Welcome to the Tech Meme Right Home for Tuesday, December 3rd, 2024. I'm Brian McCullough. Today, the search for a new Intel CEO has begun in earnest, but a change in leadership probably makes a wholesale transformation of the company more likely. China goes tit-for-tat on banning things, why ChatGPT can't say certain names, and how is that shopping with AI agents thing going? Here's what you missed today in the world of tech.
Big follow-up on yesterday's big news. Reuters says that Intel has begun shortlisting a handful of CEO candidates, including... former board member Lip Boutan, who left in August 2024 after clashing with the outgoing CEO Pat Gelsinger. Quote,
Tan, who was once seen as a contender for the CEO role, has in recent days been approached by Intel's board to gauge his interest in taking up the job, the sources said, requesting anonymity as the discussions are confidential. Tan is an industry veteran and served on Intel's board of directors.
for roughly two years as part of a plan to restore the company's place as a leading chipmaker. He joined the board in September 2022 and received expanded responsibilities a year later to oversee manufacturing operations. But Tan departed in August after clashing with Gelsinger on several aspects of Intel's turnaround plan, including the size of the company's workforce, its contract manufacturing strategy, and its work culture, Reuters has reported.
Tan has previously served as CEO of Cadence Design Systems, where he spent more than a decade and helped turn around the then-ailing design software maker's fortunes, end quote. Tan is not the only candidate, though they are apparently the frontrunner at the beginning of the search. To follow up on what happened, it looks like what we...
might have suspected happened. Bloomberg's reporting says that Intel's board gave CEO Pat Gelsinger the option to retire or be removed after the board lost confidence in his plans to turn the company around. Quote, The clash came to a head last week when Gelsinger met with the board about the company's progress on winning back market share and narrowing the gap with NVIDIA, according to people familiar with the matter.
At last week's meeting, he faced concerns focused on the lack of products capable of winning in the market, something the board felt had been neglected in the push toward turning Intel into a made-to-order chip manufacturer. He was asked to stay on to help with his replacement.
but showed little interest in that, the people said. That prompted the decision to end his tenure over the weekend, they said. Whoever replaces Gelsinger will face the same set of problems he was brought in to fix, including the fallout from the poor decisions made by his predecessors. what would have once been the most desirable job in the $500 billion chip industry, has become a nearly untenable position.
The next CEO has to take on competitors with greater resources and catch up in AI computing, all while showing that Intel can be the groundbreaking company it once was. Finding someone to take that hot seat may not be easy. Before Gelsinger was appointed to replace CEO Bob Swan, there was speculation that a number of prominent executives were possible candidates, many on Wall Street, proposed approaching Advanced Micro Devices' Lisa Su for the job, end quote.
Many are saying that Gelsinger's retirement opens the door for Intel to consider fresh deal options, including splitting up the factory and product design divisions and selling the Altera unit. Quoting Bloomberg again,
The board has discussed a range of possibilities in recent months, such as private equity transactions and even a split of Intel's factory and product design businesses, but Gelsinger was opposed to breaking up the company, focusing instead on his plan to restore Intel's technological edge and become a major
to order manufacture for outside clients. It's also an opportunity for suitors to take another look at acquiring some or all of the business. Qualcomm expressed some interest in a transaction before, though nothing got very far, Bloomberg News has reported.
change increases the probability of divestitures, Bloomberg intelligence analysts Kunjan Sobhani and Oscar Hernandez Tejada said in a note Monday. Gelsinger was firmly against breaking up the company, but the prolonged and expensive turnaround has tested shareholder patients, potentially forcing Intel to reconsider, end quote. If the new CEO goes ahead with a bigger shakeup,
Here is a list of deal ideas that Intel could revisit. Number one, splitting factory and product divisions. This would involve fully separating Intel's factory business from the more profitable unit that develops products. Under Gelsinger, the company has been expanding its manufacturing operations to become
a foundry, a maker of components for outside customers. The idea is to eventually compete with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, a pioneer of the foundry approach. Number two, lure a suitor like Qualcomm. Bloomberg had reported that Qualcomm considered an Intel acquisition, but its interest had cooled as of last week. The complexities associated with acquiring all of Intel made a deal less attractive, people familiar with the matter said at the time.
but Qualcomm could consider buying pieces of Intel, such as the product business, Like much of the chip industry, Qualcomm doesn't manufacture its own semiconductors. Instead, it designs chips and relies on partners like TSMC to handle production. That's why it's unlikely to want Intel's factory operations.
Number three, selling Altera. Intel's Altera unit, acquired in 2015 for about $17 billion, makes chips that can be reprogrammed for different uses after they're manufactured. Intel has held negotiations about selling a portion of the business to financial investors. potential step toward an initial public offering for the unit. Buyout firms such as Francisco Partners, Bain Capital, and Silver Lake Management have been studying offers to invest in Altera. Last month, though?
Bloomberg reported that Lattice Semiconductor was considering making an offer for all of Altera. Lattice is working with advisors and is seeking a private equity backer as it explores a potential bid, people familiar with the process said.
An Apollo investment. Apollo offered to make a multi-billion dollar investment in Intel earlier this year. The New York-based firm indicated that it would be willing to make an equity-like investment of as much as $5 billion, Bloomberg reported in September. But negotiations didn't lead to an announcement.
5. A Mobileye transaction. Intel acquired Mobileye, a maker of self-driving technology, in 2017. Though the business went public in 2022, Intel still owns most of the company. That situation has the potential to change under a new CEO. In September, Intel said it isn't currently planning to divest its majority stake in Mobileye, but Bloomberg reported earlier in the month that the chipmaker was contemplating options for its 88% holding, end quote.
I think we've spoken before about turnabouts and how this was possible, so here you go. China is banning shipments to the US of several... dual-use minerals and metals used in chipmaking and military applications in a retaliation to new U.S. chip curbs, quoting the Financial Times.
China's Commerce Ministry on Tuesday said it would not permit the export of dual-use items related to gallium, germanium, antimony, and superhard materials to the U.S., and that it would implement stricter controls for graphite-related items.
The US has broadened the concept of national security, politicizing and weaponizing trade and technology issues, and abused export control measures, it said in a statement. To safeguard national security, China has decided to strengthen export controls on dual-use items to the US, it added. noting that the measures would be effective immediately
Four major Chinese industry associations representing the internet, auto, semiconductor, and communications industries reacted to the U.S. moves by calling on their members to reduce purchases of U.S. semiconductors. U.S. chip products are no longer safe or reliable and relevant. Chinese industries should be cautious in procuring U.S. chips, said the China Semiconductor Industry Association.
The embargoed minerals and metals are used in the production of semiconductors and batteries, as well as communications equipment, components, and military hardware, such as armor-piercing ammunition. Beijing had already been strengthening controls on their export in response to tightening Western chip sanctions, with its curbs on shipments of germanium and gallium, leading to an almost two-fold increase in the minerals' prices in Europe.
China's latest shipments ban to the US makes clear President Xi Jinping's government is willing to target Western economic interests to hit back against Washington's chip restrictions. It also highlights Beijing's dominance of the global supply of dozens of crucial resources.
China produces 98% of the world's supply of gallium and 60% of germanium, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. Washington on Monday imposed a range of new sanctions designed to slow the development of China's semiconductor industry. They include tougher restrictions on the export of critical semiconductor manufacturing tools and a ban on the export to China of advanced high-bandwidth memory, or HBM, chips, a crucial component in artificial intelligence products, end quote.
Have you heard about the David Mayer AI bug? Apparently... ChatGPT refuses to say certain names, including David Mayer, though OpenAI might have fixed the issue with that particular name. Others still seem to be affected, including David Faber, Brian Hood, and Jonathan Turley.
I'm unable to produce a response it says when you prompt with those names. Why might the AI not be able to say some names? It could be a post-prompt handling bug, but it's more likely it's because these names are names that people have filed. digital privacy requests for otherwise known as right to be forgotten requests. Quoting TechCrunch, who are these men and why does ChatGPT hate them so? OpenAI has not responded to repeated inquiries, so we are left to put together the pieces.
ourselves the best we can. Some of these names may belong to any number of people, but a potential threat of connection identified by ChatGPT users is that these people are public or semi-public figures who may prefer to have certain information forgotten by search engines or AI models.
Brian Hood, for instance, stands out because, assuming it's the same guy I wrote about him last year, Hood, an Australian mayor, accused ChatGPT of falsely describing him as the perpetrator of a crime from decades ago that, in fact, he had reported. Though his lawyers got in contact with OpenAI, no lawsuit was ever filed. As he told the Sydney Morning Herald earlier this year, the offending material was removed and they released version 4, replacing version 3.5.
As far as the most prominent owners of the other names, David Faber is a longtime reporter at CNBC. Jonathan Turley is a lawyer and Fox News commentator who was swatted, i.e. a fake 9-11 call, sent armored police to his home. in late 2023. Jonathan Zittrain is also a legal expert, one who has spoken extensively on the right to be forgotten, and Guido Scorza is on the board of Italy's Data Protection Authority.
Each of these persons is conceivably someone who, for whatever reason, may have formally requested that information pertaining to them online be restricted in some way. Which brings us back to David Mayer. There is no lawyer, journalist, mayor, or otherwise obviously notable person.
buy that name that anyone could find, with apologies to the many respectable David Mayers out there. There was, however, a Professor David Mayer who taught drama and history specializing in connections between the late Victorian era and early cinema. Mayer died in the summer of 2023 at the age of 94. For years before that, however...
The British American academic faced a legal and online issue of having his name associated with a wanted criminal who used it as a pseudonym to the point where he was unable to travel. So what can we conclude from all of this? Lacking any official explanation from OpenAI, our guess is that the model has ingested or was provided with a list of people whose names require some special handling. Whether due to legal, safety, privacy, or other concerns, these names are likely covered by...
rules, just as many other names and identities are. For instance, ChatGPT may change its responses if it matches the name you wrote to a list of political candidates. As is usually the case with these things, Hanlon's razor applies. Never attribute... to malice or conspiracy, that which is adequately explained by stupidity or syntax error.
The whole drama is a useful reminder that not only are these AI models not magic, but they are also extra fancy autocomplete, actively monitored and interfered with by the companies that make them. Next time you think about getting facts from a chatbot, think about whether it's end quote. Feel like your finance software isn't cutting it? Want the latest and greatest in financial software to simplify spending, help you save time, and keep you from getting trapped in busy work? Check out Ramp.
Ramp is the corporate card and spend management software designed to help you save time and put money back in your pocket. Ramp gives finance teams unprecedented control and insight into company spend. With Ramp, you're able to issue cards to every employee with limits and restrictions. and automate expense reporting so you can stop wasting time at the end of every month.
RAMP's accounting software automatically collects receipts and categorizes your expenses in real time so you don't have to. You'll never have to chase down a receipt again, and your employees will no longer spend hours submitting expense reports. The time you'll save each month on employee expenses will allow you to close your books eight times faster. Ramp saves you money. Businesses that use Ramp save an average of 5% the first year.
And now, get $250 when you join Ramp. Just go to ramp.com slash techmeme. Ramp.com slash techmeme. R-A-M-P dot com slash techmeme. Cards issued by Sutton Bank. Member FDIC. Terms and conditions apply. The cybersecurity industry has an effectiveness problem. Despite a growing list of technologies and vendors and record spending on tools, organizations worldwide continue to suffer disruptive and damaging cyber attacks.
It's clear that simply purchasing another security tool will not solve the problem. To survive the modern threat environment, organizations need to address their cyber risk by implementing a properly fit, vigilant, and continuously improving security operations model.
Arctic Wolf provides managed security operations to thousands of organizations of all sizes and in practically all industries around the world. In their 2024 security operations report, you'll gain insights gleaned from more than... 253 trillion observations over 12 months across their install base. Gain essential expert guidance, discover security trends, and get a clear understanding of the evolving threat landscape in the Arctic Wolf 2024 Security Operations Report.
Visit arcticwolf.com to get your copy. That's arcticwolf.com. Finally today, if the next era in AI is the bot era, how is that kicking off? Well, early tests show perplexity AI's shopping agent, which lets users make purchases in its app, sometimes takes hours to process purchases or fails to buy items. entirely. Not great, Bob, quoting TechCrunch.
Perplexity recently released an AI shopping agent for its paying customers in the United States. It's supposed to navigate retail websites for you, find the products you're looking for, and even click the checkout button on your behalf. Perplexity may be the first major AI startup to offer this, but others have been exploring the
space for a while, so expect to see more AI shopping agents in 2025. OpenAI and Google are reportedly developing their own AI agents that can make purchases, such as booking flights and hotels. It would also make sense for Amazon. where millions of people already search for products, to evolve its AI chatbot Rufus to help with checkout as well. Meanwhile, Perplexity is partnering with Stripe to leverage some older payments features that have been repurposed for AI agents.
But based on our early attempts, Perplexity's shopping agent takes hours to process purchases and sometimes runs into issues where it can't purchase items at all. Overall, using the agent today seems more complicated than buying something on Amazon. Perplexity also says there are human checkers involved to ensure its AI agent is working accurately. Having a human in the loop
is not uncommon for the AI industry, but then most AI chatbots don't see the items I'm purchasing and my billing address. This raises some privacy issues for perplexity and whatever company is hiring its human checkers. TechCrunch tested out Perplexity's shopping agent by asking it to buy us toothpaste. After prompting Perplexity with, I'd like to buy toothpaste, the agent returned several options from Walmart, Amazon, and some smaller websites.
For a few options, Perplexity offers a button under the product called Buy With Pro, while other options take you straight to the website of the retailer. Buy With Pro is Perplexity's shopping agent at work. I chose a tube of crest. From Walmart, without leaving the Perplexity app, I was able to check out and seemingly purchase the toothpaste. But instead of paying Walmart, my bank statement showed that I had paid Perplexity's agent.
Three hours later, I received an email from Perplexity that its agent was not able to buy me the toothpaste because it was sold out at Walmart. The next day, I tried to purchase another tube of Crest with Perplexity's shopping agent. Eight hours later, I got a confirmation from Perplexity that it worked.
So what gives? Why did my first purchase get rejected and why did both take hours to complete? While perplexity shopping might seem a lot like Amazon or the TikTok shop where you can buy items from a wide array of merchants who uploaded managed storefronts on the platform, it's actually... completely different. Perplexity's AI agent seems to be scraping retailers' websites and giving you information about their products.
Because this process isn't necessarily in real time, it can cause a disconnect between what perplexity tells you and what a store actually has in stock, which appears to be what happened in my case.
Perplexity declined to comment on whether retailers like Walmart were aware that their products were appearing on its app. This suggests that their scraping and purchase process is not authorized by those companies, something that could complicate buying or returning items. You're also not actually buying anything when you
check out in Perplexity's app. You're paying Perplexity the exact amount that item costs, giving its AI agent instructions to buy a specific item and telling it to fill out your name and shipping address in the process.
Some time later, perhaps hours, the agent executes that task, or at least tries to. This is the equivalent of giving a small pot of money to an assistant in the real world and give them rules about how they're allowed to spend it, said Stripe product lead Jeff Weinstein, who helped build Stripe's AI.
agent toolkit in an interview with TechCrunch. But instead of giving money in a pot or otherwise to a real human assistant who I would trust to buy toothpaste on their own, Perplexity's AI agent occasionally needs to be monitored by another human, and even then it doesn't always work.
can't disclose specifics around how BuyWithPro works, but what I can say is that there is human oversight providing occasional support, which ensures that transactions are completed in a timely manner, and we avoid issues like purchasing the wrong product, said Perplexity spokesperson Sarah Platt. Latnik, and an email to TechCrunch.
If AI shopping agents really take off, it could mean fewer people going to online storefronts where retailers have historically been able to upsell them or promote impulse purchases. It also means that advertisers may not get valuable information about shoppers so they can... be targeted with other products.
For that reason, those very advertisers and retailers are unlikely to let AI agents disrupt their industries without a fight. That's part of why companies like Rabbit and Anthropic are training AI agents to use the ordinary user interface of a website. That is, the bot would use the site just like
like you do, clicking and typing in a browser in a way that's largely indistinguishable from a real person. That way, there's no need to ask permission to use an online service through a back-end, permission that could be rescinded if you're hurting their business." Nothing more for you today. Talk to you tomorrow.