Vaccine Experts Caught Lying: The Shocking Truth Every Parent Should Know

I'm alex and i'm super i'm dr thomas dozier and i am also super hi i'm dr dennis and i am the natural hey i'm dr kevin that makes me the junkie oh yeah and we are the supernatural hello everyone welcome to supernatural junkies i'm alex and oh that's kevin's phone someone's calling right now.

And we have Dr. O'Hara. We have Dr. Dozier with us today. I am going to identify as Kat and Kat's self. And today is our 20th anniversary, right? Today is the greatest day in human history was the day that my wife married me. Yep. Happy anniversary, guys. Thank you. That's right. I was up telling the boys this and they're like, oh, great.

This means that dad's taking us out of school today and probably going to make us work all day that's his idea of the greatest day right but not only that now check this out boys you see this sweater right here, this is the sweater i met my wife in and i want you to know it's not what you wore to bonefish no it was the that was that was the uh one of our dates yep and so i can still wear this shirt boys check it out yep.

I'm not saying i can wear the same pants definitely wear the same shirt so you know so pretty exciting day today you know we're excited so the only thing we can say is it's a bad idea to get married the first week of january so it was cold it was outside it was not yeah we're at the zoo well and also it's like you get christmas then you get new we have thanks christmas and then new year and then your anniversary it's just like so after a while we decided we would just celebrate our anniversary

you know a few weeks later or months later yeah months usually february valentine's day somewhere doesn't matter but yeah it's it was cold it was outside the reception was at the zoo you know it was beautiful only time and what do we need, up until like the two days before it right and then then it got really cold but we had eaters people had a great time yeah dancing whatnot trying to keep warm anything to keep warm yeah it's funny because all of our family's from detroit and they have these

big jackets it's only because people here don't own big jackets that's why but yeah can't imagine how big dr dozier's jacket would have to be though stay warm in that weather yeah it's cold yeah maybe keeping Where everybody's going with his barbecue. That's right. That's right. Where's the biblicue? The biblicue. Where's the holy biblicue? We're already starting our... Well, this year we kind of like deviated. We did a little something different for Christmas. We had a seafood fest. Ooh.

We had Alaskan king crabs. We had shrimp scampi. We had Louisiana gumbo. We had fried fish. Should I keep naming it? I'm starting to salivate. That's not fair. Those people were New York Prescottarians. We had fried chicken wings. We had all the green fixings and things that you would just, oh my goodness. It was the envy of Christmas. And the thing about it, it was so much left over. But I didn't want to disturb people from enjoying their Christmas.

So I just made sure I feasted on the leftovers for a few days. Very kind of you. Very considerate. He's very, very considerate. I'm sure it was your version of the seven fishes, right? Dr. Dennis, we invited you over for a big party, baby. And you guys, what did you guys end up doing? It was huge. What were we talking about? New Year's? Yeah. Yeah, I think I got that text like two hours before. Oh, me too. This is. I didn't know about it. I was like, what?

Oh, sorry. Last minute. This is just to see whether you're really holding out for us or not. What's happening? Thankfully, it's just nobody showed up. I just know. I know, right? Look at this. No, we didn't do much. We just think John was in bed by 830. I watched football at the 1030. Oh, my God.

We were in bed early, too. Yeah, for sure. So what are we talking about today, guys? Shot, shot, shot, shot, shot, shot, shot. Sorry.

The New World Order weaponization well you can see you know I think this election winning it has gotten a lot of people asleep and, We want to try and wake people up. I think this is a wake-up episode for sure. And so I think Alex is going to get us started today. You want it to start, baby? Want to talk about Aaron Seary? Is that what you want to start with? Yep.

Yeah, so specifically, Russell Brand has been putting out these shorts with the interview he did with Aaron Seary, who's from the ICANN, Informed Action Consent Network. Dell Bigtree has a lot to do with that, too. But Aaron Seary is the lawyer. And he specifically was asking, he did a FOIA request asking for information about vaccines, specifically the DTaP vaccine, simply because, you know, a lot of people think that it's the MMR,

right, that has some problems and it has caused autism, right? Right. But Aaron Seary was like, that's in fact not true. And it's the DTAP that is more problematic as far as people reporting, self-reporting on VAERS, that that is when after their newborns, right, having received the DTAP were coming back a few months later or short time later having autism symptoms.

Right. So he specifically filled out a FOIA request. It took years by the way years and years and years for him to get any information about this it wasn't until he had to go to federal court was that about eight years in later um okay so you know we know that this started with the vaccines 1986 right when they were released of any liability right legally so prior to that we don't really know what they had for studies but in 1986 yes there was.

Information or whatever they had concluded that decided, hey, this is safe to give to children. It doesn't cause anything, which we all know is crap and alive. But then about two, let me take a look because I've got notes here. I'm sorry if I'm reading my notes, but there's a lot of information. 2012. Okay. So the Institute of Medicine was asked to look into whether DTAP Vax caused autism. And so when we think about medical institutions and the studies that they have

to do. You think that it's pretty vast, right? And comprehensive. But what it turned out is that they were basing the fact that the DTaP was safe, was based on one study. And it was a Geyer and Geyer study. Now this name is going to come back to haunt us. So remember that name. And so they did this. And what their study basically said is they didn't find any correlation between autism and the DTaP vaccine. But so people were reporting on VAERS at that point that this was happening.

Well, the CDC and the Institute of Medicine threw that information out because VAERS is unreliable. Now, it's not necessarily at that point, it wasn't even self-reporting, right? VAERS is medical professionals report that. They designed it. Right. So it's not like people were going on there and filling all that stuff out right now that they they could do much, much later. So this was medical professionals that people were reporting to them and the doctors were noticing.

OK, so the conclusion from that study, and this is a quote, can basically that neither confirm nor deny that the DTaP causes vaccines, autism, sorry, the vaccines cause autism, which was the most common adverse reaction that was claimed on VAERS that they were having. Okay. So at that time, I know in what, 2012, they also looked into the MMR and, It says they compared, right, one vaccine to 17, right, saying 16 to 17 vaccines. Sorry, I'm just looking at my notes to try to make that sense.

That one, cut that part out. Well, let me explain something here that got a couple clips for you to see how they determine some of the safety effects. And the fact that even when they find major safety problems, like, you know, when you see the numbers as a parent, you're like, yeah, no, I'll take my chance. So let me just show you a couple of clips here from Stanley, and this is going to give you some more information. Let's just read this one sentence.

That's my one of my favorite sentences. It says the longer reported reporting period, meaning six months, which I normally never do vaccine trials may have resulted in serious adverse events being reported in a higher percentage of subjects than for other vaccines. Oh, wait a second. We finally looked for six months instead of a few days and a few weeks, and we found a super high rate. So what's our excuse for the high rate? And I'm going to show you another thing that I think is totally nuts.

I'm going to open up the package insert for Prevnar 7. So you remember this product that had the 7.2% adverse event rate? Yes. So you might hope that here's the package insert for that product. So safety was reviewed in this one, depending on what they looked at for days or maybe weeks. So they didn't have six months. And they were comparing Prevnar with a control.

Well, you hope the control would be what? because there's no other product on the market that's a seven valent meningococcal vaccine in the u.s so you could you should have compared against placebo but you see the little cross right there yes let's let's go down right here and let's see what the control was can you see that yes would you like to do the honor investigational menning can't read that word.

Meningococcal group c conjugate vaccine mncc what does that mean do you know what investigational means it means unlicensed oh that was the control the control was another unlicensed product so what you need to see with that is number one if you look at that first report they had 7.2 or 8.2 severe reactions to this vaccine. Now, when you look at what they're really, you know, trying to immunize against, that right there tells you that most parents would opt out.

But the reason they wash this out is because what he brings up in the second one is that they compare this not to a placebo, but to another vaccine. And so they only compare vaccines to vaccines, right? So if they already have, you know, a certain amount of dead people. Okay, adverse reactions, they just figure that that's just part and parcel.

So they don't actually compare it to a placebo. This second study that he referenced is even worse because they couldn't compare it to anything like it because what they're doing is, so they compared it to another experimental vaccine, an unknown experimental vaccine. And because this vaccine didn't have more dead people or adverse reactions, they said that we can wash this out. So they're not comparing apples to apples.

That's how they cook the books and hide the deaths and the severe reactions to these vaccines so i know you guys want to jump in but i do want to point out that if if none of this is problematic why did it take so many why did a foyer request have to happen and then i cannot work had a petition to see the studies they had to sue them okay and then after referral to disclose by their CDC lawyer, then the Department of Justice, right, had to step in.

And finally, after taking them to federal court, this was a years-long process after he submitted a FOIA request. If they are so great and they have the studies to back this up, ask yourself why such work to hide it or to not release it at all.

And as you'll see when we come to the clip with Stanley Potkin and Catherine Edwards. If you look up anything with vaccines, you will know who those people are. It's very important, but they have a lot to say on that, that they were forced to disclose this. So just to be clear, before we even show you those clips, we want to show you the 100 and complete denial of any association to vaccines, really with anything, but especially autism.

We're not sure as a scientific community what causes autism, but we know that vaccines do not. Vaccines are really the one thing we have looked at as causing autism. We know that vaccines don't cause autism. The science is clear. Vaccines don't cause autism. I do not deny in any way that we need to do more about autism, but it has nothing to do with vaccines. Let me be clear.

Vaccines do not cause autism. Hello, this is Dr. Kevin Cruz, and I'm excited to share a new healthy weight loss alternative to Ozembic and other semaglutide medications. Usually, I don't recommend semaglutides because of the side effects, but I'm excited because MV GLP-1 is made of natural ingredients and has been proven to increase GLP-1 by 140% with no side effects. And it works. In an independent 12-week study, people lost 25 pounds and 27% of visceral fat in just 12 weeks.

For example, this woman lost 22 pounds and 7 inches in the waist. But even normal people can get ripped, as this man lost 7 pounds and dropped 2% of his body fat. Thankfully, GLP-1 only costs $1.79 per month, which is half the cost of any semi-glutide on the market. This is why MVGLP1 is the first product I have ever recommended for weight loss and diabetes. To get started, just use the QR code on the screen.

Or if you have questions, you can contact us at frontdesk at absolutewellnesscenters.com. Thanks for watching and blessings on your weight loss journey. Okay, I'm listening to these guys, and before we started the show, I was thinking about what the Bible says about oppositions of science, falsely so-called. And I know in contextually, speaking of those who have claimed to have intelligence that supersedes that of the Bible, but this is what we've been seeing with this.

We've been seeing, as I would say, so-called science, pseudoscience. These are individuals that are opinionated, and not only are they just opinionated, but they're lining up with an agenda. I believe this clearly. Years ago, and I want to go back to the 2010 lockstep, 2010, Rockefeller lockstep 2010. And I remember reading that and researching and researching it, and this was before the pandemic. And I was giving this to different people and talking to different people about it.

And it's stunning how people really don't lock into things, lockstep, lock in, or pay attention to things, be very mindful of things until it hits. And then when it hits, you may get something to say, now, what was that you were talking about? Or people, you forget about it and go to the next panic state. But recently, there was a college professor that was on a particular show, and he stated some things right out of that without mentioning it.

And what was mentioned in Rockefeller 2010 was that this COVID vaccine was invented in a lab at Fort Detrich, Maryland, Fort Detrich, Maryland. And somehow intentionally it was to get out there and get to get out of there and get to the Wuhan lab in China. If you ever read this, now, don't try to go online and find it now because you'll get fact checkers, you'll get individuals and it's false information, what have you.

But if you read this, you would have to ask yourself, how could someone be so exact when it's not predictive prophecy or they're not being divinely inspired? How can someone be so exact to state the things that they stated? And when I say so exact, they bring out what's going to happen with this. They bring out wearing a mask. They bring out distancing.

They bring out discrediting anyone who would come up with a medication or such as when we see hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin, who would come across with something that could combat this. And it was predicted to have a great number of fatalities. And it was to bring people into a state of fear. And if that first one did not accomplish everything we're supposed to accomplish, then there will be another one unleashed that was more lethal than the first until it accomplishes its purpose.

This professor that was talking about this the other day, I mean, I lit up, and I'm not here trying to take any credit. What I'm hearing, a lot of these guys, and this has been known for some time that this was going to happen. I know we're talking about the vaccines, but we need to talk about this bioweapon. This has been known for some time that they were creating this bioweapon. Yeah. And one even went as far as to say that many people should be prosecuted and placed in prison for murder.

Yeah. And they get to give a list of the number of people that I believe about of the we got what about seven and a half billion people on the earth. At least about five billion people took this vaccine. And tens of millions died. And you're saying that these individuals should be prosecuted. And I believe this is the thing that has to go across the air because lies have been gaslighted.

Gaslight lies and people believe that we won't be gaslighting, but I believe more people need to be pushing the accountability for what has happened. And it can come to pass. Something happened yesterday to show you that it can come to pass. There's a man that had been in power for about 13 years. And yesterday he resigned. And that's the prime minister of Canada. And the reason he resigned is because this is what the people wanted. And it was destroying them. They left this party.

And I believe that when you really, really stop and you bring out the strength of the things that are happening. And if you're going to bring out the truth, you need truth tellers and truth tellers with silence. And all of these people that we hear, just like we hear on these tapes and all these videos and all. These are paid people. They're paid to lie. We heard about the experts, but we never got their names, the experts. But we knew some experts.

We knew Dr. Ronald Malone. We knew Dr. Jose Bonilla. We knew Dr. James Thorpe. We knew and we know some of these people. We sat and we talked with some of these people, and many of these people were silenced because they had the truth. And so now that these voices are sounding off more, I think what we need to do is bring this out so that if they do try to begin, many people won't yield to this.

So many people won't give in because I do believe if they're able to pull this off a second time, another time, they will do exactly what they called for in Rockefeller Lockstep 2010. And I'm calling it, I'm not just saying Lockstep 2010, because that is what it was referred to. And I believe they would do just what it calls for, have a greater mortality, greater mortality count than they had the first time. I just believe it.

Good points there, Dr. D. This goes way back. This goes back before the 1986 liability shield that they had received. If you look in the 1970s and they had the swine flu vaccine, four people died and they pulled it off the market. The reason why they got the liability shield is because the pharmaceutical companies went to Congress and said they will no longer produce vaccines because there's too much of a liability.

Well, well, lo and behold, Congress being lobbied by them and paid by them, they, they, they gave them the shield and Reagan signed it by the worst thing Reagan did that. And the, the legalized immigration thing. But the thing is here is that there is no liability for these pharmaceutical companies. They're not going to be products that have, that are dangerous.

Okay. And we know that they're dangerous, and we've seen what they've done over the last 30, 40 years to the health of the American people. You're looking at products here that have caused numerous injuries. We talk about the, you know, everybody seems to be waking up from COVID, the COVID vaccine. This goes back before COVID because this was a conditioned response. They conditioned people that they have to take vaccines in order for the children to go to school.

There have been tons of injuries. When I graduated chiropractic school in 1992, autism was one in 10,000. It is one in 36 today. Autism is caused by vaccines because if you go look at the Amish as a control group that do not vaccinate, they have no autism, no ADHD. No autoimmune diseases because they haven't been poisoned by vaccines.

Now, we went into the 90s when Andrew Wakefield discovered, he was an English doctor, discovered that the MMR was was invaginating into the immune cells in the gut and he felt that there was a reaction between that and autism. He got he lost his medical license and he got. Screwed by the systems, let's say. And then we got into, you know, TBT with thimerosal. Then they said thimerosal is not immune-causing. Now, what people overlook is that all of these vaccines have aluminum in it.

Aluminum is a neurotoxin. And the amount of aluminum that they have in these vaccines as an adjuvant is what's causing the neurologic reactions. Because it is known that aluminum causes autoimmune disease. So we have some serious issues. And, you know, we're hopeful for RFK to get in there. And I hope he does. And I hope the first thing he does is that he takes vaccines back off the market so they can prove research against the placebo, which a placebo is a saline or inert object.

They don't test any vaccines against placebo. So they're all tested against other vaccines. And you want to talk about unethical, what Aaron Seary pointed out in that last clip, that they had the meningococcal vaccine that was not licensed and they gave it to a control group? What's up with that? It's criminal. Medical ethics are out the window. These people, vaccines, if you haven't noticed, vaccines, it's a religion.

It's a cult. They will not go down against it. It's part of the beast system that we'll talk about later. So I'm going to go ahead and prep these next two videos for you. But here we have, who is this first guy? Stanley Plotkin. I mean, he is, you know, the godfather. He's a vassologist. He, you know, if anything to do with vaccines, the guy is in on it. You know, he's done a lot of the literature. He's, you know, the one that they go to for advice on vaccines.

And so he is highly respected in that industry. Although I think the more that we learn, I'm not going to get too into this right now until So we talk more about it. These people are criminal. And they know they're criminal. It's disgusting. And they have poisoned and killed. Injured. Millions. Millions. And the fact that, you know, anyway, I won't just go ahead and play it because it's so maddening. I can't. This is an excerpt from the IOM's report, right? Yes.

Can you read the causality conclusion with regard to whether DTAP and Tdap cause autism?

The evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between diphtheria toxoid, tetanus, toxoid, or acellular pertussis containing vaccine and autism. If you don't know whether DTAP or Tdap cause autism, shouldn't you wait until you do know, until you have the science to support it, to then say that vaccines do not cause autism? Do I wait? No, I do not wait because I have to take into account the health of the child.

And so for that reason, you're okay with telling the parent that DTAP, T-DAP does not cause autism, even though the science isn't there yet to support that claim? Absolutely. So when he mentions, I have to think about the health of the child, what I heard was, yeah, if that's a healthy child, I have to get in there and destroy it immediately. That's what I heard when he said that, because that's what that does. And he knows it. He's full of crap.

It became a great money-making venture. And once they were released from liability, and you guys have to look at the research behind this stuff too. I know you're like, oh, you guys mentioned a lot of stuff. We're not lying. These people make money perpetuity. That means our families' families make money, even though the research was provided for by us. We paid those tax dollars to do all the research on that crap that didn't find anything, by the way.

But then what happens is that the people that are responsible for making that vaccine make money in perpetuity. After they die, their entire family gets set up with this money. So what's really behind this? It's not the health of the child. It's the destruction of that child. Because why do you put in, you call it crazy, but worm DNA, a cock spangling DNA, and a flu shot. And tell people to take it, pregnant women to take it, everyone to take it.

Why? Why does newborns, why do we challenge a newborn's immune system? They don't have an immune system. They get, what is it, a series of six shots of these, like it's a series under the age of six months, the DTAP being one of them. So they're getting a cumulative effect of these heavy metals.

And they have no immune system. If you hear what he's saying there, and he says it with conviction, the reason he says that with conviction is because he's what you would call a situational ethicist, a situational ethics. You have one that will be deontological. When it's deontological, you're looking at absolute truth. They do not look at absolute truth. When you look at absolute truth, okay, now you have to be objective.

A situational ethicist is this simple phrase here. The end justifies the means. And so we really believe that what they're doing is correct. It doesn't matter what it costs. It may cost millions of lives. If they achieve the end that they want, then it was the right thing to do. And so that is the way that they look at it, regardless of the damage that they cause. and that in itself is unethical. Even though it's considered a situational ethic, that is unethical.

So you could say that's like an oxymoron. It's an ethic with no ethics. And that's what you hear when you listen to those people talk like that, and you see that it goes against orthodoxy. You know that you have, I'm repeating it so that people can get this in their, in their mindset or in their vocabulary. If it's not there, you have a situational ethicist. That's situational ethics. The end justifies the means. Well, we're going to watch another clip by another statement.

I'm sorry, another backpologist. Well, I do have to say this before we go there, but he just, he just admitted he's the expert, and he admitted that they do not know whether this is causing autism or not. But he doesn't care because, again, the end justifies the means. He doesn't care that your child, and look at that last study, 7%, 8% with severe reactions, and you're okay with moving forward? The health of the child.

I thought that would be considered part of the health of the child, but it gets worse. And again, this is the next clip we want to show you. Another demon. I mean, vaccinologist, sorry. Literally out of the mouth from the world's leading vaccinologist. And let me see if that can. Conducting clinical trials. Okay. According to your profile, you have done most of the preventable trials while I had to license many of the vaccines, correct? On the market?

Yes, sir. Okay. So you're highly experienced at conducting clinical trials, correct? I'm highly experienced conducting clinical trials. And you're familiar with many of the clinical trials that relied upon to license many of the vaccines currently on the market, correct? I am. In your opinion. Did the clinical trials relied upon to license the vaccines that Yates received, many of which are still on the market today?

Were they designed to rule out that the vaccine causes autism? No. You've badgered me into answering the question the way you want me to, but I think that that's probably the answer. Is that your accurate and truthful testimony? Yes. So Catherine Edwards, she's very well-known, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, where she did retire in 2022, but she was the principal investigator, I want to say that, for vaccine safety.

So she's very familiar with all this stuff. She's very well-known, like I said, in the industry, and that should be frightening, right? She's the principal investigator, so she knows very well that these things are not safe.

Did you see how he badgered her? oh my gosh you just what like she couldn't she had he was cornered right did you see by force what i love is like that has got to behavioral analysts like that would be a goldmine just watching when she's covering her mouth watching a demon that last last look of hers and the way she rolls her eyes so you know dr dennis wants to get in on this but i just want to mention because it this is the part that you can watch the whole clip they're great russell has them

on right now. Also just type in Aaron Siri. I can, you'll find them. Del Bigtree always has them on too. Okay. So the court order, what FOIA found out, I love this. So when they finally released this, cause he specifically asking about the studies for D-JAP, he said, I want to see those five. And so, and this is what, this is great. He said those papers that they signed officially, the Institute of Medicine, CDC all signed up on this, the federal, the judges, whatever.

Okay. Okay, so this is 20 studies they listed. They listed 20 studies. And this is the paperwork he signed to. And he goes, I don't know if they thought, Erin said, I don't know if they thought we were stupid. We didn't know how to read. We weren't gonna look into them. This is beautiful. 19 of those studies had nothing to do with the vaccines he asked about.

That's what they said the official studies were based on. Folks, those vaccines that your children are getting were based on those 20 studies. 19 of them had nothing, nothing to do with what he was asking about. Now, the one study they did reference that did look into it, I want you guys to guess. Remember how I said that Geyer and Geyer study that actually said, we can basically, we can either confirm nor deny it does anything.

That was the one study, study number 20, the last of the 20 they listed was that Geyer and Geyer study that found nothing either way. Folks, that's what your children are getting that vaccine based on those studies that have nothing to do with anything. That should piss you off and horrify you at the same time, but should also tell you about the state of vaccines, right?

And we do need to be more informed consumers of everything we consume, including those things that we're willing to put into our children's bodies that can damage them permanently, if not in cases, seriously kill them. You know, I mean, you hate to say that, but for some people that is the reality and they're going around, how do they have the nerve to be on TV? These doctors, these demons saying they don't, they're totally fine.

Yeah, they're good. No, we're good. All of those people saying that, that you saw in that clip, why can't we hold them accountable too because they have influence over people and that's how they choose to use it. Look, we might not have the world's biggest audience, but, and some of that is because what we're willing to step out and say, but it's important that we do this so that you know, I didn't know all this either. Like, I don't want to know all this on some level, but we have to.

Sorry, go ahead, Dr. Dennis.

Good points, Alex. I do know this and it really makes me, aggravated because she's late there one i mean two they well he's asking her if they could confirm whether or not they cause autism but they never what are you testing for and how could you have a legitimate test like she's like well yes i am a tester i'm the i'm the i am a vaccinologist like well well where's your control group have you had biology 101 where you're supposed to have a placebo, not another vaccine.

The reason why they test against another vaccine is because that vaccine has its own adverse reactions. So when we take the culmination of the adverse reactions in a control group and in the experimental group, there's a little difference and they say it's safe and effective. Of course, there's a little difference because they both have adverse reactions. So that is a big problem here. And it's really getting into a negative realm. One last thing, Dr. Dozier talked about situational ethics.

And I think the first being who came up with situational ethics was in the garden. Did God truly say? Did God truly say? Situational ethics. I think you should be clear that the proof that vaccine safety doesn't exist. And there's your proof.

We see it with the COVID vaccine, right? We're seeing it everywhere. I think at this point, we need to question all of those things. It's not just the, you know, the childhood vaccine schedule. I think any, at this point, we see how they do these studies. And this is one example out of, you know, we could pull up the COVID one, right? If we really wanted to do a deep dive, like Dr. Dozier did, frightening, horrifying.

Well, here's going to tie into what Dr. Dozier said earlier, and I know Dr. Dennis sent this to me, so I'm going to throw it to him in a minute. But let's watch this clip. This is Dr. Martin explaining exactly how far back this whole COVID narrative, the patents from viruses to actual vaccines that have been patented for a long time. To be abundantly clear, coronavirus has been in play as a biological weapon agent since 1966. In 1990, Pfizer filed the first patent on a vaccine for coronavirus.

Is it any wonder that Pfizer was in the game and knew that it was going to actually somehow mysteriously show up with the vaccine? Oh, and they told Trump, we made it in two days. Yeah, they had a patent in 1990.

Doc, you've got the floor. I'm not going to interrupt you. Keep No, no, no, it's all good because what happened in 1999 is Ralph Baric's coronavirus modification and manipulation program took what used to be a respiratory and a gastrointestinal bug and turned it into something that would actually create cardiomyopathy in rabbits. And in 2002, that gave rise to the patent that was filed called the Infectious Replication Defective Clone of Coronavirus.

Now, we have a commercially interested group of sociopaths who want to make money while killing people. That's the bottom line. And creating a global control grid for the social credit score out of the vaccine passport. No question, but the reason why that's important, remember, is if you can weaponize health care, If you can weaponize the idea that you need to do something in the interest of surviving. That's a victorious beachhead. It's a phenomenal beachhead. You get behavior

modification. You get compliance. You get all sorts of other things. They knew on September 18th, 2019, that they were going to release a lethal respiratory pathogen. They were, use the word lethal. They knew it was deadly. They knew it was going to kill people. And let's, for the sake of it. So it's not of a wet lab or a wet market. It didn't happen on accident. China virus. It was all pre-programmed. It wasn't China virus.

Remember that in 2016, the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, there is a very, very, very clear statement that says WIV1 is poised for human emergence. Dr. Dennis, take Dr. Mark and run with him. Well, I think he brings up a lot of important information there. So you're saying that they've been tweaking the coronavirus in the lab since 1966 and then have all these patents on coronavirus, and then all of a sudden we get into a pandemic involving coronavirus.

And it just happens that it goes in with what Dr. Dozier was talking about earlier, that lockstep in 2010, the Rockefeller thing. Also, what Bill Gates said, that if we properly vaccinate, we will be able to reduce the world's population by 15%. Well, they did a good job. I think I sent you the statistics that Edward Dowd came out with about the ramifications of the coronavirus.

And that he found that in his study that it killed, and these are ranges because he's taken all over the world, these statistics, anywhere from 7.5 to 15 million people. That 29 to 60 million people were disabled by the coronavirus jams. I'm not going to call them the vaccine and not vaccines. 500 to 900 million were actually injured by this. And over 5 billion people, as like Dr. Dozier said earlier, have taken this.

So that's pretty close to 15% to 20% of the population that were injured or killed by this vaccine. And they're not done yet because they're still on the market. Why are they still on the market? Why is it in the childhood vaccine schedule? Why are these still there? And why do we still have an emergency use authorization for these?

We have to ask this. And I said to you guys, I will know if RFK is for real, if the first thing he does, if he gets confirmed, is takes these jams off the market until they can be proven safe and effective, which is never. What Dennis just laid out, I have those same sentiments, need to be taken off. I remember my wife and I were going on an anniversary trip, and there was this female. She was either a doctor, a medical doctor, or the step before becoming a doctor.

And she said, she said, this video that I'm doing right now is going to be taken off the air. And she was saying, do not take this. Her numbers were low. She perhaps did not think it was going to be as bad as it was. She said about 200,000 people are going to die from this, but we know it was more. And then she said pretty much that they were not going to take it off because there are people who have placed money in it, invested, and they have to get paid.

She said people are going to be paid billions of dollars. And she said, I'm telling you, listen to me now because they are going to take this off. True enough, it was taken off in little to no time. But I believe this is a lot of what we've seen, and there's something I did not say, but if I'm not mistaken, and I want to say it that way, I believe when it came to this so-called jab, this bioweapon, which appears if it killed as many people, it's a bioweapon. This bioweapon is.

I believe the Pentagon had something to do with it as well. And so you had to have, for them to do something like this, you had to have a lot of cover-ups, because this in itself was warfare on people around the world. And that in itself is criminal, right? And so when I see this, the video that we saw, I have a person saying, you're badgering me. I mean, that in itself, that is the craziest thing. That's just foolish. You're not being badgered. You ask the question and that's

usually what a person has been hemmed up. You got them hemmed up. You got them. Let's just say you got them cornered. They don't know where to go. So they end up saying something foolish. And just by her saying what she said, it seems to allude to you putting me in a place where I have to answer something that I refuse to answer. And that's what we're going to keep getting unless now we have not research, but we have investigators.

And as Dennis was saying, RFK is going to need to do what he said he would do, and he needs to be able to do it without interference, or they will not stop. So, you know. Because right now, let me think about this. Hold on, Doc. Let me put you back over here. Go ahead. I'm sorry. because when you think about this, WHO, right, World Health Organization.

Why do these people want to be so tied up with the World Health Organization when our former president, who's about to be our president again, he got us unhooked from all of that stuff. Why do you want to be hooked with the World Health Organization? Why do you want to be hooked up with the World Economic Forum and Klaus Schwab and Harare and all of these people? Why do you want to be hooked up with something like that when it means humanity no good?

It's just something for people to think about, And I'm sure there's some people listening to us who are, and this is a plug for us. Yes, they'll plug. I'm sure there's some people listening to us when you hear me mention Klaus Schwab and Harari, even World Economic Forum. You may not know who referring to. Hit the comment section, please.

And ask us. If you don't know, ask us who it is. We'll be glad to respond to you and tell you who these organizations are and how you can find out some things about it. Well, that's also a shameless plug that I fully support because we are going to go there probably in our next podcast and fill in some of these what could be wild accusations may be considered by some people, but we're going to show you that this goes a lot deeper.

But one of the things that we really want to point out is that you fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on us. And here we have, I want you to know this, that this is actually happening that just like the 2010 or the, you know, the 2000, what was it? The, what was the? What is it? 201. I'm sorry. No, 201, right? Event 201. Oh. Or just like event 201, okay, we have yet another person coming up. And notice who it is, of course. This is somebody that I also saw in Dr.

Martin's video. But I just want to show you this part here to realize that they are already threatening us with another pandemic.

And exactly the timing of this couldn't be more apropos as to who's really behind it and what they're up against so this is the actual clip here from dr martin's video where he was sharing on info wars how big pharma shill peter hotez and again we had remember we had dr uh still wagon on wanting to debate hotez of course and you know because everybody is is would love to debate him because he's the father of lies, if you will. But here he is talking about a potential pandemic.

But why is it a potential if it will come crashing down on January 21 on the Trump administration? I mean, how in the world could you say something like that if you didn't think somehow you knew something or that you didn't somehow know exactly a date that you were going to release it. I mean, this is ominous, right? And so one of the reasons I think that we are having this particular show is so that you can realize they want to do this again.

This is not the first time that they really want to do that.

So once you understand what's happening in the world today, that they are planning another pandemic, this whole thing is going to come right back around. That's what this is all about, because this is a narrative that gives them what they want. And what is it that they want? They want this mandatory access to our bodies. And that's where we're going to go in the next show to show you that the target of, of virtually all of the breakthroughs and technologies aren't going to be outside

your body. They're going to be in your body. And when we see these things happening, you have to wonder, will we be human if these things happen to us? We are already talking about humanism 2.0, right? This is what transhumanism is. It's the goal to remake humanity into a new image.

So all of these narratives that we have a little stay in our execution, because we do have some people that are going to be more sympathetic in this administration, we still have to remember that the people that pull this off are not going to give up. So it's very important for us to realize that. Dr. Dennis, go ahead. Well, we're going to talk about Peter Hotez,

the big shrill, the person who he is. He was in Dr. Martin's last video when he was much younger, but saying that vaccines do not cause autism. Well, now he's coming out and saying that we're going to have another pandemic. And guess when it's going to happen? January 21st, the first day of the Trump administration. How could he know a pandemic is going to start January 21st?

If we can't, if you can't, folks, and if we can't see that this is all planned and this is being controlled by the new world order, and they are in place. And that's why I had a scripture picked out for today, because it has a lot to do with where we are in eschatological times. And now we look at Revelation 6 and the seal that was the second seal that is opened. And it says, When he opened the second seal, I heard a second living creature saying, Come and see.

And another horse, fiery red, went out. And it was granted to the one who sat on it to take peace from the earth and that people should kill one another and that there was given to him a great sword. That's pretty apropos of what we're getting into here now. I think we're taking pieces being taken from the earth and the new world order is coming after us with swords to kill us.

One of them are these pandemics there are other things we'll get into in future episodes well there's no doubt that disease and pestilence are part of what happens in the end time and a lot of times the bible is not necessarily saying that god is the one who's triggering some of this stuff so i think it's important to remember that you know we are in these end times and even though we said some crazy things and we're going to keep seeing them,

but that's only if you don't really know what's happening. So if I follow up on my idea, is there a group of people in the world? That need access to our bodies. And, you know, kings and kingdoms have had access to our bodies for thousands and thousands of years. And there's really nothing that they could do to make you less human. You know, they could certainly try and brainwash you. They could certainly torture you. They can do those things.

But the bottom line is, at the end of that, you would still be human. But now we're entering in a new stage where it appears that technology is specifically targeted towards our body. And the point of this technology is to do something that's never been done before. Here's a little clip by Klaus Schwab telling you exactly what he's trying to do with this technology. So the difference of this first industrial revolution is it doesn't change what

you are doing. It changes you if you take a genetic editing, just as an example.

It's you who are changed and of course this has a big impact on your identity yeah and offer certain kinds of possibilities that have to be careful about you know when you began to when you began to do that kind of gene editing some people worry that you are changing what it means to be human so like this whole episode like if you have trust issues just hits all the trust issues right like i'm feeling so traumatized just from our own episode i

just told the docs i was like, are my nostrils flaring this whole episode? Because I'm so pissed hearing this. And we should, this is ridiculous. The fact that if you don't see demon when these people talk, you know, you're lucky because whenever I hear these people talk, all I can see are the horns. Like the fact that you need, why do you think you have the right to come in and give me something that alters my DNA, that changes me somehow, that makes me part machine or whatever.

I don't, I don't accept or want your, you know, be funnier, be sexier, be machine, whatever. Look, if you're attracted to R2D2, that's on you, boo. Like don't, don't come at me with that stuff. But like when I hear this, I'm like, it's just so ridiculous that it's the same trick, right? It's the same, take this, you'll be smarter. It's the same piece of fruit being offered. But now they're trying to force it on us. They're trying to find ways to force it into us.

You're absolutely right. And this goes back to what we were talking about earlier off camera, Kev, about going back to the book and back to the premise of the book and how access to the body and changing us as human beings. And is that what the mark of the beast is? Changing us so we're no longer able to repent and no longer able to accept Christ or not God, so not God's creation.

And we have to look into some of this stuff. I'm sure going forward in this year, we're going to touch base on all this. Well, of course, as you guys know, this is my passion. I've had it for a long time. And I remember when my dad was telling me about the Mark of the Beast, I thought, Dad, that's ridiculous. Nothing like that could ever exist because, you know, there's nothing you can do with your body. There's no false God you can worship that you somehow can't repent from.

So that's where you get down to this bigger issue. is my dad basically said, you're right, son, there isn't anything in the world that could do something like this. But one day there will be. And that's where Christians are completely living in the matrix. They don't understand how technology is uncovering and giving us the language of God so that we can take that language and become God. Satan was not lying when he said he would make us into gods. That is still what he's trying to do.

Isn't it interesting that he said it started with the industrial revolution. That was the point. The point was to change us. What did he want to change? He wants to change your identity. Isn't it interesting that the entire LGBTQ movement is focused on the same thing? What is your identity? What happened when God created us? He created us in his image. He called us his children. Jesus told us to pray, our father, right? These are the realities that we are a Christian family of God.

That's who we are. And so what Satan is wanting to do is change that image, and he can do it with these new technologies that are coming out. So stay tuned next week. Of course, we're going to get into more of the details of how even vaccines can be used to do this. But this was a shocking episode. you can see that we have the sickest kids in the world. We have the most autistic children in the world. And so these are the reality.

So when you think about your doctor, think about the doctor of last place, because that's what we're dealing with here. We have to do something different. Otherwise, we're going to continue to get the same results that we have, continue to pray for our families and our children, and pray for this new administration that we're going to get some breakthroughs with the answers about how they have violated the temple of the Holy Spirit.

So God bless you guys. Dr. Dennis, you want to pray us out, brother? Sure. Well, God, I just want to thank you, Lord, for today, for today's episode, and for also just waking us up, Lord. Lord, today is Kevin and Alex's anniversary. Lord, I ask that you bless them. You already have blessed them with 20 beautiful years. Let's see. Please, Lord, bless them with 20 more, 30 more, 40 more years.

50 years 50 years, I like that And Lord, we pray for our listeners Lord, we pray for those that watch us And listen to us We just hope that they get some great information From us, but not only from us But also that you would touch their hearts Amen You would open up their hearts That they would see you And what we're trying to communicate to them We ask this in Jesus name Amen, God bless you guys.