Sharri | 22 August - podcast episode cover

Sharri | 22 August

Aug 22, 202449 minSeason 1Ep. 446
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Labor MPs dismayed at Anthony Albanese's call over Gaza visas, Scott Morrison responds to the news the UK is reviewing the AUKUS deal. Plus, text messages highlight the involvement of Penny Wong and Katy Gallagher in the Brittany Higgins saga.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

Why on Sky News This is Sharry Good Evening.

Speaker 2

Welcome to the show tonight. Labor MP's dismayed at Anthony Albanesi's call over garsen visas after a shocking parliamentary fortnite. Labour figures are alarmed that the Prime Minister couldn't even say her mus supporters aren't welcome in this country. More on that exclusive. In a moment, Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison responds to the news that the UK is reviewing

the Orchest deal. I spoke with him exclusively today, plus text messages highlight the involvement of the so called mean girls Penny Wong and Katie Gallagher in the Britney Higgins saga. Legal affairs expert Chris Merritt will take us through the latest evidence and a scathing attack on The New York Times from the former editor in chief of The Age, Michael Gowenda. He'll join me live in the pro tonight

to discuss the doxing scandal. But first we are witnessing at the DNC the shameless and audacious remaking of Kamala Harris. The kings of showbiz and politics, Oprah and the Clintons are harnessing their power to transform Harris from an incompetent laughing stock to one of America's political greats. This is spin at its finest, a truly masterful transformation of an inept candidate. For here was Oprah and Bill Clinton propping

up Kamala Harris. Today, Carmon sense tells you that Kamala Harris and Tim Wallas can give us decency.

Speaker 3

Let's all choose Karmala Harror.

Speaker 4

When Kamala Harris as president, every day will begin with you.

Speaker 5

You.

Speaker 2

You, you, the candidate utterly transformed from someone not even the left wing media thought was capable of becoming president.

Speaker 6

I think she was arguably Biden's worst political decision.

Speaker 5

They don't like her.

Speaker 2

There's lots of reasons they.

Speaker 5

Don't like her.

Speaker 7

Kamala Harris's approval rating is now at twenty eight percent, which is an historic low for any modern vice president.

Speaker 6

We're hearing it from mainstream media, one outlet after another, one league after another, that Kamala Harris is a worst vice president ever, the worst Polish distetition ever.

Speaker 2

And that was all when she was VP, when Biden was still intending to be the Democratic nominee. So how has this happened? Will Barack Obama's tacticians have reportedly become involved or even taken over Kamala Harris's presidential campaign. It's extraordinary that gloss, slogans, and the power of celebrity can transformed the perception of an individual to the point that she appears tough where she was weak, and intelligent where

she was incompetent. The Wall Street Journal's editorial board says that Harris is no longer the vice president who failed to secure the border. She'll now be tough on illegal migration. She's no longer the veep who said Bidenomics is working while inflation reached a forty year high. She's now the candidate who will reduce your family's food bill by going after your grosser for price gouging. Her campaign suggests she's changed her views on all that, although she hasn't said

why or even been asked. The Wall Street Journal says Americans are expected to take her expedient leap from the left to the center on faith. Well, if this spin works, and if Kamala Harris is elected president, she'll be the most radical left figure to command the Oval office. The prospect is alarming because the media are failing to interrogate her on what she actually stands for, on what her

domestic all foreign policies are. And this is concerning at the most volatile period in global politics since the Second World War. We're seeing an ambitious China, an emboldened Iran, and an aggressive Russia, all of them forming closer alliances to challenge the West and threaten our peace. And what do we know of how Kamala Harris would lead America and the world through this troubled period, Well close to nothing. And the DNC, for all its glitz and showbiz, hasn't

enlightened us in the slightest. There's an absence of substance and an abundance of Trump bashing. Now, it should be the simplest thing to say that terror supporters are not welcome in our country, but the Prime Minister just can't say it. He can't say that terror supporters aren't welcome in Australia. Liberal im P Julie and Lisa asked Albineasi this question twice today in Parliament. Have a look, Prime Minister.

Speaker 8

On October seven, Hamas terrorists went into small Israeli farming villages and a music festival where they filmed themselves gleefully murdering children, raping women and mutilating their victims, including after death. Thirteen hundred innocent people were gunned down and murdered for sport, and two hundred and fifty one hostages were forced at gunpoint into Hamas terror tunnels under Gaza. On return, thousands

of people were dancing in the streets in celebration. Prime Minister did supporting Hamas passed the character test for an Australian visa a simple answer.

Speaker 2

The Prime Minister just couldn't answer the question.

Speaker 9

One of the things that some of the Jewish community leaders have said to me in the wake of October seven is that they are precisely the sort of people who want to see peace and reconciliation with the Palestinians as well. There they were very close to where the border was, and to have them subjected to the horrific murder, rape and abuse that occurred, the kidnapping of people is horrific if it occurred to any human being.

Speaker 2

And the speaker wouldn't even take a point of order, presumably to point out that the Prime Minister wasn't answering the question. So Julian Lisa got up and asked it again very specifically.

Speaker 8

Prime minister does supporting Hamas past the character test for an Australian visa.

Speaker 2

Albin Easy would not answer well. After question time, Julian and Lisa told me, I don't understand why the Prime Minister cannot say what Australians expect a prime minister to say, that anyone who supports terrorist organizations like HAMAS is not welcome here. It is very disappointing that he can't just say in simple words what John Howard or Bob Hawk

would easily have said. And I can tell you that even labor politicians are shocked that Albin Easy could not come out and say that anyone who supports terrorism isn't welcome in our country, that it would fail the character test requirement for a visa. Labor MPs are concerned. They dismaye about Albenese's handling of this crucial issue that's fundamental

to our very value and democracy. They have failed to understand why Albneazy didn't come out straight after the ASIO Director General Mike Burgess's comments two Sundays ago, ten days ago and clarify that actually no HAMAS supporters terrorst supporters aren't welcome in Australia. The only explanation I can see is that Hamas supporters are welcome in Australia, Like the head of ASIO said himself.

Speaker 10

If it's just rhetorical reupport and they don't have an ideology or support for a violent extream as an ideology, then that's not a problem.

Speaker 2

And the reality is Hamas sympathizers have already come to Australia on visas issued by the Australian government. I show that this had happened back in February. A twenty one year old Palestinian had liked and shared pro Harmusk content right after October seven, content that celebrated those terrorist attacks. Well, he's no longer in Gaza. He's now in Melbourne on

an Albanesi government visa. Today the Opposition leader Peter Dutton accused Albanesi of dodging thirty questions relating to what he is now calling the Visas for Votes scheme.

Speaker 11

Over the last two weeks, the Prime Minister has dodged about thirty questions on the government's handling of people coming from terrorist control Gaza since October seven. It's now clear that by cutting corners and concocting the Visa for Votes scheme. This government has put domestic political considerations ahead of national security and Australians are now lis safe.

Speaker 2

And not to get into too much detail about what went on in Parliament, but they actually made Peter Dutton remove the phrase of visa for votes. That's not even allowed freedom of speech to call this visa for votes, that's not even allowed under the Labor government in parliament, that is freedom of speech. Now Here were some of the questions that the Prime Minister refuse to answer just today.

Speaker 12

Will individuals currently in the terrorist controlled Garza war Zone who have already been granted a visa by this government be subject to face to face interviews or biometric checks before they arrive in Australia. How many people from the Gaza war zone has Qatar accepted?

Speaker 13

I referred to the government's issuing of tourists visas to nearly three thousand people from the terrorists controlled Gaza war Zone. Can the Prime Minister provide details on any concerns raised by the New South Wales State Police or the New South Wales Government regarding this matter.

Speaker 2

Albanezi calls all the questions about the visa process pointless noise, and he lectured Dutton about national security.

Speaker 9

National security is too important to be used as a political football. Our national security is something that historically in this place, in this place has been above the sort of game playing and targeting that we've seen here. The targeting of any group based upon hate is a bad thing, whether that people of Jewish faith, people of Islamic faith. And what they don't want also is conflict brought here. They want Australa to play a constructive role.

Speaker 2

Now that is an extraordinary remark that he doesn't want the conflict brought here when the Prime Minister is literally handing out visas to thousands of people from a terrorist hotspot without proper or in some cases, any security checks. There are also live questions about whether Tony Burke gave any ministerial or personal recommendations to overturn visa cancelations. His

offers simply won't answer the question. What's needed now is a thorough review of all the visas issued to ensure that recipients are genuine refugees and don't pose a security risk to our country. It's not good enough just to

hope and pray a terror attack doesn't take place. Now, let me tell you, I've spoken to a lot of current and former political and law enforcement figures about what's unfolding here, what the government has done with this Ghazan visa situation, and all of them that I've spoken to are universally horrified. Albanezi is out of his depth. He is risking national security and he's putting community safety on

the line. But this is what happens when you put a radical pro Palestinian activist in charge of running the country. All right, let's bring in tonight's pat on our Perth, Mayre Basil Zemplus and National Senator Matt Canavan. Welcome to you both. Matt. I'm just going to get your reaction to what I've just been speaking about this gas and visa process. It's been such a shambolic, chaotic and rushed process.

Law enforcement are horrified, labor and ps are dismayed that the Prime Minister can't even publicly say her must supporters shouldn't come to this country. What's your reaction, Matt, to the past couple of weeks we've.

Speaker 14

Seen Look, it just beggars belief, Shari.

Speaker 1

I mean, ever since we saw the ASO director admit that well, if you just have some well I think he turned rhetorical support for a terrorist organization, you can still come to this country.

Speaker 14

I mean, people here are gobsmack.

Speaker 1

That this is this is actually the policy of an elected Australian government here, as you say in Labor and Peace, a gobsmack.

Speaker 14

It defies all explanation.

Speaker 1

The only explanation is that the Labor Party have become so panicked at the electoral armourgeddon that some seem to think might might be imposed on them an election in Western Sydney because of a voting base sympathetic to the Palestini Palestine issue, that they're willing to trade our nation's security, our national security to protect their own seats. It's the only explanation. So Peter Dutt's is absolutely right to call it the visa for vote scheme. I can't believe that

has been ruled out of Parliament. I mean, when you think of the other terms and abuse that is thrown across the chamber, it shows how defense of the Labor Party is. That we're probably getting close to the truth there. The truth hurts, and maybe it is the truth that they are handing out these visas and the hope that they'll get votes in exchange. But we also, of course we allso getting exchange a much less secure environment for

Australians here. It is completely beyond the pahail and it's something that austrained people should reject.

Speaker 2

Yeah, it is really concerning. I'll come back to this a bit later in the show with Peter Jennings about ZIL. I want to ask you about the Democratic National Convention Day two star started event. Bill Clinton, Oprah Winfrey, what do you think about this transformation, the remaking of Kamala Harris from someone that the left media and the US the Democratic Party more broadly didn't even consider a particularly competent vice president.

Speaker 7

Sherry, I can see that you're quite triggered by the events that are happening across at the DNC. And yes, it has been a makeover, it's been a transformation. We shouldn't forget that the United States is the home of Hollywood and this is probably what they do best, and they're throwing everything at it. I suppose those who aren't sure about Kamala, and I know there's a lot of those people who do think that suddenly what she used to stand for.

Speaker 14

She doesn't anymore.

Speaker 7

How she was represented, She's not represented as they can console themselves with. It's very difficult to be inauthentic for too long before you get found out, and so it's a very dangerous game. Now if she's not any of these things that they are presenting her as, she will get found out. But will that happen before the election? That's the interesting question. What we do know is based on the reaction, the feedback the show is the fact

that everyone's getting wrapped up in it. They definitely made the right call changing their candidate for the next election.

Speaker 2

Yeah, no question. Politically they made the right call. But look, what I care about mostly is foreign policy. And we are seeing, like I said at the start of the show, the most volatile environment globally since World War Two, And we need to know what Kamala Harris is going to do. We need to know will she support Israel? Is she going to come to Taiwan's defend? Where does she stand on Ukraine? She hasn't been interrogated. Foreign policy has been absent entirely from the DMC convention week.

Speaker 7

That is, of course what the debates are for, right, That's what those debates are for. That's what those opportunities this is presented her way. Then when she has to face the questions, and the media should be insisting that she has to answer the questions, then it's harder.

Speaker 14

To hide your true self.

Speaker 2

So let's see then, we'll see if she does do any tough interviews over the next few months. She hasn't yet. All right, Let's have a look at Environment Environment Minister Tanya Plibasek. She's now said that she's not going to release the advice that led to her blocking the one billion dollar gold mine. This was the mind that was all set to go ahead. The men's government in New South Wales was supporting it, State and federal departments had

signed off in it. Matt Canavan, she needs to release this vice, surely.

Speaker 14

Well.

Speaker 1

I think the people of the Orange Bathurst area, Blaney, the smaller the town, small town close to the mind, they deserve to see it's their government. It's their government's made this decision that's imposed an enormous cost on this town and community. We've seen in the media today that you know, there's been people out there who bought businesses in Blaney, a butcher's shop on the expectations we go ahead, as you said, it had its approvals, and fact their

livelihood's destroyed. Now, of course there are also eight hundred jobs that were going to be created might be there. Those people deserve a government to be upfront and transparent with them. I mean, what is about what is about this advice? Is it some secret business when I'm allowed to see, why can't it just be simply explained to

the Australian people. And I go back again to the same point I made earlier that the fact that government's not being transparent about this, the fact they're not answering questions, has to lead you to the position that in fact this decision is indefensible and it's probably being made in consideration of the government's other issue they've got with the Greens and Greens preferences, and so they're making it on that basis, not on the national interest, not on the

interest of those people in these country towns are struggling and want something to happen. And keep in mind also our economy overall is stuttering now with the I all price crashing. We need these types of projects and people need a government that focuses on our economy and our prosperity,

and we're not getting that right now. The government really has no economic or productivity agenda right now except seemingly imposing more and more red tape on businesses that want to create jobs in this country.

Speaker 2

Yeah, it's the uncertainty, it's the unreliability around business investment that is such a big issue here Basil. The minor Regious Resources has had to write down the value of the gold mine by one hundred and ninety two million dollars and the mining company is now reportedly considering legal action, but it looks like they're not going to be able to go ahead at all.

Speaker 7

As we well know over here in the West, when mining does well, Western Australia does well, Australia.

Speaker 14

Certainly does well.

Speaker 7

This is a decision that's bad for the economy, it's bad for jobs, and it's not a decision that can be stacked up and the Minister really does have to come clean and explain why. We know, for example, as you mentioned State Planning, it gets a tick. Her own department, it seems gave it a tick, and we know the local Aboriginal Land Council also gave it a tick. So we need to know why has this been knocked back? Because otherwise what else is going to be knocked back?

It needs to be transparent. We need answers and the country needs these projects approved.

Speaker 2

All right, that's a good point.

Speaker 6

Now.

Speaker 2

Major news today the ABC managing director David Anderson said publicly that he was going to leave the ABC. This is just a year into his second five year term, Matt Canavan. There's a lot of speculation that it could be linked to the incoming chair, Kim Williams, who has been described as being quite interventionist. What do you what are you hearing?

Speaker 5

Look?

Speaker 1

Who would know? Who would know? I'm not hearing anything. It's only just been announced today. I mean, I think the sad thing is that I'm not going to hold my breath to expect any major change at the ABC. There needs to be changed, I mean if it's hardly.

Speaker 14

A well run organization now.

Speaker 1

But to give David his jew, he did dismiss that journalist who was saying rapidly terrible things about the Israel conflict, adding to tension, something a journalist employed by national broadcaster should not do. He obviously copped a lot of backlash to that, so that might play a role from the staff, you.

Speaker 14

Know, and look, maybe good luck to Kim Williams.

Speaker 1

It seems to be a staff run collective over there, and really it should be an organization run for the interest of the whole nation. So maybe Kim can do something if he's in the diventions. But as I said, I won't be holding my breath. I won't be switching the dial to the ABC anytimes.

Speaker 14

Keep it on the Sky.

Speaker 2

And yes, I haven't watched the ABC in I don't no years. It's always on Sky News or Fox News Basil. Look, Kim Williams has said he was going to try and restore some balance to the ABC. He said that before he started. There are I am hearing a lot of rumblings that it is actually getting quite hands on things like the ABC website homepage. So you know, we'll see

just how far he goes. But I think you know, when Matt just said it is a staff collective, that is what we've seen that no chairs, managing directors or anyone on the board has ever been able to actually have an impact when it comes to having an unbiased and objective, not even group of journalists just their output.

Speaker 7

Well, something has changed, obviously, when a decision like this is a career decision like this, a five year contract is put on your table, you do consider where will I be over the course of that contract. And unless there's been some family circumstances change, which doesn't appear to be the case, we know the MD has had a change of or a change of mind or a change of direction coming from above.

Speaker 14

So that may well be a good thing.

Speaker 7

That might be what many people around Australia have been calling for for a long time. There will be a new MD to carry out the new chair's vision. Let's see what happens, shall we?

Speaker 2

All right, Basil zamplus Matt Canavan. Great to see you both as always on a Thursday. Now, the British New Labor government has appointed one of its top security bureaucrats to review the AUCUST partnership. The Nightly reports that Sir Stephen Lovegrove will pour over the progress and benefits of

UCUS and report to the government in October. Now, this ORCUS partnership between the US, the UK and Australia is critical to our national security and as the American Congressman Michael McColl told me last week, it is the single biggest deterrent against China right now. Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison orchestrated the Orchest deal and when he learned that it was Stephen Lovegrove who was going to lead this review,

he wasn't concerned in the slightest. Now, Scott Morrison was traveling, he couldn't be on this show tonight, but he told me the review of Orcus by Stephen Lovegrove is a welcome development and provides the opportunity for a refreshed UK commitment to Orcus from the Starmer government. He said, Stephen was in the room with Boris, President Biden and I when we founded Orcus, and was instrumental in bringing Orcus

into being. No one other than Boris would have a better understanding of the ambitions, purpose and need for Orcus in the UK than Stephen.

Speaker 8

He said.

Speaker 2

I look forward to seeing his report and commend the Starmer government for appointing him to this important task. And while Scott Morrison couldn't be on the show tonight, he will be on my program early next week to discuss this and other topics. But for now, let's bring in Strategic Analysis. Australia Director Peter Jennings. Great to see you again. Why would Kiir Starma be ordering a review into Orcus.

Speaker 15

Well, It's a new government and I guess he needs to persuade that huge backbench of MPs that Labour now has keeping them in government that this is something that's going to work from a labor perspective as well. I agree with Scott Morrison's take. I think that I would be astonished if anything negative came out of the review. And importantly, for AUCUST to work, each of the three countries that are partners Shari need to get something from it.

It's not about a charitable act towards strengthening Australia's defense.

Speaker 14

What the British get is a.

Speaker 15

Strengthened defense industry and will get benefit from that. What the Americans get is a stronger ally in the Endo Pacific. So each of the three countries needs to get a benefit and I'm sure this review will put the case to Keir Starmer that the UK is a strong beneficiary from UCAS as well.

Speaker 2

Peter, I'd like to ask you about the gas and visa issue now, Tony Burke, the Minister has categorically said that no government in its right mind would send people back to Gaza. Now the Palestinians are here on visitor visas, they have an expiration date, So what do you expect will happen when that time is up in the near future.

Speaker 15

I think it's very clear Shari. Those visitor visas last for twelve months, and so if we can assume, and we know that a number of them were being issued from mid October on that right now there will be people with those visas who will be applying for asylum status in Australia in order to remain permanently. And the thing about asylum status, as I understand it, is a minister has to make that authorization. They have to authorize

that a person can make an application for that. And so what we've seen in the last fortnight is the government essentially trying to push this problem onto firstly the intelligence agencies, get Mike Burgess in front of the cameras, he'll look after it for as then saying that there is a process which is going to happen somehow completely removed from any politician taking responsibility for allowing those people in.

But now we are, in coming months ago to have a constant stream of the thirteen hundred that are in Australia, I believe applying for asylum status and that is going to land directly on the desk of the Immigration Minister.

Speaker 2

I didn't mean to laugh then, when you were making a serious point about Mike Burgess assuring Australians that he was taking care of security. I mean there's been a loss of confidence in ASIO after they said the people with rhetorical support for hermus will welcome into the country. I think that that interview has proved problematic. But before you get into that, Pete, I want to ask you

as well. We've just seen the Democratic National Convention rolling out at the moment, Kamala Harris being represented to the American public as though she were a brand new candidate, not the current VP, as part of the current Biden administration. What do you think a Kamala Harris presidency would look like.

Speaker 15

I think if Kamala Harris becomes president, she's going to become the American Jasinda Ardern. She's going to be very focused on performative, theatrical politics of a woke, progressive variety, and that's going to be an unusual thing to see from the White House, even after having Obama and Biden

in the chair for so many years. How is it going to be possible for her to do that at the same time as she's responsible for, for example, modernizing America's nuclear weapons arsenal, which is something that is happening right now, or for maintaining de terrence not just against Russia, but Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran because those four countries are kind of sequencing their behavior together. I think this is going to be a very challenging.

Speaker 14

Span for.

Speaker 15

A President Harris to try and cover from on the one hand, playing to the pro Palestinian student crowds occupying university campuses as they did, through to playing that serious role of being that the global national security guardian, which only the United States can do. But certainly at the moment, I think the model is Jsinda Radin. That's what I see Kamala looking like in terms of how she's presenting herself in the run up to the president election.

Speaker 5

Yeah.

Speaker 2

Yeah, we we'll see if she does become subject to any scrutiny regarding her policies. Peter Jennings, always wonderful to have you on the show. Thank you really appreciate it. Now still coming up in the program. Text messages highlight the involvement of the so called mean girls Pennywong and Katie Gallagher in the Brittany Higgins saga. Also, the former editor in chief of The Age slams The New York Times over its reporter leaking the names of hundreds of Jews.

Michael Gwenda will join me to discuss this shameful saga that's coming up after this quick break. Welcome back.

Speaker 10

Well.

Speaker 2

The New York Times is meant to be one of the world's most trusted newspapers, and yet one of their journalists was part of a private WhatsApp group of six hundred Australian Jews. This journalist downloaded the private chats and leaked them to another individual and it leaked from their leading to horrific threats and anti Semitic attacks, and the private information of Australian Jews private individuals being leaked and disseminated.

The former editor in chief of The Age newspaper, Michael Gwenda, writes in The Australian that the ethical foundations of journalism in liberal democracies like Australia have been reduced to rubble and I'm pleased to say, Michael joins me. Now, Michael, thank you very much for your time. Look, firstly, can you explain it it be with you? How did it come to light that a New York Times journalist had originally leaked the information about hundreds of Australian Jews.

Speaker 5

Well, I think what happened was that.

Speaker 16

After the doc sne happened the group, which happened some time ago, months ago. Now people on that WhatsApp obviously realized that their information, their chats had been somehow accessed by someone and leaked and had gone and had gone to people who were frankly viciously. They call themselves pro Palestinian, but they're vicious people who have basically, over a long period of time, six months or longer, attacked some of these Jewish people online, and many of them have tens

of thousands of followers. Now they realized, these people realized that somehow their chats had been leaked to these people, including people like Clementine Ford for instance, and they thought, well, they couldn't believe that this has been done. It could only have been someone who was on part of the chat group that had done that. I think it took them some time. I don't know how they discovered who

it was, but they eventually did discover well. I think the group themselves had real suspicions that it was this person that had eleeked it. But the Wall Street Journal, to their great credit, did the journalistic examination of what had gone on, found out who it was and published that really fine story a few days ago of what had actually taken place. That it was a New York Times journalist based in Melbourne. I'm not sure she's still here because she writes she writes the europe Newsletter.

Speaker 5

How she does that from.

Speaker 16

Melbourne, I don't know, but they discovered that, they published the story. It was a good story. But I think, to the great shame of Australian journalism, this story had to be done by the Wall Street Journal rather than one of the newspapers here in Australia.

Speaker 2

Very good point. Now, Michael, you've written a letter to the New York Times leadership. In it, you know, you ask what responsibility they've taken for one of their reporters, you know, being involved in this leaking of the information that led to so many hundreds of Jews being harmed. Do you think they have taken enough responsibility. They haven't even really reported on this at all.

Speaker 5

Now they've taken no responsibility.

Speaker 16

In my view, I think it's I think it's I don't understand the standard, except in terms of this is something that they think happened far away in Australia and that they can basically ignore it.

Speaker 5

I think that's how they're behaving.

Speaker 16

I thought to myself, if this had happened to say, a group of six hundred American Jews, that their information had been lead in this way by a New York Times reporter, could they have ignored the story the way they have.

Speaker 5

I doubt that they could have.

Speaker 16

But to me, this is just absolutely an example of journalistic cowardice. I wrote to them, I said, you know you pride yourself on being fearless in your reporting. You also pride yourself and have over many years, been absolutely committed to when you make mistakes, revealing the mistakes that your journalists have made.

Speaker 5

Examining them, telling your readers about.

Speaker 16

Them, telling your readers what you're going to do to make sure it doesn't happen again.

Speaker 5

They have not done anything like that in this case.

Speaker 16

I think it's I think it's a sign for me it's a sign of where journalism is at, especially I've got to say, in the liberal media. It's a sign of where which I was part of for my whole journalistic life. It's a sign of where we've ended up.

Speaker 2

Well, yes, I mean, you know you look far too young for this, but I understand you spent five decades at the Age you were the editor in chief, and yet you're writing about anti semitism has appeared in the Australian. What does that tell you about, as you call it, the liberal media in this country.

Speaker 5

Well, I'll tell you one thing.

Speaker 16

It tells me that the Age and papers like the Age, and I think this is probably true about the ABC as well, that the executive producers, the news directors, the editors have lost control of their newspapers and their television stations and then news outfits. I think that we've reached a point now where editors, I feel like this has happened.

Editors are really captive of their staff, and I think the truth is that there are many people on papers like the Age of Sidney Morning Herald that would be and have staff that would be appalled if I was allowed to write for them.

Speaker 5

I think that's the situation we're in at the.

Speaker 2

Moment, and shame on them because anyone, any media outlet, should be honored to have your work being published. Michael, thank you for your courage and speaking out on this issue and on the media who have been hostile in covering the antisemitism crisis. I just don't understand how the ABC has failed to comprehensively cover what's been going on in our country. It's unprecedented in Australia at the levels of antisemitism. Public broadcaster has barely touched the issue. Michael

Gwenda really appreciate your time. Thank you. Now up next, when families can't afford to buy a chicken, you know, the cost of living crisis is coming home to roost. Will cover that in a moment. Plus how long will Donald Trump have to remain behind bulletproof glass before he can have a rally out in the open. I'm going to discuss that with my panel. Next, welcome back, Well, let's bring you now Sky News contributor Gary Hardgrave and

llenp Senator James McGrath. Welcome to you both, gentlemen. Let's turn to the cost of chicken. Now, you know the cost of living crisis is biting hard when sales of chicken fall dramatically. This is meant to be and I have to say don't eat chicken myself, but this is meant to be the cheapest and most popular protein for Australians. This is according to the ODS newspaper. Gary. You know, there's a lot of grocery products that people just can't afford to buy anymore.

Speaker 14

You know, Shari.

Speaker 17

If you don't eat it and I don't eat it, and Australians on average eat fifty kilos of chicken a year, there must be some people doing a lot of work for you and me.

Speaker 14

Look, it's very rare.

Speaker 2

Why don't you eat chicken? Gary, what's your excuse?

Speaker 14

It's not my first choice.

Speaker 17

I'd much rather have a good piece of red meat and some great seafood.

Speaker 14

So there you go. It's pretty simple.

Speaker 17

But look, chicken is the mainstay for a lot of people, and yet the cost of.

Speaker 14

Living crisis is coming home. But the problem, the problem.

Speaker 17

Here is that McDonald's, KFC and the people that cook chickens are not affording the cost of the electricity.

Speaker 14

That's the problem, Charri.

Speaker 17

And this is all the big retailers, all the big commercial fast food stores. Everybody is feeling the pressure because labor is so hell bent on driving up the cost of electricity.

Speaker 14

So yep, going to come home to rooster.

Speaker 2

As you say, yeah, James, I think there's a section of the population that are really struggling just to put food on the table, you know, kind of close to poverty during this cost of living crisis. But then there's another whole section of Australians who were just actually cutting back on a lot of grocery items because inflation has pushed up the price of just common things and it's not going back down.

Speaker 10

Food prices under labor have gone up eleven percent in the last two years. This country isn't a cost of living crisis. Now, I love chicken and I'll take your fifty and fifty kilos here, go for it. I die genuinely adore KFC. But seriously, there are families out there their treat is on a Friday night is to get KFC. And if people can't afford KFC, it shows there is a real problem in Australia and that is because we've got a labor government and as Gary pointed out, they're

driving up the power of the cost of power. Sorry, they're driving up the cost of living just generally with this insurance, rent, mortgage and whatever. People are cutting back and it's because of Alban exactly.

Speaker 2

Yeah. Now, Donald Trump held his first outdoor campaign rally since the assassination attempt. He had to do it behind bulletproof glass.

Speaker 14

Have a look that charade that they have going on.

Speaker 4

They mentioned my name I think two hundred and seventy one times. They mentioned the economy like twelve times. They mentioned the border.

Speaker 14

Maybe none.

Speaker 4

They don't talk about the border. Our Great Borders doesn't talk about the border. But they mentioned me more than any other category. I'm now a category that had me down today as a category. That's all they talk about Trump. We've driven him crazy. They have Trump derangement syndrome and Gary.

Speaker 2

Of course he was speaking there about the DNC, but it's true their focus was more Trump than any policies.

Speaker 17

Yeah, because Trump is the guy that's standing between the insanity of more of this green left climate corn internationally and getting ourselves back on track. And frankly, Australians will be better off if Donald Trump can completely pierce this mad dream about renewables being able to give us enough electricity to cook that Kentucky fried chicken that James seems

to like so much. Look, you know, Donald Trump has got to get out there, and if he's taking any sort of advice from security people to be behind plexiglass, I tell you one thing it does do is emphasizes the fact that he is a big threat to the elites and to the establishment all around the world, and people are going to be able to get him. This bloke will broke her a difference if he can be elected.

So keep him safe, keep him bottled up. Well I don't think he can keep him bottled up, But keep him on track and make us make America and the rest of the world great again.

Speaker 2

I say now, I want to end our conversation with this amazing eleven year old Australian girl. She survived a horrific stabbing attack in London. She's spoken to the Daily Telegraph for the first time. Have a quick look.

Speaker 18

The police that have been looking after me. They drove me everywhere and they've just been so lockfilly. Some of them bonded with me really fast and I felt safe. My friend Chris and Carly they came with us to Taylor swift for work for work and they had a great time, but they also made me feel.

Speaker 2

More safe, James, She's incredible. But how is it that girls, that women are being stabbed, that the knife attacks in the UK. It's just next level.

Speaker 10

It's next level in the UK. But also here the violence against women and girls in Australia. But what is just brilliant about this young Australian is what her mum said, that nothing will stop her. And I think the future

is bright in Australia. We've got people like Layla who've gone through a horrific stabbing incident, attempted murder in the UK, and you just look at it now and go, oh my goodness, adults, look at this person, stop whinging, stop being silks, look at this young Australian and just get on with.

Speaker 14

Yeah.

Speaker 2

Beautiful story, beautiful girl. Gary Hargrave, James McGrath, Great to see you both tonight. Now after the break, Just how involved were the so called mean girls Katie Gallagher and Penny Wong in the Britney Higgins scandal. Well, some of their own text messages have come to light. We're going to look at it with Chris Merritt, after the break.

Senior Albanesi government ministers Penny Wong and Katie Gallagher have long denied they had anything to do with weaponizing Brittney Higgins rape allegations against the Morrison government politically, but new text messages shed light on their involvement in the saga. They've been tended in court in the defamation suit that Linda Reynolds is pursuing against Higgins and her husband David Scharaz. Now Finance Minister Katie Gallagher texted the journalists who break

the story, Sam Maiden, to discuss parts of it. She said she saw the police before the first April though she's meaning brit So texting about the detail of the case and Pennywog also sent text messages to Maiden as you can see on the screen as well. Let's bring in now legal affairs expert and the vice president of the Rule of Law Institute, Chris Merritt. Chris, thanks great

to see you again. Look what do you think these messages show about Pennywog and Katie Gallagher's involvement in pushing the story along from a political perspective.

Speaker 19

Look, it'll be up to justice title hopefully In his judgment to put together a timeline which will hopefully spell out a bit more detail about who knew what and when. But on the face of things, it looks as though this is in line with the finding in the earlier defamation case in the Federal Court, where Justice Michael Lee said this must be the only cover up where the party accused of covering up wanted to call the police. So the timing is crucial on all this who knew

what and when? And the big concern, however, is this Labor is not a party to this. This is a defamation case. There's a risk that we might never get to the bottom of this, that this defamation case might not get to the bottom of it, which means the National Anti Corruption Commission. This might fall to the Commission

to dig into and have a good look at. But there are a few surprises in this week's proceedings, and one of the biggest is that there now appears to be two psychiatric reports on the harm that's said to have been caused to Miss Higgins. One of the reports says one hundred percent of the harm was caused by the sexual assault that is said to have taken place, and the other says only a only sixty percent, and the rest was due to the mishandling of the sexual

assault by the government. Now how that came about is also a matter that hopefully could still be referred to the Anti Corruption Commission, But the judge didn't seem to be that interested in this aspect of the affair. It doesn't go to the question of defamation. That goes more to the broader narrative of the payout to Miss Higgins, so that we could finish up with a very unsatisfactory

outcome in this case. We might get a win or a loss in the defamation proceedings, but that could leave a number of questions hanging that are very crucial to the broader narrative and the public interest.

Speaker 2

We also heard this week that Brittany Higgins won't be giving evidence. She won't be defending herself.

Speaker 3

If you like, is this unusual, Well, if you're going to defend a mation case and not take the stand, it's a very strange way to conduct a defense.

Speaker 19

Let me put it that way. It denies Miss Reynolds's counsel from the opportunity of cross examining and testing Miss Higgins on the stand. We already know that mister Charraz is not going to give evidence, so it's almost like fighting someone who's not there. So the case will be determined on the evidence that's come to light so far, and some of that evidence. The text messages that came

out today this week are really quite surprising. They show that Samantha Maiden, the News Limited journalist news dot com journalist, actually chastised mister Sharraz at one stage and urged him to stop conducting himself like some sort of agent out of concern for the stress.

Speaker 2

She was concerned about putting pressure on Higgins, no question, Chris Merritt were out of time. Great to see you. Thanks everyone for your company this week. I'll see you Monday. And here's Paul Murray

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android