NPR informs and connects communities around the country, providing reliable information in times of crisis. Federal funding helps us fulfill our mission to create a more informed public and ensures that public radio remains available to everyone. Learn more about safeguarding the future of public media. From NPR. What do birds, mammals, and reptiles all have in common?
We're amniotes, meaning we develop in a fluid-filled egg covered in a membrane. That allows us to develop outside of water, unlike, say, a fish. And that means we all have a common ancestor that branched out into other species. that researchers think probably lived over 300 million years ago. and was probably similar to an amphibian, with some key differences. Fernando Garcia Moreno is an evolutionary and developmental neurobiologist.
He says for a long time there's been a debate about how amniote brains like birds and mammals evolved and what makes them similar. One brain structure called the pallium has been seen as a comparable structure in birds, mammals, and rivers. In every case, in all the species, the pallium is... in charge of high task and high hierarchical tasks, such as cognitive processing, sensorial processing, motor control, also language, for instance, in the case of mammals and birds.
In mammals, this structure is near the top of the brain. It's sometimes called the cerebral cortex. And it includes an area called the neocortex, plus some other key structures. The hippocampus, which is in charge of memory, for instance, memory processing, or the amygdala, which is in charge of emotional processing. Birds and reptiles don't have a neocortex. So some scientists say mammal brains are totally unique. They must have evolved completely separately from birds and reptiles.
But other researchers say while birds and reptiles may not have a neocortex, they do have some of the same neurons. They're just in different places. So for some researchers, they thought that the same cell types appearing in the neocortex are located in a different manner, not in layers, but in nuclei, in birds for instance.
They tend to think this because all these neurons communicate each other in a quite similar fashion. This side of the debate says maybe bird brains and mammal brains are more similar than they seem. So Fernando and his lab try to figure out how these structures develop, and if that process could tell us anything about what makes our brains different from birds. So today on the show, how does nature make a brain?
why the phrase bird brains could be a misnomer, and why humans may not be as special as we think. I'm Regina Barber, and you're listening to Shortwave, the science podcast from NPR. 99% of the U.S. population lives within listening range of at least one public media station. And everyone can listen to NPR podcasts free of charge. That means you get completely unpaywalled access to stories.
prize-winning reporting, and shows that represent the voices in every corner of the country. Hear the bigger picture every day on NPR. This is Ira Glass. In Lily's family, there's a story everybody knows by heart. If this story had never happened, all of us wouldn't be here right now. Sammy wouldn't be here.
Nina wouldn't be here. Wally wouldn't be here. Anyone that we know wouldn't be here. So what happens when Lily's mom tells her this story is not true? This American Life, surprising stories every week. Cell phones, cars, coffee. How do these goods make their way to us from overseas? And what will President Trump's tariffs mean for their price tags? Join the 1A podcast as we explore supply chains and costs associated with some of your favorite products.
It's our series, How Did This Get Here?, every Wednesday. Listen to the 1A podcast from NPR and WAMU. Okay, so Fernando, we're talking about how your study found that bird and mammal brains develop like through different processes. And so you're looking at these palliums of birds, reptiles, and mammals. And what did you find? We found that the palimum of all the structures develops in the embryo following different rules.
So the areas in the brain in which these neurons are generated for the volume, or the timing in which these neurons are generated, it is strictly different when we compare reptiles to mammals. or to birds. Let's go back into like how this evolutionary structure happened. Like what does the study show you? Yeah, we cannot research the brain of these animals who are extinct for 300 million years, but it allows us to hypothesize how the brain of these animals were.
And we think that it shows us how the brain of the Glasgow ancestor was organized in terms of paleoneurons and paleocircuitry. So we think that the same equivalent circuits that we see today in different areas of the pallium were present in the last common ancestor, not present, for instance, in the case of amphibians. because all amniote species, mammals, reptiles and birds, evolved circuits from them.
Definitely, these were simpler circuits, much simpler than the ones that we can see today, but we think that the last common ancestor already had some of them. It is very relevant, its features, because it has been selected several times in evolution. And we think that for people trying to research connectomics... intelligence or neural artificial neural networks they should consider how this circuit acts because it is the most efficient and the optimal one selected by evolution so we should not
reinvent the wheel when nature is telling us this is the efficient circuit. Wow. And then we were talking about this idea of... You know, these brains are different, but they're kind of doing similar things, this idea of convergent evolution. So, like, what is the process called? convergent evolution? Convergent evolution means that two features in two independent animals have evolved separately. but they have reached the same feature, the same characteristics.
So the classic example is the wings of bats, butterflies. and birds. So when you research them, you can see that they develop in a completely different fashion. So bats are making the wings with their fingers, whereas birds, they're doing it with the whole arm. and insects that are doing it with some different Primordia MDM.
So we know that they are convergent because if we go to the common ancestor to these three animals, it was kind of a worm that didn't have any wing and didn't have even limbs. So we know that the wings of these species, they have evolved separately. They are not inherited from a common ancestor. But then we know that they are fulfilling the same function, and therefore they have a very similar structure.
Because to fly, you need a wing, which is in this fashion, with a particular surface, particular thickness or weight. So function, because it was common, you need to fly, dictated the shape of wings in all these pieces. In the case of these circuits, we consider they evolved in a convergent manner because although they follow different evolutionary routes, they ended up generating circuits which are very similar.
If your studies are kind of pointing towards the development of brains being convergent evolution, why is that significant to the understanding of how our brains work? There is something quite relevant which is intelligence, for instance, or the highest sensorial processing. have appeared several times in evolution. So we are not just an example of something very unique and special. Intelligence is not such unique and special. We think that complex brain and complex cognitive tasks...
have evolved separately several times because the circuits and the neurons in charge of them have evolved several times and separately. So for instance, birds, some birds can count. Yeah, and some birds can talk. Some birds can use tools. Exactly. And they are doing it with different parts of the pallium. Of course, the pallium is involved, but different parts of the pallium are in charge.
or making the sounds, for instance, or the motor control of the larynx and the tongue, this kind of thing. But the neurons and the areas of the plane are different. So human intelligence or mammalian intelligence is not unique. Other species evolved intelligence and complex cognitive tasks through other neurons and different neurons and separately evolved. Yeah, I mean, I find it fascinating. You're basically saying that, like, even though...
Bird brains are different. The neurons are in different places. They're doing different things. They developed in different ways. They can still do similar tasks. But you're saying they're doing that and their intelligence is not the same intelligence we have. We think so, because we are using different structures and different types of neurons. to be this kind of intelligence. So bird brains are amazing. A couple of examples. So they have evolved to fly.
and therefore they have secondary specializations. And the most important in this case, and the pain in the neck for us in the lab, is that they have reduced... enormously the size of neurons. So they are tiny. In this way, they can reduce the size of the brain and the weight of the brain. The whole brain and the whole body of birds is designed to weigh very low.
so they can fly. The neurons in bird brains are tiny and they are thoroughly compacted, so these are the most dense, in terms of neurons, the most dense brains in nature. But also, when you compare the number of neurons, which always or classically was considered a correlation to intelligence, some birds, they have double the number of neurons of a primate of the same size. Oh. So they have huge numbers of neurons. Definitely these are very clever animals, and they are differently clever to us.
And I know that you didn't study humans, but I'm curious if you think like this research can tell us anything about whether there's something special about like the way the human brain developed. I have to say that I am the least anthropocentric person in research biology. You're like, boo, humans. Yeah, definitely. So I'm extending my low anthropocentric view. I am also very low mammalocentric view. We see in the lab a lot of complexities in other brains.
So we also, I don't do research directly on human brains, right? But I tend to think that in the last 25 years since I've been working in labs, There is a paper coming out every two, three years claiming that there is a specific feature to humans. It could be a cell type which only appears in humans or a circuit that is only developing in humans.
But then, after three, four years, someone finds the same circuit or cell type or progenitor type in primates. And then someone else finds it five, ten years later in mice. So in the end, me as the least anthropocentric researcher ever, I tend to think that our brain is special in quantitative features, but not in qualitative features. So we are a mammalian brain, definitely this is different to a bird brain, but we just have more of the same unit.
And there might be an emergent property coming up from this increase in the number. But I don't believe someone has convinced me so. cell types which are specifically human, or connections which are specifically human. In the case of birds, they can count and they can plan the future. As you said, they can make tools on their own. They can hide some… Like food?
some food or something for the future, this kind of thing. So they can plan, but they are doing it with a different part of the poly. Wow. What do you hope people will take away from your... The main takeaway is that humans are special, but so are birds and reptiles. So our brains are amazing, but their brains are even as amazing at least. We have neurons other species do not have, but the chicken, even the chicken, stupid chicken, they do have neurons that we don't have.
So evolution has found so many different ways to generate complex brain, not just only one direct pathway from amphibians to humans. In this case... The tree of intelligence is just a tree. It's not just a single branch in the case of mammals. Fernando, thank you so much for talking to us about bird brains. Of course. Thank you.
This episode was produced by Rachel Carlson, edited by our showrunner Rebecca Ramirez, and Tyler Jones Check the Facts. Our audio engineer was Kwesi Lee. Beth Donovan is our senior director, and Colin Campbell is our senior vice president of podcasting strategy. I'm Regina Barber. Thank you for listening to SureWave from NPR.
Wait, wait, don't tell me. Fresh air. Up first. NPR News Now. Planet Money. Ted Radio Hour. Throughline. The NPR Politics Podcast. Code Switch. Embedded. Books We Love. Wildcard. are just some of the podcasts you can enjoy sponsor-free with NPR+. Get all sorts of perks across more than 20 podcasts with the bundle option. Learn more at plus.npr.org.
Want to know what's happening in the world? Listen to the State of the World podcast. Every weekday we bring you important stories from around the globe. In just a few minutes, you might hear how democracy is holding up in South Korea. Or meet Indian monkeys that have turned to crime. We don't go around the world. We're already there. Listen to the State of the World podcast from NPR.