close, he'll kill

somebody very easily. I mean people. The people forget that. We used to go to the old hair airport where the rabbits are all deaf, and and you know, go hunting because we needed the meat. Believe it or not. Wait, you used to hunt rabbits with your zip gun because they were deaf from the planes at O'Hare Airport. It's quite a story. Yeah, you could sneak up behind them if you were down landing. You know, this is amazing you know, deeps hitting them with a rock, you know, so, yeah,

you're kicking an old school How do you mean? How how quickly could I if I gave you them a cheerus? How quickly could you assemble a zip gun? Rob? Bob? Sorry? Ten minutes? Yeah, maybe even less and it would work constantly for a very long time. And do you have but you have to use metal parts in a zip gun? Right? Oh? Yeah?

You take a copper tube the size of you, put it in a black pipe of galvanized pipe, and then your mouth that with some you boats to a flat piece of wood, and your mouth that piece of wood to a handle, which is simple screws. Take a piece of spring steel, throw it on the back and and screw it into the wood and then bend it down and pull it back. All right, Well, Bob, thanks for sharing the expertise. My friend gonna talk to you Shields High team. Our two is coming upon us. It's gonna

be amazing. A lot of you listen to this show are fortunate enough to have uh furry friends, to have a dog or a cat. Uh, and you got a yard. But then you get a problem that comes along with all that, right, because your dog may decide that it's time to dig and digging something. That's some dogs just like to do. It's in their nature, right, it's instinct. You're not gonna train the dog to stop digging, but you can stop them from being able to dig under

your fence in the yard. That's what dig defense does. But you dig Defense extends the protection of your fence underground. You can install it at the base of any fence to protect your property and your pet. All you need is a hammering gloves, no more chasing after fin oh, after he gets out of the yards. Runner on the whole neighborhood calls in mayhemmer right right now. Dig Defense is available online at Lows Tractor Supply Menard's Wayfair and Stop the dig dot com and now for the month

of July visit stop the dig dot Com. Use promo code buck for ten percent off. That's stop the dig dot Com and use promo code buck for ten percent off. Your buck Sexton mission to coding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a great American Again. This is the Buck Sexton Show. Activity Analyst. No the panic over three D printed guns, continues, My friends, this joe Us happened, breaking news for all of you

as we are on air. A federal judge in Seattle blocks release of blueprints for three D printed guns. Let me say, this is stupid, this is lawless, this is counterproductive. But we are dealing with liberals, so I guess that's all we should expect. I thought we were gonna move on other topics. But because of this breaking news here about this federal judge, we got a little more to dig into here. I didn't give you all of the

background for how we got to this point. As I mentioned you, I I interviewed when I interviewed Cody Wilson for the first time on real news in the Blaze TV about his Defense Distributed project and Defense Distributed back was under the Obama administration found to be in violation of the International International Traffic in Arms Regulations or IR. I don't know, you say it because it had published

downloadable plans for three D printed guns. Folks, those files and producer Mike which need to be the break He's like, what do they think that? This isn't closing the barn doors after the horses have left. This is like the horses have gone off to other counties, had more horses, had nice horse lives. Some of them ended up getting sent to the glue factory because they got so old, I mean, and then closing the barn doors is way gone. And I was kind of sad about the glue factory.

I should you know, I like I like the horses. Yeah. Here here, here's what Cody Wilson was saying about his project play. Who have more than twenty states trying to block you from making these directions available online? So what do you expect to happen? They won't win. We've already published the file, so I don't know how they could give me to stop publishing the funds. President Trump tweeted

that he's looking into three D plastic guns. He said, this doesn't seem to make And so what's your response to the President. I don't sell three D guns, So the President will understand that in time. Are you worried that the government will reverse its decision? Like I told you, aority uploaded the plans. I mean, you know it's the ship is sale. It's publicly any information now, it's irrevocable. No one can take it back. Believe an access information

is ever tremendously negative or a bad thing. I know that people can use information for bad things, but this isn't a justification to what stop a publisher from speaking. He's a smart guy, folks, Now, he knows his stuff. He's always stayed within the law, by the way, at all of this, he's been very very you know, does not sell these things? Is you know he never gets caught up and not having an FFL license or you know,

he knows what he's doing. And here we are with the fact that the files are download over a hundred thousand times. All those people could have posted them all over the world. We don't know. You can't stop this. What the heck is this all about them? What do people think they're accompan wishing here? So but back just for the background here, so we're all on the same page.

So the International Traffic in Arms Regulation, they were saying that by putting information about how to build a gun online, that was effectively legally the same as if you were trying to like send guns overseats and they were stopping you preemptively from doing that, saying you can't sell guns overseas. You can't put this information online because then it allows people overseas to build guns, to build their own guns,

which is quite a stretch. And so then there was a legal battle over this, and of course you get the Brady Center and every town gun safety and all all these different groups are all all getting fired up over this thing. But then there was a settlement that was reached where the Defense Distributed which is Cody Wilson's organization,

was going to be able to freely publish their gun designs. Again. Um, But according to a release from the Washington State Attorney General's office, the agreement, which wasn't made publican Chulduly tenth, was done in an arbitrary and capricious fashion by the Trump administration and violates the Administrative Procedure Act. This is

all from the Seattle Times. There is no indication in the settlement agreement or else where that any analysis, study, or determination was made by the government defendants in consultation with other agencies, says the release from the Internal General's Office. Folks, this is lawlessness, Okay, this is this is not up to some judge somewhere to weigh in on and say, yeah, I don't think the federal government, in reaching this settlement did a good enough job, so I'm gonna block this.

You know, do do federal judges think they can overrule anything that the federal government does? Is that now the new anyone federal judge can say no, you can't go to war with that country because I say so, because I don't think it's a good idea. This is what

you get this. You know, you look out at the Ninth Circuit and some of these some he's very liberal, uh, some of these very liberal appellate courts, and you get these guys who on gals, these judges who think that there their role is to be hashtag resistance and to prevent the American people from having to suffer the consequences that come from the elected officials that they voted for. That's what's going on here. You got all these different

states that are suing. To quote, the multi state lawsuit alleges the settlement between Wilson, his company and the Trump administration did not get the approval of the Department of Defense and didn't give Congress thirty days notice before agreeing to allow Defense Distributed to begin publishing three D gun files by creating a special exemption for Wilson's company at the in the ETAR. The lawsuit also says the settlement in fringes on states rights to regulate firearms, therefore violating

the Tenth Amendment. I mean, this is just kitchen saying pathetic stuff. This is they're just throwing everything at this. What do they think they're going to accomplish. This is creating a massive gun control straw man and then gleefully dousing it in gasoline and setting it on fire and thinking you're doing something useful. Hundreds of thousands of people already have these files around the world. It's the Internet. Technology is passing by these status progressives in their desire

to regulate everything. This is amazing. A temporary restraining order from this judgment for this just happened. Federal judge in Seattle's put out a temporary restraining order to stop the release of these three D blueprints. Remember this is Cody Wilson, the whole organization. At this point, they're just trying to make a point. The point is the government can't just control information because it doesn't like what some people will

do with that information. That's not that's not a a a legal justification for censorship, which is what we're talking about here that would survive strict scrutiny. You know, so this is this is a failure of the liberals are failing here on every level. This isn't the threat they think it is. They're willing to throw the First Amendment under the bus for this. They don't understand the real implications of this technology. They can't stop this technology. They're

just it's just flailing. It's just this, this this rage effort here. Mike, who who do we have? We got lines a little over the place I wanted. We got a lot of people want to call it on this one? Who do we havent? Wants to talk guns? All right? Bill in uh? Bill in Mississippi? What's up? Oh in Florida? Sorry, live Oak, Florida. My bad? Go ahead, Bill, that's okay. I don't make any difference, you know, these stages, Uh, they can do what they want with them as far

as trying to pull stuff off. But it's gonna get over ruled anyway. But you know, make weapons and I worked in the apartment corrections and stuff like that, and they could make a weapon out of an apen. You know, all they had to do is get ahold of a bullet that's not a big deal. The governor back here about till I'm gonna say about twenty five years ago. Uh he he is on a podium and the Florida Highway Patrol at HP making sure of his security. He's come up with a spud gun. Now do you know

what a spud gun is? Uh? Is it a gun that fires potatoes? That you're exactly correct? Okay, that's a thing. I didn't know that was a thing. Yeah, And it's very quiet. It's like you know, if you if you shot somebody with a bow and arrow with people seem to forget about that type of thing. Those are silent, silent killers, you know. So it's you know, there's a lot of weapons, a lot of a lot of ways to hurt people. And I was saying this before. Why

was you I was trained in how to make you know. Look, it's very I don't want to get into this right because people getting yell at me. But they are very easy ways to make the equivalent of homemade napalm, to make essentially a sticky, viscous Molotov cocktail that not only will it explode on impact and spread as an incendiary, but it's very hard to get off. It kind of sticks to you almost like a like a gelatinous, super hot plato. It's not hard to make it all, folks,

It's it's a couple of ingredients. I've worked in law enforcement. A matter of fact, I'm fixing to go down to uh the border down there wants to dust settles when they quit fighting all this stuff to work for international customs enforcement. That's what ICE is. A lot of people don't even understand the definition of it, but that's what

it is, international custom enforcement. So I'm fixing the head that way out of Florida to hit to New Mexico Arizona line down there, just slightly north of the border, and watch and see what happens, you know, which I will get paid well for that. Well there we go. Well good, you know when you make that track. Good luck, my friend, and thank you for thank you very much for your call man, producer, Mike. Who else we I'm in my my call screens down here, so I gotta

ask him who else we have on the lines? We had, we had everything lit before we enter the break, and then I talked for a lot, I know, so people get bored of me talking or not bored of me talking to get bored of hole. Hopefully that doesn't happen they get bored holding while I am talking. Um, But look at this this gun thing, this this three D pretty gun thing. It's just another another instance of the knee jerk and reactionary anti gun view that is so

so dominant on the left. Now, this information is already out there, it's all over the place. You're not going to stop it. It's not even particularly valuable or dangerous information. And the fact that the Obama administration took this position before is preposterous. And all this is doing is highlighting the work that Cody Wilson has done and teaching a lot of people out there, a whole lot more about

three D printed guns. This is gonna make it a a form of kind anti status protests now to learn how to make your three D printed gun. And what are they gonna do. They're gonna start throwing people in prison for downloading a file? Does that? Is that what's gonna happen. They're gonna download a file about how to build an inanimate object and you're gonna go to prison for that. Now, how do they think they're gonna stop

this it's it's good. By the way, you know what's gonna happen, And Mike, I'll make a prediction right now, someone's gonna, you know, just print this is gonna share the link in a very public place just as a as an extended solitary finger to the federal government. Right now, That's what's gonna happen, right I mean, why not anyway, you know, Wiki leaks, one of these organizations will just

put something up like here you go, information terrorism. That's what they're gonna say, eight four or four nine eight to five eight four four buck. I will talk about the Mueller probe a little bit at least, we'll get into that. So stay with me. I know you want

a home security system, and you want the best. You want something that will cover you top to bottom and you don't have to worry about getting locked in us some long term contract or being with some kind of shady company that's just about squeezing dollars out of you instead of keeping your dollars safe and your family safe at home. Simply safe checks all the boxes, folks. It's simply the best home security system out there. Gives you fantastic protection. It's easy to use. You know, I've known

these guys a long time. Simply safe you suld just be five guys working together, and they came up with this idea because one of them had been burglarized. So they know what's at stake here. They really do. The system is easy to use. I've got it at home, and let me tell you it is so user friendly. You download an app. Everything everything you need to do you can do remotely. Right, go order it yourself now, go to simply safe dot com slash buck. That's simply

safe dot com slash buck. My listeners will get free shipping and free returns are going to simply safe dot com slash buck. So I believe we'll come into it again. And so I'm talking to some people don't involve in the original part of the of the investigation. I thank John for all of the cooperation he gave them, because he puts us in a position where we don't have to cooperate. We gave them one point four million documents,

thirty two witnesses. President Trump has answered every question and now they look at his tweets to investigate him for trying to influence structurejics by tweet I prosecutive structure of justice. If they're gonna do structure justice by tweet to impeach your president, God bless us, because I've seen this game played many times before. Uh, there's a stall game going on at d J and FBI. They're trying to stall as much as they can, hoping and betting that Republicans

would lose the House in the fall. And if that happens, then you essentially it shuts down everything. Rod Rosenstein will not be held in contempt, FBI will not be held accountable. All these investigations will shut down, Everything will be buried, and you'll be left with media narratives saying, oh, what the public can't read, what you really can't read, what's locked out? That's the really bad stuff against Carter Page and the Republicans and the Trump campaign. That's why the

sooner the president he classifies this, the better. And I think the American people need to understand how important it's going to be to get out and vote in this election. It's very important. Stuff from Congress of Newness there, very important. I've been saying this too. Don't think that just you know, you had Rudy there starting off with the whole Mueller and the President shouldn't sit down with them. But also

people are saying that that it's coming. You know, he said that he thinks it's coming to an end, and then really, you know, let's say in the next six months the Mueller probe is coming to an end. But that's not that's not enough for a lot of us. It's not just that we want the Muller probe to come do it. I want answers. I want to know how it got to this point, how it got to this place. I want to know what is blacked out

in that phase application that Congress. The new nest told me to my face is as bad, if not worse than the stuff about the dossier. Well, what could that be? The you know stuff that We'll make it very clear that there was political targeting going on, that there was abuse of power. There'll be no way around it. And people have to come to grips with the reality that the FBI was weaponized by the Hillary Clinton campaign using foreign cutouts and foreign sources against Trump. I don't just

want this thing to go away. I also want justice. And justice means a full accounting. It means answers as to how we got to this point, don't You're gonna see CNN it's just going to kind of slink away from this whole thing too once the alert pro wraps up and act like they haven't been essentially promising their audience that there would be this massive Russia conspiracy proven that involved the Trump administration. Don't let them get away with this. Oh, look at all the indictments of the

Russian trolls. It's it's nothing and it doesn't mean anything. It's meaningless. Yeah, how many how many Russians have been hauled in the US courts to face face justice for setting up some stock poppet accounts on Twitter? Answer? Zero. That's not going to change anytime soon either. So this has been a whole lot of smoke screen, a whole lot of sore loserism about Hillary. And that's what motivates this, Not Oh, it's about democracy and defending the country and

the institutions are under assault. That's not what motivates this. You can pretend that that's what's necessary. They've pretended they've created this this top cover for themselves under that whole pretense, but the reality is that they want to bog down the Trump administration, which they've been somewhat successful in doing, not entirely, and they want revenge for Hillary's loss. That's what is driving this, and so that's what's at stake here.

I'm not even you know what. Maybe we'll talk more about Manafort tomorrow. The most interesting thing about the Manaphort trial so far is that the guy spent fifteen thousand dollars on an Ostrich jacket. Producer Mike, if I gave you sixty million dollars tomorrow for hanging with shady Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs. I do not think that an Ostrich jacket for fifteen grand would make it into the producer

Mike budget. I don't think so. No. Yeah, maybe maybe a crocodile coat, kind of like Morpheus and the Matrix. That was pretty boss, you know what I'm talking about. He were like that or allegating, not crocodile, allegant whatever, some kind of like lizard skin coat. That's some next level stuff. But an Ostrich I don't even know what an Ostrich coat would look like this, folks. This was read out today the prosecutors to really just make Manif look like a greedy s O. B. They they talked

about his fifteen thar Ostrich coat. Think of all the ostriches that went into making that. Oh no, you know what ostriches are mean? Tell you that not nice. They're big, they're fast, they'll peck at you, they'll kick you. So you know, I think they raced them in some parts of the world to their ostrich races or is it

EMUs they race. I can't keep it all straight. I know, I'm an amateur zoologist here in the Freedom Alright, alright, immigration, I've got folks, I've got some stuff to tell you about immigration and ICE and abolist ICE that that I don't think you'll hear anywhere else, and it's very, very important, So please stay with me. That's coming up in just a moment. Yeah, we're not gonna provide them additional information

so they can go out and round up people. If I could abolish ICE, I would, um, But we can abolist this contract and we are. That's the uh. The Philadelphia mayor there, Jim Kenney producer, Mike, Do you know this guy? I do? What's what's his what's his deal? He's a progressive, leftist liberal mayor of the city of Philadelphia. So so you're telling me he's he's incompetent, makes promises

that he can't follow through on, and basically panders to people. Yes, yes, and yes, I had a feeling feeling well, but I guess at least he roots for the Eagles, right, So we've got that going. That's in question to me. I don't know Mike. Mike would even give him that one. Now. It's like in the beginning there he was singing about it's a little hard to hear, but he was singing about being named the sanctuary city. And in the video

he's actually dancing. Wow. Yeah, very interesting. You know, I saw I had to talk today with a a very see. He was actually acting Director of Immigrations and Customs Enforcements, So I can tell you exactly who was under the Obama administration now. Now, Immediately when I sat down and talk this guy, I figured, okay, because I was doing an interview, and I figured he's he's an Obama error guy, so he's gonna now he you know, he was a little more favorable to some of the Obama decisions than

I would be, if I get that. But he also gave some very interesting context. Let me tell you some important things. Here are some things you're not gonna hear from probably anybody else about what's going on really with this whole abolished Ice movement and all the rest of it. First of all, this guy agreed, and he was acting ICE director, so I'm not surprised to say this. He's the whole abolished Ice chant. Thing is this is for idiots. This is this is idiotic. This makes no sense, It's

not serious, and it's really unfair, you know. It's it's you've got people who are maligning immigrations and customs enforcement, which involves a lot of veterans. I think about thirty veterans in terms of the overall organization. And and then there are there are two other areas that where I was talking to this guy and about the whole Abolished Ice movement that I thought were really interesting. And he's a this guy have been a lawyer for a long time. He knows the ins and ounce of it. So I

was really able to push him on some stuff. So here's the thing there, there's the whole notion of catching release in sanctuary cities. Let me deal with the what's really going on with catching release? So he says that there is a He said that that the policy of the abodministration was not you know, there wasn't the same scale of people who are coming over. So that's one thing, um. But what what Obama was was doing was that they were giving people because I said, look, no one shows up.

What Obama was doing was, hey, okay, we'll process you and we'll give you a court age to determine your asylum claim, but you get to stay in the United States if you come with a kid while we make a determination about your claim. And I said, well, come on, man, like no one's showing up for those hearings. He said, actually, that's not really true. People will show up for the hearings. And I and then I pushed a little more, said, okay, hold on a second, buddy. Remember this was Obama's acting

Immigrations and Customs Enforcement director. Is very senior guy in Obama said okay, well, hold on a second. How quickly do those hearings happen? He goes, well, four or five years out a lot of the time. That's okay, Okay, now we're getting somewhere. So the Obama see that this is what they do, and this is why we can't have a serious discussion with the Omama people about immigration.

This guy, he answered the questions. I'll give him credit, but you see the hid in the hand here of what Obama was really up to, what is administration was really trying to accomplish. They say that they're just letting people wait for their hearings. They say that there's a high percentage of people showing up for the hearings. What they don't want to say and they hope no one figures out, and journalists are all, I supologize, they're crying

with anything. Well, they hope that they don't figure out is that they delay the hearing so far into the future that no person realistically and he admitted this. He admitted this, no person could believe that there would be a deportation of anyone who had been in the country and not committed additional crimes after four or five years

if they showed up to their asylum hearing. So you see, what it allows them to do is create the ties into America and the backstory where once again they're dreamers or parents of dreamers or parents of U. S. Citizens because they've had kids in the last four or five years. They allow that's the scam. I see it now. No one else talking about this, no one else focused in on this problem. I thought this was so interesting because you know that that you know, Obama is a pro

illegal guy. The Democrats their mindset, they are pro illegal immigration. They're not trying to limit it. They're not trying to stop it. They're trying to cover it up and turn a blind eye to it. But they want more of it. You know. The Democrats are like the kid who opens the back door to his parents house and wants as many of his buddies to come up and party, you know, in the in the apartment over the garage as possible, but doesn't want mom and dad to know how many

people over right. I mean, that's what Democrats are doing with illegal immigration. They're just waving everybody into the house party. When mom and dad aren't looking, it's like, oh no, I'm I'm not inviting people over and that. So there you go. That's you know that, there are so many ways they've they've been scamming the American people, and that's really what Obama is doing a immigration. When you dig into it, the whole thing of Obama Deporter in chief,

that never made any sense right, it didn't make any sense. Oh, that's right. The way they created a perception of Obama as strict on the border, as the quote Deporter in chief was to say that if border patrol, oh that's right, they patrol the border. Immigration and customs enforcement has a separate function about law enforcement and processing and immigration courts. Uh. But border patrol catches somebody and then turns them away at the border. That's considered a deportation under the Obama

era rules. So that's just increases that, you know, that just increases their numbers without actually increasing any enforcement or anything else, and just changing the definition. So there's the perception of of additional scrutiny and strictness of the border. Okay, So the delay though with the hearings that was I said, Okay, now it all makes sense. Folks. You know this listing.

You think after some who's gonna go in front of immigration judge after five years of being in the country claiming that they need asylum from Central America, do you think these immigration judges are gonna say, sorry, you gotta go i O. By the way, if they say that, you really think that they're gonna they're gonna get deported immediately, they'll probably at the end of a backlog of deportations.

And then it's just the whole the thing, the whole thing. Yeah, the system is only broken because people are breaking it, because they're breaking the law. So so you have all all of that, and uh, then you have the issue of sanctuary cities. And you know what, let let me I want to I want to come back to this. Actually, let me come back to sanctuary cities either side, because this was really interesting and it's something no one else is gonna talk to you about, at least not that

I think, and I details on this. And then also we've got we got a senator today who just showed you what she does not know about immigration, which is the first thing she does not know, the first thing of immigration. We'll get more of this. Stay with me. Just send your child to again. I think we're missing the point. These individuals are there because they have broken

a law. There has to be a process. They have broken a law only as deemed so by the President with his no man, they're they're there for violation of Title eight of the Immigration of the US and Nationality Act. Okay, there eight. UC's Eleeland try is both a criminal and civil violation. They are in those f r c s pending the outcome of that civil immigration process. They have broken the law. Well, these are mainly My understanding is that under the zero tolerance these are no longer civil

civil proceedings, but in fact we're coming up proceedings. They're both. They were criminal proceedings when the Border Patrol prosecuted them, but at the conclusion of that process, once the individual came into ice custody, they would go through administrator proceedings. I'm confused, Yes she is, oh man, that was Democratic Senator Herono. Who Youmanice, She's like, well's they're not breaking the law. Yeah, actually, U s Senator. It is breaking

the law to enter the United aids illegally. That is true. That is a thing that's real. And you'll notice the Democrats now have gotten so caught up in their rhetoric and the nonsense and all the stuff that there's that that they don't seem to really believe anymore that illegal aliens are committing an illegal act. They believe this these slogans like no person is illegal, which is just brainless. These things people say, there's no such things as a

person who's illegal. Well, yeah, I mean, you know, you can call a person someone who is is trespassing while carrying your private possessions, or you can say they're a burglar, right, I mean, technically the problem is the things they're doing. But you're still gonna refer to somebody as a burglar if they are trespassing and taking your stuff. I don't think we have to refer to them as stuff takers who happen to be in a place that they're not legally entitled to be, who have who have gone on

to your private property. Burglar is fine, Trespasser is fine. You know, one who commits the illegal act does get tainted by the verbiage of the illegal act. That's just the way it is. And you see this with the Herodos. She's like, wait, folks, these are the people writing the immigration laws. These are the Senator Roto Visa. She said, I'm confused. She doesn't know what's going on our own

members of Congress. And I would tell you this if we were able to do one of those kind of man on the three things the members of Congress and ask them an immigration law. You know, how many members of Congress do you think that aren't sitting on a certain subcommittee or aren't involved in this, you know, as

as a major part of their portfolio. Know that a country that a foreign country that does not take people that we deport willingly, and and and as a partner in that process, we we have a we have the legal right to ban all visa US from that country. In fact, that is the prescribed punishment for that offense for another country. So if Guatemala doesn't take back all the people we want to deport to Guatemala, the State Department the United States government supposed to say no more visas,

that's in law. How many members of Congress even known that. How many members of Congress knew that it is an additional penalty. It becomes a felony if you are deported from the country and re enter illegally. In fact, a lot of conservatives saying we did a pass a law that makes it no there already was a law. People will know. This is part of the devolution that happens

in our public consciousness around the issue of immigration. When laws are not enforced, When some laws are not enforced, we have asked the question, which laws do we take seriously? And no one really has the answers. Now, before we went into that quick moment with our wonderful sponsors, I I was telling you about how the catch and release process really works and what the what the scam is the delay In a lot of cases, it's the delay and the hearings because there never they're either not gonna

show up. If they do show up, so much time will have passed, they're never gonna get deported. And then you have the sanctuary city component of this. And this is really important, folks, This is really interesting, and I am not hearing about this from anyone else. There are seven thousand or so criminal investigators attached to Immigrations and Customs enforcement who do not do immigration specific enforcement. They do transnational federal criminal issues that happened to coincide with

the you know, illegal flows into this country. Stuff having to do with cartels, child trafficking, uh, you know, any form of human trafficking, you know, major criminal act activity.

And because of the zealotry behind some of these sanctuary jurisdictions like New York and San Francisco in Chicago, because of the ideological commitment to this notion of sanctuary cities, it's not just that local and state law enforcement are being told in these places you cannot, I mean California's past laws to make it a criminal offense to try too hard to help law enforcement. You can't make this

stuff up. But it is not solely that they are blocking enforcement in illegal alien havens and illegal alien communities with regard to immigration specific crimes. These sanctuary jurisdictions are blocking the criminal investigators of Immigrations and Customs enforcement who are involved in stopping people that are trafficking children for sex across state lines, stopping people who are trafficking drugs, stopping any federal crime that crosses over into the immigrations

and cross the customers of force and radar. I mean, you know, there's a lot of coordination between these different law enforcement agencies, and the fact that you have local law enforcement being told oh sorry, uh Ice. You know the ICE Criminal investigators, Um, you know h s size what they're called here. Let me just tell you that hs I. This is from the ICE dot com website.

Criminal investigators all sufferred as special agents conduct criminal investigations involving national security threats, terrorism, drug smuggling, child exploitation, human trafficking, illegal arms, export, financial crimes, identity fraud, benefit fraud, and more. H s I Special Agents have the opportunity to work regularly with federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies, including

the FBI, e A, U S. Marshal Service. They have the opportunity to participate in special task forces or Fugitive Operations teams. They are essentially federal auxiliaries of the various missions of d e A and FBI and others who also bring access and expertise to the immigration and international transnational component of things. And folks, these people are being

told and this is what they're not you know. They would say, oh, well, you know, we don't want we don't want local law enforce and to be doing immigration work. We don't want local law enforcement. And that's the line you hear. Well, these thousands of Homeland Security investigators, uh, these these these criminal investigators with the Homeland Security Department under remember Immigration and Customs enforcement is under Homeland Security.

They are getting the stiff farm from local law enforcement to they are being told, sorry, can't help you, can't work with you on this issue, can't share informans with you, can't share information if it's going to possibly cross over So when people like Trump are saying that these sanctuary jurisdictions are aiding and abetting ms, their teen and and the worst of the worst, the baddest of the bad,

it's true. It's true because they're so concerned with the optics and the perception of Oh, we're welcoming to illegals and they're not illegal, they're undocumented. Do not cave on that. Do not allow them to get you saying it's happened. Occasion, I'll blurt out like, yeah, I mean the undocument I mean illegal alien. I mean, you know, do not let the propagandas seep into your brain. They're working very hard

at it, They're they're really pushing hard enough. And and these other clown show places, Uh, they don't do the research, they don't do the work. They don't know what they're talking about an immigration and customs enforcement, And there are real efforts, there are real problems where there's a blockage of cooperation on on the most important kinds of criminal investigations because these jurisdictions won't work with immigrations customs enforcement period.

That's what I was told today by the acting ICE director under Obama. And that's a story. People need to know. That's a truth that needs to get out there, needs to become a part of this discussion. Uh, and I'm gonna do my part to get the word out. We got a big third hour coming up. Team got an update for you on a gee Hottis who was saved several times by the West and repaid that debt with a suicide bombing. Vile scum will delve in his ideology. Stay with me. You are now entering the Freedom Tital

Operations Center. Falls visitor programs musty kept strictly. Need to know Team Buck is cleared and ready for the Buck Brief. The Manchester suicide bomber who killed twenty two people at an area on a Grande concert in May. It turns out he was rescued by the British Royal Navy a few years earlier. This is one of these cases where it's just so clear to me that it's not about poverty or deprivation or isolation from society or any of these other additional factors that can lead someone to become

a jihadist. It is about a belief in jihat. That is the that is the precursor, the precondition. You must have a belief in jihad to act in this way, you must truly think that it is the truth that you are a holy warrior for Mohammed and fighting for Allah and all all the stuff that they always say

and they put in their martyrdom videos. So this guy, Salmon Abetti, who was born in Manchester, Okay, he was born in Manchester in the UK because his parents fled to the United Kingdom and were given uh safe haven there. So you know, his his family owes their lives to the generosity of the United Kingdom and the people of Britain. And then his father returned. His father returned to Libya, Inn after rebels over through the government and then the

sun here. Salomon of Eddie was in Libya and was rescued because things got so things got so hot during the civil war in Libya. Was rescued by the British Navy and then proceeded to go and blow up a pop concert, an Areata Grande concert. Killed twenty two people. I mean, just in one of the as as unspeakable and horrific and senseless and act of violence as any

human being could ever could ever engage in. You know, that's one of the parts of this whole immigration and asylum to bait as it involves the the Islamic world is you know, you would think that there is a sense of gratitude from people who flee to the West because we've given them safe haven. But you have to remember that there is an entire ideology of radical Islam that and in Islamism that blames all of the problems of the Islamic world on the West. So essentially, essentially, effectively,

eighties are fault. The dysfunctions that they think they are fleeing in the Middle East are a result. They will be told by radicalized moms, by their own government media in many cases, by mainstream papers, by Western papers, by by leftists in Europe and in America that there was the dysfunction that they are suffering in the Islamic world is our fault, and so why while and look, I understand that we're speaking in the in broad strokes here and that there are lots of people who are incredibly

grateful to be here. And you could probably tell me stories about either refugees who live in your hometown wherever, who are you know who are great and they've become great Americans I think I get that, but there's something specific the same way that there's a unique threat posed to civilization by the ideology of radical Islaman and jihadism. It is a unique threat. I'm not saying it's the

only threat, but it's a particularly poignant one. There's also something unique in this moment in time, in this ideology where we, as the societies that are bringing people in, have to be on guard for those who aren't going to be grateful. In fact, we're going to view this as a point of weakness. I'm reminded of that interview that I did on air uh not long ago with

a doctor Bennard. I don't know how many of you recall this, but she she had written this piece, and she's a fluent German speaker who is who spent lots and lots of time in Afghanistan as well. I believe she speaks Pashto fluently, although I'd have to check to make sure about that, but she is married to an Afghan and she did this whole study on Afghan refugees in Austria and how these horrific, uh, these horrific acts of violence. This was back in the summer of seventeen,

she published this in the National Interest. Cheryl Bernard was her name. Afghan stand out among the refugees committing crimes in Austrian elsewhere. Why and said, is because they they have been trained both at home and then by fellow refugees, and then in once they've been accepted in the host country to hate the country that has taken them in.

And with Salomon A. Betty, the suicide bomber from the area on a Grande concert whose family was saved by Britain, and then who once he decided to go fight in Libya? People say, oh, buck, but that war, you know against Kadafi, the West and NATO and Britain. You know, we were all involved that, okay, But so Rory was um. I don't think that was a good idea. That was a Hillary Clinton thing. And that's a whole whole separate discussion

we could get into. But are we now to believe that Kadafi was that the Libyan people would have been happier? Kadafi could have slaughtered the people of Benghazi. I I just you know, it's always we're damned if we do, damned if we don't. People are just looking for excuses.

They're looking for ways to blame the dysfunctions of their society on the West, on the freest, most prosperous, happiest, best places which are which is the Western world, which I would not It is not really a geographic determination anymore.

You know, a lot of people would say that Japan and South Korea are part of increasingly part of Western civilization, um and certainly Australia, which is by no in no geographic way in New Zealand and no geographic way united with us, but they're definitely part of Western civilization, right. So it's more about ideals, rule of law, and culture

than it is about actual geography. When refer to the West, the west has become a pretty imprecise term, and as a lot of people would note, the parts of Africa are way far west of parts of Europe, So it doesn't really make any sense to geographically. It's it's more of a of an ideal of uniting factors around a

whole bunch of of different different countries. But this is something we really have to pay attention to because you know, the previous the history of the United States taking in immigrants, particularly in moments of crisis for them is gratitude for the to the host country, you know, gratitude to the host country for saving them, for taking in you know, the from the poem right, the poor, the week younger, all that, even though that's not official U S policy

and hasn't been. You know, there's some sentimentality that I guess has a validity there about how we just taken people from all of the world based on a whole bunch of different facts. But with the Islamic world, as we see from Salomon at Betty, there can be people whose families are saved by the West, who then they themselves are personally saved by by Western forces as they

escape a conflict where Western forces. You know, if you're I'm really trying to add this all up right, and I know I'm I'm giving you a stream of consciousness here, and and I need to tighten this sense that the tightened this analysis up for you a little bit, so

it's very clear where I'm going. But you got a guy whose family was saved by the UK, who then went to fighting the conflict where the UK was involved in trying to save more Libyans for humanitarian reasons, and then things get too hot there for him, so he has to be saved from a you know, sinking boat in the Mediterranean by the British Navy. So his family

saved by the Brits. Then the Bridge try to save probably his extended family in Libya, and then they saved him specifically when he's escaping the conflict where they're trying to save his extended family Libya, after his family went back there. After the Brits saved his family in the first place. Right, they see this big circle of just the West just helping this guy out, and he returns so many straps on a suicide invest and kills twenty

two people, young girls trying to enjoy a pop concert. Um. This this is a a a true uh and and very dark form of brain of brainwashing geared towards evil. That that's what happens with the jihadest mindset. Anything becomes permissible to them so long as they could fitted into this rubric of of jihad and and any act of violence against their perceived opponents. In this who's everyone, which means really everyone who doesn't agree with them is more

is not just morally acceptable. What has a divine right? And that's What is different about radical Islam from a lot of other things, the notion that Allah is a essentially a guarantee of more righteousness, despite the heinousness of any particular act. Whatever you do under this banner of radical Islam, under the banner of jihad is is inherently justified because it is part of the is Part of

this struggle is divinely ordained struggle. And I will tell you that we are at a period right now where it feels like there's a lull, and I don't think it has nothing to do with Trump too. I'll tell you that I think that the bad guys know that if they give they step out a line at the Jihada, step out of line, they give Trump an opportunity, He's just gonna drop the dropped the hammer on them like

it's never been dropped before. Um. You know, I think that there is that the symbolism of some of Trump's bigger strikes as commander in chief against the Islamic worlds terrorists. Safe havens have had real effect and impact. But you know, Al Qaeda is resurging right now, and yeah, in nobody's talking about Yemen. I'm thinking I'll probably do a Yemen deep dive here on the show tomorrow. It's the biggest humanitarian crisis in the world, folks. No, you know, all

these media talking hands are all blah blah blah. We care so much about people and why Republicans are mean and all this other stuff. Right, nobody's talking about the fact that Yemen is on the brink of of of a complete catastrophe right now, meaning that there's a blockade and they're they're running out of food. We haven't seen anything like in a forced mass starvation on the scale that you'd be seeing in Yemen in decades. And the only thing that that comes to mind that would really

come close would be Somalia. You remember, there's a U. S Military intervention Somalia, you know, under U n auspices black Hawk down having because people are starving. That's happening right now and Yemen. But the media would rather tell you about Michael Avanati and Stormy Daniels and Cohen and all that. That's what they're focused on. That's the awareness raising they're doing, not fact that Yemen's about to collapse. All right, We've got much more teams there right there.

The FBI calls home title theft one of the fastest growing crimes out there. And you have to brace yourself, folks, because if you've ever had your credit card soon as I have, it's nothing compared to what you're in for. The hell you're in for if an identity thief takes control of your home's title. It's so easy to do this online, folks. I've seen the demo home title Lock. Folks have walked me through it. They get access to the necessary information about your home's title. Then they create

an online forgery. They printed out, they get it notarized, and bam, all of a sudden, they can start record. They can start getting loans against your property, against your equity. You find out about this when you get the payments. Don't let this happen to you. For just pennies a day, Home title Lock protects my most viable asset, my family's home. Registered now for a free analysis and discover if your home's title has been compromised. That's a sixty dollar value. Free.

Visit home title lock dot com. That's home title lock dot com. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she isn't going anywhere anytime soon. The Justice reportedly said yesterday she hopes to stay on the bench for at least another five years. The five year old told Sie end quote. My senior colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, stepped down when he was ninety, so I think I have about at

least five more years. At least five more years, that's the plan for the US Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. A lot of eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg's workout regimes because well, we'll see lot Hinton valence. They call her the notorious RBB for a reason. She sets the standards and working out being smart. You know, well into your late eighties, she's physically active. Jonathan RBG five more years. We've seen the workouts. Progressives who desperately want um RBG

to stay. I sometimes envisioned or hope that Ruth Bader gains Justice Ginsburg. Uh sleeps in bubble wrap, walks around in bubble rap because I want nothing to happen to her. I mean this, Oh my gosh, it's pathological. Folks. They're so terrified of what would happen if they lost their

super legislature. Uh, they're super legislature, that is the Supreme court, which has handed the Left victory after victory for decades, and now that we're kind of now that we're hip to the scam and it may no longer work for them, they're particularly upset. But this whole notion of of Ruth Bader Ginsburg as a pop culture hip hero is another one of these incredible media constructs. I mean, there's this whole cult of the RBG, of the Ruth Bader Ginsburg

work out. I mean there's a lot of of pieces. If you go up and you google, uh Ruth Bader Ginsburg work Out, a lot of things pop up and people talk of out this and they talk about it like the RBG, like the notorious b i G, which

was Biggie Smalls. This is all the construct folks. This is all out of nowhere because they're they're creating this persona for Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who is you know, a an older woman who I I don't think you can say it's particularly tied into the pop culture of the moment, but this is what happens. This is the treatment you get from the left when you give them what they want politically, they'll make you cool even if you're not cool. They'll make you a hip even if you're not a hip.

They'll create the perception that you do these super hardcore workouts that like nobody else can do. I mean, this is a piece on Politico. I did Ruth Bader Ginsburg's workout. It nearly broke me. Pumping iron with rbg's personal trainer is no joke. I mean, Ruth Bader Ginsberg. I'm happy that she's staying, you know, healthy and all this stuff, but I gotta be honest with you. You know, she's kind of a all old woman. I mean, can we can we stop with this Ruth Bader Ginsburg superhero cult nonsense.

But there is a there is really this weird panic from Democrats because you know, Kennedy retired officially today. See how the Supreme Court opening. I I I got Ron Johnson coming on the show on Not This Show on Rising tomorrow, or asked him about McConnell, McConnell saying that it's clear sailing here on getting kavanall through Kavanaugh. There's nothing they can come up with that's going to derail this nomination. They're trying so hard, but it's pathetic and

they are completely paddick about Ginsburgh. I mean Ginsburg coming out now and saying that she's gonna be she's good for another five years. Let me just also point out, and I'm not look, I wish no person ill health based on their politics because I'm not. I am not actually a savage. I'm not a leftist. I'm not a collectivist. Uh bled Ruth Bader Ginsburg. You know, she doesn't know she'd to know what the years? You know, she's eighty.

Oh my gosh, she's eighty five. I thought she was late seventy and pardon me, I didn't realize she's eighty five years old. Mike. Yes, now you know, eighty five is the new seventy five. I get that, But still that's you know, she's she's up there. Um, you know, she's gonna wait till ninety before she retires. And there's clearly a political reason for this, folks. I mean she I think she understands in the back and in the back of her mind, I think she realizes Trump's gonna

be present for a long time. You know, Trump is going to break in the liberal media over time, whether they like it or not, because he's gonna be around for quite some time. But that she's here saying that she's going to last through the Trump presidency is a signal to the left right, and she's trying to calm their fears. I suppose keep in mind, folks that once you're eighty five, you know, you don't know, you don't know what five years you know what? Really, the few

none of us really know what what five years of old. Gosh, I hope I'm healthy in five years, healthy in five months. But here, here we are, with the Supreme Court battle looming, seeing how the veil has been lifted from all this stuff they talk about openly on TV. Liberal versus conservative justices. That's not the way this is supposed to happen. That's not how all this is supposed to work. I'm supposed

to have liberal and conservative justice. We're supposed to have judges who interpret the law based on what the law says. The notion that this is like draft picks for two different teams, Team Liberal and team Conservative just shows you

how politicized the court has become. It. It's at this point, I think, irretrievably politicized unless you get just all constitutionalists who would fall into the rubric of conservatism and as far as the left is concerned on the court, it's just gonna keep being this game of, well, how do we get enough leftists who are committed idealogues, who will interpret the law in accordance with their policy preferences. How do we get enough of them? We can get what

we want. That's the way the liberals have been playing the game for decades. And they have created this pop culture hero of Ruth Bader Ginsberg and the Notorious RBG and all this stuff. It's just it's weird, it's cultish, it's kind of pathetic. Uh, you know, there's there's nothing. I mean, most people, most people that are walking around turning about the Notorious RBG don't even I honestly believe that.

They don't even know what she sounds like. You know, they can't even think of what the last time they heard her speak. And you know, look, I I she's a frail old, frail older woman. I don't know if the whole thing strikes me. It's very very strange. And their obsession on her health andever it's just creepy. It's just creepy. Um. But it shows you how desperate they are, it really does. That's that's a a part of this whole discussion right now that you can't avoid. And Ginsburg,

what is she like? Chief counsel for the a c l U. You couldn't find somebody who is a more committed liberal than Ruth Bader Ginsburg. And she got confirmed. You know, they they put her through on the court. Uh. It's just so much nonsense these days, really is It's it's getting crazy out there, folks, all right, eight eight to five eight four d buck, you go on a chat before we close up shop tonight in the Freedom Hut. Also, don't forget Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton. That's where

you send me messages. We will be right back. That comedians do their job, because let me explain something to you. You're not letting comedians do their job, and you're miserable. Not miserable, because laughter is a release, just like watching acting, just like listening to music, just like looking at art. Laughter is a release that you are now cutting off. Stop walking around so offended. You're not going to survive

life if you walk around. Now. While I don't find Leslie Jones even a little bit funny as a comedian, I have to say I agree with their insight here, and that people need to stop acting like there's some terrible uh there, there's some terrible act that's been committed every time somebody makes a joke about anything. The left really is in the process of killing comedy entirely. Nothing

is allowed to be funny anymore. For a while, they figured that just making fun of white people, white Christians and white racism was gonna just sustain comedy and Trump and Trump supporters. But now I think there's a fatigue those jokes, even if you think that those are the only things you should be making jokes about, which is idiotic. But a lot of leftists think that way. Those jokes

are now stale. Those jokes are no longer amusing, even to the people who really just want to be snyde and mock others because they've heard them so many times.

And this is one of the this this is one of these moments where you look at what's happened in recent weeks with O'casio Quartez, for example, on that satirical interview clip where they had Alibeth Stucky from CRTV and doing the sit down with with a Kazi Quartez, it was clearly meant to be a joke and it was cut, and you had many people on the left who think that their hip and think that they're really with it, freaking out about it, you know, becoming agitated, becoming angry

over what what had transpired, and I just think it is completely and utterly uh well, it's nuts for one thing, but but also when you look a little deeper into it, we're we're losing something as a culture. Man. I come on this radio show and there's so many times and I feel badly because I feel like I'm depriving not just you but myself of the release of just letting a rip and making some jokes. There's so many times

when I think that would be funny. But I just air on the side of all right, don't don't push it too much, because you know, I don't need the uh, the disgusting smear merchants of media matters and and others you know coming after me. I just don't need it, you know, I don't find it. I don't think it's a trade off that I want to make. So you know, I I just look at all this stuff now and I wish it were different. And so with that in mind,

that we all need a little bit of comedy. I wanted to share something with you that I think is is the the funniest thing that I've heard in quite a while. Just without further ado, please play clip I'm not that damn smart. You know how easy this is, Jesus, but no one wants to do it. No one has the instinct or the whale to execute anything real. They only execute failure. I are Can you just play the beginning of that again? It's my favorite. I'm not that

damn smart. You know. Oh man, he's amazing. You couldn't You couldn't construe a character that was more rich in unintentional unintentional satire than than Mr Mr Jones over there. It is. It is incredible. Uh. I like his do we have his ever a while ago? Just I like to eat meat. I like to make children. You know, it's like whoa settle down there, buddy. You know, I used to think that he was a lot older than me, just because I think he looks quite a bit ab.

I mean, he's not that much. He's maybe I think he's has like early forties. So we're not contemporaries, but we're pretty close to be contemporaries. Uh, and he is. He's a wild man. So I just thought that was something I wanted to brighten your day a little bit because there's not enough comedy going around or we're not

allowed to make enough jokes. I'm also thinking that it would be fun if I could set up a podcast or something where we just we just called it the Unsafe Space, and we people could just basically say anything, and the idea would be that you're you're not allowed to get in trouble for it, Like there's some you can indemnify yourself. There's some way that you could sign well, like I'm not I'm not saying that this is okay or put it correct. I'm just saying that this is

a thing that But there is no such thing. You cannot create an unsafe space right now without the risk of tremendous media backlash and people coming after you with all kinds of stuff. So it's a shame, but at least we got Alex Jones to keep us entertained. Facebook's apparently banned im which or bandom temporarily or something, which I suppose they have the right to do. But it is a little bit. It is a little bit troubling that they are taking that approach to things. Uh, but

LEASTI he does. He does come up sometimes with with comedy Goldberg, your Illuminati and you know, Queen of England and all that stuff. It's I give the guy for for a lunatic. He's very entertaining. We have roll call coming up here in just a moment, team, so stay with me. The show ain't over yet, folks, keeping it real. It's time for roll call up. Oh it's so jazzy. So some of that license free music that you get is uh, it's got some got some groovy tunes to it.

Got some groovy tunes to it. By the way, if any of you have suggestions for uh a place I can find a really good workout music list? What do you call that playlist? Music list? Gosh, I'm I'm listening to say And by the way, don't give me Welcome to the Jungle and a c D. I already have all that. I've already got all the basics covered. I need something that's probably from the last ten years, you know,

because I know all the classics. Okay. I the Tiger has been on my playlist since I've had a playlist I'm looking for new stuff that will get me kind of fired up. So no classic rock because I already have all the classic rock. If you've got any ideas at me on Facebook dot com slash bucks excident. Let's get two. I have not been working on enough these days. Man, I'm turning into a pasty, a pasty pile of goo. Uh. T J writes Buck. I have to say you're a

better man than me. Not true, t J. Plus, you wear shields high in your photo on Facebook, which makes me just heart you tremendously. The fact that you're able to keep a straight face, not to mention, keep from bursting into laughter following that Nancy Pelosi interview on Rising this morning that took some serious reserve. Also, do you really think Nancy can remember something? And count? I hate

to be degrading, but honestly, he doesn't. Look at the interview, I seriously question or competency to hold any public office. Not to mention speaker, just saying from t J. T J, Nancy wants to tell you to go and shove it. That's that's the That's what Nancy has said. She gets feisty. Man, you'll mess with Nancy. Dennis next up here, thank you for the interview with Beth Lindstrom. Can you interview Tracy Lavron. She's running against Jim McGovern one of the others that

needs to go. Personally, I'm a modern I'm probably a moderate Democrat, but I do like seeing you on Fox. Well, Dennis, thank you. You know, look, I I try to be reasonable, even affable in the way that I make my case for what I believe. UM, So, I I do really appreciate it when Democrats listen. I like when independence listen. And and you know, I I have had back in the day when I used to do CNN, when it was still a network that tried to have both sides

of the story. UM, I had people coming to me and say, you know, I'm a Democrat, but I really like I like the way you present your case on TV. I was thought that was it was very generous of them to say. And you know that was in the pre Trump era, though, I think right now be a little bit different. Alright, Next up here, Rachel, Right, how's it going, Buck? I was listening to you talking about the name change in Austin, Texas, and I couldn't help

but think about Germany. They haven't done this sort of thing, have they? Only in leftist America? Keep up the great work, Rachel. Well, Rachel, if you mean renaming stuff, yeah, I mean I think deutsch Land was deutsch Land before, during, and after Hitler's rise, So I mean, I don't think that they've changed names, although I doubt that after the Second World War. I mean, look here, I don't think they named anything after Hitler.

I guess it's maybe one of the main one of the main distinctions that you'd have to point to you here. I don't think that there was any uh that there was no fondness for what had happened with the Third Reich, and amongst the Germans especially concerned they lost that war. So I don't think that there was anyone naming, naming, editing after after Hitler. Um, But I don't. I don't really know, Rachel. That's an interesting question. I mean, you

think about the Soviet Union. There's still plenty of stuff about Lenin and plenty of vestiges of their Soviet past in Russia today, So interesting, jar Rights, I have to counter the taekwondo comment and its applicability and self defense. I used to train in krav maga under a man who is one of the top twenty people when it comes to ascension in the largest taekwondo association worldwide. He will be the first one to tell you that taekwondo

has very little application in self defense. You know, jar, I don't want to get in the middle of this one. I don't want to catch an axe kick to my temple. But I will just say that. You know, I've I've seen a lot of taekwondo, and I've very rarely seen taekwondo work. That said, just being able to throw a solid punch and having those basic mechanics of self defense, I think that's certainly worthwhile. But you know what, what

every I've never seen a fight. I'll say this, and I've seen my fair share of fights, actually, believe it or not. I don't send me like buck Really. Yeah, I used to run with kind of a kind of a fast crowd back in the day. It's a lot. I was really in a high school. I saw a lot of fights in high school. Um, not so many in college and and then as an adult fighting Oh gosh, no, none of that. Uh not savages. But I've never really seen a fight that had two people stand and trade

strikes for more than a few seconds. It always would turn into grappling, tackling, and and it's sort of wrestling and punching. I've rarely seen it ever turned into just trading standing strikes. So you know, with taekwondo, I know there's some grap Anyway, people like Buck stop talking about martial arts. I really want to have you know what I'll bring on someday, somebody who's a martial arts expert.

We can talk about the applicability of some of the different styles here, and we talk about who shoo style and praying mentis style, and you must you must learn to fight. I mean stuff like that. That'd be fun. I the wo sho is Yeah, no, that's Chinese. I'm trying to remember now, praying mantis. I used to play a lot of these martial arts video games too, misspent youth, Um, here we go. Mud is the name of this person? Hi? Mud,

My name is Bucks. So I can't I don't cast aspersions. Buck, love your show, love your vocals, and love you found Miss Molly. We have a lot in common and maybe even a kindred spirit. I'm a disabled Marine Corps combat veteran who mouthful. Huh. I was intelligence analysts for years. I loved it, all said aspirations of stepping up to the bigs. I'm Catholic and filled with guilt and blatant dynasty like brutal, yet thinly masked with humor. Uh not Irish. Worse,

I'm Scottish. They both speak gibberish. I love history, nowhere near your level, sorrowfully, A re modeled impressionist after I broke my neck, lost my voice for a year, and I'm still learning to generate inflections. A trivia aficionado, including movie quotes, though I bet I could rival even Uh you ever try the bacon game? Uh? Both dig the do I'm freaking bald, and then follically challenged what's in the box? Well that's from seven? All quotes are my

own cheers. Uh Matt oh, Matt. I don't know why I said mud there, but Matt hey, Matt. First of all, thank you for your service, man, and thank you for your your note, your your humanity, your sense of humor, and your kind words about what I'm doing here. Does sound like we're kindred spirits and it Uh. I appreciate that. I appreciate you listen to the show Shield Times coming back because I said this month we're gonna do the

Siege of Malta. I think I'm gonna break it up into two parts, and you know, I'm gonna do it, and you know, maybe a lot of people will listen. Maybe we'll have like a football stadium or two or the people listening again this time, or maybe it'll just be you know, friends and family. But I just think that's the fun thing to put out there. I like to do it, and especially as the new cycle slows down, and think it'll be a lot of fun. Thank you

very much the Matt for your kind note. Brian Right wrote the following, Buck, just watch yesterday's Rising and I love that you got in that job on Austin Washington, d C. And a racing history to the left, just saying Yale named for a slave trader and president of the East India Trade company, Mike Drop. Do you have the demographics back on political leanings of the viewers of Rising? Is it split even as you're trying to target You know, Brian,

that's a really good question. We don't have demo info yet on the show. We probably will in the fall. Um when we just I know that the two biggest audiences are in New York and California, So I don't know what that means. It could be concerned, you know, there could be some Roadue conservatives in those two states that are listening, or or perhaps we're getting a lot

of Democrats that are watching. I don't know. Uh, it's it's all very new and very experimental, but I'm having fun with it, and I do appreciate that some of you take the time to watch. It's nice to have some members of the team in support. Hill dot TV Slash Rising. If you want to check it out, we have with some fun segments. Definitely check out some of

the panel segments. I think those are and then the towards the end of the show, we do something called before you Go, where we just run down some stories. I think those are the most fun parts of the show and so those of you haven't been exposed to it before, I think that's probably where I would I would start and let we're or a big interview. We get big. We got Senator Ron Johnson on tomorrow. That'll be really interesting. Uh, Dan right, buck Love your show

missed several episodes. Tuning in online though maybe have comments soon. Interactive listeners, that's what you like, right Dan? Well, Dan, obviously I'm reading a comment from an interactive listener right now, So there you go. Um, and then what do we have here? Uh? Almost this is from Michael almost forgot. I have to laugh every time you come with the lame reasons why you don't like having guests on too often admitted bub. The only reason is you like to

hear yourself blab for two for three hours. Michael Guilty has charged, Bro Guilty has charged I. I am. I am greedy with this audience. I do not like to share this audience unless I have a really good reason, because I have so much that I want to tell you. I get to read in all day. At the time I come on this radio show, I've just been thinking all day about things that I can talk to you about and make this as worthwhile, interesting and insightful as

I possibly can. Um. But thanks Michael for the always salty interactions. I appreciate it. You know. It's once in a while, like like before Christmas and my birthday, Michael was like, You've done an okay job this year. I'm like, thank you, Michael, so sweet of you, Sue. Next up here, real life experience of paying for medical insurance through husband's employer and seeing the benefits customers of my retail liquor

store received free. The benefits customers of my retail liquor store received free while I suffer and pay, but they get treated like royalty. You know, Sue, you know you bring this up and and this is something that happens where people see that they're very much struggling to be self sufficient with their health insurance and pay their bills, and then other people there's a tremendous effort to find some way to get somebody else, meaning the government, to

pay for them. Um. So you know that's that's a thing that happens. It is people don't really like to talk about it, but I think it is. Uh, it's commonplace. So anyway, Uh, thank you for your thoughts. Team, great to have you with me here in the Hut. We're gonna have Raheem Kasam on the Freedom Hunt podcast this week, so that is exciting. Get ready for that one. Please do check out some of our wonderful sponsors here in

the Freedom Hunt. I will see you tomorrow. Chill to my alarm goes off at five o'clock in the morning every morning, and I usually finish up at round nine thirty at night after to radio, folks, it's a long day. How do I power through it? Strike Force Energy. Strikeforce is veteran owned and American made, and it's one of the hottest energy products on the market today. You see,

strike Force Liquid comes in a packet. You just pour a little bit a little bit of it in water, tea, lemonade, yogurt, and it gives you that extra push through your day. It's available in four flavors, zero sugar, zero calories, and right now, if you go to strike Force Energy dot com, enter discount code buck at checkout. For every packet you buy, folks, Strikeforce will donate a packet to military members around the globe. That's right, They'll send this to them down range. Strike

Force Energy is fuel for the fight. To go to Strikeforce Energy dot com, enter discount code buck and send it to our troops overseas.