Well, welcome to the TechMame right home for Tuesday, September 5, 2023. I'm Brian McCulloch today. Some more controversies surrounding Elon Musk and X. China looks like it's managing its chip situation better than the US might have hoped, is Spotify's podcasting bet officially a failure, is Apple's Lionel Messi bet already a winner, and will getting rid of Books 3 only helped the AI incumbents. Here's what you missed today in the world of tech.
Elon Musk is threatening to file a defamation suit against the anti-deformation league, for quote, falsely accusing X and himself of being what he said is anti-Semitic. He also blames the ADL for X's US ad sales drop. Quoting tech crunch. In the newest uproar you might have missed, Elon Musk says X, formerly Twitter, will file a defamation lawsuit against the anti-deformation league.
Musk accused the ADL and organization that works to combat anti-Semitism, extremism, and bigotry of falsely accusing him and X of being anti-Semitic. Quote, to clear our platform's name on the matter of anti-Semitism, it looks like we have no choice but to file a defamation lawsuit against the anti-deformation league. Oh, the irony tweeted the billionaire celebrity on Monday. Musk also blamed the ADL for X's falling US advertising revenue.
Quote, our US advertising revenue is still down 60%, primarily due to pressure on advertisers by at ADL. That's what advertisers tell us, so they almost succeeded in killing X slash Twitter. And quote, Musk started off this latest tirade by claiming to be pro-free speech, but quote against anti-Semitism of any kind. The tweets come as Musk has been called out for liking posts with the hashtag
ban the ADL, which was trending on X last week. The trending hashtag and Musk's engagement with it began hours after the ADL said it had a productive conversation with X CEO, Linda Yaccarino, about fighting hate speech on the platform. Quote, since the acquisition, the adL has been trying to kill this platform by falsely accusing it and me and of being anti-Semitic tweeted Musk on Monday.
If this continues, we will have no choice but to file a defamation suit against ironically the anti-deformation league. So you know how the US is trying to block China from getting its hands on the latest and
greatest in technology, especially when it comes to chips? Well, a tear down of the recent Huawei Mate 60 Pro smartphone shows that phone is using a new Kirin 9000S chip that was fabricated in China by SMIC using a 7nm process, meaning China seems to be hustling well enough to stay at least within a shouting distance of the cutting edge on its own, despite US efforts.
The processor is the first to utilize SMIC's most advanced 7nm technology and suggests the Chinese government is making some headway in attempts to build a domestic chip ecosystem according to the research firm Tech Insights. Much remains unknown about SMIC and Huawei's progress,
including whether they can make chips in volume or at reasonable cost. But the Mate 60 Silicon raises questions about the efficacy of a US-led global campaign to prevent China's access to cutting edge technology driven by fears it could be used to boost Chinese military capabilities. With its export controls last year, the US administration tried to draw a line at preventing China from getting access to 14 nanometer chips or about 8 years behind the most advanced technology.
The US had also blacklisted both Huawei and SMIC. Now China has demonstrated it can produce at least limited quantities of chips five years behind the cutting edge and chin closer to its objective of self-sufficiency in the critical area of semiconductors. It's a pretty important statement for China, Tech Insights Vice Chair Dan Hutchinson said SMIC's technology advances are on an accelerated trajectory and appear to have addressed yield impacting issues in their 7 nanometer technology.
According to a Korean media report, Meta has partnered with LG to launch a new Quest Pro device somewhere in 2025 to compete with Apple's Vision Pro. Most likely, Meta also plans a sub-$200 headset in 2024 though some doubts about that remain. Coding upload VR. LG Electronics will reportedly handle production using LG Displays, LG Energy Batteries, and other components from LG Inotech. The first product from the
partnership is reportedly slated for 2025, priced at around $2,000. The report says the industry estimates the headset could be named Quest4Pro but this is unlikely. Analysts and reports often get the name of future products wrong while still accurately describing the device. For example, several sources suggested QuestPro would be named Quest2Pro and that
Apple Vision Pro would be called Apple Reality Pro. Given Meta's current naming scheme and repeated description of Pro as a separate product line, the more likely product name would be QuestPro 2. This wouldn't be the first time Meta has partnered with an experienced consumer electronics company for a VR headset. Oculus Go was manufactured by Xiaomi and Oculus Rift S was manufactured and co-designed by Lenovo. In both cases, the headset bore the partner company's logo on the side
as well as the Oculus branding on the front. How LG's branding will appear on the reported 2025 headset is not yet known. The report also claims the cheap headset Meta reportedly plans to release in 2024, not with LG will be priced under $200 though this seems difficult to believe, given that the three years old Quest2 is currently priced at $300 and quote. The ARM IPO is coming down the pike. Softbank has priced
ARM's shares at a range of $47 to $51. Aiming to raise up to $4.87 billion by selling 95 and a half million shares for an implied valuation of slightly more than $52 billion that would, by far, make ARM the biggest tech IPO of the year and remember. This is a hugely strategic IPO for the tech industry beyond even the implication that tech IPOs are possible again,
quoting Reuters. Customers of ARM holdings limited including Apple, Nvidia, Alphabet, and advanced micro devices as well as Intel and Samsung have agreed to invest in the chip designers initial public offering according to people familiar with the matter. Apple, Nvidia, and the other strategic investors have agreed to invest between $25 and $100 million each in the BlackBester IPO. The sources said, ARM and Softbank have set aside 10% of the shares to be sold
in the IPO for its clients Reuters has previously reported. Amazon, which had previously held talks to invest in the IPO, has decided not to participate in one of the sources said, requesting anonymity as the discussions are confidential. A scramble among ARM's clients comprising the world's biggest technology companies to snap up shares in the IPO is testing the semiconductor designers'
adherence to not picking sides in the chip industry. The interest is fueled by a desire by companies to expand their commercial relationship with ARM and make sure rivals do not gain an edge Reuters has previously reported. While an investment in the IPO would not come with a seat on ARM's board or ability to dictate strategy, it could strengthen ties with each participating company and make it harder for a competitor to acquire ARM later.
The Wall Street Journal has a piece up making what I would say is the definitive case about a topic we've touched on for a while now, i.e. maybe Spotify's greater than $1 billion bet on building a podcast empire has not paid off. This piece suggests that most of Spotify's podcasting shows are not profitable, there are continuing debates over which shows should be exclusive and which should not, and a lot of the original shows that Spotify has commissioned are being cut.
Quote, podcast revenue in the US is expected to reach $2.3 billion this year, a 25% increase from 2022, according to the interactive advertising bureau and industry group, and is expected to more than double by 2025. That represents, though, a tiny slice of the $200 billion digital ad market Spotify spent its way to the top of an industry that turned out to be less lucrative than it appeared
when it began its podcast quest in 2018. The pool of podcast listeners is growing but the flood of shows on various streaming platforms makes it tough to break new hits, facing competition across genres and formats, Spotify found that exclusive podcasts generally don't draw subscribers away from rivals. Podcast costs at the company rose 29 million euro in the first half of this year.
The company, which had 220 million paid subscribers to its premium service in June, said it has more than 100 million podcast listeners on its platform 10 times when it had in 2019. Spotify said it is on track to make its podcast business profitable in 2024. Chief Executive Daniel Eck has said he wants Spotify to be the world's largest audio company
spanning audiobooks, education, sports, and news. Podcasts are only the first step towards Spotify's goal of evolving from a music streaming company to an audio giant, generating $100 billion in revenue by 2030. Spotify reported 11.7 billion euros in revenue in 2022. While the company probably overpaid for some content, Eck said the investments helped
Spotify achieve its goal of becoming the top podcast platform. The company expects podcast ad revenue to grow 30% this year ahead of Spotify's overall revenue growth executives have told staff in recent months. But the company has at times struggled to sell ads even for popular podcasts, such as Science Versus, which discusses FADs and pop culture, said people familiar with the matter. Spotify is advertising overall in the most recent quarter made up 13% of revenue,
which the company wants to push to 20%. Company leaders have told their staff to be more selective about original shows. Executives have said in meetings that deals for new podcasts should consider costs. How quickly a show can gain listeners, it's likely audience size. How much of the company can charge for ads and opportunities for ancillary revenues such as merchandise sales and live tours. The NFL is back, baby, Draft King Sportsbook, which is an official sports betting
partner of the NFL, is giving you a can't miss offer for week one. This week, new customers can get $200 in bonus bets instantly when you bet just $5 on any NFL game. Draft Kings is hooking everyone up with game day greatness. All customers can take advantage of two new offers every single game day this September. Download now and use code tech meme to sign up. New customers can take home $200 in bonus bets instantly just for betting $5. That's code tech meme. Only on Draft King
Sportsbook, an official sports betting partner of the NFL. The Crown is yours. Gambling problem call 1-800-Gamberler or visit www.1-800-Gamberler.net. In New York, call 877-8-HOPE-NY or text-HOPE-NY-467-369. In Connecticut, help is available for problem gambling call 888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org. Please play responsibly on behalf of Boot Hill Casino and Resort KS. 21 plus age varies by
jurisdiction. Void in Ontario, C-DKNG.co slash football for eligibility, terms and responsible gaming resources, bonus bets expire 7 days after issuance, eligibility and deposit restrictions apply. If you work in security or IT and your company has AACTA, this message is for you. Have you noticed that for the past few years, the majority of data breaches and hacks you read about and hear about on this very podcast have something in common? It's employees. Hackers absolutely love
explaining vulnerable employee devices and credentials. But it doesn't have to be this way. Imagine a world where only secure devices can access your cloud apps. In this world, fish credentials are useless to hackers and you can manage every OS, even Linux, from a single dashboard. Best of all, you can get employees to fix their own device security issues without creating more work for IT. Good news is, you don't have to imagine this world,
you can start living in it, just start using KELI. KELI is a device trust solution for companies with AACTA and it ensures that if a device isn't trusted and secure, it can't log into your cloud apps. Visit KELI.com slash ride to watch a demo and see how it works. That's k-o-l-i-d-e.com slash ride. But here's a content bet that seems to be paying off according to antenna. MLS season pass on Apple TV Plus had 110,000 US signups on July 1st, the day of Lionel Messi's first MLS match. That's up
from 6,143 signups on July 20th. July overall was Apple TV Plus's best signup month in 2023, quoting the journal. Well, Messi also has a large following internationally, including his home country of Argentina. Overseas subscribers aren't captured in antenna data. Messi's draw for MLS season pass on Apple TV Plus is a sign of how rights and distribution partnerships with major sports leagues can have knock-on effects and benefits for streaming platforms.
Live sports are a major driver of subscriptions and engagement across streaming services. But companies from Apple to Alphabet's Google to Warner Bros Discovery are still figuring out how much to charge consumers to watch games. We are beating our expectation in terms of subscribers and the fact that Messi went to enter Miami helped us out a bit there. Apple CEO Tim Cook said
on the company's August earnings call. Apple last year signed a deal with MLS worth at least $2.5 billion that gave the iPhone maker the right to exclusively stream all MLS matches globally. When it announced the 10-year deal, some industry experts wondered whether the partnership would help attract subscribers given Apple TV Plus's limited subscription base compared with
the hundreds of millions of subscribers at Netflix. Apple sells MLS season pass for $12.99 a month or $39 per season to people who also subscribed to Apple TV Plus and $14.99 a month or $49 per season to those who don't. MLS season ticket holders, a core group of soccer devotees,
were given free subscriptions to MLS season pass for this year. Nearly half of those who paid for MLS season pass from February through July were existing Apple TV Plus subscribers, according to antenna, and indication that the deal is resonating with current customers of the tech giant. 15% of those who signed up for MLS season pass during that period also signed up for Apple TV Plus. For streamers, live sports can also help reduce churn even when they are
at on services such as with MLS season pass. Jonathan Carson, chief executive of antenna said, people who sign up for sports services tend to be more loyal than others, he said. Viewers who sign up for a streaming service to binge watch a show tend to do so quickly and then cancel, but sports seasons stretch on for months, which gives the streamer time to show them other programming Carson said. Finally, today you remember how we've discussed authors suing the
makers of large language models claiming their books were used to train the LLMs. That's because there's this corpus of book data floating around on the internet called books three. Copyright activists are trying to get books three taken down to stop it from being abused or used in these training sessions, but why it makes the case that the law of unintended consequences isn't play here because taking down book three may only benefit the big companies that have already been
using that AI training data set. Quote, this is a view shared by many copyright lawyers. If you're open AI or meta, you have the resources to litigate this until the end of time said, Karen McCarthy, a lawyer specializing in data scraping issues. A small organization is not going to have the resources to do that. So this lack of clarity in the law right now is benefiting the biggest players. One thing everyone wired spoke to could agree upon, all this increased scrutiny on
data sets has made AI's big players shy away from transparency. That could have a knock-on effect. Meta is a prime example. It openly shared the data sets used to train the first version of its chat GPT competitor, Lama, including books three. Now it's tight-lipped about what it used for newer versions. It behooves these companies to be opaque about their sources McCarthy says, knowing they're likely to face lawsuits if they fess up to using copyrighted material and their
data training sets is a powerful deterrent. This in turn will make it harder for writers to know when their copyright is potentially infringed. Right now, it's up to AI companies whether or not to disclose where their training sets come from. Without that information, it's impossible for people to prove that their data was used, let alone ask for it to be removed. While the European parliament has passed a draft law of AI regulations that would require increased data transparency,
those regulations are not yet in effect, and other regions lag far behind. This fight cuts to the heart of often vicious disagreements about what role AI should have in our world. Copyright law exists to balance the rights granted to creators with the collective right to access information at least in theory. The battle over books three is about what this balance should look like in the age of AI. The heart of this fight boils down to whether we accept that generative AI training
on copyrighted material is an inevitability. This is the stance Stephen King recently took after finding out that his work is in books three. Quote, would I forbid the teaching, if that is the word of my stories to computers, not even if I could. I might as well be King Canute, forbidding the tide to come in or a luddite trying to stop industrial progress by hammering esteem loom to pieces, he wrote. In the meantime, there are already stopgap efforts to persuade generative AI groups to respect
the wishes of people who wish to keep their work out of data sets. Spawning, a star of devoted to this type of tool has a search engine called have I been trained that currently allows people to check if their visual work has been used in AI training data sets. It is planning to add support for video, audio and text next year. It also offers an API that helps companies honor opt-outs. So far, stability AI is one of the major players to adopt it. Although Spawning CEO Jordan Mayor
is optimistic that companies like OpenAI and MetaMite one day get on board. You might have heard about the troubles at Burning Man this past weekend. Our own Chris Messina was there this week. I haven't actually spoken to Chris yet. I think he's back but I don't know yet. Maybe we'll have to do a quick emergency bonus episode on one topic on surviving Burning Man in 2023 if it turns out Chris has some stories to tell. Talk to you tomorrow.