BHS - 8A - Bullet Points | Foodie Friday - podcast episode cover

BHS - 8A - Bullet Points | Foodie Friday

Jul 05, 202432 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

We talked about Bullet points to the news and Foodie Friday even though Neil isn't here today.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

You're List Saints KFI AM six forty. The bill handles show on demand on the iHeartRadio app. The Firearms Policy Coalition, in conjunction with the National Rifle Association, the California Rifle and Pistol Association, and the Second Amendment Foundation have filed a lawsuit against this new excise tax on guns, gun parts, and ammunition. This took effect on Monday. This was Assembly Bill twenty eight.

The proponents of it said it would generate almost one hundred and sixty million dollars in its first year, and that money can go to fund programs for gun violence prevention, for gang intervention, and who knows what else. So the lawsuit wants to block the new law, says it's a violation of the Second Amendment because it is a special tax on gun owners, which it is for sure a special tax on gun owners. We have similar taxes in this society.

Alcohol has a special tax, tobacco has a special tax. And what alcohol and tobacco and guns have in common, and I don't think anybody's gonna want to argue with me about this, is that they are legal. These are all legal things. In the hands of the wrong person or misused can cause big problems for individual people or for society as a whole. So in that sense, guns are just like alcohol and tobacco. We don't want to completely make them illegal. Well now we can't even if you wanted to,

but there's some level of responsible ownership and use of these products. Here's where they're different, though, and that's what's behind this lawsuit. Only guns are connected to a constitutional right. There's no constitutional right to have alcohol or tobacco. There is a constitutional right to have a gun, with of course the exceptions that exist and so forth, and regulations and requirements. But the core bottom line is the Second Amendment is implicated. Just like, say, if

you wanted to put a special tax on printing presses. I know, I know what you're saying. Oh my god, it's twenty twenty four. Nobody's using printing presses anymore. Yes, I'm just trying to make the point. A special tax on printing presses would be different than a special tax on booze or tobacco because a printing press is to print material, which is a form of communication, which has First Amendment protection. So it's the same idea.

So in any event, here comes this lawsuit. Now we talk about this with Bill on do they have a case all the time, this issue of standing and you know, do you have the right to file a lawsuit? And you can't file a lawsuit unless you've been hurt by this law. So they had to find somebody who's been hurt by this new tax, and they

say that they have and her name is Danielle James. And the way that she has been hurt by this tax on guns, according to the lawsuit, is she was gonna buy a gun, specifically a six hour P three sixty five ex Macro I guess, a little semi automatic pistol. She was going to purchase this gun, as is her Second Amendment right, and she put it off because this tax increased what it would cost to buy the gun.

So now she has to save up the money to get the gun. And she says, I would buy this gun now, but because it's gonna cost me eleven percent more, I'm not going to. Therefore, this tax has infringed on my exercise of a Second Amendment right. Then there's a guy that they found, Josh Gerkin, who is from Orange County who sometimes is a firearms instructor at the local gun ranges and he purchases, you know, quite a bit of ammunition, and he says, I'm gonna have to buy less

ammunition because it costs eleven percent more. So that's the basis. Now, listen, I you know, I don't know how compelling these two examples are. I'm not gonna lie to you. I can't believe that you have the money for this gun. But if it's eleven percent more, not only do you not have the money for the gun, but you're not gonna have the extra eleven percent for all long time. And the other guy, I guess observation there is he's saying, well, I might cut back. Okay,

have you cut back? Have you, for example, been unable to teach a class because you could not afford the ammunition? I'm not sure here, but I get the idea. I get the core idea behind the lawsuit, which is there's a Second Amendment right in play, and if the government puts a special tax on a constitutionally protected right, that's illegal. And that's the theory. And I'm not saying they're right, and I'm not saying they're wrong.

I'm saying that's what's happening. And By the way, anyone who's surprised by this lawsuit is kind of a dullard because you could have seen this coming miles and miles away. And then I want to leave you with this because listen, one thing I really believe everybody can agree on is that you should be at least minimally responsible with your firearm. You know, if you have

kids in the house, you got to keep that firearm locked up. A guy in Pennsylvania now has been arrested and charged because a three year old child in the house accidentally shot a lady in the back and there were apparently other young children in proximity to this gun. Now where was this gun, because sometimes you hear about a kid finds the gun in its hiding place or something like that, where there's been some effort to hide the gun and it failed.

Well, apparently this gun was sitting on a table, already locked and cocked and loaded. He was the dude, this guy, Brian Zigfree, who's forty one. He was like, you know, handling the gun, puts it down right there on the table with all these kids around. So all the three year old had to do was pick it up and by happenstance,

point it in the wrong direction, and get the trigger pulls. So I guess I just want to leave, like on a note of solidarity with everybody, which is everybody agrees this guy is a total jerk and should be criminally punished for that. Right, don't disappoint me with angry tweets or whatever you're gonna do. All right, we'll get some news from Heather Brooker in

the KFI newsroom and then some room room news. GM paying millions and millions of dollars because of something going on with their cars, and it's not the first time. Apparently you're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI Am six forty. We got some information in if you feel like the rent is it's too damn high here in southern California, well here's some stats to prove it. Although you might be surprised. Yes, California has some of the highest

per square foot rental costs in the country. But we're not number one or number two, three, or four. We're number five average of two dollars and ninety six cents per square foot. If you want to pay more on average, you can go to Hawaii, Massachusetts, New York or Washington DC. If you want to pay as little as possible, you can go to North Dakota, where the average rental is only a dollar eight cents per square foot. Also, we have the eleventh smallest average apartment size in the country.

The average California apartment is eight hundred and fifty one square feet, five percent below the national average. If you want the tiniest average apartment possible, get on up to Alaska. And if you want the biggest, you got to go to Georgia. Apparently the average apartment size in Georgia is over one

thousand square feet. Now let's talk about some car news. GM will pay a little bit over one hundred and forty five million dollars in penalties because a federal investigation found that about six million of their cars were spitting out more emissions than they were saying. Not only do they have to pay the money as a penalty, they have to give up about fifty million metric tons in carbon

allowances. These are their cars from the twenty twelve to twenty eighteen model years, and they were spitting out about ten percent more carbon dioxide than the initial compliance reports said. Now, this is not like the Volkswagen thing. You may remember the Volkswagen thing in twenty whatever it was fifty teen sixteen, where Volkswagen was found to on purpose with a special device, cheat in the testing

of their emissions. They would put this thing on the car and then test it and then go, oh, these are our emissions, ha ha. So they got in big trouble. Now, GM is not accused of doing anything like that. I don't believe that they did anything like that, but they did. They screwed up and understated the amount of emissions. So they're going to have to pay that money. The EPA is not making them recall any of these cars that are spitting out a little more emissions than they're supposed

to. It's not the first time that GM has paid money for fuel and emission related problems. Last year apparently they paid one hundred and twenty eight million for fuel economy penalties because they didn't meet the requirements. Now, before that, guess what, That fuel economy program has been in place for like forty years, and before last year they had not paid any kind of fine for forty years. So it's not like they're a nair Dwell company. But uh

yeah, I've been caught with a few problems. Now, oh man, okay, street racing. We know street racing is a problem. We know that law enforcement tries to do something about it, but it's almost impossible. I think Bill even talked about this on the show very recently about the laws that they passed just don't work. So there's another solution that somebody is trying. And the idea is, well, what if you could give the experience of street racing, but not on the streets. And that is what Leadfoot

City hopes to provide. It's the first ever automotive sports theme park. They'll be a restaurant, they'll be a bar, there'll be an event space, they'll have an amphitheater. I'm sure that they'll have concerts. They'll have a burnout pit and and a mile long drag strip. And the way that they're gonna do this is they want it to feel like not that you're on a dragstrip at a racetrack. That's not what they want you to feel like.

They want you to feel like you're in the city, like you're on Sepulvida and now you can go And they said this is designed for racing hobbyists or those looking to put the hammer down on their personal vehicles and feel the adrenaline rush. And the guy behind it, the creator of this attraction, whose name is Achilles Thomas. I hope he's not a heel. I'm sorry, I shouldn't have he said. Hey, even mom can come in her minivan as long as the car is safe, meets our minimum safety criteria. She

can get on this dragstrip. She can send the kids over to the game section at this park. She can get on the drag strip and put the pedal to the metal. I know people will go and do it. I don't think the people who are causing the problem with the street racing are gonna do it because they're not gonna see it as an acceptable alternative. Because part of the thrill for the street racing near Doells is that you're not supposed to be doing it. So the second you say, well, you can do

the same thing. You can go really fast and race your buddy, but it's allowed, they're like, no, thanks. The adrenaline rush comes because it's forbidden. All right. Now, we're gonna get news from Heather Brooker, and then for the next part of the show, we're gonna talk about food. Yes, we're gonna do Foody Friday. Neil is off today, but we're still gonna bring you Foody Friday and a possibly desperate attempt to make a certain food seem healthy. You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI

AM six forty some of the stories following for you. Over in Britain, they had a big snap election and the Conservative Party that has been controlling things for fourteen years is not going to be controlling nothing anymore. The Labor Party has won the crucial number of seats that secures them a majority in the Parliament. There, all right, let's get into this. We're gonna do some

Foody Friday. I know that Neil is off, but I like Foody Friday on a Friday, and I like food, and I like the first subject of today's Foody Friday? Ice cream. Is there anybody on this show who doesn't like ice cream? To me, this is a very yeah. I didn't think anybody would speak up. There might be one of you that doesn't like ice cream, but I'm guessing you're too afraid. I mean, I like non dairy ice cream, Okay, all right, that counts. I

like the real stuff. Can't have the real stuff. I'm sorry. Oh my well, all right, So everybody who loves ice cream, right, yes, So here's the thing. We all love ice cream in some form or another. Nobody says ice cream is healthy. Nobody walks around and says, hey, you know, I'm trying to eat more healthy, so I've started eating more ice cream. But there are some dietitians who are trying to make ice cream sound healthy. For example, and I will name them.

There's a dietitian named Shelley. Oh, don't giggle when I say her name. I swear to God her name is Shelly Balls. And she said in an interview with Yahoo that, well, one of the benefits of icecream nutritionally is that a serving of ice cream has about twelve percent of your daily requirement for calcium. And calcium is a nutrient that we most of us, don't

get enough of. It's under consumed in our normal eating pattern. So how about that when you have that ice cream cone, you're getting some calcium also, she says six grams of protein preserving plus or minus a little bit, depending on the brand, And that's the same amount of protein in a hard boiled egg or an ounce of almonds. Okay, fine, there are obviously sources of calcium that are healthier than ice cream and protein. But fine.

Now Here comes Stephanie Vanta Zelfton, another dietitian who was talking to Yahoo, and she said, and I want to believe that whoever wrote this is mischaracterizing what she said, but it says she often recommends ice cream as a dessert option for her diabetic clients. Now the thinking is this, Okay, ice

cream has sugar, yes, but it also has fat and protein. So if you combine the fat and the protein with the sugar, it actually reduces the spike that you might see if you ate something that was more sugary. I mean, this makes I guess I could see this that it would be better if you're diabetic, it would be better to eat ice cream than to eat cotton candy. But I also I would think, and I don't want to bum anybody out, but if you're diabetic, maybe the best dessert option

is not dessert. So now, of course, if you follow anything on social media, you see this new trend which is to really try to make ice cream healthier. And it's all these people who are basically making ah I want to say fake ice cream. It's all these fitness people. I'm sure you've seen them on your TikTok, your Instagram reels, whatever where they're taking Like, take some cottage cheese. This is true. If you haven't seen

this, I'm about to make you go yuck. Maybe take some cottage cheese and some protein powder and maybe some I like stevia, and put it in the blender and then pour it in a dish and then put it in the freezer. And that's ice cream. And boy is it healthy. It might be healthy, but it's not ice cream. Also, the people that are talking about, oh, what you do is you take your ice cream and then you put other stuff in it to make it healthier, like chia seeds

and hemp seeds and oats. Yeah, if I'm gonna give an ice cream cone to a horse, I might do that. Oh. I love ice cream, don't get me wrong. I love it. I love it too much. I really do love it too much. Remember when Nancy Pelosi was in the news because she did some video from her house and she was showing off her kitchen and she opened up this fancy refrigerator and like she had an entire refrigerator that was nothing but pints of super premium ice cream. Remember that?

And people are like, what's wrong with you, lady? And I was like, why do you only have one refrigerator that's entirely full of ice cream? But I'm never gonna pretend the ice cream is healthy. Let's talk about this now. The weekend is coming, It's a holiday weekend. There's gonna be a ton of cooking out going on. And cooking out has a long history in this country. And one thing I found out that was amazing is how the charcoal briquette was invented and the people, the four people that

are involved in making it. So you can go to the grocery store and get a bag of Kingsford charcoal burgett. And I'm not being preferential to the Kingsford brand, except that Eg Kingsford, who was a real estate agent, is one of these four guys responsible for you having it. The other three are Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, and some guy named John Burrows who's probably

really mad that he's nowhere near his famous as these other people. But it all started when, you know, Henry Ford was building cars and back in the day the Model t's had wood. The running boards were wood, the dashboards were wood, the spokes of the wheels were wood. You needed about one hundred feet of hardwood for each car. So he got with this EG.

Kingsford was actually a real estate agent, and they worked together and they bought this huge parcel of timberland up in Michigan, I think like three hundred thousand acres, and they built a saw mill there and a parts plant there, and they actually founded a town called Kingsford for the workers to live in. And they started making the stuff for the cars. And then Henry Ford said, look at all this wasted wood, though, what a waste of

money, this wood that we that aren't going into the parts. What can we do with it? And so one of the chemists that Ford, found a way to take this wood scrap and mix it with some other stuff and create these little lumps of fuel and they called them charcoal bricketes. Now, what is Thomas Edison's role. His role is he helped design a factory to

make these charcoal brickets right next to the sawmill there. And eventually, long story short, Kingsford ended up getting the name on a charcoal bricket company in the fifties. That's why the Kingsford brand is named after this guy. And once that happened in the fifties where you could just walk into a grocery store and get him, that's when barbecues went crazy in this country. And the other thing is that the reason we associate grilling with men is because that's how

it was marketed. All the advertising about grilling out in the fifties and the sixties. Not only was it always a man, always at the grill in the ad, but you had an aggressive message that grilling was for men and not for women. There was a food writer named Clementine Paddleford who wrote a column in nineteen sixty where she said barbecue is fast becoming a national sport,

one for men only. And then in that same newspaper they were doing a cookout competition and they put in the text they go the winners and their wives could win these prizes, and you couldn't even enter if you were a lady. Now that's going away, and now there's a lot of women who are becoming grill masters, even like publicly so, and winning competitions and all of that. But it did start out as a boys club. Hey, let's get some news from Heather Brooker and then we'll close out Foody Friday with a

lawsuit about sodas and the potato chip that will rule the world. You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI AM six forty. Now we're doing Foody Friday, and there's a lawsuit now against the makers of this soft drink brand called Poppy. None of you've seen it in the stores, but it is

all over the place, and it is a prebiotic soda. Just as we were talking about a move to try to take ice cream and do something with it to make it healthier, well, the new trend is taking soda pop another thing that nobody really is gonna say is healthy, and do something to it so that you couldn't say it has health benefits. And so what's going on with Poppy, and I think there's another brand called Allipop that's doing a similar thing, is to put some fiber in it, prebiotic fiber, to

be exact. And then that is what Poppy touts and the other brands of these pre biotic soda is tout that you get the soda taste, but you also get pre biotic fiber and maybe there's less sugar than a regular soda, but there's still some sugar in it. And this is big business. When you take a drink and you do something to it like this, you're creating

a foot they call functional beverage. Right, there's this idea that like, you're not drinking it just because you want a nice drength, you're drinking it for a health reason as well. And this is apparently a thirteen billion dollar market now functional beverages. Wow. By contrast, you know kombucha, which I guess you could say is a functional beverage, but it's also natural about a billion, maybe maybe one point one one point two billion a year.

Wellness shots, those little things that taste awful that you take about a billion. But these functional beverages have way more of a market share than that. And so here comes a lawsuit saying, uh, first of all, you don't have enough. You may be putting this prebiotic fiber in his soda, but you don't have enough of it to really do anything. There are scientists who are dedicated to figuring out how much prebiotic fiber in a can of soda

do you need to have an effect? And there was a researcher out of the University of Illinois who did the research and wrote a report and said, if you put seven and a half grams of prebiotic fiber in a soda, it might forgive me for this. I'm not trying to be gross, but it might help soften your stools or increase the number of powel movements that you have every week. And the lawsuit is saying, oh, you know, seven and a half grams might do something, but you have like two grams

and that's not nearly enough to be making these claims. And so I don't know what's going to happen with this kind of a lawsuit. I would imagine the FDA, which does have all kinds of rules about making health claims and how to label your products, may refine the requirements for what you can put on a can of this soda. I will tell you that I did try.

I'm not going to say which one. I did try. One of these brands of SODA's not so much because I thought, oh, that's the only way I'm going to get any prebiotic fiber, but because was on big sale that week. It was on a super duper sale, and I love a bargain. Uh, And I'm not gonna lie. They're weird. They taste to me, they taste just weird, not bad, but weird, Like there's the soda part, but you can sense the fiber part a little bit separately, and it's not that enjoyable. Here we go, ladies and

gentlemen. Soon the world will be dominated by the great God Pringles, and more specifically, mister P Pringles Mingles. Mister P apparently is the mascot of Pringles, and mister P is gonna be the king of the snack world because the parent company that owns Springles, Kelenova, used to be Kellogg's, changed their name, spun off their cereal division, said well, do the cereal thing really anymore. We're gonna focus on snacks, and they are pinning their

hopes on Pringles, which is already this is crazy to me. Three billion dollars a year from Pringles and they're not happy. They're not satisfied with Pringles selling three billion dollars a year. They want four billion dollars a year and they say they can do it because the secret weapon of Pringles is since they're a manufactured disc, it's not really a disc but I can't think of a better word for the shape of a Pringles. We've all seen a Pringles.

But it's a manufactured crisp, and you can make it taste like anything anything everything Bagel, carnaitis, taco, sharp white, cheddar and ranch teraoki, hoban yerro, mango, bowl of breakfast, cereal steak and onions. I'll stop now you get the point. There are I believe it's one hundred and fifty or one hundred and sixty different Pringles flavors all over the world. And this is how they're going to expand, because you see the area for expansion.

I don't know they're gonna make Americans buy more Pringles, but you expand worldwide. You go to a place that doesn't have any Pringles. They're eating some other kind of snack. Those are losers. We want to give them

Pringles. How are we going to get them to switch to Pringles. We'll find a flavor that they like over there, you know that country had I don't know, like in Belarus. They might have certain tastes and they'll figure out what tastes do the people in Belarus like the most, and we'll just engineer a Pringle. It tastes like that and there you go. And it's

a very successful strategy because all of these special flavors sell like hotcakes. They're also expanding with you know, they're trying to do the healthy thing as well. The trend here today on Foody Friday is things that aren't really healthy that they try to make healthier. So, you know, they came out with these harvest blends, Pringles multi grain, got sweet potatoes in there, that

kind of stuff. They're also getting into the spicy market with Pringles Scorching, and I guess what's coming out now is Pringles Mingles, which is like a puffed snack, so it's not like a manufactured disc. It's like a kind of like a cheeto. I would imagine. It doesn't come in a can, comes in a bag. And this is their plot to take over the

world. I think Pringles when I was a kid and when I was in college, pringles were like I really thought Pringles were the best tasting thing on the planet, and I easily could eat a whole tube of Pringles at once easily. And then later as an adult, I bought some Pringles and I don't know if they changed anything or not, but they didn't seem as good. All Right, I am done here. Thank you to everybody on the

show today. You've been listening to the Bill Handle Show. Catch My Show Monday through Friday six am to nine am, and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android