Why don’t we eat people? (classic)

Hello, Search Engine Nation and beyond. February 20th is National Cherry Pie Day as well as National Muffin Day. Two widely celebrated, widely observed American holidays with the same message. Some foods should be eaten. In honor of both of these holidays, we're re-airing one of our very favorite episodes, which is about what foods you can eat and can't eat, and a young man with questions about both.

Also, if you have a moment, we've been real good and haven't asked this for a while, please consider reviewing and rating us on Apple Podcasts. All of our moms and dads read the reviews and it makes them feel better about our jobs doing audio podcasting in 2026. Thank you. Our episode after these ads.

This episode of Search Engine is brought to you in part by MUBI, the global film company that champions great cinema. From iconic directors to emerging auteurs. There's always something new to discover. With Movie, each and every film is hand-selected so you can explore the best of cinema. If you're looking for something extraordinary, don't miss My Father's Shadow, coming to US Theaters on February 13th. Directed by Akinola Davies Jr.

First Nigerian film ever in official competition at Cannes. This poetic and tender story follows a father and his two young sons navigating their relationship against the vibrant, politically charged city of Lagos in 1993. Written by Real Life brothers Akinola Davies Jr. and Walter.

And Wally Davies, and starring Shape Dorishu, it's a film that quietly uncovers the unspoken bonds of family. Whether you're already a lover of great cinema or just discovering it, Mubi brings the world's best films straight to your screen. To stream the best of cinema, you can try Mubi free for 30 days at Mubi.com slash search engine. That's mubi.com slash search engine for a whole month of great cinema for free. This episode of Search Engine is brought to you in part by Zapier.

We cover a lot of trends on this show, and over the last few months, everyone has been talking about AI. But just talking about trends doesn't actually make your workday easier. What makes the biggest difference is using AI in a practical way. And that's where Zapier comes in. Zapier is how you break the hype cycle and actually put AI to work. It can help you automate repetitive tasks.

Connect the tools you already use, and save hours that used to get eaten up by manual work. And you don't need to be a tech expert to use it. Zapier is how you actually deliver on your AI strategy, not just talk about it. With their AI orchestration platform, you can connect tools like Like ChatGPT or Cloud to your workflows, build AI-powered automations, agents, or even customer chatbots. Teams across marketing, sales, HR, and more have already automated over 300 million AI tasks with Zapier.

Join the millions of businesses transforming how they work with Zapier and AI. Get started for free by visiting Zapier.com/slash search. That's Z A P I E R First of all, can you say your name and how old you are?

I'm four and I'm My name is Adam. And did you just turn four or have you been four for a while? I t I turned four, um, like A few days ago. You turned four in May, right? Okay. Okay. It's good to have a fact checker. Otto had arrived with his mother to search engines recording studio because he had a question.

Our interview had begun as all my interviews do. I'd offered the guests some candy from our office candy jar. Otto had chosen a lollipop, which he was now crunching on with some gusto. Meanwhile, I was just trying to begin our conversation with some softball. Um I asked your favorite color, but I'm gonna ask you again for the record. What's your favorite color? Red. What's your favorite season? Winter? Snowman's Oh, that's pretty good. Um, you're here with your mom, is that true?

Yes. And what's your mom's name? Hina. And do you know what your mom's job is? She works at a restaurant. Okay, so just another quick fact check here. Hannah Goldfield, Otto's mom, does not work at restaurants. She writes about them. She's a food critic for The New Yorker. And part of her ethos, and this will become important later, is that she considers it part of her job to quote, eat anything.

You asked your mom a question recently. Do you remember what the question was? Well I need to eat human nuts. Why were you wondering about that? 'Cause I was asking my dad what else I could eat for dinner. And did you suggest a human head or did he suggest a human head? I did. And why do you think you were hungry for a human head? Because I I know you eat cow. Yeah. 'Cause it lasts like B. I mean so the f the full context was that

I actually wasn't in the room at the at the moment that the question was first asked and my husband was asking Otto what else he wanted for dinner other than what we were having that night and I actually can't remember what it was. And Otto said Sausage, chicken skin, and the meat of a human head. Okay. Okay. And

Josh, my husband was obviously surprised and he laughed and then he texted me. I was upstairs doing something. He was like, You gotta come down and hear what Otto just said. So we repeated this whole Exchange and I said, Otto, do you know what would have to happen for us to eat? the meat of a human head. And he said, yeah. And I said, you know, you know, the person would have to be dead. And he said, yeah, well they would already be dead like like an old person and their body was just

there and we could just eat the meat of their head. And I explained to him that humans don't eat. other humans, but the more I tried to explain why the less of a good answer I had. Did uh it seem like Otto still wanted to know, or was it kind of like the question had more sticking power for you than it did for him? I think it had more sticking power for me. I think that he kind of quickly realize It was taboo. And he backed off of it.

And that's something I've been thinking a lot about about. I actually I I was talking about this to a friend and I described it as taboo and he thought that that word was like not nearly a strong enough word. He felt like taboo was like, you know, it's taboo not to give up your seat for a pregnant woman on the subway. But i it no, it but it's I think it's one of the ultimate taboos.

I have a friend who says that the truest taboos are the ones whose existence we don't even acknowledge. It's an idea that we've decided culturally or instinctively is so b rotten that it becomes hard to even explain why we don't do it because we don't even talk about why we don't do it. We just don't do it. Yes, exactly. So Hannah found herself stuck thinking about her son's brush with the cannibalism taboo, even after Otto had moved on.

And she soon found herself poking around on the internet. I just like looked up cannibalism on Wikipedia and there's like a famous Cannibal. Um, which is such a funny word also. Like when I when I hear that word, m immediately I have this like cartoon image, maybe from like Mad magazine or something, of like A quote unquote savage wearing like

Bones. It's the bone necklace. Yeah, bone necklace, loincloth. The like Western explorers and like an iron pot and like the soups being like gradually heated. Totally. That's the candle in your brain. Right. You start to realize that There isn't that much logic to it. And if like tomorrow you got a PR blast email that said like the people who made the impossible burger have figured out how to like make a synthetic

human steak, like a lab grown human steak. So you can satisfy your curiosity about human meat without causing human suffering. Would you go? So the idea would be you can taste what human meat would taste like without killing someone. Killing someone. I think so, yeah. I think I would. I I don't think if it was totally lab grown.

I think I would. I Otto. Would you eat human meat if you were allowed to eat human meat? And if nobody had to get hurt for human meat to be eaten? Yeah. And is it because you think it would be tasty or because you're curious? Give them carry. Will you eat things that are like that most people would be scared to eat? Like are you a picky eater? What's the rule in our house about food?

Which would suggest that you guys are slightly breaking your own rules here. If there's just a blanket prohibition on human human stall me. I mean d this it strikes me as like it's so absurd and hilarious, but then I'm like, but why? Right, right. Like it feels so um Taboo. It just Yeah. I feel like a slight sense of nausea, a little bit of shame. Yeah. And yet the most logical part of my brain is like, sure. It's weird. You know it's a taboo because

There's the rule, but then there's something more powerful behind the rule that's like bigger than the rule. You know what I mean? It's like that's how you know you're in the presence of a real type. Where you're like, I don't I'm worried to even get near this thing, even though I think I understand why the rule exists.

Even if there was a carve out, I'm kind of afraid of being caught near the carving. Yes. Yes. Have you like in the course of your life as a person who eats a lot of things, have you eaten things that felt to you instinctively like

as like you had a similar reaction a as if you'd eaten human meat where you just felt like I shouldn't be eating this or like I my mind is telling my body not to do this. Yeah, nothing as extreme as the taboo of eating human meat, but uh The first thing that comes to mind is balut, which is it's a Filipino

dish. I mean they may eat it in other in other parts of the world. Um it's a fertilized duck egg. I think it can also be other poultry eggs, meaning that like unlike an unfertilized egg that you eat with bacon for breakfast, it's been fertilized, so it's like the fetus of a duck.

That sound you're hearing in the background is of a precocious and slightly bored four year old figuring out that if you make funny sounds with your mouth, the microphone will pick them up. Anyway, balut. So when you bite into it, is there like You like pull out what looks like an embryonic bird. Wow. I had it only once many years ago at a Filipino restaurant. But it's very, very popular there. Like so popular that kids eat it as like an after school snack. And I try to remember that it's like

everything is so based on what you grew up eating, what was considered normal. So it's like for me, yes, I can't quite get over how weird that feels, but I totally can understand how someone could grow up eating that and think it was the most normal thing in the world. But when you were eating it y the

FM radio station, your brain was just broadcasting like no, no, stop, no. For sure. It just felt r off to me. Not even like no, no, no, but like I'm doing this so I can say that I've tried it, but it's not something I w well you know, jump at the chance to eat again. Although I would like if you offered me some right now, I would try. I just like I haven't insatiable curiosity.

About food. It's also just funny because it's like if you were like, Do you wanna eat an egg? I'd be like, Sure. If you were like, Do you wanna eat a duck? I'd be like, Absolutely. If you were like, Do you wanna eat a a baby duck? I'd be like, I don't really have a strong opinion about that. Right.

What what what are the like reproductive politics of like duck fetus is bad is really weird. Like there's just a there's a complicated amount of culture in that response that I don't know how to explain. Exactly.

In America, there's a newer taboo which says that people shouldn't be disgusted when they encounter foods from other cultures, which is absolutely polite. But also does not take into account that pretty much every culture has ideas about what's gross. And for some of those cultures, what's gross is actually what we

In India, where my editor Shruti grew up, a lot of people are born and raised vegetarian. They've never eaten a bite of meat. Can you imagine how gross meat would be if you'd never eaten it?

or what inhospitable ideas you might harbor about the ropey, wet texture of animal muscles, towards the people who compliment crispy skin Sharuthi told me in the school lunchrooms there, she'd often see a kid react to their neighbor eating chicken, the way a kid here might react to their neighbor eating balut. Disgust, the real disgust you feel in your stomach, doesn't feel like it comes from culture. Our disgust feels hardwired. But that's just not true.

If it were, Otto would have just been born knowing he can't eat people. Instead, it's a rule he's being taught. And a rule he'll soon understand is so important, he'll forget that he ever had to learn it at all. Okay. Otto, thank you for coming in to ask your question. You're welcome. Hannah, thank you for coming in and bringing Otto. Thanks for having us. Otto, you're free.

There's something about eating a person, even if they're already dead, that we've all agreed is And we are not contesting that rule. But we are interrogating it. We're just asking questions about it. After the break, three stories about cannibalism. At least one of which I think will come. complicate your certainty about the anti-cannibalism feeling. That's after smads.

This episode of Search Engine is brought to you in part by Claude from Anthropic. Here's a question worth following. What happens when AI gets added? You go down a rabbit hole asking something you genuinely want to understand, and what you see could be shaped by who paid for placement. The curiosity gets hijacked. Anthropic just committed to keeping Claude ad-free. No sponsored responses and no influence on where your questions lead.

Claude is built as a thinking partner for exactly this kind of exploration. Following questions wherever they go, sitting in the bewildering parts, not rushing to conclusions just to wrap things up. The rabbit hole stays yours. Get started with Claude for free at claude.ai slash search engine. This episode of Search Engine is brought to you in part by Framer. Your marketing website is the one touch point every single customer has with your brand.

So if you're still struggling to make simple updates, if marketing wants a landing page, design mocks it up, and engineering says, yeah, we'll get to it, you're leaving opportunity on the table. That's why thousands of companies, from early stage startups to Fortune 500s like Perplexity, Miro, and Mixpan.

channel are building their websites in Framer. Framer is a website builder that works like your team's favorite design tool. Real-time collaboration, a robust CMS with everything you need for great SEO, and advanced analytics with integrated A-B testing. So your design

Your designers and marketers can build and optimize your site from day one without waiting on engineering. Learn how you can get more out of your dot com from a Framer specialist or get started building for free today at Framer.com slash search for 30% off a Framer Pro Annual Plan. That's framer.com slash search for 30% off, framer.com slash search. Rules and restrictions may apply.

Welcome back to the show. Normally, you know how podcasts work. This is not your first one. We did the intro part, then we do the part where I talk to an expert on cannibalism. Somebody who wrote a book, they'll say a bunch of smart stuff. I'll ask them follow-up questions about it. This week we're gonna do something a little different. So I read a bunch of books on cannibalism, some science, some cultural history. I watched a TED Talk. There is a cannibalism TED Talk.

And then I called a friend. I mentioned in the first half when I was talking to Hannah that I had a friend who I text with about taboos. You're probably picturing a pretty tawdry relationship right now, but it's just my friend Calva. Calvasane. Uh you may have heard him in another episode of Search Engine where we asked him how am I supposed to find new music now that I'm old and irrelevant?

Calva, welcome back. PJ, I'm here. I've I've been here. I know. E Ever since the last time you interviewed me for your podcast, I've been sitting here at this table in this chair. Just watching you, listening, waiting patiently for you to turn my microphone back on. I'm sorry I made you wait so long.

Finally. Um so the reason I wanted to that I wanted you talking here today, we text a lot, you're I would say chronically open minded to the point where presented with most rules, particularly most social rules, you're the person I know who's liable to ask

Why? How come? Are we sure? Does it seem like a fair characterization? I think that's a fair characterization. So then before we even begin, I just want to make sure that I know what page we're starting on. Like what is your feeling about people eating people? My feeling about people eating people. I mean

Look, this is a a taboo that everyone recognizes is a taboo, but when you tell me about people eating people, I immediately want to break it apart into different pieces, right? There's people eating people on top of a mountain.

after a plane crash. Yes. And some people have died and the other people need the sustenance, right? That's one kind. Yes. There's a kind of ritualized people eating people where that's part of the culture and you do it on special occasions or for a special reason or there's lots of different kinds of people eating people, but in general Yes, I I certainly I share the idea that it's something that we generally don't do, and I can't claim I've ever had an overriding desire to do it.

Okay, so Kalipha being Kalipha is already a step ahead of me, defining some of our categories here, but I do have a plan for how this is gonna go. Well, not a plan. Today, I'm going to serve you three stories of cannibal. The Amuzbouche is a historical story, possibly the origin story of our modern fear of cannibals. For the main course, I have a contemporary story of a person eating a person. And for dessert, I have a lot of different. Mystery set in remote Papua New Guinea.

Okay, so the first story I told you.

The conquest. Okay, so Kay, this story happens alongside the Western entry into the Americas. And I think it is where we got the modern meme of cannibalism, like the ubiquitous cartoon image that Hannah and I talked about. guy with a bone in his nose, cooking an explorer in a steaming cauldron. that image, like the origin story of that image. I think I have a story of that for you. The origin of cannibalism as taboo. Now we know how the taboo starts and we can work on ending it. Yes. Okay.

Fourteen ninety-three, Christopher Columbus lands in Guadalupe, which at the time he would call Santa Maria de Guadalupe. He's on his second voyage to the new world. According to this one book I read called Cannibalism: a perfectly natural history by Bill Shutt. Columbus's prime directive, like his mission from Spain, was to find gold in the islands.

I don't know why this belief was propagated, but the Europeans believed that silver was found in cold places and gold was found in hot places. So according to their logic, it stood to reason this expedition was going to yield lots and lots of gold. So he arrives with an army of seventeen ships, lots of well armed men, and he reports back to his sponsors in Spain that there's this one group of native people called the Arowacks. And according to Columbus, these Arowacks, they are great.

He writes that the Aeroacs quote are fitted to be ruled and to be set to work, to cultivate the land and do all else that may be necessary. But according to Columbus, The Arawaks warn that there's this other group on certain southern islands, and this group is not as nice. They're called the Caribs. The Caribs do not want to be ruled. They're ready to fight. And Columbus says that the Arawaks warn him If the Caribs beat you in battle

They might eat you. Columbus writes, quote Thus I have found no monsters, nor had a report of any, except in an island Carib, which is the second coming into the Indies, and which is inhabited by a people who are regarded in all the islands as very fierce, and who eat human flesh. So this is this this is a familiar story.

faraway place, meeting a bunch of people and basically trying to categorize them. Yes, exactly. And like some of them he seems like they're gonna be helpful, some of them are not. So These locals are called Caribs. Carib somehow gets mistranslated to cannib, and cannibal becomes like what the cannibs do. So this is really like

While there was an idea that it was bad to eat people before this, we had a different name for them. Like cannibal goes to this moment. But this whole story is just rife with like mistranslation, misunderstanding. And so we don't know what really happened. Like Did Columbus make all this up? Were the Caribs actually richly eating their captured enemies? Were the Araqs making this up to get Columbus to go after their enemies? Like there's just a lot of debate here even today.

But what's important is Columbus told people that on these islands some of the locals were dangerous and that they would eat his men. W why why did the eating thing loom so large in his mind? I feel like if I was meeting some people possibly hostile I think it was just sort of like

a particularly bad way to die in their minds? Because I agree. Like for me I'm like, I'd prefer not to be killed after being killed, being eaten would be like a tertiary concern, probably. Or but maybe it's a way of measuring distance. Or maybe it's a way of s of thinking, well, me and people like us We don't eat people. And so if if I encounter someone and I hear that they do eat people, then those people are somehow maximally different from me and my people.

I think there's a lot of evidence that that is what is going on here.'Cause what ends up happening is Queen Isabella, who has like sent Columbus on this journey, when she gets the reports back that some of these people eat people. She says that he's allowed to treat the cannibals differently from the other locals. Ooh, I see. So the incentive structure gets all messed up. Exactly. So she writes this is the letter she sends.

If such cannibals continue to resist and do not wish to admit and receive to their lands the captains and men who may be on such voyages by my orders, nor to hear them in order to be taught our sacred Catholic faith and to be in my service in obedience they may be captured and are taken to these my kingdoms and domains and to other parts and places and to be sold. So basically just the Queen appears to be giving Columbus and his fellow colonizers

special permission to subjugate and enslave cannibals in a way that he wouldn't be able to with other people. Because cannibal is sort of linked with a a kind of a maximum cruelty or a definition of quote unquote savagery. Yes. And so what ends up happening, he shows up trying to find gold because again, he thinks you find gold in hot places.

There's not as much gold as he was anticipating. And so since they're not finding gold, the Spaniards just start looking for people to enslave. And that will be the resource that they go after. So now even when they're in Arawite country, they'll just label people there cannibal. Anytime someone resists them, anytime it's convenient, it's like this magic word, cannibal. You call somebody cannibal, but you can take their rights away. But th there's an irony here, right? Which is that

For those people in Spain at that time, cannibalism represented human beings at their worst, right? Right. And for us, many of us now. enslavement represents human beings at their worst. Yes. And so and so the idea was if we suspect the w the way f from what you're telling me, the idea is they were like if we suspect

that human beings are being at their worst, we're gonna do the thing that future generations will think of as human beings at their worst. Exactly. There's actually a another complicating story here. The whole time the Europeans are obsessed with cannibalism

The rising catalism, just like in a slightly different form. Huh. So the thing they were accusing the cannibals of doing was ritual cannibalism. It's like I eat you because I won in combat, because it symbolizes something, because I think that I get strength from doing it. What the Europeans had been doing was medical cannibalism, which is when you eat people or body parts because you think there's a medical benefit to it. Mm-hmm.

Um, so there'd been a trend from the eleventh century through the seventeenth century in Europe of eating something called mummia. Which was um material made from ground up powdered mummies, which was supposed to be good for you. They had gotten the obvious question. About the sourcing. Yes. Are these ethically sourced mummies? These were not ethically sourced mummies. These were deeply unethically sourced mummies. They were robbing mummies from Egyptian graves.

That this would be a very valuable product because there's a finite supply of mummies. So it is a valuable product and it quickly becomes a problem, which is that they exhaust the finite supply. Did they call it peak mummy? No, they just pretended like they had more mummies and started finding other recently defended. That sounds I don't want to go on a limb. That sounds bad. It was bad. So um they had like recipes to speed up the mummification process of corpses. There's a

I don't know how to pronounce this. There's a seventeenth century book called London Pharmacopiae, which includes a recipe describing how to do this. I've read about it in Shutt's book, but The recipe recommends that quote the mummia be made of the cadaver of a redheaded man, age twenty four, who'd been hanged. The corpse is to lie in cold water in the air for twenty four hours, after which the flesh was cut in pieces and sprinkled with a powder of myrrh and aloes.

This was soaked in the spirit of wine and turpentine for twenty-four hours, hung up for twelve hours, and again smoked in the spirit mixture for twenty-four hours, and finally hung up to dry. Was there a sense of the first time?

about why these people were being hanged? Or was the idea that we're hanging so many people we can just grab some of the ones that happen to have red hair? My guess is the latter, although I'm also not sure how you get from There's something special about an Egyptian mummy. To whatever is special about an Egyptian mummy is also special about a red haired person. Except for like maybe red haired people were rare.

But i you know, it in a non taboo sense, that's the big that seems like a big distinction, right? What do you mean? Are we killing people so we can eat them, or are we doing weird things to corpses? Yeah, and I have to say, in my whatever like internal kind of taboo radar I have inside of me

Killing people so you can eat them feels like way worse than doing weird things to corpses. Like if they were hanging As I mean, as someone who does not want to be killed so he can be eaten, I absolutely agree with that. And I'll say on your podcast right now You know, hundreds of years from now if something happens to what remains of my corpse.

It seems completely fine. Yeah. So I don't know. It seems mostly completely fine. They're gonna have to bury you in an unmarked location. They can just throw me in the ocean. Okay, so remembering Otto's question, why can't we eat people? I think what's nice about the Carib Story is it's kind of like the fact that we have this taboo against cannibalism, we would have the taboo anyway. I feel very confident about that. But the language we have for it, like the fact that we call

Cannibals, cannibals. And the mental image that's in Hannah's mind and my mind of the like Explore in the Steven Cauldron with the islanders going around him. Like That comes from this historical moment. Like there was a reason to have political propaganda in 1493, well after Columbus sort of completed his mission of taking over this land and wiping out lots of people. We're left with this. Little artifact.

Um anyway, that is our first story. Before we go to the next story, I just want to say that one aspect of cannibalism I'm not gonna spend very much time on this week is survival cannibalism. That's when people eat people because they're forced to by extreme circumstance. In America we have the Donner Party, who in the eighteen hundreds took what they were told was a shortcut on the Oregon Trail,

Then we were stuck camping through a very harsh winter. They ate some of their dead. In Uruguay in the 1970s, there was very famously that rugby team whose plane crashed in the mountains. Those survivors ate some of their dead as well. Obviously, those are vivid examples of cannibalism. For me, what I find most interesting is that.

in cases like the rugby team, we'll say that they get a pass, but then we will also mark them for what they were forced to do. Like w it's almost like we've decided that they are in a different category now. The only reason I'm not spending much time on survival cannibalism Is I think it's sort of the exception to Otto's question. Like, as far as I can tell, the rule goes if you're starving and people are dead, you can eat.

It's just that that fact will now dominate your Wikipedia page for the rest of time. So cannibalism is might be acceptable under certain circumstances, but it's still gonna be infamous. Yes, exactly. And like it's sort of weird because those people have survived terrible things and it's like I mean I understand why they are infamous for the way they survived, but like

Yeah, it's just a mark that I don't think they ever get to get around. And we'll use cannibalism to judge the terribleness of the thing they survived. Right. How bad was it up there? It was so bad they had to eat people. Yeah. And you almost like it was funny, I was reading I was trying to decide whether to include the Donner Party story in this and I read a lot about the daughter party story. And it's like there's a lot of story there besides that fact.

But I also understand my brain does it too. My brain is just like daughter party. Eating people. That's it. Yeah, and maybe it's that little kid part of your brain, right? That's like fascinated by this thing that we don't do. So of course, any time there's a story about someone doing the thing, that's much more interesting than just like someone went into the snow and died. Yeah. It's also interesting in the story because Like there's even this much time later when you read an an account of it

the writing will be one way where it's like, you know, they've read this book and the book suggested a shortcut and the shortcut sent to the wrong place and it's sort of one level of detail. And then once it gets into the cannibalism sections

it gets so much more detailed and so much more like at the time this person claims that they didn't do it, but later we found out they did do it. But some it almost takes on the feeling of gossip where how the information got out becomes very important and you just realize like, Oh, we are fascinated by this. But PJ, in the interest of listener service, um you explained in some detail how to make mummia. Yes. Do you have a donor party recipe to

God. It doesn't seem like honestly. Here's what I will say about the Donner Party. The most fascinating thing about the Donner Party story is not about the preparation of humans, it's that. And I didn't know this. The reason they got lost is that there's all these people who were going out west. And there was like a cottage industry of people who were selling them guidebooks. And there was this guy who was essentially a huckster who wrote a guidebook that's like, so you're going out west?

Here's how to do it. And what the other guys won't tell you is I've found a secret shortcut. Oh, it's like maps to the stars houses. Yes, except for this map to the stars house was a Bad map that he had not actually tried himself. After publicizing the book, he tried it once, just like on a horse by himself.

And so no one in a wagon had tried to do what he said was easy to do. And the whole time they're proceeding on this shortcut that they've read about in his book and they're realizing how bad it is. He had gone out ahead as like promotion and Like nailed to the trees.

notes encouraging people to keep following his path. And so things are getting worse and worse and they're beginning to understand the size of their predicament. And then they're finding these like cheerful notes, being like, keep on going. That's the best part of the daughter party story. It's just the grimness of

having received bad advice from someone promoting their book, which it feels like a very modern problem. One star. Do not recommend. Well, I mean, I like the idea that that Hannah's kid asked Why can't we eat people? And that your answer would include at least one recipe. Yes, at least one recipe. There will actually be another recipe before the end of this. Spoiler.

Okay. I'm not talking about survival cannibalism, except for that. The other sort of cannibalism the the thing that I notice reading more about cannibalism and reading these books by experts about cannibalism is that I have noticed a trend among the academics, which is that They don't like talking about murderous cannibalism, like Jeffrey Dahmer style cannibalism. In the Bill Shup book I read, he goes out of his way to say he is not gonna talk about like

your Ed Gines, like your your serial killers who ate people. He's he has a passing reference to the one German guy who consensually ate a person. The famous German guy. Who I have questions for you about. But he's like he almost like doesn't want to count them in his Cannibalism ethnography. Why? Because they're outliers, they're too unusual. Well here's what's interesting. He says it would be disrespectful to the victims, but to me I'm like, but that's the taboo, isn't it?

Like that's where you're like, even in walking up to the electric fence, I'm gonna step away from the electric fence. Like I don't wanna think about the part of this that is sort of at the core of it. Right.

Okay, so I wanna talk about the German cannibal. That's actually the second story I wanna tell you, which I'm gonna call the trial. I feel like I should say if like kids are listening to this episode, this would be a good part to skip. Like this is not stuff I would have wanted in my thirteen year old brain.

But to me, kind of the most interesting murderous cannibal story when it comes to just thinking about the cannibalism rule and why we have it is the story of the German cannibal, Armin Meiva. He was a German computer repair technician. He went on a cannibalism message board called The Cannibal Cafe and said he was looking for a man who wanted to be killed and consumed.

A few people respond to the ad, he actually meets some of them who all eventually back out and he lets them back out. But then there's one man who says he wants to go through with it, and so Maives kills him and eats him. And they film the whole thing, including the part where the guy seems to be agreeing to everything that's gonna happen. So he's caught in Germany, he was found guilty of the earth.

Germany's version of manslaughter and gets a sentence of about eight years. According to reports at the time, Germans were shocked by this sentence. They thought it was way too light. It also probably didn't help that Maives was saying that he still had fantasies of re-offending once he got out of jail. And so the prosecutors call for a retrial and they get the court to like really pay attention to the tape.

And interestingly, in Germany, the way German law defines murder, one of the things that can make a killing a murder is That the killer was was looking for sexual gratification. And so they pushed that idea here. They're like, if you look at the video, clearly this was about sexual gratification. The video had been included in the first trial, but this time the court looks at it and they say, Yes, this is Germany's version of murder. He's getting a life sentence.

But I think you could look at this and you could say what you're actually seeing is a country trying to decide like What are the limits of things we'll allow consenting adults to do to each other? And realize like Oh. We definitely still have a cannibalism tax. Although there's there's a way of thinking about that case in a consent based framework, right? You can think about that and say, like, well

This other person, it wasn't truly informed consent. That's not something one can consent to if one is in one's right mind. Therefore that consent is not valid, therefore we're gonna prosecute it as murder. That's separate from the question of Did he do something extra wrong beyond committing murder if we think it was murder, right? Like would the sentence be the same if he had met up with this guy, made this agreement to kill him and eat him, and killed him and then not eaten him?

Do you think it would have been the same? Yeah. To me that's the crime, right? Is the actual killing. Right. And what happens later, you know. We have laws about desecrating a corpse or something, and there are those other laws, but you know, mainly to the extent which it's outrageous.

the murder is the outrage, even though the other part, the cannibal part, is what makes us all think about it and the reason we know about it. Right. Yeah. But i it's not obvious to me that that revulsion that Most of us have at the idea of cannibalism. It's not obvious to me that that's wrong. Right? Like th that might be a moral intuition we should learn from and respect. And one way to respect a moral intuition is to have laws against it. So

Okay. So on the one hand, it's like you're saying once you're dead, if some future society eats your corpse, it's like not the biggest deal in the world. But you're also saying that like if we have a feeling like a moral intuition that cannibalism is wrong, we should probably follow that feeling and create laws around it. Like where

You're both sides in cannibalism. I am a little bit'cause I'm having a double reaction to the existence of a taboo, right? And so my first reaction is to be like, oh, there's a taboo here where we're being guided by something besides our rational sense of consent and not harming people, right? Part of this reaction is like a little bit superstitious. Right. So my first reaction is to kind of like try to identify the superstition. But my second reaction is to be like, well

There is something to be said for superstition in that sense. There is something to be said for taboo. And and and when I think about it, just because I acknowledge that it is a taboo doesn't mean I want to get rid of that taboo or get rid of all taboo.

And w I think what the reason I like thinking about cannibalism as a taboo, even though maybe it's silly, is because it's the one where I'm actually most convinced that it might be like natural. Like I think Columbus informs the language we use for cannibalism and like the cartoon images in our head we use for cannibalism, but like I think it's a rule that

as many different human societies as could flourish and and as many ways they could construct themselves. Like most of them when they if they wrote down their taboos, which they wouldn't, but if they did, cannibalism was one of them. So i I think I just like thinking about it because It almost feels hardwired, but then you can also see where it's Culturally transmitted. Yeah, and this is a heuristic that can lead you astray, right? Like you can say, like, I've grown up in a world where

You know, slavery is considered okay and I'm looking at other societies and it seems like there's slavery all over the world and there's a long history of slavery, so this must be a natural feeling, right? Like that that's a that's a way of thinking that can lead you astray. But obviously the point is There's no way to be sure, right? This is what philosophers talk about. This is right, the idea of like which of these things that seem really obvious to me are actually kind of wrong.

And there's no way to be sure that the things that feel obvious to you are not in fact wrong. I feel pretty sure about cannibalism. A lot of people have felt pretty sure about a lot of things over the years. After the break, a mystery in Papua New Guinea that might make us question some of the things we're pretty sure we're pretty sure. The story.

Thy ticket, Lady Jennifer of Coolidge. Well many thanks, good sir. Heareth my discover card. They accept Discover at Renaissance fairs? Yeah, they do here. Discover is accepted at the places I love to shop. Geteth with the times. With the times? You're playing the Lord. Yeah, and it sounds pretty good, right? Discover is accepted at 99% of places that take credit cards nationwide. Based on the February 2025 Nielsen reports,

You walk in tired and hungry, one bad dinner away from losing it. You don't like to cook. You don't want more takeout. You just want something good. That's why there's Dish by Blue Apron. Pre-made meals with at least 20 grams of protein and no artificial flavors or colors, from fridge to fork in five minutes or less. Keep the flavor, ditch the subscription, get twenty percent off your first two orders with code APRIN20. Terms and conditions apply. Visit blueapron.com slash terms for more.

It's always amazing to see how quickly your child grows, and I'm not just talking about their height. From those early babbles to full-on storytelling, getting to watch how their ideas, creativity, and confidence develop over the years is honestly pretty incredible.

Sometimes they surprise you with what they come up with, and Lego Bricks can be right there with them through all of those stages. It's not just a toy, it's a full creative building journey that keeps evolving as they do. Lego Sets play starts as early as one and a half. with Lego Duplo, the bigger bricks designed for little hands that are just starting to explore and build. Then around age four, kids transition to the smaller Lego bricks.

And suddenly, you're watching real structures take shape, real ideas form, and their imagination really take off. They begin with simple stacking, but over time they grow into full-on creators. Building worlds, stories, and things you never would have expected. That's the kind of magic of Lego Bricks. You're not buying a phase, you're starting a journey. Learn more and start building today with Lego Bricks.

Welcome back to the show. Uh we've reached our third and final story here, The Funeral. Calva, I'm just going to read you um my not short introduction to this one. I'm ready to hear it. Okay. On the island of Papua New Guinea, there's this small group of people called the Foray. The Foray are a group in the tens of thousands, who for years had been almost entirely uncontacted by outsiders. They live in the remote eastern highlands. Picture a dense landscape of green hills.

The foray have few encounters with the Western world. There's a run-in with an Australian gold prospector in the 1930s. In the 40s, apparently one World War II fighter plane crashes near them, which must have been an insane experience. But they're mainly left alone until the nineteen fifties, when anthropologists start to really get curious about how the foray live. And as the anthropologists arrive with their questions, they learn the foray have one of their own.

The foray tell the anthropologists that their people are dying in large numbers, and in this very scary way. There's a mysterious phenomenon called Kuru. The foray think it's a curse, the anthropologists think it's a disease. The Western media outlets hear about it and they start calling it laughing sickness. Kuru mostly affects children and women. Something like only 2% of cases were found in adult males.

When you get Kuru, the first stage is that you begin to walk in a wobbly way. You struggle to pronounce some familiar words. It sounds to me a little bit like being too drunk at a wedding. The next phase is where it begins to get scary. You shake, you shiver, you have goosebumps, and you start to laugh. Not because anything's funny. These are spasms. huge, uncontrollable bouts of laughter that come out of nowhere and which you cannot stop.

At this point, you know you have Kuru, and you know that that means you're going to die. How much time you have left ranges. Some people live with the disease for two months, some people as long as three years. But no one recovers. Everyone arrives at the final stage. In the final stage, you struggle even to sit up. You may not be able to talk. You're conscious, but you don't seem to be present.

One of the last things you lose is your ability to swallow. Food, water. This is the point where if you're foray, the people who love you will smother you to death out of mercy so that you don't starve. But if Kuru was a disease, it didn't function like any disease anyone had ever seen. It didn't seem to be contagious. You could sit with a person dying of Kuru and not catch it yourself. But when the foray moved in with other groups living near them, sometimes Kuru came with them.

In the fifties, Westerners were guessing that Kuru might be genetic. If so, it was a recent mutation, because the foray told them this phenomenon was relatively new. It may have only been happening since the nineteen tens. There'd been one explanation that had been sort of a rumor that no one seemed to want to commit to writing. In the late sixties, two papers were published hypothesizing that the foray may be contracting Kuru through cannibalism.

The foray ate their dead. Not always, not all the time. But in the same way that you tell your partner whether you want to be buried or cremated, in foray society, you would tell your partner if you wanted to be buried, left out in the forest, or consumed by your family. This is from a paper by an anthropologist named Jerome T. Whitfield about what happened to a 4-A person who chose to be consumed.

Quote, the head of the deceased was placed over a fire to burn off the hair, and then it was defleshed with a bamboo knife. A hole was made in the top of the skull using a stone, and the brain was gradually removed by one of the older women, whose hand would be wrapped in ferns. The tissue was then mixed with ferns and placed in bamboo tubes, normally two or three and cooked. End quote.

For the foray who were eaten, the head and the brains were typically reserved for women, but women would sometimes bring their children to the funerary rite and share food with them. There's something. Something beautiful about that. That's what surprises me.

It's it's really you know, it's it's you s compare it to other rites on the one hand to eating the placenta, right? Which is a tradition that some people are reviving, or even to something like a wake, where if you've never been to an open casket wake It's a little bit strange. Um, but yes, this seems like an incredibly respectful way of honoring a body, right? It's not treating a body as meat.

No, and it it's funny, my assumption is that any society that's practicing cannibalism, it's because of a lack of respect for the body. But this seems like it comes from a place of utmost respect for a body. And from the forays perspective, if you love someone First of all, it would be better to be consumed by the people who love you than by worms and maggots, which is like what's gonna happen if you're in the ground or left out. But also they felt that

by consuming the person, they might be consuming like not parts like body parts, but like aspects of the person's personality might transfer them or their soul might be protected in some way. Like it it feels like

they have a sense of protecting life and it's causing them to do this thing that in our culture is associated with, you know, a a deep disrespect for life. Aaron Powell Yeah. I mean, you know, at the base of the cannibalism taboo is this idea that As human beings, we don't look at each other as food.

And this in a way honors that, right? This isn't like, oh, this person died, they're gonna be delicious, right? This is like, yeah, we don't look at each other as food and we're gonna do this ritualistic thing to honor the life, maybe. Yeah. So so what's interesting about like where this foray story ends is These anthropologists generally knew there was some debate, but the sort of weight of evidence was on the side of the idea that the foray were eating their dead.

because they knew that, what they were able to figure out is that when they ate their dead Sometimes what was happening is they were spreading Kuru. It's a prion disease, which was a relatively not understood kind of disease, but it's like an infection of brain protein. And so When they ate brain tissue from a dead foray, they were getting this disease. The strange thing about Kuru is it doesn't show up right away. You can carry it for something like

as long as forty years before the time bomb explodes. And so it wasn't person dies, we hold a funeral for them, the next week everyone's ill. It was like person dies, we hold a funeral for them, maybe many years later someone's ill.

But the actual ending of the story was the foray decided to change the rules around cannibalism. Mm-hmm. But it wasn't because cannibalism was wrong or gross. It was just like We're dying from it. You know, there is this idea that a lot of food taboos traditionally, you think of kosher and halal systems.

had to do partly with health and had to do partly with safety and ways of consuming meat that wouldn't put you at risk. And so it's not surprising to learn that there might be some element of that in the taboo against Human cannibalism. This would be interesting. If the cannibalism taboo, which we assume is about protecting others, might turn out to be also about protecting ourselves.

But hypothetically, what if there was a safe way for us to consume people? This is something that had come up in conversation with Hannah, too. Synthetically created human meat. Would would you eat lab grown human meat? I can tell you what I wanna say I would do and I can tell you what I know is real.

Like I wanna say, like of course I would try it. I'm a curious person. I wanted to have every single experience. I'm afraid of nothing. Blah blah blah. Somebody took me on a date once to this restaurant in Toronto. where you could eat just like the brains of animals and I threw up right away. And there was nothing about the food that was bad. It was just like the idea that I was eating a brain and people have brains and you're not supposed to eat brains'cause people have brains like

cause me to have a physical reaction where I vomited. So I don't think I would eat. Would you eat human grown lab meat? Lab grown human meat. Human grown lab meat would be a scientist who was murdered in his lab while working late one night. I think I would eat lab-grown human meat. I mean, i it doesn't seem like we're necessarily too far away from a time when you can grow all different kinds of flesh in a lab. Yeah. And so in that sense, w what it would mean for it to be quote unquote human

I guess would have something to do with the DNA and I don't know. But it it gets a little abstract. Aaron Ross Powell But what about the argument that you've made, which is that if you create that world in which we can eat synthetic human meat and have like PJ sandwiches or whatever, you are reducing you're lowering the strength of this natural taboo against

the sacredness of our bodies and then like perhaps creating a society that you don't want to live in. Yeah. And I mean, you know, that's part of what modernization is, right? Is like various taboos get considered superstitious and they kind of fall away and then the question is can we hold the line against other kinds of behavior we think is bad even as these taboos get weakened.

Sometimes we need to develop new taboos or new rules, right? You're living in a world where like sex leads to pregnancy and then all these birth control technologies come in. And then you've gotta re figure out your rules and your taboos around sex, which were, you know. Still in the process of doing. Yeah. In this case, would it be possible to still respect people's bodies and not eat people's bodies, even if we're eating lab grown meat that sort of tastes

the way someone's body would taste. I suspect maybe this is a cop-out. Can I give you a cop-out answer? Yeah. So one cop-out answer is Uh maybe we didn't evolve to find the taste of humans that delicious and so that when we're comparing different kinds of lab meat, we're gonna be drawn to things that are a little bit more like the kinds of things that humans have traditionally eaten.

I will tell you, unfortunately. So these these are a version of the New Yorker cartoon where the doctor says to the pig, it's your ribs. I'm afraid they're delicious. who wrote this paper on the foray, the part that I found kind of most like, oh shit. I can I read you one more quote from the paper. Mm-hmm.

So the way th they talk about the type of cannibalism that the foray practice as endo cannibalism. Endocannibalism is you're eating members of your group. Exocannibalism is eating members of the out group. Um So so they're explaining like why they did it.

Later works have explained the role of endocannibalism in the epidemiology of Kuru and emphasized that the body was eaten out of love, like grief love, as well as for gastronomic appreciation, which was not the intended purpose of the practice, but its results. Hm. What does that mean? The intended purpose of the practice? It means that while they were eating their dead to communicate all these things about life and love and grief.

The side effect was that they were discovering that people are actually really tasting. Oh But it's hard to separate tastiness and from the stories we tell us, right? Just like just like the label on a bottle of wine is gonna affect the way it tastes to people. Right. Right. If you have this all this build up and all this ritual and all this symbolic meaning.

Maybe the human body starts to taste delicious the same way a communion wafer might taste delicious to a believer. I also think that, you know, there's reason to imagine that we might have evolved not to find humans tasty. In general. Right. Right. Right.

I like the idea that you'd respond to this kid with this question the way we often respond to kids, which is by telling them something that's sort of mainly true. True but incomplete. Yes. I think true but incomplete is like the way out of answering this without having to like horrify him with a bunch of stories about like

German cannibals, uh even like I think he should have a uncomplicated version of celebrating what he probably knows as Indigenous People's Day. Like I think the the right answer for Otto is You shouldn't eat people because it can make you really sick. Yes.

That's Cal Fasane, a taboo critic, but sometimes a taboo supporter. He writes about all sorts of things with the New Yorker. This week, as we were wrapping the episode, I briefly spoke with Hannah, Otto's mom. She said in the couple months since we first spoke, Otto keeps changing the way four years old.

She says these days they play a game where when he goes to bed, he's allowed to ask his parents a certain amount of questions before he falls asleep. This week she said Otto has not been wondering about cannibalism. His mind had moved on to another question, which frankly I don't have the answer to. What are rocks made up? Maybe that's next week. Uncertain. The most anxiety-inducing command in the English language.

Guys. It's no use putting it off. The best time for an underwear refresh is now. Tommy John underwear is designed for a perfect fit that stays put all day. Their zero chafe thanks to four times more stretch than competing brands, and their innovative horizontal Quickdrop Fly is a game changer. With over 30 million pairs sold, there are thousands of men out there more comfortable than you. Don't settle for less.

Go to Tommyjohn.com today for 25% off your first order with code Comfort. That's Tommyjohn.com code comfort. Tommy John Comfort perfected.

Check check check. Oh there we go. Now we're live. Hot hot hot. Hello hello hello. Okay. Welcome back to the show. Um, I'm here in the studio with search engine producer Garrett Graham. It's great to be here. And we're here because it's time for us to do recommendations. I feel like this week we have like It's a little bit of a a little bit of a show and tell. It's a show and tell. I feel like we're making like one of those like T V morning shows because there's On the studio table here.

There's two plates with little paper towel napkins and silver on them because we both brought food recommendations for each other. Just like what podcast are we making now? We j it we're just keeping with the organization of the episode. We're just throwing a second dessert at it's like when you're like about to leave the restaurant and they're like

You're the the the kitchen's friendly with you and they're like, We brought you one more thing. Precisely. Um, who goes first? Why don't we let's go pastry first? So I I I brought some pastries. I do want to set them up briefly though, which is that A couple of weeks ago you plugged a sandwich shop? A local Brooklyn sandwich and pastry shop where I approved of both the way they ran their business and the um and the quality of their food. And I was like is it

Is it okay that this is such a New York specific recommendation? We decided that it was okay. We're doubling down a little bit, but also we're doubling down specifically because my competitive juices started flowing a little bit. You were really hyping up. C and soil, you were wearing some sea and soil paraphernalia around the office.

I I am in love with a pastry shop in my neighborhood. So I brought I brought some pastries. You brought pastries? For us to sample. Uh oh these are gorgeous. Okay, so there are three options. You get to pick. Uh I brought a ham and cheese croissant. Okay. Which they sneak a little stone ground mustard inside of. Wow. Uh a sesame.

Cunaman. I I've never been confident saying that word. I'm not gonna start now. I'm not confident enough to correct you. Quinamon, Quonamon. Uh and then I brought a uh sunchoke mushroom Cheesy Danish. Oh wow. Which is a bit of a curveball, I gotta be honest. A savory pastry. A savory pastry. Uh so you get to draft first. I'm gonna try the savory pastry. Savory pastry. Okay, here we go.

So where are these pastries from? So these pastries are from a bakery in my neighborhood. It's called Otway. You've been talking about Otway a lot. Like a lot. Uh it's O-T-W-A-Y and also There was a listener who chimed in and was like, You have to try Otway which at that point I was like, Okay, clearly something's going on with this pastry place. It's magnificent. I feel like I'm in a weird position now though where like

If I don't like this history I'd just tell me. Well also Crapping on some base which not want to Like international podcasts for no reason. Pressure's kind of on for you and for Awe. There's this quote, I'm not sure it's true, but somebody told me that the philosopher Zizek said the most um anxiety producing command that you can get in the English language is enjoy. Uh which is how I feel holding the space strain. Huh. It's really good. It's like flaky. Well ma'am human.

That's amazing. It's almost like eating like a croissant pizza. Wow. Oh I would recommend Otway. I think if you're visiting is it in Manhattan? It's in Brooklyn. It's in Brooklyn in the like Clinton Hill Bed sty kind of area. Is this eventually just gonna be a podcast where we review pastries in Brooklyn? Yes, that's season two. Is there a business model for that? We'll have to hear from our listeners. Then well the podcast industry is doing very poorly.

This is not a paid segment. We're not the way we're putting this podcast is not by Shaking down coffee shops my doors every day streak. This is just this is a passion project. This is a passion project. Okay, this is my recommendation, which is not local to Brooklyn, um which might be a relief for some listeners. So

My friend Chris Crawford runs this company called Tarte Vinegar. It's like she makes her own vinegar in a s very, very, very small factory in Brooklyn. What's what's this vinegar? This one is salad and soup vinegar. And the thing she started doing recently, which is really helpful, is like

'Cause like I always basically this holiday season I just buy everybody Chris's vinegar. Um but everybody appreciates it and then sometimes they don't know what to do with it. And with this now she has recipes on the side. But do you just wanna try straight vinegar? Uh sure. Okay, here's a spoonful of vinegar. Vinegar and pastries, classic Thanksgiving fair. What do you think? Oh, it's really nice. If you hadn't told me it was vinegar, I don't think I would have said vinegar. It just tastes like

Kind of a tasty drink. Yeah, I actually drink this. I'll like mix this with seltzer and just like drink it at my home. I think there are people who believe there are health benefits. I just like it. I just like her vinegars. Right. Okay, so my recommendation is tart vinegar, which you can get on the internet. Your recommendation is Otway Bakery.

Neither of these companies have paid us to endorse their product. I I'll pay them to endorse their product. I pay them every morning when I get a coffee for a pastry. Search Engine is a presentation of Odyssey and Jigsaw Productions. It was created by PJ Vood and Shreiti Pinamanini and is produced by me, Garrett Graham, and Noah John. Theme, original composition, and mixing by Armin Bazarian. Fact checking by Sean Merchant. Special thanks this week to David Church.

Our executive producers are Jenna Weiss Berman and Leo Reese Dennis. Thanks to the team at Jigsaw, Alex Gibney, Rich Perello, and John Schmidt, and to the team at Odyssey, JD Crowley, Rob Mirandi. Cox, Eric D. Maura Curin, Josephina Francis, Kirby. Our agent is Orin Rosenberg. U T A and our social media at the end. Follow and listen to J vote now for free on the Wherever we get your podcasts.

Also, as we said at the top, if you would like to become a paid subscriber, head over to pjvote.com. There's a link in the show notes. Or the other way you can help our show is to head over to Apple Podcasts. Okay, that's it for this. But we will see you back.