From the Vault: Play the Record Backwards, Part 1 - podcast episode cover

From the Vault: Play the Record Backwards, Part 1

Nov 11, 202357 min
--:--
--:--
Listen in podcast apps:

Episode description

In this classic episode of Stuff to Blow Your Mind, Robert is joined by Rusty Needle’s Record Club host Seth Nicholas Johnson for a discussion of various means of secreting information into audio, from backmasking and locked grooves to examples from the digital age of music. (originally published 11/29/2022)

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

Hey, you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb. In today's vault episode for you, because it is Saturday, we have a classic episode. This is Play the Record Backwards Part one. It originally published eleven nine, twenty twenty two. This is one that I did with the former producer Seth Nicholas Johnson back during Joe's parental leave. So I hope you enjoy part one of this series.

Speaker 2

Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of iHeartRadio.

Speaker 1

Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb.

Speaker 3

And I'm Seth Nicholas Johnson.

Speaker 1

Seth is of course the producer of Stuff to Blow Your Mind, but he also co hosts the music podcast

Rusty Needles Record Club. Today's episode is going to be something of a crossover episode because we're going to be talking about Stuff to Blow your Mind type stuff, but this one is going to veer directly into vinyl record territory for I think a large a large portion of the episode, and especially when you get into that area, I'm really going to have to defer to you, Seth, being the master of records that you are, and with myself being someone who was told from an early age

not to touch records, yes, and being an obedient child, I obeyed everyone on that and I have virtually not touched any vinyl my entire life, because that's what grown ups are supposed to do.

Speaker 3

You know, it's not actually a bad rule to make for children, because you know, they are very delicate. And not only do I manufacture vinyl on my own, which has taught me a lot about it, but also I run a record label, so I've had it pressed at vinyl factories, and I'm a big vinyl collector on my own, and even me very familiar with what you should and shouldn't touch. Basically, only touch the rim and the label,

never touch the grooves. Even I just because I'm a human being, I'll be clumsy and drop something and it'll like scratch against an edge and like, well that's ruined forever, you know, So I can't imagine in trusting that to a child. You know, That's why children's records are always just scratched into oblivion. So so you know, I understand, and I also understand why even adults have are hesitance to jump into that world.

Speaker 1

But I also see the attraction of it. Obviously. I mean on Weird House Cinema episodes are always pointing out which movies score has been re released in some sort of strange, ultra rare vinyl release, and it's often beautiful just from a packaging standpoint, but also when you get down to the details of the record pressing, like, I see the appeal of it. So it's not for lack of occasionally thinking, hey I could, I could start getting

into vinyl. But yeah, just from an early age, I was told shouldn't touch that, and I agree.

Speaker 3

I mean, it's wonderful for forcing yourself to be actually involved in what you're consuming musically, that's my favorite part about vinyl. Sure, the sound quality is better, there's no getting around that. It is better. But in addition to that, I love that I need to put the record on the little turntable, I need to turn on my stereo, got to put the needle in the groove, I need to wait fifteen to thirty minutes, flip it over, put

it back on the other side. You know, like I have an active interest in what I'm listening to, and therefore it makes me appreciate it more. It's just like eating sunflower seeds. You know, cracking open the shells is half the fun.

Speaker 1

You know. Okay, so you get that Tack Kyle experience with it.

Speaker 3

It's not just a passive series of zeros and ones being pre chosen by an algorithm. I chose this record, I'm putting it on. I'm making these noises happen in my own small contribution way.

Speaker 1

So in this episode, we're going to be talking in general about things hidden in music. You might think of them as easter eggs or any other number of terms. You might use hidden messages if you'd rather. And we'll also be talking about accusations and panics associated with some of these techniques, the psychology involved, and specific examples from music history.

Speaker 3

And as we explain these various record based techniques, I will give some real world examples of them that you can find in your local record store and that hey, I think you should listen to, because I think every example I give is something that I'm like, Yes, I recommend this, go check it out.

Speaker 1

Excellent. Yeah, And some of these examples are going to come up are things that were mentioned in papers I'll be citing, but they're obviously ones In many cases you were very familiar with and you can perhaps give a

little more background on right. All right, So the first stop is going to take us back before musical recording was possible, or at least to a time when the main way to record music was at least via media was to put it on paper, was to write down the music, and even then a certain amount of musical encoding is possible. So we have to be reminded that music is information. So it shouldn't come as a surprise that hidden information can be present in music in ways

that pre date analog or digital media. Not getting into what's possible with language itself, because obviously, you know any given song's lyrics in any given language, there's going to be enough complexity there that you can hide things that you can sort of get across points Subliminally. You can use metaphors. I mean, all the weapons of language are at your disposal if you at all know how to

use them when you're crafting lyrics. But beyond that, we can certainly look at examples of musical cryptograms, because basically musical symbols and musical notes can and have been used in substitution ciphers. And we've talked about substitution ciphers on pasted up of stuff to blow your mind. When musical theorists in the West began to assign letter names to notes, steering I believe the ninth century CE, it also became

possible to turn things around. Though it wasn't until I believe the Romantic period and beyond that that this was really explored. So you might be wondering, well, okay, what are you talking about here with the obviously we have notes, we have an play, an a play, A B natural, et cetera. And this is where we see a great example of this, and this is one that I mentioned

a number of you're familiar with. The famed Baroque composer Johann Sebastian Bach, who lived sixteen eighty five through seventeen fifty, would employ what we call the Bach motif. So that's a B flat an A A C and then a B natural. Now you might say, well, well that's a B A C B that's meaningless. Well, in German, a B flat is B and a B natural is H, thus spelling out Bach.

Speaker 3

Clever.

Speaker 1

Maybe maybe once you've it's been explained, maybe a little too obvious, but but yeah, there it's an example where he decided to using the system in place to label these different sounds, to then turn it around and write his no own name in the music itself. And there are numerous other examples of this from other composers.

Speaker 3

You know, I've actually looked this up before because it is it's a fun idea to communicate with the sounds

of notes. In fact, I remember there was a gosh I believe it was a scene in the Paul Thomas Anderson film Magnolia where they're on like a game show and these are like what these are things you'll bring to a picnic and they'll just play notes and they'll like spell out the words, so like egg, I'll bring an egg, that kind of thing, you know, like it's it's something you can do and it's fun, it's puzzley, it's it's good times. So I've looked this up in

the past. There are approximately, especially if you include the h as a part of it, around two hundred words that you can spell using just musical notes. You know, things like cabbage head. You know, like these things, these things are possible, they're a part of that language. So I think it would be difficult, but I bet you could form a message you could form sentences and you know, we'll talk more about more examples right now.

Speaker 1

Yeah, yeah, I mean, because you're essentially talking about music obsessed individuals, total music nerds in different ages, just eventually getting in there and just experimenting with what they could do, be it something that was about creating new sound, elevating the art, etc. Or just having a laugh, and that's those two ideas seem to run throughout the history of

this kind of hidden messages in music activity. There are also older examples of musical cryptograms, including the work of Renaissance musician Jocquin de Prez lived fourteen fifty five through fifteen twenty one. He was a French Flemish composer and he composed a particular work, this is Missa Hercules du Ferrari. It was for the Duke of Ferrara, and the music is derived from the musical letters in the Duke's name, a musical cryptogram that was later known as the Soghetto cavato.

Another example, American occultist Paul Foster Case would create a cryptogram in the twentieth century that made use of esoteric symbols and concepts and if I understand what I was reading on it correctly. It used occult symbols Hebrew and Latin to translate a word into notes, though the usage

here would be more ceremonial than anything. But one of several examples will be touching on that either is within the realm of the occult or we'll touch on examples later that are more in the area of sort of like foe occultism or accusations of occultism, etc.

Speaker 3

So those are all excellent examples, but let's give our audience one more that's a bit more modern something. Then they can go find a record of right now, the nineteen seventy seven album Let There Be Rock by ACDC. They close with a song called a Whole Lot of Rosie where the primary guitar riff goes aca daca or akkadaka, which is acdc's nickname in their home country of Australia.

Speaker 1

Ah, that's impressive. I had no idea about that, huh, so John Sebastian Bach. Also, the members of ACDC all all the same brain when it comes to coding the songs here.

Speaker 3

Yes, shoulder to shoulder.

Speaker 1

So there are just a few brief examples to demonstrate what is It was possible even before analog and digital media becomes involved in the scenario. But at this point

let's move on to some more analog examples. So the first thing we're going to look at with actual recorded audio is something that I'm sure many, if not most, of you are familiar with at this point, either by virtue of various panics over popular music, especially satanic panic, and its reverberations through media from everything from horror movies

to supernatural television shows and so forth. But also it impacts actual record an actual recording practice, an actual production practice, a technique known as back masking.

Speaker 3

So before we.

Speaker 1

Get into any actual examples of back masking or allegations of back masking, and this is where it gets, it gets very weird because it seems like on the surface you would think, well, either you're doing it or you're not doing it, and if you're doing it, truly it's provable. But it gets a little more ambiguous than that. So in simple terms, this is reversing audio, especially recordings of human speech, playing it backwards in a recording. In many cases,

you know you know it when you hear it. Basic backward speech, which is also sometimes utilized in media for like alien words or arcane spells and so forth. A lot of times it's used for creepy effects. And I think we all we you know it when you hear it. You can hear this this sound effect, and it's it's people speaking backwards. That's what it is.

Speaker 3

It's almost unfortunate that we're all so familiar with it at this point, because back in the old days, before you know, before we all walked around with computers in our pockets and we all have the ability to record ourselves whenever we wanted, it must have truly sounded foreign. You know. It's here audio played backwards, and it's been like, wow, what is that. I've never heard any creature make that noise before. And now when we hear it, we just go, oh,

that's that's reversed audio. We know what it sounds like, you know, we know, we know the hallmarks of it.

Speaker 1

Yeah, And I guess with with actual reversed audio, they're like one of two things happens. It just sounds weird and cool and sounds like dark magic and so forth. And I think that's especially nowadays, that's how most of us hear it. But also the brain can't help but lean into it and sometimes try and hear things in it,

and that gets into a whole other area. Now, the other side of the equation we mentioned allegations of back masking, erroneous back masking, arguments that especially dangerous seeming rock bands of previous decades, the idea that they were actually back masking in a way so that what sounds like just normal lyrics can be reversed and have a totally different meaning, usually one that is satanic.

Speaker 3

Or sometimes not. There's a great episode of The Simpsons where a joke is made that Paul McCartney snuck in a recipe for lentil soup into Maybe I'm Amazed. We have to play it backwards to hear it. And here's actually the really fun part. Over the closing credits of that episode of The Simpsons, they do play maybe I'm amazed. This is actually a famous episode. This is the one where Least becomes a vegetarian.

Speaker 1

This episode, that's a great episode.

Speaker 3

Yes, and so in that episode they do play maybe I'm Amazed over the closing credits. And if you actually record the closing credits audio and reverse it, they really did insert a recipe for lentil soup into that song. It's wonderful.

Speaker 1

Wow.

Speaker 3

Yeah, I had no idea the real song only in the Simpsons episode Wow.

Speaker 1

So it shouldn't surprise anyone that this practice goes back pretty much as long as we've had the ability to record in playback speech. In fact, I was reading, you know, there's a book titled Language, Myths, Mysteries and Magic from twenty fourteen, and there's an article in there I'm backmasking by Karen stoles Now, and the author points out that this actually goes all the way back to Thomas Edison around eighteen seventy seven, as the noted American inventor and

businessman would experiment with playing music backwards. I think, notably a whistled version of Yankee Doodle Dandy, and this would have been used via tinfoil phonograph recordings. He observed that music quote is still melodious in many cases, and some of the strains are sweet and novel, but all together different from the song reproduced in the right way. And I think this is a realization that certainly someone like Thomas Edison was in a position to acknowledge and admire

back then. And then there's kind of been a wave of it throughout audio history and certainly nowadays. I'd never really looked at this before, but if you go on like YouTube, you'll find so many examples of people taking music and reversing like whole albums, just to play it backwards and see what happens. Sometimes they have a specific thing they're going for, maybe they're after something in the lyrics, or it's one of the cases that we'll be touching

on later on in this episode. But other times, especially with I saw the number of ambient albums, people just want to experience the album. I love both both the forwards and backwards.

Speaker 3

I've got another little recommendation to throw in here. Okay, So there is a wonderful musician and his name his real name is Dave Portner, but he goes by av Tair. Av Tair is most famously from the band Animal Collective, but he has a wonderful solo career as well. There was a time when he was married to one of the members of the band Moom and her name was

Krea Brecken. Okay, so they released while they were married a collaborative album together called Pull Hair Rabbi All right, now, when this album first leaked back in the days when like leaking was a big issue. Folks would listen to it and they were like, oh, this is a bad leak. It sounds like the entire album is played backwards. Someone let me know when you get a real version of the leak. Well, av Tair himself came onto these boards

and was like, no, no, that's the real version. When he and his wife had finished recording their album, they decided, you know, the entire album sounds better if you play it backwards. So what became a pretty straightforward folk album became a pretty foreign sounding backwards album and it's wonderful. It's called pull Hair Rubbi. I highly recommend it, and

it sounds almost instrumental. It sounds very foreign, and it sounds very strange because once they did reverse it initially and they decided, yes, this whole album just will be backwards versions of every single song, then they did start leaning into that. They made special decisions that really highlighted those choices, and it worked out really well. Genuinely, it's a wonderful album. I think people should.

Speaker 1

Listen to it on a very I guess, kind of simple level. It reminds me a lot of what's going on with AI and creativity nowadays, be it with text or visuals, where you have a level of human creativity that's going into the machine, it's getting spat out in some form, and then there's going to be a certain amount of tweaking, either after tweaking to the resulting material or then going back and seeing, Okay, now I see

what the technology does to what I started with. What can I do to optimally change the results and make it even more in line with what I'm trying to create.

Speaker 3

I think this has been something that's an element of creativity the people have used forever, which is just taking some of the decisions out of the hands of the creator to help influence something else, whether it be like those you know, those like cut up practices where you're trying to write lyrics, so you write little words, put them in a hat and pull them out one by one, or you know those famous Brian Eno cards where there's like difference like prompts written on each card that you

pull out, and that's supposed to help you with your production process. Like you know, there's lots of examples of this, and yeah, no, I think you're absolutely right. I think AI and intentional reversing just takes a few of those decisions out of the hands of the artist.

Speaker 1

Now stalls Now also shares another example from Edison. Edison and his colleagues were apparently also fond of making recordings of someone saying mad dog and playing it backwards so that it sounded like God damn. And this was not any kind of early satanic record recording. This was apparently just pure novelty. They just observed that this was the

case and found it amusing. But it touches on something that will We'll keep coming back to the idea that sometimes when you take spoken language and you reverse it, it can sound like other words in that language. And yeah, and then then there's a lot of psychological layering to put on top of that. But we'll get to that now. Eventually, real to real tapes came along, this would have in the nineteen thirties, and it became increasingly easy for audio

lovers to experiment with the medium. So, for instance, French composer Pierre Schaeffer lived nineteen ten through nineteen ninety five experimented with t looping, sampling and back masking, and the use of back masking would then increase among avant garde musicians during the nineteen fifties, according to Stassnow, and certainly I think a lot of you out there can think of various recording artists who use some of these tools,

tape loops especially. There are a lot of ambient recording artists that I can think of that make use of this, But it comes down to just manipulating the recorded data at heart. Now, in the history of back masking, it's impossible to talk about all this without touching on the Beatles. And it's not just because all of the Beatles are popular and are an easy band to source for all this.

Like that, they really were the ones that are credited with sort of bringing back masking into the mainstream, both for good and kind of also for bad, for the you know, leaning into the whole panic area. So to be clear, though, all major and serious accounts, which which stalls Now discusses in their paper, seem to drive on the Beatles engaged in back masking purely for novelty's sake.

This entails large. I think The main examples here three tracks off of the legendary nineteen sixty six album Revolver that would be I'm Only Sleeping Tomorrow never Knows. But then also the single Rain, which wasn't on that album but came out of the same recordings. So specifically, on these I'm Only Sleeping you have a back masked lead guitar part by George Harrison. So George Harrison played it

one way. When they were tinkering around and figuring out, you know, how they're putting all this together, they said, hey, we like it better in reverse. Let's use it that way. It helps create this kind of dreamlike, you know, psychedelic sound.

Speaker 3

Yeah, I'm sure just novelty variety and probably just purely aesthetics is just what dictated these decisions for them. I mean, and sure maybybe part of it. Was like, hey, it'll be funny if people try to reverse these things because they sound backwards, But I bet that wasn't really the primary thoughts. I'm sure aesthetics were the first and foremost decision maker there.

Speaker 1

Yeah, I've seen it mentioned that the John Lennon and producer George Martin both kind of took credit for the discovery, but both in kind of casual ways, Like I think George Martin was more along. It was more along the lines of like, yeah, we were experimenting and this sounded good, and John Lennon was more likely to say, well, I was really high at the time and I kind of discovered it either way, though Yeah Tomorrow Never Knows also has backwards guitar on it, and then Rain stands out

a little bit because it features backward vocals. So these are popular and I guess somewhat obvious examples of backmasking in the biggest band in the world. And so of course this leads to greater scrutiny, great greater awareness of the technique. And this is going to mean that that later on people were looking at subsequent Beatles albums and saying, well, I wonder what's forwards, but what's backwards? Are they using

this again? And this ends up this ends up leading to a lot of speculation from some of the more I guess, you know, conspiracy minded fans about what may be hidden in subsequent albums. Those stalls now writes in their paper quote, there were no hidden messages until the

fans and fanatics went looking for them. And so from here we begin to veer into this area of accusations of back masking and getting into urban legends about songs like Revolution nine off of nineteen sixty eight's The White Album. If this is something I wasn't super familiar with, but there's a voice saying number nine, number nine, number nine, and the legend goes that if you reverse that, you

hear turn me on dead Man, and you can. You can find examples of this on I think just the Wikipedia page for the White Album or for Revolution number nine, and you can hear it. I was listening to it just the other day, and I have to say I did not find it particularly convincing. I feel like you really have to want to hear turn me on dead Man, And then you get into that area where it's like, if this is the hidden message, why is the hidden message? Like so like clunky.

Speaker 3

Yeah, but I think you can say that about something of that I think you're coming to, which is all of the Paul is Dead clueses that are out there. This was taken as one of those, as a Oh, this is just an indicator if folks don't know, there's a long held rumor slash conspiracy theory that is clearly very untrue, but people just like to talk about it that Paul died in a car crash early on in the Beatles' career, and then he was replaced by a

Paul look alike at one point. It's obviously very untrue, but there are many examples that conspiracy theorists like to talk about, like, oh gosh, here here's one. For example, if you look at the cover of Abbey Road picture in your mind, you have the four Beetles walking across the road. They're all dressed in kind of interesting clothing, very distinct from one another. I'm going off the top of my head, but I think I can do this

all the way. At the back you have George Harrison, who is dressed kind of like a working man, kind of like working man's clothes, denim, nothing fancy. In front of that, you have Ringo who's wearing like kind of a fancier suit and tie. Okay. In front of that you have Paul, also dressed, you know, pretty casually, and I think he's not wearing shoes all right, And then in front of him you have John Lennon, who is dressed all in white with long flowing hair, et cetera,

et cetera. So the message you were supposed to receive from that is that John Lennon was God and he was taking home the dead body of Paul McCartney. He wasn't wearing shoes because something to do with like being buried without your shoes on. It was something this one referenced. Ringo represented like the priest who was like burying and giving the eulogy, and George Harrison was representing the grave digger, the man actually burying Paul. And it's like, yeah, I guess,

you know, like that's quite a stretch. There's a lot of other things too, Like if you hold a mirror up to the bass drum on the cover of Sergeant Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, it allegedly like gives you the date that Paul died. And like if you look at like the pictures on the cover of Let It Be, I think Paul's is the only one with like a red background and everyone else's is white or something like that. Like there's all these little things and they're all meaningless.

But this was another one to turn me on dead Man. It's I don't know, I don't know why someone could put so much stock in this, but I suppose it's fun, you know, just to look for clues and hints and stuff.

Speaker 1

Yeah, I mean, we have to remember this is in the wake of Beatlemania, and we could think of it as like a heretical strain of Beatlemania that began to attach itself to these various cryptic details in either the you know, the advanced production design of the music or the advanced record design of you know, illustration work and

graphic design on the albums. There's plenty to sort of latch onto in both of these and some of one of those things, I guess you look at a lot of conspiracy thinking some of this may have began for fun, it's just as an amusement, but then it can kind of take on an energy of its own, and you begin to wonder to what extent are people truly buying into this idea that Paul is dead and has been

replaced by a look alike. And obviously the most rational thing you would do if you were perpetrating this kind of conspiracy was leave a lot of clues for it in your subsequent album output. Absolutely so, anyway, Paul McCartney was not dead then, and as of this recordings still alive. Actually now, it is worth noting that a day in the life off of Sergeant Pepper's Only Hearts Club Band, which will come back to again that it does contain

some sounds that are just for dogs. Though there's also the allegation that a reverse section at the end of the song can be reversed into something crude, but according to Martin, this is all just gibberish reverse. They just recorded a lot of gibberish and then reversed it.

Speaker 3

I mean, I mean, you can hear nearly anything in anything. I remember personally. I had a copy of Crosby, Stills and Nash Deja Vus, and when I was younger, I played the title track backwards because why not, you know, I had a record player, why not play it backwards? And there was a section where I swore, my little teenage brain, I swore that they said you cannot hide,

hide amongst them. Okay. So I was hanging out at a friend of mine's house and I heard her her I think it was her stepfather, was in the other room playing this record out loud, and I was like, oh my gosh, I know a hidden message in this record that if if you play it backwards, that it says you cannot hide. Hide, amongst them, and she's like, oh, go to the go tell. I'm like, okay, this is

gonna be great. So I go to this adult little teenage boy and I'm like, you know, if you play this song backwards, you can hear, you can hear hidden messages, you can hear, you cannot hide hide amongst them. And he goes. He stares me for a while, cocks his head. He's just like, you smoke a lot of pot, do you No, I'm just a music lover. I love playing my records backwards. And yeah, didn't. I didn't get the reaction I was hoping for, which was awe and praise and a standing ovation.

Speaker 1

But oh well, this is a great time for me to ask this though, because I guess this is something that should be obvious to people who use record players. But I didn't even think about this. But every record player gives you the ability to play both forward and backwards? Is that correct?

Speaker 3

Almost? Almost some of them do it deliberately, Like there are record players that I own that literally have a switch that you can go from forwards to backwards. And that's if you have a quote unquote like fancy record player, that button will be the and that's that's a very useful thing to have, especially we're trying to like cue up an exact moment in a song, that kind of thing.

So yeah, so that that is a feature that many record players have a literal reverse button, but on the less expensive ones, And this is the way I used to do it when I was younger. You would turn off the belt that that drives the actual turning of the record, and you would but you would leave the speaker on and you would manually move your hand backwards, pushing the record in reverse, which makes it sound even creepier because it's not even like, you know, at like

a regular pace. It's got like this like human lurch to it's you know. So, but I also know that there are record players that just will not go in reverse, no matter if you push them, you'll just end up breaking them. So yeah, there's different kinds, but some actually just have a button that plays it in reverse.

Speaker 1

Interesting, well, this is all telling because it does sound, from what you're saying, like just the basic vinyl record scenario would sort of put the tools in the average music fans hands to sort of go in and investigate for themselves, right and find things potentially or confirm things that they heard they might.

Speaker 3

Find Yeah exactly. Yeah.

Speaker 1

So again. By most accounts, back maasking by the Beatles was generally more about novelty and dumb jokes, but that doesn't mean that occult back masking didn't take place. According to Jonathan Weinel, Darryl Griffiths, and Stuart Cunningham in twenty fourteen's Easter Eggs, Hidden Tracks and Messages in Musical Mediums, occultist Aleister Crowley encouraged practitioners to engage backwards thinking by

listening to recordings backwards. And while I think this sounds kind of silly, this notion and the ripples of this notion certainly influence the eventual place of backtracking in Satanic panic. Satanic Panic, of course, this is something that we've touched

on in the show before. This was a moral panic, mostly in the United States and then also in the UK and parts of Europe here in the eighties and nineties, though its reverberations in subsequent years and subsequent decades can be found in different parts of the world and also in different sort of communities and certainly faith communities as well.

Basically just whips everyone into a frenzy over the idea that something that had never really existed in the world, that is, the organized worship of Satan, was in engaging in covert means of corrupting the youth of the world, as well as ritually torturing and murdering children. So, yeah, there's much more one could say about satantic panic in its awfulness and also like the real cost of it to actual human beings. There's also a lot to be said into how it ends up impacting media, how it

impacts music and horror and so forth. But backmasking comes into play as a part of all of this as well, because you had allegations that scary metal bands and even bands that we might not think of today as being scary, we're using backmasking to corrupt listeners with incantations of devil, magic, drugs and more.

Speaker 3

Which this era is so baffling to me because I suppose, if you're the kind of person that wants to believe in this organized worship of Satan that's happening right under your nose, any of your neighbors could be a Satan worshiper. I suppose you're also the same kind of person that's going to believe that a backwards incantation can do something have some effects in the real world. So I don't know. I just hope for the practical minds of most people

to go, wait, there's a backward spell on this. Oh well, good things. Spells don't work, so who cares? You know?

Speaker 1

Yeah, it ultimately raises a bunch of ridiculous questions when you start analyzing it with a logical mind. But and then some of them too. It just it just made absolutely no sense, or it makes no sense to me. For example, it was alleged at one point that acdc's Highway to Hell can hained back masked lyrics, and when asked about this, Angus Young refuted it by saying, hey, well, there's nothing subliminal about the actual lyrics to the song. Part of the lyrics are hey, Satan paying my dues

playing in a rocking band? Like what? Like? Why do you need to also hide the Satanism if you're basically saying praise Satan right there in.

Speaker 3

The lyrics, I don't get it.

Speaker 1

And there were these were, but these were real accusations with potentially real consequences for bands and record companies at the time. For instance, one accusation that picked up steam among evangelicals, especially at the time, And this is one that I imagine a lot of you have heard, and there are examples of this. You can pull up on

Wikipedia for the entry for this song. But led Zeppelin Stairway to Heaven classic rock song, like it's it's a song that I think is great, but I couldn't tell you because I've heard it too many times on the radio. So it's it's not my favorite led Zeppelin song because I've just heard it too many times. It would not like in the top ten for me. And it contains it does contain some actual lyrics that go as follows. If there's a bustle in your hedgerow, don't be alarmed.

Now I'm not entirely sure what that means, but that those are just part of the lyrics to Stairway to Heaven. And the accusation is that if you play this backwards, then you hear the words Here's to my sweet Satan, the one whose little path would make me sad, whose power is Satan. He'll give you, He'll give you six sixty six. There was a little tool shed where he made us suffer, sad, satan.

Speaker 3

Way too elaborate for backbasket, not a chance.

Speaker 1

I mean, after I read this, I listened to the example of it, and I mean, it is it is creepy to hear because you are hearing reverse language. You are hearing you are hearing something that sounds like satan. But then on the other hand, it's so ridiculous sounding, like what does this even mean? Like if I were to take this at face value, what is the tool shed doing for me in this scenario? Like nothing in this is really all that creepy compared to any actual

satanic lyrics. Oh really, there are plenty of examples in led Zeppelin's lyrics that are, on the face, more shocking than what we have right here in the alleged back masking.

Speaker 3

I mean, I mean, and also I think certain words just when they get reversed automatically kind of sound creepy. Like for example, I remember Yoko oh No got accused of this. She had a song called Kiss, Kiss Kiss, and of course when you play kiss Kiss Kiss backwards, it's six six six for sure. And you know, yeah, I think certain words just sound easily like other words backwards. But I don't believe for a moment that this many words could sound good forwards and backwards, not for a second.

Speaker 1

Yeah, I mean also the weird exercise you'd have to go through to get to this point. I think the other important thing is like when you when you reverse lyrics, when you reverse words, you're gonna get other sounds. But those sounds are not going to have real context until you give them contexts and you you say like, well, yeah, that sound that that kind of six sixty sixth sound, it's going to sound like like six sixty six that sort of thing.

Speaker 3

Yeah, it's a real Laurel or Yanny situation.

Speaker 1

Yeah, yeah. I think the other telling thing about this so, first of all, it's an accusation that Robert Plant and their audio engineer at the time refuted, and unlike with the Beatles, it doesn't seem like the band or those involved in producing the tracks really found this technique all

that interesting. And I don't know this is maybe just me, but I feel like if they had actually done this on purpose, it's one thing to cover it up during the initial period of satanic panic during the you know, certainly in the eighties and even nineties, but it seems like if this, if they had actually back masked some content here and gone to some links to put some satanic silliness in here, it would have come out right, Like how great are the surviving members of led Zeppelin

going to really be at keeping secrets like this?

Speaker 3

I mean, I think when these things happened. Like another example of this that was famous at the time was the supposed sinking of playing Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon with the Wizard of Oz and I gave you this whole experience with the two lined up perfectly, and everyone in Pink Floyd is like, how would we do that? You know, like we were just like in a studio. Everything's analog, Like we didn't have like you know, no, of course not, of course we couldn't have done that, you.

Speaker 1

Know, yeah, or like can you imagine the reality where they're like, yes, this is actually how we make all of our albums. We pick a classic movie, we play it, and we just match things up with what's happening on the screen. I mean that could be somebody's artistic technique, but yeah, it's just those connections are not made by the creator. Those connections are made on your end. When you combine two things and look for meaning between those two things, which.

Speaker 3

Can be fun, but don't believe it. Yeah, you know, yeah, like fun is fun as long as you don't believe this nonsense.

Speaker 1

Yeah, enjoy it, but don't ruin by going too far right. So I mentioned that there were potential real consequences for all this, Like it got to the point where there were actually some lawmakers that were interested in demanding backtracking warnings on albums so that consumers could be aware that there might be hidden messages, which is ridiculous to imagine, like may contain hidden messages that.

Speaker 3

May contain electric guitar.

Speaker 1

And this is another thing getting back to I mentioned earlier, how when you have the full tools of language at your disposal, there's so many things you can do to manipulate people, to hide your message, to say something kind of cheeky so that some people get it but others don't.

There's plenty of stuff you can do with language that hasn't been reversed, and great lyricists are going to be able to use those tools, like doing this whole backtracking technique is just such a crude and ineffective way of hiding your secret message if you actually have a secret message you want to get out there.

Speaker 3

And especially too if you want to keep it a secret for most people. Like for example, Oh, let's say you're trying to send a secret message on a sheet of paper and you just write each of the letters backwards, so you have to hold it up and look at it in the mirror to read the message. Yeah, someone's going to figure it out like that. Let's say you take the first letter of each word in your lyrics

and it spells a new secret message. Hey, that's going to be actually harder to decipher, you know, So it's not even a very good secret message.

Speaker 1

Yeah. I mean, we mentioned Don McClain recently on the show when we discussed the Flight of Dragons, like American Pie has plenty of cryptic content within it, and that has achieved without reversing anything. Right. So anyway, getting back to this idea that like, why would you need a label, right, why would there need to be a warning saying mine

contained secret messages? Because if it's backwards, I can't understand it. Right. Well, that's where we get into these claims, and I think these are this is this is pretty much been refuted as pseudoscience at this point. But this idea that backmasked messages can be understood subconsciously even if you're not consciously understanding them. So one of the main proponents of the power of reverse speech is an individual by the name of David John Oates. And this is a guy that's

appeared on the likes of Coast to Coast. This is the you know, the radio station radio show rather that's popular and known for its various treatment of UFOs and so forth. You know, a lot of what I guess you've described a sort of fringe ideas. And Oates would discover this notion that normal speech contains a smaller percentage of backward speech that I'm not sure I even understand

exactly what the idea here is. That maybe it kind of cuts to the chase a bit that the thing that you're sort of trying to say through with forward facing speech, you're also saying, at least in a simplistic form, through the reverse of the speech. There is an example that is sometimes used to support this, and it's apparently if you take Neil Armstrong in nineteen sixty nine saying small step for man of course during the lunar landing. If you were to reverse that it sounds something like

manual spacewalk. And this one I thought sounded pretty pretty silly to me. I mean, what does that even mean? Why? What? What's my take home from that? If this is some sort of meaningful content, like I guess, it would at best mean that the smart things that you say forward sound stupid or backwards.

Speaker 3

It doesn't make any sense. If it at least like predicted the future, it'd be helpful, you know, like, oh, let's say he said small step for man, and then in reverse it actually said like, hey, watch out for that rock over there, you're going to trip over. It's like that would be helpful. He could use that information, you know. But but no, this is nothing. This is nonsense.

Speaker 1

Yeah. So again this has been widely refuted in scientific literature at pseudoscience, and one of the central arguments is that, okay, with oats work, and with well not even just oats work, but just in general, if you're trying to push this idea that the thing that you're about to hear reversed is going to say something else, it depends heavily on priming. You're being You're given an idea of what you were about to hear. Backwards, and I encountered that time and

time again researching for this episode. Like when you go to the audio examples on the Wikipedia for Stairway to Heaven, he tells you what you're about to hear, what you were going to hear straightforward, and what you were expected to hear in reverse. So you're going into it to it looking for that template to line up. But what's

really going on is something called paridolia. This is the tendency for humans to find meaning in something, be it seeing a face in the surface of the moon, secret messages in a reverse song, connections between this album and this movie when this movie's played on mute, that sort of thing, and it's I mean, it's a powerful force. It's it's a it's something that guides a lot of our creativity that we can look at, like a smear

on the wall. We can look at a cloud in the sky and we can we can we can lean into a version of it that's not there. We can make we can apply some sort of logic to it and create fantasy. And I think that, I mean, that's I feel like easily the far more sensible way of understanding any kind of sense that seems to come out

of reverse speech. I'm extremely skeptical of the notion that meaningful reverse speech would simply emerge from traditional speech, as well as the idea that meaningful information could then be understood by our brain and even on like a subliminal level, like mad dog and goddamn sorry to have to curse again.

But this is the one of the historical examples. These ideas are maybe not completely unconnected from each other, but they're also like there's not really a strong meaningful connection either, Like I'm not sure what the argument would be between those two words.

Speaker 3

And it's funny too because and then the argument is, oh, but only in English, you know, Yeah, because these words, let's say we say them in French instead, the two words will not be the same two words forward and backwards. You won't be the same message, no matter what. That's basically impossible. So so no, you know, it's like when people make arguments about oh, great predictions followed through like

the myan calendar or something. It's like, yeah, but they didn't use like leap days like we do, you know, like what time zone were they using? Like like these things don't line up, like like different cultures have different ways to kind of like parcel out our lives, and they don't match up cross culturally, so you can't just say something is a universal truth. It's just like, well, maybe that only works in English for me when I have the words written down.

Speaker 1

Yeah, and I was looking at a couple of sources on this, you get a little more depth in it.

In nineteen eighty five, JR. Voki and JD. Reid suggested that some information might pass through when you were when you were reversing using reversed audio, But they were also very firm on the matter being misrepresented in the media in this in nineteen eighty five and one of their papers, they write, quote, is there any evidence to warrant ascertations that such a messages affect our behavior across a wide variety of tasks. We were unable to find any evidence

to support such a claim. Secondarily, we present evidence to suggest that the apparent presence of backward messages in popular music is a function more of active construction on the part of the perceiver than of the existence of the messages themselves.

Speaker 3

Right, almost like a roar shack test.

Speaker 1

Yeah, Yeah, And this I think is extremely telling too. At two thousand and one study by Kriner, Altis and Vass found that quote no priming effect was found for backwards messages, although there were significant priming for forward messages. The results are not consistent with an effect of reverse

speech on word processing. And I think that's this is really key, because we know that priming works with forward with normal language, that I can say something to you and I can prime you for something, and the effects of that priming is measurable through experimentation. So if something wise to come through via reversed audio through back masking, it would have an effect on priming, and we would be able to measure that. And there's nothing to measure

because it doesn't work. It doesn't do that. Now that being said, there's still plenty of fun examples of back masking in music. One that came up for me and this is another example of the song that I've heard many times, but I did not really think about the back masking in it because I'm just so used to hearing this technique. It's cool, but I don't give it a lot of second thought or even wonder what's being reversed.

But there's a great Boards of Canada album Geogotti and there's a track titled you Could Feel the Sky, and there's definitely some back mask audio in there, and it may be reversed. It seems like it's likely a reversal of a clip from I think a documentary on paganism that says the God with Horns, and I guess this is maybe just kind of a cheeky nod to back masking history in some of the Satanic panic ideas, which of course Boards of Canada would have very much been

familiar with. And there's still so many examples too of people going into business for themselves on back masking, playing stuff backwards, sharing it on YouTube and saying, hey, clearly, if you play this Black Sabbath lyric backwards, you hear I want to be like Jesus. Stuff like that. I mean, there's if you're just going into it purely for fun. Yes, there's probably some fun and amusing quote unquote discoveries to make.

Speaker 3

There, but just keep in mind that it's just as much meaning as can be applied to spilling some alphabet soup on the floor and seeing how many words are spelled.

Speaker 1

Outs, you know exactly.

Speaker 3

That can be fun, but there's no meaning there.

Speaker 1

I thought It was put really well in a piece of salon written by Eric Davis. This piece was titled what exactly lyrics within the background grooves of Stairway to Heaven quote. Soon, backmasking became the Satanic Panic du jour, giving paranoid Christians technological proof that rock bands like Queen Kiss and Sticks and then there's an exclamation point in

Parnhesies did indeed play the Devil's music. While most people Christian or otherwise found all this rather silly, these fears did reflect more pervasive fears that the media had become a subliminal master of puppets, fears that would themselves come to inspire some nineteen eighties metal and I think this one might have also been the paper to point out that you also get these ridiculous images and ridiculous footage of some of the provocateurs of Satanic Panic, some of

the individuals that were making these accusations, messing around with record players and playing stuff backwards and just really gazing hard and deep and trying to find evidence of Satan in the reversed audio.

Speaker 3

Hey, you know, everyone needs a hobby. I'm glad they're having fun. Good for them.

Speaker 1

How about you Seth. Do you have any favorite examples of backmasking You A.

Speaker 3

Uh, yeah, yeah, I have one that I absolutely love, not only because I think it's a fun example of, you know, kind of how this can influence a song's writing and kind of create a finished product, but also just because I think it's a lovely song off of a wonderful album by one of my favorite bands. Here's an example. This is off of radioheads two thousand and one album Amnesiac. There's a very alien sounding song called

like Spinning Plates. It sounds so odd because it originally started off as a song called I Will, which is very funny because Radiohead eventually actually finished that song and released it on a later album. But enough about that. They were trying to record this song during this recording session called I Will, and they just couldn't get it

to work. They were just messing around with it, doing whatever, and at one point they decided to play it backwards and they're like, yeah, that's it, that's the album I want to hear. So they had this instrumental for this song backwards and I this is good. This is good, And so Tom York, the lead singer, he created a new vocal melody to go over it. But when you played the forward vocal melody over the backwards song, it just didn't quite line up. It just didn't sound right.

They didn't mesh together. So what he decided to do instead was to phonetically take the words he wanted to say, reverse them, and then sing it backwards. He was obviously singing forward in real time, but he's singing the backwards result of what he wanted, so when he reversed it, it would sound like forward words. Oh wow, So I'll

say that in a morsisstinct way. Tom York made up new words that were phonetically the backwards version of his new forward vocals, and then reverse the recording, creating lyrics that sounded forward in the final song but are actually being reversed. A very similar system was used in the TV show Twin Peaks for the character the Man from Another Place aka the Arm. He's the guy that's like, you know, sometimes my arm's been back. You know that you like will come back in style that guy. That's

very similar system. Yeah, but as we'll point out, it's just like all this discussion we've been having that character of the man from Another Place from Twin Peaks, he always had subtitles, because would you really be able to understand what he was saying backwards if there weren't subtitles there. I don't know.

Speaker 1

That's a great point. That's a key point. Now. I love Radiohead, and I love Tom Yorke's vocals. Tom new York's vocals almost seemed like the perfect vocals to use in an experiment of reverse because I don't know. Sometimes I feel like there's certain vocalists whose voices I think of more as a musical instrument, like a pure instrument,

as opposed to a deliverer of actual linguistic information. And I don't mean that as like a slam on them, and it doesn't necessarily mean that I can't understand what they're saying. I mean sometimes I think of people like like Maynard from Tool. You know, It's like I can understand the words he's saying, but I'm not really engaging with what he's saying on a lyrical level. It's more about like the pure sound experience, and I feel like that's that's what I have with Tom York.

Speaker 3

Well, if you look at like the kind of the hallmarks of reversed audio, and what's really changing. The big key, the thing that we cannot create with forward sounds and can only be created backwards is when anything percussive occurs, it goes and there's like a big sound at the beginning and then it trails off very quickly. So when you hear that backwards, especially thinking about something like the sound of like a drum being played backwards, it's a

which is a very iconic backwards sound. I suppose, you know, I'm the one who edits these episodes. I could just put in a reverse sound there, but no, no, no, I like making with my mouth instead. But but yeah, I think that's a big part of it. And Tom York has a very vowel heavy, very floaty, ethereal singing style, lots of oohs and ahs and moaning and kind of like soft sounds. So because of that, forwards and backwards

doesn't affect it too much. You know, he's not a percussive, you know, singer, and the percussion is really what signifies, oh, something's backwards here.

Speaker 1

So huh, all right, everybody, that's going to have to be side A and you're gonna have to flip it over for side B. We ended up reaching the point where we're going to have to cut this one in half, but we'll be back in the next episode of Stuff to Blow Your Mind. Seth Will and I will continue this discussion and we'll get more into physical media where we'll start talking about well, essentially enter the labyrinth of

Vinyl records. In the meantime, I'll just remind everybody that core episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind published on Tuesdays and Thursdays, and the Stuff to Blow Your Mind podcast feed Mondays, we do listener mail. Wednesdays we do a short form artifactor Monster Effect, and on Fridays we do Weird House Cinema our time to set aside most series concerns and just talk about a weird film. By the time you're listening to this, I think Joe is actually back, So uh, we should be welcoming Joe back

on some episodes in the very near future. But we recorded these episodes ahead of time. And as always, thanks to Seth Nichols Johnson for not only co hosting but of course producing Stuff to Blow Your Mind. And if you want to reach out to any of us, if you have feedback on this episode, you have thoughts about reversed music and so forth. Well, you can email us at contact. It's Stuff to Blow Your Mind dot com.

Speaker 2

Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're listening to your favorite shows.

Speaker 1

Sat there at the time.

Speaker 3

The farm part

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file