Episode 31: Bahá’í  Approaches to Depolarization (Part Two) - podcast episode cover

Episode 31: Bahá’í Approaches to Depolarization (Part Two)

Jul 11, 202428 minEp. 31
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

An exploration of Bahá’í-inspired approaches to depolarization building on what we've been learning over the past few episodes from the world's leading luminaries in this discourse.

Part Two explores what we can do to help 're-humanize' the other and how we can better listen to and understand others so that they truly feel 'heard'.

CONTENTS

0:00 Introduction
3:19 Re-Humanization
18:51 Active Listening
24:33 Closing Thoughts

Transcript

Introduction

Society Builders pave the way To a better world, to a better day A united approach to building a new society. Join the conversation For social transformation Society Builders. Society Builders with your host Duane Varan. (Duane) Welcome to another exciting  episode of Society Builders and thanks for joining the conversation,  for social transformation.

In our last episode we began our journey  of summarizing what we ve been learning about the science of depolarization over  the past few episodes and then working to understand what Baha i-inspired approaches  to such depolarization might look like. And, of course, the challenge of  sharing all of this is something that was too much to cover in a  single episode, so we re exploring this theme across a series of episodes. And today  s episode is the second part of this series.

In our last episode we started with the first  theme we ll be exploring in this context and that focused on what we can do to both limit the  effects of polarized content in our own lives and how we should be on guard to not further propagate  such content. Remember, polarization is a social pollutant. If we live in society if we interact  with society we re going to be breathing polarized

content every day. So in the same way that we have  become more aware of what we eat in recent years, looking at counting our calories and scrutinizing  ingredients in this same way, we also have to become more aware of the content we consume and  limit the toxic polarized content in our diet. But we also need to be sensitized to the fact  that because we breathe in such social pollutants,

we are also often transmitters of polarized  content, despite our best intent. And so we also need to become more aware of our own expression  working towards what the Universal House of Justice frames as an etiquette of expression  becoming guarded in the content, volume, and style of our expression, while exercising  tact, wisdom and timeliness in our response. So depolarization starts with us. Today, we continue our journey as we explore  a few more themes reflected in Baha i-inspired

approaches to depolarization. Specifically,  we ll explore how polarization dehumanizes the other and what we can do to help rehumanize that  equation. And we ll explore how we can enhance our capacity to listen and understand others,  which are critical to effective depolarization. So there s a lot of exciting gems  there for us to discover today.

Re-Humanization

(musical interlude) A key feature of toxic polarization is that  it often dehumanizes the other. We become desensitized to the other. It s like we don t  really care how they feel and this isn t a view we form after critical reflection we re operating  in auto pilot. We re guided by our impulse and so unconsciously we prejudge the other and treat  them different to how we would like to be treated. Now I emphasize that all of this is happening  at a subconscious level. And this is precisely

why it s so easy for us to fall in this trap  and become a victim to it. I say victim here because we don t want this outcome we don t  want to be perpetrators of polarization - so even as perpetrators, we are victims too because  it conflicts with the person we truly want to be. Addressing this issue is simple on one hand  and complex on the other. It s relatively easy to help people become aware of their  propensity to dehumanize another but it

s much harder getting them to rehumanize the  other. And this is our particular challenge. Now to start our exploration, let s go back  to episode 20 and listen to Amanda Ripley as she shares this delightful story about how  Nelson Mandela approached this challenge. (Amanda Ripley) So over time, he learned to really resist those impulses, and he in particular,  got really good at learning to never, ever humiliate your opponent to the contrary,  to actually speak to them in their language.

I think the anecdote you're referencing is after  he got out of prison, while he was in prison, he learned Afrikaans, he learned how  to speak the language of his oppressor, which was hugely and is hugely controversial.  Right. Among yeah. So fascinating. Yeah, because it's like, why should he have  to there's a million things you could say

about that. But anyway, he very purposefully  wanted to speak their language. And he has another quote, which is basically, you can  speak to a man's head if you speak to him in a language you understand, but if you speak to  him in his language, you can speak to his heart. But when this high ranking official came to  his home, as is, after he's out of prison, and they wanted to negotiate something, and this  particular official was a known overt racist,

it was not implicit. And Mandela had invited  him into his home, and when he got there, he started speaking to him in his own language,  which takes the official by surprise, of course. And then he asked him if he'd like some tea. He says, 'yes', and then he  begins to prepare the tea for him. Now, Mandela had staff at this point,  right. There were people there who could do that sort of thing, but he  very intentionally did it himself.

And it was these small things he did in order  to interrupt the dance that they were in of high conflict, to take him by surprise, so  that there was a little bit of humanity. And when you see your opponent as a human and vice  versa, it is harder to dehumanize them. Right. (Duane) I think this is a great starting point for our conversation. It helps  us visualize the challenge.

And similarly, I think the whole story that  Rabbi Roly Matalon shares with us in episode 23 about the exchange he facilitated between  members of his congregation and people who s views were at the other extreme of his  own, really highlights the value of this kind of rehumanization. Just to remind you  his congregation was deeply left-leaning,

progressive liberals and they were distraught  when Trump was first elected. So he organized an exchange with a group of prison-guards  who were deep Maga Republicans where his group spent almost a week living with them in  rural Michigan and then they came up to New York to live with his congregation all part  of an effort to better understand the other. And Rabbi Roly explains in our interview how  this act of trying to appreciate the other

is a spiritual principle. Let s listen in as  he explains why this is a spiritual problem: (Rabbi Roly) It is a spiritual problem because it is a problem about  discovering another person's humanity. Humanity and the human soul are spiritual  issues, right? So just to hear somebody else, to understand, to relate, not just to  dismiss because you have different political ideas, but just to try to understand,  number one, that's a spiritual issue.

And look at the effect this all had. Rabbi  Roly summarizes this impact in telling the story about how shortly after an atrocity in which  members of a Jewish congregation were killed in a synagogue in Pittsburg, how these deep red Maga  Republicans that he had facilitated the exchange with then sent a delegation to express their  solidarity. Again, let s listen in on his story: (Rabbi Roly) So two days later we are on a phone call and they said, we  are so shocked by what happened because

now we know Jews and we feel you're  our family. And so an attack on a synagogue is an attack on all of us, on our  family. I am so moved as I'm saying this. (Duane) Amazing! (Rabbi Roly) Right! (Duane) Yeah. (Rabbi Roly) Before we knew you Jews were Jews.  After we met you, you're our family. So we are

outraged. We are going to write a statement and  so on. We would like to come to the synagogue to send a delegation to the synagogue the  following week to express our solidarity and to read a statement before the congregation  and to denounce the anti-semitism in our country. (Duane) I mean, this story is  so incredibly moving, right? Rabbi Roly s congregation didn t  go Maga. The Republicans didn t go

Democrat. Their fundamental views hadn  t changed. But what did change was that they came to view the humanity in  each other they were rehumanized. And I want to take this now to its extreme. Even  when you re interacting with people who have done terrible, terrible thing IF you want to see  a path forward if you want to see progress towards depolarization then you have to  be able to see that person s humanity. You have to be able to see the best in  them. And clearly this is no easy feat.

I think Andrea Bartoli really illustrated  this when he was talking about the process of building peace in civil war-torn Mozambique.  That task required him and others to sit and mediate with people who had committed the  most horrific acts possible but to find a path forward he had to accompany them. Now this  wasn t easy for him in fact, he positions this as the most challenging part of his work but  it s critical to navigating a journey forward.

And this is all about helping a person  in THEIR journey accompanying them in expanding the horizons associated  with their own aspirations. And this is the challenge for both friend  and foe alike to help accompany them. Let s listen to him as he describes  this journey of accompaniment: (Andrea Bartoli) So there is an interesting  gift in accompaniment that enriches our lives tremendously, because those who  accompany are not guiding. Those who

are accompanying are not imposing. Those  who are accompanying are not oppressing. Those who are accompanying are really  accompanying. They are the space we need to be who we are. They are the  presence we need to be who we are. So what we saw over and over again  with the elderly, with the immigrants, with the kids, really with everybody. That  accompaniment is fundamentally transforming. And of course, it transforms both. It  transforms the one that is accompanied,

but also the one that accompanies. Right. There  is a very strong, natural bond in accompaniment. (Duane) And, of course, Baha is will  immediately recognize this as so much effort over the past 25 years has been placed  in helping us learn to accompany others. This challenge of re-tuning our framework of  rehumanizing the other of learning to accompany the other - is one of the greatest challenges  in depolarization. So how do we do this?

And here, one of the most effective strategies  is to awaken a different identity within us. We all live with multiple identities. When we go to  a sporting match cheering for our favorite team, we awaken an identity. At home, we awaken  another. At work, yet another. In each of these environments, there are norms and we are  constantly engaged in a negotiation between who we believe ourselves to be who we want to be  - and who others in our midst expect us to be.

And this was a theme that Amanda Ripley  shared with us in episode 20 about how people become entrenched in the identities  tied to their conflicts and how a big part of getting out was to awaken other latent  identities from within. Like how Sandra, a FARC rebel, had to rediscover her identity  as a mother to help escape her conflict. The path to rehumanization often requires us  to awaken a different identity in ourselves so we can reframe how we conceptualize the other.

So in the same way that the FARC rebel needs  to awaken her identity as mother in her path to rehumanizing the other, we too need to awaken an  identity in this task and what identity is that?

You guessed it it s our spiritual identity  it s our identity as a Baha i. And this is a theme that the Universal House of Justice  has been emphasizing in its recent messages: a focus on identity and reinforcing and  cultivating our spiritual identity on finding coherence in our lives a balance  between our material and spiritual selves. And part of that Baha i identity is this business  of learning not to judge others. Of seeing the

humanity in others. Remember that story when  someone asked Abdul-Baha how He could be kind to everyone and He replied that in every face  He looks into, He sees the face of His Father. And this isn t just a Baha i thing. It s a  spiritual thing. To me, one of the clearest indicators of whether a person s faith is a  positive or negative influence is whether it is a source of a person judging themselves or whether  it s a yardstick for judging others. When it s a

tool for judging yourself it s amazing you become  a better person every day. But when it s a vehicle for judging others, it s a harmful influence  in my opinion at least. For me that s the acid test. Is your faith a yardstick for judging  yourself or a yardstick for judging others? So this business of not judging  others, I think, is key to how Baha is should approach depolarization it  s critical to the path of rehumanization.

And one more thing here. One of the main  strategies used by activists these days to promote even very positive causes  is cancel culture putting pressure on others to not interact with a specific person  because their views are at odds with yours. Now I appreciate the noble intent here. It  s a way that people are promoting what are often very worthy principles principles  we often agree with and want to promote

too. And it s easy to see how we  might resort to this tactic in our interaction with like-minded people taking  a stand on an issue which we also uphold. But despite the noble intent behind  this we need to see cancel culture for what it really is at it s core it s a path to dehumanization. Because YOU disagree with  someone, because you are in the right, you are willing to brand THEM as an outcast.  Personally, I think that sounds dehumanizing.

Again I appreciate the intent but I worry that  it only adds fuel to the fire of polarization. But hey, that s just my view you should  reflect on this for yourself and ask yourself what cancel culture does in this path  of polarization. And if you agree with me here, then you ll want to have heightened awareness  again in your own media consumption. So you re guarded against resorting to getting  sucked into the gravity of cancel culture.

So rehumanizing is not easy. It requires  critical reflection on our own actions, it requires awakening our spiritual identity,  it requires not judging others and seeing the humanity in them, it requires accompaniment, and  it requires critical reflection on the strategies which others might employ in their pursuit  of noble causes but which we need to question because it might prove to be counter-productive.

Now that s a lot to reflect  on. But it all starts with an aspiration an aspiration to rehumanize the other.

Active Listening

(musical interlude) Now another key tool for improving our ability  to help depolarize is found in our capacity to listen and understand others. And this is  a skill a skill we can develop and perfect. When people don t feel listened to when  they don t feel understood they often need to escalate speaking louder resorting to  more aggressive language even more aggressive means. Much of this is about something  incredibly simple the need to be heard.

Now listening and understanding doesn t mean that  you ll necessarily agree with their views. It just means that people feel that you weighed their  arguments that you gave it your due consideration. Remember as Dr. Schirch helped us understand  so much of this path to depolarization is

about neurophysiology. It s  about the battle between our reptile brain and our rational brain  between our emotional self and our rational self between our lower or material  nature and our higher or divine nature. So listening and understanding helps  elevate conversation to a more rational level where we can disagree with  each other but disagree with respect. And we were incredibly fortunate to be  given a gift through the experience of

world-famous mediator, Gary Friedman, and  that was in episode 22. And this was the tool he shared which he calls looping a tool for  helping us better listen and understand others. Now looping is about actively listening to what  a person says and then saying it back to them in your own words and asking them whether you  understood them correctly. And if you didn t, looping back and getting them to explain it  again until you re able to recite it back to

them to their satisfaction. That s a clear sign  that you actually understand what they re saying. And as Gary explains, this need  to explain, in our own words, what the other person says, ensures  that we listen properly. He says this: (Gary Friedman). You can't loop unless you  listen, and you can't listen unless you've turned your attention to now what's  happening before you in this moment.

Learning to listen to others is an incredibly  important skill for Baha is to develop in fact, I think it s the one of the most important  qualities in learning to share the Faith with others. Many people think that effective  teaching is about learning to perfect a

pitch about being a good public speaker  about crafting good arguments. But in my experience it s about learning to listen hear  and understand a person s needs so that you can guide them to fulfilling their aspiration  so you can answer THEIR questions so you can direct them to the wonderful and precious gifts  in our Faith that intersect with their journeys. I remember one learned Baha i once told me  that Abdul-Baha once said that we should

reflect on why God gave us two ears but only  one mouth. I ve never found that reference, but it s such an interesting idea, right. That  we should listen twice as much as we talk. But clearly, Abdul-Baha was a master in the art of listening. Here s a story that Colby Ives  shares in his book, Portals to Freedom, about his interaction with Abdul-Baha  which illustrates this. He says: I have heard certain people described as  "good listeners," but never had I imagined

such a "listener" as Abdu l-Bah . It was more  than a sympathetic absorption of what the ear received. It was as though the two individualities  became one; as if He so closely identified Himself with the one speaking that a merging  of spirits occurred which made a verbal response almost unnecessary, superfluous. As  I write, the words of Bah u ll h recur to me: "When the sincere servant calls to Me  in prayer I become the very ear with

which He heareth My reply That was just it!  Abdu l-Bah seemed to listen with my ears. How incredible, right! We have to listen with  the other person s ears. I love that metaphor. And, of course, listening is something  we can actually train for. Amanda Ripley, for example, recommended the  research of Dr. Graham Bodie who, among other things, found that people only  feel listened to 5% of the time. Just 5%!

And researchers like Dr. Bodie offer courses  to help people improve their listening skills. You can search for his courses or for hundreds of  others often called training for active listening. So improving our capacity to  listen and understand others is another example of how we should  approach depolarization as Baha is. (musical interlude)

Closing Thoughts

So we ve covered a lot of ground  today as we explore Baha i-inspired approaches to depolarization. But  we still have more ground to cover. In our next episode, we ll explore two  more strategies toward depolarization based on the scientific literature and  we ll reflect on how Baha i principles might further contribute to these approaches: First, how to help break binaries  narratives that reduce problems to

conflict between two opposing forces.  And finally, we ll explore how we can enhance the environments under which contact  between antagonistic groups are facilitated. Wow! That s going to be an exciting discussion. So don t miss out! Join me again next time as we continue our  conversation for social transformation. That s next time on Society Builders.

(Music). Society Builders pave the way To a better world to a better day A united approach to buil-ding a new society There s a crisis facing humanity People suffer from a lack of unity It s time for a bet-ter p-ath to a new society Join our conversation For social transformation Society Builders So engage with your local communities And explore all the exciting possibilities We can elevate the atmosphere in which we move The paradigm is shifting It is so very uplifting

It s a new beat, a new song, a brand new groove Join our conversation For social transformation Society Builders The Baha i Faith has a lot to say Helping people to discover a better way With discourse and social action framed by un-i-ty Now the time has come to lift our game And apply the teachings of the Greatest Name And rise to meet the glory of our destiny Join our conversation For social transformation Society Builders Join our conversation For social transformation Society Builders

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android