BHS - 7A – The Alec Baldwin Trial | Biden’s ‘Checkers’ Speech - podcast episode cover

BHS - 7A – The Alec Baldwin Trial | Biden’s ‘Checkers’ Speech

Jul 09, 202427 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Alec Baldwin goes on trial today. The cost of ‘extreme heat’ in California and whether or not insurance should cover it. Biden supporters are waiting for his ‘checkers’ speech... how ONE speech can turn around a terrible campaign, just ask Richard Nixon. The country’s hottest new job market – Buskers! Cities are paying up to $100 an hour for street performers to revive downtowns.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

You're listenings KFI AM six forty the Bill Handles show on demand on the iHeartRadio app. And this is KFI AM six forty Bill Handle here on a Tuesday morning, July nine, still looking at Hurricane Barrel, now a tropical storm wreaking havoc, certainly as it goes up through the Mid States, mid part of the United States. And here's another bit of news, Guests, what starts today. The Alec Baldwin trial for that shooting on the Rust set Rust,

by the way, is finished. They went ahead and finished it a few months ago. So that's done. And of course we all remember, I mean this was news national news that exploded October twenty one, twenty twenty one. Okay, it's coming up to three years. So on the set in New Mexico, Alec Baldwin points a gun at the camera. Well, sitting behind the camera is cinematographer, right, Helena Hutchins, And the gun was live, there was live ammunition. He shoots it, hits her in

the chest and kills her. And then this became enormous news. Was Alec Baldwin at fault. Then you have the armor, you have the assistant director because Alec Baldwin was told the gun was cold, and that means that there was no live ammunition in the gun. Theoretically he was told there's no live ammunition. Turned out there was live ammunition and somehow it got into the gun. We still don't know how we do know that there was live ammunition in

the cart there is. From what I understand, the gun is placed in a locked cage on wheels and the armor has to go in check the gun, load the gun with blanks, and so you have the armor responsible and then you have a redundancy where the assistant director also has to check out the gun to see if it is live. So what ends up happening. Well, here's the uproar. Alec Baldwin is accused of involuntary manslaughter pointing a loaded weapon at someone well, which is against the law. Of course, his

defense is, hell, I didn't know it was live. Are you actually going to accuse me of not checking when I have two people on the set. So why is Alec Baldwin getting nailed? Because I questioned it and I still question it. So what happened? Why is he getting nailed? Public pressure? Sure for one thing. A bunch of high stakes, legal maneuvering. That's another one and pure hubris on Alec Baldwin's part, because he actually shot three people that day, one Helena Hutchins, who was killed, the

other one the assistant director who was standing behind and who was wounded. And what is not particularly known very well is he also shot himself in the foot and why what did he do? Well weeks after the shooting, he goes on ABC and has an interview with George Stephanopoulos stepanop Pulis Stephanot pull Yeah, the great guy, George Stephanopolis and says, I didn't pull the trigger the gun. How do you say that in Greek? By the way, the

gun just unloaded by itself. Well, because of such high profile of the case, it goes to the FBI for investigation where they go through it with a fine tooth comb and they say the trigger was pulled. Of course it was pulled. There was no other way for the gun to go off if the trigger wasn't pulled. That very gun, and Alec Baldwin said, I never pulled the trigger. Okay, caught in that one, and that doesn't

help his case. So where did he shoot himself in the foot? What kind of idiot is he He goes and does an interview, and no lawyer in the world would let him do an interview. Hey, if anybody asks you about what happened, you shut up. I have no comment. Don't think that's hubris of an actor to think like I can pull this off. I can, Yeah, I can. I can sell this like I sell That's exactly correct, that's exactly You're not talking about a semi automatic modern weapon.

You're talking to about an old gun that with probably a nine pound pull on it, that's not going to be drapped. Is I think it is an actual gun and it fires, and it's a big honkin bullet, and it kills Helena Hutchins. And his argument, by the way, he's being charged with involuntary manslaughter. He can get years in prison. So a couple of things that don't help him. One it's Alec Baldwin. Two, of

course Helena Hutchins was killed, but he's the producer of the film. And it's the buck stops here philosophy, and it has been alleged and no one is refuting it. Alec Baldwin as the producer low budget film that he's the one that I'm sure financed, if not all of it, part of it. On the set, all kinds of safety requirements were ignored, They rushed the production. Safety issues were overlooked, and so this entire per option of what happens, and the jury is going to have to look if he is

responsible. I don't get it. How he can be charged with manslaughter is beyond my comprehension. He is told it is a cold gun, he aims at the camera. He doesn't aim at Helena Hutchins. It's not like she was standing ten feet away and he aims at her and pulls the trigger. Even though it was a rehearsal, it wasn't during actual filming. And I don't know if that's important or not, But the bottom line is I think his defense is absolute. I have people on the set who tell me that

gun is cold. If you convict me, what you're saying is every actor who is handed a gun has to check to see if the ammunition is live or not. Okay, how do you do that? Literally? Do you stop shooting now? Neil? You have pointed out earlier that today you don't have to even have a shot. You can literally point the gun at anybody or at the camera and you put in the sound, which they do anyway, and CGI and show the blast and the firing. Oh yeah, flash

of fire, smoke and the mental flash. So it's so the fact that he did it, maybe it's a lot cheaper, which I'm sure because there's no CGI involved. Well, here's the thing, though, you're never if someone's behind that camera, you're never My understanding, and I have a friends and family in the industry, is it never gets pointed at someone? Well, how do you do that? Wait a second, If you are shooting

at the camera to show them a shot, they do a mirror. They do it so that they are never ever pointing it, or that the camera person or the cinematographer is not behind the camera at the time. All right, So the shift is that they shoot it off to the side. Okay, I understand that. Okay, assuming that's correct, Assuming that's correct, who is responsible for that? Is it the cinematographer who handles the camera?

Is it the director? Is it the assistant director or the or the star in this case, or the producer, because that's where the buck stops. You have a star and the producer. I would think that because he's the one who hires the director. Yeah, basically the boss of everybody. Well, he's also but not only is he being blamed overall, he's being blamed specifically for that gunshot. And that's where I think I believe he's going to win. But the case starts today. It's going to be eight days and

in front of a jury. Jury selection starts today, and we'll see what pans out. All right, For the first time, there is a report that has just been issued ninety two pages by the state insurance Department, California State Insurance Department. This was a bill that was passed in twenty twenty two that mandates the state to come out with a report and just tell us what it costs, not necessarily the deaths, but the actual cost in terms of

insurance, in terms of infrastructure costs. So the fourth of July holiday was the hottest fourth of July on record, the holiday and the insurance department looked at it. Matter of fact, they compared the seven extreme heat events in the state from twenty thirteen to twenty twenty two, and we know that it took the lives of hundreds of people, and it's getting worse. We had massive new records. Palm Springs hit what one hundred and twenty something. Death

Valley hit one hundred and twenty eight. There was one death. Cyclist was traveling along Death Valley and oh, one hundred and twenty eight temperature heat killed them. Well, what a shocker that is. And we have what Phoenix had record highs. Las Vegas hit one eighteen. My best friend lives in Las Vegas and all he admitted it was hot. Thank you, savill always accept the heat. He's okay with it, not when it's one hundred and

eighteen degrees. So these events had a total economic impact of seven point seven billion dollars of lost wages, productivity, agricultural manufacturing disruptions, power outages, infrastructure damage, and a whole lot more. And on top of that, we've had five of the deadliest wildfires in the history of California, I think in the last ten years. So we're moving very quickly to every record being

broken. The death toll from the extreme heat events identified by the Insurance Department estimated nearly four hundred and sixty in It is first of a kind report, and here is a major issue. Heat waves of this magnitude are not considered natural disasters per FEMA, per the United States, per the insurance companies, floods are, earthquakes are. Certainly hurricanes are not. Heat waves, and

heat waves kill more people than any other natural occurrence in the country. And so there's an argument saying, listen, you have to put heat waves on the list of natural disasters. It's called the silent killer because it's not as if someone drowns or as swept away, or a building or a piece of furniture falls on them during the course of an earthquake, or a road that falls on them. If you remember, in a north Ridge quake, there was a cop who flew off of an overpass he was driving and the whole

thing collapsed under him. And in Reseda during one of the earthquakes, the entire office or the entire apartment building just pancaked. It wasn't built, it was built to code, but it was old and the whole thing came down. So the argument is we have to look at heat waves and give them numbers. What category is the heat wave? Much like we give earthquakes a number on the Richter scale, we give hurricanes number category four category five.

Heat waves should go from well I don't know. One to ten, but I don't know. Maybe it's one to five. I don't know. You have to talk to the experts on that one. Who delineated. And the insurance companies don't cover heat waves? They don't and people die. Now the argument is, how does insurance cover a heat wave? Do you insure yourself if you don't have air conditioning? Well, if you can afford air conditioning, you assure as hell it can afford insurance. But here's the problem.

What if your air conditioning breaks? You can buy home insurance that fixes your air conditioning. If you have a power outage and someone dies, let's say is shocked or a piece of equipment blows up because of the utility doing something wrong with the power, you have power surges, you can make a claim someone dies because of a heat wave. Nope, insurance companies don't cover that.

I mean your life insurance will cover it. And as always in the report, who gets nailed Hispanic Black Pacific Islanders, people that are poor, the elderly, who are most susceptible. Of course, there isn't a story I do that doesn't include and who gets hurt the most Hispanics, Blacks, poor people always the case. So the argument for making these heat waves a natural occurrence, a disaster, a coverable occurrence, Well, that argument I think is gaining legs big ones. All Right, Joe Biden is in a

little bit of trouble after that disastrous debate. Was it last week or the week before? Now are we all? So we're wow week and a half out of the speech that a lot of people think to completely destroy his candidacy, as I do. And so what is he doing to somehow rehabilitate himself in the mind of the Democratic Party hierarchy, in the minds of voters, in the mind of just Democrats, both national and state officials. Well,

what he's doing is having interviews, having rallies. So I'm going to take you back to nineteen fifty two, and this is a fun part of history

I want to share with you. Dwight Eisenhower was running for president, and in a very rare run for president, he was offered the presidency or the candidacy of both the Democrats and the Republicans, and he chose the Republicans, and he chose as his running mate this relatively little known at that time, senator from California Nition, a senator maybe just was in the house, and he was known and Nixon was known as the Communist fighter and was absolutely disgusting

in going after the communists. He was more a Joe McCarthy congressperson than anyone else. So he is now running for he's chosen as the vice presidential candidate. And he got into trouble because there was a report that came out that a fund had been raised to help pay his expenses by eighteen thousand dollars, and he was making in the three thousand dollars range. And he got into trouble and all of a sudden people were looking at hey, eighteen thousand dollars

was raised by contributors to help Nixon. And Nixon was about to lose the vice presidential candidacy. Dwight Eisenhower was about to bounce him from the ticket. So what ni And did. This is a brilliant move, is he came up with a speech that he was going to do to the American people nineteen fifty two radio and television, an extraordinarily brilliant move. And he went on TV. He bought half an hour of primetime TV where the Republican National Committee

did, and he talked about that fund. He talked about that money, and he said, this was for expenses only. I didn't take a dime of that money. If you look at the expense sheet, the most of it was for mail, a lot of it was for travel, and not a dime went to me for personal expenses. And this was the famous checker speech. And I'll tell you why it's called checker checkers. So he's in

front of a television camera. He does it here in Los Angeles, and does it at a sound stage and Pat Nixon, his wife, is off to the corner and the camera occasionally pans to her, and there she is completely stricken by what's going on. And he says, I didn't do it. I didn't take any personal funds. My wife doesn't have a mink coat. She has a good Republican cloth coat. And he was as Richard Nixon

was pleading, he was defensive. He did admit to one thing, and he said, there was one thing that I did take one of my supporters. We went to the airport. There was a package waiting for us, and it turned out to be a crate, and inside the crate with a little black and white dog who had heard Pat Nixon during one of the speeches or one of her rallies, say my daughter wants a dog. So there is this black and white dog, and his six year old Tricia named it

Checkers. And he said, that's one thing I am going to keep. I am going to keep Checkers. The kids, like all kids, love the dog, and I just want to say this right now, regardless of what they say about it, We're going to keep Checkers. Therein lies the famous Checkers speech. His reputation turned around immediately. It was one of the

most successful comebacks rehabilitations that have existed in modern politics. Dwight Eisenhower after hearing the speech, I got together and reporters heard Dwight Eisenhower, who had originally said, you know, I'm going to dump you, he said, that's my boy. And Nixon went on to become vice president, ran against JFK, lost that race, came back in nineteen sixty eight, and became president in another extraordinary comeback. And we look back at the that speech, at

that comeback, and is it gonna happen? Can it happen with Joe Biden? No, Joe Biden already has his dogs, So that's a problem. That's the start. Joe Biden buying national television would do nothing because he has all the national television coverage he wants the president. The president coughs and it's reported. So while it helped Richard Nixon, it saved his political career. Will the performance of Joe Biden a week and a half ago in the debate

help him? No? Doesn't he wish that someone gave him a dog? We're keeping although someone giving him a dog? Is that a violation of a campaign contribution? Personal contribution? Not going into the campaign? Here's a dog unless the campaign owns the dog? What and loans the dog to the Biden family. I think that would be within the campaign laws. What if it's a seeing eye dog, that's different, that's different. I think that. No, No, I don't think so. I think Joe Biden has to

buy the dog. He can't accept the gift of a dog. Didn't his dogs like bite the crap out of the sea? Yeah, that's yeah. The dogs. Yeah, the dogs ate a couple of Secret Service people to the point, and I mean really ate them to the point where the dog had to be well, had to be sent away to I was gonna say dog Heaven, but that's not the case. Sent away to Doggyville, wherever

presidents send their doggies to some kind of boarding facility. All right, now, I don't know if you have noticed, but there has been a huge increase in street performers. You know, they're playing guitar or saxophone or violin or dancing around and there's always a can in front where people put tips. Now, I've always called street performers beggars, that's my name for them. But why are we seeing more and more of them? I'll tell you why.

Because you've got malls, you've got cities where people that go to these places aren't going anymore. I mean particularly malls and places of businesses, and places of business have to do something to bring people in, and so they're becoming places where destination places and great street performers out there, and so you're seeing a lot more. By the way, these guys can make up to

one hundred dollars an hour they're being hired. There's a Wall Street Journal story about a Martini Shakers who goes across the South and plays little gigs and got hired. And when I talk about little gigs, barn Raisings, Hog Killings South. That's a little gig, but got hired by a business district and I think it was one of the Southern cities, if I'm not mistaken,

Jacksonville or one of those cities. It gets paid one hundred dollars an hour for being out there and gets the tips because it's fun to see street performers. Robin Williams started as street performer in San Francisco, and you've got cert to Slay started as street performances and look where that's gone. And if you go up to I get Peer thirty nine in San Francisco, which always has a street performer in front of this little mall area, this little strip area

with a bunch of restaurants. I once saw saw a guy juggle chain saws three chainsaws. Now, juggling a chainsaw or three of them is no easy trick. How about chainsaws that are working that we're on and he was juggling them. I mean that's pretty impressive. Now it's you've got street performers saying there's a you know, there's an issue. Sometimes I don't get many tips. One street performer that was interviewed by the Wall street Journal said, I

have seen people steel tips that were in my tip jar. I mean, come on, you know, I mean there's disgusting, and there's disgusting, and why would you do that in front of a steep performer? I mean, I can see if you're doing in front of a blind performer that works, but you know, it's it's just not that easy to do. So this is a kind of performance that you're going to see more and more all

the time. Now, is there a downside? Yeah, you only get a couple hours, So we get a couple one hundred dollars a week or every few days because they tend to rotate them. Also, I wonder what the the initial interview is all about, Right, the cattle call you out there to perform, I guess in front of a group of people and the city fathers or people that run them all, and you perform. And what's the weirdest one you've ever seen? Mine? Is that juggling of the chainsaws?

Neil Michelle Amy. I had a friend who did that. I had a friend who was a street performers. Yeah, did all knives, all kinds of things, yeah, knives or but you know, I've seen bowling balls. I've seen fire batons. Yeah yeah, but that's it. I've seen some really good ones. Mine's are a big one. I mean tell you, I like the guys who look like statues. Oh yeah, those oh yeah, and then they scare you. Yeah. Oh, you know that. It's a street performance when in front of a statue there's a tip

jar or a cane, which usually regular. You should do that. We should go buy a real statue and just put a tip jar in front of it and make a couple of bucks. That makes sense, I look it up at the end of the day. I was at City Walk Universal City Walk the other day with the family, and they hire performers to come out and play music and it's lovely. They're usually just a singer with a guitar or maybe a keyboard or you know where. You can find a ton of

street performers in the London underground, in the subway. Yeah, at all the stations. And that's by the way, you auditioned for that. These are good musicians, and they don't it's not like they set up. It's almost a permit process. And there are some really terrific musicians that do that. There are also some terrible ones. That's a lot of fun. Heckling a street performer. That is great stuff. All Right, we're done.

This is KFI AM six forty live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app. You've been listening to the Bill Handle Show. Catch my Show Monday through Friday six am to nine am, and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android