Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson & United States v. Texas- Post-Argument SCOTUScast - podcast episode cover

Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson & United States v. Texas- Post-Argument SCOTUScast

Dec 09, 202127 min
--:--
--:--
Listen in podcast apps:
Metacast
Spotify
Youtube
RSS

Episode description

On November 1, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson on whether a state can insulate from federal-court review a law that may prohibit the exercise of a constitutional right by delegating to the public the authority to enforce that prohibition; and in United States v. Texas on the authority of the federal government to bring suit and obtain injunctive or declaratory relief against a state, state court judges, and other states officials or all private parties to prohibit SB 8, a Texas abortion regulation, from being enforced.

A distinguished pair of scholars joined us to discuss the cases, their history, the legal issues involved, and the implications going forward.

Featuring:
Prof. Stephen Sachs, Antonin Scalia Professor of Law, Harvard Law School
Prof. Howard Wasserman, Professor of Law, Florida International University College of Law
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson & United States v. Texas- Post-Argument SCOTUScast | SCOTUScast podcast - Listen or read transcript on Metacast