Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue - Post-Argument SCOTUScast - podcast episode cover

Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

May 30, 202014 min
--:--
--:--
Listen in podcast apps:
Metacast
Spotify
Youtube
RSS

Episode description

This SCOTUScast addresses the January 22 Supreme Court argument in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. The question, in this case, is whether it violates the Free Exercise Clause for a state supreme court to invalidate a school choice program, merely because that program includes religious options, pursuant to that state’s Blaine Amendment. The Institute for Justice represents the Plaintiffs in the case.

To discuss the case, we have Erica Smith, Senior Attorney at the Institute for Justice.
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast
Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue - Post-Argument SCOTUScast | SCOTUScast podcast - Listen or read transcript on Metacast