SYSK Selects: Can Nuclear Fusion Reactors Save The World?

to Chuck Bryant, there's Jerry, there's Barrel laughs. Uh, and this is stuff you should know. She gave us the old quick start. Yeah, like I don't want to hear any more impression record. Yeah, she knows that shuts me up, or at least cuts off whatever station on chiding her. It's great. I'm telling you, if we could release the twenty seconds before each show as its own show, that would be terrible. No one would care, We'd think it was funny and everybody else would be like, you edit

this out for a reason. Uh So, Chuck, how you doing great? Have you ever been to Azen Provence? France. No is that a place. Yeah, No, I haven't. It is a rustic little town in Provence. And it is strangely, maybe even ironically in the non hipster use, but in the actual Yeah, it's a real word definition of the word um. Also site to one of the most futuristic engineering projects humanity has ever undertaken. Meat. Meat. It's a sound it makes. Oh, I thought you're mocking me. No,

no for being thrilled by the thought of this thing. No, it is kind of funny that this thing is in a sleepy little town like a hamlet, maybe evencern in Switzerland. That's not in the city, is it. No, you can't build these things in cities. That's whether in sleepy towns exactly because no one knows they're being poisoned. Yeah, and

you can push the mare around pretty easy, exactly. This thing is called either I T e R, which is an acronym for the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactors, which really gets to the point across. Did you know the word acronym is an acronym M. That's not true. Okay, I just want to see how long you would try and sort it out in your head. I would have kept going on what it means seconds. Maybe that would have been a great joke. I could have just kept it going.

I'm not gonna tell you I would have been I would have it was maybe fifteen seconds, because you would have gotten that much more. So I wouldn't have looked it up. I would have figured it out myself. Anyway. EID is this colossal engineering project. Somebody compared it to

the pyramids at Giza. Yeah, that's that's exciting stuff. Sure. Um. The thing is is it's a nuclear fusion reactor, and it's the culmination of decades of attempts to create a nuclear fusion reactor because we got fussion down and we'll talk about the difference in a minute, um, but fusion has been very elusive, and nowhere is it more apparent than in the EIDER project. Because this thing is going to cost an approximately fifty billion dollars when it's completed,

fifty billion dollars. They started. They're hoping to turn on the switch in two thousand twenty, but it's looking like two thousand twenty three or two thousand twenty four, and it won't be starting to produce anything until the two thousand forties at the earliest. So what's the point. I'll tell you the point. If we can figure out nuclear fusion, Chuck, the world's literally the world's energy problems will be solved

for millennia. If we can just figure this out, we will have a almost no radio activity nuclear option um, almost limitless fuel supply, totally green clean, no no pollution of greenhouse emissions, and with plenty of energy to spare using the already extant infrastructure we have to supply power. Like, you don't have to completely rebuild everything. You can just

to the electrical cables outside. It'll be the exact same thing. Yeah, you can just go to a nuclear fission reactor and press the button that says fusion, and it'll all of a sudden joint atoms instead of split them exactly. That's what the difference is. With fission, you're splitting atoms and you're gaining energy from that. With fusion, you're smacking them together and you're gaining even more energy because we're you're

exploiting a different fundamental force. Yeah, and that I was being KOI clearly there is no button because we would have pushed it a long time ago. Yeah. And when I say no, pollution and no greenhouse emissions before the pedantic among you right in, we know that just even shipping something from here to there causes pollution and greenhouse emissions, but we're talking about the The output of the reactor

itself is very green. So if you want to know all about Ider, well, we're gonna talk about it here there, because it's just you just can't talk about nuclear fusion reactors and not mention Eider. But if you want to know a lot about Eider, there is a really great article called A Star in a Bottle um, and it's by a person named Rathi Kacha Duran durian Uh. And it was written in the New Yorker not too long ago.

And man, it is every detail you want to know about the Eider project written really well um and it's long, but it's totally worth the read. Yeah, it's all over the news lately. And for good reason. You said a lot of energy. I have a stat I'm gonna throw back to the old days here. Per kilogram, I'm a fuel. If we're talking fusion and fission, fusion produces four times more energy than fission. I saw seven. It's probably one of the things where it's like four to five to

ten or something. Right, I've found four times and ten million times more than coal. Yeah, ten million times the energy as coal, and that's with equal fuel per kilogram of fuel. It's just I mean, it is the future. Yeah. And you can say, well, that's great because we want eighteen million times the amount of power that coal provides. You can say, well, there, buddy, you can also bring it backwards because you can supply an awful lot of

power then with a lot less fuel. Yeah, we're like the advantage of nuclear fusion or mind boggling and and very few uh downsides, which we'll get to of course, but yeah, I mean, like really genuinely, it's not just like some like here's all the great stuff about it and just don't pay attention to all these like really horrible aspect us. Um, Like, there really aren't too many downsides. The downside is we are at this moment incapable of

successfully creating a commercially viable nuclear fusion reactor. That's right, But we've got an understanding of what the challenges are ahead of us thanks to the last fifty or so years of really really really smart physicists working on the problem of nuclear fusion. Uh, and the great inspiration for nuclear fusion is the Sun. The Sun and all stars

like it are enormous, immense nuclear fusion reactors. So if you are building a nuclear fusion reactor here on Earth, you're essentially creating a star, and that is a very difficult thing to do. It turns out, Yeah, the Sun creates. And we talked about the Sun in our very famous episode on the Sun. Um. The Sun creates six twenty million metric tons a few six and twenty million metric

tons of hydrogen at its core every second. So every second at the Sun's core, it produces enough power to light up New York City for a hundred years New York City every second. And that's the Sun. And all we want to do is do the same thing on a much smaller scale. I think the guy there's this kid who built one in his garage and he said he wanted to Chris saw this Ted talk. He wanted to create a star in a box is what he called it. Yeah, I've seen it, like this New Yorker

called it a star in a bottle. Yeah. This kid's name is Taylor Wilson and he's a nuclear physicist and he's like sixteen and he created Yeah, he he created a successful one. And the key, though, is not to be able to create the fusion. The key is to be able to harness enough plasma, which we'll get to at a high enough temperature and density for there to

be a net power gain. Right, you can create fusion, but in order to get out more than you're putting in is the only thing that matters, because what you want to do is create electricity exactly. That's there's two huge challenges right now to nuclear fusion. We pretty much understand it enough to start it going and and get energy from it. The problem is is material science isn't at a point where it can build a containment vessel

to really house a thermonuclear reactor. And then the other big obstacle is, like you said, net energy gain, Like if you're putting in as much or more energy then you're getting out of your nuclear reactor, then you're wasting energy, and it's the opposite of what you're supposed to be doing. Yeah, they're not just trying to impress people with their science knowledge, no,

but up to trying to create energy. Up to now, though, Chuck, like every single thermonuclear reactor that's ever been built has just been impressing people with knowledge, Like they haven't gotten any net energy out of a single thermonuclear usion reactor, you see, I have that they have their right now they're up to like tin uh presently, they're at tin megawatts. Yeah, and that's more than they put into a net gain

of tin mega watts currently. Everything I saw was when we turn this thing on, it should have a net gain, but I didn't see that they've actually done it. Yeah, tin mega watts now and Eider is going to produce five hundred megawatts once it's fully operational. Right. So the next challenge then is this, if we're already getting a net energy gain out of it, then that means that

the net energy gain is it's not sustainable. Like you said, you want to keep the thing going so you don't have to keep starting from scratch to power it up. You wanted to basically be self sustaining, so you just have to add a little more fuel to the dream. So let's talk about the history of of fusion reactors Chuck. Yeah, it kind of goes back to this guy, name Lyman Spitzer. He's a thirty six year old Princeton astrophysicist. And this was in the nineteen fifties, and he was recruited to

work on the H bomb. And UH went out and got a copy of of a of a paper that was released from Germany. I think, right that Argentina. Argentina. Yeah, they announced that they had get that wrong. They had successfully built a fusion reactor. Right. So he gets this paper, UH goes on a ski trip, starts thinking about how he can do this, takes a little break from his job building the H bomb, and figures out, you know, I think it's possible if we can harness this plasma.

I guess we should just go ahead and find what plasma is. Since we keep saying it, Well, there's there's the normal three energy states that were familiar with, water, solid and gas, liquid solid and gas. Right, there's a fourth one. It's plasma. And plasma is basically like an energetic gas where the temperatures are so high that whatever atoms you put into it, the electrons are stripped off and allowed to move around freely. Basically, the surface of

the Sun is plasma. That's that's what plasma is. It's a gas, it's a roiling gas that's really hard to control and is really unpredicted, which is when you want to see the Sun like that rippling, wavy looking thing. That's plasma, right. And the reason the Sun manages to stay together is because it is enormously massive and has a ton of gravity at its core. Yeah, we don't have that advantage here on Earth. We don't, so we try to make up for that by increasing the temperature.

That's right. And he was onto it way back then in the nineteen fifties. If we can just harness this, we can just get hot enough. And he created a tabletop device called the uh Stellarator and it was an a figure eight position. It was a pipe and a figure eight uh. And this would keep things from banging into walls theoretically. Yeah, and he was onto something because well, we'll get to lockeed later, but they're using some or

device nowg eight. Oh yeah, I didn't realize that was a figure eight it is, which is weird because what they eventually found out was that a donut shape was really the key, uh to get that net gain. So the and the reason that they found out that a donut shape worked was because in the I think the late fifties, UM, the US had run up against the wall.

They're saying, like, okay, we've got this, but we can't control the plasma because think about it, what you're trying to do is create a star inside something, but it can't touch any of the vessel that it's in or else it'll just completely erupt it. Right. Yeah. They compared it to holding jelly and rubber bands. Right, it was just like you can't. They couldn't figure out how to

control the plasma. So when when the US ran up against this wall, they said, hey, the rest of the world, we're gonna declassify what Lyman Spitz Lyman Spitzer has been doing and like we'll share if you guys are And it turns out that the Russians had um already come

up against this problem and licked it. They figured out that if you put the thing in a what's called the toroidal shape, a donut shape UM using electro magnets, you contame the plasma essentially, and the the the donut shape itself was pretty ingenious, but the real stroke of genius was by running electromagnets in rings around the doughnut.

So it's like you you have a donut, and you put a bunch of earrings around it, right, and those are electromagnets, So you're creating an electro magnetic force field which contains the plasma. But then you also put an electro magnetic force field in the middle of the plasma. So not only does it heat it up to the temperatures you want, it also stabilizes it further. So the Russians had invented what they call the tacomac um, which is this donut shape nuclear fusion reactor that basically became

the standard for the next fifty years or so. Yeah, you basically could achieve a really dense, super hot plasma. And we'll get into temperatures and stuff in a bit. But since we can't create that kind of pressure that they have in the Sun due to their gravity, their gravity,

the Sun's gravity, you know, the Sun and all those people. Yeah, uh, like you said, we had to make up for it here on Earth with temperatures, right, because apparently if you are in a in the middle of a nuclear reactor, a nuclear fusion reactor, um, you're going to find that the temperatures inside are about six times hotter than the core of the Sun. Not even the services and the core of the sun. And the reason why it has to be so much hotter is because, like you said,

we can't we can't replicate that density. We can get to those temperatures that we need, but we can't get to the density, so we have to make up for it. So, Chuck, we're talking about nuclear fusion, and there's it's actually surprisingly understandable at its most basic core. Yeah, you're fusing atoms. Is not the hardest thing in the world to wrap your head around. Yeah. So with fission, we're splitting atoms. You're taking an atom and you're splitting its nuclei apart.

You're splitting the neutrons and the protons apart from one another. And when you do that, one of the four fundamental forces, electromagnetic force, pushes them away and you get this burst of energy. With fusion, you're taking nuclei from different atoms. You're taking protons and um neutrons, and you're smashing them together. And when you do that, you're unleashing what's called the strong force, which appropriately enough is stronger than electromagnetic force,

which is why nuclear refusion yields more energy than nuclear fission. Yeah, Einstein himself said, you know, each time you smash these things together, you're gonna lose a little bit of mass, and that little bit of mass is a ton of energy. As it turns out. That's right, The famous equals mc square. Yeah, and I don't think he realized in nineteen o five, or maybe Einstein did. E Instein probably did. Yeah, Einstein

probably did. I would guess he did. So. The problem is, even though it is very easy to smash some protons together, um, there's a tremendous amount of resistance to that smashing together. They don't want to smash together, no, because it's just like if you take a magnet to magnets and you put the positive poles toward one another, they repel one another, right, Yeah, same thing, that's that's the same principle on an atomic

level too. If you take protons, which are positively charged particles, and try to put them together, they repel one another. And the closer you get them together, the stronger the the repellent force is the electromagnetic force, right. But if you can get them close enough, the electromagnetic force is overcome by that strong force, the strong nuclear force, and

they become bound together. Because the strong force is that one of those four fundamental forces of the universe, and that is the force that keeps atoms together, and that is the that force is stronger than the force that repels like charged particles. Yeah. And when you talk about close, they need to be within one times ten to the negative fifteen meters of one another. So that is, if you'll indulge me, sure you're gonna read a bunch of zeros, it's point zero zero zero zero zero zero zero zero

zero zero zero zero zero zero one meters apart. Right, that's how close they have to be. That's right to get them to accept one another and to fuse. Um. I think I have a theory that if they they are not fusing because they think they're going to be made into a bomb, and if we told that creating energy, they might be more willing to fuse together. Yeah, because

protons are peace necks. Everybody knows that. So when when they do fuse together, right, when you do cross that threshold and the strong force takes over and overcomes the electromagnetic force. Um, Like we said, a tremendous amount of energy is released, and it's released in part in the form of neutrinos neutrons, right, which are right neutral particles which suddenly start carrying a tremendous amount of kinetic energy.

So let's say you have one atom, you've got another atom, and they're both like, I'm not getting close to you. We're not going to get to Okay, we got together that force that that mass that's displaced is transferred through the neutron that gets kicked off of the atom, right and is carried out. Now, a neutron doesn't have any

kind of positive or negative charts. It's neutral. It's a neutron, which means that it can pass through the very electromagnetic fields that are keeping this plasma where this reaction is taking place together. Once that happens, Chuck, it can go out to what's called a blanket wall and a thermonuclear reactor warm it, and then that heat is transferred into a water cooling system. The water is warmed up, turns steam, which generates a which I guess moves the turbine, and

then all of a sudden, the turbines producing electricity. Yeah, it's funny how just it gets so complex, but all you're still trying to do is create steam. It's like turn a turbine. It's like cooking the I s s up to a horse, right, you know, move it over there. So there are a few types of fusion reactions. UM. The ultimate goal right now, what we can do on a small scale is what's called a uh deuterium tritium reaction.

That's the one that we can currently achieve. That's one atom of deuterium and one atom of tritium combining to form a helium four atom and a neutron. Yeah, the ultimate goal. I mean, that's good and that will create a lot of energy, but there are a few downsides. Tritium is radioactive. For one, UM, you have to mine it from lithium. Yeah, and lithium is fairly rare. UM. The ultimate goal is to to reach deuterium deuterium reactions, which is two deuterium atoms combining to form that helium

three in a neutron. And you can get that from the sea water. It's abundant, almost limitless um. And I couldn't find this, but I think clean water can be a residual effect of this. Am I wrong. I don't know if it's if well, you're probably not injecting water, but to get the deuterium. I mean, desalination plants are the key to the future as far as supplying the world with fresh water. Yeah, I thought I saw somewhere where it was an actual byproduct, but yeah, but then

I couldn't find it. So I'm not sure if that's right or you know what, you just chalk my memory. I feel like in a hydrogen powered car, water is one of the by products, so maybe so yeah, all right, don't quote me on that though. Um at the very least, it's a great way to create energy, right and and what what's You also can get um tritium from helium,

I believe. So even now with the the deuterium tritium reactions that we're working on, there's there's already a there's a work around, you know, like you can create a thermonuclear reactor that's a breeding reactor to where the byproduct helium can be used to harvest more of the fuel you're using tritium. Yeah, aren't we running low on helium? We are? Which is like remember when we were talking

about the dirigibile the Zeppelin, which one was how blimps work. Yeah, and then a long time ago we did one on the Mars turbine Mars turbine reaction. But yes, there's very clearly helium shortage, and the idea that we're just using it for party balloons rather than this is scary. And don't be confused. We say things like deuterium and it sounds super complex. All that is a hydrogen with an extra neutron. Yeah, it's an isotope. So there's three isotopes

of hydrogen and they're all still the same element. They're all still hydrogen, but they have different configurations as far as their neutrons go. So protium is a hydrogen isotope with one proton and no neutrons. Deuterium is a hydrogen isotope with one proton and one neutron, and tritium is

a hydrogenitro isotope with one proton and two neutrons. And like you said, tritium is radioactive, but the beauty of it is you need very very very little of it to to fuel a nuclear fusion reactor and it becomes a stable helium, a non radioactive helium in the reactor,

so you don't have this leftover radioactive fuel. And awesome, I think they said there's an it would be equivalent of the radiation we just see every day and I'm walking around on the street right, Yes, the background radio aation. I believe I saw that too. The thing is is the parts to the nuclear reactor themselves will become irradiated over time. Apparently, though compared to the kind of radio

activity that's generated from nuclear fission. Um this stuff you could just disassemble and bury in the desert for a hundred years, go back and dig back up, and it will be totally inactivated. So it's it's the stuff that is radioactive is extraordinarily manageable. Yeah, it is. And um, like I said, we don't want to make it sound

like this is perfect. There is. They do predict the short to medium term radioactive waste problem and they say that's due to activation of the structural materials the actual thermonuclear device itself. Yeah, and while you don't need much tritium, even a few grams of tritium is problematic. Um. But hopefully you know, there's no accident, although they say accidents with these um as if you just turn the power off, it stops everything. It's not like a chain reaction can

occur like a fission reactor. There's no out of your control. There's not a meltdown. There's which Also, if you want to know more about that, go listen to our how nuclear meltdowns work UM episode. That was pretty good. We really sit right after Fukushima, but it applies to all fission um reactors. That's right. So the goal is ultimately deuterium deuterium reactions where your pargether. It does. And the reason why is again, it's abundant fuel. You can get

it from desalinating sea water and then um. Secondly, it's not radioactive at any point, so it wouldn't make the the thermonuclear reactor itself radioactive, that's right. The reason why we're not doing that already is because we can't achieve the temperatures necessary. That's right, Which leads us to the two big stumbling blocks. Um. Everyone knows this is a great idea. There's no one out there saying, oh, I don't know about this fusion thing. Creating a star in

a box sounds kind of weird. The problem is the the barriers that we have here on planet Earth. Um, which is one temperature into pressure. Uh. We have achieved the temperature which is the requirements is one dred million kelvin and like you said, that's about six times hotter than the Sun's core, which is pretty intense um. And the other is pressure. Like we said, we need to get them within I'm not gonna make you read all those zeros again, but smash them that close in order

to fuse. And since we don't have that kind of mass and gravity that the Sun does, there are a few pretty genius ways that we're working around that. Uh. Yeah, there's basically two as it stands, and then the Lockheed Martin one, which will a lot of people are skeptical about what we should say. It's kind of a variation on the on one theme. But there's basically there's two ways that we've figured out to create nuclear fusion reactors so far. One is using magnetic confinement and the other

is using inertial lineman. So magnetic confinement uses that tacomac technology. Yeah, it's sort of like CERN. You know, it's using magnets to to create pressure. I guess in cerns case are using it to create speed, right, but in this case is to create pressure. Right. So what you're doing is is you have a um, you have this donut shaped chamber, and that's your reaction chamber. And then again rings around the doughnut that go on around the inside and outside

of the donut. I know, I'm kind of imagining wonderful donuts doing Homer sims in area. Um, they create electromagnetic fields. Now, remember this plasma is hydrogen gas that's been heated up to a temperature so hot that the electrons just float off and move around freely. And because of this higher temperature, these particles have become really really energized, so they're moving and bouncing all over the place and the pressure is

building up. But because electrons are negatively charged and because protons are positively charged, if you use alternating electromagnetic fields, you can contain this plasma. So that's this incredibly hot gas that's six times hotter than the core of the Sun can be contained within the electromagnetic fields. That's right. And uh, we talked about power and power out it need you need about seventy megawatts of power to create this to start this fusion reaction, but you're gonna yield

about five hundred megawatts. That's the ID project, I believe. Yeah, that's the ider and that's um, that's only a three hundred to five hundred second reaction. But like we said earlier, the eventual goal is that it's sustaining itself, uh, which is just a beautiful concept. So basically what they do is they have the the the gas is injected into the chamber, the hydrogen gas, and then there's the electromagnetic

fields that are holding the plasma in place. But then remember we said, the Russians figured out that if you put an electromagnetic field in the middle of the whole thing, it will stabilize that asthma, but it also heats it up, so it serves this double purpose. And then just to add a little extra temperature, they shoot it with microwaves

and some other stuff and then heat it up. And then as the plasma goes crazy and all the fusion energies released, the neutrons move their way outside of the electromagnetic field into the blanket, which they heat up, and the heat energy is transferred to power that turbine to remove the horse down the down the lane, and it's just creating steam. Yeah, and there's I mean, that's like,

that's what Ider is doing right now. That's what they're trying to prove um and then also as ider is spending billions and billions and billions of dollars and running into tons of delays. Um, it's an amazing project. Lockheed Martin basically just came out and said, Oh, by the way, this thing that you're trying to do that's gonna be a hundred feet tall and require staggering amounts of energy

and money. We're doing one that puts out the same amount of energy as yours, but it's a t to the size, which means it's almost out of the gate commercially viable. Yeah. That is their skunk Works UM division of Lockheed. And they announced this like three days ago here in mid October. And um, they've gotten a lot of blowback from the scientific community because they wouldn't release data. They don't have data. They said it's a high beta device right now, and kind of shut out the scientific

community as far as questions go. And um, every scientist that I saw interviewed for this said, yeah, they're they're trying to get some attention, to get some partners to join in. Well. Yeah, Plus, it makes you want to run out and buy Lockheed Martin stock, because if one company can figure out how did create a thermonuclear fusion reactor here on Earth that's scalable, that fits in a truck. Yeah, that that that that person would be very wealthy. Yeah.

So it's a dubious claim, but they are, you know, they're working towards a good thing. I'm not like poopooing the whole thing. But until they have hard data and like some proof, then I think the scientific communities got their arms folded right now. Yeah, and and I mean they have at least some details. It's just not detailed

enough for a scientist's detailed enough for Aviation Week. Yeah, they wrote an article on it, and basically what the what the guy they interviewed was saying was that over at either they have a low beta ratio, which is the amount of electro magnetism that you need compared to the amount of plasma you can put into the chamber. So there's like five percent plasma electromagnetivity or electromagnetism just to keep this plasma thing from just blowing up, because

that can happen. They might not melt down, but if everything went wrong, the whole thing could blow up. Well, and you know, you know what an atomic bomb is it's it's a fusion reaction, right, and this is a lot of those all put together in one hundred foot

um tower. Uh. This guy was saying that the beta ratio for their machine is like, So, what he was saying is they figured out a way and again it's not very detailed, but they figured out a way to contain the plasma, but in a way that also allows it to expand because if you think about it, the more plasma there is, the more hydrogen atoms there are, more hydrogen atoms, more isotopes there are, the more nuclear fusion reactions are events you can have, the more energy

you can yield. Right. Yeah, so they're saying they figured out how to contain the plasma, but again, like you said, the scientific community is really skeptical because they think it's just a pr synge. Well, I think they made the mistake by saying they invented a magicometer to make it all happen, and that's and don't ask about it. Yeah right. I did see though that we're lockeed was using the figure eight in stelerator configuration. Uh, and I think that's true.

I tried. I found a couple of more sources that were kind of vague about it, and I think the details on it are just vague period. But I don't know why they would abandon the donut shaped if the figure eight was uh, you know, nine fifties technology that's

have been disproven. Well, supposedly, their whole jam was that the even in the doughnut in the Tacomac, this donut shaped reactor, plasma has a tendency to just move around and make its way out Like it's not it's still not fully contained, and they're using something basically mirrors to catch the plasma that's getting out and moving it to

parts of the electromagnetic field that are less dense. So there's a bunch of protons in this part of the field, that field is being strained, but then maybe there's not that many protons over here, so they use mirrors to direct the protons to the low density area of the field. Yeah, even the whole thing out, which makes sense. But again, if you're not releasing data, don't expect the scientific community

to buy it. You got that right. So there's another way to build a thermonuclear reactor that's currently being worked on two and we'll talk about that right after this, so, buddy, magnetic confinement is pretty neat, and we talked about that and that's uh understandable, and I love it. I want to date it. But internal confinement I want to marry because it has lasers. Um At the National Ignition Facility at Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, they are actually using laser beams.

They have a device called the n i F device where they focus a hundred nine two laser beams on a single point in a ten meter diameter target chamber called a whole realm that's got to be German. And basically inside that target chamber, they have a little tiny pea sized pellet of deuterium tritium in a little plastic cylinder. It's funny that it can be plastic somehow. Yeah, you'd think it would introduce like impurities or something into it. Yeah, or it would need to be like iron or something.

I don't know. It just seems unstable, but uh, that is one point eight million jewels of power from these lasers. They're just gonna heat the cylinder up, generate some X rays and then that radiation will convert that pellet into plasma and compress it. So again they're creating plasma, but instead of smashing it together with magnets, they're superheating it with lasers. So that's your that's your your money's on that one. You're like, I just think it's neat because

I like lasers. But that's your preference of the two. Yes, well, actually, whichever one works is going to be my preference. Okay. Uh, And that one will yield fifty two times more energy, more energy out than energy put in, so that's that's a good goal. So um, yeah, I guess basically the whole point of magnetic confinement is that if you can do without electro magnets, you're you're you have a more simple and elegant I mean the internal confinement or inertial inertial. Yeah,

that's what I mean, inertial confinement. Basically, the whole thing just happened so fast. You don't even need these magnets to confine plasm because you're not creating the sustained ignition, right. Yeah. I might have said internal confinement before. By the way, it's inertial. Yea. So what about cold fusion, buddy? That was all the rage I remember back in the eighties. Yeah, because in some researchers said that they successfully created nuclear

fusion using um just room temperature stuff like palladium. They took palladium and um banaeals and beer cans pretty much heavy water which had a deuterium in it, and they put the whole thing together and created nuclear fusion without the high temperatures, hence the name cold fusion. And if you can get around these high temperatures, then you work out the whole material science problem, right. And if you work out the whole material science problem, then this is

it's a desirable thing to have cold fusion. The problem is is a lot of scientists tried to replicate these guys findings and weren't able to so basically they were kicked to the curb. So does that mean has cold fusion been abandoned or are people still trying to get on that train. No. In two thousand and five, some U c l A. Researchers basically said, um, we think we might have this thing down, and they did. That's

something called um pyro electric crystal fusion. Pyroelectric fusion's a crystal, yeah, we're basically it's the same result they do what would be called cold fusion. UM The problem is that has a negative net energy yield. You have to put in a lot more energy than you get out of it. Right, Well, that's no good um either. Seems like they are making headway more than Lockheed despite their claim. Um, they are being like we said, it's in Europe and it's being

financed by a bunch of different countries. Um. The U s is in, but they're kicking in. I think the least amount only about seventeen million euros last year. Of course we contributed dollars, but they're giving it to us in euros. Um. I think the EU spends the most, about eighty million. South Korea and China kicked in about twenty and nineteen million respectively each. And I saw earlier where Russia was involved, but then I didn't see what

they had contributed financially. Ye are they still all right? Well, maybe they're just uh, we're writing a chip for them for later. They'll just pay us back. Uh. But it is a very expensive prospect um, and you need you know, countries getting together for something like this is not the kind of thing that like the US can take on on their own, I guess, unless you're Lockeed Martin and you don't have to prove your data, right, So this

nuclear fusion, we'll see what happens. Yeah, you got anything else, man? No, I just say everybody should go read a Star in a Bottle on the New Yorker. It's really really good. Yeah, it's pretty neat. Um there. You can also go to instructibles. If you want to build a uh nuclear fusion reactor in your garage, you can do so. Um, you're not going to create energy because, like we said, you're gonna be putting more than you get out. Um, but there

are instructions and that kid did it. His was a little more advanced than the instructibles one obviously, but um yeah, sixteen year old kid. Yeah, he's amazing because his was legit. He's done more than that too. His TED talk was pretty impressive. Cool. He's like working on with Homeman Security already for various projects that have nothing to do with this. Yeah. Yeah. Uh. Well, if you want to learn more about nuclear fusion, you can type those words in the search bar how stuff

works dot com. And since I said that, it's time for a listener mail, and Chuck, before we do listener mail, I want to um give a shout out to our Kiva team. Yeah, for those of you you don't know, we did a podcast many years back on micro lending. UH in Kiva k I v a dot org is a organization where you can loan UH entrepreneurs and well used to be just developing countries. Now you can do it here in North America as well, UH twenty dollars at a time that you can get paid back for.

You can get your money back if you're not happy, or you can just keep reloaning that money and it helps them get their small business going. And we started Kiva team many years ago and it is killing it. So you got some stats for us. So basically, as of October nineteen, UM, we have loaned Our team has loaned two point seven million dollars two people in developing countries nice and in the US here there um. And the big one is we've exceeded one hundred thousand loans

man by our team. Our team only has eight thousand, seventy nine members, So all eight thousand seventy nine of you guys, thank you. Way to go. Congratulations, Yes and thanks as always to Glenn and Sonja are de facto Kiva. UH. What would you call them presidents presidents, Presidents of the stuff you should know, Team captains of the stuff you should know Team no presidents, Okay, presidents. President is Glens like yes president, Uh. Yeah, they've been really like keeping

it going for us. Yeah, and when you know, sometimes we'll forget and Glennill nudges. Hey, guys, remember the Kiva team. We should mention it, right, So the next the next goal we have is for three million dollars in loans and we're on our way to it. So come join us. We uh, don't begrudge people who are late to the party. Just go to kiva dot org, slash teams slash stuff you should know and you can sign up. That's right. So now it's time for listener mail, right indeed, sir,

I'm gonna call this sky writing follow up um from Australia. Hey, guys, recently listened to how skywritting works and it reminded me of something. Although this may not be suitable for listener mail,

which I disagree actually because i'm reading it. I was maybe eight or nine when a few friends and I were out on the street playing uh and doing things at nine year old do it's so awkward to say that, So you're not replacing something right there, No one, Um, they were just doing nine year old things, good clean fun. We looked up and saw a plane starting the skywrite. We're instantly intrigued what was being written? They started with

an H and then an oh. This went on for maybe twenty minutes until finally the word Hooters was scrawled across the sky. I'll be a backwards so I guess they had the Hooters restaurant chicken wing chain in Australia. I guess they're a rich kid. Yeah, really immature rich kid. Yeah. Or that. My brain couldn't comprehend how this person managed

to screw up writing a word backwards. The best reason my childish brain could come with was a skywriting took place somewhere between us and a group of people that it was initially intended for, and that I just thought it was written up and downwards rather than across the sky. Um until now, I've never understood or bother to learn why it was like that. So thank you for keeping the podcast great allowing me to figure that out. That is from Marlin. Hello boy, uh hap happaraci chi nice.

Have you ever seen a word like that. Hapoor Rachi ha poor Rachi. Marlin from Sydney, Australia. Man, thanks a lot, Marlin. H And that's Marlin with an a even oh yeah, Marlan. Well, thanks a lot, Marlin, and we're gonna say like that. Sure. If you have an awesome last name and want to share it with us, you can tweet to us at s y s K podcast. You can join us on

Facebook dot com, slash Stuff you Should Know. You can send us an email to stuff Podcast at how Stuff Works dot com and as always, joined us at our home on the web. Stuff you Should Know dot com. Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeart Radios. How Stuff Works for more podcasts for my Heart Radio because at the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite chips