Unprincipled and Inconsistent Voting Rights Shenanigans - podcast episode cover

Unprincipled and Inconsistent Voting Rights Shenanigans

Sep 19, 202253 min
--:--
--:--
Listen in podcast apps:
Metacast
Spotify
Youtube
RSS

Episode description

Leah talks with Wilfred Codrington III about his article, "Purcell in Pandemic," which appeared in the NYU Law Review. The Purcell Principle comes from a 2006 Supreme Court case about what makes an appropriate timeline for changing election laws. The principle wasn't clear to begin with, and has only gotten more confusing in litigation surrounding the 2020 election. Will we see it continue to play out in this year's midterms?

Get tickets for STRICT SCRUTINY LIVE – The Bad Decisions Tour 2025! 

  • 10/4 – Chicago

Learn more: http://crooked.com/events

Order your copy of Leah's book, Lawless: How the Supreme Court Runs on Conservative Grievance, Fringe Theories, and Bad Vibes

Follow us on Instagram, Threads, and Bluesky

For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast
Unprincipled and Inconsistent Voting Rights Shenanigans | Strict Scrutiny podcast - Listen or read transcript on Metacast