Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of iHeartRadio.
Hello, and welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name is Joe McCormick. My regular co host, Robert Lamb is out on vacation the day I'm recording this, but he will be back again soon. Today we've got an interview for you. This is a chat that I had with planetary scientist doctor Sabine Stanley about her twenty twenty three book called What's Hidden Inside Planets. This is a wonderfully interesting book about the science of planet formation and about what we know about the insides of planets near
and far. A quick bit of author bio before we get started here. Doctor Sabine Stanley is a distinguished planetary scientist and a key contributor to NASA's Mars Insight mission. Holding a PhD in Earth and Planetary Sciences from Harvard u University, she focuses on the complexities of planetary interiors. Currently a faculty member at a top research university, she
leads innovative studies in her specialized field. Beyond academia, Doctor Stanley is a regular speaker at international scientific conferences and serves as a consultant for various space missions. Her research has been published in leading scientific journals, earning her multiple awards for her contributions to planetary science. With a career that blends rigorous research and public engagement, Doctor Stanley remains a pivotal voice in the scientific community committed to enhancing
our cosmic understanding. So I guess now let's jump right into our conversation, Doctor Sabine Stanley, Welcome to the podcast.
Thanks so much for having me.
So I wanted to start off with the idea something you bring up in the preface of your book, which is that when non scientists look out at space and find things to get excited about, one of the things I think that really gets people stirring is the idea of an exoplanet with liquid water at the surface, or
a planet with breathable atmosphere breathable to us. And yet you say in your preface that quote, arguably a planet's interior is more important than the surface in determining a world's fitness for life or ability to withstand the pressures put on it by its home star. I think this might be really surprising to people. Could you explain this?
Sure, there are actually two parts to this I would say the first is deep inside our planet, in the iron core, we actually generate the Earth's magnetic field, and magnetic fields when they are generating the core, they come all the way out to the surface of the planet and they basically surround the planet, and our magnetic field acts as this amazing shield stopping these high energy solar
wind particles from hitting us. Now, when you have these high energy particles coming from the Sun, if they actually blast it into the planet without the magnetic field there, they would work to strip off our atmosphere. They would bring high radiation levels to the surface. It would essentially not be a really great place to live if we
didn't have our magnetic field. So one really important thing when thinking about is that planet going to be really good for say, life to form, is does it have a magnetic field and that's really created in deep inside the planet. The other aspect of this is that most of the reasons that we think the surface of Earth is so nice and habitable, right the liquid water, that breathable air, all of that is related to a kind of recycling process that happens inside Earth. Earth's water a
lot of it came from outgassing a volcano. So there's water deep inside the Earth. When you have volcanic flows bringing up magma to the surface, there's lots of gas, particles and water in that that eventually makes it out into the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide is recycled this way. Water is recycled this way. So you can't really just focus on the surface. You have to ask how does that surface interact with what's going on deep inside planet.
So when people imagine what's going on deep inside the planet and the way it affects the surface, probably what first comes to the average non scientist's mind would be like earthquakes and volcanic eruptions, But actually it's much more entangled than that.
Yeah. Absolutely, But those are also great examples of ways that the interior of our planet is really connected to how we experience the surface of a planet. Earthquakes, that's because the plates on the surface of the Earth are moving around and they descend back into the Earth at subduction zones and create these frictional spots between plates that create these earthquakes. Right.
Another great example, there's a false fact that I once knew that your book corrected me on if you had asked me what was the source of Earth's magnetic field that you were just talking about. I would have said that it was generated by the spinning of the molten liquid core around the Earth's solid iron core because of the image of spinning, and I guess there's general knowledge that sort of dynamo effect, But in the book you explained that that isn't exactly correct. That's not exactly what's
going on. So what does generate the Earth's magnetic field?
Yeah, you're absolutely right. This is a common misunderstanding out there, even some scientists have it. So it turns out in order to generate magnetic fields, you do need to have a good electrical conductor, and so having a metal like iron in this center of the Earth that helps. You do need to have it be liquid or fluid ability to move around. But the key thing is the motions that can create magnetic fields through, like this dynamo action that you talked about. Those motions have to be much
more complex than just spinning around. So it's not just that the Earth is spinning and that's causing it. It's actually these like helical type flows that occur because of the fact that the Earth is trying to cool down, so space is cold. The inside of Earth is hot. And so just like if you put a pot of soup on the stove, the bottom of the pot is hot, the top of the pot is cold. You get that
boiling action that rolling around. Same thing in the core of the Earth, you get these churning motions as the hot material at the center of the Earth tries to make it up and out to cool down the core and then the planet. So it's convection, that's what we call it. It's convection. That's the motion that's actually creating the magnetic field that Earth has.
So it's this magnetic dynamo that creates the field that can in some ways permit and sustain life on Earth. To what extent is Earth unique in this regard? What do we know about the presence of a possible dynamo in other planets or objects in our Solar system?
Yeah, great question. So lots of the other planets actually do have magnetic field. So all the giant planets, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, they all have these global magnetic fields generated by a dynamo deep inside just like Earth. The smallest of the planet's mercury also has a dynamo, and this was actually quite a surprise when it was discovered. Now, for Mars, it doesn't have a dynamo today, so it doesn't have this global MAGNETELD, but it did have one
in the past. So about four billion years ago, the rocks on the surface of Mars were magnetized from a dynamo that was active at that time. And then there's Venus. For Venus, we have no way to tell if it ever had a dynamo in the past. It does not have one today.
You bring up Venus, and there's a funny thing you mentioned toward the end of the book, which is the frustrations that Venus presents planetary scientists, especially the ones who want to study the interior of the planet. Why is Venus so frustrating? Why is it so hard to study?
Yeah, Venus is the worst planet in the Solar System. I'm just going to put that out there right now. Here's the issue, right, it's really hard to study the insides of planets. You don't have access to it. You can't drill down and study the core of a planet that way, so you have to develop all these really clever methods to try and figure out what's going on deep inside the Earth. A lot of methods that are kind of like what doctors use to figure out what's
going on inside the human body. Right, We do scans of things, we use gravity, we use magnetic fields, we use seismology. So then you try and use any of these techniques on Venus, and they don't work for a variety of different reasons. So first of all, let's say we wanted to use seismology, right, So the waves that pass through a planet when you have an earthquake, for example, on Earth, the speed of those waves is completely determined
by the material properties they are passing through. So we actually learn a lot about what the materials are inside the Earth by looking at how fast these seismic waves travel through it. You want to do this on Venus, Sorry, the surface is a horrible temperature, and the atmosphere is made of sulphuric acid, and the pressure is ninety two atmospheric pressures, so it's just the materials are just going to melt and dissolve basically, so no chance to do that.
Then you try and use a magnetic field, right, Having a magnetic field is a great way to learn about the interior of a planet. As soon as you know a planet has a global magnetic field, you know, it's got a liquid molten electrical conductor in its interior, and it's got those churning motions. Well, Venus doesn't have that,
so we can't use that. And you try and say, okay, well, why don't we just observe the surface and look at the rotation of the surface, for example, while Venus has this horribly opaque atmosphere that you can't actually look through and try to do that. And then one of my favorite things about Venus is that when you look at all the planets, all the planets, you know we talk about planets being spheres, they're not spheres. They're actually kind
of bulgy oblate spheroids, we call them. So they're fatter across the equator than they are at the poles, and that bulging of the equator is because of the fact that the planet's spin. Now we can use that information how bulgey a planet is to actually tell what material is inside it, how dense it is inside it. And you go and try and do this at Venus, and Venus is rotating so slowly that it basically has no bulge.
So we can't use that either. Basically, Venus is just very frustrating doesn't want us to know anything about its interior.
So there's a great section in the chapter Gazing Outward where in this chapter you're talking about the formation of our Solar System from the orig original molecular cloud that came together to make the Sun and the planets the protoplanetary disc. And you talk about how the interesting ways the connections between the features of that initial cloud and features of the current Solar System and even everyday life
on Earth. So, for example, the elemental composition of that vast cloud determines the elements that make our Solar System, but also more interesting and subtle things like how the slight initial rotation of that cloud governs so much about our world. Could you talk about some of these connections between the properties of the cloud and the way the Solar System is now?
Yeah? Absolutely, So. I remember once sitting there and just thinking, you know, okay, yeah, we know that the planet's orbit around the Sun, we know that the planets are spinning. Why is everything spinning all right? Why don't doesn't anything just stay still? And the answer has to do with this great concept in physics called angular momentum conservation. So basically, you can't just change the spin of something without putting a lot of torque on it, like forcing it. Right.
And so then you put something out in the middle of nowhere, a molecular cloud, right, and you don't have anything really torquing it or anything, and you ask, well, how much spin is it going to have? And it's going to have some random amount, right, like nothing's perfectly isolated and still, so you take all those particles in the molecular cloud and you add up all their spins, and a lot of them will cancel out. Someone will be spinning in one direction, other particles will be spinning
in the other direction. And you add it all up and it almost all cancels out except for a little bit. And that little bit in a molecular cloud. Here's the amazing thing. Once gravity gets hold of that molecular cloud, it starts gravitationally collapsing to eventually form our solar system. That amount of spinning just increases and increases and increases as the cloud gets smaller and smaller and smaller. And you have a total understanding. People have a total understanding
of this effect. If you've ever watched, for example, figure skaters who are about to do a jump with a spin it and they pull their arms in. As soon as you make something more compact, it spins faster, even though you don't do anything to it. And the same thing happened to the molecular cloud. As it became smaller and smaller and smaller, it spin faster and faster and faster. And that's what led to all the spinning we have in the Solar System now. And this is true not
just of our Solar System. We can look out and see other Solar systems forming. We can see other planets around other stars. They're all spinning too. It's all the kind of we share that among all the planets.
We call the roughly spherical objects that orbit stars planets, and we call the objects that orbit planets moons. But are there any other material differences between a planet and the moon? Are there even any trends?
Yeah, it's a great question. So moons can be complicated. So in reality, if you're someone like me who's interested in the interior of planets, you're just as happy to consider moon's planets. Right, Moons for their they're made of similar stuff. They have the same laws of physics that govern their interior. We have moons that have magnetic fields. Ganymede, which is a moon of Jupiter, actually has a magnetic field generated in its core. So we study the same
processes on these bodies. Where moons can be a little bit different than planets, there's a lot bigger possibility of where they came from compared to where they ended up. So for example, the rocky planets in the Inner Solar System, Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, they all pretty much formed close to where they are now. Some moons actually come from very far away and then get trapped in the gravitational field of a planet and then become a moon there. And that happens a lot,
for example in the Outer Solar System. So if you look at Jupiter or Neptune or any of these planets, some of their moons are on these really weird orbits. They're like orbiting in the opposite direction as the planet is spinning. They're not around the equator at all. And those moons we think are actually captured basically comets. They're captured comets or asteroids that were doing their own thing got gravitationally kicked into the Solar System a little bit
close in and then got trapped around a planet. So you can actually find some bodies orbiting these planets that were probably formed much further away, and so in that sense, that's a little bit different than what you see with planets.
One of the most shocking facts that you discussed in the book concerns the formation of the Earth's moon. Now, I know the leading theory on the formation of the Earth's moon is the giant impact idea, but specifically, the thing that you introduced to me was how rapidly the Earth's moon was probably formed according to the leading theory of its origin. Could you explain this.
Yeah, this blows my mind. By the way, so we're somewhat I think people have heard of this theory that something about the size of Mars, usually called they crashed into Earth, had this kind of glancing impact into pro to Earth Earth. This was like four point five billion years ago, and that crash caused some of that body and some of the Earth to get kind of blasted off the surface of the planet and small chunks were
put into orbit. And then you ask the question, Okay, so now you have this disk of material surrounding the Earth. How long did it take for that disk of material to become the Moon a single object? Now, that disk of material followed the same laws of physics as the planet's forming out of the disc. Initially on gravity caused collisions. Some of those collisions caused things to clump together. Eventually, the Moon grew and grew and grew, and estimates suggest
it took forty years for this to happen. Now, when you're talking about things in astronomy and in Earth science, you're working on millions of years, billions of years. Those are the types of lengths of time we're used to. So talking about a process that takes forty years is
just shocking. And so I always have this image in my head, and this is obviously impossible because it was four point five billion years ago, But I have this image in my head of like some parents sitting down with their kids and the parents going, you know, when I was your age, there was no moon in the sky kind of thing, right like that. It's on a human generational timescale that this changed.
That's truly unbelievable. And you actually mentioned several other things about the Moon that I didn't quite know about and were so interesting one is that it's a parent magnitude from the Earth was larger initially, I guess because it was closer. But you also mentioned something called a fossil bulge in the moon. Could you explain these?
So when the Moon formed, it was much closer to the Earth, and since then it's been slowly receding away from the Earth. And we can even measure this change in distance of the Moon to the Earth. And that's happening because of really interesting gravitational interaction between the Moon
and the Earth. And it's the same reason, for example, that the Moon only shows us one face, so tidal interactions, the fact that you know, the Earth's not a perfect sphere, the Moon's not a perfect sphere, and they tug on each other when are not kind of facing the right way. That has caused the Moon to start moving further away. It's also caused the Earth to start slowing down its rotation a little bit, and so over time, the Moon's moving further away and it's going to make it smaller
and smaller and smaller. And one reason we know all of this is that the moon, if you look at how bulgy it is, Like I talked about how spinning objects have this bulge on them. The Moon is too bulgy for how fast it's spinning right now, and the only way to explain that is it must have been spinning faster in the past. And the only way for it to have been spinning faster in the past is if it was much closer to the Earth, because we
know it's locked. It's day is locked to the Earth's you know, it's always facing the Earth the same side, so it had to have a much faster spin in order to get that bulge that it had.
With exoplanets, we often hear about the habitable zone of a star, the area of the distance out from a star that we believe there could be the conditions possible for life to arise. But an interesting fact you mentioned is that if a faraway exoplanet astronomer we're looking at our Solar system, they would see not one but three planets within our habitable zone, Earth, Venus, and Mars. But neither of the other two planets, Mars or Venus are
especially hospitable now, and Venus is really inhospitable. So what does that tell us about looking for exoplanets that could sustain life elsewhere?
I think it tells us that we have to be a little more subtle in how we figure out whether a planet is a good candidate for some of that might have life or not. Right, totally, get why we are using these criteria right now. Right, what's the distance from a planet star at which the temperatures are just right so that water could be liquid on the surface if there was water there. That's kind of the condition
we're using now. But as mentioned, planets are complicated, and you could have a planet that comple letly changes its surface temperature through a greenhouse, a runaway greenhouse effect. That's what happened on Venus. Right, Venus is getting not that much more heat from the Sun as we are, but it happened to go through this climate process, this runaway greenhouse that made the temperture on the surface incredibly hot and not able to sustain any water. The water all
evaporated off of Venus. So we have to be a little bit more careful. We need to understand the dynamics of what's going on inside the bodies and outside, because that's what creates the atmospheres. Another great example of this, I think we also need to kind of broaden the search for habitable worlds, let's say, because if you look in our Solar system, aside from Earth, the next best place to possibly look for where life might form are actually in the water oceans of some of the moons
in the outer Solar System. Now, these oceans are buried like miles beneath the surface, but they're liquid water, they have energy sources, they have complex carbon molecules, all the kind of ingredients that we think might be important for life. So I think we need to think more carefully about what the conditions are for life on exoplanets out there, and we might end up finding life in places we didn't expect.
So when trying to understand what's inside planets, we've talked about using detection methods for like magnetic fields and seismic research and things like that. But what can isolated pieces of physical evidence like meteorites and diamonds tell us about how planets are formed and what's inside them.
Yeah, this is one of my favorite things in the world. So I'm going to start with the diamonds thing. We really would like to actually have samples from deep inside the Earth, because that would be the best way to study it. It's impossible to do this, we can't drill deeper than about eight miles or something like that, right, and the earth goes down about almost three thousand miles, right,
So this is just not possible, luckily for us. Sometimes the Earth brings samples from the deep up to the surface, and one thing it does is it brings up diamonds. Lots of people know about diamonds because they're important in say the jewelry industry, things like that, And when you're someone who's a jeweler, what you really care about are these pure diamonds, the things that are just pure carbon
and diamond form. When you're a geologist or someone who's studying the in tier of the earth, you want the impure diamonds. You want the diamonds where some little bit of the interior of the Earth got stuck in the middle of the diamond as it was forming. And because diamonds are so hard, they actually maintain their pressure, and so when they come up to the surface, that little bit of material from deep inside the Earth actually stays
preserved in the inside of that diamond. And so we can actually study materials how they are in the deep interior of the Earth by looking at these inclusions in the diamonds when they come to the surface. So that's one thing. Now, meteorites are like the best Christmas gift anyone could ever get from other planets. Right. Basically, you have some sort of collision or something that happened far away that caused a piece of a planet or an
asteroid to get knocked off. Eventually that piece of the asteroid came near Earth and some of it landed on Earth and we can go and collect it. That's rarely where you have samples of the insides of other planets, and we even have meteorites that are very iron rich that come from the cores of previous planetary asteroid like bodies that got broken up. So one of the best pieces of evidence we have for what's in our core is actually looking at the cores of other bodies. They're
all very similar. They all have this iron rich cores that eventually come to Earth and we get to study them.
This reminds me there's an object that you mentioned several times in the book that I feel like I can tell you are especially excited about, and it is the asteroid sixteen Psyche. What makes Psyche so exciting?
So, first of all, there is a mission on its way to Psyche right now, So we are going to study this asteroid up close and personal, and I'm very excited about that. I think in our Solar System, we're used to different kinds of worlds. Right You've got the rocky worlds of the inner planets in the Solar System, You've got the gas giants like that Are and Saturn. You've got the water worlds like you're in a a Neptune, and even some of the moons we can consider water
World's Europa Enceladus moons like that. Sixteen. Psyche is a metal world. So this is a body that is mostly made of iron. It's mostly metal, and we just haven't seen that before. And I'm really excited about what it's going to be like to go look at this thing and you know, answer questions like, hmm, what does a crater look like on a body that's mostly made of metal? Is? What does a volcano look like on this thing? Does it have a magnetic field? What's really going on on
the surface. So it's very exciting. It's a new type of planetary body that we've never gotten to see up close and personal.
I think you mentioned the idea of a metal volcano. That's a real thing. What does that mean?
We're going to find out, But imagine this is you know, this is an asteroid that's big enough that it could have stuff going on in the interior. You could have some of them iron from the interior being liquid and getting kind of taken up out of the interior onto the surface at these volcanic vents. So, yeah, we might get to see a metal volcano up close.
Coming back to looking inside planets, if you go beyond Earth and even beyond the rocky planets, one of the most fascinating questions to ponder is what's inside the gas planets and the ice giants. I suspect you've seen the many variations on the article or video. What is it
like to fall into Jupiter or something like that. It's clearly a captivating question because we see these outer cloud layers and there's just this you question, like, obviously, you imagine you're denser than some outer part of that cloud layer and you could sync down into it, and you've got to wonder what's inside. So what do we know about what is inside the gas giants and the ice giants?
Yeah, this is one of my favorite things to talk about. So we are so accustomed to how materials behave in the types of conditions we have here on the surface of the Earth. If I just say the word water, you have a natural instinctive reaction to what water is. It's either that liquid in my glass, or maybe it's frozen on some ice somewhere, or it's water vapor that's causing fog. Right, you put water under the high pressures and high temperatures that are deep inside planets, it's a
completely different beast. Same thing is true for hydrogen. So let's start there. Hydrogen the most kind of the simplest element we have, thing that we're used to being in gaseous form. Now in Jupiter and in Saturn. As you keep descending into the planet, temperatures are rising, you get to millions of degrees, you can get to millions of atmospheres of pressure. Hydrogen is a very different material under that pressure, and in fact, is you squeeze a hydrogen molecule,
you basically allow So imagine hydrogen molecule. You got a proton at the center and the nucleus, and you got this electron floating around. You squeeze enough of those close together the electrons essentially get freed from the protons and you create what's called what we call a metal. So you can actually have metallic hydrogen going on inside Jupiter and Saturn, and it's a great electrical Conductor's actually where Jupiter creates its magnetic field, same with Saturn. So that's
kind of a material we're not expected. Interestingly, helium take another one, the second most simple element we have, helium. You do the same thing. The helium. Turns out that in the outer layers of Jupiter and Saturn in the atmosphere, helium and hydrogen are nicely mixed. Right. It's kind of like if you put salt in water or sugar in water warm water and you stir it. They're nicely mixed. You can't kind of separate them, but you put them
under high enough pressure. When this hydrogen becomes a nice metal, the helium no longer wants to stay mixed in it, and so helium will actually kind of exolt out of the hydrogen and become these droplets, and then helium's heavier than hydrogen, so they drop out. It rains helium inside
Jupiter and Saturn. So I think that's really cool. Then you get to the ice giants, where you have a lot more complicated molecules methane, ammonia, and you say, okay, what happens to those things under high pressure, and you can get things, for example, like super ionic water that's actually formed in where all the oxygen atoms form a nice lattice and all the hydrogen the protons that would make up water in the H two O flow freely between it, something we've never seen on the surface of
the Earth. And you can even make a diamond ocean deep inside Neptune and Uranus. It's been hypothesized that the carbon in things like carbon dioxide and methane ends up in the diamond phase deep inside, but then it melts, so you actually get a liquid diamond ocean. Diamond actually has this really cool property that water on the surface of the Earth also has, and that's right near that
freezing point. The solid phase is slightly less dense than the liquid phase, which is why we have, for example, icebergs that can float on water. Here. The same is true deep inside Uranus and Neptune. Diamond bergs would actually float on a diamond seed deep inside Uranus and Neptune. So these are just material behavior that we just have no experience with here on the surface of the Earth, and I love thinking about it.
Yeah, simultaneously wonderful and frustrating that it violates our intuition, so you can't really picture it. You want to be able to, but you can't with the idea of superheated ices and things like that. But it reminds me of actually things closer to home. You talk about other ways that even the interior of the Earth also violates our
intuitions about how materials work. For example, I think there's a part in the book where you talk about how it's hard for people to understand sometimes that parts of the mantle migrate up and down even though the mantle is solid not liquid. Is that right?
That's absolutely right. So I think there's also a big misunderstanding out there that you think because you see at volcanos, you see this magma coming up being all liquid, you think that means that the interior of the earth, the mantle, is all liquid, And that's absolutely not true. The rock inside the mantle of the Earth is solid, it's very solid.
That doesn't mean it can't flow. So we do see that rock move around, it moves on really slow timescales, so it can take hundreds of millions of years for a rock to make it from say the core mantle boundary, up to the surface of the Earth. But it does flow, it does move around, and the only reason we see it in its liquid state at the surface is because it was under a lot of pressure deep inside the Earth. Pressures increase incredibly as you go down, and so that
it was basically pressure frozen. It was basically made a solid because of the high pressure, and then you bring that up to the surface and you release the pressure and everything kind of expands out and becomes the magma the liquid that you see.
There is a strange feature Towards the end of your book. There's a great section where you just sort of like explore all of the different strange aspects of planets, especially like the ice giants and the gas giants. So you talk about the helium ray and the diamond rain. You also talk about why Uranus and Neptune have strange multi polar magnetic fields. Does does that mean? Where does that come from?
Imagine back to when we only really knew about the Earth's magnetic field, right, and Earth's magnetic field the most common feature about it is it looks like a die pole. So there's a north pole and there's a south pole, and the magnetic field lines connect them. When we started exploring other planetary bodies, we started to see this happen a lot. So Jupiter and Saturn also very dipolar. Mercury dipolar.
When the Voyager two mission, which was the only mission that we have that has gone out to Uranus and Neptune and basically just flew by for a little while, when it got to first Urinus, which is closer, it didn't see a dipolar field. It saw this multipolar fields. There were a bunch of North poles and a bunch of South poles all over the planet. I remember reading about some of this history of when this happened in
the eighties, and people, you know, weren't expecting that. So the first question you have is, all, well, maybe maybe something broke, maybe the magnetometer is not working properly or something like that, and they did lots of tests and
they make sure that wasn't the case. Then you get out to Neptune and it's also this multipolar field, and so you got to say, hmm, well, were we just wrong about the fact that magnetic fields are supposed to be dipolar, and the fact that Uranus and Neptune happen to be the only water rich planets in the Solar System, these ice giants, and they happen to be the only ones with multipolar fields, then you got to start saying, maybe there's a causal relationship with there, right, So I've
spent a lot of time thinking about that and trying to think about how you create multipolar fields in an ice giant, And it turns out that there are some features in an ice giant that might make multipolar fields more likely to occur. Turns out that the dynamo region can be really thin in these bodies, so you just have this really thin shell where the conditions are just right for convection to occur in a good electrical conductor and create a magnetic field. When you have this really
thin shell, you can't make big global dipolar fields. Nothing's communicating the right way. All the length skills are too small. So maybe you get more multipolar fields that way. People are still studying this that we're really looking forward to new mission, hopefully to Uranus sometime in the next decade, so that we can study the magnetic field up close and the interior of the planet, so that we can understand the connection.
We have a basic idea of the types of planets that can exist from our own Solar system. We have, you know, the inner rocky planets. We have the gas giants, we have the ice giants, and then we have these other planets that we're familiar with from looking at other stars, like the hot Jupiters and the super earths and so forth. But there is a new planet type that you introduced me to in this book. I don't think i'd ever heard of it before, the hypothetical carbon planet. That sounds
so strange. What is the deal with this?
Yeah, you know, it's interesting when you look in our Solar system, and let's say you look at the rocks inside the Earth. They're mostly made of what we call silicates, so they have silicon and oxygen atoms combined together, magnesium silicates, aluminum silicates. This is kind of what defines the chemistry of the rocks on the Earth, and all of that was determined by the ratio of carbon to oxygen to magnesium in the protoplanetary disk that formed and eventually became
all the materials we have. Now, if you go to some other solar systems out there, they might have slightly different ratios. And if nebula out there that eventually forms a star with planets around it happened to have a little bit more carbon, then the types of rocks that you form, the types of minerals that you form, can be very different, and you can actually create planets that are mostly made of carbon, that have a much higher
carbon content than what we have here on Earth. It's a geologist kind of like dreamscape to think about, what if the chemistry was just slightly different because there's just a little bit more of some tiny sub element. Right, Remember, our solar system was mostly hydrogen and helium, and it was just little bits of these rocks that eventually became the Earth. And now you just slightly tweak the ratio of those elements in extrasolar planets and you could create completely different worlds.
Last question. You already mentioned why the upcoming study of asteroid sixteen Psyche is going to be so exciting, but what are some of the other upcoming missions and experiments that you think are likely to teach us the most about planetary science. What are you most excited to learn in the near future.
Okay, there are two missions that I'm most excited about, and I actually have nothing to do with these missions, so I'm just a super fan of these missions. The first one is the Europa Clipper mission, which is going to go to a moon of Jupiter named Europa, scheduled launch next year. And Europa is an exciting place because it's this icy moon of Jupiter and we know that it has a liquid water ocean buried beneath the surface, and we think it has all the ingredients you might
think of as necessary for life. So the plan is to go there and see try to get a sense of what that ocean is made of. Are there complex molecules in there that are kind of what we would consider the building blocks of life, things like that. So that's one really exciting. The other one is actually another moon. There's a mission called Drag and Fly, which is scheduled. Yeah, you know it's going to be a good mission when it has a cool name, right, So Dragonfly is scheduled
to go to Saturn's moon Titan. Now Titan, in my opinion, is probably one of the coolest places in the Solar System to think about. It's the only other planetary body out there to have nitrogen as its main based thick atmosphere. So the Earth is the other planet, right, so it has some similarities to it. It's the only other body out there that we have seen liquids running on the surface. So just like on Earth we have rivers and seas and oceans, Titan has rivers and seas and oceans on
the surface. Now there's a catch, they're not water. Those rivers and season oceans are actually made of things like methane and ethane, so not you know, fun places. But Titan has this thick atmosphere and it's also incredibly small, so it has a really low gravity. So my favorite fact about Titan is that it's really easy to fly there. So you could strap some cardboard on your arms and flap them on the surface of Titan could fly right. So this is amazing. So the Dragonfly mission has decided
to take advantage of it. So it's sending essentially an octacopper, so it's two quad copters, so think of a helicopter, but with eight different blade things. It's sending this thing out there. It's going to be able to land on the surface, do a bunch of science and then take off again, look around, figure out where it wants to go next, travel quite long distances, and then land again
and do more science. So this is going to be the first time we're able to study this world very locally, right, like touch it, and also fly around to very different parts of it. And Titans exciting because it has all the building blocks of life. We know there's a liquid water ocean underneath. We know it has complex chemicals, those hydrocarbons like methane and ethane. We know it has energy sources.
So we really want to understand a lot of the processes that we think are important in the creation of life are going to be happening on Titan, and we're excited to study them up close.
Doctor Sabine Stanley, thank you so much for joining us today. It's been a real pleasure to talk.
Thanks so much.
This was fun, all right. If you would like to check out the book for yourself again, it is called What's Hidden Inside Planets from twenty twenty three, available in audiobook form as well if that's your medium of choice. Quick note about our show if you are new to it. Stuff to Blow your Mind is a science and culture podcast with core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays of every week. Usually I'm joined by my co host, Robert Lamb. He's out on vacation this week, but he will be back
again soon, let's see. Mondays of each week we read back messages from the Stuff to Blow your Mind email address, which I'll give out in just a moment. On Wednesdays of each week, we feature a short form scripted podcast called The Artifact or the Monster Fact or even There are some new types of facts coming online. You'll learn about them soon. Also, we have a show that airs every Friday that is a movie. This is sort of a more informal thing that Rob and I do every Friday.
It is called Weird House Cinema, where we just watch and discuss strange films, good or bad, well known or obscure. We take them all weird movies on Weird House Cinema, and then on Saturdays we run an episode from the Vault, an older episode of the show. Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway. If you would like to get in touch with us with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest a topic for
the future, or just to say hello. You can email us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.
Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listening to your favorite shows. Ratt