Hello, it's Saturday, June 12 2021. Think I'm on episode eight. Let me check. Yes, it's number eight. Eight episodes. Eight seconds, eight days, eight months, eight. I don't know, I didn't even know what I'm saying. I didn't know if I was gonna record this or not today. But I'm here. I just finished the different podcasts. So I figured I'd throw this one
in while I can. And while the dogs appear to be sleeping, they were walking around like mad on my last podcast, or at least my my big dog Godfrey was and he was just making all kinds of stupid noise. I don't know I hope the noise gate function in Audacity can take that out. Because it's a more straight up podcast where I'm not rambling like I am here. For today, let's see. I you know, when I get to Saturday, and I take a look at what I blogged over the previous week, and I didn't think I did
anything. And then I look at it like, Oh, yeah, you listed a lot of crap. More than more than what I thought. So you know, I don't know if I'll get through it all or not. And I'm going to start out with something I just literally ran across just in the last few minutes. I saw a post on daily wire COMM And it was from us regarding Senator James Lankford, Republican from Oklahoma. He was quizzing our HHS Secretary and I can't
remember his name. His last name is Sarah. But I don't I can't remember if he goes by Xavier or Javier, I'm gonna guess Javier. Because his name is spelled XAVI er, and I heard his last name said, you know, they call them Secretary viscera. So that one hopefully, I got that one. Right. So I think it's heavier. Sarah, the Secretary of Health and Human Services. It's a short video on YouTube. It's like five minutes long, but you cut into about one minute and Senator Lankford Lankford asks him if
he's cut a certain division out? And I don't know why. I mean, I guess I know why. But is it that difficult? Just to answer a question directly? Nobody does it anymore. Almost nobody, that that was the one refreshing thing that you got out of Trump? You know, if you didn't like what he was saying, or who was saying it, at least he would give you a direct answer to a question. He might even give you more than what you bargained for. But listen to this bullshit
at your nomination hearing. You and I talked about the conscience and freedom and freedom of faith. All of those protections that are there, I was surprised to see the language in the budget is stripped up much of that language that had existed in previous budgets about freedom of conscience, freedom of religion. And it also seems that you're eliminating the conscience and religious freedom division.
So eliminating that division. And I wish he would just launch into that question, you know, first of all, I don't even think we need a Department of Health and Human Services, there should be that that cabinet position should just be eliminated as as as much of the modern presidential cabinet. But he asked this question, it's pretty direct question. Have you done this or not?
Is that true in your budget? Are you eliminating the conscience and freedom, religious freedom division, we are going to continue to do the work to protect the religious, civil constitutional rights of all Americans under HHS purview. And we are going to continue to be a solid organization through the Office of Civil Rights that we have to make sure that we're protecting everyone's rights, including religious conscience rights.
Oh, my God, what a fucking load of bullshit. Why can't you just say you did it and then follow up with with either what you've replaced it with or what the goal is why you were why you got rid of it. Just answer the goddamn question. You know, there isn't anything really that HHS should be doing anyway, with regard to religious freedom. They shouldn't be discriminating against any American for any reason. Period,
end of story. So whether they have some stupid division, you know, for religious freedom or not, should really make no difference. Yeah, just the whole thing was just fucking infuriating.
But you, you're taking away that division as a priority and putting it under something else? Or where is it going, Oh, it continues to function, the work continues to be functioning under the Office of Civil Rights.
So there you go. Finally, finally, he says where it went. But he, he cannot bring himself to say that they eliminated that division. So it's still, you know, whatever. He's claiming whatever those functions are that that one division was doing. It's now under the Civil Rights Division.
Okay, so it has not changed or it has changed, the work will not change. I mean, we continue to have a responsibility to protect the religious freedom of all Americans, when it comes to any of the health care programs that are out there, we will continue to provide protections for the civil constitutional rights of all Americans, including those that involve religion, and so nothing there changes. Okay, we'll follow up on that in the days ahead, to be able to see that often
comes at bat shifts.
I also know she changed the term in your budget work. You shifted from in places from using the term mother to birthing people.
Can you even believe that this is where we are today that you can't call a mother a mother, that because of, you know, where we are today with transgender rights, whatever that is, I mean, that, you know, rights are not something that exists for a label rights are something you're born with. You just you have them because of your exist because of your existence, not because of some label that you want to place on yourself. It's a biological fact. Women, females have
babies, you can call yourself a man. But biologically, you cannot have a baby unless you have a womb, females have wombs. So traditionally, you you would call that person a mother. So now, starting in the federal government, the Department of Health and Human Services, has changed the term mother to birthing person. House how just absolutely asinine is this? And the senator asked some asks, Mr. bursera, this question, Amber, Sarah wants to say, Mom, when you're watching the video, he
wants to say, Mother. But because of the current policies and the ridiculousness of it all, he can't just say birthing person is a mother. But we're just using this more, he can even say we're using this more inclusive term, to capture more than just females who identify as female as a woman. It's good to encompass females that identify as a man. So they're using the new term birthing person to be inclusive. But why
is it that he couldn't say it still means mother? Because it does, it still means mother eating it, it would encompass that
rather than mother, can you help me get a good definition of birthing people? Well, I'll check on the language there. But I think if we're talking about those who give birth, I think we're talking about
right there. He wanted to say Mother explaining to them he wanted to say Mother, but he couldn't do it. I was a little taken back in his read a few videos just so stupid. Her
mother was gone in spots. using the term mother, we got a birthday. Listen that again, rather than mother, can you help me get a good definition of birthing people? Well, I'll check on the language there. But I'm talking about those who give birth. I think we're talking about mothers say it. I don't know how else to explain it. I was able
to bring himself to say it
and it was replaced with birthing people. And I didn't know if this was a direction that you were going if there were shifts, if there are regulatory changes that are happening related to that or what the purpose of that is. I think it's probably and again, I'd have to go back and take a look at the language that was used in the budget, but I think it simply reflects the work that's been done
and It's just such an asshole thing to do. You know, it, just say it. What what? What would the senator be able to say? Okay, he's a republican senator from Oklahoma. So you must we assume he's asking about religious liberties. And now about the term mother being taken out and replaced with birthing person, which just how does that how stupid does that
make us sound anyway? What would the senator be able to do if the HHS Secretary just said a birthing person is a mother, but we've replaced the word mother with birthing person to try to be more inclusive to these other groups? You know, and the senator would be able to maybe make a little bit of a stink, but what what could actually be said, I mean, how is he going to combat trying to include more people rather than exclude more people, when everybody knows anyway, biologically, a person
who gives birth is a mother is a woman is a female. Anyway, it just it when I saw that it just like so. This is just so stupid. And nobody can ever even just answer a goddamn question. So what I see started off the week with Jeff Bezos, his face What the hell happened to his face. Here's a video about him and him inviting his brother on the first flight of Blue Origin. Love the inspiring music, from space, new changes, even sounds different relationship with this
planet with humanity. It's one Earth, I want to go on this flight, because it's a thing I've wanted to do all my life. It's an adventure. It's a big deal for me. I invited my brother to come on this first flight.
I mean, he can barely say, brother there. It's just so weird. I don't know what it is. Maybe he's got an illness, who knows? It's just like, you can't go from being what you see all the time to having that face and that speech pattern. And nobody says anything. I searched around for it. I couldn't find any. Anything on what is happening with Bezos? Oh, let's see, okay. The Atlanta Journal, they had a story about epilepsy and patients being enrolled in drug trials here in the Atlanta area
without their consent. And it revealed that doctors and researchers are, in fact, human beings. Really, they're humans. They're not perfect. You know, and the world looks at right now, doctors and scientists, researchers, they're they're put up on this pedestal as if they are more than human, is if they don't have human biases and prejudices, you know, so, we always get the follow the science as a science is somehow unbiased. You know, science is performed by humans, therefore,
science is biased. You cannot have science without a bias. You can do your best. And that's why they're supposed to have peer review and other scientists look at it so that way, if somebody who who's not maybe blinded by a certain bias can come in and take a look at something and say, Well, this isn't right. Because of this, this this, you know, you didn't take this data into consideration because you didn't even want to look at it.
So it turns out the hospitals and doctors they sometimes they use feelings and prejudices regarding drugs, and they play favorites, according to some researchers. Let's see it from the Atlanta Journal, Atlanta Journal Constitution. They see for example, the researchers who did the epilepsy drug study said doctors in different hospitals often had feelings or prejudices about one of three drugs that didn't really have a basis in
fact, so much for putting faith in the science. The study put those to rest the critics of the E FF IC and I forgot what the hell that stood for, say abuses against patients have piled up under it because the leaders involved in designing, approving and publishing studies are also usually researchers and people
sympathetic to researchers. their mindset inevitably tips over from care from the individual patients in the study to the public gains that might be made, said George anass are Ana's director of the Center for Health Law, ethics and human rights at Boston University. No, this can't be This just can't be that they don't take individual patients and their welfare patients welfare into consideration instead of their own personal bias. That's not what I've been told, especially
over this last year with COVID. You know, we get this kind of bullshit with climate change, we get this kind of bullshit with COVID-19. And the vaccine, the the vaccines, and the PCR tests and all this other stuff. Don't Don't question anybody because they always have your best interest at heart. Bullshit, they're they're human, they're human, like the rest of us. And they'll make decisions based on their own personal best interest. You know? Sure, do people exist that take others
into account more than they more than they take themselves? Yes, people do exist that do nice things for people just because. But I, you know, I subscribe to, you know, the Ronald Reagan method of, you know, trust, but verify, you know, you can take somebody at their word, but then watch what they do is what they do are the things that they do. Honestly, following up on what they say, you know, they say, follow the science is our, you
know, are the things that they do, following the science. At least in this year, you know, I think much of it's just been bullshit, nobody's done anything. They've just always been looking for their own interest. story out of the Wall Street Journal, talking about being educated, and woke, could
cause you problems. It was an opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal, where this guy was saying that he's not interested in hiring people that want to waste their time and energy on things that just don't matter. He wants to hire people that are interested in moving his business forward. Who the heck was he see, I got a link here on my site to The Wall Street Journal opinion piece.
And this was written by somebody by the name of our our Reno, and our Reno is editor of something called first things I have no idea what first things is, I don't know who Mr. Reno is. Let me search for that real quick. First thing, that's a website. So they publish something, let's see what the heck the published by the institution, the Institute of religious and public life first things is an educational institute aiming to advance religiously, and to advance a
religiously informed public philosophy. So I think you can gather from that he would be anti woke to start. But he says here, and I would think most companies would want to go in this direction, because, you know, what does IBM want to do? Do they want to provide it technology solutions? Or do they want to worry about some, you know, somebody's perceived slight or micro aggression that may not even exist, except for
only the head of the person who thinks they're a victim. Anyway, this guy says the biggest liability that comes with hiring graduates from places like Harvard, Haverford, where he's from he graduated from is that they have both colleges. So I'm not just mispronouncing haber, Ford, or Hereford, and Harvard.
They've been socialized to panic over pseudo crises, talk of systemic racism, fixation on pronouns inculcate in young people, an apocalyptic urgency, a mentality that often disrupts the workplace and encourages navel gazing about diversity, inclusion, and other ill defined notions that are far removed from the main work of his organization, which is good writing, good editing and good arguments. He says a few years ago, a student a student, a student at an Ivy League school
told him let me let me just read the quote from his article. A few years ago, a student at an Ivy League school told me quote, the first things you learn your freshman year is never to say what you're thinking unquote. The institution He attended claims to train the world's future leaders from what the young man reports the opposite is true. The school is training
future self sensors, which means future followers. So if you're too woke, and you're, you know, trying to get hired in certain companies, He might want to either on wake or on woke, you know and see the world as it really exists, you know, or you might not get hired. And you'll never know, you know, that kind of discrimination will happen internally. You'll just never know you'll you'll show up. They'll ask you some questions and based on those answers, and in your interview, they'll just
pass any go to the next person. The big story this this past week was the What do they call it? The having such a brain fart right now? What do they call a big stupid story? I don't know. It was a bombshell bombshell report. I don't know who it was that a pro publica or pro publica, I hear it pronounced both ways. And I don't know which I prefer pro publica where they received a whole bunch of tax returns from people like Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, Rupert Murdoch, Mark Zuckerberg,
and Jeff Bezos. And they were making a big stink and how wealthy these people are. And you know, what they do here? The story was not it wasn't enlightening at all. It was really kind of disgusting. And not because they obtained personal IRS records of these wealthy people. It was disgusting, because they are preying upon an ignorant American public that has no idea how they're being taxed or what is being taxed. They just hear this is a wealthy guy, he paid X
number of dollars in income taxes. And that percentage is some low percent. So he's not paying his fair share. That is such a load of horseshit. And if you have if you look at their wealth and their income, and that's what you come across with, you're being extremely ignorant. Because the only thing pro publica uncovered in this report. Is that income taxes, taxes, income. I know it sounds stupid
to have to even say that. But people do not understand what an income tax is an income tax taxes, your income, people receiving paychecks. Now, other things are added into income like dividends and capital gains, but those are not technically income taxes. A capital gains tax is a tax on capital gains, not on income. A dividend tax is a tax on dividends, not on income. And that's why income taxes you
could raise them to be 100%, you could raise it would be 99%. And that income tax rate will not affect people like Warren Buffett Bill Gates, Rupert Murdoch, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, because they don't make what would be considered income. They have wealth. And you can take you know, somebody like Bezos he could take you know, he could cash out let's say he cashes out a billion dollars. Okay, takes it out in stock. He
pays whatever capital gains rate is on that stock. I don't remember what the current capital gains rate is capital gains tax. capital gains tax rate 2021. Let's see. Of course I can't find the stupid answer. Very easy. Stupid Motley Fool has got a whole bunch of crap here. I just want it simple. That's what I get for using Duck Duck go. capital gains tax rate 2021. Alright, it maxes out right now. At 20%. So out of a billion dollars you know, he's gonna pay 20% of that. So 10% of
a billion is 100 million. So $200 million in tax. That leaves him still with 800 million $800 million. I didn't do the math earlier, you pull out a calculator. I'm sure that sounded great if you're listening in headphones, opening the door. So 800 million. I don't even know if you can do this. But let's say you want to put it in a savings account. Right now, if you look at synchrony bank synchrony bank.com, they are giving you a half a percent annual percentage rate ever
present used to be over 2% and a half percent. So you take that $800 million dollars, multiply that by half a percent. And that gives you a cool $4 million a year. So he could do that. Put it in a savings account. Okay, interest in dividend tax, he's gonna he's gonna pay some small tax on that. But he's gonna be pulling down $4 million a year just to let it sit there and to sit in a rig what would traditionally be like a passbook savings account. That's why income taxes don't matter to
them. You could do a wealth tax. But a wealth tax is difficult. Because how do you value wealth? You know, if you have cash and stocks sitting in an account, you know, you've got a brokerage account, you got the cash in a in a bank account. Those are easy. You know, and even a brokerage account that will go up and down in value depending on the value of the stocks held stocks and bonds held. But real estate, other types of physical assets. Those are almost what anybody says they are, you know,
there's there's a range. So you could say a house, you know, a house in a neighborhood say, you know, it's worth half a million dollars. But if somebody wants to come in, suddenly buy it for 750,000 kind of changes things. You know, or say the neighborhood goes down. And now this half a million dollar house is only worth about 300,000. This did happen in 2008, if you remember, not that long ago, where the price of real estate just plummeted homes. Because there were so many so many
foreclosures and so many homes on the market. That houses that were previously half a million bucks, they lost a couple $100,000 in value. So if somebody was applying for a loan, to buy a house, before that, say in 2005 2006, they took out a half a million dollar loan, they bought a house. And now in 2008, the price plummets to 300,000. And now the home buyer is underwater, they technically owe more than what
the house is worth. Did they lie on their application? It was there is their wealth higher than what they're currently claiming because of the loss of value in the house. And this is why wealth to me is difficult to tax. You know, and when they look at somebody like Trump, the current investigation happening against against him in New York, where, you know, they're, they're claiming that for insurance purposes, he downplayed the value of properties. And for loans, he
played up the value of his properties. That's that's just business. That's just what people do. You know, if you're looking to get a loan, you're going to want to maximize that loan. So you know, you're going to want to say okay, you can always get an appraisal, that'll give you a high end of a range that you're looking for, you know, and then for insurance insurance, you want to pay as little as possible because you're not going to use insurance unless something bad
happens. So you want to you know, downplay it so you've got a building in you know, most people they over insure anyway, I think, I don't I don't think a whole lot of people under insure, but you want the value to be played down. So your premiums are less. It's just smart business, you know, and you can't you can't really criminalize that if you do it.
We're in trouble but So pro publica, you know, they go through what each of these guys pays in, in taxes, and they give some new calculation of effective tax rate that takes their wealth into consideration. But you can't take wealth into consideration when it comes to income tax. Because right now, we don't have a wealth tax. And you cannot include the, you know, the value of assets. When you're trying to figure out the,
you know, tax rate effective tax rate. But when you, you know, they had the numbers in there, what they paid in taxes, and it was an obscene amount of money that they had to pay. And what the article doesn't take into consideration. Let's just take Bezos, for instance. Because he was a target. What? What is he contributed to the US economy to the world economy, as compared to what they believed he should be taxed? not sound like my dog was crying. But think about that.
Basil opens up a distribution center someplace. How many jobs has he just added? How many people now are providing for their families paying for college? buying goods and services? Just in one location. I mean, you look at all of it. You look at Blue Origin. Hold on, she is crying. Hold on one second. I gotta go get it open the door for right. Rex is in the house. All right. Rex is in the house. Sorry about that. But I could just hear her crying. I don't
know if you could pick it up on the microphone. But I could hear her crying. It was just stupid. Yeah, how much? How much economic activity have these people put into the world? Just think about that, just for a second, Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, Rupert Murdoch, Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos? You know, is it in the trillions, all combined. It's an enormous amount of economic activity, those people just by doing what they do, what they have done. You know, and I'm not the
biggest fan of any of these people. But you cannot deny the accomplishments and you cannot deny the economic activity that they've put into the world. And it to me it far outweighs any of this income tax bullshit. If we want if we want to have some type of a fair tax. First of all, don't tax income or habits severely limited. Because attacks attacks is designed to limit an economic and economic activity. When you tax something, you get less of it. That's why they have sin taxes.
You know, when you tax look at cigarettes, cigarettes are taxed, you know, through the wazoo. So people, fewer people smoke, the only people that smoke now Are they really want to smoke because it's not cheap. or alcohol taxes, they always lump on more taxes to to limit the consumption of alcohol. Same thing with gasoline. If they want you to drive less, they'll raise the gas tax. It's not just a revenue generator, it's also a
behavior modification system. So you know, what, what should we do, we should replace the income tax, either with a flat tax of very low flat tax or no tax at all, and move to consumption taxes. Because who spends more who spends more wealthy people or poor people? Now we can play around with that consumption tax and tax food at a very low rate. You know, groceries, maybe, maybe not food in general because you know, you're not going to want to do that with eating out like restaurants and
things like that. But tax, you know, maybe groceries, grocery stores, tax, those are very low rate. You don't have just a tiered level of retail consumption taxes. So that way, wealthy people who spend and they spend a lot they'll pay more in tax. Now. We already have of sales taxes, but we don't have a national sales tax. And the sales taxes are
relatively low depending on where you live. But this way to human beings we can better moderate or modify our consumption behavior if there's a tax added to it you know, in that way as well, you're not penalized when you make more money because what do you know people who make a lot of money put more money back out into the system some some people are safe, you know, big Savers, they put it away but rich people rarely take money and shove it into a mattress and it just sits
there forever. They put it out there into the world to either make them more money you know, or to buy goods and services. So to me that's that's the fair way of doing it. The only thing pro publica did is just prove that income tax taxes income. Oh, let's see. Okay, I was perusing other news and I came across Oh, I forgot to record on my podrick So where am I at home I'm
already at 36 minutes while it's time flying. I just ran across this video and ice live in the Chicago area so I had watched a lot of W Gen news and discovered how much I miss it because they have a nice banter. I don't know it's just there. It's all very Chicago's week on at the forefront live will talk to you Chicago medicine me This is a 14 heartstrings figure, you know the pace. You know, I really hated from the surgeon who helped pioneer this technique, all that mute that I hate when
they have pre roll ads. I just hate it here. All right. This is from the wjc Morning News. It's got here the number one question people under this video too long to play the whole thing. Julian channel 70 of the homeless. There was a controversy recently in Chicago where one of the most favored sports casters or favorite sports casters was fired because of comments he made at the end
of a sports segment. I can't even remember what it was, but it was Mark Mark Jean Greco. He's I've watched them forever. And he made some comment about Cheryl Burton being a ditzy decorator or something for some reality show that he would like to put together. It was just a joke. And I guess she complained at least that's the story. She complained to her bosses and ended up with him getting suspended. And later, they came to an agreement where he left the show, you know, essentially
he was just fired. But here's the agenda. was amazing.
All right, really made that party already. The next item on the differences between working ew g n and ABC seven. Here you can call your co anchor any name you want. Right Right And speaking of traffic of Val I think I see an accident on top of Robin said great job. Yeah with everyone but me. He forgot about the part that she's a whore.
Morning News for that day and age well. Anyway, they they're just an entertaining show. It's very Chicago filled with people. They're very Chicago and it's something that you don't find anywhere else. It made me miss watching the Nine O'Clock News and occasionally the morning news. I didn't watch a lot of it. Let's see. Oh, then we have racial harmony in New York City. I don't know where this is. Okay. Apologize for the bad language. I want to start welcome on the sidewalk. So it's
okay for him to call an Asian carp a chink. But, you know, Hunter Biden can use the N word in texts. But as mere mortals, you can't go anywhere near that word. So the whole world sometimes feels like it's falling apart and you get this. He's right in this guy's face. No, no. I'm good. All right, all right. How is it under any circumstance? How is that right? And then later on, somebody calls them out for being racist and he's he spews out black people can't be racist. Anyway,
critical race theory is in the news all over the place. This reminds me a bit of Common Core, although Common Core did become curriculum in a lot of places. critical race theory is something to me that should not be taught in the elementary or high school levels, you can discuss this in college all you want. But to include this kind of stuff in elementary in high school, is indoctrination. You know, Elementary in high school, all this should be concentrated on his math reading. And, and
writing sorry, I just had another brain fart anyway. You know, at a time when, especially in big city schools, kids that are graduating high school, can't do math, and they can't read at grade level. So they if they do enter college, they're stuck doing all kinds of remedial work just to catch up. So their first year in college is catching up to where they
should have been when they graduated high school. So introducing something like critical race theory, which plenty of people want to discuss it as a theory of systemic racism, whatever, fine, but leave that to college, where at least in college, you have at least a little bit more maturity, you know, you're 18 at minimum. And you've Have you have a little bit of life experience. And at least now you you know how to read and critically, critically think
about what you're reading, you know, do some basic math. And then you can, you know, delve into these deeper subjects. You know, all these subjects that deal with politics versus, you know, elementary education should be thrown out all of it. So, you had a woman in I think it was a Virginia School. And she came from China. And she grew up during Mao's Mao, Mao Tse Tung's, China,
I've been very alarmed about what's going on in our school, you are now teaching, training our children to be social justice warriors, and to load our country and our history. Growing up in Mao's China, or the same, we're familiar, the communist regime use the same critical theory to divide people. The only difference is the use class instead of race. during the Cultural Revolution, our witness, students and teachers can turn against each other, we
change school names to be politically correct. And we were taught to denounce our heritage, destroy anything that is not communist, oats, statues, books, and anything else. And we are also encouraged to report on each other just like the student equity ambassador program, and the bias reporting system. This is indeed the American version of the Chinese Communist, the Chinese Cultural Revolution. The critical race theory has its roots in Cultural Marxism, it should have no place in our school.
So she handed it to her. She had a pretty good amount of applause, a lot of people raising their hands. I don't know why they're raising their hands and on applauding that was a weird thing when you see this video. But yeah, I agree with her. You know, this kind of stuff should be just not taught at elementary level because the kids can understand it. So if they can't understand the concepts of what being talked about, you know, when it's being pushed on them, it
then becomes indoctrination. What they should be learning is the traditional meal math, you know, reading and how to write you know, maybe I should learn how to talk but they just lacked the maturity to discuss this in a in a meaningful way. And I'm not saying that, I believe in critical race theory because, you know, I don't I think it's a
lot of gobbledygook. But I'm also saying that, that saying that you can't talk about it, and that maybe you know that it doesn't, as a theory, you know, that some people want to put forward that you can't talk about that in school or teach it as a thing. You know, but it that belongs at university. It doesn't belong in high school or grammar school. The CDC this week. Here's some COVID News. It was kind of laid out in the
COVID news this week, at least for me. They're acknowledging that inflammation of the heart seems to be a thing after the second dose of Pfizer or Madonna. Here's what it says from CNBC. There have been a higher than expected number of cases of heart inflammation and 16 to 24 year olds after receiving their second dose of Pfizer or Madonna's COVID-19 vaccines. They cite preliminary data from its vaccine safety monitor system, the CDC has received reports of 275 cases in
that age group as of May 31. The agency center presentation prepared for Food and Drug Administration advisory panel meeting Thursday, scientists expected between 10 and 102 cases of Myo carditis or pericarditis were the heart muscle or lining this route or the lining surrounding it became inflamed, according to the CDC. Does anybody remember when the Johnson and Johnson vaccine was pulled? Because six people got blood clots at a 6.8 million doses? I know a lot more doses
have been given a Pfizer and Madonna. But, you know, I don't know what the number is because I haven't seen it yet. In the number of teens that have been vaccinated. So if you have 275 cases of heart inflammation, it's more than double what they were expecting. Don't you think there should be a halt in vaccinating children, you know, and yet Madonna has failed to expand, there's two children 12 years old and an older you know, they got to stop this now. Because children aren't even at
high risk. And asymptomatic spread is bullshit. It's been said so many times before and now it's the only time that they're that they're trying to push asymptomatic spread. It's not a thing. The Wall Street Journal had a piece about the CDC, and it was an opinion piece, talking about hospitalizations. This is what they said the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a report last week warning that adolescent hospitalizations due to
COVID-19. Were on the rise. The media picked up the message and ran with it but it isn't true. The CDC misrepresented the data and play down a more important finding that provides further evidence that pandemic control measures are likely having a serious adverse impact on young people's mental health. So it isn't true, but they say the CDC misrepresented they didn't misrepresent. They lied. They flat out lied. And here it is the Wall Street Journal goes on to say the CDC truncated thanks,
Godfrey. That's my Labrador. The CDC truncated its analysis at the precise date April 24. That would cast an increase in teen hospitalization in the worst possible light. The 10% rise in early March that attracted so many headlines was similar to rises and other age groups, and had declined sharply by late April, adolescent hospitalizations for COVID-19 were back down 2.6 per 100,000. By late May, before the CDC report was published and well below the rate of 2.6 for the
adults for the adult US population. Moreover, COVID cases among children in 2021 have now fallen by 84%. And hospitalizations are down by 69% since January, thanks largely to adult vaccination. So they got to follow the science unless they want to ignore the science. We got to follow the data unless they want to ignore the data. You know, and then they go on to ignore the depression that teens
are going through with dealing with lockdown. Again, according to The Wall Street Journal 20% of teen hospitalizations in the study between January 1 and march 31 were for psychiatric emergencies, not COVID. Although pandemic related closures have made it difficult to study the mental health of children during the past year the available data point to a crisis. lockdowns and school closures have led to greater incidences of obesity and eating disorders according to experts at the Stanford
Children's Health Network. So they just omitted these things. Why? And you know, why doesn't the Wall Street Journal just come straight out and say it they lied? They're not misrepresenting anything. They're just lying to the people. And you know, Dr. Fauci is his liar and chief this guy just says anything depending on Whichever the way he wants the wind to blow moving on here in Georgia. I moved to Gwinnett
County, Georgia from Cook County, Illinois. Okay, I lived in a northern suburb of Chicago. And now I'm in a North Eastern suburb of Atlanta. So I'm in Gwinnett. County, so I don't live in Fulton County, but it seems that Fulton County has a lot in common with Cook County, Illinois when it comes to voter fraud. So here is Hold on one second, I have to clear my throat. There is an article in real clear investigations calm.
And it's got all kinds of funny business that it's happening with their mail in ballots. They're supposed to be audited. And the audit. what was supposed to happen is county officials were supposed to scan these ballots and hand them over to auditors. The original ballots were never supposed to leave anybody's hands. And when they before they started this process, the place where the ballots were stored, was supposed to have a 24 hour
guard. Somehow, conveniently, prior to the audit, the 24 hour guard that was supposed to be standing there, they left their post, and exactly at that time when they left their post. The place was left empty that anybody could go in. Now, supposedly things were locked down. But it was just so convenient. And nobody knows whether anything was tampered with and whether anybody looked at anything or stole anything. Nobody knows.
And here's one of the things. They have people that are testifying and stating that there were problems with the ballots there. There's one woman a poll manager Susie voyles. According to the story, when Fulton County Georgia poll manager Susie Boyle sorted through a large stack of mail in ballots last November, she noticed an alarmingly odd pattern of uniformity in the markings for Joseph arbeiten.
One after another the absentee votes contained perfectly filled in ovals for Biden, except that each of the darkened bubbles featured an identical white void inside them in the shape of a tiny Crescent, indicating they've been marked with toner ink instead of a pen or pencil. So somebody was printing them off apparently. But nobody can look at them. You know, there's nobody wants to investigate. Who knows what's going to be fun, but you know, I, I didn't know stuff like that was happening.
In other states, places like this. I assumed it would be happening more in New York, New Jersey, la you know, DC, Boston. But down south, I didn't think that they would have these kind of voting shenanigans, but I guess it's just everywhere. Back to some COVID News, J and J. You know, they're they're Johnson
and Johnson, their vaccine was about to expire this month. But like, like Groundhog Day, when the vaccine vial came out, and the FDA looked at it, it must have I don't know, when you see a shadow or don't see a shadow, which one gives you six more weeks of winter. Anyway, the FDA just magically said, poof, your vaccine is no longer expiring. You've got six more weeks.
That's kind of nice. Yeah, my father was in pharmaceuticals, he made pharmaceuticals, for Walgreens, you know, made cough medicines and all kinds of different over the counter and prescription drugs. So expiration dates, you know, they're not, you know, it's it's like, it's an artificial expiration date. It's like a best guess, I guess, as to when it's effective. You know, all all of these drugs generally,
can be used far beyond the expiration date. You know, it's just most of the time, they don't break down into something harmful. What happens is they just become less effective. So I don't think it's a big deal. I just find it funny that you know, that Johnson and Johnson dollar stuff is going to expire the magically they just extend the expiration date on Camila Kamala Harris, what a week she had. Biden taps her to handle the border and the influx of illegal immigration. And just
she's such an empty suit. And the big deal was in her interview with Lester Holt, where she just kept repeating that we've been to the border. We've been to the border. We've been to the border, you haven't been to the border. And I haven't been to Europe. What an empty suit. What an empty suit. Where's, there's, there's one other topic I wanted to talk to you about. But let me just this is the section of that video to visit the border. face. She was dumbfounded by the question. You know.
We are going to the border. We've been to the border. So this whole this whole this whole thing about the border? We've been to the border. We've been to the board. You haven't been to the board. And I haven't been to you? I don't know. I don't understand the point. I'm not just the board. Well, I mentioned because I know Republicans have certainly commend you on this. But democratic congressman Quasar has a border district is said to you and the president come.
And I care about what's happening at the border. I'm in Guatemala, because my focus is dealing with the root causes of my
son and she recovered and, you know, that's where she should have gone with that in the first place is that I'm dealing with the root causes of of the problem at the border, you know, that she'll get there eventually. But just I don't understand why she just doesn't go to the freakin border. And there's so much pressure and both it's not like it's gonna make a difference anyway. So you just go and you remove that argument from everybody's baloney, but she's such a dumb
empty suit. We've been to super clean.
You haven't been to the border. And I haven't been to Europe. Listen, I I've been to the border before I will go again. But when I'm in Guatemala,
dealing with her nervous laughter What's going on? Just gotta go. Under. So can you commit right now that you will indeed visit the US Mexico border? And will you do it soon?
Jeremy, let me tell you something. Yes, I will. And I have before I said, I'm gonna go to the border. And when are you going to the border? Vice President ministration has asked. I'm not finished. She says that I'm going to the border.
I shouldn't say but she just sometimes seems so bitchy. Anyway, she just coming off is such a moron. I don't understand why she just doesn't go. Last thing I'll leave with is that I was watching this video. It was a conversation with Cornel West and Glenn Lowry. And the other they they talk. How do I put it? It's either it's either, you know, they're so smart that they're talking so far above me. Which is possible. Let's say it's not impossible. It's possible. You
know, or Cornel West is just spewing a lot of gobbledygook. I don't think that's the case. You know, when he when he when he's got like a free flowing ideas, and then he's just free flowing with with what's coming out of his brain. It just sounds like such word salad sometimes. But it was still a very fascinating conversation. I think I need to rewatch it in order to really let it soak in. You know, I've read books written by Cornel West and he writes better than he talks which I think that's
what I do. But sometimes to me sounds like he's saying so much, but I don't quite understand what he just said.
Alright, let's see what's going on is pathological in my blackness, we cannot judge the black experience. So that point that and we have to situate it. We have to situate it within the larger forces, among which are economic and political and institutional forces. We have to situate it. I'm granting all of that these things I understand, but I still have a point. We are responsible for how we live we are responsible for how we raise our children to black people. We
have to take responsibility for our lives. It is far too seductive to allow the narrative, the story that we use to interpret our experience to become solely in singly our victimization. That's a deep mistake. It's a political mistake. More importantly, it's a spiritual mistake. Yeah, it's an existential mistake? Absolutely. Absolutely. Absolutely, oh, we cannot allow the machinations of the forces
up here to impede our embrace of that responsibility. And we cannot allow the narrative in the service of transitory political interests, to obscure the responsibilities or their
stake here in our community. So I want you to situate my concern just expressed within both the failure of democracy point that you're making about the forces up here, and the commercialization commodification point that you're making which two are valid points, but I think the clock is ticking on black people in America, the world is not standing still. And I'll stop I know I'm making the speech. But I really want you to react to the world as the Chinese are
coming. American Empire is Cornell is fond of putting it will not last forever, as true black people are in no position to miss an opportunity to realize the full, productive possibilities of our human potential.
I think everybody should go back and look at that, because they they talk about a whole wide range of subjects, from religion, to economics to capitalism, and socialism and communism. China, you know, victimhood as you, as you heard there, you know, that when people start out being a victim before, you know, before they do anything else, you're already
starting from behind. And I think that's the mental position that Glenn Lowry was basically talking about that you can find yourself very difficult to rise out of something if you believe you're a victim always being held out. But it was it was a hour long conversation. And to me, it was very interesting. And I will listen to that again, just so I can absorb it more. Cornel West is very entertaining speaker, but sometimes I just have no idea what he's saying. And I you know, he's probably
just talking right over my head. So see, I had more to cover than I thought. You know, I was kind of amazed. I didn't realize I blogged so many things this past week. So I don't even know what to call this, this episode, but it's getting late. So I'm going to close it there. See what I come up with next week. Hopefully, things open up more. And everybody's a little bit happier as we stop wearing masks, and reclaim the freedoms that we supposedly already have.
I forgot to mention that. This is a podcasting 2.0 compatible podcast. Good a new podcast apps calm. Get yourself a new podcast app, stay away from Apple, Spotify, Google podcasts, get something new, where you'll see transcripts, chapters, I didn't do chapters last two weeks, I'm going to try to chapters chapter images. And please go to my website. buy a shirt if you want one. Kevin bay.com slash birch. There's a link on my website. Throw me a few bones if you want to send a donation or two. If
you got anything out of it. You thought it was entertaining at all? For me, I have a few shekels. Is it politically correct? So chuckles anyway, enjoy the rest of your weekend. I will talk to you next week. Bye bye. Oh, wait. Forgot my own tagline. That's all I got.