Fartaceuticals

Yammer on and it really has no effect on anything at all. Other than maybe, maybe it helped maybe it's a nice outlet for me and my mood. Which I'm in a poor mood today. Very poor mood. Now this I'm not broadcasting this one live on YouTube. And I'll probably just put like up a little promo video and put the actual full video just up on my website. Because I'm going to talk about COVID-19 I'm going to talk about ivermectin and last time I did that on YouTube, it took me down. So, you know,

screw it. Just this whole this whole thing has just gotten so ridiculous. So what let's say it says August 9 2021. I was supposed to record on Friday and of course I didn't do it. What episode of my on on this podcast? I'm all over the road. My mood is so shitty. So so shitty. Let me go to let me check out what episode I'm supposed to be on. 15 Episode 15 Ah, okay, let's let's get this sucker in the can. Let's Tim Poole it and see this get off my back end of my WordPress site.

So it's like it's it's all COVID all the time every day until we're all just beaten into submission with this shit. I was amused that in the UK, children are using antigen tests, which is a rapid test, I guess that they have at home. I don't know if you can even buy them here. But kids in the UK they're getting out of school by faking positive COVID tests and how are they doing it? They're doing it by using little Coca Cola and fruit juices from the BBC. Children are always going to

find cutting ways to bunk off school. I guess that's what they call getting out of school in the UK. And the latest trick is to fake a positive covid 19 lateral flow test using soft drinks. So how are fruit juices, cola and devious kids fooling the tests? And is there a way to tell a fake positive result from a real one? somebody tried to find out the reporter first I thought it best to check the claim. So I cracked open bottles of cola and orange juice then deposited a few drops directly

on to the lateral flow test strips. Sure enough, a few minutes later, two lines appeared on each test supposedly indicating the presence of the virus that causes covid 19. Brilliant. Nothing like a test that can prove positive with a little bit of Coca Cola and fruit juice and or fruit juice.

So who's to say when you're going someplace and they want you to test positive that they're not just throwing some shit on if you're taking one of these rapid tests, throwing some shit on it and say hey, you're now you're now infected your festering pool of COVID-19 of SARS Coby to the state of Illinois and flat, flat fat boy which I wish he was flat. Well, I don't live in Illinois anymore. I moved out because of

guys like this fat motherfucker. This dumb fat fuck. Tribune asked the question the Chicago Tribune that it is, is it ethical to offer lottery entries in exchange for people to get vaccinated? To me? It's an obvious answer. No, especially when the state of Illinois is drowning in hundreds of billions of dollars in pension debt. So fat ass blue boy image which is not really routable Gourevitch fat boy, which is governor JB Pritzker. I call them fat boy Vich because to me, he looks a lot like Rod

Blagojevich just blown up to gargantuan proportions. And I know it's not popular to fat shame people these days. But I just dislike him on all kinds of levels. This is a man who lived in it's the Gold Coast of Chicago. But which is like, it's in the city just north of downtown. And it's where a lot of wealthy people have properties. He bought the property next door, removed all the toilets from the property in order to eliminate over $300,000 that he would have to pay in

property taxes. He eventually repaid it once it was discovered. But the fact that he did it, well, your average person doesn't have these capabilities. And, you know, while maybe it was technically legal what he did, I mean, come on. He's a billionaire. He was getting rid of $300,000 in taxes, which is more property taxes than I would have paid in my house. Or over 30 years. $300,000 is just, in my opinion, it's just a giant asshole. Anyway. Chicago Tribune reports.

Is it ethical to offer lottery entries in exchange for people to get vaccinated? What about prize money? How about taking things away if they don't like your freedom? motherfuckers? Yes, I'm in a mood sorry. As the Delta Varian complicates the recovery from the pandemic and health officials seek ways to convince people to get vaccinated, many incentives are emerging in Illinois, the Department of Public Health has offered $7 million in cash prizes, and $3 million in

scholarships. In recent weeks, prizes went to residents at Chicago, Quincy, Springfield, Berwyn, and Joliet. Last week, the Chicago Health Department announced they will offer $25 Visa gift cards for those vaccinated at home. What a bunch of mother fucking assholes. You know, and it just makes you feel if you're at all opposed to any of this stuff. Regarding COVID-19 and forced vaccinations, it should be highly disgusting that they're running a lottery for this shit.

The vaccine is so effective, and so desirable. And COVID-19 is so dangerous that they need to run fucking lotteries where they will pay you to get this fucking thing. You know, what about what about all the businesses that they shut down? I think they could use the $7 million or the 10 million to get 7 million in

cash and 3 million in scholarships. You know, what if your restaurant went out of business because of these motherfuckers and they're giving away $7 million of taxpayer dollars, whether they came from the feds or whether they came from the people of Illinois. They don't make any money on

their own. They take it from you and then they spread it out. So I mean, what if what if you had a little little grocery store a little corner store that they put out of business because of their fucking lockdowns and their goddamn mandates, and now they're giving away millions of dollars. It just pissed me off. PCR tests change the definition of infected. There was a video on YouTube by Alison Morrow. She's a former journalist. And now she's like our I guess that former journalist, she's an

independent journalist. Now she used to be on TV, regular TV. And she interviewed somebody who has experienced with the PCR tests and reports how the PCR tests are not real tests for the virus, they just basically tell you whether it's there or not. But it doesn't tell you whether or not you can get infected. Let me see if I can pull up the version,

a rapid test, and then he'd send a test out for culture. So sending a test out for culture confirms that not only is the microorganism presence that causes that illness, but that it's actually active, it's growing. So a PCR test can tell you whether a virus is present or absent. Because like I said, the gene I'm looking for is either present or it's absent. But it can't tell you what condition that particular gene or micro organism is in. So you can have a bit of genomic

material that's there. And maybe it'll register in the PCR test. But it's not actually replicating. So we've even changed the definition of sick, infected. Nice. And I know the guy from the FDA says this is the gold standard. Well, the gold standard in terms of what? It's the gold standard, maybe in terms of sure it's a it's a fancy test. It's very accurate tests in terms of Yes, the virus is present. No, it's not present. But it doesn't actually tell you whether the virus is

actually active. So really, a cell based assay, in my opinion, would be the gold standard, because then it tells you, yes, it's present. And yes, it's active. So it tells you two things, it PCR just tells you it's present, or it's not present. And like I said, it can't tell the difference between different viruses. But can it tell me if it's alive or not? I know there's a comp, there's a disk.

that the video is still up, to be honest. Because it kind of downplays the PCR test and tells, you know, tells you exactly what it is what it can do and what it can't. You know, while that's the that's the test that's being used to tell us whether or not we're all being killed by the delta, delta delta plus or and now the lambda, which is coming down the pipe. And let's see, I had a post this week that said, strapping folks

vaccine mandate headed our way. And it's because the FDA, it's you know, they were they're floating the balloons now have the FDA giving full approval to the Pfizer vaccine, even though I think Madonna's application went in first. But you can be sure, since they're floating this, and you know, businesses have been mandating vaccinations for their employees. Which I don't know why this hasn't been taken up in the courts, for an experimental vaccine that is supposed to be voluntary. How a

business can force an employee to get it? How is that business not liable if there's a severe adverse reaction and somebody dies? I don't understand it. But you can bet once the Pfizer or Madonna or the j&j. Once any of those gets formal approval by the FDA, then you're going to start seeing governmental mandates to get yourself vaccinated with something that you don't want. What else did I put here? Oh, okay. I had a small this is about the future of podcasting, of which I'm

nobody obviously. And, you know, to me of media in general. You know, I'm fiddling around with podcasts just because I'm interested in the technology and not the old technology, but the new technology that of extending RSS the, if you go to podcast index.org. And you go look at what they're doing, they are

extending RSS, and RSS is the feed. You know, when you when you go into a podcast app, regardless of it other than Spotify, but if you're into if you're in Apple podcasts, or Google, Google podcasts, or any of the more popular podcast apps that are independent. Generally, when you're pulling a podcast down to that app, it looks at what's called an RSS feed. And it stands for real Simple Syndication. I know there's another definition out there, but I believe that's the most

popular one real Simple Syndication. And it's really just a text file that contains information about the podcast and the episodes and allows you to download them to the app. And the group behind podcasting 2.0 they're extending RSS to do more than just that. They've already extended it to where you can get tracks. transcripts live transcripts as you're listening to the podcast. And I do that with this podcast, you'll be

able to see those shortly after I post. There's also chapters and chapters existed before, but they had to be embedded within the mp3 file. This one allows you this is like chapters in the cloud. So this allows you to create your chapters after the fact, provide chapter images to go along with it, and provide links. So it, you know, it makes the podcast actually more

interactive. So if I'm talking about a specific video, or say, A, say a product, say you're even doing your own, you know, your own advertising, and you talk about a specific product, you can include an image of that product, and maybe a link to

where somebody can go to buy that product. They're also doing what's called value for value or streaming payments, you know, most, I would say most podcasters, or most pad people in podcasting, right now, they look for ads, you know, other other people that are hobbyists like myself, who are just doing this because they feel like it, don't care if we get ads. Don't

care about any of that stuff. But I'm experimenting with the value for value model, were you able to if you're using a one of the podcasting 2.0 apps that allow you to stream Bitcoin, or fractions of Bitcoin called satoshis, to the podcaster, while you're listening, so it's like a pay pay as you listen kind of technology. So they have something called the value block and the podcaster. I don't even know how to explain how to explain it properly, but we get a wallet. Mine is on the

lightning network. On ln PE, l n, PE, so the letter L, the letter n and then the word PE. And so when somebody streams, when somebody listens to this using a streaming payment app, you know, every minute, or whatever certain number of satoshis are streamed directly to my wallet, there's nobody in between, there's no bank in between. You know, there's no advertiser in between, necessarily. So it's just a

transaction between the listener and the podcaster. Now, there's other little splits that happen in the middle, you know, like, there might be a 1% split for the for Ellen pay, which I piggyback off of, for my wallet, otherwise, I'd have to have a full node, which I don't want to have to pay for. Because I'm not really getting much out of there. I did get 2500 sets a couple weeks ago. So looking forward to anybody else who

wants to send money this way, or satoshis this way. But also that, you know, you can, you know, people do make direct payments to podcasts using things like Patreon, or PayPal, or you know, other services where there's a definite percentage cut, Patreon takes a big cut from what I understand,

I've never used them. PayPal, you know, they take a small percentage cut for processing the payment, but that's part of the course, or par for the course for using any type of electronic payment, whether using a credit card, Pay Pal, whatever. So that you know, using Bitcoin and these electronic wallets, it takes all the middleman out. So I can see that as the future of, of paying for media. Pay As You Go pay as

you listen. And you can do something what's called a boost where you boost extra payments for something that you either found extra valuable, or extra entertaining, or for whatever reason you feel like hey, I like that. So you give what's called a boost. And you can set that boost to be whatever it is 500 satoshis 1000. Now, when I say 500 or 1000, we're not we're still not talking about real money, we're talking about

fractions of $1. You know, I don't know, like one Satoshi is a fraction of a penny and I think it's like 1,000,000,000th of a Bitcoin or something like that. I forget what they said. So it's not a lot of money we're talking about now, on a massive scale, it could be substantial money, you know, small scale,

you know, it's not much of anything. So, for the individual listener, you know, he might be streaming and a couple of bucks, you know, maybe $10 at the most per episode that you're listening to maybe five bucks, depending on how you have your settings. So anyway, there's a long, long intro to the post that I made earlier in the week where I said I'd rather be lumped in with the crazies freaks nut cases and crack bots

in the live in a sanitized world. And the reason is I got into a back and forth with somebody who's prominent in power. Casting in the industry. And I'm, you know, me, I'm nobody. So, you know, after a couple replies you know, I decided okay, I don't really need to have less words let it sit there. But there's a certain segment of the existing podcasting industry and infrastructure that only sees podcasting as an, as a vehicle for advertising. And the way I

see it advertising poisons the well. Because if you, you know, say you run a tech podcast, and you have a tech company, like, you know, say Samsung or Apple, or anybody, any big eight could even be a small tech tech company that advertises on your show. You know, how, how honest Can you be about the technology you talk about if it has an effect on that company? You can't you know, the how objective Could you be if your money comes straight from the listener?

Now, I understand as well, that you're not going to get, you know, the big mega dollars like you like, like you're going to see with Joe Rogan, or any of the other giant podcasts or like, let's say, podcasts that nobody really listens to, but they they might say they do like the Obama, Michelle Obama podcast. You know, people are willing to pay big money for the names like Megan Markel, or whatever the hell, the other Royal Prince guy who got kicked out of his own family, because

they felt that the family was racist. That's how much I pay attention to the royal family, I forget who they are. So you have companies willing to pay these people big bucks, because supposedly they're a draw? I don't know if they are or not. But I mean, you know, how worthless are those podcasts going to be? They can't truly be honest about anything that they talk about, it's really just a promotion for themselves, or maybe the service that you're that you're listening out. So,

so I said that the push should be for podcasting. 2.0, it should be more pushed towards independence. advertising is fine. It has its place. You know, I used to be in broadcasting for 20 plus years. Not on the on air side, but on building TV and radio stations. You know, and it's regular TV, regular radio, so they lived off of advertising and advertising

was not easy to get. But it has its place, especially for local radio, local TV, it's how local businesses are able to get their company seen, you know how you're going to know there's a restaurant on the block if they don't advertise, you know, unless you drive past it. So, Edwards advertising has its place, but what these guys are talking about is not that type of local advertising, they're talking about big corporate advertising. And these people that want to buy, you know, I'm

into podcasting. And I see it as an insidiousness. You know, just, it will water down if if podcasting 2.0 if that's the main focus of increasing advertising, podcasting will go down the way other media has gone down, you know, television, radio, I'm not talking about the independent TV and radio

stations, they're still pretty much independent. You know, they're still beholden to advertisers, you're not gonna be able to bad mouth, an advertiser, or, or bad mouth, you know, a product that they put out or something, something, anything to do with that advertiser, you really have to be able to talk bad about it. But you look at how the media landscape has consolidated, how television stations are all owned by just a few giant companies across the country.

Same thing with radio. You know, most of the radio you listen to the reason radio has gotten so bad, is because it's owned by, you know, largely by large corporations which kind of homogenize and sanitize the content. You know, when you hear a really good local radio station, which there aren't that many anymore. they cater to their, you know, the people that listen to them, they're not catering to the advertiser

necessarily. They're catering to the audience and the audience is what brings in the advertiser because the advertiser wants the people that listen In large corporate broadcasting, it's the other way around. They want the big advertisers and they don't really give a shit about who's watching. Or whether or not it's entertaining. They don't care. That's why television network television is awful. It's it's really not even watchable

anymore. I don't know how anybody watches the news. The news is the, you know, it's not even news anymore. Especially when we're talking about things like COVID. They're not giving you news. They're giving you whatever the line is from the government. And they can't talk bad about pharmaceuticals because farmers if you just watch the news, all the advertising is from far, far, far too far pharmaceuticals. That's what I'm going to name this podcast

pharmaceuticals. But they can't badmouth them because those are the companies that advertise You know, when you watch the news, that's it. They're they're all pharma ads. So are you think you're really gonna see some honesty surrounding the COVID vaccines or any other drug that they push? So, you know, a couple of shows that I listened to the no agenda show in the low carb MD podcast. These are both shows that are outside

mainstream thought. So the person I had the back and forth with they kept Alright, this person kept calling people that are outside the mainstream crazies, fringe crackpot. You know, labeling these things, because it's not advertiser friendly. You know, using words like nutcases freaks even. And you know, I was pretty offended by it. And the person I'm talking about, they know the pod father referred to as the pod father, Adam curry, who is also heading up podcast index, that

orc. And Adam curry puts on the No, no agenda show with john C. Dvorak, a former tech writer for PC Magazine, among other magazines, and I've been reading john C. Dvorak, since I was a

teenager. And they cover topics in politics, government media, and you know, they've got the best absolute best coverage of COVID the vaccines of any other media, including the local newspapers, you know, I read the Wall Street Journal, Chicago Tribune and the Atlanta Journal. The no agenda show the first hour, if you just listen to that first hour, you're gonna get more news because they cover the world and they it's not like

they don't, you don't hear the network broadcast. They play back the network broadcast and they point out the inconsistency as they kind of analyze the media and how the media is portraying what's going on. What it is honestly, some of the best coverage you're gonna see and if you are pro vaccine pro COVID, this pro lockdowns, pro masking, you're gonna listen to that first hour, and you're gonna think these people are crackpots. But what are they doing? They're giving their

opinion. And playing back useful news, the actual news that everybody else in the world is watching, and they'll get stuff from all over the world. Germany, France, the UK, Australia, Africa, South America, they'll get news from everywhere. It's not like they're just covering one angle. And that's what makes it so valuable. But you can easily call them freaks crazies nut cases, because they're not

following along with the media push. The next one's low carb MD podcast, done by two doctors that advocate for basically low carb diets now. They're, you know, they're these two doctors, they also they had regular practices, working in the hospital working in their regular medical offices. And neither one of them liked the way things were going. So they changed their practice and they started their own metabolic health clinics. And the metabolic health clinics are

surrounded. Most of their patients, I guess, are diabetics, type two diabetes, and obese patients. And so their goal is to help them be metabolically healthy, to where they can get off of drugs off of insulin off of other pharmaceuticals, and live a healthy life, you know, lose weight and all that kind of stuff. But they can also be considered crackpots because the diet and the method that they use to help their patients is not following the long the US dietary guidelines.

It's different. They're using their own clinical experience to help their patients feel better and get off of whatever drugs they're on. Their goal is to actually stop having patients but you can easily consider them crackpots. So when somebody who's prominent in podcasting is talking like that, calling people nut cases and they always bring out guys like Alex Jones. What are you afraid of? If alex jones is such a nutcase? What are you afraid of? You know, I when I I've never watched the

alex jones or listen to him. I've seen clips of him like everybody else. And it's not something I would ever listen to because he sounds like a nut bag. But so what that doesn't mean you label them and you silence him kick them off. It means if you don't like them, you don't listen to him. But guys like this, who are prominent in podcasting and trying to shape the direction of it bother me when they when they want to silence people that they deem are freaks. I don't like

it. I don't like it. As my granddaughter would say. Let's see. Okay, New York City. I'll skip him because I don't really give a shit about the Blasio. And okay, here's where we get into ivermectin. ivermectin, is a drug that has been pushed off by the mainstream media. It's been demonized. There was an article in a publication called Mountain Home magazine. And in this long article, they cover different people that have had to sue their hospitals in order to have

the drug administered. There's an 80 year old woman in upstate New York. She came down with COVID before Christmas last year. She was she had to be on a ventilator. She was in the ICU, she was doing poorly. Her family had to sue in order to get ivermectin administered, she was they were just waiting for her to die. Basically. She was able to get it and she started improving and she ended up going home that mirrors almost exactly what happened to the woman in Illinois at Elmhurst Hospital,

where she also had to sue. In order to have ivermectin administered what the federal government, the NIH, the CDC, CNN, Fox News and MSNBC, CBS, NBC ABC, Dr. Fauci, Dr. Collins, which is his boss, Facebook, Google, Twitter and any other entity organization or person that is actively sought to diminish the dissemination of information on the efficacy of Iver meant of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, in my opinion, is now criminal. What is the reason for holding this

information back? What are they trying to do here? What you know, what are they afraid of from this cheap ass drug? That very prominent doctors that somebody who you know, this isn't like, Joe Blow on the corner. If you go to FL CCC, dotnet. And you go look up the doctors that are involved in that organization. They're all very highly credentialed, you know, famous in the medical field for their accomplishments. And they talk about the effectiveness of this drug.

ivermectin. They can't get on network news. They can't get on cable news. They're not covered by the major newspapers other than there was an op ed in the Wall Street Journal not that long ago. What's the endgame here? What is the purpose here? When they may be you know, the guy And the media to me, could be responsible for every person that dies. That's not allowed to take this drug if they wanted to. Meanwhile, you're being forced, literally forced to take a vaccination that no matter

what they say, it is experimental. The experiments is happening now on the population of the world. Where ivermectin is, has been proved is that it's not just a horse paste or something to get rid of worms, like my dogs take ivermectin for heartworm, that's the in their heartworm medication. But people have been taking it humans have been taking it for other illnesses that this anti parasitic takes care of. So it's a human drug isn't an animal drug? is a given to animals more

often? Maybe? I don't know. But I know it's been given to people. And it is a people a human drug? Where are the law firms that need to sue over this? Where are they? Why isn't anybody going after the government or the news organizations or the social media companies for the silencing of the efficacy of this drug, I don't understand what's going on. And that gets me to my last post that I did today, because I'm in

a mood. And part of it is going out in the world and seeing people wearing their masks, because and they seem you know, it's like the classic thing that we're going through right now. They see me as the problem, I see them as the problem. We gave in so easily. To all of this. We gave in so easily to being told to put a piece of cloth over your face. We gave in so easily, and rushed into injecting ourselves with an

experimental vaccine. And I guess everything that I've talked about during this entire podcast now what 30 minutes long? makes me sound like a batshit crazy conspiracy theory person. But what am I left to do here? It seems to me, you know, at the beginning, I gave the government and the so called experts the benefit of the doubt thinking that they had genuinely genuinely had people's best interest at heart. Maybe going about things the wrong way, you know, doing things logically

like government usually does. But we're kind of past that point now. We're past the point of just government bungling. This is purposeful. And it feels purposeful. They're actively demonizing and dehumanizing. People who do not want to get vaccinated. Am I one of them? Yeah. I don't want to get vaccinated. I don't feel I need it. I'm in a low risk group. You know, who knows if I've even had COVID or not? We don't know. But

I'm in a low risk group. So I don't I don't get vaccinated for things that I'm not at risk of. But a vaccine is out there. And people who feel at risk, or maybe are at high risk, and we know from over a year and a half now this virus, who's at high risk, and in general, it still is and it hasn't changed much. It still is people over the age of 65. People who are obese people who have type two diabetes and people who are have compromised immune systems. They're largely at risk.

And we have a vaccine supposedly for these people. So there are choices everybody can make. You can make your own risk assessment and choose to get vaccinated. You could choose to not get vaccinated and maybe try to treat yourself you know, maybe you will take ivermectin or you know, use the ivermectin protocols that are that were developed by the flcc See that? But there are choices now. So if you feel at risk, you can protect yourself. So what are you afraid of from people that

don't want to get vaccinated? If you're vaccinated, you're not at risk anymore or you're low risk. What is it? What What right do you have to force your protection on other people you know, and dehumanizing people, because they don't want to want to get a vaccine, they don't believe they need calling them stupid, ignorant, super spreaders, you know, basically calling them killers, you know, and, you know, normal people, they've been frightened in the

submission. You know, first they were scared, you know, pandemic, pandemic, all these people dying hospitals overwhelmed that they didn't bother looking at who was actually in the hospital. And who needed to be protected that, you know, the actual science around it was ignored in favor of the quote unquote, the science. And the science is political. It's not scientific. So they convinced these people to put on a mask. They convinced these people that, you know, if we just did that, a couple of

weeks, it'll slow the spread, and we'll be fine. But it didn't work. You know. So people put on their mask. They thought okay, things are gonna go back to normal. And then what happened? lockdowns, mandatory lock downs. You can't go in a store. You can't do this. You can't do that people are ordering food out. So then people started to kind of relax. Okay, fine. You know, we'll just ride this out over the next month or so. Then comes the variance, deadly deadly variance.

And so people rush out and get vaccinated, will the vaccine protect us from the variance? Push, push, push, push, push. And then they're told Well, not enough people are being vaccinated. The goal was 70% by July 4, you know, I don't know what number they actually hit because the numbers kept changing. Even if I read the news today, they're gonna say 70% are now vaccinated. Least with one jab, 50% to fully vaccinated? I don't know. I don't know what the real number

is. They keep giving they keep giving different numbers for different things. The same measurements are never used, so you don't know what numbers are real. And then they start turning the table saying, Okay, this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated. What a lovely phrase. And that goal is insidious that that phrase is insidious it the goal of it is

to pit neighbor against neighbor. Your unvaccinated neighbor is an evil Fuck, because he wants you to die, even though you're vaccinated and supposedly protected, but he's a dumb ass rube. Who doesn't understand science or I'm sorry, the science. People have been just whipped into this frenzy. You know, how, how different is this from the rise of the Nazis. And I know everybody's complains about comparing this to the Jews

in World War Two. But I think there's enough there now to say this is a we're having a similar beginning except this is not about religion, or specific race of people. Which being Jewish is not a race. It's a religion. We're talking about demonizing the unvaccinated it's still a group of people who don't believe that that's what they want. The unvaccinated are being called evil, stupid. They're being dehumanized and selfish. You don't want to protect others. You're not willing to

protect others. You want people to die. You know, and to me, what has happened is that governments of the world world, particularly the United Nations, the World Health Organization and much of Europe, they're they're all globalists, the United States historically has not been, we've been the ones pushing and controlling things from our end, maybe maybe, for our own purposes, we've joined in all these organizations.

But now we're fully on board. You know, climate change was the big push to subdue the population and get everybody going in a certain direction. To make you think that your modern lifestyle is evil, and harming the planet. But it didn't work. You know, and there's enough books out there. Now, there's enough information out there. Now, if you're looking for it, if you're not going to find it on the news, because they keep reporting everything is linked

to climate change. Make no mistake, that's where COVID is headed, it's headed towards climate change, all the policies are the same. Just once COVID one climate change, there's enough information out there to know that we don't have more storms than before, we don't have more hurricanes before, we don't have more wildfires than before, we don't have more floods than before. None of those things are happening in greater number. Their Earth, on average, maybe warmer than it

was before. Personally, I don't know. I mean, I know they've taken satellite readings and stuff. But I'm still not, at least in my mind, I'm not confident that these things are totally accurate for the globe. But whatever. The globe is a dynamic living system. Let's just take it to be true. Historically, over human history, warming has resulted in a benefit for human life. More humans have died during the ice

ages, than during any kind of warming period. Warming period has always been a period where humans have thrived. But let's throw that aside because that's actual science is not the science. And the science is more interested in controlling your behavior. Get an electric car, because it's going to save the planet. Even though the in order to generate the electricity and to save the electricity could be more

harmful than just keeping your internal combustion engine. Put up windmills and solar panels that are dependent on the wind and the sun that are not consistent. Forget about nuclear power, it's too consistent, too consistent, too powerful and provides too much power. We need to control the population. But I think people in general, other than the news realized they're not in big danger from climate change. And I don't think the propaganda was working because human beings don't live

more than 100 years. You know, on average, I think what would it be 70 to 80 years. Changes in the earth. Take 1000s, if not 10s of 1000s, if not hundreds of 1000s of years, the Earth is over 4 billion years old. The changes that take place over time are not something we can see as human beings. We haven't been here that long. But the need of some people to exhibit power over others has been here as long as we've been here. And

that is what they're after. And it's it's come to me now I don't believe these people have anybody's best interest at heart. All they have is their power grab. And they view you and me and every other regular person as just a cog in the machine. You are here to serve them. You're here to provide the tax dollars you're here to provide whatever human capital

you are, to further their grip on power. What else can it be there after the individualists they're after people who think for themselves, that's why they're trying to demonize the unvaccinated. Also with climate change is the same thing. The End individualists sees right through this stuff. So what better way to demonize the individualist than to say that

they want to kill your grandmother with a virus? They, you know, by forcing you or I mean, look what's happened in the United States, the eviction moratoriums, the foreclosure moratoriums, that is a de facto nationalization of residential real estate in the United States. When your private property rights go, what what do you have left? If you're not able to own yourself? If you're not able to own anything, what do you have? You know, do you own yourself if you're forced to get a

vaccination? If you don't have a say, and whether or not the government can pump you full of a drug, what do you have? You are powerless. You got nothing. They have you. They can do with you what they want. That's what's got me in such a bad mood today. I feel that we're at an inflection point. And it's going to be happening this fall and winter. And how the United States reacts to all of this, I think is what's going to push

the future. They've already instituted the passport sanitaire in France, even though people were marching in the streets. In Italy, they were burning vaccine cards. But they still pass their vaccine passport. Is it going to happen here? They're pushing for it. And when that FDA approval comes down for Pfizer, we'll see what happens. And I think that's, I think that's the inflection point we're at now. Hopefully, I'm wrong. Hopefully I see a better day in the coming weeks

because this shits got me pissed off. And that's that's also partly why I want to change my podcast name to spitting in the wind because this entire 15 minutes or so of my ranting is exactly that just spitting in the wind. Just throwing shit out there just going right back into my face. Not gonna change a goddamn thing. That's the feel good for this week. Anyway, I'm gonna end it here. Just to let you know, this is a podcast,

going into the push for podcasting 2.0. After all of that bullshit, there's a podcasting 2.0 compatible podcast. So that means that if you're using one of the new podcast apps at new podcast apps.com you can see the transcript and chapter chapter images chapter links if I have any. You can also stream satoshis to this if you found this uplifting and entertaining by using one of the apps that are value enabled and you feel like shoving a few satoshis into

your wallet. But that's it for this week. That's all I got spitting in the wind, whatever the fuck it is. Let's hope next week I'm in a better mood. Alright, everybody have a good week. Talk to you later. I really didn't feel like doing this today. But I got through it. It's depressing, but I need to get it out. Sometimes. It's really spurned by people wearing masks all by themselves walking around. I just, I don't get it. I don't understand it. Really calling it Have a good week. Bye bye.