Hey, and welcome to the short stuff. I'm Josh, there's Chuck, and we're sitting in for Jerry, who usually sits in for Dave. So yeah, let's go.
Let's go.
This is well, it's a follow up to our Doomsday Clock episode. But it turns out we didn't do a Doomsday Clock episode. I know we talked about this, so it might have been in one of when we were doing videos years ago. I think it was probably in one of those. But I know for a fact the only reason I would have known about this is because of this job and you.
That makes me feel good that I wasn't completely unaware that we had done an episode on doomsteak clocks.
Yeah, it popped up in someplace. But what's the Doomstak clock?
Josh?
So, the doomsday clock is a metaphorical clock that is operated or overseen by the Bulletin Atomic Scientists, which was a group of scientists who had worked on the Manhattan Project. They got together and they said, we need to create a group that is going to basically keep an eye
on this nuclear proliferation that's starting up. And one of the things they did in nineteen forty seven was create the doomsday clock, and it essentially is this I guess it's a graphic representation of how close humanity is to self inflicted disaster like a nuclear.
War, perfectly said elegantly said I see, yeah, So, like you said, been around since nineteen forty seven.
They set the time every year.
It's sort of a thing where they say, like, all right, the time for this year is going to be this, would they move it forward if something really went down within a year?
I think they do it every year, so.
Like in January they said it, and if like four months later, like the s goes down, they wouldn't be like they'd be like, nop, gota wait till next year.
Well, I think two things would happen. Either it would be something that they would take into account the next year, yes, or the world would end and they wouldn't have anything to do anyway.
Okay, But again, we're talking about it this year because there was and you know, we'll.
Talk about a little bit how it's fluctuated over the years.
But the reason we bring it up is because this year, January eighth, twenty twenty five, is when they moved the second hand on the clock forward to eighty nine seconds to midnight, yeah, which means it's the closest that clock has ever been to midnight since they started.
Yeah, since they started, or when they started in nineteen forty seven, when the US and Russia were starting the Cold War, creating nukes, testing nukes out in the open underground in space, there was seven minutes to midnight. We're now less than two minutes away from midnight because stuff is just so close to hitting the fan. And we
should say that they've actually moved the clock backward. They've moved the secondhand backwards further away from midnight in the past, and the furthest away it was from midnight was nineteen ninety one, after the Soviet Union Union dissolved. Uh huh, it was all the way back from seventeen minutes to midnight, which is work.
I think.
I think that's called teeky time.
Yeah, it's like bust out the rum, everybody, exactly.
We're all at seventeen minutes. Yeah.
The closest pre this time in twenty twenty five was in nineteen fifty three. It was two minutes before midnight, So we're eighty nine seconds till midnight, And the closest previous was two minutes. So that's you know, it's pretty drastic. And again, you know, I guess we can go ahead and mention. One of the criticisms of this is that it's it's something that just gins up some the critics will say it's something that just gins up paranoia in people and like pushes the panic button and.
What is it even doing? But what is doing? I think it's a.
Valuable thing because it just raises awareness every year with people. It's just another thing to kind of say, hey, like we're not headed in the right direction as amenity goes.
Yeah. So the first editor of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists was Eugene Rabinowitch, and Eugene Rabinowich said that the purpose of the doomsday clock is to quote frighten men into rationality and to basically say like, hey, you know, this is where this stuff's out of control. People. You need to be paying attention to these things, because they don't just say we're eighty nine seconds from midnight. See
you next year. They explain what the what the reasoning is for moving or even not moving or moving back the secondhand and this year being eighty nine seconds the closest we've ever been. They had a whole crop of issues that go well beyond the nuclear risk that was originally the clock was originally designed to track. And I say, we take a break and we come back and talk about why we're so close to midnight right now according to the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists.
All right, everyone, we're back.
We're eighty seconds to midnight, not ten minutes to midnight, like Charles Bunson was and that great movie.
What was it called ten Minutes to Midnight?
Yeah, you didn't see that one. No, you should check that out. It's got a couple of choice scenes. It's about a creepy, uh, serial killer that's he's chasing.
Oh Bronson's not the creepy serial killer. He's being chased by a creepy dude.
Charles Bunsen is always the guy on the hunt for the bad guy.
Have you ever seen Death Wish three, where like the group of pos has taken over the neighborhood.
Yeah, all the Death Wish movies.
I mean, the first one was genuinely pretty good, but they got really sort of over the top after a while.
Yeah, it's good though.
It's good. You got the Death Wish pal this is my favorite impression to do.
But I can't wait till you get your Morgan Freeman down.
Oh no, I don't think so.
All right, So how do we get eighty nine seconds to midnight? This comes direct from the bulletin website. Some we can kind of summarize a few of these. I'm just going to read outright because it's so like sort of expertly put.
But the first thing is.
The ongoing war in Ukraine, and not just that, but the nuclear risk therein involved in the third year of that conflict that you know, hopefully it doesn't go that way. Maybe things are wrapping up, but at the peak of this thing, like any weird bad decision could have led to something like that happening.
Yeah. Same with the Middle East right now that can spiral out of control and suck in nuclear powers against one another. That's a nuclear risk for sure. And then we're back to increasing the size of our nuclear arsenal, which is a reverse of what we were doing in the eighties and nineties where we were getting rid of them. That's not a good sign. And then one other thing too, and this is definitely new countries that hadn't had nukes before were basically like, well, we're never going to have
nukes because that's just not the way things are. It's changed geopolitically, and now countries are starting to think about developing their own nuclear programs, where if you have more countries with more nukes, you have that much more risk.
Yeah, for sure.
Climate change is the next thing they have listed, and you know, this one kind of speaks for itself.
We don't need to beat a dead horse.
But their take basically is that global greenhouse gas emissions are still rising. No one is doing enough to combat this. This is bringing on extreme weather and climate changed events or climate change influence events, and it's affecting people all over the world. And even if we're growing things like solar and wind, it's just not fast enough and not nearly an enough to make a dent and the damage that's being done.
Right. Also, there's the biological arena, as they put.
It the boy, This one is very scary.
That's the most mucisy arena.
Yeah, but obviously coming out of COVID and with avian the avian flu now expanding you know, to farm animals, to dairy products, human cases, all this stuff is very scary and the point of this episode isn't to scare the cred out of everybody, but it's hard to read the stuff and not get the crud scared out of you sometimes.
Yeah, also, don't leave AI on the sidelines. In their disruptive Technology part, they were like, like, yes, AI. They didn't get into the existential threat that AI itself pose. They more looked at it like, hey, some militaries are starting to incorporate AI in their like battlefield decision making, Like we're a step away from AIS deciding whether to kill or not kill and then eventually giving AIS control over our nuclear arsenals. That's not a direction we want
to be going. And then the whole thing, this is the reason why all these things that have been around for a while or have been developing for a while have been accelerated to eighty nine seconds from midnight because of the threat multiplier of misinformation and disinformation and conspiracy theories.
Yeah, and this is the one I wanted to read a part or two from this because it just kind of speaks volumes of things. They really put it very succinctly. Spread of misinformation, disinformation, and conspiracy theories that degrade the communication ecosystem increasingly blur the lines between truth and falsehood. And then they talk about AI making it even you know, we've talked about deep fake video and stuff like that, like making all that stuff just so much easier, And
then this final line is really really good. The battered information landscape is also producing leaders who discount science and endeavor to suppress fe free speech, and human rights, compromising the fact based public discussions that are required to combat
the enormous threats facing the world. So like, all of the problems that we've been listing are bad enough, and then when you've got disinformation and conspiracy theories and misinformation thrown on top of that, and AI exacerbating all that, that's when it's like they're moving that clock as close to midnight as they've ever been.
Yeah, And the reason why is because people would be under that circumstance, they're being led away from paying attention to the stuff the doomsday clock is warring against. And that just makes it that much riskier too, because we have to be paying attention to it, whether you like
it or not. For some reason, when I was researching this today, I was like, this is striking me as a little ridiculous, and like, I get the point of it, and I think it is noble and worthy, but there's also some like real, I don't know, real criticisms of it. And I found one piece by a guy named Stephen Johnson on Life Hacker and he interviewed Lawrence Krause, who's
a physicist and a member of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientist. Sorry, the New Republic interviewed Kraus and he said, it's not scientific. It's a number that's arrived at by a group of people exploring each of the questions and having a huge amount of discussion and ultimately convergence on a number. That number is frankly arbitrary. And that's true. You have to remember it's a metaphor. There's no way to measure it. Okay, for eighty nine seconds from midnight right now? How much
longer is the world going to last? And the big problem with it, I think is national geographic put it. If everything's a crisis, nothing's a crisis. So before the whole thing was created to say this one thing, nuclear proliferation, this is what we're warning about. Now you've got climate change, AI avian flu information. It's just like being piled on, and I think it's really diluted the point and the pointedness of the whole thing.
Yeah maybe, but that's also the world we're living in right now.
Yeah, but it makes it so easy to just be like, oh, well, I give up, I'm going to guess, so pay attention to I don't know, flowers versus zombies. Do people play? Let Still, I know that was the thing. I think it was at some point unless I had a fever dream.
Uh well, you didn't have a fever dream. One thing, whether or not you agree with the doomsday clock or not. One thing we can I can recommend because you're too humble too. It's a little limited podcast series called The End of the World with Josh Clark. That way you can really learn something and take a deep dive into real existential threats that face humanity.
Thanks Chuck, I appreciate that.
Holds up still great? I imagine I haven't gone back and listen to it again.
I bet it still holds up though.
Yeah. Well, because one of the number one rules and show businesses leave them wanting more, I say short stuff is out.
Stuff you should know is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts, My heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.