The First Arabians

Ever wondered why the Romans were defeated in the Teutoburg Forest? What secrets lie buried in prehistoric Ireland? Or what made Alexander truly great? With a subscription to History Hit. You can explore our ancient past alongside the world's leading historians and archaeologists. You'll also unlock hundreds of hours of original documentaries with a brand new release every single week covering everything from the ancient world to World War II. Just visit historyhit.com slash subscribe.

You walk in tired and hungry, one bad dinner away from losing it. You don't like to cook. You don't want more takeout. You just want something good. That's why there's Dish by Blue Apron. pre-made meals with at least 20 grams of protein and no artificial flavors or colors from fridge to fork in five minutes or less.

Keep the flavor. Ditch the subscription. Get 20% off your first two orders with code Apron20. Terms and conditions apply. Visit blueapron.com slash terms for more. When the flu is keeping you up at night. Don't try to tough it out. Knock out your flu symptoms with NyQuil Intense Flu. You got this. It provides powerful relief of your flu symptoms so you can sleep well through the night. NyQuil Intense Flu.

The nighttime sniffling, aching, aching, fever, best sleep with a flu medicine. Use as directed. Keep out of reach of children. If journalism is the first draft of history, what happens if that draft is flawed? In 1999, four Russian apartment buildings were bombed, hundreds killed. But even now, we still don't know for sure who did it. It's a mystery that sparked chilling theories.

I'm Helena Merriman, and in a new BBC series, I'm talking to the reporters who first covered this story. What did they miss the first time? The History Bureau, Putin and the apartment bombs. Listen on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcasts.

At the dawn of human history, this vast and dramatic landscape became a gateway to the wider world. The story of the first Arabians begins with the earliest homo sapiens to migrate out of Africa. Today is an especially exciting time, thanks to groundbreaking advances in ancient DNA research that are illuminating the complex and fascinating journey

of our ancestors. In this episode, we'll explore how genetics can help us understand the connections between those first homo sapiens who arrived in Arabia and modern day populations. We'll also look at what life might have been like for those early human communities living in Arabia more than 50,000 years ago. This is The Ancients. I'm Tristan Hughes, your host, and this... is the story of the first Arabians. Our guest today is Dr. Pierre Zaloua, Professor of Genetics at Khalifa University.

Pierre, it is such a pleasure to have you on the podcast and to be doing it in person. Welcome. Thank you. Actually... We've met three years ago. Yes, we did. Or two years ago. And then I'm happy that we finally made it. We met at an archaeological conference in Saudi Arabia, of all places. But it feels fitting for today's topic on the first Arabians, but also the first...

homo sapiens in the wider region as well, because you've just written a brand new book, Ancestors, all about the history of the Levant, or the Levant as well, with DNA and exploring the stories of these earliest people to these areas of the world. Is it a really exciting time with new scientific developments and so on? I think ancient DNA has transformed the way we look at population migrations and who populated.

which part of the world first. I think ancient DNA caused a paradigm shift in the way we do population genetics. And no wonder that Papo Svante got the Nobel Prize for it. I mean, it's transformed the way we look at human migrations. And in a lot of places, actually, it made huge impact.

It made major discoveries that made us change our ideas or our theories about when and how humans migrated out of Africa. The challenge I have to just... put it here is Arabia because of the heat and because of the conditions where the remnants of humans in the desert actually Extracting DNA from human remains has been extremely challenging. And to date, I will tell you that that has not been a, maybe apart from a couple of samples.

No DNA beyond 5,000 years have been able, we have not been able to get any DNA out of samples that are more than a few thousand years old from Arabia.

from the entire Arabia, which is a huge challenge. It's a huge challenge. And is that in contrast to places a bit further north, like the Levant, where you have more human bones today? Exactly, exactly. So in the Levant and in northern Levant, in the... Caucasus even, and in Iran, the Zagros Mountains, and in Anatolia, we've had ample, ample DNA samples. And that's why the story is so exciting.

the point where we get to Arabia. But we have other tools at our disposal that have given us ideas about when Arabia was populated and how Arabia was populated, etc. But until we get... ancient DNA, and I'm hoping we will. I mean, we're trying so hard, and actually from that visit that you and I had, colleagues there that are trying to actually get some good quality DNA out of the samples that they have.

But still to date, we have not been able to get that. You are a brilliant geneticist. Can you explain to us a bit more of the process behind how you would try to extract ancient DNA from these remains? So, ancient DNA. Every single cell of our body or the skeleton supposedly has DNA. But with time, cells get very porous. And then if there's no collagen to keep the bones together, you lose.

a lot of the skeletons of the cell itself and DNA is no longer there. So you need some form of skeleton to fix the DNA to it. So we basically use certain... parts of the skeleton, namely the teeth and the molar, precisely because if you can actually drill within the molar part, you can actually extract DNA and you hope that there is DNA inside.

So that's one part that we can get DNA from. But most recently, and I say recently over the last five years or so, we discovered that the petrous bone, which is, yes, which is below the ear, right at the end of the mandible. It's very thick. It's actually one of the thickest, if not the thickest bone in the body. Because it's thick, it actually can withstand a lot of heat and a lot of climatic changes, et cetera. And we can actually extract DNA from it.

And that's what most scientists have been successful with is extracting DNA from petrous bones. And actually, this was a major shift in the way we extract DNA. So basically, you grind. that bone and then when you grind that bone you basically you dissolve all the material into an aqueous phase and then liquid phase and then you get the DNA out and you analyze the DNA.

How can you then use that DNA to track prehistoric migrations of people that in some cases occur tens of thousands of years ago? Well, I think the beauty of ancient DNA is because you can archaeologically date, because you can carbon date and use other methods to actually date that material. So we know exactly using ancient DNA or ancient material is...

how old the material is. So that's something that we have now. For example, when you discover Neanderthal DNA, which is a very old DNA, so from other methods you can actually date.

that skeleton or those remains, and you can actually put a date to it. And then when you extract the DNA, you now know that people who lived 100,000 years ago or 50,000 years ago, this is what the... what their DNA looked like and you compare it to what the DNA looked like today and then you can actually look how much did it change in 50,000 years ago knowing

That knowing what we know from science is, yes, DNA changes every generation. But it's like a clock. We know exactly the changes that actually can happen through time. And by doing this comparison... we will be able to know if this change is actually a normal timeline change or if something else happened to to these people did they disappear or

the people living today are the direct descendants of these skeletal remains. It is such a fascinating scientific field, and I must admit, I'm someone who doesn't have a big scientific background at all, so I'm loving learning more about this. If we go back to Arabia and you've highlighted how it's more tricky learning more about the earliest people populating Arabia because of the temperatures, to learn more therefore about that...

What other methods do you have to use alongside ancient DNA? Okay, so let's discuss first, why do people move? Okay, so why did our ancestors leave Africa? Okay, well, they need... better you know better place to live because either heat was too much or the hunting grounds were actually you know getting they shrunk etc so it said so they go from one environment to another

to survive. So people move throughout history, they've been moving throughout history to seek better climate, better places to hunt, better places to live, etc. So why would actually people move into Arabia? And that's the question that we had. So I would say throughout the last, you know, 100,000 years, the climate was the main driver.

for human migration. So you have to look at climate maps and see how did Arabia look like 50,000 years ago? How did Arabia look like 100,000 years ago? How does Arabia look like today?

And so it's extremely important for us to understand how the area looked, how the area behaved, you know, how was the environment in that area before we can actually say, well... human lived or didn't live so this is a huge element that we need in place first so looking at climate shifts looking at was it wet did it actually did it have enough

green pastures for actually people to live, for animals to graze. And then, you know, you need, so when we talk about humans, you need, you know, subsidies for humans as well, right? I mean, you need. the animals that they hunt, you need the plants that they eat, etc. So that's extremely important. So climatology or the science of environmental changes is extremely important.

That's one aspect that we look at. So the second aspect is archaeology. You know, is there any archaeological remain that actually can tell us that humans did in fact live in that place? The problem with Arabia is that we see some evidence of human presence 130,000 years ago, maybe 210,000 years ago. But then, because of the climate...

Because of the shift in climate, then the area was no longer inhabitable. So people actually escaped. And when they escaped, either they moved long distances, went back to Africa, or they went up north. or they live in refugia. And usually these refugia, from what we know today, have been around the Gulf area, so close to the water.

Okay, so like the Gulf of Aden or the Persian Gulf today? The Persian Gulf today, exactly. So basically, we know that people move to these… areas and they shrink I mean these areas livable areas they shrink so much because of the climate and of course we have the you know glacial ages, right? I mean, the last glaciation that happened 25,000 years ago to 18,000 years ago, this is the last glacial maximum that we talk about, was also a major player and we'll talk about.

Because during that period, Arabia was not a place where you can actually sustain life. So these fluctuations that happen, so if we talk about, let's go back to 130 to 110,000 years ago. And then for a long period of time, Arabia was not populated because people cannot live there. And then perhaps, you know, around, I would say, 65,000 to 50,000.

there has been a cooling area in there, more humid, and we have evidence that some people may have lived there. But then soon after that came the last glacial maximum, and then... the entire population disappeared up until, I would say, 6,000 years ago, where we call it the African human period, which actually, you know, anywhere between 14 to 6,000 years, that's when Arabia was...

mostly populated, I would say around 7,000 prior to today. We see, I would say, the largest number of people moved into Arabia based on the archaeological evidence that we have. So if we're going to talk about when was Arabia populated, I would say my guess would be around that time, 7,000 years ago, started to see.

strong evidence of populations that actually remained. One thing I have to mention as well is after the ice melted around 18,000 years ago, what happened to the Virgin Gulf? What happened to the... to the sea level. It rose significantly. So those people, the ancient people who actually may have lived around there, what happened to them? They're underwater now. So that's why it's very hard.

to find these archaeological remains from 50,000 years ago or 20,000 years ago if they exist because they're underwater. So hopefully one day we can actually...

have underwater archaeology and then discover those. Some have now started to being discovered. I know the evidence is more tentative, but I hope you don't mind if we go... before 7,000 years ago right now with these earlier, I don't know if I want to say unsuccessful, but more temporary occupations of people in Arabia. You mentioned that evidence from 130,000-120,000 years ago.

Do we have these brief moments which seems like there is human occupation in Arabia earlier on? These are based purely on certain archaeological findings and no humans. Actually, they have not been able to find human remains. But the archaeology actually is telling that these may have been occupied. And the problem is, again, as I said, we have not been able to find human remains up until 7,000 or 6,000 prior. And we are working. I am.

you know, with some collaborators that, you know, we're working on some of these remains. So far, we're not very successful, but we are pushing on that. So it's really hard to... pinpoint the evidence right now of these ancient ancient people who actually lived i think As we do more archaeological studies, underwater archaeological studies, we will find numerous sites across the Persian Gulf where we can actually see remnants of these ancient populations.

This is also important to highlight because I know you've also done a lot of work on the Levant where there's the presence of Neanderthals and of early Homo sapiens together. Do we not think that Neanderthals made it? into Arabia? Do we think that the Levant is almost the cutoff point? It's a very difficult question to answer because we don't have any DNA. But the most likely path is the Sinai.

up to the Levant where Neanderthal lived for a very long time moved into Europe and we know there's strong evidence now that most likely they the first interaction between or the first cross between Neanderthal and Homo sapiens. Interbreeding. Interbreeding happened in the Levant and perhaps happened more than once. So we know for a fact that they existed together at some point in the Levant.

Now, how did the Neanderthals got there? Yes, I mean, you can argue that they may have also, you know, come through the Bab el-Mandeb. You have to realize that through Bab el-Mandeb in Yemen. They could cross it. You don't need to. I mean, the water was so shallow there, so people could cross. And the Sinai was very different back then. I mean, you can actually cross it much easier than today. It was not all that desert like today.

And again, as we learn more about how people move, this one out-of-Africa migration is no longer sustainable, I think. And one thing I have to also mention is we don't talk about migration. back migration also played a huge role. People moved out of Africa, but a lot of people moved back into Africa. And so a lot of movement happened over the last 50,000 years, you know, during the last glacial maximum.

people escaped the Levant, escaped Arabia, you know, and I won't be surprised. Actually, we have evidence to show that they actually moved back into East Africa and some other parts of Africa. The Natufians, which we'll talk about, we believe. that after the Younger Dryas, which is a very cold period that happened around 11,000 years ago, the population of Natufians who lived in the Levant shrunk. And some of them may have actually escaped. Some of them went north.

but others actually went south and perhaps crossed back into Africa to escape. Because we see material culture that, in Natufian culture, that is more impacted by Africa, whether because they interacted with them or... whether they have actually moved there and interacted with them in Africa and they brought them back. So really, we have to think about, you know, it's not always one direction of movement. It's actually, you know, it's a corridor back and forth.

Maybe you like cooking. Maybe you don't. Either way, the new Blue Apron is for you. Because along with our classic meal kits, we're offering new pre-made and one-pan meals to help you get dinner on the table fast. And now there is no subscription needed, so you can just order and enjoy. Do delicious food your way. Shop 100 plus meals at BlueApron.com. Get 50% off your first two orders with code APRON50.

Terms and conditions apply. Visit blueapron.com slash terms for more. Hi there, I'm Dan, host of Dan Snow's History Podcast. I can imagine on these dark winter nights, all you've got to do is curl up with a cup of tea and get lost in an amazing story. Well, I can help you with that. Twice a week, I tell you the most dramatic and extraordinary stories from history with details I can guarantee you've never heard before. Feel the frostbite of that grisly failed...

American invasion of Canada in the dead of winter. Imagine every clash and blow at the Battle of Bosworth. Follow Eleanor of Aquitaine, one of the most powerful women in the medieval world, as she goes on crusade to the Holy Land with 300 handmaidens in tow. She leads her own army. Everyone goes gaga for Eleanor. And trace the voyage of the first Vikings as they arrive on Iceland's lonely shores. For the best historical stories to get lost in, check out Dance Notes History here.

If we can focus quickly also on those out-of-Africa migrations. Pierre, I know you've done a lot of work around this as well. Can you tell us how they relate to those early groups of homo sapiens? going into Arabia and then, as you mentioned, ultimately some of them retreat back into Africa. But can you explain how DNA is making us rethink the nature of those migrations into Arabia at that time?

The 50,000 years out of African migration has been highly documented because we have strong archaeology and we have also strong DNA to show we can time that migration. through DNA mutations that happened. And the fact that, you know, now Homo sapiens, you know, initially we thought, you know, when I first start to study.

Population genetics, the whole idea was like, we are 150,000 years old. Of course, now we push that to 400,000 years. We think some Homo sapiens actually are 400,000 years old now. And again, because of ancient DNA, that made us change these theories. But the most striking idea is that the population in Africa shrunk so much during that time that those who actually...

migrated out of Africa were very few. And we're talking maybe in the thousands, maybe a few thousands only. And that's why we're not as genetically diverse as you would expect if we were evolving. without this bottleneck through 400,000 years ago, we would be a lot more diverse than we are today. So this is what DNA is telling us. So DNA tells us these stories that we shrunk and then we expanded again when we left.

So, and then from that point on, when you study people today, you compare their DNA and you can actually tell how many generations passed. through mutations that we calculate. So we know that if we say a generation is 25 years, so we expect certain changes based on DNA mutations, right? And then we can... we can calculate and figure out when a mutation appeared. So we start actually understanding when people moved, how they moved, and who moved to certain places and who established.

those places and once we start looking at populations living today we start actually constructing reverse engineering we actually start to say oh this group who lives in the levant today we know where they come from. Because we have ancient DNA from people in situ, in specific places, we can compare this ancient DNA to modern DNA and say, Is this a likely descendant? And that's how we do it. So we compare ancient DNA to modern DNA, and we do the calculation of time.

by generation, and we can tell. For example, in the Levant, we know that the Levant, the modern-day Levant, is made of mostly three, or at the most, four major... genetic components. In other words, who are the ancestral populations of the Levant? We know that the Natufians who lived in the Levant 14,000 years ago were actually the original or the, in fact, the first inhabitants of the Levant that are continuously, their DNA is continuously present until today. And then these...

people were mixed from the Neolithic Anatolian, talking 12,000 years, 12 to 8,000 years, who came from Anatolia. And then we also know that from the Zahros Mountains, you know, the foot...

the foothill of Iran's mountains. They also came into the Levant. And that's how the Levant is actually populated. And I'll continue the story. So from that point on, because... of climate we understand how climate was we understand also that yes the levant at that point was sustainable for for having people in and then we have evidence now that these people migrated south into Arabia. So Arabia is actually heavily populated by ancient Levantine populations.

If you think about Arabia, modern Arabia was not populated from Africa. No, it was populated from the north. This is what ancient DNA is actually making us correct what we didn't know before. And then that's how we do it.

The reason I ask also is that because I know, as you mentioned, no remains before 7,000 years ago, so it is much more tricky in Arabia. But I've got on my notes things like the gate of tears and how... with early successful migrations of humans out of Africa that it seems likely that they went along the Arabian coast and although it wasn't enduring there because ultimately they have to leave Arabia when they...

climate gets much worse, as you mentioned, some 23,000 years ago. Because of that, I mean, do we therefore have any sense, any idea of how those early communities lived in Arabia and how they got to Arabia? Just anything about their lives? Yes. So when we talk about Bab el-Mandeb or Gate of Tears, is most likely Arabia, ancient Arabia?

not the one that we know today, was populated most likely from the Gate of Tears, from Babylon. Sorry, where is that? This is Yemen. It's just across. So, Erythraea, Ethiopia. Thank you. So basically, the most likely scenario is that ancient Arabia was populated through that route, but also other people tracked even more. eastward and that's how they populated the East Asia up to Australia. But what we know of these ancient people who actually came to Arabia, not very much because...

The climate changed so much in Arabia that I would say some of these early cultures, who were actually hunter-gatherers, of course, they lived in very small communities and they lived close to the water. And then... as the last glacial period happened, with the ice melting around 18,000 years ago, these communities actually either escaped or went underwater. That's why we still haven't discovered.

those people yet. I think, as I said earlier, we will get to know more about this when we do some underwater archaeology, and I think we're going to get there soon. After that, Arabia was dry for a long time, up until, as I said, the last, we call it the African humid period. It started to happen around 14,000 years ago, and then it peaked.

around eight to seven thousand years ago in Arabia, and then that's when Arabia was populated again. And do we see, and so the people are coming at that time, they're coming from many different places, including the Levant, do we think? This is what I think, and I could be wrong, but this is what so far the DNA that I've worked with have told us, is yes, most of modern...

Arabians that we see today have a huge DNA component from the Levant and that region. Of course, you also have the Iranian component as well present. You have the Natufian present as well. And, and, importantly, you have two other components into modern Arabia. One from East Africa. You see it? You see... Another one from Egypt. There's a lot of common lineages between Egypt and Arabia. And you see from the east through Dilmun, the Bahrain interaction with the east.

you know with the indian trade and all of this so but these last three are more recent so egypt east africa and india were much more recent whereas the levant input was much older than this to Arabia. So if I want to say, you know, the population of Arabia today, I would say, yes, Levantine, mostly Egypt, East Africa, and some part of India.

Thank you for letting me ask so many questions about the pre-7000 years ago. I do appreciate it, but I love exploring that kind of the deep ice age story of it all. But does it therefore seem that by 8000, 7000 years ago, There is quite a population boom in Arabia at that time, around 7,000 years ago. We believe there was a population boom, and that's what we see today. I mean, these are the people who actually survived over the last 7,000 years, although…

If you look at Arabia today and compare it to 7,000 years ago, of course, it was a much different place. You had much greener places in Arabia than what you see today. What do we know about the environment at that time? You know, small communities, as I said, so you don't see very large communities and mostly around places where you have water. Of course, there were a lot of lakes present, so they were more nomadic and actually they kept the name.

you know we believe the name Arabia which is you know it's it's also a term that you know needs to be studied extensively it's you know it's described nomadic people who lived in Arabia so I think That's how these people live. They moved around these lakes, around places where there is water, and the remnants of those are these oasis that you still have today in Arabia. So I was actually going to ask, my next question was, when do we think that the people who then...

populate Arabia. Of course, massive land mass. When do they become more sedentary? Do they bring farming with them? But it doesn't seem like it's a straightforward answer to that. Yes. It's not a straightforward answer. No, absolutely not. I think the nomadic lifestyle of Arabia has dominated most of the last three, four millennia.

you know they they moved from one place to another you know after 6 000 years actually arabia started to to become more arid and more more desert up until today so yes people their movement were a bit difficult. They moved with difficulty because of sustainable land actually shrunk. And I think they lived nomadic life for the last few millennia. And some of them still do today.

You know, these caravans that we talk about, that we all learned about, they were only recent. You also mentioned in passing earlier, and I know it. and its involvement in the story, the story of the Natufians. Now can you explain who they are and how they relate to the story of Arabia by this time a few thousand years ago? So the Natufians, the name of Natufians comes from

the valley of Natuf, Wadi Natuf, which is in Jordan. This is where actually the late period Natufians were. So the Natufians are the earliest cultures that we know of in the Levant. anywhere between 12,000 and 14,000 years ago. And they lived, we can start seeing, I mean, they lived in many caves, of course, and maybe some early, early community life of the Natufians.

The difficulty that we have with Natufians today is we don't have too many samples to look for. I mean, most of what we know comes from... half a dozen samples that have actually been sampled successfully but and most data comes from David Reich who is a very famous ancient DNA specialist as well. So these are the people who live in the Levant.

They occupied parts of Syria, modern-day Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan. And then after the Younger Dryas happened, you know, 11,000 years, where you have this major... climate shift, they split. We believe that they split. Some went south, further south, and perhaps they reached Africa, and some went further north.

But they shrunk in size because of the climate. They shrunk so much. And then after, when the climate changed again, then they spread again. And while they were spreading, at the same time... people were coming down from the Caucasus, from the Anatolian Plains, and from the Zagros. So as people expanded, because the climate got better after the last glacial maximum.

And they started mixing. So we see evidence of mixing between the Natufians and the Neolithic Anatolians and the people coming from Iran, from the Zagras Mountains. And that's what constituted the Levant today. that we know today. And then part of the Southern Natufians that actually escaped, we believe that actually led to most of the inhabitants of Arabia. So we think that, yes. So, but they also mixed.

from the northern Levantine as well. So, and this is still up in the air. It's not 100% solid, but this is what the early evidence is showing us.

So following 7,000 years ago, do you as a geneticist and your team, do you have more information available for learning more? As you mentioned there with like the Natufian link, for instance. about the makeup of these early populations in Arabia. I guess it's still the Stone Age at that time or deep in prehistory, but less than 7,000 years ago. Yes. So again, Arabia prior to 7,000 years ago.

very, very limited evidence, archaeological or other, that exists in Arabia. The Levant, of course, we had a lot more. I think the Levant, we see continuous populations. over the last 7,000 years and perhaps more. Of course, the Levant, because of the climate and because of the topography of the Levant and Anatolia, A lot more refuge were there and people actually could escape and stay in these refuges when the weather was bad. Unlike Arabia, where you could not find serious refuge to go.

And as I said, you know, because after 7,000 or 6,000 years ago, the land became more arid and more desert-like. After that time, do we have more examples from the prehistoric Arabian population, so 6,000, 5,000, 4,000 years ago, so we can learn much more about them?

Let's talk maybe 5,000. Okay. 5,000 and 4,000 years ago. And this is where we start seeing the evidence right now. Arabia has not been studied extensively archaeologically. It's now been... you know i would say over the last maybe five to seven years where a lot of activities have been going on and and alola as as a site but it's much later than this alola we're talking the nabateyan

and this is much recent so we know more about this and and and frankly what i know about this is much more recent than than the 7 000 so i couldn't tell much about you know prior to these people who actually live in Arabia. We still don't know. The new WeCoVe pill is now available through Weight Watchers.

Powerful GLP-1 results in a simple pill at the lowest price available. And with Weight Watchers, you can get doctor support and personalized nutrition programs. See if you qualify at WeightWatchers.com. Adnot reviewed or approved by Novo Nordisk. Did you know Tide has been upgraded to provide an even better clean and cold water? Tide is specifically designed to fight any stain you throw at it, even in cold. Butter? Yep. Chocolate ice cream? Sure thing. Barbecue sauce?

Tide's got you covered. You don't need to use warm water. Additionally, Tide Pods let you confidently fight tough stains with new Coldzyme technology. Just remember, if it's got to be clean, it's got to be Tide. So Pierre, of course, we're covering a huge geographic region with Arabia, several modern countries today. How do we think the whole region was ultimately populated? What do we know about that?

One of the most important things to note here is we believe a lot of things happened in that region. Really, the first communities that existed were. you know in the euphrates in in mesopotamia right and i mean we're not too far the fertile crescent yes exactly so so the first community is the first cities you know the first real populations as we call them populations actually started there

So this region has been continuously populated over the last 7,000 years, which makes it a fascinating region. So when you approach and you want to study this region, you have to look at this. massive shifts of populations and cultures. And you say, how am I going to decipher all of this by looking at modern DNA today? And it's really, it's a puzzle. It's a huge puzzle.

So if we think about it, so if we go back 7,000 years ago or a bit earlier during the Neolithic time and the agricultural expansion, let's put it this way. So let's talk 8,000 to 9,000 years when actually people started to leave their hunter-gatherer styles into small communities and agricultural and expansions and start farming.

So this happened in the Fertile Crescent. This happened in Mesopotamia. And who were the cultures that actually lived there back then? So there were very few of them. And as I said earlier, These actually were the people who lived in the Zagros mountains at the foot of the Zagros. These people who lived in Anatolia and the Natufians. So this is how it all started. So these are the people who actually were.

the ancestors of the Sumerians, Sumer, the first city in the world, as we call it, 3,100 years ago, 100 BC. So these are the original cultures that actually led to the people who live today. I mean, all of us. So you have Sumer that started around 3,100. And then... After Sumer, then came the Akkadians. And the Akkadians came somewhere from, you know, northern Euphrates, perhaps more from, you know, west.

Asia, perhaps the Levant, they were Semitic people. The Akkadians were Semitic people. And they came and they took over and they destroyed, well, they dominated Sumer. And then after that, you had so many... different cultures that actually fought. You had the Babylonians, you had the Assyrians. And so all of these people actually that moved in that region make our work extremely difficult.

to understand. But at the end of the day, when you do the analysis, you see that all of these actually came from these three distinct original cultures, which I think fascinating. If I continue through that...

So if we go from what happened to the Babylonians, then you have the Assyrians and the Neo-Assyrians that actually came and they took over. Neo-Assyrians actually took over the entire region up until... um uh north egypt so so they they had a major presence so when all these cultures actually dominate you still you say you know what am i doing now

5,000 years later, what am I doing? How can I actually decipher all of this? So it's not an easy task. So when I did my work on, and I say identity and the Levant, identity and DNA in the Levant. It's just I'm trying to figure out, you know, who are these people, you know, and when did they arrive and where did they come from? So it's really fascinating when you start putting archaeology.

history and genetic together to understand our ancestry and that's what's fascinating about all of this so you have to think and you have to put in perspective you know that you know it's not It's not always a linear approach. It's very complex, interactive approach. And you have to come to the idea that...

it's not going to be an easy answer. It's not going to be a simple linear answer. It's a very complex topic. And you've highlighted the wider region there, of course. And I'm guessing it also filters into Arabian populations as well. That's right. I mean, you know.

Part of, if we look at Mesopotamia, right? And if you look at Iran, I mean, if you go south, right? I mean... that's where you you are you have Yemen and you have Arabia right I mean this this interaction it's a continuum we we don't know if actually people moved from Arabia into Iran or from Iran into Arabia and I think we're seeing both we're seeing this interaction

ancient until today. When we talk ancient, we're talking 7,000 years. Presuming then you've also looked at DNA from people who live in Arabia today. Do you notice... significant differences in the genetic, is it the ancestry I guess, of people let's say from Yemen compared to Amman and so on? Is that also an interesting component to look at?

When you do DNA analysis on modern people who live in Arabia or in any region, there's something you have to really understand is that culture actually... makes an impact on how our dna is in other words so what you choose to do in your life where you migrate where you move who you marry makes your dna different so if you

If you migrate into an area where nobody lived before as a small group and you grow, your DNA is going to look very different than the initial group because actually, you know, you're actually... breeding within a very small group. So culture actually in that sense changes the way the DNA is going to look like. And this is something that we don't often think about.

So when you tell me that if you take the genes or the genomes or the genetic makeup of people who lived in Yemen versus people who lived in... Jeddah, for example, Saudi Arabia. Yes, you're going to find differences because there is a geographical barrier. You know, these people have been living together for a long time. But if you take it a step further or if you take it a step...

Deeper than this, no, the changes are not very different. So yes, you could see some changes that are modern changes, that are new changes that you can actually describe. But the stock... remains the same. And that's descended from those prehistoric migrations to Arabia thousands of years ago. You could see them. That's an amazing line then, right down to the present day.

Lots of this science sometimes goes over my head, but you've explained lots of it brilliantly in understanding the kind of story of this early populating, of such an important, crucial region of South West Asia. Is there anything else you'd like to highlight that we really should...

talk about with these earliest populations in Arabia, and I guess, if you want, the wider region that we should think about when looking at ancient DNA and other fields today? Well, I think it's important to understand. that people moved a lot. And it's also important to understand that there's not gonna be a single story about human. populations. I think there's going to be many many stories and these stories I would say will change because science will change. What we understand today is

is based on what we've learned. But then maybe 10 years from now, new evidence comes and then it will change the way we understood things. We keep on changing many things. As I said earlier, you know, we thought... Homo sapiens were only 150,000 years old. Now we think they are 400,000 years ago. So initially, when I was studying genetics,

My professor told us that Neanderthals and Homo sapiens never mixed because they based all of this on mitochondrial DNA. Now we know that they mixed at least four times. We know now there is Denisovans as well. in the east so and we know that there's a mix between Denisovan neanderthal and homo sapiens as well so what i'm trying to say is we're learning i don't think anything

you know, we should not simplify the story. I think simplifying the story, you know, yes, we'd like to say we came, we descended from X population at that particular time, but it's not always. I think the complexity of it makes it more interesting, especially for people like me. And as I give examples, there are multiple, multiple populations or cultures that lived in a very small region.

which is the Fertile Crescents all the way down to the Levant. But then if we go back 10,000, 12,000 years ago, we know that the source of these populations were only three cultures. So these are fascinating stories. I'll give you an example. The Levant today is populated. Yes, you have all of these invaders that we talk about, like the Romans, the Persians came.

and then the Romans, and then... A bit of Aksum as well, Ethiopia in Yemen, yeah? I mean, I'm talking about the Levant. Oh, sorry, the Levant, okay. So in the Levant, you have the Romans, and then... and then the Persians, of course. So you have all of these mix that happen in the Levant. And then you would expect to see a lot of these DNA remains.

of of romans and persians and the crusades later but you don't you see only very small fraction that actually is is actually changing only which is fascinating which is fascinating These tell stories that actually make us say, you know, yes, people come, you know, especially in the past, you know, these waves of people moving through wars, you know, Alexander with his army.

they didn't leave any DNA or very, very little DNA to mention. It's so interesting going back to those three groups that you highlighted earlier that they stem from. I guess that's also in the case with the famous Arabian kingdoms like the Nabataeans or the Sabaeans in Yemen, they also have their links to those three from earlier. That's right. That's right. That's right. My last question then must also be Semitic languages. Can ancient DNA and your studies help?

us learn about the spread of Semitic languages into the Arabian Peninsula? Well, I write about Semitic languages in my book, and something that fascinates me, and I learn so much about languages. I'm not a linguist, of course. Languages move very differently than DNA. The two are not tied together at all. It'll be a mistake to think that we can associate language movement with DNA. I'll give you an example.

Persia, when Persia dominated the entire region, including the Levant, you know what the lingua franca was? Aramaic. Yes. So it was not Persian at all. Languages move very differently.

And I think it's a very difficult thing to actually conflate the two together. It's just going to be very difficult. Yeah. This has been such a deep dive into ancient genetics and its links to the Arabian Peninsula and the wider Levant, the Fertile Crescent. Talk to us a little bit about your new book, Ancestors.

It's a book about the Levant, mostly. And it's a book that tells the story about who the ancestors of the Levant were. And it's not only about... ancestry or ancestors of the levant it tells a story about cultures the cultures that lived in the levant and how these cultures manifested themselves how we can look at dna to just understand how these cultures moved but most importantly the message in this book is to basically state that DNA is only a thread.

about these cultures so it tells you how these cultures move but it doesn't tell you anything about these cultures these cultures we talk about languages we talk about lifestyles

We talk about habits, rituals, and all of this. And I think that's what this book talks about. It talks about that we should not limit a culture to a DNA test, should not limit identities to a... to a DNA test, I always say that roots is not a word to be used for humans, maybe certain plants, but origin is something that you carry with you as a human being.

And then your identity is something that you modulate and you evolve. So DNA does not or should not have the impact that initially we thought it would have on identities and cultures. So that's what I talk about in the book. Yeah, it's a great book. As you cover all of that area and the long history and prehistory of those areas and the makeup of the populations. It just goes for me to say thank you so much for taking the time to come on the podcast today. Thank you.

Well, there you go. There was Dr. Pierre Zaloua talking all things the first Arabians. I hope you enjoyed the episode. Thank you for listening. Please follow The Ancients on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. That really helps us and you'll be doing us a big favour. If you'd also be kind enough to leave us a rating, well, we'd really appreciate that.

Now don't forget, you can also sign up to History Hit for hundreds of hours of original documentaries with a new release every week. Sign up at historyhit.com slash subscribe. That's all from me. I'll see you in the next episode. What's happening? Is that your antiperspirant? Yeah. Let me see that can. Aluminum butane.

I cannot pronounce that. You have to switch to native deodorant. Native Simple Formula has only clean ingredients. It gives you effective 72-hour odor protection with no hydrocarbon propellants. Wow, this smells heavenly. Clean, effective 72-hour odor protection isn't a myth. It's native. If journalism is the first draft of history, what happens if that draft is flawed?

In 1999, four Russian apartment buildings were bombed, hundreds killed. But even now, we still don't know for sure who did it. It's a mystery that sparked chilling theories. I'm Helena Merriman, and in a new BBC series, I'm talking to the reporters who first covered this story. What did they miss the first time? The History Bureau, Putin and the apartment bombs. Listen on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcasts.