Gary, I love me some neuroscience. Good. I think I'd be a neuroscientist. I were not an astrophysic. I really think so. What would you catch Frisbee? Because you can't use keep looking up. Keep looking within. All right. There you go. Keep thinking about it. No, it's just there's so many frontiers. We learned that trauma in one generation can manifest in generations yet to be born. You can't learn that by studying the brain or my family. All that coming up on StarTalk Special Edition.
Welcome to StarTalk. Your place in the universe where science and pop culture collide. StarTalk begins right now. This is StarTalk. You'll be the grass-tacing your personal astrophysicist. And today it's special edition. You know what that means? We've got Gary O'Reilly. Hey Neil. How you doing, man? Former soccer pro. Allegedly. Yeah. Yeah. All right. Man, good. You know, I'm loving these special editions because what they all have in common is something about the human condition.
Yeah. What it is to be human or what it is to no longer be human because a machine is going to replace our mind, body and soul. All of that is in special edition. Yeah. So today's topic, epigenetics and you. Gary, set the stage here. Okay. Plenty of great ideas start with a question and podcasts about matter. Right? And that question would be what if? So using what if the stresses and traumas experienced by your grandparents could affect your genetic makeup generations later?
I don't want that to be the case. All right. Hold that thought. I already know that's the case. Right? You haven't got grandparents. They wouldn't let me forget that their stresses and traumas actually are affecting. That's a verbal down. But even even though those stresses and traumas will have taken place long before you were conceived. Yeah. We're back on an epigenetic trail. But this time our destination is transgenerational, not intergenerational.
So it's transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. Yes. It's for real. It's a thing. And we may have found the sharpest blade at the cutting edge of epigenetic research. So having said all of that, please nail introduce our guest. Are you saying we have a sharp blade sitting among us? In a metaphoric way. I'm hoping. I'm glad to know right now that the orderlies have said that that's not allowed. Dr. Bianca Jones-Marlin, welcome to start talk. Thank you for having me.
Yeah. You just write up the street here at Columbia University. Yes. Oh my gosh. That's stuff. At the Zuckerman Institute, what goes on at the Zuckerman Institute? I said to you, the mind, the brain, and the behavior of humans, of model organisms, and how the world works. What's a model organism? Model organisms. There's like the ones that we really like that work really well for our genetic questions, like mice, flies, non-human primates, like resist macaque and monkeys.
But we also have non-modal organisms, like naked mole rat, for example. which are precious, yes. You can't beat that. Exactly. What's the difference between a naked mole rat and a... New York City rat? A lot. One's brilliant. The New York City rat will steal your wallet. They're close. No, no. You'll never see a naked mole rat with a piece of pizza in this mouth. So it doesn't stay. It's like, ew. Pizza mole rat.
Wait, so what makes the mole rat a different category of animal to study relative to the list you just gave? It's because we're looking at model organisms because we have a question that can pretty much generalize amongst organisms. When you have a non-model organism like my good friend Dr. Ishmael Dussiwar, who studies as naked mole rats at Columbia, he's looking at pain. And a cool thing about them, they don't feel pain. They don't feel pain.
They also don't get cancer and they live kind of forever. So they're outside of the paradigm of which you're investigating. Exactly. I did not know that. They're also precious. But it allows us to ask different questions so we can't ask in my said diet within two years. The background is in neuroscience as it specifically applies in these challenges. So first, let's just set the stage. We need to know what epigenetics is. And I know what an epi center is.
It is the part of the Earth above, directly above where the earthquake took place. Okay. Epidermis is the skin above all your body and organs. So what is epigenetic? Is something sitting above your genes? Perfect, on the nose. No, I don't want to be the one who explains it. You did it so well. I did it. I don't want a woman's blame you. I just had to be... I want you to woman's blame me. No, no, no. What did I leave this missing content there?
Yes. And so our genetic code, this is our DNA, this stays the same in the cohort. It's the same in every cell. Our genetic code is the same in every cell. But we have eye cells. We have liver cells. We don't have eye cells growing in our liver, hopefully, in vice versa. And this is because we have epigenetic markers. Same as the epi-center and the epi-dermis. Epi means above. So epigenetics means above the genome. These are big proteins, big markers that sit on the genome.
And they say, nope, don't read this part of the genome or come read this part of the genome. And they changed the way that DNA is wrapped around histones or sit in a space. So it turns them on and off. Is that a way to... Yes, that's it. And we think about it that way. Yes, I think you can. So the expression of the gene, the self... Expression. ...is dependent upon the epigenetic determination. How much is expressed and why it is expressed? It depends on the epigenetic environment.
So here we have transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. How does that get inherited? Oh my goodness. I mean, if we all knew how it got inherited, like that quickly, I think you'd be addressing me in my Nobel Prize. But since we're not there yet, but there are questions surrounding that. You can see here when you know about prize you're coming back here on the show. Yeah, exactly. All right, girls, got to honor.
So there's many questions that are left unanswered when it comes to how transgenerational epigenetic inheritance works. I think we're at the space now in neuroscience where we are observing the intergenerational inheritance of an experience. It's pretty much canon now. We can say with my studies as well as others that an experience and a parent will change the way the offspring develop. And I'll be pretty specific with this. Experience and a parent. Experience and a parent.
Even before the child is conceived. Exactly. Before the child is conceived. So not a pregnant model or. Because we heard that that can be influenced. You could have envisioned a way. If you have a pregnant person that's pregnant with a female, the eggs of their granddaughter could be inside of them. So you pretty much can be talking to three generations in one space. Okay, but catch me up on Bio 101. So I knew that a girl born has all the eggs she'll ever drop.
Yes. But how does the egg that she drops have eggs? Which means she has a genetics of her granddaughter who will then make up the body and the eggs of the granddaughter inside of those eggs that's inside of the mom. So it's basically like a Russian doll. Okay. Nice. I have two Russian dolls here. Okay. We're passing on a question now. Oh, she's got a space station. Yes. Space station. Whose office do you think you're in? Why? The Haiti Planetarium, Neil the Grass Tyson's office.
Because it was like Russian doll. I turned around and I was like, I don't know. Yes. This is the International Space Station. That's cool. Inside there is Soyuz. Soyuz. Yes. They're good at work. Okay. So each of these is sort of a genetic expression within the previous one. So is the little egg? So the one inside of that. So she wants you to want me to keep going. Okay. The one inside of there. So let's say mom's space station have like stressful experience. Yes. And then baby, what's on baby?
This is Soyuz? Baby Soyuz. Yes. Baby Soyuz is probably going to be stressed. But baby Soyuz was there in the ether, right? Now we're talking about Grand Baby. Okay. Who's Grand Baby? Okay. I don't know what this thing is. Okay. What is that? What is that? What's that? Okay. It's. That's what it is. It's like a what this thing is, what's sci-fi to me. Okay. So this is not grandchild. That's okay. It's well with, I don't know if that's the way to transgenerational.
I'm not talking about gray granchiles, I don't know anything about this yet. All right, so then the last one here we're now four generations in. Yeah. And I guess what that is. Oh. It's botnics. Botnics. Botnics. And it's Russian all the way through. Oh, look at that. That's the one. So you're telling me that some parts, some elements of all our behavior is not our fault. Ooh. I'm saying that in some model organisms, I was like, oh, listen. Because my kids are listening to this.
Okay. No, that's on you. Well, let me not be so negative. Are you suggesting that some components of our character personality, demeanor, and the like is traceable to forces that occurred outside of the life that we've lived? What I'm saying is that in some model organisms, there's an experience that can happen to an apparent that leads to epigenetic changes, that leads to changes in development of offspring. Now, we've demonstrated this in worms. My lab specifically looks at mice.
When it comes to humans, the best study surrounding, the most studied topic surrounding intergenerational and transgenerational inheritance comes from, after World War II, the Dutch hunger winter. So this is a period of time where the Netherlands were cut off from food, and it led to a man-made famine. So this is also, I think, something pretty particular. We're not talking about it. Really? In 1944 to 1945. Yes.
And then the generations were suffering from serious medical conditions that died being- Diabetes, hypertension, even schizophrenia, not just for the children. And we're speaking about young children who were starved, but we're not pregnant. We're not procreate. And we're starved. They went on to have children, who went on to have children, which is our generation now. Like these people are alive now.
And what we observed is that what other studies have observed, this is not what my lab particularly does, is that there's an increase in hypertension, diabetes, schizophrenia. And I also think it's very particular to- They did Dutch reply. I was, yes, going to go there. Oh, come on. This is a man-made famine. This is not something that's tracking with the environment in a way that all things are aligned. This is a man-made famine.
So you can envision a space where you have a man-made famine, a man-made decrease in food, increase only in salted food, because that's all you have access to for a sphere- So it's for- Yes, exactly, yeah. Plus a lot of stress I would assume, if we're talking about the black population prior to the 1900s, and then introduce food deserts and access to low-quality food. We can envision an epigenetic space.
Yeah, so a food desert is a common terminology that we use for a space in which there's not fresh food available in like a X-block radius. Like a block-block radius. Oh, really? Really? That's a food desert, OK? You can get McDonald's before you can get broccoli. OK? They're all cold. Chuck has defined food desert. MUSIC I'm Olican Hemraj, and I support Star Talk on Patreon. This is Star Talk with Neil deGrasse Tyson.
MUSIC So you've got this Dutch winter famine in 44-45 as a real-time observation. A data set? Yeah. And I think it is possibly the only one that's been able, sadly, created so far. It is the best study, and this is because- this is because the Netherlands took very clean note of who served in the military. So they started to see these data come about.
Now we know that there is a Chinese famine that took place, because of course can look at the black American and Native American population and Thai food deprivation with stress and health outcomes. So- But this one is well studied in a short period of time. If we take that and use that as starting point- Yes. Your research at your Marlin lab- What a coincidence. You work in a lab called the Marlin lab. Voila. I chose well. I heard the boss there is great. She's fast. Marlin, you're quite good.
Yeah. What are the odds of that? Your research covers a number of things. But what about this epigenetic inheritance? What is your research about? What is it finding? And how are you finding it and going about getting results? Yes. We spoke about the Dutch hunger winter and black America. And our work is really motivated on how do we make tomorrow better than it is today? What does it mean to be a human in this space and in this place? Have experiences that are both positive, but also negative.
How that affects the way the brain develops, the body develops, how that affects offspring, interactions with offspring, and how does that affect there for communities which affect the world? That really is a heart of what we do in the Marlin lab. And if you didn't get it, the Marlin lab is my lab. It's my lab. That's my lab. Yeah, that one.
Pretty cool. Yes. And so I take my passion for figuring out how we can make tomorrow better than it is today and my love for science, biology, and neuroscience and bring this together. So although our mission is to aid the world in this way, we use model organisms such as mice and techniques such as studying epigenetic inheritance to get to the sounds. So how do you, I mean, okay, if we're back to trauma, what are you sadly doing to mice to inflict trauma?
And how do you then balance that out to see how these changes take place? Well, first we paint the mice black. Oh my god. That's the first thing we do. You know, this sad part is, oh gosh. They're called C57 Black 6. Those are the name of the mice. Oh, please. It's just like in the name, every time you write it down, we're like black mouse, yeah. Oh, what a shame. But we treat them very well. Because we really want to see. So we will not allow them to get a mortgage in certain areas.
We do red line them. Um. He was doing for our first commercial break. I'm going to be back. I mean, do you think we've been set? We've cut a part to the mice. I'm going to be back. Oh, yeah. Amazing, no exit, right? Just stuff to mess with you. Yeah, because we want to see like how, what is the bare minimum that you could do to create a epigenetic change? We really try to do the bare minimum.
And we also respect the fact that every mouse that is part of this experiment and experience is a mouse that we're asking them to dedicate their life to this experience. So we do take that very seriously. She's asking them. We do. We do. Look, they have names. After I underscore black six, they have a name. We give them names. OK. Yeah. There's Tyrone. There's Ty. Ty. Ty. Ty. Ty. Ty. I'm going to get my hands on the table here. I am forbidden from saying this.
Yeah, yeah, you better get your hands on the table. Oh, it's my favorite. It's a t-shirt. Guys, OK. I'm pulling it back. Go ahead. You're all going to get me in trouble. All right. They pretty much have a pretty regular mouse library. They hang out on a cage, they get food, sometimes they get to have sex. They load their best life. This is what they do. So there's not much many dynamic things happening in their life when they're here in the lab. What we do is we place them into a new chamber.
So they haven't seen this chamber before. We then introduce an odor, a smell. This is a smell. It kind of smells like almond. It's called a set of anone. And we present a set of anone for 10 seconds. And then it co-terminates with a light foot chock. We give them a light foot chock on their foot, and they jump back. But in a mouse who pretty much has had the best life of eating, drinking, and hanging out. This is a terrible thing. Yes. Yes. It's a big deal.
It's like, this is when they find out, oh my god, I'm black. This is the black. When did you find out you're black? Until. One day, it smelled almond. This is the black. It smelled almond, and I got a shot. Good chock. So they're like, what is happening? This happens five times in a row. And then we put them back in the cage over the span of 10 minutes. Oh, OK. Oh, wow. We put them back in the cage. And we take them out the next day. We put them in the chamber. You could already tell.
They're about to... Dig just from their chamber itself. They're experiencing it too. Appalensive. Yes, they freeze. It's called freezing. They're running away. There are two responses to stress. So they freeze when they get in. We have not given them the odor. They already know the room is already stressing them out. So then they get kind of chilled with the room. Like, OK, nothing's happening. And then we turn on the odor and they freeze again. Of course.
And they wait for you to shock them, right? And they're counting down for their foot shock. Right. And so they freeze, freeze, freeze when they smell it, and then they jump. Because they get the foot shock. They have a good thing. We do this for 10 minutes a day, for three days. There's many things you can use. Many things neuroscientists use to create this pairing, like odor, or we can use sound. We use odor- Sensory correspondence.
Sensory correspondence. Yes. And I even said the vision, like going into the chamber will also make them scared. Right, exactly. But we use odor for a very specific reason. And I can either tell you now, you can ask me, I can tell you, what do you want me to do? No, let's deal it. Do you know what? Do you know what? I can't get me guessing. Oh, yes. We use odor because odor is just a really cool sense. The lab studies smell, taste, and sound, these three.
And focusing on odor, when you breathe in, you aspire. You're smelling my lovely aqua-deparmor perfume, right? And you'll remember this moment forever because of this. This is how we interact with the world. When you breathe in, there's some neurons that interact both with the world and with the brain. These neurons are called olfactory sensory neurons. They're first-order neurons that like explore the world and also consent a message back to the brain.
And I was lucky enough to train under Richard Axel for my postdoc. He won the Nobel Prize for understanding he along with his postdoc Linda Buck, won the Nobel Prize in 2004 for ironing out what it means to have a mammalian sensory system, like the nose. And what we see in the nose is that every neuron in the nose expresses only one olfactory receptor. So it could pretty much only respond to a chemical that binds only to that receptor. So there's a level of specificity.
And in speaking about epigenetic inheritance and transgenerational epigenetic inheritance, what does it mean for us to be stressed because of our ancestors? This is what we're missing in the field. And this is why I'm so proud that my lab has been able to bring this to the field, the level of specificity. Because we're not talking about your feelings getting hurt. We're talking about an odor that only binds and activates this one receptor in this nose.
And what we've been able to replicate because another lab did this first and it came up with a lot of controversy. And then demonstrate to a finer extent is that those neurons that are a smell that almond, you take that mouse out, not the moms, only the deads. You breathe them and you look at the next generation. And those generations are born with a different olfactory sensory. They get the cell out of here. So how do you, how do you, that is insane.
It's not that you can look up the nose and say, oh, you've got more or you've got the same. So how are you testing? How are you finding your results to prove? Yes, we have a really cool new technique. Amazing. Thank you. Yes. I mean, that is really, I mean, let me back up just for a minute. Yeah. You described the experiment as though it was written on a tablet somewhere.
But you had to sit down with either yourself or with colleagues and figure out what would make a good test for the hypothesis, right? That's a good answer, not a lot of time. I just want to give credit to you. Thank you. It's easy to set, put them in. No. No, you have to think that through. Tell me, that's just tremendous. Okay. And you want it to be simple enough so that there's not another, a lot of complicating other factors, right? Exactly. The isolate the causes and effect. Right, right.
On the nose. That's so great. And it's not an easy part of the brain to get to. We created techniques and we use techniques now in the lab. We do brain clearing. So we can clear the entire tissue. Okay, that's not, yeah, I'm going to see. Okay. And you light the imaging. Yeah, that's so cool. Brain clearing. Brain clearing and light the ass. Straight up, make clones at the right. That's right. That's right. That I'm not sure. Transgenerational. Yes. That's a little transgenerational.
So how exactly and where exactly? That's going to be the name of my first bullet. Transgenerational Tyrone. In general, in her address of trauma. So what's the brain clearing though? How do you get to that space? I totally skipped apart because we're seeing that the offspring have a brain that looks like the parent. What the parent brain looks like. We take the animal out of this chamber after three days of otor shock pairing. We actually let them relax.
They tend they actually get to have a little fun. They breed because we're going to look at those kids later. And 21 days later, we ask them to sacrifice their life and then we look at their brain. And if you look at the animals that just got an odor and no shock or just got a shock and no odor or got odor and shock but it's not co-terminating at the same time, their brains all look the same. The paired animals we call, the animals got the odor, co-terminating with shock.
They have more neurons that respond to that odor. So I want to give a second to give the beauty of biology that sits there before we get to the next generation. The brain takes energy to make new things to change. It's an electric device. It's an electric device so it makes sense. So what period of time does it take for this generation of more receptors to actually happen?
We are seeing in the order of 21 days about a month, cool part about the male factor pithelium, there's stem cells in this area. That's the part where the smell. Exactly. The neurons that can smell the world and then send information to the main olfactory epithelium. Epithelium. Epithelium. What about epithelium? Yeah. Epithelium, good. And so this tissue, it has a stem cell population. There are very few few areas of the brain that have stem cells.
One is the hippocampus, an area known for placement and memory. One is the olfactory bulb. This is where these neurons send the information to that go to other parts of the brain. And the male factor pithelium. So there's neurons that are there. They're not neurons. I take that back. They're cells that are there. And they're like, what am I going to be when I grow up? And they're usually, hey, I'm going to be a peppermint cell because that's what my epigenetic modifications will allow me to be.
And then we give them this experience. It's odor shock pairing. And what we've gone on to demonstrate, what my lab has demonstrated is that these neurons are going to be peppermint, say, as important as peppermint is, almonds more important. I'm going to do that. I've got to make them be true. I'm going to do it. I'm going to do it. I've got to make a detour because that's more important for me. Now I have this experience. I just want to just, that becomes a stimuli, basically. Exactly.
It is the most exciting thing. Just so we hit, just around. Why are you brilliant? Just for you. Just on the same mouse page, how long does it take a newborn mouse to be old enough to have a next generation? It takes about six weeks. So a mouse is born six weeks later, it can get pregnant. Yes. And how long is the gestation period? 21 days. That's why you said 21 days before. Because it just happens to be a coincidence that also 21 days is a good time in the nose.
And the typical life expectancy of a mouse is a few years. Oh, two years in the lab. Two years. Two years and a half, yes. Two years, okay. In the wild a lot. A lot shorter. Yeah, because they're tasty snacks from owls and foxes and things. Okay. So I guess what I'm getting at is mice, which are interestingly genetically similar to us because we're mammals and vertebrates and this sort of thing. I get that. But what would take us decades to manifest as an organism happens in weeks in your lab.
So that if you need to go through multiple experiments, it's way more efficient. People also study flies and worms and they can do this seven generations in two weeks. So we're dead smack in the middle. It takes a while to get to the transition part. So that's why flies and worms show up in these kinds of conversations. You would not do it on Galapagos tortoises because that would just tell us. Zero percent chance. No, no. You're mad at that. Yeah. So you conduct this experiment with an adult.
How many generations will this be present? This change? We are observing it right now from parent to offspring, from sperm of male to offspring. Our preliminary data suggests that this is not carried on to the next generation if you do nothing to the parent. And this makes evolutionary sense. If your parent has gone through a trauma and you have not come across this stressor or trauma in your lifespan, why would you give your offspring anxiety?
Why is it that you would pass it on to the next generation? Because it's not relevant. Biology is smart. It's smarter than us. And so we sometimes speak about this in a lens of like fear or we don't want this. But really, I view it as a biology wanting us to survive. Because if you have more neurons in the next generation, you probably can sense this odor more quickly. So it becomes a defense mechanism in a manner of speaking right? Adaptive in a way.
And I wouldn't call anxiety or stressors in this area adaptive. But I do think biologically, the hope is that it becomes something that the animal will allow the organism to survive. It gives a defense mechanism that would otherwise be there. And it needed it for the almonds, even though why would you need to defend against almonds? Because you had to learn. You and your lab gave an electric shock. Because that's what the world looks like, right? The world is dynamic. It's always changing.
There may be times where something that originally is neutral becomes something that has to be averse of and your brain has to learn that. It's the beauty of being able to learn that, having your genome learn that and having that be passed on. If your generations are in the same environment that caused all the trauma and stress for the original parent and it stays like that, understandable. You've got the mechanisms that you should be able to survive.
But what if that environment changes and you don't long lead? Surely you've got a slightly maladapted series of offspring? It's the question of maladaptation. I cannot create a space in my mind that would describe biology being maladaptive. Because what if that order did come back? The order could never come back and then yes, you probably have a few more neurons and maybe you smell a little bit less pepper. But what if that order does come back?
Because not smelling pepper might won't kill you, but not smelling almond could. Yes, see that? That's evolution in an ocean. Right here. Happening much quicker than... No, we describe that. It's not epigenetic, but it's in the skeptics community. We describe why it is we are so good at seeing patterns, even when there's no pattern there.
And it's been plausibly traced back to if you think you see a lion in the bushes and you run away even though there wasn't a lion in the bushes, you live another day. If you don't think there's one there and there is, then that's the end of your gene pool. Game over. Right, so there's a benefit to the caution to be on the cautionary side of all of this. Let's throw it into the moment. We have a war in Ukraine, we have a war raging in Gaza. Both with huge tolls on the next generation.
The stress and trauma must be unimaginable for the likes of me as anyone else had imagined. How are we likely to see future generations experiencing all sorts of issues like we did with the Winter Famine? Scary thought. Yeah, but is it most likely that? It would be the new black people in the world. Yeah. Look, this is the generations on generations. And I do think, and I would love to add, my hope as a neuroscientist is that biology is adaptive and wants us to survive.
And so although there is going to be an element of inheriting the man-made trauma, right? This is not like a ethylological trauma. This is man-made trauma that we are having. Notice that this hasn't become de-gendered. Man-made trauma. I said what I said. That was good. Okay. I didn't start. It's kind of hard to de-gendered that. It's just a human-made trauma. It's that. Political man-made trauma. Yeah. All right. Deal with it. I would want to finish the fact that we can still learn. Right.
And so my hope is that in understanding what's happening with these mechanisms that the Marlon Lab is studying, we can also understand a little bit more about what it means to re-adapt when things are not in the state of trauma. That's what we hope to bring forward. So it's not all hope is lost. Is there a difference in the habitability between the male who experiences the trauma and the female? The female is carrying eggs. The male's at juice to sperm. Yeah. Can we sit on that for a second?
This is the part that makes me excited about science. The male factor pathelium turns over on the order of 21 days. So maybe 40 days. So there's a neuron. It's born, live your best life. You're dead in 40 days. And a new one. And humans and mammals. What is the diet way? So for example, maybe if anyone's had COVID over the last few years, she'll come to know you can't smell. But then after all, you begin to smell. All right. And then you start to smell things that you're not smelling. Like gas.
Okay. That was my experience. I kept saying, who left the stove on? I'm running around the house. Like someone left the stove on them. They're all looking at me like, what is your problem? We have an electric oven. You're more right. But now you can smell fine. Maybe when you played soccer, you probably headbutted a ball. And for a period of time, you probably couldn't smell well or your taste was kind of funny. But no, I can see what you're saying. There's a direct cause and effect.
Because those neurons, then they're dendrites of the part of the neuron that takes an information out into this area in the nerves. The minus of the parts of the nerve cell. Yeah. So we have the cell body that's represented here by my well manicured hand. And then we have the dendrites here. The dendrites sit out in the ether of our nasal cavity. And so as we breathe in, as we respire, we get these molecules, they bind to the dendrites.
And dendrites are looking like tentacles come off of our body. Yes, coming off the cell body. Exactly. And then they'll send this message to the cell body that says, okay, there's enough of these molecules that are bound. Let's make this neuron fire electrically because neurons are both chemical and electrical. And so a fire electrically and it sends that electric signal down the axon. Right. And then it ends in what's called the manal faculty bulb.
So this is when it starts sending information to the brain to places like the amygdala, which they represent emotion, places like the puriform cord. So this stimulus gets shared with parts of the brain that can take action on it. Yes. Is that a fair way to characterize it? Yes, exactly. And this is important because it turns over every 21 days, 21 to 40 days. So do sperm.
Our data has demonstrated that when you mate a animal, 40 days after the otershock pairing, we still see this change in the next generation. Yes. So that's gotta be the female. The females are never shocked. You would never do that in the Marcellus. So the way we're doing, how does it go beyond? Exactly. It's something happening that gets down to the sperm. Right. It's being stored in the sperm. And even no sperm. In the gonad. In the gonad. In the gonad. Oh, well, yes. In the epidermis.
Yes. In the epidermis. Yes. That's a word. Yes. It shouldn't be such a problem. It's epidermis. Yes. It's epidermis. Yes. It's epidermis. Yes. It's epidermis. Yes. That's the what? The thing that creates sperm. The epidermis is an area of the inside the testes, in which immature sperm, so there's sweet baby sperm, they go into the epidermis, and they get what's called an epidermis somal payload. This is not the work that we have pioneered. This is work that others have pioneered.
That demonstrate, if you have, like, for example, low food. So in metabolic, this has been demonstrated. There is a payload of information that comes from the liver, or that's in the liver, and also found in the epidermis. What happens is these sperm go through the epidermis, they mature, they get grown, and they also get this payload, the epidermis som, that says you were starved, and they bring that down to the next generation.
Yes. So, I years ago, and you maybe you'll know this, and I can't, I'm so sorry, but I read a study I was trying to look at it. I was trying to look at it. I was trying to look at the study itself. And it dealt with sperm production and cocaine use in men. Do you know the study I'm talking about? I believe I do. It was done at Penn. Yes. Yes. Yes. And it was fascinating because the men were passing the information on in their sperm that equated it back to the cocaine use.
And it was just fascinating too, but this is exactly what we're talking about. So what you're saying there is outside of a stress trauma, certain environmental circumstances can have an effect on the way the epigenetics are altered. We do know that stress and trauma do, because that's made up. Cocaine uses lifestyle. Yes. There must be also some other things I'm guessing environmental pollutions and also. So do you have a list?
I mean, can you make rank list of, avoid this because it'll mess up your gonads? I mean, this. Well, we don't want to say mess up. People will respond to that list. Say something. It may not be mess up. It will change. Change is not always bad. That's true. Right. Okay. Now, you're willing to take that experiment on to see if it goes good or bad. All right. So what is risen to the top of people's research efforts are studying the bad effects.
So give me an example of something that could be a good effect in the epigenetic transgenerational process. Could I give you something that would be an example of a good effect? I think a good effect is biology saying if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Right. It may not be that we need to. The good effect is the neutral effect. Yeah. The neutral effect is, oh, right. Yeah. No, studies are going on. It's been a lot of time when I got and your children come out going, what? No, damn.
Mom, I'm so terribly, terribly hungry. Yeah. The starvation threshold is different when you're on a yacht. So for example, just as an example. Yes. It's long been known that suicide rates are higher among people who are less traumatized. So suicide rate for black Americans, it was way lower than for white Americans, especially wealthy white Americans. And black females, there's the lowest. It's, of course, they have the hardest.
Those numbers are creeping up a little recently, which is a sign of more equality, I guess. But suicide rate. Wow. I guess. What a metric. We did it now. It was angry as a white male. Okay, cool. So I don't know if this question is relevant or even interesting, but as they say, your biggest problem is your biggest problem. So if you're on the yacht and there's a delay, I see where you're going with this. Okay. And you have a big party you're trying to put on.
You could be very stressed out there. Don't judge my trauma. I try to put it in my trauma. To the therapy session, your trauma is your trauma. From a psychologist lens, yes. The biggest deal in this mouse life is that it got its foot shocked. We all stubbed our toe at some point within this last week. We're not really going to remember it happens often. But in the dynamic of this mouse, yes, that's, oh, that's better than I. I'm coordinated, okay? Sorry, I'm not going to apologize. Yes, yes.
I could see the biggest problem being the biggest problem. I think when we think about looking at humans, you have to take culture into consideration. And that's what we separate when we study mice. Why we have a model organism like mouse is because we can control everything else. There are definitely cultures in which the morbidity associated with suicide is higher. My mother's from Guy in South America. At some point it had the highest suicidality rate. No longer does.
I think it's number three now. In the world. In the world. Yes. Right? Three major populations, which are Indo-Gyonis, Afro-Gyonis and Chinese-Gyonis, or Asian-Gyonis, as well as a native population. And it was higher in the Indo-Gyonis. But there are also different cultural aspects of being Indo-Gyonis. So I think it's harder to part. So you got to get the basic science in there first before you get social logical. Before you jump, it's hands down. I think it's wise. Interesting. Of course.
It's wise and respectful. Otherwise, it gets a big tangled mess and you don't know what your causes in the show. And no one fix anything. What happens if the shocks were generational and continued? Yes. So right now, what we are observing is an intergenerational change. But what if the environment doesn't change, even in the next generation or the generation after that?
This is when we can start to envision a space what we're looking at is an actual evolution change, a change in evolution and not just an epigenetic change. Because if what, and we have not demonstrated this, nor have other labs, but it could be the space in which for seven generations you get the order foot shock. And then you have the eighth, you'll expect to see the change in brain. What if you do nothing to the eighth and then look at the tenth?
Is this when it finally has stopped becoming intergenerational and finally overrode? So in that 12th generation, what we see is the same expression that we did in the eighth and the seventh, but we created that eighth and seventh. And now with you generation. Number way. So we would. But that smells Lamarkean here. People say Lamarkean is if it's like. Okay, well, okay, let me do right by Lamarkean. We gotta do right by Lamarkean. Lamarkean is Lamarkean. John Lamarkean.
That's Lamarkean. Jean Peppi is Lamarkean. Okay, maybe a half a century before Darwin's. You also want to give credit where credits do. Darwin's work is built upon what Lamarkean studied. If I could put that in a nutshell, pretty much what Lamarkean inheritance would describe is a giraffe walking in its giraffe space and it sees green leaves on top of a tree and it's like, okay, I really want these green leaves, I'm gonna hope and wish and stretch. Try to get those leaves.
Just try to get the leaves. And as you try, your neck gets longer. And then you have a longer neck. Voila. And the next generation is even longer. That's exactly what I'm talking about. And longer. So it's an entire. So it's an entire. So it's an entire characteristic from things that happen. And your circumstances are surrounding. Exactly. Okay, all right. Whereas Lamarkean, I mean, Darwin says you were born with a long neck. You eat all the top of the leaves.
All your cousins die with short neck. And now you get to breed more and have a little. And that would be we were selected to remain because. Exactly. You're a net was suited for eating trees. And everybody was died. And everybody died. Does it mean that it's one or the other? It does not have to be nature versus nurture in the space. Okay. It could be an end or. So is this a daptin survive or is that just a just too broad a stroke?
I think this is what becomes back to how many generations does the smell continue on. What we can say is that the studies that went on after Lamarkean and Herodin some became a concept where scientists will go in and they would say, okay, well, let's see if Lamarke is real. We're gonna go take this mouse. We're gonna cut off its tail. And let's see if the next generation is born with no tail. In fact, let's do for three generations. We do not do this in the lab. Let me clarify.
But for three generations, you cut off the mouse tail and you see. We do with poodles. Don't apologize for not doing it too much. Exactly. And poodles are still born with tails. Yes, with one tail. They cut them short to make it a little bushy, tough. But right. So they said, okay, Lamarke is wrong. But what they didn't study is are the mice now afraid of the scientists who comes in with the lab coat and scissors. So what are we really focusing our question and answer on?
Because that would be a psychological trauma, not just a physical change. Let's turn this around. Because we've talked about traumas. We're gonna cut the tails off young animals, right? How cute. How wonderful. What if you get exposed an animal to something pleasant and continued that pleasant exposure? Do you find that that becomes a more balanced, a happier creature? Cool creature. Yeah. I know. This is not gonna happen anyway, right?
What is it possible to have other things transferred, not just trauma? If I were to have a conversation with biology, I think what biology would say back to me is like, let's survive so we can thrive. If sugar is good, if flour smells good, we're good. But do you have conversations with biology? All the time. All the time. And it speaks back to me. Okay. Okay. In the way neurons fire, it goes on to so beautiful.
But what we think is happening when it comes to a stressor is that there's something called quincidence detection. And we talk about this as electrophysiologist who record from neurons in the brain when one neuron fires and another neuron hears that firing and also fires is quincidence detection. We have an animal who's smelling the environment so those neurons are firing. And it gets a shock. That's another pathway that's now firing the same time those old factory sensory neurons are firing.
If we have something pleasant, we could have the smell of a flour and maybe some dopamine be released and like that could be paired. But it may not be- Dopamine makes you feel good. That means a neurotransmitter makes you feel good. But would that be enough of a threshold to say, now let's take all the energy necessary to make sure animals smell flour is more? It's already rost into what the pleasant circuitry looks like.
But I think the best way to answer that question would be, let's override it with something really good. Let's give them some good cocaine. Right? Because it's so good that it's bad. How does that change the next generation? That's the way I would approach that experience. Did you with most things? It's so good, they're bad. Well yeah, I mean sugar is certainly what like, you know, we, there are sugar receptors in our stomach, in our tongue, in our brain. But why?
Because it's essential for survival. And we're going to high calorie density. Exactly. But at one point it gets hijacked. But it was by candy bar company. Right. But the scarcity is what allowed it to be, oh it's so good. And hey, I got to get this because you're not going to get it. But now that it's abundant, now it's a bad thing. Because you can get it all the time. Right. So it's subject to abuse. Those same receptors have been hijacked by modern civilization. Right.
So you would agree or possibly even lament that these features of our adaptability in modern times, if you don't need that adaptation yet you still have manifestations of it, a clever advertiser or a clever marketing person can hijack those sensory urges. Of course. Yeah. Absolutely. And whose responsibility is marketer? Yeah. So we've discussed Chuck's need for sugar. He needs to survive. Senses, sight, smell, taste. They're all sensory. So it's all survival.
This whole thing of epigenetic inheritance is. I mean, I'd like to thrive. This simple umbrella to my mind is survival. Yes. So therefore it's as necessary as oxygen. Oh, hands down. Hands down. So we oxygen to aerobic. Yeah, to. Yeah. Yeah. Yes. They're anaerobic life that doesn't want oxygen just to be just to be. We're being species. We're just only talking about the important ones. It's being species. Correct. Noisms. So let's see. We can land this plane. This fascinating plane.
Let me be synch here. So what? Now you understand the phenomenon. What are you going to do about it? An entire generation of people survive the depression, famine, racism, slavery. Can you do anything about it other than just come behind us all? Is that well, here's why you're that way and then go back to your lab. Meanwhile, Chuck has hypertension. He's got anxiety, anguish, he can't raise issues. Procedase. Okay. Okay. I can't do anything about it. What good is this?
And if you can do something about it, then are you playing God? I think there's a twofold answer. One is for the love and need of understanding science. The other one is for the love and need of understanding people. If there was a space in which someone who had gone through trauma, and cestually, and then are born here in modern day and are suffering from all these elements, even though they eat healthy, they exercise. They still have hypertension. They still feel this anxiety.
I believe to have a neuroscientist say to you, you can take that burden off of you. It's not your fault. This is just the way that you've inherited experiences of your ancestors. That validation within itself will probably create a shift for better. So that thing is not your fault? It's not your fault. I mean, I just heard you talk about sugar. So maybe that one is your fault. It's not your fault. It's not your fault, mantra. It's not your fault, mantra. It's not your fault except a sugar.
That part. That runs deep. That's great. And I think the other is, if we have to understand what's happening in a mal-adaptive situation, quote unquote, in a bad situation, we have to understand the basis of biology. We can't fix something unless we know what, however. Right. In the hit series, The Expans, there's talk of adapting a life form that can just simply live in the vacuum of space. Because that's a new frontier where a lot of people are hanging out all the time.
So I'm just wondering, generally in science, if you understand something, ultimately you can manipulate it and control it. Yes. Is there a plan for that going forward where you can go in and nip-tuck, tweak-pinch, and all of these symptoms go away? Thereby removing the epigenetic forces operation. If we understand it, can we go in and come in nip-tuck? In the same way, if we understand the need for sugar, should we pound it into our food and candy and give it to our children?
I think it has to do with responsibility as scientists to say, we now have the ability to do a little nipping and a little tucking. But do we understand how this is going to change generations to come if we take out the ability for you to change this that up to you? You could do them a future generation to not want sugar and then they won't even have the need for it to be honest. Or not smell the smell and not have anxiety but then constantly get slapped up. That's a really good answer.
I can't even rebut that. The unintended consequences. Why you give me such a good name? I can't nothing to ask you now, you answer my question so good. This is why the good doctor is here. I know. To give the good doctor a like. So I'd love everything you've described. Is there any controversy among your colleagues about what you're doing or are they competitive ideas? What is your work fit in the landscape of other scientists? It is dead smack in the center of the controversy.
And a lot of it has to do with what we're taught in textbooks and what we decide as canon, decided as truth. And then we see that maybe Mark wasn't all wrong and that really draws people's brains. So our job as neuroscientists is to say, put your textbook aside, this is the data. Let's look at what our studies have demonstrated and take it from there on a clean slate. But presumably there are other labs. There are other labs. What you do is it's then reproducible.
So why should anything be so controversial as what is poking mice? I think you're on a very important note of this. But you just have special black mice. The B.O.s Gats. Stop. Stop. Pull a TAPRON. We are. I know. I know. Or any of you mice named TAPRON. I can't answer the question now because you know who I am and I can't say it. That was all of course. But I will say that my lab was the first to replicate this study of the original change in the parent. This study it was done.
Let's start. Yes, Brian D.S. and Carrie Russell. They got a lot of fire for it because they got a lot of fire. They got a lot of fire for it. So I entered into the flames thinking like first things first can we replicate this? Clearly using our brain clearing and using our cool microscopes we've been able to replicate that. We then built upon it by showing this is the mechanism.
I think that unfortunately we have to sometimes wiggle our brains out of the old mindset and just look at the data and see what that looks like. And I think that's why it shows like this is so important because you're motivating people to think slightly differently and have that little of different of a spin. That's all that's taking the direction. That's all the way the cutting edge of neuroscience works.
I mean when you look at addiction just addiction alone the work that has been done to prove that addiction is not a matter of will power. It's not a matter of desire. We're going on. It's actually a brain malady. I mean if you had told somebody that 30 years ago they'd have laughed at you. They said you're a quack and now it's just accepted. So yeah keep going. This is that dovetails with the free will question. How much are we actually in control of our body mind and soul? Right.
How much of it is a chemical response? Right. And how much of it is man made? Right. Well that's where the man made it. You've introduced an entirely new ask. I only bring the data. Yeah. I want to talk about the data show. So cool. Now we have to ask because we we like neuroscience and start to talk special edition. So we're compelled to ask how much genetic control do you have over your husband? I rely heavily on epigenetics. Our relationship with my husband and my children.
Okay. Completely obedient household. Epigenetics and prayer. That's so funny. That's so funny. Thank you for sharing your expertise and you just up the street in Columbia. Yes I am. We've got to come back. Yeah just a couple of miles north of here. We're at the American Museum of Natural History and you got your own lab. And there's more research going on in different areas in the Marlin lab. So we may well be revisiting. Okay. All right. Dr. Professor thank you. Thank you.
Thank you for having me. Chaco, is good to have you, man. Always a pleasure. All right. This has been start talk special edition. Neil the Grass Tyson has always been in you. Keep working out.