This episode of Search Engine is also brought to you by OnePassword. How do you make a password that's strong enough no one will guess it and impossible to forget and do it for a hundred different websites and make it so everyone in your company can do the same without ever needing to reset them. Sounds impossible. Unless you have one password. One password combines industry leading security with award-winning design to bring private, secure, and user-friendly
password management to everyone. All you have to remember is the one strong account password that protects everything else. Your logins, your credit cards, secure notes, or the Office Wi-Fi password. I have been using OnePassword forever. I really hate remembering and resetting passwords. I find that the way the app works is very intuitive and easy. OnePassword's award-winning password manager is trusted by millions of users and over a hundred thousand businesses,
from IBM to Slack. Right now, Search Engine listeners get a free two-week trial at OnePassword.com slash SeG for your growing business. That's two free weeks at OnePassword.com slash SeG. Don't let security slow your business down. Go to OnePassword.com slash SeG. First, the bad news. SAP Business AI won't help you generate cubist versions of your family's holiday photos, but it will help you understand which supplier is best to help you roll
out your plant-based packaging in Southeast Asia. Identify the training your junior project manager needs to rise up the ranks and automate repetitive tasks while you focus on big innovations, so you can be ready for the next opportunity. Revolutionary technology, real-world results. That's SAP Business AI. Welcome to Search Engine, I'm PJ Vought. No question too big, no question too small, no question too old. We're going to do something different this week. How often do you think about
the Roman Empire? Last fall this meme circulated, where people mostly women on TikTok, as their husbands or boyfriends, how often they thought about the Roman Empire? Why do you think about the Roman Empire? It's a very interesting time. But there was a third type of guy, never mentioned in this meme, and that guy was me. I don't think about the Roman Spodge, but I do think about ancient Greece a fair amount of the time. Specifically,
I think about ancient Greece as a coping mechanism. When I get deeply upset about our democracy, I think about theirs. Athens was the very first democracy in human history, one that faced some of the same problems we faced, some problems of their own, and then died in spectacular fashion. I know this might not be the escapism some people are looking for this week, but walk with me for a sec.
Any book can be a self-help book, and for the past few years, mine has been what's wrong with democracy, from Athenian practice to American worship, which is a factual academic look at the problems of Athenian democracy in the fifth century BC. I spoke to its writer this week. Okay, first things first can you just introduce yourself. Sure, my name is Lauren Salmons, but everyone calls me Jay, and I teach Greek history in Greek
and Latin at Boston University, and have done so for over 30 years. I also work for the American College of Greece and a consulting role in Athens. And my interests have been democracy and imperialism, and the historians who write about democracy and imperialism for pretty much my whole career. One of the ancient historians who Jay thinks about most often is a Greek writer named Thucydides.
Jay first encounters work decades ago as a student. When I got to graduate school, I still thought I was going to be a Roman historian, but it was really Thucydides that dragged me into Athenian history. I found him so interesting that I abandoned my Roman studies and focused on the Greeks. And what was it about Thucydides? Like, what about the way that he wrote? I mean, Thucydides has an extremely dark view of human nature. He's very much like my father in
many ways. If you think things are as bad as they can possibly get, you're definitely wrong. They're going to get worse. But I think sometimes people think Thucydides is sort of taking joy in that, that he's saying, which is good, that human beings exercise power in this really sort of awful way. But I think that's wrong. He's someone who recognizes the tragedy of the fact that human beings tend to make similar mistakes over and over again.
Thucydides was an elite in Greek society, a general who was exiled from Athens after losing a big battle. He ended up spending time in enemy land. The only place he was welcome for much of his life. Exile is hard on people, but it can be useful for writers. And Thucydides took the opportunity to try to understand Athenian society from his new position outside of it. A lot of what Thucydides
wrote, you could be forgiven for thinking about us today. Completing about Athens, his hometown, around 400 BC, he observed that, quote, most people, in fact, will not take the trouble in finding out the truth, but are much more inclined to accept the first story they hear. Of course, one of the most famous things Thucydides said is, as long as human nature remains the same,
similar things will happen again. And that's why he believed his work would be useful for those who want to know about the future, not because history is cyclical, not because history repeats itself, but because human beings repeat themselves, and make the same kinds of mistakes, generation after generation. So Thucydides is going to be our primary source for this story. And he really was there. He watched the first democracy rise and fall. Chapter 1 Athens
When the story begins around 650 BC, Greece is a series of city states. Athens was a typical one. The city itself, very small, maybe 10 or 20,000 people live there. On the top of the big hill, there's a few temples, some spots for public gatherings. Most people live down below, eventually they'll build a city wall. Outside the city, miles and miles of rural farmland,
where the majority lived. And then, if you keep traveling further, throughout the Mediterranean, there's something like a thousand other city states that looked more or less like Athens did. These city states are independently ruled and constantly at war with each other. And like our American states, there are a series of experiments, each representing a different way society could function. Spartans lived in a country with more women's rights, but also
lived under military rule. Corinthians knew their state was the wealthy commercial hub, but that it was run by oligarchical eats. Athens, when our story begins, is not yet known as the home of Plato, Socrates and Aristotle. As the cradle of Western philosophy and government, Athens is known instead as kind of a backwater. Athens was a second tier state, maybe even a third tier state in the seventh and sixth centuries BC. And what does that mean? Like, what is a third tier state at that time?
Well, I mean that they, they weren't as powerful as some other states. Their military strength was not up to some other states, but what I really mean is that they didn't have the early history that other states had. Like Sparta and Thebes and Argos, those are names that ring through mythology, and what the Greeks thought of their very ancient past. Whereas Athens, for example, if you take Homer, the Iliad, Athens plays almost no role at all in the Iliad. Most classicists can't even name
the Athenian hero of the Iliad because he's a nobody in the story. He appears four times and twice he's been called a coward, but they do know that Odysseus comes from Ithaca and Ajax comes from Salamas. So you have all these other heroes that come from other places that seem far less important than Athens, but to an Athenian reading Homer, he fails to find himself there. So what does this mean for the Athenian psyche? And I think it's actually a major factor in how the Athenians thought
of themselves. You mean that they had like what I'm from Philadelphia, like they had what Philadelphia ians have, which is like this feeling of like sort of being sandwiched between places that thought of themselves is greater, like this sort of angry overlooked feeling? Yeah, yeah, I do, I do think that that's probably making it too strong. Yeah, I think that this feeling rarely rises to a kind
of conscious level, but it's active. It does rise to a conscious level. For example, Pericles in one of the speeches that Thucydides records says, we don't need any Homer to sing our praises. That's a really odd thing to say. We don't need any Homer. We know we're not there and we don't need him. We're going to write our own epic. This nation that wanted to write its own epic, it had a plan. Chapter two, the Athenian experiment. Athens planned to make a name for itself
involved constantly picking fights with its neighbors. The Athenians were obsessed with imperialism that's how they believed they'd get into the history books as a conquering power. That's their goal, but in the fifth century BC, they happen to make what will turn out to be a very consequential choice for human history. They offer widespread voting. There were some other Greek city-sates that allowed voting, but it was restricted to small groups of elites, aristocrats,
property owners. In Athens, the politicians start allowing more and more regular people to vote. And this is one of the things that makes Athenian democracy different. It starts to look different from other Greek city-states because the Athenians lowered the property qualification. To the point eventually, you don't have to own property to be a citizen and vote in the assembly.
This was an extraordinarily radical idea. Of course, there were big groups excluded, women, foreigners, enslaved people, but by the standards of the time, letting the masses vote was unheard of. And what's most interesting is that Athenian voting looks completely different from the voting we do today in America. Like to them, the idea of an election day where we all show up and pick the politician who will represent us and then get a little sticker afterwards,
the Athenians would have found this comical. In Athens, what would happen instead was much more exciting. The Athenians had a stone machine called a Claretarian, which it's sort of hard to picture, but you could just imagine instead if you want the random ball jambler from a bingo hall. The Claretarian helped randomly assign random citizens to the Athenian version of Congress. There, they would serve for a year. You didn't vote for your congressman. You became one at random,
and then got to put forth laws which any other citizen could vote on. If this sounds crazy, it has an upside. The lottery system, sortition, prevents the thing we have, a system where we get to vote for our politicians, but those politicians are usually elites and wealthy people use their money to influence that vote. Another Greek writer, Aristotle, foresaw this problem over 2000 years ago. Aristotle said, you can't define democracy by voting in elections because if you have voting
in elections, you're going to have rule of the rich. Aristotle said this necessarily follows from elections that you end up with rule of the rich. They thought that early. Yes, that's amazing. I mean, that's obviously not true. Aristotle got it wrong. This is something Jay clearly relishes about the Athenians. How their dark view of human nature meant that in some ways they could predict problems with democracy that we encounter as surprises. I had my own moment where I felt
a shock of recognition hearing about a different part of Athenian democracy. It had to do with how they ran their justice system. So I should say I first found Jay's book in 2021, which meant I was reading it during a very unique moment in American life. People were angry about society and that anger was reiling on social media. At the time, it felt like every week there were these impromptu public events, some trial by internet. These speedy affairs where some schmo was praided out,
almost always found guilty, and then usually ostracized. Sometimes permanently, sometimes just temporarily. I witnessed a lot of these events as a spectator. I even reported on a few, and then one day I found myself inside of one as the schmo. The main thing I was struck by was how uniquely modern it felt. Even when I tried to write about it, it felt too modern to describe. There were no words or all the words were wrong. Reading Jay's book, I realized this was not as modern as I'd
believed. What I thought was an unprecedented system of justice was in fact a very precedented system of justice. Chapter three, the people decide. So just help me picture like I'm a cues of a crime in ancient Greece. What does my trial look like in Athens? Well, it's going to be hard by jury, a large jury of Athenians. Okay, you're going to have to defend yourself. There's no lawyer to defend you. You can hire someone to write a speech for you, but you're still going to
have to deliver that speech yourself. Am I delivering that speech in like I'm assuming I'm not in a mahogany courtroom? No, where am I? They're outdoors. The Athenian courts were typically outdoors. Jurors sitting on benches around you. No microphones, no amplification, no nothing. The whole trial is going to happen in one day. Prosecutor will make its case. The prosecutor will also not be a public prosecutor. It'll be an individual Athenian citizen who has the ability to bring this case
against you. And you're going to defend yourself. And the whole thing will be over in a day. The jurors will vote whether you're guilty or not. And if they find you guilty, then they're going to vote on what punishment you're going to get. And what, how many people are sitting on my jury in a trial? A 500 or a thousand. Sometimes more than that. So I am pleading my case in front of 500 to 500. Am I screaming the whole time? I hope so. If you want to be hard, if you've got any chance
and you need to think about entertaining the jury too. Right. You've got to hold people's attention. It's just like public speaking anywhere else. You know, you may have all the evidence in the world. But if you can't hold their attention or if they just don't like you, I mean, let's just say they doors don't like you. They've been looking for a chance to get rid of you. Right? And there's no mechanism for making sure that only evidence is used here. One of the practices the Athenians
engaged in that I found very fascinating was that they had a formal system of ostracism. Can you just describe for me how that worked? Sure. Once a year, the Athenians would get together and vote on the question, are we going to ostracize anybody this year? Ostracism would mean sending somebody away for 10 years. The property wasn't seized. Nothing was done to them. They were just sent away. So there's no right to property that prevents the Athenian people from doing this.
The Athenian people can do what they want. It is in fact a direct democracy. Of course, I always tell my students, I'm definitely voting yes, you know, every year. Are we going to have an ostracism? Yes. Definitely. I don't know who we're going to ostracize, but I don't want to miss the chance of having an ostracism. That's pretty great. So in then a few days later, they would come back and they would have the actual vote. And the day of the vote, you would write the name of the person you
wanted to ostracize on a broken piece of pottery. That pottery is called an ostracon. So that's what gives ostracism its name. And so you wrote the name of the person you wanted ostracized, you know, Professor Sammons. And then you turn that in. And if 6,000 people voted, then who ever got the most votes had to go. No matter what. No matter what. There's no appeal. There's nothing you can say, well, they just don't like me. You know, they have a bias against people from Arkansas, like me.
You know, they're throwing me out. There's no appeal to this. You have to go. And why? Like at what point do they realize our society will function better? If once a year we can take the human desire to cast some of ours out and formalize it. Right. So this looks pretty clearly to have been something they invented right after the Persian Wars. And in the context where Athens had gotten rid of its tyrants, but the Persians had tried to bring a tyrant back and impose a tyrant on Athens,
a previous tyrant. And the first people who were ostracized were people who could be associated in some way with the tyrants. So it looks like the Athenians thought to prevent a potential tyrant. We will use this thing ostracism, right? We can't trust having this guy around even. So we're going to get rid of them. But it turns into something else. I think we both know where this is going.
But before it does, it is only very to acknowledge that the mob was not always wrong. Athenians use ostracism to remove some very dangerous tyrants, people who may have broken no laws, but who did threaten society. The mob also, I mean, this one's just funny. They ostracized Arasites the Jast, in part because they were so irritated by his nickname, which, if you're a fair, does sound a little bit like Virtue signaling. Over time, as you'd expect, elites began just
casting each other out of society for all sorts of reasons. Some fair, some not. Athenian democracy was not concerned, as we sometimes are, with due process. It was concerned strictly with amplifying the voice of the people. And today, we question some of the Athenian people's choices, like when they tried convicted and executed Socrates. Socrates, perhaps the greatest philosopher in the history of the West, found guilty of being insufficiently pious of corrupting the youth
with his strange ideas. In Socrates' case, we're told that more people voted that he should be executed than found him guilty. So there were people who voted for Socrates' innocence, who still voted that he should be executed. And why? Why in Socrates' case? He had annoyed a whole lot of people, including some very powerful people. This is part of what's so confusing about how to think about the first democracy. The Athenians gave us Socrates. They also killed him. And every democracy
since has had to wrestle with this moment. This moment where the people got exactly what they wanted. And how much were the American founders thinking about Athenian democracy when they designed our democracy? They thought about it, but they didn't see it as a positive example. Almost everything they said about it was we want to avoid that. The founders just didn't want the American system to be that open to the will of the people. The will of the people had to be controlled to some degree.
It had to be blunted, you know, the force of the will of the people. James Madison, one of our founders, wrote that had every Athenian citizen been Socrates, every Athenian assembly would still have been a mob. And in Athens, unlike in America, the leaders really learned to fear the people. Generals who lost wars, wars that people had voted for, were sometimes executed, often exiled. Sometimes the people would ostracize a general,
then a few years later realized they wanted him back and have to hit undo. It was a raucous, I would suggest insane way to run the city state. And over time, the leaders who were learned to thrive in a society like this would be the ones who would help destroy it. After the break, a new word becomes popular in Athens, Demogog. Today's episode is presented by SAP Business AI, revolutionary technology, real world results.
Hi, Chris. How's it going? Can you hear me? I can. Can you hear me? Yeah, I'm so sorry for being late. I understand that you have an incredibly busy schedule. Oh, don't worry. Recently, I was over 15 minutes late for an early morning conversation with my very understanding friend, Chris. Years ago, we worked in the same office. He was on the business side. At the time, you were not a C suite executive. Now, you're, I think my only friend is a C suite executive.
I doubt that, but I'll take it. These days, Chris is a successful founder. He started a company that helps AI models get smarter. As a business executive, Chris says AI is a helpful tool that he uses in his day to day. I do. I use it for everything. I'm basically a cyborg at this point. How do you use it? If I am going into a meeting with a prospect, a company that we want to work with, I will have a chatbot basically pull together all the information I need to know to be successful
in our meeting. It's just incredible crunching through a ton of research and condensing it, and helping me walk into a meeting really prepared. Research is one big use case. Business development ideas. If I'm feeling like we're stalling out on growth in any given month, I might turn to a chatbot and ask, what are some other companies we might approach to fit this profile? It's great at delivering just a big, long list of ideas. It's good at helping me brainstorm.
It's really a sounding board on those sorts of things. Do you use it as like a plucky intern? Yes, a plucky intern for all of my anxious rabbit holes. Ready to elevate your business? With SAP Business AI, you can grow revenue, increase efficiencies, and manage risks seamlessly. It's relevant, reliable, and responsible. AI is embedded into SAP solutions to enable businesses to drive immediate business impact with AI embedded across their
organization. It can also help you make confident decisions based on AI grounded in their business data and put AI into practice with the highest ethical, security, and privacy standards. SAP Business AI. Revolutionary technology. Real-world results. This episode is brought to you in part by Mint Mobile. You know when you discover a new binge where they show or a song that you bump on repeat and you have to share with your friends so they
can experience just how awesome it is. That's kind of what it feels like when you discover that Mint Mobile offers premium wireless for 15 bucks a month when you purchase a three-month plan. It's such an awesome deal. There's no way you can keep it to yourself. Friends don't let friends overpay for wireless. Stab a buy to your over-priced wireless plan and switch to Mint Mobile. Mint Mobile is here to rescue you and your squad with premium wireless plans starting at 15 bucks a
month. All plans come with high speed data and unlimited talk and text delivered on the nation's largest 5G network. To get this new customer offer and your new three-month premium wireless plan for just 15 bucks a month, go to mintmobile.com slash search. That's mintmobile.com slash search. Cut your wireless bill to 15 bucks a month at mintmobile.com slash search. $45 up from payment required equivalent to 15 bucks a month. New customers on first three
month plan only. Speed's slower above 40 gigabytes on unlimited plan. Additional taxes fees and restrictions apply. Seam mint mobile for details. Welcome back to the show. Chapter 4 Greek tragedy. When our story began Athens had been a third-tier city state, a backwater. But by the middle of the 5th century BC that had changed. They defeated the Persians while fighting alongside the Spartans. They dominated islands like Noxos, Ahina, Evia. Throughout the Aegean
all these cities are paying tribute back to Athens. Things look good. The threat to Athenian democracy when it arrives. It won't come from one of Athens' neighbors. It'll come from its people. One of the early ideas in Athenian democracy had been that all these random people who are being pulled off their farms and into public service, they should get paid. A good idea which
spun into something else. One of the things is that the pay for public service in the 5th century became eventually pay for all kinds of things including in the 4th century they paid themselves to vote. They're paying themselves to vote. Like a lot? But no not a lot. What you would get paid as a laborer for one day. Something like that. It's funny I have to say on first blush the idea of paying people to vote does not seem so bad to me. It means more people voted. Maybe more working people
voted. But what happened in Athens is that the demagogues realized offering to pay people to do things was a very good way to buy public support. Eventually they got to the point where they paid themselves to go to the theater so that they subvented they underwrote theater tickets for a Theon's. And why were they making miserable decisions? Well I mean how do you if you're in a assembly and a politician gets up and says I think you guys should be paid to vote. Who's going
to vote against that? Right. I mean once that idea is out there. Once the idea of paying people to do X or Y is out there. It's just impossible it seems to me in a democratic environment to get people to go no no I'll give up that money I don't want to be paid. No I don't want to get that extra benefit. So with the crowd voting for what the crowd wanted government spending in 5th century BC Athens
starts to go a little kuku bananas. For instance the tax revenue that's being used to fund the military some demagogues suggest why don't we just use that money to fund entertainment instead. More festivals more theater more religious holidays. The crowd and its infinite wisdom agrees. Which required politicians to find even more innovative ways to accumulate silver. They borrowed money from the goddess Athena. How do you borrow money from a goddess?
Yeah it's funny Athena was very willing to loan. They saw their money in their treasuries and that was owned by their gods as available for human use. It wasn't that the money owned by the gods couldn't be used. So they would just make sure I understand so the state would like you know mind silver from the minds it would have reserved. Exactly. Some of those coins would be given as tribute to the gods but they're not like throwing it down a well where they can't get it it's
available and then you can borrow from the gods. Right so the thing is kept those books separate. The money that was taken out of the minds that was money that didn't have to be borrowed. But the money that they borrowed from the gods some of which they had taken from other Greek states some of that imperial money gets dedicated to the gods. So the Athenians were melting down their statues of the gods for gold. They're also spending the money they'd set aside for the gods
to fund endless wars. That money had to be paid back and had to be paid back at interest and Athena was very generous during the Peloponnesian Wars she lowered her interest rate from something like 7% to 1.5% something like that. It was nice over but the Athenians basically spent all the money they had and they're that they'd accumulated through their empire and that debt was a debt to
the gods but they never paid it back. A state a democratic state can just spend itself into oblivion and in fact I would go so far to say it will spend itself into oblivion. So you think in some ways the mistake they made is just like they overspent. They overspent and that overspending led to more military action because why? The empire is generating some of this money that's being used to pay people. Yeah and to build the
buildings and to pay people to serve on juries. The Athenians quite well understood that sailing out and attacking other Greeks and imposing tribute payments on them was paying them. There was a direct relationship between those two things. They understood that. So the democratic system of paying for public service and building these buildings is generating empire. It's not that the Athenians weren't imperial before. Athens was always aggressive even before democracy. The Athenians
had an unusually aggressive profile. It's part of their national character for some reason but boy democracy really amped it up. There must have been Athenians who knew that if a state paid everybody to vote, paid everybody to serve on the thousand seat juries, paid people to go to Athenian Coachella that eventually the need for silver would force them into a war they would lose. The Athenians, the few Athenians who knew, also knew to shut up. He writes quote with this
enthusiasm of the majority. The few that liked it not feared to appear unpatriotic by holding up their hands against it. And so kept quiet. At least in the Athenian story, the desire to be democratic led to people voting for wanting more money essentially or wanting to be paid to do more things which necessitated more imperialism which they didn't have a problem with. There's
no Howard's in of Athens. No, I mean there were there were by the end of the fifth century, there are Athenians who are saying things like this imperialism thing is a little out of control. It's a tiny tiny voice in a chorus of but more empire is better. Chapter five. The end. The inevitable finally happens in 338 BC. The Athenians have voted too many times to pay themselves, not enough times to fund the military that they keep sending off to fight.
Some generals now are even relying on their own private resources to keep things together. Athens ends up losing a battle finally that can't bounce back from. Philip of Macedon, father of Alexander the Great, he is the one to conquer the Athenians, at the Battle of Kerenia. The Athenians are no longer a sovereign people. The first democratic experiment in human history is over about 200 years after it had begun. When we picture the end of our democracy lately people talk about fascism,
how it's going to be the handmaid's tale or Germany in 1933. But the end of Athenian democracy wasn't really like that. In fact, there were plenty of Athenians who were pretty okay with life under the new reign of Philip. Philip didn't destroy Athens. The Athenian city state continued and the Athenians actually kept having jury trials and they kept electing officials. They just weren't sovereign anymore. Athens wasn't running its own show. They got
to worry about the Macedonians. They're not making their own policy anymore. They're not deciding whether they're going to go to war or not. Macedon is calling the shots on that. Eventually the Romans are going to call the shots on that. That's what changes. But internally they still had elections and they still had officers. They still played democracy. We could call it. That's probably unfair to call it playing. But they had lost that thing that had defined the Greek
city state before which is being the absolute sovereign authority over yourself. You make your own laws. You make your own foreign policy. You decide whether you're going to go to war or not. Nobody else is going to tell you whether you're going to do that. They lost that. Right. And the moment where the most important decisions are not the city states decision to make, I feel like you don't call that a democracy anymore. You're a place that gets to vote on some
things, but you're not a democracy. And see, it sounded to me like you were describing the world we live in now. A place where you get to vote on some stuff. Yeah. I mean, I've had this really dark thought over the last few years. Maybe I've done many of them. But Aristotle says, man is suited to live in a life in the palace. And that the heavy responsibilities of citizenship is the best way for a human being and the ideal way for a human being to spend his public life. And
maybe I still believe that that is true. I'm an ideal world. But it just seems to me that human beings in the end find that two burdensome and that they retreat. Jesus is strange thing about studying the Athenians as a historian is how much they thought about how they'd be perceived by future historians in a weird way. How much they were thinking about him. America will one day end. Everything does. We know there will be some future society that looks
back on us. Try to understand the choices we made so that it can better understand itself. Somewhere, many centuries ahead, there's another Jay. Some devoted scholar reaching back to this moment, asking why. Jay says that he started to fall deeper into Athens when he became more disappointed in the present. At first, it felt like an escape from the modern politicians. He couldn't stand listening to an America. But more and more, he found himself recognizing us in the Athenians.
And really seeing the truth and what through cities it said. The human nature itself is a constant. Look in the late 80s and early 90s, I realized that I had to stop basically watching the news. And I had to retreat to some degree into the cities and these other authors. But the problem is that you keep seeing the same things in those authors that you see around you. So my copy of the cities has in the margins of November 1992 in the margins.
I got this reminded me of something. It's not that I don't follow the news at all anymore, but I realized I just couldn't become someone who was in that game of what's the next winning move in this political sport. Jay retreated into the cities and later I retreated into Jay's work. Not because I was disappointed in democracy, I was disappointed in the internet. The same way, Athenian democracy naturally created demagogues and over time drove most other people
away. I feel like our social media actually worked in a very similar way. And so for a while, I turned away from the internet. Honestly, I think I even turned away from society. But here's a good sentence. We Greeks believe that a man who takes no part in public affairs is not merely lazy, but good for nothing. That's through cities. Despite his very dark view of human nature, his faith that people were ultimately ruled by fear, self-interest, and a desire to be
seen favorably by their peers, he still believed we had to show up. We had to show up to a democracy that would always be vulnerable to demagogues, who would stir up crowds for their own short-term gain. We had to show up and take our place in a crowd that would often make the wrong choice. We had to show up despite knowing that real leaders would be rare, and when they did arrive,
we might just punish them for their honesty. We had to show up despite knowing that human nature itself is an incurable condition that we're likely to make the same mistakes as our ancestors centuries before. The story of Greek democracy is appropriately a tragedy, a story whose end was inevitable because of the character of the people in it and the setting in which they found themselves. I understand that not everybody finds a tragedy reassuring, but I do. It helps me to
think that the way we are is not new. We're always like this, or at least we're always struggling to not be like this. We go through moments where humans, and probably, organize themselves towards something better, more reasonable, and then the madness takes over. And then we begin again. Is there any part of you that just thinks like the Athenians had a rough draft number one, the Romans had rough draft number two. America might be rough draft number three.
No. You don't think there's going to be a rough draft number four, you don't think there should be or what? Oh, I find this hilarious that people assume that democracy is somehow the ultimate form of government. This has been a running stick of mind for years that you go to any political science department in the West, and you won't find somebody who goes, no, the next thing is going to be this really better thing. It's not democracy at all, right? Somehow they're all studying ways
to make democracy better and ways to make democracy more democratic. So you're caught in this kind of circle where you evaluate democracy against the principles of democracy. I don't think that works. You got to evaluate it by some external standards. How much justice does it produce? How much goodness does it produce? How much wealth does it produce? How many families does it produce? There's all kinds of ways you could evaluate it that aren't how democratic is it? That thing just won't work,
right? In terms of an evaluation process for me. So I really hope that we're not just going to keep reinventing democracy over and over, and that a human history hasn't ended, you know, with this thing that we're just going to keep tweaking. Like, isn't it possible that mankind will actually produce a system of government in the future that's superior to democracy? It's at least possible, I think. And so if it's possible, we should be thinking about it. But I still think we focus too
much on that political thing. We take our eyes off the other things that are actually more important. Right. It just feels like government is our tool. If decidities felt that human nature was both a constant and had a dark view of it, then I guess it's easy to think, well, we're not going to change human nature. And so we just need to keep changing the rules around people to try to guide them towards something better. Right. That's true. But I'll also just add in decidities
defense that he did have a dark view of human nature. So do I. But that no historian believes that mankind is completely irredeemable because you would never write about the past if you didn't think a better future was actually possible. Thucydities had to believe a better future is actually possible. That's what he says. In fact, early in his history about the future, he doesn't put it quite in that optimistic way, but it's implied. What does he say? Well, he says that he wants his work to be
a possession for all time. He says for those who want to know about the future, this work will be valuable because as long as human nature is what it is, similar things will happen again. And if you know the kinds of things that are likely to happen, you can in fact plan for them. And you can try to avoid them. It's not that you're likely to avoid them, but it's possible you may. And I think, no, I believe this. This is to me the inherent optimism that goes along with history,
even if you have a dark view of human nature. So I don't believe that it's impossible for better things to happen in the future. And it's one of the reasons I study the past. Dr. Lauren J. Sammons, executive director of the Institute for Hellenic Culture and the Liberal Arts at the American College of Greece. His most recent book is called Paracles and the Conquest of History, a political biography. What's wrong with
democracy is harder to find, but you can find it. It's worth looking. After a short break, we have an announcement to make. This episode is brought to you in part by Lumen. Lumen is the world's first handheld metabolic coach. It's a device that measures your metabolism through your breath. And on the app, it lets you know if you're burning fat or carbs and gives you tailored guidance to improve your nutrition,
workouts, sleep, and even stress management. All you have to do is breathe into your Lumen first thing in the morning and you'll know what's going on with your metabolism, whether you're burning mostly fats or carbs. Then Lumen gives you a personalized nutrition plan. For that day, based on your measurements, you can also breathe into it before and after workouts and meals, so you know exactly what's going on in your body in real time. And Lumen will give you
tips to keep you on top of your health game. Your metabolism is your body's engine. It's how your body turns food you eat into fuel that keeps you going. Because your metabolism is at the center of everything your body does, optimal metabolic health translates to a bunch of benefits, including easier weight management and per demg levels, better fitness results, and better sleep. So if you want to take the next step in improving your health, go to lumen.me-slash-search to get 15%
off your Lumen. That's l-u-m-e-n.me-slash-search for 15% off your purchase. This episode is brought to you in part by NetSuite. What does the future hold for business? Ask nine experts and you'll get ten answers. Bull market, bear market, can someone please invent a crystal ball? Until then, over 40,000 businesses have future-proved their business with NetSuite by Oracle. The number one cloud ERP, bringing accounting, financial management, inventory,
and HR into one fluid platform. With one unified business management suite, there's one source of truth, giving you the visibility and control you need to make quick decisions. With real-time insights and forecasting, you're peering into the future with actionable data. Whether your company is earning millions or even hundreds of millions, NetSuite helps you respond to immediate challenges and sees your biggest opportunities. Speaking of opportunity, download the CFO's Guide to AI
and Machine Learning at NetSuite.com-slash-pj. That guide is free to you at netsuite.com-slash-pj. This episode is brought to you in part by Mooby, a curated streaming service dedicated to elevating great cinema from around the globe. From iconic directors to emerging authors, there's always something new to discover. With Mooby, each and every film is hand selected,
so you can explore the best of cinema, streaming anytime, anywhere. The substance is now in US theaters and streaming exclusively on Mooby, a gonzo tour de force and visionary shock to the system from director Kourley Farjot. I'm starting to meet more and Margaret Kuala. Be careful what you wish for are fable for the ages, turning toxic beauty culture inside out. I remain excited to see this movie, but I keep slightly, slightly putting it off because it seems a little bit scary.
If you've seen the film, please message me on threads and let me know on one to ten, how scary it is. You can watch it on Mooby. To stream this and other great films, you can try Mooby for free for 30 days at Mooby.com-slash-sure-changing. That's M-U-B-I-.com-slash-sure-changing for a whole month of great cinema for free. Go watch the substance, tell me how scary it is.
That is our show this week. We have a lot more episodes coming up in 2024. We are publishing through the holidays and we will have our final board meeting of the year on Friday, December 6th. Our board meeting is when we do a Zoom meeting with all of our paid subscribers. Way, way, way too many people to put into a Zoom meeting. It's a Athenian democracy up there. One wise man, that's me, the Socrates of my time. Garrett, my Plato, watching in pain as I suffer
my last stand before an unreasonable crowd. That's you guys. Plus, you guys ask us where we get ideas for stories or if I'm still friends with people I used to work with. I'm just kidding. Please stop asking that. We will tell you how the business of the show is doing right now. We'll have lots of stats, only some of them concerning, and we'll talk about what we plan to do next. This is only for our paid subscribers, but don't worry. If you have not signed up, there's still time. We have a
limited amount of paid subscriptions in stock, hurry, hurry act now. You can sign up for incognito mode over at search engine, dot show, and for everyone who already has, thank you so much. Again, our final board meeting of the year, Friday, December 6th, 1pm. I just found out 1pm Eastern time. We will be sending out a zoom link to join week of knowing me. Morning off. Search Engine is a presentation of Odyssey and Jigsaw Production. It was created by me,
PJ vote, and truthy, Pinomini. It is produced by Garrett Graham and Noah John, fact checking by Clara Hyman. Theme, original composition and mixing by Armin Bizarreon. Our executive producers are Genoise Berman and Leah Restennis. Thank you to the team at Jigsaw, Alex Gibney, Rich Pro, and John Schmidt. And to the team at Odyssey, JD Crowley, Rob Morandi, Craig Cox, Eric Donnelly, Colin Gainer, and at Casey Morikur and Josephina Francis, Kurt Courtney and Hillary
Steph. Our agent is Orin Rosenbaum at UTI. Follow and listen to Search Engine with PJ vote. Now, they're free. On the Odyssey app or wherever you get your podcasts. Thank you for listening. We'll see you next week.