Canadian Gestapo

appeared on Fox News. offski joins me now Patrick Ingram. It's crazy. There. I blogged about him over the past few weeks, and then everybody else has as well where the armed police meet him at his church door. And he screamed at them calling them Nazi Gestapo, which really that's what they are. You didn't think that we would make it to another time where police would be shuttering a church under the guise of Public Safety

and Health with COVID-19 and the Coronavirus. This man is, you know, publicly been fighting them and he's out of jail right now from what I understand. But it's just, it's just nuts. There was another. I don't believe this is the same church. The church of god in almer, or aylmer. I don't know how they pronounce it up in Canada. But there was another church service where the police came and marched in. And they shut them down, shut them down, and then lock the doors. There's a video

on Twitter. In this video here, you could hear the the congregation singing. And in the video, you've got maybe about 10 police officers walking down the driveway, they didn't park in, in the parking lot of the church, but they're marching. You know, it would be great if they were goose stepping, but they're just marching through the parking lot through the driveway, and they're heading towards the church. The person taking the video is just right now he's outside in the parking

lot. And he's showing the police coming, please are armed. Believe it or not, they have their flak jackets on. They do not have helmets, at least no right here and to lock the doors here. Here's their ration. So you get the church. So conservative Christian church seems they almost look like they're Amish. But you know, these are harmless people. And they're singing their church hymns. And the police are outside with their warrants and their guns, as a group of parishioners are all videotaping.

It's all kind of crazy to think that this is Canada. So here, let's see for the video a little bit. You got the Please forgive them for the pastor saying that he's going to be praying for the police. Saying that they don't know what they're doing. You know, obviously they don't, these are supposed to be members of the community. You're supposed to have religious freedom in Canada. Probably known as a syrup. Here's the police officer or order here today, requiring the sheer

Then the pastor gave a little speech in front of the front of the church doors and then as the congregation met outs He proceeded to continue given freedoms to preach

what's going on. I'm living in the Atlanta, Georgia area. And, you know, Georgia right now in the United States is famous for, it's only 25% of the population being vaccinated. So 75% of people here are withholding waiting or just playing that going to get it for some reason. So the reports in the news in the Atlanta Journal Constitution have all been surrounding

guilting people into getting a vaccination. And there's a story that happened today that appeared in the newspaper that I did not blog these things yet, because they were just fresh. reporting about how things are opening up and about how people spent spent the day like without without their masks. Here's one here, Adrian gress gerwitz. She arrived at the great harvest bread company in Milton wearing a mask, I guess previous it says here on Thursday, she would have worn a mask. But Friday was

different. Less than 24 hours after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention significantly relaxed COVID-19 guidelines for vaccinated Americans. She shed her face covering it's liberating she said, who is vaccinated. It's just a little more comfortable to be out. Really. So you know, you know, when you've walked into a place, and people are behaving normal, over a disease, that 99.9% not only survive, but you know, really don't have lasting complications from this.

And you see people acting normal and you're and you have a reaction to it. You've been propagandized into fear. So this whole this whole story is about different people throughout Atlanta, about how they're vaccinated. And now they're they feel so good that the CDC has given them permission to go out and about and take off their mask. There you got some people as well. They're saying, Well, I'm vaccinated. But I don't know who else is out there isn't? We don't know. There's a lot of

people aren't unvaccinated. So what sense does it make what logical sense does it make that if you have been vaccinated against a disease and you run into somebody that has not been vaccinated, who's at risk? Why would you be at risk? Why? Why would you continue to wear a mask? If the other person isn't vaccinated, we all have choices now. The vaccines are all out there. They're free, you can make an appointment go get them. It's Matter of fact, they're more vaccines out there than

people that want to get them. So this is now this now comes down to a personal choice. If you don't want to get it, you don't have to get it. If you want to get it, go get it. There's nothing stopping you. You can protect yourself. If you feel you're at high risk. You can protect yourself. So there was another story about a group of scientists calling for further inquiry into the origins of the Coronavirus and I blogged about this one earlier in the week. I'm trying to find it now.

Let's see. I can't remember now where the heck it was. But yeah, there there were there was a an article on medium and that one covered Oh, wow. I you know, I I blogged more than I thought I did. I cannot find it right now. But I remember was an article on medium. And it went through in detail in great detail whether or not the Coronavirus was created in a lab or just found found in nature or the heck is it? I can't believe I can't find

it. I know I blocked it anyway. So it this is reported in New York time. So hopefully, there's something happening there. You know, if, if the New York Times is jumping in on this bandwagon, something has to be up, because they've been so pro who and so Pro, nothing to see here. This is something that moved from a

bat to people. That it's it's kind of surprising. So 18 scientists stated Thursday in a letter published in the journal Science, that there's not enough evidence to decide whether a natural origin or accidental laboratory leak caused the pandemic. That's true. And the medium article did say that, you know, there is no definitive proof one way or the other. But the, you know, if you're looking for a preponderance of evidence, there are features of SARS covi. Two that have never been found

in a wild type virus. It's only been found in lab created viruses of viruses created to test whether or not virus you know a particular virus can be transmitted to people. So there seems to be a smoking gun, whether it will amount to anything who knows. But in other news, let's see more scientists argue against the need against argue against the need for

COVID-19 booster shots. So interviews and interviews with Reuters This is from Yahoo Finance more than a dozen influential infection, infectious disease and vaccine

development experts. So there's a growing evidence that a first round of global vaccinations may offer enduring protection against the Coronavirus and its most worrisome variants discovered to date, some of these scientists expressed concern that public expectations around COVID-19 boosters are being set by pharmaceutical executives rather than health specialists. Follow the experts. Although many agreed that preparing for such a need as a precaution was prudent. So they

had to sort of cover their ass with that one. So in other words, you know, a booster shots probably not going to be necessary, you know, but I do suspect this is going to be the flu shot where every year, every single year, you're going to be pushed to get this. Let's move on to Arizona, Arizona and the audit. Things are what the heck is going on. I got a I got a dog making a lot of noise. So I do this podcast in my office, my home office and it keeps the door closed. I got three dogs in

here. Because if they hear stuff outside, then they're going to go running around and maybe barking so I try to keep it as quiet as possible. But my Labrador is for some reason, either having a dream or twitching uncontrollably down there. Anyway, the Arizona audit it's possible that Democrats could be in some trouble if the reporting on this is true so far. The Democrats refusing to comply with court subpoenas. And there are Chain of Custody anomalies and database deletions

from hard drives. Which doesn't sound very good does it know. So in this article from reported by Cheryl akkad, Atkins Attkisson, that's her name, actress and I can never pronounce her name properly. According she says according to a letter from Karen ban, president of the Arizona State Senate sent to the Maricopa Board of Supervisors the county continues to flout valid legislative subpoenas refusing to hand over virtual images of

routers. The county also has allegedly failed to provide the passwords necessary to access vote tabulation devices for the audit. A second issue flagged by the audit has to do with anomalies in Chain of Custody process for ballots. The letter says the country has yet to provide Chain of Custody documentation. bags for storing the ballots were not sealed. batch dividers are missing and ballot boxes were sealed with

regular tape rather than tamper evident seals. The third issue mentioned is the alleged deletion of the entire database directory from the D drive of the machine szene ms primary, that would mean subpoena data has been removed. According to the audit, there is no evidence that the main database for all election related data for the 2020 general election has been moved as has been removed. So there's some definite problems whether or not this amounts to anything who knows, but it's

just interesting than the less. We had Rand Paul coming out and coming after St. Fauci again, which was kind of nice. And let's see here. Oh, wait, I think I found the article the medium article. Yeah, I titled it SARS Coby to created by nature or nurture. And it was a science writer. And the writer was previously a writer for the science writer for The New York Times, amongst other publications. And he looked at all the arguments for and against SARS, kobie to being lab

created. The kicker is, though nobody questioned the argument. It's a long, detailed article, and it is worth the read from from that article. Here is quoting What the heck is his name? I can't, you know, I didn't I didn't put his name down. Anyway, the article is linked on my blog. So you can read it is a long read. From the article science is supposedly a self correcting community of experts who constantly check

each other's work. So why didn't other virologist point out that the Anderson group's argument was fully absurdly large, full of absurdly large holes. Perhaps because in today's universities speech can be very costly. Careers can be destroyed for stepping out of line. Any virologist who challenges the community's declared view risks having his next grant application turned down by the panel of fellow virologists that

advises the government grant distribution agency. The data sack and Anderson letters were really political, not scientific statements, yet were amazingly effective. articles in the mainstream press repeatedly stated that a consensus of experts had ruled lab escape out of the question or extremely unlikely. Their authors relied for the most part on the dagen Anderson letters, failing to understand the yawning gaps in their arguments. Mainstream newspapers all have science

journalists on their staff as do major networks. And these specialists reporters are supposed to be able to question scientists and check their assertions, but the NASDAQ and Andersen assertions went largely unchallenged. What else does this sound like? This sounds exactly like the climate change argument. Don't you think? You know, you have there are scientists out there that challenge the premise of the manmade climate change argument. Some of them do admit that, you

know, the Earth is getting warmer. But they they say that there is not enough evidence as to whether or not man is responsible. And they also say they do not know if in fact, it is a bad thing. But it's it's difficult to get that kind of news out there. It's just flooded with the other climate change is going to end the world we need to stop it now. shut down all economic activity, which is also very similar to

SARS, Coby to an COVID, the COVID mass hysteria. So, you know, if you're not allowed to question anything, what do we have? If you're not allowed to be skeptical, and try to get down to the root cause? Or maybe you have a different idea? Or you have different evidence, if nobody's willing to look at it, you know, what, what's happening to us? So if the heading back to COVID, if the SARS could be to virus was created in a lab,

it may be that the American taxpayer funded it. How does that make you feel and that the then I'll go back to the Rand Paul video cuz that's what this is about. In the medium article, this author says, by a strange twist in the story, a scientist work was funded by the NIH, or I'm sorry, the ni and I ID to many acronyms, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and it's part of the NIH and grant proposals funded her work which are a matter of public records

specifically, on what you plan to do with the money. I'm sorry, a specify and specify exactly what you plan to do with money. The grants worksite were assigned to the prime contractor, Dr. datsik of the Eco Health Alliance. He also helped With the investigation as to whether or not this was lab created, so there's a conflict of interest and he subcontracted them to a doctor. She the doctor, she is this doctor in China. That is the chief person I guess that controls their

Coronavirus research. Here are extracts from the grants for fiscal years 2018 and 2019. co v Cove stands for Coronavirus and S for protein which refers to the viruses spike test predictions of Cove interspecies transmission. predictive models of host range will be tested experimentally using reverse genetics, pseudo virus and receptor building essays and virus infection experiments across a range of cell cultures

from different species and humanized mice. We will use s protein sequence data, infectious clone technology in vitro and in vivo infection experiments and analysis of receptor binding to test the hypothesis that percentage divergence thresholds and s protein sequences predict spillover potential. He says what this means in non technical languages that doctor she set out to create novel coronaviruses with the highest possible infectivity for human

cells. Her plan was to take genes that coded for spike proteins, possessing a variety of measured affinities for human cells ranging from high to low. She would insert these by genes one by one into the backbone of a number of viral genomes, reverse genetics and infectious clone technology, creating a series of kemetic viruses. These kemetic viruses would then be tested for their ability to attack human cell cultures and

humanized mice. And this information would help predict the likelihood of spillover the jump of a Coronavirus from bats to people. So China's leading expert on bat viruses was funded by the NIH. Quite possibly. But we can't investigate whether or not the virus came from her lab doctor she's lab because her records are sealed. So the now infamous lab in Wu Han, or Wuhan, they study these viruses in their lab, and their safety precautions were a joke. This is also from the article before

2020. The rules followed by a virologist in China and elsewhere required that experiments with the SARS one and MERS viruses be conducted in BSL three condition. And I forgot what BSL stands for I think is a biosafety level, so biosafety level three conditions, but all other bat coronaviruses could be studied in BSL two. So these are the higher the number, the higher the protection level. The next

this is one level down from BSL three. BSL two requires taking fairly minimal safety precautions such as wearing lab coat, lab coats and gloves, not sucking up liquids in a pipette and putting up biohazard warnings yet and assign a function experiment conducted in BSL two might produce an agent more infectious than either SARS one ormers, and if it did, then lab workers would stand a high chance of infection, especially unvaccinated. So much of her work on these gain of function

Coronavirus is not the gain of function. coronaviruses are the ones where they change the virus itself to see how it will infect or try to produce one that will infect a human being eat more easily. She performed her testing at BSL two. And according to this author, BSL two. It would pose an unacceptably high risk of infection. Because the standard of the standard of safety, the biosafety level of BSL two is equivalent to the standards used in a US dental

dentist's office. So Isn't that funny? They're conducting experiments in a lab of highly infectious diseases, where they're not really taking any precautions. They're not wearing, you know, you know, bunny suits clean. They're not working in clean rooms. They're just simple mask, simple glove, some lab coats so they could easily get infected. Oh, and I don't know, I don't understand why they talk about vaccination because vaccines didn't exist at the time for these things, but

it's neither here nor there. So it's it's a very long article and it seems that Dr. Fauci could have been partly responsible. And this part of the story is near the end of that article. So you'll know you have to go down there and read it. But here he says, the responsibility of the NIH ID and NIH is even more acute because for the first three years that they grant to eco Health Alliance, there was a moratorium

on funding gain of function research. Why didn't the two agencies therefore halt the federal funding as apparently required to do so by law? So it was against the law to do this, but somebody wrote a loophole into the moratorium. He goes on to say the moratorium specifically barred funding of any gain of function research that increase the pathogenesis c

pathogenicity of the flu MERS or SARS viruses. But then a footnote on page two of the moratorium document states that an exception from the research pause may be obtained at the head of the USG funding agency determines that the research is urgently necessary to protect the public health or national

security. This seems to mean that either the the director of the NIH ID, Dr. Fauci or the director of the NIH, Dr. Francis Collins, or maybe both would have invoked the footnote in order to keep the money flowing to Dr. She's gaining function research. So wouldn't that be just the biggest kick in the freakin pants that the world shut down, the US economy shut

down, your lives have been shut down. And if the number of people that they say died by COVID-19 is accurate, that it could have possibly been funded by us, the American taxpayer and approved by the nation's love, you know, beloved Dr. Anthony Fauci, that would be the ultimate kick in the pants.

their lab. But if they were wouldn't he then be culpable. So Doesn't he have a self interest in smoothing things over? I'm not saying he did cover things up. But you wouldn't appoint someone who's in the line of supply chain of giving the money to them? Because ultimately, here's the rub. I don't know whether it came from the lab. Nobody knows whether it came from the lab. But who would be culpable. Dr. falchi could be culpable for the entire pandemic Soca doctor says Anke does Anke

and kotian. Dr. Shi, I don't know. But you wouldn't put the people who gave the money to the Wu Han lab in charge of the investigation that looks like a cover up.

like to follow. And none of them other than Rand Paul. And the article on medium has covered this in any meaningful way. Oh, I lost my place. I close the wrong tab on my browser. So it's kind of amazing if that if that's true. It's amazing. And it's kind of sad. Let's see, what else do I have here? This is nine COVID. Large us banks poised to loosen requirements to get credit cards. That's bad news. This smacks of the housing crisis. Hopefully on a smaller scale where can't crash a world

economy? But you know what, what are they going to do here, they're going to start giving credit cards to people who maybe normally couldn't get it. And what they're going to do is they're going to use they're they're going to banks are going to share information between each other. Regarding people's

balances and payment habits. I don't know how much of a privacy violation any of that stuff is. But they're going to use that information to have some different type of credit score for people who are having trouble getting credit cards, and it may be good for some people, you know, some people crawling out of debt or maybe they had some some financial mishap you know, and they need to get a credit card again, and

I understand the need for cards. But some people really you shouldn't, they shouldn't have it just like people before should not have had mortgages, some of them. They had mortgages on houses, where they were getting a mortgage that was like somewhere in you know, 90% of 90 95% of the value of the house, there was no equity there. And then when the real estate market bubble burst, suddenly they were underwater, their house was worth less than what they owed. And that's how

we ended up having a lot of these, these problems. So what's going to happen here, when you have a whole host of people getting credit cards, and then they can't pay them back? They lose a job, the economy tanks? And now who's going to be responsible? Are they going to sell this debt? like they did with mortgages? Are they going to package them together and

sell them off to other companies? And I just I just don't see this as a good thing, you know, people should have to have the capacity to repay their debts before they're given lines of credit. Oh, let's see. Okay. Well, there were hearings in Congress, about January 6. You know, you have one side, which are the Trump haters, and they're totally irrational. You have the other side that are Trump lovers, which are equally

totally irrational. But here's the thing with January 6. This is, I believe, the United States is Tiananmen Square, incident, as it's known in China. The Oh no, they call it the, what do they call it, they call it. They call it an incident, I can't remember now, but they call it an incident rather than in some Wikipedia. Rather than a massacre, which it's called everywhere else in the world. It's called the Tiananmen Square

Massacre. In the Tiananmen Square Massacre event, there were hundreds, perhaps even 1000s, nobody knows exactly for sure, there's been no official count. And the Chinese government doesn't really admit to it. People were killed by the Chinese government, because they wanted to shut down the protests that were happening there. And the Chinese government, basically shut down all media, and produced an official

narrative of what happened, and they would not deviate. They did not allow anybody to report it as anything other than that. There were journalists that were fired. There were journalists that were jailed. They removed images, videos, articles from the web, or they've blocked it in China, you know, using the Great Wall of China. So in China, the Tiananmen Square Massacre that the rest of the world knows never happened. So this, this is a case where something did happen, but they're using the

media to their advantage to say it never happened. Now, in our case, with January 6, we're being told by the media, we're being told by the democrats or the Trump haters out there, that January 6, was an armed insurrection, that the government was trying to be overthrown, that it was a bloody and deadly coup attempt. This is what we're being told. And this is the farthest thing from the truth. The farthest thing from the truth. I watched it that day. I watched it unfold live on

TV. And you know, I blogged this again, I put the videos back up because surprisingly, NBC hasn't even taken their video down. There's a video and it's one of the first ones and I remember watching this as the people broke through and there was a camera crew inside. Already streaming live video, I was watching the PBS news hour. And you just see this large group of people walking through the Capitol. In between the ropes, they have the area roped off. And I've never heard of an armed

insurrection. That walked peacefully through ropes in between the ropes. They didn't even knock them down. They weren't knocking down statues. They weren't tearing paintings off the wall. You know that's not to say things didn't get out. control with some of the people there things definitely get out of control. They shouldn't have been in there in

the building in the first place. But regardless, we're being told them when you hear armed insurrection, when you hear insurrection, when you hear, you know, all this coup attempt, baloney, you know, the images in your head, are you've got people running around with maybe ar fifteens, you know, or, or, you know, even just nine millimeter handguns, you know, running through the halls of the Capitol and Congress, you know, trying to, you know, find Congress people and hold them hostage.

That isn't that what happened? Let me see if I remember this is public. This is from NBC last night. Because of the pandemic this has been right now you can see people on this video breach means that there are every single carrying American flags and screen calmly and even widely spaced ready breach walking between the ropes, where you have, they're taking videos with their phones, they're taking selfies and they're

taking pictures, and then you have Capitol Police. Standing by the side, your bags are checked, and police do a sweep of what you bring into the Capitol. This has to be the most peaceful interaction ever recorded. History, I have to say, I mean, you know, that was the NBC one then there's another video in the rotunda. You can hear all the people there, but they're just standing there. They're standing there milling around. They're having a chat. And you got the Capitol Police standing

on the side, just watching them. Some of them are just having conversations with people. You need to go look these things up if you haven't seen them. This is not an armed insurrection. This is a group of people that wanted to protest the government over the election that believed that there were some election irregularities and that nobody was doing anything to try to

find out what the problem was. But the media is not telling you that the media is telling you legacy media and this goes the legacy media is not just television, radio, newspapers, it's also social media, Facebook, Twitter, they are now considered to me legacy media because they all repeat the same thing. And if you try to go beyond those means at least Facebook and Twitter, maybe even Instagram, they you know, Shadow ban you they silence you so and they're doing you a disservice.

They're not telling you the truth. And while it you know, there was there was violence there. There was definitely one person there killed, shot and killed Ashley Babbitt. There was another I think it was a woman that was trampled. And it was a person that was trampled. I don't believe it was in the building, I believe it was outside and died from injuries being trampled, the rest of it was assigned sideshow. They did not die as a direct result of any

violence that happened that day. So the media also telling you that five people died during a bloody insurrection a bloody coup attempt. That's a lie. It's an out and out lie. And it's it's like you see the two worlds. It's, it's pretty disturbing when you're on the outside looking into it. And you have people that just they hate Trump so much, and they want to believe it so badly, that he inspired a coup attempt. Let's put aside to that. He, on January 6, President Trump was

still president. So it's impossible to have a coup attempt on yourself. Now, you could say that, you know, these people were trying to stop the count there because of that was at the time when the electoral college was meeting and they were tallying the electors. So you could say they were trying to stop the count, delay, the count all these kinds of things, you know, that's at the worst. You know, did they break into Pelosi office? Yes. Did they, you know, cause some damage?

Yes. But it was not a coup attempt. Nobody almost died in Congress. Vice President Pence wasn't almost hanged. No, that stuff happened. None of it. But you're being told it did. And you're being told repeatedly over and over and over again until one day it's just gonna be Yeah, it happened. It was the insurrection. You know, we're almost there already. This is like the the Trump fine people Bologna, where they claimed he said that Nazis were fine. People were very fine people,

which is not what he said at all. As a matter of fact, he said the exact opposite. But yet you were told from the moment it happened, because they were able to isolate that one soundbite and not give you the full context that people thought it actually happened. And that's the power of the media. off of that little bit, we have Apple Apple Computer. they parted ways with an employee because a bunch of employees wrote a letter to

Apple saying that they don't see they don't feel safe. Why don't they feel safe for this one from this one employee because he wrote a book in 2018 where he said some things that they believe are massage earnest. Here's the quote. The guy's name is Garcia Martinez. And he did respond on Twitter the other day, you know, basically saying that Facebook fired him because there were no there was no reporting on whether or not he was fired. Because it was being reported that they just decided

to part ways which makes it seem like it was voluntary. But Mr. Garcia wrote in his book that most women in the Bay Area are soft and weak. cosseted and naive despite their claims of worldliness and generally full of shit. In other passages, he referred to women based on his attraction to their bodies and said most women at Facebook and in the Bay Area didn't know how to dress. And another passage dealing with fundraising he said an equity round is having to convince five women to do a six

on with you. This is how it was reported by the Wall Street Journal. Matt Taibbi writing an article and substack he knows Mr. Martinez. And he went through he wrote a long article outlining the book, what Garcia was referring to, and put it in better context. And that even let's just say the claims are accurate that he wrote something massage monistic in a book in 2018. There's no evidence that he did any of this stuff. At a workplace. There's no evidence that he did any of this at

Apple. So what is the fireable offense? This is Apple just strictly virtue signaling. For some reason. Maybe they just didn't want they want it to explode. But Garcia, Garcia Martinez, he wrote on Twitter that he was recruited by Apple, he didn't seek the job there. They recruited him, they wanted him to go there. He sold his house in Washington, he moved down there. He changed his entire life to go and work at Apple. And within days, it turned around, people write some stupid

letter. And he's out. Now, I've done business in California. California has some extremely strong labor laws. To me, he should sue. He should sue for wrongful termination. He should sue them for libel and slander. And just go after him because what they did was not right. He had, there was no fireable offense, he did nothing in the workplace. And the kicker here

is Apple's just disgusting statement. Here's their statement at Apple we've always strived to create an inclusive, welcoming workplace where everyone is respected and accepted. Unless you write a book in 2018, and say something that might be misogynistic behavior that demeans or discriminates to get discriminates against people for who they are, has no place here. So they could discriminate for against this guy because he has he made some so called

misogynistic statements in a book. They can discriminate against him. I was that legal? It shouldn't be. Apple needs to be called out on the carpet for that, and he needs to get a lot of money. Let's see, we get inflation news. Inflation is all over the place. I think it's a temporary spike that's largely created by the shutdown of everything in the world. So there's some pent up demand and there's too much money in circulation right now. I expect that's going to work itself out

over the next few months. The inflation we got to worry about is next year and the year after that. When all this money that's still working its way through the system doesn't go away. And we continue to have a lot of money chasing too few goods, that's going to be a problem. Back to COVID. There was let's see, there was a hearing up in Canada up in Winnipeg. And they were talking about the PCR tests. The chief microbiologist up there. Chief microbiologist and laboratory specialists, Dr.

Jared Bullard. He was a witness for the Manitoba government. And when he was questioned under oath, he acknowledged that the PCR tests have significant limitations. He admitted that PCR tests do not verify infectiousness, and we're never intended to be used diagnose respiratory illnesses. In addition to all of that, he testified that samples tested at a cycle threshold of over 25, at least up in Canada, they're produced no viable virus, and samples tested at a cycle

threshold of 18 only produced 44% of positive samples. That means that, at a lower threshold have a side effect cycle threshold with a PCR test of 18. Only 56% are not only but only 44%, tested, positive and 56% majority tested negative, those people were not considered infectious. Meanwhile, in Manitoba, they've been testing at cycle thresholds of at least 40, which is exactly the same as as has been going on down here in the United States. So it's impossible to know from the

numbers that they give whether or not anybody is infectious. At a cycle threshold of 4042 that I've seen with the FDA, they'll be able to find any fraction, any little piece of a virus of SARS COVID. And then you know, that positive test then we'll say your your infectious when you are most likely not. We had the trouble in the Middle East with Israel and the Palestinians

once again, which we haven't seen this in a while. You know, Trump had things seemingly under control with the Abraham accords and moving the US embassy to Jerusalem. Things were I don't recall things being that quiet in the Middle East my entire life. So we have fighting going back and forth now. And there was a video that I saw on Twitter of the Israeli Iron Dome.

This, this is somebody on Twitter. And it just looks like a bunch of fireflies flying up into the sky and you get little flashes of light where their Iron Dome defense system is meeting the incoming rockets from the Palestinians, and just blowing them out of the sky before they ever land. It's kind of incredible video. That's pretty amazing. Let's see, let's move on here. john stossel had a video that he came out with in

talking about welfare for the rich. You know, I'm against all government subsidies, whether it's for business, whether it's for people, you know, the federal government doesn't have any business taking money from one person and handing it to

another. But you know, in my sarcastic way, you know, I'm against all where all welfare unless the UBI is passed universal basic income, then give me my share, because it will please me to no end, that the younger generations that have been calling for universal basic income will have to pay me pay me for doing nothing that would make me very happy. Let's see then I have my story about the nature versus nurture. Oh, there was an article in the Atlanta Journal, it was an

opinion piece by a woman. She is a young woman in college. And she's was obviously abused by the education system. Perhaps she is abused by somebody mentally because she cannot reconcile being a half Asian. That's what I am. I'm a half breed. I'm half Korean, half white. My father is from Korea, South Korea and my mother, her family his immediate family's from upstate New York and the extended family. It comes from Quebec, Canada. And then from there beyond there it goes to

France. So I'm half white and half Korean half breed as I like to say which It's not a popular thing these days to say. It's just it's so disheartening. Here's what she says from her opinion piece. On on my most recent phone call with my parents, we were lamenting the fatal attacks on six Asian women in Atlanta, our hometown. Both my parents Express grief and outrage over what seems Zena phobic hate crime. But in a sudden tone shift, my dad expressed his gratitude for my

mother's whiteness. He said, I'm glad mom is white to help you and trailed off realizing the gravity of this statement. If If any of that is true, his parents either don't understand or, you know, are part of the problem here. Because I lived I've lived 54 years as a half Asian. And this girl, she's in college, so she's, you know, got to be in her lower 20s. You can't tell me, people are more racist today than they were when I was growing up back in the late 60s, early 70s. Nobody knew what I

was. I didn't really give it down. People ask me all the time. What are you Where are you from? What's your nationality? I never took offense to that. You know, especially back then, there were not very many half breeds. At least half Asians have Koreans. In in, in my hometown of Chicago. In the the phonebook, which we used to use back then the white pages, my family had the only last name Bay in the phonebook. Ba there were other Koreans in Chicago there were Kim's in parks and

chosen choice. But no base we were the only ones. And you know, I never took offense to that. I never took offense to people wondering what I was because you really couldn't tell. You know, my eyes are not all that slanted. You know, depending on the time of year, my skin is either brown or or very white. My hair's black. My eyes are brown. I mean, I could pass for Mexican I could pass for Native American I could pass

for half Asian, which, you know, is what I am. But she she writes this long article about how she's kind of afraid, like is she white enough, is half white, white enough. And her family is like afraid of her getting killed or beaten out on the street because she's half Asian. Here's a little bit more from her article to my dad. However, I appear safe I appear in conspicuous if I walk quickly enough past the racist, they won't be able to place my

ethnicity in time to start throwing rocks and punches. I did not inherit the gentle eyes that join in the corners like those of my grandparents. My hair is a few shades lighter than my dad's Stark black hair. My skin is tan. But only in the summer, when everyone else is getting darker to her pictures in the paper. She looks more Asian than I do. If I if I saw her on the street, I would definitely know she's Asian, or

at least half. Never once in my life was I worried about walking down the street unless I was in a particularly bad neighborhood was I worried about anybody trying to punch me or throw rocks because of what it looked like. And I'm walking around Atlanta here at the Atlanta area all the time. And I'm running in the you know, just about everybody we've dealt with my wife and I since we moved here, my wife is full Filipino. Everybody has been nice. There's been zero racism pointed toward

us toward us. And so let's say let's say some of the people we've dealt with, let's say they are racist. It wasn't overt. You know, whatever it was they kept it in check. that there has been literally nobody now I know there's been incidents in the news of Asians getting beaten. You know, primarily, they've been in higher crime areas in New York City, San Francisco, Los Angeles. And the shootings that they talked about here in

Atlanta. I don't believe those were racially motivated. I believe it was a nut Nut Job guy that was shooting up a massage parlor because they were massage parlors. I don't believe that was an act of hashtag Asian hate. But this this woman here she had to be abused in the school system, to believe that white people are are so racist, that they're going to see her walking down the street, peg her as an Asian and start throwing

rocks and punches. That's ridiculous. Not only that people who are any ethnicity black, brown, Asian, you know, yellow as they like to say. There, there's no way you can tell me that racism is worse today than it wasn't when my father came to the, to this country, he came to the United States in the 50s 1950s. He didn't speak English, he didn't have any money. He had a scholarship to a university in Central Illinois. So he came here in the central Illinois in the 1950s was

nothing but white. And he tells the stories all the time about his professors, and the people he met there, the people that he worked in the summers with, they were all white. But they all treated him well. He wasn't getting punched and getting rocks thrown at him then. You know, and throughout all the racism you know that people like to tout from the 50s on up. It should have been impossible for him to have done anything in this world. Because he was being held back and held down by the

white man by the white patriarchy. Okay, he's a man. So I guess he could be part of the patriarchy just not part of the white part. I don't know if you can hear that click clack of my dog's nails. He's walking around. But my father being full Korean, was able to live the American dream, the real American dream. He came from nothing, and built it all himself to where he became a multi millionaire. All using his

brain, the sweat of his brow, and his hard work. Anybody who came here after that, as far more advantages and he had this young Asian woman here in Atlanta, I think she's in Marietta. Going to college, she's half Japanese. Somehow she feels so oppressed. That she feels she can't make it in this world. Now, how is that not abuse? How is it abuse?

You know, she talks about identifying as Asian, when people ask her how about identifying as an American, she also gets the concept of the American melting pot incorrectly. She thinks that the American melting pot is exists, you know, as a concept to erase cultural and linguistic differences. Nothing could be farther from the truth there.

She has been taught to hate her own country. The idea of the American melting pot is that people from all over the world from different cultures, different societies, different religions, different everything can come here and coexist side by side. That doesn't mean you cast anything aside. You know, my father never gave up speaking Korean. I don't speak Korean because my mother's white. So you know, Korean was never

spoken in the home. But my younger brother and sister from my father's second marriage, they grew up speaking Korean. You know, they don't really do it anymore. But Korean culture wasn't buried to them. You know, the Koreans here in Atlanta, they have a giant community here. Nobody's trying to suppress the Korean culture. Nobody's trying to suppress the Japanese culture, the Mexican culture. You know, or the Europeans that came here, the Polish, the Irish, the Jewish,

the Germans. Nobody's trying to suppress any of that culture. In the United States celebrates that type of culture, we celebrate the fact that people can, you can have a Jewish person and an Arab person living next door, side by side. And they're not launching rockets at each other. They may not like each other, they may love each other. Who knows. But the fact

is, we can all live together here. So the problems that she feels, to me, were created by the media and created by her the education system here, where they don't teach you properly. What the American Dream is. They don't teach you properly about the Constitution. They don't teach you properly about what cultural diversity really is. You know, or what, what the American melting pot is. Instead, you're taught that all white people are evil, and they're all trying to suppress

you. And that's wrong. That's abuse. So I had an article, it was it was a article about the Chinese census and about their population. And I got this one so wrong. It was kind of hilarious. When I was reading it, I thought I read that, that the Chinese population increased their population by 72 million every year. And I was like, Whoa, that's a huge number. And that's why I posted that every 4.6 years, China grows by us.

And that's considered slow. was wrong, it was a decade. So every 10 years, every 10 years, their population seems to increase by 72 million. And I guess it's slowing down. They had their one child per family policy, and they've dropped that they want people to have more babies. But still 72 million people over 10 years. So you know, the replaces every 46 years, not 4.6. But still, that's pretty fast. I think us only has 330 million people. So you know, they may not care in China, whether or

not they can support their social programs. Because it's a communist nation. There's no such thing as true private property. If the government wants that they can take it. So I don't know how much that census report really means anything. NPR had a story where so they reported this without actually reporting it that COVID-19 lockdowns may be responsible for over 400,000 deaths. The CDC isn't has the number of deaths due to COVID. In the US at the time when I

blogged this at 570,520. NPR reported on a new study that estimates over 900,000 people died from died due to COVID. Sort of from the story, NPR says A new study estimates that the number of people who have died of COVID-19 in the US is more than 900,000, a number 57 57% higher than official figures. worldwide. The study authors say that, say the COVID-19 death count is nearing 7 million more than double the reported number of 3.2 4 million. So how did they get this? They didn't just

look at people who died of COVID. They looked at everything else under the sun, every side death that, you know could be attributed to something attached to COVID. So hear more from the NPR story. Then it examined other mortality factors influenced by the pandemic, for example, some of the extra deaths that were caused by increased opioid opioid overdoses or deferred healthcare. Those were counted as COVID deaths. So opioid overdoses, maybe because paramedics couldn't get to them

quick enough. Maybe they got to the hospital and whatever care they received, they couldn't couldn't be fast enough. So deferred health care, and overdoses are counted in this report, as an estimated COVID. And it says here, let's see researchers at the at UW and I can't remember what the what the research where it was. Maybe University of Wisconsin, I don't remember ultimately concluded that the extra deaths not directly caused by COVID were effectively offset by other

reductions in death rates. When you put all that together, we conclude that the best way, the closest estimate for true COVID death is still excess mortality, because some of those things are on the positive side. Other factors are on the negative side. So they're just they're just taking stabs at it now. They're not counting things that are actually COVID deaths.

They're just counting everything. So you know, if you if you take if you take it as as they report it, lockdown caused nearly as many deaths as directly related to COVID as the numbers count, and that should be that should be troublesome and kind of disturbing. More on COVID. And whether or not this was a lab created virus, Sky News. I think this is Sky News from Australia.

era of genetic weapons. It says They can be artificially manipulated into an emerging human disease virus weaponized and unleashed in a way never seen before.

all consuming, all consuming. And, you know, like I went to the store today, I went to a public supermarket, and at least here in the north eastern suburbs of Georgia. mask wearing isn't so prevalent anymore. There are people walking around like normal people. It will be nice once we get back to just just being the usual jerks. We always are but I just need to move on to something else. I'm just so sick and tired of this stuff. We'll see what happens next week. That's all I got.

See what I can do that's uplifting on the blog. I'm always known for my positivity. Sarcasm, by the way. Anyway, enjoy the rest of your weekend. Please let me know if you listen to this podcast. I have no idea if anybody's listening. I'm still posting everything so I don't have any data. I'm sure I do. But I just don't know how to get in it right now. I haven't bothered to figure it out. Send me a line. Mail at Kevin b.com m Ei L. or on Twitter my handle is

at Kevin baby. My name is spelled ke vi n b isn't boy he later on