Thank You, Dr. Fauci, with Jenner Furst

in Wuhan. Was it a lab experiment gone wrong? This is a heavy sensitive subject even now at the end of twenty twenty four. Luckily, guys, we are joined this evening by one of the world's foremost researchers on this case, these dilemmas, these questions, the award winning director, executive producer, studio exec and creator of Thank You, Doctor Fauci. Folks, we proudly welcome Jenner first to the show. Thanks for coming on, man.

you think they should be in general. I can only imagine that that perhaps led to your exploration to some degree, or you know, at least a moment when we need to hear about some of them, this kind of stuff, what may have actually happened.

done my initial research. We took the project out. This was about Pepfar, an initiative in Africa which tried to stop the AIDS pandemic. It involved President Bush and Bono and it was a pretty crazy story and no one bought it. And so I went on and directed I believe three during the pandemic. So I was very busy, and I was very lucky. And my personal life and all the different things that we all experienced and suffered

through I experienced. But I was busy, and like I said, fortunate because the industry, my industry supported remote working, and I was able to keep directing and people wanted content. And in late twenty twenty three, my attorney contacted me and said they're these independent television producers. They have raised their own personal finances and they want to attach you to this project. They're looking for an accomplished director who

will independently investigate a story. And before I tell you, I just want to warn you it's controversial. You may find them crazy. I promise they're good guys, and you should. You should hear them out. And so I take a call and these producers, Lewis Fenton and Scott Saint John, they tell me that they believe that Anthony Fauci has done terrible things and that he lied, and he lied repeatedly. And you know, this wasn't a big shock to me. Unfortunately,

I'm a very cynical person. I can't say I skipped a beat in the beginning of the pandemic when conversations about Wuhan began, because it's logical, right, there's a laboratory in the same city where the outbreak happened. I believe that governments lie, that the media lie, all those things. But I had been whisked away like everybody else, and you know, caught up in the craze and the dividing

nature of this topic. I was vaccinated. I saw my own friend group kind of get fractured around that issue my own family. I saw the politically charged nature of the story, and I found myself subconsciously align with a side of this story, you know, regardless of the fact that I've been conditioned to accept everything that I would soon discover. I was manipulated into kind of just going with the herd, so to speak. And so I listened to them and I said, look, I don't do head pieces,

I don't do witch hunts. If you want to just do a takedown of Anthony Fauci, I'm probably not the right guy. Give me a couple of days. Let me go and see what is out there as far as evidence is concerned, because I don't, you know, I don't just want to jump in. I want to see where the reporting is to date, and I want to get back to you guys. I spent about three hours on the Internet and immediately saw that there were almost two hundred thousand pages of evidence that had been released over

the last two years since I was looking. And it wasn't the substance of this material that shocked me the most was that I had lived in a bubble where every major media outlet that I trusted like the New York Times, the Washington Post, you know, other major outlets like that, had avoided this story. They had avoided not just the reporting of the grants and the funding and all the different connections that Anthony Faucci and the United

States government had to WUHAN. They had even avoided the bombshell grant proposal from twenty eighteen, which is before the pandemic happened, to do work on coronaviruses and essentially create a virus that looked identical to COVID before the pandemic started in the same city that the pandemic originated. And so I was, you know, I felt like a sucker. And that's what really got me looking deeper. And that's how I'm here right now.

on social media. And so, first of all, I was mortified that the paper of record, the you know, democracy dies in darkness, you know, the Fourth Estate, had avoided this story. And even more shocking to me was that

they continued to promote a natural origin. And I started to see that a lot of these scientists who are out in front talking about the pandemic in this stratified landscape where if it's blue, you know, it's natural, and if it's red, it came from a lab, and Faucy is evil, and you know, just a very very black

and white story. But I started to see that who I had previously associated, who had been conditioned to associate with as a progressive, was getting the story completely wrong and in fact was potentially propagating a lie and doing so in a way that was absolutely horrifying to me. And the more I looked into it, the more I saw that it was way worse than I even thought.

speeches adhering to a narrative. You introduce us to doctor Robert Redfield, one of the guys who is not making a lot of universally propagated conversations about COVID, despite the fact that he is the director of the Center for Disease Control from twenty eighteen to twenty twenty one. For a lot of us watching the film, doctor Redfield seems to have some surprisingly strident differences of opinion and perspective

from those of doctor Fauci. Could you tell us a little bit about his contentions and a little bit about how you guys got connected.

form of research called gain of function. And doctor Robert Redfield happened to be one of those people, and he happened to be in a very very important role during the pandemic, at least when the pandemic started, and I

was introduced to him from a very unlikely person. So as I began to fall down the rabbit hole, one person would introduce me to another person, to another person, and so, you know, you get in touch with Richard Ebright, and Richard Ebright says, you know, you need to talk to these people, and you need to talk to Jeffrey Sachs. And so I talked to Jeffrey Sachs, who's a you know, renowned progressive, left leaning economist, and he says, you know, you must talk to doctor Robert Redfield, who was a

Trump appointee and the CDC director. And so right off the bat, everything went against the political conditioning that we are all you know, supposed to have, and these people were united not about you know, some kind of commentary or opinion, but about the hard, cold evidence, and Redfield

had been ostracized. And if you look at the press of the CDC director at the time of the original outbreak, at the time that the pandemic began to spread around the world, the CDC director and the CDC were blamed

for a lot of the problems. And if you even look at Anthony Fauci doing press, he will say things like, I'm just following the guidance of the CDC, And what I learned was it was the complete opposite, and that the CDC director, Bob Redfield, was essentially powerless, and that within that agency HHS, you have the FDA, you have the CDC, and you have the NIH. And at the

time the HHS director was Alex Azar. But the person with the most seniority, who had been in HHS for the longest, who had understood that bureaucracy better than anyone, was Anthony Fauci. And I think for anyone on the inside, they knew that Anthony Fauci was the most powerful person.

And so in talking to Bob Redfield, it was immediately clear that everything about this man, about this doctor, about this scientist, about his opinions, about the actual things that transpired in the early days of COVID was wrong, and that there had been some cover up. There was a series of events that the public had no idea happened. And Bob Redfield is the most inside person. And not only is an inside person to the outbreak and to the early days of the pandemic, he's someone who knew

Fauci for forty years. He was on the ground during the AIDS pandemic in the very beginning. In fact, he did a lot of very important work. And when we look back at history, it's very ironic because Anthony Fauci takes credit, you know, as one of the heroes of the AIDS pandemic, but it was actually the opposite when the pandemic happened, and people like Redfield represented really good, honest,

ethical science. He was one of the first people to say, this isn't a gay disease, this is transmitted by bodily fluids. He was treating people in the army, and I think that I immediately understood that Bob Redfield had no interest in fame. He had no interest in parleying his experience into a platform. He didn't have a lot of social media followers, and he didn't create a lot of wealth

after the pandemic. He had no endorsements, he didn't work for a pharmaceutical company, he doesn't worked for a powerful lobbyist group. He's just a doctor who was on the front lines of the pandemic as the CDC director, and everything he did and everything he thought was covered up.

in Wuhan. Why do you think Fauci was such a good poster child. I guess of this.

And contrary to what liberal progressive Democrats may believe, the man who gave him the most power in his career was Dick Cheney. And in the wake of nine to eleven, when all of these different rights and regulations and structures were being taken apart of yeah right with the excuse of terrorism, biodefense had the same filter. And it was the anthrax attack that put Anthony Fauci on a direct

course to become the number one person in biodefense. The problem was there was no real regulation and that Cheney had taken biodefense out of the Pentagon in the Defense Department, where it was heavily regulated, where there was a lot of compliance review, and he had given it to an

agency where there was none of that. And billions of dollars went into this research, and there had been scientists fighting that, and even scientists like Redfield who witnessed this whole transition, who were very skeptical and who felt like the research that was being done was not research that was going to make the planet safer that in fact, it was the opposite. It was research that was going to create more and more risk for everyone because.

about Crisper, and you know genetic sort of editing. This was happening in viruses, and you know, this has the potential to take a common cold and mix that cold with HIV, or mix you know, a bird flu with a bola, or take some characteristics of one virus that transmits in a respiratory way with a virus that was never you know, airborne. And this type of research was

popularized by Anthony Fauci. A lot of people were arguing that this was a Pandora's box and that once you open it, you can't close it again, and that once you know, one mistake could wipe out the human race or could create a pandemic that you know, the world had never seen.

did not exist in the wild. And I want to go back to something that you mentioned here because it's definitely a sticking point, not just on a scientific level, but on a deep philosophical level for a lot of the scientists and experts you interview, which is the binary or purported binary difference between bioweaponry research and biodefense research. At more than one moment, we see experts that you're speaking with to seem like almost righteously indignant about the

idea that how did they put it? In one in one conversation, the idea that the best way to protect against bioweapons is to research into how we make bioweapons.

arguably do things that we can't necessarily predict. And like many people have said, where these scientists were playing God or playing master of the universe, or you know, playing master of evolution. And I think that that is a dangerous concept and really an archetype in science for years. I mean, this is one of those stories that is so essential mythological. It's a fable, it's a parable. You know, it's when you fly, you know, it's icarus. You fly

too close to the sun, your your wings melt. And that's essentially the type of work that Faut she was doing while enjoying incredible celebrity and enjoying the power he gained from being the largest funder of biomedical research in the world and someone who had a secret parallel budget with the Defense Department to shell out even more billions

that were not recorded. And you know, it's ironic that after all that time, a pandemic happens arguably from this research, and we are completely unprepared for the pandemic, which was the reason why this research happened in the first place.

In fact, a lot of this research was connected to an mRNA vaccine for coronaviruses, which you know, the initiative sprung from the original Stars outbreak years ago in the early odds, and for years, this idea that a Stars virus could be another pandemic or biological weapon, or simply something to focus on in vaccine technology actually propelled a lot of the research that resulted in the pandemic at and so you couldn't have a more ironic and tragic

closed loop system where the research that was supposed to prevent a pandemic ended up causing a pandemic for which society was not prepared for. And then now we are actually more at risk for another pandemic like the one that just happened because we never told the truth about

how it happened. We never regulated a damn thing, And in fact, the lie about natural origin led to even more funding around researching viruses that come out of nature, when in fact these viruses don't come out of nature, and that the next killer is not going to be a natural virus, it's going to be the result of the same research that caused the last one.

and you have them on the food chain. And as you continue to go up, you have pharmaceutical companies specifically in vaccine development, who almost all of their search is subsidized by Anthony Fauci in the United States government. You know, they're getting money from the United States government to do this research and ultimately they profit from this research and all of it is subsidized, so of course they're incentivized

to want this research to continue. And then you have sort of an aspect of this equation that involves a lot of money but is not meant to be seen by the public. And that's the involvement of the intelligence community, and that there's actually a connection between the intelligence community,

venture capital, this research, vaccine development, and biotech companies. And so you have to ask yourself, how the hell is that food chain all connected ethically and without raising extreme suspicion from the average person, And there isn't a good answer for.

a side note for that one. When we're talking about intelligence agencies in Thank you, doctor Fauci, there is this concept of what we could call a Faustian bargain, a devil's bargain, the idea that the United States, through various Matroshka dolls of interaction gave the nation of China incredibly sophisticated technology and funded research. Tell us what you think as a way of aiding their goal of spying on Chinese labs.

usually a story that doesn't even talk about that. But if you look back at the news that was happening around the time that the United States government was endorsing and supporting this research, around twenty fourteen twenty fifteen, you'll see this idea that science brings nations together, that science is the great uniter, that like the International Space Station for example, this is something that all of our great scientists around the world can do benevolently, and this can aid,

you know, international relations. And the reality is one that is far more sinister than that, and that when it comes to the greatest threats to humanity, it isn't nuclear weapons. It isn't what you see on the news about Iran

and its nuclear program. It's biological weapons. And the new arms race that was taking place was between the United States and China to world powers, one that was very dominant in this space and another that wanted to catch up China and wanted to advance an agenda and become a leader in this space, and did not have the same regulations as the United States and did not have any interest in being compliant to the Bioweapons Treaty or any of these other safeguards, and that they essentially the

intelligence shows that they set very ambitious goals. And this was known in the intelligence community for years. And there was sort of this problem in China where they didn't have certain aspects of technology, they didn't have certain aspects of intellectual property or talent who understood how to use this technology. And they called that the stranglehold problem. And they ended up partnering with the French to build out

the wuhanans to the Virology's Biosafety four lab. This was the most sophisticated lab in China to handle the most dangerous pathogens on the planet, and the French lent most of their knowledge and a lot of the technological expertise to build this lab, to train the Chinese on how to operate the lab, and ultimately the French were kicked out at the last second before the lab was ready to be functional, and the Chinese assumed control of the lab,

and this sent signals I think in the intelligence community that the Chinese intended to use the lab for bioweaponry

and for research that was adversarial in nature. And this is around the same time that you see the funding to that lab from the United States increase, and where you see scientists who are highly suspicious individuals who run quote on profits like Peter Dashik and Eco Health Alliance start to do more research at Wuhan as a pass through right, as essentially something that can receive money from the United States government and then distribute it with even

less regulation than the government had at the time, which was scammed.

you have to create the agent itself. And so as long as your research is defensive in nature, it's permitted in the Bioweapons Treaty. Or you can make defensive measures, but those could involve the creation of an offensive agent and that is kosher.

in this story. Underneath Anthony Fauci is this web of scientists who were doing research at Wuhan or who were connected to Wuhan, And this proposal predates the pandemic and outlines essentially a blueprint for how to create a virus that looks identical to COVID nineteen in its sort of effect.

And of course plausible deniability is to you know, look at every little nuance of the actual virus, which has evolved countless time since it was released, and you know, for people like Fauci to say that, well, this has no connection whatsoever, and of course it was never funded, which we also believe is a lie.

and very very infectious. So if you took a virus that maybe didn't have an easy time transmitting in humans, if you added a fer and cleavage site, you would have a very infectious virus. And that I think is really the first smoking gun in the story, because as the outbreak is happening and as it's becoming a global pandemic, the genetic sequence is released by the Chinese and it has this immediate sore thumb sticking out, which is the

fer and cleavage site. Many scientists pointed to that, and they looked at the genetic comparison of other coronaviruses that were similar, and there were a lot of anomalies. The most striking one was this fern cleavage site. It had not existed in this way in any other virus and essentially made a virus that would spring loaded to infect humans.

And so the whole logical, you know, explanation for this being a natural virus started to fall away for a lot of people, including doctor Bob Redfield, because you have a virus that immediately is infecting humans, when if it was natural, there would be several evolutions and there would be a way to track those evolutions in other animals,

other host species, and ultimately into humans. And instead you had a virus that wasn't even infecting bats, that was being blamed on bats, but was essentially transmitting like wildfire. Bob Redfield says he believes it's the second most infectious virus in history, and it's being blamed on a bat in a wet market and there isn't even evidence of where that incident occurred. Meanwhile, by the time we were reporting it, little did the world know this had spread

around the globe probably three times. That by January of twenty twenty, this virus had most likely gone around the globe multiple times. And so the fir and cleavage side to kind of tie it all together. The reason why this virus was so infectious, the reason why it was an airborne virus, and the reason why it was so suspicious is because it used this thing, this tool, this attribute, which was well known and gain a function to make it that way, and scientists on the inside knew that.

It seems like there are may be multiple roles in getting together a group of scientists who would march in lockstep with the wet market conclusion or the wet market theory. And there's a lot of time spent in I mean, you and your team and your partners find some pretty disturbing internal communications. I'm thinking specifically about folks like the investigative reporter Emily Copp leading so many charges on Foyer requests.

Could you tell us a little bit about why some scientists felt they were excluded from this quote unquote inner circle and why other scientists seemed to be totally fine jumping on things like that open letter from the Lancet in February of twenty twenty.

the world. And I think it's pretty obvious that the folks on the inner circle, when you do the actual digging on these folks, they all had conflicts of interest. They either received money directly from Anthony Fauci's agency in the United States government to do research involving gain of function, which was of course the most controversial aspect of this research that people like Fauci did not want to talk about.

And many of these people who signed the Lancet letter, for example, have direct ties to even vaccine technology, biotechnology research, pharmaceutical companies. And so you see this media campaign essentially for three months straight, and this is while the virus is continuing to spread around the world, and this is while we are confounded by the virus's attributes and we don't know what it's doing and we don't know how

to treat it. And of course that is a horrible, horrible misleading idea here that we don't know about this virus, because there was research into this virus and aspects of this virus and the virus's attributes for close to a decade, and if there had been an honest conversation amongst all of these scientists, and if they had been willing to acknowledge what was staring them right in the face, which was evidence that this had and manipulated in the lab,

evidence that many of the grants, I mean many grants, like over twenty grants to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, to doctor Ralph Barrick at UNC, to a lot of other scientists who were actually involved in these teleconferences would tell you how this virus behaves and would give you a leg up for treating this virus, including countermeasures which were somewhat successful at treating the virus that were not vaccines. And yet for months, there's one story that's hitting the airwaves.

The virus is natural. It just hit us and you know, out of the blues, smacked us in the face. And we've been warning you about this type of you know, natural phenomenon for decades now, and it's exactly why we do this dangerous research so that we can understand these things that are just going to come out of nature, like you know, a bolt from above, and we're just scrambling to figure it out. So please be patient and trust the science because we're just trying to figure it

out right now. And it was actually the opposite. The only thing they were trying to figure out was how to carry out a cover up which would essentially obscure or hide all of the connections that these individuals had for years to this work and all of the culpability

that they had for the pandemic happening. But the problem is unlike a traditional fraud or a traditional crime, where you can really narrow down a set of suspects and you can, you know, put culpability down to you know, who drove the getaway car and who held the gun.

the United States. You have a lot of people all standing to lose something from telling the truth, and you have a lot of people all standing to gain something from telling a lie. And so you just have a perfect storm and ultimately a crime that becomes too big

to prosecute. And that's where we are now. But these individuals did the early work, and these individuals set the stage and created the master narrative, the big lie that would get repeated for years and ultimately got the media in line and got even the United States government under Donald Trump in line to enact this cover up and to essentially launch warp speed and to give these pharmaceutical companies complete and total protection, no liability for damage, and

all of it, all of it was based on a lie. And if we are to really step back and look at that, the damage is inconceivable.

But back to the story, So in early January, right after New Year's Eve, you see a flurry of emails and then you see scientists start to have conversations amongst each other after this genetic sequence is released to the public, and that's in early January, January eleventh, and by the twenty seventh of January, Fauci gets contacted by a scientist named Christian Anderson. And Anderson is based in California and does a lot of research on viruses like a bola

and lassa. He worked for worked with a laboratory in West Africa called the Viral Hemorrhagic Fever Consortium, and he contacts Fauci and says, you know, this fern cleavage side is very suspicious and this looks like it may have

come from a lab. And by the way, I I found these grants that basically show almost instructions and or components of this virus, and they were funded by the ni AID and the work happened with Ralph Barrick back in twenty fourteen, in twenty fifteen, and Fauci responds by saying something along the lines of you know, if this is true, then you know you should contact the FBI. Right Meanwhile, you know Fauci is continuing to field panic

and start to do some damage control. And then on the thirty first of January, you've had all these emails, this kind of concern that this is going to get out of control and that there needs to be essentially a story right now because this could affect a lot of us, and you're not going to see them, you know, dump their guts on emails because they are seasoned bureaucrats. I mean, it's like the Mafia. They don't talk on the phone, watch the soprano, and Tony doesn't let you

say anything on his house line. Fauci was the same way about his email account. I mean, if anything, he put things in his email to try to protect himself to make it seem like he had genuine concern or genuine he was genuinely trying to get to the bottom of what happened, as if he didn't know already.

those mistakes, we wouldn't be here right now. There's still plenty in those emails that's suspicious and that raises a

lot of questions. But you have this turning point, and you have these conversations happening online amongst accomplished scientists, scientists who have a background in this field and who can call it like it is and look at this genetic sequence and google and use the research databases that they exist, and go and find grants that are doing research that is very suspicious compared to the outbreak and in the location where the outbreak happened. And so this is starting

to crescendo. And then on the thirty first of January, there is a number of different articles that come out, but there is a preprint of a paper, and this paper advances the original suspicion that existed and says, yes, there is a fern cleavage side, but there are three other regions of this genetic sequence that are suspicious and do not seem natural. And we have found in our crunch of the genetic sequence, in comparison to all the other genetic sequences that exist for these viruses, we have

found fragments that are suspiciously similar to HIV. And this is when the panic begins to articulate and get even more frenzied, and Fauci is up late at night scheduling an emergency teleconference. And by this point Bob Redfield has had numerous conversations with Anthony Fauci. He's the director of the CDC, and he has talked to Fauci directly about

his feelings about this virus. That he felt it came from the lab in Wuhan, that he felt it wasn't natural, that he felt it was spreading in a way that was uncontrollable for a natural virus, and that he also was aware of research that was funded by the United States at the lab to do work that may result in a pandemic just like this. And on that night of frenzied emails inviting scientists like Christian Anderson, who at first was somewhat of a whistleblower, who shows up saying, hey,

you know, doctor Fauci, this virus doesn't look natural. And doctor Fauci goes, that's, you know, great observation, you know, doctor Anderson. Well, if it's true, let's call the FBI. Well, Anderson gets invited to this teleconference, along with a lot of other scientists that have a lot to lose if Gain of Function has another scandal. But the CDs director, doctor Bob Redfield, does not get invited to the emergency teleconference. And so you have the director of the NIH, Francis Collins.

You have Jeremy Farrar, the guy who is you know, the Fauci of Europe. And you have these scientists who do this work, in fact, are famous for this work.

have Eddie Holmes and Andrew Rambo. Again, these are scientists who have been in the community for a while doing this type of work themselves, but also have ties going all the way back to the HIV research being done in the nineties to try to understand origin and understand the virus better. These were people that Fauci knew, that Fauci had funded, and whose work he was familiar with. And you have some scientists who really have no reason

for being there. The only reason they maybe were there were to argue why this was or wasn't gain of function, why this was or wasn't a lab league. But they weren't doing that objectively because this scientist, for example, this guy Ron Fuchier, was one of the most controversial scientists in gain of function today. He had been funded by Fauci to make avian flu bird flu airborne, and bird flu has like a fatality rate that can be anywhere

between ten percent and fifty percent. There has never been a huge human to human spread of bird flu it doesnatural right, it does, Yeah.

Origin of Stars KOV two. That paper was written by Christian Anderson, Bob Gary Andrew Rambo and Eddie Holmes. There were a bunch of other writers, but those four guys happened to be in the teleconference. On February second, there's another teleconference that we didn't even know about that happened.

It's February first that this teleconference happened, So if you have to go back, and the date is February first, Fauci is panicked on the thirty first of January, and by the first of February he gets everybody together for a teleconference. On February third, there's another teleconference, and this one actually includes some of the scientists who may be responsible for the pandemic. And this was never disclosed to the public, and these scientists were never even credited on

that proximal origin paper. And essentially you had scientists who were either famous for gain of function research and or involved in the actual creation of a virus that may have caused this pandemic, who are present and who are interfacing with scientists who are writing a scientific paper to prove that this did not happen in a lab and that this was natural. And so you can't think of a more suspicious set of facts than that.

culmination of your research here? And then secondly, I just we just have to ask, man, did you ever feel that you were in danger looking into this or ever in fear of some some kind of possible reprisal.

or even I witnesses whistleblowers. They're the ones who die first. They're the ones who were killed first. And I was coming to this story late, but I was the aggregator. I was the person connecting a lot of this research and a lot of these sources together. And I quickly realized that I was being monitored, or at least I

felt I was being monitored. There were weird things happening with my devices, and I had some very strange zoom calls that you know, I was getting thumbs up and balloons and all sorts of things on very bizarre lines. And I started to have an evolution where I understood that maybe I was being monitored, but that it appeared that who was monitoring me was in support of my thesis, and that it was a very bizarre thing that happened.

And so I began to realize that I was not going to be killed, and I was not at risk of being killed, and that kind of melodramatic story that journalists,

you know, like to tell case I was. I was safe, but that the greatest risk for someone like me is that there will be people who come into your life and convince you that they have a lot of evidence that you should know about, or that you need to talk to this one person because this one person has it figured out, or actually it's not Anthony Fauci, it's Francis Collins, or it's not that it's this, or you know, that is the risk because for someone like me, who

you can google and who has reached, you know, over a billion people, with my work has been seen by over a billion people, It's been on major platforms. That the name of the game is not killing me because my crew is too big, and that it's too many people know I'm making this movie. The name of the game is misleading me and getting me to include information

that isn't true. And what I began to understand is that I was being supported by people potentially within the CIA, and I had a background source in the CIA whom

I cannot disclose any information about. But what I can say about this individual is that they endorsed and supported the data that I had collected and the hypothesis that I had formed around this data, and that they believed that I was on the right track, and that the biggest thing they wanted people to know and the American public to know is that most of the people in these agencies, the FBI, the NSA, the CIA, the DoD.

These are patriots, for lack of a better word, people that believe they're serving our country and that they're protecting us from threats that will never know, and that they believe that they're honest people and they're hardworking people, and that the corruption is really at the top, and that they want more than any thing for that corruption to

be routed out, for that corruption to be annihilated. And so I found by the end of the story that the people that I may fear the most, you know, the CIA, you know the intelligence community, they're the ones who are going to off me, were actually individuals who

supported my efforts. And that was the big twist for me when I realized that this was a story that made for a lot of strange bedfellows and created strong alliances and strong collaborations across political lines, across agency lines, and that a lot of these people were simply soldiers of the truth. And I found myself in a similar role.

And I think it'll be a war that I'm fighting for the rest of my life at this point, because the folks on the other side are quite powerful and they have a lot of tricks and things are actually just getting started. So I hate to say something like that. I hate to say that, oh, we figured out the truth now and there's there's protections in place and this won't happen again. It's it's the opposite. And you asked me what did I learn? What did I discover? You know,

from making this movie. I learned how much I don't know, and I am hungry to learn more about what happened with COVID. But watch for the biggest distraction. The biggest distraction is going to be the quote smoking gun. And the reason why that's the biggest distraction. You know, when did the virus leak? What is the incident that caused that leak, What is the exact composition of that virus, and the proof that that composition was man made? You'll

never find that, Okay, you will never find that. The serological data about the virus was never released from the Chinese. We don't know what the earliest you know, illness look like. We have a genetic sequence, which is essentially just a computer set of letters, right, And the reason why that so much attention is put on the exact origin of this virus is because that's the part that the most powerful and sinister individuals know that they've gotten away with.

The prime that you can prove right now is that there was a cover up, and that the individuals engage in a cover up are engaged in a lot of sinister activities around the globe. That these activities involve war games, that they involve pharmaceutical industry essentially abusing the public for years, and they involve what could be another pandemic that will cause even more societal change, even more profit, and even more I think, destruction to the fabric of our world.

And that is the thing that we need to focus on right now. We need to focus on the clear evidence that a bird flu will likely emerge sometime very soon. You can see the fingerprints in the media. You can see stories about bird flu emerging in cow milk and crossing over. And that's a distraction. In fact, I think that is them perfecting their toolbox because the last time they did this it didn't work okay, and proximal origin was too obvious, and the wet market was too obvious

of a lie. And now for months now we've been seeing about, you know, bird flu crossing over in these isolated instances, and that is really preparing the stage for the next pandemic and for us to believe that it was natural. It will not be a natural pandemic. It will be a man made pandemic. And that is what

we should be focusing on. So watch carefully. If you continue to see a story emerge about the exact you know, genetic proof that the virus came from a lab, you are actually being distracted because that is the part that they are most confident about. They are most confident that you'll never be able to prove that. That's why Anthony Faucis stood there with so much bravado and so much confidence in front of Congress because he knew he got away with that part. This is the part they didn't

get away with. They covered it up. The evidence is there, it's right in front of us. That's the crime. And the next crime is going to be ten times bigger than the last one.

coming for us next. I think he uses the word premonition or something to that effect, but ultimately he sees that as the thing that's coming that is really I mean, you have that belief now as well, because we've been talking about on the show, and it does just feel like a strange set of circumstances.

with Fauci and the others of COVID. So you have to ask yourself, you know, once you can see this puzzle, because that's the part that they work so hard on, is for you not to have the puzzle pieces. And that's what the film does. And if you think you know the story of COVID, you don't because I made a documentary about it and sipped through three hundred thousand pages of evidence and I still don't know the exact story of COVID. And if you think you're over COVID,

that is a manipulation. You are being conditioned to think you were over COVID so that the crime is never solved and so that when the next one happens, you will forget what happened this time. So when you see people who are in a malaise and don't want to talk about COVID, COVID's over. The pandemic's over. The pandemic ain't over, Okay, We're all suffering from one form of long COVID or another. And I know that sounds crazy for all of us who think we're healthy. This virus

continues to affect our bodies years later. This virus may have pieces of HIV in it. This virus has caused a mass autoimmune dysregulation in the public of the planet. Okay.

And doctor Redfield cares about patients, and doctor Fauci is still concerned with his power and his legacy and probably getting final payment for his deeds which couldn't have been issued during his time in government. He received roughly seven million dollars in security from the United States government after he retired annually. Okay, more than that. And long COVID and vaccine injuries which are very similar to long COVID

will continue to haunt us for years. Some of us will struggle with this for the rest of our lives. Redfield and others believe they can actually reverse a lot of this, and that it's not some complex, high cost medicine. It's actually enhanced antihistamines and you know, anti clotting agents and doing MRIs to learn where blood clots may be happening in your body and essentially helping the immune system regulate again. And you know, this is a frightening thing

for a lot of people. But while I was making the movie, the person who I had hired to be my main researcher dropped out within a week because she had aggressive stage three breast cancer out of nowhere. She was in her early thirties. One of my producers, their mother died right before production of an aggressive lung cancer that went from zero to stage four out of nowhere. She went to an urgent care because she thought she had pneumonia. She never went home. She was unconscious within

a couple weeks and dead. My partner and my company while we were making this movie. His mother died of a sudden heart attack, and he is confident with his other siblings that that was caused by a blood clot that was essentially a reaction to the vaccine or the virus. I have two relatives right now with aggressive cancers that

got them out of nowhere right after the pandemic. Now, if that sounds familiar to you, and you notice that there are people in your community that are sick or drop dead or that have cancers in ways that you didn't noticed before, I think it's time to ask ourselves those hard questions, and that if we think we're over COVID, we're just fulfilling the propaganda that was fed to us, and we're actually feeding it to each other. That was the scariest part for me. It's not that I was

the victim of state sponsored or corporate sponsored propaganda. It was that it was so effective that I was feeding it to others organically, others were feeding it to me, and that I'd be willing to have a fight at the dinner table when the person that I was likely defending was the United States government or a pharmaceutical company.

Think about that. Think when you fight about this and you think it's political, think who taught you how to feel that way and who gave you the playbook, And think of the fact that instead of them paying for it. You're not even being paid, you're not an influencer, you're not carrying that message out. It's so damn effective that we spread it amongst each other. That's how affect of this propaganda is, is that we spread it amongst each other.

And that's like, you know, Hitler level propaganda. Okay, that's like that's that's another level and we're all suffering from it, and we need to wake up. This is something that democrats, leftists, progressives, all the people who have been fighting for you know, government reform and consumer protection, wake up. This is our fight too. This is not just conservatives and people on the right. In fact, the political nature of this is

the core manipulation. It's not political. It affects everyone on the planet, and only the one percent of one percent benefit. Well, the ninety nine point nine percent of us get harmed. It's time to tell the truth now.

You move on to the next thing, be that celebrity scandal, or be that to the next crisis. So we cannot thank you enough. There is so much that we have not been able to get to. But thankfully again, guys, yeah, just part one right, it's a seriously thank you. You're being so generous with your.

it up. So I want to give credit to you, guys, because as a purveyor of truth, as a podcast that has listened to by many people, you are doing the good work right now and help this story get out because we have experienced a media blackout for almost four weeks now. Press release went out to five thousand outlets, and no major outlet, no international outlet, no big national news outlet covered the story to date. And so I

want to thank you for having me. People who want to learn about this film can go to thank you Doctor faucimovie dot com and that all of the ways to watch the film are there. That our social profile on x is really the best way to stay connected. You know, that's the only platform really allowing for a free and open debate right now and where we have the most presence, So you can find us on XSet.

Thank you Doctor Fauci, and you can find always to watch this movie at thank you doctor faucimovie dot com.