If you don't have a structured process to hold yourself accountable to, you're going to miss things that can end up costing you the opportunity and cost you your quarter. It can cost you your year. You're listening to the Audible Ready Podcast, the show that helps you and your teams sell more faster. We'll feature sales leaders sharing their best insights on how to create a sales engine that helps you fuel repeatable revenue growth. Presented by the team at Force Management,
a leader in B to B sales effectiveness. Let's get started. Hello, I'm Rachel klet Miller. Welcome to the Audible Ready Sales Podcast. Today we are taking on commonly made mistakes reps make with medic and how to avoid them. I'm joined today by Antonella Oday. Hi Antonalala, Hi Rachel. Hello. So, Antonela just ran a working session on a Sender on this same topic. Now. A Cender is our subscription platform. Check it out my center dot co the links in the show notes. You should be there.
Everybody is, So I wanted to bring Antonella on to sort of continue the conversation because it was a good one in our live session. So Antonella, let's start first, with just an overarching opener here on medic I'm on LinkedIn as a lot of us are, and people will often criticize medic. What do you think when you see that criticism of medic I have to ask why, Like, why would anyone think that it really makes no sense? And here's my data to back that up. Think about the most common reasons why
deal slipstall or fail. You have no real allies in the account, no business paying or compelling events, or their decision criteria favors the competition, there's no line of sight on how the decision is going to be made. There's a handful of others. Those are the most common reasons why. We just consistently backed up the opportunity coaching sessions I'm involved in with clients, so I
can make that connection and it exists today saying issues consistently come up. Each of those issues that commonly come up tied to one of those components in medic. So if we know that by strengthening those components, we can reduce the chances of an opportunity slipping, solving or failing. Explain to me how it's not relevant. I'll also add this, many customer facing people out there are working in a really complex sales environment where each interaction needs to be strategic and
well thought out. If you don't have a structured process to hold yourself accountable to, you're going to miss things that can end up costing you the opportunity and cost you your quarter, it can cost you your year. So not leveraging MEDIC can be detrimental to sales outcomes as So we are from the point of view that MEDIC is relevant and if you don't think it is, you're probably not using it right. So let's talk about some common traps with MEDIC.
We're going to run through just some common and challenges that Antonelys's reps have around metic. We're going to talk about what you can do about them. So the first one is going to be around metrics, and it's not really getting specific enough with our metrics. Talk about what you mean by that and what can sellers do. So gathering metrics from our buyers is not always easy. So we sometimes get data that resembles a metric and we sell the great
a bit too soon. Its like, for example, you could be talking to a stakeholder who says, well, we want this initiative to drive revenue for the organization. Okay, that's a start, but if you're really looking to strengthen the opportunity, it's not enough. We need to ask what those revenue goals look like, because remember, we want to show proof of where we've been able to meet those metrics before, and ultimately we need to deliver
on those metrics. So let's say your buyer expects a twenty five percent lift in revenue. Maybe your best example for your organization is twelve percent. Now we have an issue. You can drive revenue, you've done it for others, but the expectation of the buyer is out of the realm of what you
actually can deliver. Now you have twols, you can attempt to establish a realistic baseline for them to use based on your track record, or you can make the decision that you can't deliver on those expectations and you step away from the opportunity. Both outcomes are win. I know we may not look at it that way when we step away from an opportunity, but you either move
forward or you don't waste time and resources. But if you don't get specifics early, you can end up waiting a lot of time, only to lose the opportunity later on. Yeah, I think we've said before lose fast, right, loose fast. You can ring in other places. So let's move to economic buyer. We have so much content on an academic buyer, and I know, I mean, I could do a whole podcast series on economic
buyers. And so there's a lot of challenges you may have with this particular letter in medic But one I want to talk about is a common trap around the economic buyer, and it has to do with the budget holder. They're not always the same person talk through that. That's when I see probably most often. I'll go as far as saying that the budget folder or project donor is very rarely the economic buyer. When you think about the economic buyer,
it's true definition. There are people that have power and influence. They can say no one others say yes, and vice versa. But there are also people that have access to discretionary funds. So when I hear the word budget, that's a red flag. Don't convince yourself as a seller, Otherwise you should see it as a red flag in question. If we as sellers are not skeptical, this creates a lot of problems for us. First, we
end up not identifying the real economic buyer. We don't know who that person actually is that has the final say, and that person can come in at the last minute and say no when you've worked so hard to get everybody else to say yes, and they can still in and take the money from your project and move it somewhere else. The second problem it presents is that we
get no line of sight on what's most important to the economic buyer. What are their metrics, what's their identified pain And if we don't understand what those are, what you bring to the table may not be compelling enough to move forward. And then the last challenge it creates is you potentially open the door to lose the deal to competitor because they are able to identify the economic fire and if they get face to face with them and they get alignment with them,
they're more likely to win the deal. So in every interaction, ask who is involved in the decision process, who is the final sign of set expectations that you will need to meet with the economic buyer. I will tell stakeholders, this is our process, this is how we work with clients. I want to meet with the stakeholders. I need to meet with the economic buyer early and at the end we get what we ask for. If you don't ask the who and set expectations around meeting with them, you don't get
the information and you don't get the access, and there you go. Great points in economic buyer are some good things to remember. Next, let's hit the decision criteria. Talk about this one a lot. We know we need to influence it right. That's the correution of your deal. How you have influenced the decision criteria. But reps commonly try to do this too late. So how do we do this early? My best piece of advice here is
have a strategy and a plan from the very first meeting. You should know from the very first interaction what are our strongest differentiators, Know which ones give you the biggest advantage, and once you've identified them, playing questions around those differentiators to help better understand your buyer's pains, what their goals are, and
relate it to those and what they may need to solve them. Influencing the decision criteria is nothing more than asking questions associated to that differentiator so that a buyer can come to their own conclusion and articulate they want or need it. Right. So my advice to you is not to try to sell your buyer on the decision criteria. No one wants to be sold. Guide them through a well thought out series of open ended questions and have them come to their
own conclusion. The last thing I will say is don't stop influencing, keep asking questions. Try to get as many things that favor you on that formal list of decision criteria. Make sure you flushing out and validated with multiple stakeholders. This then creates a really challenging scenario for any competitor. They may be considering, Yeah, that's great. Okay, So the second D decision process always becomes important, particularly as we hit end of the year. I've heard
you say that sellers really need to stay close to the decision process. What do you mean by that and how do they do it? The decision process is what I consider a moving target, right, and you think about the current economic climate, it's probably amplifying it even more. Let me provide some context to what I mean. For some of us, our deals may take a couple of months to close. Typically for others that can take two years, and weather it's a couple of months or it's two years. What we
know for certain is that things are going to change the political landscape. People be companies, people take out their roles, and if that happens, the dynamics are likely to change in the buying cycle. You have to assume that what you thought you knew is no longer valt People come in with different points of view, people come in with different outcomes they want to achieve. You
need to get a handle on that asap. And today's climate also lends itself to more scrutiny related to the paper process right, which we often talk under the decision process. So maybe Legal and Finance needs more time to review contracts, so the process is longer. So when I say stay close to it, I mean regularly checking in with the stakeholders you're in contact with and validate
what they know. I'm a bit of a stickler for like an ORG chart, because I need that visual to see what's happening, who's reporting to who, who's moving on. It's a great tool to come back to to stay on top of the people that we need to get a yes front. But on the paper process side, continue to validate the timeline around that you know, has anything changed, adjust dates, adust time frames, maybe added steps
that come in. You don't want to be in a situation where there could be a surprise for your customers and being able to meet their target dates. And you definitely don't want any surprises to your pipeline or your forecast. So staying close to the people and the process reduces that risk. Oh I love that. Okay, identified pain, it's a big one. We need big pain. We know we needed business pain. What is the most common trap with this letter? It's one of the tough one because there's a lot of
potential traps here, and so I'm going to give you three. I'm going to keep it brief and concise. The first one is focusing on the wrong pain. Not all pain is created equal, And what I often see here is we hang our hat on a technical pain. And that's not to say that the pain of a technical stakeholder doesn't matter. It matters on its own. It just doesn't often carry enough weight to move things through the pipeline quickly
or to land those bigger deals. Those technical pains typically are not on the radar of the economic buyer, so it becomes easy for them to prioritize those projects or move that money somewhere else. The big business problems can become in essence, like a security blanket on raw opportunities. The second one is not understanding that we would cause or the compelling events. If there is not something that is driving buyers to connect with you, I get concerned that they're just
window shoppers. They're looking, but they're not potentially buying. Today's climate, very few businesses are spending money on something without a driving orce or a compelling event. So really understanding what's driving them to engage with you is really important. And the last one I'll say is not quantifying the pain. Yes, you connect the pain and a quantifiable way to revenue costs the risk. It
becomes really challenging for the buyer to have real urgency to move forward. Quantifying the pain really helps the buyer real life like the depth and breadth of the pain and helps create that urgency. Very awkwardly need from them to find that solution. Correct great reminders there. So the next one is champions. We have a ton of content on Champions. I would it's one of the most popular topics on a center, and I know the common trap is confusing a
champion with a coach. I hear you all talk about that so often. But another one I wanted to bring that you talked about in the live session was single threading the champion concept. I thought that was an important one. Talk about what you mean by that. That whole concept of balls around the idea of relying on just having one champion within the account. And it's an interesting one because we know the work it takes to develop just one true champion.
There's a lot that goes behind that. Right, But as I mentioned earlier when we talked about decision process, that people in the decision process are moving targets, so having just one champion could really put you at risk. They could leave the company, they can move into a different position, and
then they're left without any ally in the account. Right. So, another area we don't often consider, I think is especially true in some of the more complex deals is the fact that you know, champion may be limited in their knowledge if the organization's needs are dynamics, so additional champions can help fill in those gaps as well. The last thing I want to share around champion is something we may not be thinking about. We can feel really good about
our champion. They may be doing all the right things for us on our behalf, But what if the competition has multiple champions within the account, They're going to be in a stronger position to have more allies that are working to get consensus on their behalf. Now they're in a position to win the deal. So it's not just for us and our ability to maneuver throughout the account.
We have to take into consideration what's happening on the outside with the competition and what they're doing, and how they are networking politically within the account as well. Perfect and so on that topic of competition, that's our second se let's close with competition. We know we need to understand our competitors, but
sometimes sellers don't really go wide enough with the competition concept. Yeah, part of us says the strength of a deal is acknowledging and exploring all possibilities, and if you don't really know what you're up against, your game plan and strategy is probably going to be very flawed. When I was selling and leading sales teams, my biggest fear related to the competition was that do nothing or
do it internally scenario. It's the toughest one to overcome because think about how easy it is to do nothing specifically, but also do something in house. People lean towards comfort what they know, lack of disruption, no additional costs, that's health decline. And if you don't understand that this is a potential obstacle, no matter how good your product or services, you're going to face some significant resistance. Ignoring it may cause you to ineffectively position your offering.
You may waste time and effort and resources thinking you're moving things forward, only to find out they're keeping tires so to speak, and plan to do things themselves. And one of the things I like to ask from understanding their challenges are how likely are you to do nothing to resolve this problem or how well equipped are you to tackle this challenge internally and not seeking outside vendor at all? Because I need to know what I'm up against the determine if I can
win or if I need to step away. Great things to remember, Antonella, thank you for this conversation today. I mean all this stuff. These are good things to remember because every deal is different, and you may find yourself succeeding in one deal and struggling in another and these reminders can be really important, especially when we're going to try to get those deals across the finish line at the end of the year. So wrap us up, let's give
us some final takeaways around medic. Medic provides really valuable structured approach to qualify your opportunities. The biggest piece of advice I'd like to give sellers is skepticism is your best friend. It's a safeguard against potential traps. You should be skeptical of not only what you are hearing, but also what you think you
know. Taking that type of approach is going to provide you with a more objective view of the deal, but also the ability to pivot more effectively when you have to, and maintain a skeptical view throughout the process is going to minimize surprises but also equate to confidence in your pipeline and your forecast. That's it. I love that skepticism is your friend. Thank you so much Atonella. Thanks Rachel, all right, thank you to all of you for listening
to the Audible Ready Sales podcast. At Force Management, we're focused on transforming sales organizations into elite teams. Our proven methodologies deliver programs that build company alignment and fuel repeatable revenue growth. Give your teams the ability to execute the growth strategy at the point of sale. Our strength is our experience. The proof is in our results. Let's get started. Visit us at forcemanagement dot com.
You've been listening to the Audible Ready podcast. To not miss an episode, subscribe to the show in your favorite podcast player Until next time.