336: Avoiding the Special Pleading Fallacy - podcast episode cover

336: Avoiding the Special Pleading Fallacy

Jul 10, 202431 minEp. 338
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

In debates and discussions about the Trinity and the identity of God, the fallacy of special pleading (or "moving the goalposts") often occurs. This fallacy takes place when one person changes the conditions or definition of their original argument when a counter-argument has met the original conditions, resulting in the original claim being moved farther away in order to avoid admitting the strength of the counter-argument. This week's episode offers several examples of the case of special pleading in debates about God and Christ, shows why they are unhelpful in having charitable conversations, and offers tips on avoiding this common logical fallacy.

Visit Amazon to buy your copy of my new book Wisdom Christology in the Gospel of John:

https://a.co/d/6nFEbZg      

Please consider supporting this Podcast and future projects by donating at:

https://www.paypal.me/10mintruthtalks         

Check out some of my videos on YouTube at:

https://www.youtube.com/@BiblicalUnitarianPodcast            

Follow us on Twitter at:

https://twitter.com/OneGodPodcast  

For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android