The AI Arms Race - podcast episode cover

The AI Arms Race

Oct 25, 20175 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Russian President Vladimir Putin recently said that whoever develops artificial intelligence first will conquer the world. Are we on the brink of an AI arms race and what can we do to make sure AI works for the greater good?

Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

Some say artificial intelligence will transform our planet. Vladimir Putant says harnessing AI is the path to ruling it. I'm John and Strickland, and this is tech stuff daily. Artificial intelligence is a hot topic of discussion. While it might conjure up thoughts of humanlike robots or super intelligent machines, the term artificial intelligence is actually a really broad one.

It encompasses everything from basic functions of intelligence such as voice recognition, and goes all the way up to concepts like cognition and self awareness. Perhaps because of this broad definition, discussions about AI are also all over the map. Some people tout the ability of AI to help us accomplish difficult tasks or to offload more tedious work onto machines. Others point at AI as being a potential existential threat

for all of humanity. Elon Musk, the entrepreneur behind such companies as Tesla and space X, has famously spoken out against developing AI without some sort of strong guiding principles. Musk's argument is that AI poses an enormous risk to humans. It doesn't have to be super intelligent to be a problem either. Take the concept of weaponized AI, for instance, This could take many forms. One example might be military

robots with fairly simple AI. That AI could look for enemy soldiers or vehicles and direct a robot to fire upon them. Such a weapon would be a powerful tool for a nation to use against enemy forces, and it might mean that countries possessing that capability would be more willing to enter into conflicts. After all, the soldiers are made out of metal, glass, and plastic. They're expensive, but

they're disposable. If you can put robots against an enemy and keep your people safe, you might be more willing to enter into that armed conflict. Or you could develop artificial intelligence designed to infiltrate and sabotage enemy infrastructure. Rather than controlling a physical robot, these program ms would attempt to penetrate, spy upon, or disrupt systems like power grids

or other critical infrastructure. Security firms like Semantech have already warned the public that hackers had successfully compromised several energy companies to an alarming degree, and that if hackers so wished, they could potentially cause massive blackouts across major sections of the United States power grid. And automated intelligence that can

behave in a similar way would be incredibly dangerous. None of this requires the artificial intelligence to have anything remotely similar to human intelligence, but if it is possible to make machines think for themselves, that could be even more risky. Russian President Vladimir Putin said that whoever becomes the leader in this sphere, that sphere being artificial intelligence, will become

the ruler of the world. Puton seems to suggest that AI will be the next big arms race, and there are a lot of contenders pushing toward developing ever more powerful AI besides Russia, including China and the United States. Over at the United Nations, discussions about weaponized a I have begun. A group of more than one technology experts send a message to the U n to call for a ban on autonomous weapons. The message, in part read that if development in that space continued, it would be

very difficult to reverse direction later on. In the meantime, weaponized AI could pose an enormous threat to vulnerable populations, and that's assuming everything is working properly in the first place. The United Nations has a rescheduled meeting of government experts to talk about AI that will happen in November. The meeting was rescheduled because some of the member nations had yet to pay their dues in September when the meeting

was originally supposed to take place. While AI could potentially cause a great deal of harm, there's no denying it could also have a positive impact on the world if used responsibly. For example, IBM S Watson platform has been working with healthcare professionals to help doctors diagnosed and treat patients. Autonomous vehicles have the potential to prevent thousands of deaths

from car accidents caused by human error. Abots are taking on more jobs that traditionally are dangerous for humans to perform. There are many applications of AI that are clearly beneficial to humans as a whole. The question about whether AI will ultimately be a boon or a threat to mankind seems to hinge largely upon how we are determined to

implement it. If, as the group of technology experts argue, we place strict limitations on the use of AI in military applications, we may say that artificial intelligence is the most important technological advanced human beings have made since the invention of fire. If we do not heed those warnings, we may say it's the most destructive tool ever created. To learn more about artificial intelligence in all its forms

and applications, subscribe to the tech Stuff podcast. The show publishes every Wednesday and Friday with a deep dive on big topics in the technology space. Also, I throw in a lot more jokes. That's all for today. I'll see you again soon. Wal Wal won

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android